F F F F F F e e e a a a s s s i i i b b b b b b i i i l l l i i i t t t y y y S S S S S t t t u u u d d d y y y y y y R R R e e e p p p p p p o o o r r r t t t o o o f f f H H H f f f C C C H H H I I I P P H H H y y y d d d r r r o o o p p p 20 Hangzhou China NOV. 2016 P P P O O O T T T A A A p p p o o o w w w e e e 016 u Guowang T 6 A A A F F F A A A L L L r r r S S S t t t a a a t t t Technology C L L L L L L S S S t t t i i i o o o n n n Co., Ltd
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
1.4 Engineering Tasks and Scale ................................................................................ 3 1.4.1 Necessity and advantage ................................................................................ 3 1.4.2 Project scale ................................................................................................... 4
1.5 Project Layout and Main Buildings ...................................................................... 4 1.5.1 Engineering scale and building level ............................................................. 4 1.5.2 General project layout .................................................................................... 5 1.5.3 Main buildings ............................................................................................... 5
1.6 Electromechanical and Metallic Structure ........................................................... 6 1.6.1 Hydraulic machinery ...................................................................................... 6 1.6.2 Electrical connecting system method ............................................................. 6 1.6.3 Main equipment selection .............................................................................. 6 1.6.4 Metal structure ............................................................................................... 7
1.15 Conclusions and Suggestions for Future Work ................................................ 11 1.15.1 Conclusions ................................................................................................ 11 1.15.2 Suggestions for future ................................................................................ 12
2.3 Basic Hydrological Data .................................................................................... 17 2.3.1 Hydrological station network and information ............................................ 17 2.3.2 Application of the data ................................................................................. 18
3.3 Natural Building Materials ................................................................................. 26
3.4 Conclusions and Suggestions ............................................................................. 26
Chapter 4 Engineering Tasks and Scale ................................................................... 28
4.1 General Situation ................................................................................................ 28 4.1.1 Physical geography ...................................................................................... 28 4.1.2 Social and economic situation ..................................................................... 28 4.1.3 Hydropower resources and the development and utilization situation ........ 29 4.1.4 Necessity of the project ................................................................................ 29
4.2 Scale of Power Generation Projects ................................................................... 30 4.2.1 Power supply range and load forecast ......................................................... 30 4.2.2 Drafting of the scheme ................................................................................. 30 4.2.3 Calculation of hydropower and installed capacity selection ........................ 31
Chapter 5 Project layout and main buildings ......................................................... 35
5.1 Design basis ........................................................................................................ 35 5.1.1 Main technical specifications and references .............................................. 35 5.1.2 Basic design information ............................................................................. 35 5.1.3 Project grade and standards ......................................................................... 36
5.2 Project location and general layout .................................................................... 36
5.2.1 Location of the dam ..................................................................................... 36 5.2.2 Location of the power house ........................................................................ 38 5.2.3 Selection of water diversion method ............................................................ 40 5.2.4 General layout of the project ........................................................................ 41
5.3 Water retaining structures ................................................................................... 41 5.3.1 Layout of the dam ........................................................................................ 41 5.3.2 Stability calculation ..................................................................................... 42 5.3.3 Flood discharge and energy dissipation facilities ........................................ 43
5.4 Open canal diversion method (comparative plan) .............................................. 43 5.4.1 Open canal ................................................................................................... 43 5.4.2 Pressure forebay ........................................................................................... 44
5.6 Power house and booster station ........................................................................ 46 5.6.1 Selection of the power house location ......................................................... 46 5.6.2 Power house structure .................................................................................. 46 5.6.3 Booster station ............................................................................................. 46 5.6.4 Housing for the use of administration .......................................................... 47 5.6.5 Entrance road ............................................................................................... 47
Chapter 6 Electromechanical and metal structures ............................................... 48
6.1 Units ................................................................................................................... 48
6.2 Access mode to power system and main electrical connection .......................... 50 6.2.1 Access mode to power system ..................................................................... 50 6.2.2 Main connection........................................................................................... 50
6.3 Selection of main electromechanical equipment ................................................ 52 6.3.1 Short circuit current ..................................................................................... 52 6.3.2 Selection of the main electrical equipment .................................................. 52
6.4 Layout of the electromechanical equipment ...................................................... 54 6.4.1 Inner-plant electrical equipment layout ....................................................... 54 6.4.2 Layout of the booster station ........................................................................ 54
6.5 Metallic structure ................................................................................................ 55 6.5.1 Dam and metallic structures at the water intake .......................................... 55 6.5.2 Metallic structure for tailwater ..................................................................... 56 6.5.3 Penstocks...................................................................................................... 56 6.5.4 Main quantities of metallic structures and equipment ................................. 56
6.6 Heating ventilation and fire protection ............................................................... 56 6.6.1 Heating ventilation ....................................................................................... 56 6.6.2 Fire protection .............................................................................................. 57
6.7 Lightning protection and earthing ...................................................................... 60
7.2 Operation management ....................................................................................... 62 7.2.1 Project dispatching operation ....................................................................... 62 7.2.2 Management and maintenance of the structures .......................................... 62 7.2.3Management and maintenance of metallic structures ................................... 62
7.3 Scope of project management and protection .................................................... 63 7.3.1 Project management scope ........................................................................... 63 7.3.2 Protection scope ........................................................................................... 63
7.4 Project management facilities and maintenance of the equipment .................... 64 7.4.1 Project management facilities ...................................................................... 64 7.4.2 Maintenance of the equipment ..................................................................... 64
Chapter 8 Construction organization planning ...................................................... 66
8.3 Selection of the material site and the excavation ............................................... 68 8.3.1 Selection of the material site ........................................................................ 68
8.4 Construction of the project’s main works ........................................................... 68
8.5 Construction of the diversion system ................................................................. 69
8.6 Construction of the power house ........................................................................ 70
8.7 Transportation for construction .......................................................................... 71 8.7.1 Selection of transportation means ................................................................ 71 8.7.2 Outbound transportation .............................................................................. 71 8.7.3 Internal transportation .................................................................................. 71
8.8 General layout of the construction ..................................................................... 72 8.8.1 The planning and layout principle of the construction ................................ 72 8.8.2 Construction zoning and layout planning .................................................... 72 8.8.3 Waste slags site ............................................................................................ 73
8.9 General construction progress ............................................................................ 74 8.9.1 Implementation basis and principle ............................................................. 74 8.9.2 General construction progress...................................................................... 74
8.10 Main construction machinery ........................................................................... 74
Chapter 9 Labor Safety and Industrial Sanitation ................................................. 76
9.1 Design Basis ....................................................................................................... 76 9.1.1 Provisions of the national and local administration ..................................... 76 9.1.2 Technical specifications, procedures and standards ..................................... 76
9.2 Project Overview ................................................................................................ 76 9.2.1 Project location ............................................................................................ 76 9.2.2 Project layout ............................................................................................... 76 9.2.3 Characteristics of natural conditions ............................................................ 77 9.2.4 Project benefit and major hazards ................................................................ 77
9.3 General Layout of the Project ............................................................................ 77
9.4 Labor Safety ....................................................................................................... 79 9.4.1 Prevention of Fire and Explosion ................................................................ 79 9.4.2 Electrical damage prevention ....................................................................... 79 9.4.3 Mechanical damage prevention and crash damage prevention .................... 80 9.4.4 Flood prevention and drowning prevention ................................................. 80
9.5 Industrial Sanitation ........................................................................................... 80 9.5.1 Noise proof and vibration proof ................................................................... 81 9.5.2 Temperature and humidity control ............................................................... 81 9.5.3 Lighting and illumination ............................................................................ 82 9.5.4 Dust proof, antifouling, anti-corrosion and antitoxin .................................. 82 9.5.5 Anti electromagnetic radiation ..................................................................... 82
9.6 Safety and Health Facilities ................................................................................ 82
10.4 Land Requisition of the Project ........................................................................ 86
Chapter 11 Water and Soil Conservation ................................................................ 87
11.1 Principles and Standards ................................................................................... 87
11.2 Project and Overview of Project Area .............................................................. 87 11.2.1 Overview .................................................................................................... 87 11.2.2 Status and Prevention of soil erosion ......................................................... 88
11.3 Forecast of Water and Soil Erosion .................................................................. 88 11.3.1 Forecasting Basis ....................................................................................... 88 11.3.2 Forecasting Time Period ............................................................................ 88 11.3.3 Content and Method of Forecast ................................................................ 89 11.3.4 Forecast results and comprehensive analysis ............................................. 89
Feasibility report of Chipota falls hydropower station
1
Chapter 1 General Information
1.1 Overview
The China - Zambia Renewable Energy Technology Transfer Project carried out
jointly through cooperation by UNDP, Zambia Ministry of Mine Energy and Water
Resources and Ministry of Science and Technology of the People’s Republic of China,
is focusing on the rural electrification in Zambia. By way of capacity building and
demonstration projects, this project will absorb and utilize the Chinese experience to
promote social and economic development in Africa. The project term is 4 years.
