faridabadCDP

Jawaharlal Nehru National Urban Renewal Mission

City
FARIDABAD Development Plan 2006-2012
Technical Assistance by

October 2006

City Development Plan Municipal Corporation of Faridabad

CONTENTS 1 PROJECT BACKGROUND.......................................................................................................................... 1

1.1 BACKGROUND........................................................................................................................................ 1 1.2 OBJECTIVES OF A CITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN........................................................................................ 2 1.3 THE CDP PROCESS ADOPTED BY FARIDABAD ....................................................................................... 3

2 FARIDABAD CITY AND ITS ECONOMY................................................................................................. 6 2.1 ABOUT FARIDABAD ............................................................................................................................... 6 2.2 GEOGRAPHY AND GEOLOGY .................................................................................................................. 6 2.3 CLIMATE AND RAINFALL ....................................................................................................................... 7 2.4 LINKAGES AND CONNECTIVITY.............................................................................................................. 7 2.5 PLACES OF IMPORTANCE........................................................................................................................ 8 2.6 FARIDABAD IN NCR............................................................................................................................... 9 2.7 ECONOMY .............................................................................................................................................. 9

2.7.1 Economic base ........................................................................................................................ 9 2.7.2 NCR proposals for economic development ........................................................................... 11 2.7.3 Major issues pertaining to industrial growth of Faridabad.................................................. 12

2.8 INSTITUTIONAL MECHANISM ............................................................................................................... 13 2.8.1 Municipal Corporation of Faridabad (MCF) ....................................................................... 13 2.8.2 Haryana Urban Development Authority (HUDA) ................................................................ 15 2.8.3 Town & Country Planning Department, Govt. of Haryana .................................................. 16 2.8.4 Major issues pertaining to Institutional Mechanism in Faridabad....................................... 16

3 FORMULATION OF VISION AND MISSION ........................................................................................ 18 3.1 APPROACH TO FORMULATING A VISION FOR FARIDABAD UNDER CDP................................................ 18 3.2 STAKEHOLDERS CONSULTATIONS – THE PROCESS AND OUTCOME...................................................... 18 3.3 VISION FOR FARIDABAD....................................................................................................................... 23

3.3.1 Important Aspects that Defined Faridabad’s Vision............................................................. 23 3.3.2 Vision Statement.................................................................................................................... 23 3.3.3 Mission Statement ................................................................................................................. 24

3.4 FARIDABAD TOMORROW...................................................................................................................... 25 4 CITY ASSESSMENT – SITUATION ANALYSIS .................................................................................... 26

4.1 GROWTH TRENDS................................................................................................................................. 26 4.1.1 Demography.......................................................................................................................... 26 4.1.2 Municipal Area and Population Density............................................................................... 26 4.1.3 Sex Ratio and Literacy .......................................................................................................... 27 4.1.4 Population Projection ........................................................................................................... 28

4.2 LAND USE............................................................................................................................................. 28 4.2.1 Urbanisable Land – Proposed Land use............................................................................... 29 4.2.2 Implementation of Development Plan ................................................................................... 33 4.2.3 Developed area vis-à-vis Urbanisable Land......................................................................... 34 4.2.4 Key issues, potential and challenges regarding land use...................................................... 34

4.3 URBAN ENVIRONMENT ........................................................................................................................ 35 4.3.1 Air Pollution.......................................................................................................................... 35 4.3.2 Water Pollution ..................................................................................................................... 37 4.3.3 Key issues regarding urban environment.............................................................................. 38

4.4 URBAN POOR AND SLUMS IN FARIDABAD ............................................................................................ 38 4.4.1 Poverty in Faridabad ............................................................................................................ 38 4.4.2 Slums in Faridabad............................................................................................................... 39 4.4.3 Key issues regarding Slums and Urban poor........................................................................ 40

4.5 MUNICIPAL SERVICES – ROADS, STREET LIGHTING, AND TRANSPORTATION....................................... 41 4.5.1 Road Network........................................................................................................................ 41 4.5.2 Street lighting........................................................................................................................ 42 4.5.3 Urban Transport ................................................................................................................... 43 4.5.4 Issues, Potential and Challenges in roads, street lighting and transport sectors ................. 46

ii


4.6 MUNICIPAL SERVICES – WATER SUPPLY.............................................................................................. 47 4.6.1 Source of Water Supply......................................................................................................... 47 4.6.2 Treatment facilities ............................................................................................................... 48 4.6.3 Storage and Distribution System........................................................................................... 48 4.6.4 House Service Connections, user charges and cost recovery ............................................... 50 4.6.5 Service Levels........................................................................................................................ 52 4.6.6 Issues, Potential and Challenges in water supply sector ...................................................... 52

4.7 MUNICIPAL SERVICES – SEWERAGE..................................................................................................... 53 4.7.1 Existing Sewerage System ..................................................................................................... 55 4.7.2 YAP ....................................................................................................................................... 55 4.7.3 Issues related to Sewerage system ........................................................................................ 56

4.8 MUNICIPAL SERVICES – STORM WATER DRAINAGE ............................................................................ 57 4.8.1 Issues related to Storm water drains..................................................................................... 57

4.9 MUNICIPAL SERVICES – SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT........................................................................ 58 4.9.1 Quantum of Solid Waste Generation..................................................................................... 58 4.9.2 Collection of Solid Waste ...................................................................................................... 58 4.9.3 Waste Transportation & Disposal......................................................................................... 58 4.9.4 Issues, potential and challenges in Solid Waste Management .............................................. 59

4.10 SOCIAL INFRASTRUCTURE.................................................................................................................... 60 4.10.1 Fire Services ......................................................................................................................... 60 4.10.2 Recreation, Gardens and Parks ............................................................................................ 61 4.10.3 Health facilities ..................................................................................................................... 62 4.10.4 Educational facilities ............................................................................................................ 62

4.11 MUNICIPAL FINANCES.......................................................................................................................... 63 4.11.1 Financial Status at a Glance................................................................................................. 64 4.11.2 Revenue Account ................................................................................................................... 65 4.11.3 Capital Account..................................................................................................................... 71 4.11.4 Key issues regarding financial condition of MCF ................................................................ 72

5 CITY INVESTMENT PLAN, STRATEGIES AND IMPLEMENTATION PLAN................................ 75 5.1 CITY INVESTMENT PLAN (CIP) ............................................................................................................ 75

5.1.1 Institutionalising the CIP Process......................................................................................... 75 5.1.2 Summary of Investments........................................................................................................ 76

5.2 SECTOR WISE CIP DETAILS – CAPITAL NEEDS/ INVESTMENTS.............................................................. 78 5.2.1 Water Supply (MCF)............................................................................................................. 78 5.2.2 Sewerage (MCF) ................................................................................................................... 80 5.2.3 Roads, Street lighting, Urban transport and Traffic management (MCF)............................ 82 5.2.4 Storm Water Drainage (MCF) .............................................................................................. 85 5.2.5 Conservancy (SWM) & Sanitation (MCF) ............................................................................ 87 5.2.6 Slums and Basic Services for Urban Poor (MCF) ................................................................ 90 5.2.7 Land use/ Development planning (MCF, HUDA)................................................................. 91 5.2.8 River Conservation ............................................................................................................... 92 5.2.9 Fire services.......................................................................................................................... 93 5.2.10 Projects supporting Economic Development and City Beautification .................................. 94 5.2.11 Urban Governance/ System Modernisation .......................................................................... 95 5.2.12 New MCF office, system studies and minor capital works.................................................... 96

5.3 SECTOR WISE LISTING OF PRIORITY PROJECTS ..................................................................................... 98 5.3.1 Priority Projects – Water Supply .......................................................................................... 98 5.3.2 Priority Projects – Sewerage ................................................................................................ 99 5.3.3 Priority Projects – Roads.................................................................................................... 101 5.3.4 Priority Projects – Storm Water Drains ............................................................................. 104 5.3.5 Priority Projects – Parks and Play Grounds ...................................................................... 106 5.3.6 Priority Projects – Slums .................................................................................................... 107

6 INVESTMENT CAPACITY AND SUSTENANCE OF MCF ................................................................ 108 6.1 FINANCING STRATEGIES FOR THE CIP................................................................................................ 108 6.2 FINANCE PROJECTIONS ...................................................................................................................... 109

6.2.1 Municipal Account – Growth Projections and Assumptions............................................... 109

iii


6.3 INVESTMENT CAPACITY/ SUSTENANCE.............................................................................................. 110 6.3.1 Impact of JNNURM Reforms on Investment Capacity ........................................................ 110 6.3.2 Fund Requirement............................................................................................................... 111

7 REFORM ACTION PLAN ........................................................................................................................ 112 7.1 BACKGROUND.................................................................................................................................... 112 7.2 MANDATORY REFORMS BY FARIDABAD MUNICIPAL CORPORATION.................................................. 112

7.2.1 Adoption of a modern accrual-based double-entry system of accounting .......................... 112 7.2.2 Introduction of a system of e-Governance using IT applications such as GIS and MIS

for various services provided .............................................................................................. 113 7.2.3 Property tax on GIS platform and proposed achievement of collection efficiency of at

least 85%............................................................................................................................. 114 7.2.4 Levy of reasonable user charges by MCF for all services to recover full cost of O&M ..... 114 7.2.5 Internal earmarking within local bodies, budgets for basic services to the urban poor

and provision of basic services to the urban poor including security of tenure at affordable prices ................................................................................................................. 114

7.3 OPTIONAL REFORMS AT ULB LEVEL ................................................................................................. 115 7.4 REFORMS TO BE UNDERTAKEN BY GOVT. OF HARYANA .................................................................... 115

7.4.1 Mandatory Reforms............................................................................................................. 115 7.4.2 Optional Reforms ................................................................................................................ 116

Annexure 1: JNNURM Interactive Workshop ...........................................................................118 Annexure 2: MCF Officials Workshop.......................................................................................120 Annexure 3: City Stakeholder Workshop– 16th July 2006 .........................................................122 Annexure 4: Summary of Discussions with Stakeholders..........................................................128 Annexure 5: Municipal Finance – Assessment of Past 5 Years .................................................133 Annexure 6: CIP- Demand –Gap Analysis, Costing and Investments .......................................141 Annexure 7: Investment Phasing ................................................................................................144 Annexure 8: Financial Projections- Financial Operating Plan ...................................................146 Annexure 9: Reform Check List .................................................................................................148

iv


LIST OF TABLES

Table 1. Institutional Service Responsibility Matrix ................................................................................. 13 Table 2. MCF, Staffing Pattern (2005-06) ................................................................................................. 14 Table 3. Population Growth of Faridabad.................................................................................................. 26 Table 4. Density Pattern in Faridabad and Other Cities in India ............................................................... 27 Table 5. Sex Ratio and Literacy Level....................................................................................................... 27 Table 6. Population projections for Faridabad........................................................................................... 28 Table 7. Proposed Land Use of Faridabad – 2011..................................................................................... 29 Table 8. Ambient Air Quality in Faridabad city (NAAQM) ..................................................................... 36 Table 9. Ambient Air Quality in Faridabad city at other locations............................................................ 36 Table 10. Surface water quality in Faridabad City .................................................................................... 37 Table 11. Ground water quality in Faridabad City .................................................................................... 37 Table 12. Slums in Faridabad .................................................................................................................... 39 Table 13. Road Length in Faridabad.......................................................................................................... 41 Table 14. Street lights in MCF area ........................................................................................................... 42 Table 15. Location and capacity of GLSRs ............................................................................................... 48 Table 16. Location of ESRs in Faridabad .................................................................................................. 50 Table 17. Present Water Tariff Structure ................................................................................................... 51 Table 18. Water Charges – Demand Collection Balance Statement.......................................................... 51 Table 19. Service Levels – Water Supply.................................................................................................. 52 Table 20. Sewerage Treatment Plants - Faridabad..................................................................................... 55 Table 21. Storm Water Drains (Tertiary Network) Details........................................................................ 57 Table 22. Fleet of Conservancy vehicles with MCF.................................................................................. 59 Table 23. Staff and vehicles with Fire Department, MCF ......................................................................... 60 Table 24. Financial Status at a Glance....................................................................................................... 64 Table 25. Source-wise revenue income ..................................................................................................... 65 Table 26. Nos. of properties in Faridabad.................................................................................................. 66 Table 27. House tax – DCB statement ....................................................................................................... 67 Table 28. Application of funds by head of Account .................................................................................. 68 Table 29. Section-wise establishment expenditure .................................................................................... 69 Table 30. Outstanding Debt Liability ........................................................................................................ 70 Table 31. Details of Capital Account......................................................................................................... 71 Table 32. Key Financial Indicators ............................................................................................................ 73 Table 33. Municipal service delivery – Responsible agencies .................................................................. 75 Table 34. Agency/ Period wise summary of Capital Investments ............................................................. 76 Table 35. Summary of Capital Investments............................................................................................... 77 Table 36. Water supply : Demand-Gap Assessment.................................................................................. 78 Table 37. Sewerage : Demand-Gap Assessment........................................................................................ 80 Table 38. Roads, street lighting, traffic management : Demand-Gap Assessment .................................... 82 Table 39. Storm water drainage : Demand-Gap Assessment..................................................................... 85 Table 40. Conservancy & Sanitation : Demand-Gap Assessment ............................................................. 87 Table 41. Important assumptions made in the projections....................................................................... 109 Table 42. CIP Funding Pattern................................................................................................................. 111

v


ABBREVIATIONS ARV Annual Rateable Value BOD Biological Oxygen Demand BT Black Topped BT Bio-technology CAA Constitutional Amendment Act CAGR Compound Annual Growth Rate CC Cement Concrete CNCR Central National Capital Region CDP City Development Plan CIP City/ Capital Investment Plan COD Chemical Oxygen Demand cu.m Cubic Meter DCB Demand Collection Balance DTC Delhi Transport Corporation DCR Development Control Regulations DHBVN Dhakshin Haryana Bijlee Vitharan Nigam DO Dissolved Oxygen DPR Detail Project Report ESR Elevated Storage Reservoir EWS Economically Weaker Section FSI Floor Space Index (same as FAR) GLSR Ground Level Storage Reservoir GoI Government of India GoH Government of Haryana gpcd Grams per Capita per Day HHs Households PT/ HT Property Tax/ House Tax HMCA Haryana Municipal Corporation Act, 1994 HUDA Haryana Urban Development Authority HUIDB Haryana Urban Infrastructure Development Board HSIDC Haryana State Industrial Development Corporation HUDCO Housing & Urban Development Corporation IT Information technology IPT Intermediate Public Transport JNNURM Jawaharlal Nehru National Urban Renewal Mission Kg Kilograms KL Kilo Litres LCS Low Cost Sanitation LIG Low Income Group LMV Light Motor Vehicle lpcd Litres per Capita per Day M Meters mcum Million cubic meter ML Million Litres MCF Municipal Corporation of Faridabad MoA Memorandum of Agreement MoEF Ministry of Environment and Forest MRTS Mass Rapid Transit System MNC Multi National Companies NGO Non-Governmental Organization NBCC National Building Construction Company NCRPB National Capital Region Planning Board

vi


NCT National Capital Territory NIUA National Institute of Urban Affairs NH National Highway NRCD National River Conservation Department NIT New Industrial Township O&M Operation & Maintenance PCU Passenger Car Unit PWD (PH) Public Works Department (Public Health) PWD (BR) Public Works Department (Building and Roads) PPP Public Private Partnership PSP Public Stand Post RWA Resident Welfare Association ROB Road over Bridge RTO Regional Transport Office Rs. Rupees (Indian) sq. km. Square Kilometre STP Sewerage Treatment Plant SEZ Special Economic Zones SWOT Strength, Weakness, Opportunities and Threats SWM Solid Waste Management UFW Unaccounted for water UGD Underground Drainage ULB Urban Local Body WBM Water Bound Macadam WFPR Work Force Participation Rate YAP Yamuna Action Plan

vii


1 PROJECT BACKGROUND

1.1 BACKGROUND

As per the 2001 census, the urban population of India stood at 285.35 million, which is about 27.8 per cent of the country’s total population; by 2021, the urban population is estimated to account for above 40 per cent of India’s population. Thus, cities and towns are expected to play a vital role in India’s socio-economic transformation and change. Apart from their contribution to the country’s gross domestic product (GDP), which is currently placed at about 50-55 per cent, and their growing role in global markets, cities in India will be the engines of economic growth, the centre-points of innovation and the hub of many socio-economic activities.

However, the current state of affairs in most of our urban areas is unsatisfactory on all parameters of urban governance like planned growth, share of slum population, reliability of civic infrastructure and financial resources. All these factors will have a significant negative economic consequence if not addressed in a planned manner.

Municipal governments and other institutions responsible for providing services are facing an acute shortage of capacity and resources, notwithstanding the Constitution (74th) Amendment Act, 1992, on urban local bodies. Most urban local bodies are starved of resources on account of their inability to effectively use their revenue-raising powers, particularly those relating to property tax and user charges.

Given the current state of affairs of our cities, their incompatibility with the country’s socio-economic objectives and India’s growing role in the world economy, the Government of India launched the Jawaharlal Nehru National Urban Renewal Mission (JNNURM) in FY 2005-06. This mission will be in place for the next seven years; it aims at creating economically productive, efficient, equitable and responsive cities. The Jawaharlal Nehru National Urban Renewal Mission focuses on:

Improving and augmenting the economic and social infrastructure of cities;

Ensuring basic services to the urban poor including security of tenure;

Initiating wide-ranging urban sector reforms whose primary aim is to eliminate the legal, institutional and financial constraints that have impeded investment in urban infrastructure and service; and

Strengthening municipal governments and their functioning with respect to the provisions of the Constitution (Seventy-Fourth) Amendment Act, 1992.

