Feeling LO? Making Connections Through Curriculum Mapping Assessment Workshop Fall 2015 Swarup Wood Professor of Chemistry California State University Monterey Bay
Dec 27, 2015
Feeling LO? Making Connections Through Curriculum Mapping
Assessment WorkshopFall 2015
Swarup WoodProfessor of Chemistry
California State University Monterey Bay
Background
CSUMB is developing systematic assessment of our newly adopted ILOs
We will need to develop high quality assessment of MLOs, GE outcomes, and to understand how programmatic courses support mastery of the ILOs
Beholding to our stakeholders as well as our accreditors
Assumptions Curriculum mapping can be an engaging
effective way to align curricular resources to achievement of learning outcomes (student success)
Teaching is valuable in so far as it produces learning
Very very very rarely a course’s curriculum is better connected to a faculty’s interest than to the programs MLOs…
Think about the classrooms and institutions where most of us grew up
Continued Outcomes-based environments require
alignment between the institutional, program, and course level learning outcomes
Outcomes-based environments require alignment between learning outcomes and what is actually going on in class
How do we know?
If Student Success Relies Upon Mastery of Program Learning Outcomes… Assumes MLOs are well developed up through the
curriculum Assumes that course learning outcomes are well
aligned with core skills and knowledge areas embedded in the MLOS
Assumes students are provided adequate exposure and multiple opportunities to practice these core skills and knowledge areas
Curriculum mapping is a way of testing these assumptions
Why Develop Curriculum Maps?
To meet the demands of your accreditors? Because your dean requires it? To determine which courses address which
outcomes? To develop and scaffold your outcomes up
through your curriculum? To make meaningful connections between:
– ILOs, MLOs, and CLOs– Course learning outcomes and the teaching,
learning and assessment resources devoted to those outcomes
Outcomes for Today Understand several uses of curriculum
mapping Deconstruct several of your MLOs into skill
and content areas Use curricular mapping strategies to connect
MLOs to:– ILOs and CLOs– Teaching, Learning, and Assessment resources
that serve those outcomes
Understand how curriculum mapping can be used to map pedagogical approaches, etc
Deconstructing Outcomes into Discrete Skills and Content Areas
Outcome: Analyze the concepts of power relations, equity, and social justice using examples of each concept in the US society, and other societiesOn your own, imagine yourself an 18 year old
– Identify skills and content areas you would need help with in order to master this
With Colleagues
Describe one of the skills at different levels
100, 200, 300, 400 or… Introductory, developing, mastery Effective curriculum mapping assumes
that we are able to do this– And can help facilitate being able to do it
With a Colleague
Deconstruct at least two of your program’s MLOs into skills and content areas
For two skills– Use the grids towards the back of your handout:
Where in your program is this skill introduced, developed, and mastered
What is going on in a given course to support acquisition of that skill?
Does a faculty lecture on it?– If so, is lecture an effective way to work that skill?
Does the course use images that illustrate the process of that skill
Do students practice it?– In class?– Through assignments?
What is the Basis for Marking That Cell: Guiding Questions?
Do Students Receive Feedback on Development of the Skill?
Once? Twice? I have no clue if or where this skill is
taught…and less understanding how much feedback students receive
What would it take to find out?
Course Title A
Course Title B
Course Title C
Course Title D
100 level x
200 level x x
300 level x x x
400 Level X
Internship X
Co-curriculum x x
Alignment of an MLO With Courses Throughout the Program: MLO 1
Alignment of an Outcome-embedded SkillIn Courses Throughout the Program: Skill___
List the Evidence
Course Title A
Course Title B
Course Title C
Course Title D
100
200
300
400
Aligning MLOs with ILOs
Look back at the two MLOs you deconstructed into skills and knowledge areas
Use the grid at the end of the handout to align those skills and knowledge areas with those that comprise one of our Core Competencies: Critical Thinking
Explanation of issues: Establishes or requires student to consider issue/problem critically, state clearly and describe comprehensively.
Evidence: Establishes or requires students to take information from source(s) with enough interpretation/evaluation to develop a comprehensive analysis or synthesis. Viewpoints of and selection of experts are questioned thoroughly.
Influence of context and assumptions: Establishes or requires students to thoroughly (systematically and methodically) analyze own and others' assumptions and carefully evaluate the relevance of contexts when presenting a position.
