Page 1
1 of 385th HEMS Workshop 2005
Field-Portable GC/MS Characterization and Testing
Garth E. Patterson, John W. Grossenbacher, J. Mitchell Wells, Anthony J. Cochran, Caryn O’Hearn, Brent D. Rardin, Brent A. Knecht, Jason L.
Springston, Mark A. Gregory, Dennis J. Barket, Jr.
Griffin Analytical Technologies, Inc.3000 Kent Avenue
West Lafayette, IN 47906
Page 2
2 of 385th HEMS Workshop 2005
Field Portable Mass Spectrometry
Page 3
3 of 385th HEMS Workshop 2005
Field Portable Mass Spectrometry“To improve upon the trace detection systems currently employed in airports across the US, mass spectrometry (MS) is an obvious candidate to consider. It has become the gold standard for resolving high-consequence analyses …”
But
“Mass spectrometers have historically been large, complex systems. …commercially-available chemical analysis systems…are not designed for an environment as harsh as an airport or other transportation arena.”
-or a battlefield, a depot perimeter, an office building HVAC system…
Committee on Assessment of Security Technologies for Transportation, National Research Council of the National Academies. The National Academies Press: Washington,D.C., 2004.
Page 4
4 of 385th HEMS Workshop 2005
Griffin’s Portable GC/MSCylindrical Ion Trap Mass Analyzer• Easily miniaturized trap geometry• MS/MS capability• Lower voltage, higher pressure operation• Internal electron ionization (EI)
~1 cm3
Low Thermal Mass-GC• Ramp rate ≥200˚ C/min• Maximum Temp 350˚C • Cooling time ~2 min• Variety of phases• 1 m – 30 m standard
~10 cm
Page 5
5 of 385th HEMS Workshop 2005
Griffin’s Portable GC/MSMinotaur 300 Instrument Specifications:
•MS/MS capable•Picogram sensitivity
(application dependent)•Low thermal mass GC, SPME, MIMS, and direct SPME sample introduction available
•Multi-level software control•Helium or ambient air bath gas •Ruggedized and shock-
mounted for outside-the-lab operation (Minotaur 400)
•Network communication compatible
Minotaur 400
Page 6
6 of 385th HEMS Workshop 2005
Shock Mount platform
Wire-rope isolators are used to provide shock and vibration isolation of the most fragile components
Page 7
7 of 385th HEMS Workshop 2005
Layered Software ArchitectureLayered Software Architecture
Level 1 simplified user interface
scientific user interface
Level 2
fundamental development
tool and expert user interface
Level 3
Page 8
8 of 385th HEMS Workshop 2005
Analysis of CW agent simulantsSeparation of 9 organophosphorus pesticides30 m x 0.25 mm Rtx-5MS column
2 4 6 8 10 12 14retention time (min)
1
2
3
4
5
6
78
9
1) O,O,O-Triethyl Thiophosphate
2) Thionazin
3) Sulfotep
7) Methyl Parathion
4) Phorate
5) Dimethoate
6) Disulfoton
8) Parathion
9) Famphur
Page 9
9 of 385th HEMS Workshop 2005
Analysis of CW agent simulants
(Text File) Griffin50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220 230 240 250 260 270 280
0
50
100
51
63
76
79
93
109
127
137
155 234
247
263
268
MS of Peak #7
NIST MS ofMethyl Parathion
Match Probability 88.5%
(replib) Methyl pa ra thion50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220 230 240 250 260 270 280
0
50
100
50 6375
79
93
96
109
125
139 155 201233
246
263
O
NO
O
P
O
O
S
Page 10
10 of 385th HEMS Workshop 2005
Analysis of CW agent simulants
(Text File) Griffin50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220 230 240 250 260 270 280 290 300 310
0
50
100
51
57
63
73 8191
97
109
125
139
155
165186
199207 236 255
291
MS of Peak #8
NIST MS ofParathion
Match Probability 82.1%