It provides for public disclosure of local spending decisions together with the earmarking of budgetary locations for basic services to the poor.

The JNNURM assumes that in order to make our cities meaningfully contribute to India’s economic growth and its poverty reduction objectives, it is essential to create incentives and support for urban reforms both at the state and the city level. This can be achieved by:

Developing appropriate enabling frameworks;

Enhancing the creditworthiness of municipal governments; and

Integrating the urban poor with the service delivery systems.

1


The JNNURM is also designed to encourage the involvement of the private sector in service delivery and management and thus the implementation of the reform agenda. It accordingly provides for the participation of business, industry, civic groups and communities in local decision-making. It is estimated that cities with a million plus population and a few special cities (currently 63 cities) together need about Rs. 1,20,000 crores to cover the gap in their infrastructure-building funds. To meet this gap, the Government of India (GoI) proposes to allocate about Rs. 50,000 crores during the next seven years in the form of grants to urban local bodies (ULBs).

Application Process to JNNURM funds

City Development Plan

Detailed Project ReportsTimeline for Implementationof Reforms

Application for JNNURM fundsApplication for JNNURM funds

Application Process to JNNURM funds

City Development Plan

Detailed Project ReportsTimeline for Implementationof Reforms

Application for JNNURM fundsApplication for JNNURM funds

But GoI has framed the JNNURM guidelines in such a way that applicant ULBs will be eligible for grant assistance provided the cities undertake certain reforms; the objective is to improve infrastructure as well as to ensure long-term sustenance of the ULBs. Thus, to be eligible for the grant assistance under JNNURM, the Government of India requires cities to:

Formulate a medium-term City Development Plan (CDP) to align with citizens’ interest and priorities;

Prepare project proposals in accordance with the CDP; and

Draw up a timeline for implementing the urban sector reforms.

Subject to the fulfillment of the above-stated requirements and their satisfactory appraisal, the Government of India, Ministry of Urban Development/Ministry of Urban Employment and Poverty Alleviation will sign a Memorandum of Agreement (MoA) with the state government and the city, and release funds in accordance with the payment schedule that will form a part of the Memorandum of Agreement (MoA).

The formulation of a City Development Plan is thus a mandatory requirement for accessing JNNURM funds. The Haryana Urban Infrastructure Development Board, Government of Haryana, has retained the services of CRISIL Infrastructure Advisory to prepare the City Development Plan under the JNNURM guidelines for Faridabad.

1.2 OBJECTIVES OF A CITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN

The City Development Plan (CDP) is the municipal corporation’s corporate strategy that presents both a vision of a desired future for the city and the Corporation’s organization, as well as mission statements on how the Corporation, together with other stakeholders, intends to work towards achieving this long-term vision in the next five years.

The CDP should lead to the translation of missions into actions and actions into outcomes. The objective of involving stakeholders through a consultation process and securing endorsements of the proposed actions by the local body and other implementing agencies is to hold these bodies accountable for their mission statements, actions and expected outcomes.

2


The CDP clearly defines how a Corporation will serve its customers (businesses and citizens). For example, the CDP talks about how the Corporation intends to guarantee a basic level of urban services to all citizens; make urban planning responsive to emerging needs; and become responsive to the needs of, and improve its services, to local businesses. The CDP also outlines how the Corporation plans to run its business.

The CDP further elaborates on how the Corporation intends to manage public finances in a modern and transparent way; execute urban planning and governance in line with an established framework; and become more responsive - cost and time efficient – by availing of technology in its governance and service delivery processes. Finally, the CDP reveals the Corporation’s strategy to manage its resources, i.e. how it intends to increase revenues and expand its tax base to allow for self-sustaining urban service delivery; improve its creditworthiness; and recruit and retain a skilled workforce.

1.3 THE CDP PROCESS ADOPTED BY FARIDABAD

The formulation of the CDP for Faridabad was divided into three phases and involved the following tasks and activities. The process is also presented in the chart below.

Faridabad City Development Plan – Approach

and Sector Go and Sector Goa

PrioritizationPreferencesPreferences SustainabilitySustainability

Stakeholder Consultations

Action PlansAction Plans InvestmentNeeds

InvestmentNeedsWish listStrategiesStrategies Infrastructure

Gap AnalysisInfrastructureGap Analysis

Assessment & Analysis

do we want

re w

Vision and Sector GoalsVision and Sector Goals

PrioritizationPreferencesPreferences SustainabilitySustainability

CITY DEVELOPMENT PLANCITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN

Stakeholder Consultations

Action PlansAction Plans InvestmentNeeds

InvestmentNeedsWish listStrategiesStrategies Infrastructure

Gap AnalysisInfrastructureGap Analysis

Assessment & Analysis

Vision alsVision ls

Where to go?

Where a e now?What Strategies are required?

What are priority needs?

Where do we want to go?

Where are we now?What Strategies are required?

Phase 1-Define vision and mission statements

Step 1.1: Reconnaissance Collected data from the Corporation and other agencies to gain a preliminary

understanding of the city;

Conducted rapid city assessment and identified the underlying issues and emerging opportunities of the city and the Corporation; and

3


Identified stakeholders from diverse backgrounds like Industries Associations, Business Associations, Resident Welfare Associations, NGOs, citizens’ groups, line agencies involved with the Municipal Corporation of Faridabad (MCF) like the Haryana Urban Development Authority (HUDA), Public Works Department (PWD), the Electricity Board, etc.

Step 1.2: Workshop with MCF officials

Based on the findings of the above tasks, a workshop was conducted for MCF officials and the line agencies to understand their perspective on Faridabad, issues and technical details of the existing infrastructure. During this workshop, the objectives of JNNURM were specified to them and they were asked to identify issues concerning the city and the strategies required to address these issues and their future plans.

Step 1.3: Second workshop to define vision/mission statements

Based on the findings of Step 1.1, a workshop was conducted to appraise the citizens about the JNNURM process, provide facts and figures about Faridabad, and urge them to identify challenges which Faridabad needs to overcome. The stakeholders hailed from across the spectrum, including citizens, resident welfare association members, chartered accountants, advocates, Vypar Mandal and NGO representatives, and officials from MCF and the State Government Departments. The stakeholders were appraised about the objectives of JNNURM and the CDP process, and the findings of step 1.1. Further, they were asked to identify issues and strategies in the area of urban infrastructure and envision for Faridabad.

Phase 2 –Assessment of City Infrastructure and Finances of MCF Collected additional information on demography, economy, civic services, physical

features, etc.

Carried out infrastructure assessment including a detailed analysis of the existing municipal services and also undertaken the operating efficiency of the core municipal services provided by the Corporation.

Conducted a credit assessment to provide insight into the Corporation’s current performance and financial management practices, as well as provide an opinion on the ability of the Corporation to meet its financial commitments on a timely basis.

Phase 3 –Draft City Development Plan

Step 3.1: Identification of Projects for City Investment Plan Norms for each civic service was fixed, based on desired levels of services as

stakeholders views or available policy documents..

Gaps in all core municipal services were identified for a horizon period of 30 years,

Projects in the area of non-civic services like economic infrastructure, land development, parks and playgrounds were identified, based on stakeholder consultations including those with MCF officials.

Step 3.2: Project costing and determination of funding sources Based on the consultants’ experience and available information from Faridabad, unit cost

for each service component was arrived at, and gaps in service investment were located .

4


Based on the priorities of MCF, investment phasing was done.

Based on the JNNURM funding pattern and MCF’s financial position, investment sustenance was assessed.

Step 3.3: Strategic Implementation Plan

An implementation plan for all the prioritised projects/actions was prepared in a logical sequence based on the phased investment and availability of resources.

A detailed capital investment plan for the identified projects was prepared.

Also, a Financial Operating Plan to outline the preliminary budget and clarify financing assumptions and responsibilities for implementation and financing was prepared.

Phase 4: Final CDP document The draft CDP was presented to officials of MCF and Council members. Based on their

feedback and feedback from the Haryana Urban Infrastructure Development Board (HUIDB), the draft CDP was modified for final submission to the Government of India.

5


2 FARIDABAD CITY AND ITS ECONOMY

2.1 ABOUT FARIDABAD

Faridabad is a southeastern town in the state of Haryana. It was founded in 1607 AD by Sheikh Farid, Emperor Jehangir's treasurer. Sheikh Farid built a fort and a mosque and slowly the town grew in size. Later, it became the headquarters of a pargana which was held in jagir by the Ballabgarh ruler.

After independence, the town has become a centre for the resettlement of refugees created by Partition. Now Faridabad is the most populated and industrialized city in the whole of Haryana. Faridabad alone generates about 60 percent of the revenues of Haryana with its large number of industrial units. There is also a belief that it was Baba Farid, an eminent Sufi saint, who founded Faridabad.

On agriculture front, Faridabad is famous for gears, refrigerators, shoes and tyres are other

well-known industrial products of the city. The Badkhal Lake tourist complex, the Suraj Kund Tourist Complex, the Aravali Golf Club, the Raja Nahar Singh Palace and Dabchick are famous tourist spots of the city.

Faridabad District

HARYANA State

production of Heena. Tractors, motorcycles, switch

For ease of civil administration, Faridabad district is divided into five sub-divisions viz. Faridabad, Ballabgarh, Palwal, Hodal & Hathin. The Faridabad Municipal Corporation consists of Old Faridabad, Ballabgarh and NIT (New Industrial Township).

2.2 GEOGRAPHY AND GEOLOGY

Faridabad is situated on the Delhi – Mathura National Highway No. 2 at a distance of 32 km. from Delhi, at 28o 25' 16" north latitude and 77o 18' 28" east longitude. The town is bounded on the north by Delhi State, on the east by Agra and the Gurgaon canals and on the west by the Aravali Hills. The Yamuna flows very near to the city at its northern side and moves away as it goes south.

The major part of Faridabad city is underlain by Quaternary Alluvium consisting of sand, clay and silt. In the western and northwestern part of the town, the quartzite ridges of the Delhi system can the observed. Along the Yamuna flood plain towards the eastern part of the town, the younger alluvium is mainly sandy with a thickness of about 10-15 m. The main water -bearing horizons (aquifers) consisting of a sandy layer is generally confined to 60m below ground level. Beyond this depth alluvium is more clayey and generally aquifers are not potential water sources even though depth of bedrock is more than 200m.

6


The limited thickness of aquifers further restricts the development of ground water on a large scale. In the Delhi quartzites, the availability of ground water is also limited and is controlled by secondary permeability imparted by joints and fractures.

2.3 CLIMATE AND RAINFALL

Faridabad town experiences a semi-arid climate which is characterized by wide temperature variations and scanty and irregular rainfall. During summer, temperature may reach upto 450 C in June while in winter it drops to 1.90 C in February. May and June are the hottest and driest months, when dust storms from the west prevail with high speed. The average wind velocity is 2.1 km./hours during June and 1.3 km./hour during November. The relative humidity is maximum during August (upto 84 percent) and minimum during May (upto 16 percent).

The average annual rainfall recorded at the Faridabad rain gauge station is 845 mm as computed from the data of 1978 to 1997. Maximum rainfall occurs during July to September on account of the south – east monsoon. The number of actual rainy days varies between 7 and 22 in a year.

2.4 LINKAGES AND CONNECTIVITY

Road linkage

Uttar PradeshState

FARIDABAD Gurgaon

NCT-Delhi

Haryana State

Rajasthan State

NH 2

Ghaziabad

Faridabad is identified as one of the Delhi Metropolitan Area (DMA)/ Central National Capital Region cities of National Capital Region (NCR) and accordingly it has strong linkages with Delhi. NH 2 from Delhi-Mathura passes through the length of the city and is the central axis of the city of Faridabad. Further, NH 3 and NH 4 also pass through the city. It is connected with Gurgaon by the Gurgaon-Faridabad road. As part of NCR proposals, connectivity is proposed for improvement through the western peripheral expressway (Kundli-Manesar-Palwal-

“KMP”) and eastern peripheral expressway

(Kundli-Ghaziabad-Palwal “KGP”).

7


Rail linkage

Faridabad is on the broad gauge line from Delhi to Mathura of the Northern Railway and is an important Rail Junction in this sector as most train reaching Delhi pass through Faridabad. Hence Faridabad is well connected with the rest of the country by rail. Apart from the Main Faridabad Station, it also has two minor stations, Old Faridabad and Ballabgarh stations.

Air linkage

The Indira Gandhi International Airport and the Palam domestic airport, New Delhi, are the nearest airports providing air linkage for the city.

2.5 PLACES OF IMPORTANCE

Badkhal lake: It is located in Badkhal village, 32 km. from Delhi. The lake, fringed by the Aravalli hills, is a man-made embankment. A flower show is held here every spring. Its name is most probably derived from the Persian word bedakhal, which means free from interference. Close to Badhkal lake is the Peacock Lake, another picturesque spot.

Baba Farid's Tomb: The city of Faridabad is believed to have been named after Baba Farid, an eminent Sufi saint. There is also a belief that it was he who founded Faridabad. His tomb in the town is a popular pilgrimage spot for the local people.

Suraj Kund Tourist Complex and The Crafts Fair: Situated at a distance of around 8 km. from South Delhi, it is an ideal picnic spot. The Suraj Kund Lake is surrounded by rock-cut steps. Built by the Rajput king Surajpal Tomar, Suraj Kund represents the rising sun. Ruins of a Sun temple lie around the lake. The complex includes a beautifully made up done-up Rajhans, a fresh water pool with a beautiful garden, this water pool is known as Siddha Kund; its waters are said to have healing properties.

A delightful handloom and handicraft fair is held here annually in February. Skilled artisans from all over the country display the rich crafts tradition of India in the typical setting of a rural Indian marketplace. Cultural programs like folk dances, magic, acrobats and rural cuisines are also a part of this colourful fair. One can also see traditional crafts being made and buy them directly from the craftsmen. Food is served in banana leaves and clay pots.

Nahar Singh Cricket Stadium: The Nahar Singh Cricket Stadium in Faridabad was built in 1981. The first match, a Ranji trophy game between Haryana and the Services was played in 1982 and the first one-day international match was played between India and West Indies.

The ground has a capacity to hold around 25,000 people. There are six centre pitches and three practice pitches. There is also a modern pavilion with a suite which has 200 seats. It also has a commentator box, a box for the media, a press box, the President’s box, an umpire room, a health club, a restaurant, a billiards room, a card room, and a coffee shop. There is an outdoor tennis court. To the north, nine stands have been constructed with an office and parking facilities for ministers. The Nahar Singh Stadium stands out as one of the most modern stadiums in North India.

8

http://www.webindia123.com/city/haryana/farida/interest.htm?cat=Places%20of%20Interest


2.6 FARIDABAD IN NCR

Faridabad is an important constituent of NCR and is identified as a Central National Capital Region (CNCR) city earlier refereed to as Delhi Metropolitan Area (DMA) city. Also it is the only other Metro city in NCR other than Meerut. NCR Regional 2021 has listed out a large number of projects involving Faridabad with suggested policy changes, strategies and implementation plan. The proposals are in the sectors of:

Economy & fiscal policy Transport Power Water Sewerage, Solid waste management & drainage Communications and social infrastructure Environment and disaster management

While being part of NCR gives a high priority status to the city, the ground situation with respect to infrastructure reflects poorly upon this emerging metropolis of the capital region. Whereas the quality of infrastructure in NCT and Faridabad are at opposite ends with Faridabad on the poorer side, the governance and financial condition of the Municipal Corporation also reflects the same.

The reasons for the current situation are galore; lack of initiatives, strong leadership; and so on. While being part of NCR should convert into a strong opportunity for Faridabad to transform, on the contrary this status appears to have become a bane on the functioning of the city. This has also resulted from the lack of seriousness/ timely implementation with respect to several of NCR projects related CNCR cities like Faridabad. For instance the eastern and western peripheral expressways, public transportations systems in the form of RRTS/ MRTS, Orbital Rail Corridor etc, all are nearing completion of their planned implementation period but are yet to be put into formal actions on ground.

Also to be noted is the delayed implementation of the Yamuna Action Plan (YAP) and associated programs in the sewerage sector. Accordingly the YAP proposals and each of the NCR proposals under various sectors ranging from growth management to waste management with respect to Faridabad are presented and discussed in tandem with the existing situation in the city in the following chapters.

2.7 ECONOMY

Faridabad, a constituent part of NCR is home to one of the largest industrial estates of Asia which houses a large number of manufacturing industries. Economy of Faridabad is more or less dependent on Industry.

2.7.1 Economic base

The industrial base of Faridabad is not just the economic base of Faridabad, but again a constituent part of the overall economy of the NCR, implying that the economies are interdependent. As on date there are 16 multinational companies (MNC), 809 ISO-based industries, 205 medium and large-scale industries and 399 small-scale units as per the records of the District Industrial Centre, Faridabad. However, there are also a large number of other smaller industrial units, functioning from various locations including residential areas in the city.

9


On the whole, the total number of small, medium and large industries in the Faridabad-Ballabgarh Complex stands at about 15,000. The Complex provides direct and indirect employment to nearly half a million people and ranks as the 9th largest industrial estate in Asia. Its combined turnover is estimated to be about Rs.1,500 billion. The place is home to many international/ multinational companies like Whirlpool, Goodyear, Larsen & Toubro, Asia Brown Boveri, GKN Invel, Woodward Governor and Castrol besides Escorts, Eicher, Cutler Hammer, Hyderabad Asbestos, and Nuchem which are operating in this belt.

