FINAL REMEDIAL DESIGN WORK PLAN TULSA FUEL AND MANUFACTURING COLLINSVILLE, OKLAHOMA February 2012 Prepared for Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality DCS Project # 12069C / PO# 2929014842 Burns & McDonnell Project No. 64496 Burns & McDonnell Engineering Company Engineers-Architects-Consultants Kansas City, Missouri
188
Embed
FINAL REMEDIAL DESIGN WORK PLAN TULSA FUEL AND ...
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
FINAL
REMEDIAL DESIGN WORK PLAN
TULSA FUEL AND MANUFACTURING COLLINSVILLE, OKLAHOMA
Engineers-Architects-Consultants Kansas City, Missouri
Remedial Design Work Plan Table of Contents Tulsa Fuel and Manufacturing - Collinsville, Oklahoma
WP_TOC.docx TC-1 02/06/2012
TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. LIST OF TABLES .................................................................................................................... TC-4 LIST OF FIGURES .................................................................................................................. TC-4 LIST OF SUPPORTING STAND ALONE DOCUMENTS .................................................... TC-4 LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS .................................................................. TC-5 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 1-1
1.1 Overview of RD Project .......................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Final Cleanup Levels ............................................................................................... 1-2 1.3 Description of Selected Remedy ............................................................................. 1-3 1.4 Work Plan Organization .......................................................................................... 1-4 1.5 Overview of Remedial Design Process ................................................................... 1-5
2.1 Site Description ....................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1.1 Surface Features .......................................................................................... 2-1 2.1.2 Meteorology ................................................................................................ 2-2 2.1.3 Surface Water Hydrology ............................................................................ 2-3 2.1.4 Geology ....................................................................................................... 2-4 2.1.5 Soil ............................................................................................................... 2-4 2.1.6 Hydrogeology .............................................................................................. 2-5 2.1.7 Demography and Land Use ......................................................................... 2-5 2.1.8 Ecology ........................................................................................................ 2-6
2.2 Site History .............................................................................................................. 2-7 2.2.1 Past and Current Site Activities ................................................................... 2-7 2.2.2 Regulatory History ...................................................................................... 2-8
2.3 Physical and Chemical Data to be Used in RD ....................................................... 2-10 2.3.1 Hydrology, Geology, and Hydrogeology .................................................... 2-11 2.3.2 On-Site Soil and Waste Materials ............................................................... 2-11 2.3.3 Surface Water and Sediment ....................................................................... 2-12 2.3.4 Ground Water .............................................................................................. 2-13
3.9.3.1 Project Delivery Strategy and Construction Schedule (SOW Tasks 9.1.1 and 9.1.2) ........................................................................................ 3-16
5.1 Project Staffing ........................................................................................................ 5-1 5.1.1 BMcD Project Manager .................................................................................. 5-1 5.1.2 BMcD Engineering Manager .......................................................................... 5-1 5.1.3 BMcD Field Site Manager / Project Geologist ............................................... 5-1 5.1.4 BMcD Health and Safety Manager ................................................................. 5-2 5.1.5 BMcD Site Health and Safety Supervisor ...................................................... 5-2 5.1.6 BMcD Quality Control Director ..................................................................... 5-3 5.1.7 BMcD Project Chemist ................................................................................... 5-3 5.1.8 BMcD Project Engineer .................................................................................. 5-3 5.1.9 BMcD Project Team ....................................................................................... 5-4
5.2 Project Coordination ................................................................................................ 5-5 5.2.1 Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality .......................................... 5-5 5.2.2 United States Environmental Protection Agency............................................ 5-5
5.3 Project Team Activities ........................................................................................... 5-6 5.3.1 Routine Team Meetings .................................................................................. 5-6 5.3.2 Community Involvement Activities ................................................................ 5-7 5.3.3 Monthly Progress Reports .............................................................................. 5-7 5.3.4 Invoicing ..................................................................................................... 5-7 5.3.5 Project Team QA/QC Reviews During Project Execution ............................. 5-7
APPENDICES APPENDIX A - Select Figures from Remedial Investigation Report APPENDIX B - American Burying Beetle Survey Report
Remedial Design Work Plan Table of Contents Tulsa Fuel and Manufacturing - Collinsville, Oklahoma
WP_TOC.docx TC-4 02/06/2012
LIST OF TABLES Table No. Title
1-1 Cleanup Levels for Chemicals of Concern 3-1 Geological and Waste Investigations 3-2 Hydrogeological Ground Water and Surface Water Investigations 4-1 Remedial Design Preliminary Schedule 4-2 Remedial Design Deliverables Schedule and Sequence
LIST OF FIGURES Figure No. Figure
2-1 Site Location Map 2-2 Site Topography Aerial Photographic Map 2-3 Site Feature Map 2-4 RI Soil Results vs. RAOs (0 – 0.5 ft bgs) 2-5 RI Soil Results vs. RAOs (0.5 – 2 ft bgs) 2-6 RI Soil Results vs. RAOs (2 – 4 ft bgs) 2-7 RI Soil Results vs. RAOs (> 4 ft bgs) 2-8 Estimated Depth of Waste Materials 2-9 RI Sediment Results vs. RAOs 2-10 RI Monitoring Wells 3-1 Soil and Waste Sample Location Map 3-2 Sediment Sample Location Map 3-3 Boring and Monitoring Well Location Map 4-1 Project Schedule 5-1 Organization Chart
LIST OF SUPPORTING STAND ALONE DOCUMENTS
Consultant Statement of Work – Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality (ODEQ), 2011,
Consultant Statement of Work for the Remedial Design for the Tulsa Fuel and Manufacturing Superfund Site, August.
Feasibility Study Report – Burns & McDonnell Engineering Company, Inc. (BMcD), 2007. Final Feasibility Study Report for Tulsa Fuel and Manufacturing, Collinsville, Oklahoma. October.
Record of Decision – United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), 2008. Record of Decision. Tulsa Fuel & Manufacturing Superfund Site, Collinsville, Tulsa County, Oklahoma. November.
Remedial Investigation Report – Burns & McDonnell Engineering Company, Inc. (BMcD), 2007. Final Remedial Investigation Report for Tulsa Fuel and Manufacturing, Collinsville, Oklahoma. August.
Remedial Design Work Plan Table of Contents Tulsa Fuel and Manufacturing - Collinsville, Oklahoma
WP_TOC.docx TC-5 02/06/2012
LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ABB American Burying Beetle ARAR applicable or relevant and appropriate requirements ATSDR Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry bgs below ground surface BMcD Burns & McDonnell Engineering Company, Inc. CA Cooperative Agreement CERCLA Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act CERCLIS Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information
System CFR Code of Federal Regulations CIH Certified Industrial Hygienist CIP Community Involvement Plan COC chain of custody CQA construction quality assurance CSI Construction Specification Institute DCS Oklahoma Department of Central Services DMP Data Management Plan DQCR Daily Quality Control Report DQO data quality objective EEO Equal Employment Opportunity oF degrees Fahrenheit FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency FS Feasibility Study FSM Field Site Manager FSP Field Sampling Plan gpm gallons per minute HASP Health and Safety Plan HRS Hazard Ranking System HSM Health and Safety Manager IC Institutional Control IDW investigation-derived waste LTM long-term monitoring MCACES Microcomputer Aided Cost Estimating System mg/kg milligrams per kilogram g/L micrograms per liter mph miles per hour msl mean sea level
Remedial Design Work Plan Table of Contents Tulsa Fuel and Manufacturing - Collinsville, Oklahoma
WP_TOC.docx TC-6 02/06/2012
LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS (continued) NELAP National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program NOE Notice of Exemption NPDES National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NPL National Priorities List NWCC National Water and Climate Center NWS National Weather Service OAC Oklahoma Administrative Code OCC Oklahoma Conservation Commission OCS Oklahoma Climatological Society ODEQ Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality O&M Operation and Maintenance ONHI Oklahoma Natural Heritage Inventory OSDH Oklahoma State Department of Health P&ID piping and instrumentation diagram PA Preliminary Assessment PPE personal protective equipment PRP Potentially Responsible Party QA quality assurance QAPP Quality Assurance Project Plan QC quality control RA remedial action RAO remedial action objectives RD remedial design RI Remedial Investigation ROD Record of Decision SAP Sampling and Analysis Plan SARA Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act SDB Small Disadvantage Business SEL State Environmental Laboratory SHSS Site Health and Safety Supervisor SI Site Inspection SMP Site Management Plan SOP standard operating procedure SOW Consultant Statement of Work for the Remedial Design for the Tulsa Fuel &
Manufacturing Superfund Site START Superfund Technical Assistance and Response Team TCLP toxicity characteristic leaching procedure TFM Site Tulsa Fuel and Manufacturing site in Collinsville, Oklahoma TGS Tulsa Geological Survey USCB United States Census Bureau USDA United States Department of Agriculture USEPA United States Environmental Protection Agency
Remedial Design Work Plan Table of Contents Tulsa Fuel and Manufacturing - Collinsville, Oklahoma
WP_TOC.docx TC-7 02/06/2012
LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS (continued) USGS United States Geological Survey VE Value Engineering yd3 cubic yards
* * * * *
Remedial Design Work Plan Introduction Tulsa Fuel and Manufacturing - Collinsville, Oklahoma
WP_01.docx 1-1 02/06/2012
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Burns & McDonnell Engineering Company, Inc. (BMcD), under contract with the Oklahoma Department
of Central Services (DCS) Construction and Properties Division (DCS Project #12069C / PO#
2929014842) on behalf of the Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality (ODEQ), will conduct a
remedial design (RD) for the Tulsa Fuel and Manufacturing site in Collinsville, Oklahoma (TFM Site).
The RD is 100 percent federally funded through a Cooperative Agreement (CA) between the ODEQ and
the United Stated Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA).
1.1 OVERVIEW OF RD PROJECT
A remedial investigation / feasibility study (RI/FS) was undertaken at the TFM Site from 2005 through
2007, and a Record of Decision (ROD) that describes the selected remedy for the TFM Site based on the
RI/FS was issued by the USEPA on November 24, 2008. The purpose of this RD Work Plan is to set
forth the requirements for the RD of the selected remedy as defined in the ROD. The RD is generally
defined as those activities to be undertaken to develop the final plans and specifications, general
provisions, and special requirements necessary to translate the ROD into the remedy to be constructed
under the Remedial Action (RA) phase. Specifically, this RD involves the design of a consolidation cell
and cap of TFM Site soil, sediment, and waste materials and waste materials present on properties
contiguous to the TFM Site that are contaminated with arsenic, cadmium, and/or lead. This RD Work
Plan is designed to provide the framework for conducting the RD activities at the TFM Site.
Tasks to be performed during the RD, which are detailed in Section 3.0, include the following:
Task 1 – Introduction
Task 2 – Project Planning and Support
Task 3 – Community Involvement
Task 4 – Data Acquisition
Task 5 – Sampling Analysis
Task 6 – Analytical Support and Data Validation
Task 7 – Data Evaluation
Task 8 – Treatability Study and Pilot Testing
Task 9 – Preliminary Design
Task 10 – Equipment, Services, and Utilities
Task 11 – Intermediate Design
Remedial Design Work Plan Introduction Tulsa Fuel and Manufacturing - Collinsville, Oklahoma
WP_01.docx 1-2 02/06/2012
Task 12 – Prefinal and Final Design
Task 13 – Post RD Support
Task 14 – Project Closeout
The RD will be performed in accordance with the Consultant Statement of Work for the Remedial Design
for the Tulsa Fuel & Manufacturing Superfund Site ([SOW] ODEQ, 2011) and consistent with the ROD
(USEPA, 2008). In addition, the RD will be performed in accordance with the Remedial
Design/Remedial Action Handbook (USEPA, 1995) and other guidance issued by USEPA regarding
conducting an RD. The RD Work Plan was also prepared to satisfy the requirements of the
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980, as
amended by the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act (SARA) of 1986.
The goal is to complete and deliver the final plans and specifications for the RD, including RA contract
documents within 24 months, dependent on funding availability from USEPA, after approval of the RD
Work Plan. The estimated completion for this work assignment to contract closeout is 26 months.
1.2 FINAL CLEANUP LEVELS
Remedial action objectives (RAOs) are the cleanup objectives for protection of human health and the
environment. ODEQ and USEPA developed RAOs for TFM Site soil, sediment, surface water, and waste
material. Cleanup levels were established for both residential and nonresidential soil. These site-specific
cleanup levels are the desired endpoint concentrations for each exposure route that are believed to provide
adequate protection of human health and the environment. Although the TFM Site is currently unused
vacant land, it is reasonable that future land use may be zoned residential based on development interest
in the general area. Cleanup to residential levels will result in partial unlimited use, unrestricted
exposure, and will be protective for human and terrestrial ecological receptors. The cleanup levels for the
TFM Site are presented on Table 1-1.
