Top Banner

of 109

Final Report Rob Final-libre

Jun 02, 2018

Download

Documents

Vishal Mishra
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre

    1/109

    DESIGN OF T-BEAM RAIL-OVERBRIDGE

    SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENTOF THE REQUIREMENTS FORBACHELOR OF TECHNOLOGY

    IN

    CIVIL ENGINEERING

    BYVASAV DUBEY (109526) MADHURESH SHRIVASTAV(109833)

    LOKESH KUMAR (109822) AMAN AGARWAL (109814)

    SHOBHIT DEORI (109281) KULDEEP MEENA(109821)

    PRADEEP KUMAR (109695) ANIMESH AGARWAL(109788)

    MANJEET GOYAT(109597)

    BATCH OF 2009-2013

    UNDER THE GUIDANCE OFDR. H. K. SHARMA

    NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY

    KURUKSHETRA MAY 2013

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre

    2/109

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre

    3/109

    4 Design of Longitudinal Girders 60

    4.1 Analysis Longitudinal Girder by Courbon's Method 60

    4.2 Shear Force in L-girders 65

    4.3 Design Of Section 69

    5 Design Of Cross Girders 73

    5.1 Analysis of Cross Girder 73

    5.2 Design of Section 79

    6 Design of Bearings 82

    6.1 Design Of Outer Bearings 82

    6.2 Design Of Inner Bearings 85 7 Conclusion 90

    7.1 Deck Slab 90

    7.2 Cantilever Slab 90

    7.3 Longitudinal Girders 90

    7.4 Cross Girders 91

    7.5 Bearings 91

    References 93

    Appendix-A : IRC Loadings 94

    Appendix-B: Impact Factors 98

    Appendix-C: K in Effective Width 100

    Appendix-D: Pigeaud's Curve 101

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre

    4/109

    i

    Acknowledgement

    We wish to record our deep sense of gratitude to Dr. H.K. Sharma, Professor,Department of Civil Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Kurukshetra forhis able guidance and immense help and also the valuable technical discussionsthroughout the period which really helped us in completing this project andenriching our technical knowledge.

    We also acknowledge our gratefulness to Dr. D.K. Soni, Head of Department,Department of Civil Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Kurukshetra fortimely help and untiring encouragement during the preparation of this

    dissertation.

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre

    5/109

    ii

    List of Figures

    Figure 1.1: Cutaway view of a typical concrete beam bridge.

    Figure 2.1: Plan of Bridge Deck

    Figure 2.2: Section X-X of Bridge Deck Plan

    Figure 2.3: Section Y-Y of Bridge Deck Plan

    Figure 2.4: Class AA Track located for Maximum Moment on Deck Slab

    Figure 2.5: Both Class AA Track located for Maximum Moment on Deck Slab

    Figure 2.6: Disposition of Class AA Wheeled Vehicle as Case 1 for MaximumMoment

    Figure 2.7: Disposition of Class AA Wheeled Vehicle as Case 2 for MaximumMoment

    Figure 2.8: Disposition of Class AA Wheeled Vehicle as Case 3 for MaximumMoment

    Figure 2.9: Disposition of Class A Train of Load for Maximum Moment

    Figure 2.10: Class AA Tracked loading arrangement for calculation of Shear Force

    Figure 2.11: Class AA Wheeled loading arrangement as Case 1 for Shear Force

    Figure 2.12: Disposition of Class AA wheeled vehicle as Case 2 for Shear Force

    Figure 2.13: Disposition of Class A Train of load for Maximum Shear

    Figure 3.1: Cantilever Slab with Class A WheelFigure 3.2: Reinforcement Details in Cross Section of Deck Slab

    Figure 3.3: Reinforcement Details in Longitudinal Section of Deck Slab

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre

    6/109

    iii

    Figure 4.1: Class AA Tracked loading arrangement for the calculation of reactionfactors for L-girders

    Figure 4.2: Influence Line Diagram for Moment at mid span

    Figure 4.3: Class AA Wheeled loading arrangement for the calculation ofreaction factors for L-girders

    Figure 4.4: Computation of Bending Moment for Class AA wheeled Loading

    Figure 4.5: Class A loading arrangement for reaction factors for L-girder

    Figure 4.6: Computation of Bending Moment for Class A Loading

    Figure 4.7: Class AA tracked loading for calculation of shear force at supports

    Figure 4.8: Dead Load on L-girder

    Figure 4.9: Reinforcement Details of Outer Longitudinal Girder

    Figure 4.10: Reinforcement Details of Inner Longitudinal Girder

    Figure 5.1: Triangular load from each side of slab

    Figure 5.2: Dead Load reaction on each longitudinal girder

    Figure 5.3: Position of class AA tracked loading in longitudinal direction

    Figure 5.4: Plan of position of class AA tracked loading in longitudinal direction

    Figure 5.5: Reaction on longitudinal girder due to class AA tracked vehicle

    Figure 5.6: Position of class AA wheeled loading in longitudinal direction

    Figure 5.7: Plan of position of class AA wheeled loading in longitudinal direction

    Figure 5.8: Reaction on longitudinal girder due to class AA wheeled loading

    Figure 5.9: Position of class AA wheeled loading in longitudinal direction

    Figure 5.10: Reaction on longitudinal girder due to class A loading

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre

    7/109

    iv

    FIgure 5.11: Reinforcement Details of Cross Girder

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre

    8/109

    1

    1 Introduction

    1.1 General

    A bridge is a structure that crosses over a river, bay, or other obstruction,permitting the smooth and safe passage of vehicles, trains, and pedestrians. Anelevation view of a typical bridge is A bridge structure is divided into an upperpart (the superstructure), which consists of the slab, the floor system, and themain truss or girders, and a lower part (the substructure), which are columns,piers, towers, footings, piles, and abutments. The superstructure provideshorizontal spans such as deck and girders and carries traffic loads directly. Thesubstructure supports the horizontal spans, elevating above the ground surface.

    1.2 Classification of Bridges

    1.2.1 Classification by Materials

    Steel Bridges steel bridge may use a wide variety of structural steel componentsand systems: girders, frames, trusses, arches, and suspension cables.

    Concrete Bridges: There are two primary types of concrete bridges: reinforcedand pre-stressed.

    Timber Bridges: Wooden bridges are used when the span is relatively short.

    Metal Alloy Bridges : Metal alloys such as aluminum alloy and stainless steel arealso used in bridge construction.

    Composite Bridges: Bridges using both steel and concrete as structural materials.

    1.2.2 Classification by Objectives

    Highway Bridges: Bridges on highways.

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre

    9/109

    2

    Railway Bridges: Bridges on railroads.

    Combined Bridges: Bridges carrying vehicles and trains.

    Pedestrian Bridges : Bridges carrying pedestrian traffic.

    Aqueduct Bridges: Bridges supporting pipes with channeled water flow. Bridgescan alternatively be classified into movable (for ships to pass the river) or fixedand permanent or temporary categories.

    1.2.3 Classification by Structural System (Superstructures)

    Plate Girder Bridges: The main girders consist of a plate assemblage of upper andlower flanges and a web. H or I-cross-sections effectively resist bending andshear.

    Box Girder Bridges: The single (or multiple) main girder consists of a box beamfabricated from steel plates or formed from concrete, which resists not onlybending and shear but also torsion effectively.

    T-Beam Bridges: A number of reinforced concrete T-beams are placed side byside to support the live load.

    Composite Girder Bridges: The concrete deck slab works in conjunction with thesteel girders to support loads as a united beam. The steel girder takes mainlytension, while the concrete slab takes the compression component of the bendingmoment.

    Grillage Girder Bridges: The main girders are connected transversely by floorbeams to form a grid pattern which shares the loads with the main girders.

    Truss Bridges: Truss bar members are theoretically considered to be connectedwith pins at their ends to form triangles. Each member resists an axial force,either in compression or tension.

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre

    10/109

    3

    Arch Bridges: The arch is a structure that resists load mainly in axial compression.In ancient times stone was the most common material used to constructmagnificent arch bridges.

    Cable-Stayed Bridges : The girders are supported by highly strengthened cables(often composed of tightly bound steel strands) which stem directly from thetower. These are most suited to bridge long distances.

    Suspension Bridges: The girders are suspended by hangers tied to the main cableswhich hang from the towers. The load is transmitted mainly by tension in cable

    1.2.4 Classification by Design Life

    Permanent Bridges

    Temporary Bridges

    1.2.5 Classification by Span Length

    Culverts: Bridges having length less than 8 m.

    Minor Bridges: Bridges having length 8-30 m.

    Major bridges: Bridges having length greater than 30 m.

    Long span bridges: Bridges having length greater than 120 m.

    1.3 T-Beam Bridges

    Beam and slab bridges are probably the most common form of concrete bridge inthe UK today, thanks to the success of standard precast prestressed concretebeams developed originally by the Prestressed Concrete Development Group(Cement & Concrete Association) supplemented later by alternative designs by

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre

    11/109

    4

    others, culminating in the Y-beam introduced by the Prestressed ConcreteAssociation in the late 1980s.

    They have the virtue of simplicity, economy, wide availability of the standardsections, and speed of erection.

    The precast beams are placed on the supporting piers or abutments, usually onrubber bearings which are maintenance free. An in-situ reinforced concrete deckslab is then cast on permanent shuttering which spans between the beams.

    The precast beams can be joined together at the supports to form continuousbeams which are structurally more efficient. However, this is not normally donebecause the costs involved are not justified by the increased efficiency.

    Simply supported concrete beams and slab bridges are now giving way to integralbridges which offer the advantages of less cost and lower maintenance due to theelimination of expansion joints and bearings.

    1.4 Background

    Nearly 590,000 roadway bridges span waterways, dry land depressions, otherroads, and railroads throughout the United States. The most dramatic bridges usecomplex systems like arches, cables, or triangle-filled trusses to carry the roadwaybetween majestic columns or towers. However, the work-horse of the highwaybridge system is the relatively simple and inexpensive concrete beam bridge.

    Also known as a girder bridge, a beam bridge consists of a horizontal slabsupported at each end. Because all of the weight of the slab (and any objects onthe slab) is transferred vertically to the support columns, the columns can be lessmassive than supports for arch or suspension bridges, which transfer part of theweight horizontally.

    A simple beam bridge is generally used to span a distance of 250 ft (76.2 m) or

    less. Longer distances can be spanned by connecting a series of simple beambridges into what is known as a continuous span. In fact, the world's longestbridge, the Lake Pontchartrain Causeway in Louisiana, is a pair of parallel, two-lane continuous span bridges almost 24 mi (38.4 km) long. The first of the twobridges was completed in 1956 and consists of more than 2,000 individual spans.The sister bridge (now carrying the north-bound traffic) was completed 13 yearslater; although it is 228 ft longer than the first bridge, it contains only 1,500 spans.

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre

    12/109

    5

    A bridge has three main elements. First, the substructure (foundation) transfersthe loaded weight of the bridge to the ground; it consists of components such ascolumns (also called piers) and abutments. An abutment is the connectionbetween the end of the bridge and the earth; it provides support for the end

    sections of the bridge. Second, the superstructure of the bridge is the horizontalplatform that spans the space between columns. Finally, the deck of the bridge isthe traffic-carrying surface added to the superstructure.

    1.5 History

    Prehistoric man began building bridges by imitating nature. Finding it useful towalk on a tree that had fallen across a stream, he started to place tree trunks orstone slabs where he wanted to cross streams. When he wanted to bridge a widerstream, he figured out how to pile stones in the water and lay beams of wood orstone between these columns and the bank.

    The first bridge to be documented was described by Herodotus in 484 B.C. Itconsisted of timbers supported by stone columns, and it had been built across theEuphrates River some 300 years earlier.