This industrial estate in Faridabad is spread over an approximate area of 6,948 hectares and is home to a variety of engineering products from forgings to tractors, clutch assembly to leaf springs. The major industrial production in the district, mainly represented by Faridabad city itself, is of tractors, steel re-rolling, scientific instruments, power looms, agriculture implements, JCB cranes, etc. The district as a whole reported the production of 12,880 tractors, 24,230 metric tonnes of sugar, 4,240 motorcycles, mopeds, scooters, and agriculture implements worth Rs. 5,666 lakhs, during the year 2000-01.

Industry, Employment and Economic Structure

The industrial estate of Faridabad is understood to be providing direct and indirect employment to nearly half a million people. The work force participation rate (WFPR) of Faridabad city as per Census 2001 is 31 percent that is about 3.3 lakhs implying another equal number of employees of Faridabad industries travel daily from other NCR areas to Faridabad. The employment in the industries of Faridabad is both skilled and unskilled in nature. The majority of the workforce today is in the tertiary/ services sector. This also indicates the quantum of migration that had and has happened within and outside NCR. While migration within NCR is low, migration into NCR from other regions of Northern India is high. This causes a larger impact on Faridabad due to its industrial character.

It may also be noted that the WFPR of Faridabad city was 30 percent in 1991 and 34 percent in 1981. Sectors, which indicated maximum diversification and growth over the decades, are industries other than household and services. The decline in WFPR over the decades is due to the change in the economic character of Faridabad- from being predominantly primary/ secondary it is now tertiary/ service oriented. The trend is similar to that in NCR with industries other than household registering the maximum growth.

Industry and Environment

The industries and the manufacturing process is largely environment friendly. However the estate has a large number of heavy vehicles plying in and out to transport the raw material and finished goods and these have been the major cause for the air pollution in the surroundings of this large estate. As earlier mentioned several small scale industries which act as ancillary units are located within the residential sectors of the city thereby involving the plying of heavy vehicles on most arterial and internal roads of the city too.

Another feature to be noted is the absence of any common effluent treatment plant (CETP) for the large quantum of industrial waste waters generated here. The present industrial water demand is about 20 MLD and the same is expected to reach 100 MLD in another 20 years owing to the growth of the industry. For this large quantum of industrial water supply, the generation of waste water would be equally large necessitating the need for common treatment (from economic point of view) of these wastewaters.

10


There are no major hazardous industries located in the estate and the only hazard the estate is prone to is fire. In Faridabad instances of industrial fire accidents are minimal and none reported during the past five years.

An Economy in Transition

Industrial activity in Faridabad itself is the result of the policy decision taken after independence regarding the nature of development in the surroundings of Delhi. Faridabad emerged as the choice for the creation of a settlement for the refugees of Partition as well the preferred location for setting up the manufacturing base of the capital as well as the country. The estate, once ranked among the top industrial estates of the continent, today is in the 9th position owing to the neglect during the past decade and a half coupled with stiff competition from other NCR cities and cities elsewhere in the country.

Clearly, the change in the economic policies of the Government of India regarding foreign direct investment has led to a change in the economic structure of the country as a whole and also of such towns like Faridabad. Within NCR, Gurgaon and Noida have been in the forefront in attracting these investments, which have been primarily in the information technology (IT) and bio-technology (BT) sectors. Faridabad has lagged behind in these sectors and is now gearing up to catch up with Gurgaon and Noida. More and more investments are flowing into the sectors of industry, commerce and real estate. State government too has been proactive in these terms through awarding incentives for investments to come in. In case of Faridabad, Haryana State Industrial Development Corporation (HSIIDC) is the nodal agency for the purpose of industrial development.

There are five major industrial associations in Faridabad which play a big role in terms of the development and regulation of industrial activity in the city. They are:

1. Faridabad Industries Association 2. Faridabad Small Industries Association 3. Laghu Udhyog Bharti 4. Faridabad Manufacturers’ Association 5. Faridabad Chamber of Commerce & Industries

2.7.2 NCR proposals for economic development

As an overall strategy, the regional Plan, 2021 of NCR identifies the need to have a Common Economic Zone for the entire area of NCR. This is in light of different and multiplicity of policies, frameworks, acts, institutions, agencies etc applicable for different areas of NCR as NCR is spread across states. The Common Economic Zone is proposed to have rationalized tax structure; uniformity of incentives; uniformity of financial/ banking services; removing restrictions on inter-state traffic movements; uniform power supply, telecommunications, infrastructure like water, sewerage, waste management, pollution control, uniform law & order machinery etc. This Common Economic Zone though is yet to take any formal shape, the same as a long tem measure is in the right direction.

As area-specific strategies, the Central National Capital Region (CNCR) cities like Faridabad shall have induced industrial development taking advantage of the location within NCR and the thrust will be on promoting model/ integrated industrial townships with adequate provision for residential, commercial, institutional, and recreational facilities.

11


These townships can also be Special Economic Zones (SEZ) with uninterrupted power supply, efficient telecommunication facilities, integrated transport networks and freight corridors, warehousing and effluent treatment facilities, etc. Further, Faridabad has also been identified as the location for the wholesale trade of auto parts. There is also plan for the development of the Alternative Wholesale Market for auto parts by the concerned state level agency as a joint venture project and proposal to declare auto parts as a commodity under the ‘Specified Commodities Act’ to avail the benefits.

2.7.3 Major issues pertaining to industrial growth of Faridabad

Consultations and interactions with the officials of MCF, and industrial associations as well as citizens have indicated some of the primary causes for the slowing down of industrial activity in Faridabad, which need to be immediately addressed. The causes are:

Shortage of power and water

This is a common phenomenon across the NCR; it has become a major issue for the existing industrial set-up as well as for those who plan to set shop. The current situation is also against what has been envisaged in the NCR plan proposals of status of SEZs for the industrial locations with uninterrupted power supplies and other infrastructure.

Also, the industry is faced with the challenge of water supplies in future in view of the current situation of non-perennial sources and continuous depletion of ground water sources. Alternate sources for augmentation of supplies, coupled with technology up-gradation and a drive towards reduced industrial water consumption/ recycling are of paramount importance.

Incompatible land uses

Faridabad today is dotted with several industrial units, set up in non-confirming land use categories, primarily residential areas. Also HSIIDC/ HUDA has so far developed only about 3500 industrial plots as against the current number of 15,000 operating industrial units in the city. This is understood to be due to the lack of proposals in the Development Plan for smaller units. Industrial associations have also been vocal in their requirement for organised industrial estates for varied sizes and purposes.

Implementation of long-term strategic proposals of NCR

For being part of NCR, Faridabad has been identified for a varied number of proposals towards mutually benefiting economic growth like, the Common Economic Zone, Alternate Wholesale Market for auto parts, the KMP and KGP Peripheral expressways, MRTS and so on. However, a time-bound action plan for the implementation of the same is necessary on the part of NCRPB to implement the proposals so that the individual cities don’t lose out due to delay in implementation of these proposals.

12


2.8 INSTITUTIONAL MECHANISM

MCF and HUDA are the primary institutions involved in the physical development or service delivery aspects in Faridabad. All the core municipal services, their design and implementation are within the domain of MCF. HUDA primarily exercises the role of a land developer. To an extent the Town & Country Planning Department of Govt. of Haryana also has an institutional role to play in the form of preparing and notifying the DP for the MCF as well as FCA areas. Implementation of the DP however is outside the purview of Town & Country Planning Department.

Table 1. Institutional Service Responsibility Matrix Service/ Sector Planning & Design Execution O&M Town Planning Town & Country

Planning Department MCF, HUDA -

Urban poor & Slums MCF MCF MCF Water Supply MCF MCF MCF/ PPP Sewerage MCF MCF MCF Storm Water Drainage MCF MCF MCF Solid Waste Management MCF MCF MCF/ PPP Roads, Bridges, Drains MCF, HUDA MCF, HUDA MCF Street lights MCF, HUDA MCF, HUDA MCF

There is observed to be a clear multiplicity of roles by these institutions due to the fact that each institution operates under different and independent constitutional provisions/ acts and that the administered areas are different from the jurisdictional areas. The same is brought out in the following section. Institutional overlap of service delivery is also elaborated under each respective sector of infrastructure assessment chapter.

2.8.1 Municipal Corporation of Faridabad (MCF)

The Municipal Corporation of Faridabad (MCF) came into existence in 1992 and constituted the erstwhile municipalities of Faridabad Township/ New Industrial Township (NIT), Faridabad Old, Ballabgarh and 38 numbers of revenue villages then referred to as the Faridabad Complex Administration. MCF is governed by the Haryana Municipal Corporation Act, 1994 (HMCA). As per this Act, MCF is obligated to provide basic infrastructure like water supply, drainage, sewerage and roads, and services such as conservancy, fire fighting, streetlights, education and primary health.

The elections to the municipal body are held every five years. The last general elections were held in 2003 and the next are to be held in 2007-08. The ward committees are constituted as per the provision of 74th CAA. There is a Ward Committee for each of the administrative ward within the MCF area.

The Municipal Commissioner is the key figure in local self-government and is the administrative head of MCF; the Commissioner is assisted by senior officials in discharging his functions. The Commissioner manages the day-to-day affairs of the Corporation, subject to approvals and sanctions from the standing committee and the Corporation. Whenever required, the entire executive powers to carry out the provisions of the HMCA are vested in the Commissioner.

13


The staffing pattern of MCF under broad heads is presented in the table below. 520 posts in the Corporation are still vacant. Most of these posts are in the conservancy sector. To overcome this shortfall, MCF has engaged the services of persons on daily wages; these persons number 1510. That takes the total staff strength at MCF to 5,317 against the sanctioned 4,327.

Table 2. MCF, Staffing Pattern (2005-06) Municipal Corporation of Faridabad Sanctioned Filled Gap Daily Wagei General Admin & Tax Collection 521 438 83 12ii Water & Sewerage 944 880 64 481iii Engineering 217 178 39 33iv Accounts 5 2 3 v Health & Sanitation 139 106 33 4vi Conservancy 1,415 1,212 203 750vii Town planning 32 25 7 1viii Gardens, Fire, Library, and All others 1,054 966 88 229 Total 4,327 3,807 520 1510

MCF at present is largely manual in its functioning with computerisation restricted to a minimal number of senior officers of the Corporation. E-governance systems are yet to be planned and implemented in the Corporation. On the financial management front too, the corporation is lagging behind with introduction of double entry accruals accounting system and computerisation yet to be initiated.

Conformity to the provisions of 74th Constitutional Amendment Act (74th CAA)

Sections 41-44 of the Haryana Municipal Corporation Act, 1994 (HMCA) lays down the powers and functions of the Corporation and the provisions for operationalising these powers and functions are provided in the following chapters. Section 42 of the HMCA lists out the functions that the State Government may entrust to the Corporation through a government order (GO) which essentially comprise the 18 listed items of Schedule XII of the 74th CAA. However, the HMCA doesn’t give powers and procedure to operationilise the Schedule XII items. Thus the basic essence of the 74th CAA remains far from achieved.

Since its inception, the Municipal Corporation of Faridabad (MCF) has been the provider and facilitator of all core municipal services, including water supply and sewerage, in its jurisdictional area. However, the jurisdictional area as a term is contiguous as there is more than one service provider and implementing agency within MCF’s jurisdictional area. These are HUDA, HSIIDC and Haryana Housing Board etc. HUDA, for example, provides services in the areas being developed by them and transfers these areas/ sectors to MCF for maintenance purposes only after five years of development. This clearly presents the multiplicity of authorities and functions against the very purpose of the 74th CAA.

In the case of Faridabad, only 12 of 18 functions listed under the Schedule XII of 74th CAA have been devolved, but even these are not devolved in true sense as they are not backed by operational procedures in the HMCA and also necessary financial support from State government. Other functions like town planning, urban forestry, and urban poverty alleviation are yet to be devolved.

A summary of the conformity of the provisions of 74th CAA is presented below.

14


Regularity in holding of elections: The elections are held every five years. The Corporation was established in 1992. The last general elections were held in 2003 and the next are to be held in 2007-08.

Constitution of Ward committees: The ward committees are constituted as per the provision of 74th CAA. There is a Ward Committee for each of the administrative ward within the MCF area. However there is no clarity on the administrative and sanctioning powers of these ward committees.

Devolution of Planning Functions: No. (Master Plan is prepared by the Town & Country Planning Department and CDP by City Government). Building permissions are given by MCF and HUDA in their respective controlled areas. There is area overlap and functions’ overlap.

Establishment of the DPC/ MPC: MCF/ Faridabad is part of NCR and NCRPB fits the role.

Others: The repeal of Urban Land (Ceiling & Regulation) Act 1976, suitable amendment to Rent Control Act and Stamp Duty Acts are under consideration by Govt. of Haryana.

E-governance: E-governance is non-operational in MCF. Organisation needs complete restructuring and strengthening.

2.8.2 Haryana Urban Development Authority (HUDA)

HUDA, a statutory body of Government of Haryana was constituted under the Haryana Urban Development Authority Act, 1977 (HUDAA). HUDA is carved out of the erstwhile Department of Urban Estates to overcome the difficulties in development and implementation by different agencies/ departments and to achieve the expeditious development of urban estates, so that HUDA can take up all the developmental activities by itself and provide various facilities in the urban estates. The main functions of HUDA are as under:

To promote and secure development of urban areas with the power to acquire, sell and dispose off property, both movable and immovable;

To acquire, develop and dispose land for residential, industrial and commercial purposes; To make available developed land to Haryana Housing Board and other bodies for

providing houses to economically weaker sections of the society; and

Some sectors within MCF Area but being maintained by HUDA

To undertake building works.

HUDA has so far setup 27 urban estates throughout the state of Haryana of which one estate is in Faridabad and extends beyond the MCF limits into the FCA and administered by a zonal Administrator assisted by an estate officer and an assistant estate officer. The main functions of these Estate Officers are to sell developed and undeveloped plots of all categories of land and realise the amount of installments.

A good number of developed sectors within Faridabad as presented in the adjacent figure are under the administration and management of HUDA.

15


These sectors are residential, commercial as well as industrial in nature. At present the Sectors being maintained by HUDA are 3, 12, 20A & B, 21 C Part III, 21D, 30, 31, 44 to 48, 55, 58, 59 and Dhauj Crushing Zone. New sectors being developed by HUDA are 2, 56, 56A, 62, 64 and 65.

It may be noted that HUDA apart from providing basic infrastructure like roads, drains and street lights as part of development of a sector, maintains the sector for five years. If such sectors fall under the jurisdiction of MCF they are later transferred to MCF for further maintenance. However water supply, sewerage and waste management functions are looked after by MCF from the day of the development of the sector irrespective of whether it is administered by MCF or not. This situation is understood to be leading to a lot of revenue loss to MCF.

2.8.3 Town & Country Planning Department, Govt. of Haryana

The Town & Country Planning Department of Govt. of Haryana has prepared/ finalised the Development Plan (DP) for the Faridabad-Ballabgarh Controlled area including the present MCF area. The Town & Country Planning Department prepares the Development Plan taking into consideration the further needs of industrial, residential and commercial sectors so as to ensure proper and planned urban development, exercising the powers inherited by sub-section(4) of section 5 of Punjab Development Act, 1963.

However the implementation of the same is not the domain of the department. Respective agency like HUDA, HSIIDC and MCF take up the role of implementation of the DP indirectly. That is as and when such agency intends to develop a particular sector, land is acquired and detailed planning scheme is prepared in line with the proposals of the DP by that agency and implementation of the same is taken up.

2.8.4 Major issues pertaining to Institutional Mechanism in Faridabad

Consultations and interactions with the officials of various agencies like MCF, HUDA, Town & Country Planning Department etc as well as citizens have stressed upon the below mentioned aspects as the prime reasons for the lack of clarity on institutional aspects and governance of the city of Faridabad.

Lacking legal and constitutional support for right implementation of 74th CAA

Section 42 of the HMCA only lists out 18 items of Schedule XII of the 74th CAA but did not provide for any powers and operationilising procedure. Accordingly only 12 of 18 functions have been devolved to MCF but not backed by operational procedures. Further other functions like town planning, urban forestry, and urban poverty alleviation are yet to be devolved. Thus the basic essence of the 74th CAA remains far from achieved.

Multiplicity of authorities and functions

The jurisdictional area of MCF as a term is contiguous as at times MCF’s services extends into FCA and there is more than one implementing agency within MCF’s jurisdictional area like HUDA. The multiplicity is also due to the applicability of different acts to different agencies like the HMCA for MCF, HUDAA for HUDA, and so on. For example, buildings developed in HUDA administered areas follow the HUDA (Erection of Buildings) Regulations, 1979 and such areas after any transfer to MCF administration will have to comply with the Building Regulations provided in Chapter XIV of HMCA.

16


No say for MCF in preparation of DP for its jurisdictional area

As of the Town & Country Planning Department of Govt. of Haryana is the sole agency that prepares the DP for all urban areas/ controlled areas in the state. Town planning as a function is yet to be devolved to MCF in line with 74th CAA and as earlier mentioned, the jurisdictional area of MCF as a term itself is contiguous due to multiplicity of service providing and implementing agencies.

17


3 FORMULATION OF VISION AND MISSION

3.1 APPROACH TO FORMULATING A VISION FOR FARIDABAD UNDER CDP

The CDP is the Municipal Corporation’s strategy that outlines the vision for the growth of the city and details how the Corporation together with stakeholders intends to achieve its long-term vision. The CDP leads to the translation of missions into actions and actions into outcomes. In this context, stakeholder consultations were held before finalizing the CDP. The stakeholder consultations were held at organizational and individual levels, and included workshops. The objective was to bring all stakeholders on one platform and enable them to voice their opinions and come to a consensus on issues, strategies and actions.

