Top Banner
Farm Energy Assessments Kick-Off Meeting September 18, 2009 Carolyn Roos, PhD Washington State University, Energy Program [email protected] Appendix: Background on RELCOST Results
42

Farm Energy Assessments Kick-Off Meeting September 18, 2009 Carolyn Roos, PhD Washington State University, Energy Program [email protected] Appendix:

Mar 27, 2015

Download

Documents

Kaitlyn Chase
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Farm Energy Assessments Kick-Off Meeting September 18, 2009 Carolyn Roos, PhD Washington State University, Energy Program roosc@energy.wsu.edu Appendix:

Farm Energy Assessments

Kick-Off Meeting

September 18, 2009

Carolyn Roos, PhD

Washington State University, Energy Program

[email protected]

Appendix:Background on

RELCOST Results

Page 2: Farm Energy Assessments Kick-Off Meeting September 18, 2009 Carolyn Roos, PhD Washington State University, Energy Program roosc@energy.wsu.edu Appendix:

Results• Pro Forma Statements

Cash Flow Use of Funds Income Statement Balance Sheet

• Financial Ratios

• Levelized Costs

• Life Cycle Cost Analysis Net Present Value Internal Rate of Return BC Ratio Discounted Payback

Pro Formas

Page 3: Farm Energy Assessments Kick-Off Meeting September 18, 2009 Carolyn Roos, PhD Washington State University, Energy Program roosc@energy.wsu.edu Appendix:

What Are Pro-Formas?

• Pro formas are standard financial statements commonly used by investors for valuation, risk evaluation, and investment purposes.

• They provide insight into how project will generate income a firm’s ability to repay debt, cash flow and cash available to provide equity investors a return

Page 4: Farm Energy Assessments Kick-Off Meeting September 18, 2009 Carolyn Roos, PhD Washington State University, Energy Program roosc@energy.wsu.edu Appendix:

Are they important?

Examples of the importance placed on pro formas by financial professionals.

• The Financial Accounting Standards Board standards require firms to prepare and report a statement of cash flow.

• Lenders often will not fund a project without cash flow statement because it demonstrates a company’s ability to meet its obligations and finance operations.

Page 5: Farm Energy Assessments Kick-Off Meeting September 18, 2009 Carolyn Roos, PhD Washington State University, Energy Program roosc@energy.wsu.edu Appendix:

Reports - Pro Forma Statements• Cash flow statement

• Shows how the project makes a profit for each project year

• Income Statement• Shows the project’s financial performance for each project year

• Balance Sheet• Shows the project’s financial position for each project year

• Use of Funds Statement• Shows how fund sources are used for each project year

Using reports: Gain understanding of modeled results Supporting data for project proposals Project prioritization, funding decision support

Pro Formas

Page 6: Farm Energy Assessments Kick-Off Meeting September 18, 2009 Carolyn Roos, PhD Washington State University, Energy Program roosc@energy.wsu.edu Appendix:

Cash Flow StatementHow the project makes a profit

Inflows & Outflows

• Operations

• Financing Activities

Pro Formas

Page 7: Farm Energy Assessments Kick-Off Meeting September 18, 2009 Carolyn Roos, PhD Washington State University, Energy Program roosc@energy.wsu.edu Appendix:

Interpreting a Cash Flow Statement• Positive cash flow is desirable.• Even healthy businesses can have a negative net cash

flow in, for example, a year of high capital expenditures. • A repeated negative net cash flow over a number of

years is usually an indication of trouble. • Negative cash balances indicate the project is

underfunded, has too little revenue or expenses are too high. • Cash flows that are very inconsistent with net profit can

indicate operating or managerial problems.

