FMC Corporation September 30, 2005 SENT VIA U.S. MAIL Ms. Bonnie Guy Gross (3HW23) Remedial Project Manager U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 1650 Arch Street Philadelphia, PA 19103 FMC Corporation 1735 Market Street Philad 215.299.6000 phone 215.299.6947 fax www.fmc.com 1! SDMS OocfO liiiii 2054331 Re: Final Version of the Report Titled Burnt Debris Area Sample Results Report, Avtex Fibers Superfund Site, Front Royal, VA Dear Bonnie: FMC Corporation has enclosed two copies of the final version of the referenced report (one stapled and one clipped) in response to EPA's September 29, 2005 letter accepting the bold-strikethrough version. Please contact me at (215) 299-6210 or Bob Keating with any questions. Sincerely, Marguerite Carpenter, Ph.D. Project Coordinator Enclosures (2) cc: L. Norman, FMC T. Modena, VADEQ S. Curran, Gannett Fleming R. Keating, ERM J. Torrence, ERM flR3032l48
101
Embed
FINAL DEBRIS AREA SAMPLE RESULTS REPORT … Project Manager ... FMC Corporation has enclosed two copies of the final version of the ... T. Modena, VADEQ S. Curran, Gannett Fleming
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
FMC Corporation
September 30, 2005
SENT VIA U.S. MAIL
Ms. Bonnie Guy Gross (3HW23) Remedial Project Manager U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 1650 Arch Street Philadelphia, PA 19103
FMC Corporation 1735 Market Street Philad
215.299.6000 phone 215.299.6947 fax
www.fmc.com
1! SDMS OocfO
liiiii 2054331
Re: Final Version of the Report Titled Burnt Debris Area Sample Results Report, Avtex Fibers Superfund Site, Front Royal, VA
Dear Bonnie:
FMC Corporation has enclosed two copies of the final version of the referenced report (one stapled and one clipped) in response to EPA's September 29, 2005 letter accepting the bold-strikethrough version.
Please contact me at (215) 299-6210 or Bob Keating with any questions.
Sincerely,
Marguerite Carpenter, Ph.D. Project Coordinator
Enclosures (2) cc: L. Norman, FMC
T. Modena, VADEQ S. Curran, Gannett Fleming R. Keating, ERM J. Torrence, ERM
flR3032l48
BURNT DEBRIS AREA SAMPLE RESULTS REPORT 0%
FMC Corporation
Burnt Debris Area Sample Results Report Avtex Fibers Superfund Site Front Royal Virginia
30 September 2005
Final Version
Environmental Resources Management, Inc. Harry S Truman Parkway, Suite 400
Table 2 - Regional Background Inorganic Concentrations in Surficial Soils
Table 3 - Validated Results of Trace Level Analysis of Chlorinated Dioxins and Furans
Table 4 - Calculation of Toxic Equivalent Concentrations for Composite Sample
LIST OF APPENDICES
A - Data Validation Reports
B - Analytical Data Sheets
ERM 1 FMG 0 3 2 5 0
X, 1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background and Purpose
FMC Corporation (FMC) prepared this report to:
1. Describe the results of the sample collected to characterize the burnt debris and ash that was discovered while constructing a drainage channel along the northern border of the proposed SoccerPlex Parcel (see Figure 1); and
2. Notify EPA that the burnt debris and ash will be excavated and disposed of off-site, and post-excavation samples will be collected to confirm that the removal process was completed.
On 10 June 2004, test pits were being.dug along the proposed drainage channel alorig the north boundary of the proposed SoccerPlex to determine the horizontal and vertical extent of inert construction debris (brick, coal, concrete, glass, metal, and wood) present in this area. At one test pit, burnt debris/ash was uncovered (see Figure 1). The subject material contained primarily black ash (approximately 90 percent), and contained lesser amounts (approximately 10 percent) of burnt wooden planks, round pieces of melted lead, brick, metal, glass, viscose material, rayon fiber, tow, and a newspaper dated September 1953. The burnt debris/ash was placed back into the test pit and covered with soil.
Due to the nature of the material, FMC will excavate the burnt debris/ ash and dispose of the material off-site at a properly permitted facility. The purpose of the sampling described herein was to characterize the burnt debris and ash to determine the appropriate disposition of the waste material, and also to determine whether the material could have potentially impacted the underlying soils. FMC conducted the characterization in accordance with the requirements set forth in the 23 September 2004 letter to EPA titled Final Approach to Characterize the Burnt Debris/Ash Area in the Vicinity of the Proposed SoccerPlex Parcel.
1.2 Report Organization
The remainder of this Report is organized as follows:
• Section 2.0 - Sampling Scope. This section provides a description of the 29 September 2004 sampling event;
0 RR30325 FMC-0002565-9/30/OL
Section 3.0 - Results. This section provides a summary of the sampling analytical results; and
Section 4.0 - Next Steps. This section provides the basis for the recommendation that the material be disposed off-site, and post-excavation samples collected.
ERM ^ FMC-Oi 3 2 52
Qc
2.0 SAMPLING SCOPE
On 29 September, one 10-aliquot composite characterization sample was collected from the burnt debris/ash material. The sample was collected in-place in order to "pre-characterize" the material and to determine whether special material handling procedures are warranted. The waste characterization sample was collected from a material that contained black ash and soil, and debris containing glass, metal, rayon tow, viscose and wood.
A backhoe was used to dig five test pits and two aliquots were collected from each test pit to create the 10-aliquot composite. The burnt debris/ ash area was divided into quadrants, and the test pits were dug from the approximate center of each quadrant and from the center of the burnt debris/ash area. Aliquots were collected from the burnt debris/ash material, at sampling depths of approximately 1-2 feet and 4-5 feet below the soil surface from each test pit. Aliquots were collected from the backhoe bucket and then homogenized in a stainless steel bowl.
The composite sample was submitted to Lancaster Laboratories, Inc. for the following analyses:
Site reduced target analyte list (TAL) for total and SPLF analyses;
• Target Compound List (TCL) Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds (SVOC) for total and SPLP analyses; and
Total Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs).
In addition, a portion of the composite sample was submitted to STL-Knoxville, Tennessee for analysis of Dioxins and Furans using SW-846 Method 8290. Additional sample volume was held at LLI in case results indicated that the Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) analysis was needed. Based on the total and SPLP lead results, ERM requested on 18 November that the sample also be analyzed for TCLP metals.
The waste characterization sample of the burnt debris/ ash was analyzed following Target Analytical Option 111 and the data were validated using the Level 2 validation (refer to the Site-Wide Quality Assurance Project Plan). Appropriate qualifiers were added to the data as necessary. The data validation reports are included in Appendix A, and are identified by the sample delivery group designations AW83, AW76, and H4J060250.
ERM 3 FMC-0002565-9/30, KR303253
3.0 RESULTS
3.1 TCLP and TCL/TAL Results
Table 1 shows the results for the TCLP, TCL and TAL data. The corresponding laboratory data sheets are provided in Appendix B and the results are discussed below.
TCLP Data
Table 1 shows the results for the TCLP metals data. The most significant finding is that the debris is RCRA characteristically hazardous for lead, and will require off-site disposal as a hazardous waste. Based on the information gathered from eight test pits excavated in June 2004 and the five additional test pits excavated in September 2004, it appears that the maximum extent of the burnt debris/ash area is roughly 50 feet long by 50 feet wide by 6 feet deep, or estimated at approximately 550 cubic yards.
TCL/TAL Analyses
Table 1 lists the detected results for the waste characterization sample for the TAL total and SPLP analyses, TCL SVOC total and SPLP analyses, and total PCB analysis. The results of the analysis of the waste characterization sample are summarized below, with the exception of the dioxin and furan analyses.
• Total SVOCs. SVOCs were not detected above the laboratory's reporting limit or limit of quantitation (LOQ);
• SPLP SVOCs. SPLP SVOCs were not detected above the LOQ;
• Total PCBs. PCBs were not detected above the LOQ;
^ • Total Metals. Fourteen of 17 metals were detected above the LOQs.
• SPLP Metals. Eleven of 17 metals were detected above the LOQs.
Consistent with the approach for the Remedial Investigation of the proposed SoccerPlex parcel {Remedial Investigation Report for the Proposed SoccerPlex Parcel, dated 5 February 2004), the total metals results were compared to risk-based concentrations (RBCs) developed by the EPA Region III for a residential exposure ("EPA's Residential Soil RBCs," April 2005), and set at a carcinogenic risk level of 1x10-^ and an adjusted non-carcinogenic Hazard Index of 0.1 to account for additive effects. These
ERM % FMC^002565-9, •7^/05
O/s %A
data were compared to the conservative residential soil RBCs (based on incidental ingestion of soil for 350 days/year for 30 years) to provide an additional level of safety for future youth recreation use of the proposed SoccerPlex Parcel, and would also be appropriate for any future unrestricted use of this parcel. The results of the total metals analyses indicate that six metals (arsenic, lead, manganese, mercury, thallium and vanadium) exceeded the residential RBCs.