CHIPOTA FALLS hydropower station (hereinafter referred to as CHIPOTA
hydropower station) is located on the MULEMBO River, CHELA TAMBULE village,
SERENJE region of the Central Province of Zambia, 400 km away from Lusaka, the
capital. The geographical location of the site is latitude 13°13' 4.8" S, and longitude
30°25' 52.24" E. The river is the third-order tributary of Zambezi River (first-order
tributary is the Luangwa River, and the second-order tributary is Lukasashi River).
The river originates from the Muchinga Mountains, and the source is at an elevation
of 1615m. Above the dam site, the length of the river is about 25.8km, the average
gradient ratio is about 6‰, and the catchment area is about 140km2.
The installed capacity of the project is 2 x 100kW, with a design head of 45.38m,
and a design flow of 0.68m3/s. The average annual power generation capacity is
1.3553 million kWh, with annual installed utilization hours of 6777 hours. The main
works consist of the dam, penstock, power house, tailrace and booster station.
Through the site survey, data collection and sorting in June 2016, a Feasibility
Study Report of CHIPOTA FALLS Hydropower Station was completed in late August
of 2016.
1.2 Hydrology
1.2.1 Climate The Central Province of Zambia has a mild tropical savanna climate, abundant
rainfall, and an average annual temperature of 21℃. It has three seasons throughout
Feasibility report of Chipota falls hydropower station
2
the year: from May to August, it is the dry, cool season, with the temperature between
15 ~ 27℃, a harvest season for most crops; from September to November, it is the dry,
hot season, with the temperature between 26 ~ 36℃; from December to the next April,
it is the warm, wet season, with the temperature slightly lower than the dry cool
season, and the annual rainfall concentrated in this season. According to the
meteorological data of the Hong Kong Observatory (1961~1991 year), the average
annual rainfall is 1133.6mm.
1.2.2 Hydrology There are no rain-gauge and hydrological stations near the site and rivers
surrounding the site. Thus, it lacks hydrological data.
Runoff
The CHIPOTA hydropower station has a catchment area of 140km2. Since there
is no measured hydrological data at the dam site, the runoff is calculated by
combining the field measurement with the distribution regularities of the average
monthly discharge at Shiwang’andu gauging station, which is located in Northern
Province; thus, the average monthly flow at this site will be determined using the
same process. The results obtained will be re-measured and the imputed results will
correspond to the fact. After calculation, the average annual flow at the dam site of
CHIPOTA hydropower station is 0.68m3/s, for P=25%, P=50%, P=75%. The three
design average monthly flows are respectively 1.14m3/s, 0.68m3/s and 0.4m3/s.
Flood
Since there is no measured flood data at the dam site, it is proposed to adopt the
reverse estimation of the historical flood line to work out the flood discharge, which is
figured out to be 110m3/s.
1.3 Engineering Geology
1.3.1 Landform The site is located in a platform fracture zone. Through long-term erosion of the
river, the platform broke into sections lengthwise along the river and formed
multiple-cascade waterfalls. On the left bank of the river is a dense forest and steep
mountains, and on the left of the ridge is another small tributary. On the right side of
the river are relatively flat mountains. At the elevation position where the
final-cascade waterfall is visible is a relatively flat and open sloping field, where the
Feasibility report of Chipota falls hydropower station
3
trees are flourishing but relatively sparse. A traffic road is located on the right side of
the river. Above the visible first-cascade waterfall is flat grassland, which is not
eligible for storage capacity.
1.3.2 Strata lithology The site selection is conducted without carrying out a geological survey, but
with only the general field visit. Above the dam site no adverse geological structure is
found. Portions of rocks in the section of riverbed are exposed. On the left and right
bank is flat grassland where the covering layer is not thick; thus, the excavation of
dam foundation works is relatively simple.
Below the dam site, the riverbed ladders are fault scarps, forming cascade
waterfalls. The fault scarps have no signs of further development towards the
upstream. The rock is dark red, and should be karst-rock, a kind of basalt. It is hard.
The area for the plant is a gentle sloping field with exposed rock. The rock
property is same as that of the riverbed.
1.3.3 Natural building materials The adjacent area of the site is the basalt area, the stone of which is suitable for
water conservancy engineering. In the valley near the site, there is silver sand,
however, which is of high silt content and is only suitable to be used as mortar, but
not structural parts. The timber is mainly weed trees, which can be used as auxiliary
material of scaffolding, while the building materials need to be purchased.
1.4 Engineering Tasks and Scale
1.4.1 Necessity and advantage The area is rich in mineral resources, forests and water resources, but the
development level is not high. The local people mainly live on crop farming. The
social and economic conditions in the region are still at a moderate level in Zambia.
The population near the site is about 15,000. It is where the headman
KABAMBA resides, where there are communities, a primary school, junior high
school (high school to be built), hospital and local court. It is understood that the
residents here basically have no access to electricity for lighting and other living
conveniences; and only a few residents get lighting electricity through household
solar energy devices. It is very necessary to build a power station to supply electricity
for lighting and the processing of agricultural products.
Feasibility report of Chipota falls hydropower station
4
Additionally, the development of CHIPOTA hydropower station can enhance
the development of mineral and tourism resources, to promote local economic
development rapidly and stably. At the same time, the project will improve the
electrification, while reducing the consumption of biological fuel and improving the
ecological environment. Therefore, the construction of CHIPOTA hydropower station
is critical.
1.4.2 Project scale The proposal of installed capacity is based on the requirements of recent
household and production use and a 5~10 year projection to ensure that the waterfall
landscape does not change greatly. According to calculations, the recent maximum
household electricity load is 120kW, the guaranteed output power of the site is
154.72kW (P=75%), and the average output power is 246.87kW. Therefore, it is
relatively reasonable to choose the installed capacity of 2×100kW. The index of the
hydropower station is in Table 1-1.
Table 1-1 Calculation Results of Hydropower Index
Item Index
CHIPOTA Hydropower Station:
Design head(m) 45.38
Guaranteed discharge(m³/s) 0.40
Guaranteed output(kW) 154.72
Installed capacity(kW) 2×100
Average annual generation(kWh) 1355,300
Annual utilization hours(h) 6777
1.5 Project Layout and Main Buildings
1.5.1 Engineering scale and building level CHIPOTA hydropower station is a hydropower project mainly for power
generation, with a maximum dam height of 3.5m and an installed capacity of
2×100kW. According to the Design Code for Small Hydropower Station
(GB50071-2002) in China, this project is categorized as level V, whose main
Feasibility report of Chipota falls hydropower station
5
buildings, i.e., the dams, powerhouses and penstocks and other temporary buildings,
are categorized as level V. Each building level and the corresponding flood standards
are listed in Table 1-2:
Table 1-2 Building Level and Flood Standards
Building Level Flood Standards(Return Period)
Design Calibrated
Dams 5 10 20
Powerhouses 5 20 50
Penstocks 5 10 20
Other temporary buildings 5 5 Note: Due to the lack of flood data, the actual calibrated flood is estimated to be
110m3/s (Chapter Hydrology).
1.5.2 General project layout The power station project consists of a dam, penstock, powerhouse, tailrace and
booster station. The dam is arranged in an appropriate position in the upper reaches of
the first-cascade waterfall. The penstocks are laid along the right bank of the river.
The powerhouse is arranged on the gentle slope on the right bank, where the bottom
of the fourth-cascade waterfall is. The booster station is arranged by the upstream side
close to the powerhouse.