    Most famous for their arch bridges of stone and concrete, the Romans also built

    beam bridges. In fact, the earliest known Roman bridge, constructed across theTiber River in 620 B.C. , was called the Pons Sublicius because it was made ofwooden beams (sublicae). Roman bridge building techniques included the use ofcofferdams while constructing columns. They did this by driving a circulararrangement of wooden poles into the ground around the intended columnlocation. After lining the wooden ring with clay to make it watertight, theypumped the water out of the enclosure. This allowed them to pour the concretefor the column base.

    Bridge building began the transition from art to science in 1717 when Frenchengineer Hubert Gautier wrote a treatise on bridge building. In 1847, an Americannamed Squire Whipple wrote A Work on Bridge Building, which contained the firstanalytical methods for calculating the stresses and strains in a bridge. "Consultingbridge engineering" was established as a specialty within civil engineering in the1880s.

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre

    13/109

    6

    Further advances in beam bridge construction would come primarily fromimprovements in building materials.

    1.6 Construction Materials and Their Development

    Most highway beam bridges are built of concrete and steel. The Romans usedconcrete made of lime and pozzalana (a red, volcanic powder) in their bridges.This material set quickly, even under water, and it was strong and waterproof.During the Middle Ages in Europe, lime mortar was used instead, but it was watersoluble. Today's popular Portland cement, a particular mixture of limestone andclay, was invented in 1824 by an English bricklayer named Joseph Aspdin, but itwas not widely used as a foundation material until the early 1900s.

    Concrete has good strength to withstand compression (pressing force), but is notas strong under tension (pulling force). There were several attempts in Europeand the United States during the nineteenth century to strengthen concrete byembedding tension-resisting iron in it. A superior version was developed in Franceduring the 1880s by Francois Hennebique, who used reinforcing bars made ofsteel. The first significant use of reinforced concrete in a bridge in the UnitedStates was in the Alvord Lake Bridge in San Francisco's Golden Gate Park;completed in 1889 and still in use today, it was built with reinforcing bars oftwisted steel devised by designer Ernest L. Ransome.

    The next significant advance in concrete construction was the development ofprestressing. A concrete beam is prestressed by pulling on steel rods runningthrough the beam and then anchoring the ends of the rods to the ends of thebeam. This exerts a compressive force on the concrete, offsetting tensile forcesthat are exerted on the beam when a load is placed on it. (A weight pressingdown on a horizontal beam tends to bend the beam downward in the middle,creating compressive forces along the top of the beam and tensile forces alongthe bottom of the beam.)

    Prestressing can be applied to a concrete beam that is precast at a factory,brought to the construction site, and lifted into place by a crane; or it can beapplied to cast-in-place concrete that is poured in the beam's final location.Tension can be applied to the steel wires or rods before the concrete is poured(pretensioning), or the concrete can be poured around tubes containing

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre

    14/109

    7

    untensioned steel to which tension is applied after the concrete has hardened(postensioning).

    1.7 Design

    Each bridge must be designed individually before it is built. The designer musttake into account a number of factors, including the local topography, watercurrents, river ice formation possibilities, wind patterns, earthquake potential, soilconditions, projected traffic volumes, esthetics, and cost limitations.

    Figure 1.1: Cutaway view of a typical concrete beam bridge.

    In addition, the bridge must be designed to be structurally sound. This involvesanalyzing the forces that will act on each component of the completed bridge.

    Three types of loads contribute to these forces. Dead load refers to the weight ofthe bridge itself. Live load refers to the weight of the traffic the bridge will carry.Environmental load refers to other external forces such as wind, possibleearthquake action, and potential traffic collisions with bridge supports. Theanalysis is carried out for the static (stationary) forces of the dead load and thedynamic (moving) forces of the live and environmental loads.

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre

    15/109

    8

    Since the late 1960s, the value of redundancy in design has been widely accepted.This means that a bridge is designed so the failure of any one member will notcause an immediate collapse of the entire structure. This is accomplished bymaking other members strong enough to compensate for a damaged member.

    1.8 Construction Procedure

    Because each bridge is uniquely designed for a specific site and function, theconstruction process also varies from one bridge to another. The processdescribed below represents the major steps in constructing a fairly typical

    reinforced concrete bridge spanning a shallow river, with intermediate concretecolumn supports located in the river.

    Example sizes for many of the bridge components are included in the followingdescription as an aid to visualization. Some have been taken from suppliers'brochures or industry standard specifications. Others are details of a freewaybridge that was built across the Rio Grande in Albuquerque, New Mexico, in 1993.The 1,245-ft long, 10-lane wide bridge is supported by 88 columns. It contains11,456 cubic yards of concrete in the structure and an additional 8,000 cubic

    yards in the pavement. It also contains 6.2 million pounds of reinforcing steel.

    1.8.1 Substructure

    1 A cofferdam is constructed around each column location in the riverbed,and the water is pumped from inside the enclosure. One method of setting

    the foundation is to drill shafts through the riverbed, down to bedrock. Asan auger brings soil up from the shaft, a clay slurry is pumped into the holeto replace the soil and keep the shaft from collapsing. When the properdepth is reached (e.g., about 80 ft or 24.4 m), a cylindrical cage ofreinforcing steel (rebar) is lowered into the slurry-filled shaft (e.g., 72 in or2 m in diameter). Concrete is pumped to the bottom of the shaft. As the

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre

    16/109

    9

    shaft fills with concrete, the slurry is forced out of the top of the shaft,where it is collected and cleaned so it can be reused. The abovegroundportion of each column can either be formed and cast in place, or beprecast and lifted into place and attached to the foundation.

    2 Bridge abutments are prepared on the riverbank where the bridge endwill rest. A concrete backwall is formed and poured between the top of thebank and the riverbed; this is a retaining wall for the soil beyond the end ofthe bridge. A ledge (seat) for the bridge end to rest on is formed in the topof the backwall. Wing walls may also be needed, extending outward fromthe back-wall along the riverbank to retain fill dirt for the bridgeapproaches.

    1.8.2 Superstructure

    4 A crane is used to set steel or prestressed concrete girders betweenconsecutive sets of columns throughout the length of the bridge. Thegirders are bolted to the column caps. For the Albuquerque freeway bridge,each girder is 6 ft (1.8 m) tall and up to 130 ft (40 m) long, weighing asmuch as 54 tons.

    5 Steel panels or precast concrete slabs are laid across the girders to form asolid platform, completing the bridge superstructure. One manufactureroffers a 4.5 in (11.43 cm) deep corrugated panel of heavy (7-or 9-gauge)

    steel, for example. Another alternative is a stay-in-place steel form for theconcrete deck that will be poured later.

    1.8.3 Deck

    6 A moisture barrier is placed atop the superstructure platform. Hot-applied polymer-modified asphalt might be used, for example.

    7 A grid of reinforcing steel bars is constructed atop the moisture barrier;this grid will subsequently be encased in a concrete slab. The grid is three-dimensional, with a layer of rebar near the bottom of the slab and anothernear the top.

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre

    17/109

    10

    8 Concrete pavement is poured. A thickness of 8-12 in (20.32-30.5 cm) ofconcrete pavement is appropriate for a highway. If stay-in-place formswere used as the superstructure platform, concrete is poured into them. Ifforms were not used, the concrete can be applied with a slipform paving

    machine that spreads, consolidates, and smooths the concrete in onecontinuous operation. In either case, a skid-resistant texture is placed onthe fresh concrete slab by manually or mechanically scoring the surfacewith a brush or rough material like burlap. Lateral joints are providedapproximately every 15 ft (5 m) to discourage cracking of the pavement;these are either added to the forms before pouring concrete or cut after aslipformed slab has hardened. A flexible sealant is used to seal the joint.

    1.9 Problem Statement

    A reinforced concrete bridge was to be constructed over a railway line. It wasrequired to Design the bridge superstructure and to sketch the layout of plan,elevation and reinforcement details of various components for the following data:

    Width of carriage way = 7.5 m

    Effective span = 14 m

    Centre to centre spacing of longitudinal girders = 3.2 m

    Number of longitudinal girders = 3

    No. of cross girders = 4

    Thickness of wearing coat = 56 mm

    Material for construction = M-35 grade concrete and Fe-415 steel conforming toIS 1786.

    Loading = IRC class A-A and IRC class A ,which given worst effect

    Footpath = 1.7 m on left hand side of the bridge.

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre

    18/109

    11

    Total width of road = 10.3 m.

    Design the bridge superstructure and sketch the layout of plan, elevation andreinforcement details of various components.

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre

    19/109

    12

    2 Deck Slab

    2.1 Structural Details

    Let us assume slab thickness of 225 mm.

    For cantilever slab, thickness at junction = 350 mm and 100 mm at the end.

    Providing vehicle crash barriers (for without footpath) on one side of carriage wayand vehicle crash barrier and pedestrian railing on the other side of thecarriageway.

    2.2 Effective Span Size of Panel for Bending Moment Calculation

    Let us provide longitudinal beam c/c spaced 3.2 m and with rib width 300 mm.

    4 cross girders provided with c/c spaced 4.67 m and rib width 250 mm.

    Effective depth of slab = 225 - 25 - 8 = 192 mm

    Span in transverse direction = 3.2 m

    Effective span in transverse direction = 3.2 - 0.3 + 0.192 = 3.092 m 3.1 m

    Span in longitudinal direction = 4.67 - 0.25 + 0.192 = 4.6 m

    Effective size of panel = 3.1 m x 4.6 m

    2.3 Effective Span Size of Panel for Shear Force CalculationEffective span in transverse direction = 3.2 - 0.3 = 2.9 m

    Span in longitudinal direction = 4.67 - 0.25 = 4.42 m

    Effective size of panel = 2.9 m x 4.42 m

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre

    20/109

    13

    Figure 2.1: Plan of Bridge Deck

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre

    21/109

    14

    Figure 2.2: Section X-X of Bridge Deck Plan

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre

    22/109

    15

    Figure 2.3: Section Y-Y of Bridge Deck Plan

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre

    23/109

    16

    2.4 Moment due to Dead Load

    Effective size of panel = 3.1m x 4.6 m

    Self Wt. of deck slab = 0.225 x 24= 5.4 KN/m 2

    Wt. of wearing course = 0.056 x 22 = 1.23 KN/m 2

    Total = 6.63 KN/m 2

    Ratio K =Short SpanLong Span =

    3.14.6 = 0.674

    1 K = 1.48

    From Pigeaud's curve, we get by interpolation

    m 1 = 4.8 x 10-2

    m 2 = 1.9 x 10-2

    Total dead wt. = 6.63 x 3.1 x 4.6 = 94.54 KN

    Moment along short span = (0.048 + 0.15 x 0.019) x 94.54 = 4.81 KN-m

    Moment along long span = (0.019 + 0.15 x 0.048) x 94.54 = 2.38 KN-m

    2.5 Moment due to Live Load

    2.5.1 Live load BM due to IRC Class AA Tracked VehicleSince the effective width of panel is 3.1 m, two possibilities should be considered

    for finding maximum bending moment in the panel due to Class AA trackedvehicle. In the first possibility one of the track of 35t will be placed centrally(figure 2.4) on the panel. In second possibility both track of 35t each will beplaced symmetrically as shown in figure 2.5.

