CONTENTS: The Building Block Volume 7, Issue 2 February 12, 2016 1 BUZZ OF THE MONTH 2 ARTICLE– A HOLISTIC APPROACH TO SITE SAFETY COMPLIANCE 3 HORROR STORIES 4 SERVICE UPDATES 5 MEET CRSG SANDRA MATTEI 6 RECRUITMENT 7 CRSG NEWS 9 CALENDAR OF EVENTS FEBRUARY 10 CONSTRUCTION & REALTY SERVICES GROUP 68 Whitehall Street Lynbrook, NY 11563 Tel: (516) 256-0317 Fax: (516) 256-0335 307 West 38th Street, Suite 1218 New York, NY 10018 Tel: (212)736-6900 Fax: (212) 736-6910 www.crs-group.com DOB Best Squad, Development Hub New Protocols and Confirmation of Procedures The DOB Best Squad has enacted a new Protocol relating to on site incidents and Stop Work Orders. Currently the new protocol is an internal operating procedure and the DOB as of now has not issued any formal memos or directives. If a Full SWO is issued due to a fatality or major incident/ accident, BEST Squad will either issue a verbal or handwritten, SWO on the spot. Once the SWO is issued they then reach out to the DOB internal attorneys who make the determination as to whether or not involve the District Attorney in relation the incident. If no further action is required, paper violations will be issued (this can take several days and we have seen up to a week) and The Chief of the DOB unit involved will call for a meeting at the DOB BEST Squad office. At said meeting the DOB will likely ask for the most current SSP, any related Design Drawings & written means and methods describing what preventative measures will be put in place to help make sure the incident or something similar does not happen again. After the meeting with the Chief, the next step would be the DOB entering a Partial SWO in place of a full SWO allowing the team to do safety remediation on site. Once this is all done, the next step would be to call for an inspection to lift the SWO. As for the DOB Development Hub, they have begun to strictly enforce internal administrative rules when it comes to their procedures for plan submissions and plan review appointments. The NYC Development HUB is where design professionals electronically submit applications and construction plans to the Department. Their rule is that they will not grant plan review appointment requests until a new set of plans has been uploaded or submitted. In the past it has been common to upload a set just to get an appointment and then the applicant will continue revising the plan set and submit a new one after the appointment has been scheduled. The HUB is putting a stop to this and will only acknowledge the plan submission that was originally made when the appointment time comes. The alternative now is that the appointment will have to be pushed back and rescheduled if a new set of plans is submitted any time after the initial appointment is granted leading to longer lead times on appointments and approvals. In addition the Development HUB is pushing to have less in person appointments and more virtual appointments. They will review in person appointments now on a case by case basis and when an in person plan review appointment is granted they are limiting the number of attendees to three. Virtual appointments allow for more members of a design or development team to be part of the plan review. DOB BULLETINS High– Strength Steel Reinforcing Bars Bulletin 2016-001 This document establishes acceptance criteria for threaded high-strength steel reinforcing bars as alternative materials in the NYC Construction Codes. TPPN 5/99 Bulletin 2016-002 This bulletin rescinds Technical Policy and Procedure Notice (TPPN) 5/99 that is no longer applicable under any code. Grease Duct Enclosure Assemblies Bulletin 2016-003 This document establishes criteria for grease duct enclosure assemblies not prescribed in the Mechanical Code as alternative to the NYC Construction Codes.
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
CONTENTS:
The Building Block Volume 7 , Issue 2
February 12, 2016
1
BUZZ OF THE MONTH 2
ARTICLE– A HOLISTIC
APPROACH TO SITE
SAFETY COMPLIANCE
3
HORROR STORIES 4
SERVICE UPDATES 5
MEET CRSG
SANDRA MATTEI
6
RECRUITMENT 7
CRSG NEWS 9
CALENDAR OF EVENTS
FEBRUARY
10
CONSTRUCTION & REALTY SERVICES GROUP
68 Whitehall Street
Lynbrook, NY 11563
Tel: (516) 256-0317
Fax: (516) 256-0335
307 West 38th Street, Suite 1218
New York, NY 10018
Tel: (212)736-6900
Fax: (212) 736-6910
www.crs-group.com
DOB Best Squad, Development Hub New Protocols and Confirmation of
Procedures
The DOB Best Squad has enacted a new Protocol relating to on site incidents and Stop Work
Orders. Currently the new protocol is an internal operating procedure and the DOB as of now has not
issued any formal memos or directives. If a Full SWO is issued due to a fatality or major incident/
accident, BEST Squad will either issue a verbal or handwritten, SWO on the spot. Once the SWO is
issued they then reach out to the DOB internal attorneys who make the determination as to whether or not
involve the District Attorney in relation the incident. If no further action is required, paper violations will be
issued (this can take several days and we have seen up to a week) and The Chief of the DOB unit
involved will call for a meeting at the DOB BEST Squad office. At said meeting the DOB will likely ask for
the most current SSP, any related Design Drawings & written means and methods describing what
preventative measures will be put in place to help make sure the incident or something similar does not
happen again. After the meeting with the Chief, the next step would be the DOB entering a Partial SWO in
place of a full SWO allowing the team to do safety remediation on site. Once this is all done, the next step
would be to call for an inspection to lift the SWO.
