Methodological Advances Filter centrifugation as a sampling method for miniaturization of extracellular fungal enzyme activity measurements in solid media J. HEINONSALO a , G. KABIERSCH a, *, R.M. NIEMI b , S. SIMPANEN b,c , H. ILVESNIEMI d , M. HOFRICHTER e , A. HATAKKA a , K.T. STEFFEN a a Viikki Biocenter, Department of Food and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry, P.O. Box 56, FIN-00014 University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland b Finnish Environment Institute, Research Programme for Biodiversity, P.O. Box 140, FIN-00251 Helsinki, Finland c Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki, Niemenkatu 73, 15140 Lahti, Finland d Finnish Forest Research Institute, Vantaa Research Station, P.O. Box 18, FIN-01301 Vantaa, Finland e Department of Environmental Biotechnology, International Graduate School of Zittau, Markt 23, 02763 Zittau, Germany article info Article history: Received 16 December 2010 Revision received 12 May 2011 Accepted 20 July 2011 Available online 21 September 2011 Corresponding editor: Petr Baldrian Keywords: Enzyme extraction Fungi Peroxidase Sampling method Screening abstract A novel sampling method to evaluate extracellular fungal enzyme activities was developed and the validity tested for agar media. The method is based on centrifugation of small agar pieces taken from growing fungal solid-state cultures. Centrifuge tubes that allow spinning liquid out from small samples containing, for example, the hyphal front of a growing mycelium are essential for the protocol. Centrifugation recovers a liquid phase from the samples, which contains soluble material including many enzymes. The recovery of two added model enzymes, namely laccase and manganese peroxidase (MnP), from agar media was sufficient (ranging from 50 % to 75 %) but the addition of humic material into agar decreased the observed MnP activity significantly to approx. 25 % of the stock solution. Using growing cultures, the presence of humus as well as Scots pine sawdust on Hagem’s agar plates induced the production of laccase and peroxidase in certain fungi, which indicates that the method is suitable for screening enzyme activities on different growth media or with variable additives or growth conditions. The use of the presented sampling method for functional enzyme fingerprinting of different fungi may be a promising tool for investigating the behaviour and ecological role of forest soil fungi. This method also allows obtaining spatial data from very small and defined areas of solid fungal cultures, e.g. from microcosms. ª 2011 Elsevier Ltd and The British Mycological Society. All rights reserved. Introduction Analysis of enzymatic activities in samples obtained from solid media or solid environmental samples usually requires the addition of water and/or buffer. This may lead to the dilution of enzymes below the detection limit. As a conse- quence, additional laborious and costly working steps to concentrate the sample may be required. A common way to extract enzymes from solid media is to add buffer (e.g. 50 mM sodium acetate, pH 5.0) or water, soak and shake the samples * Corresponding author. Tel.: þ358 9 191 59 318; fax: þ358 9 191 59 322. E-mail address: grit.kabiersch@helsinki.fi (G. Kabiersch). available at www.sciencedirect.com journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/funeco 1754-5048/$ e see front matter ª 2011 Elsevier Ltd and The British Mycological Society. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.funeco.2011.07.008 fungal ecology 5 (2012) 261 e269
9
Embed
Filter centrifugation as a sampling method for miniaturization of extracellular fungal enzyme activity measurements in solid media
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
.sciencedirect.com
f u n g a l e c o l o g y 5 ( 2 0 1 2 ) 2 6 1e2 6 9
Filter centrifugation as a sampling method for miniaturizationof extracellular fungal enzyme activity measurements in solidmedia
J. HEINONSALOa, G. KABIERSCHa,*, R.M. NIEMIb, S. SIMPANENb,c, H. ILVESNIEMId,M. HOFRICHTERe, A. HATAKKAa, K.T. STEFFENa
aViikki Biocenter, Department of Food and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry, P.O. Box 56,
FIN-00014 University of Helsinki, Helsinki, FinlandbFinnish Environment Institute, Research Programme for Biodiversity, P.O. Box 140, FIN-00251 Helsinki, FinlandcDepartment of Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki, Niemenkatu 73, 15140 Lahti, FinlanddFinnish Forest Research Institute, Vantaa Research Station, P.O. Box 18, FIN-01301 Vantaa, FinlandeDepartment of Environmental Biotechnology, International Graduate School of Zittau, Markt 23, 02763 Zittau, Germany
Table 2 e The production of laccase (2A) peroxidase (2B) on HAwith and without added sterilized boreal forest humus and Scots pine sawdust by a selection of white-rot,brown-rot, litter-decomposing, ectomycorrhizal and root-endophytic fungi. The values that are corrected using correction factors obtained in tests presented in Fig 1 arealso presented. The factors are for laccase on HA, HA with humus and HA with sawdust 1.84, 1.35 and 1.62, and for MnP 1.66, 4.08 and 1.84, respectively
Table 3 e The summary of the 12 enzyme activities analysed (semiquantitative from no activity[L to strong activity[DDD). The fungi were grown on Hagem’s agar without supplements or supplemented with Mn II, humus or Scots pinesawdust
Enzyme activity A. praecox P. croceum Control
Mn II Humus Sawdust Hagem’s Mn II Humus Sawdust Hagem’s Hagem’s
facilitates investigation of the effect of various supplements
on growth and enzyme production. Even the conversion of
colourless toxic additives might be studied, if subsequent
analysing tools for small volumes become available.