(ma inlib) Pa ra thion50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220 230 240 250 260 270 280 290 300 310
0
50
100
50
65
75
81
97 109
125
139
150
155
172
186
201
218
235
246
263
275
291
N
O
OO
P
O
SO
Page 11
11 of 385th HEMS Workshop 2005
Analysis of CW agent simulantsPesticide Quantitation
y = 317554.5020x + 18347.1768R2 = 0.9992
0
50000
100000
150000
200000
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6
ng/µL
Pea
k A
rea
Methyl Parathiony = 269482.7262x + 15513.2492
R2 = 0.9990
0
50000
100000
150000
200000
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6
ng/µL
Pea
k A
rea
Parathion
Compound Limit of Detection (pg/µL)O,O,O-triethylthiophosphate 9thionazin 21sulfotep 45phorate 10dimethoate 44disulfoton 34methyl parathion 26parathion 41famphur ~1000 pg (not detected in 500 pg/uL sample)
Page 12
12 of 385th HEMS Workshop 2005
Analysis of CW agent simulantsDimethyl methylphosphonate (DMMP)
CEESDMMP
IPA
124
123109
94
79DMMP
Chloroethyl ethyl sulfide (CEES)
y = 793.54x + 73898r2 = 0.988
0.0E+00
2.0E+05
4.0E+05
6.0E+05
8.0E+05
1.0E+06
1.2E+06
1.4E+06
1.6E+06
1.8E+06
2.0E+06
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500
[DMMP], pg/uL
peak
are
a, a
rb. u
nits
y = 174.58x + 11765r2 = 0.9962
0.0E+00
5.0E+04
1.0E+05
1.5E+05
2.0E+05
2.5E+05
3.0E+05
3.5E+05
4.0E+05
4.5E+05
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500
[CEES], pg/uL
peak
are
a, a
rb. u
nits
LOD ~ 1.5 pg
LOD ~ 1.0 pg
Page 13
13 of 385th HEMS Workshop 2005
Analysis of ExplosivesSeparation of 14 nitrated organics15 m x 0.25 mm Rtx-TNT1 column
5 10 15 20 25 30 35retention time (min)
1
234
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
1) Nitrobenzene2) 2-Nitrotoluene3) 3-Nitrotoluene4) 4-Nitrotoluene5) 1,3-Dinitrobenzene6) 2,6-Dinitrotoluene7) 2,4-Dinitrotoluene8) 1,3,5-Trinitrobenzene9) 1,3,5-Trinitrotoluene10) RDX11) 4-Amino-2,6-dinitrotoluene12) 2-Amino-4,6-dinitrotoluene13) Tetryl[14) HMX not observed]
Page 14
14 of 385th HEMS Workshop 2005
Analysis of Explosives
(Text File) Griffin50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220 230
0
50
100
51
53
63
6674
76
7987
89
92 104 120
134149
152
164180 194
210
MS of Peak #9
NIST MS ofTNT
Match Probability 90.5%
(replib) Benzene, 2-methyl-1,3,5-trinitro-50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220 230
0
50
100
51
63
6974
76
89
9296
104 120
134149
152
164180 193
197
210
O
NO
N
N
O
O
OO
Page 15
15 of 385th HEMS Workshop 2005
Analysis of Explosives
(Text File) Griffin50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210
0
50
100
56
71
75
81
98
120
128
159 205
MS of Peak #10
NIST MS ofRDX
Match Probability 80.3%
(ma inlib) 1,3,5-Tria zine, hexa hydro-1,3,5-trinitro-50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210
0
15
30
56
69
71
75
83
85
97
102
112
120
128
133
148
205
N
N
NN
N
N
O
O O
O
OO
Page 16
16 of 385th HEMS Workshop 2005
Analysis of ExplosivesExplosive separation at faster ramp rates
5oC/min
20oC/min
5 10 15 20 25 30 35retention time (min)
80oC/min
Page 17
17 of 385th HEMS Workshop 2005
Analysis of ExplosivesExplosive separation at faster ramp rates
5oC/min
5 10 15 20 25 30 35
1
23 4
5
67
8
9
10
1112
13
2 104 6 8
20oC/min1
2
3 4
5
67
8
9
10
1112
13
80oC/min1
23
45
6
78
9
10
11
12
13
1 2 3 4
Page 18
18 of 385th HEMS Workshop 2005
Analysis of ExplosivesExplosive separation on a 5 m Rtx-5MS column
1 2 3
Nitrobenzene
TNT
DNB
RDX
DNT
TNB 2-amino-DNT
retention time (min)
50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 2200
50
10051
56
62
68
75
77
87