Materials such as broken retorts and condensers, slag, and other smelter related materials represent a
primary source material at the Site (USEPA, 2008). Although the contaminated soils present at the Site
represent a source material, they are not characterized as a “principal threat waste” because the resulting
soil contamination associated with this smelter material can be reliably contained (USEPA, 2008). For
purposes of the RD, waste materials that cannot be sampled can be identified by a visual standard. As
such, any visible waste material associated with the historical smelter operation will be addressed during
the RA for the TFM Site. A summary of the RAOs for the TFM Site are provided in the following
paragraphs:
Remedial Design Work Plan Introduction Tulsa Fuel and Manufacturing - Collinsville, Oklahoma
WP_01.docx 1-3 02/06/2012
On-Site Soil and Waste Materials: Protect human health by preventing direct contact, through
the ingestion or inhalation exposure pathways with arsenic, cadmium, and lead contaminated on-
site soil and waste material by reducing arsenic, cadmium, and lead concentrations to residential
levels less than 37 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg), 75 mg/kg, and 500 mg/kg, or to
nonresidential levels less than 200 mg/kg, 560 mg/kg, and 1,000 mg/kg, respectively. In addition
to numerical cleanup levels, visible waste associated with the historical smelter operation will be
addressed during the RA for the TFM Site (USEPA, 2008).
Sediment: Protect human health and the environment by preventing direct contact, through the
ingestion pathway, with arsenic, cadmium, and lead contaminated sediment by reducing arsenic,
cadmium, and lead concentrations to levels less than 181 mg/kg, 813 mg/kg, and 500 mg/kg,
respectively (USEPA, 2008).
Surface Water: Protect human health and the environment by preventing direct contact, through
the ingestion pathway, with contaminated surface water by reducing cadmium concentrations to
levels less than 238 micrograms per liter (µg/L).
1.3 DESCRIPTION OF SELECTED REMEDY
The selected remedy for the TFM Site was described in the ROD, and this remedy addresses the TFM
Site as one operable unit to manage the current and potential future residential risks associated with
exposure to soil, sediment, surface water, and waste. Approximately 200,000 cubic yards (yd3) of waste
material, including soil, sediment, and waste will be addressed through on-site consolidation and capping.
The consolidation and capping alternative meets RAOs and cleanup levels by preventing exposure and
contaminant migration. The alternative is cost effective; will provide a permanent remedy; and, is
effective in the short-term and long-term by containing contamination on-site by consolidation, capping,
and treating material, if necessary (USEPA, 2008).
Based on data obtained during the RI, the soil, sediment, and waste materials to be consolidated may
exceed the Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) regulatory level and may be a
characteristic hazardous waste under 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 261.24. Prior to
consolidation and capping, confirmation TCLP sampling will be conducted on the soil, sediment, and
waste material1. Based on the results, the material will be treated with high pH substance or other
1 Only waste material that is sufficiently small enough to not require manipulation such as crushing, grinding, or sieving will be submitted to the laboratory for TCLP analysis. Preparation steps that involve physically changing
Remedial Design Work Plan Introduction Tulsa Fuel and Manufacturing - Collinsville, Oklahoma
WP_01.docx 1-4 02/06/2012
stabilization compound if necessary before consolidation and capping. Since materials are being left on-
site, long-term monitoring (LTM), site inspections, operation and maintenance (O&M), institutional
controls (ICs), and five-year reviews will be required (USEPA, 2008).
A summary of each of the remedies for the on-site materials is provided in the following paragraphs:
On-Site Soil and Waste Materials: The selected remedy for on-Site soil and waste materials
includes the consolidation and capping of approximately 164,000 yd3 of soil and waste materials
that exceed the cleanup levels for residential or nonresidential arsenic, cadmium, and lead. The
materials will be excavated, analyzed for TCLP, stabilized if TCLP results exceed criteria
established in 40 CFR 261.24, and consolidated and capped on site. Confirmation soil sampling
will be conducted in each area of excavation to ensure cleanup levels have been met and all
contaminated soil and waste material has been removed and placed within the consolidation cell
(USEPA, 2008).
Sediment and Surface Water: The selected remedy for the on-Site Ponds, Mid-Site Ravine, and
Strip Mine Pit includes on-site fixation or stabilization and on-site disposal of approximately
33,000 yd3 materials that exceed the sediment cleanup levels. The areas will be dewatered;
sediment will be excavated; materials will be analyzed for TCLP and stabilized if TCLP results
exceed criteria established in 40 CFR 261.24; and consolidated and capped on site. Confirmation
sampling will be conducted in each area of excavation to ensure cleanup levels have been met and
all contaminated sediment has been removed and placed within the consolidation cell (USEPA,
2008).
1.4 WORK PLAN ORGANIZATION
The RD Work Plan provides the technical approach for completing the RD, including a summary of
historical information, cleanup objectives, selected remedy, additional data collection needs for the RD,
project schedule, and a project management. The sections of the RD Work Plan are as follows:
Section 1.0 – Introduction: This section provides an overview of the RD, a description of the
selected remedy, a summary of final cleanup levels, and an overview of the RD process.
the particle size of the tested material creates samples that are not representative of site conditions and fundamentally alters the sample’s analytical performance. Therefore, only waste materials with small particle size, having the appearance of soil, will be submitted for laboratory analysis of TCLP.
Remedial Design Work Plan Introduction Tulsa Fuel and Manufacturing - Collinsville, Oklahoma
WP_01.docx 1-5 02/06/2012
Section 2.0 – Background: This section summarizes current knowledge of the TFM Site,
including: location, general description, past and current site activities, regulatory history, and a
summary of physical and chemical data to be used in the RD.
Section 3.0 - Task Narrative: This section summarizes the key tasks to be performed during the
RD, including: introduction; project planning and support; community involvement; data
acquisition; sampling analysis; analytical support and data validation; data evaluation; treatability
study and pilot testing; preliminary design, identification/procurement of long-lead equipment,
services, and utilities needs; intermediate design; prefinal and final design; post remedial design
support; and, project closeout.
Section 4.0 – Schedule: This section summarizes the schedule for completing the RD tasks.
Section 5.0 – Project Management: This section summarizes project organization and
management structure to complete the RD.
Section 6.0 – References: This section presents the references used to prepare the RD Work
Plan.
1.5 OVERVIEW OF REMEDIAL DESIGN PROCESS
The primary elements of the selected remedy as documented in the ROD, which will need to be included
in the RD are as follows:
Excavation and consolidation of materials
TCLP testing and stabilization, if needed
Capping
ICs
Site inspections
Long-term O&M and monitoring
5-Year Reviews
The RD process for these elements will follow a planning, investigation, evaluation/reporting, and design
sequence with agency review of project documents as they are submitted. An outline of this process is
provided in the following paragraphs. Additional details regarding the schedule and sequential approach
to the RD process is provided in Section 4.0, and a description of project management is provided in
Section 5.0:
Remedial Design Work Plan Introduction Tulsa Fuel and Manufacturing - Collinsville, Oklahoma
WP_01.docx 1-6 02/06/2012
Step 1 - Project Planning: The initial RD efforts involve project planning including evaluation of
existing information; a site visit and scoping meeting with ODEQ; identification of additional
data needs; development of a RD Work Plan, Site Management Plant (SMP), Health and Safety
Plan (HASP), Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP), Field Sampling Plan (FSP), and Data
Management Plan (DMP); submittal of planning documents to ODEQ; and, modification to
planning documents based upon commentary and discussion with ODEQ.
Step 2 – Data Acquisition/Field Investigation: Immediately following finalization of the planning
documents, subcontractor procurement, and coordination with the Oklahoma State Environmental
Laboratory (SEL), data acquisition will commence. These activities include an American
Burying Beetle (ABB) survey to determine presence/absence of this endangered species on the
TFM Site; topographical survey of the TFM Site; visual reconnaissance and survey to identify
areas of visible waste materials; additional characterization of soil and sediment to more
accurately delineate the volume of materials requiring remediation as well as any stabilization
requirements; a geological and hydrogeological investigation to meet the requirements of
Oklahoma Administrative Code (OAC) Title 252. Department of Environmental Quality, Chapter
Evaluate non-impacted TFM Site soils and transition soils that may exceed residential cleanup
levels but fall below nonresidential cleanup levels for potential inclusion within the cap; and,
Determine appropriate placement of the consolidation cell based on minimization of RA and
O&M costs as well as long-term effectiveness of the remedy to protect human health and the
environment.
A summary of RI findings for the TFM Site relevant to the RD is provided in the following sections, and
additional details are provided in the RI Report (BMcD, 2007).
2.3.1 Hydrology, Geology, and Hydrogeology
A description of TFM Site hydrology, geology, and hydrogeology were previously provided in Section
2.1 and Appendix A. Additional details regarding physical characteristics of the TFM Site that will be
pertinent to the RD are provided in the RI Report (BMcD, 2007).
2.3.2 On-Site Soil and Waste Materials
Laboratory analytical results from sampling completed during the RI field activities indicate that on-site
surface and subsurface soils have been impacted with metals. A comparison of RI soil results at various
depth intervals to the RAOs is presented on Figures 2-4 through 2-7:
0 to 0.5 feet bgs, Figure 2-4: A broad area of soil samples with results in excess of the
nonresidential RAOs was located south of the access road/driveway and comprised the majority
of the southern portion of the TFM Site. Limited areas of soil results below the nonresidential
RAOs but in excess of the residential RAOs were noted. Areas of soil results below the
residential RAOs were noted in the western portion and northern portion of the TFM Site.
0.5 to 2 feet bgs, Figure 2-5: A broad area of soil samples with results in excess of the
nonresidential RAOs was located surrounding TFM Ponds 1 and 2 and the southern portion of the
TFM Site. Only sporadic locations of soil results below the nonresidential RAOs but in excess of
the residential RAOs were noted. Areas of soil results below the residential RAOs were noted in
the western portion and northern portion of the TFM Site as well as surrounding the former
residence.
Remedial Design Work Plan Background Tulsa Fuel and Manufacturing - Collinsville, Oklahoma
WP_02.docx 2-12 02/06/2012
2 to 4 feet bgs, Figure 2-6: The area of soil samples with results in excess of the nonresidential
RAOs was located surrounding TFM Ponds 1 and 2 and extended into the former
production/furnace area. The remaining soil results for the majority of the TFM Site were less
than the residential RAOs.
Greater than 4 feet bgs, Figure 2-7: Only the location surrounding RI trench location TR-09
exhibited soil results in excess of the nonresidential RAOs. The remaining soil results for
samples collected greater than 4 feet bgs were below the nonresidential RAOs.
Review of the TFM Site indicated a clear division into two areas: 1) areas of the TFM Site where waste
materials were not visually observed during sampling (i.e., on-site non-waste areas); and, 2) areas of the
Site where waste materials were visually observed during sampling (i.e., on-site waste areas). The extent
of on-site waste areas as well as the depth of waste materials visually observed during the RI is provided
on Figure 2-8. The depth of soil results in excess of nonresidential and residential RAOs corresponded to
the depth of visually observed waste materials.
Selected soil samples were collected for TCLP analysis during the RI to determine if the samples were
hazardous by characteristic. With one exception, exceedances of the TCLP criteria in 40 CFR 261.24
were only noted when waste materials were also present at the location and depth interval. Additional
soil sampling is planned during the RD investigation to determine if soils are present on the TFM Site that
would be considered hazardous by characteristic.
2.3.3 Surface Water and Sediment
Surface water and sediment were characterized during the RI for five on-site Ponds, one on-site drainage
(Mid-Site Ravine), and the Strip Mine Pit immediately adjacent to the waste area. The highest
concentration of metals was noted in surface water and sediment associated with TFM Ponds 1 through 3
and the Mid-Site Ravine. Waste materials were observed in and around these surface water bodies, and a
retort embankment was observed at Pond 3. In addition, smelter waste materials were observed to have
collapsed into the Strip Mine Pit.
It is anticipated that TFM Ponds 1 through 4, the Mid-Site Ravine, and the Strip Mine Pit will be
abandoned/decommissioned during the RA. As such, it is anticipated that these water bodies will be
drained and the water discharged prior to the remedial action. A one time sampling event from each of
these features is planned during the RD investigation for purposes of characterizing the water for
management and/or discharge.
Remedial Design Work Plan Background Tulsa Fuel and Manufacturing - Collinsville, Oklahoma
WP_02.docx 2-13 02/06/2012
A comparison of RI sediment results to the RAOs is presented on Figure 2-9. At least one sediment
sample from TFM Ponds 1 through 4 and the Mid-Site Ravine exceeded the RAOs. Since RI sediment
sampling was limited to 0 to 0.5 feet bgs, additional sampling is planned during the RD investigation to
delineate the vertical extent of sediment exceedances of RAOs. During the RI, Strip Mine Pit sediment
sampling was limited to discrete samples collected from the middle of the water body. Additional
sampling is planned during the RD investigation to delineate the horizontal and vertical extent of smelter
waste materials that have slumped from the on-site waste area into this water body.
One sediment sample was collected for TCLP analysis during the RI to determine if the samples were
hazardous by characteristic. No exceedances of the TCLP criteria were noted. Additional sediment
sampling is planned during the RD investigation to determine if sediment is present on the TFM Site that
would be considered hazardous by characteristic.
