Diagnosis Rate (Cases per 100,000) Medium High Medium Low Low High Note: * Three socioeconomic disadvantage measures are represented: Townsend Index of Social Deprivation, Percent Below Poverty Level, and Percent Unemployed. Diagnosis rate and socioeconomic disadvantage rankings are based on county rate distribution quartiles. Data: US Census Bureau, Census 2000; Small Area Income and Poverty Estimates, 2006-2008; Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2006-2008; SC DHEC, 2006-2008. County Data Range Percent Unemployed (4.5 to 12.4) Social Deprivation-Townsend Index (-4.9 to 8.2) HIV/AIDS (Cases per 100,000) (4.8 to 44.0) Percent Below Poverty Level (10.3 to 38.9) Ring Key Percent Unemployed Percent Below Poverty Level Social Deprivation-Townsend Index Inner Ring Outer Ring HIV/AIDS Figure 3. Diagnosis Rate of HIV/AIDS and Levels of Socioeconomic Disadvantage* in South Carolina by County Socioeconomic Disadvantage McCormick Abbeville Greenwood Laurens Oconee Pickens Anderson Greenville Spartanburg Newberry Cherokee York Fairfield Chester Lancaster Richland Kershaw Chesterfield Marlboro Darlington Dillon Marion Horry Florence Lee Georgetown Williamsburg Sumter Berkeley Clarendon Charleston Dorchester Beaufort Jasper Saluda Edgefield Lexington Aiken Calhoun Barnwell Orangeburg Bamberg Allendale Hampton Colleton Union
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Diagnosis Rate (Cases per 100,000)
Medium High
Medium Low
Low
High
Note:
* Three socioeconomic disadvantage measures are represented: Townsend Index of Social Deprivation, Percent Below Poverty Level, and Percent Unemployed.
Diagnosis rate and socioeconomic disadvantage rankings are based on county rate distribution quartiles.Data: US Census Bureau, Census 2000; Small Area Income and Poverty Estimates, 2006-2008; Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2006-2008; SC DHEC, 2006-2008.
County Data Range
Percent Unemployed (4.5 to 12.4)
Social Deprivation-Townsend Index (-4.9 to 8.2)
HIV/AIDS (Cases per 100,000) (4.8 to 44.0)
Percent Below Poverty Level (10.3 to 38.9)
Ring Key
Percent Unemployed
Percent Below Poverty Level
Social Deprivation-Townsend Index
Inner Ring
Outer Ring
HIV/AIDS
Figure 3. Diagnosis Rate of HIV/AIDS and Levels of Socioeconomic Disadvantage* in South Carolina by County
Socioeconomic Disadvantage
McCormick
Abbeville
Greenwood
Laurens
Oconee
Pickens
Anderson
Greenville
Spartanburg
New
berry
Cherokee
York
Fair�eld Ches
ter
Lanc
aste
rRi
chla
ndKe
rsha
wCheste
r�eld
Marlboro
Darlington
Dillon
Marion
Horry
Florence
LeeGeorgetown
WilliamsburgSumterBerkeleyClarendon
Charleston
Dorchester
Beaufort
Jasp
er
Saluda
Edge�eldLexingto
nAiken
Calhoun
Barnwell
Orangeburg
Bam
berg
Alle
ndal
e
Ham
pton
Colleton
Union
Related Documents
