8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre
1/109
DESIGN OF T-BEAM RAIL-OVERBRIDGE
SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENTOF THE REQUIREMENTS FORBACHELOR OF TECHNOLOGY
IN
CIVIL ENGINEERING
BYVASAV DUBEY (109526) MADHURESH SHRIVASTAV(109833)
LOKESH KUMAR (109822) AMAN AGARWAL (109814)
SHOBHIT DEORI (109281) KULDEEP MEENA(109821)
PRADEEP KUMAR (109695) ANIMESH AGARWAL(109788)
MANJEET GOYAT(109597)
BATCH OF 2009-2013
UNDER THE GUIDANCE OFDR. H. K. SHARMA
NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
KURUKSHETRA MAY 2013
8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre
2/109
8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre
3/109
4 Design of Longitudinal Girders 60
4.1 Analysis Longitudinal Girder by Courbon's Method 60
4.2 Shear Force in L-girders 65
4.3 Design Of Section 69
5 Design Of Cross Girders 73
5.1 Analysis of Cross Girder 73
5.2 Design of Section 79
6 Design of Bearings 82
6.1 Design Of Outer Bearings 82
6.2 Design Of Inner Bearings 85 7 Conclusion 90
7.1 Deck Slab 90
7.2 Cantilever Slab 90
7.3 Longitudinal Girders 90
7.4 Cross Girders 91
7.5 Bearings 91
References 93
Appendix-A : IRC Loadings 94
Appendix-B: Impact Factors 98
Appendix-C: K in Effective Width 100
Appendix-D: Pigeaud's Curve 101
8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre
4/109
i
Acknowledgement
We wish to record our deep sense of gratitude to Dr. H.K. Sharma, Professor,Department of Civil Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Kurukshetra forhis able guidance and immense help and also the valuable technical discussionsthroughout the period which really helped us in completing this project andenriching our technical knowledge.
We also acknowledge our gratefulness to Dr. D.K. Soni, Head of Department,Department of Civil Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Kurukshetra fortimely help and untiring encouragement during the preparation of this
dissertation.
8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre
5/109
ii
List of Figures
Figure 1.1: Cutaway view of a typical concrete beam bridge.
Figure 2.1: Plan of Bridge Deck
Figure 2.2: Section X-X of Bridge Deck Plan
Figure 2.3: Section Y-Y of Bridge Deck Plan
Figure 2.4: Class AA Track located for Maximum Moment on Deck Slab
Figure 2.5: Both Class AA Track located for Maximum Moment on Deck Slab
Figure 2.6: Disposition of Class AA Wheeled Vehicle as Case 1 for MaximumMoment
Figure 2.7: Disposition of Class AA Wheeled Vehicle as Case 2 for MaximumMoment
Figure 2.8: Disposition of Class AA Wheeled Vehicle as Case 3 for MaximumMoment
Figure 2.9: Disposition of Class A Train of Load for Maximum Moment
Figure 2.10: Class AA Tracked loading arrangement for calculation of Shear Force
Figure 2.11: Class AA Wheeled loading arrangement as Case 1 for Shear Force
Figure 2.12: Disposition of Class AA wheeled vehicle as Case 2 for Shear Force
Figure 2.13: Disposition of Class A Train of load for Maximum Shear
Figure 3.1: Cantilever Slab with Class A WheelFigure 3.2: Reinforcement Details in Cross Section of Deck Slab
Figure 3.3: Reinforcement Details in Longitudinal Section of Deck Slab
8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre
6/109
iii
Figure 4.1: Class AA Tracked loading arrangement for the calculation of reactionfactors for L-girders
Figure 4.2: Influence Line Diagram for Moment at mid span
Figure 4.3: Class AA Wheeled loading arrangement for the calculation ofreaction factors for L-girders
Figure 4.4: Computation of Bending Moment for Class AA wheeled Loading
Figure 4.5: Class A loading arrangement for reaction factors for L-girder
Figure 4.6: Computation of Bending Moment for Class A Loading
Figure 4.7: Class AA tracked loading for calculation of shear force at supports
Figure 4.8: Dead Load on L-girder
Figure 4.9: Reinforcement Details of Outer Longitudinal Girder
Figure 4.10: Reinforcement Details of Inner Longitudinal Girder
Figure 5.1: Triangular load from each side of slab
Figure 5.2: Dead Load reaction on each longitudinal girder
Figure 5.3: Position of class AA tracked loading in longitudinal direction
Figure 5.4: Plan of position of class AA tracked loading in longitudinal direction
Figure 5.5: Reaction on longitudinal girder due to class AA tracked vehicle
Figure 5.6: Position of class AA wheeled loading in longitudinal direction
Figure 5.7: Plan of position of class AA wheeled loading in longitudinal direction
Figure 5.8: Reaction on longitudinal girder due to class AA wheeled loading
Figure 5.9: Position of class AA wheeled loading in longitudinal direction
Figure 5.10: Reaction on longitudinal girder due to class A loading
8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre
7/109
iv
FIgure 5.11: Reinforcement Details of Cross Girder
8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre
8/109
1
1 Introduction
1.1 General
A bridge is a structure that crosses over a river, bay, or other obstruction,permitting the smooth and safe passage of vehicles, trains, and pedestrians. Anelevation view of a typical bridge is A bridge structure is divided into an upperpart (the superstructure), which consists of the slab, the floor system, and themain truss or girders, and a lower part (the substructure), which are columns,piers, towers, footings, piles, and abutments. The superstructure provideshorizontal spans such as deck and girders and carries traffic loads directly. Thesubstructure supports the horizontal spans, elevating above the ground surface.
1.2 Classification of Bridges
1.2.1 Classification by Materials
Steel Bridges steel bridge may use a wide variety of structural steel componentsand systems: girders, frames, trusses, arches, and suspension cables.
Concrete Bridges: There are two primary types of concrete bridges: reinforcedand pre-stressed.
Timber Bridges: Wooden bridges are used when the span is relatively short.
Metal Alloy Bridges : Metal alloys such as aluminum alloy and stainless steel arealso used in bridge construction.
Composite Bridges: Bridges using both steel and concrete as structural materials.
1.2.2 Classification by Objectives
Highway Bridges: Bridges on highways.
8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre
9/109
2
Railway Bridges: Bridges on railroads.
Combined Bridges: Bridges carrying vehicles and trains.
Pedestrian Bridges : Bridges carrying pedestrian traffic.
Aqueduct Bridges: Bridges supporting pipes with channeled water flow. Bridgescan alternatively be classified into movable (for ships to pass the river) or fixedand permanent or temporary categories.
1.2.3 Classification by Structural System (Superstructures)
Plate Girder Bridges: The main girders consist of a plate assemblage of upper andlower flanges and a web. H or I-cross-sections effectively resist bending andshear.
Box Girder Bridges: The single (or multiple) main girder consists of a box beamfabricated from steel plates or formed from concrete, which resists not onlybending and shear but also torsion effectively.
T-Beam Bridges: A number of reinforced concrete T-beams are placed side byside to support the live load.
Composite Girder Bridges: The concrete deck slab works in conjunction with thesteel girders to support loads as a united beam. The steel girder takes mainlytension, while the concrete slab takes the compression component of the bendingmoment.
Grillage Girder Bridges: The main girders are connected transversely by floorbeams to form a grid pattern which shares the loads with the main girders.
Truss Bridges: Truss bar members are theoretically considered to be connectedwith pins at their ends to form triangles. Each member resists an axial force,either in compression or tension.
8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre
10/109
3
Arch Bridges: The arch is a structure that resists load mainly in axial compression.In ancient times stone was the most common material used to constructmagnificent arch bridges.
Cable-Stayed Bridges : The girders are supported by highly strengthened cables(often composed of tightly bound steel strands) which stem directly from thetower. These are most suited to bridge long distances.
Suspension Bridges: The girders are suspended by hangers tied to the main cableswhich hang from the towers. The load is transmitted mainly by tension in cable
1.2.4 Classification by Design Life
Permanent Bridges
Temporary Bridges
1.2.5 Classification by Span Length
Culverts: Bridges having length less than 8 m.
Minor Bridges: Bridges having length 8-30 m.
Major bridges: Bridges having length greater than 30 m.
Long span bridges: Bridges having length greater than 120 m.
1.3 T-Beam Bridges
Beam and slab bridges are probably the most common form of concrete bridge inthe UK today, thanks to the success of standard precast prestressed concretebeams developed originally by the Prestressed Concrete Development Group(Cement & Concrete Association) supplemented later by alternative designs by
8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre
11/109
4
others, culminating in the Y-beam introduced by the Prestressed ConcreteAssociation in the late 1980s.
They have the virtue of simplicity, economy, wide availability of the standardsections, and speed of erection.
The precast beams are placed on the supporting piers or abutments, usually onrubber bearings which are maintenance free. An in-situ reinforced concrete deckslab is then cast on permanent shuttering which spans between the beams.
The precast beams can be joined together at the supports to form continuousbeams which are structurally more efficient. However, this is not normally donebecause the costs involved are not justified by the increased efficiency.
Simply supported concrete beams and slab bridges are now giving way to integralbridges which offer the advantages of less cost and lower maintenance due to theelimination of expansion joints and bearings.
1.4 Background
Nearly 590,000 roadway bridges span waterways, dry land depressions, otherroads, and railroads throughout the United States. The most dramatic bridges usecomplex systems like arches, cables, or triangle-filled trusses to carry the roadwaybetween majestic columns or towers. However, the work-horse of the highwaybridge system is the relatively simple and inexpensive concrete beam bridge.
Also known as a girder bridge, a beam bridge consists of a horizontal slabsupported at each end. Because all of the weight of the slab (and any objects onthe slab) is transferred vertically to the support columns, the columns can be lessmassive than supports for arch or suspension bridges, which transfer part of theweight horizontally.
A simple beam bridge is generally used to span a distance of 250 ft (76.2 m) or
less. Longer distances can be spanned by connecting a series of simple beambridges into what is known as a continuous span. In fact, the world's longestbridge, the Lake Pontchartrain Causeway in Louisiana, is a pair of parallel, two-lane continuous span bridges almost 24 mi (38.4 km) long. The first of the twobridges was completed in 1956 and consists of more than 2,000 individual spans.The sister bridge (now carrying the north-bound traffic) was completed 13 yearslater; although it is 228 ft longer than the first bridge, it contains only 1,500 spans.
8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre
12/109
5
A bridge has three main elements. First, the substructure (foundation) transfersthe loaded weight of the bridge to the ground; it consists of components such ascolumns (also called piers) and abutments. An abutment is the connectionbetween the end of the bridge and the earth; it provides support for the end
sections of the bridge. Second, the superstructure of the bridge is the horizontalplatform that spans the space between columns. Finally, the deck of the bridge isthe traffic-carrying surface added to the superstructure.
1.5 History
Prehistoric man began building bridges by imitating nature. Finding it useful towalk on a tree that had fallen across a stream, he started to place tree trunks orstone slabs where he wanted to cross streams. When he wanted to bridge a widerstream, he figured out how to pile stones in the water and lay beams of wood orstone between these columns and the bank.
The first bridge to be documented was described by Herodotus in 484 B.C. Itconsisted of timbers supported by stone columns, and it had been built across theEuphrates River some 300 years earlier.
