チャイナショックのアメリカでの影響 笹原彰 アイダホ大学商経学部助教授 平成31年2月5日 第 56 回 ESRI-経済政策フォーラム -世界的な対外経済不均衡の趨勢と今後の展望- 笹原彰 (アイダホ大学商経学部助教授) ESRI 経済政策フォーラム 平成31年2月5日 1 / 14
チャイナショックのアメリカでの影響
笹原彰
アイダホ大学商経学部助教授
平成31年2月5日
第 56回 ESRI-経済政策フォーラム-世界的な対外経済不均衡の趨勢と今後の展望-
笹原彰 (アイダホ大学商経学部助教授) ESRI 経済政策フォーラム 平成31年2月5日 1 / 14
‘China Shock (チャイナショック)’ とは
China Shockとは中国からの安価な製品の輸入の増加によるアメリカ経済へのマイナスの影響のこと
例えば...
製造業の雇用の減少 (Autor, Dorn, and Hanson, 2013)
住宅価格の低下 (Barrot et al., 2016; Feler and Senses, 2017)
婚姻率の低下 (Autor, Dorn, and Hanson, 2017)
イノベーションの低下 (Autor, Dorn, Hanson, Pisano, and Shu, 2016)
政治的二極化 (Autor, Dorn, Hanson, and Majlesi, 2016)
笹原彰 (アイダホ大学商経学部助教授) ESRI 経済政策フォーラム 平成31年2月5日 2 / 14
北米自由貿易協定 (NAFTA)
1990-2000年代、貿易自由化は米国の繁栄をもたらすものと期待された。
ビル・クリントン大統領, NAFTA調印, 1993年 12月 8日
「私は NAFTAがより経済成長を促進し、より平等な社会をつくり、環境保全につながり、さらに世界平和の礎になると信じています。」
笹原彰 (アイダホ大学商経学部助教授) ESRI 経済政策フォーラム 平成31年2月5日 3 / 14
中国の世界貿易機構 (WTO)への加盟
石廣生 (Shi Guangsheng), WTOへの加盟, 2001年 11月 11日
「アメリカと中国の両国は既に世界貿易システムにおいて非常に影響力のある 2国であり、中国のWTOへの加盟は我々アメリカにも中国にも成長をもたらすでしょう」 米通商代表部Robert Zoellick
笹原彰 (アイダホ大学商経学部助教授) ESRI 経済政策フォーラム 平成31年2月5日 4 / 14
貿易自由化のアメリカの製造業の雇用への影響
Manufacturing employment
Import penetration from China
0.5
11.5
22.5
Import
penetr
ation fro
m C
hin
a, as a
share
of G
DP
10
12
14
16
18
U.S
. em
plo
ym
ent, m
illio
ns o
f w
ork
ers
1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015
中国からの輸入額の GDP比:0.1%から 2.3%まで上昇アメリカの製造業の雇用者数: ピーク時の約 1800万人から 2007年まで 1380万人まで減少 (420万人の減少, cf: 横浜市の人口が約 372万人)
データ出所: 米国労働統計局笹原彰 (アイダホ大学商経学部助教授) ESRI 経済政策フォーラム 平成31年2月5日 5 / 14
420万人の雇用減少のうちどれくらいがチャイナショックのせい?
中国からの輸入増加と製造業の雇用減少が同時進行で起こっただけで、両者の間に因果関係はないかもしれない。
Autor, Dorn, and Hanson (2013)は米国内の地域間の産業構造の違いに着目して、チャイナショックの効果を取り出すことに成功した。
例: ネバダ州のラスベガスは観光業に特化、アラバマ州のハンツビルは繊維産業に特化
笹原彰 (アイダホ大学商経学部助教授) ESRI 経済政策フォーラム 平成31年2月5日 6 / 14
Autor, Dorn, and Hanson (2013)は製造業への影響を分析
彼らも経済全体への効果はプラスであることを否定していない。→数値例 (実際の推定結果ではありません)
アメリカのGDP19.4兆ドル 20.4兆ドル
77%
12%
1%
10%
サービス業14.9兆ドル
製造業2.3兆ドル
農業0.2兆ドル
その他
80%
10%
1% 9%
製造業2.0兆ドル
サービス業16.3兆ドル
国際貿易
その他農業
0.3兆ドル
笹原彰 (アイダホ大学商経学部助教授) ESRI 経済政策フォーラム 平成31年2月5日 6 / 14
アメリカからの輸出も増加している
産業連関業を用いた雇用分析 (Feenstra and Sasahara, 2018)アメリカから他国への輸出によって 1995年から 2011年の間に 660万人の雇用が創出された(うち 410万の雇用はサービス業)。
回帰分析を用いた雇用分析 (Feenstra, Ma, and Xu, 2017)輸出と輸入の両方を考慮すると、1991年から 2011年の間の貿易による雇用へのプラスの効果とマイナスの効果はほぼ同じ大きさ。
Autor, Dorn, and Hanson (2013, 左) and Feenstra-Sasahara (2018, 右)
Manufacturing employment
Import penetration from China
0.5
11.5
22.5
Import
penetr
ation fro
m C
hin
a, as a
share
of G
DP
10
12
14
16
18
U.S
. e
mp
loym
en
t, m
illio
ns o
f w
ork
ers
1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015
Manufacturing employment
Service employment
Import penetration from China
0.5
11.5
22.5
Imp
ort
pe
ne
tra
tio
n f
rom
Ch
ina
, a
s a
sh
are
of
GD
P
20
40
60
80
100
U.S
. e
mp
loym
en
t, m
illio
ns o
f w
ork
ers
1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015
笹原彰 (アイダホ大学商経学部助教授) ESRI 経済政策フォーラム 平成31年2月5日 7 / 14
Caliendo, Dvorkin, and Parro (2018)サービス業も考慮した一般均衡分析
2000-2007年の間のチャイナショックのアメリカへの影響製造業の雇用が 55万人減少(実際の製造業の雇用減少の 16%)アメリカ全体の厚生は 0.2%増加労働者は製造業からサービス業に再配分
アメリカのコンピューター/家電産業の雇用の減少への各州の貢献(パーセント)
Fig. 7: Regional employment declines in manufacturing industries
1. Contribution to industry employment decline in the U.S. (%) 2. Normalized by regional employment share
a.1: Computer and electronics a.2: Computer and electronics
AL0.05
AK0.01
AZ1.2
AR1.2
CA14.2
CO2.1
CT2
DE0.16
FL2.2
GA1.4
HI0.02
ID0.23
IL6.7 IN
0.38
IA1.05
KS0.64 KY
0.34
LA0.36
ME0.4
MD1.1
MA5.8
MI1.6
MN2.4
MS0.83
MO3.9
MT0.13
NE0.31NV
0.3
NH0.69
NJ2.2
NM0.4
NY8.2
NC7.1
ND0.33
OH4.7
OK1.3
OR2.5
PA2.6
RI0.67
SC1.6
SD0.07
TN0.79
TX7.6
UT0.84
VT0.21
VA3.4
WA1.6
WV0.2
WI1.9
WY0.07
AL0.03
AK0.06
AZ0.72
AR1.4
CA1.2
CO1.2
CT1.5
DE0.53
FL0.41
GA0.48
HI0.04
ID0.55
IL1.5 IN
0.17
IA0.96
KS0.67 KY
0.25
LA0.26
ME0.81
MD0.57
MA2.3
MI0.44
MN1.2
MS0.95
MO1.9
MT0.44
NE0.5NV
0.41
NH1.3
NJ0.69
NM0.74
NY1.2
NC2.4
ND1.5
OH1.1
OK1.1
OR2
PA0.58
RI1.7
SC1.2
SD0.26
TN0.38
TX1.1
UT1.2
VT0.86
VA1.2
WA0.74
WV0.37
WI0.9
WY0.44
b.1: Machinery b.2: Machinery
AL0.03
AK0.01
AZ1.02
AR0.41
CA2.9
CO1.8
CT0.34
DE0.1
FL1.3
GA5.1
HI0
ID0.19
IL5.1 IN
2.1
IA1.7
KS2.8 KY
6.2
LA2
ME0.06
MD2.4
MA1.2
MI4.1
MN5
MS2.8
MO2.8
MT0.13
NE2.4NV
0.28
NH1.4
NJ0.24
NM0.17
NY6.2
NC1.6
ND0.6
OH8.5
OK2.3
OR0.31
PA5.4
RI0.42
SC1.9
SD0.43
TN2.3
TX5
UT0.62
VT0.31
VA2.1
WA2.5
WV0.93
WI2.4
WY0.04
AL0.02
AK0.03
AZ0.6
AR0.47
CA0.25
CO1.1
CT0.25
DE0.33
FL0.25
GA1.7
HI0
ID0.46
IL1.1 IN
0.94
IA1.5
KS2.9 KY
4.6
LA1.4
ME0.12
MD1.2
MA0.47
MI1.1
MN2.5
MS3.2
MO1.4
MT0.44
NE3.9NV
0.38
NH2.6
NJ0.08
NM0.3
NY0.93
NC0.52
ND2.8
OH2
OK2.1
OR0.25
PA1.2
RI1.1
SC1.3
SD1.7
TN1.1
TX0.72
UT0.88
VT1.3
VA0.75
WA1.1
WV1.7
WI1.2
WY0.23
c.1: Textiles c.2: Textiles
AL0.16
AK0.01
AZ0.49
AR0.28
CA11.9
CO0.3
CT1.1
DE0.17
FL1.3
GA1.1
HI0.51
ID0.03
IL8.7 IN
2.8
IA1.02
KS1.2 KY
2.1
LA0.06
ME0.36
MD0.86
MA0.98
MI0.28
MN0.92
MS2.7
MO1.6
MT0.17
NE0.35NV
0.38
NH0.5
NJ0.99
NM0.15
NY4.6
NC11.7
ND0.09
OH4.9
OK0.71
OR2.5
PA3.1
RI0.37
SC5
SD0.01
TN3.2
TX5.9
UT3.6
VT0.03
VA8.7
WA0.69
WV0.1
WI1.4
WY0.001
AL0.11
AK0.07
AZ0.29
AR0.32
CA1.03
CO0.18
CT0.8
DE0.58
FL0.24
GA0.37
HI1.3
ID0.07
IL1.9 IN
1.2
IA0.93
KS1.3 KY
1.6
LA0.04
ME0.72
MD0.44
MA0.39
MI0.08
MN0.46
MS3.1
MO0.82
MT0.56
NE0.57NV
0.52
NH0.95
NJ0.31
NM0.27
NY0.69
NC3.9
ND0.42
OH1.2
OK0.64
OR2
PA0.69
RI0.97
SC3.5
SD0.05
TN1.5
TX0.85
UT5.1
VT0.12
VA3.1
WA0.32
WV0.18
WI0.66
WY0.01
Note: This figure presents the reduction in local employment in manufacturing industries. Column 1 presents the
contribution of each state to the U.S. aggregate reduction in the industry employment due to the China shock.