11

22

33

44

City Stakeholder Consultations/ Workshop

Data Collection, Situation Analysis

Interaction WorkshopOfficials Workshop

Project FinanceImplementation OptionsStrategic Planning/ Reforms’ timelines

Consultations and Revisions to

draft CDP

MCF Consultations

Vision and Mission statements

Draft CDPAugust 16th 2006

July 16th, 2006

July 8th -July 11th -

Credit Strength AssessmentProject Identification

& Prioritization

Final CDP/Approval

Infrastructure Gaps/Investment Needs

The stakeholders comprised Corporation officials; elected representatives; officials from line agencies, NGOs, resident welfare associations, industry associations and vyapar mandals; advocates; chartered accountants; and citizens. The stakeholder consultations also involved representatives of the HUDA, the PWD-PH, and the Town & Country Planning department. In addition, individual discussions were held with Faridabad MLAs and MPs.

Three workshops were held during the period of 8th July 2006 to 16th July 2006 as illustrated in the chart above. The outcomes of each discussion and workshop are summarized in the following section: this discussion forms the base for the formulation of a vision for the city, strategies and action plans. The details of the participants and the summary of consultations are presented in Annexures 1 and 4.

3.2 STAKEHOLDERS CONSULTATIONS – THE PROCESS AND OUTCOME

The various levels of consultations/ discussions organised for formulating the CDP, which followed a structured format with a pre-defined agenda and objectives, are presented below. The process details and the summary of the outcomes of each consultation are discussed in the respective sections.

18


Nature of Consultation Participants 1. JNNURM Interactive Workshop –

July 8th, 2006 Under chairmanship of Divisional Commissioner- Officials from GoI, GoH, MCF, NIUA, HUDCo, NBCC.

2. MCF Officials Workshop- July 11th, 2006

MCF officials including officials from HUDA, PWD-PH, Town & Country Planning department, District Industries Centre, Dhakshin Haryana Bijlee Vitharan Nigam (DHBVN).

3. Discussion with Elected Representatives

Shri Avatar Singh Bhadana- MP Faridabad Shri AC Chowdary, MLA, NIT, Faridabad Shri Mahendra Pratap Sing, MLA, Faridabad Smt. Sharada Rathode, MLA Ballabgarh

4. Vision Workshop – July 16, 2006 Citizens, Industries Association, Vypar Mandal, Resident Welfare Associations, NGOs, newspaper groups, line agencies and municipal officials.

5. Discussion on Draft CDP with HUIDB on September 6th 2006

MCF officials, Council members and HUIDB officials

Interactive Workshop

As part of the CDP process, MCF organised various workshops. The interactive session was the first in this process, organised on July 8th, 2006 and was chaired by the Divisional Commissioner Gurgaon. The participants were representatives from the GoI and the GoH, MCF officials and officials of all line agencies with offices in Faridabad.

The objective of the workshop was to create awareness among the stakeholders of Faridabad regarding the JNNURM objectives, the process and the guidelines for preparation & evaluation criteria for City Development Plan and the Detail Project Report. During the workshop, the consultants presented the CDP process being adopted for Faridabad. Further, there were a series of presentations on the objectives of JNNURM, mandatory and optional reforms, guidelines for the preparation of DPR for citywide and basic urban services for poor projects, evaluation process and expectations from the CDP and DPRs by officials from GoI, Housing and Urban Development Corporation (HUDCO), National Building Construction Company (NBCC) and National Institute of Urban Affairs (NIUA), etc.

Representatives from GoI have appraised the MCF officials on the objective of JNNURM and the commitment from MCF on the reforms and objectives of linking investment with reforms. NIUA representatives have explained the CDP appraisal process. The following aspects should be addressed clearly and in greater detailed in the CDP – demography, urban poor, urban finance and city vision.

19


Officials from NBCC and HUDCO have appraised the gathering about various aspects of DPR, areas which need to be detailed out in the DPR like area coverage, rate analysis, and cost analysis of various technologies. In the case of basic services for the urban poor, there should be a separate DPR for each slum. The DPRs should be comprehensive, taking into account housing and infrastructure requirement, beneficiary details, etc.

The MCF Workshop

Following the interactive workshop, an in-house workshop involving officials from MCF and line agencies was organised on 11th July 2006. It was a kick-off meeting to create awareness regarding JNNURM and the CDP process. The objective of the workshop was to secure the implementing agency’s views on issues such as the strengths of Faridabad and the areas, which deserve focus in the interests of

the city’s development. Over 50 officials, including the Municipal Commissioner, Joint Commissioners and department heads of MCF and representatives from line agencies attended the workshop.

The meeting started with a brief introduction of JNNURM, highlighting its features, objectives and desired reforms. The importance of JNNURM and the crucial role of the CDP were explained. Following these initial discussions, a presentation was made before all officials on facts and figures relating to Faridabad’s demography, economics, MCF’s financial profile, civic infrastructure and related issues, and proposed reforms to be implemented under JNNURM. Later, the officials were asked to identify the “major issues concerning the city”, “specific issues concerning municipal services” and “strategies and actions required to address the issues.” In addition, officials were also provided with data formats and were briefed on the purpose and relevance of the detailed data. This is crucial for the CDP preparation and the identification of issues, projects and strategies.

The strengths of Faridabad, according to the MCF officials, were its strong industrial base, and its proximity and connectivity to New Delhi. With regard to their vision for Faridabad, participants wished to see Faridabad as the best city of Haryana, clean and beautiful with ideal infrastructure facilities and an efficient public transport system.

During the discussion, the Commissioner of MCF indicated that Faridabad needs to have a comprehensive plan for sewerage, storm water disposal, a well-planned road network, multi- level parking facilities, and the improvement and beautification of all traffic junctions. Also, the plan needs to provide for the expediting of ongoing efforts to develop parks and playgrounds in all residential sectors. Additionally, the Commissioner has stressed that MCF should strive to computerise all its departments and implement e-Governance in all areas of its operations.

The participants and the outcome of the workshop are presented in Annexures 2 and 4.

20


Discussion with Elected Representatives

In order to get the larger picture or vision for Faridabad and the order of priorities, individual discussions were held with the elected representatives -- Shri. Avatar Singhji Bhadana, Member of Parliament; members of the Legislative Assembly representing MCF; Shri. A.C. Chowdary; Shri. Mahendra Pratap Singhji; and Smt. Sharada Rathod. The detailed discussion with the elected representatives is recorded in Annexure 4.

All the elected representatives felt that Faridabad would face problems mainly in the areas - water supply, sewerage & drainage, and internal/ regional connectivity - if planned interventions are not given importance. The number of slums has been continuously increasing; the slum dwellers do not have access to basic services. The concentration of these locations in industrial and other environmentally sensitive areas is also a major problem that should be immediately tackled. The increasing crime rate in Faridabad is major fallout of the slowdown of industrial growth as well as the failure of various urban poor/ slum development initiatives due to restrictions on the development of slums on government lands. Owing to these shortcomings, Faridabad is not in a position to compete with other cities in attracting new investments, particularly in the service sector.

The elected representatives have suggested that to regain lost glory, Faridabad needs to urgently address the development of its city civic infrastructure, power supply, availability of higher educational facilities and medical facilities, which are lacking in Faridabad.

The City Stakeholder Workshop

This workshop was held on 16th July, 2006 with the objective of bringing together municipal decision-makers and stakeholders to arrive at a consensus and define the vision and mission for Faridabad’s economic growth for improving the quality of life in the city. Mr. Mehtab Singh, IAS, Commissioner of MCF, had chaired and coordinated the workshop. Mr. Sunderlal Sharma, Senior Deputy Mayor and Mr. NK Katara, Superintending Engineer, MCF was also on the panel to facilitate the discussion.

The workshop commenced with a welcome note by Mr. NK Katara. He unfolded the concept of the City Development Plan (CDP) in the context of the JNNURM and further explained the objective of JNNURM under which the Government plans to provide capital grants to urban local bodies (ULB) for funding various urban infrastructure projects/ initiatives that bring greater transparency, accountability and governance in the functioning of the Corporation. He emphasised that no proposal would be

accepted unless a CDP was in place and that the idea of the CDP was to fund projects, which fitted into the overall vision of the city.

21


Later, CRISIL Infrastructure Advisory representatives presented the CDP process being adopted in Faridabad and gave out facts and figures based on a rapid assessment of the city that was carried out by the consultants. In addition, stakeholders were apprised of the potential and challenges which Faridabad needed to overcome to improve its infrastructure and be eligible for JNNURM funding. These talks and presentations created an understanding amongst the stakeholders regarding JNNURM and the importance of the CDP. The stakeholders were then requested to focus their discussion on the following aspects:

The major issues related to Faridabad and factors affecting economic growth Issues related to municipal services The future of Faridabad, i.e., Faridabad in the next 15-20 years from the perspective of

economic development and municipal services Strategies and actions required Your contribution towards the betterment of Faridabad

The stakeholders’ discussions mainly focused on the poor state of infrastructure and unauthorised construction; unplanned development of industrial estates and location of industries in residential areas; and non -availability of developed industrial plots as per the requirement of different industries. The stakeholders were appreciative of this exercise and suggested that MCF should conduct such meetings frequently to get feedback from citizens.

The commissioner readily accepted this suggestion and promised to hold such meetings regularly during the implementation of JNNURM. The details of issues, suggestions and strategies proposed by stakeholders are presented in Annexure 4.

Representation of Urban poor & Slums in Stakeholder Consultations

Due to the poor quality of data and lack of any socio-economic data on slums in Faridabad, consultations with citizens have been the main recourse to identify issues pertaining to services’ delivery in slums. Considering the need and importance for representation of the same in the stakeholder consultations, each consultation and discussion also focused on aspects related to urban poor and slums in the city. These consultations were in the form of discussions with the MP/ MLA specifically on the slums; discussions with the elected representatives/ corporators of each ward on the status and problems of slums in their ward; consultations with the NGOs working in these slums; and discussions with slum dwellers during visits to select slums in the city like Bapu Nagar, Dabua Colony, Mirjapur etc.

Presentation of Draft CDP

Based on the inputs from stakeholder consultations, workshops and an analytical review of existing infrastructure, the Draft CDP was formulated, replete with a city investment plan which showed MCF’s investment capacity and its strategies and action plan for implementation of CDP. The same is submitted in the form a report to elicit feedback. The draft CDP was also placed for discussion with HUIDB officials on 6th September 2006 based on which the state level sanctioning committee has proposed for approval of the Draft CDP and finalization for onward submission of final CDP to GoI. The draft CDP was also presented by MCF to its Council. The feedback thus received from all such quarters was used to further refine the Draft CDP for final submission to the GoI for approval.

22


3.3 VISION FOR FARIDABAD

The vision for Faridabad was drafted based on stakeholder consultations, wherein the citizens and various stakeholders vocalised how they envisaged Faridabad to develop in the next 20 years. Also, officials’ perspectives on how they would like to develop Faridabad were taken into account. Accordingly, the mission statement for MCF was formulated.

3.3.1 Important Aspects that Defined Faridabad’s Vision

During individual discussions and the workshops, the stakeholders discussed and articulated several factors that should be taken into consideration while formulating the vision. These statements are listed below and have been used in drafting the vision statement. Develop Faridabad as a High-Tech city Green Faridabad Multi-sector economic approach to

ensure sustainability Good and planned road network An environment-friendly city with

excellent infrastructure Slum-free and pollution-free city

A tourist transit hub Better connectivity to Delhi and preferred

satellite in NCR Industrial growth to be revived and

sustained Able, efficient and self –contained Efficient use of energy Good connectivity with the region Best city of Haryana

3.3.2 Vision Statement

Based on the city’s strengths, futuristic desires, perspectives and potential of Faridabad, the following Vision Statements have been drafted and placed before the MCF council. The MCF has to accept and adopt a futuristic Vision for Faridabad that encompasses the desires of its citizens.

The citizens of Faridabad have expressed their thoughts on the vision for Faridabad in the following statements:

“Our Vision to Make Faridabad the Best City of Haryana with Top Class Infrastructure”

“Sukh, Sampann aur Samarth Faridabad”

“Faridabad to be the Future Industrial Destination of the Region with Best Infrastructure and Safe Livable Environment”

“A Planned and the Model City to Promote Economic Development, Safe Environment, with Best Infrastructure with Equity”

The above-mentioned statements, together with MCF’s understanding of the potential and challenges of Faridabad, are summarized in the form of the following Vision Statement for Faridabad city.

23


“Faridabad shall be the place for safe living in the NCR, with, environment enriched, economy booming and the class of infrastructure unmatched. Faridabad

shall be the country’s City of the Decade 2011-21”. 3.3.3 Mission Statement

With an ambitious vision in mind, the Municipal Corporation of Faridabad defines its presence through a mission of “Commitment to develop the city in a planned manner and be a efficient service provider through commitment to achieve distinction in civic amenities provision and a Municipal Corporation which is “well governed with modern, simple, responsible, approachable governance to all its citizens”.

MCF perceives its role as the principal service provider of all municipal services. MCF also intends to involve the private sector in managing services efficiently in a cost-effective manner; MCF would act as a facilitator for provision of services, which promote socio-economic development, but are not under its umbrella. The mission strategies of MCF for each sector are discussed in the following section: MCF As Service Provider to MCF to be Facilitator for Prepare a comprehensive infrastructure plan

for water, sewerage and storm water drainage

Improve road network and beautify all major junctions

Develop community centers in all residential sectors

Provide all core municipal services Ensure efficient and sustainable solid waste

management Conserve city environment by developing

gardens, conserving and protecting water bodies, etc.

Provide basic urban service for all urban poor , construct dwelling units and rehabilitate all families in Juggi- Jopidi colonies

Provide a clean, green and pollution-free environment

Create places of healthy entertainment and recreation

Provide efficient fire service Ensure efficient urban and developmental

planning, and strict adherence to byelaws Ensure good and modern urban governance

Health services, higher education Adequate power supply for

sustainable economic growth Extension of metro rail to Faridabad Better connectivity with NOIDA and

Gurgaon Recreation and entertainment Community participation

24


3.4 FARIDABAD TOMORROW

Rapid urbanization, population growth, growing economy and emerging opportunities in the region have placed an enormous demand for quality civic infrastructure. Apart from being plagued by huge gaps in infrastructure to service the current population, Faridabad faces other common challenges like accumulation of garbage, traffic congestion, deteriorating roads, pollution, and a strain on civic supplies like water, drainage and electricity.

Faridabad was once the industrial centre of Haryana and the sixth largest industrial centre of Asia. It has now moved down to the ninth position and is also facing challenges from other progressive towns in the region, due to the lack of adequate and good civic infrastructure. Other reasons for the downtrend are the lack of educational facilities, particularly higher education, power supply, etc.

In order to meet its future challenges, MCF needs to be more responsive and action-oriented. Faridabad is set to become a modern township. But, if the vision for tomorrow has to be realized, it will need the commitment and support of every participating citizen and institution as well as MCF to the implementation of the CDP proposals.

Having formulated the vision for a structured development of the city, it would be mandatory to commit to reforms to attract resources for providing adequate infrastructure. With assistance under JNNURM, the Corporation can create state-of-the-art infrastructure and encourage investments (public and private) in creating quality infrastructure.

A new wave of public-private partnerships could also sweep the urban infrastructure sectors. This would boost the city’s character as an investment destination. The city desires to showcase itself as the gateway to the country’s economic growth and strengthen its position as a growth engine for Haryana and the NCR. Industry too has a responsibility and a larger role to play in urban governance by adopting a more proactive approach.

The anticipated outcome:

Sustained economic growth, increase in income levels and improvement in the economic condition of the poor

Organised micro-enterprise sector with emphasis on IT

Strengthened sectoral networks of services

Leveraging of sectoral capabilities for development and facilitating the creation of an information infrastructure network

Market-friendly environment for micro entrepreneurs

Strong linkage between industry and institutions promoting R&D

Realise the role defined for Faridabad in NCR

25


4 CITY ASSESSMENT – SITUATION ANALYSIS

4.1 GROWTH TRENDS

Faridabad is the biggest urban agglomeration of the Haryana State consisting of the old municipal town of Faridabad, Ballabgarh, and the New Industrial Town (NIT) along with 38 revenue villages. The Development Plan of Faridabad, prepared in 1991, comprises 91 sectors (maximum number of sectors in any development plan of Haryana) with the highest projected population of 17.5 lakhs by 2011 at an assumed decadal growth rate of 70% for 1991-2001 and 2001-11.

4.1.1 Demography

The growth of Faridabad has been a continuous process since independence. Faridabad city is a result of the decision taken after the Partition of the country to establish an industrial-cum-housing estate at Faridabad to relieve the pressure of population growth in Delhi and also to decentralize the location of industries. Since then, Faridabad has been the hub of industrial activity of the state of Haryana and has more than 600 heavy/ medium and small-scale industries. This industrial inducement coupled with natural growth of Faridabad increased many folds over the past four decades. The demographic transition is presented in Table 3.

Table 3. Population Growth of Faridabad Census Year

Population Total

Decadal Change

Growth Rate (%)

1961 56,000 - -1971 1,22,000 66,000 117.861981 3,30,864 2,08,864 171.201991 6,25,085 2,94,221 88.932001 10,55,938 4,30,853 68.93

Source: Census of India, respective years

As evident, the population growth over the past decade of 1991-2001 has come down in comparison to the earlier decades. However, the city has registered a decadal growth rate of about 69 percent and an average annual CAGR of 5.38 percent, which are still on the higher side. In our discussion so far, we have considered the area under the jurisdiction of MCF only. However, the economic activity in the city is to a very large extent directly dependent on the national capital New Delhi, located close by. Faridabad is also a part of the NCR; hence the growth dynamics of Faridabad will depend and move in direct relation to that in NCR.