Most famous for their arch bridges of stone and concrete, the Romans also built
beam bridges. In fact, the earliest known Roman bridge, constructed across theTiber River in 620 B.C. , was called the Pons Sublicius because it was made ofwooden beams (sublicae). Roman bridge building techniques included the use ofcofferdams while constructing columns. They did this by driving a circulararrangement of wooden poles into the ground around the intended columnlocation. After lining the wooden ring with clay to make it watertight, theypumped the water out of the enclosure. This allowed them to pour the concretefor the column base.
Bridge building began the transition from art to science in 1717 when Frenchengineer Hubert Gautier wrote a treatise on bridge building. In 1847, an Americannamed Squire Whipple wrote A Work on Bridge Building, which contained the firstanalytical methods for calculating the stresses and strains in a bridge. "Consultingbridge engineering" was established as a specialty within civil engineering in the1880s.
8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre
13/109
6
Further advances in beam bridge construction would come primarily fromimprovements in building materials.
1.6 Construction Materials and Their Development
Most highway beam bridges are built of concrete and steel. The Romans usedconcrete made of lime and pozzalana (a red, volcanic powder) in their bridges.This material set quickly, even under water, and it was strong and waterproof.During the Middle Ages in Europe, lime mortar was used instead, but it was watersoluble. Today's popular Portland cement, a particular mixture of limestone andclay, was invented in 1824 by an English bricklayer named Joseph Aspdin, but itwas not widely used as a foundation material until the early 1900s.
Concrete has good strength to withstand compression (pressing force), but is notas strong under tension (pulling force). There were several attempts in Europeand the United States during the nineteenth century to strengthen concrete byembedding tension-resisting iron in it. A superior version was developed in Franceduring the 1880s by Francois Hennebique, who used reinforcing bars made ofsteel. The first significant use of reinforced concrete in a bridge in the UnitedStates was in the Alvord Lake Bridge in San Francisco's Golden Gate Park;completed in 1889 and still in use today, it was built with reinforcing bars oftwisted steel devised by designer Ernest L. Ransome.
The next significant advance in concrete construction was the development ofprestressing. A concrete beam is prestressed by pulling on steel rods runningthrough the beam and then anchoring the ends of the rods to the ends of thebeam. This exerts a compressive force on the concrete, offsetting tensile forcesthat are exerted on the beam when a load is placed on it. (A weight pressingdown on a horizontal beam tends to bend the beam downward in the middle,creating compressive forces along the top of the beam and tensile forces alongthe bottom of the beam.)
Prestressing can be applied to a concrete beam that is precast at a factory,brought to the construction site, and lifted into place by a crane; or it can beapplied to cast-in-place concrete that is poured in the beam's final location.Tension can be applied to the steel wires or rods before the concrete is poured(pretensioning), or the concrete can be poured around tubes containing
8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre
14/109
7
untensioned steel to which tension is applied after the concrete has hardened(postensioning).
1.7 Design
Each bridge must be designed individually before it is built. The designer musttake into account a number of factors, including the local topography, watercurrents, river ice formation possibilities, wind patterns, earthquake potential, soilconditions, projected traffic volumes, esthetics, and cost limitations.
Figure 1.1: Cutaway view of a typical concrete beam bridge.
In addition, the bridge must be designed to be structurally sound. This involvesanalyzing the forces that will act on each component of the completed bridge.
Three types of loads contribute to these forces. Dead load refers to the weight ofthe bridge itself. Live load refers to the weight of the traffic the bridge will carry.Environmental load refers to other external forces such as wind, possibleearthquake action, and potential traffic collisions with bridge supports. Theanalysis is carried out for the static (stationary) forces of the dead load and thedynamic (moving) forces of the live and environmental loads.
8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre
15/109
8
Since the late 1960s, the value of redundancy in design has been widely accepted.This means that a bridge is designed so the failure of any one member will notcause an immediate collapse of the entire structure. This is accomplished bymaking other members strong enough to compensate for a damaged member.
1.8 Construction Procedure
Because each bridge is uniquely designed for a specific site and function, theconstruction process also varies from one bridge to another. The processdescribed below represents the major steps in constructing a fairly typical
reinforced concrete bridge spanning a shallow river, with intermediate concretecolumn supports located in the river.
Example sizes for many of the bridge components are included in the followingdescription as an aid to visualization. Some have been taken from suppliers'brochures or industry standard specifications. Others are details of a freewaybridge that was built across the Rio Grande in Albuquerque, New Mexico, in 1993.The 1,245-ft long, 10-lane wide bridge is supported by 88 columns. It contains11,456 cubic yards of concrete in the structure and an additional 8,000 cubic
yards in the pavement. It also contains 6.2 million pounds of reinforcing steel.
1.8.1 Substructure
1 A cofferdam is constructed around each column location in the riverbed,and the water is pumped from inside the enclosure. One method of setting
the foundation is to drill shafts through the riverbed, down to bedrock. Asan auger brings soil up from the shaft, a clay slurry is pumped into the holeto replace the soil and keep the shaft from collapsing. When the properdepth is reached (e.g., about 80 ft or 24.4 m), a cylindrical cage ofreinforcing steel (rebar) is lowered into the slurry-filled shaft (e.g., 72 in or2 m in diameter). Concrete is pumped to the bottom of the shaft. As the
8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre
16/109
9
shaft fills with concrete, the slurry is forced out of the top of the shaft,where it is collected and cleaned so it can be reused. The abovegroundportion of each column can either be formed and cast in place, or beprecast and lifted into place and attached to the foundation.
2 Bridge abutments are prepared on the riverbank where the bridge endwill rest. A concrete backwall is formed and poured between the top of thebank and the riverbed; this is a retaining wall for the soil beyond the end ofthe bridge. A ledge (seat) for the bridge end to rest on is formed in the topof the backwall. Wing walls may also be needed, extending outward fromthe back-wall along the riverbank to retain fill dirt for the bridgeapproaches.
1.8.2 Superstructure
4 A crane is used to set steel or prestressed concrete girders betweenconsecutive sets of columns throughout the length of the bridge. Thegirders are bolted to the column caps. For the Albuquerque freeway bridge,each girder is 6 ft (1.8 m) tall and up to 130 ft (40 m) long, weighing asmuch as 54 tons.
5 Steel panels or precast concrete slabs are laid across the girders to form asolid platform, completing the bridge superstructure. One manufactureroffers a 4.5 in (11.43 cm) deep corrugated panel of heavy (7-or 9-gauge)
steel, for example. Another alternative is a stay-in-place steel form for theconcrete deck that will be poured later.
1.8.3 Deck
6 A moisture barrier is placed atop the superstructure platform. Hot-applied polymer-modified asphalt might be used, for example.
7 A grid of reinforcing steel bars is constructed atop the moisture barrier;this grid will subsequently be encased in a concrete slab. The grid is three-dimensional, with a layer of rebar near the bottom of the slab and anothernear the top.
8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre
17/109
10
8 Concrete pavement is poured. A thickness of 8-12 in (20.32-30.5 cm) ofconcrete pavement is appropriate for a highway. If stay-in-place formswere used as the superstructure platform, concrete is poured into them. Ifforms were not used, the concrete can be applied with a slipform paving
machine that spreads, consolidates, and smooths the concrete in onecontinuous operation. In either case, a skid-resistant texture is placed onthe fresh concrete slab by manually or mechanically scoring the surfacewith a brush or rough material like burlap. Lateral joints are providedapproximately every 15 ft (5 m) to discourage cracking of the pavement;these are either added to the forms before pouring concrete or cut after aslipformed slab has hardened. A flexible sealant is used to seal the joint.
1.9 Problem Statement
A reinforced concrete bridge was to be constructed over a railway line. It wasrequired to Design the bridge superstructure and to sketch the layout of plan,elevation and reinforcement details of various components for the following data:
Width of carriage way = 7.5 m
Effective span = 14 m
Centre to centre spacing of longitudinal girders = 3.2 m
Number of longitudinal girders = 3
No. of cross girders = 4
Thickness of wearing coat = 56 mm
Material for construction = M-35 grade concrete and Fe-415 steel conforming toIS 1786.
Loading = IRC class A-A and IRC class A ,which given worst effect
Footpath = 1.7 m on left hand side of the bridge.
8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre
18/109
11
Total width of road = 10.3 m.
Design the bridge superstructure and sketch the layout of plan, elevation andreinforcement details of various components.
8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre
19/109
12
2 Deck Slab
2.1 Structural Details
Let us assume slab thickness of 225 mm.
For cantilever slab, thickness at junction = 350 mm and 100 mm at the end.
Providing vehicle crash barriers (for without footpath) on one side of carriage wayand vehicle crash barrier and pedestrian railing on the other side of thecarriageway.
2.2 Effective Span Size of Panel for Bending Moment Calculation
Let us provide longitudinal beam c/c spaced 3.2 m and with rib width 300 mm.
4 cross girders provided with c/c spaced 4.67 m and rib width 250 mm.
Effective depth of slab = 225 - 25 - 8 = 192 mm
Span in transverse direction = 3.2 m
Effective span in transverse direction = 3.2 - 0.3 + 0.192 = 3.092 m 3.1 m
Span in longitudinal direction = 4.67 - 0.25 + 0.192 = 4.6 m
Effective size of panel = 3.1 m x 4.6 m
2.3 Effective Span Size of Panel for Shear Force CalculationEffective span in transverse direction = 3.2 - 0.3 = 2.9 m
Span in longitudinal direction = 4.67 - 0.25 = 4.42 m
Effective size of panel = 2.9 m x 4.42 m
8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre
20/109
13
Figure 2.1: Plan of Bridge Deck
8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre
21/109
14
Figure 2.2: Section X-X of Bridge Deck Plan
8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre
22/109
15
Figure 2.3: Section Y-Y of Bridge Deck Plan
8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre
23/109
16
2.4 Moment due to Dead Load
Effective size of panel = 3.1m x 4.6 m
Self Wt. of deck slab = 0.225 x 24= 5.4 KN/m 2
Wt. of wearing course = 0.056 x 22 = 1.23 KN/m 2
Total = 6.63 KN/m 2
Ratio K =Short SpanLong Span =
3.14.6 = 0.674
1 K = 1.48
From Pigeaud's curve, we get by interpolation
m 1 = 4.8 x 10-2
m 2 = 1.9 x 10-2
Total dead wt. = 6.63 x 3.1 x 4.6 = 94.54 KN
Moment along short span = (0.048 + 0.15 x 0.019) x 94.54 = 4.81 KN-m
Moment along long span = (0.019 + 0.15 x 0.048) x 94.54 = 2.38 KN-m
2.5 Moment due to Live Load
2.5.1 Live load BM due to IRC Class AA Tracked VehicleSince the effective width of panel is 3.1 m, two possibilities should be considered
for finding maximum bending moment in the panel due to Class AA trackedvehicle. In the first possibility one of the track of 35t will be placed centrally(figure 2.4) on the panel. In second possibility both track of 35t each will beplaced symmetrically as shown in figure 2.5.