    Case 1: Class AA Track located as in figure 2.4 for Maximum Moment

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre

    24/109

    17

    Figure 2.4: Class AA Track located for Maximum Moment on Deck Slab

    Impact factor = 25%

    u = = 0.988mv = = 3.72mK = 0.674

    uB =

    0.9883.1 = 0.319

    vL =

    3.724.6 = 0.809

    From Pigeaud's curve, we get by interpolation

    m 1 = 10.5 x 10-2

    m 2 = 4.1 x 10-2

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre

    25/109

    18

    Total load per track including impact = 1.25 x 350 = 437.5 KN

    Moment along short span = (10.5 + 0.15 x 4.1) x 10 -2 x 437.5 = 48.63 KN-m

    Moment along long span = (4.1 + 0.15 x 10.5) x 10 -2 x 437.5 = 24.83 KN-m

    Final Moment after applying effect of continuity

    MB = 48.63 x 0.8 = 38.9 KN-m

    ML = 24.83 x 0.8 = 19.86 KN-m

    Case 2: Both track of 35t each symmetrically as shown in figure 2.5.

    Figure 2.5: Both Class AA Track located for Maximum Moment on Deck Slab

    X = 0.531 m u 1 =0.988 m v = 3.72 m

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre

    26/109

    19

    i) u = 2( u 1 +X) = 3.038 m v = 3.72m

    u B =

    3.038 3.1

    vL =

    3.724.6 = 0.809

    From Pigeaud's curve, we get by interpolation

    m 1 = 5.5 x 10-2

    m 2 = 2.5 x 10-2

    M1 = (5.5 + 0.15 x 2.5) x 10-2 x 1.519 = 0.0892

    M2 = (2.5 + 0.15 x 5.5) x 10-2 x 1.519 = 0.051

    ii) u = 2X = 1.062 v =3.72

    u B =

    1.0623.1 = 0.343

    vL =

    3.724.6 = 0.809

    From Pigeaud's curve, we get by interpolation

    m 1 = 10.5 x 10-2

    m 2 = 4.0 x 10-2

    M1 = (10.5 + 0.15 x 4.0) x 10-2 x 0.531 = 0.0589

    M2 = (4.0 + 0.15 x 10.5) x 10-2 x 0.531 = 0.0296

    Final moment applying effect of continuity and impact

    MB = (0.0892 - 0.0589) x 2 x 350 x 1.25 x 0.8/0.988 = 21.468 KN-m

    ML = (0.051 - 0.0296) x 2 x 350 x 1.25 x 0.8/0.988 = 15.16 KN-m

    2.5.2 Live Load BM due to IRC Class AA Wheeled VehicleSince the effective width is 3.1 m, all four wheels of the axle can beaccommodated on the panel for finding maximum bending moment in the paneldue to Class AA wheeled vehicle. In the first possibility four loads of 37.5 KN and

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre

    27/109

    20

    four loads 62.5 KN are placed symmetrical to both the axis as shown in figure 2.6.In second possibility all four loads of first axle is place symmetrically with all fourwheels of second axle following it as shown in figure 2.7. A third possibility shouldalso be tried in which four wheel loads of the first axle are so placed that themiddle 62.5KN wheel load is placed centrally, with the four wheel loads of secondaxle following it as shown in figure 2.8.

    Case 1: All four loads of 37.5 KN and four loads 62.5 KN are placed symmetrical toboth the axis as shown in figure 2.6.

    Impact factor = 25%

    u1 =

    = 0.469 m

    v1 = = 0.345 m(A) For Load W 1 of Both Axles

    X = 0.865 m Y= 0.428 m

    i) u = 2(u 1 +X) = 2 x 1.335 = 2.67 mv = 2(v1 + Y) = 2 x 0.773 = 1.546 m

    u B = 2.673.1 = 0.861 vL = 1.5464.6 = 0.336

    From Pigeaud's curve, we get by interpolation

    m 1 = 8.5x 10-2

    m 2= 6.0 x 10-2

    M1 = (8.5 + 0.15 x 6.0) x 10-2 x 1.335 x 1.546/2 = 0 .097

    M2= (6.0 + 0.15 x 8.5) x 10 -2 x 1.335 x 1.546/2 = 0.075

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre

    28/109

    21

    Figure 2.6: Disposition of Class AA Wheeled Vehicle as Case 1 for Maximum

    Moment

    ii) u = 2X = 1.73 m v = 2Y = 0.856 m

    u B =

    1.733.1 = 0.558

    vL =

    0.8564.6 = 0.186

    From Pigeaud's curve, we get by interpolation

    m 1 = 12.0 x 10 -2

    m 2 = 10.0 x 10-2

    M1 = (12.0 + 0.15 x 10.0) x 10-2 x 0.866 x 0.428 = 0.050

    M2= (10 + 0.15 x 12.0) x 10-2 x 0.866 x 0.428 = 0.049

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre

    29/109

    22

    iii) u = 2(u 1 +X) = 2.67 m v = 2Y = 0.856 m

    u B = 0.861

    vL = 0.186

    From Pigeaud's curve, we get by interpolation

    m 1 = 8.5 x 10-2

    m 2 = 7.5 x 10-2

    M1 = (8.5 + 0.15 x 7.5) x 10-2 x 1.335 x 0.428 = 0.055

    M2 = (7.5 + 0.15 x 8.5) x 10-2 x 1.335 x 0.428 = 0.050

    iv) u = 2X = 1.73 m v = 2(v 1+Y) = 1.546 m

    =1.733.1 = 0.558

    vL = 0.336

    From Pigeaud's curve, we get by interpolation

    m 1 = 11.5 x 10-2

    m 2 = 7.5 x 10-2

    M1 = (11.5 + 0.15 x 7.5) x 10-2 x 0.866 x 0.773 = 0.0845

    M2 = (7.5 + 0.15 x 11.5) x 10-2 x 0.866 x 0.773 = 0.0618

    Final M 1 = (0.097+ 0.05 - 0.055 - 0.0845) = 0.0075

    Final M 2 = (0.075 + 0.044 - 0.050 - 0.0618) = 0.0072

    (Mw 1)B =.0075x4x37.5

    .469x.345 = 6.95 KN-m

    (Mw 1)L=.0072x4x37.5

    .469x.345 = 6.67 KN-m

    (B) For Load W 2 of Both AxlesX = 0.266 m Y = 0.428 m

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre

    30/109

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre

    31/109

    24

    M1=(13.5 + 0.15 11.5) 10-2 0.428 0.735 = 0.0478

    M2=(11.5 + 0.15 13.5) 10-2 0.428 0.735 = 0.0426

    iv) u= 2X = 0.532 m v = 2(v 1 + Y) = 1.546 m

    u B = 0.172

    vL = 0.336

    From Pigeaud's curve, we get by interpolation

    m 1=19.0 x 10-2

    m 2=9.5 x 10-2

    M1=(19 + 0.15 x 9.5) x 10 -2 x 0.266 x 0.773 = 0.42

    M2=(9.5 + 0.15 x 19) x10-2 x 0.266 x 0.773 = 0.025

    Final M 1 = (0.0778 + 0.025 - 0.0478 - 0.042) = 0.013

    Final M 2 = (0.0561+ 0.018 - 0.0426 - 0.025) = 0.0065

    (Mw2)B=.013 x 4 x 62.5 .469 x 0.345 = 20.09 KN-m

    (Mw2)L =.0065 x 4 x 62.5

    .469 x 0.345 = 10.04 KN-m

    Final moment applying effect of continuity and impact

    MB= (20.09 + 6.95) x 1.25 x 0.8 = 27.04 KN-m

    ML= (10.04 + 6.64) x 1.25 x 0.8 = 16.71 KN-m

    Case 2: All four loads of first axle is place symmetrically with all four wheels ofsecond axle following it as shown in figure 2.7.

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre

    32/109

    25

    Figure 2.7: Disposition of Class AA Wheeled Vehicle as Case 2 for Maximum

    Moment

    (A) For Load W 1 of Axle IX= 0.866m

    i) u =2(u 1+ X) = 2 x 1.335 = 2.67 m v= 0.345 m

    u

    B = 0.861

    v

    L= 0.075

    From Pigeaud's curve, we get by interpolation

    m 1=10.2 x 10-2

    m 2=9.8 x 10-2

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre

    33/109

    26

    M1=(10.2 + 0.15 x 9.8) x 10-2 x 1.335 = 0.156

    M2=(9.8 + 0.15 x 10.2) x 10-2 x 1.335 = 0.151

    ii) u = 2X = 1.732 m v = 0.345 m

    u B = 0.559

    vL = 0.075

    From Pigeaud's curve, we get by interpolation

    m 1=12.5 x 10-2

    m 2=13.5 x 10-2

    M1=(12.5 + 0.15 x 13.5) x 10 -2 x 0.866 = 0.126

    M2=(13.5 + 0.15 x 12.5) x10-2 x 0.886 = 0.133

    Final M 1 = (0.156 - 0.126) = 0.03

    Final M 2= (0.151 - 0.133) = 0.018

    (MB)W1 =.03 x 2 x 37.5

    .469 = 4.797 KN-m

    (ML)W1 =.018 x 2 x 37.5

    .469 =2.88 KN-m

    (B) For Load W 2 of Axle IX = 0.266 m

    i) u = 2(u 1+ X) = 0.735 x 2 = 1.47 m v = 0.345m

    u B = 0.474

    vL = 0.075

    From Pigeaud's curve, we get by interpolation

    m 1=14.0 x 10-2

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre

    34/109

    27

    m 2=13.0 x 10-2

    M1=(14.0 + 0.15 x 13.0) x 10-2 x 0.735 = 0.117

    M2=(13.0 + 0.15 x 14.0) x 10-2 x 0.735 = 0.111

    ii) u = 2X = 0.532 m v = 0.345 m

    u B = 0.172

    vL = 0.075

    From Pigeaud's curve, we get by interpolation

    m 1=23.0 x 10-2

    m 2=20.0 x 10 -2

    M1=(23.0 + 0.15 x 20.0) x 10-2 x 0.266 = 0.069

    M2=(20.0 + 0.15 x 23.0) x 10-2 x 0.266 = 0.064

    Final M 1 = (0.117 - 0.069) = 0.048

    Final M 2= (0.111 - 0.069) = 0.042

    (MB)W2 = .048 x 2 x 62.5 .469 = 12.79 KN-m

    (ML)W2=.042 x 2 x 62.5

    .469 = 12.52 KN-m

    (C) For Load W 3 of Axle IIX = 0.866 m Y = 1.028 m

    i) u = 2(u 1+ X) = 2 x 1.335 = 2.67 mv = 2(v1 + Y) = 2 x 1.373 = 2.746 m

    u B = 0.861

    vL = 0.597

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre

    35/109

    28

    From Pigeaud's curve, we get by interpolation

    m 1=7.5 x 10-2

    m 2=4.2 x 10-2

    M1 = (7.5 + 0.15 x 4.2) x 10-2 x 1.335 x 1.373 = 0.149

    M2 = (4.2 + 0.15 x 7.5) x 10-2 x 1.335 x 1.373 = 0.0976

    ii) u = 2X = 1.732 m v = 2Y = 1.028 x 2 = 2.056 m

    u B = 0.559

    vL = 0.447

    From Pigeaud's curve, we get by interpolation

    m 1=11.2 x 10-2

    m 2=6.5 x 10-2

    M1=(11.2 + 0.15 x 6.5) x 10-2 x 0.866 x 1.028 = 0.108

    M2=(6.5 + 0.15 x 11.2) x 10-2 x 0.866 x 1.028 = 0.073

    iii) u = 2(u 1+ X) = 2.67 m v = 2Y = 2.050 mu B = 0.861

    vL = 0.447

    From Pigeaud's curve, we get by interpolation

    m 1 = 8.2 x 10-2

    m 2 = 5.5 x 10-2

    M1 = (8.2 + 0.15 x 5.5) x 10-2 x 1.028 x 1.335 = 0.124

    M2 = (5.5 + 0.15 x 8.2) x 10-2 x 1.028 x 1.335 = 0.092

    iv) u = 2X = 1.732 m v = 2(v 1 + Y) = 2.746 m

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre

    36/109

    29

    u B = 0.559

    vL = 0.597

    From Pigeaud's curve, we get by interpolation

    m 1 = 10.2 x 10 -2

    m 2 = 5.2 x 10-2

    M1 = (10.2 + 0.15 x 5.2) x10-2 x 0.866 x 1.373 = 0.131

    M2 = (5.2 + 0.15 x 10.2) x 10-2 x 0.866 x 1.373 = 0.08

    Final M 1 = (0.149 + 0.108 - 0.124 - 0.131) = 0.002

    Design M 2 = (0.0976 + 0.073 - 0.092 - 0.08) = 0.0006

    (MB)W3 =.002 x 2 x 37.5

    .469 x .345 = 0.927 KN-m

    (ML)W3 =.0006 x 2 x 37.5

    .469 x .345 = 0.278 KN-m

    (D) For W 4 of Axle IIX = 0.266 m Y = 1.028 m

    i) u = 2(u 1+ X) = 2 x 0.735 = 1.47 mv = 2(v1 + Y) = 2 x 1.373 = 2.746 mu B = 0.474