4.1.2 Municipal Area and Population Density

Prior to its inception as a Corporation in 1993-94, the present-day MCF was referred to as Faridabad Complex Administration (FCA) comprising the municipalities of Faridabad Township, Old Faridabad, Ballabgarh and 38 revenue villages. The present geographical area of Faridabad is 207.88 sq.km. and has remained thus since its inception as a Municipal Corporation. The density of the Corporation in 2001 was 5080 persons per sq.km.; in 1991, the density was 3007 persons per sq.km. As on date, the density of population in Faridabad city is estimated to be about 6129 persons per sq.km.

26


Table 4. Density Pattern in Faridabad and Other Cities in India Municipal Corporation of Faridabad Other cities in India

Year Area- Sq.km Density Persons/ Sqkm. City Density

Persons/ Sqkm. (2001)1991 207.88 3007 Pimpri-Chinchwad 5,9022001 207.88 5080 Kota 3,1372006 207.88 6129 Visakhapatnam 8,683

Source: Census of India

Faridabad has a higher gross population density, compared to other peer group cities like Pimpri-Chinchwad and Kota, but the density is lesser than that of Visakhapatnam, which is also an industrial city. Though Faridabad’s present day population density is in a comfortable range for the quantum of area under the jurisdiction of its Corporation, the comparison mentioned above and the significant increase in density signals the need for planned dispersal of development activities within the Corporation area.

It is observed that the areas within FCA towards Gurgaon have been on high demand for fast paced growth where real estate activity has picked up considerably during the past five years. Private colonizers have developed and are in the process of developing large number of apartment and housing complexes in these areas. There are also institutional and recreation related developments in the area. Major commercial developments in the form of shopping malls, multiplexes etc are observed to be still restricted to the NH 2 and its nearby surroundings.

Growth Directions

Commercial Growth

4.1.3 Sex Ratio and Literacy

Both the sex ratio and the literacy levels in the city have improved over the years. The sex ratio of the city has improved consistently from 740 in 1981 to 817 in 2001. The sex ratio on the lower side is a common phenomenon across the region extending to Rajasthan from where there has been a lot of out-migration during the times prior to and immediately after independence. It can also be attributed to the character of the city as a manufacturing base which attracts large numbers of male singles; they become a part of the city’s skilled and unskilled workforce. The overall literacy level has also improved considerably over the years and stands at 80 percent as per the Census 2001. The table below highlights the sex ratio and the literacy levels of Faridabad city from 1971 to 2001.

Table 5. Sex Ratio and Literacy Level Parameter/ Year 1981 1991 2001Sex Ratio 740 804 817Literacy - - 80%

Source: Respective Census

27


4.1.4 Population Projection

For the last four decades, the decadal growth rate of population has been declining continuously - though it is still on the higher side - indicating stabilisation; this is a common phenomenon in most parts of the country. The current decline can be mainly attributed to the movement towards gradual stabilisation, which in the case of Faridabad can be expected to be achieved during the decade 2021-31.

The Development Plan (DP) for Faridabad prepared in 1991 assumed a decadal growth rate of 70 percent for the decades 1991-01 and 2001-11 and estimated a population of 17.5 lakhs by 2011. This was based on past growth rates which were above 100 percent; the same have however declined during the last two decades. Based on similar analysis, the NCR regional plan for 2021 has projected the population of Faridabad as 16 lakhs by 2011 and 25 lakhs by 2021.

Further the NCR regional plan for 2021 proposed Faridabad-Ballabgarh as a CNCR city/ Delhi Metropolitan Area (DMA) city with controlled and moderate growth in the future. While migration within NCR is low, migration into NCR from other regions of Northern India is high. This causes a larger impact on Faridabad due to its industrial character. Accordingly, the past and current trends of population growth in Faridabad city have been projected using various methods, the results of which are presented below.

Table 6. Population projections for Faridabad Population projections Method 2001 2011 2021 2031

Polynomial 2nd order method 15,96,403 22,54,233 30,28,501Polynomial 3rd order method 15,87,680 22,20,861 29,72,461Arithmetic increase method 13,05,923 15,55,907 18,05,892Incremental increase method 14,27,540 19,20,760 25,35,598Geometrical progression method 21,69,481 44,57,313 91,57,787Assumed projection

1055938

15,37,208 21,34,351 28,45,505

Source: Analysis

It is observed that the variance in the case of polynomial methods and incremental increase methods is low; these largely follow the current growth trends and are in line with what has been envisaged in the Regional Plan 2021 of NCR. While the projections with the arithmetic increase method are on the lower side, those by the geometric progression method are on the higher side.

Accordingly, an average of the polynomial 2nd order method, polynomial 3rd order method and incremental increase methods is considered appropriate and present the closest of the current population growth trends. The population projection for Faridabad is thus assumed as 15.37 lakhs by 2011, 21.34 lakhs by 2021 and 28.46 lakhs by 2031.

4.2 LAND USE

The Development Plan (DP) for Faridabad was prepared for the period 1991- 2011, for the erstwhile municipalities of Faridabad Township/ NIT, Old Faridabad, Ballabgarh and 38 revenue villages, altogether referred to as the Faridabad Controlled Area. The DP was prepared comprising 91 sectors to accommodate an estimated population of 17.5 lakhs by 2011.

28


4.2.1 Urbanisable Land – Proposed Land use

The DP proposals have been prepared in 1991 for a total urbanisable area of 38743 acres/ 156.79 sq.km. in FCA area. The present municipal area of MCF is 207.88 sq.km and it is understood that approximately 75 percent of the MCF area is already developed.

Table 7. Proposed Land Use of Faridabad – 2011

Note: (i) Residential areas outside of ring road have not been

included in the above areas.

Proposed Land Use (2011) Head Area (Sq.Km) % area

1 Residential 77.95 49.7 2 Commercial 7.73 4.9 3 Industrial 31.36 20.0 4 Special zone 4.42 2.8 5 Public utilities 1.55 1.0 6 Public & semi-public 5.30 3.4 7 Transportation/ circulation 15.54 9.9 8 Open spaces/ recreation 12.95 8.3 Total 156.79 100.0

Proposed Land use (2011)

20%

3%

5%

1%3%

10%

8% 0%50%

ResidentialCommercialIndustrialSpecial zonePublic UtilitiesPublic & Semi- publicTransportation/ CirculationOpen Spaces/ RecreationWater bodies

(ii) The above areas include areas under existing land uses within the towns of old Faridabad, NIT and Ballabgarh.

While 50 percent of the urbanisable area is proposed for residential purposes, a significant 20 percent of the area is proposed for industrial uses. Each of the land use categories is further detailed below.

Residential

An area of 19,262 acres/77.95 sq.km. has been reserved for residential purposes on the basis of an average residential density of 90 persons per area. However, the proposed residential density for the residential sectors adjoining the industrial areas was fixed at 120 persons per acre to accommodate the population of the Economical Weaker Section (EWS) and Low Income Group (LIG). The sectors adjoining the Central Business District (CBD) have been proposed to be developed on the basis of residential density of 100 persons per acre whereas the sectors on rocky terrains along the Badkhal-Suraj Kund road were expected to have lower residential density.

29


Figure - Development Plan 2011 for Faridabad

30


Figure - Development Plan 2011 for Faridabad

31


Commercial

An area of 1910 acres/ 7.73 sq.km. has been proposed for commercial purposes in the Development Plan. Considering the proposed industrial area in the eastern side of the Agra Canal and the inadequacy of commercial areas in the Faridabad-Ballabgarh Complex, about 3.33 sq.km. of the proposed commercial area was planned on the eastern side of the Agra Canal. The proposal mainly aims at locating commercial areas along major roads and sector roads between sector 78 to 83 and sector 70. To the west of the Agra Canal, sector 12, which was previously planned as a City center, was retained as a commercial-cum-business centre and a town park was merged with this sector for a better synthesis of high-rise buildings and open spaces. This would also take care of the need for open spaces to an extent. In addition to the commercial belt between sectors 21-C, 46, 45 and the railway line, seven District Business Centres have also been proposed in sectors 52, NIT No. 1, 45, 4, 16, 18 and 79 in the Development Plan.

Industrial

Considering the industrial character of the Faridabad-Ballabgarh Complex, the area under industrial uses was proposed at 7,749 acres/ 31.36 sq.km. Of this, an area of 10.65 sq.km.on east of Agra Canal was proposed in the form of six industrial sectors.

Special Zone

An area of 4.42 sq.km. was proposed to be used as a special zone wherein institutions, offices, recreational facilities and areas with residential, commercial and other uses ancillary to the main uses mentioned above were planned. However, there was a condition - the gross area under each main use would not be less than 10 acres. A special zone was planned to incorporate mixed and inter-dependant land uses.

Public Utilities

While accommodating the then existing public utility sites, new sites for purposes such as sewerage treatment facilities and waste disposal have been proposed in the Development Plan. The total area proposed under this category is 1.55 sq.km.

Public and Semi-Public Uses

An area of 5.30 sq.km. was proposed for accommodating regional level, town level and community level institutions and amenities. The regional and town level facilities like hospitals, schools, and colleges etc are proposed in a linear pattern along the major roads on east of Agra Canal. The neighbourhood level community facilities were proposed to be provided at the level of preparation of layout plan of industrial sector. The Development Plan provides for 17 colleges and 17 hospitals following the National Capital Region (NCR) norms.

Transport & Communication

The circulation system of the city was expected to follow a grid-iron pattern. For the location of transport nagars/ sites, the Bypass and the Delhi-Mathura Road adjoining the industrial area were considered the most appropriate. Accordingly, provision was made in sectors 20-A, 27-D, 59, 61, and 67 and near the village Movai opposite sector 87 for six transport Nagars/ sites, primarily to act as intermediate facilities. The total area proposed, including the area under roads, is 15.54 sq.km. which is about 9.9 percent of the proposed urbanisable area.

32


Major Open Spaces

An area of 12.95 sq.km./ 3199 acres was proposed under this use. Of this, a large extent of area was proposed in the form of a 100 m wide green belt along the eastern side of the Agra Canal and along the expressway and the bypass. Additionally, another 500 m wide belt on the eastern side of the proposed alignment of bypass was provided for regional recreational facilities like amusement parks and tourist complexes.

4.2.2 Implementation of Development Plan

There is no mandate or identified single institution for the implementation in the DP. MCF and HUDA are the prime institutions with Haryana Housing Board also contributing at times to the implementation aspect. Detailed plans in line with DP proposals are prepared by respective agency that plans to develop a specific parcel of land. MCF due to its several obligations of service delivery has played little or limited role till date with respect to developing the land and hence implementation of DP. Accordingly HUDA has been the only agency who has been acquiring land in the MCF and FCA areas and developing the same. HUDA transfers such areas falling in the jurisdiction of MCF to MCF after five years of maintenance. Haryana Housing Board along with HUDA has also developed some Housing Board Colonies in Faridabad.

In the case of industrial development, the HSIDC has worked with HUDA for future industrial development as per the provisions of the Punjab Scheduled Roads & Controlled Area Restriction of Unregulated Development Act, 1963, Punjab Scheduled Roads and Controlled Area Restriction of unregulated development rules 1965 and the provisions of the Haryana Development and Restriction of Urban Area Act 1975 and its Rules of 1976.

Apart from these developments, many private developers (colonizers) have also been developing layouts after obtaining the requisite license; permission/ exemption form the Haryana government as per the prevailing norms of HUDA, Housing Board Haryana, and HSIIDC. The private licensed colonizers maintain their colonies for an initial period of five years; subsequently, these are handed over to MCF for their upkeep, future growth and maintenance under the HMCA, 1994. The salient features and proposals of the Development Plan are discussed in the following sections.

Building Permissions

As earlier mentioned, building permissions are accorded by multiple agencies in case of Faridabad. For areas administered by MCF the permissions are given by MCF and for those administered by HUDA (even if falling within MCF jurisdictional area) the same are accorded by HUDA/ FCA. Since most of the private developments are outside the MCF area, these private developers apply for building permission in HUDA/ FCA. As earlier pointed out in the section on ‘Institutional Mechanism’ there is a clear example of multiplicity of role play in this activity. Like, buildings developed in HUDA administered areas follow the HUDA (Erection of Buildings) Regulations, 1979 and such areas after any transfer to MCF administration will have to comply with the Building Regulations provided in Chapter XIV of HMCA. It also needs mention that the Building Regulations provided in Chapter XIV of HMCA are not comprehensive. So also are the Building Regulations provided in the annexures to the DP prepared for MCF and FCA.

33


4.2.3 Developed area vis-à-vis Urbanisable Land

The DP proposals have been drawn for only 157 sq.km of then identified urbanisable area of FCA in 1991. Taking the developments post 1991 in the economy of the region/ NCR the entire area within FCA has become urbanisable sans any DP proposals. While the area proposed for urbanisation (157 sq.km; mostly falling under MCF) has been completely developed (approximately 20 percent non-confirming to DP proposals). It may be concluded that while parts of MCF areas are yet to develop (areas on the west to the north of Badhkal Lake) the growth has spilled into areas outside MCF limits. Though within FCA, these areas are outside the purview of the DP and also the reason for many private colonisers developing layouts and high-rise apartments in such areas.

It needs mention that the DP prepared in 1991 is completely lacking in any concrete proposals for specific development activities. The same is left to the developer of the land. Accordingly neither the National Capital Region Planning Board (NCRPB) proposals are reflected in the DP of FCA and conversely NCRPB has no proposals from the DP of FCA to act or detail upon. That is such NCRPB proposals like widening of NH 2, development of peripheral expressways, orbital rail corridor, development of wholesale markets etc, unless finds place in the DP of FCA cannot take a formal shape.

This leads to a situation of missing clarity on the proposals to be actually implemented and hence presents an urgent need for the DP to reflect and provide for reserving adequate land for all such proposals. In light of the current DP nearing its plan period, the revision may be initiated at the earliest (irrespective of the period of completion of DP by 2011) and also considering the policy decision of reducing the time frame for revision of DP from 20 years to 10 years.

4.2.4 Key issues, potential and challenges regarding land use

Key Issues

Lack of concrete proposals in DP

The DP prepared in 1991 for FCA is more in the form of a guideline document and presents only the proposed land use for the estimated urbanisable land. Detailing out the DP and Implementation of the detailed plans are left to the respective developer like HUDA or MCF. This has resulted in a situation where the DP neither has any development proposals nor has incorporated any of the NCRPB proposals that would require major parcels of land to be reserved. Also non-incorporation of such major development proposals of NCR in the DP would lead to legal complications and extended delay in implementation.

Non-conformity of land uses

In the course of industrial development, the past decade and a half has witnessed a large number of ancillary service units, which are smaller than the small-scale industrial units. For lack of any specific proposals in the DP, these smaller units took refuge in residential areas; as on date, more than 9000 such units are estimated to exist within residential sectors. While these are non-hazardous, consultations with citizens revealed that a large number of these are causing noise pollution. A mix of residential and industrial uses is not acceptable by any planning norm; hence this issue would require attention when the Development Plan is taken up for revision.

34


Institutional duplication of efforts

While the Town & Country Planning Department prepares the Development Plan, the implementation of the same involves many agencies like HUDA, HHB, HSIIDC and private developers. However, in this entire process, MCF is left with no role in either the actual preparation of the plan or the implementation of the plan itself. The developed sectors are transferred to MCF by HUDA/ private developers for maintenance purposes, that too after five years. This goes against what has been envisaged in the 74th CAA for town planning as this function is to be completely devolved to MCF. Also, the current situation has deprived MCF of major revenues that can accrue from land development.

Potentials

Faridabad shows adequate potential to accommodate future population additions, indicating prospects of large-scale real estate activity in the near future.

The city also boasts of an extensive green belt, which could induce large sections of population to reside in Faridabad.

Challenges The town planning function is yet to be devolved on MCF, against what has been envisaged

in the 74th CAA. This presents a major challenge for MCF, implementing the Development Plan proposals in the true sense.

Bringing in uniformity in the provisions of building byelaws of all planning-related agencies like HUDA and MCF is a necessity.

There is a need to adopt a high-rise, high-density policy for residential areas and a Flatted Factory policy for industrial areas, to better serve and accommodate the future additions.

The present DP will complete its tenure in 2011, thereby necessitating a revision of the Plan. The same needs to be taken up through GIS-based systems.

Demand-Gap analysis, Infrastructure requirements and Investment needs are presented in the Chapter 5, City Investment Plan, Strategies and Implementation plan.

4.3 URBAN ENVIRONMENT

A city’s environment is the most critical determinant of the quality of life of its inhabitants and consequently of urban productivity. Air, water, greenery and noise levels are the constituents of urban environment. The Haryana State Pollution Control Board (HSPCB) is responsible for monitoring the water and air quality of the city.

4.3.1 Air Pollution

The major cause of air pollution in Faridabad is the discharge from automobiles (carbon monoxide, particulate matter, hydrocarbons and oxides of nitrogen), industries and thermal power plants (fly ash and sulphur dioxide). In the absence of specific studies/ monitoring of vehicular emissions, no specific conclusions could be arrived at. However, it is clear that the large numbers of industry-related heavy vehicles plying the city roads is the main cause of air pollution. The reasons for this substantial contribution by trucks to pollution are the presence of large industrial estates within the city limits and the passing of regional traffic through the city on the NH.

35


HSPCB/ Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) carried out Ambient Air Quality (AAQ) monitoring of the parameters of SPM, SO2 and NOx in Faridabad as part of the National Ambient Air Quality Monitoring program (NAAQM). Monitoring is being carried out year-to-year at two locations – near the Escorts Medical Centre, which is an industrial location, and near the regional office in Sector 9, which is a residential location.