1.5.3 Main buildings The dam type is a rubble concrete gravity dam. The crest elevation is 1421.50m,
0.73m below the deck elevation of the upstream bridge. The minimum foundation
plane elevation is 1418 m. The maximum dam height is 3.5m. The length of the dam
axis is 30m. The crest width is 1.50m, and the maximum dam bottom width is 4.00m.
The upstream face is vertical, and the downstream dam slope is 1:0.7. The overflow
face uses WES curve and underflow energy dissipation is adopted.
The power generation water diversion system is arranged on the right bank of
the dam, including the water inlet and penstocks. The design flow is 0.68m3/s. The
water diversion pipelines use a steel pipe structure.
Powerhouse: The power station is the ground powerhouse and adopts a masonry
structure type and a light roof, with a length of 12m, width of 6.8m, height of 4.5m,
and powerhouse ground elevation of 1371.50m. Two sets of stand-alone 100kW
Feasibility report of Chipota falls hydropower station
6
Turgo turbine generator units are installed in the powerhouse, with a total installed
capacity of 200kW. The turbine model is XJA-W-46/1×11, and the spacing between
units is 5m.
The booster station is arranged on the upstream side of the powerhouse. The
plane size is 5×5m (length×width), and the ground elevation is 1371.5m. The main
transformer is arranged in the booster station by the side upstream from the
powerhouse.
1.6 Electromechanical and Metallic Structure
1.6.1 Hydraulic machinery After a comparison and selection of installed capacity, the power station is
installed with 2 sets of Turgo turbine generator units with a stand-alone capacity of
100kW and a total installed capacity of 200kW.
The design head of the power station is 45.38m. Through comprehensive
economical comparison, the model of the selected water turbine is XJA-W-46/1×11.
Its rated head is 46m, rated speed is 600r/min, and rated flow is 0.34m3/s.
The model of the generator is SFW100-10/740, with a rated capacity of 100kW,
and a rated voltage of 0.4kV.
Main auxiliary equipment: The model of the speed governor is CJWT-1.
1.6.2 Electrical connecting system method Residents in the vicinity of the power station basically have no access to
electricity for lighting and other living conveniences. It is understood that very few
residents get electricity for lighting through household solar energy devices. This
power station will solve the electricity utilization of 15,000 people in the vicinity.
There is no power grid nearby, thus, the station will operate off the grid. The total
installed capacity of the power station is 2×100kW, and the annual power generation
capacity is 1.3553 million kWh. It is 10km from the power station to the power
supply area, and the power is delivered to the community via 11kV lines and then
stepped down to 400V/200V to the users.
1.6.3 Main equipment selection The triad NDK-2001 low voltage unit intelligent control panels have been
selected as the generator voltage side controller and power distribution unit. Each is
inbuilt with a ME-630A type air circuit breaker. A ZR-VV22-95mm2 type flame
Feasibility report of Chipota falls hydropower station
7
retardant PVC insulated cable has been selected as the generator terminal lead,
running with one line per phase.
The 11kV line side switch equipment is of outdoor type. A ZW8-12/630 type
vacuum circuit breaker and isolation switch GW9-12/630 is adopted.
In order to support the generator capacity, the main transformer has adopted a
Feasibility report of Chipota falls hydropower station
19
2.4 Runoff
The hydrological data is limited and the project is very unique. The power
station only needs to meet the community households’ demand for electricity;
therefore, there will be no damage to the waterfall landscape. Considering that the
only power supplier requires a high guarantee rate, the design guarantee rate is 75%.
Please check the frequency curve and Q75%=0.4m3/s which supports this claim.
Table 2-3 CHIPOTA Station Site Design Monthly Runoff Table
Item Design monthly runoff (m3/s)
25% 50% 75%
CHIPOTA
hydropower station 1.14 0.68 0.40
2.5 Flood
According to the introduction of headman KABAMBA at the location of the
MULEMBO River, floodwaters will submerg the road bridge upstream the dam site.
The bridge is 1422.23m high and 12m wide, and the riverbed elevation at the bottom
of the bridge is about 1419.50m. Assuming the depth of water at the bridge site is 3m
and the flow rate is 3m3/s, then the flood is estimated to be 110 m3/s of which the dam
will be able to accommodate.
2.6 Water-level Discharge Relation Curve at the Dam and Plant Site
Based on the measurement on the topographic maps of the CHIPOTA power
station in June 2016, we will intercept the river section at the dam site and plant, and
calculate the section flow by using the following formula:
Q ——cross-sectional flow
n ——River reach roughness
R ——Section hydraulic radius
AIRn
Q ×= 21
321
natu
of 5
sele
disc
tabl
Tab
Wat
d
Dis
Watpl
Dis
Accordin
ural river co
5‰, and the
ecting the tu
charge, and
le 2-4.
ble 2-4 Wat
ter level at th
dam site (m)
scharge (m3/s)
ter level at thlant site (m)
scharge (m3/s)
Figu
Feas
I
A
ng to the fie
ourse. The s
e roughness
urning poin
correcting t
ter-Level D
e 1419.5
) 2.2
e 1366
) 3.82
ure 2-3 Wate
sibility report of
——slope
——flow a
eld survey,
slope of the
s adopts 0.0
nt of section
the contrary
ischarge Re
Dam
1420
10.58
1366.5
11.23
er-level Dis
of Chipota falls
20
of the hydra
area, m2
the river w
e water surf
04. We calcu
n, checking
y inflection
elation of th
m and Plant
1421
39.18
1367
19.93
scharge Rela
hydropower st
aulic grade
where the po
face approxi
ulated the f
the relation
amount. Th
he Natural R
Site
1422
68.41 1
1368
46.57
ation Curve
tation
line
ower station
imately ado
flow at each
n between w
he calculatio
River Course
1423 1
100.38 17
1369 1
86.73 13
e at the Dam
n is located
opts the ave
h water leve
water level
on results ar
e at CHIPO
1424 14
73.21 235
1370 13
38.20 200
m Site
d is a
erage
el by
and
re in
OTA
425
5.02
371
0.35
2.7
with
sedi
水位
()
Figu
Sediment
The catch
h less hum
iment quant
1365
1366
1367
1368
1369
1370
1371
1372
0
水位
(m)
Feas
ure 2-4 Wate
hment above
man activity
tity in the ri
50
sibility report of
er-level Dis
e the CHIP
y effect and
iver is small
100
流
厂址水
of Chipota falls
21
charge Rela
POTA powe
d very low
l.
0 150
流量(m3/s)
位流量关系
hydropower st
ation Curve
er station ha
w water an
0 20
系曲线
tation
at the Plant
as thick gro
nd soil eros
00 25
t Site
ound vegeta
sion. Thus,
50
系列1
ation
the
Feasibility report of Chipota falls hydropower station
22
2.8 Attached Figures
Figure 2-5 Schematic Diagram of CHIPOTA Site Upstream Basin
Fi
igure 2-6 Sc
Feas
chematic D
sibility report of
iagram of G
of Chipota falls
23
General Lay
hydropower st
yout of the C
tation
CHIPOTA PPower Station
Feasibility report of Chipota falls hydropower station
24
Figure 2-7 Topography and Geomorphology in CHIPOTA Power Station Area
Feasibility report of Chipota falls hydropower station
25
Chapter 3 Engineering Geology
3.1 Overview
The MULEMBO River is located in CHELA TAMBULE village (where the
headman KABAMBA resides), SERENJE region of the Central Province of Zambia.
It originates from the Muchinga Mountains. There is little geological data for this
project. After an on-site survey, the ground covering layer in the area is not thick and
rocks are exposed. Base on the preliminary judgment, the rocks at the location are
estimated to be basalts, with the rock mass being quite hard. The place is in a good
geological condition.
3.2 Regional Geology
3.2.1 Landform The site is located in a platform fracture zone. Through long-term erosion of
river, the platform broke into sections lengthwise along the river and formed
multiple-cascade waterfalls. On the left bank of the river there is dense forest and
steep mountains. There is another small tributary on the left of the ridge. The
mountain body on the right is relatively flat. A relatively flat and open sloping field at
the same elevation position of the last-cascade waterfall can be found. The forest there
is flourishing, but relatively sparse. Traffic passage is on the right side of the river.