    vL = 0.597

    From Pigeaud's curve, we get by interpolation

    m 1 = 11.0 x 10-2

    m 2 = 5.2 x 10-2

    M1 = (11.0 + 0.15 x 5.2) x 10-2 x 0.735 x 1.373 = 0.119

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre

    37/109

    30

    M2 = (5.2 + 0.15 x 11.0) x 10-2 x 0.735 x 1.373 = 0.069

    ii) u = 2X = 0.532 m v = 2Y = 2.056 mu

    B = 0.172

    v

    L= 0.447

    From Pigeaud's curve, we get by interpolation

    m 1 = 16.0 x 10-2

    m 2 = 7.5 x 10-2

    M1 = (16.0 + 0.15 x 7.5) x 10-2 x 0.266 x 1.028 = 0.047

    M2 = (7.5 + 0.15 x 16.0) x 10-2 x 0.266 x 1.028 = 0.027

    iii) u = (u 1+ X) = 1.47 m v = 2Y = 2.056 m

    u B = 0.474

    vL = 0.447

    From Pigeaud's curve, we get by interpolation

    m 1 = 12.2 x 10-2

    m 2 = 6.8 x 10 -2

    M1 = (12.2 + 0.15 x 6.8) x 10-2 x 1.028 x 0.735 = 0.0998

    M2 = (6.8 + 0.15 x 12.2) x 10-2 x 1.028 x 0.735 = 0.065

    iv) u = 2X = 0.532 m v = 2(v 1 + Y) = 2.746 mu B = 0.172

    vL = 0.597

    From Pigeaud's curve, we get by interpolation

    m 1 = 14.5 x 10-2

    m 2 = 5.8 x 10-2

    M1 = (14.5 + 0.15 x 5.8) x 10-2 x 0.266 x 1.373 = 0.056

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre

    38/109

    31

    M2 = (5.8 + 0.15 x 14.5) x 10-2 x 0.266 x 1.373 = 0.029

    Final M 1 = (0.119 + 0.047 - 0.0998 - 0.056) = 0.0102

    Final M 2 = (0.069 + 0.027 - 0.065 - 0.029) = 0.002

    (MB)W4 =.0102 x 2 x 62.5

    .469 x .345 = 7.87 KN-m

    (ML)W4 =.002 x 2 x 62.5

    .469 x .345 = 1.55 KN-m

    Final moment applying effect of continuity and impact

    MB = (4.797 + 12.79 + 0.927 + 7.87) x 1.25 x 0.8 = 26.38 KN-m

    ML= (2.88 + 12.52 + 0.278 + 1.55) x 1.25 x 0.8 = 17.23 KN-m

    Case3: four wheel loads of the first axle are so placed that the middle 62.5KNwheel load is placed centrally, with the four wheel loads of second axle followingit as shown in figure 2.8.

    u1 = = 0.469 mv1 = = 0.345 m(A) For LoadW 1 of Axle I

    X = 0.366 m

    i) u = 2(u 1+ X) = 1.67 m v = v 1 = 0.345 m

    u B = 0.538

    vL = 0.075

    From Pigeaud's curve, we get by interpolation

    m 1 = 12.8 x 10-2

    m 2 = 13.8 x 10-2

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre

    39/109

    32

    M1 = (12.8 + 0.15 x 13.8) x 10-2 x 0.835 = 0.124 KN-m

    M2 = (13.8 + 0.15 x 12.8) x 10-2 x 0.835 = 0.131 KN-m

    Figure 2.8: Disposition of Class AA Wheeled Vehicle as Case 3 for MaximumMoment

    ii) u = 2X = 0.732 m v = v 1= 0.345 m

    u B = 0.236

    vL = 0.075

    From Pigeaud's curve, we get by interpolation

    m 1 = 19 x 10-2

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre

    40/109

    33

    m 2 = 17.5 x 10-2

    M1 = (19.0 + 0.15 x 17.5) x 10-2 x 0.366 = 0.07915 KN-m

    M2 = (17.5 + 0.15 x 19.0) x 10-2 x 0.366 = 0.0744 KN-m

    Final M 1 = (0.124 - 0.07915) = 0.044

    Final M 2 = (0.131 - 0.0744) = 0.0556

    (MB) w1 =.044 x 37.5

    .469 = 3.518 KN-m

    (ML) w2 =.0556 x 37.5

    .469 =4.53 KN-m

    (B) For Load W 2 of Axle Iu B = 0.151m

    vL = 0.075m

    From Pigeaud's curve, we get by interpolation

    m 1 = 24.0 x 10-2

    m2

    = 22.0 x 10 -2

    (MB)W2 = (24.0 + 0.15 x22.0) x 10-2 x 62.5 x 1.25 x 0.8 = 17.06 KN-m

    (ML)W2 = (22.0 + 0.15 x 24.0) x 10-2 x 62.5 x 1.25 x 0.8 = 16.00 KN-m

    (C) For Load W 3 of Axle IX = 0.776 m

    i) u = 2(u 1+ X) = 2.469 m v = v 1= 0.345 m

    u B = 0.794

    vL = 0.075

    From Pigeaud's curve, we get by interpolation

    m 1 = 9.8 x 10-2

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre

    41/109

    34

    m 2 = 10.8 x 10-2

    M1 = (9.8 + 0.15 x 10.8) x 10-2 x 1.2345 = 0.140

    M2 = (10.8 + 0.15 x 9.8) x 10-2 x 1.2345 = 0.151

    ii) u = 2X = 1.594 m v = v 1 = 0.345 m

    u B = 0.492

    vL = 0.075

    From Pigeaud's curve, we get by interpolation

    m 1 = 13.5 x 10-2

    m 2 = 14.0 x 10 -2

    M1 = (13.5 + 0.15 x 14) x 10-2 x 0.766 = 0.119

    M2 = (14.0 + 0.15 x 13.5) x 10-2 x 0.766 = 0.122

    Final M 1 = (0.140 - 0.119) = 0.021

    Final M 2 = (0.151 - 0.122) = 0.029

    (MB)W3 = .021 x 62.5 .469 = 2.79 KN-m

    (ML)W3 =.029 x 62.5

    .469 = 3.864 KN-m

    (D) For Load W 4 of Axle IX = 1.366 m

    i) u = 2(u 1 +X) = 3.670 m v = v 1 = 0.345 m

    u B = 1.183 1

    vL = 0.345

    From Pigeaud's curve, we get by interpolation

    m 1 = 8.0 x 10-2

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre

    42/109

    35

    m 2 = 9.0 x 10-2

    M1 = (8.0 + 0.15 x 9.0) x 10-2 x 1.835 = 0.171 KN-m

    M2 = (9.0 + 0.15 x 8.0) x 10-2 x 1.835 = 0.181 KN-m

    ii) u = 2X = 2.732 m v = v 1 = 0.345 m

    u B = 0.88

    vL = 0.075

    From Pigeaud's curve, we get by interpolation

    m 1 = 9.0 x 10-2

    m 2 = 9.8 x 10 -2

    M1 = (9.0 + 0.15 x 9.8) x 10-2 x 1.366 = 0.143

    M2 = (9.8 + 0.15 x 9.0) x 10-2 x 1.366 = 0.152

    Final M 1 = (0.171 0.143) = 0.028

    Final M 2 = (0.187 0.152) = 0.035

    Since right most wheels of 37.5 KN are extending over the panel so loadcontributed by these wheels will be