89
105120
134 149 164
180193
197
210MS at 2:01 min, matches NIST TNT spectrum with 93% probability
(Text File) Griffin
m/z
Page 19
19 of 385th HEMS Workshop 2005
Sample loop
He source
MFC
Vent
Pump and needle valve
needle valve
Solenoid
Linier actuator
Valve 2cold
Minotaur400
Sample loop
He source
MFC
Vent
Pump and needle valve
needle valve
Solenoid
coldhot
Vent
Ambient air in
Manifold
Nafion dryer
“Dry air” cylinder
Valve 1
PROPHET On-line GC-CITMS Atmospheric VOC Monitoring System (Gavin Edwards, Paul Shepson)
Page 20
20 of 385th HEMS Workshop 2005
Sample loop
He source
MFC
Vent
Pump and needle valve
needle valve
Solenoid
Linier actuator
V2
V1
coldMinotaur
Sample loop
He source
MFC
Vent
Pump and needle valve
Solenoid
Linier actuator
coldhotMinotaur
Vent
Ambient air in
Manifold
Nafion dryer
“Breathing air” cylinder
Analysis Mode
Page 21
21 of 385th HEMS Workshop 2005
Sample loop
He source
MFC
Vent
Pump and needle valve
needle valve
Solenoid
Linier actuator
V2
V1
coldhotMinotaur
Sample loop
He source
MFC
Vent
Pump and needle valve
needle valve
Solenoid
Linier actuator
V2
V1
coldhotMinotaur
Vent
Ambient air in
Manifold
Nafion dryer
“Breathing air” cylinder
Sampling Mode
Page 22
22 of 385th HEMS Workshop 2005
Page 23
23 of 385th HEMS Workshop 2005
Page 24
24 of 385th HEMS Workshop 2005
Page 25
25 of 385th HEMS Workshop 2005
Page 26
26 of 385th HEMS Workshop 2005
Page 27
27 of 385th HEMS Workshop 2005
Page 28
28 of 385th HEMS Workshop 2005
Page 29
29 of 385th HEMS Workshop 2005
Page 30
30 of 385th HEMS Workshop 2005
Page 31
31 of 385th HEMS Workshop 2005
Verified new inlet and MS system in an atmospheric chemistry field study
9 calibrations, humidity blanks evaluated
>2000 measurements (7/11/2005-8/16/2005, off and on)
14 days with 24 hr coverage, 7 days with partial coverage
Isoprene concentrations between <70 ppt (LOD) and >8 ppb
Potential for intercomparison with other techniques such as FIS, DEA and PTRMS
Field Study Summary
Page 32
32 of 385th HEMS Workshop 2005
Direct SPMEDirect Inject SPMESPME fiber is directly inserted intothe vacuum chamber for rapid desorption
Max temp 300˚CReplaceable septum with novacuum vent
Page 33
33 of 385th HEMS Workshop 2005
Direct SPMEDirect SPME analysis of DMMP, headspace sampling of neat compound
124109
94
79
63
77
~30 second desorption, ambient temperature
Page 34
34 of 385th HEMS Workshop 2005
Direct SPME
166138139122
111
109
93
658182
~1.5 minute desorption,ambient temp.
Direct SPME analysis of DEEP, headspace sampling of neat compound
Page 35
35 of 385th HEMS Workshop 2005
Direct SPME
~1 minute desorption, ambient temp.
155
182
127
125109
111
99
8182
97
Direct SPME analysis of TEP, headspace sampling of neat compound
Page 36
36 of 385th HEMS Workshop 2005
Direct SPMEDirect SPME analysis of TNT, headspace sampling 100 ng/uL solution
210
180149
134
~10 second desorption, 200oC
Page 37
37 of 385th HEMS Workshop 2005
Conclusions• New GC/MS instruments based on LTM-GC and
CIT mass analyzer provide:Small footprint, ruggedized package for field use
Rapid separation of complex mixtures
MS analysis with good database matching (NIST and user-defined) for compound ID, MS/MS for ID confirmation
Quantitation to low pg (ppt-ppb) levels without preconcentration
Complementary sample inlets are also available
Page 38
38 of 385th HEMS Workshop 2005
Acknowledgments• Acknowledgements
– Brad Rowland, US Army DPG– Prof. Graham Cooks, Purdue University– Prof. Paul Shepson, Purdue University
• The Griffin Team