Case 1: Class AA Track located as in figure 2.4 for Maximum Moment
8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre
24/109
17
Figure 2.4: Class AA Track located for Maximum Moment on Deck Slab
Impact factor = 25%
u = = 0.988mv = = 3.72mK = 0.674
uB =
0.9883.1 = 0.319
vL =
3.724.6 = 0.809
From Pigeaud's curve, we get by interpolation
m 1 = 10.5 x 10-2
m 2 = 4.1 x 10-2
8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre
25/109
18
Total load per track including impact = 1.25 x 350 = 437.5 KN
Moment along short span = (10.5 + 0.15 x 4.1) x 10 -2 x 437.5 = 48.63 KN-m
Moment along long span = (4.1 + 0.15 x 10.5) x 10 -2 x 437.5 = 24.83 KN-m
Final Moment after applying effect of continuity
MB = 48.63 x 0.8 = 38.9 KN-m
ML = 24.83 x 0.8 = 19.86 KN-m
Case 2: Both track of 35t each symmetrically as shown in figure 2.5.
Figure 2.5: Both Class AA Track located for Maximum Moment on Deck Slab
X = 0.531 m u 1 =0.988 m v = 3.72 m
8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre
26/109
19
i) u = 2( u 1 +X) = 3.038 m v = 3.72m
u B =
3.038 3.1
vL =
3.724.6 = 0.809
From Pigeaud's curve, we get by interpolation
m 1 = 5.5 x 10-2
m 2 = 2.5 x 10-2
M1 = (5.5 + 0.15 x 2.5) x 10-2 x 1.519 = 0.0892
M2 = (2.5 + 0.15 x 5.5) x 10-2 x 1.519 = 0.051
ii) u = 2X = 1.062 v =3.72
u B =
1.0623.1 = 0.343
vL =
3.724.6 = 0.809
From Pigeaud's curve, we get by interpolation
m 1 = 10.5 x 10-2
m 2 = 4.0 x 10-2
M1 = (10.5 + 0.15 x 4.0) x 10-2 x 0.531 = 0.0589
M2 = (4.0 + 0.15 x 10.5) x 10-2 x 0.531 = 0.0296
Final moment applying effect of continuity and impact
MB = (0.0892 - 0.0589) x 2 x 350 x 1.25 x 0.8/0.988 = 21.468 KN-m
ML = (0.051 - 0.0296) x 2 x 350 x 1.25 x 0.8/0.988 = 15.16 KN-m
2.5.2 Live Load BM due to IRC Class AA Wheeled VehicleSince the effective width is 3.1 m, all four wheels of the axle can beaccommodated on the panel for finding maximum bending moment in the paneldue to Class AA wheeled vehicle. In the first possibility four loads of 37.5 KN and
8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre
27/109
20
four loads 62.5 KN are placed symmetrical to both the axis as shown in figure 2.6.In second possibility all four loads of first axle is place symmetrically with all fourwheels of second axle following it as shown in figure 2.7. A third possibility shouldalso be tried in which four wheel loads of the first axle are so placed that themiddle 62.5KN wheel load is placed centrally, with the four wheel loads of secondaxle following it as shown in figure 2.8.
Case 1: All four loads of 37.5 KN and four loads 62.5 KN are placed symmetrical toboth the axis as shown in figure 2.6.
Impact factor = 25%
u1 =
= 0.469 m
v1 = = 0.345 m(A) For Load W 1 of Both Axles
X = 0.865 m Y= 0.428 m
i) u = 2(u 1 +X) = 2 x 1.335 = 2.67 mv = 2(v1 + Y) = 2 x 0.773 = 1.546 m
u B = 2.673.1 = 0.861 vL = 1.5464.6 = 0.336
From Pigeaud's curve, we get by interpolation
m 1 = 8.5x 10-2
m 2= 6.0 x 10-2
M1 = (8.5 + 0.15 x 6.0) x 10-2 x 1.335 x 1.546/2 = 0 .097
M2= (6.0 + 0.15 x 8.5) x 10 -2 x 1.335 x 1.546/2 = 0.075
8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre
28/109
21
Figure 2.6: Disposition of Class AA Wheeled Vehicle as Case 1 for Maximum
Moment
ii) u = 2X = 1.73 m v = 2Y = 0.856 m
u B =
1.733.1 = 0.558
vL =
0.8564.6 = 0.186
From Pigeaud's curve, we get by interpolation
m 1 = 12.0 x 10 -2
m 2 = 10.0 x 10-2
M1 = (12.0 + 0.15 x 10.0) x 10-2 x 0.866 x 0.428 = 0.050
M2= (10 + 0.15 x 12.0) x 10-2 x 0.866 x 0.428 = 0.049
8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre
29/109
22
iii) u = 2(u 1 +X) = 2.67 m v = 2Y = 0.856 m
u B = 0.861
vL = 0.186
From Pigeaud's curve, we get by interpolation
m 1 = 8.5 x 10-2
m 2 = 7.5 x 10-2
M1 = (8.5 + 0.15 x 7.5) x 10-2 x 1.335 x 0.428 = 0.055
M2 = (7.5 + 0.15 x 8.5) x 10-2 x 1.335 x 0.428 = 0.050
iv) u = 2X = 1.73 m v = 2(v 1+Y) = 1.546 m
=1.733.1 = 0.558
vL = 0.336
From Pigeaud's curve, we get by interpolation
m 1 = 11.5 x 10-2
m 2 = 7.5 x 10-2
M1 = (11.5 + 0.15 x 7.5) x 10-2 x 0.866 x 0.773 = 0.0845
M2 = (7.5 + 0.15 x 11.5) x 10-2 x 0.866 x 0.773 = 0.0618
Final M 1 = (0.097+ 0.05 - 0.055 - 0.0845) = 0.0075
Final M 2 = (0.075 + 0.044 - 0.050 - 0.0618) = 0.0072
(Mw 1)B =.0075x4x37.5
.469x.345 = 6.95 KN-m
(Mw 1)L=.0072x4x37.5
.469x.345 = 6.67 KN-m
(B) For Load W 2 of Both AxlesX = 0.266 m Y = 0.428 m
8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre
30/109
8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre
31/109
24
M1=(13.5 + 0.15 11.5) 10-2 0.428 0.735 = 0.0478
M2=(11.5 + 0.15 13.5) 10-2 0.428 0.735 = 0.0426
iv) u= 2X = 0.532 m v = 2(v 1 + Y) = 1.546 m
u B = 0.172
vL = 0.336
From Pigeaud's curve, we get by interpolation
m 1=19.0 x 10-2
m 2=9.5 x 10-2
M1=(19 + 0.15 x 9.5) x 10 -2 x 0.266 x 0.773 = 0.42
M2=(9.5 + 0.15 x 19) x10-2 x 0.266 x 0.773 = 0.025
Final M 1 = (0.0778 + 0.025 - 0.0478 - 0.042) = 0.013
Final M 2 = (0.0561+ 0.018 - 0.0426 - 0.025) = 0.0065
(Mw2)B=.013 x 4 x 62.5 .469 x 0.345 = 20.09 KN-m
(Mw2)L =.0065 x 4 x 62.5
.469 x 0.345 = 10.04 KN-m
Final moment applying effect of continuity and impact
MB= (20.09 + 6.95) x 1.25 x 0.8 = 27.04 KN-m
ML= (10.04 + 6.64) x 1.25 x 0.8 = 16.71 KN-m
Case 2: All four loads of first axle is place symmetrically with all four wheels ofsecond axle following it as shown in figure 2.7.
8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre
32/109
25
Figure 2.7: Disposition of Class AA Wheeled Vehicle as Case 2 for Maximum
Moment
(A) For Load W 1 of Axle IX= 0.866m
i) u =2(u 1+ X) = 2 x 1.335 = 2.67 m v= 0.345 m
u
B = 0.861
v
L= 0.075
From Pigeaud's curve, we get by interpolation
m 1=10.2 x 10-2
m 2=9.8 x 10-2
8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre
33/109
26
M1=(10.2 + 0.15 x 9.8) x 10-2 x 1.335 = 0.156
M2=(9.8 + 0.15 x 10.2) x 10-2 x 1.335 = 0.151
ii) u = 2X = 1.732 m v = 0.345 m
u B = 0.559
vL = 0.075
From Pigeaud's curve, we get by interpolation
m 1=12.5 x 10-2
m 2=13.5 x 10-2
M1=(12.5 + 0.15 x 13.5) x 10 -2 x 0.866 = 0.126
M2=(13.5 + 0.15 x 12.5) x10-2 x 0.886 = 0.133
Final M 1 = (0.156 - 0.126) = 0.03
Final M 2= (0.151 - 0.133) = 0.018
(MB)W1 =.03 x 2 x 37.5
.469 = 4.797 KN-m
(ML)W1 =.018 x 2 x 37.5
.469 =2.88 KN-m
(B) For Load W 2 of Axle IX = 0.266 m
i) u = 2(u 1+ X) = 0.735 x 2 = 1.47 m v = 0.345m
u B = 0.474
vL = 0.075
From Pigeaud's curve, we get by interpolation
m 1=14.0 x 10-2
8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre
34/109
27
m 2=13.0 x 10-2
M1=(14.0 + 0.15 x 13.0) x 10-2 x 0.735 = 0.117
M2=(13.0 + 0.15 x 14.0) x 10-2 x 0.735 = 0.111
ii) u = 2X = 0.532 m v = 0.345 m
u B = 0.172
vL = 0.075
From Pigeaud's curve, we get by interpolation
m 1=23.0 x 10-2
m 2=20.0 x 10 -2
M1=(23.0 + 0.15 x 20.0) x 10-2 x 0.266 = 0.069
M2=(20.0 + 0.15 x 23.0) x 10-2 x 0.266 = 0.064
Final M 1 = (0.117 - 0.069) = 0.048
Final M 2= (0.111 - 0.069) = 0.042
(MB)W2 = .048 x 2 x 62.5 .469 = 12.79 KN-m
(ML)W2=.042 x 2 x 62.5
.469 = 12.52 KN-m
(C) For Load W 3 of Axle IIX = 0.866 m Y = 1.028 m
i) u = 2(u 1+ X) = 2 x 1.335 = 2.67 mv = 2(v1 + Y) = 2 x 1.373 = 2.746 m
u B = 0.861
vL = 0.597
8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre
35/109
28
From Pigeaud's curve, we get by interpolation
m 1=7.5 x 10-2
m 2=4.2 x 10-2
M1 = (7.5 + 0.15 x 4.2) x 10-2 x 1.335 x 1.373 = 0.149
M2 = (4.2 + 0.15 x 7.5) x 10-2 x 1.335 x 1.373 = 0.0976
ii) u = 2X = 1.732 m v = 2Y = 1.028 x 2 = 2.056 m
u B = 0.559
vL = 0.447
From Pigeaud's curve, we get by interpolation
m 1=11.2 x 10-2
m 2=6.5 x 10-2
M1=(11.2 + 0.15 x 6.5) x 10-2 x 0.866 x 1.028 = 0.108
M2=(6.5 + 0.15 x 11.2) x 10-2 x 0.866 x 1.028 = 0.073
iii) u = 2(u 1+ X) = 2.67 m v = 2Y = 2.050 mu B = 0.861
vL = 0.447
From Pigeaud's curve, we get by interpolation
m 1 = 8.2 x 10-2