For the metals exceeding the residential soil RBCs (arsenic, lead, manganese, mercury, thallium and vanadium), the metals data were also compared to published regional background concentrations. Regional background soil concentrations were determined using the data presented in the U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report titled Chemical Analyses of Soils and Other Suificial Materials of the Conterminous United States (Boerngen and Shacklette, 1981). The background data were comprised of 16 surface soil samples collected from 15 Virginia counties.
Table 2 shows that the concentrations of arsenic, thallium and vanadium detected in the waste characterization sample are consistent with naturally occurring levels of arsenic, thallium and vanadium in soil. However, the presence of lead, manganese and mercury above the residential RBCs and regional background values indicate that these metals are contaminants in the burnt debris, and post excavation sampling after the burnt debris is removed will be required to ensure that residual level of these metals in the underlying soil will not result in increased risk to users of the proposed SoccerPlex parcel.
The SPLP data indicate that lead and vanadium exceeds the OU-10 ground water protection standard. Note that a dilution attenuation factor (DAF) of 10, used to conservatively estimate the concentration that could occur in ground water beneath the source soils, is applied to the reported results before the result is compared to the standard. For example, lead had a reported result of 0.352 mg/L, which converts to 0.035 mg/L when the DAF of 10 is applied to the result. Likewise, vanadium with a reported concentration of 0.047 mg/L, converts to 0.0047 mg/L when the DAF of 10 is applied to the result. With respect to the vanadium SPLP result, the concentration of total vanadium in the sample was attributed to background, thus the vanadium SPLP result is not viewed as a SPLP exceedance.
3.2 Dioxin Results
Table 3 lists the results of the dioxin and furan analysis. Dioxins and furan were detected in the waste characterization sample, but are also ubiquitous
ERM D FMC«flb(fc56?9/30/05
% %
in the environment. Provided below is an explanation of toxicity equivalents, which determine whether the dioxin and furan results indicate an unacceptable risk to human heath. This explanation is necessary to place the reported dioxin and furan results in the context of potential risk to human health.
According to the US EPA preliminary draft report Exposure and Health Assessment for 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) and Related Compounds (May 2000), "the concept of toxicity equivalence has been considered and discussed by the scientific community and toxic equivalency factors (TEFs) have been developed and introduced to facilitate risk assessment of exposure to CDD/CDF congeners, and "dioxin-like" PCB mixtures." On the most basic level, TEFs compare the potential toxicity of each dioxin-like compound comprising the mixture to the well-studied and understood toxicity of TCDD, the most toxic member of the group. This procedure involves assigning individual TEFs to the 2,3,7,8 substituted CDD/CDF congeners, and "dioxin-like" PCBs. To accomplish this, scientists have reviewed the toxicological databases along with considerations of chemical structure, persistence and resistance to metabolism, and have agreed to ascribe specific, "order of magnitude" TEFs for each dioxin-like congener relative to TCDD, which is assigned a TEF of 1.0: The other congeners have TEF values ranging from 1.0 to 0.00001, and are selected to account for uncertainties in the available data and to avoid underestimating risk. The TEF of each congener present in a mixture is multiplied by the respective mass concentration and the products are summed to represent the 2,3,7,8-TCDD Toxic Equivalence (TEQ) of the mixture.
Table 4 presents the dioxin and furan results in terms of a TEQ value. The "B" qualified data in Table 3 were not used to calculate the TEQ value because the data quality was suspect. Table 4 shows that the total TEQ concentration was 1.52 pg/ g, which is less than the USEPA residential risk-based concentration of 4.3 pg/ g for potential residential land use. Therefore, no confirmatory sampling for dioxin and furan is warranted.
ERM 6 FMC-0002S65-9/3 M303256
4.0 NEXT STEPS
The burnt debris/ash will be excavated. The extent of excavation will be determined by visual observation and verified by post-excavation sampling in accordance with the procedures provided in the 23 September 2004 burnt debris area letter. For convenience, the post-excavation sampling procedures are restated below.
• The excavation will be divided into two halves to facilitate post-excavation sampling, and one grab sample will be collected from each half of the bottom of the excavation.
• One grab sample will be collected from the mid point of each of the four excavation sidewalls (total 6 post-excavation samples).
• The bottom samples will be collected from a depth of 0-6 inches below surface soil. The sidewall samples will be collected from the sidewall surface to approximately 6 inches into the sidewall.
• The post-excavation samples will be analyzed for total lead, manganese, and mercury, SPLP and TCLP lead based on the analytical results obtained from the waste characterization composite sample.
If the results of the post-excavation soil samples meet the corresponding EPA's Residential Soil RBCs for lead, manganesej and mercury, EPA's recommended lead soil level for residential land use, and Site ground water protection standard for lead, then the underlying soil will be considered in attainment. For purposes of determining attainment, the Residential Soil RBCs for manganese and mercury will be adjusted to equal a noncancer target benchmark of 0.1 in accordance with Region III risk assessment protocol.
If the results of the post-excavation soil samples exceed the Residential Soil RBCs, then one foot of soil will be removed from the affected area and additional post-excavation soil samples will be collected. This process will be repeated until analytical results indicate attainment of EPA's Residential Soil RBCs. The disposition of the post-excavated soils will be determined based upon the analytical results and a comparison to the OU-10 soil cleanup standards. If the post-excavation soils fail the TCLP lead test, the soils will be handled as a characteristic hazardous waste. If the post-excavation soil meets the OU-10 soil cleanup standards, then the soil may be used as cover soil for the basin and landfill closures. However, if the post-excavation soils do not meet the OU-10 soil cleanup standards, alternative disposition will be necessary.
ERM / FMC-Ol ,002565-912^0^3 03 25 7
'•k
Figure
&R303258
:x} CO CD CO ro cn KO
Tables
flR303260
Table! Burnt Area Debris Analytical Results (Unvalidated Detected Analyses Only) Proposed SoccerPlex Parcel, Avtex Fibers Superfund Site, Front Royal, VA
Sample ID AV-NCB-SS-01 -C-092904 AV-NCB-SS-Ol-C-092904 AV-NCB-SS-01-092904 Sampling Date 09/29/04 9/29/2004 9/29/2004
Polychlorinated Biphenyls (7) (ug/kg) <20 ND NA NA
Semivolatile Organic Compounds (64) (ug/kg) <400 ND <0.010 ND NA
Inorganic Metals (17) (mg/kg) Arsenic 0.43 C 0.564 1 1 4.36 NA NA Barium 550 N 0.0470 355 NA NA Beryllium 16N 0.0294 . 0.950 NA NA Cadmium 7.8 N 0.0658 1.44 • NA NA Chromium 23N 0.235 17.8 NA NA Cobalt 160 N 0.188 35.1 NA NA Copper 310 N 0.153 121 NA NA Lead 400 1.09 465 NA NA Manganese 160 N 0.0705 2,190 NA NA Mercury 0.78 N 0.0391 4.08 NA NA Nickel 160 N 0.270 19.8 NA NA Thallium 0.55 N 1.08 3.60 • NA NA Vanadium 7.8 N 0.223 27.1 NA NA Zinc 2,300 N 0.576 465 NA NA
Inorganic Metals (17) (mg/L) Antimony 0.006 (MCL) NA 0.024 0.024 NA Barium 2(MCL) NA 0.005 0.223 NA Chromium 0.1 (MCL) NA 0.005 0.175 NA Cobalt 0.073 N NA 0.005 0.0355 NA Copper 1.3 (AL) NA 0.01 0.0785 NA Lead . 0.015 (AL) NA 0.02 1 0.352 NA Manganese 0.073 N NA 0.005 0.425 NA Mercury 0.002 (MCL) . NA 0.0002 0.00082 NA Nickel 0.073 N NA 0.01 0.0191 NA • Vanadium 0.0037 N NA 0.005 1 0.047 NA Zinc 1.1 N NA 0.02 0.360 NA
TCLP Metals (8)(mg/L) Barium 100.0 NA NA 0.005 0.794 Cadmium 1.0 NA NA 0.005 0.0055 Lead 5.0 NA NA 0.020 1 5.15 Mercury 0.2 NA NA • 0.0002 0.00029
Notes: Samples submitted to Lancaster Laboratories for analysis. NA - Not Analyzed. ND - Not detected above the method detection limit mg/kg — milligrams per kilogram . mg/1 • milligrams per liter 4.36 - Items In bold and enclosed in a box exceed standard. ' - EPA Region in Risk-based Concentration Table (April 2005) for residential soil are based on 1x10-6 risk for carcinogens and a hazard quotient (HQ) of 0.1. The default lead direct contact exposure standard is 400 mg/kg based on a residential exposure (USEFA, 1994). Cadmium standard based on cadmium (food). ^ - The inorganic metals standards for the SPLP leachate are based on the Site Specific Ground Water Protection Standards. Determination of whether or not ground water protection standards are met is made by dividing the SPLP concentration by the DAF of 10 and then comparing the concentration to the standard (RBC^ MCL, or AL). ' - The TCLP metals standards are based on EPA primary drinking water standards. A sample is considered to have failed the Toxicity Characteristics test and is considered hazardous waste if any of the metal concentrations in the leachate exceed the maximum (100 times the Primary Drinking Water Standard).