2.3.4 Ground Water
Seven monitoring wells were installed during the RI, and these wells are shown on Figure 2-10. One
upgradient well (MW-01) was installed to serve as the background well for the TFM Site. Four
additional monitoring wells (MW-02 through MW-05) were installed downgradient in the on-site waste
area to evaluate potential contaminant impacts to ground water. A deep well (MW-04D) was installed
adjacent to Monitoring Well MW-04 to determine the presence of ground water within the bedrock based
upon elevated cadmium results within Monitoring Well MW-04. Lastly, Monitoring Well MW-06 was
installed east of the TFM Site and downgradient of Monitoring Well MW-04 to evaluate the potential
migration of dissolved metals offsite.
Limited impacts were noted to ground water beneath the TFM Site. Low-flow ground water sampling
conducted during RI Phase II indicated that elevated metals concentrations (i.e., cadmium) were only
noted at Monitoring Well MW-04. The vertical extent of cadmium was defined by a ground water sample
from MW-04D, which was screened in a deeper interval than MW-04 and was non-detect for cadmium.
The downgradient horizontal extent of cadmium was defined at off-site Well MW-06, which was non-
detect for metals.
To meet the requirements for construction of an approximate ten acre consolidation cell, a
hydrogeological investigation as outlined in the OAC 252-515-7, will be performed during the RD
investigation. To meet conditions of OAC 252:515-7-5 Ground water Study, four monitoring wells will
be installed in close proximity to the proposed consolidation cell and ground water elevation
measurements will be collected monthly for one year. While these measurements are technically only
Remedial Design Work Plan Background Tulsa Fuel and Manufacturing - Collinsville, Oklahoma
WP_02.docx 2-14 02/06/2012
required for the four wells installed in close proximity to the proposed consolidation cell, elevation
measurements will be collected from all of the wells present at the TFM Site. In addition, a datalogger
will be installed in one well to provide continuous measurement.
While the OAC 252:515-7 does not require analytical sampling during the design phase, it is known that
smelter waste materials are present at depths that could intercept shallow ground water. Therefore,
quarterly ground water sampling is recommended as part of the RD investigation to add to the RI data that
support the determination that contamination is not present in ground water and migrating off-site.
Analytical sampling will include the four monitoring wells installed for piezometeric monitoring of the
proposed consolidation cell and the seven existing wells installed during the RI. In addition, ground
water events will be timed to coincide with ground water sampling that is on-going at the adjacent
Collinsville Smelter Site.
* * * * *
Remedial Design Work Plan Task Narrative Tulsa Fuel and Manufacturing - Collinsville, Oklahoma
WP_03.docx 3-1 02/06/2012
3.0 TASK NARRATIVE
The tasks (1.0 through 14.0) included in the SOW (ODEQ, 2011) are discussed in detail in this section.
3.1 INTRODUCTION (SOW TASK 1.0)
The RD is generally defined as the activities to be undertaken to develop the final plans and
specifications, general provisions, and special requirements necessary to translate the ROD into the
remedy to be constructed under the RA phase. The RA is generally defined as the implementation phase
of site remediation or construction of the remedy, including necessary O&M, performance monitoring,
and special requirements. The RA is based on the RD to achieve the remediation goals specified in the
ROD.
Tasks described in Section 3.0 will be performed in accordance with the SOW (ODEQ, 2011) and will be
consistent with the ROD, the Remedial Design/Remedial Action Handbook (USEPA, 1995), and other
USEPA RD guidance.
3.2 PROJECT PLANNING AND SUPPORT (SOW TASK 2.0)
This section presents how the TFM Site specific remediation goals, as specified in the ROD, will be met.
3.2.1 Project Planning (SOW Task 2.1)
Prior to developing this RD Work Plan, BMcD and ODEQ project personnel participated in a scoping
meeting and site visit on October 27, 2011, to develop a conceptual understanding of the RD requirements
for the TFM Site. The site visit was documented in the Site Visit Report, dated November 7, 2011
(BMcD, 2011). Existing information was evaluated during the development of this RD Work Plan. This
RD Work Plan presents the general approach and rationale that will be used for the RD.
3.2.2 Site-Specific Plans (SOW Task 2.2)
Site-specific plans will be developed to provide procedures to be followed during RD implementation.
Site Management Plan (SMP)
A SMP will describe how access, security, contingency procedures, management responsibilities, and
waste disposal will be handled. The SMP will consist of a Pollution Control and Mitigation Plan and a
Transportation and Disposal Plan (Waste Management Plan).
Remedial Design Work Plan Task Narrative Tulsa Fuel and Manufacturing - Collinsville, Oklahoma
WP_03.docx 3-2 02/06/2012
Health and Safety Plan (HASP)
The Remedial Design Site Health and Safety Plan (HASP) will be prepared to address health and safety
requirements for TFM Site workers and visitors. The HASP addresses employee training, protective
equipment, medical surveillance requirements, standard operating procedures (SOPs), and contingency
plan in accordance 40 CFR 300.150 and 29 CFR 1910.120.
Sampling and Analysis Plan (SAP)
A SAP will describe chemical data acquisition. The SAP will consist of a QAPP, a FSP, and a DMP.
The QAPP will be prepared in accordance in USEPA QA/R-5 format. The QAPP will describe the
project objectives and organization, functional activities, and quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC)
protocols that will be used to achieve the Data Quality Objectives (DQOs).
The FSP will describe sampling and data collection methods to be used for the RD. The FSP will include
sampling objectives, sample locations and frequency, sampling equipment and procedures, sample
handling and analysis, subcontractor responsibilities, and SOPs.
The DMP will describe the processes and systems used for handling data from collection through
analysis.
3.2.3 Project Management (SOW Task 2.3)
A description of the project management approach is discussed in Section 5.0 of this RD Work Plan.
3.2.4 Subcontractor Activities (SOW Task 2.4)
The following subcontractors will provide services for BMcD during implementation of the RD:
Analytical Laboratory Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality State Environmental Laboratory 707 N. Robinson Oklahoma City, OK 73102 Attn: April Hurst (405) 702-1038 [email protected]
Remedial Design Work Plan Task Narrative Tulsa Fuel and Manufacturing - Collinsville, Oklahoma
Remedial Design Work Plan Task Narrative Tulsa Fuel and Manufacturing - Collinsville, Oklahoma
WP_03.docx 3-4 02/06/2012
Surveyor L.W. Survey Company 2156 West Albany Street Tulsa, OK 74012 Attn: Michael Ray (918) 251-1035
Bench Scale and Field Test Treatability Study Contractor Remediation Services, Inc. 2735 South 10th Street Independence, KS 67301 Attn: Grant Sherwood (620) 331-1200
3.3 COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT (SOW TASK 3.0)
BMcD will provide community involvement support to ODEQ as necessary throughout the RD.
Community involvement support will be provided in accordance with Community Relations in Superfund:
A Handbook (USEPA, 1988). The CIP (ODEQ, 2011b) for the Site will be updated by ODEQ as
necessary.
As requested by ODEQ, BMcD will prepare fact sheets to inform the public about different stages of RD
activities. At least two separate fact sheets will be prepared. BMcD will also provide logistical and
technical support for public availability sessions and other community relations efforts, including the
TFM Site information repository and mailing lists.
3.4 DATA ACQUISITION (SOW TASK 4.0)
Data acquisition of environmental samples and information will be collected to support the RD. A
geological investigation will be conducted to provide additional data on surface soil, subsurface soil, and
sediment. A hydrogeologic investigation will be conducted to satisfy state solid waste regulations for the
consolidation cell. A surface water investigation will be conducted to provide information for
remediation of the surface water features on the TFM Site. A visual waste survey will be conducted on-
site and on properties adjacent and contiguous to the TFM Site to identify areas of visible waste. An
ecological investigation will be conducted to provide an understanding of the current ecological
conditions and considerations for RD implementation. RI investigation derived waste (IDW) present on
site will also be addressed.
Remedial Design Work Plan Task Narrative Tulsa Fuel and Manufacturing - Collinsville, Oklahoma
WP_03.docx 3-5 02/06/2012
3.4.1 Site Reconnaissance (SOW Task 4.2.1)
3.4.1.1 Topographic Survey
A topographic survey of the entire TFM Site will be conducted to develop the base map for the RD. The
survey will have one-foot contours and will be accurate to 0.05 feet on state plane coordinates. Ground
surface elevation will be established to within a minimum 0.01 vertical feet (above msl) relative to an
established United States Geological Survey (USGS) benchmark. The survey will capture tops and
bottoms of all slopes and all other breaklines. Property lines and utilities will also be included in the
survey. Surveying services will be provided by L.W. Survey Company of Tulsa, Oklahoma.
3.4.1.2 Visual Waste Survey
A visual waste survey will be conducted to determine the extent of waste material outside of the former
production area. Smaller areas of waste material exist onsite as driveway/road materials, in drainage
channels, and discontinuous “waste pockets”. Locations of waste materials identified outside of the
former production area will be mapped to document all visible waste materials for future incorporation
within the consolidation cell. Where waste is identified, soil samples will be collected to determine the
extent of impacted soil and need for stabilization of the soil prior to placing it in the consolidation cell.
Samples will be submitted to the SEL for off-site laboratory analysis of total arsenic, cadmium, and lead
and TCLP arsenic, cadmium, and lead (Table 3-1).
Waste material has also been observed to extend offsite to adjacent properties as road/path materials. A
visual waste survey will be conducted on all properties adjacent and contiguous to the TFM Site by
walking a 25-50 foot buffer around the perimeter of the TFM Site. Locations of waste materials
identified on off-site properties will be mapped to document all visible waste. Where waste is identified,
soil samples will be collected to determine the extent of impacted soil and need for stabilization of the soil
prior to placing it in the consolidation cell. Samples will be submitted to the SEL for off-site laboratory
analysis of total arsenic, cadmium, and lead and TCLP arsenic, cadmium, and lead (Table 3-1). If waste
materials are observed to extend beyond the properties adjacent and contiguous to the TFM Site, the
ODEQ Project Manager will be notified. RD activities conducted on properties beyond those that are
adjacent and contiguous to the TFM Site will be at the discretion of the ODEQ Project Manager.
The TFM Site is bounded immediately to the east by the Atchison Topeka Santa Fe railroad tracks,
currently owned and operated WATCO. An access agreement is not in place for this property and will
not be pursued for RD activities. A visual waste survey of this property will be conducted, as applicable,
from adjacent properties where access agreements are in place.
Remedial Design Work Plan Task Narrative Tulsa Fuel and Manufacturing - Collinsville, Oklahoma
WP_03.docx 3-6 02/06/2012
3.4.2 Geological Investigation (SOW Task 4.2.2)
A geological investigation will be conducted to verify volumes, determine the need for stabilization, and
identify a potential onsite borrow source that could be used for cap material. Surface soil and subsurface
soil samples will be collected from on-site locations to verify volumes and evaluate potential borrow
material. Sediment samples will be collected from on-site locations to verify volumes of sediment above
the RAOs and determine the need for stabilization.
3.4.2.1 Surface/Subsurface Soil Sampling
Surface and subsurface soil samples will be collected to further define on-site materials and determine the
need for stabilization. Surface and subsurface soil samples will be collected as indicated on Table 3-1.
Sample locations are presented on Figure 3-1, and additional locations will be identified following the
visual waste survey. Additional sample locations may be added based on conditions observed during
sampling, at the discretion of the ODEQ Project Manager. Further details on the proposed sampling
activities and a discussion of sampling methods will be described in the FSP.
Direct-Push Sampling
Direct-push sampling techniques will be used to collect soils in areas where slag-like materials are not
expected to provide subsurface obstruction. Direct-push services will be provided by Environmental
Priority Service, Inc. of Salina, Kansas. Sample locations will focus on RI sample locations where
vertical extent has not been fully defined, areas not heavily sampled during the RI, and observations made
during the visual waste survey (see Section 3.4.1.2). Sample locations may be adjusted based on
conditions encountered in the field.
Soil samples will also be collected at RI location SP-55 to define vertical extent of contamination. Three
sample locations will be near the on-site Ponds: one sample location will be located north of TFM Pond 3,
one sample location will be located southwest of TFM Pond 4, and one sample location will be west of
TFM Pond 4 near the low-lying area draining into TFM Pond 4. Additional soil sample locations will be
selected based on observations made during the visual waste survey.
Surface and subsurface samples will be collected at approximately 20 sample locations. Samples will be
collected from the surface (0-0.5 feet bgs), shallow subsurface (0.5-2 feet bgs), and deeper subsurface (2-
4 feet bgs). Samples will be submitted to the SEL in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, for off-site laboratory
analysis of total arsenic, cadmium, and lead and TCLP arsenic, cadmium, and lead.
Remedial Design Work Plan Task Narrative Tulsa Fuel and Manufacturing - Collinsville, Oklahoma
WP_03.docx 3-7 02/06/2012
Test Pits and Borings – Borrow Materials
Test pits and borings will be used to collect soils in on-site areas that have the potential to be used as a
borrow source for cap materials. Test pits will be used to collect disturbed geotechnical samples and
chemical samples. Borings will be used to collect undisturbed geotechnical samples. Test pit services
will be performed by Environmental Remediation Specialists, Inc. of Tulsa, Oklahoma. Boring services
will be performed by Mohawk Drilling, Inc. of Tulsa, Oklahoma. Sample locations will focus on areas
identified in the RI with metals concentrations below the RAOs. Samples will be submitted to the SEL
for off-site laboratory analysis of total arsenic, cadmium, and lead. Samples will also be submitted to a
geotechnical laboratory (Standard Testing and Engineering Company in Tulsa, Oklahoma) for off-site
analysis of Atterburg limits, hydraulic conductivity, sieve with hydrometer, soil bulk density, specific
water/moisture content, standard proctor, and modified proctor. Soil samples will also be collected for
analysis by the Tulsa County Oklahoma State University Extension office to determine fertility needs for
maximum growing effectiveness. Following evaluation of sample results from the potential borrow
sources, chemical analysis for additional analytes will be required prior to designating any area as a
borrow source (see Table 3-1).