m 2 = 5.5 x 10-2
M1 = (8.2 + 0.15 x 5.5) x 10-2 x 1.028 x 1.335 = 0.124
M2 = (5.5 + 0.15 x 8.2) x 10-2 x 1.028 x 1.335 = 0.092
iv) u = 2X = 1.732 m v = 2(v 1 + Y) = 2.746 m
8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre
36/109
29
u B = 0.559
vL = 0.597
From Pigeaud's curve, we get by interpolation
m 1 = 10.2 x 10 -2
m 2 = 5.2 x 10-2
M1 = (10.2 + 0.15 x 5.2) x10-2 x 0.866 x 1.373 = 0.131
M2 = (5.2 + 0.15 x 10.2) x 10-2 x 0.866 x 1.373 = 0.08
Final M 1 = (0.149 + 0.108 - 0.124 - 0.131) = 0.002
Design M 2 = (0.0976 + 0.073 - 0.092 - 0.08) = 0.0006
(MB)W3 =.002 x 2 x 37.5
.469 x .345 = 0.927 KN-m
(ML)W3 =.0006 x 2 x 37.5
.469 x .345 = 0.278 KN-m
(D) For W 4 of Axle IIX = 0.266 m Y = 1.028 m
i) u = 2(u 1+ X) = 2 x 0.735 = 1.47 mv = 2(v1 + Y) = 2 x 1.373 = 2.746 mu B = 0.474
vL = 0.597
From Pigeaud's curve, we get by interpolation
m 1 = 11.0 x 10-2
m 2 = 5.2 x 10-2
M1 = (11.0 + 0.15 x 5.2) x 10-2 x 0.735 x 1.373 = 0.119
8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre
37/109
30
M2 = (5.2 + 0.15 x 11.0) x 10-2 x 0.735 x 1.373 = 0.069
ii) u = 2X = 0.532 m v = 2Y = 2.056 mu
B = 0.172
v
L= 0.447
From Pigeaud's curve, we get by interpolation
m 1 = 16.0 x 10-2
m 2 = 7.5 x 10-2
M1 = (16.0 + 0.15 x 7.5) x 10-2 x 0.266 x 1.028 = 0.047
M2 = (7.5 + 0.15 x 16.0) x 10-2 x 0.266 x 1.028 = 0.027
iii) u = (u 1+ X) = 1.47 m v = 2Y = 2.056 m
u B = 0.474
vL = 0.447
From Pigeaud's curve, we get by interpolation
m 1 = 12.2 x 10-2
m 2 = 6.8 x 10 -2
M1 = (12.2 + 0.15 x 6.8) x 10-2 x 1.028 x 0.735 = 0.0998
M2 = (6.8 + 0.15 x 12.2) x 10-2 x 1.028 x 0.735 = 0.065
iv) u = 2X = 0.532 m v = 2(v 1 + Y) = 2.746 mu B = 0.172
vL = 0.597
From Pigeaud's curve, we get by interpolation
m 1 = 14.5 x 10-2
m 2 = 5.8 x 10-2
M1 = (14.5 + 0.15 x 5.8) x 10-2 x 0.266 x 1.373 = 0.056
8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre
38/109
31
M2 = (5.8 + 0.15 x 14.5) x 10-2 x 0.266 x 1.373 = 0.029
Final M 1 = (0.119 + 0.047 - 0.0998 - 0.056) = 0.0102
Final M 2 = (0.069 + 0.027 - 0.065 - 0.029) = 0.002
(MB)W4 =.0102 x 2 x 62.5
.469 x .345 = 7.87 KN-m
(ML)W4 =.002 x 2 x 62.5
.469 x .345 = 1.55 KN-m
Final moment applying effect of continuity and impact
MB = (4.797 + 12.79 + 0.927 + 7.87) x 1.25 x 0.8 = 26.38 KN-m
ML= (2.88 + 12.52 + 0.278 + 1.55) x 1.25 x 0.8 = 17.23 KN-m
Case3: four wheel loads of the first axle are so placed that the middle 62.5KNwheel load is placed centrally, with the four wheel loads of second axle followingit as shown in figure 2.8.
u1 = = 0.469 mv1 = = 0.345 m(A) For LoadW 1 of Axle I
X = 0.366 m
i) u = 2(u 1+ X) = 1.67 m v = v 1 = 0.345 m
u B = 0.538
vL = 0.075
From Pigeaud's curve, we get by interpolation
m 1 = 12.8 x 10-2
m 2 = 13.8 x 10-2
8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre
39/109
32
M1 = (12.8 + 0.15 x 13.8) x 10-2 x 0.835 = 0.124 KN-m
M2 = (13.8 + 0.15 x 12.8) x 10-2 x 0.835 = 0.131 KN-m
Figure 2.8: Disposition of Class AA Wheeled Vehicle as Case 3 for MaximumMoment
ii) u = 2X = 0.732 m v = v 1= 0.345 m
u B = 0.236
vL = 0.075
From Pigeaud's curve, we get by interpolation
m 1 = 19 x 10-2
8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre
40/109
33
m 2 = 17.5 x 10-2
M1 = (19.0 + 0.15 x 17.5) x 10-2 x 0.366 = 0.07915 KN-m
M2 = (17.5 + 0.15 x 19.0) x 10-2 x 0.366 = 0.0744 KN-m
Final M 1 = (0.124 - 0.07915) = 0.044
Final M 2 = (0.131 - 0.0744) = 0.0556
(MB) w1 =.044 x 37.5
.469 = 3.518 KN-m
(ML) w2 =.0556 x 37.5
.469 =4.53 KN-m
(B) For Load W 2 of Axle Iu B = 0.151m
vL = 0.075m
From Pigeaud's curve, we get by interpolation
m 1 = 24.0 x 10-2
m2
= 22.0 x 10 -2
(MB)W2 = (24.0 + 0.15 x22.0) x 10-2 x 62.5 x 1.25 x 0.8 = 17.06 KN-m
(ML)W2 = (22.0 + 0.15 x 24.0) x 10-2 x 62.5 x 1.25 x 0.8 = 16.00 KN-m
(C) For Load W 3 of Axle IX = 0.776 m
i) u = 2(u 1+ X) = 2.469 m v = v 1= 0.345 m
u B = 0.794
vL = 0.075
From Pigeaud's curve, we get by interpolation
m 1 = 9.8 x 10-2
8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre
41/109
34
m 2 = 10.8 x 10-2
M1 = (9.8 + 0.15 x 10.8) x 10-2 x 1.2345 = 0.140
M2 = (10.8 + 0.15 x 9.8) x 10-2 x 1.2345 = 0.151
ii) u = 2X = 1.594 m v = v 1 = 0.345 m
u B = 0.492
vL = 0.075
From Pigeaud's curve, we get by interpolation
m 1 = 13.5 x 10-2
m 2 = 14.0 x 10 -2
M1 = (13.5 + 0.15 x 14) x 10-2 x 0.766 = 0.119
M2 = (14.0 + 0.15 x 13.5) x 10-2 x 0.766 = 0.122
Final M 1 = (0.140 - 0.119) = 0.021
Final M 2 = (0.151 - 0.122) = 0.029
(MB)W3 = .021 x 62.5 .469 = 2.79 KN-m
(ML)W3 =.029 x 62.5
.469 = 3.864 KN-m
(D) For Load W 4 of Axle IX = 1.366 m
i) u = 2(u 1 +X) = 3.670 m v = v 1 = 0.345 m
u B = 1.183 1
vL = 0.345
From Pigeaud's curve, we get by interpolation
m 1 = 8.0 x 10-2
8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre
42/109
35
m 2 = 9.0 x 10-2
M1 = (8.0 + 0.15 x 9.0) x 10-2 x 1.835 = 0.171 KN-m
M2 = (9.0 + 0.15 x 8.0) x 10-2 x 1.835 = 0.181 KN-m
ii) u = 2X = 2.732 m v = v 1 = 0.345 m
u B = 0.88
vL = 0.075
From Pigeaud's curve, we get by interpolation
m 1 = 9.0 x 10-2
m 2 = 9.8 x 10 -2
M1 = (9.0 + 0.15 x 9.8) x 10-2 x 1.366 = 0.143
M2 = (9.8 + 0.15 x 9.0) x 10-2 x 1.366 = 0.152
Final M 1 = (0.171 0.143) = 0.028
Final M 2 = (0.187 0.152) = 0.035
Since right most wheels of 37.5 KN are extending over the panel so loadcontributed by these wheels will be
W =37.5 x 0.429 x 0.345
0.469 x 0.345 =33.5 KN
(MB)W4 =0.028 x 33.5
0.469 = 3.33 KN-m
(ML)W4 =0.035 x 33.5
0.469 = 4.16 KN-m
(E) For Load W 1 of Axle IIX = 0.366 m Y = 1.028 m
i) u = 2(u 1 +X) = 1.67 m v = 2(v 1 + Y) = 2.746 m
8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre
43/109
36
u B = 0.54
vL = 0.6
From Pigeaud's curve, we get by interpolation
m 1 = 10.1 x 10 -2
m 2 = 5.2 x 10-2
M1 = (10.1 + 0.15 x 5.2) x 10-2 x 0.835 x 1.373 = 0.12
M2 = (5.2 + 0.15 x 10.1) x 10-2 x 0.835 x 1.373 = 0.076
ii) u = 2X = 0.732 m v = 2Y = 2.053 m
u B = 0.236
vL = 0.45
From Pigeaud's curve, we get by interpolation
m 1 = 15.0 x 10-2
m 2 = 7.4 x 10-2
M1 = (15.0 + 0.15 x 7.4) x 10-2 x 0.366 x 1.020 = 0.06
M2 = (7.4 + 0.15 x 15.0) x 10-2 x 0.366 x 1.020 = 0.036
iii) u = 2(u 1 +X) = 1.670 m v = 2Y = 2.056 m
u B = 0.54
vL = 0.45
From Pigeaud's curve, we get by interpolation
m 1 = 11.0 x 10-2
m 2 = 6.5 x 10-2
M1 = (11.0 + 0.15 x 6.5) x 10-2 x 1.028 x 0.855 = 0.103
M2 = (6.5 + 0.15 x 11.0) x 10-2 x 1.028 x 0.855 = 0.069
8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre
44/109
37
iv) u = 2X = 0.73 m v = 2(v 1 + Y) = 2.746 m
u B = 0.236
vL = 0.596
From Pigeaud's curve, we get by interpolation
m 1 = 13.2 x 10-2
m 2 = 5.8 x 10-2
M1 = (13.2 + 0.15 x 5.8) x 10-2 x 0.366 x 1.373 = 0.070
M2 = (5.8 + 0.15 x 13.2) x 10-2 x 0.366 x 1.373 = 0.039
Final M 1 = (0.12 + 0.06 - 0.103 - 0.070) = 0.007
Final M 2 = (0.076 + 0.036 - 0.069 - 0.039) = 0.004
(MB)W1 =.007 x 37.5 .469 x .345 = 1.62 KN-m
(ML)W1 =.002 x 37.5 .469 x .345 = 0.93 KN-m
(F) For Load W 2 of Axle IIY = 1.020 m
i) u = 0.469 m v = 2(v 1 + Y) = 2.746m
u B = 0.151
vL = 0.596
From Pigeaud's curve, we get by interpolation
m 1 = 14 x 10-2
m 2 = 5.8 x 10-2
M1 = (14 + 0.15 x 5.8) x 10-2 x 1.373 = 0.204
8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre
45/109
38
M2 = (5.8 + 0.15 x 14) x 10-2 x 1.373 = 0.108
ii) u = 0.469 m v = 2(v 1 + Y) = 2.746 m
u B = 0.151
vL = 0.45
From Pigeaud's curve, we get by interpolation
m 1 = 16 x 10-2
m 2 = 7.5 x 10-2
M1 = (16 + 0.15 x 7.5) x 10-2 x 1.028= 0.18
M2= (7.5 + 0.15 x 16) x 10 -2 x 1.028 = 0.100
Design M 1 = (0.204 - 0.018) = 0.186
Design M 2 = (0.108 0.10) = 0.008
(MB)W2 =.186 x 62.5
0.345 = 4.34 KN-m
(ML)W2 =
.008 x 62.5
0.345 = 1.45 KN-m
(G) For Load W 3 of Axle IIX = 0.766 m Y = 1.020 m
i) u = 2(u 1 + X) = 2.47 m v = 2(v 1 + Y) = 2.746 m
u B = 0.79
vL = 0.596
From Pigeaud's curve, we get by interpolation
m 1 = 8.0 x 10-2
