Top Banner

of 18

Final Presentation 7 August 2009

Apr 07, 2018

Download

Documents

dellapermata7
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
  • 8/3/2019 Final Presentation 7 August 2009

    1/18

    Della Permata YSEP2008

    IKEDA laboratoryCivil Engineering

    DepartmentTokyo Institute of

    Technology

    PRESENTATION- August 7th ,2009

  • 8/3/2019 Final Presentation 7 August 2009

    2/18

    What is artificial flood

    ??

  • 8/3/2019 Final Presentation 7 August 2009

    3/18

    BACKGROUND

  • 8/3/2019 Final Presentation 7 August 2009

    4/18

    Detachment Algae by BedLoad in Downstream Region

    of DAM

    There is relation betweenbed load and algaedetachment.

    The flush discharge withfine gravel supply is

    indispensable to remove

    By Dr. YoshihisaAkamatsu

    PREVIOUS RESEARCH

  • 8/3/2019 Final Presentation 7 August 2009

    5/18

    No.0+10

    126

    128

    130

    132

    134

    136

    138

    140

    142

    0 10 20 30 40

    (m)

    (TP

    .

    40m3/s

    20m3/s 2m3/s

    8m

    Picture of sediment

    The amount of sediment was200 m3

    Artificial flood with sedimentsupply on February 18, 2009

    Location of

    sedimentsupply near

    Ishigoya DAM

    DischargeHydrograph

    0

    00

    00

    00

    00

    00

    0 0 0 00 00 00 00 00 00 11

    m / s0

    m / s0

  • 8/3/2019 Final Presentation 7 August 2009

    6/18

    OBJECTIVETo evaluate the effectiveness ofthe recent artificial flood withsediment supply (on February 18th,2009) for removing attached algaeand improving the environmentcondition along the river

    STUDY FIELDNakatsu River, Kanagawa Prefecture,

    Japan

  • 8/3/2019 Final Presentation 7 August 2009

    7/18

    FOCUS ON MY

    STUDYComparing the change of the

    amount of attached algae beforeand after flood by comparing

    1.FIELD OBSERVATIONresult in real condition of river bedand

    2.NUMERICALCALCULATIONresult in ideal

    condition of river bed (which there

  • 8/3/2019 Final Presentation 7 August 2009

    8/18

    AREA OF FIELD OBSERVATION ONFEBRUARY 17-19, 2009

    sampling point of attachedalgae before and after

    flood at point

  • 8/3/2019 Final Presentation 7 August 2009

    9/18

    Result of FieldObservationBefo

    re

    AfterPictures of sedimentsupplied

    Water level

    reached maximum

    value

  • 8/3/2019 Final Presentation 7 August 2009

    10/18

    RESULT OF FIELDOBSERVATION

  • 8/3/2019 Final Presentation 7 August 2009

    11/18

    OUTLINE OF NUMERICALCALCULATIONA numerical model to predict the amount

    of detached algae was conducted underthe hypothesis that there is enoughsediment with the effective graindiameter size (about 10 mm) to remove

    the attached algae.The flowchart of numerical calculation

  • 8/3/2019 Final Presentation 7 August 2009

    12/18

    Governing Equation of NumericalModelBasic continuity equation of 2D flow

    in (x,y) co-orthogonal coordinatesystem

    h : depth (m)t : time (s)u, v : velocity (m/s)x, y : distance (m)V : total velocity(m/s)

    Depth average flowmodel

    In which

  • 8/3/2019 Final Presentation 7 August 2009

    13/18

    Governing Equation of NumericalModel

    0

    0.5

    1

    1.5

    2

    0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06

    P(10

    -4/s)

    *

    The relation equation between Bed shear stress and survival rate

    percentage

    The empirical relation between theshear stress ( *) and attrition rateof amount of attached algae perunit time (P) under the condition of10 mm sediment is supplied

    The empirical formula fromgraph

    * : bed shear stressSg : specific relative weightg : gravity acceleration (m/s2)nm : mannings roughness

    coefficientd : diameter of bed material

    (m)h : depth (m)P : attrition rate of amount ofattached algae per unit time(/s)tuk : duration time (s)

    Cd : dimensionless coefficient

  • 8/3/2019 Final Presentation 7 August 2009

    14/18

    Method of CalculationThe calculation was conducted for observed

    flush discharge in the calculation area

    Boundary condition at the upstream

    Flow discharge is given by observed values

    Velocity is calculated under the assumption of

    uniform flow

    Boundary condition at the downstream

    The observed water depth is calculated underthe assumption of uniform flow

    mannings coefficient of roughness (n) is setto be calculated from bed material. (n=0.03)

    It is assumed that the filamentous algae is insaturated state cover all river bed before flush

  • 8/3/2019 Final Presentation 7 August 2009

    15/18

    RESULT OF NUMERICALCALCULATION

    Before flood

    After flood

    1 2 3 4 5

  • 8/3/2019 Final Presentation 7 August 2009

    16/18

    COMPARISON RESULT BETWEEN FIELDOBSERVATION AND NUMERICAL

    CALCULATION

    Survival rate percentage from field observation is higher

    than those from numerical calculation result. It indicates

    that sufficient supply of artificial sediment is required to

    remove all of algae for this flood discharge.

  • 8/3/2019 Final Presentation 7 August 2009

    17/18

    CONCLUSIONThe artificial flood conducted in

    Miyagase Dam along Nakatsuriver was not much effective in

    algae detachment.This result suggests that theartificial flood with the

    sufficient amount of sedimentsupply which contains effectivegrain diameter size is

    important to remove the

  • 8/3/2019 Final Presentation 7 August 2009

    18/18

    Thank You for Your

    Kind Attention