The area above the visible first-cascade waterfall is flat grassland, which is not
eligible for storage.
3.2.2 Strata lithology The site selection was conducted without carrying out a geological survey but
with only a general field visit. No bad geological structure was found at the dam site
and above, and some of rocks at the riverbed are exposed and are estimated to be
basalts. The grassland on both banks of the river are flat. Thus, the excavation of the
dam foundation will be relatively simple.
The riverbed ladders below the dam site are fault scarps, forming cascade
waterfalls. The rock is dark red, and estimated to be karst-rock, a kind of basalt. The
Feasibility report of Chipota falls hydropower station
26
rock is hard and has high compressive strength.
The area where the plant will be built is a gentle sloping field, where the rock is
exposed and the rock property is the same as the riverbed.
3.2.3 Geological structure Zambia is a typical inland country, and its territory is on a plateau with little
undulation. The landscape is hilly by appearance, with the average elevation being
above 1000m. The topography of the land slopes from the northeast to the southwest.
The Zambia River and its tributaries, the Kafue River and the Luangwa River, flow
from north to south, while the Zambezi River flows from east to west into the Luapula
River.
3.2.4 Hydrological geology The layer is generally 2-3m in thickness, not very thick where underground
water is not found. But, abundant quaternary phreatic water is distributed in the
quaternary unconsolidated formation at the small valley
3.3 Natural Building Materials
The place around the site is the basalt area, and the rock is available for water
conservancy engineering. In the valley near the site, there is silver sand; however, it is
of high silt content and only suitable to be used as mortar, but not for any of the
structural sections. The timber is mainly weed trees which can be used as auxiliary
material for scaffolding, while the building materials will need to be purchased..
3.4 Conclusions and Suggestions
1. The penstock anchorage block (pier) foundation is made of gravel soil or
gravel containing low liquid limit clay as the bearing layer. The characteristic values
of the bearing force are 260kPa and 220kPa respectively.
2. The soil covering where the plant foundation will be built is very thin; thus, a
masonry foundation should be used.
Feasibility report of Chipota falls hydropower station
27
Figure 3-1 Regional Geological Structure
Feasibility report of Chipota falls hydropower station
28
Chapter 4 Engineering Tasks and Scale
4.1 General Situation
4.1.1 Physical geography
Zambia is located in the inland plateau in the middle, southern part of the African
continent. The elevation ranges between 1000m to 1500m for most of the region,
sloping from northeast to southwest.
Zambia has a mild and cool tropical savanna climate, with an average annual
temperature between 18~20℃. It has three seasons: from May to August, it is the dry,
cool season, with the temperature between 14 ~ 32℃, a harvest season for most crops;
from September to October, it is the dry, hot season, with the temperature between 26
~ 32℃; from November to April, it is the warm, wet season, with the temperature
lower than the dry and cool season. Most of the rainfall in a year occurs during this
season. Annual rainfall is about 1400mm in the northern part, gradually reduces
toward the southern part to 700mm.
CHIPOTA hydropower station is located on the MULEMBO River (where the
headman KABAMBA resides), CHELA TAMBULE village, SERENJE region of the
Central Province of Zambia. The river is the third-order tributary of Zambezi River
(first-order tributary is the Luangwa River, and the second-order tributary is
Lukasashi River). The site is 400 km away from Lusaka, the capital. The geographical
location is latitude 13°13' 4.8" S, longitude 30°25' 52.24" E.
4.1.2 Social and economic situation
The main economic pillars in Zambia include agriculture, mining and services.
The economy is heavily reliant on the copper mining industry. Therefore, its economy
often fluctuates with the changes of mineral industry. In order to change this situation
and promote sustainable development, the government has decided to implement
economic diversification and market oriented economic policies, focusing on the
development of agriculture, tourism, gem development, hydropower and other
Feasibility report of Chipota falls hydropower station
29
competitive industries. At present, the economy has achieved continuous growth in
successive years. According to the statistics in 2014 made by the World Bank,
Zambia's GDP and GDP per capita were 27.07 billion USD and 1802 USD
respectively. The actual growth rate and inflation rate in 2014 were estimated to be
5.6% and 7.9%. Therefore, Zambia has a lower middle-income economy.
4.1.3 Hydropower resources and the development and utilization situation Africa has 40% of the world's hydropower resources, but suffering a power
shortage. But, only 8% of the hydropower resources of the entire African continent
have been developed. At present, there are still more than 500 million people without
access to electricity services, and electrification is particularly important in rural areas.
Most small hydropower stations are located in remote rural areas, and they play an
important role for the electrification, promotion of local production, improvement on
living standards and employment in these areas.
Zambia is located in the middle southern part of Africa with abundant water
resources, accounting for 45% of Southern Africa’s water resources. The hydropower
potential is preliminarily estimated to be 6765MW, in which 1715MW has been
developed. Therefore, Zambia has paid much attention on the investment of
hydropower projects.
4.1.4 Necessity of the project This region is endowed with a large potential of mineral resources, forest and
rich water resources, but the development level is not high. Most of the people there
rely on agriculture to make a living. The social and economic conditions in the region
are still at a moderate level in Zambia.
In the area near the site the population is about 15000. There are many
communities in the area, as well as a primary school, junior high school (high school
to be built), hospital and local court. As per investigation, the residents here have
neither electric lighting nor other electrical means of consumption. Only a few
residents achieve lighting electricity through household solar energy devices. This
project will supply electricity for household use, as well as for the processing of
agricultural products. Tt will increase the electrification and reduce the consumption
of biological fuel and improve the ecological environment. Therefore, the
construction of CHIPOTA hydropower station is critical.
Feasibility report of Chipota falls hydropower station
30
4.2 Scale of Power Generation Projects
4.2.1 Power supply range and load forecast After consulting the Zambian side, the supply range of this project is identified
to only include the 15,000 consumers within the area of the site. Taking 10W/person
as the electricity consumption per capita, 80% as the simultaneity rate for electricity
consumption, the current maximum electricity load is 120KW. Taking the estimated
electrical consumption in the next 5~10 years and the protection of the waterfall
landscape into consideration, the installed capacity of the power station is
preliminarily identified to be 200kW, which can meet the present demands, as well
future demands.
4.2.2 Drafting of the scheme As per the topographic and geologic conditions, two schemes are drafted in the
feasibility study and compare different selections of the dam site, plant site and water
diversion method as follows:
Scheme I: The dam is about 25m upstream the existing bridge and the
powerhouse is on the flat land at the bottom of the gentle slope on the right bank of
the 4th cascade waterfall. Water is diverted to the pressure forebay through an open
canal and then diverted to the power house by penstocks.
Scheme II: The dam is located at about 25m downstream the existing bridge and
the powerhouse on the hillside half-way up the gentle slope on the right bank of the
4th cascade waterfall. Water is diverted directly from the dam to the power house by
penstocks.
The advantages and disadvantages of the two schemes are shown in table 4-1.
Table 4-1 Comparison of the two schemes
Item Advantages and disadvantages
Advantages Disadvantages
Feasibility report of Chipota falls hydropower station
31
Scheme I
1. The dam will be upstream of the little bridge, with a shorter dam axis andsmaller amount of labor. 2. With a crest elevation of 1422m, the head loss of the open canal is small. 3. The power house is close to the riverbed, on flat ground, with small excavation quantity and short tailrace.
1. Because the dam is located upstream the little bridge, the diversion structure shall be lengthened which will go across the road, leading to an increase of labor time, and a more difficult construction and construction diversion. 2. An open canal occupies a larger area. A greater amount of excavation and abandoned slags are liable to cause soil erosion and damage the ecological environment. The construction of an open canal needs a large quantity of aggregates and a pressure forebay at the end needs to be built, so the construction period will be longer. 3. The ground elevation of the power house is low which does not meet the flood prevention requirement and will influence the safety.
Scheme II
1. The dam is located downstream the little bridge. The broad downstream riverbed supports construction diversion. 2. Penstock has little effect on the ecological environment, needs small earth-rock project quantity and short construction period and is convenient for the management and maintenance in the following operation. 3. The layout of the plant area is rational, which is in favor of the delivery and installation of the equipment. It avoids the impact of a flood, favoring the safety of the power station.
1. With longer dam axis, the project quantity is increased. 2. With a crest elevation of 1421.5m, the penstock head loss is increased.