Test Pits – Waste Characterization
A waste investigation will be conducted to define the extent of waste materials. Test pits will be used to
define horizontal and vertical extent of waste within the waste material area (see Figure 2-3), at the
perimeter of the waste material area, and in isolated waste material areas. A description of the waste and
thickness of the waste will be documented at each test pit (see Table 3-1).
In the waste material area, soil samples will be collected from the native clay under the waste to assess
any apparent leaching of materials from the waste into the subsurface and determine the need for
stabilization of the native clay. Samples will be submitted to the SEL for off-site laboratory analysis of
TCLP arsenic, cadmium, and lead.
If fine waste materials that have the appearance of soil are present at the perimeter of the waste material
area and at the isolated waste material areas, samples of these materials will be collected for
characterization. Soil samples will be collected from the soil under the deepest occurrence of waste
material to assess the need for stabilization of the soil at the perimeter of the waste material area and the
isolated waste material areas. Samples will be submitted to the SEL for off-site laboratory analysis of
total arsenic, cadmium, and lead and TCLP arsenic, cadmium, and lead.
Remedial Design Work Plan Task Narrative Tulsa Fuel and Manufacturing - Collinsville, Oklahoma
WP_03.docx 3-8 02/06/2012
3.4.2.2 Sediment Sampling
Sediment samples will be collected to determine vertical extent of sediment contamination and need for
stabilization. Sediment samples will be collected from TFM Pond 1, TFM Pond 2, TFM Pond 3, TFM
Pond 4, the Mid-Site Ravine, and the Strip Mine Pit. Sediment samples will be collected as indicated on
Table 3-1. Sample locations are presented on Figure 3-2. Details on the proposed sampling activities and
a discussion of sampling methods will be described in the FSP.
Samples collected from TFM Pond 1, TFM Pond 2, TFM Pond 3, TFM Pond 4, and the Mid-Site Ravine
will be collected from two depths (0.5-1 feet bgs and 1-2 feet bgs) at each location for analysis of total
arsenic, cadmium, and lead to determine vertical extent of contamination. Samples will also be collected
from one depth (0-0.5 feet bgs) at each location for analysis of TCLP arsenic, cadmium, and lead to
assess the need for stabilization prior to placing the sediment in the consolidation cell. Samples will be
submitted to SEL for off-site laboratory analysis.
The extent of smelter materials slumping into the Strip Mine Pit is unknown. Sediment cores will be
collected from the Strip Mine Pit along transect lines at various distances from the shore (transect lines
are illustrated on Figure 3-2). The cores will be visually inspected for the presence of waste materials.
Sample locations and depths will be determined based on visual inspection of the cores. Samples will be
collected from up to three depths at eight locations for analysis of total arsenic, cadmium, and lead to
determine vertical extent of contamination. One sample will also be collected at each location for
analysis of TCLP arsenic, cadmium, and lead to assess the need for stabilization prior to placing the
sediment in the consolidation cell.
3.4.3 Hydrogeological Investigation – Ground Water (SOW Task 4.2.3)
A hydrogeological investigation will be conducted to meet the requirements of OAC 252:515. The
hydrogeologic investigation is designed to meet permit requirements for the consolidation cell. Details of
the ground water hydrogeological investigation were developed to meet the requirements of OAC
252:515 Subchapter 7, Subsurface Investigation. Specific details of the Drilling Plan (per OAC 252:515-
7-4) are presented in the FSP. Boring, monitoring well, and ground water activities will be conducted as
indicated on Table 3-2. Boring and monitoring well locations are presented on Figure 3-3.
Based on the assumption of an approximate ten acre consolidation cell, the following activities are
planned. Six borings will be installed to 30 feet below the lowest elevation of the bottom of the waste
materials in the consolidation area. One boring will be advanced to a minimum of 100 feet bgs. Borings
will be advanced to bedrock (approximately ten feet bgs) using “dry methods” and will be advanced to
Remedial Design Work Plan Task Narrative Tulsa Fuel and Manufacturing - Collinsville, Oklahoma
WP_03.docx 3-9 02/06/2012
total depth using coring methods. Drilling services will be provided by Mohawk Drilling, Inc. of Tulsa,
Oklahoma. A lithologic log will be prepared for each boring. One geotechnical soil sample will be
collected from each type of soil encountered. Previous investigations indicate there are up to four types
of unconsolidated materials present at the TFM Site: a silty loam/silty sand; a clay; a lower silty
loam/silty sand; and the waste material. The geotechnical soil samples will be submitted for analysis of
Atterburg limits, hydraulic conductivity, sieve with hydrometer, and specific water/moisture content.
Geophysical logging using gamma ray/neutron logs will be performed at three of the borings.
Geophysical testing services will be performed by Enviro-Log Operations, LLC of Edmond, Oklahoma.
Upon completion, the borings will be abandoned.
Four monitoring wells will be installed to monitor ground water elevation in the proposed consolidation
cell area. Based upon previous investigations, ground water is present in an unconfined condition in a
thin zone located directly above bedrock. A lithologic log will be prepared for each boring. Borings will
be continuously sampled to the top of bedrock. The monitoring wells will be constructed with five feet of
screen that straddles the top of ground water.
RI data indicates that waste materials are present at depths that could intercept shallow ground water.
Three ground water sampling events conducted during the RI indicated that contamination is not present
in ground water and migrating off-site; this determination was made using six on-site wells and one
downgradient off-site well. If supplemental data points are desired to support this determination,
additional off-site monitoring wells may be installed to the east of the TFM Site following completion of
construction activities at the adjacent Collinsville Smelter Site. Installation of additional off-site
monitoring wells, while not planned at this time, will be at the discretion of the ODEQ Project Manager.
Ground water elevation measurements will be collected monthly in accordance with OAC 252:515
Subchapter 7, Part 5, Ground water Study. Although ground water elevation measurements are only
required for the four piezometers in close proximity to the proposed consolidation cell, ground water
elevation measurements will be collected from all of the TFM Site monitoring wells, including seven
existing monitoring wells and four proposed monitoring wells. A datalogger will be installed in one of
the wells to provide continuous ground water elevation data.
Analytical sampling is not required during the design phase; however, it is known that waste materials are
present at depths that could intercept shallow ground water. Quarterly ground water sampling of seven
existing and four proposed monitoring wells will be conducted to add to the RI data that support the
determination that contamination is not present in ground water and migrating off-site.
Remedial Design Work Plan Task Narrative Tulsa Fuel and Manufacturing - Collinsville, Oklahoma
WP_03.docx 3-10 02/06/2012
3.4.4 Hydrogeological Investigation – Surface Water (SOW Task 4.2.4)
Surface water samples will be collected for characterization for discharge purposes from TFM Pond 1,
TFM Pond 2, TFM Pond 3, TFM Pond 4, the Mid-Site Ravine, and the Strip Mine Pit. Surface water
elevation measurements will also be collected from TFM Pond 1, TFM Pond 2, TFM Pond 3, TFM Pond
4, and the Strip Mine Pit. Surface water samples will be collected as indicated on Table 3-2. Details on
the proposed sampling activities and a discussion of sampling methods will be described in the FSP.
It is anticipated that the surface water features onsite (TFM Pond 1, TFM Pond 2, TFM Pond 3, TFM
Pond 4, the Mid-Site Ravine, and the Strip Mine Pit) will need to be drained during the RA. Surface
water samples will be collected for characterization of discharge purposes (i.e., National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System [NPDES] parameters). Surface water samples will be collected in
conjunction with the first quarterly ground water monitoring event. If the ponds are drying during this
event, sample collection will be delayed to a later quarterly ground water monitoring event when the
ponds have water. Samples collected from TFM Pond 1, TFM Pond 2, TFM Pond 3, TFM Pond 4, the
Mid-Site Ravine, and the Strip Mine Pit will be collected for analysis of total arsenic, cadmium, lead,
manganese, and zinc. Samples will also be collected for analysis of water quality parameters required for
Extent of smelter materials slumping into Strip Mine Pit is unknown. Approximately three (3) days sampling by boat is planned. Sediment samples will be collected in a grid pattern at varying distances from shore. A sediment core device will
be pushed to depth, and samples will be collected from three (3) depths at each location. Only samples from eight (8) locations will be submitted to the lab. Samples will be submitted for analysis of Total As, Cd, and Pb from each depth
interval collected and TCLP As, Cd, and Pb from only one (1) depth interval per location.
Other locations 8 8 16
Samples included for miscellaneous drainages associated with the site. Samples will be collected if visual survey indicates that there are additional drainages beyond those identified in the RI, which should be characterized. The sampling rationale
will follow that described for TFM Ponds 1 through 4 and the Strip Mine Pit.Test Pits
Characterization - within waste material area
6 6
Characterization - perimeter of waste
material area9 9 9
Additional test pits to determine horizontal and vertical extent of waste materials. Fine material (soil and/or waste materials) will be collected for characterization. Soil samples will be collected from the soil under the deepest occurence of waste to
assess the need for stabilization of the soil.
Characterization - isolated waste material areas
5 5 5Additional test pits to determine horizontal and vertical extent of waste materials in isolated areas where waste materials
have been identified. Fine material (soil and/or waste materials) will be collected for characterization. Soil samples will be collected from the soil under the deepest occurence of waste to assess the need for stabilization of the soil.
Cap Materials 7 7
Geotechnical;Tulsa County
OSU Extension Office
Test pits and borings from various potential borrow areas on the Site. Analytical to include subcontracted geotechnical and analysis for total As, Cd, and Pb to determine soil concentration relative to ROD RAO. Based on findings, additional sample collection at later date for full analysis (i.e., VOC, SVOC, RCRA metals, pesticides, PCBs, and herbicides) will be performed.
Samples will also be collected for analysis by the Tulsa County OSU Extension Office to determine fertility needs for maximum growing effectiveness.
Visual WasteOn-Site 4 8 8Adjacent to Site 4 8 8
Additional surface soil and direct-push characterization to further define on-site materials. Estimate approximately 20 surface locations and 20 subsurface locations with samples from two (2) depths per location.
Visual survey of site and areas adjacent to site for waste materials. This is estimated to be one day on-site and one day off-site. If suspected smelter materials are encountered, then a sample will be collected. Estimate approximately eight (8)
locations with samples from two (2) depths per location.
TFM Ponds 1, 2, 3, and 4 and the Mid-Site Ravine exhibit concentrations of As, Cd, and/or Pb that exceed Sediment RAOs established in ROD. Additional sampling is needed to determine the vertical extent of contamination (two [2] depths
sampled for each location for Total As, Cd, and Pb). Additional characterization of sediments from these areas is also needed to determine need for stabilization (one [1] sample each location from surface interval for TCLP As, Cd, and Pb).
Only one RI pond sediment sample analyzed for TCLP As, Cd, and Pb.
Additional test pits to determine vertical extent of waste materials in and around the former smelter operations area. Soil samples will be collected from the native clay under the waste to assess the need for stabilization of the native clay.
K:\ENV\OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY\Site\64496\Deliver\WP\Final\Tables\Table 3-1.xlsx Page 1 of 2
Table 3-1Geological and Waste Investigations
Sample Collection and Field Activities SummaryTulsa Fuel and Manufacturing Superfund Site Remedial Design
No analysis needed. Waste generated during the RD will be disposed on-site accoding to USEPA's Guide to Management of IDW, 9345.3-03FS. IDW generated during the RI will be assessed and recontainerized as needed.
Task 4.2.7 Dispose of Investigation Derived Waste InvestigationRI Drums
SoilIncludes inspection of RI IDW drums for integrity. Based on ODEQ 6/17/11 inventory, there are currently 11 soil drums
present from the RI. No analysis is needed; however, drums will be assessed for integrity and content recontainerized as needed. It was assumed that all 11 drums would require recontainerization.