Table 8. Ambient Air Quality in Faridabad city (NAAQM) CPCB/ HSPCB Ambient Air Quality Annual Average Value (µg/ m³)

Monitoring Station 2001 2002 2003 CPCB Standard

SPM 1 Escorts Medical Centre (Industrial) 327 465 402 360 2 Sector 9, Regional Office (Residential) 338 474 408 140 SO2 1 Escorts Medical Centre (Industrial) 23 13 10 80 2 Sector 9, Regional Office (Residential) 23 13 10 60 NOX 1 Escorts Medical Centre (Industrial) 15 26 29 80 2 Sector 9, Regional Office (Residential) 15 27 29 60

Source: HSPCB/ CPCB (National Ambient Air Quality Monitoring program)

The results of NAAQM, as presented in the table above, indicated that suspended particulate matter (SPM) levels are critically high in residential and industrial areas; SO2 and NOx emissions are within comfortable levels. SPM levels are, however, subject to major seasonal variations and locational factors. During the summers for instance, SPM levels are reported to be much higher than normal; during the monsoons, they dip to very low levels. The high level of SPM in residential areas, which is observed to be increasing year after year, is mainly due to the unrestricted movements of heavy vehicles in the residential areas of the city. The above mentioned is also corroborated by the recent survey of ambient air quality at select locations as part of the rapid Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) conducted in 2005 for the proposed solid waste disposal site. As can be observed in the table below, SPM levels have been above the critical mark at all locations except at Pali Village.

Table 9. Ambient Air Quality in Faridabad city at other locations Ambient Air Quality (2005) 24 Hrs 98th Percentile Value (µg/ m³)

Monitoring Station SPM (µg/ m³)

Norm SO2 (µg/ m³)

Norm NOX (µg/ m³)

Norm CO (µg/ m³)

Norm

1 Bhakri village (r) 389 200 14 80 78 80 736 2000 2 Saran school (i) 504 500 5 120 51 120 872 5000 3 Badhkal lake (s) 302 100 9 30 54 30 860 1000 4 Sector 21D (r) 462 200 6 80 80 80 1498 2000 5 MCF office (Old Faridabad) (r) 441 200 16 80 67 80 1961 2000 6 Sector 49, HSEB Electric Sub-station (r) 427 200 5 80 74 80 1930 2000 7 Pali village (i) 456 500 8 120 62 120 967 5000 8 Municipal Auditorium, NIT (r) 421 200 5 80 66 80 2066 2000 9 SWM proposed disposal site (r) 385 200 6 80 58 80 1139 2000

(r) Residential location (i) Industrial location (s) Sensitive location

Source: Rapid EIA for proposed SWM disposal site

36


It may also be observed from the table above that the carbon monoxide (CO) levels are above permissible limits at one location, i.e., the municipal auditorium in NIT which is also the central business district of NIT.

4.3.2 Water Pollution

In the absence of data with CPCB/ HSPCB on the surface and ground water quality in Faridabad city, the results of the water quality monitoring at select locations, as part of the rapid Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) conducted in 2005 for the proposed solid waste disposal site, have been considered for analysis in this section.

Table 10. Surface water quality in Faridabad City Average of Pre & Post Monsoon

Surface Water Quality DO

(mg/L) CPCB

Standard BOD

(mg/L) CPCB

Standard Total Coliform (MPN/100 mL)

CPCB Standard

pH Value

CPCB Standard

Badhkal lake 4.25 C/D 2.8 B/C 125 B 7.3 A/B/D/E


As per the CPCB norms for inland surface water, COD above 10 is highly polluted, DO less than 4 is critical and BOD must ideally be 3. The figures above presented indicate that the waters of Badhkal Lake can be classified under CPCB class “C”. It was also observed in the study that the lake waters were not clear and that a significant amount of worship material is being thrown into its waters. .

Table 11. Ground water quality in Faridabad City Average of Pre & Post Monsoon

Ground Water Quality Boron (mg/L)

Class TDS (mg/L)

Total Coliform

(MPN/100 mL)

Class pH Value

Class

1 Bhakhari village/ Hand pump 1 0 A 3717 2 A 7.55 A 2 Bhakhari village/ Hand pump 2 0 A 1640 2 A 7.55 A 3 Graveyard, Faridabad-Gurgaon road 0 A 794 2 A 7.55 A 4 Bhakhari village/ Hand pump 3 0 A 859.5 2 A 7.46 A 5 Bhakhari village/ Hand pump 4 0 A 706 2 A 7.66 A 6 Abandoned mine near

SWM proposed site/ Gr. water 0 A 160 2 A 7.55 A

7 Badhkal lake complex/ Bore well 0 A 275 2 A 7.35 A 8 MCF compound/ Tube well 0 A 863 2 A 7.6 A 9 Institute of Finance & Management

/ Gr. Water 0 A 929 2 A 7.36 A


An analysis of the Boron content, TDS and pH value of the ground waters at various locations, mentioned in the table, indicate that the ground water in the region is largely free from pollution and the baseline data is well within the prescribed limits for ‘primary water quality criteria’ issued by CPCB. Ground water quality hence can be classified as “A” Accordingly also is the water supply system in the city where ground water is drawn and supplied without any conventional treatment however after disinfection by chlorination.

37


4.3.3 Key issues regarding urban environment

Lack of alternate parallel corridors to NH

The lack of alternate corridors to NH2, coupled with the absence of inter-connectivity between the eastern and western sides of the railway line, virtually makes the NH the spine of the city. Any trip generated within the city needs to go through or cross the NH. Neither are there any bypass/ regional corridors for the regional traffic. Thus it inevitably enters the city roads and mixes with the city traffic, contributing to increased vehicular emissions into the city’s atmosphere along the stretch of the NH.

Lack of a public transport system

The lack of an organised public transport system in the city has led to an increase in the number of private transport vehicles like stage carriers and seven-seaters. These contribute significantly to carbon emissions in the city. Faridabad also receives a lot of regional traffic and floating population from Delhi, who travel by private vehicles. This increasing number of private vehicles is consequently causing more vehicular emissions and higher noise levels in the city.

Lack of Common Effluent Treatment systems for Faridabad Industrial Complex

The present industrial water demand is about 20 MLD and the same is expected to reach 100 MLD in another 20 years owing to the growth of the industry. For this large quantum of industrial water supply, the generation of waste water would be equally large and the absence of common treatment facilities (from economic point of view) of these wastewaters is clearly felt in the wake of the large scale pollution of the river Yamuna.

Apart from the above mentioned other aspects leading to degradation of urban environment in the city of Faridabad like, inadequate sanitation and drainage systems; inefficient waste management practices etc are discussed under such respective section.

4.4 URBAN POOR AND SLUMS IN FARIDABAD

This section reviews the status of slums and the urban poor and their access to urban basic services in the city, drawing from secondary information and interactions with stakeholders.

4.4.1 Poverty in Faridabad

Discussions with stakeholders revealed that the poverty levels are of varying nature and are coexistent in the city. Absolute poverty, as per the general definition, i.e. not enough to eat, is not prevalent in the city, except amongst a small section of people living in the slums; these people lack even housing and other amenities and can be categorized as the urban poor.

For the majority of the poor in the city, the only concern is security of land tenure, quality of housing, and access to basic infrastructure.

Defining and Measuring Poverty The simplest definition of poverty is the lack of specific consumptions (i.e., not enough to eat). A broader definition is the lack of command over commodities exercised by a population. Access to basic services, especially adequate and safe water, health and sanitation, and education are now increasingly being recognized as an important indicator of poverty.

Standard and widely accepted representations of poverty are the Head Count Index (HCI), which signifies the percentage of people below poverty line and the Poverty Gap (PG), which measures the depth of poverty(in statistical terms, this stands for the mean distance below the poverty line as percent of the poverty line).

38


If other parameters of urban poverty like housing, access to better sanitation facilities and capability to function in society are considered, then almost all slum dwellers can be categorized as the urban poor.

4.4.2 Slums in Faridabad

The booming industry in the city during the 70s and the 80s and the growth of its economy has also contributed to the growth of slums. Large numbers of labourers from different parts of the country have migrated in groups to the city in lieu of opportunities and settled on available vacant lands, largely belonging to the Central and State Govts, MCF, HUDA, Wakf board, Rehabilitation Department, and even private lands. Further, the meagre provisions in the Development Plan for EWS/ LIG housing and the non-availability of adequate service levels in several of these remote locations have been leading to a deteriorating environment in the city.

In all, there are 67 identified slum clusters in the city. The survey conducted during 2001 identified the total population living in these slums as 132424. It is estimated that as on date, the population living in the slums would be about 1.47 lakhs. That accounts for about 12 percent of the total city population.

The majority of the slums are concentrated at critical locations like along the alignment of the Badarpur bypass, the entire area between Old Faridabad and G.T. Road, and several lands acquired by HUDA for residential and industrial purposes.

Table 12. Slums in Faridabad Zone Huts/ Structures Population (2001) Population (2006)1 NIT zone 15802 71792 796942 Ballabgarh zone 7032 31294 347393 Old Faridabad zone 6874 29338 32567 Total 29708 132424 147000

Slum Survey, 2001 &Estimates

The earlier attempts of MCF, HUDA and the District Administration towards removing the encroachments on important and critical lands like the railway lands, and along major regional roads of the city have not yielded the desired results due to various injunctions and interim relief offered by various civil courts. In view of the above, the Honourable High Court of Haryana has given directions to frame a scheme for proper rehabilitation of the old occupants of those slum locations, which are proposed for encroachment removal. In this context, JNNURM is considered to be providing the right opportunity.

Access to basic services and amenities in slums

The slum survey earlier conducted has only listed the numbers of slums and the population residing in them; it did not evaluate the availability of services in each slum location. No other specific survey has been conducted on the slums in the city. However, information as available in the form of stakeholder consultations has been analysed to understand the access of slum dwellers to basic services, primarily water supply and sanitation. It also needs mention that Govt. of Haryana has ordered a stop vide Memo No. 439(30)/8081/G.II dated 21-07-1997 on providing any civic amenities to unauthorised jhuggi clusters residing on rehabilitation lands. This applies to majority of the slum locations in the city and hence this Government notification applies to all. This is also the reason for absolute lacking of civic amenities in most of the slums.

39


Of the total 765 and odd Public Stand Posts (PSP) and 515 hand pumps in the city, an estimated 425 PSPs and half the number of hand pumps are made available by the authorities in the slums, amounting to about 215 persons per public stand post and hand pump. While this indicator itself suggests an uncomfortable living condition, it is reported that this situation is not uniform. While some slum locations have piped water supply and some have public stand posts, the rest and a majority of them lack any such facility.

With respect to sanitation, of the total 734 seats of public conveniences in the city, about 410 are located in the slums as part of 24 complexes. Per person availability of seats of public convenience is 359, which represents a far from comfortable situation. This also indicates the general inadequacy of basic services to slum dwellers in the city.

4.4.3 Key issues regarding Slums and Urban poor

Restriction on providing civic amenities to slum dwellers on rehabilitation lands

Govt. of Haryana has ordered a stop vide Memo No. 439(30)/8081/G.II dated 21-07-1997 on providing any civic amenities to unauthorised jhuggi clusters residing on rehabilitation lands. This is in view of several slum dwellers raising pucca/ semi pucca structures on such lands meant for rehabilitation purposes thereby leading to 1) non-usage of these lands for the very purpose of rehabilitating the jhuggie dwellers in a planned manner and 2) poor living conditions in many slums of the city. A solution needs to be drawn up at the earliest to arrest the further growth of slums and improve the living conditions of not just the slum dwellers but also the citizens of Faridabad.

Concentration of slums along sensitive locations

The majority of the slum dwellers in the city have taken refuge on easily available locations close to the railway land and major road corridors apart from vacant lands. This dense concentration of slum dwellers along such environmentally and developmentally sensitive locations has only resulted in the complete lack of access to basic services, causing unhygienic living conditions.

Unaffordable housing situation for LIG/ Slum dwellers

Today, the land market in Faridabad under the impact of NCR is booming with real estate values reaching levels unaffordable by the LIG/ slum dweller groups. Also, the lack of any specific proposals for these groups in the Development Plan has led to a shortage of housing for these unprivileged groups in an otherwise large housing market.

Lack of awareness on slum development programs

There is a general paucity of awareness of the various slum development schemes and programs announced from time to time by the central and state governments. This leads to long delays in the implementation of the programmes and overall dissatisfying results, apart from the factor of the benefits of the programs not reaching the intended beneficiaries.


40


4.5 MUNICIPAL SERVICES – ROADS, STREET LIGHTING, AND TRANSPORTATION

MCF’s role with regard to road infrastructure in the city includes the construction and maintenance of all roads in its jurisdiction, except the roads belonging to the Public Works Department (highways and other district-level roads). The construction of internal roads, in the case of a private colony development is the responsibility of the developer. MCF However verifies the adequacy of proposals in these areas with respect to the DP, at the time of sanction.

MCF and other functional agencies are also responsible for implementing the DP proposals with regard to new major roads and road-widening activities.

4.5.1 Road Network

The MCF area is characterised by the old Faridabad, Ballabgarh and the New Industrial Town (NIT). The Delhi-Mathura NH 2 is the spine of all road networks in the city. As presented in the adjacent figure areas to the east of NH 2 mostly follow the grid-iron pattern (except for core village areas which have a geometric road network with narrow lanes and high density concentrations). These are Old Faridabad and Ballabgarh areas. Areas to the west of NH 2 mainly comprising of NIT have a mix of organic and grid-iron pattern of roads. The road network in the MCF area functionally comprises arterial roads, collector roads and local streets.

The main arterial roads either start or end on the NH 2. Other highways in the city include NH3 and NH4, which also branch out from NH 2. State highways include the Faridabad-Gurgaon highway and the

Ballabgarh-Sohna highway.

Grid and Organic pattern of roads

Grid-Iron pattern of roads

The network of roads in the city runs to a length of 1218 km. This includes the 80 Km of NH, SH and PWD roads. The total length of roads under MCF’s maintenance is 1138 km., of which 840 km. is of BT surfacing, 48 km. has cement concrete surface and 250km. are of gravel with brick on edges.

Table 13. Road Length in Faridabad S. No Surface Type Length in Km PercentageMunicipal Roads 1 Concrete 48.00 4%2 Black-topped 840.00 69%3 Gravel (brick on edge) 250.00 21%Total Road Length 1138.00 93%Other roads (NH/ SH/ PWD etc) 80.00 7%

41


Road condition

79 percent of the roads in the city are surfaced; the per-capita road length as on date is 0.96 metres, which is relatively better in comparison to other peer cities with similar population and size. However this is against only 80 percent of the developed area within MCF limits and newly developing and peripheral areas towards the west lacking absolutely in terms of proper road connectivity. The average width of roads in the city is 6.66 metres.

Due to rapid development in economic, industrial and commercial activities, there has been an enormous increase in traffic plying on the city roads. Also, due to delay in the execution of the bypass road, the NH2 other main arterial roads are privy to local and regional traffic. The high volume of traffic, mainly heavy traffic related to the industries located in and around the city, also causes damage to the road surface.

From the geographical point of view, the Delhi-Agra rail line passes through the length of the city and divides Faridabad into two vertical sections. NH 2 runs along the rail line. This geographical situation necessitates a greater number of road over bridges (ROBs) in the city to cross the railway line and avoid traffic congestion at railways crossings. At present, there are only three ROBs across the rail line, the

most widely used being the Neelam ROB, which is constantly congested.

ROB

Neelam Bridge

NH 2

Rail

Bata Bridge

to Delhi

4.5.2 Street lighting

The provision and maintenance of streetlights is an obligatory function of MCF. MCF is responsible for the installation, replacement, repairs, operation and maintenance of streetlights in the city. There are about 22,036 street light poles in Faridabad city with different types of electrical fixtures. 76 percent of the fixtures are tube lights and 24 percent are high power lamps, mainly sodium vapour lamps of various wattages - 70W, 150W and 250W.

Table 14. Street lights in MCF area Number of Lights by Type Numbers of streetlightsTube lights 16,681 Sodium Vapour Lamps 5,354 Mercury Lamps -High Mast Lamps 1 Others - Total 22036

Source: MCF

42


Against the available road length of 1218 km. within the MCF limits, the average spacing of streetlight poles works out to about 55 meters, which rates well below the norm of 30 meters indicating the gross inadequacy of the system. However, this condition is not uniform.. The inadequacy is mainly observed in the newly developing areas, unauthorized colonies and slum locations and to an extent in the residential sectors adjoining the industrial estates.

4.5.3 Urban Transport

Road infrastructure has not expanded in tandem with the increase in the number of vehicles in the city. In the last four decades, while the population of the city has increased ten times the vehicle population is understood to have increased 60 times. With the projections indicating that Faridabad would have a population of about 21 lakhs by 2021 and 29 lakhs by 2031, road and transportation infrastructure has to not only meet the existing demand, but also cater to the demand that will be generated by the increasing population. It is observed that neither the data on the registered numbers of vehicles nor any other localised statistics can provide the true picture of travel pattern and traffic movements due to the dynamics of travel/ trips generated within NCR and between Delhi and Faridabad. A systematised study in that direction is necessary to assess the ground situation.

By comparison, the movement patterns presented in the Regional Plan, 2021 of NCR indicate that public transport commands majority share at 72 percent of the trips generated in the NCR, while private vehicles constitute 28 percent of the trips. It was also observed that within NCR, trips during the morning peak hours are destined for NCT-Delhi; during evenings, the opposite is observed. This clearly indicates the nature of travel within NCR. People prefer to use Delhi Transport Corporation (DTC) bus service as mode of public transport for long-distance movements within NCR and most of these trips are office and work-related. Faridabad is also one such location within NCR from where a large number of work-related trips are generated and which typically end in NCT-Delhi.