m 2 = 4.4 x 10-2
8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre
46/109
39
M1 = (8.0 + 0.15 x 4.4) x 10-2 x 1.373 x 1.235 = 0.147
M2 = (4.4 + 0.15 x 8.0) x 10-2 x 1.373 x 1.235 = 0.095
ii) u = 2X = 1.532 m v = 2Y = 2.056 m
u B = 0.49
vL = 0.45
From Pigeaud's curve, we get by interpolation
m 1 = 11.5 x 10-2
m 2 = 6.5 x 10-2
M1 = (11.5 + 0.15 x 6.5) x 10 -2 x 1.028 x 0.766 = 0.098
M2= (6.5 + 0.15 x 11.5) x 10-2 x 1.028 x 0.766 = 0.065
iii) u =2(u 1 +X) =2.47 m v = 2Y = 2.056 m
u B = 0.79
vL = 0.45
From Pigeaud's curve, we get by interpolation
m 1 = 8.8 x 10-2
m 2 = 5.0 x 10-2
M1 = (8.8 + 0.15 x 5.0) x 10-2 x 1.028 x 1.235 = 0.0.12
M2= (5.0 + 0.15 x 8.8) x 10-2 x 1.028 x 1.235 = 0.08
iv) u = 2X = 1.532 m v = 2(v 1 + Y) = 2.746 m
u B = 0.49
vL = 0.596
From Pigeaud's curve, we get by interpolation
m 1 = 11.0 x 10-2
8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre
47/109
40
m 2 = 5.2 x 10-2
M1 = (11.0 + 0.15 x 5.2) x 10-2 x 1.373 x 0.766 = 0.123
M2= (5.2 + 0.15 x 11.0) x 10-2 x 1.373 x 0.766 = 0.070
Final M 1= (0.147 + 0.098 - 0.121 - 0.123) = 0.001
Final M 2 = (0.095 + 0.065 - 0.08 - 0.07) = 0.01
(MB)W3 =.001 x 62.5
0.469 x 0.345 = 0.380 KN-m
(ML)W3 =.01 x 62.5
0.469 x 0.345 = 3.86 KN-m
(H) For Load W 4 of Axle IIX = 1.366 m Y = 1.028 m
i) u = 2(u 1 + X) = 3.67 m v = 2(v 1 + Y) = 2.746 m
u B = 1.18 1
vL = 0.596
From Pigeaud's curve, we get by interpolation
m 1 = 6.6 x 10-2
m 2 = 3.8 x 10-2
M1 = (6.6 + 0.15 x 3.8) x 10-2 x 1.366 x 1.835 = 0.181
M2 = (3.8+ 0.15 x 6.6) x 10-2 x 1.366 x 1.835 = 0.121
ii) u = 2X = 2.732 m v = 2Y = 2.056 m
u B = 0.88
vL = 0.45
From Pigeaud's curve, we get by interpolation
8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre
48/109
41
m 1 = 8.0 x 10-2
m 2 = 5.0 x 10-2
m 1 = (8.0 + 0.15 x 5.0) x 10-2 x 1.028 x 1.366 = 0.123
m 2 = (5.0 + 0.15 x 8.0) x 10-2 x 1.028 x 1.366 = 0.098
iii) u = 2(u 1 +X) = 3.67 m v = 2Y = 2.056 m
u B = 1.18 1
vL = 0.45
From Pigeaud's curve, we get by interpolation
m 1 = 7.3 x 10 -2
m 2 = 4.5 x 10-2
M1 = (7.3 + 0.15 x 4.5) x 10-2 x 1.028 x 1.835 = 0.15
M2 = (4.5+ 0.15 x 7.3) x 10-2 x 1.028 x 1.835 = 0.11
iv) u = 2X = 2.732 m v = 2(v 1 + Y) = 2.746 m
u B = 0.88 vL = 0.596
From Pigeaud's curve, we get by interpolation
m 1 = 7.4 x 10-2
m 2 = 4.0 x 10-2
M1 = (7.4 + 0.15 x 4.0) x 10-2 x 1.373 x 1.366 = 0.15
M2 = (4.0 + 0.15 x 7.4) x 10-2 x 1.373 x 1.373 = 0.096
Final M 1= (0.181 + 0.123 - 0.15 - 0.15) = 0.004
Final M 2 = (0.121 + 0.087 - 0.11 - 0.096) = 0.002
8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre
49/109
42
(MB)W4 =.004 x 33.5
0.469 x 0.345 = 1.38 KN-m
(ML)W4 =.002 x 33.5
0.469 x 0.345 = 0.69 KN-m
Final Moments applying effect of continuity and impact
MB = (3.518 + 17.06 + 2.79 + 3.3 + 1.62 + 4.34 +0.386 + 1.38) x 1.25 x0.08
= 34.39 KN-m
ML = (4.53 + 16.6 + 3.864 + 4.16 + 0.93 + 1.45 + 3.86 + 0.69) x 1.25 x0.08
= 35.48 KN-m
2.5.3 Live Load BM due to IRC Class A LoadingFigure 2.9 shows the placement of loading for maximum B.M. in which wheel ofaxle 1 is placed centrally with wheel of axle 2 behind it, each of 57 KN.
u = = 0.65 mv = = 0.43 m(A) For Load W 1 of Axle I
u = 0.65 m v = 0.43 m
u B = 0.21
vL = 0.09
From Pigeaud's curve, we get by interpolation
m 1 = 20.5 x 10-2
m 2 = 16 x 10 -2
(Mw 1)B = (20.5 + 0.15 x 16) x 10-2 x 57.0 = 13.053 KN-m
(Mw 1)L = (16 + 0.15 x 20.5) x 10-2 x 57.0 = 10.87 KN-m
8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre
50/109
43
Figure 2.9: Disposition of Class A Train of Load for Maximum Moment
(B) For Load W 2 of Axle IIY = 0.985 m
i) u = u 1 = 0.65 m v = 2(v 1 + Y) = 2.83 m
u B = 0.21
vL = 0.09
From Pigeaud's curve, we get by interpolation
m 1 = 13.9 x 10-2
m 2 = 5.8 x 10-2
M1= (13.9 + 0.15 x 5.8) x 10-2 x 1.415 = 0.209
8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre
51/109
8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre
52/109
45
2.6 Design of Inner Panel
Depth of deck slab = d = cbc = 11.5 MPa st = 230 MPa j = 0.9 Q =1.1
d = = 187.32 mmDepth provided =225 mm
d = 225 - 25 - 8 = 192 mm
Area of steel (along short span) =38.9 x 10 6
230 x 0.9 x 192 = 1126 mm2
Provide 16 mm Dia @ 140 mm c/c (1408 mm 2)
Area of steel (along long span) =35.48 x 10 6
230 x 0.9 x 192 = 1026 mm2
Provide 16 mm Dia @ 140 mm c/c (1408 mm 2)
2.7 Shear Force In Deck Slab
2.7.1 For Class AA Tracked VehicleShear Force is calculated by effective width method for effective size of panel 2.9m X 4.42 m. For maximum Shear Force, the load will be so placed that its spreadup to bottom reaches the face of the rib as shown in figure 2.10.
Dispersion in direction of span or between longitudinal girder
= 0.85 + 2(0.056 + 0.225)
= 1.412 m
8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre
53/109
46
Dispersion along width (b e) = K.x (1-x
L ) + bw
B
L =
4.42
2.9 = 1.524
From the table for effective width method
K = 2.84
For Maximum shear, load is kept in such a manner that dispersion lies in span ordispersion length should end at edge.
Load should be kept at
1.412
2 = 0.706 m
be = 2.84 x 0.706 ( 1-0.706
2.9 ) + 3.6 + 2 x 0.056 = 5.3 m
Load per meter width =3505.3 = 66.04 KN
Figure 2.10: Class AA Tracked loading arrangement for calculation of Shear Force
8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre
54/109
47
So shear force at edge =66.04 x ( 2.9 - 0.706)
2.9 = 49.962 KN
2.7.2 For Class AA Wheeled VehicleShear Force is calculated by effective width method for effective size of panel 2.9m X 4.42 m. For maximum Shear Force, the loading is to be arranged by trial anderror, keeping in mind the following two points.
i) Wheel 1 is 1.2 m from kerb.ii) The outer line of third wheel from left should be as near to the face of right
hand support as possible.
So there can be two possibilities for placing the loads for Shear Forcecomputation. In first possibility, left most wheel is placed such that its spread upto bottom reaches the face of the rib as shown in figure 2.11. In secondpossibility, third wheel from left is placed as near to the face of right hand supportas possible as shown in figure 2.12.
Case 1: Left most wheel is placed such that its spread up to bottom reaches theface of the rib as shown in figure 2.11.
Dispersion in direction of span = 0.30 + 2(0.056 + 0.225) = 0.862 m
(A) For W 1 Load
Effective width = b e = K.x (1-x
L ) + bw
= 2.84 x 0.431 ( 1 -0.431
2.9 ) + 0.15 + 2 x 0.056 = 1.304 m
Average effective width =1.304+ 1.2
2 = 1.25 m
8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre
55/109
48
So, Load per meter width =37.51.25 = 29.95 KN
Figure 2.11: Class AA Wheeled loading arrangement as Case 1 for Shear Force
(B) For W 2 Load
Effective width = b e = K.x (1-x
L ) + bw
= 2.84 x 0.1.031 ( 1 -1.031
2.9 ) + 0.15 + 2 x 0.056 = 2. 149 m
Average effective width =2.149 + 1.2
2 = 1.674 m
So, Load per meter width =62.5
1.674 = 37.32 KN
(C) For W 3 Load
Effective width = b e = K.x (1-x
L ) + bw
= 2.84 x 0.869 (1 -0.869
2.9 ) + 0.15 + 2 x 0.056 = 1.99 m
Average effective width =1.99 + 1.2
2 = 1.595 m
8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre
56/109
49
So, Load per meter width =62.5
1.595 = 39.189 KN
(D) For W 4 Load
Effective width = b e = K.x (1-x
L ) + bw
= 2.84 x 0.269 ( 1 -0.269
2.9 ) + 0.15 + 2 x 0.056 = 0.955 m
So, Load per meter width =37.5 x 0.550
0.862 x 0.955 = 25.056 KN
So shear force at edge due to all loadings
=29.95(2.9 - 0.431)
2.9 +37.32(2.9 - 1.031)
2.9 +39.189 x 0.869
2.9 +25.056 x 0.269
2.9
= 63.61 KN
Shear force at other edge = 29.95 + 37.32 + 39.189 + 25.056 - 63.61 = 67.905 KN
Shear force with impact = 67.905 x 1.25 = 84.88 KN
Case 2: Third wheel from left is placed as near to the face of right hand support aspossible as shown in figure 2.12.