SPLP - Synthetic Precipition Leaching Procedure Test TCLP - Toxicity Characteristic Leachate Procedure Test MDL - Method Detection Limit LOQ - Limit of Quanification C - value based on carcinogenic effects N - value based on noncarcinogenic effects
flR30326l
Table! Regional Background Inorganic Concentrations in Surficial Soils FMC Avtex Fibers Superfund Site Front Royal, Virginia
Location/Virginia Counties Sample No.
Parameter (ppm)
Location/Virginia Counties Sample No. Arsenic Lead Manganese Mercury Thallium Vanadium
Notes: Data was obtained from Boerngen, J.G. and H.T. Shacklette, 1981. Chemical Analyses of Soils and Other Surficial Materials of the
Conterminous United States. United States Geological Survey, Open-File Report 81-197. Concentrations were reported for Virginia counties only, ppm - Parts per million. Blank indicates not analyzed.
3D CO O CO no
Table 3 Results of Trace Level Analysis of Chlorinated Dioxins and Furans in Burnt Debris Composite Sample FMC Avtex Fibers Superfund Site Front Royal, Virginia
Notes: * - Toxic Equivalent Factors (TEFs) based on the World Health Organization (WHO) 1998 TEF
scheme (TEF WH098) to weight each compound according to its relative toxicity for cancer risk evaluations. Only laboratory measurements for each congener were considered in calculatiori of TCDD TEQ concentration. A TEF of 0.001 for OCDD is provided based on EPA Region III draft guidance (EPA Region lU, Draft Dioxin/Furan Data Validation Guidance, March 1999).
** - Qualifiers - B = The analyte is present in the associated method blairk at a reportable level. J = The reported result represents an estimated quantity.
^ = Total TEQ Concentration (sum of the TEQ for each congener) is compared to the USEPA Region IH RBC for TCDD of 4.3 pg/g based on potential residential land use.
Appendix A Data Validation Reports
RR303265
a %
Data Validation Report for SDG#AVV83 Soil TCLP Data
The verification was based USEPA SW-846 Methods 1311 for Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP), 601 OB for arsenic, selenium, barium, cadmium, chromium, lead, and silver and 7470A for mercury (methods) and included the following parameters:
- field duplicates * - reporting limit verification
- overall assessment of data for the SDG
* All criteria were met for this parameter.
A Level 2 verification was performed in accordance with the specifications provided in the FMC Corporation Site-wide Quality Assurance Project Plan, Revision 2, 20 July 2004, prepared by Environmental Resource Manasement (QAPP) and Field Sampline and Analysis Plan, Non-Time-Critical Removal Action - Buildines, prepared by ERM, January 2002, and as supplemented by the Field Sampline and Analysis Plan Supplement NTCRA-Buildims and Plant Area Soils, prepared by ERM, October 2004 (FSAP). The verification was conducted by applying the method and FSAP specifications to the relevant procedures described in Region III Modifications to National Functional Guidelines for Organic Data Review Multi-Media, Multi-Concentration (OLMOl.O - 0LM01.9), September, 1994 (Guidelines). The Level 2 verification corresponds to the Region III Level M3 effort, as described in Innovative Approaches to Data Validation, USEPA Region III, June 1995, which includes a review/evaluation of blanks, calibrations, retention times, chromatograms, laboratory reporting forms and other information, including raw data, mass spectra, and supporting data. Table I provides a summary of the verification actions and qualifications that are detailed below.
CALIBRATION:
Low-level check standards:
Low-level calibration check standards (CRA/CRI) providing recoveries not within 90-110% are tabulated below:
VALNTCRA904 .15 ECCI
&R303267
CRA/CRI ID. ELEMENT RECOVERY (Vo) CRA mercury 115.0
CRI1 arsenic 85.7 chromium 113.2
CRI2 arsenic 72.4 barium 111.8 lead 112.2 silver 77.8
Action:
• For recoveries above 110%, sample results reported positive but <2 LOQ are flagged as biased high (K).
• For recoveries below 90%, sample results reported <2L0Q are flagged as biased low (L).
BLANKS:
Blanks providing results >IDL and their associated action levels are tabulated below:
BLANK ID CCB2
CCB3
CCB4
PARAMETER barium
barium lead
barium
CONC. 0.44
0.35 3.3
0.26
0.92
ACTION LEVEL 2.2
1.8 17
1.3
4.6 Prep Blank barium
Positive values reported below the action level: NONE
FIELD DUPLICATES:
For this SDG, field duplicates are not identified.
OVERALL ASSESSMENT OF DATA FOR THE SDG:
The low-level check standards provided recoveries below 90% for arsenic, and silver. These results reported as not-detected are flagged as biased low (L).
The low-level check standard provided recovery of mercury above 110%. The result for this element, that is reported positive but <2 LOQ is flagged as biased high (K).
VALNTCRA904 16 ECCl
RR303268
X All other QC criteria evaluated were within specification, no further actions or qualifications were required or deemed necessary.
VALNTCRA904 17 ECCl
ftR303269
% %
Table I
SDGNo.: AVV83
Verification Review Action Summary
Mercury
Arsenic
Barium
K1
LI
Selenium
Silver
Cadmium
Chromium
Lead
LI
If an element has no entry, no qualifications were necessary.
K1 - Result is biased high (K) due to non-compliant CRA recovery.
LI - Result biased low (L) due to non-compliant CRI recovery.
VALNTCRA904 18 ECCl aR30327(
Data Validation Report for SDGttAVV76 Soil Total and SPLP Results
ftR30327l
9.
SDG#: AVV76
Total Elemental Parameter Samples: AV-NCB-SS-Ol-C-092904 AV-NCB-SS-EB-01-092904
The verification was based USEPA SW-846 Methods 1312 for Synthetic Precipitation Leaching Procedure (SPLP), 601 OB for all elements except mercury and 7471A for total mercury and 7470A and 6020 for SPLP mercury and thallium, respectively, (methods) and included the following parameters:
* - data completeness * - holding times * - ICP/MS instrument tune
- matrix spike sample analysis - ICP serial dilution - field duplicates
* - reporting limit verification - overall assessment of data for the SDG
* All criteria were met for this parameter.
A Level 2 verification was performed in accordance with the specifications provided in the FMC Corporation Site-wide Quality Assurance Project Plan, Revision 2, 20 July 2004, prepared by Environmental Resource Manaeement (QAPP) and Field Sampline and Analysis Plan, Non-Time-Critical Removal Action - Buildinss, prepared by ERM, January 2002, and as supplemented by the Field Sampline and Analysis Plan Supplement NTCRA-Buildinss and Plant Area Soils, prepared by ERM, October 2004 (FSAP). The verification was conducted by applying the method and FSAP specifications to the relevant procedures described in Re2ion III Modifications to the Laboratory Data Validation Functional Guidelines for Evaluatins Inoreanic Analyses, April, 1993 (Guidelines). The Level 2 verification corresponds to the Region III Level IM2 effort, as described in Innovative Approaches to Data Validation, USEPA Reeion III, June 1995, which includes a review/evaluation of blanks, calibrations, laboratory reporting forms and other information, including raw data, and supporting data. Table I provides a summary of the verification actions and qualifications that are detailed below.
CALIBRATION:
VALNTCRA904 i'^'303272
%
Low-level calibration check standards (CRI) providing recoveries not within 90-110% and (CRA) 80-120% are tabulated below:
Associated samples with positive values reported below the action level are: NONE
MATRIX SPIKE SAMPLE ANALYSIS:
Samples providing matrix spike (MS)/matrix spike duplicate (MSD) recoveries not within 75-125% or the laboratory-derived limits, which also contain native analyte at <4X the spiking level are tabulated below:
SAMPLE NO. Batch QC Total
Batch QC SPLP
ELEMENT antimony
mercury
MS/MSD RECOVERY (Vo) 74/74
132/125
VALNTCRA904
Action:
• For recoveries below the louver limit, sample results are flagged as biased low (L). • For recoveries above the upper limit, positive sample results are flagged as biased high (K).
ICP SERIAL DILUTION:
Samples reported with element present at a level >50 IDL that provide serial dilution % difference in excess of 10 are tabulated below: ^
SAMPLE ID. ELEMENT %D Batch QC Total zinc 27.7
Action:
• Sample results for the element are flagged as estimated (J).
Comments:
The diluted value is larger than the undiluted value, therefore, low bias is indicated.
FIELD DUPLICATES:
For this SDG, field duplicates are not identified.
OVERALL ASSESSMENT OF DATA FOR THE SDG:
The CRI provided elevated signals for total thallium. The result reported positive for this element below 2 LOQ is flagged as biased high (K).
The CRI provided reduced signals for total antimony, and silver. The results reported below 2 LOQ for these elements are flagged as biased low (L).
The CRI associated with the equipment blank provided reduced signals for arsenic, copper, and silver. The results reported as non-detect for these elements are flagged as biased low (L).
The CRI provided reduced signals for SPLP arsenic. The result reported as non-detect for this element are flagged as biased low (L).
The CRI provided elevated signals for SPLP antimony and nickel. The results reported positive for these elements below 2 LOQ are flagged as biased high (K).
The Batch QC sample provided MS/MSD recoveries of SPLP mercury above the upper limit. The result reported positive for this element is flagged as biased high (K).