Taking all factors into consideration, Scheme II is more suitable and is
recommended by this feasibility study.
4.2.3 Calculation of hydropower and installed capacity selection Based on the actually measured CHIPOTA topographic map and taking the
influence of backup water level and mounting elevation of the units into consideration,
the gross water head of the power station will be 50.0m. As per the preliminary layout
plan, the penstock will be about 530m long. According to the hydrological calculation,
the design average monthly flow at the site will be Q50%=0.68m3/s, which is identified
as the design reference flow. As an only power supply, the station needs a high
guarantee rate. The design guarantee rate of the power station is identified to be 75%
and the guarantee flow is Q75%=0.4m3/s.
(1) Calculation of pipe diameter
The pipe diameter is calculated as per the following formula:
Feasibility report of Chipota falls hydropower station
32
732.5
HQD =
In the formula: D=pipe diameter(m);
Q=Reference flow (m3/s),Q50%=0.68 m3/s;
H=Calculated head (m),H=50.00m;
The pipe diameter of the penstock at the CHIPOTA hydropower station is
D=0.65m;
(2) Calculation of head loss
The penstock of CHIPOTA hydropower station is 530m long, and the frictional
head loss is calculated as per the following formula:
In the formula: L=Pipe length(m),L=530m;
D=Pipe diameter(m),D=0.65m;
V=Flow rate in pipe (m/s),V=2.05m/s;
Partial head loss is calculated as per the following formula:
∑h 局=g
V
2
2
⋅ζ
Table 4-2 Statistical Table of the Partial Head Loss Coefficient
Loss position ζvalue Quantity Total Horn mouth 0.2 1 0.2
Bottom valve 0.7 1 0.7 Gate valve 0.1 1 0.1
Elbow and bend 0.3 3 0.9 Gate slot 0.2 1 0.2
Total 2.1 The total head loss is h△ frictional+∑hlocal=4.17+0.45=4.62m
So the net head of power station is: hnet=50.00-4.62=45.38m。
(3) Calculation of hydroenergy
1) Calculation of guarantee output
When the design guarantee output P=75%,the guarantee flow Q75%=0.4m3/s,
the corresponding head loss will be 1.65m and the net head is 48.35m.
When the average output coefficient is proposed to be 8.0, then the guarantee
Feasibility report of Chipota falls hydropower station
1) Select the installed capacity based on the guarantee output. Considering the
requirement for power supply reliability, taking 1.5 as the installation coefficient, the
installed capacity of the power station is 232.08kW.
2) When selecting the installed capacity based on the average output and the
installed capacity of the power station is 246.87kW.
When ensuring the electricity supply and the waterfall landscape, installed
capacity of the power station is preliminarily identified to be 2×100kW.
Feasibility report of Chipota falls hydropower station
34
The index of the hydropower station is shown in Table 4-3.
Table 4-3: Table of Calculation Results of Hydroenergy Index
Item Index
CHIPOTA hydropower station:
Design head(m) 45.38
Guarantee flow(m³/s) 0.40
Guarantee output(kW) 154.72
Installed capacity(kW) 2×100
Average annual power generation capacity
(104 kW.h) 135.53
Annual utilization hours(h) 6777
Feasibility report of Chipota falls hydropower station
35
Chapter 5 Project layout and main buildings
5.1 Design basis
5.1.1 Main technical specifications and references (1) Standard for Classification and Flood Control of Water Resources and
Hydroelectric Project SL252-2000; (2) Design Specification for Stonemasonry Dam SL25-2006; (3) Specifications for Seismic Sesign of Hydraulic Structures SL203-97; (4) Design Code for Hydropower House SL266-2014; (5) Design Specification for Intake of Hydraulic and Hydroelectric Engineering
SL285—2003; (6)Code for Fire Protection Design of Hydraulic and Hydroelectric Engineering
Feasibility report of Chipota falls hydropower station
36
With seismic intensity being less than VI degree, seismic defense will not be
considered.
5.1.3 Project grade and standards CHIPOTA hydro power station is a hydro power project aiming at power
generation, with a maximum dam height of 3.5m and an installed capacity of 2×
100kW. According to Design Code for Small Hydropower Station (GB50071-2002),
this project is a V grade project, with the dam, power house and penstock of its main
construction being in the category of 5thgrade and other temporary constructions of
the 5thgrade. See table 5-1 for the construction grade and the corresponding flood
standards.
Table 5-1 Construction grade and flood standards
Construction Grade Flood standard
(recurrence interval) Design Check
Dam 5 10 20 Power house 5 20 50 Penstock 5 10 20 Other temporary construction 5 5 Note: Due to lack of flood data, the actual check flood is estimated to be 110m3
/s.
5.2 Project location and general layout
5.2.1 Location of the dam Dam site plans
The site of the dam shall be located at a suitable place upstream from the 1st
stage waterfall. There will be a traffic bridge and road about 50m upstream from the
waterfall. With exposed rock and a shallow coverage layer, the geological conditions
are good. Both banks of the dam site are flat grasslands, without requisite conditions
for a reservoir. Through field reconnaissance, two feasible options of dam sites for
CHIPOTA hydropower station are decided: the upper site is 25m upstream from the
traffic bridge and the lower site is 25m downstream from the traffic bridge, which are
50m apart. Comparison shall be made based on the aspects of topography, geology,
flood impact, construction, water head utilization, etc., and the optimum shall be
adopted.
Feasibility report of Chipota falls hydropower station
37
Comparison of the plans
From the view of topography: 1. Mountains on either bank of the upper dam site
are basically symmetrical. The water flow is straight and unhindered with a riverbed
elevation of 1419.70m;
2. Mountains on the banks of the lower dam site are asymmetrical with left bank
steep and right bank flat. The riverbed changes from narrow to wide with an elevation
of 1419.30m and the long dam axis is favorable for the flood discharge and energy
dissipation.
From the view of geology: the two dam sites are not far apart, with similar
lithology of the bedrock at the under-part of the riverbed and basically the same
hydrogeological condition. Both upper and lower dam sites are of granite geology
with hard and intact rock. There is no large fault passing by near the dam site that will
cause instability and leakage.
From the view of flood impact: 1. The upper dam site locates upstream from the
traffic bridge, when discharging flood, no farmland, buildings, etc., will be submerged,
so the dam height has only to meet the requirement for water diversion.
2. The lower dam site locates downstream from the traffic bridge and the
normal pool level of the dam will be restricted by the traffic bridge. When discharging
flood, the submergence depth of the traffic bridge increases (according to on-site
survey, the traffic bridge was always submerged during the flood season over the
years); however, due to less utilization of the bridge, short-term submergence will not
bring about any big effect.
From the view of construction: 1. With a shorter dam axis, the upper dam site
needs correspondingly smaller work quantities; however, its thicker covering layer
will lead to bigger excavation quantity. The diversion structure shall be lengthened
which will go across the road, leading to an increase of work quantities, harder
construction, longer construction period and harder construction diversion.
2. With a longer dam axis, the lower dam site needs larger work quantities for
the dam body; however, the work quantity for the diversion structure will be reduced,
crossing with the road will be avoided and it will be much easier for construction
diversion.
From the view of water head utilization: the normal pool level of the upper dam
site is 1422.00m, while the lower dam site is 1421.50m. With a difference of 0.5m,
the advantage in water head utilization is not obvious.
Feasibility report of Chipota falls hydropower station
38
Through comparison, the two dam sites are near to each other, with basically the
same topographic and geologic conditions. Both have no submergence loss and little
impact from flood. They have little difference in water head. However, the upper dam
site has larger diversion structure quantities and the diversion structure spreads across
the road causing more difficult construction and diversion, as well as a longer
construction period. For the lower dam site, though its dam body quantities will be
slightly larger than the upper dam site, the length of the diversion structure will be
shortened, crossing with the road will be avoided and it will be much easier for
construction diversion at the same time.
Taking all factors into consideration, the lower dam site, which is more rational,
will be the suggested plan of this feasibility study.
Figure 5-1 Bridge near dam site
5.2.2 Location of the power house Power house site plan
The power house will be located on the gentle slope of the right bank at the same
elevation with the last stage seeable waterfall (riprap bridge). According to field
reconnaissance and topographic maps and taking the factors of water head utilization,
geological conditions, layout of the penstock, tailwater connection, basic excavation
quantity, etc., into consideration, the optimum plan shall be decided.