    W =37.5 x 0.429 x 0.345

    0.469 x 0.345 =33.5 KN

    (MB)W4 =0.028 x 33.5

    0.469 = 3.33 KN-m

    (ML)W4 =0.035 x 33.5

    0.469 = 4.16 KN-m

    (E) For Load W 1 of Axle IIX = 0.366 m Y = 1.028 m

    i) u = 2(u 1 +X) = 1.67 m v = 2(v 1 + Y) = 2.746 m

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre

    43/109

    36

    u B = 0.54

    vL = 0.6

    From Pigeaud's curve, we get by interpolation

    m 1 = 10.1 x 10 -2

    m 2 = 5.2 x 10-2

    M1 = (10.1 + 0.15 x 5.2) x 10-2 x 0.835 x 1.373 = 0.12

    M2 = (5.2 + 0.15 x 10.1) x 10-2 x 0.835 x 1.373 = 0.076

    ii) u = 2X = 0.732 m v = 2Y = 2.053 m

    u B = 0.236

    vL = 0.45

    From Pigeaud's curve, we get by interpolation

    m 1 = 15.0 x 10-2

    m 2 = 7.4 x 10-2

    M1 = (15.0 + 0.15 x 7.4) x 10-2 x 0.366 x 1.020 = 0.06

    M2 = (7.4 + 0.15 x 15.0) x 10-2 x 0.366 x 1.020 = 0.036

    iii) u = 2(u 1 +X) = 1.670 m v = 2Y = 2.056 m

    u B = 0.54

    vL = 0.45

    From Pigeaud's curve, we get by interpolation

    m 1 = 11.0 x 10-2

    m 2 = 6.5 x 10-2

    M1 = (11.0 + 0.15 x 6.5) x 10-2 x 1.028 x 0.855 = 0.103

    M2 = (6.5 + 0.15 x 11.0) x 10-2 x 1.028 x 0.855 = 0.069

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre

    44/109

    37

    iv) u = 2X = 0.73 m v = 2(v 1 + Y) = 2.746 m

    u B = 0.236

    vL = 0.596

    From Pigeaud's curve, we get by interpolation

    m 1 = 13.2 x 10-2

    m 2 = 5.8 x 10-2

    M1 = (13.2 + 0.15 x 5.8) x 10-2 x 0.366 x 1.373 = 0.070

    M2 = (5.8 + 0.15 x 13.2) x 10-2 x 0.366 x 1.373 = 0.039

    Final M 1 = (0.12 + 0.06 - 0.103 - 0.070) = 0.007

    Final M 2 = (0.076 + 0.036 - 0.069 - 0.039) = 0.004

    (MB)W1 =.007 x 37.5 .469 x .345 = 1.62 KN-m

    (ML)W1 =.002 x 37.5 .469 x .345 = 0.93 KN-m

    (F) For Load W 2 of Axle IIY = 1.020 m

    i) u = 0.469 m v = 2(v 1 + Y) = 2.746m

    u B = 0.151

    vL = 0.596

    From Pigeaud's curve, we get by interpolation

    m 1 = 14 x 10-2

    m 2 = 5.8 x 10-2

    M1 = (14 + 0.15 x 5.8) x 10-2 x 1.373 = 0.204

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre

    45/109

    38

    M2 = (5.8 + 0.15 x 14) x 10-2 x 1.373 = 0.108

    ii) u = 0.469 m v = 2(v 1 + Y) = 2.746 m

    u B = 0.151

    vL = 0.45

    From Pigeaud's curve, we get by interpolation

    m 1 = 16 x 10-2

    m 2 = 7.5 x 10-2

    M1 = (16 + 0.15 x 7.5) x 10-2 x 1.028= 0.18

    M2= (7.5 + 0.15 x 16) x 10 -2 x 1.028 = 0.100

    Design M 1 = (0.204 - 0.018) = 0.186

    Design M 2 = (0.108 0.10) = 0.008

    (MB)W2 =.186 x 62.5

    0.345 = 4.34 KN-m

    (ML)W2 =

    .008 x 62.5

    0.345 = 1.45 KN-m

    (G) For Load W 3 of Axle IIX = 0.766 m Y = 1.020 m

    i) u = 2(u 1 + X) = 2.47 m v = 2(v 1 + Y) = 2.746 m

    u B = 0.79

    vL = 0.596

    From Pigeaud's curve, we get by interpolation

    m 1 = 8.0 x 10-2

    m 2 = 4.4 x 10-2

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre

    46/109

    39

    M1 = (8.0 + 0.15 x 4.4) x 10-2 x 1.373 x 1.235 = 0.147

    M2 = (4.4 + 0.15 x 8.0) x 10-2 x 1.373 x 1.235 = 0.095

    ii) u = 2X = 1.532 m v = 2Y = 2.056 m

    u B = 0.49

    vL = 0.45

    From Pigeaud's curve, we get by interpolation

    m 1 = 11.5 x 10-2

    m 2 = 6.5 x 10-2

    M1 = (11.5 + 0.15 x 6.5) x 10 -2 x 1.028 x 0.766 = 0.098

    M2= (6.5 + 0.15 x 11.5) x 10-2 x 1.028 x 0.766 = 0.065

    iii) u =2(u 1 +X) =2.47 m v = 2Y = 2.056 m

    u B = 0.79

    vL = 0.45

    From Pigeaud's curve, we get by interpolation

    m 1 = 8.8 x 10-2

    m 2 = 5.0 x 10-2

    M1 = (8.8 + 0.15 x 5.0) x 10-2 x 1.028 x 1.235 = 0.0.12

    M2= (5.0 + 0.15 x 8.8) x 10-2 x 1.028 x 1.235 = 0.08

    iv) u = 2X = 1.532 m v = 2(v 1 + Y) = 2.746 m

    u B = 0.49

    vL = 0.596

    From Pigeaud's curve, we get by interpolation

    m 1 = 11.0 x 10-2

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre

    47/109

    40

    m 2 = 5.2 x 10-2

    M1 = (11.0 + 0.15 x 5.2) x 10-2 x 1.373 x 0.766 = 0.123

    M2= (5.2 + 0.15 x 11.0) x 10-2 x 1.373 x 0.766 = 0.070

    Final M 1= (0.147 + 0.098 - 0.121 - 0.123) = 0.001

    Final M 2 = (0.095 + 0.065 - 0.08 - 0.07) = 0.01

    (MB)W3 =.001 x 62.5

    0.469 x 0.345 = 0.380 KN-m

    (ML)W3 =.01 x 62.5

    0.469 x 0.345 = 3.86 KN-m

    (H) For Load W 4 of Axle IIX = 1.366 m Y = 1.028 m

    i) u = 2(u 1 + X) = 3.67 m v = 2(v 1 + Y) = 2.746 m

    u B = 1.18 1

    vL = 0.596

    From Pigeaud's curve, we get by interpolation

    m 1 = 6.6 x 10-2

    m 2 = 3.8 x 10-2

    M1 = (6.6 + 0.15 x 3.8) x 10-2 x 1.366 x 1.835 = 0.181

    M2 = (3.8+ 0.15 x 6.6) x 10-2 x 1.366 x 1.835 = 0.121

    ii) u = 2X = 2.732 m v = 2Y = 2.056 m

    u B = 0.88

    vL = 0.45

    From Pigeaud's curve, we get by interpolation

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre

    48/109

    41

    m 1 = 8.0 x 10-2

    m 2 = 5.0 x 10-2

    m 1 = (8.0 + 0.15 x 5.0) x 10-2 x 1.028 x 1.366 = 0.123

    m 2 = (5.0 + 0.15 x 8.0) x 10-2 x 1.028 x 1.366 = 0.098

    iii) u = 2(u 1 +X) = 3.67 m v = 2Y = 2.056 m

    u B = 1.18 1

    vL = 0.45

    From Pigeaud's curve, we get by interpolation

    m 1 = 7.3 x 10 -2

    m 2 = 4.5 x 10-2

    M1 = (7.3 + 0.15 x 4.5) x 10-2 x 1.028 x 1.835 = 0.15

    M2 = (4.5+ 0.15 x 7.3) x 10-2 x 1.028 x 1.835 = 0.11

    iv) u = 2X = 2.732 m v = 2(v 1 + Y) = 2.746 m

    u B = 0.88 vL = 0.596

    From Pigeaud's curve, we get by interpolation

    m 1 = 7.4 x 10-2

    m 2 = 4.0 x 10-2

    M1 = (7.4 + 0.15 x 4.0) x 10-2 x 1.373 x 1.366 = 0.15

    M2 = (4.0 + 0.15 x 7.4) x 10-2 x 1.373 x 1.373 = 0.096

    Final M 1= (0.181 + 0.123 - 0.15 - 0.15) = 0.004

    Final M 2 = (0.121 + 0.087 - 0.11 - 0.096) = 0.002

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre

    49/109

    42

    (MB)W4 =.004 x 33.5

    0.469 x 0.345 = 1.38 KN-m

    (ML)W4 =.002 x 33.5

    0.469 x 0.345 = 0.69 KN-m

    Final Moments applying effect of continuity and impact

    MB = (3.518 + 17.06 + 2.79 + 3.3 + 1.62 + 4.34 +0.386 + 1.38) x 1.25 x0.08

    = 34.39 KN-m

    ML = (4.53 + 16.6 + 3.864 + 4.16 + 0.93 + 1.45 + 3.86 + 0.69) x 1.25 x0.08

    = 35.48 KN-m

    2.5.3 Live Load BM due to IRC Class A LoadingFigure 2.9 shows the placement of loading for maximum B.M. in which wheel ofaxle 1 is placed centrally with wheel of axle 2 behind it, each of 57 KN.

    u = = 0.65 mv = = 0.43 m(A) For Load W 1 of Axle I

    u = 0.65 m v = 0.43 m

    u B = 0.21

    vL = 0.09

    From Pigeaud's curve, we get by interpolation

    m 1 = 20.5 x 10-2

    m 2 = 16 x 10 -2

    (Mw 1)B = (20.5 + 0.15 x 16) x 10-2 x 57.0 = 13.053 KN-m

    (Mw 1)L = (16 + 0.15 x 20.5) x 10-2 x 57.0 = 10.87 KN-m

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre

    50/109

    43

    Figure 2.9: Disposition of Class A Train of Load for Maximum Moment

    (B) For Load W 2 of Axle IIY = 0.985 m

    i) u = u 1 = 0.65 m v = 2(v 1 + Y) = 2.83 m

    u B = 0.21

    vL = 0.09

    From Pigeaud's curve, we get by interpolation

    m 1 = 13.9 x 10-2

    m 2 = 5.8 x 10-2

    M1= (13.9 + 0.15 x 5.8) x 10-2 x 1.415 = 0.209

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre

    51/109

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre

    52/109

    45

    2.6 Design of Inner Panel

    Depth of deck slab = d = cbc = 11.5 MPa st = 230 MPa j = 0.9 Q =1.1

    d = = 187.32 mmDepth provided =225 mm

    d = 225 - 25 - 8 = 192 mm

    Area of steel (along short span) =38.9 x 10 6

    230 x 0.9 x 192 = 1126 mm2

    Provide 16 mm Dia @ 140 mm c/c (1408 mm 2)

    Area of steel (along long span) =35.48 x 10 6

    230 x 0.9 x 192 = 1026 mm2

    Provide 16 mm Dia @ 140 mm c/c (1408 mm 2)

    2.7 Shear Force In Deck Slab

    2.7.1 For Class AA Tracked VehicleShear Force is calculated by effective width method for effective size of panel 2.9m X 4.42 m. For maximum Shear Force, the load will be so placed that its spreadup to bottom reaches the face of the rib as shown in figure 2.10.

    Dispersion in direction of span or between longitudinal girder

    = 0.85 + 2(0.056 + 0.225)

    = 1.412 m

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre

    53/109

    46

    Dispersion along width (b e) = K.x (1-x

    L ) + bw

    B

    L =

    4.42

    2.9 = 1.524

    From the table for effective width method

    K = 2.84

    For Maximum shear, load is kept in such a manner that dispersion lies in span ordispersion length should end at edge.

    Load should be kept at

    1.412

    2 = 0.706 m

    be = 2.84 x 0.706 ( 1-0.706

    2.9 ) + 3.6 + 2 x 0.056 = 5.3 m

    Load per meter width =3505.3 = 66.04 KN

    Figure 2.10: Class AA Tracked loading arrangement for calculation of Shear Force

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre

    54/109

    47

    So shear force at edge =66.04 x ( 2.9 - 0.706)

    2.9 = 49.962 KN

    2.7.2 For Class AA Wheeled VehicleShear Force is calculated by effective width method for effective size of panel 2.9m X 4.42 m. For maximum Shear Force, the loading is to be arranged by trial anderror, keeping in mind the following two points.

    i) Wheel 1 is 1.2 m from kerb.ii) The outer line of third wheel from left should be as near to the face of right

    hand support as possible.

    So there can be two possibilities for placing the loads for Shear Forcecomputation. In first possibility, left most wheel is placed such that its spread upto bottom reaches the face of the rib as shown in figure 2.11. In secondpossibility, third wheel from left is placed as near to the face of right hand supportas possible as shown in figure 2.12.

    Case 1: Left most wheel is placed such that its spread up to bottom reaches theface of the rib as shown in figure 2.11.

    Dispersion in direction of span = 0.30 + 2(0.056 + 0.225) = 0.862 m

    (A) For W 1 Load

    Effective width = b e = K.x (1-x

    L ) + bw

    = 2.84 x 0.431 ( 1 -0.431

    2.9 ) + 0.15 + 2 x 0.056 = 1.304 m

    Average effective width =1.304+ 1.2

    2 = 1.25 m

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre

    55/109

    48

    So, Load per meter width =37.51.25 = 29.95 KN

    Figure 2.11: Class AA Wheeled loading arrangement as Case 1 for Shear Force

    (B) For W 2 Load

    Effective width = b e = K.x (1-x

    L ) + bw

    = 2.84 x 0.1.031 ( 1 -1.031

    2.9 ) + 0.15 + 2 x 0.056 = 2. 149 m

    Average effective width =2.149 + 1.2

    2 = 1.674 m

    So, Load per meter width =62.5

    1.674 = 37.32 KN

    (C) For W 3 Load

    Effective width = b e = K.x (1-x

    L ) + bw

    = 2.84 x 0.869 (1 -0.869

    2.9 ) + 0.15 + 2 x 0.056 = 1.99 m

    Average effective width =1.99 + 1.2

    2 = 1.595 m

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre

    56/109

    49

    So, Load per meter width =62.5

    1.595 = 39.189 KN

    (D) For W 4 Load

    Effective width = b e = K.x (1-x

    L ) + bw

    = 2.84 x 0.269 ( 1 -0.269

    2.9 ) + 0.15 + 2 x 0.056 = 0.955 m

    So, Load per meter width =37.5 x 0.550

    0.862 x 0.955 = 25.056 KN

    So shear force at edge due to all loadings

    =29.95(2.9 - 0.431)

    2.9 +37.32(2.9 - 1.031)

    2.9 +39.189 x 0.869

    2.9 +25.056 x 0.269

    2.9

    = 63.61 KN

    Shear force at other edge = 29.95 + 37.32 + 39.189 + 25.056 - 63.61 = 67.905 KN

    Shear force with impact = 67.905 x 1.25 = 84.88 KN

    Case 2: Third wheel from left is placed as near to the face of right hand support aspossible as shown in figure 2.12.