As - Arsenic RAO - Remedial Action ObjectiveCd - Cadmium RCRA - Resource Conservation and Recovery ActPb - Lead RD - Remedial DesignAASHTO - American Association of State Highway and RI - Remedial Investigation Transporation Officals ROD - Record of DecisionASTM - American Society for Testing and Materials SVOC - Semivolatile Organic CompoundBMcD - Burns & McDonnell Engineering Company Inc. TCLP - Toxicity Characteristic Leaching ProcedureIDW - Investigation Derived Waste TFM - Tulsa Fuel and Manufacturing
Geotechnical (Cap Materials) - Atterberg limits (ASTM D4318), Hydraulic Conductivity (ASTM D5084), Sieve with Hydrometer (ASTM D422), Soil Bulk Density (AASHTO T233), Specific Water/Moisture Content (ASTM D2216), Standard Proctor (ASTM D698), and Modified Proctor (ASTM D1557)
K:\ENV\OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY\Site\64496\Deliver\WP\Final\Tables\Table 3-1.xlsx Page 2 of 2
Table 3-2Hydrogeological Ground Water and Surface Water Investigations
Sample Collection and Field Activities SummaryTulsa Fuel and Manufacturing Superfund Site Remedial Design
Number of SEL Analytical Samples
MatrixNumber of Locations
Total As, Cd, and Pb
Field-Filtered As, Cd, and Pb
Total As, Cd, Mn, Pb,
and ZnWater
QualitySubcontract
Analytical CommentsTask 4.2.3 Conduct Hyrdogeological Investigation - Ground Water
Borings 6
Geophysicial and
Geotechnical Testing
To meet conditions in OAC 252:515-7-3, six (6) borings will be advanced using coring methods. Geophysical logs consisting of gamma ray/neutron will be obtained from three (3) of the borings. One soil sample from each type of soil
encountered will be submitted for geotechnical analysis of Atterberg limits (ASTM D4318), Hydraulic Conductivity (ASTM D5084), Sieve with Hydrometer (ASTM D422), and Specific Water/Moisture Content (ASTM D2216). Previous investigations indicate that there are up to four (4) types of unconsolidated materials present: a silty loam/silty sand; a
clay; a lower silty loam/silty sand; and the slag waste material.
Monitoring Well Installation
4Proposed Area of
Cap
To meet conditions of OAC 252:515-7-5 Ground Water Study, the following investigation will be required: installation of four (4) monitoring wells for monthly piezometric monitoring. These wells are to be installed in closer proximity to the
proposed capped area than the wells currently present at the site.While the OAC 252:515-7 does not require analytical sampling during the design phase, it is known that smelter waste materials are present at depths that could intercept shallow ground water. Therefore, quarterly ground water sampling is recommended to add to the RI data that support the determination that contamination is not present in ground water
and migrating off-site. Analytical sampling will include the four (4) monitoring wells installated for piezometeric monitoring of the proposed capped area, and the seven (7) existing wells installed during the RI (see below).
Ground Water Elevation Measurement
11
In accordance with OAC 252:515-7-5, Ground Water Study, ground water elevation measurements will be collected monthly. While these measurements are technically only required for the four (4) wells installed in the close proximity to
the proposed capped area, elevation measurements will be collected from all of the wells present at the site. In addition, a datalogger will be installed in one well to provide continuous measurement. (Note: Ground water elevation
measurement for four of the twelve events will be collected in conjunction with quarterly ground water sampling.
Ground Water Sampling
Quarterly Event 1 11 11 11
Quarterly Event 2 11 11 11
Quarterly Event 3 11 11 11
Quarterly Event 4 11 11 11
Task 4.2.4 Conduct Hydrogeological Investigation - Surface Water
Surface Water
Elevation Measurements
Surface water elevation measurements will be taken monthly from the on-site Ponds and the Strip Mine Pit. Activities will be conducted in conjuction with ground water elevation measurements, and the time estimate is included with that
While the OAC 252:515-7 does not require analytical sampling during the design phase, it is known that smelter waste materials are present at depths that could intercept shallow ground water. Therefore, quarterly ground water sampling is recommended to add to the RI data that support the determination that contamination is not present in ground water and migrating off-site. Analytical sampling will include the four monitoring wells installated for piezometeric monitoring
of the proposed capped area, the two additional downgradient wells installed above, and the seven existing wells installed during the RI.
Ponds and the mid-site ravine will likely need need to be drained during construction. A one time sampling event is planned for the ponds and ravine for purposes of characterizing the water for discharge. It was assumed that this
added one (1) day onto the first quarterly ground water sampling event.
K:\ENV\OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY\Site\64496\Deliver\WP\Final\Tables\Table 3-2.xlsx Page 1 of 2
Table 3-2Hydrogeological Ground Water and Surface Water Investigations
Sample Collection and Field Activities SummaryTulsa Fuel and Manufacturing Superfund Site Remedial Design
Number of SEL Analytical Samples
MatrixNumber of Locations
Total As, Cd, and Pb
Field-Filtered As, Cd, and Pb
Total As, Cd, Mn, Pb,
and ZnWater
QualitySubcontract
Analytical Comments
As - Arsenic ASTM - American Society for Testing and MaterialsCd - Cadmium BMcD - Burns & McDonnell Engineering Company Inc.Mn - Manganese OAC - Oklahoma Administrative CodePb - Lead RI - Remedial InvestigationZn - Zinc TCLP - Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure
TFM - Tulsa Fuel and Manufacturing
Geotechnical (Borings) - Atterberg limits (ASTM D4318), Hydraulic Conductivity (ASTM D5084), Sieve with Hydrometer (ASTM D422), and Specific Water/Moisture Content (ASTM D2216).
Water Quality - Specific conductance, pH, dissolved oxygen, and turbidity measures during field sampling. Laboratory analyses include: Hardness, Alkalinity, Chloride, Sulfate, Total Suspended Solids, Nitrate/Nitrite as N, Ammonia as N, Chemical Oxygen Demand, Total Organic Carbon, Biochemical Oxygen Demand, and Oil and Grease. Note: Field measurement of dissolved oxygen should be provided with Biochemical Oxygen Demand samples.
K:\ENV\OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY\Site\64496\Deliver\WP\Final\Tables\Table 3-2.xlsx Page 2 of 2
Table 4-1Remedial Design Preliminary Schedule
Tulsa Fuel and Manufacturing Superfund SiteCollinsville, Oklahoma
Task Description Date CommentsSTART Notice to Proceed 09/30/11
2.0 PROJECT PLANNING AND SUPPORT2.1 Project Planning
2.1.1 Scoping Meeting 10/27/11 No Set schedule2.1.2 Site Visit 10/27/11 No Set schedule
Site Visit Report 11/07/11 10 Days After Site VisitODEQ Review 11/14/11 7 Days after Receipt
2.1.3 Evaluate Existing Information 9/30/11 - 11/28/112.1.4 Off-Site Access Agreements
Info for Adjacent Property Owners 10/19/11Off-Site Letters Sent ODEQ Lead
2.1.5 Work PlanDraft 11/28/11 30 Days after Scoping MeetingODEQ Review 12/19/11 21 Days after receipt of WPComment Review Conference Call (Work Plan and Sampling and Analysis Plan)
01/20/12 After ODEQ Review
Final 02/06/12 15 Days after Conference Call2.2 Preparation of Site-Specific Plans
2.2.1 Site Management Plan (SMP)Draft 03/07/12 30 Days after approval of RD Work
PlanODEQ Review 03/19/12 10 Days after receipt of SMPFinal 04/03/12 15 Days after recept of ODEQ
comments2.2.2 Health & Safety Plan (HASP)
Draft 12/09/11 45 Days after Scoping MeetingODEQ Review 12/30/11 21 Days after receipt of HASPFinal 01/16/12 15 Days after recept of ODEQ
comments2.2.3 Sampling and Analysis Plan (SAP) [Quality
Assurance Project Plan (QAPP) + Field Sampling Plan (FSP)] and Data Management Plan (DMP)
Draft 12/09/11 45 Days after Scoping MeetingODEQ Review 01/12/12 21 Days after receipt of documents
Final 02/06/12 15 Days after Work Plan Conference Call
2.3 Project Management2.3.1 Monthly Progress Reports 10th of Month By 10th of Each Month2.3.2 Meeting Participation / Routine
2.3.3 Contract Closeout2.4 Subcontract Procurement and Support
Activities2.4.1 Identify and Procure Subcontractors 02/06/12 - 03/06/12 After approval of all plans, pre-field
activities2.4.2 Establish & Carry Out QA Program for
SubcontractorsPerformed within individual data
acquisition tasks2.4.3 Subcontract Management Performed within individual data
acquisition tasks
K:\ENV\OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY\Site\64496\Deliver\WP\Final\Tables\Table 4-1_Schedule.xlsx Page 1 of 6
Table 4-1Remedial Design Preliminary Schedule
Tulsa Fuel and Manufacturing Superfund SiteCollinsville, Oklahoma
Task Description Date Comments3.0 COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT
3.1 Develop Community Involvement Plan N/A ODEQ Task3.2 Prepare Fact Sheets As directed by ODEQ (Two during
course of project, early in project and post design)
3.3 Public Meetings Availability & Support As directed by ODEQ (Two during course of project, early in project
and post design)
3.4 Assisting in Maintaining Info Repository No set due dates4.0 DATA ACQUISITION
4.1 Mobilization and Demobilization4.1.1 ID Field Support Equipment & Facilities N/A Per assumptions, not needed.4.1.2 Mobilization N/A Included with each part of field
investigation (Task 4.2)4.1.3 Demobilization N/A Included with each part of field
investigation (Task 4.2)4.2 Field Investigation Phs 1: 02/29 - 03/23/12
7.0 DATA EVALUATION7.1 Data Usability Evaluation and Field QA/QC 03/26/12 - 04/13/12 QA/QC of boring logs, etc.
7.2 Data Reduction, Tabulation, and Evaluation 05/12 and GW Events
7.3 Develop Data Evaluation ReportData Evaluation Report - Soil and Geological Investigations (Phase 1 Field Activities)
Draft 05/03/12 10 days after receipt of analytical results from laboratory
ODEQ Review 05/18/12 15 Days after receipt of document
Final 06/04/12 15 Days after receipt of ODEQ comments
Coordination with SEL prior to and during field activities. Assumed 30-
Day turn around time for SEL.