VALNTCRA904 Ifff303276
%
The Batch QC sample provided MS/MSD recoveries of total antimony below the lower limit. The result reported as not-detected for this element is flagged as biased low (L).
The Batch QC sample provided an ICP serial dilution result for total zinc that is approximately 30% higher than the undiluted value. The result for this element is flagged as estimated (J) to signify the indication of low bias.
All additional QC information evaluated was within specifications, and no further actions or flagging were required or deemed necessary.
VALNTCRA904 6 ECCI
flR303277
Table I
SDGNo.: AVV76
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Verification Action Summary
K3, L1,L4 Mercury
L2, L3 Nickel
Selenium
K4
K3
Beryllium
Cadmium
Silver
Thallium
L1,L2
K1
Chromium L3 Vanadium
Cobalt Zinc J1
L2 Lead Copper
Manganese
If an element has no entry, no qualifications were necessary.
J1 - Total result is estimated (J) due to non-compliant serial dilution reproducibility.
Total result is biased high (K) due to non-compliant CRI recovery.
Total result is biased high (K) due to non-compliant CRI recovery.
SPLP result is biased high (K) due to non-compliant CRI recovery.
SPLP result is biased high (K) due to non-compliant matrix spike recovery.
Total result is biased low (L) due to non-compliant CRI recovery.
EB result is biased low (L) due to non-compliant CRI recovery.
SPLP result is biased low (L) due to non-compliant CRI recovery.
Total result is biased low (L) due to non-compliant matrix spike recovery.
The verification was based on USEPA SW-846 Methods 1312 for the Synthetic Precipitation Leaching Procedure (SPLP) and 8270C for the target compound list (TCL) Semi-volatile Organic Compounds (SVOC) (methods) and included the following parameters:
* - data completeness * - technical holding times * - GC/MS instrument performance check
target compound identification * - compound quantitation and reporting limits * - system performance
overall assessment
*
* All criteria were met for this parameter.
A Level 2 verification was performed in accordance with the specifications provided in the FMC Corporation Site-wide Quality Assurance Project Plan, Revision 2, 20 July 2004, prepared by Environmental Resource Manaeement (QAPP) and Field Sampling and Analysis Plan, Non-Time-Critical Removal Action - Buildines, prepared by ERM, January 2002, and as supplemented by the Field Sampline and Analysis Plan Supplement NTCRA-Buildines and Plant Area Soils, prepared by ERM, October 2004 (FSAP). The verification was conducted by
. applying the method and FSAP specifications to the relevant procedures described in Reeion III Modifications to National Functional Guidelines for Organic Data Review Multi-Media, Multi-Concentration (OLMOl.O - 0LM01.9), September, 1994 (Guidelines). The Level 2 verification corresponds to the Region III Level M3 effort, as described in Innovative Approaches to Data Validation, USEPA Region III, June 1995, which includes a review/evaluation of blanks, calibrations, retention times, chromatograms, laboratory reporting forms and other information, including raw data, mass spectra, and supporting data. Table I provides a summary of the verification actions and qualifications that are detailed below.
INITIAL CALIBRATION:
VALNTCRA904 8 ECCI
RR303279
Target compounds with average relative response factors (AVG RRF) <0.05 or relative standard deviations in excess of the 15% specified in the method are tabulated below:
INSTRUMENT CAL DATE COMPOUND RSD HP09572 9-20-04 2,4-dinitrophenol 19 '
Action:
• None, see comments.
Comments:
For RSD> 15, no action was taken on the basis of professional judgment indicated in the Guidelines since the laboratory utilized regression quantitation models for these compounds, which is an allowed option in the method.
Note that the Target Revision 3.4 software utilized by the laboratory inverts the dependent and independent variables from the requirements of the method. This inversion may impact slightly quantitative values derived from regression analysis models. No action was taken since the compound was reported as non-detect and no signal was observed in the sample.
CONTINUING CALIBRATION:
Target compounds with percent difference in response from the average of the initial calibration in excess of 20% specified in the method are tabulated below:
CAL DATE/TIME ASSOCIATED SAMPLES 10-9-04/10:49 TOTAL
10-11-04/09:48 SPLP
Action:
• For SPLP result for the compound is flagged as biased low (L).
Comment:
The above action is b^ed on professional judgment since for negative %D sensitivity loss is indicated and the compound was reported as not-detected.
VALNTCRA904 9 ECCI
RR303280
%
COLLOCATED SAMPLES:
For this SDG, collocated samples are not identified.
OVERALL ASSESSMENT:
For the SPLP sample, the result reported as not-detected for hexachlorocyclopentadiene is flagged as biased low (L) due to lack of continuing calibration stability with sensitivity loss indicated.
With the exception of lack of initial calibration linearity for 2,4-dinitrophenol and continuing calibration stability for 4-nitrophenol, that did not require actions or flagging, all additional QC criteria evaluated were within specification. No additional actions or flagging were required or deemed necessary.
The verification was based on USEPA Method 8082 (method) for the target compound list (TCL) polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB) and included the following parameters:
* - data completeness * - technical holding times * - GC/ECD instrument performance * - initial calibration
collocated samples * - target compound identification * - compound quantitation and reporting limits * - system performance
overall assessment
*
* All criteria were met for this parameter.
A Level 2 verification was performed in accordance with the specifications provided in the FMC Corporation Site-wide Quality Assurance Project Plan, Revision 2, 20 July 2004, prepared by Environmental Resource Manaeement (QAPP) and Field Sampline and Analysis Plan, Non-Time-Critical Removal Action - Buildines, prepared by ERM, January 2002, and as supplemented by the Field Sampline and Analysis Plan Supplement NTCRA-Buildines and Plant Area Soils, prepared by ERM, October 2004 (FSAP). The verification was conducted by applying the method and FSAP specifications to the relevant procedures described in Reeion III Modifications to National Functional Guidelines for Oreanic Data Review Multi-Media, Multi-Concentration (OLMOLO - 0LM01.9), September, 1994 (Guidelines). The Level 2 verification corresponds to the Region UI Level M3 effort, as described in Innovative Approaches to Data Validation, USEPA Reeion HI, June 1995, which includes a review/evaluation of blanks, calibrations, retention times, chromatograms, laboratory reporting forms and other information, including raw data, mass spectra, and supporting data. Table I provides a summary of the verification actions and qualifications that are detailed below.
CONTINUING CALBRATION
Continuing calibrations providing response difference in excess of +/- 15% from the initial calibration are tabulated below:
INSTRUMENT ID. DATE/TIME COMPOUND %D
VALNTCRA904 12 ECC!
AR303283
%
H2601A 10-08/14:26 Aroclor-1260 -16.6
Associated samples: SOIL
Action:
• None, see comments.
Comments:
For the indicated compound, no action was taken since the associated sample result was reported not-detected from both columns.
COLLOCATED SAMPLES:
For this SDG, collocated samples are not identified.
OVERALL ASSESSMENT:
With the exception of lack of continuing calibration stability for Aroclor-1260, that did not require actions or flagging, all additional QC criteria evaluated were within specification and no actions or flagging were required or deemed necessary.
The verification was based on USEPA SW-846 Method 8290 for polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins (PCDD) and polychlorinated dibenzofiirans (PCDF) and included the following parameters:
* - internal standard and clean-up standard recoveries * - sample analysis and identification * - sample quantitation and total homologue
estimated detection limit (EDL) and estimated maximum possible concentration (EMPC) toxicity equivalency factor (TEF), isomer specificity and second column confirmation
* - required sample reruns * - dilutions
overall assessment of data for the SDG
* All criteria were met for this parameter.
A Level 2 verification was performed in accordance with the specifications provided in the FMC Corporation Site-wide Quality Assurance Project Plan, Revision 2, 20 July 2004, prepared by Environmental Resource Manaeement (QAPP) and Field Santpline and Analysis Plan, Non-Time-Critical Removal Action - Buildinss, prepared by ERM, January 2002, and as supplemented by the Field Santpline and Analysis Plan Supplement NTCRA-Buildinss and Plant Area Soils, prepared by ERM, October 2004 (FSAP). The \erification was conducted by applying the method and FSAP specifications to the relevant procedures described in United States Environmental Protection Aeency, Resion III, Dioxin/Furan Data Validation Guidance, DRAFT, March 1999 (Guidelines). The Level 2 verification corresponds to the Region III Level M3 effort, as described in Innovative Approaches to Data Validation, USEPA Region
SDG250CDD I ECCI
aR303287
III, June 1995. which includes a review/evaluation of blanks, calibrations, retention times, chromatograms, laboratory reporting forms and other information, including raw data, mass spectra, and supporting data: Table I provides a summary of the verification actions and qualifications that are detailed below.
Also attached are the:
• Data packages, as received, and • analytical results with verification actions added in red ink.
PRELIMINARY REVffiW:
Comments:
Performance evaluation sample results and a toxicity equivalency calculation was not found in the data package, therefore, these items were not reviewed.
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION MATERIALS:
Comments:
See comments in the preliminary review section above.
CONTINUING CALIBRATION:
Specific response stability:
Isomers with specific response percent differences (%D) between 20 and 25 from the initial calibration average are tabulated below:
' Action levels adjusted for associated sample moisture content correction.