Page 8: Farm Energy Assessments Kick-Off Meeting September 18, 2009 Carolyn Roos, PhD Washington State University, Energy Program roosc@energy.wsu.edu Appendix:

Income StatementProject’s Financial Performance

Gross Income Earnings before interest and taxes Net profit before taxes Net profit after taxes Retained Earnings

Pro Formas

Page 9: Farm Energy Assessments Kick-Off Meeting September 18, 2009 Carolyn Roos, PhD Washington State University, Energy Program roosc@energy.wsu.edu Appendix:

Interpreting an Income Statement

Income Statements:

• Reports flows of revenues and expenses incurred to produce and finance operations.

• Not based on when cash is actually received or spent, but when the obligation to pay is incurred or a contract is settled. So an income statement does not provide an explanation of the

cash flows.

Page 10: Farm Energy Assessments Kick-Off Meeting September 18, 2009 Carolyn Roos, PhD Washington State University, Energy Program roosc@energy.wsu.edu Appendix:

Balance SheetProject’s Financial Position

• The Balance Assets =Liabilities

Pro Formas

Page 11: Farm Energy Assessments Kick-Off Meeting September 18, 2009 Carolyn Roos, PhD Washington State University, Energy Program roosc@energy.wsu.edu Appendix:

Interpreting a Balance Sheet

• Having positive assets on a balance sheet is good.

• Negative assets indicates trouble unless it is being supported by some other party, such as a

parent company.

• Negative current assets (as opposed to long-term assets) indicates the business may have difficulty meeting its short-term liabilities.

Page 12: Farm Energy Assessments Kick-Off Meeting September 18, 2009 Carolyn Roos, PhD Washington State University, Energy Program roosc@energy.wsu.edu Appendix:

Use of Funds StatementHow Fund Sources Are Used

• Sources of funds

• Uses of funds

Pro Formas

Page 13: Farm Energy Assessments Kick-Off Meeting September 18, 2009 Carolyn Roos, PhD Washington State University, Energy Program roosc@energy.wsu.edu Appendix:

Using a Use of Funds Statement

• The Use of Funds statement provides a summary of sources of funds and how they are used. Provides insight into operations and expenditures

• As a check, sources and uses must balance.

Page 14: Farm Energy Assessments Kick-Off Meeting September 18, 2009 Carolyn Roos, PhD Washington State University, Energy Program roosc@energy.wsu.edu Appendix:

Life Cycle Cost Analysis

• A method for assessing the total cost of facility ownership.

• Takes into account all costs of acquiring, owning, and disposing of the project.

• Used by utilities, governments, investment bankers and developers. But does not substitute for pro formas

• Life cycle cost analysis results include Net present value, Internal rate of return, Benefit-cost ratio. Discounted and simple pay back period.

Page 15: Farm Energy Assessments Kick-Off Meeting September 18, 2009 Carolyn Roos, PhD Washington State University, Energy Program roosc@energy.wsu.edu Appendix:

Net Present Value

• NPV is an investment’s benefits minus costs summed over the life of the project.

• Only projects with positive NPVs should be considered (as a minimum) Quite a bit greater than zero is typically required.

• A valuable indicator because it recognizes the time value of money.Therefore, its result is only as reliable as the discount rate that is chosen. Be sure that the discount rate accurately reflects the cost of capital and the risk of

the project.

Page 16: Farm Energy Assessments Kick-Off Meeting September 18, 2009 Carolyn Roos, PhD Washington State University, Energy Program roosc@energy.wsu.edu Appendix:

Internal Rate of Return• The Project IRR represents the return on capital expenditures minus

grants. • The Equity IRR is the return on equity investments.

• The minimally acceptable IRR is often called the hurdle rate. A company’s hurdle rate is normally the discount rate used in considering

investment alternatives.

• Because the IRR is a percentage – rather than an absolute value like the NPV – it can be used to compare projects of different sizes.

• Often preferred in situations where a project produces negative cash flow (outflows) in the beginning, followed by positive cash flow (inflows) in later years.

• Small, high-growth companies and private businesses are more likely to use the IRR, while larger, public companies are more likely to use the NPV.