K:\ENV\OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY\Site\64496\Deliver\WP\Final\Tables\Table 4-1_Schedule.xlsx Page 3 of 6
Table 4-1Remedial Design Preliminary Schedule
Tulsa Fuel and Manufacturing Superfund SiteCollinsville, Oklahoma
Task Description Date CommentsData Evaluation Report - Ground Water elevation measurement and sampling
Draft 01/21/13 10 Days after receipt of analytical data
ODEQ Review 02/05/13 15 Days after receipt of document
Final 02/20/13 15 Days after receipt of ODEQ comments
8.0 TREATABILITY STUDY AND PILOT TESTING8.1 Literature Search8.2 Develop Treatability and Pilot Study Work
PlanDraft 03/07/12 30 Days after RD Work Plan
approvalODEQ Review 03/28/12 21 Days after receipt of Work Plan
Final 04/09/12 10 Days after receipt of ODEQ comments
8.3 Bench Test 04/10/12 - 04/27/12 Planning, Sampling, Testing8.4 Pilot Scale Test (Not Applicable) N/A8.5 Field Test 04/30/12 - 05/18/128.6 Develop Treatability Study Report
Draft 07/17/12 60 Days after completion of treatability study
ODEQ Review 08/07/12 21 Days after receipt of reportFinal 08/22/12 15 Days after receipt of ODEQ
comments9.0 PRELIMINARY DESIGN
9.1 Preliminary Design / Design Criteria Report 10/05/12 45 Days after Final Treatability Study Evaluation Report
ODEQ Review 10/26/12 21 Days after receipt of report9.1.5 Basis of Design Report Includes Task 9.3
Draft 10/05/12 45 Days after Final Treatability Study Evaluation Report
ODEQ Review 10/26/12 21 Days after receipt of reportRevision -- Revised as neededODEQ Review Dependent upon need for
Revision15 Days after receipt of report
9.1-9.2 Preliminary Plans and Specifications9.1.1 Project Delivery Strategy and Scheduling9.1.2 Preliminary Construction Schedule9.1.3 Specifications Outline9.1.4 Preliminary Drawings and Schematics
9.1.6 Preliminary RA Cost Estimate9.2 Describe Variances with the ROD
ODEQ Review 11/21/12 30 Days after receipt of plans and specs
10/22/12 60 Days after Final Treatability Study Evaluation Report
K:\ENV\OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY\Site\64496\Deliver\WP\Final\Tables\Table 4-1_Schedule.xlsx Page 4 of 6
Table 4-1Remedial Design Preliminary Schedule
Tulsa Fuel and Manufacturing Superfund SiteCollinsville, Oklahoma
Task Description Date Comments9.4 Conduct / Assist in VE Screening
(VE Screening Report)10/22/12 60 Days after Final Treatability
Study Evaluation ReportODEQ Review 11/12/12 21 Days after receipt of report
9.6 Participate in Preliminary Design Review and Briefing
11/19/12 7 Days after receipt of ODEQ Comments
9.5 Respond to Design Review Comments 12/19/12 30 Days after Preliminary Design review meeting
ODEQ Review 01/03/13 15 Days after receipt10.0 EQUIPMENT, SERVICES, AND UTILITIES
10.1 List of Long-Lead Equipment, Services, and/or Utilities
02/01/13 30 Days after Preliminary Design approved
ODEQ Review 02/11/13 10 Days after receipt of list10.2 Plans and Specifications for Long-Lead
Procurement Items02/26/13 15 Days after receipt of ODEQ
comments on the listODEQ Review 03/13/13 15 Days after receipt
11.0 INTERMEDIATE DESIGNIntermediate Plans and Specifications11.1 Update Construction Schedule11.2 Intermediate Specifications11.3 Intermediate Drawings / Schematics11.4 Revised Basis of Design Report11.5 Revised RA Cost Estimate11.8 Describe Variances with the ROD
ODEQ Review 02/22/13 21 Days after receipt of plans and specs
14.0 Work Assignment Closeout14.0 Contract Closeout 12/04/13
14.1 Return Documents to ODEQ14.2 Duplicate, Distribute, and Store Files
14.3 Archive Files14.4 Prepare Closeour Report
GW = Ground WaterIDW = Investigation-Derived WasteN/A = Not ApplicableODEQ = Oklahoma Department of Environmental QualityOKC = Oklahma City, OklahomaPhs = PhaseQA = Quality AssuranceQC = Quality ControlRA = Remedial ActionRD = Remedial DesignRI = Remedial InvestigationSW = Surface WaterSEL = Oklahoma State Environmental Lab
30 Days after submittal of Final RA Contract Documents or as
otherwise directed by ODEQ
Dependent upon Direction from ODEQ
As directed by ODEQ
K:\ENV\OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY\Site\64496\Deliver\WP\Final\Tables\Table 4-1_Schedule.xlsx Page 6 of 6
Table 4-2Remedial Design Deliverables Schedule and Sequence
Tulsa Fuel and Manufacturing Superfund SiteCollinsville, Oklahoma
Task Deliverable Timing of SubmittalSubmittal Due
DateODEQ Review Period
Date for Completion of ODEQ Review
October 2011 Submittals4.2.6 American Burying Beetle
Survey Report30 days after
completion of survey10/19/2011 10 days after receipt of
report10/31/2011
November 2011 Submittals2.1.2 Site Visit Report 10 days after site visit 11/7/2011 7 days after receipt of
report11/14/2011
2.1.4 Draft Remedial Design (RD) Work Plan
30 days after scoping meeting
11/28/2011 21 days after receipt of RD Work Plan
12/19/2011
December 2011 Submittals2.2.2 Draft Health and Safety
Plan (HASP)45 days after scoping
meeting12/9/2011 21 days after receipt of
HASP12/30/2011
2.2.3 Draft Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP)
45 days after scoping meeting
12/9/2011 21 days after receipt of QAPP
12/30/2011
2.2.3 Draft Field Sampling Plan (FSP)
45 days after scoping meeting
12/9/2011 21 days after receipt of FSP
12/30/2011
January 2012 Submittals2.2.2 Final HASP 15 days after receipt of
ODEQ comments1/16/2012 N/A --
February 2012 Submittals2.1.5 Final RD Work Plan 15 days after
Conference Call2/6/2012 N/A --
2.2.3 Final QAPP 15 days after Conference Call
2/6/2012 N/A --
2.2.3 Final FSP 15 days after Conference Call
2/6/2012 N/A --
March 2012 Submittals2.2.1 Draft Site Management
Plan (SMP)30 days after approval
of RD Work Plan3/7/2012 10 days after receipt of
SMP3/19/2012
8.2 Draft Treatability Study Work Plan
30 days after RD Work Plan Approval
3/7/2012 21 days after receipt of Treatability Study Work
Plan
3/28/2012
April 2012 Submittals2.2.1 Final SMP 15 days after receipt of
ODEQ comments4/3/2012 N/A --
8.2 Final Treatability Study Work Plan
10 days after receipt of ODEQ comments
4/9/2012 N/A --
K:\ENV\OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY\Site\64496\Deliver\WP\Final\Tables\Table 4-2_Deliverable Schedule.xlsx
Table 4-2Page 1 of 4
Table 4-2Remedial Design Deliverables Schedule and Sequence
Tulsa Fuel and Manufacturing Superfund SiteCollinsville, Oklahoma
Task Deliverable Timing of SubmittalSubmittal Due
DateODEQ Review Period
Date for Completion of ODEQ Review
May 2012 Submittals7.3 Data Evaluation
Summary Report - Soil and Geological
Investigations (Phase 1 Field Activities)
10 days after receipt of analytical results from
laboratory
5/3/2012 15 days after receipt of report
5/18/2012
June 2012 Submittals7.3 Final Data Evaluation
Summary Report - Soil and Geological
Investigations (Phase 1 Field Activities)
15 days after receipt of ODEQ comments
6/4/2012 NA --
July 2012 Submittals8.6 Draft Treatability Study
Evaluation Report60 days after completion of
treatability study
7/17/2012 21 days after receipt of report
8/7/2012
August 2012 Submittals8.6 Final Treatability Study
Evaluation Report15 days after receipt of
ODEQ comments8/22/2012 N/A --
October 2012 Submittals9.1 Design Criteria Report 45 days after Final
Treatability Study Report
10/5/2012 21 days after receipt of report
10/26/2012
9.1.5 Basis of Design Report 45 days after Final Treatability Study
Report
10/5/2012 21 days after receipt of report
10/26/2012
9.1.4 Preliminary Plans and Specifications (Note 1)
60 days after Final Treatability Study
Report
10/22/2012 30 days after receipt of plans and specs
11/21/2012
9.4 Value Engineering (VE) Screening Report
60 days after Final Treatability Study
Report
10/22/2012 21 days after receipt of report
11/12/2012
December 2012 Submittals9.5 Response to Preliminary
Design Review Comments
30 days after design review meeting
12/19/2012 15 days after receipt of response
1/3/2013
January 2013 Submittals7.3 Data Evaluation
Summary Report - Groundwater (GW)
elevation measurement and GW sampling
10 days after receipt of analytical results from
laboratory
1/21/2013 15 days after receipt of report
2/5/2013
K:\ENV\OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY\Site\64496\Deliver\WP\Final\Tables\Table 4-2_Deliverable Schedule.xlsx
Table 4-2Page 2 of 4
Table 4-2Remedial Design Deliverables Schedule and Sequence
Tulsa Fuel and Manufacturing Superfund SiteCollinsville, Oklahoma
Task Deliverable Timing of SubmittalSubmittal Due
DateODEQ Review Period
Date for Completion of ODEQ Review
February 2013 Submittals10.1 List of Long-Lead
Procurement Items30 days after
Preliminary Design approved
2/1/2013 10 days after receipt of list
2/11/2013
11.0 Intermediate Plans and Specifications (Note 2)
30 days after Preliminary Design
approved
2/1/2013 21 days after receipt of plans and specs
2/22/2013
7.3 Final Data Evaluation Summary Report - GW
15 days after receipt of ODEQ comments
2/20/2013 NA --
10.2 Plans and Specifications for Procurements of
Long-Lead Procurement Items
15 days after receipt of ODEQ comments on
the Long-Lead Procurement Item List
2/26/2013 15 days after receipt of plans and specs
3/13/2013
March 2013 Submittals11.9 Response to
Intermediate Design Review Comments
15 days after design review meeting
3/26/2013 15 days after the receipt of response
4/10/2013
May 2013 Submittals12.0 Prefinal Plans and
Specifications (Note 3)30 days after
Intermediate design approved
5/10/2013 21 days after receipt of plans and specs
5/31/2013
June 2013 Submittals12.6 Response to Prefinal
Design review comments15 days after design
review meeting6/28/2013 15 days after receipt of
response7/15/2013
August 2013 Submittals12.5 100 Percent Design 30 days after resolution
of Prefinal Design review comments
8/14/2013 N/A --
September 2013 Submittals12.7 Draft Remedial Action
(RA) Contract Documents
30 days after Final Design approved
9/13/2013 21 days after receipt of RA Contract Documents
10/4/2013
November 2013 Submittals12.7 Final RA Contract
Documents30 days after receipt of ODEQ comments on
draft documents
11/4/2013 N/A --
ITEMS WITH DUE DATES DEPENDENT UPON NEED FOR TASK3.2 Fact Sheets As needed -- 15 days after receipt of
fact sheet--
9.1.5 Basis of Design Report (Revision)
Revised and distributed as necessary
-- 15 days after receipt of report
--
11.7 VE Report (if needed) 30 days after initiation of VE Study
-- 21 days after receipt of report
--
K:\ENV\OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY\Site\64496\Deliver\WP\Final\Tables\Table 4-2_Deliverable Schedule.xlsx
Table 4-2Page 3 of 4
Table 4-2Remedial Design Deliverables Schedule and Sequence
Tulsa Fuel and Manufacturing Superfund SiteCollinsville, Oklahoma
Task Deliverable Timing of SubmittalSubmittal Due
DateODEQ Review Period
Date for Completion of ODEQ Review
Note 1 = Preliminary Plans and Specifications Submittal Items:9.1.1 Project Delivery Strategy and Scheduling9.1.2 Preliminary RA Schedule9.1.3 Specifications Outline9.1.4 Preliminary Drawings and Schematics9.1.5 Basis of Design Report9.1.6 Preliminary RA Cost Estimate
9.2 Variances from the ROD
Note 2 = Intermediate Plans and Specifications Submittal Items:11.1 Update Construction Schedule11.2 Intermediate Specifications11.3 Intermediate Drawings and Schematics11.4 Revised Basis of Design Report11.5 RA Cost Estimate11.8 Variances from the ROD
Note 3 = Prefinal Plans and Specifications Submittal Items:12.1 Prefinal Drawings and Specifications12.2 Prefinal Drawings Reductions12.3 Final Basis of Design Report12.4 Revised RA Cost Estimate12.7 Subcontract Award Documents12.8 Bid availability, Operability, and Constructability Reviews12.9 Revised Project Delivery Strategy and Schedule
12.10 Document VE Modifications (If needed)12.11 Draft O&M Manual12.12 CQA Plan
K:\ENV\OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY\Site\64496\Deliver\WP\Final\Tables\Table 4-2_Deliverable Schedule.xlsx
Table 4-2Page 4 of 4
FIGURES
Collinsville Smelter
Collinsville Strip Mine
Tulsa Fueland
Manufacturing
Mid-Site RavineIntermittent Drainage
Access Road/Driveway
"Old" U.S. Highway 169
136th Street
Blackjack Creek
ACME BrickStrip Mines
HorsepenCreek
Caney River
Intermittent DrainageStrip Mine Pit
126th Street
U\Tu
lsa Fu
els\A
RC\Ar
cDoc
s\WP F
igures
\Fina
l\Fig2
-1Site
_Loc
ation
_Map
_11X
17.m
xd
mrb t
c 05
/16/20
05 1
:2400
0 Site Location
LEGENDSite BoundaryCollinsville Smelter and Strip MineHydrographyRailroadsRoads
If any consituent exceeded the RAO, then the location washighlighted as an exceedance.
mg/kg = milligrams per kilogramRAO = Remedial Action Objective
NOTE:
EC-02
TFM
PZ-09
PZ-07
PZ-04
Pond 1
SP-21SP-19
SP-53
SP-50SP-51SP-52
SP-49SP-48SP-45
SP-41SP-44
SP-38SP-37
SP-36SP-34
SP-30
SP-33
SP-28 SP-27
SP-26SP-25
SP-24
SP-23SP-18
SP-16
SP-08SP-13SP-14
TR-12
TR-16
TR-17
TR-08TR-09TR-13
TR-19
TR-11
TR-02TR-05
TR-01
TR-15
TR-04
TR-14TR-18
TR-20
TR-10
TR-21
TR-03
TR-06
TR-07
SP-12SP-15
SP-07
SP-06SP-05SP-04SP-02
SP-47
SP-40
SP-46
SP-42SP-43
SP-35
SP-39
SP-31SP-32
SP-29
SP-22SP-20SP-17
SP-09SP-10SP-11
SP-03SP-01
Pond 4
Pond 3
Pond 2
Mid-Site RavineIntermittent Drainage
Pond 5
Strip Mine Pit
Intermitte
nt Drainage
FormerSmelter
OperationsArea
FormerResidence
Former Strip Mining Area(Acme Brick Strip Mine)
Access Road/Driveway
FaithAssemblyChurch
South 12th Street
"Old" U.S. Highway 169
Collinsville Smelter
Atchinson Topeka Santa Fe Railroad
SP-54
SP-60
SP-55
SP-56
SP-57SP-59
SP-58
U:\TulsaFuels\ARC\ArcDocs\2011\Fig2-8_Estimated_Depth_of_Waste_Materials.mxd sos Jan 7, 2012
TULSA FUEL AND MANUFACTURING Collinsville, OK
ESTIMATED DEPTH OFWASTE MATERIALS
Figure 2-8
LEGEND
Surface
Surface/Subsurface
Temporary Piezometer
Trenching
Ecological / Vegetation
Site Boundary
Water Bodies
Collinsville Smelter
Former Smelter Oper. Area
Hydrography
Roads
N300 0 300
S C A L E I N F E E T
< 1 FT BGS
1 - 2 FT BGS
2 - 3 FT BGS
3 - 5 FT BGS
5 - 7 FT BGSAreas were smelter waste was visually observedduring the Remedial Investigation are shown.
The values presented on the figure indicate themaximum depth at which waste materials were observed.