Figure 2.12: Disposition of Class AA wheeled vehicle as Case 2 for MaximumShear Force
8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre
57/109
8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre
58/109
51
Shear Force due to all loading at edge
=22.46(2.9 - 1.09)
2.9 +35.78 x 1.281
2.9 +49.92 x 0.431
2.9
= 14.56 + 15.804 + 7.419 = 37.78 KN
S.F. at other edge = 49.92 + 35.78 + 22.46 37.78 = 70. 38 KN
S.F. with impact = 70.38 x 1.25 = 87.915 KN
So, Shear Force due to Class AA wheeled vehicle = 87.975 KN
2.7.3 For Class A LoadingShear Force will be maximum when dispersed edge of the load touches the faceof the support as shown in Figure 2.13.
Dispersion along span = 0.50 + 2 ( 0.056 + 0.225 ) = 1.062 m
Figure 2.13: Disposition of Class A Train of load for Maximum Shear
(A) For Load W 1
Effective width = b e = K.x (1-x
L ) + bw
= 2.84 x 0.531 ( 1 -0.531
2.9 ) + 0.25 + 2 x 0.056 = 1.5939 m
8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre
59/109
52
Average effective width =1.539 + 1.2
2 = 1.3969 m
So, Load per meter width =57
1.3969 = 40.80 KN
(B) For Load W 2
Effective width = b e = K.x (1-x
L ) +bw
= 2.84 x0.569 ( 1 -0.569
2.9 ) + 0.25 + 2 x 0.056 = 1.66 m
Average effective width =1.66 + 1.2
2 = 1.43 m
So, Load per meter width =57
1.43 = 39.84 KN
So Shear Force at edge due to combined loading
=39.84 x 0.5969
2.9 +40.80 x 2.369
2.9 = 7.74 + 3.32 = 41 .069 KN
Shear force with impact factor = 41.061 x 1.22 = 50.10418 KN
2.7.4 For Dead LoadDead load of panel = 6.63 KN/ m 2
So dead load shear force =6.63 x 2.9
2 = 9.6135 KN
2.7.5 Summary
Live Load Shear Force = 87.975 KN (Class AA Wheeled )
Dead Load Shear Force = 9.6135 KN
Design Shear Force = 87.975 + 9.6135 = 97.5885 KN
8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre
60/109
8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre
61/109
54
3 Cantilever Slab
3.1 Moment due to Dead Load
The total maximum moment due to the dead load per meter width of cantileverslab is computed as following table 3.1.
Figure 3.1: Cantilever Slab with Class A Wheel
Table 3.1: Computation of Dead Load Bending Moment due to Cantilever Slab
S.No.
Components Dead Load (KN/unitm run)
LeverArm (m)
BendingMoment (KN-m)
1 Vehicle Crash Barrier 0.275x 24= 6.6 1.65 10.892 Slab(rectangular) 1.8x0.1x24=4.32 0.9 3.893 Slab (triangular) .25x1.8x.5x24 = 5.4 0.6 3.24
4 Wearing Coat .056x22x1.3=1.6 0.65 1.04Total 17.92 19.06
8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre
62/109
55
3.2 Moment due to Live Load
Effective width of dispersion b e is computed by equation
be = 1.2 x +bw
x = 0.9 m b w = 0.25 + 2 x 0.056 = 0.362 m
be = 1.2 x 0.9 + 0.362 =1.442 m
Impact factor =4.5
6+ Leff
Leff = 14+ 0.192 =14.192m
I.F. =4.5
6+ 14.192 = 2.2
Live Load per meter width including impact =57x1.22
1.442 = 48.23 KN
Maximum Moment = 48.23 x 0.9=43.41 KN-m
Shear Force = 48.23 KN
Design Moment (Dead Load B.M. + Live Load B.M.) = 19.06 +43.41= 62.47 KN-m
Design Shear Force =17.92 + 48.23 =66.15 KN
3.3 Design of Cantilever Slab
Using M -35 concrete
m = 8.11 cbc =11.5 MPa st = 230 MPa
kc = 0.289 j c = 0.904 R = 1.502
d = = 203.94 mm
8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre
63/109
56
Effective depth provided = 350 - 40 - 8 = 302 mm
Area of main reinforcement required
Ast =62.47x10 6
230 x 0.9 x 302 = 1149.19 mm2
Spacing of 16 mm bars =100x201.1
1149.19 = 174.99 mm
Provide 16mm Dia bars @ 150 c/c, Area of steel provided = 1340.67 mm 2
Distribution steel provided for
B.M = 0.3 LL BM + 0.2 DL BM
= 0.3 x43.41 + 0.2 x19.06 = 16.84 KN-m
Ast =16.84x10 6
230 x 0.9 x 302 = 309.79 mm2
Spacing of 8 mm Dia bar =100x50.3 309.79 = 162.37mm
Provide 8 mm Dia bars @ 150 c/c, Area of steel provided = 335.33 mm 2
Shear stress ( v) =66.15x10 3
1000 x 302 = 0.22 MPa
P=100 A st
bd =100x 1340.67
100 x 302 = 0.44
c = K1. K2. ca
ca = 0.23+ 0.31- 0.230.25 x 0.19 = 0.291 MPa
d = 0.302 m
K1 = 1.14- (0.7x.302) = 0.929
8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre
64/109
57
K2 = 0.5 + 0.25 p= 0.5+ .25x .44 = .61>1
c = 0.929 x1 .291 = 0.27 MPa
c.> v safe
8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre
65/109
58
8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre
66/109
59
8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre
67/109
60
4 Design of Longitudinal Girders
4.1 Analysis Longitudinal Girder by Courbon's MethodThe reaction factors will be maximum if eccentricity of the C.G. of loads withrespect to the axis of the bridge is maximum.
According to Courbon's method, reaction factor R i is given by
Ri=PIi
Ii ( 1 +
IiIid i
2 . e d i)
P = total live load
II = moment of inertia of longitudinal girder i
e = eccentricity of the live load
d i = distance of girder I from the axis of the bridge
Effective span = 14.00 m
Slab thickness = 225 mm
Width of rib = 300 mm
Spacing of main girder = 3200 mm
Overall depth = 1600 mm
4.1.1 Class AA Tracked Vehicle
Minimum clearance = 1.2 + 0.85 / 2 = 1.625 m ( up to centre of track)
e = 2.05 m
X2 = (3.2) 2 + (0)2 + (3.2) 2 = 2 x (3.2) 2
For outer girder, X = 3.2 m
8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre
68/109
61
Figure 4.1: Class AA Tracked loading arrangement for the calculation of reactionfactors for L-girders
For inner girder, X = 0
RA =P
n ( 1 +n e X X2 ) =
2W3 ( 1 +
3 x 2.05 x 3.2 2 x (3.2) 2 ) = 1.308 W
RB =2P3 ( 1 + 0 ) =
2P3 =
2W3 = 0.666 W
Figure 4.2: Influence Line Diagram for Moment at mid span
8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre
69/109
62
Impact factor for class AA loading = 10%
M = 350 (2.6 + 3.5
2 ) = 1067 KN-m
B.M for outer girder = ( 1.1 x 1.308 )x 1067 = 1535 KN- m
B.M for inner girder = ( 1.1 x 0.666 ) x 1067 = 781.68 KN- m
4.1.2 Class AA Wheeled Vehicle
Figure 4.3: Class AA Wheeled loading arrangement for the calculation ofreaction factors for L-girders
Min clearance = 1.2 + 300 / 2 = 1.2 + 1.5 = 1.35 m
e = 2.250 m
X2 = 2 (3.2) 2
RA =P
n (1 +neX
X2 ) =4W3 ( 1 +
3 x 32.25 x 3.22 (3.2) 2 ) = 2.74 W
RB =4W3 = 1.33 W
Impact factor = 25%
C.G of wheel will be 500 mm from first axle
8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre
70/109
63
RA x 14 = 62.5 (6.25 + 7.25)
RA = 60.27 KN
Figure 4.4: Computation of Bending Moment for Class AA wheeled Loading
M = 60.27 x 6.75 = 406.81 KN-m
B.M for outer girder = 406.81 x 1.25 x 2.74 = 1393.32 KN-m
B.M for inner girder = 406.81 x 1.25 x 1.33 = 676.3KN-m
4.1.3 Class A Loading
Here , P= 4 W n= 3 e = 1.650 m
Ra =4W3 ( 1 +
3I2(I x 3.2 2) x 3.2 x 1.650) = 2.36 W
Rb =4W3 ( 1+ 0 ) = 1.33 W
Rc = 4w ( 2.36 + 1.33 ) W
RA + RB = 340.54 KN
In the longitudinal direction the first six loads of class A train can beaccommodated on the span. The centre of gravity of this load system will befound to be located at a distance of 6.42 m from the first wheel.
8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre
71/109
64
Figure 4.5: Class A loading arrangement for calculation of reaction factors forL-girder
The loads are arranged on the span such that the max. Moment will occur underthe fourth load from the left. The loads shown in figure are corresponding Class Atrain load multiplied by 1.33 (reaction factor at intermediate beam ) and furthermultiplied by impact factor of 1.225. For example:- the first load of 22 KN, if theproduct of first train load of 13.5 KN and the factor 1.33 and 1.225.
RA + RB = ( 22 x 2 ) + (92.87 9 x 2 ) + ( 55.4 x 2 ) = 340.54 KN
Figure 4.6: Computation of Bending Moment for Class A LoadingTaking moment about A
8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre
72/109
65
RB x 14 = ( 22 x 1.040 ) + ( 22x 2.140 ) + ( 92.87 x 5.34 ) + ( 92.37 x 6.54) + ( 55.4 x10.84 ) + (55.4 x 13.84) = 181.47 KN
Max. B.M will occur under 4 th load from left
Max .BM = R B x 7.46 55.4 ( 7.3 + 4.3 ) = ( 181.47 x 7.46 ) 55.4 ( 7.3 + 4.3 )
= 711.13 KN m ~ 712 KN- m
B.M due to D.L. = 915 KN-m
Rea tio fa tor for e d ea a ordi g to Cour o s ethod = .
Hence maximum B.M. due to L.L. =712 x 2.36
1.33 = 1263.4 KN -m
4.2 Shear Force in L-girders
4.2.1 Shear Force due to Live LoadShear Force will be maximum due to class AA tracked vehicle. For maximum shearforce at the ends of the girder, the load will be placed between the support andthe first intermediate.