As per the NCR Regional Plan 2001, only 6.4 percent of the total traffic movements between Delhi-Faridabad were accounted for by buses or public transportation. A staggering 71 percent was accounted for by the passenger vehicles/ private vehicles. In terms of generation of passenger traffic for Faridabad, 52 percent of passenger traffic is accounted by buses followed by private vehicles at 35 percent. That is against significant numbers of passenger traffic generation by buses, the availability in umbers of public transport systems are less and inadequate. This is also signified by the per-capita trip rate generation of bus passengers at 0.046 against 0.031 by vehicle passengers.

Travel Characteristics

While the preferred mode of travel (motorised) in Faridabad is two-wheelers, the predominant number of trips undertaken in the city are understood to be pedestrian in nature followed by cycling. Further, the estimated numbers stage carriers and contract carriers and limited numbers of seven-seaters that form the public transport system of the city, which ply the roads on a given day not even account for 1 percent, indicating that people travel in congestion within the available modes of transport/ travel. In the absence of organised public transport system, apart from stage carriers, auto rickshaws are the other mode of travel. Alternatively, the numbers of two-wheelers plying on city roads is understood to constitute about 70 percent of the total vehicles and four-wheelers about 20 percent.

43


This situation also clarifies the observed shift in the travel mode in Faridabad from public transport to personal transport and the high growth in the numbers of two-wheelers. This is however against a lot of vehicles registered in Delhi observed to be moving in Faridabad indicating the situation to be much worse.

Public Transport/ Mass Transit

The NCR Regional Plan 2001 has projected a trip rate of 0.036 for vehicle passengers and 0.034 for public transport for Faridabad that is 25856 vehicle passenger trips per day and 85224 public transport trips to be catered to through an efficient public transport system in the city. The projected passenger trips for public transport at 85224 trips also signify the need for MRTS system of public transport in the city. Also the NCR Regional Plan 2021 has indicated major proposals for public transportation like development of the Regional Rail Transit System (RRTS), extension of the MRTS system to Faridabad and linking with RRTS, development of the Orbital Rail Corridor etc all to be implemented by 2011. These proposals have been discussed in ensuing section on ‘NCR Proposals’. However till date, the city continued to be devoid of any organised public transport system.

The public transport system in the city at present comprises stage carriers and seven- seaters, which ply the city roads and transport commuters to various required destinations. In the absence of an organised public transport system, urban mobility is made possible through transport and non-transport modes. The transport mode includes tempo passengers (seven-seaters), three-wheelers, auto-rickshaws, mini-buses, and taxis. Private transport modes include two-wheelers, cars, and jeeps.

Since public transport is not organized to provide quality and dependable service to all sections of the public and in all directions of the city, increasing acquisition of and dependence on personal transport vehicles meet the gap. This has resulted in on-street parking of the stage carriers and seven-seaters, which contribute to the congestion of the main roads, slow movements of vehicles and increasing air pollution.

Traffic Management and Circulation

Majority of the road network in the city is grid-iron pattern with sufficient road widths and pose little problems with respect to traffic management. The road network primarily has arterial roads and internal roads. Major issues with respect to traffic management are restricted to the core of the old areas of Faridabad and Ballabgarh where the network is organics and narrow and the NH 2. NH 2 carries maximum traffic plying in the city of Faridabad. This comprises both the city traffic, NCR traffic as well as the regional traffic. Due to lack of alternate parallel corridors to NH 2 it has virtually become the spine of traffic movements of the city. Trips generated in the city have either the origin or destination as NH 2. This is also due to concentration of major commercial and institutional areas along NH 2 and lack of any alternate city business districts CBD). This presents a clear case of lack of integration between land use and transportation.

Further the Delhi-Agra broad gauge rail line also runs parallel to the NH 2 and the linkages across the rail line between the eastern and western areas is another major issue from traffic management perspective. The present available connectors are only three numbers of ROBs for a linear city of length about 18 Km. For this length the three ROBs are inadequate and necessitates the need for more connecting ROBs across the rail line. One near the Ballabagrh Railway station close to Bata factory would be of priority.

44


Also to mention is the NCR proposal for widening of the length of NH 2 in Faridabad to expressway standards. Such widening will need to propose adequate service roads so as to segregate the regional traffic and city traffic. Further there is also a proposal for a 4 lane elevated road connecting Delhi-Faridabad near Badarpur which would primarily reduce the load on NH 2 entering Faridabad. The proposals while are in the right direction and will possibly solve majority of traffic problems associated with NH 2 in Faridabad, initiation of the same for planned completion before 2011 is important.

Parking

Organised on-street parking facilities are provided only in select locations in the city, primarily due to lack of space for MCF to provide such facilities. As earlier mentioned, DP proposals are restricted to overall planning and independent sectors are planned by the respective developer (MCF/ HUDA, private developers etc) provision for parking spaces is lost out in the process. This again spells out the lacking integration between land use and transportation planning. Parking lots at present are provided by MCF at 8 locations in the city for two-wheelers and four-wheelers. Lack of sufficient parking lots and organised on-street parking facilities has resulted in haphazard and unorganised parking on most stretches of commercial roads in the city.

NCR Transport proposals

As per NCR regional plan the modal split is in favour of public transport system and it estimates that the modal split will increase to 82 percent by 2025 due to the extension of MRTS facility into outside NCT-Delhi areas. The regional plan 2021 of NCR has proposed to develop NCR

through four policy zones: 1) NCT-Delhi 2) Central NCR Zone 3) Highway Corridor Zone, and 4) Rest NCR Zone. The regional plan proposes to maximize the opportunities in the CNCR zone of which Faridabad-Ballabgarh is also a part. The plan proposes to assist the CNCR towns in competing with NCT-Delhi in terms of employment generation, economic activities, transport systems, housing, social infrastructure, environment, etc. Accordingly, the Transport Plan 2021 for NCR has further given the following proposals involving Faridabad-Ballabgarh and to be implemented in the first phase during 2001-11.

Proposal to develop NH 2 from Delhi to Ballabgarh to expressway standards.

All CNCR towns are proposed to be connected through peripheral expressways, of which the Kundli-Manesar-Palwal (KMP) western peripheral expressway and the Kundli-Ghaziabad-Palwal (KGP) eastern expressway are located closest to Faridabad-Ballabgarh.

Faridabad

NH 2 Widening to Expressway

Peripheral Expressways

Orbital Rail Corridor

Regional Rapid Transit System (RRTS)

NCR

45


Metro rail transit system (MRTS) to be extended to Faridabad, one of the CNCR towns and further to have feeder and connect services with the regional rapid transit system (RRTS) to cater to increasing intra-city urban transport needs.

4.5.4 Issues, Potential and Challenges in roads, street lighting and transport sectors

Key Issues

Entry and mix of regional traffic on city roads:

For want of a bypass road to Faridabad, the vehicular traffic is compelled to pass through the city. Due to this, there is tremendous traffic congestion on important roads of the city, primarily the NH 2. While this issue has been tackled partially by the formation of the Faridabad-Surajkund-Delhi expressway, the NCR proposals for a western peripheral expressway and an eastern peripheral expressway need to be implemented at the earliest (the same were proposed for implementation in the first phase during 2001-11).

Lack of appropriate and efficient road infrastructure:

While road connectivity within the developed areas of the city is good, the infrastructure is below standard. Inadequate grade separation and poor surface quality are leading to travel delays, congestion and pollution. Appropriate safety and visibility enhancement parameters like signage, markings, channel islands, street name boards and other street furniture are absent on the majority of roads. Major roads lack footpaths and pedestrian facilities; those available are encroached upon by informal activities and street hawkers.

Lack of an integrated traffic and transportation system

Except for a few major intersections in the city, the rest lack cohesion with road geometry, necessitating an integrated traffic and transport system. Also, the mixing of traffic owing to the lack of lane separators and unabated parking on the main roads and intersections is predominant. The capacity of many intersections has thus been exhausted. Many areas, and mainly the core areas of the city in NIT and Ballabgarh, are experiencing parking problems, low-speed travel, increased congestion, and worsening air quality.

Lack of coordination between land use and transportation systems;

Land use planning of the city has been largely restricted to the residential, commercial and industrial areas of the city; the most important function of transportation systems has been ignored. The lack of truck terminals and planned arterial ring roads/ bypasses is precipitating a high degree of unwanted freight movement and parking inside the city. The major fallout is the degradation of the environment by oil and waste discharges from the trucks and heavy vehicles along major roads.

Lack of an efficient public transport system:

Presently, Faridabad city does not have an organised public transport system, except for the extension of Delhi Transport Services to the Badarpur border of Delhi-Faridabad, which caters to the transport needs of Faridabad only to an extent. The city within is entirely dependent on auto-rickshaws and stage carriers for urban mobility. The fallouts of an ineffective public transport system are visible in the form of traffic snarls, congestion on roads and roadsides, increase in pollution, accidents, etc.

46


Potential presented by urban transport The regional plan proposals of NCR towards improving regional connectivity between the

CNCR cities of Faridabad, Gurgaon, Ghaziabad and Sonepat reveal the potential for sustenance of the present and potential industrial/ commercial and residential activities in the CNCR cities.

NCR proposals for the extension of metro rail to Faridabad will also enhance the city’s potential for attracting large-scale investments.

Challenges for the urban transport In line with the proposed improvements in the regional connectivity of Faridabad, the city

also needs to improve its internal connectivity, mainly between the eastern and western areas.

Early implementation of the proposed KMP western peripheral expressway, up-gradation of NH 2 from Delhi-Ballabgarh to expressway standards, widening of the Gurgaon-Faridabad road, etc. present a clear challenge for the implementation agencies.

There is a need for an integrated road, traffic and transportation plan for Faridabad and its surroundings in line with the proposals of NCR.


4.6 MUNICIPAL SERVICES – WATER SUPPLY

Water supply systems in the region are dependent to a large extent on ground water and Faridabad is no exception. In line with the increasing population, more and more ground water is extracted to meet the demand. However, in view of depleting ground water levels, water is also being tapped through the rainy wells located along the Yamuna River.

4.6.1 Source of Water Supply

The source of water supply to the city of Faridabad is ground water, tapped from 420 deep tube wells located in various parts of the city and two rainy wells located along the Yamuna River. The river Yamuna runs along the length of Faridabad-Ballabgarh at a distance of about 10 km. The total installed capacity of the tube wells is 195 MLD and that of the two rainy wells is 45 MLD, leading to a total installed capacity of 240 MLD. Faridabad is utilizing the entire installed capacity to cater to the demands of the residential, commercial and industrial areas.

Tube wells are drilled to a depth of 200 ft. to 350 ft. and the discharge from tube wells varies from 2500 gallons per hour to 15,000 gallons per hour. It is observed that the discharge from the tube wells located closer to the canal is more in comparison to the rest. The spring level which was 15’ to 20’ below ground level during the early seventies is now in the range of 45’ to 60’ below the ground level and the ground level further falls steeply towards the farther end on western side of the canals towards the Aravali Hills. It is therefore essential to search for an alternative and reliable source of water to augment the present per capita supply and to keep pace with the projected population of 28 lakhs by 2031.

MCF has privatized the operation and maintenance of all the tube wells supply water to the city. The private operator has provided for a centralized monitoring system for the same whereby he exercises control over the hours of operation of the tube wells.

47


4.6.2 Treatment facilities

The quality of the ground water being extracted at present needs disinfection only. Hence, only chlorination is being done before the water is distributed for usage. However, considering the present trend of excessive ground water drawl, it is considered that future extracts would require a sand filters-based treatment.

4.6.3 Storage and Distribution System

At present, raw water is transmitted from the tube wells and the rainy wells to various underground reservoirs through raising mains and transmission mains which run to a total length of 40.39 km. before pumping into the elevated reservoirs for further distribution.

Table 15. Location and capacity of GLSRs

S. No Location of GLSR Pump capacity Areas served Capacity

(ML)1 Tigaon road 3x100HP Ballabgarh town 4.552 Chawla colony 1x50HP Chawla colony 0.453 Sector-14 2x50HP Sector- 14 0.914 Sector –15 2x50 HP Sector – 15 0.915 Sector –15 A 2x50 HP Sector – 15 A 0.916 Sector –16 2x50 HP Sector – 16 0.917 Sector –16 A 2x50 HP Sector – 16 A 0.918 Sector –17 2x50 HP Sector – 17 0.919 Sector –29 2x60 HP; 2x100 HP Sector – 28,29&30 4.5510 Sector –21 C 2x60 HP Sector – 21 C&21 A 4.5511 Sector –22 1x50 HP Sector – 22 & Sanjay colony 0.45

12 Sector –23 A 1x50 HP Sector – 23, 23 A & Housing Board Colony 0.45

13 Sector –25 2x200 HP; 2x100 HP Sector – 22, 23, 24, 25, 55, Sanjay Colony Mujesher 13.64

14 NH-1 3x60 HP NH-1 0.9115 NH-2 2x55 HP; 1x90 HP NH-2 0.9116 NH-3 3x45 HP NH-3 0.9117 NH-5 2x55HP; 1x90 HP NH-5 0.9118 Budh Vihar 2x60 HP Sanjay Colony 4.5519 Dabua Colony 2x60 HP; 1x40 HP Dabua Colony & Janta Colony 0.9120 Jawahar Colony 2x25 HP Jawahar Colony 0.9121 Parvatia Colony 3x50 HP; 1x60 HP Parvatia Colony 5.9122 Mujesher - To be commissioned 4.55 Total 54.55

Source: MCF

There are 22 ground level storage reservoirs (GLSR) fitted with boosting stations. The total capacity of the GLSRs is 54.55 ML, which is 23 percent of the installed capacity of the water supply system. These GLSRS are located across the city in line with the location of the tube wells. The distribution system in the city is based on the division of the entire city into primarily three zones - Old Faridabad, Ballabgarh and NIT. These zones are sub-divided into various sectors/ colonies (mentioned above) for further distribution. Each such sub-division is catered to by an elevated service reservoir of 1 lakh gallon (4.55 ML) capacity. The water supply system, location of the tube wells, GLSRs and ESRs are also presented in the figure below.

48


Figure – Water supply for Faridabad

49


There are in all 25 ESRs. The total capacity of the ESRs is 11.37 ML, which is just about 5 percent of the installed capacity of water supply of 240 MLD. Ideally, it is necessary to have 1/3rd of the installed capacity as elevated storage for intermittent supply systems as in Faridabad. The location of the ESRs zone-wise is presented in the table below.

The total length of the distribution system in Faridabad is 910 km. The network includes CI, AC and PVC pipes which range from 90 mm to 300 mm in diameter. Against the available road length of about 1218 km., the distribution network covers only 75 percent of the road length indicating a fair coverage of the city through the service.

Table 16. Location of ESRs in Faridabad S.No Old Faridabad zone Ballabgarh zone NIT zone 1. MCF store sector 21-A Chawla colony Nursery 2. Sector 21-C Milk plant road ESI. Boosting 3. Sector 37 Sector-10 Tikona park 4. Ashoka Enclave I& II Sector-9 Kalyan Singh chowk 5. Sector-28 Central Green 6. Sector-29 Sector-25 boosting 7. Sector-19 8. Old FBD (Sec-28) 9. Sector-14 10. Sector-15 11. Sector-16 12. Sector-16-A 13. Sector-17 14. Sector-15-A 15. Pali crusher zone

Source: MCF

4.6.4 House Service Connections, user charges and cost recovery

The total number of house service connections in the city is 1,06,850; these cover only 57 percent of the total properties assessed in the city indicating a huge gap in cost recovery. Of these 52 percent connections are metered, though the working condition of these meters is doubtful.

93 percent of the total connections are domestic in nature, five percent commercial and the rest two percent industrial. As on date, the total number of public stand posts (PSP) provided by various agencies including MCF, PWD-PH and HUDA is about 765, of which an estimated 425 are located in various slums of the city.

The tariff structure is fixed by the Government of Haryana across the state irrespective of the cost of service. The current water tariff as presented in Table 17 was last revised during 2002-03. Further, if a house service connection is unauthorized and not a part of the regularized colonies and villages, MCF charges Rs. 2000 as penalty for regularization. Water charges are collected from the date of sanction of the building plan for that building.

50


Table 17. Present Water Tariff Structure S. No.

Type of Consumer Metered water supply (Rs./ KL) Un-metered water

supply (Rs./ month)

1 Domestic Rs. 1.25 per KL up to consumption of 15 KL; Rs. 2.5 per KL for consumption above 15 KL up to 30 KL; Rs. 4 per KL for consumption above 30 KL

2 Commercial & Industrial Rs. 4.00 per KL

Rs. 50 to Rs. 5000 per month according to the area of the site/ building and the no. of floors

New connection fee

1 Domestic Security fee – Rs. 500/-; Ferrule size, inspection fee, pit charges, water bylaws fee, application fee all together – Rs. 432/-; Total – Rs. 932 + road cutting charges as applicable

2 Commercial Security fee – Rs. 1000/-; Ferrule size, inspection fee, pit charges, water bylaws fee, application fee all together – Rs. 432/-; Total – Rs. 1432 + road cutting charges as applicable

3 Industrial Security fee – Rs. 2500/-; Ferrule size, inspection fee, pit charges, water bylaws fee, application fee all together – Rs. 432/-; Total – Rs. 2932 + road cutting charges as applicable

Source: Memo No. 14/90/02-3CII dated 05-02-2003 of Urban Development Dept, Government of Haryana

The demand collection balance (DCB) statement presented in Table 18 indicates that the average collection efficiency is 68 percent of the total demand. Arrears account for 29 percent of the total demand. The current demand for the year 2005-06 is Rs. 786 lakhs, which works out to an average of Rs. 61 user charge, per connection per month. The number of persons per house service connection stands at twelve, against an average household size of 4.9, indicating scope for the presence of a large number of unauthorized connections.

