Top Banner
Tablet PCs Cindy O’Reilly [email protected]
21
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Final Project OReilly

Tablet PCs

Cindy O’[email protected]

Page 2: Final Project OReilly

Stage 1: Need

Page 3: Final Project OReilly

Stage 2: Research

• Late 1980s• Handwriting recognition• Early versions of pen computers:

– NestorWriter handwriting recognizer– Communication Intelligence Corporation

• Pen replace mouse? Pen computer replace Desktop?

• Pen Extensions for Windows 3.1Blickenstorfer, 2005

Bricklin, 2002

Page 4: Final Project OReilly

Stage 3: Development• 1992 products released

– GO Corporation PenPoint– Lexicus Longhand handwriting recognition software

• IBM ThinkPad• Technology was not ready• Too difficult to replace keyboard input with pen & voice input• Tablet PCs released by Microsoft in 2002• Uses “Digital Ink” as well as handwriting recognition• Has keyboard

Blickenstorfer, 2005Bricklin, 2002

Page 5: Final Project OReilly

Stage 4: Commercialization

• In early 1990s, press enthusiastic then critical• Companies lost millions• Microsoft promoting “Digital Ink” features &

downplaying handwriting recognition

Blickenstorfer, 2005Bricklin, 2002

Page 6: Final Project OReilly

Innovation-Decision Process Timeline

19851985

19901990

19951995

20002000

20052005

KnowledgeKnowledge

PersuasionPersuasion

DecisionDecision

ImplementationImplementation

ImplementationImplementation

ConfirmationConfirmation

Click on the words on the timeline to link to the source of the information

Page 8: Final Project OReilly

Blickenstorfer, 2005Bricklin, 2002Walker, 2005

Page 9: Final Project OReilly

Early Adopters

• High school students and teachers

• Engineering education• Elementary School in Ont

ario• Cornwallis Technology Col

lege

Laggards

• Lack of success with early pen computing

• Poor supporters of technology

Page 10: Final Project OReilly

In our schools…

Early adopters• Library media specialists• Teachers who currently use

laptops• Art teachers

Laggards• Not used to integrating

technology• Poor success with early

versions• Music teachers

Page 11: Final Project OReilly

Perceived Attributes

• Relative advantage• Compatibility

Page 12: Final Project OReilly

Approach to Diffusion

• Decentralized• All students in class• Multiple grade levels

Page 13: Final Project OReilly

Change Agents

• Members of technology department• Library media specialists • Teachers who have used tablet PCs with students

Page 14: Final Project OReilly

Achieving Critical Mass

• Not at critical mass yet• Rogers’ (2003) critical mass strategy• One teacher per grade level 1-5

Page 15: Final Project OReilly

Technology Needs of Our School

• Elementary student friendly technology• Poor keyboarding skills• Technology that’s ready to use & easily stored• Enhances use of technologies already in place• Encourage artistic creativity

Page 16: Final Project OReilly

Tablet PCs Help Meet Needs

• Elementary student friendly technology• Poor keyboarding skills• Technology that’s ready to use & easily stored• Enhances use of technologies already in place

Page 17: Final Project OReilly

Tablet PCs in Action

• Demo by HP on tablet PCs in education• Students using tablet PC in classroom• Math teacher demonstrating tablet PC lesson• Example of a tablet PC from Dell• Writing on a tablet PC

Page 18: Final Project OReilly

ReferencesBlickenstorfer, C. (2005). A brief history of Tablet PCs.

Retrieved June 24, 2009 from WebProNews website: http://www.webpronews.com/expertarticles/2005/12/20/a-brief-history-of-tablet-pcs

Bricklin, D. (2002). About tablet computing old and new. Retrieved June 24, 2009 from Dan Bricklin’s website: http://www.bricklin.com/tabletcomputing.htm

Fitzgerald, T. J. (2004). The tablet PC takes it place in the classroom. Retrieved July 2, 2009 from New York Times’ website: http://www.nytimes.com/2004/09/09/technology/circuits/09jott.html?_r=3&ex=1095743441&ei=1&en=327395b18725c278

Page 19: Final Project OReilly

ReferencesReid, R. (2004). Tablet PCs go to school. Retrieved July 15, 2009 from PC World’s

website: http://www.pcworld.com/article/114383/tablet_pcs_go_to_school.html Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York: Free Press.Tablet PCs in Engineering Education. Retrieved July 15, 2009 from Penn State

University’s website: http://www.engr.psu.edu/ae/cic/projects/tablet_pc.aspx?p=24

Using RM Tablet PC at the Cornwallis School. (2009). Retrieved July 14, 2009 from http://www.rm.com/secondary/casestudies/casestudydetail.asp?cref=cs113293

Walker, G. (2005). The last word: The future of the Tablet PC. Retrieved July 7, 2009, from Veritas et Vesis website: http://www.veritasetvisus.com/VVTP-2,%20Walker.pdf

Page 20: Final Project OReilly

Photo Credits• http://www.instantgoodness.com/images/uploaded/pages/285/Tablet_PC-HP-

TC1100.jpg• http://projects.csail.mit.edu/clp/about/• http://www.gottabemobile.com/content/binary/snograss.jpg• http://www.digiops.org.nz/Images/Mollie_Erina_Kyle_Nicholas_.jpg• http://www.cfkeep.org/html/phpThumb.php?src=/uploads/

picture3_copy6.jpg&aoe=1&w=• http://campus.ort.edu.ar/static/archivos/image/2682• http://www.exeter.edu/news_and_events/news_events_15529.aspx• http://k12tablet.wikispaces.com/file/view/tabletkid2.jpg

Page 21: Final Project OReilly