This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
1. Feminist fictionmakingBy Carol-Anne Croker
2. ...The order which [the work of art] professes is merelyan
imaginary order, projected onto disorder, thefictive resolution of
ideological conflicts, aresolution so precarious that it is obvious
only in thevery letter of the text where incoherence
andincompleteness burst forth. It is no longer a questionof defects
but of indefensible informers... the workderives its form from this
incompleteness whichenables us to identify the presence of a
conflict atits borders. In the defect of the work is articulated
anew truth... Peter Mackerey . p.103
3. Feminist fictionmaking> This presentation today is to
discuss the articulation between my artefact and exegesis six
months from completion.> For the exegesis I have presented three
Conference papers which are presently functioning as the first
draft. The first chapter is discussing feminist writing, what it is
and why it needs to be defined. Many of you will remember my last
Colloquium where I spoke of writing a female space, utilising the
conceptual framework of gynesis to challenge what I contend is the
dominant phallocentric construction of women within cultural texts.
(Women as object of male gaze).
4. Feminist fiction making> The second chapter locates my
writing within the contemporary market, i.e, popular womens
fiction. This chapter reflects on the idea that popular womens
fiction is often dismissively labelled as Chick Lit. I am seeking
to unpack the hidden value systems and ideology operating as
objective genre classification.> I am endeavouring to mobilise
the term Chick Lit as a subversive and disruptive term, and not
that associated with post-feminist backlash. Integral to this is
the notions of sexuality and power.> Who is watching?> Who is
doing?> Who is being watched and done unto?> Why?
5. Feminist fiction making> The third chapter based upon my
Conference presentations is looking at the notions of high and low
culture, literary and pulp fiction.> This chapter necessitates
an examination of the Australian literary market.> Who is
published and by whom?> What is the content?> What is the
genre?> What iconography is being utlised?> How is Australia
and Australianness represented in our fiction?> Is our fiction
for a globalised market or a national one, and does this
matter?> How?
6. Feminist fiction making> Literature is mostly about
having sex and not much about having children. Life is the other
way around David Lodges character in The British Museum is Falling
Down, Harmondsworth: Penguin 1983(1965), p.56.> This distinction
between sex in life and sex in books: what Brain Castro called the
functional notion of representation is an illusion; the paths of
the world and the paths of the book are not parallel. Brian Castro,
Necessary idiocy in Looking for Estrellita. St Lucia. UQP (1999) p.
30 As cited by Xavier Pons, Messengers of Eros: Representations of
Sex in Australian Writing. Cambridge Scholar Publishing.
(2009)
7. Feminist fiction making> The fourth chapter in the
exegesis will look at the methodological and theoretical frames
within which I am situating my analysis and reflexivity.> This
is where I am currently working.> From this exploration it is
envisaged that I will be able to identify how my journal entries
along this writers journey feeds into my exegetical conceptualising
and in turn how this nexus/intersection is operating within the
artefact.I have called this presentation feminist fictionmaking
because: In order give an example of how I am constructing this
exploration, I will be using a model developed by Dr Enza Gandolpho
from Victoria University, in her recent journal article, Feminist
Fictionmaking, New Writing. Vol 5 (2) pp 140-149. (2008).
8. Feminist fiction making> Fictionmaking is a form of
cultural production and social construction that can and should
interrogate> Feminists novelists being political encountable,
writing to challenge perceptions.> Novelists create a deeper
understanding of ourselves and others and feminist fictionwriters
have political intention> Through the intention of the writer
cannot be said to construct the meaning of the work, it is a
crucial aspect of the fabric that forms the work.> {This is
where the exegesis sits} a basis for self reflective, critical
approach aimed at illuminating the feminist fictionmaking process.
(emphasis mine)
9. Feminist fiction making> Gandolfo insists that we
demysitify the writer and writing process.> Fiction is an area
where this deconstruction and interrogation can occur fictionmaking
calls up notions of imagination, imbued with signification linked
to concepts of creativity.> In this sense (the craft of) and the
writer themselves becomes neutered, a conduit for the
mystical/magical or is positioned as deviant : a genius.> Over
the course of my PhD I have been investigating whether writing is
this mystical unknowable process, or a craft to be learned,
practiced and honed. This is my PhD journey, to interrogate
fictionmaking.