Page 17: Farm Energy Assessments Kick-Off Meeting September 18, 2009 Carolyn Roos, PhD Washington State University, Energy Program roosc@energy.wsu.edu Appendix:

Benefit-Cost Ratio

• The BC ratio is the sum of the present value of the benefits from an investment over the life of the project divided by the sum of the present value of the costs of the investment.

• Only projects with BC ratio greater than 1 (as a minimum) should be considered. Usually much greater than 1 is required.

Page 18: Farm Energy Assessments Kick-Off Meeting September 18, 2009 Carolyn Roos, PhD Washington State University, Energy Program roosc@energy.wsu.edu Appendix:

Payback• Payback period is the time required for cumulative cash inflows to

recover the cash outflows of a project. • • Simple payback is the period required for an energy investment to pay for

itself through first-year energy cost savings.

• Simple payback ignores the time value of money.

• Discounted payback is similar to simple payback, but it is calculated using discounted cash flows.

• The discounted payback is also the time at which the BC ratio equals one and the NPV equals zero. In other words, discounted payback is the time required for the project’s

benefits to equal its initial costs.

Page 19: Farm Energy Assessments Kick-Off Meeting September 18, 2009 Carolyn Roos, PhD Washington State University, Energy Program roosc@energy.wsu.edu Appendix:

Financial Ratios

• Indicators of financial performance in each year.

• Ratios include profitability margins liquidity measures cash flow ratios leverage ratios

Financial Ratios

Page 20: Farm Energy Assessments Kick-Off Meeting September 18, 2009 Carolyn Roos, PhD Washington State University, Energy Program roosc@energy.wsu.edu Appendix:

Profitability Margins

• Earnings expressed as ratio or percentage of sales.

• Give investors insight into management efficiency.

• Percentage rather than an absolute number allows investors to compare the profitability of different companies

of various sizes.

• Profit margins can vary significantly between industries so comparisons made only with similar companies.

Financial Ratios

Page 21: Farm Energy Assessments Kick-Off Meeting September 18, 2009 Carolyn Roos, PhD Washington State University, Energy Program roosc@energy.wsu.edu Appendix:

Gross Margin

• Shows how efficiently a firm uses material and labor.

• Varies. Example: Airline industry gas 5% gross Software industry has has 90%.

Gross Profit Margin = (Sales - Cost of Sales) / Sales

Financial Ratios

Page 22: Farm Energy Assessments Kick-Off Meeting September 18, 2009 Carolyn Roos, PhD Washington State University, Energy Program roosc@energy.wsu.edu Appendix:

Operating Margin • Shows how successful projects generates income from

operation.

• High operating profits mean the company has effective control of costs, or sales are increasing faster than operating costs.

• Accounts for not only costs of materials and labor (like gross margin), but also administration and selling costs

• Operating Profit Margin = EBIT / Sales

Financial Ratios

Page 23: Farm Energy Assessments Kick-Off Meeting September 18, 2009 Carolyn Roos, PhD Washington State University, Energy Program roosc@energy.wsu.edu Appendix:

Pre-Tax and After-Tax Margins

• Used to evaluate the relationship between operating income and revenues.

• After-tax profit margin is % of money actually earned per $ of sales.

• After-tax profit margin most stringent of margins because it takes all costs and taxes into account.

• Pre-tax Margin= Net Profit Before Taxes /Sales

• After-tax Margin= Net Profit After Taxes /Sales

Financial Ratios

Page 24: Farm Energy Assessments Kick-Off Meeting September 18, 2009 Carolyn Roos, PhD Washington State University, Energy Program roosc@energy.wsu.edu Appendix:

Liquidity Measures

• Indicate how quickly an asset can be converted into cash without incurring a substantial loss.

• Include current ratio acid-test ratio (aka quick ratio).