Compounds with positive values reported below the action level are:
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF Total HxCDF 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF Total HpCDF OCDF
Action:
• Sample results for the compounds are flagged as not significantly above the blank (B).
FIELD BLANKS:
Comments:
Equipment blank AV-NCB-EB-01-092904 was analyzed and data are reported for an aqueous sample (units of pg/L). The reviewer is unable to relate the different media, container, and preparation methodologies used for the equipment blank to the associated
SDG250CDD a^W^03289
% \
soil sample. Also, no specific information was found in the Guidelines for dealing with field blanks of different media than environmental samples.
MATRIX SPIKE:
Comments:
A matrix spike was not requested on the COG and associated data was not found in the package.
Laboratory Control Sample/Laboratory Control Sample Duplicate were reported for the batch associated with the Soil Sample and the relative percent difference for 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF and 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF were reported at 19% which is in excess of the 15% method default limits. The recoveries of all compounds were within specification and the above indicated compounds were reported at levels below the laboratory reporting limit, therefore, no action was taken.
LABORATORY DUPLICATE ANALYSIS:
Comments:
Evidence of a laboratory duplicate analysis was not found in the data package, therefore, this parameter could not be evaluated.
COLLOCATED SAMPLE ANALYSIS:
Comments:
For this SDG, a collocated sample is not identified.
ESTIMATED DETECTION LIMIT (EDL) AND ESTIMATED MAXIMUM POSSIBLE CONCENTRATION (EMPG):
1. EDL:
Comments:
For values reported above the 2.5 signal-to-noise limit specified in the method but below the lowest-level ICAL standard, the laboratory affixed the "J" flag to indicate an estimated value. It is the reviewer's professional opinion that levels meeting the method requirements but below the low-level ICAL standard indicated in method 8000B should not be qualified due to low level.
2. EMPC:
SDG250CDD 4 ECCI
aR303290
%
For the soil sample, compounds providing ion ratios > + 15% and < + 25% or co-maximization times not within 2 seconds are tabulated below:
2,3,7,8-TCDD Total TCDD Total TCDF 2,3,7,8-TCDF Total PeCDD 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD Total HxCDD 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF Total PeCDF 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF TotalHxCDF 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF Total HpCDF OCDF
Action:
• Soil sample results reported for the indicated compounds are flagged as estimated (J).
Comments: , »
When the ion ratios or co-maximization times are not within specification, the possibility of high bias and/or false positive values exists.
TOXIDITY EQUIVALENCY FACTOR fTEFT ISOMER SPECIFICITY AND SECOND COLUMN CONFIRMATION:
TEF:
Comments:
As noted in the preliminary review section above, a toxicity equivalency calculation was not found in the reviewed information, therefore, this parameter could not be evaluated.
OVERALL ASSESSMENT OF DATA FOR THE SDG:
The method blank associated with the soil sample was reported with 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD, 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD, 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD, 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF, 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF, 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF, 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF, 2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF, 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF, Total HxCDF, 1.2.3.4.6.7.8-HpCDF, 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF, Total HpCDF, and OCDF present at concentrations that generated action levels resulting in the flagging of the reported values as not significantly above the blank (B). These results should be considered as maximum possible concentrations due to blank contamination.
For .the soil sample, ion ratios were out of specification for 2,3,7,8-TCDD, Total TCDD, Total TCDF, 2,3,7,8-TCDF, Total PeCDD, 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD, 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD, Total HxCDD, 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF, 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF, Total PeCDF, 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF, 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF, 2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF, 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF, Total HxCDF, 1.2.3.4.7.8.9-HpCDF, Total HpCDF, and OCDF. The results reported for these compounds are flagged as estimated (J) to signify the potential for high bias and/or false
SDG250CDD 5 ECCI rR303291
positive. These results should be considered as maximum possible concentrations due to low response and/or interference.
All other QC information evaluated was within specification and no additional actions or qualifications were deemed necessary.
If the field is left blank, no actions were necessary.
B1 - Results for 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD, 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD, 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD, 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF, 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF, 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF, 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF, 2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF, 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF, Total HxCDF, 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF, 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF, Total HpCDF, and OCDF are not significantly above the method blank (B).
J1 - Results for 2,3,7,8-TCDD, Total TCDD, Total TCDF, 2,3,7,8-TCDF, Total PeCDD, 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD, 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD, Total HxCDD, 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF, 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF, Total PeCDF, 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF, 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF, 2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF, 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF, Total HxCDF, 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF, Total HpCDF, and OCDF are flagged as estimated (J) to signify maximum possible concentrations due to non-compliant ion ratios or co-maximization times..
SDG250CDD 7 ECCI
flR303293
Bavxxoxnitented. IteBcnoPC^ WanaigeaiEpt. (BSH)
dxeaoLt SaBS>le ID: AV-SCB-'SS-Ol-C-092904
Trace Level Organic Conpounds
Lcjrt-Saiqgkle : Date Scuqpled...: Pr^ bate. Pr|^ Batch ft. . . : Diliitiaa Factor: % ifbisture :
H4J060250-001 09/29/04 10/22/04 4296444 1 . ie
Woa* Order ft— ; Date Recieived..; Jtoalyais bate..:
6R0(^2AA. 10/01/04 10/29/04
Matrix : SOLID
PARAMETER RESULT i;2;?,7,8rEeCnD Tb^ PeCDD
I.4,7,e-B*a m v,,7,8,9-BaCnD TotadL HlDCaiD 1. 2, 3,4,6, 7, S-HpCSD Tpt^ BpODD odbb 1,2,3,7;8-^PeCDF 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF Total PeGDF 1,2.3,4,7;8-S^ECDF 1,2,3,6., 7 i 8*r]BboCDF 2,3,4,6,7,8^BicCDF 1,2,3,7,8,9-ttcCDP Total HxCDF 1,2, 3, 4,6,7, E-r^pCDF
Questions? Contact your Client Services Representative Katherine A Klinefelter at (717) 656-2300.
Respectfully Submitted,
aR303300
Q % %
Lancaster r Laboratories Analysis Report
2425 New Holland Pike. PO Box 12425, Lancaster, PA 17605-2425 •717-656-2300 Fax:717-656-2681 • WWW.lancaSterlabS.com
Lancaster Laboratories Sample No. ET 4409723
AV-NCB-SS-Ol-C-092904 Composite Soil Sample TCLP NON-VOLATILE LEACHATE EXTRACTION Avtex Fibers Reentry of LL#4365750 Collected;09/29/2004 15:00 by JT
Page 1 of 1
Submitted: 11/18/2004 16:45 Reported: 11/30/2004 at 10:47 Discard: 12/31/2004 .
SSIC- SDG#: AW83-01*
Account Number: 04174
ERM 350 Eagleview Blvd Suite 200 Exton PA 19341
CAT As Received No. Analysis Name CAS Number Result 00259 Mercury 7439-97-6 0.29
The metal analyses were performed on a non-volatile leachate according to the procedure specified in SW-846, Chapter 7.4 (Revision December, 1994). A sample is considered to have failed the Toxicity Characteristic (TO test and is considered a hazardous waste if any of the metal concentrations (mg/1) in the leachate exceed the following maxima (100 times the Primary Drinking Water Standards):
05713 Itot j WW SW846 Hg Digest SW-846 7470A 1 11/23/2004 20:45 Nelli S Markaryan 1
flR30330l
.ancaster
.aboratories %
Analysis Report %
2425 New Holland Pike, PO Box 12425, Lancaster, PA 17605-2425 •717-656-2300 Fax:717-656-2681 • WWW.lancasterlabs.COm
Quality Control Summary
Client Name: ERM Reported: 11/30/04 at 10:47 AM
Group Number: 921580
Matrix QC may not be reported if site-specific QC samples were not submitted. In these situations, to demonstrate precision and accuracy at a batch level, a LCS/LCSD was performed, unless otherwise specified in the method.
Page 1 of 1
Laboratory Compliance Quality Control Blank Blank Report LCS LCSD LCS/LCSD Result LOQ Units %REC %REC Limits
*- Outside of specification (1) The result for one or both determinations was less than five times the LOQ. (2) The background result was more than four times the spike added.
aR303302
Analyst ^quest / Environmeni Services Chain of Custody
li»Kasl!erLalx)ratories Whersqu^isasdence. Acct#
For Lancaster Laboratories use onty*
COC^ G 0619 7 2
Client
Project Namefflt A\/\^
Project Manager -Joki^ Wct'Za^^ ^
Sanipler _
Name of state wtiere samples were collected:
^nr ^ i n Jo 'CSL .i- r g pg>r Aj
Turnaround Timo Requested (TAT) (please circle): Qjjorm^ Rusti (Rush TAT is subject to Lancaster Laboratories approval and sutSiarge.) Date results are needed: ^ • Rush results requested by (please circle): Phone Fax Phone#: Fax#: • ' - . ' E-mail address:
Data Package Options (please circle if requited) QC Summary Type VI (Raw Data) Type I (Tier I) GLP
Submit Electronic Deliverables (in the EDD fonnat that was provided by ERM to LLI) via e-mail to John [email protected], Christie [email protected], and to John Hazardfg>erm.com
All data packages should be sent to ERM on a CD.