Student’s position: Establishes or requires students’ position (perspective, thesis/hypothesis) to be imaginative, taking into account the complexities of an issue. Limits of position (perspective, thesis/hypothesis) are acknowledged. Others' points of view are synthesized within position (perspective, thesis/hypothesis).
Conclusions and related outcomes: Establishes or requires students to develop conclusions and related outcomes (implications and consequences) that are logical and reflect student’s informed evaluation. Requires students to appropriately rank conclusions.
Explanation of issues
Evidence Influence of context and assumptions
Student’s position
Conclusions
MLO skill or content area
MLO skill or content area
MLO skill or content area
Alignment of MLO Skills and Content Areas with Elementsof the Critical Thinking ILO
Things to Keep in Mind Alignment Layers Building faculty intention between and among
the layers Making connections Faculty’s top complaints around students?
– Where do we go first?
Faculty needs versus student needs Curriculum (learner-centered?) Pedagogy (learner-centered?)
More Ways to Use Alignment Grids MLO Skills and Knowledge Areas vs
Pedagogy MLO Skills and Knowledge Areas vs
Cognitive Domain MLO Skills and Knowledge Areas vs
Depth of Learning Experience MLO Skills and Knowledge Areas vs
Brain Engagement
Curriculum vs Pedagogy
Equity
Pow
er Relations
Social Justice
Writing S
kills
Analysis
US
and
other societies
Outcome: Analyze the concepts of power relations, equity, and social justice using examples of each concept in the US society, and other societies.
Pedagogy
Role play power relations x x x x
Discussion on NY Times article x x x x
Guest: Rev Monica Galligan x x
Model analysis-what are the component pieces of an analysis?
Group work on societal norms x x
Lecture-components of an analysis
Are The Pedagogies We Are Using…
Actually facilitating the kinds of learning we want?
Helping our students learn how to analyze, synthesize, and evaluate?
Giving our students practice with these skills?
Aligning Pedagogy with Cognitive Domains
Knowledge Comprehension Application Analysis Synthesis Evaluation
Lecture Discussion Video Debate Role play Modeling Practice Group work Problem solving
Pedagogies vs Cognitive Domains (LO: Perform an Analysis of…) Lecture
– Knowledge: meaning of analysis, component pieces of analysis– Model the process of analysis
Group work– Knowledge and Comprehension: Groups read an analysis, diagram
its component pieces, and discuss the meaning and function of each piece
Practice– Application and Analysis: Homework assignment in which students
conduct their own analysis with an additional piece that illustrates their thinking around how they conducted the analysis
Evaluation– Application and Evaluation: Students apply a rubric to several
sample analyses, discussing the positive and negative attributes of each one
Curriculum vs Brain Engagement
Content: E
quity
Content:
Pow
er R
elations
Content: S
ocial Justice
Content: U
S and O
ther
Analysis
Outcome: Analyze the concepts of power relations, equity, and social justice using examples of each concept in the US society, and other societies. In the grid: descriptions of what faculty are doing (curriculum and pedagogies) to engage these areas
Engage their senses
Motivation-why important to students
Leverage their prior knowledge
Structure for reflection
Pictures and images
Structure for story telling-how are faculty working to help students tell their own stories with their new knowledge?
Aligning Curriculum with Activities, Practice, Assessment
Equity
Pow
er Relations
Social Justice
Writing S
kills
Analysis
US
and
other societies
Outcome: Analyze the concepts of power relations, equity, and social justice using examples of each concept in the US society, and other societies.
Learning Activities
…. x x
Assignments
… x x
Assessment
…. x x
…. x x
Guiding Questions Who is filling in the X’s? Do we have a common understanding of what
the outcomes mean? To what extent are the courses with X’s
genuinely well connected to the outcomes?– How do you work with part time faculty to facilitate
this? Can you see connections between course
skills/content and the course learning outcomes?– And the MLO?...and the ILOs?
Were the program learning outcomes developed at the same time as the programs courses and curriculum?
What Kind of Experiences Will Your Program Facilitate?
Go back to two MLOs you deconstructed earlier
Using what we’ve discussed today, develop three questions or issues you have about how your program facilitates student mastery of these skills or content areas
Back Out of The Weeds
Making connections Coherent curricula-linking institutional
learning outcomes– To major learning outcomes– To course learning outcomes– to what is going on in class
Thanks