Column 2 presents the contribution of each state to the U.S. aggregate reduction in the industry employment
normalized by the employment size of each state relative to the U.S. aggregate employment. Panels a present the
results for the computer and electronics industry. Panels b present the results for the machinery industry. Panels
c present the results for the textiles industry.
33
笹原彰 (アイダホ大学商経学部助教授) ESRI 経済政策フォーラム 平成31年2月5日 8 / 14
Caliendo, Dvorkin, and Parro (2018)サービス業も考慮した一般均衡分析
2000-2007年の間のチャイナショックのアメリカへの影響製造業の雇用が 55万人減少(実際の製造業の雇用減少の 16%)アメリカ全体の厚生は 0.2%増加労働者は製造業からサービス業に再配分
アメリカのサービス業の雇用の増加への各州の貢献(パーセント)
Fig. 8: Regional employment increase in non-manufacturing industries
1. Contribution to industry employment increase in the U.S. (%) 2. Normalized by regional employment share
a.1: Construction a.2: Construction
AL0.15
AK0.19
AZ2.3
AR1
CA8.9
CO3.6
CT1.6
DE0.42
FL8.1
GA3.9
HI0.4
ID0.96
IL3.2 IN
-0.15
IA0.95
KS1.1 KY
0.53
LA1.9
ME0.58
MD3.8
MA3
MI1.2
MN2.7
MS0.65
MO2.4
MT0.39
NE1.5NV
0.94
NH0.78
NJ2.4
NM1.1
NY5.7
NC3.6
ND0.27
OH1.3
OK2.5
OR1.2
PA4.2
RI0.45
SC1.1
SD0.45
TN3.7
TX4.8
UT0.9
VT0.56
VA4.5
WA2.9
WV0.39
WI0.67
WY0.37
AL0.1
AK0.95
AZ1.3
AR1.1
CA0.77
CO2.2
CT1.2
DE1.4
FL1.5
GA1.3
HI1
ID2.3
IL0.71 IN
-0.07
IA0.87
KS1.1 KY
0.39
LA1.4
ME1.2
MD2
MA1.2
MI0.32
MN1.4
MS0.75
MO1.2
MT1.3
NE2.5NV
1.3
NH1.5
NJ0.76
NM2.1
NY0.84
NC1.2
ND1.3
OH0.3
OK2.2
OR0.93
PA0.95
RI1.2
SC0.75
SD1.7
TN1.8
TX0.68
UT1.3
VT2.3
VA1.6
WA1.4
WV0.71
WI0.32
WY2.3
b.1: Services b.2: Services
AL0.05
AK0.16
AZ2.7
AR0.94
CA12.5
CO2.7
CT1.9
DE0.4
FL6.7
GA3.6
HI0.47
ID0.63
IL3.4 IN
0.39
IA1
KS0.89 KY
0.25
LA0.85
ME0.64
MD3.4
MA4
MI1.5
MN2.1
MS0.83
MO1.8
MT0.39
NE0.93NV
2
NH0.79
NJ3.1
NM0.94
NY8.5
NC2.4
ND0.33
OH2.4
OK1.7
OR1.2
PA5.1
RI0.58
SC0.99
SD0.3
TN2.3
TX0.45
UT0.84
VT0.42
VA6.1
WA2.6
WV0.37
WI1.4
WY0.15
AL0.03
AK0.79
AZ1.6
AR1.1
CA1.1
CO1.6
CT1.4
DE1.4
FL1.2
GA1.2
HI1.2
ID1.5
IL0.75 IN
0.17
IA0.92
KS0.92 KY
0.18
LA0.63
ME1.3
MD1.7
MA1.6
MI0.42
MN1.1
MS0.95
MO0.91
MT1.3
NE1.5NV
2.8
NH1.5
NJ0.98
NM1.7
NY1.3
NC0.79
ND1.5
OH0.57
OK1.5
OR0.92
PA1.1
RI1.5
SC0.7
SD1.2
TN1.1
TX0.06
UT1.2
VT1.7
VA2.2
WA1.2
WV0.68
WI0.66
WY0.94
c.1: Whole. & Retail c.2: Whole. & Retail
AL-0.23
AK0.05
AZ3.1
AR3.7
CA19.5
CO4.2
CT3.5
DE0.48
FL7.5
GA3.9
HI0.2
ID1.6
IL2.1 IN
0.18
IA2.8
KS0.97 KY
-2.17
LA-0.69
ME2.8
MD2.5
MA4.5
MI-10.05
MN3.7
MS1.7
MO-0.12
MT0.39
NE1.9NV
0.67
NH2.2
NJ4.6
NM0.58
NY6.8
NC5.3
ND0.95
OH5.8
OK2.7
OR3.3
PA4.8
RI1.2
SC1.9
SD0.52
TN7.4
TX-29.07
UT2
VT1.04
VA11
WA2.6
WV1.1
WI4.8
WY0.14
AL-0.16
AK0.24
AZ1.8
AR4.1
CA1.7
CO2.5
CT2.6
DE1.6
FL1.4
GA1.3
HI0.5
ID3.7
IL0.45 IN
0.08
IA2.6
KS1.01 KY
-1.61
LA-0.51
ME5.6
MD1.3
MA1.8
MI-2.77
MN1.9
MS1.9
MO-0.06
MT1.3
NE3.1NV
0.92
NH4.2
NJ1.4
NM1.1
NY1.01
NC1.8
ND4.4
OH1.4
OK2.4
OR2.6
PA1.1
RI3.1
SC1.3
SD2
TN3.6
TX-4.16
UT2.8
VT4.2
VA4
WA1.2
WV2
WI2.3
WY0.91
Note: This figure presents the rise in local employment in non-manufacturing industries. Column 1 presents the
contribution of each state to the U.S. aggregate increase in the industry employment due to the China shock.
Column 2 presents the contribution of each state to the U.S. aggregate increase in the industry employment
normalized by the employment size of each state relative to the U.S. aggregate employment. Panels a present the
results for the construction industry. Panels b present the results for all services industry. Panels c present the
results for the wholesale and retail industry.
34
笹原彰 (アイダホ大学商経学部助教授) ESRI 経済政策フォーラム 平成31年2月5日 8 / 14
Fort, Pierce, and Schott (2018)製造業の雇用減少の新しい側面(New Perspectives)
製造業の付加価値は増加している製造業の付加価値は 2008年時点で約2兆ドル非製造業の付加価値は 2008年時点で約13兆ドル製造業の労働生産性は上昇している
アメリカの製造業と非製造業の付加価値
48 Journal of Economic Perspectives
30
50
70
90
110
130
Oth
er non
-farm
12
14
16
18
20
Man
ufac
turi
ng
1948 1958 1968 1978 1988 1998 2008 2018
Manufacturing (left axis)
Other non-farm (right axis)
A: Employment, 1948–2016(millions of workers)
5
10
15
Non-m
anufacturing
1
2
3
Man
ufac
turi
ng
1948 1958 1968 1978 1988 1998 2008 2018
Non-manufacturing/Other GDP (right axis)
B: Real Value Added, 1958–2011(trillions of dollars)
Manufacturing(left axis)
Figure 1 US Employment and Value Added within and outside Manufacturing
Source: Monthly employment data are from the US Bureau of Labor Statistics. Annual manufacturing real value added data are from NBER-CES Manufacturing Industry Database (Becker, Gray, and Marakov 2013). Annual real GDP data are from US Bureau of Economic Analysis. Non-manufacturing value added is real GDP less manufacturing real value added. Note: Shading corresponds to NBER-dated recessions.
