Fault analysis of reservoir intervals in the Maui Field New Zealand Petroleum Geoscience Workshop September 2017 Hannu Seebeck Glenn Thrasher Susanna Willan Waikawau Normal fault ~30 m disp. Mid Miocene siltstones
Fault analysis of reservoir intervals in the Maui FieldNew Zealand Petroleum Geoscience Workshop September 2017
Hannu Seebeck Glenn ThrasherSusanna Willan
WaikawauNormal fault ~30 m disp.Mid Miocene siltstones
GNS ScienceNZ Petroleum Geoscience workshop, 28-29 September 2017
IntroductionInitial investigations for the development of
the Maui structure
Iteration 1 Structural Model19 horizons mapped and gridded at
500 m x 500 m resolution
13 proportional slices representing key intervals gridded at 500 x 500 m
Seamless fault and horizon model
Triangulated-surface model calculated at500 m x 500 m resolution
Depth converted Isopach Maui16Seafloor-Top Mangahewa0 MaRed = thickBlue = thin
Iteration 1
Iteration 2
GNS ScienceNZ Petroleum Geoscience workshop, 28-29 September 2017
Isopach 4DTM. Miocene –Top Mangahewa11 MaRed = thickBlue = thin
Isopach 4DTL. Miocene –Top Mangahewa7.2-5.3 MaRed = thickBlue = thin
GNS ScienceNZ Petroleum Geoscience workshop, 28-29 September 2017
IsopachL. Miocene-Top Mangahewa7.2-5.3 Ma
IsopachMiocene foreset-Top Mangahewa9 Ma
Isopach Iteration 1M. Miocene-Top Mangahewa11 Ma
GNS ScienceNZ Petroleum Geoscience workshop, 28-29 September 2017
Hypothesis
How has uplift under the shelf been accommodated?
Why is this important?Any hydrocarbons migrating from the
East Maui Basin at this time were potentially flowing through this structure
towards the north
IsopachL. Miocene-Top Mangahewa
7.2-5.3 Ma
Shelf Break
Shelf Break
Thinning under shelf
Thinning under slope
Uplift
Possibility of significant L. Miocene compressional folding
IL Seismic sectionPGS Megasurvey
GNS ScienceNZ Petroleum Geoscience workshop, 28-29 September 2017
IsopachL. Miocene-Top Mangahewa
7.2-5.3 Ma
PGS MegasurveySeismic amplitude TWTT
2
3Seconds
Two-way travel time
2 km
GNS ScienceNZ Petroleum Geoscience workshop, 28-29 September 2017
IsopachL. Miocene-Top Mangahewa
7.2-5.3 Ma
PGS MegasurveySeismic amplitude TWTT3D triangular surface model500 x 500 m
3D model
3
2
1
SecondsTwo-way
travel time
4 km
GNS ScienceNZ Petroleum Geoscience workshop, 28-29 September 2017
Fault analysisMOVE™ 2017.2 Midland Valley
Fault displacement profile along sectioned fault
3D Fault triangulated surfaces with displacement magnitudeMax. displacement 110 m red arrow
Max. displacement
Max. displacement
GNS ScienceNZ Petroleum Geoscience workshop, 28-29 September 2017
Decompaction + fault restoration to M. Miocene (~11 Ma)
Restoration of elliptical fault displacement (3-3.6 Ma)
Fault restoration + decompactionMOVE™ 2017.2 Midland Valley
Elliptical fault displacement Forward model
Structural model
GNS ScienceNZ Petroleum Geoscience workshop, 28-29 September 2017
Summary and next stepsFaults bounding Maui reservoirs result from reversal of regional strain from compression to extension resulting in collapse of incipient folding across Maui high
Low angle basement fault(s) reverse motion initiated folding in cover sequence
Reactivation and/or development of basement faults important for late stage normal fault nucleation trends
Different restoration strategies influence tectonic interpretation
Upon completion of Iteration 2 model build:
Restoration of Cape Egmont and Maari faults
Erosion estimates
3D decompaction
WaikawauNormal fault 2 m disp.Mid Miocene siltstones
GNS ScienceNZ Petroleum Geoscience workshop, 28-29 September 2017
Acknowledgements
Andy Nicol (UC)John Walsh (UCD)
This project is funded by the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment through the GNS Science-led research programme on New Zealand petroleum source rocks, fluids, and plumbing systems (contract C05X1507)
For further information please contact:[email protected]
3D fault surfaces Mid Miocene siltstones