Plan I: The power house shall be located at the bottom of the gentle slope, in the
open area on the right bank close to the riverbed. The ground elevation is
1367.00m~1368.00m and the design elevation of the power house shall be 1367.50m.
Plan II: The power house shall be located on the slope half-way up the gentle
Feasibility report of Chipota falls hydropower station
39
slope, with the ground elevation of 1371.0m~1373.0m and power house design
elevation of 1371.50m.
Comparison of the plans
From the view of water head utilization: the ground elevation of Plan I is 4.00m
lower than Plan II, so the utilizable water head of Plan I is higher.
From the view of plant area layout: for Plan I, the plant site is flat with the gate
of the power house facing southwest and the booster station being placed behind the
power house. For Plan II, the ground elevation is higher than Plan I and there is open
ground in front of the southwestward gate which connects the access road naturally.
The booster station locates at the upstream side of the power house, which facilitates
the transport and installation of the equipment.
From the view of tailwater connection: according to the units installation
drawing, now that the bottom plate elevation of the tailwater pit is 1.55m lower than
the ground elevation of the power house and the design water depth is 0.2m, the
tailwater level of Plan I is 1366.15m, while that of Plan II is 1370.15m. Through field
survey and consultation with local residents, the submergence water level over the
years was about 1369.50m, so Plan I fails to meet the flood prevention requirement.
When a flood comes, there is a risk of tailwater reverse flow, which affects the normal
operation of the power station.
From the view of foundation excavation quantity: Plan I has an open and flat
ground, needing smaller foundation excavation quantity while Plan II needs a slightly
larger foundation excavation quantity than Plan I.
Take all factors into consideration, Plan II is more rational and will be the
recommended plan of this feasibility study.
Figure 5-2 riprap bridge and sloping land near the plant site
Feasibility report of Chipota falls hydropower station
40
5.2.3 Selection of water diversion method Water diversion plan
Based on the comparison in chapter 4, the two diversion methods of open canal
diversion and penstock diversion are proposed. Take the aspects of water head
utilization, construction condition, environment impact, project management, project
investment, etc. into consideration and choose the best the plan.
Plan I applies an open canal to divert water. The open canal is laid along the
contour on the right bank of the river course, connecting to a pressure forebay at the
end. After the forebay, there is pipeline laid along the hillside to the power house.
Plan II applies a penstock to divert water. The penstock goes out directly from
the dam to the power house along the hillside on the right bank of the river course
according to landform.
Comparison of the plans
From the view of water head utilization, open canal diversion for small
hydropower station normally adopts 1/1000 canal slope with smaller water head loss
than penstocks, therefore, the gross water head in Plan I is higher than Plan II.
From the view of construction condition, the construction of open canal in Plan I
needs a large quantity of aggregates. A pressure forebay at the end needs to be built. A
lack of local labor and field mining of stone materials will lead to a slow construction
progress and long construction period. Plan II applies penstocks to divert water for
power generation directly from the dam, which requires fewer materials and a simpler
construction process, and the construction progress can be guaranteed under the
condition of less labor force.
From the view of environmental impact, an open canal in Plan I occupies a larger
area. A greater amount of excavation and abandoned slags are liable to cause soil
erosion and damage the ecological environment. While in Plan II, the laying of
penstocks needs smaller earth-rock quantities and a shorter construction period, which
causes little impact on ecological environment.
From the view of project administration, the open canal in Plan I crosses the
forest land. Litters like leaves are likely to accumulate. Regular cleaning is needed,
which increases the administrative cost. While in Plan II, the penstock is laid directly
from the dam to the power house. When water overflows the dam, litters like leaves
are not easy to accumulate, so it is convenient to maintain.
Feasibility report of Chipota falls hydropower station
41
From the view of project investment, Plan II adopts a penstock, which will
obviously cost more than Plan I.
In sum, Plan I features a higher utilizable water head and a smaller investment.
While its disadvantages in the aspects of ecology, construction period and
administration are prominent, the loss outweighs the gain. Though the investment of
Plan II is higher, the construction progress is faster. Being environment-friendly and
convenient in maintenance, Plan II is generally more rational. Therefore, Plan II will
be the recommended plan of this feasibility study.
Figure 5-3 Slope on the right bank
5.2.4 General layout of the project According to the comparison of the plans, the power station project in Plan I
(comparative plan) consists of a dam, an open canal, a pressure forebay, a penstock, a
power house, a tailrace, booster station etc. Plan II (recommended plan) consists of a
dam, penstock, power house, tailrace, booster station, etc. The dam will be located at
a suitable place upstream from the 1st stage waterfall. The open canal or penstock will
be laid on the right bank along the river. The power house will be on the right bank
gentle slope under the 4th stage waterfall. The booster station will be placed on the
opposite side of the power house.
5.3 Water retaining structures
5.3.1 Layout of the dam The dam will be a rubble concrete gravity dam, which will be designed based on
the requirements of Design Specification for Concrete Gravity Dams DL5018-1999
and relevant laws, rules and regulations, referring to dams of the same type. It will
also take into consideration the comprehensive factors of the natural geological
Feasibility report of Chipota falls hydropower station
42
conditions, natural building materials, the overall arrangement requirements of the
project, etc.
Plan I (comparative plan): according to the layout of the open canal, the dam
crest elevation is determined to be 1422.00m, 0.23m lower than the bridge deck. The
lowest foundation plane elevation is 1418.50m. The maximum dam height is 3.50m.
The dam axis length is 24.00m. The dam crest width is 1.50m, and the maximum dam
bottom width is 4.00m. The upstream face will be vertical and the downstream will
have a slope of 1:0.7. The overflow face uses a WES curve and underflow
energy dissipation is adopted.
Plan II (recommended plan): On the premise that the dam height meets the water
intake arrangement and hydraulic conditions, the elevation of the dam crest is set to
be 1421.50m, 0.73m lower than the elevation of the small bridge deck. The lowest
foundation plane elevation is 1418.00m. The maximum dam height is 3.50m. The
dam axis length is 30.00m. The dam crest width is 1.50m, and the maximum dam
bottom width is 4.00m. The upstream face will be vertical and the downstream will
have a slope of 1:0.7. The overflow face uses a WES curve and underflow
energy dissipation is adopted.
5.3.2 Stability calculation Since the cross sections of the two plans are basically the same, stability
calculations are the same as well. Choose one of the plans for calculation, taking Plan
II as an example:
(1) The gravity dam calculation shall be performed as per the requirements of
Design Specification for Concrete Gravity Dams DL5018-1999, shear resistance
strength formula shall be used for sliding resistance stability calculation and the
material mechanics method shall be applied in the stress calculation.
(2) Calculation conditions
Normal pool water level is 1421.50m and there is no water downstream.
Design flood level: (none).
Check flood level is 1423.00m and the corresponding downstream water level is
1422.30m.
Riverbed elevation is 1419.30m.
Shear resistance friction coefficient in riverbed stability calculation f=0.55.
(3) Load combination
Feasibility report of Chipota falls hydropower station
43
The following three combinations of load are the control condition of gravity
dam stability calculation.
a. Basic combination: reservoir normal water level without downstream water,
self-weight of the dam and uplift pressure, etc.
b. Special combination: check flood level and corresponding downstream water
level, self-weight of the dam, uplift pressure, etc.
(4) Stress calculation results
The material mechanics method is applied in the stress calculation, see table 5-2
for the results. We can know from the table that the stress value should meet the
In the installation of the units, the maximum hoisted parts in the plant are 2.5t.
Mobile profiled-steel-made supporting frame is adopted, equipped with a manual
hoist with a lifting capacity of 5t.
b. Technical water supply system of the units
Technical water supply shall be determined by the manufacturer of the units.
c. Drainage system
The cooling water and other seepage water shall be drained directly to the
downstream riverbed.
d. Oil system
The quantity of turbine oil and insulation oil in this power station is small, so two
0.2m3 gasoline barrels shall be equipped.
e. Maintenance tools
In order to meet the requirements for maintenance and exchange of operating
Feasibility report of Chipota falls hydropower station
50
units and the auxiliary equipment, this power station shall be equipped with one set of
tools for routine maintenance.