Mail data package CD, invoice, and acknowledgements to ERM, Attention John Hazard, 350 Eagleview Blvd., Suite 200, Exton, PA, 19341
Mail data package CD to Bruce Wallen, ECCI, 6 George St., Gorham, ME, 04038
2425 New Holland Pike • Lancaster, PA 17601 Explanation of Symbols and Abbreviations'^. The following defines common symbols and abbreviations used in reporting technical data:
N.D. none detected BMQL Below Minimum Quantitation Level INTO Too Numerous To Count MPN Most Probable Number
lU International Units CP Units cobalt-chloroplatinate units umhos/cm micromhos/cm NTU nephelometric turbidity units
C degrees Celsius F degrees Fahrenheit meq milliequivalents lb. pound(s)
g gram(s) kg kilogram(s) ug microgram(s) mg milligram(s) ml milliliter(s) 1 liter(s) m3 cubic meter(s) ul microliter(s)
< less than - The number followino the sian is the limit of Quantitation, the smallest amount of analvte which can be reliably determined using this specific test.
> greater than,
J estimated value - The result is > the Method Detection Limit (MDL) and < the Limit of Quantitation (LOO).
ppm parts per million - One ppm is equivalent to one milligram per kilogram (mg/kg), or one gram per million grams. For aqueous liquids, ppm is usually taken to be equivalent to milligrams per liter (mg/l), because one liter of water has a weight very close to a kilogram. For gases or vapors, one ppm is equivalent to "one microliter of gas per liter of gas.
ppb parts per billion
Dry weight Results printed under this heading have been adjusted for moisture content. This increases the analyte weight basis concentration to approximate the value present in a similar sample without moisture. All other results are reported
on an as-received basis.
U.S. EPA CLP Data Qualifiers: Organic Qualifiers Inorganic Qualifiers
A TIC is a possible aldol-condensation product B Value is <CRDL, but >IDL B Analyte was also detected in the blank E Estimated due to interference 0 Pesticide result confirmed by GC/MS M Duplicate injection precision not met D Compound quantitated on a diluted sample N Spike sample not within control limits E Concentration exceeds the calibration range of S Method of standard additions (MSA) used
the instrument for calculation N Presumptive evidence of a compound (TICs only) U Compound was not detected P Concentration difference between primary and W Post digestion spike out of control limits
confirmation columns >25% * Duplicate analysis not within control limits U Compound was not detected + Correlation coefficient for MSA <0.995
X,Y,Z Defined in case narrative
Analytical test results for methods listed on the laboratories' accreditation scope meet all requirements of NELAC unless otherwise noted under the individual analysis.
Measurement uncertainty values, as applicable, are available upon request.
Tests results relate only to the sample tested. Clients should be aware that a critical step in a chemical or microbiological analysis is the collection of the sample. Unless the sample analyzed is truly representative of the bulk of material involved, the test results will be meaningless. If you have questions regarding the proper techniques of collecting samples, please contact us. We cannot be held responsible for sample integrity, however, unless sampling has been performed by a member of our staff. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of the laboratory.
WARRANTY AND LIMITS OF LIABILITY - In accepting analytical work, we warrant the accuracy of test results for the sample as submitted. THE FOREGOING EXPRESS WARRANTY IS EXCLUSIVE AND IS GIVEN IN LIEU OF ALL OTHER WARRANTIES, EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED. WE DISCLAIM ANY OTHER WARRANTIES, EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING A WARRANTY OF FITNESS FOR PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND WARRANTY OF MERCHANTABILITY. IN NO EVENT SHALL LANCASTER LABORATORIES BE LIABLE FOR INDIRECT, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR INCIDENTAL DAMAGES INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFIT OR GOODWILL REGARDLESS OF (A) THE NEGLIGENCE (EITHER SOLE OR CONCURRENT) OF LANCASTER LABORATORIES AND (B) WHETHER LANCASTER LABORATORIES HAS BEEN INFORMED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES. We accept no legal responsibility for the purposes for which the client uses the test results. No purchase order or other order for work shall be accepted by Lancaster Laboratories which includes any conditions that vary from the Standard Terms and Conditions of Lancaster Laboratories and we hereby object to any conflicting terms contained in any acceptance or order submitted by client.
3768.02
flR303306
\
Analytical Data Sheets for Composite Soil Total and SPLP Results
RR303307
# Lancaster Laboratories
%
Analysis Report 2425 Now Holland Pike, PO Bo* 12425. Uncastor, PA 17605-2425 •717-656-2300 Fax:717-656-2661 • WWW.lancasterlabS.com
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Prepared for:
ERM 350 Eagleview Blvd
Suite 200 ExtonPA 19341 610-524-3752
Prepared by:
Lancaster Laboratories 2425 New Holland Pike
Lancaster, PA 17605-2425
SAMPLE GROUP
The sample group for this submittal is 914416. Samples arrived at the laboratory on Friday, October 01, 2004. The PO# for this group is 0002565.
The specific methodologies used in obtaining the enclosed analytical results are indicated on the laboratory chronicles.
ELECTRONIC COPY TO 1 COPY TO
ERM
Data Package Group
Attn: Mr. John Hazard
BR303308
%
#Lancaster « i - D Laboratories Analysis Report 2425 Now Holland Pike, PO Box 12425, Lancaster, PA 17605-2425 •717-656-2300 Fax:717-e56-2e8i-www.lancastetlabs.com
Questions? Contact your Client Services Representative Katherine A Klinefelter at (717) 656-2300.
Respectfully Submitted,
RR30330'
_ancaster .aboratories Analysis Report
2425 New Holland Pike, PO Box 12425, Lancaster, PA 17605-2425 *717-656-2300 Fax:717-656-2681 • WWW.iancasterlabS.com
Lancaster Laboratories Sample No. EL 4365749
AV-NCB-EB-01-092904 Grab Water Sample Avtex Fibers
Collected:09/29/2004 13:00
Submitted: 10/01/2004 09:05 Reported: 10/25/2004 at 10:21 Discard: 11/25/2004
SSOIE SDG#: AW76-01EB
by JT Account Number: 04174
ERM 350 Eagleview Blvd Suite 200 Exton PA 19341
As Received CAT As Received Limit of |te. Analysis Name CAS Number Result Quantitation Units
3-Methylphenol and 4-raethylphenol cannot be resolved'under the chromatographic conditions used for sample analysis. The result reported for 4-methylphenol represents the combined total of both compounds.
N-nitrosodiphenylamine decomposes in the GC inlet forming diphenylamine. The result reported for N-nitrosodiphenylamine represents the combined total of both compounds. 4-Bromophenyl-phenylether 101-55-3 < 10. 10. ug/1
03962 Hexachlorobenzene 118-74-1 < 10 . 10. ug/1
aR3033lI
jncaster Laboratories Analysis Report
2425 New Holland Pike, PO Box 12425, Lancaster, PA 17605-2425 •717-656-2300 Fax:717-656-2681 • WWW,lancasterlabS.COm
Lancaster Laboratories Sample No. EL 4365749
Page 3 of 4
AV-NCB-EB-01-092904 Grab Water Sample Avtex Fibers
Collected:09/29/2004 13:00
Submitted: 10/01/2004 09:05 Reported: 10/25/2004 at 10:21 Discard: 11/25/2004
Analyst Damary Valentin David K Beck Deborah A Krady Damary Valentin Donna R Sackett Donna R Sackett Donna R Sackett Donna R Sackett Donna R Sackett Damary Valentin Donna R Sackett Donna R Sackett Donna R Sackett Damary Valentin Damary Valentin Donna R Sackett Damary Valentin Douglas D Seitz
D1 F
utlon ctor
flR3033l2
#
jncaster jboratories
-%
Analysis Report 2425 New Holland Pike, PO Box 12425, Lancaster, PA 17605-2425 •717-656-2300 Fax:717-656-2681 • www.lancasterlabs.com
Lancaster Laboratories Sample No. EL 4365749
AV-NCB-EB-01-092904 Grab Water Sample Avtex Fibers
Page 4 of 4
Collected:09/29/2004 13:00
Submitted: 10/01/2004 09:05 Reported: 10/25/2004 at 10:21 Discard: 11/25/2004
N-nitrosodiphenylamine decomposes in the GC inlet forming diphenylamine. The result reported for N-nitrosodiphenylaraine represents the combined total of both compounds.
)1 cannot be 1 resolved under the for sample analysis. The result reported le combined total of both compounds. 106-47-8 < 400. 400. ug/kg 91-57-6 < 400. 400. ug/kg 95-95-4 < 400. 400 . ug/kg 88-74-4 < 400. 400. ug/kg
Submitted: 10/01/2004 09:05 Reported: 10/25/2004 at 10:22 Discard: 11/25/2004
SOISP SDG#: AW76-03*
Account Number: 04174
ERM 350 Eagleview Blvd Suite 200 Exton PA 19341
As Received CAT As Received Limit of No. Analysis Name CAS Number Result Quantitation Units ^3 947 Naphthalene 91-20-3 < 10. 10. ug/1 03 94 8 Hexachlorobutadiene 87-68-3 c 5. 5. ug/l 03949 Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 77-47-4 <25. 25. ug/1 03950 2-Chloronaphthalene 91-58-7 < 10. 10 . ug/1 03951 Acenaphthylene 208-96-8 < 10. 10. ug/1 •• 03952 Dimethylphthalate 131-11-3 < 10. 10. ug/1 04680 2-Methylphenol 95-48-7 < 10. 10. ug/1 04681 2,2' -oxybis (I'-Chloropropane) 108-60-1 < 10. 10 . ug/1 04682 4 -Methylphenol 106-44-5 < 10. 10. ug/1
3-Methylphenol and 4-methylphenol cannot be resolved under the chromatographic conditions used for sample analysis. The result reported for 4-methylphenol represents the combined total of both compounds.