The Access Road/Driveway is composed of waste materials.Depth will be confirmed during the remedial design investigationactivities.
ft bgs = feet below ground surface
NOTE:
ESTIMATED DEPTH OF WASTE MATERIALSVISUALLY OBSERVED DURING RI
OFF-03
Strip Mine Pit
Mid-Site RavineIntermittent Drainage
Pond 5
Pond 4
Pond 3
Pond 2 Pond 1
Intermitte
nt Drainage
FormerSmelter
OperationsArea
Atchinson Topeka Santa Fe Railroad
Blackjack Creek
"Old" U.S. Highway 169
Collinsville Smelter
South 12th StreetFaithAssemblyChurch
Access Road/Driveway
FormerResidence
Former Strip Mining Area(Acme Brick Strip Mine)
FP-03
FP-02
FP-01
OFF-20
OFF-19
OFF-18
OFF-17
OFF-16
OFF-15
OFF-14
OFF-01
OFF-04
OFF-02
MSR-03 OFF-05
OFF-06OFF-07
OFF-08PD1-03
PD1-02
PD1-01
OFF-09
OFF-10
PD2-02
PD2-01
PD3-02
PD3-01
PD4-01
PD5-01
MSR-02
CST-01
MSR-01
OFF-13
OFF-12
OFF-11
SMP-06
SMP-05
SMP-04
SMP-03
SMP-02SMP-01
TULSA FUEL AND MANUFACTURING Collinsville, OK
RI SEDIMENT RESULTSVS
RAOs
Figure 2-9
U:\TulsaFuels\ARC\ArcDocs\2011\Fig2-9_RI_Sediment_Results_VS_RAOs.mxd sos Nov 21, 2011
300 0 300
S C A L E I N F E E T
N
LEGEND
Surface Water and SedimentSample Locations
Sample Result > RAO
Site Boundary
Water Bodies
Waste Materials Encountered
Former Smelter Oper. Area
Collinsville Smelter
Hydrography
Roads
PD4
MSR Mid Site RavineSMP
PD5 Pond 5
Pond 4
PD3 Pond 3PD2 Pond 2PD1 Pond 1CST Cistern
Strip Mine PitNOTE:
Sediment samples were collected from 0 - 0.5 feetbelow ground surface (ft bgs).
Sediment RAOs are as follows: Arsenic = 181 mg/kg Cadmium = 813 mg/kg Lead = 500 mg/kg
If any consituent exceeded the RAO, then the location washighlighted as an exceedance.
mg/kg = milligrams per kilogramRAO = Remedial Action Objective
Pond 4
Pond 3
Pond 2
Mid-Site RavineIntermittent Drainage
Pond 5
Strip Mine Pit
Blackjack Creek
Intermitte
nt Drainage
FormerSmelter
OperationsArea
FormerResidence
Former Strip Mining Area(Acme Brick Strip Mine)
Access Road/Driveway
FaithAssemblyChurch
South 12th Street
"Old" U.S. Highway 169
Collinsville Smelter
Atchinson Topeka Santa Fe Railroad
MW-05
MW-04
MW-03
MW-02
MW-01
RW-01
MW-06MW-04D
Pond 1
Figure 2-10
RIMONITORING WELLS
TULSA FUEL AND MANUFACTURING Collinsville, OK
U:\TulsaFuels\ARC\ArcDocs\2011\Fig2-10_RI_Monitoring_Wells.mxd sos Jan 3, 2012
LEGEND
Monitoring Well
Residential Well
Site Boundary
Water Bodies
Waste Materials Encountered
Collinsville Smelter
Former Smelter Oper. Area
Hydrography
Roads
300 0 300
S C A L E I N F E E T
N
Pond 1
Pond 4
Pond 3
Pond 2
Mid-Site RavineIntermittent Drainage
Pond 5
Strip Mine Pit
Blackjack Creek
Intermitte
nt Drainage
FormerSmelter
OperationsArea
FormerResidence
Former Strip Mining Area(Acme Brick Strip Mine)
Access Road/Driveway
FaithAssemblyChurch
South 12th Street
"Old" U.S. Highway 169
Collinsville Smelter
Atchinson Topeka Santa Fe Railroad
TP-07
TP-05
SP-64
TP-04
SP-63
SP-62SP-61
TP-01
TP-03
TP-02
TP-06
TR-25
TR-26
TR-27
TR-30
TR-29
TR-28
TR-24TR-23
TR-22TR-32TR-31
TR-41
TR-33TR-40
TR-36TR-35TR-34
TR-37TR-38
TR-39
U:\TulsaFuels\ARC\ArcDocs\2011\Fig3-1_New_Soil_Waste_Sample_Location.mxd sos Jan 3, 2012
TULSA FUEL AND MANUFACTURING Collinsville, OK
SOIL AND WASTESAMPLE LOCATION MAP
Figure 3-1
LEGEND
Surface/Subsurface
Test Pit (Characterization)
Test Pit (Cap Materials)
Site Boundary
Water Bodies
Waste Materials Encountered
Collinsville Smelter
Former Smelter Oper. Area
Hydrography
Roads
N300 0 300
S C A L E I N F E E T
Additional soil sample locations will be selectedbased on observations made during theVisual Waste Survey (20 soil sample locationsare planned).
NOTE:
Strip Mine Pit
Mid-Site RavineIntermittent Drainage
Pond 5
Pond 4
Pond 3
Pond 2Pond 1
Intermitte
nt Drainage
FormerSmelter
OperationsArea Atchinson Topeka Santa Fe Railroad
Blackjack Creek
"Old" U.S. Highway 169
Collinsville Smelter
South 12th StreetFaithAssemblyChurch
Access Road/Driveway
FormerResidence
Former Strip Mining Area(Acme Brick Strip Mine)
MSR-08MSR-07MSR-06
MSR-04
MSR-05
PD1-08
PD1-07
PD1-06
PD1-04
PD2-05
PD2-04
PD2-03
PD4-02
PD4-03
PD3-05PD3-06
PD3-03
PD1-05
PD2-06
PD3-04
SM
PT-
09
SM
PT-
06
SM
PT-
07
SM
PT-01
SM
PT-
08
SMPT-11
SMPT-12
SMPT-10
SM
PT-
04
SM
PT-
05
SM
PT-03
SM
PT-02
U:\TulsaFuels\ARC\ArcDocs\2011\Fig3-2_Sediment_Sample_Location.mxd sos Jan 3, 2012
300 0 300
S C A L E I N F E E T
N
LEGEND
Sediment
Strip Mine Pit Transect
Site Boundary
Water Bodies
Waste Materials Encountered
Former Smelter Oper. Area
Collinsville Smelter
Hydrography
Roads
PD4
MSR Mid Site RavinePD5 Pond 5
Pond 4
PD3 Pond 3PD2 Pond 2PD1 Pond 1
SMPT Strip Mine Pit Transect
NOTE:
Strip Mine Pit sediment sample locations will selectedin the field based on visual inspection of core samples(8 sediment sample locations with up to 3 intervalsper location are planned).
TULSA FUEL AND MANUFACTURING Collinsville, OK
SEDIMENTSAMPLE LOCATION MAP
Figure 3-2
Pond 4
Pond 3
Pond 2
Mid-Site RavineIntermittent Drainage
Pond 5
Strip Mine Pit
Blackjack Creek
Intermitte
nt Drainage
FormerSmelter
OperationsArea
FormerResidence
Former Strip Mining Area(Acme Brick Strip Mine)
Access Road/Driveway
FaithAssemblyChurch
South 12th Street
"Old" U.S. Highway 169
Collinsville Smelter
Atchinson Topeka Santa Fe Railroad
MW-05
MW-04
MW-03
MW-02
MW-01
RW-01
MW-06MW-04D
B-06B-05
B-04
B-03B-02B-01MW-08
MW-10
MW-09
MW-07
Pond 1
Figure 3-3
BORING AND MONITORING WELLLOCATION MAP
TULSA FUEL AND MANUFACTURING Collinsville, OK
U:\TulsaFuels\ARC\ArcDocs\2011\Fig3-3_Boring_Monitoring_Wells.mxd sos Jan 3, 2012
LEGEND
RD Boring
RD Monitoring Well
RI Monitoring Well
Residential Well
Site Boundary
Water Bodies
Waste Materials Encountered
Collinsville Smelter
Former Smelter Oper. Area
Hydrography
Roads
300 0 300
S C A L E I N F E E T
N
ID Task Name Duration Start Finish
1 Notice to Proceed 0 days Fri 9/30/11 Fri 9/30/11
2 2.0 Project Planning and Support 567 days? Fri 9/30/11 Mon 12/2/13
3 2.1 Project Planning 92 days Fri 9/30/11 Mon 2/6/12
4 111825 2 9 162330 6 132027 4 111825 1 8 152229 5 121926 4 111825 1 8 152229 6 132027 3 101724 1 8 152229 5 121926 2 9 162330 7 142128 4 111825 2 9 162330 6 132027 3 101724 3 10172431 7 142128 5 121926 2 9 162330 7 142128 4 111825 1 8 152229 6 132027 3 101724 1 8Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov D
2012 2013
Task Milestone Summary Review
Figure 4-1Preliminary Schedule
Tulsa Fuel and Manufacturing Superfund SiteCollinsville, Oklahoma
Site BoundaryWater BodiesCollinsville SmelterHydrographyWetlandsFormer Smelter Oper. AreaWaste Materials EncounteredGroundwater ContoursProposed Monitoring WellMonitoring WellResidental Well
LEGEND
APPENDIX B
American Burying Beetle Survey Report
1
Shelton, Sharon
From: Steve Votaw [[email protected]]Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2011 10:36 AMTo: Shelton, SharonSubject: RE: TFIM, Collinsville, OK
Sharon, Thank you. I forwarded this approval to Brian Roh earlier this week. This is the official and only response we will receive. The survey was approved and the project cleared. Hopefully the site will be reclaimed by May 20, 2012. If not please let me know. Please retain for your records. Thank you ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) has reviewed the following American burying beetle (ABB) survey report: Tulsa County, Oklahoma regarding the Tulsa Fuels Reclamation Project for the Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality ending September 19, 2011. This American burying beetle (ABB) survey report indicates that no ABBs were captured at the proposed project site. This survey is valid until May 20, 2012. Since the survey results are negative, and we have reviewed and approved the survey report, no further section 7 consultation with the Service concerning the ABB is required. This response does not pertain to any other federally‐listed species that may be impacted by the proposed project. This notice needs to be forwarded to the appropriate project proponent, and appropriate federal, state, or tribal agency for their records. As the permittee and hired consultant this is your responsibility. Further, I may not have the contact information for the project proponents, or the appropriate state, federal, or tribal agency. Our comments are submitted in accordance with section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA). This correspondence is valid for one year from the above date. If you have any questions, please let me know. Thank you. Christopher D. Tanner Fish & Wildlife Biologist U.S.Fish and Wildlife Services Oklahoma Ecological Services Field Office 9014 E. 21st Street Tulsa, OK 74129 Phone: (918) 382‐4517 Fax: (918) 581‐7467 Email: [email protected] ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Steve Votaw President Eagle Environmental Consulting, Inc.
2
P.O. Box 335 Vinita, OK 74301 918‐272‐7656 918.256.6131 (f) www.eagle‐env.com ‐‐‐‐‐Original Message‐‐‐‐‐ From: Shelton, Sharon [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2011 10:13 AM To: 'Steve Votaw' Subject: RE: TFIM, Collinsville, OK Hi Steve ‐ I'll get this submitted into our accounting for payment. I was speaking with Sara Downard yesterday at DEQ. She told me that she had been talking with FWS and that they indicated the ABB survey was approved. Just curious, have they sent an approval letter your way? Or something giving the green light to do the site work? Sharon Shelton Associate Chemist & Project Manager, Environmental Group Burns & McDonnell Direct: 816‐822‐3168 Main: 816‐333‐9400 Fax: 816‐822‐3463 [email protected] www.burnsmcd.com Proud recipient of PSMJ's Premier Award for Client Satisfaction This e‐mail and any attachments are solely for the use of the addressed recipients and may contain privileged client communication or privileged work product. If you are not the intended recipient, and receive this communication, please contact the sender by phone at 816‐333‐9400 and delete and purge this e‐mail from your e‐mail system and destroy any other electronic or printed copies. Thank you for your cooperation. ‐‐‐‐‐Original Message‐‐‐‐‐ From: Steve Votaw [mailto:steve@eagle‐env.com] Sent: Monday, October 24, 2011 10:26 AM To: Shelton, Sharon Subject: TFIM, Collinsville, OK Dear Ms. Shelton: Attached is our invoice for the captiond project for your review and approval. We only included one additional trap night cost instead of two. Let mel know if you have any questions. Thank you very much. Sincerely, Steve Votaw Eagle Environmental Consulting, Inc.