笹原彰 (アイダホ大学商経学部助教授) ESRI 経済政策フォーラム 平成31年2月5日 9 / 14
Fort, Pierce, and Schott (2018)製造業の雇用減少の新しい側面(New Perspectives)
サンプル期間を通じて存続している製造業の企業の事業所数製造業の事業所を閉鎖して非製造業の事業所を新規に設置している製造業の企業が退出して別の非製造業の企業が事業を拡大しているというよりも、製造業の企業が非製造業の事業に進出している
製造業の企業の事業所数
New Perspectives on the Decline of US Manufacturing Employment 67
activities.14 Further insight into these explanations comes from analysis of the particular activities occurring at non-manufacturing plants of manufacturing firms. Toward that end, we break non-manufacturing industries into three groups based on their two-digit NAICS sectors: retail (NAICS 44 to 45), professional services (NAICS 51 to 56), and all other non-manufacturing industries. Perhaps unsurpris-ingly, given the broad definition of manufacturing firms noted above, we find that about one-third of the overall growth in non-manufacturing employment of manu-facturing firms between 1977 and 2012 is in retail, while another third falls into the “other” category.
However, 32 percent of the increase in non-manufacturing employment at manufacturing firms is driven by professional services, which captures a wide range of often skill-intensive activities: information technology (NAICS 51); finance, insur-ance, real estate and leasing (NAICS 52-3); engineering and other technical services (NAICS 54); headquarters services (NAICS 55); and administrative support and waste management (NAICS 56). The growing use of workers in such industries may reflect
14 While recent research suggests that US manufacturers increasingly outsource ancillary services such as cleaning to domestic contractors (Dey, Houseman, and Polivka 2012; Berlingieri 2014; Katz and Krueger 2016), such activity would not be captured in Figure 7 as it traces non-manufacturing employment within manufacturing firms.
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Mill
ion
s of
wor
kers
1977 1982 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007 2012
All plants
Manufacturing plants
Non-manufacturing plants
Figure 7 Employment at Manufacturing Firms Decomposed into Employment at Manufacturing versus Non-Manufacturing Establishments, 1977–2012
Source: Longitudinal Business Database and author’s calculations.Note: Manufacturing firms are defined as any firm observed to have a manufacturing establishment during the sample period. The shading corresponds to NBER-dated recessions.
笹原彰 (アイダホ大学商経学部助教授) ESRI 経済政策フォーラム 平成31年2月5日 10 / 14
その他のチャイナショックの研究
Bloom, Handley, Kurmann, and Luck (2019)
米国の国勢調査のデータを用いた研究。チャイナショックが製造業から非製造業への雇用者の再配分を促した
Feenstra, Ma, and Xu (2019)
チャイナショックの負の影響が大きかった時期(2000年-2011年)とアメリカの住宅バブルとその崩壊の時期が重なったことで、チャイナショックの影響が大きくなった
Feenstra and Sasahara (2019)
中国への輸出機会が東アジア、アセアン諸国で雇用創出している
Amiti, Dai, Feenstra, and Romalis (2018)
中国からの輸入によって 2000-2006年の間にアメリカの製造業の消費者価格指数が約7%低下した。
笹原彰 (アイダホ大学商経学部助教授) ESRI 経済政策フォーラム 平成31年2月5日 11 / 14
Auer, Bonadio, and Levchenko (2018)NAFTAを撤回した場合の経済効果
アメリカ全体の厚生は 0.22%減少
2016年大統領選挙でトランプへの投票が多かった地域で特に厚生が低下 (オハイオ州の第 4選挙区で-0.41%)
NAFTAによってどれくらい貿易の影響を受けているのか3つの指標を使って数値化
輸入競争指数 (どれくらい輸入競争にさらされているか)輸出機会指数 (どれくらい輸出機会に恵まれているか)中間財輸入指数 (どれくらい中間財の輸入に頼っているか)
3つの指標の間に強い相関→ 輸入競争によって打撃を受けていると思われる地域は、それと同時に、輸出機会にも恵まれており、中間財の輸入による恩恵も受けている
笹原彰 (アイダホ大学商経学部助教授) ESRI 経済政策フォーラム 平成31年2月5日 12 / 14
Auer, Bonadio, and Levchenko (2018)NAFTAを撤回した場合の経済効果
輸入競争指数と 2016年大統領選のトランプ投票シェア
Figure 7: Heuristic measures, real wage changes and 2016 Trump vote
Import exposure Export orientation Imported input intensity
Real wage change
DE
FLFL
FLFL
FLFLFL FLFLFLFL
FLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFL FLFLFL FLFL FLFL
GA
GAGA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GAGAGA GA
GA
GA
HIHI IDID
ILIL IL ILILIL IL
ILIL
ILILILILIL ILIL ILIL
IN
ININ
IN
IN
IN
ININ
INIA
IA
IA
IA
AL
AL AL
AL
AL
ALAL
KSKS
KS
KSKY
KY
KYKY
KY
KY
LA
LA
LA
LA
LA
LAMEME
MDMDMD MDMD
MDMDMD
MAMAMAMAMA
MAMAMA
MA MI
MI
MI MIMI
MI
MIMI
MI
MI
MIMI
MI
MIMN
MNMN
MNMN
MN
MN
MN
MSMS
MS MSMOMO
MOMOMO
MOMOMO
AK
MT
NENE
NE
NV
NV
NVNV
NHNH
NJNJ
NJNJNJNJNJ
NJNJNJNJNJNM
NM
NM
NYNYNY
NYNY NY
NYNY
NY NYNYNY
NYNY
NYNY
NYNY NYNY
NYNYNY
NYNY NY
NY
NCNC
NCNC
NC NC
NCNC
NCNC
NC
NCNC
ND
OH OHOHOH
OHOH
OH
OH
OHOH
OHOH
OH
OHOH
OH
OKOK
OK
OKOK
OROR
OR
OR
ORPA PA
PA
PAPAPA
PAPAPA
PA
PA
PAPA PAPAPA
PA
PA
RI RISC
SC
SCSC
SC
SCSCSD
TN
TN
TN TN
TN
TN
TNTN
TN
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX TXTX
TX
TXTXTX TX
TX
TXTX
TX
TXTX
TXTX
TX
TXTX TX
TX
TX TX
TXTX
TX
TXTX
TX
UTUTUT
UT
AZAZAZAZ
AZAZAZAZAZVT
VAVA
VA
VAVA VAVA
VA
VAVAVA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WAWA
WAWAWA
WV
WV
WV
WI
WIWIWI
WIWI
WI
WI
WY
AR
AR
ARAR
CA
CA
CACA
CACA CA
CA
CACACACA CA CA
CA
CACA
CACACACACA
CACA
CACACACACA
CA
CA CACACACA
CACA
CACA CACACA CACA
CA
CACACACACACA
CACACO CO
CO
COCOCO CO
CTCT
CTCTCT
Coeff = -3.539Std.Err. = 1.25R2 = .092
-.4-.3
-.2-.1
0.1
Coun
terfa
ctua
l wag
e ch
ange
(with
NTB
)
0 .01 .02 .03NAFTA import exposure
DE
FLFL
FLFL
FLFLFL FLFLFLFL
FLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFL FLFLFLFLFL FLFL
GAGA
GAGA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GAGAGA GA
GA
GA
HIHI IDID
IL IL IL ILILIL IL
ILIL
ILILILIL IL ILIL ILIL
IN
ININ
IN
IN
IN
ININ
INIA
IA
IA
IA
AL
AL AL
AL
AL
ALAL
KSKS
KS
KSKY
KY
KYKY
KY
KY
LA
LA
LA
LA
LA
LAMEME
MDMDMDMDMD
MDMDMD
MAMA MAMAMA
MAMAMA
MA MI
MI
MI MIMI
MI
MIMI
MI
MI
MIMI
MI
MIMN
MNMN
MNMN
MN
MN
MN
MSMS
MS MSMOMO
MOMOMOMOMO
MO
AK
MT
NENE
NE
NV
NV
NVNV
NHNH
NJNJ
NJNJNJNJNJ
NJNJNJNJNJ
NM
NM
NM
NYNYNY
NYNY NY
NYNY
NYNYNYNY
NYNY
NYNY
NYNY NYNY
NYNY
NY
NYNY NY
NY
NCNC
NCNC
NC NC
NCNC
NCNC
NC
NCNC
ND
OH OHOHOH
OH OH
OH
OH
OHOH
OHOH
OH
OHOH
OH
OKOK
OK
OKOK
OROR
OR
OR
ORPA PA
PA
PAPAPA
PAPAPA
PA
PA
PAPA PAPAPA
PA
PA
RI RISC
SC
SCSC
SC
SCSCSD
TN
TN
TN TN
TN
TN
TNTN
TN
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX TXTX
TX
TXTXTX TX
TX
TXTX
TX
TXTX
TXTX
TX
TXTX TX
TX
TX TX
TXTX
TX
TXTXTX
UTUTUT
UT
AZAZ
AZAZAZAZAZAZAZ
VT
VAVA
VA
VAVA VAVA
VA
VAVAVA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WAWA
WAWAWA
WV
WV
WV
WI
WIWIWI
WIWI
WI
WI
WY
AR
AR
ARAR
CA
CA
CACA
CACA CA
CA
CACACACA CACA
CA
CACA
CACACACACACA
CACACACACACA
CA
CACACACACA
CACA
CACA CACACACACA
CA
CACACACACACA
CACACO CO
CO
COCOCOCO
CTCT
CTCT CT
Coeff = -8.18Std.Err. = 0.40R2 = .4
-.4-.3
-.2-.1
0.1
Coun
terfa
ctua
l wag
e ch
ange
(with
NTB
)
0 .005 .01 .015 .02 .025NAFTA export orientation
DE
FLFL
FLFL
FLFLFL FLFLFLFL
FLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFL FLFLFL FLFL FLFL
GA
GAGA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GAGAGA GA
GA
GA
HIHI IDID
ILIL IL ILILIL IL
ILIL
ILILILIL IL ILIL ILIL
IN
ININ
IN
IN
IN
ININ
INIA
IA
IA
IA
AL
AL AL
AL
AL
ALAL
KSKS
KS
KSKY
KY
KYKY
KY
KY
LA
LA
LA
LA
LA
LAMEME
MDMDMD MDMDMDMDMD
MAMAMAMAMA
MAMAMA
MA MI
MI
MI MIMI
MI
MIMI
MI
MI
MIMI
MI
MIMN
MNMN
MNMN
MN
MN
MN
MSMS
MS MSMOMO
MOMOMO
MOMOMO
AK
MT
NENE
NE
NV
NV
NVNV
NHNH
NJNJ
NJNJ NJNJNJ