10. Feminist fiction making> Gandolfo cites Zavarzadah &
Morton , 1994: 87 Theory as Resistance: politics and culture after
post-structuralism. The Guildford Press. NY & London.> So as
a feminist writing fiction my intentionality is always political.
It is subjective, grounded in constructions of self:> self as
woman,> self as thinker,> self as writer> and self as
researcher.> Thus, the or me as subject is always in process. I
am the subject being constructed throughout my PhD.
11. Feminist fiction making> Gandolfo uses criture feminine
(Cixous 1975:p.351) to articulate her intentionality in her novel
Swimming.> The intentionality [and I would contend Gandolfos
politics] is an attempt to articulate that which is actively
silenced in the dominant masculine realms of experience> Thus
feminist fictionmaking can interrogate that which is taboo.> One
in the realm of the taboo, many structures and systems are
challenged . Thus writing taboo subjects within the Academy is a
subversive activity.> Gandolfos taboo subject in her novel is
childlessness; the mis- functioning womb, the killer womb which
then constructs her female subject as deviant. She calls this
writing in the wild zone. Gandolfo. 2008.p.142
12. Feminist fiction making> This brings me directly to my
artefact and my intentionality. Two and one half years ago when I
began this journey I wanted to interrogate the position of the
author/creator in relation to the text.> I wanted to cause
disruption (for the reader) in the text, to challenge the device of
the omniscient third person narrator with the inference that the
author is situated outside the text, and the authorial voice is
given dominance.> If I had chosen to write memoir or using
auto-ethnography I needed to firmly position myself as author and
subject within and outside the text.> This would necessitate
positioning my work in the world of the real. These characters and
events actually existed outside the text in a past, or at least in
memory constructed in the present. This would have required Ethics
clearance to write the living.
13. Feminist fiction makingAgain I state categorically, I am a
coward.I will not risk having my reader/subjects being haunted by
differentperspectives and to demand they reflect and question their
notions of self.I do want the reader to interrogate the subtext ,
the politics and the wildzone.Thus I have situated my novel within
hybridity or faction to use the popularterminology.
14. Feminist fiction makingThis brings me directly to my
artefact and my intentionality. Twoand one half years ago when I
began this journey I wanted tointerrogate the position of the
author/creator in relation to the text.I wanted to cause disruption
(for the reader) in the text, tochallenge the device of the
omniscient third person narrator withthe inference that the author
is situated outside the text, and theauthorial voice is given
dominance.If I had chosen to write memoir or using auto-ethnography
Ineeded to firmly position myself as author and subject within
andoutside the text.
15. Feminist fiction making> I confess to being a coward, I
wanted to avoid any possible controversy or potential litigation
threat. By writing my construction of real people, and actual
events I would invoke selectivity and subjectivity. Mt truth may
not be the truth of the subjects.> Hence onerous (yet necessary)
Ethics clearance to protect the back of myself and of course the
University. The nature of the game is being risk averse and
safe.> I do not want to write a safe space. I am writing in
Gandolfos wild zone. I am writing the taboo and the deviant.>
The Artefact is entitled Walking with Madness. My colleagues in
this room know that I have a mental illness, Bi-polar Mood
Disorder.There are times when I am clinically mad, and thus
constructed socially as deviant.> This is the space where I can
unpack notions of normalcy and the threatening [perhaps it is the
realm of Aristotlean tragedy : fear and pity]
16. Feminist fiction making> Thus my factional novel
features the lives of three women, friends living in Melbourne
circa 1974, 1984, and 1994.> Each character is to a degree mad ,
delusional, or in other ways socially deviant. They live around and
within the night- world of the theatre., a place where deviance has
a natural home.> The three selected narrative times, allow us to
reflect on what is considered normal for women in this time and of
the characters ages, late teens-early twenties, thirties and then
finally forties.> Why these times of life?> I turn to notions
of female archetypes within traditional narratives. [ I am sure
that you will be familiar with these , as you were with Marks
rhymes yesterday.]
17. virginmaiden
18. temptress
19. wife
20. madonna
21. whore
22. croneFeminist fiction making Crone?
23. witchBaba yaga
24. Feminist fictionmakingAnd my characters deviance? butch
maiden / temptress wife / whore bitchbimbo mother/ stepmother
ballbreaker
25. Feminist fiction making> And of course feminist!!