N-nitrosodiphenylamine decomposes in the GC inlet forming The result reported for N-nitrosodiphenylaraine represents total of both compounds. 4-Bromophenyl-phenylether 101-55-3 < 10.
00813 BNA Water Extraction SW-846 3510C 1 10/08/2004 04:30 David V Hershey Jr 01567 Synthetic Precipitation SW-846 1312 1 10/06/2004 12:30 Jessica Agosto .
Leach Agosto .
05705 WW/TL SW 846 ICP Digest (t ot)
SW-846 3010A 1 10/07/2004 20:00 James L Mertz
05713 WW SW846 Hg Digest SW-846 7470A 1 10/07/2004 19:30 Nelli S Markaryan 06050 ICP/MS SW-846 Water SW-846 3010A Mod. 1 10/07/2004 10:24 Megersa Deyessa
Di F
ution ctor
6R303320
\
jncaster , , . „ . % ^oratories Analysis Report 2425 New Holland Pike, PO Box 12425, Lancaster, PA 17605-2425 •717-656-2300 Fax:717-656-2681 • WWW.lancaSterlabS.com
Page 4 of 4
Lancaster Laboratories Sample No. ET 4365751
AV-NCB-SS-Ol-C-092904 Composite Soil Sample SPLP NON-VOLATILE LEACHATE EXTRACTION Avtex Fibers Collected:09/29/2004 15:00 by JT Account Number: 04174
Submitted: 10/01/2004 09:05 ERM Reported: 10/25/2004 at 10:22 350 Eagleview Blvd Discard: 11/25/2004 Suite 200
Exton PA 19341 SOISP SDG#: AW76-03*
&R30.3321
Lancaster r Laboratories
%
Analysis Report 2425 New Holland Pike, PO Box 12425, Lancaster, PA 17605-2425*717-656-2300 Fax:717-656-2681 • WWW.lancasterlabS.com
Quality Control Summary
Client Name: ERM Reported: 10/25/04 at 10:22 AM
Group Number: 914416
Matrix QC may not be reported if site-specific QC samples were not submitted. In these situations, to demonstrate precision and accuracy at a batch level, a LCS/LCSD was performed, unless otherwise specified in the method.
Page 1 of 13•
Laboratory Compliance Quality Control
w Blank Blank Report LCS LCSD LCS/LCSD Rnalvsls Name Result LOO Units %REC %REC Limits
•- Outside of specification (1) The result for one or both determinations was less than five times the LOQ. (2) The background result was more than four times the spike added.
aR303322
^ncaster Laboratories Analysis Report
2425 New Holland Pike, PO Box 12425, Lancaster, PA 17605-2425 •717-656-2300 Fax:717-656-2681 • www.lancasterlabs.com
Quality Control Summary
Client Name: ERM Group Number: 914416 Reported: 10/25/04 at 10:22 AM
Laboratory Compliance Quality Control
*- Outside of specification (1) The result for one or both determinations was less than five times the LOQ. (2) The background result was more than four times the spike added.
*- Outside of specification (1) The result for one or both determinations was less than five times the LOQ. (2) The background result was more than four times the spike added.
ftR30332l»
^ncaster Laboratories Analysis Report
%
2425 New Holland Pike, PO Box 12425, Lancaster, PA 17605-2425 • 717-656-2300 Fax:717-656-2681 • WWW.lancasterlabS.com
Quality Control Summary
Client Name: ERM Group Number: 914416 Reported: 10/25/04 at 10:22 AM
Laboratory Compliance Quality Control
0.00020
*- Outside of specification (1) The result for one or both determinations was less than five times the LOQ. (2) The background result was more than four times the spike added.
Analysis Report 2425 New Holland Pike, PO Box 12425, Lancaster, PA 17605-2425 '717-656-2300 Fax:717-656-2681 • www.lancasterlabs.com
Quality Control Summary
Client Name: ERM Group Number: 914416 Reported: 10/25/04 at 10:22 AM
Laboratory Compliance Quality Control
*- Outside of specification (1) The result for one or both determinations was less than five times the LOQ. (2) The background result was more than four times the spike added.
*- Outside of specification (1) The result for one or both determinations was less than five times the LOQ. (2) The background result was more than four times the spike added.
AR303327
#
jncaster Laboratories Analysis Report
2425 New Holland Pike, PO Box 12425, Lancaster, PA 17605-2425 •717-656-2300 Fax:717-656-2681 • WWW.lancasterlabs.com
*- Outside of speeification (1) The result for one or both determinations was less than five times the LOQ. (2) The background result was more than four times the spike added.
ftR303328
#
Lancaster r Laboratories Analysis Report
\
2425 New Holland Pike, PO Box 12425, Lancaster, PA 17605-2425 • 717-656-2300 Fax:717-656-2681 • www.lancasterlabs.com
*- Outside of specification (1) The result for one or both determinations was less than five times the LOQ. (2) The background result was more than four times the spike added.
flR303329
Q
^ncaster ^oratories Analysis Report
, 2425 New Holland Pike, PO Box 12425, Lancaster, PA 17605-2425 •717-656-2300 Fax:717-656-2681 • www.iancasterlabs.com
Page 9 of 13
Quality Control Summary
Client Name: ERM Reported: 10/25/04 at 10:22 AM
Group Number: 914416
Sample Matrix Quality Control
*- Outside of specification (1) The result for one or both determinations was less than five times the LOQ, (2) The background result was more than four times the spike added.
MS MSB MS/MSD RPD BKG DUP DUP Dup Analvals Name %REC %REC Limits RPD MAX Cone Cone RPD Max Dibenzofuran 93 94 36-139 1 30 4-Nitroaniline 87 87 27-133 0 30 Carbazole 94 94 60-117 0 30
*- Outside of specification (1) The result for one or both determinations was less than five times the LOQ. (2) The background result was more than four times the spike added.
flR30333l
a
#
Lancaster r Laboratories Analysis Report
2425 New Holland Pike, PO Box 12425, Lancaster, PA 17605-2425 ' 717-656-2300 Fax:717-656-2681 • www.lancasterlabs.com
Page 11 of 13
Quality Control Summary
Client Name: ERM Reported: 10/25/04 at 10:22 AM
Group Number: 914416
Sample Matrix Quality Control MS HSD HS/MSD RPD BKG DUP DUP Dup
*- Outside of specification (1) The result for one or both determinations was less than five times the LOQ, (2) The background result was more than four times the spike added.
AR303332
a
#
_ancaster .aboratories
%
Analysis Report 2425 New Holland PIks, PO Box 12425, Lancaster, PA 17605-2425 •717-658-2300 Fax:717-656-2681 • www.lancasterlabs.com
Quality Control Summary
Page 12 of 13
iJXI
L(
Client Name: ERM Group Number: 914416 Reported: 10/25/04 at 10:22 AM
Surrogate Quality Control 2 -Fluorobiphenyl Terphenyl-dl4
*- Outside of specification (1) The result for one or both determinations was less than five times the LOQ. (2) The background result was more than four times the spike added.
flR303333
#
^ncaster Laboratories Analysis Report
%
2425 New Holland Pike', PO Box 12425, Lancaster, PA 17605-2425 •717-656-2300 Pax:717-656-2681 • WWW.lancasterlabS.com
Page 13 of 13
Client Name: ERM Reported: 10/25/04 at 10:22
Quality Control Summary
Group Number: 914416 AM
Surrogate Quality Control 2-Fluorophenol Phenol-d6 2,4,6-Tribroraophenol Nitrobenzene-dS
*- Outside of specification (1) The result for one or both determinations was less than five times the LOQ. (2) The background result was more than four times the spike added.
aR30333l4
Analys[ ^equest / Environmel f Services Chain of Custody Lancaster LaboratDries
ir Whenequalityisasdence. AccL# t . For Lancaster Laboratories use only
Group# ̂ I Sample # COC# 0061972 Please print. Instructions on reverse side correspond with circled numbers.
Client:. EftM Project Name/#;.
Project Manager Jlflfy\
Sampler:.
Name of state where samples were collected:
Acct. #
I Turnaround Time Requested (TAT) (please circle): (Rush TAT Is sutrject to Lancaster Laboratories approval and ̂ Date results are needed: Rush results requested by (please circle): Phone#: Fax#: E-mail address: JTAA ^
® ^ Data Package Options (please drde if required) QC Summary Type VI (Raw Data) — )
^ J Type I (Tier I) GLP C ;^Type II (Tier II) Other C Wpe IIKNJ Red. DeT^ dPTvoe IV (CLP) CO C/1
Site-specific QC required? Yes (If yes, Indicate QC sample and submit triplicate volume^ , Internal Chain of Custody required? Yes
Lancaster Laboratories, lric.,'2425 New HDllandi»ite,-POflox 1242S7t3^taiSter. PA 17605-2425 (717) 656-2300" Copies: WhKe and yellow should accompany samples to Lancaster Laboratories. The pink copy should be retained by the client.