NJNJNJNJNJ
NM
NM
NM
NYNYNY
NYNY NY
NYNY
NYNYNYNY
NYNY
NYNY
NYNYNYNY
NYNY
NY
NYNY NY
NY
NCNC
NCNCNC NC
NCNC
NCNC
NC
NCNC
ND
OH OHOHOH
OHOH
OH
OH
OHOH
OHOH
OH
OHOH
OH
OKOK
OK
OKOK
OROR
OR
OR
ORPA PA
PA
PAPAPA
PA PAPA
PA
PA
PAPA PAPAPA
PA
PA
RIRISC
SC
SCSC
SC
SCSCSD
TN
TN
TN TN
TN
TN
TNTN
TN
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX TXTX
TX
TXTX TX TX
TX
TXTX
TX
TXTX
TXTX
TX
TXTX TX
TX
TX TX
TXTX
TX
TXTX
TX
UTUTUT
UT
AZAZ
AZAZAZAZAZAZAZ
VT
VAVA
VA
VAVA VAVA
VA
VAVAVA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WAWA
WAWAWA
WV
WV
WV
WI
WIWIWI
WIWI
WI
WI
WY
AR
AR
ARAR
CA
CA
CACA
CACA CA
CA
CACACACACA CA
CA
CACA
CACACACACA
CACA
CACACACA CA
CA
CA CACACACA
CACA
CACA CACACA CACA
CA
CACACACACACA
CACACO CO
CO
COCO CO CO
CTCT
CTCTCT
Coeff = -6.15Std.Err. = 1.86R2 = .088
-.4-.3
-.2-.1
0.1
Coun
terfa
ctua
l wag
e ch
ange
(with
NTB
)
.01 .015 .02 .025NAFTA imported input intensity
Trump vote
DE
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FLFL
FL
FL
FL
FLFL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
GA
GAGAGA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GAGA
GA
GA
HIHI
ID
ID
IL
ILIL
IL
IL IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IN
IN
ININ
IN
IN
IN
ININ
IAIAIA
IAAL AL AL
AL
AL
AL
AL
KS
KS
KS
KS
KY
KY
KY
KY
KY
KY
LA
LA
LA
LALA LA
ME
ME
MD
MDMD
MD
MD
MD
MD
MD
MAMAMAMA
MA
MA
MA
MA
MA
MI
MI
MI
MI
MIMI
MIMI
MI
MI
MIMI
MI
MI
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MNMN
MN
MS
MS
MS
MS
MO
MO
MOMO
MO
MO
MO
MO
AKMT NE
NE
NE
NV
NVNV
NVNH
NH
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJNJNJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJNM
NM
NM
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY NYNY
NY
NY NY NY
NY
NY NY
NY
NYNY
NY
NY
NYNYNY
NC
NCNC
NC
NC NC
NC
NC
NCNCNCNCNC
ND
OH OH
OH
OH
OH
OHOH OHOH
OH
OHOH
OH
OHOH
OH
OK
OK OK
OK
OK
OR
OR
OR
ORORPA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PAPA
PAPA
PA
PA
RI
RI
SCSC
SC
SCSC
SC
SCSD
TN
TN TNTN
TN
TN
TNTN
TN
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX TX
TXTX
TX
TX TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TXTX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
UTUTUT
UT
AZAZ
AZ
AZ
AZ
AZ
AZ
AZ
AZ
VT
VA
VA
VA
VA
VA
VA
VA
VA
VA
VA
VA
WAWA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WVWV
WV
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI WIWIWI
WY
AR
AR
ARAR
CA
CA
CA
CA CA
CA
CA
CA
CACA CACA CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CACA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CACA
CA
CACA
CACA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CO
CO
CO
COCO
CO COCT
CT
CTCT
CT
Coeff = 2342.11Std.Err. = 161.50R2 = .335
020
4060
8010
0Vo
te s
hare
0 .01 .02 .03NAFTA import exposure
DE
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FLFL
FL
FL
FL
FLFL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
GA
GAGAGA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GAGA
GA
GA
HIHI
ID
ID
IL
ILIL
IL
IL IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IN
IN
ININ
IN
IN
IN
ININ
IAIAIA
IAAL AL AL
AL
AL
AL
AL
KS
KS
KS
KS
KY
KY
KY
KY
KY
KY
LA
LA
LA
LALA LA
ME
ME
MD
MDMD
MD
MD
MD
MD
MD
MAMA MAMA
MA
MA
MA
MA
MA
MI
MI
MI
MI
MIMI
MIMI
MI
MI
MIMI
MI
MI
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MNMN
MN
MS
MS
MS
MS
MO
MO
MOMO
MO
MO
MO
MO
AKMT NE
NE
NE
NV
NVNV
NVNH
NH
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJNJNJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJNM
NM
NM
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY NYNY
NY
NY NY NY
NY
NY NY
NY
NYNY
NY
NY
NYNYNY
NC
NCNC
NC
NC NC
NC
NC
NCNCNCNCNC
ND
OH OH
OH
OH
OH
OHOH OHOH
OH
OHOH
OH
OHOH
OH
OK
OKOK
OK
OK
OR
OR
OR
ORORPA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PAPA
PAPA
PA
PA
RI
RI
SCSC
SC
SCSC
SC
SCSD
TN
TN TNTN
TN
TN
TNTN
TN
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX TX
TXTX
TX
TX TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TXTX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
UTUTUT
UT
AZAZ
AZ
AZ
AZ
AZ
AZ
AZ
AZ
VT
VA
VA
VA
VA
VA
VA
VA
VA
VA
VA
VA
WAWA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WVWV
WV
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI WIWIWI
WY
AR
AR
ARAR
CA
CA
CA
CA CA
CA
CA
CA
CACACACA CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CACA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CACA
CA
CACA
CACA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CO
CO
CO
COCO
COCOCT
CT
CTCT
CT
Coeff = 2204.057Std.Err. = 172.43R2 = .241
020
4060
8010
0Vo
te s
hare
0 .005 .01 .015 .02 .025NAFTA export orientation
DE
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FLFL
FL
FL
FL
FLFL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
GA
GAGAGA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GAGA
GA
GA
HIHI
ID
ID
IL
ILIL
IL
ILIL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IN
IN
ININ
IN
IN
IN
ININ
IA IAIA
IAALAL AL
AL
AL
AL
AL
KS
KS
KS
KS
KY
KY
KY
KY
KY
KY
LA
LA
LA
LALA LA
ME
ME
MD
MDMD
MD
MD
MD
MD
MD
MAMAMAMA
MA
MA
MA
MA
MA
MI
MI
MI
MI
MIMI
MIMI
MI
MI
MIMI
MI
MI
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MNMN
MN
MS
MS
MS
MS
MO
MO
MOMO
MO
MO
MO
MO
AKMTNE
NE
NE
NV
NVNV
NVNH
NH
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJNJNJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJNM
NM
NM
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY NYNY
NY
NY NY NY
NY
NYNY
NY
NYNY
NY
NY
NYNYNY
NC
NCNC
NC
NC NC
NC
NC
NCNCNCNCNC
ND
OH OH
OH
OH
OH
OHOH OHOH
OH
OHOH
OH
OHOH
OH
OK
OK OK
OK
OK
OR
OR
OR
ORORPA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PAPA
PAPA
PA
PA
RI
RI
SCSC
SC
SCSC
SC
SCSD
TN
TN TNTN
TN
TN
TNTN
TN
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX TX
TXTX
TX
TX TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TXTX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
UTUTUT
UT
AZAZ
AZ
AZ
AZ
AZ
AZ
AZ
AZ
VT
VA
VA
VA
VA
VA
VA
VA
VA
VA
VA
VA
WAWA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WVWV
WV
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI WIWIWI
WY
AR
AR
ARAR
CA
CA
CA
CA CA
CA
CA
CA
CACA CACACA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CACA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CACA
CA
CACA
CACA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CO
CO
CO
COCO
CO COCT
CT
CTCT
CT
Coeff = 4118.811Std.Err. = 296.88R2 = .326
020
4060
8010
0Vo
te s
hare
.01 .015 .02 .025NAFTA imported input intensity
Notes: The top row of the Figure depicts the scatterplots of the real wage change at a congressional district level against each of the heuristicmeasures defined in Section 5.2. The bottom row of the Figure depicts the scatterplots of the Trump vote share against each of the heuristic measuresdefined in Section 5.2. The lines through the data are the OLS fit. The boxes report the coefficient, robust standard error, and the R2 of the bivariateregression.
