FINANCE Chris Fick League of Oregon Cities 1
Feb 24, 2016
1
FINANCEChris Fick
League of Oregon Cities
2
Cities are struggling Revenues have declined nearly 4 percent
over the last five years; Rainy day funds have plummeted 16
percent; 42 percent of cities report being less able
to address their financial needs this year; and
Nearly half of cities believe that their city will be even less able to meet financial needs next year.
3
Budget Reduction StrategiesEmployed by Cities
Cut road maintenance 38%
Reduced staff and/or operations at city hall 37%
Reduced total operating spending 30%
Decreased planning and permitting services 30%
Reduced number of FTEs 27%
Cut infrastructure spending 25%
Increased employee contribution to healthcare 24%
Decreased overall service levels 16%
Reduced public safety spending 14%
4
LOC Board: Makes revenue reform a long-term
priority of the League
Primary revenue constraints Measures 5 and 50
5
Measure 5 (1990) Capped property taxes for all general
governments (cities, counties, special districts, local option levies) at $10 per $1,000 of RMV Limits property taxes to 1% of RMV
$300,000 home = $3,000 limit on general government property taxes
Measure 5 limits mimic the real estate market
6
Measure 50 (1997) Set a new assessed value (AV) level
At 10% less than 1995 RMV Capped annual growth in AV at 3% Set permanent rates for all taxing
districts
7
Effects of Measures 5 & 50 Compression Loss of local control Inequity
Permanent rate Neighborhood to neighborhood New Property - Changed Property Ratio
Increased service delivery by districts
8
Compression Compression under Measures 5 & 50 occurs
when the value of property taxes on an individual property is greater than the $10 per $1,000 of RMV More than half of Oregon cities are in compression Revenue lost to compression is increasing
FY2008-09 FY2009-10 FY2010-11 FY2011-12
$(30.00)
$(25.00)
$(20.00)
$(15.00)
$(10.00)
$(5.00)
$-
$(10.80)
$(15.60) $(19.60)
$(28.20)
City Property Tax Revenue Lost to Compression
In m
illio
ns
9
Compression – Falling RMVs
2009 2012$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
$800 $738
$650 $600
$500 $462
$50 $0
Local option leviesSpecial DistrictCityCounty
2009 2012 Difference
RMV $200,000 $180,000 ($20,000)
Measure 5 limits $2,000 $1,800 ($200)
Local Taxes
Local option levies $50 $0 ($50)
Special District $500 $462 ($39)
City $650 $600 ($50)
County $800 $738 ($62)
Revenue lost to
compression
Revenues compressed
10
Loss of Local Control Voters lack the ability to:
Make local decisions; Prioritize; or Engage in long-term planning (5 year limit on
local option levies)
11
Sweet Home, OR Timber-dependent city in Linn County Measure 50 permanent rate of $1.42 per $1,000
of AV City has funded police and library services with
local option levy since 1986 Voters approved levies with nearly 60 and 55
percent support respectively in 2010
12
Sweet Home continued… However, other taxing districts recently passed local
option levies Market values plummet $38 million, $34 million, and
$18 million over last three years Result: Revenue loss from compression has
doubled, from $300,000 (13% of property tax revenues) in 2009-10 to $730,000 (31% of property tax revenues) in 2011-12
Seven taxing districts in 1997 Possibly eleven taxing districts by 2013
13
Inequity – Permanent Rates
Permanent Rates vary dramatically $0.59 - Josephine County $0.60 – Curry County $4.34 – Multnomah County $4.50 – Harney County $8.53 – Wheeler County $8.71 – Sherman County
14
Inequity – Permanent Rates
Philomath PhoenixPopulation 4,610 4,550 Tax rate per $1,000 RMV $5.30 $3.65Police dept? Yes YesFire dept? No NoProperty Tax Revenues $1,301,749 $923,205
Permanent Tax Rate (in $) per $1,000 of RMV
Number of Cities
Percentage of Cities
None 13 5.4%
$0.01 to $1.00 23 9.5%
$1.01 to $3.00 72 29.8%
$3.01 to $5.00 72 29.8%
$5.01 to $7.00 45 18.6%
$7.01 to $9.00 14 5.8%
$9.01 to $12.00 3 1.2%
All Cities:
A comparison:
15
Inequity – Neighborhood to Neighborhood
Measure 50 locked in AV at 1996 levels
Block 1 RMV AV Taxes
9910 SW 61st $ 307,980 $ 195,790 $ 4,147
9931 SW 61st $ 316,630 $ 216,090 $ 4,577
9930 SW 61st $ 326,880 $ 198,530 $ 4,205
9911 SW 61st $ 365,590 $ 230,690 $ 4,886
Block 2 RMV AV Taxes
5134 NE 16th $ 312,720 $ 66,690 $ 1,416
5117 NE 16th $ 313,530 $ 47,410 $ 1,007
5126 NE 16th $ 330,910 $ 47,270 $ 1,004
5133 NE 16th $ 392,540 $ 64,100 $ 1,361
This block receives a Measure 50 discount of 79 to 85 percent off their tax rate applied to their RMV.
This block receives a Measure 50 discount of 32 to 40 percent off their tax rate applied to their RMV.
A Tale of Two Blocks
Esta
blish
edGe
ntrif
ying
16
Inequity – Changed Property Ratio
Changed Property Ratio (CPR) determines the “assessed value” given to newly constructed or altered property
Assessors multiply the ratio of AV to RMV within a county to the RMV of a new or changed property
Result: Inequity across cities – slower growing cities have lower AV; faster growing cities have higher AV
1997-9
8
1998-9
9
1999-0
0
2000-0
1
2001-0
2
2002-0
3
2003-0
4
2004-0
5
2005-0
6
2006-0
7
2007-0
8
2008-0
9
2009-1
0
2010-1
1
2011-1
240455055606570758085
Statewide Ratio of AV to RMV
Stat
ewid
e ra
tio o
f RM
V to
AV
17
Inequity – Changed Property Ratio (CPR) in Jackson County
Example: New Property with RMV of
$200,000Local tax rate of $5 per $1,000CPR calculated at county level
Central PointCity CPR: 81.1%AV: $162,200*Tax liability: $811*
Jackson CountyCounty CPR: 70%AV: $140,000Tax liability: $700
AshlandCity CPR: 61.4%AV: $122,800*Tax liability: $614*
-$111
+ $86
$0
* If CPR were determined locally.
Loss due to county-wide CPR
Gain due to county-wide CPR
18
Potential Solutions HJR 26 – Constitutional Amendment
Allow local option levies outside of compression
Restore maximum length of voter-approved local option levies to ten years
Reset at Sale Allow cities to create City Service
Districts Set a “floor” on CPR Lifting other state preemptions
19
The League’s Efforts HJR 26
Build a coalition Polling Leverage governor’s support Research/Media
State of Cities EcoNW report
Toolkit Regional meetings