\
ATTACHMENT 1 29 September 2004
Client: ERM Project Name: Avtex Fibers Project Manager: John Hazard (610) 524 3500 P.O.# 0002565 TAT: Normal 10 day Data Package: Type HI (Tier NJ Reduced Deliverable) LLICOC# 0061972
Explanation of Symbols and Abbreviations The following defines common symbols and abbreviations used in reporting technical data: %
N.D. none detected BMQL Below Minimum Quantitation Level TNTC Too Numerous To Count MPN Most Probable Number
lU International Units CP Units cobalt-chloroplatinate units umhos/cm micromhos/cm NTU nephelometric turbidity units
C degrees Celsius F degrees Fahrenheit meq milliequivalents lb. pound(s)
g gram(s) kg kilogram(s) ug microgram(s) mg milligram(s) ml milliliter(s) 1 liter(s) m3 cubic meter(s) ul microliter(s)
< less than - The number followina the sian is the limit of Quantitation, the smallest amount of analvte which can be reliably determined using this specific test.
> greater than
J estimated value - The result is > the Method Detection Limit (MDL) and < the Limit of Quantitation (LOG).
ppm parts per million - One ppm is equivalent to one milligram per kilogram (mg/kg), or one gram per million grams. For aqueous liquids, ppm is usually taken to be equivalent to milligrams per liter (mg/l), because one liter of water has a weight very close to a kilogram. For gases or vapors, one ppm is equivalent to one microliter of gas per iiter of gas.
ppb parts per billion
Dry weight Results printed under this heading have been adjusted for moisture content. This increases the analyte weight basis concentration to approximate the value present in a similar sample without moisture. All other results are reported
on an as-received basis.
Inorganic Qualifiers Value is <CRDL, but >IDL Estimated due to interference Duplicate injection precision not met Spike sample not within control limits Method of standard additions (MSA) used for calculation Compound was not detected Post digestion spike out of control limits Duplicate analysis not within control limits Correlation coefficient for MSA <0.995
U.S. EPA CLP Data Qualifiers: Organic Qualifiers
A TIC is a possible aldol-condensation product B B Analyte was also detected in the blank E C Pesticide result confirmed by GC/MS M D Compound quantitated on a diluted sample N E Concentration exceeds the calibration range of S
the instrument N Presumptive evidence of a compound (TICs only) U P Concentration difference between primary and W
confirmation columns >25% * U Compound was not detected +
X,Y,Z Defined in case narrative
Analytical test results for methods listed on.the laboratories' accreditation scope meet all requirements of NELAC unless otherwise noted under the individual analysis.
Measurement uncertainty values, as applicable, are available upon request.
Tests results relate only to the sample tested. Clients should be aware that a critical step in a chemical or microbiological analysis is the collection of the sample. Unless the sample analyzed is truly representative of the bulk of material involved, the test results will be meaningless. If you have questions regarding the proper techniques of collecting samples, please contact us. We cannot be held responsible for sample integrity, however, unless sampling has been performed by a member of our staff. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of the laboratory.
WARRANTY AND LIMITS OF LIABILITY - In accepting analytical work, we warrant the accuracy of test results for the sample as submitted. THE FOREGOING EXPRESS WARRANTY IS EXCLUSIVE AND IS GIVEN IN LIEU OF ALL OTHER WARRANTIES, EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED. WE DISCLAIM ANY OTHER WARRANTIES, EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING A WARRANTY OF FITNESS FOR PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND WARRANTY OF MERCHANTABILITY. IN NO EVENT SHALL LANCASTER LABORATORIES BE LIABLE FOR INDIRECT, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR INCIDENTAL DAMAGES INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFIT OR GOODWILL REGARDLESS OF (A) THE NEGLIGENCE (EITHER SOLE OR CONCURRENT) OF LANCASTER LABORATORIES AND (B) WHETHER LANCASTER LABORATORIES HAS BEEN INFORMED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES. We accept no legal responsibility for the purposes for which the client uses the test results. No purchase order or other order for work shall be accepted by Lancaster Laboratories which includes any conditions that vary from the Standard Terms and Conditions of Lancaster Laboratories and we hereby object to any conflicting terms contained in any acceptance or order submitted by client.
3768.02
ftR303338
Analytical Data Sheets for ^^^Posite Soil Dioxin Results
aR303339
a \
SAMPLE SUMMARY H4J060250
WO # SAMPLE# CLIENT SAMPLE ID SAMPLED SAMP DATE TIME
GROGW GROGX
001 002
AV-NCB-SS-Ol-C-092904 AV-NCB-EB-01-092904
09/29/04 15:00 09/29/04 13:00
NOTE(S); - The analytical results of the samples listed above are presented on the following pages. - All calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round-off errors in calculated results. - Results noted as "ND" were not detected at or above the stated limit. • This report must not be reproduced, except in fiill, without the written approval of the laboratory. - Results for the following parameters are never reported on a dry weight basis: color, corrosivity, density, flashpoint, ignitability, layers, odor,
lint filter test, pH, porosity pressure, reactivity, redox potential, specific gravity, spot tests, solids, solubility, temperature, viscosity, and weight.
RR3033U0
%
Eiivlroiiniental Resources Management (ERM)
Client Sanqple ID: AV-NCB-SS-Ol-C-092904
Trace Level Organic Con^unds
Lot-Sanple #... Date Sanpled... Prep Date Prep Batch #... Dilution Factor % Moisture
H4J060250-001 09/29/04 10/22/04 4296444 1 16
Work Order #... Date Received.. Analysis Date..
GROGWIAE 10/01/04 11/02/04
Matrix : SOLID
PARAMETER RESULT DETECTION LIMIT UNITS METHOD
2,3,7,8-TCDF 2.1 Q 0.38 pg/g SW846 8290
INTERNAL STANDARDS PERCENT RECOVERY
RECOVERY LIMITS
3C-2,3,7,8-TCDF
NOTE(S) :
95 (40 - 135)
Results and reporting limits have been adjusted for dry weight. Q Estimated maximum possible concentration (EMPC).
flR3033Ul
IjOt-San5)le #. .. Date Sanpled... Prep Date Prep Batch #... Dilution Factor % Moisture
Environmental Resources Management (ERM)
Client Sairple ID: AV-NCB-SS-Ol-C-092904
Trace Level Organic Conpounds
H4J0G0250-001 Work Order#. 09/29/04 10/22/04 4296444 1 16
Lot-Sanple #. . . : H4J060250-001 Work Order #... : GR0GW2AA Matrix : SOLID
NOTE(S) : -Results and reporting limits have been adjusted for dry weight. B Method blank contamination. The associated method blank contains the target anaiyte at a reportabie ievel. J Estimated result. Result is less than the reporting iimit. Q Estimated maximum possible concentration (EMPC).
flR3033l43
Lot-Sanple #... Date Sanpled... Prep Date Prep Batch #... Dilution Factor % Moisture
\
Environmental Resources Management (ERM)
Client San?)le ID; AV-NCB-SS-Ol-C-092904
Trace Level Organic Conpounds
H4J060250-001 Work Order #. 09/29/04 10/22/04 4296444 1 16
Results and reporting limits have been adjusted for dry weight. Q Estimated maximum possible concentration (EMPC). J Estimated result. Result is less than the reporting limit.
AR3033UU
% '4
Environmental Resources Mcinagement (ERM)
Client Saitple ID: AV-NCB-EB-01-092904
Trace Level Organic Conqpounds
1
«
m
Lot-Sample #...: H4J060250-002 Work Order #.. . : GROGXIAA Matrix . ' Date Sampled...: 09/29/04 Date Received.. : 10/01/04 Prep Date : 10/07/04 Analysis Date.. : 10/21/04 Prep Batch #...: 4281413
Analysis Date.. : 10/21/04
Dilution Factor: 1
DETECTION PARAMETER RESULT LIMIT UNITS METHOD 2,3,7,8-TCDD ND 3.6 pg/L SW846 8290 Total TODD ND 3.6 pg/L SW846 8290 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD ND 1.1 pg/L SW846 8290 total PeCDD 1.6 Q,J 1.1 pg/L SW846 8290 i,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD ND 0.89 pg/L SW846 8290
NOTE(S): Q Estimated maximum possible concentration (EMPC). J Estimated result. Result is less than the reporting limit. B Method blank contamination. The associated method blank contains the target analyte at a reportable level.
flR3033i46
X. . METHOD BLANK REPORT
Trace Level Organic Conqpounds
Client Lot #...: H4J060250 Work Order GR3JL1AA MB Lot~Sanple #: H4J070000-413
Calculations are perforrned before rounding to avoid round-off errors in calculated results. Q Estimated maximum possible concentration (EMPC). J Estimated result. Result Is less than the reporting limit.