25
笹原彰 (アイダホ大学商経学部助教授) ESRI 経済政策フォーラム 平成31年2月5日 13 / 14
Auer, Bonadio, and Levchenko (2018)NAFTAを撤回した場合の経済効果
輸出機会指数と 2016年大統領選のトランプ投票シェア
Figure 7: Heuristic measures, real wage changes and 2016 Trump vote
Import exposure Export orientation Imported input intensity
Real wage change
DE
FLFL
FLFL
FLFLFL FLFLFLFL
FLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFL FLFLFL FLFL FLFL
GA
GAGA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GAGAGA GA
GA
GA
HIHI IDID
ILIL IL ILILIL IL
ILIL
ILILILILIL ILIL ILIL
IN
ININ
IN
IN
IN
ININ
INIA
IA
IA
IA
AL
AL AL
AL
AL
ALAL
KSKS
KS
KSKY
KY
KYKY
KY
KY
LA
LA
LA
LA
LA
LAMEME
MDMDMD MDMD
MDMDMD
MAMAMAMAMA
MAMAMA
MA MI
MI
MI MIMI
MI
MIMI
MI
MI
MIMI
MI
MIMN
MNMN
MNMN
MN
MN
MN
MSMS
MS MSMOMO
MOMOMO
MOMOMO
AK
MT
NENE
NE
NV
NV
NVNV
NHNH
NJNJ
NJNJNJNJNJ
NJNJNJNJNJNM
NM
NM
NYNYNY
NYNY NY
NYNY
NY NYNYNY
NYNY
NYNY
NYNY NYNY
NYNYNY
NYNY NY
NY
NCNC
NCNC
NC NC
NCNC
NCNC
NC
NCNC
ND
OH OHOHOH
OHOH
OH
OH
OHOH
OHOH
OH
OHOH
OH
OKOK
OK
OKOK
OROR
OR
OR
ORPA PA
PA
PAPAPA
PAPAPA
PA
PA
PAPA PAPAPA
PA
PA
RI RISC
SC
SCSC
SC
SCSCSD
TN
TN
TN TN
TN
TN
TNTN
TN
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX TXTX
TX
TXTXTX TX
TX
TXTX
TX
TXTX
TXTX
TX
TXTX TX
TX
TX TX
TXTX
TX
TXTX
TX
UTUTUT
UT
AZAZAZAZ
AZAZAZAZAZVT
VAVA
VA
VAVA VAVA
VA
VAVAVA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WAWA
WAWAWA
WV
WV
WV
WI
WIWIWI
WIWI
WI
WI
WY
AR
AR
ARAR
CA
CA
CACA
CACA CA
CA
CACACACA CA CA
CA
CACA
CACACACACA
CACA
CACACACACA
CA
CA CACACACA
CACA
CACA CACACA CACA
CA
CACACACACACA
CACACO CO
CO
COCOCO CO
CTCT
CTCTCT
Coeff = -3.539Std.Err. = 1.25R2 = .092
-.4-.3
-.2-.1
0.1
Coun
terfa
ctua
l wag
e ch
ange
(with
NTB
)
0 .01 .02 .03NAFTA import exposure
DE
FLFL
FLFL
FLFLFL FLFLFLFL
FLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFL FLFLFLFLFL FLFL
GAGA
GAGA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GAGAGA GA
GA
GA
HIHI IDID
IL IL IL ILILIL IL
ILIL
ILILILIL IL ILIL ILIL
IN
ININ
IN
IN
IN
ININ
INIA
IA
IA
IA
AL
AL AL
AL
AL
ALAL
KSKS
KS
KSKY
KY
KYKY
KY
KY
LA
LA
LA
LA
LA
LAMEME
MDMDMDMDMD
MDMDMD
MAMA MAMAMA
MAMAMA
MA MI
MI
MI MIMI
MI
MIMI
MI
MI
MIMI
MI
MIMN
MNMN
MNMN
MN
MN
MN
MSMS
MS MSMOMO
MOMOMOMOMO
MO
AK
MT
NENE
NE
NV
NV
NVNV
NHNH
NJNJ
NJNJNJNJNJ
NJNJNJNJNJ
NM
NM
NM
NYNYNY
NYNY NY
NYNY
NYNYNYNY
NYNY
NYNY
NYNY NYNY
NYNY
NY
NYNY NY
NY
NCNC
NCNC
NC NC
NCNC
NCNC
NC
NCNC
ND
OH OHOHOH
OH OH
OH
OH
OHOH
OHOH
OH
OHOH
OH
OKOK
OK
OKOK
OROR
OR
OR
ORPA PA
PA
PAPAPA
PAPAPA
PA
PA
PAPA PAPAPA
PA
PA
RI RISC
SC
SCSC
SC
SCSCSD
TN
TN
TN TN
TN
TN
TNTN
TN
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX TXTX
TX
TXTXTX TX
TX
TXTX
TX
TXTX
TXTX
TX
TXTX TX
TX
TX TX
TXTX
TX
TXTXTX
UTUTUT
UT
AZAZ
AZAZAZAZAZAZAZ
VT
VAVA
VA
VAVA VAVA
VA
VAVAVA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WAWA
WAWAWA
WV
WV
WV
WI
WIWIWI
WIWI
WI
WI
WY
AR
AR
ARAR
CA
CA
CACA
CACA CA
CA
CACACACA CACA
CA
CACA
CACACACACACA
CACACACACACA
CA
CACACACACA
CACA
CACA CACACACACA
CA
CACACACACACA
CACACO CO
CO
COCOCOCO
CTCT
CTCT CT
Coeff = -8.18Std.Err. = 0.40R2 = .4
-.4-.3
-.2-.1
0.1
Coun
terfa
ctua
l wag
e ch
ange
(with
NTB
)
0 .005 .01 .015 .02 .025NAFTA export orientation
DE
FLFL
FLFL
FLFLFL FLFLFLFL
FLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFL FLFLFL FLFL FLFL
GA
GAGA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GAGAGA GA
GA
GA
HIHI IDID
ILIL IL ILILIL IL
ILIL
ILILILIL IL ILIL ILIL
IN
ININ
IN
IN
IN
ININ
INIA
IA
IA
IA
AL
AL AL
AL
AL
ALAL
KSKS
KS
KSKY
KY
KYKY
KY
KY
LA
LA
LA
LA
LA
LAMEME
MDMDMD MDMDMDMDMD
MAMAMAMAMA
MAMAMA
MA MI
MI
MI MIMI
MI
MIMI
MI
MI
MIMI
MI
MIMN
MNMN
MNMN
MN
MN
MN
MSMS
MS MSMOMO
MOMOMO
MOMOMO
AK
MT
NENE
NE
NV
NV
NVNV
NHNH
NJNJ
NJNJ NJNJNJ
NJNJNJNJNJ
NM
NM
NM
NYNYNY
NYNY NY
NYNY
NYNYNYNY
NYNY
NYNY
NYNYNYNY
NYNY
NY
NYNY NY
NY
NCNC
NCNCNC NC
NCNC
NCNC
NC
NCNC
ND
OH OHOHOH
OHOH
OH
OH
OHOH
OHOH
OH
OHOH
OH
OKOK
OK
OKOK
OROR
OR
OR
ORPA PA
PA
PAPAPA
PA PAPA
PA
PA
PAPA PAPAPA
PA
PA
RIRISC
SC
SCSC
SC
SCSCSD
TN
TN
TN TN
TN
TN
TNTN
TN
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX TXTX
TX
TXTX TX TX
TX
TXTX
TX
TXTX
TXTX
TX
TXTX TX
TX
TX TX
TXTX
TX
TXTX
TX
UTUTUT
UT
AZAZ
AZAZAZAZAZAZAZ
VT
VAVA
VA
VAVA VAVA
VA
VAVAVA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WAWA
WAWAWA
WV
WV
WV
WI
WIWIWI
WIWI
WI
WI
WY
AR
AR
ARAR
CA
CA
CACA
CACA CA
CA
CACACACACA CA
CA
CACA
CACACACACA
CACA
CACACACA CA
CA
CA CACACACA
CACA
CACA CACACA CACA
CA
CACACACACACA
CACACO CO
CO
COCO CO CO
CTCT
CTCTCT
Coeff = -6.15Std.Err. = 1.86R2 = .088
-.4-.3
-.2-.1
0.1
Coun
terfa
ctua
l wag
e ch
ange
(with
NTB
)
.01 .015 .02 .025NAFTA imported input intensity
Trump vote
DE
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FLFL
FL
FL
FL
FLFL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
GA
GAGAGA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GAGA
GA
GA
HIHI
ID
ID
IL
ILIL
IL
IL IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IN
IN
ININ
IN
IN
IN
ININ
IAIAIA
IAAL AL AL
AL
AL
AL
AL
KS
KS
KS
KS
KY
KY
KY
KY
KY
KY
LA
LA
LA
LALA LA
ME
ME
MD
MDMD
MD
MD
MD
MD
MD
MAMAMAMA
MA
MA
MA
MA
MA
MI
MI
MI
MI
MIMI
MIMI
MI
MI
MIMI
MI
MI
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MNMN
MN
MS
MS
MS
MS
MO
MO
MOMO
MO
MO
MO
MO
AKMT NE
NE
NE
NV
NVNV
NVNH
NH
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJNJNJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJNM
NM
NM
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY NYNY
NY
NY NY NY
NY
NY NY
NY
NYNY
NY
NY
NYNYNY
NC
NCNC
NC
NC NC
NC
NC
NCNCNCNCNC
ND
OH OH
OH
OH
OH
OHOH OHOH
OH
OHOH
OH
OHOH
OH
OK
OK OK
OK
OK
OR
OR
OR
ORORPA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PAPA
PAPA
PA
PA
RI
RI
SCSC
SC
SCSC
SC
SCSD
TN
TN TNTN
TN
TN
TNTN
TN
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX TX
TXTX
TX
TX TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TXTX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
UTUTUT
UT
AZAZ
AZ
AZ
AZ
AZ
AZ
AZ
AZ
VT
VA
VA
VA
VA
VA
VA
VA
VA
VA
VA
VA
WAWA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WVWV
WV
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI WIWIWI
WY
AR
AR
ARAR
CA
CA
CA
CA CA
CA
CA
CA
CACA CACA CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CACA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CACA
CA
CACA
CACA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CO
CO
CO
COCO
CO COCT
CT
CTCT
CT
Coeff = 2342.11Std.Err. = 161.50R2 = .335
020
4060
8010
0Vo
te s
hare
0 .01 .02 .03NAFTA import exposure
DE
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FLFL
FL
FL
FL
FLFL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
GA
GAGAGA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GAGA
GA
GA
HIHI
ID
ID
IL
ILIL
IL
IL IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IN
IN
ININ
IN
IN
IN
ININ
IAIAIA
IAAL AL AL
AL
AL
AL
AL
KS
KS
KS
KS
KY
KY
KY
KY
KY
KY
LA
LA
LA
LALA LA
ME
ME
MD
MDMD
MD
MD
MD
MD
MD
MAMA MAMA
MA
MA
MA
MA
MA
MI
MI
MI
MI
MIMI
MIMI
MI
MI
MIMI
MI
MI
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MNMN
MN
MS
MS
MS
MS
MO
MO
MOMO
MO
MO
MO
MO
AKMT NE
NE
NE
NV
NVNV
NVNH
NH
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJNJNJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJNM
NM
NM
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY NYNY
NY
NY NY NY
NY
NY NY
NY
NYNY
NY
NY
NYNYNY
NC
NCNC
NC
NC NC
NC
NC
NCNCNCNCNC
ND
OH OH
OH
OH
OH
OHOH OHOH
OH
OHOH
OH
OHOH
OH
OK
OKOK
OK
OK
OR
OR
OR
ORORPA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PAPA
PAPA
PA
PA
RI
RI
SCSC
SC
SCSC
SC
SCSD
TN
TN TNTN
TN
TN
TNTN
TN
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX TX
TXTX
TX
TX TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TXTX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
UTUTUT
UT
AZAZ
AZ
AZ
AZ
AZ
AZ
AZ
AZ
VT
VA
VA
VA
VA
VA
VA
VA
VA
VA
VA
VA
WAWA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WVWV
WV
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI WIWIWI
WY
AR
AR
ARAR
CA
CA
CA
CA CA
CA
CA
CA
CACACACA CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CACA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CACA
CA
CACA
CACA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CO
CO
CO
COCO
COCOCT
CT
CTCT
CT
Coeff = 2204.057Std.Err. = 172.43R2 = .241
020
4060
8010
0Vo
te s
hare
0 .005 .01 .015 .02 .025NAFTA export orientation
DE
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FLFL
FL
FL
FL
FLFL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
GA
GAGAGA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GAGA
GA
GA
HIHI
ID
ID
IL
ILIL
IL
ILIL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IN
IN
ININ
IN
IN
IN
ININ
IA IAIA
IAALAL AL
AL
AL
AL
AL
KS
KS
KS
KS
KY
KY
KY
KY
KY
KY
LA
LA
LA
LALA LA
ME
ME
MD
MDMD
MD
MD
MD
MD
MD
MAMAMAMA
MA
MA
MA
MA
MA
MI
MI
MI
MI
MIMI
MIMI
MI
MI
MIMI
MI
MI
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MNMN
MN
MS
MS
MS
MS
MO
MO
MOMO
MO
MO
MO
MO
AKMTNE
NE
NE
NV
NVNV
NVNH
NH
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJNJNJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJNM
NM
NM
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY NYNY
NY
NY NY NY
NY
NYNY
NY
NYNY
NY
NY
NYNYNY
NC
NCNC
NC
NC NC
NC
NC
NCNCNCNCNC
ND
OH OH
OH
OH
OH
OHOH OHOH
OH
OHOH
OH
OHOH
OH
OK
OK OK
OK
OK
OR
OR
OR
ORORPA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PAPA
PAPA
PA
PA
RI
RI
SCSC
SC
SCSC
SC
SCSD
TN
TN TNTN
TN
TN
TNTN
TN
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX TX
TXTX
TX
TX TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TXTX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
UTUTUT
UT
AZAZ
AZ
AZ
AZ
AZ
AZ
AZ
AZ
VT
VA
VA
VA
VA
VA
VA
VA
VA
VA
VA
VA
WAWA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WVWV
WV
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI WIWIWI
WY
AR
AR
ARAR
CA
CA
CA
CA CA
CA
CA
CA
CACA CACACA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CACA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CACA
CA
CACA
CACA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CO
CO
CO
COCO
CO COCT
CT
CTCT
CT
Coeff = 4118.811Std.Err. = 296.88R2 = .326
020
4060
8010
0Vo
te s
hare
.01 .015 .02 .025NAFTA imported input intensity
Notes: The top row of the Figure depicts the scatterplots of the real wage change at a congressional district level against each of the heuristicmeasures defined in Section 5.2. The bottom row of the Figure depicts the scatterplots of the Trump vote share against each of the heuristic measuresdefined in Section 5.2. The lines through the data are the OLS fit. The boxes report the coefficient, robust standard error, and the R2 of the bivariateregression.