As for the DOB Development Hub, they have begun to strictly enforce internal administrative rules when it
comes to their procedures for plan submissions and plan review appointments. The NYC Development
HUB is where design professionals electronically submit applications and construction plans to the
Department. Their rule is that they will not grant plan review appointment requests until a new set of
plans has been uploaded or submitted. In the past it has been common to upload a set just to get an
appointment and then the applicant will continue revising the plan set and submit a new one after the
appointment has been scheduled. The HUB is putting a stop to this and will only acknowledge the plan
submission that was originally made when the appointment time comes. The alternative now is that the
appointment will have to be pushed back and rescheduled if a new set of plans is submitted any time
after the initial appointment is granted leading to longer lead times on appointments and approvals. In
addition the Development HUB is pushing to have less in person appointments and more virtual
appointments. They will review in person appointments now on a case by case basis and when an in
person plan review appointment is granted they are limiting the number of attendees to three. Virtual
appointments allow for more members of a design or development team to be part of the plan review.
DOB BULLETINS
High– Strength Steel
Reinforcing Bars
Bulletin 2016-001
This document establishes
acceptance criteria for threaded
high-strength steel reinforcing bars
as alternative materials in the NYC
Construction Codes.
TPPN 5/99
Bulletin 2016-002
This bulletin rescinds Technical
Policy and Procedure Notice (TPPN)
5/99 that is no longer applicable
under any code.
Grease Duct Enclosure
Assemblies
Bulletin 2016-003
This document establishes criteria for
grease duct enclosure assemblies
not prescribed in the Mechanical
Code as alternative to the NYC
Construction Codes.
02
BUZZ OF THE MONTH
Word is initial data review yields findings that construction safety
is not affected by collective bargaining but rather job size.
Will new training initiatives by minority organizations for constriction
training break the unionized hold on statewide DOL approved
“apprenticeship” programs?
What will the DOB requirement for the submissions of “framework”
drawing design for concrete jobs?
DID YOU KNOW…?
NYC Buildings newest technology enhancement makes browsing Policy
and Procedure Notices (PPN) simple using a keyword search in a sin-
gle comprehensive database.
The recent reluctance of DOB to entertain CCD1’s and ZRD1’s has put
more on the owner and the design professional to accept a greater
degree of compliance requests.
DOB’s new initiatives/protocols on legal area review of violations on
SWO and DA and DOI review on fatalities have created a severe
“back to work” delay in the industry.
How will the industry deal with the new 2015 Code requirement of
designing for 90mph wind loads for temporary structure?
Alteration 1 work poses its own set of compliance issues depending
upon it occupancy conditions and existing life safety systems.
Construction compliance has to be planned taking into account the
particular and selective demo means portion and the appropriate
regulatory agency approval garnered. The site safety plan and/or
demo means and methods (as part of structural application) become
more complicated and phased for the job and may spin into a myriad
of variances to accommodate the phasing and work of the project.
03
ARTICLES
A HOLISTIC
APPROACH TO
SITE SAFETY
COMPLIANCE
Changes to the OSHA regulations, as well as localities adoption of the international building codes has set up situational
compliance never experienced before by the construction industry. Compliance to these changes require sweeping
modifications in enforcement of construction safety program components.
OSHA’s definition of “controlling contractor” and local codes that have codified and qualified safety representatives on site
have thrust safety to the forefront in construction and made safety elements as important a component of the pre-construction
process as the purchase of concrete or steel.
The explosion of the OCIP and CCIP insurance programs have made safety a benefit-cost to the project, not only centralizing
the cost of insurance so as to get better purchase numbers from the contractors, but as well as getting a benefit to positive job
safety performance which will cause it to be a profit center for the job.
All these items point to the need for our industry to plan for all elements of safety for a project, from the development of the job
site safety plan and program to the designation of the project safety organization (involving both the overall projects and indi-
vidual contractor qualified safety representative). Also, job site training programs for OSHA’s required qualifications for people
working on the job, to orientation programs, to weekly contractor tool box meetings, to accident analysis and lessons
“learned” training becomes the highest of priorities. In addition, plan development has expanded, now requiring logistics for
various phases of construction as well as engineering of safety protection (nets, barricade, perimeter protection). Designing
the use of new perimeter protection based systems (peri, net cocoon, etc.) and development of standard protection details
(guardrails, toe boards, hole protection, job ladders, etc) are also a primary goal.
The administration of the job also now includes daily safety logs, safety recommendation logs, accident reports and analysis,
deficiency notices, fines and backcharge programs as well as contractor report cards and performance assessments, etc.
These elements now call for a “holistic” approach to safety– one where it may be a consideration to engage a single contractor
who will handle the safety completely on the site for all the elements mentioned.