Financial Ratios

Page 25: Farm Energy Assessments Kick-Off Meeting September 18, 2009 Carolyn Roos, PhD Washington State University, Energy Program roosc@energy.wsu.edu Appendix:

Current Ratio

• Relationship between current assets and current liabilities.

• Roughly indicates the margin of safety available to a firm to meet short-term liabilities.

• Current Ratio = Current Assets / Current Liabilities

Financial Ratios

Page 26: Farm Energy Assessments Kick-Off Meeting September 18, 2009 Carolyn Roos, PhD Washington State University, Energy Program roosc@energy.wsu.edu Appendix:

Acid-Test Ratio

• Indicates whether a firm could meet its creditor obligations if sales were to drop catastrophically.

• Similar to the current ratio except does not include stocks

Acid-Test Ratio =

= (Current Assets – Stocks ) / Current Liabilities

Financial Ratios

Page 27: Farm Energy Assessments Kick-Off Meeting September 18, 2009 Carolyn Roos, PhD Washington State University, Energy Program roosc@energy.wsu.edu Appendix:

Cash Flow Ratios

• Cash flow ratios can be useful in determining the adequacy of cash and cash equivalents.

Financial Ratios

Page 28: Farm Energy Assessments Kick-Off Meeting September 18, 2009 Carolyn Roos, PhD Washington State University, Energy Program roosc@energy.wsu.edu Appendix:

Debt-Service Coverage Ratio

• The debt-service coverage ratio indicates the amount of cash flow available to meet annual interest and principal payments on debt. A ratio less than 1 would mean a negative cash flow. A ratio of less than 1, say 0.95, would mean that there is only enough net operating income to cover 95% of annual debt payments.

Financial Ratios

Page 29: Farm Energy Assessments Kick-Off Meeting September 18, 2009 Carolyn Roos, PhD Washington State University, Energy Program roosc@energy.wsu.edu Appendix:

Other Cash Flow Ratios

• Other cash flow ratios not currently included in RELCOST, but which could be incorporated, are • Cash Flow Solvency = Cash Flow from Operations/ Total

Liabilities• Cash Flow Margin = Cash Flow from Operations/ Sales • Cash Flow Return on Assets =Cash Flow from Operations/

Total Assets

Financial Ratios

Page 30: Farm Energy Assessments Kick-Off Meeting September 18, 2009 Carolyn Roos, PhD Washington State University, Energy Program roosc@energy.wsu.edu Appendix:

Leverage Ratios

• Financial leverage relates to the practice of using debt to finance investments. An unlevered firm does its financing by issuing common stock and has no debt on its books. A levered firm finances part of its operation with debt.

• Debt-to-Equity Ratio • Debt Ratio • Equity Ratio • Debt-Asset Ratio • Interest Coverage Ratio

Financial Ratios

Page 31: Farm Energy Assessments Kick-Off Meeting September 18, 2009 Carolyn Roos, PhD Washington State University, Energy Program roosc@energy.wsu.edu Appendix:

Leverage Ratios

• Debt to pay interest & principal sometime in the future.

• “Debt Leveraging” can be advantageous where interest is a tax-deductible expense

More of the operating income flows through to investors.

• However, the more debt a firm has in its capital structure, the greater the financial risk.

Financial Ratios

Page 32: Farm Energy Assessments Kick-Off Meeting September 18, 2009 Carolyn Roos, PhD Washington State University, Energy Program roosc@energy.wsu.edu Appendix:

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

• Sum of long-term debt divided by equity.

• Acceptable ratios vary: Electric utilities have steady inflows of receipts

can safely afford to have high D/E ratios Cyclical companies usually have lower ones.

• Debt-to-Equity Ratio = Total Liabilities / Equity Investments

Financial Ratios

Page 33: Farm Energy Assessments Kick-Off Meeting September 18, 2009 Carolyn Roos, PhD Washington State University, Energy Program roosc@energy.wsu.edu Appendix:

Debt Ratio

• Ratio of total liabilities to total assets.