25
笹原彰 (アイダホ大学商経学部助教授) ESRI 経済政策フォーラム 平成31年2月5日 13 / 14
Auer, Bonadio, and Levchenko (2018)NAFTAを撤回した場合の経済効果
中間財輸入指数と 2016年大統領選のトランプ投票シェア
Figure 7: Heuristic measures, real wage changes and 2016 Trump vote
Import exposure Export orientation Imported input intensity
Real wage change
DE
FLFL
FLFL
FLFLFL FLFLFLFL
FLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFL FLFLFL FLFL FLFL
GA
GAGA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GAGAGA GA
GA
GA
HIHI IDID
ILIL IL ILILIL IL
ILIL
ILILILILIL ILIL ILIL
IN
ININ
IN
IN
IN
ININ
INIA
IA
IA
IA
AL
AL AL
AL
AL
ALAL
KSKS
KS
KSKY
KY
KYKY
KY
KY
LA
LA
LA
LA
LA
LAMEME
MDMDMD MDMD
MDMDMD
MAMAMAMAMA
MAMAMA
MA MI
MI
MI MIMI
MI
MIMI
MI
MI
MIMI
MI
MIMN
MNMN
MNMN
MN
MN
MN
MSMS
MS MSMOMO
MOMOMO
MOMOMO
AK
MT
NENE
NE
NV
NV
NVNV
NHNH
NJNJ
NJNJNJNJNJ
NJNJNJNJNJNM
NM
NM
NYNYNY
NYNY NY
NYNY
NY NYNYNY
NYNY
NYNY
NYNY NYNY
NYNYNY
NYNY NY
NY
NCNC
NCNC
NC NC
NCNC
NCNC
NC
NCNC
ND
OH OHOHOH
OHOH
OH
OH
OHOH
OHOH
OH
OHOH
OH
OKOK
OK
OKOK
OROR
OR
OR
ORPA PA
PA
PAPAPA
PAPAPA
PA
PA
PAPA PAPAPA
PA
PA
RI RISC
SC
SCSC
SC
SCSCSD
TN
TN
TN TN
TN
TN
TNTN
TN
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX TXTX
TX
TXTXTX TX
TX
TXTX
TX
TXTX
TXTX
TX
TXTX TX
TX
TX TX
TXTX
TX
TXTX
TX
UTUTUT
UT
AZAZAZAZ
AZAZAZAZAZVT
VAVA
VA
VAVA VAVA
VA
VAVAVA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WAWA
WAWAWA
WV
WV
WV
WI
WIWIWI
WIWI
WI
WI
WY
AR
AR
ARAR
CA
CA
CACA
CACA CA
CA
CACACACA CA CA
CA
CACA
CACACACACA
CACA
CACACACACA
CA
CA CACACACA
CACA
CACA CACACA CACA
CA
CACACACACACA
CACACO CO
CO
COCOCO CO
CTCT
CTCTCT
Coeff = -3.539Std.Err. = 1.25R2 = .092
-.4-.3
-.2-.1
0.1
Coun
terfa
ctua
l wag
e ch
ange
(with
NTB
)
0 .01 .02 .03NAFTA import exposure
DE
FLFL
FLFL
FLFLFL FLFLFLFL
FLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFL FLFLFLFLFL FLFL
GAGA
GAGA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GAGAGA GA
GA
GA
HIHI IDID
IL IL IL ILILIL IL
ILIL
ILILILIL IL ILIL ILIL
IN
ININ
IN
IN
IN
ININ
INIA
IA
IA
IA
AL
AL AL
AL
AL
ALAL
KSKS
KS
KSKY
KY
KYKY
KY
KY
LA
LA
LA
LA
LA
LAMEME
MDMDMDMDMD
MDMDMD
MAMA MAMAMA
MAMAMA
MA MI
MI
MI MIMI
MI
MIMI
MI
MI
MIMI
MI
MIMN
MNMN
MNMN
MN
MN
MN
MSMS
MS MSMOMO
MOMOMOMOMO
MO
AK
MT
NENE
NE
NV
NV
NVNV
NHNH
NJNJ
NJNJNJNJNJ
NJNJNJNJNJ
NM
NM
NM
NYNYNY
NYNY NY
NYNY
NYNYNYNY
NYNY
NYNY
NYNY NYNY
NYNY
NY
NYNY NY
NY
NCNC
NCNC
NC NC
NCNC
NCNC
NC
NCNC
ND
OH OHOHOH
OH OH
OH
OH
OHOH
OHOH
OH
OHOH
OH
OKOK
OK
OKOK
OROR
OR
OR
ORPA PA
PA
PAPAPA
PAPAPA
PA
PA
PAPA PAPAPA
PA
PA
RI RISC
SC
SCSC
SC
SCSCSD
TN
TN
TN TN
TN
TN
TNTN
TN
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX TXTX
TX
TXTXTX TX
TX
TXTX
TX
TXTX
TXTX
TX
TXTX TX
TX
TX TX
TXTX
TX
TXTXTX
UTUTUT
UT
AZAZ
AZAZAZAZAZAZAZ
VT
VAVA
VA
VAVA VAVA
VA
VAVAVA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WAWA
WAWAWA
WV
WV
WV
WI
WIWIWI
WIWI
WI
WI
WY
AR
AR
ARAR
CA
CA
CACA
CACA CA
CA
CACACACA CACA
CA
CACA
CACACACACACA
CACACACACACA
CA
CACACACACA
CACA
CACA CACACACACA
CA
CACACACACACA
CACACO CO
CO
COCOCOCO
CTCT
CTCT CT
Coeff = -8.18Std.Err. = 0.40R2 = .4
-.4-.3
-.2-.1
0.1
Coun
terfa
ctua
l wag
e ch
ange
(with
NTB
)
0 .005 .01 .015 .02 .025NAFTA export orientation
DE
FLFL
FLFL
FLFLFL FLFLFLFL
FLFLFLFLFLFLFLFLFL FLFLFL FLFL FLFL
GA
GAGA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GAGAGA GA
GA
GA
HIHI IDID
ILIL IL ILILIL IL
ILIL
ILILILIL IL ILIL ILIL
IN
ININ
IN
IN
IN
ININ
INIA
IA
IA
IA
AL
AL AL
AL
AL
ALAL
KSKS
KS
KSKY
KY
KYKY
KY
KY
LA
LA
LA
LA
LA
LAMEME
MDMDMD MDMDMDMDMD
MAMAMAMAMA
MAMAMA
MA MI
MI
MI MIMI
MI
MIMI
MI
MI
MIMI
MI
MIMN
MNMN
MNMN
MN
MN
MN
MSMS
MS MSMOMO
MOMOMO
MOMOMO
AK
MT
NENE
NE
NV
NV
NVNV
NHNH
NJNJ
NJNJ NJNJNJ
NJNJNJNJNJ
NM
NM
NM
NYNYNY
NYNY NY
NYNY
NYNYNYNY
NYNY
NYNY
NYNYNYNY
NYNY
NY
NYNY NY
NY
NCNC
NCNCNC NC
NCNC
NCNC
NC
NCNC
ND
OH OHOHOH
OHOH
OH
OH
OHOH
OHOH
OH
OHOH
OH
OKOK
OK
OKOK
OROR
OR
OR
ORPA PA
PA
PAPAPA
PA PAPA
PA
PA
PAPA PAPAPA
PA
PA
RIRISC
SC
SCSC
SC
SCSCSD
TN
TN
TN TN
TN
TN
TNTN
TN
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX TXTX
TX
TXTX TX TX
TX
TXTX
TX
TXTX
TXTX
TX
TXTX TX
TX
TX TX
TXTX
TX
TXTX
TX
UTUTUT
UT
AZAZ
AZAZAZAZAZAZAZ
VT
VAVA
VA
VAVA VAVA
VA
VAVAVA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WAWA
WAWAWA
WV
WV
WV
WI
WIWIWI
WIWI
WI
WI
WY
AR
AR
ARAR
CA
CA
CACA
CACA CA
CA
CACACACACA CA
CA
CACA
CACACACACA
CACA
CACACACA CA
CA
CA CACACACA
CACA
CACA CACACA CACA
CA
CACACACACACA
CACACO CO
CO
COCO CO CO
CTCT
CTCTCT
Coeff = -6.15Std.Err. = 1.86R2 = .088
-.4-.3
-.2-.1
0.1
Coun
terfa
ctua
l wag
e ch
ange
(with
NTB
)
.01 .015 .02 .025NAFTA imported input intensity
Trump vote
DE
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FLFL
FL
FL
FL
FLFL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
GA
GAGAGA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GAGA
GA
GA
HIHI
ID
ID
IL
ILIL
IL
IL IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IN
IN
ININ
IN
IN
IN
ININ
IAIAIA
IAAL AL AL
AL
AL
AL
AL
KS
KS
KS
KS
KY
KY
KY
KY
KY
KY
LA
LA
LA
LALA LA
ME
ME
MD
MDMD
MD
MD
MD
MD
MD
MAMAMAMA
MA
MA
MA
MA
MA
MI
MI
MI
MI
MIMI
MIMI
MI
MI
MIMI
MI
MI
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MNMN
MN
MS
MS
MS
MS
MO
MO
MOMO
MO
MO
MO
MO
AKMT NE
NE
NE
NV
NVNV
NVNH
NH
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJNJNJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJNM
NM
NM
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY NYNY
NY
NY NY NY
NY
NY NY
NY
NYNY
NY
NY
NYNYNY
NC
NCNC
NC
NC NC
NC
NC
NCNCNCNCNC
ND
OH OH
OH
OH
OH
OHOH OHOH
OH
OHOH
OH
OHOH
OH
OK
OK OK
OK
OK
OR
OR
OR
ORORPA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PAPA
PAPA
PA
PA
RI
RI
SCSC
SC
SCSC
SC
SCSD
TN
TN TNTN
TN
TN
TNTN
TN
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX TX
TXTX
TX
TX TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TXTX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
UTUTUT
UT
AZAZ
AZ
AZ
AZ
AZ
AZ
AZ
AZ
VT
VA
VA
VA
VA
VA
VA
VA
VA
VA
VA
VA
WAWA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WVWV
WV
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI WIWIWI
WY
AR
AR
ARAR
CA
CA
CA
CA CA
CA
CA
CA
CACA CACA CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CACA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CACA
CA
CACA
CACA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CO
CO
CO
COCO
CO COCT
CT
CTCT
CT
Coeff = 2342.11Std.Err. = 161.50R2 = .335
020
4060
8010
0Vo
te s
hare
0 .01 .02 .03NAFTA import exposure
DE
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FLFL
FL
FL
FL
FLFL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
GA
GAGAGA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GAGA
GA
GA
HIHI
ID
ID
IL
ILIL
IL
IL IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IN
IN
ININ
IN
IN
IN
ININ
IAIAIA
IAAL AL AL
AL
AL
AL
AL
KS
KS
KS
KS
KY
KY
KY
KY
KY
KY
LA
LA
LA
LALA LA
ME
ME
MD
MDMD
MD
MD
MD
MD
MD
MAMA MAMA
MA
MA
MA
MA
MA
MI
MI
MI
MI
MIMI
MIMI
MI
MI
MIMI
MI
MI
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MNMN
MN
MS
MS
MS
MS
MO
MO
MOMO
MO
MO
MO
MO
AKMT NE
NE
NE
NV
NVNV
NVNH
NH