This “single responsibility contract” identifies a one stop presence– where finger pointing doesn’t exist. The contractor–
through the job safety representative– must be responsible for identifying deficiencies and then— if not corrected by the
offending contractor– correcting it with their team and identifying the backcharge. This protection “team” will also be the team
installing the initial protection and performing the routine “maintenance” during the job (although contractors will contractually
be responsible to replace the protection they remove to do their work).
The safety contractor will also be responsible for developing the job site safety program and logistics. The safety contractor is
also responsible for creating the job site safety organization by accepting the required safety representative for each contractor
and establishing that representative as the point person for each contractors safety compliance. The safety contractor would
also be responsible for the review and acceptance of all contractors safety plans and the development of the contractor safety
plan requirement that will be incorporated into each contract. The job safety representative will also be responsible for
monitoring performance with permit requirements both from a governmental and job site (hot work, etc.) perspective.
Also incorporated into the safety program the job site safety representative and its Professional Engineer (P.E.) will develop an
engineered protection program– showing protection details and location of these elements that will be installed by the safety
protection crew.
On a daily basis the job safety representative of the safety contractor will conduct inspection of compliance, identify deficien-
cies and safety recommendations and issue fines for non compliant activities. The safety representative will also make sure
that the contractors are performing their weekly tool box/training requirements as well as all paperwork requirements. The
safety representative will conduct weekly safety meetings with contractor safety representatives as well as monthly owner/job
safety steering committee meeting where accident/incident and contractor performance will be reviewed.
The owner/CM/GM should evaluate this concept of a single source, holistic, construction safety contractor and evaluate it as a
“line item” cost– one outside of general conditions and guided by a separate contract.
The potential for fines, work stoppages and accidents as well as the cost benefit associated with successful OCIP/CCIP
insurance programs would more than pay for these changes in culture and will eliminate cloudy responsibilities, finger pointing
and non compliance.
Inspection Ready is a disaster. The system that was designed to speed up inspection scheduling and make results quicker than before is still causing huge issues in each borough for different types of inspections. There was an inspection during the last week of January where the inspector advised me 9 of 10 objections would be removed and I would receive the results by the end of the day. Needless to say, 3 days later I receive the results and half of the objections still remain. I went to the borough to have the objections removed and met with the Construction chief. After providing him with supporting documents to remove the objections, he removed the objections in the system. Not trusting the Inspection Ready program, I logged into my Inspection Ready account to make sure the objections were removed before I left and my suspicions were proven true. The objections remained in the system and actually listed 1 additional objection that was not there before. When I went back to see the chief, I showed him what I was looking at on my Ipad and he showed me what was on his computer. Both my account and DOB’s account are supposed to show identical information but showed completely different info. When I asked what the problem was, I was given a number for Inspection Ready and was told that it was a computer glitch that Inspection Ready would have to fix. I called the number
and was told they will look into it but it could take a few weeks.
06
HORROR STORIES
Inside Scoop
From Domani
Expediters
I recently met with the construction chief in the Department to obtain an in-house construction sign off where I submitted an R.A. affidavit and photos to comply with several outstanding construction objections. The chief approved the temp. sign off update and was even receptive to my request to have the entry into the required items expedited so I could have my TCO renewed since it was already expired. I watched him hand his report to one of the secretaries and he told me it would be in the system by that afternoon. Sure enough, it was not. First thing the next morning I called the construction
counter and was told the following by a clerk.
1. “Regardless of what he said, the reports get entered in the order that they were received”.
2. You have to be patient.”
3. And When I asked to speak to him directly – he was on the phone and it would do any good to call back and try and speak to him because it wouldn’t change anything.
DOB staff- at their best!
Currently a C of O for one of our malls has lapsed. The Department of Buildings has reused the renewal of the entire building because of some open permits which exist on the BIN for the building. They are an open PA and FA permit for a tenant which no longer exists at the mall. The Department has been informed that these permits are to be withdrawn, we are waiting for the current tenant to simply sign off their open permits in order to get the withdraw approved. This is a requirement of the building department. However as long as the permits are open, they will not issue TCO. This catch twenty two of sorts, has been caused by the Department of Buildings . And they have offered no solution to it. I proposed approval of a withdrawal inspection for the applications and was denied. I proposed renewal of all spaces excluding this one and was told that they will not do it. Until the applications are closed, they refuse to renew TCO or to approve
withdrawal. This is even though they know for certain that the permits are invalid.
The DOT has a new policy where every time you update a general contractors general liability insurance you must submit a new permittee registration application. This permittee registration application used to be a one time submission to state who the contractor is and who has permission to pull permits under their name. Now, for whatever reason they are requiring us to submit a new permittee application every single time the general liability insurance is updated. This typically happens yearly. You can ONLY submit this when updating the insurance. Lets say you've hired someone and you want to put their name on the form to pull permits, you will not be allowed to submit the permittee application until you need to update insurance. Ridiculous, right? About 99% of the time the information on this application does not change. This has been difficult for us when asking contractors to fill out, sign and notarize a new application because they've already done it and don't understand why it needs to be done again. It has just become one more step to slow
down the process of updating insurance prior to permit expiration.