• Greater the debt ratio, the greater the financial leverage.

• A high ratio tends to magnify earnings and a low ratio could mean inefficient use of debt.

• Debt Ratio = Debt-to-Equity Ratio / (Debt-to-Equity Ratio +1)

Financial Ratios

Page 34: Farm Energy Assessments Kick-Off Meeting September 18, 2009 Carolyn Roos, PhD Washington State University, Energy Program roosc@energy.wsu.edu Appendix:

Equity Ratio

• Proportion of the total assets financed by stockholders rather than creditors.

• Low equity ratio will produce good results for stockholders as long as the company earns a rate of return on equity that is greater than the interest rate paid to creditors.

Equity Ratio = 1 / (Debt-to-Equity Ratio +1)

Financial Ratios

Page 35: Farm Energy Assessments Kick-Off Meeting September 18, 2009 Carolyn Roos, PhD Washington State University, Energy Program roosc@energy.wsu.edu Appendix:

Debt-Asset Ratio

• Indicates proportion of the company's assets being financed through debt.

• Ratio less than 1 means a majority of assets are financed through equity,

• Ratio greater than 1 means they are financed more by debt.

• A high ratio indicates a "highly debt leveraged firm".

Debt-Asset Ratio = Total liabilities / Total Assets

Financial Ratios

Page 36: Farm Energy Assessments Kick-Off Meeting September 18, 2009 Carolyn Roos, PhD Washington State University, Energy Program roosc@energy.wsu.edu Appendix:

Interest Coverage Ratio

• How easily a company can pay interest on outstanding debt.

• Lower the ratio, the more the greater the burden by debt expense.

• Ratio 1.5 or lower: ability to meet interest expenses may be questionable.

• Below 1 indicates not generating sufficient revenues to satisfy interest expenses.

• Interest Coverage Ratio = EBIT / Interest Expenses

Financial Ratios

Page 37: Farm Energy Assessments Kick-Off Meeting September 18, 2009 Carolyn Roos, PhD Washington State University, Energy Program roosc@energy.wsu.edu Appendix:

Financial Ratios

Page 38: Farm Energy Assessments Kick-Off Meeting September 18, 2009 Carolyn Roos, PhD Washington State University, Energy Program roosc@energy.wsu.edu Appendix:

Levelized Costs

• Annualized total cost divided by annual quantity produced. For example, for electricity units are $ per kW

• Often used by energy policy analysts & project evaluators to develop first-order assessments of a project’s attractiveness to compare alternate technologies.

Levelized Costs

Page 39: Farm Energy Assessments Kick-Off Meeting September 18, 2009 Carolyn Roos, PhD Washington State University, Energy Program roosc@energy.wsu.edu Appendix:

Levelized Costs

• All costs associated with producing the product fuel, operations, capital

• Can be used for all types of products Electricity, heat sales, co-products

Levelized Costs

Page 40: Farm Energy Assessments Kick-Off Meeting September 18, 2009 Carolyn Roos, PhD Washington State University, Energy Program roosc@energy.wsu.edu Appendix:

Levelized Costs

• Levelized costs of other revenue sources can be treated similarly, as a cost per units produced.

• Examples: Fiber sales for the case of an anaerobic digester, Mineral extraction from geothermal project

Units of $ per ton

Levelized Costs

Page 41: Farm Energy Assessments Kick-Off Meeting September 18, 2009 Carolyn Roos, PhD Washington State University, Energy Program roosc@energy.wsu.edu Appendix:

Levelized Costs

• Levelized Cost

= Present Value of Cumulative Total Costs

* Cost Allocation Factor

* Annualized Payment Factor

/ Cumulative Units Produced

Levelized Costs

Page 42: Farm Energy Assessments Kick-Off Meeting September 18, 2009 Carolyn Roos, PhD Washington State University, Energy Program roosc@energy.wsu.edu Appendix:

Levelized Costs

Levelized Costs