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJNJNJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJNM
NM
NM
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY NYNY
NY
NY NY NY
NY
NY NY
NY
NYNY
NY
NY
NYNYNY
NC
NCNC
NC
NC NC
NC
NC
NCNCNCNCNC
ND
OH OH
OH
OH
OH
OHOH OHOH
OH
OHOH
OH
OHOH
OH
OK
OKOK
OK
OK
OR
OR
OR
ORORPA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PAPA
PAPA
PA
PA
RI
RI
SCSC
SC
SCSC
SC
SCSD
TN
TN TNTN
TN
TN
TNTN
TN
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX TX
TXTX
TX
TX TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TXTX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
UTUTUT
UT
AZAZ
AZ
AZ
AZ
AZ
AZ
AZ
AZ
VT
VA
VA
VA
VA
VA
VA
VA
VA
VA
VA
VA
WAWA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WVWV
WV
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI WIWIWI
WY
AR
AR
ARAR
CA
CA
CA
CA CA
CA
CA
CA
CACACACA CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CACA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CACA
CA
CACA
CACA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CO
CO
CO
COCO
COCOCT
CT
CTCT
CT
Coeff = 2204.057Std.Err. = 172.43R2 = .241
020
4060
8010
0Vo
te s
hare
0 .005 .01 .015 .02 .025NAFTA export orientation
DE
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FLFL
FL
FL
FL
FLFL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
GA
GAGAGA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GAGA
GA
GA
HIHI
ID
ID
IL
ILIL
IL
ILIL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IL
IN
IN
ININ
IN
IN
IN
ININ
IA IAIA
IAALAL AL
AL
AL
AL
AL
KS
KS
KS
KS
KY
KY
KY
KY
KY
KY
LA
LA
LA
LALA LA
ME
ME
MD
MDMD
MD
MD
MD
MD
MD
MAMAMAMA
MA
MA
MA
MA
MA
MI
MI
MI
MI
MIMI
MIMI
MI
MI
MIMI
MI
MI
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MNMN
MN
MS
MS
MS
MS
MO
MO
MOMO
MO
MO
MO
MO
AKMTNE
NE
NE
NV
NVNV
NVNH
NH
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJNJNJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJNM
NM
NM
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY NYNY
NY
NY NY NY
NY
NYNY
NY
NYNY
NY
NY
NYNYNY
NC
NCNC
NC
NC NC
NC
NC
NCNCNCNCNC
ND
OH OH
OH
OH
OH
OHOH OHOH
OH
OHOH
OH
OHOH
OH
OK
OK OK
OK
OK
OR
OR
OR
ORORPA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PAPA
PAPA
PA
PA
RI
RI
SCSC
SC
SCSC
SC
SCSD
TN
TN TNTN
TN
TN
TNTN
TN
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX TX
TXTX
TX
TX TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TXTX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
UTUTUT
UT
AZAZ
AZ
AZ
AZ
AZ
AZ
AZ
AZ
VT
VA
VA
VA
VA
VA
VA
VA
VA
VA
VA
VA
WAWA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WA
WVWV
WV
WI
WI
WI
WI
WI WIWIWI
WY
AR
AR
ARAR
CA
CA
CA
CA CA
CA
CA
CA
CACA CACACA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CACA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CACA
CA
CACA
CACA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CO
CO
CO
COCO
CO COCT
CT
CTCT
CT
Coeff = 4118.811Std.Err. = 296.88R2 = .326
020
4060
8010
0Vo
te s
hare
.01 .015 .02 .025NAFTA imported input intensity
Notes: The top row of the Figure depicts the scatterplots of the real wage change at a congressional district level against each of the heuristicmeasures defined in Section 5.2. The bottom row of the Figure depicts the scatterplots of the Trump vote share against each of the heuristic measuresdefined in Section 5.2. The lines through the data are the OLS fit. The boxes report the coefficient, robust standard error, and the R2 of the bivariateregression.
25
笹原彰 (アイダホ大学商経学部助教授) ESRI 経済政策フォーラム 平成31年2月5日 13 / 14
まとめ
今回の報告では以下の研究の紹介を行いました。
David Autorらによるチャイナショックの負の側面の研究製造業雇用婚姻率イノベーション政治的二極化
Robert Feenstraらによるチャイナショックの正の側面の研究サービス業雇用財価格の低下
その他の第一線の研究者による分析Lorenzo Caliendoらによるチャイナショックの一般均衡分析Teresa Fort, Nicholas Bloomらによるミクロデータを用いた実証研究Auer, Bonadio, Levchenkoによる NAFTA撤回の経済分析
笹原彰 (アイダホ大学商経学部助教授) ESRI 経済政策フォーラム 平成31年2月5日 14 / 14
参考文献
Amiti, Mary, Mi Dai, Robert C. Feenstra, and John Romalis (2018) “How DidChina’s WTO Entry Affect U.S. Prices?”, NBER Working Paper No. 23487.
Auer, Raphael A., Barthelemy Bonadio, and Andrei A. Levchenko (2018) “TheEconomics and Politics of Revoking NAFTA”, NBER Working Paper, No. 25379.
Autor, David H., David Dorn, and Gordon H. Hanson (2013) “The ChinaSyndrome: Local Labor Market Effects of Import Competition in the UnitedStates”, American Economic Review, Vol. 103, No. 6, pp. 2121-2168.
Autor, David H., David Dorn, and Gordon H. Hanson (2017) “When WorkDisappears: Manufacturing Decline and the Falling Marriage-Market Value ofYoung Men”, forthcoming in American Economic Review: Insights.
Autor, David H., David Dorn, Gordon H. Hanson, and Kaveh Majlesi (2016)“Importing Political Polarization? The Electoral Consequences of Rising TradeExposure”, Unpublished Manuscript.
Autor, David H., David Dorn, Gordon H. Hanson, Gary Pisano, and Pian Shu(2017) “Foreign Competition and Domestic Innovation: Evidence from U.S.Patents”, NBER Working Paper No. 22879, forthcoming in American EconomicReview: Insights.
笹原彰 (アイダホ大学商経学部助教授) ESRI 経済政策フォーラム 平成31年2月5日 14 / 14
参考文献
Bloom, Nicholas, Kyle Handley, Andre Kurmann, Philip Luck (2019) “The Impactof Chinese Trade on U.S. Employment: The Good, The Bad, and TheApocryphal”, Unpublished manuscript.
Barrot, Jean-Noel, Erik Loualiche, Matthew Plosser, and Julien Sauvagnat (2016)“Import Competition and Household Debt”, Unpublished manuscript.
Caliendo, Lorenzo, Maximiliano Dvorkin, and Fernando Parro (2018) “Trade andLabor Market Dynamics: General Equilibrium Analysis of the China Trade Shock”,FRB St. Louis Working Paper No. 2015-9, forthcoming in Econometrica.
Feenstra, Robert C., Hong Ma, and Yuan Xu (2017) “US Exports andEmployment,”NBER Working Paper No. 24056.
Feenstra, Robert C., Hong Ma, and Yuan Xu (2019) “Magnification of the ‘ChinaShock’ through the U.S. Housing Market,”Unpublished manuscript.
Feenstra, Robert C. and Akira Sasahara (2018) “The ’China Shock’, Exports andU.S. Employment: A Global Input-Output Analysis,” Review of InternationalEconomics, Vol. 26, No. 5, pp. 1053-1083.
Feenstra, Robert C. and Akira Sasahara (2019) “The ’China Shock’ in Trade:Consequences for ASEAN and East Asia,” In: World Trade Evolution: Growth,Productivity and Employment, edited by Lili Yan Ing and Miaojie Yu, Routledge.
笹原彰 (アイダホ大学商経学部助教授) ESRI 経済政策フォーラム 平成31年2月5日 14 / 14
参考文献
Feler, Leo and Mine Z. Senses (2017) “Trade Shocks and the Provision of LocalPublic Goods”, American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, Vol. 9, No. 4, pp.101-143.
Fort, Teresa C., Justin R. Pierce, and Peter K. Schott (2018) “New Perspectiveson the Decline of US Manufacturing Employment”, Journal of EconomicPerspectives, Vol. 32, No. 2, pp. 47-72.
Institute for Fiscal Studies on YouTube (2017) “What Would the US Look Likewithout the China Shock?”, available athttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c07dcInoG0Y&t=2s
笹原彰 (アイダホ大学商経学部助教授) ESRI 経済政策フォーラム 平成31年2月5日 14 / 14