Further studies are needed to test the suitability of the
method for soil samples, since low recoveries with several
extraction methods were previously reported for soil samples
(Veps€al€ainen et al. 2001). The possibility of taking small-scale
samples may allow the detection of spatial and temporal
variation in enzyme activities in different kinds of micro- and
mesocosms where fungal hyphae can be harvested and
samples taken with precision. Our proposed method may be
applicable for the use of small amounts of soil, or even wood,
to give sufficient amounts of enzyme-containing liquid easily
utilisable for further analysis.
Acknowledgement
This research was funded by Academy of Finland (project
number 1212915 and 130984 for J.H., project number 206085 for
H.I., and project number 1133022 for G.K.) and EnSTe Graduate
School (for G.K.).
r e f e r e n c e s
Coakley WT, Brown RC, James CJ, Gould RK, 1973. Theinactivation of enzymes by ultrasonic cavitation at 20 kHz.Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics 159: 722e729.
Dinis MJ, Bezerra RMF, Nunes F, Dias AA, Guedes CV, Ferreira LMM,Cone JW, Marques GSM, Barros ARN, Rodrigues MAM, 2009.Modification of wheat straw lignin by solid state fermentationwith white-rot fungi. Bioresource Technology 100: 4829e4835.
Elisashvili V, Penninckx M, Kachlishvili E, Tsiklauri N, Metreveli E,Kharziani T, Kvesitadze G, 2008. Lentinus edodes and Pleurotusspecies lignocellulolytic enzymes activity in submerged andsolid-state fermentation of lignocellulosic wastes of differentcomposition. Bioresource Technology 99: 457e462.
Fan L, Pandey A, Mohan R, Soccol CR, 2000. Use of various coffeeindustry residues for the cultivation of Pleurotus ostreatus insolid state fermentation. Acta Biotechnologica 20: 41e52.
Hiscox J, Baldrian P, Rogers HJ, Boddy L, 2010. Changes in oxidativeenzyme activity during interspecific mycelial interactions
Hofrichter M, Ziegenhagen D, Vares T, Friedrich M, J€ager MG,Fritsche W, Hatakka A, 1998. Oxidative decomposition ofmalonic acid as basis for the action ofmanganese peroxidase inthe absence of hydrogen peroxide. FEBS Letters 434: 362e366.
Ilvesniemi H, Giesler R, van Hees P, Magnussson T, Melkerud PA,2000. General description of the sampling techniques and thesites investigated in the Fennoscandinavian podzolizationproject. Geoderma 94: 109e123.
Isikhuemhen O, Mikiashvili N, Kelkar V, 2009. Application of solidwaste from anaerobic digestion of poultry litter in Agrocybeaegerita cultivation: mushroom production, lignocellulolyticenzymes activity and substrate utilization. Biodegradation 20:351e361.
Modess O, 1941. Zur Kenntnis der Mykorrhizabildner von Kieferund Fichte. Symbolae Botanicae Upsalienses 5: 1e147.
Roberts P, Jones DL, 2008. Critical evaluation of methods fordetermining total protein in soil solution. Soil Biology &Biochemistry 40: 1485e1495.
�Snajdr J, Baldrian P, 2006. Production of lignocellulose-degradingenzymes and changes in soil bacterial communities duringthe growth of Pleurotus ostreatus in soil with different carboncontent. Folia Microbiologica 51: 579e590.
Steffen KT, Cajthaml T, �Snajdr J, Baldrian P, 2007. Differentialdegradation of oak (Quercus petraea) leaf litter by litter-decomposing basidiomycetes. Research in Microbiology 158:447e455.
Tabatabai MA, 1994. Soil enzymes. In: Weaver RW, Angle S,Bottomley P, Bezdicek D, Smith S, Tabatabai A, Wollum A (eds),Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2. Microbial and Biochemical Properties.Soil Science Society of America, Madison, pp. 775e833.
Valent�ın L, Kluczek-Turpeinen B, Willf€or S, Hemming J, Hatakka A,Steffen K, Tuomela M, 2010. Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) barkcomposition and degradation by fungi: potential substrate forbioremediation. Bioresource Technology 101: 2203e2209.
Veps€al€ainen M, Erkomaa K, Kukkonen S, Vestberg M,Wallenius K, Niemi R, 2004. The impact of crop plantcultivation and peat amendment on soil microbial activity andstructure. Plant and Soil 264: 273e286.
Veps€al€ainen M, Kukkonen S, Vestberg M, Sirvi€o H, Maarit Niemi R,2001. Application of soil enzyme activity test kit in a fieldexperiment. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 33: 1665e1672.
Zavarzina AG, Leontievsky AA, Golovleva LA, Trofimov SYa, 2004.Biotransformation of soil humic acids by blue laccase of Panustigrinus 8/18: an in vitro study. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 36:359e369.