C.G of load from kerb = 1.2 + 0.4258 = 1.625 m
P1 =3.075P
3.2 +1.025P
3.2 = 1.28 P
P2 =0.125P
3.2 +2.175P
3.2 = 0719 P
The reaction at the end of each longitudinal girder due to transfer of these loadsat 1.8 m from left support
RA =2.8674.667 (1.28P) =0.786 P
8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre
73/109
66
RD =1.8
4.667 (1.28/P) =0.494 P
RB =2.8674.667 (0.719P) = 0.442 P
RE =1.8
4.667 (0.719P) = 0.227 P
The load R D, RE a d R F are tra sferred at the ross girde r should be distributeda ordi g to Cour o s theor
W = 0.494 p + +0.227 P =0.721P
If X is the e tre e dista e of C.G fro D, e ha e
X = / . P . P . = .
E = 3.2 8.2 = 2.38
Figure 4.7: Class AA tracked loading for calculation of shear force at supports
8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre
74/109
67
These reactions R D and R E act as point loads on the outer and inner longitudinalgirder and their quarter points of total span. Hence reaction at A and B due tothese will be
RA = 3/ 4 R D = 0.301 P
RE = 3/ 4R E = 0.180 P
Hence shear at A = R A +RA = ( 0.381 + 0.786 )P =1.167 P
Shear at B = R B +RB =90.180 + 0.442)P = 0.622 P
Taking into account of impact maximum shear force at support of outer girder =1.1 x 1.167 x 350 = 449.3 KN
Maximum shear force at support of inner girder = 1.1x 0.622 x 350 = 239.47KN
4.2.2 Dead Load B.M. and Shear Force
Dead Load from slab for girder Dead Load KN/m
Vehicle crash barrier 0.275 x 24 =6.6Slab 9.72Wearing coat 1.6Total 17.92
Total load of deck = 2 x 17.92 + 0.056 x 22 x 6.7 + 0.225 x 24 x 6.7 = 80.27 Kn/m
It is assumed that dead load is shared equally by all girders.-
Dead load/girder = 80.27/3 = 26.76 KN/m
Overall depth of girder = 1600 mm
Depth of rib = 1600 225 =1375 mm
8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre
75/109
68
Width = 0.3 m
Weight of rib / m = 1 0.3 x 1.375 x 24 = 9.9 KN/m
Cross girder is assumed to have same rib depth and rib width = 0.25 m
Weight of cross girder = 0.25 x 1.375 x 24 = 8.28 KN/m
Reaction on min girder = 8.25 x 3.2 = 26.4 KN
reaction from deck slab on each girder = 26.76
Total dead load on girder = 26.76 +9.9 = 36.66 KN/m
Reaction from deck slab on each girder= 26.76 KN/m
Total dead load on girder = 26.76 + 9.9 = 36.66 KN/m
Figure 4.8: Dead Load on L-girder
RA + RB = (4 x 26.4) + (36.66 x 14) KN
RA = 309.42 KN
Mmax = ( 309.42 x 7) ( 26.4 x 2.33 +26.4 x 7 + 36.66 x7 x 7/2)
= 2165.94 1144.48 = 1021.46 KN-m
Dead load shear at support = 309.42 KN
8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre
76/109
69
4.3 Design Of Section
Girder Max. D.L. B.M. Max. L.L.B.M. Total B.M. UnitsOuter girder 1021.46 1535.2 2556.66 KN-mInner girder 1021.46 781.68 1803.14 KN-m
Max. D.L.S.F. Max. L.L.S.F. Total S.F. UnitsOuter girder 309.42 449.3 758.72 KNInner girder 309.42 239.47 548.89 KN
4.3.1 Design of Outer Longitudinal GirderAssuming depth as = 1360 mm, Since the heavy reinforcement will be provided in
four layers.
Ast =2556.6 x 10 6
200 x 0.9 x1360 = 10443.87 mm2
Provide 16 bars of 32 mm dia in four rows, A st p = = 12873.14 mm2
Shear reinforcements are designed to resist the max shear at supports.
v =v
bd =758 x 10 3
300 x 1360 = 1.86 MPa
100 A sbd =
12873.14 x 100300x 1360 = 3.16%
c = 0.62 MPa
Shear reinforcement for v - c = 1.86 0.62 = 1.24 N/mm2
Vs =1.24 x 300 x 1360
1000 = 505.92 KN
Using 10 mm Dia. 4 legged stirrup.
505.92 x 10 3 =200 x 4 x 78.5 x1360
Sv
8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre
77/109
8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre
78/109
71
8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre
79/109
72
8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre
80/109
73
5 Design Of Cross Girders
5.1 Analysis of Cross Girder
5.1.1 Dead LoadCross girders are spaced @ 4.667 m c/c
Assuming X-section of X-girder same as that of longitudinal girder(1600 mm)except the width, which is 250 mm.
Self wt. of cross girder = 24000 x 1.4 x .250
= 9600 N/m = 9.6 KN/m
Dead wt. of slab and wearing coat = (0.056 x 22) + (0.225 x 24) = 6.632 KN/m 2
Each X-girder will get the triangular load from each side of the slab as shown infigure 5.1.
Figure 5.1: Triangular load from each side of slab
8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre
81/109
74
Hence, Dead load on each X-girder from the slab
= 2(0.5 x 3.2 x 1.6) x 6.632 = 33.956 KN
Assuming this to be uniformly distributed,
Dead load per meter run of girder = 33.956/3.2 = 10.61 KN/m
Total w = 9.6 + 10.61 = 20.21 KN/m
Figure 5.2: Dead Load reaction on each longitudinal girder
Assuming the cross girder to be rigid,reaction on each longitudinal girder
= (20.21 x 10 3 x 3.2 x 2)/3 = 43114.67 N = 43.11 KN
5.1.2 Live Load
(A) Class AA Tracked LoadingFigure 5.3 and 5.4 shows the position of loading for maximum B.M. in the girderdue to Class AA tracked loading. For maximum load transferred to X-girder, theposition of load in the longitudinal direction is shown in figure 5.3.
8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre
82/109
75
Figure 5.3: Position of class AA tracked loading in longitudinal direction
Figure 5.4: Plan of position of class AA tracked loading in longitudinal direction
R = = 565009.64 N
Figure 5.5: Reaction on longitudinal girder due to class AA tracked vehicle
Assuming X-girder to be rigid,reaction on each longitudinal girder
= 565009.64/3 = 88336.55 N
Live load B.M. occurs under wheel load(figure 5.5)
M = (565009.64 x 2.175)/3 = 409631.99 N-m
Now taking into account the impact factor
8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre
83/109
76
M = 1.25 x 409631.99 = 512039.98 N-m
Dead load BM from 2.175 m support
= (43114.67 x 2.175) - (20.21 x10 3 x (2.175) 2)/2
=45971.44 N-m
Total B.M. = 45971.44 + (409631.99 x 1.25)
= 558011.42 N-m
Live load shear including I.F. = 1.25 x 565009.64/3
= 235420.68 N
Dead load shear = 43114.67 N
Total Force = 235420.68 + 43114.67
= 278535.35 N
(B) Live Load due to class AAa wheeled loading
Position of load for maximum B.M. in girder is shown in figure 5.6 and 5.7
Figure 5.6: Position of class AA wheeled loading in longitudinal direction
8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre
84/109
77
Figure 5.7: Plan of position of class AA wheeled loading in longitudinal direction
R=(200x1000x4.067)/4.667=174.287 kN
Assuming X-girder to be rigid, reaction on each longitudinal girder as shown infigure 5.8
Figure 5.8: Reaction on longitudinal girder due to class AA wheeled loading
= (174.287x1000)/3 = 58095.67 N
Max. live load BM, M=58095.67 x 2.7 = 156.85 KN-m
B.M. with I.F. = 1.25 x 156.85 = 196.0625 KN-m
Dead load BM from 2.7m support=43114.67x2.7-(20.21x10 3x2.7 2)/2
=42.744 kN-m
8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre
85/109
78
Total B.M. = 196.0625 + 42.744 = 238.8065 KN-m
Live load shear including I.F. = 1.25 x 58095.67 = 72619.59 N
Dead load shear = 43114.67 N
Total load = 72619.59 + 43114.67 = 115734.28 N
(C) Live Load due to class A loadingPosition of load for maximum B.M. in girder is shown in figure 5.9.
Figure 5.9: Position of class AA wheeled loading in longitudinal direction
Assuming X-girder to be rigid, reaction on each longitudinal girder
= 198687.81/3 NMaximum live load B.M. = 198687.81x2.6/3
=172.196 kN-m
Now Moment including I.F. = 1.22 x 172.196 = 210.079 KN-m
Dead Load B.M. from 2.6 m support
= 43114.67 x 2.6 - (20.21 x 10 3 x 2.62)/2
= 43.788 KN-m
Total B.M. = 210.079 + 43.788 = 253.867 KN-m
8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre
86/109
79
Figure 5.10: Reaction on longitudinal girder due to class A loading
Live load shear including I.F. = 1.21 x 198687.81/3
=80799.71 N
Dead Load shear=43114.67 N
Total Shear Force = 80799.71+43114.67
=123.914 kN
5.2 Design of Section
Total depth = 1.6 m
Effective depth = 1.540 m
Ast = (558011.42x103)/(180x.9x1540) = 2236.7 mm 2
Provide 5 bars of 25mm dia.
Area provided=2454.37mm2
Shear stress = (278535.35)/(250x.9x1540) = 0.8 N/mm 2
p=(100xAs)/bd = (100x2454.37)/(250x1540) = 0.6374
c=0.34 N/mm2
8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre
87/109
80
Net shear = V - cbd =278535.35-(.34 x 250 x 1540)
=147635.35 N
Provide 2-legged 8mm stirrups
S=(180x2x4/4x8 2x1540)/147635.35 = 188.75 mm
Thus, provide 2-L, 8mm stirrups @160mm c/c.
8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre
88/109
81
8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre
89/109
8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre
90/109
83
Wind force = 0.91 144.2 = 131.222 KN
Wind load per bearing =131.222
6 = 21.87 KN
Total longitudinal force per bearing = 1.67 + 37.936 + 21.87 = 72 KN
Rotation at bearing = 0.0025 radian
Effective span = 14.192 m
Maximum vertical load on bearing = N ma = 310 + 450 = 760 KN
Minimum vertical load on bearing = N min = 310 KN
Try plan dimensions 250 500 mm and thickness 40 mm
Loaded area A 2 = 11.6 104 mm 2
From clause 307.1 of IRC 21
Allowable contact pressure = 0.25 f c = 0.25 MPaA1 / A2 >2
Allowable contact pressure = 0.25 35 2 = 12.37 MPa
Effective area of bearing pressure =760 X 1000
12.37 = 61.438 103 mm 2
m =760 x 100011.6 x 10 4 = 6.55 MPa
Thickness of individual elastomer h i = 10 mm
Thickness of outer layer h e = 5 mm
Thickness o steel laminates h s = 3 mm
Adapt 2 internal layers and 3 laminates
8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre
91/109
84
Overall thickness of bearing = 40 mm
Total thickness of elastomer in bearing = 40 (33) = 31 mm
Side cover = 6 mm
Shear modulus assumed = 1.0 N/mm 2
Shear strain due to creep, shrinkage and temperature is assumed as 5 10 -4 andthis is distributed to 2 bearings.