Table 6-1 Hydraulic mechanical equipment table
No. Name Equipment specification & model
Quantity
1 Turbine XJA-W-46/1×11 2 sets
2 Generator SFW100-10/740 2 sets
3 Speed governor CJWT-1 2 sets
4 Excitation Static silicon controlled excitation
2 sets
5 Intake valve Z941H-10φ400 2 sets
6.2 Access mode to power system and main electrical connection
6.2.1 Access mode to power system The residents in the nearby areas of the power station mostly have no access to
illumination and other household electricity. It is known that very few residents have
solved the problem of illumination through household solar devices. This power
station will power a population of 15,000 in the nearby areas. There is no power grid
nearby, thus, the station will operate off the grid. The total installed capacity of this
power station will be 2×100kW and annual power generation will be 1.3553 million
kW.h. The distance from the power station to the supply area is 10km. A 11kV line
will be adopted to deliver electricity to the community. After the voltage is reduced to
400V, the electricity will be supplied to the users.
6.2.2 Main connection (1) Connection of the generator voltage side and increased voltage side
There are 2 sets of units in this power station. The rated voltage of the generator
is 0.4kV. There is one single circuit of outgoing line from the high voltage side,
without nearby loads. According to the combination of generator and transformer, the
two types of main connection schemes are analyzed, see figure 6-1 for details.
Feasibility report of Chipota falls hydropower station
51
Scheme 1 Scheme 2
Figure 6-1 Scheme 1: Enlarging unit connection is adopted at the generator voltage side and
the two units share one main transformer; transformer-line group connection is
adopted at the increased voltage side. Connection of this scheme is simple and clear
and is convenient to maintain. It simplifies the connection at the high voltage side,
occupies less land and needs smaller excavation and less investment. Its disadvantage
is that when the main transformer is under failure or overhaul, the electricity from the
two generators can’t be transmitted. However, the failure rate of the main transformer
is low, requiring longer overhaul cycle and shorter outage time.
Scheme 2: Unit connection is adopted at the generator voltage side, with one unit
connecting to one transformer; Single bus connection is adopted at the increased
voltage side. This scheme operates flexibly. With small failure influence range and
simple relay protection, it features higher reliability. However, there will be more high
voltage electrical equipment, leading to increases of space for equipment layout and
investment on the whole electrical connection. Based on the above analysis and considering the actual operation experience of
small-sized hydropower station, scheme 1 is recommended.
(2) Plant electricity, power supply to the plant area and dam area
The rated voltage of the generator is 0.4kV, so the plant electricity and the power
supply to the plant area will come directly from the 0.4/0.23kV voltage bus of the
generator.
One set of DC220/50Ah DC system shall be equipped.
Please refer to enclosed Main Electrical Connection Diagram.
Feasibility report of Chipota falls hydropower station
52
6.3 Selection of main electromechanical equipment
6.3.1 Short circuit current Because it operates as an independent system (take 0.8 as the power factor of the
system and 25kVA as the contralateral breaking capacity), the short circuit current of
the recommended electromechanical connection scheme is calculated. See Figure 6-2
for the system connection and equipment parameters and table 6-2 for the calculation
results of short circuit current.
10KVLG-3510Km
Figure 6-2
Table 6-2 The calculation of short circuit current
Short circuit point
T=0s Short circuit
current(KA)
T=0.6s Short circuit current
(KA)
T=1s Short circuit
current(KA)
Short circuit current peak value(KA)
d1 1.52 1.48 3.82
d2 6.94 3.87 18.01
6.3.2 Selection of the main electrical equipment The selection of electrical equipment form bases on the principle that it should
be advanced in technology, rational in economy and simple and convenient in
maintenance. It should also meet the requirements of latest regulations and
specifications.
Technical parameters of the electrical equipment are selected under normal
working conditions and the performances of the electrical equipment are examined as
per different short circuit circumstances. Both of the above two should be met at the
same time.
Preliminary selection
The control and distribution devices at the generator voltage side will apply a
Feasibility report of Chipota falls hydropower station
53
triad NDK-2001 low voltage generator unit with intelligent control panels, inside of
each installed with a ME-630A air circuit breaker, which is safe and reliable in
operation and convenient in maintenance. The outgoing lines of the generator will
adopt a ZR-VV22-120mm2 flame retardant PVC insulated cable, with one single line
per phase.
The switching device at the 11kV line side is of outdoor type, using a
ZW8-12/630 vacuum circuit breaker as its circuit breaker and GW1-10/630 as its
disconnector.
To match with the capacity of the generator, the main transformer will apply a
three-phase oil-immersed two copper core winding transformer with natural cooling.
According to the main connection design, its model is S11-250, 12.1±5%/0.4kV,
with a capacity of 250kVA.
Key parameters of the main electrical equipment with voltages of each level are
shown in enclosed diagram.
Check the equipment with short circuit current To simplify the calculation, take the total current of the corresponding short
points as the short circuit current to check the equipment. The full opening time of the
circuit breaker is 0.1s. Back-up protection action time at the 11kV side is 0.5s and the
thermal stability calculation time is tjs=0.6s; protection action time at the 0.4kV side
is 1s and the thermal stability calculation time is tjs=1s.
All the equipment selected has been checked to be acceptable.
Generator excitation
The generators in this power station adopt static silicon controlled excitation
system, which is powered directly by the generator. The excitation system shall be
supplied by the manufacturer of the generators.
Plant-service power supply and DC system
Plant-service power supply adopts a GGD distribution panel.
DC system of this power station adopts non-maintaining lead-acid battery, with
complete sets of DC equipment with a rated voltage of 220V and a capacity of 50 AH.
As the DC power source of the station, it shall meet the requirement for DC loads in
the operation of automatic devices for plant control, protection and safety, the
operation of circuit breakers, emergency lighting, etc.
Feasibility report of Chipota falls hydropower station
54
6.4 Layout of the electromechanical equipment
This power station applies a diversion-type ground power house located at the
right bank of the riverbed. The mounting site is at one side of the entrance gate of the
power house.
6.4.1 Inner-plant electrical equipment layout According to the layout characteristics of the main electrical connection and low
voltage horizontal hydro-generator, the two triad panels of the generator, two
excitation panels, one plant service panel and one DC panel shall all be placed at the
downstream side of the units.
6.4.2 Layout of the booster station According to the key project layout, topography and geomorphology near the
power station and the direction of the incoming and outgoing lines, the booster station
is located close to the power house opposite to the entrance gate of the power house.
This arrangement is simple and clear, featuring unhindered incoming and outgoing
lines, compact arrangement and less occupation of area.
Table 6-3 Electrical equipment material No. Name Specification Unit Qty A Generator & equipment nearby 1 Units control panel NDK-2001 pc 2 2 Excitation panel NWLC pc 2
3 Shared panel for wiring and main transformer
GGD-02 pc 1
4 Battery and charging feedback panel
pc 1
5 Plant electricity distribution box pc 2
B Main transformer and booster station equipment
1 Transformer S11-250/11 12.1/0.4kV set 2 2 11kV circuit breaker ZW8-12/630,630A set 1 3 11kV disconnector GW1-10/630A set 1 4 Voltage transformer JDZXW-11 set 1 5 11kV arrester YH5WS-12.7/50 set 1 C Conductor and cable 1 Cable ZR-VV 22-120,1kV m 200 2 Cable ZR-VV 22-70,1kV m 180 3 Cable ZR-VV-3×10+1×6, 0.6/1kV m 20 4 Cable kVVP7*1.5 m 300 D Lighting luminaire Indoor and outdoor set 1
Feasibility report of Chipota falls hydropower station
55
E Auxiliary equipment 1 Electricity pole Steel structure set 2
2 Pin insulator pc 3
3 Suspension insulating strip pc 6
4 Ball-end hoist pc 3
6.5 Metallic structure
This is a diversion-type power station mainly for power generation. Metallic
equipment includes two metallic sluice gates (including the hoisting machine), one
φ300 sand flushing gate valve, one trash rack, 69t penstocks and accessories and 6
expansion joints. The dam is very near to the power house, so the hoisting equipment
is small scaled and seldom used, therefore, manual actuator shall be adopted.