AMERICAN BURYING BEETLE REPORT
Proposed Tulsa Fuels Reclamation Project Tulsa County, Oklahoma
Proposed Tulsa Fuels Reclamation Project Eagle Environmental Consulting, Inc. Tulsa County, Oklahoma October 2011
i
TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 1 2.0 General Site Description ........................................................................................ 1 3.0 Sampling Methodology .......................................................................................... 1 4.0 Survey Findings ...................................................................................................... 3 5.0 Conclusion .............................................................................................................. 5 6.0 References ............................................................................................................... 6 List of Figures Figure 1 General Location Map 2 Figure 2 Trap Location Map 4 List of Appendices Appendix A Representative Photographs Appendix B Survey Data Forms Appendix C Meteorological Data
AMERICAN BURYING BEETLE SURVEY
Proposed Tulsa Fuels Reclamation Project Eagle Environmental Consulting, Inc. Tulsa County, Oklahoma October 2011
1
AMERICAN BURYING BEETLE SURVEY
Proposed Tulsa Fuels Reclamation Project
Tulsa County, Oklahoma
1.0 Introduction The subject survey effort was conducted to identify the presence or absence of American Burying Beetles (Nicrophorus americanus) (ABB) associated with the proposed Tulsa Fuels Reclamation Project in Tulsa County, Oklahoma. The project survey area included approximately 160 acres. Trapping began the night of September 12, 2011 and continued until September 19, 2011 during which no ABB’s were captured. One trap location was deployed and maintained for 8 nights. Trap location 1 was located in Section 32, Township 22 North, Range 14 East. The general project location is shown on Figure 1. The ABB has been a federally listed endangered species since 1989 and is also recognized as endangered at the State level. Based on the potential for impact to individuals of ABB, these surveys were performed in compliance with the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1539, et seq.) and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Regulations (50 C.F.R. 17.22) under Endangered Species permit number TE043399-0.
2.0 General Site Description The survey corridor is located within the undulating landscape of the North Cross Timbers Ecoregion of Oklahoma (Woods, et.al, 2004). The majority of the lands within this ecoregion are associated low rolling hills that are covered by a mixture of rangeland, pastureland, and woodland. The trap was placed within a woodland. Dominant vegetation consisted of Indian grass, hackberry, American elm, cottonwood, little bluestem, big bluestem, and American cherry.
3.0 Sampling Methodology The ABB is large (1-1.5 inches) and has a shiny black appearance with four orange-red spots on the wing covers (elytra).A large red spot on the pronotum of the beetle is indicative of the species. The habitat requirements for this beetle are
AMERICAN BURYING BEETLE SURVEY
Proposed Tulsa Fuels Reclamation Project Eagle Environmental Consulting, Inc. Tulsa County, Oklahoma October 2011
2
AMERICAN BURYING BEETLE SURVEY
Proposed Tulsa Fuels Reclamation Project Eagle Environmental Consulting, Inc. Tulsa County, Oklahoma October 2011
3
not fully known; however, the ABB is considered a habitat generalist and is known to occupy a diverse range of habitats. Habitats associated with the ABB include open grasslands, forests, as well as transitional areas. The beetle is a carrion feeder and utilizes small vertebrate carcasses for food and reproductive purposes. The ABB occurs in a variety of habitat types and will exploit virtually any possibilities where suitable forage and soil conditions may be found. One trap location was selected to ensure appropriate survey coverage of the anticipated area of disturbance. The trapping method for the ABB survey was performed according to the American Burying Beetle Rangewide Survey Guidance dated April 20, 2011. The trap location included one five gallon bucket pitfall trap with a diameter of 11.2 inches. Bait consisted of a whole extra large rat carcass with hair intact and placed on 3 to 4 inches of soil. The trap was covered with a wire mesh and protective shield.
According to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service a minimum of 5 successive trap-nights are required to establish a sampling effort. Temperatures cannot fall below 60°F, rainfall totals cannot exceed 0.5 inches, and wind speed cannot exceed 10 miles per hour for greater than 20% of the trap night between 9 pm and 4 am. Failure to meet such specified trapping effort criteria would result in an additional trap night or trap nights. Meteorological data for this ABB survey effort was obtained from the Weather Underground. The trap location is shown on Figure 2.
4.0 Survey Findings No American Burying Beetles were captured during the survey effort. Several species of beetles including two species of Nicrophorus, crickets (Gryllidae), arachnids, isopods, and various other insects and arthropods were collected. Atmospheric conditions during the ABB survey were fair with normal temperatures and wind velocities ranging from calm to moderate (0 to less than 10 mph). Nighttime temperatures were recorded in the low 50’s to mid 70’s (°F) while daytime highs reached the low 80’s to 100’s (°F). Coordination with the USFWS in Tulsa confirmed their acceptance of the survey as valid despite the inclement weather.
Representative photographs of the trap locations are provided in Appendix A. The field survey data forms and survey summary sheet are found in Appendix B. Meteorological data is provided in Appendix C.
AMERICAN BURYING BEETLE SURVEY
Proposed Tulsa Fuels Reclamation Project Eagle Environmental Consulting, Inc. Tulsa County, Oklahoma October 2011
4
AMERICAN BURYING BEETLE SURVEY
Proposed Tulsa Fuels Reclamation Project Eagle Environmental Consulting, Inc. Tulsa County, Oklahoma October 2011
5
5.0 Conclusion The subject survey was performed in an effort to identify the presence of American Burying Beetles at or near the proposed construction area. One trap location was placed near the proposed construction area to ensure adequate coverage and maintained for 8 trap nights. The trapping of 1 N. Tomentosus and 4 N. Marginatus along with multiple other insects attracted to carrion indicates trapping efforts and techniques were adequate and functional. Meteorological conditions during the survey were favorable for ABB activity.
AMERICAN BURYING BEETLE SURVEY
Proposed Tulsa Fuels Reclamation Project Eagle Environmental Consulting, Inc. Tulsa County, Oklahoma October 2011
6
6.0 References
Creighton, J.C., M.V. Lomolino, and G.D. Schnell, Oklahoma Biological Survey, University of Oklahoma. Survey methods for the American Burying Beetle, Nicrophorus americanus, in Oklahoma and Arkansas. May 1993.
United States Department of Agriculture. Natural Resources Conservation Service, Soil
Survey Staff. Web Soil Survey for Tulsa County, OK. Available online at http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/. Accessed October, 2011.
USGS. 7.5-Minute Topographic Map United States Fish and Wildlife Service. 2011. American Burying Beetle Nicrophorus
americanus Rangewide Survey Guidance. 8 pages. Weather Underground. http://www.wunderground.com/ Woods, et al 2004. Oklahoma (color poster with map, Ecoregions of descriptive text, summary tables, and photographs): Reston, Virginia, U.S. Geological Survey (map scale1:1,000,000).
Appendix A
Representative Photographs
American Burying Beetle Survey Eagle Environmental Consulting, Inc. Tulsa County, Oklahoma October 2011
Decimal Degrees 36.3481, -95.8462 Coord. System: NAD 83
Vegetation Type: Pasture Primary Soil Type: Dennis Radley Complex, silt loam Temp: Min: 54 Max: 96 Rain> 0.5 inches? Yes or No Additional survey nights required because of rain? Yes or No
Trap No americanus orbicollis tomentosus pustulatus marginatus carolinus sayi Other carrion beetles
1.U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2. U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3. U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4. U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5. U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
6. U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7. U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8. U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Totals 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Number of disturbed traps and/or bait (D): 0
Additional Survey night(s) required because of disturbance? Yes or No
ABB Male Female Old New Age Unknown
Recapture Newly Marked
Tag # Death Pronotum Width
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Comments: Single 5 Gallon Trap. Survey considered valid by Anita Barstow, Tulsa , Ecological Services Field Office.
Decimal Degrees 36.3481, -95.8462 Coord. System: NAD 83
Vegetation Type: Pasture Primary Soil Type: Dennis Radley Complex, silt loam Temp: Min: 75 Max: 100 Rain> 0.5 inches? Yes or No Additional survey nights required because of rain? Yes or No
Trap No americanus orbicollis tomentosus pustulatus marginatus carolinus sayi Other carrion beetles
1.U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2. U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3. U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4. U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5. U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
6. U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7. U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8. U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Totals 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Number of disturbed traps and/or bait (D): 0
Additional Survey night(s) required because of disturbance? Yes or No
ABB Male Female Old New Age Unknown
Recapture Newly Marked
Tag # Death Pronotum Width
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Comments: Single 5 Gallon Trap. Survey considered valid by Anita Barstow, Tulsa , Ecological Services Field Office.
Decimal Degrees 36.3481, -95.8462 Coord. System: NAD 83
Vegetation Type: Pasture Primary Soil Type: Dennis Radley Complex, silt loam Temp: Min: 61 Max: 80 Rain> 0.5 inches? Yes or No Additional survey nights required because of rain? Yes or No
Trap No americanus orbicollis tomentosus pustulatus marginatus carolinus sayi Other carrion beetles
1.U D 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0
2. U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3. U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4. U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5. U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
6. U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7. U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8. U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Totals 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0
Number of disturbed traps and/or bait (D): 0
Additional Survey night(s) required because of disturbance? Yes or No
ABB Male Female Old New Age Unknown
Recapture Newly Marked
Tag # Death Pronotum Width
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Comments: Single 5 Gallon Trap. Survey considered valid by Anita Barstow, Tulsa , Ecological Services Field Office.
Decimal Degrees 36.3481, -95.8462 Coord. System: NAD 83
Vegetation Type: Pasture Primary Soil Type: Dennis Radley Complex, silt loam Temp: Min: 54 Max: 62 Rain> 0.5 inches? Yes or No Additional survey nights required because of rain? Yes or No
Trap No americanus orbicollis tomentosus pustulatus marginatus carolinus sayi Other carrion beetles
1.U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2. U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3. U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4. U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5. U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
6. U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7. U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8. U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Totals 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Number of disturbed traps and/or bait (D): 0
Additional Survey night(s) required because of disturbance? Yes or No
ABB Male Female Old New Age Unknown
Recapture Newly Marked
Tag # Death Pronotum Width
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Comments: Single 5 Gallon Trap. Survey considered valid by Anita Barstow, Tulsa , Ecological Services Field Office.
Decimal Degrees 36.3481, -95.8462 Coord. System: NAD 83
Vegetation Type: Pasture Primary Soil Type: Dennis Radley Complex, silt loam Temp: Min: 53 Max: 58 Rain> 0.5 inches? Yes or No Additional survey nights required because of rain? Yes or No
Trap No americanus orbicollis tomentosus pustulatus marginatus carolinus sayi Other carrion beetles
1.U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2. U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3. U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4. U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5. U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
6. U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7. U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8. U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Totals 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Number of disturbed traps and/or bait (D): 0
Additional Survey night(s) required because of disturbance? Yes or No
ABB Male Female Old New Age Unknown
Recapture Newly Marked
Tag # Death Pronotum Width
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Comments: Single 5 Gallon Trap. Survey considered valid by Anita Barstow, Tulsa , Ecological Services Field Office.
Decimal Degrees 36.3481, -95.8462 Coord. System: NAD 83
Vegetation Type: Pasture Primary Soil Type: Dennis Radley Complex, silt loam Temp: Min: 56 Max: 80 Rain> 0.5 inches? Yes or No Additional survey nights required because of rain? Yes or No
Trap No americanus orbicollis tomentosus pustulatus marginatus carolinus sayi Other carrion beetles
1.U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2. U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3. U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4. U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5. U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
6. U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7. U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8. U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Totals 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Number of disturbed traps and/or bait (D): 0
Additional Survey night(s) required because of disturbance? Yes or No
ABB Male Female Old New Age Unknown
Recapture Newly Marked
Tag # Death Pronotum Width
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Comments: Single 5 Gallon Trap. Survey considered valid by Anita Barstow, Tulsa , Ecological Services Field Office.
Decimal Degrees 36.3481, -95.8462 Coord. System: NAD 83
Vegetation Type: Pasture Primary Soil Type: Dennis Radley Complex, silt loam Temp: Min: 64 Max: 80 Rain> 0.5 inches? Yes or No Additional survey nights required because of rain? Yes or No
Trap No americanus orbicollis tomentosus pustulatus marginatus carolinus sayi Other carrion beetles
1.U D 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
2. U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3. U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4. U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5. U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
6. U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7. U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8. U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Totals 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
Number of disturbed traps and/or bait (D): 0
Additional Survey night(s) required because of disturbance? Yes or No
ABB Male Female Old New Age Unknown
Recapture Newly Marked
Tag # Death Pronotum Width
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Comments: Single 5 Gallon Trap. Survey considered valid by Anita Barstow, Tulsa , Ecological Services Field Office.
Decimal Degrees 36.3481, -95.8462 Coord. System: NAD 83
Vegetation Type: Pasture Primary Soil Type: Dennis Radley Complex, silt loam Temp: Min: 57 Max: 83 Rain> 0.5 inches? Yes or No Additional survey nights required because of rain? Yes or No
Trap No americanus orbicollis tomentosus pustulatus marginatus carolinus sayi Other carrion beetles
1.U D 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0
2. U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3. U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4. U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5. U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
6. U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7. U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8. U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Totals 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0
Number of disturbed traps and/or bait (D): 0
Additional Survey night(s) required because of disturbance? Yes or No
ABB Male Female Old New Age Unknown
Recapture Newly Marked
Tag # Death Pronotum Width
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Comments: Single 5 Gallon Trap. Survey considered valid by Anita Barstow, Tulsa , Ecological Services Field Office.
Appendix C
Meteorological Data
History for KOKCOLLI2Sand Ridge Airpark, Collinsville, OK — Current Conditions
Daily Summary for September 12, 2011
Page 1 of 7Weather Station History : Weather Underground