    Figure 2.12: Disposition of Class AA wheeled vehicle as Case 2 for MaximumShear Force

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre

    57/109

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre

    58/109

    51

    Shear Force due to all loading at edge

    =22.46(2.9 - 1.09)

    2.9 +35.78 x 1.281

    2.9 +49.92 x 0.431

    2.9

    = 14.56 + 15.804 + 7.419 = 37.78 KN

    S.F. at other edge = 49.92 + 35.78 + 22.46 37.78 = 70. 38 KN

    S.F. with impact = 70.38 x 1.25 = 87.915 KN

    So, Shear Force due to Class AA wheeled vehicle = 87.975 KN

    2.7.3 For Class A LoadingShear Force will be maximum when dispersed edge of the load touches the faceof the support as shown in Figure 2.13.

    Dispersion along span = 0.50 + 2 ( 0.056 + 0.225 ) = 1.062 m

    Figure 2.13: Disposition of Class A Train of load for Maximum Shear

    (A) For Load W 1

    Effective width = b e = K.x (1-x

    L ) + bw

    = 2.84 x 0.531 ( 1 -0.531

    2.9 ) + 0.25 + 2 x 0.056 = 1.5939 m

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre

    59/109

    52

    Average effective width =1.539 + 1.2

    2 = 1.3969 m

    So, Load per meter width =57

    1.3969 = 40.80 KN

    (B) For Load W 2

    Effective width = b e = K.x (1-x

    L ) +bw

    = 2.84 x0.569 ( 1 -0.569

    2.9 ) + 0.25 + 2 x 0.056 = 1.66 m

    Average effective width =1.66 + 1.2

    2 = 1.43 m

    So, Load per meter width =57

    1.43 = 39.84 KN

    So Shear Force at edge due to combined loading

    =39.84 x 0.5969

    2.9 +40.80 x 2.369

    2.9 = 7.74 + 3.32 = 41 .069 KN

    Shear force with impact factor = 41.061 x 1.22 = 50.10418 KN

    2.7.4 For Dead LoadDead load of panel = 6.63 KN/ m 2

    So dead load shear force =6.63 x 2.9

    2 = 9.6135 KN

    2.7.5 Summary

    Live Load Shear Force = 87.975 KN (Class AA Wheeled )

    Dead Load Shear Force = 9.6135 KN

    Design Shear Force = 87.975 + 9.6135 = 97.5885 KN

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre

    60/109

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre

    61/109

    54

    3 Cantilever Slab

    3.1 Moment due to Dead Load

    The total maximum moment due to the dead load per meter width of cantileverslab is computed as following table 3.1.

    Figure 3.1: Cantilever Slab with Class A Wheel

    Table 3.1: Computation of Dead Load Bending Moment due to Cantilever Slab

    S.No.

    Components Dead Load (KN/unitm run)

    LeverArm (m)

    BendingMoment (KN-m)

    1 Vehicle Crash Barrier 0.275x 24= 6.6 1.65 10.892 Slab(rectangular) 1.8x0.1x24=4.32 0.9 3.893 Slab (triangular) .25x1.8x.5x24 = 5.4 0.6 3.24

    4 Wearing Coat .056x22x1.3=1.6 0.65 1.04Total 17.92 19.06

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre

    62/109

    55

    3.2 Moment due to Live Load

    Effective width of dispersion b e is computed by equation

    be = 1.2 x +bw

    x = 0.9 m b w = 0.25 + 2 x 0.056 = 0.362 m

    be = 1.2 x 0.9 + 0.362 =1.442 m

    Impact factor =4.5

    6+ Leff

    Leff = 14+ 0.192 =14.192m

    I.F. =4.5

    6+ 14.192 = 2.2

    Live Load per meter width including impact =57x1.22

    1.442 = 48.23 KN

    Maximum Moment = 48.23 x 0.9=43.41 KN-m

    Shear Force = 48.23 KN

    Design Moment (Dead Load B.M. + Live Load B.M.) = 19.06 +43.41= 62.47 KN-m

    Design Shear Force =17.92 + 48.23 =66.15 KN

    3.3 Design of Cantilever Slab

    Using M -35 concrete

    m = 8.11 cbc =11.5 MPa st = 230 MPa

    kc = 0.289 j c = 0.904 R = 1.502

    d = = 203.94 mm

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre

    63/109

    56

    Effective depth provided = 350 - 40 - 8 = 302 mm

    Area of main reinforcement required

    Ast =62.47x10 6

    230 x 0.9 x 302 = 1149.19 mm2

    Spacing of 16 mm bars =100x201.1

    1149.19 = 174.99 mm

    Provide 16mm Dia bars @ 150 c/c, Area of steel provided = 1340.67 mm 2

    Distribution steel provided for

    B.M = 0.3 LL BM + 0.2 DL BM

    = 0.3 x43.41 + 0.2 x19.06 = 16.84 KN-m

    Ast =16.84x10 6

    230 x 0.9 x 302 = 309.79 mm2

    Spacing of 8 mm Dia bar =100x50.3 309.79 = 162.37mm

    Provide 8 mm Dia bars @ 150 c/c, Area of steel provided = 335.33 mm 2

    Shear stress ( v) =66.15x10 3

    1000 x 302 = 0.22 MPa

    P=100 A st

    bd =100x 1340.67

    100 x 302 = 0.44

    c = K1. K2. ca

    ca = 0.23+ 0.31- 0.230.25 x 0.19 = 0.291 MPa

    d = 0.302 m

    K1 = 1.14- (0.7x.302) = 0.929

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre

    64/109

    57

    K2 = 0.5 + 0.25 p= 0.5+ .25x .44 = .61>1

    c = 0.929 x1 .291 = 0.27 MPa

    c.> v safe

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre

    65/109

    58

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre

    66/109

    59

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre

    67/109

    60

    4 Design of Longitudinal Girders

    4.1 Analysis Longitudinal Girder by Courbon's MethodThe reaction factors will be maximum if eccentricity of the C.G. of loads withrespect to the axis of the bridge is maximum.

    According to Courbon's method, reaction factor R i is given by

    Ri=PIi

    Ii ( 1 +

    IiIid i

    2 . e d i)

    P = total live load

    II = moment of inertia of longitudinal girder i

    e = eccentricity of the live load

    d i = distance of girder I from the axis of the bridge

    Effective span = 14.00 m

    Slab thickness = 225 mm

    Width of rib = 300 mm

    Spacing of main girder = 3200 mm

    Overall depth = 1600 mm

    4.1.1 Class AA Tracked Vehicle

    Minimum clearance = 1.2 + 0.85 / 2 = 1.625 m ( up to centre of track)

    e = 2.05 m

    X2 = (3.2) 2 + (0)2 + (3.2) 2 = 2 x (3.2) 2

    For outer girder, X = 3.2 m

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre

    68/109

    61

    Figure 4.1: Class AA Tracked loading arrangement for the calculation of reactionfactors for L-girders

    For inner girder, X = 0

    RA =P

    n ( 1 +n e X X2 ) =

    2W3 ( 1 +

    3 x 2.05 x 3.2 2 x (3.2) 2 ) = 1.308 W

    RB =2P3 ( 1 + 0 ) =

    2P3 =

    2W3 = 0.666 W

    Figure 4.2: Influence Line Diagram for Moment at mid span

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre

    69/109

    62

    Impact factor for class AA loading = 10%

    M = 350 (2.6 + 3.5

    2 ) = 1067 KN-m

    B.M for outer girder = ( 1.1 x 1.308 )x 1067 = 1535 KN- m

    B.M for inner girder = ( 1.1 x 0.666 ) x 1067 = 781.68 KN- m

    4.1.2 Class AA Wheeled Vehicle

    Figure 4.3: Class AA Wheeled loading arrangement for the calculation ofreaction factors for L-girders

    Min clearance = 1.2 + 300 / 2 = 1.2 + 1.5 = 1.35 m

    e = 2.250 m

    X2 = 2 (3.2) 2

    RA =P

    n (1 +neX

    X2 ) =4W3 ( 1 +

    3 x 32.25 x 3.22 (3.2) 2 ) = 2.74 W

    RB =4W3 = 1.33 W

    Impact factor = 25%

    C.G of wheel will be 500 mm from first axle

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre

    70/109

    63

    RA x 14 = 62.5 (6.25 + 7.25)

    RA = 60.27 KN

    Figure 4.4: Computation of Bending Moment for Class AA wheeled Loading

    M = 60.27 x 6.75 = 406.81 KN-m

    B.M for outer girder = 406.81 x 1.25 x 2.74 = 1393.32 KN-m

    B.M for inner girder = 406.81 x 1.25 x 1.33 = 676.3KN-m

    4.1.3 Class A Loading

    Here , P= 4 W n= 3 e = 1.650 m

    Ra =4W3 ( 1 +

    3I2(I x 3.2 2) x 3.2 x 1.650) = 2.36 W

    Rb =4W3 ( 1+ 0 ) = 1.33 W

    Rc = 4w ( 2.36 + 1.33 ) W

    RA + RB = 340.54 KN

    In the longitudinal direction the first six loads of class A train can beaccommodated on the span. The centre of gravity of this load system will befound to be located at a distance of 6.42 m from the first wheel.

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre

    71/109

    64

    Figure 4.5: Class A loading arrangement for calculation of reaction factors forL-girder

    The loads are arranged on the span such that the max. Moment will occur underthe fourth load from the left. The loads shown in figure are corresponding Class Atrain load multiplied by 1.33 (reaction factor at intermediate beam ) and furthermultiplied by impact factor of 1.225. For example:- the first load of 22 KN, if theproduct of first train load of 13.5 KN and the factor 1.33 and 1.225.

    RA + RB = ( 22 x 2 ) + (92.87 9 x 2 ) + ( 55.4 x 2 ) = 340.54 KN

    Figure 4.6: Computation of Bending Moment for Class A LoadingTaking moment about A

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre

    72/109

    65

    RB x 14 = ( 22 x 1.040 ) + ( 22x 2.140 ) + ( 92.87 x 5.34 ) + ( 92.37 x 6.54) + ( 55.4 x10.84 ) + (55.4 x 13.84) = 181.47 KN

    Max. B.M will occur under 4 th load from left

    Max .BM = R B x 7.46 55.4 ( 7.3 + 4.3 ) = ( 181.47 x 7.46 ) 55.4 ( 7.3 + 4.3 )

    = 711.13 KN m ~ 712 KN- m

    B.M due to D.L. = 915 KN-m

    Rea tio fa tor for e d ea a ordi g to Cour o s ethod = .

    Hence maximum B.M. due to L.L. =712 x 2.36

    1.33 = 1263.4 KN -m

    4.2 Shear Force in L-girders

    4.2.1 Shear Force due to Live LoadShear Force will be maximum due to class AA tracked vehicle. For maximum shearforce at the ends of the girder, the load will be placed between the support andthe first intermediate.