Shear strain per bearing due to creep, shrinkage and temperature
=5x10 -4 x 14.192 x 10 3
2 x 31 = 0.114
Shear strain due to longitudinal force =72 x10 3
11.6x10 4 = 0.58
Shear strain due to translation = 0.114 + 0.058 = 0.694
(D) Rotation
bi max =0.56 mh i
bS2
S =(a-2c)(b-2c)
2 x(a+b-4c)h i
Here a = 500mm, b = 250mm , c = 6mm , h i = 10 mm
S =11.6 x10 4
2 x ( 238 +488) x 10 = 7.99 > 6
bi max =0.5 x 10 x 10239 x 7.99 2 = 0.0033 radian
= m/10 = 6.55/10 = 0.655
Permissible rotation = n x bi max = 0.655 x 2 x 0.0033
= 4.323 x10 -3 radian > 2.5 x10 -3 radian
8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre
92/109
8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre
93/109
86
6.2.1 Longitudinal forces
(A) Braking Effect
For two lane bridge, braking effect is computed as 20% of the first train load +plus 10 % of the loads in succeeding trains.
20 % of first train load =20
100 (54 + 228) = 56.4 KN
10 % of the loads in succeeding trains. = 136 x10
100 = 13.6 KN
Total = 70 KN
Longitudinal force /bearing = 70/6 = 11.67 KN
(B) Friction Force( D.L + LL reaction at bearing ) coeff. Of friction = (309.42 + 240) 0.3
= 164.83 KN
Friction Per bearing =164.83
6 = 27.47 KN
(C) Wind LoadAssuming 10 m height
Wind pressure = 0.91 KN/m 2
Plan area of bridge span = 14 10.3 = 144.2 m 2
Wind force = 0.91 144.2 = 131.222 KN
Wind load per bearing =131.222
6 = 21.87 KN
Total longitudinal force per bearing = 11.67 + 27.47 + 21.87 = 61 KN
Rotation at bearing = 0.0025 radian
8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre
94/109
87
Effective span = 14.192 m
Maximum vertical load on bearing = N ma = 310 +240 = 550 KN
Minimum vertical load on bearing = N min = 240 KN
Try plan dimensions 320 500 mm and thickness 45 mm
Loaded area A 2 = 15 104 mm 2
From clause 307.1 of IRC: 21
Allowable contact pressure = 0.25 f c = 0.25 MPa
A1 / A2 >2Allowable contact pressure = 0.25 35 2 = 12.37 MPa
Effective area of bearing pressure =550 x 1000
12.37 = 44.462 103 mm 2
m =500 x10 3
15 x10 4 = 3.67 MPa
Thickness of individual elastomer h i = 10 mm
Thickness of outer layer h e = 5 mm
Thickness o steel laminates h s = 3 mm
Adapt 2 internal layers and 3 laminates
Overall thickness of bearing = 39 mm
Total thickness of elastomer in bearing = 39 (33) = 30 mmSide cover = 6 mm
Shear modulus assumed = 1.0 N/mm 2
8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre
95/109
88
Shear strain due to creep, shrinkage and temperature is assumed as 5 10 -4 andthis is distributed to 2 bearings.
Shear strain per bearing due to creep, shrinkage and temperature
=5 x10 -414.192 x10 3
2x30 = 0.12
Shear strain due to longitudinal force =61 x10 3
15 x10 4= 0.407
Shear strain due to translation = 0.12 + 0.407 = 0.527 < 0.7
(D) Rotation
bi max = 0.56mh i
bS2
S =(a-2c)(b-2c)
2 x(a+b-4c)h i
Here a = 500mm, b = 320mm , c = 6 mm , h i = 10 mm
Therefore, S =488 x 308
2 x 10 x (796) = 12> 9.44 > 6
Assuming m,max = 10MPa
bi max =0.5 x 10x 10308 x 9.44 2 = 0.0031 radian
= m/10 = 3.67/10 = 0.367
Permissible rotation = n x bi max = 0.367 x 2 x 0.0031
= 2.27 x10 -3 > 2.5 x10 -3 actual shear strain = 0.527 as calculated
0.2 + 0.1 m= 0.2 + 0.1 x 3.67 = 0.567 > 0.527
Also m satisfies 10 MPa > m > 2 MPa
8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre
96/109
89
6.2.2 Shear StressShear stress due to compression = 1.5 m / S = 1.5 x 3.67/ 9.44 = 0.58 MPa
Shear stress due to horizontal deformation = 0.527 x 1 =0.527 MPa
Shear stress due to rotation = 0.5 ( b/ h i )2 bi = 0.5 (
30810 )
2 X 0.0025 = 1.18 MPa
Total shear stress = 0.58 + 0.527 + 1.18 = 2.287 MPa < 5 MPa
The elastomeric pad bearing has the characteristics;
Plan dimensions = 320mm x 500 mm
Overall thickness = 39 mm
Thickness of individual layer = 10 mm
Number of internal elastomer layers = 2
Number of laminates = 3
Thickness of each laminate = 3 mm
Thickness or top or bottom cover = 5 mm
8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre
97/109
90
7 Conclusion
7.1 Deck Slab
Overall Depth = 225 mm
Reinforcement 16 mm Dia @140 mm c/c (1408 mm 2) along shorter span.
Reinforcement 16 mm Dia @140 mm c/c (1408 mm 2) along longer span.
7.2 Cantilever Slab
Depth at support = 350 mm
Depth at cantilever side = 100 mm
Main Steel Provide 16mm Dia bars @150 c/c (A st = 1340.67 mm2)
Distribution Steel Provide 8 mm Dia bars @150 c/c (A st = 335.33 mm2)
7.3 Longitudinal Girders
Width of rib = 300 mm
Spacing of main girder = 3200 mm
Overall Depth = 1600 mm
Outer Longitudinal Girder
Main reinforcement of 16 bars of 32 mm Dia in 4 rows(A st = 12873.14 mm2)
Shear reinforcement of 10 mm Dia 4 legged stirrups @150 c/c
Inner Longitudinal Girder
8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre
98/109
91
Main reinforcement of 12 bars of 32 mm Dia in 3 rows(A st = 12873.14 mm2)
Shear reinforcement of 10 mm Dia 4 legged stirrups @200 c/c
7.4 Cross Girders
Width of rib = 250 mm
Spacing of main girder = 4667 mm
Overall depth = 1600 mm
Main reinforcement of 5 bars of 25 mm Dia (A st = 12873.14 mm2)
Shear reinforcement of 8 mm Dia 2 legged stirrups @160 c/c
7.5 Bearings
7.5.1 Outer Bearings
Plan dimensions = 250 mm x 500 mm
Overall thickness = 40 mm
Thickness of individual layer = 10 mm
Number of internal elastomer layers = 2
Number of laminates = 3
Thickness of each laminate = 3 mm
Thickness or top or bottom cover = 5 mm
7.5.2 Inner Bearings
Plan dimensions = 320 mm x 500 mm
8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre
99/109
92
Overall thickness = 39 mm
Thickness of individual layer = 10 mm
Number of internal elastomer layers = 2
Number of laminates = 3
Thickness of each laminate = 3 mm
Thickness or top or bottom cover = 5 mm
8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre
100/109
93
References
1. IRC : 5 - 1998, "Standard Specifications and Code of Practice for Road Bridges,Section I General Features of Design", The Indian Road Congress.
2. IRC : 6 - 2000, "Standard Specifications and Code of Practice for Road Bridges,Section II - Loads and Stresses", The Indian Road Congress.
3. IS : 456 - 2000, "Plain and Reinforcement Concrete - Code of Practice", Bureauof Indian Standards, New Delhi, 2000.
4. Krishna Raju, N., "Design of Bridges".
5. Victor, D.J., "Essential of Bridge Engineering".
6. Punmia, B.C. and Jain, A.K., "R.C.C. Designs".
8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre
101/109
94
Appendix-A : IRC Loadings
IRC Class AA Loading
General:1. The nose to tail spacing between two successive vehicles shall not less than
90m.2. For multi- lane bridges and culverts, one train of class AA tracked or
wheeled vehicles whichever creates severer conditions shall be consideredfor every two traffic lane width.
3. No other live load shall be considered on any part of the two-lane width
carriageway of the bridge when the above mentioned train of vehicle iscrossing the bridge.
4. The maximum loads for the wheeled vehicles shall be 20 tonnes for a singleaxle or 40 tonnes for a bogie of two axles spaced not more than 1.2mcenters.
5. The maximum clearance between the road face of the kerb and the outeredge of the wheel or tack , C , shall be as under :
(a) Single lane Bridges
Carriage way width Minimum value of C
3.8 m and above 0.3 m
(b) Multi lane Bridges
Less than 5.5 m 0.6 m
5.5 m or above 1.2 m
8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre
102/109
95
Figure A.1: IRC Class A Tracked and Wheeled Vehicle
8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre
103/109
96
IRC Class A Loading
General:1. The nose to tail distance between successive trains shall not be less than
18.4 m.2. No other live load shall cover any part of the carriage way when a train of
vehicles (or trains of vehicles in multi- Lane Bridge) is crossing the bridge.3. The ground contact area of the wheel shall be as under :
Axle load (tones)Ground contact area
(B) (mm) (W) (mm)
11.4 250 500
6.8 200 380
2.7 150 200
4. The minimum clearance f , between outer edge of the wheel and the
roadway face of the kerb , and the minimum clearance g , between theouter edges of passing or crossing vehicles on multi-lane bridges shall be asgiven below (figure A.2)
Clear carriageway width g f
5.5 m to 7.5 m
Above 7.5 m
Uniformly increasing from0.4 m to 1.2 m1.2 m
150 mm for all carriagewayvehicles
8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre
104/109
97
Figure A.2: IRC Class A and B Loading Vehicles
8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre
105/109
98
Appendix-B: Impact Factors
Provision for impact or dynamic action shall be made by an increment oflive load by an impact allowance expressed as a fraction or a percentage ofapplied live load.
Class A or Class B LoadingIn the members of any bridge designed either for class A or class B loading, theimpact percentage shall be determined from the curves indicated in figure B.1
The impact factor shall be determined from the following equations which areapplicable for spans 3 m and 45 m.
Impact factor for R.C. bridges, I.F. = 4.5/ (6+L)
where L is the length of the span in meters.
Class AA LoadingThe value of the impact percentage shall be taken as follows:
For spans less than 9 mFor tracked vehicles: 25% for spans up to 5 m, linearly reducing to 10% for spans9 m.
For wheeled vehicles: 25%.
For span of 9 m or moreTracked vehicles: 10% up to a span of 40 m and in accordance with the curve for
spans in excess of 40 m.Wheeled vehicles: 25% for spans up to 12 m and in accordance with the curve forspans in excess of 23 m.
8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre
106/109
8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre
107/109
100
Appendix-C: K in Effective Width
Table C.1: Value of Constant 'K' (IRC 21: 2000)
8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre
108/109
101
Appendix-D: Pigeaud's Curve
Figure D.1: Moment Coefficient for Slabs Completely Loaded with UniformlyDistributed Load, Coefficients are m 1 for K and m 2 for 1/K
Figure D.2: Moment Coefficient m 1 and m 2 for K=0.6
8/10/2019 Final Report Rob Final-libre
109/109
Figure D.2: Moment Coefficient m 1 and m 2 for K=0.7