Top Banner
Feasibility of a LNG Pipeline in Alaska ENGL 212: Technical Writing William Columbus
12

Feasibility of a LNG Pipeline in Alaska

Jan 17, 2016

Download

Documents

wyome

Feasibility of a LNG Pipeline in Alaska. ENGL 212: Technical Writing William Columbus. OVERVIEW. -INTRODUCTION -CRITERIA -METHODS -RESULTS -CONCLUSIONS -RECOMMENDATIONS. INTRODUCTION. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Feasibility of a LNG Pipeline in Alaska

Feasibility of a LNG Pipeline in Alaska

ENGL 212: Technical WritingWilliam Columbus

Page 2: Feasibility of a LNG Pipeline in Alaska

OVERVIEW

-INTRODUCTION-CRITERIA-METHODS-RESULTS-CONCLUSIONS-RECOMMENDATIONS

Page 3: Feasibility of a LNG Pipeline in Alaska

INTRODUCTION

• Examined the feasibility of building a Liquid Natural Gas Pipeline from the North Slope to Anchorage, because the state of Alaska is wasting billions of dollars in natural resources by not bringing natural gas, a byproduct from oil drilling, to market.

• Creating a LNG pipeline is one of the best ways to transport this natural resource from the North Slope to communities that have need of energy, as well as bringing in billions of dollars of revenue and jobs to the state of Alaska.

Page 4: Feasibility of a LNG Pipeline in Alaska

Criteria for Feasibility

• Do the economic benefits outweigh the financial cost of building a LNG pipeline?

• Does the project impact the environment negatively?

• How does the student sample population feel about the project?

Page 5: Feasibility of a LNG Pipeline in Alaska

Methods

• Began research into the financial cost of the pipeline by researching reports done by federal government agencies such as:– U.S. Energy Information Administration – U.S. Geological Survey – Office of the Federal Coordinator

Page 6: Feasibility of a LNG Pipeline in Alaska

Methods

• Researched whether a LNG pipeline would have an adverse environmental impact through reports by:– U.S. Environmental Protection Agency– University of Michigan

Page 7: Feasibility of a LNG Pipeline in Alaska

Methods

• Polled student sample population with an online questionnaire to determine feelings towards the pipeline given different variables such as:– Job Production– Tax Reduction– Environmental Impact– State Financial Burdens

Page 8: Feasibility of a LNG Pipeline in Alaska

Research Results

• Initial Financial Cost – $45 Billion to build pipeline & infrastructure

• Estimated Field Size– 256 Trillion Cubic Feet

• Total estimated profit– $3,421,240,000,000

Page 9: Feasibility of a LNG Pipeline in Alaska

Results

• Environmental Impact– Minimal environmental detriment. Follows same

route as current crude oil pipeline.– The added availability of LNG will increase use of

LNG over other less clean burning fuels (coal, oil, diesel, etc.), actually helping emission levels in the state

Page 10: Feasibility of a LNG Pipeline in Alaska

Results• The majority of the

sample population supports a LNG pipeline and believes it will:– Improve Alaska’s

economy– Might lower taxes– Won’t harm the

environment

Yes69%

No6%

Need More Info25%

A LNG Pipeline Will Improve Alaska's Economy

YesNoNeed More Info

Yes No Undecided02468

101214 13

0

3

Support For A LNG Pipeline If The Proceeds Go Towards Lowering

Taxes

Support For LNG Pipeline

Popu

latio

n Si

ze

Page 11: Feasibility of a LNG Pipeline in Alaska

Conclusion

• It appears from the primary research questionnaire that the majority of the students polled would be in favor of a LNG pipeline being built in Alaska. From this sample population we can conclude that most Alaskans would also be in favor of implementing such a project.

Page 12: Feasibility of a LNG Pipeline in Alaska

Recommendations

• Recommendation is that the project be implemented immediately, so that Alaska and Alaskans can begin to harvest this vast unused natural resource, bringing billions in revenue into the state.