The details of the metallic structure is shown in table 6-4.
6.5.1 Dam and metallic structures at the water intake a. Working gate and the hoisting equipment at the intake
There shall be a plane metallic sluice gate at the intake of the dam with a 2t
manual screw hoist.
Technical properties of the working gate and its hoisting equipment are as
follows:
Dimension of the orifice(width×height): 0.9m×0.9m
Design water head: 2~4m
Orifice type: open
Sluice gate type: metallic gate
Sluice gate dead weight: 0.85t
Orifice number: 1 orifice
Sluice gate number: 1
Hoisting machine: 2t manual screw hoist
b. The trash rack at the intake is arranged with an angle of 70°, as per hydraulic
requirement and shall be cleaned manually.
Main technical properties of the trash rack are as follows:
Dimension of the orifice(width×height): 1.2m×1.8m
Design water head: 2.0m
Feasibility report of Chipota falls hydropower station
56
Dead weight: 0.4t
Orifice number: 1 orifice
Rack number: 1
Clean method: trash be cleaned by manpower
c. Gate valve at the sand flushing orifice
There shall be one Φ300mm sand flushing orifice in the dam equipped with a
Z541H-100I DN300 gate valve.
6.5.2 Metallic structure for tailwater The overhaul of the power station will not be influenced by normal water level,
so there won’t be a tailwater sluice gate.
6.5.3 Penstocks The penstocks are in total 530m long, with a diameter of 650mm and tube wall
thickness of 6~8mm. Q345C spiral pipes are adopted as steel material and the
penstocks and the supporting structures have a total weight of 69t. (see chapter 5
Design for the details).
6.5.4 Main quantities of metallic structures and equipment Table 6-4 Main quantities table of metallic structures and equipment
No. Item Specification Unit Qty. Remarks
1 Sand flushing gate valve of the dam Z541H-100I DN300 1
2 Embedded parts t 0.12
3 Intake sluice gate 0.9×0.9 m t 0.85
4 Embedded parts t 0.12
5 2t manual hoist set 1
6 Trash rack of the dam 1.2×1.8 m t 0.4
7 Penstocks φ650,δ=6--8mm t 60
8 Expansion joints φ650 pc/t 6/4.5
6.6 Heating ventilation and fire protection
6.6.1 Heating ventilation The power house of this station is of ground type. The main power house is a
one-story building with good ventilation, so the natural ventilation method shall be
adopted. Smoke exhaust measures shall combine with the ventilation system.
Feasibility report of Chipota falls hydropower station
57
6.6.2 Fire protection 1. General conditions and characteristics of the project
This is a runoff diversion-type power station, focusing on power generation, with
an installed capacity of 200kW. The main power house of the station is a single story
ground building, 12m long, 6.8m wide and 4.5m high. There are 2 turbine generators
with a space of 5.0m. Each unit is equipped with 6 panels beside it at the downstream
side.
The booster station is located opposite to the entrance gate of the power house,
5m long and 5m wide, equipped with one main transformer and a 11kV outgoing line.
2. Design basis of fire protection
(1) Specification on Compiling Preliminary Design Report of Small Hydropower Stations SL179—2011;
(2) Electrical-mechanical Design Code of Hydropower Plant DL/T5186; (3) Code for Fire Protection Design of Hydraulic and Hydroelectric Engineering
SDJ278; (4) Design Code for Heating Ventilation and Air Conditioning of Power House of
Hydropower Station DL/T5165; (5) Fire Protection Specification in Building Design GBJ16; (6)Code of Design for Water Spray Extinguishing Systems GB50219-95; (7)Code for Design of Extinguisher Distribution in Buildings GBJ50140; (8) Code for Design of Automatic Fire Alarm System GB50116; (9) Typical Extinguishing and Protection Regulation of Electrical Equipment
DL5027; (10) Code of Design for Sprinkler Systems GB50084. 3. Design principle
(1) Carry out the principle that “Fire Prevention First, Prevention and Control
Combined” and abide to the specification and relevant policies.
(2) Adopt fire retardant materials for construction and decoration materials, etc.
(3) The design should guarantee that the fire driveway, fireproof space,
emergency exit, emergency smoke exhaust, illumination, etc. meet the requirement of
relevant specification.
(4) Take full advantage of the sufficiency of water source of hydraulic and
hydroelectric project.
(5) Choose qualified products tested by relevant product quality supervision and
inspection departments for firefighting equipment, which should be safe and reliable,
convenient in use, advanced in technology and rational in budget as well.
Feasibility report of Chipota falls hydropower station
58
(6) Meet the requirement that “relying mainly on self-rescue while seeking for
aid from outside”.
4. Fire protection design
Based on the equipment installed in the buildings of the project and its purpose,
according to the regulations in Code for Fire Protection Design of Hydraulic and
Hydroelectric Engineering SDJ278-90 and Fire Protection Specification in
Building Design GBJ16-87 (2001 version), the fire risk classification and fire
resistance rating of the buildings in the project are listed in table 6-5.
Table 6-5 Main production building fire risk classification and fire resistance rating
table
No. Building/structure name Fire risk classification Fire resistance rating
Remark
1 Main & auxiliary powerhouse and mounting room
4th 2
2 Central control room 3rd 2
3 Main transformer site 3rd 2
4 Distribution device structure 4th 2
Fire protection of buildings
This power station is of diversion-type with buildings located dispersedly, which
mainly consists of the dam, steel pipeline, power house and booster station. With
electromechanical equipment densely placed inside the power house and operation
and management staff concentrated, the plant area shall be the key area for fire
protection in this project.
The permanent buildings of the power station adopt a masonry structure frame,
which caters to the specified fire resistance rating. There are driveways straight to
each building as well.
The space between buildings conforms to the requirement of fire protection
distance and there are evacuation routes inside each building which meet the
requirement of fire safety. The fire protection of the buildings and the
electromechanical equipment shall be arranged under integrated consideration.
Firefighting pipelines shall be buried, with one hydrant set inside the power house.
The fire water shall be fetched from the penstock and the fire protection area shall
Feasibility report of Chipota falls hydropower station
59
cover the whole building. A suitable number of fire extinguishers shall be equipped as
well. The fire hydrant shall be hung on the wall, 1.2m above ground, equipped with
one 20m long hose and one fire nozzle of 13mm diameter.
Fire protection of electromechanical equipment
1) Fire protection of power house electromechanical equipment
Besides 1 fire hydrant, there shall be 3 portable powder extinguishers, and 3
portable foam extinguishers as well. Openings and holes of switching box,
distribution panel and automatic device panel shall be plugged with fire retardant
materials.
2) Fire protection of booster station and outside of the plant
The booster station is small in area, so the focus of fire protection is the main
transformer loaded with a large quantity of oil. One sand box shall be equipped near
the inlet of the booster station as well.
Fire water supply
The fire water shall be connected to the fire hydrant in the power house after
decompression before the gate valve of the penstock.
Fire electricity
According to the regulations in Code for Fire Protection Design of
Hydraulic and Hydroelectric Engineering (SDJ278-90), emergency illumination
power source shall be connected to the DC system of the power station.
Emergency illumination shall be set in the main power house.
Main firefighting equipment Table 6-6 Main firefighting equipment table
No. Equipment name Main specification & model Unit Qty. Mounting
place 1 Indoor fire hydrant DN50 pc 1 Power house
2 Portable powder extinguisher MF8 pc 3 Power house
3 Portable foam extinguisher MP8 pc 3 Power house
4 Sand box pc 1 Booster station
5 Gas mask pc 2 Power house
Feasibility report of Chipota falls hydropower station
60
6.7 Lightning protection and earthing
The overvoltage protection of all level voltage distribution equipment shall be
arranged as per the requirements of specifications and regulations, see electric main
wiring diagram for details. A group of zinc oxide arrester is set at the 11kv side to
guarantee that lightning incoming surge will not jeopardize the main transformer,
generators and main electrical equipment under any operation mode.
Install lightning band for direct lightning strike protection of the power house.
The lightning band shall be connected with the column steel structure of the power
house by welding, with earthing bodies arranged along the wall. The earthing
resistance is required not to exceed 10Ω.
The earthing networks in the switching station and power house are formed
jointly by the horizontal earthing trunk and vertical earthing electrodes. Apply -50mm