    C.G of load from kerb = 1.2 + 0.4258 = 1.625 m

    P1 =3.075P

    3.2 +1.025P

    3.2 = 1.28 P

    P2 =0.125P

    3.2 +2.175P

    3.2 = 0719 P

    The reaction at the end of each longitudinal girder due to transfer of these loadsat 1.8 m from left support

    RA =2.8674.667 (1.28P) =0.786 P

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre

    73/109

    66

    RD =1.8

    4.667 (1.28/P) =0.494 P

    RB =2.8674.667 (0.719P) = 0.442 P

    RE =1.8

    4.667 (0.719P) = 0.227 P

    The load R D, RE a d R F are tra sferred at the ross girde r should be distributeda ordi g to Cour o s theor

    W = 0.494 p + +0.227 P =0.721P

    If X is the e tre e dista e of C.G fro D, e ha e

    X = / . P . P . = .

    E = 3.2 8.2 = 2.38

    Figure 4.7: Class AA tracked loading for calculation of shear force at supports

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre

    74/109

    67

    These reactions R D and R E act as point loads on the outer and inner longitudinalgirder and their quarter points of total span. Hence reaction at A and B due tothese will be

    RA = 3/ 4 R D = 0.301 P

    RE = 3/ 4R E = 0.180 P

    Hence shear at A = R A +RA = ( 0.381 + 0.786 )P =1.167 P

    Shear at B = R B +RB =90.180 + 0.442)P = 0.622 P

    Taking into account of impact maximum shear force at support of outer girder =1.1 x 1.167 x 350 = 449.3 KN

    Maximum shear force at support of inner girder = 1.1x 0.622 x 350 = 239.47KN

    4.2.2 Dead Load B.M. and Shear Force

    Dead Load from slab for girder Dead Load KN/m

    Vehicle crash barrier 0.275 x 24 =6.6Slab 9.72Wearing coat 1.6Total 17.92

    Total load of deck = 2 x 17.92 + 0.056 x 22 x 6.7 + 0.225 x 24 x 6.7 = 80.27 Kn/m

    It is assumed that dead load is shared equally by all girders.-

    Dead load/girder = 80.27/3 = 26.76 KN/m

    Overall depth of girder = 1600 mm

    Depth of rib = 1600 225 =1375 mm

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre

    75/109

    68

    Width = 0.3 m

    Weight of rib / m = 1 0.3 x 1.375 x 24 = 9.9 KN/m

    Cross girder is assumed to have same rib depth and rib width = 0.25 m

    Weight of cross girder = 0.25 x 1.375 x 24 = 8.28 KN/m

    Reaction on min girder = 8.25 x 3.2 = 26.4 KN

    reaction from deck slab on each girder = 26.76

    Total dead load on girder = 26.76 +9.9 = 36.66 KN/m

    Reaction from deck slab on each girder= 26.76 KN/m

    Total dead load on girder = 26.76 + 9.9 = 36.66 KN/m

    Figure 4.8: Dead Load on L-girder

    RA + RB = (4 x 26.4) + (36.66 x 14) KN

    RA = 309.42 KN

    Mmax = ( 309.42 x 7) ( 26.4 x 2.33 +26.4 x 7 + 36.66 x7 x 7/2)

    = 2165.94 1144.48 = 1021.46 KN-m

    Dead load shear at support = 309.42 KN

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre

    76/109

    69

    4.3 Design Of Section

    Girder Max. D.L. B.M. Max. L.L.B.M. Total B.M. UnitsOuter girder 1021.46 1535.2 2556.66 KN-mInner girder 1021.46 781.68 1803.14 KN-m

    Max. D.L.S.F. Max. L.L.S.F. Total S.F. UnitsOuter girder 309.42 449.3 758.72 KNInner girder 309.42 239.47 548.89 KN

    4.3.1 Design of Outer Longitudinal GirderAssuming depth as = 1360 mm, Since the heavy reinforcement will be provided in

    four layers.

    Ast =2556.6 x 10 6

    200 x 0.9 x1360 = 10443.87 mm2

    Provide 16 bars of 32 mm dia in four rows, A st p = = 12873.14 mm2

    Shear reinforcements are designed to resist the max shear at supports.

    v =v

    bd =758 x 10 3

    300 x 1360 = 1.86 MPa

    100 A sbd =

    12873.14 x 100300x 1360 = 3.16%

    c = 0.62 MPa

    Shear reinforcement for v - c = 1.86 0.62 = 1.24 N/mm2

    Vs =1.24 x 300 x 1360

    1000 = 505.92 KN

    Using 10 mm Dia. 4 legged stirrup.

    505.92 x 10 3 =200 x 4 x 78.5 x1360

    Sv

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre

    77/109

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre

    78/109

    71

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre

    79/109

    72

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre

    80/109

    73

    5 Design Of Cross Girders

    5.1 Analysis of Cross Girder

    5.1.1 Dead LoadCross girders are spaced @ 4.667 m c/c

    Assuming X-section of X-girder same as that of longitudinal girder(1600 mm)except the width, which is 250 mm.

    Self wt. of cross girder = 24000 x 1.4 x .250

    = 9600 N/m = 9.6 KN/m

    Dead wt. of slab and wearing coat = (0.056 x 22) + (0.225 x 24) = 6.632 KN/m 2

    Each X-girder will get the triangular load from each side of the slab as shown infigure 5.1.

    Figure 5.1: Triangular load from each side of slab

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre

    81/109

    74

    Hence, Dead load on each X-girder from the slab

    = 2(0.5 x 3.2 x 1.6) x 6.632 = 33.956 KN

    Assuming this to be uniformly distributed,

    Dead load per meter run of girder = 33.956/3.2 = 10.61 KN/m

    Total w = 9.6 + 10.61 = 20.21 KN/m

    Figure 5.2: Dead Load reaction on each longitudinal girder

    Assuming the cross girder to be rigid,reaction on each longitudinal girder

    = (20.21 x 10 3 x 3.2 x 2)/3 = 43114.67 N = 43.11 KN

    5.1.2 Live Load

    (A) Class AA Tracked LoadingFigure 5.3 and 5.4 shows the position of loading for maximum B.M. in the girderdue to Class AA tracked loading. For maximum load transferred to X-girder, theposition of load in the longitudinal direction is shown in figure 5.3.

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre

    82/109

    75

    Figure 5.3: Position of class AA tracked loading in longitudinal direction

    Figure 5.4: Plan of position of class AA tracked loading in longitudinal direction

    R = = 565009.64 N

    Figure 5.5: Reaction on longitudinal girder due to class AA tracked vehicle

    Assuming X-girder to be rigid,reaction on each longitudinal girder

    = 565009.64/3 = 88336.55 N

    Live load B.M. occurs under wheel load(figure 5.5)

    M = (565009.64 x 2.175)/3 = 409631.99 N-m

    Now taking into account the impact factor

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre

    83/109

    76

    M = 1.25 x 409631.99 = 512039.98 N-m

    Dead load BM from 2.175 m support

    = (43114.67 x 2.175) - (20.21 x10 3 x (2.175) 2)/2

    =45971.44 N-m

    Total B.M. = 45971.44 + (409631.99 x 1.25)

    = 558011.42 N-m

    Live load shear including I.F. = 1.25 x 565009.64/3

    = 235420.68 N

    Dead load shear = 43114.67 N

    Total Force = 235420.68 + 43114.67

    = 278535.35 N

    (B) Live Load due to class AAa wheeled loading

    Position of load for maximum B.M. in girder is shown in figure 5.6 and 5.7

    Figure 5.6: Position of class AA wheeled loading in longitudinal direction

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre

    84/109

    77

    Figure 5.7: Plan of position of class AA wheeled loading in longitudinal direction

    R=(200x1000x4.067)/4.667=174.287 kN

    Assuming X-girder to be rigid, reaction on each longitudinal girder as shown infigure 5.8

    Figure 5.8: Reaction on longitudinal girder due to class AA wheeled loading

    = (174.287x1000)/3 = 58095.67 N

    Max. live load BM, M=58095.67 x 2.7 = 156.85 KN-m

    B.M. with I.F. = 1.25 x 156.85 = 196.0625 KN-m

    Dead load BM from 2.7m support=43114.67x2.7-(20.21x10 3x2.7 2)/2

    =42.744 kN-m

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre

    85/109

    78

    Total B.M. = 196.0625 + 42.744 = 238.8065 KN-m

    Live load shear including I.F. = 1.25 x 58095.67 = 72619.59 N

    Dead load shear = 43114.67 N

    Total load = 72619.59 + 43114.67 = 115734.28 N

    (C) Live Load due to class A loadingPosition of load for maximum B.M. in girder is shown in figure 5.9.

    Figure 5.9: Position of class AA wheeled loading in longitudinal direction

    Assuming X-girder to be rigid, reaction on each longitudinal girder

    = 198687.81/3 NMaximum live load B.M. = 198687.81x2.6/3

    =172.196 kN-m

    Now Moment including I.F. = 1.22 x 172.196 = 210.079 KN-m

    Dead Load B.M. from 2.6 m support

    = 43114.67 x 2.6 - (20.21 x 10 3 x 2.62)/2

    = 43.788 KN-m

    Total B.M. = 210.079 + 43.788 = 253.867 KN-m

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre

    86/109

    79

    Figure 5.10: Reaction on longitudinal girder due to class A loading

    Live load shear including I.F. = 1.21 x 198687.81/3

    =80799.71 N

    Dead Load shear=43114.67 N

    Total Shear Force = 80799.71+43114.67

    =123.914 kN

    5.2 Design of Section

    Total depth = 1.6 m

    Effective depth = 1.540 m

    Ast = (558011.42x103)/(180x.9x1540) = 2236.7 mm 2

    Provide 5 bars of 25mm dia.

    Area provided=2454.37mm2

    Shear stress = (278535.35)/(250x.9x1540) = 0.8 N/mm 2

    p=(100xAs)/bd = (100x2454.37)/(250x1540) = 0.6374

    c=0.34 N/mm2

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre

    87/109

    80

    Net shear = V - cbd =278535.35-(.34 x 250 x 1540)

    =147635.35 N

    Provide 2-legged 8mm stirrups

    S=(180x2x4/4x8 2x1540)/147635.35 = 188.75 mm

    Thus, provide 2-L, 8mm stirrups @160mm c/c.

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre

    88/109

    81

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre

    89/109

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre

    90/109

    83

    Wind force = 0.91 144.2 = 131.222 KN

    Wind load per bearing =131.222

    6 = 21.87 KN

    Total longitudinal force per bearing = 1.67 + 37.936 + 21.87 = 72 KN

    Rotation at bearing = 0.0025 radian

    Effective span = 14.192 m

    Maximum vertical load on bearing = N ma = 310 + 450 = 760 KN

    Minimum vertical load on bearing = N min = 310 KN

    Try plan dimensions 250 500 mm and thickness 40 mm

    Loaded area A 2 = 11.6 104 mm 2

    From clause 307.1 of IRC 21

    Allowable contact pressure = 0.25 f c = 0.25 MPaA1 / A2 >2

    Allowable contact pressure = 0.25 35 2 = 12.37 MPa

    Effective area of bearing pressure =760 X 1000

    12.37 = 61.438 103 mm 2

    m =760 x 100011.6 x 10 4 = 6.55 MPa

    Thickness of individual elastomer h i = 10 mm

    Thickness of outer layer h e = 5 mm

    Thickness o steel laminates h s = 3 mm

    Adapt 2 internal layers and 3 laminates

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre

    91/109

    84

    Overall thickness of bearing = 40 mm

    Total thickness of elastomer in bearing = 40 (33) = 31 mm

    Side cover = 6 mm

    Shear modulus assumed = 1.0 N/mm 2

    Shear strain due to creep, shrinkage and temperature is assumed as 5 10 -4 andthis is distributed to 2 bearings.

    Shear strain per bearing due to creep, shrinkage and temperature

    =5x10 -4 x 14.192 x 10 3

    2 x 31 = 0.114

    Shear strain due to longitudinal force =72 x10 3

    11.6x10 4 = 0.58

    Shear strain due to translation = 0.114 + 0.058 = 0.694

    (D) Rotation

    bi max =0.56 mh i

    bS2

    S =(a-2c)(b-2c)

    2 x(a+b-4c)h i

    Here a = 500mm, b = 250mm , c = 6mm , h i = 10 mm

    S =11.6 x10 4

    2 x ( 238 +488) x 10 = 7.99 > 6

    bi max =0.5 x 10 x 10239 x 7.99 2 = 0.0033 radian

    = m/10 = 6.55/10 = 0.655

    Permissible rotation = n x bi max = 0.655 x 2 x 0.0033

    = 4.323 x10 -3 radian > 2.5 x10 -3 radian

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre

    92/109

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre

    93/109

    86

    6.2.1 Longitudinal forces

    (A) Braking Effect

    For two lane bridge, braking effect is computed as 20% of the first train load +plus 10 % of the loads in succeeding trains.

    20 % of first train load =20

    100 (54 + 228) = 56.4 KN

    10 % of the loads in succeeding trains. = 136 x10

    100 = 13.6 KN

    Total = 70 KN

    Longitudinal force /bearing = 70/6 = 11.67 KN

    (B) Friction Force( D.L + LL reaction at bearing ) coeff. Of friction = (309.42 + 240) 0.3

    = 164.83 KN

    Friction Per bearing =164.83

    6 = 27.47 KN

    (C) Wind LoadAssuming 10 m height

    Wind pressure = 0.91 KN/m 2

    Plan area of bridge span = 14 10.3 = 144.2 m 2

    Wind force = 0.91 144.2 = 131.222 KN

    Wind load per bearing =131.222

    6 = 21.87 KN

    Total longitudinal force per bearing = 11.67 + 27.47 + 21.87 = 61 KN

    Rotation at bearing = 0.0025 radian

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre

    94/109

    87

    Effective span = 14.192 m

    Maximum vertical load on bearing = N ma = 310 +240 = 550 KN

    Minimum vertical load on bearing = N min = 240 KN

    Try plan dimensions 320 500 mm and thickness 45 mm

    Loaded area A 2 = 15 104 mm 2

    From clause 307.1 of IRC: 21

    Allowable contact pressure = 0.25 f c = 0.25 MPa

    A1 / A2 >2Allowable contact pressure = 0.25 35 2 = 12.37 MPa

    Effective area of bearing pressure =550 x 1000

    12.37 = 44.462 103 mm 2

    m =500 x10 3

    15 x10 4 = 3.67 MPa

    Thickness of individual elastomer h i = 10 mm

    Thickness of outer layer h e = 5 mm

    Thickness o steel laminates h s = 3 mm

    Adapt 2 internal layers and 3 laminates

    Overall thickness of bearing = 39 mm

    Total thickness of elastomer in bearing = 39 (33) = 30 mmSide cover = 6 mm

    Shear modulus assumed = 1.0 N/mm 2

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre

    95/109

    88

    Shear strain due to creep, shrinkage and temperature is assumed as 5 10 -4 andthis is distributed to 2 bearings.

    Shear strain per bearing due to creep, shrinkage and temperature

    =5 x10 -414.192 x10 3

    2x30 = 0.12

    Shear strain due to longitudinal force =61 x10 3

    15 x10 4= 0.407

    Shear strain due to translation = 0.12 + 0.407 = 0.527 < 0.7

    (D) Rotation

    bi max = 0.56mh i

    bS2

    S =(a-2c)(b-2c)

    2 x(a+b-4c)h i

    Here a = 500mm, b = 320mm , c = 6 mm , h i = 10 mm

    Therefore, S =488 x 308

    2 x 10 x (796) = 12> 9.44 > 6

    Assuming m,max = 10MPa

    bi max =0.5 x 10x 10308 x 9.44 2 = 0.0031 radian

    = m/10 = 3.67/10 = 0.367

    Permissible rotation = n x bi max = 0.367 x 2 x 0.0031

    = 2.27 x10 -3 > 2.5 x10 -3 actual shear strain = 0.527 as calculated

    0.2 + 0.1 m= 0.2 + 0.1 x 3.67 = 0.567 > 0.527

    Also m satisfies 10 MPa > m > 2 MPa

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre

    96/109

    89

    6.2.2 Shear StressShear stress due to compression = 1.5 m / S = 1.5 x 3.67/ 9.44 = 0.58 MPa

    Shear stress due to horizontal deformation = 0.527 x 1 =0.527 MPa

    Shear stress due to rotation = 0.5 ( b/ h i )2 bi = 0.5 (

    30810 )

    2 X 0.0025 = 1.18 MPa

    Total shear stress = 0.58 + 0.527 + 1.18 = 2.287 MPa < 5 MPa

    The elastomeric pad bearing has the characteristics;

    Plan dimensions = 320mm x 500 mm

    Overall thickness = 39 mm

    Thickness of individual layer = 10 mm

    Number of internal elastomer layers = 2

    Number of laminates = 3

    Thickness of each laminate = 3 mm

    Thickness or top or bottom cover = 5 mm

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre

    97/109

    90

    7 Conclusion

    7.1 Deck Slab

    Overall Depth = 225 mm

    Reinforcement 16 mm Dia @140 mm c/c (1408 mm 2) along shorter span.

    Reinforcement 16 mm Dia @140 mm c/c (1408 mm 2) along longer span.

    7.2 Cantilever Slab

    Depth at support = 350 mm

    Depth at cantilever side = 100 mm

    Main Steel Provide 16mm Dia bars @150 c/c (A st = 1340.67 mm2)

    Distribution Steel Provide 8 mm Dia bars @150 c/c (A st = 335.33 mm2)

    7.3 Longitudinal Girders

    Width of rib = 300 mm

    Spacing of main girder = 3200 mm

    Overall Depth = 1600 mm

    Outer Longitudinal Girder

    Main reinforcement of 16 bars of 32 mm Dia in 4 rows(A st = 12873.14 mm2)

    Shear reinforcement of 10 mm Dia 4 legged stirrups @150 c/c

    Inner Longitudinal Girder

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre

    98/109

    91

    Main reinforcement of 12 bars of 32 mm Dia in 3 rows(A st = 12873.14 mm2)

    Shear reinforcement of 10 mm Dia 4 legged stirrups @200 c/c

    7.4 Cross Girders

    Width of rib = 250 mm

    Spacing of main girder = 4667 mm

    Overall depth = 1600 mm

    Main reinforcement of 5 bars of 25 mm Dia (A st = 12873.14 mm2)

    Shear reinforcement of 8 mm Dia 2 legged stirrups @160 c/c

    7.5 Bearings

    7.5.1 Outer Bearings

    Plan dimensions = 250 mm x 500 mm

    Overall thickness = 40 mm

    Thickness of individual layer = 10 mm

    Number of internal elastomer layers = 2

    Number of laminates = 3

    Thickness of each laminate = 3 mm

    Thickness or top or bottom cover = 5 mm

    7.5.2 Inner Bearings

    Plan dimensions = 320 mm x 500 mm

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre

    99/109

    92

    Overall thickness = 39 mm

    Thickness of individual layer = 10 mm

    Number of internal elastomer layers = 2

    Number of laminates = 3

    Thickness of each laminate = 3 mm

    Thickness or top or bottom cover = 5 mm

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre

    100/109

    93

    References

    1. IRC : 5 - 1998, "Standard Specifications and Code of Practice for Road Bridges,Section I General Features of Design", The Indian Road Congress.

    2. IRC : 6 - 2000, "Standard Specifications and Code of Practice for Road Bridges,Section II - Loads and Stresses", The Indian Road Congress.

    3. IS : 456 - 2000, "Plain and Reinforcement Concrete - Code of Practice", Bureauof Indian Standards, New Delhi, 2000.

    4. Krishna Raju, N., "Design of Bridges".

    5. Victor, D.J., "Essential of Bridge Engineering".

    6. Punmia, B.C. and Jain, A.K., "R.C.C. Designs".

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre

    101/109

    94

    Appendix-A : IRC Loadings

    IRC Class AA Loading

    General:1. The nose to tail spacing between two successive vehicles shall not less than

    90m.2. For multi- lane bridges and culverts, one train of class AA tracked or

    wheeled vehicles whichever creates severer conditions shall be consideredfor every two traffic lane width.

    3. No other live load shall be considered on any part of the two-lane width

    carriageway of the bridge when the above mentioned train of vehicle iscrossing the bridge.

    4. The maximum loads for the wheeled vehicles shall be 20 tonnes for a singleaxle or 40 tonnes for a bogie of two axles spaced not more than 1.2mcenters.

    5. The maximum clearance between the road face of the kerb and the outeredge of the wheel or tack , C , shall be as under :

    (a) Single lane Bridges

    Carriage way width Minimum value of C

    3.8 m and above 0.3 m

    (b) Multi lane Bridges

    Less than 5.5 m 0.6 m

    5.5 m or above 1.2 m

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre

    102/109

    95

    Figure A.1: IRC Class A Tracked and Wheeled Vehicle

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre

    103/109

    96

    IRC Class A Loading

    General:1. The nose to tail distance between successive trains shall not be less than

    18.4 m.2. No other live load shall cover any part of the carriage way when a train of

    vehicles (or trains of vehicles in multi- Lane Bridge) is crossing the bridge.3. The ground contact area of the wheel shall be as under :

    Axle load (tones)Ground contact area

    (B) (mm) (W) (mm)

    11.4 250 500

    6.8 200 380

    2.7 150 200

    4. The minimum clearance f , between outer edge of the wheel and the

    roadway face of the kerb , and the minimum clearance g , between theouter edges of passing or crossing vehicles on multi-lane bridges shall be asgiven below (figure A.2)

    Clear carriageway width g f

    5.5 m to 7.5 m

    Above 7.5 m

    Uniformly increasing from0.4 m to 1.2 m1.2 m

    150 mm for all carriagewayvehicles

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre

    104/109

    97

    Figure A.2: IRC Class A and B Loading Vehicles

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre

    105/109

    98

    Appendix-B: Impact Factors

    Provision for impact or dynamic action shall be made by an increment oflive load by an impact allowance expressed as a fraction or a percentage ofapplied live load.

    Class A or Class B LoadingIn the members of any bridge designed either for class A or class B loading, theimpact percentage shall be determined from the curves indicated in figure B.1

    The impact factor shall be determined from the following equations which areapplicable for spans 3 m and 45 m.

    Impact factor for R.C. bridges, I.F. = 4.5/ (6+L)

    where L is the length of the span in meters.

    Class AA LoadingThe value of the impact percentage shall be taken as follows:

    For spans less than 9 mFor tracked vehicles: 25% for spans up to 5 m, linearly reducing to 10% for spans9 m.

    For wheeled vehicles: 25%.

    For span of 9 m or moreTracked vehicles: 10% up to a span of 40 m and in accordance with the curve for

    spans in excess of 40 m.Wheeled vehicles: 25% for spans up to 12 m and in accordance with the curve forspans in excess of 23 m.

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre

    106/109

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre

    107/109

    100

    Appendix-C: K in Effective Width

    Table C.1: Value of Constant 'K' (IRC 21: 2000)

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre

    108/109

    101

    Appendix-D: Pigeaud's Curve

    Figure D.1: Moment Coefficient for Slabs Completely Loaded with UniformlyDistributed Load, Coefficients are m 1 for K and m 2 for 1/K

    Figure D.2: Moment Coefficient m 1 and m 2 for K=0.6

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre

    109/109

    Figure D.2: Moment Coefficient m 1 and m 2 for K=0.7