Table 18. Water Charges – Demand Collection Balance Statement 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 Items Rs. Lakhs

Demand Current demand 285 398 658 722 786 Arrears demand 164 210 299 225 161 Total demand 448 608 957 947 948

Collection Current collection 187 230 475 611 592 Arrears collection 59 81 226 175 124 Total collection 247 310 701 786 716

Balance 202 298 256 161 232 Collection Efficiency 55% 51% 73% 83% 76%No. of HSCs 84761 88198 96302 101952 106850 Growth of HSCs - 4% 9% 6% 5%

Source: MCF

The presence of unauthorized connections is also signified by the poor cost recovery on the service. It is assessed that the average revenue per connection per month is about Rs. 74 against an average expenditure of Rs. 98 indicating a cost recovery of about 76 percent. Ideally, the entire operation & maintenance (O&M) expenses are expected to be recovered in the form of user charges. Further, this is against privatisation of O&M of all the tube wells in the city and very minimal O&M expenses on water supply operations.

51


This clearly points out at very low revenues from the sector that is comparatively low user charges and hence lesser demand and further crippled by collection performance in the range of 70 percent.

4.6.5 Service Levels

The service levels with regard to water supply are comparatively better than those obtaining in many other cities in the country. Faridabad has a gross supply of about 188 lpcd and a net supply of 160 lpcd (accounting for 15% of transmission and distribution losses). Though the per capita supply is fair it could not be considered comfortable considering the large quantum of industrial water demand in the city. The distribution network in the city covers a length of 910 km., which is about 75 percent of the road length. The system, presently, covers almost 100 percent of the developed areas excluding the slums. The newly added areas are currently being catered to by tanker supply.

The distribution system in the city is based on both gravity and pumping; the total storage capacity available is 65.92 ML, which is 27.5 percent of the installed capacity (240 MLD) of the system. Elevated storage capacity stands at just 11.36 ML that is 4.7 percent of the installed capacity. The reservoirs are filled up more than two times a day.

Table 19. Service Levels – Water Supply Details Unit Service level Indicator Drawl at Intake works 240 MLD 188 lpcdTreatment capacity - 100%Storage Reservoirs (ESR) 11.36 ML (25 Nos.) 4.7%Storage Reservoirs (UGR) 54.55 ML (22 Nos.) 22.7%Distribution network 910 Km 75% of road lengthIndividual House Service Connections –Nos. Meter-Domestic 50755 47.50%Unmetered -Domestic 49225 46.07%Commercial & Industrial 6870 6.43%Total Connections 106850

Source: MCF

4.6.6 Issues, Potential and Challenges in water supply sector

Key Issues

Policy level issues

Short-term policy: Clarity on fixation of norms for water tariff and structure with regard to cost recovery and plugging of illegal connections are the main policy issues to be addressed in the immediate future.

Long-term policy: Availability of ground water and reliability of tube wells as a water source to cater to the demand of 2031, in the scenario of high population growth rates and identification of alternate sources including rainy wells, are the long-term policy decisions that need to be taken.

Service and O&M Issues

Ever-increasing water demand due to rapid urbanization, implementation of township policy and pressures from the floating population of NCR

52


Increasing numbers of tiny industrial service units being set up in the residential sectors leading to inequitable supplies

Unaccounted-for water and high transmission and distribution losses. Transmission and distribution losses in the system account for more than 15% of gross supply thereby making the net supply average at 150 lpcd (This includes all uses including industrial, horticultural, and commercial) against an estimated requirement of more than 330 lpcd.

Non-comprehensiveness of the system in terms of design - Each individual distribution sector is independent of the overall system and is linked to that sector’s specific GLSR and ESR only.

Potential

The service has the potential to involve the private sector in the current format to bring in efficiency.

Challenges

The system is highly dependent on ground water. In the absence of alternate sources, it is beset by the challenges of 1) Reduced ground water availability; 2) Increasing demand; and 3) New sources

The system lacks a comprehensive design for the entire city as a whole, necessitating a master plan.

Service coverage is reported to be very low at about one lakh odd house connections against more than two lakh households, indicating a large quantum of non-revenue water and consequently, poor cost recovery.


4.7 MUNICIPAL SERVICES – SEWERAGE

The city has been divided into four sewerage zones on the basis of the topography of the area and other major barriers. The 91 sectors planned for the city in the Development Plan are covered under these sewerage zones. Sectors falling within each zone are given below:

Zone – I - 27B, 27C, 27D, 32 to 45, 21A, 21B, 21C, 21D, 46 to part of 49 and 84 to 91 Zone – II - 1 to 20, 27A, 28 to 31 and 60 to 65. Zone – III - 22 to 25, part of 49 to 59, HIT 1 to III and V and RUA colonies Zone – IV - 66 to 83

The Sewerage master plan was prepared in 1992 to cover the urbanisable area proposed in the Development Plan for Faridabad. The master plan has proposed two sewerage treatment plants, one for zone – I and III and the other for zone II & IV. Further sewerage pumping stations (SPS) were proposed in the following manner.

Zone – I 4 Zone – II 6 Zone – III 4 Zone – IV 2

53


Figure – Sewerage system for Faridabad

4.7.1

54


Existing Sewerage System

In terms of population coverage, the network is understood to be covering only 50% of the city population implying that a large quantum of sewerage is flowing into the open drains and ultimately into the river Yamuna untreated. Against the 16 proposed SPSs for the four zones, 13 are in place at present. The sewerage transmitted through the system is treated in three sewerage treatment plants (STP) with a combined capacity of 115 ML.

Table 20. Sewerage Treatment Plants - Faridabad S. No Capacity Treatment

type Area coverage Population

covered 20 ML UASB type Sector 21 to sector 47

The present quantum of sewerage generated in the city is understood to be in the range of 200 MLD which is approximately 80 percent of the water supply. To convey this sewerage to various intermediate and main pumping stations for treatment purposes, there is a sewerage network of about 638 km. covering 52 percent of the total road network of the city. This however, doesn’t present the true picture of system coverage, as the road network in the city itself is falling short of requirement.

1 2.66 lakhs 2 45 ML UASB Sector 1 to 20 old Faridabad,

Ballabgarh 4.67 lakhs

3 50 ML UASB NIT area Dabua colony, Jawahar colony, sector 23 – 24, 25 etc

5.00 lakhs

It is further observed that the colonies developed in the recent past and approved by the State Government do not have any sewerage system in place. Sewage from houses are being discharged in septic tanks and the effluent is passed either into soak pits or into surface drains creating hazardous and unhygienic conditions in these approved colonies.

4.7.2 YAP

The Yamuna Action Plan (YAP) is the targeted project to contain the pollution of the river Yamuna and consequently the river Ganga.

YAP (Phase-I): The project duration for YAP-I after extension is completed in March 2003. In Haryana, the project initially covered six towns including Faridabad; later, an additional six towns were added to the list. The key concern of the YAP was the pollution arising from the domestic sector and it was accorded the highest priority. All the works proposed under YAP-I have been completed. In continuation to Phase I, works related to sewerage and sanitation were taken up under the YAP extended phase. Under the YAP I program, schemes undertaken were:

Sewerage schemes consisting of Interception and diversion sewers and Sewage Treatment Plants

Non-sewerage schemes that included Crematoria, Low Cost Sanitation, bathing ghats (or river front development), afforestation and public participation.

YAP (Phase II): Works on Phase II of YAP for augmentation of the sewerage system have been approved, but are yet to start. The same are expected to be commissioned by 2007-08. YAP-II has been formulated at an estimated cost of Rs. 624 crore (with financial assistance of Yen 13.33 billion from JBIC). The principal objective of YAP-II is to improve the water quality of Yamuna along the cities located on its banks.

55


In addition to the technical component, YAP-II will also address a program of capacity building of implementing agencies in the states of Haryana, Delhi and U.P. and the executing agency i.e. National River Conservation Department (NRCD) of Ministry of Environment and Forest (MoEF). Public participation and awareness activities in the project areas, and the water quality management program planned to assess the efficacy of the project will receive special focus. In Haryana, YAP-II under NRCP will be implemented in six towns, viz. Yamuna Nagar-Jagadhari, Karnal, Panipat, Sonepat, Faridabad, and Gurgaon.

4.7.3 Issues related to Sewerage system

Key Issues

Policy level issues

Short-term policy: Clarity on fixation of norms for sewer tariff and structure with regard to cost recovery is the main policy issue that requires to be addressed in the immediate future.

Long-term policy: Reservations in the Development Plan to be provided towards making land available in future for the location of sewerage systems/ treatment plants, etc. Also, co-ordinated planning between the departments needs to be worked out as a long-term policy measure.

Service and O&M Issues

Ever-increasing sewerage generation due to rapid urbanization, implementation of township policy and the pressures from NCR- related activities

Low system coverage with a large quantum of sewerage being allowed to flow into water bodies untreated

Mixing up of sewerage and storm water is a predominant issue in Faridabad. It is understood that at many a location, the rising level of the sewers is above that of storm water drains. This is primarily due to non-comprehensiveness and independent design of each of the systems.

Only 50% of the city’s area and population is covered. The present system is defunct and inadequate for the present population. It is outdated and has got mixed up with the drainage network in several areas

Potential

The under ground sewerage service has the potential to involve the private sector as in case of water supply towards part operation and maintenance in specific areas so to bring in efficiency to the service.

Challenges

A complete sewerage system is one of the high priority needs of the city and taking up the same would present a major implementation capability challenge for MCF.


56


4.8 MUNICIPAL SERVICES – STORM WATER DRAINAGE

The storm water drainage system in Faridabad comprises primary, secondary and tertiary drains. The primary drains comprise the river Yamuna. Secondary drains are the natural channels/ nallahs with a discharge capacity of up to 5 cum/ sec. Tertiary drains are the roadside, built-up open or closed drains and those of the unlined kutcha type. The storm water of the entire catchment area of Faridabad is finding its way mainly through three secondary drains/ outlets - Gounchi Drain, Burhia Nalla and Agra Canal; at some points, it is being pumped into the Gurgaon Canal by subsidiary pumping stations/ temporary pumping stations.

The general slope of the area is from the northwest to southeast. The western area is mostly hilly; the storm water of this area flows by the force of gravity into Buria Nalla through the Faridabad drain. The Faridabad drain crosses the Agra and Gurgaon Canals through Mawai Siphon. Ultimately, the storm water reaches the Yamuna River through the Buria Nalla and the Gounchi drain. In the case of the NIT area, the storm water is being pumped into the Gounchi Drain, which finally reaches Yamuna River. Keeping in view the general topography of the city, the entire urbanisable area has been divided into seven drainage zones as per suitability of its final disposal; level and existing natural drains available in the area. The storm water from different catchment areas is being collected and pumped mainly into the Gurgaon canal, the Gaunchi drain, the Burhia Nalla and the Agra canal through storm water pumping stations located at different places.

The network of tertiary drains in the city runs to length of 800 km. which is 66 percent of the road network in the city. 150 percent of the road network is generally considered to be good network; this system shortage is resulting in the mixing up of sewerage and storm water at several locations in the city. Details of the tertiary drains in the city are presented in 0Table 21.

Table 21. Storm Water Drains (Tertiary Network) Details S.No Drain Type Length (Kms) Percentage1 Pucca open drains 800.00 100 2 Kutcha open drains - - 3 Pucca closed drains - - 4 Total drain length 800.00 100 5 Drain length as % of total road length 65.7%

4.8.1 Issues related to Storm water drains

Flooding of road infrastructure

Road infrastructure in the city is badly affected and damaged at several locations during monsoons due to the inadequacy of storm water drainage networks. The monsoons have been witnessing, year after year, overflow of several secondary and primary drains as most stretches of these drains are silted and have not undergone desilting operations for years.

Rapid Urbanisation

Future population addition is expected to increase the pressure on the drainage system of the city, requiring MCF to stress on the development of road networks along with that of storm water drains.


57


4.9 MUNICIPAL SERVICES – SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT

Rapid urbanisation, increasing commercial and industrial activities and changing life styles in Faridabad are leading to a steady increase in the generation of solid waste. MCF is responsible for the collection, transportation and disposal of all solid waste generated in the city, except the untreated bio-medical waste and hazardous industrial waste, which is taken care of by the respective generators. MCF organizes the collection and transportation of the waste through a team of its own conservancy workers and a fleet of vehicles and dumper-placers. The waste collected is disposed at various dumping yards without any treatment.

4.9.1 Quantum of Solid Waste Generation

The primary sources of solid waste in Faridabad are local households, commercial establishments, industries, markets, hotels, restaurants, and hospitals. The total quantity of waste generated per day is in the order of 480 tonnes per day (TPD) at a per-capita generation of 377 grams per day. No significant seasonal variation in the quantity of waste generated is observed, as Faridabad does not have much tourism-related activity. Of the waste generated, only 450 MT is reported to be collected and transported to temporary dumping places after the partial sorting out recyclable materials. All the municipal solid waste is being dumped in the open without any proper treatment.

At present there is no organized door-to-door collection system. Only recently, two NGOs named NAYA SAVERA and PATHEY have been awarded the work of door-to-door collection by MCF. After collecting the waste from the houses, these NGOs transfer it to the nearest collecting points. However, this system has been enforced only in limited areas and in sectors 22, 23, 21A, 21B and 21C.

Bio-medical Waste

Bio-medical waste is being managed by private contractors who were awarded the contract by the Indian Medical Association, Faridabad. The private agency carries the bio-medical waste to Gurgaon where a centralized incinerator has been installed.

4.9.2 Collection of Solid Waste

There are at present 342 collection points in the city provided with community bins, open bins, dumper bins, etc. In all, 180 dustbins of MCF are located at specific collection points. For the purposes of primary collection, MCF has equipped its staff with 810 wheel barrows and 80 handcarts. The average spacing between the dustbins against the available road length is an uncomfortable 1867 meters and the average area coverage per collection point is 0.40 sq.km. The total staff of the conservancy department of MCF is 1212 against a sanctioned 1415 members. However, MCF has employed 750 conservancy workers on a daily wages basis. Thus on an average each conservancy worker is responsible for seeping 621 meters. of road length.

4.9.3 Waste Transportation & Disposal

Transportation of waste is carried out on all days. Waste collected from various locations in the city is transported either to the transfer station or directly to the dumping yard. MCF uses its own conservancy vehicles. There are two JCBs of 3 Metric Tonnes (MT) capacity each to assist in secondary collection activities. The JCBs are reported to be making at least five trips per vehicle per day.

58


Table 22. Fleet of Conservancy vehicles with MCF

Vehicle Model No.s Capacity/ Vehicle (MT) Trips Per day

Nature of transfer

Daily hrs. of operation

JCB 2 3.0 5 Secondary 8 HrsTractor Trolleys 51 3.5 3 Tertiary 8 HrsTempos 3 3.5 3 Tertiary 7 HrsBulk Refuse Carriers 4 4.0 2 Tertiary 7 HrsDual loaded dumper placers 2 2.0 6 Tertiary 8 Hrs

For the purposes of secondary collection as well as for transportation to the disposal sites, MCF uses a fleet of 51 tractors with trolleys, three tempos, four BRCs and two DLDPs. The total capacity of the vehicles being put to service is 209 MT which is about 44 percent of the waste generated. These vehicles carry out on an average more than three trips per day. Against a density factor of 0.35 and an average of three trips per vehicle per day, the collection capacity of the conservancy vehicles with MCF is only 86 percent of waste generation, indicating a shortfall.

There are at present five numbers of dumping sites which are temporary in nature. These are located at:

Kheri Road Basalwa Dairy site, Old Faridabad BLB near Ucchagaon Nagla Enclave, NIT Faridabad Near Badarpur Border behind Samshan Ghat Gurgaon road in the revenue estate of village Bhakari (now also proposed as the landfill

site)

No scientific method of disposal is followed and the waste is dumped on open ground. About 147 acres of land would be required to cater to the needs of the population of the year 2031. MCF presently has identified 58.6 acres of hilly land on the Faridabad-Gurgaon road for municipal solid waste disposal and treatment and has got a rapid environmental impact assessment (EIA) conducted for the site. The results indicated suitability of the site for sanitary landfill; the design for the same is in progress.

4.9.4 Issues, potential and challenges in Solid Waste Management

Key Issues A limited extent of the city area is covered by door-to-door collection, including source

segregation. However, even this effort has been rendered unproductive as at the point of collection for transportation; the segregated waste gets mixed up to a large extent.

The shortfall in the required capacity of the fleet by about 35 MT is exerting pressure on the present fleet of vehicles through over utilization in terms of the number of trips made. Also the non-availability of intermediate transfer stations is increasing the number of trips and thereby the O&M expenses on the fleet.

Only two dumper placers are available with MCF. There is a need to increase the number of dual loaded dumper placers (DLDPs) and to put in place intermediate transfer stations, in order to do away with the bin system of secondary collection and transportation.

Crude dumping is resorted to at the disposal sites due to non-availability and non-provision of infrastructure for scientific disposal.

59


Potential

The service has the potential to involve the private sector and increase efficiency.

Challenges

The system will need major refurbishment and augmentation as all the newly-added areas are lacking completely in MSW infrastructure. The city also needs to acquire a large fleet of vehicles and dumper placers to effectively implement the MSW Rules, 2000 and make the city a clean place.

Infrastructure development for sanitary landfill and composting at the proposed site will need to be completed in the next two years.


4.10 SOCIAL INFRASTRUCTURE

4.10.1 Fire Services

As Faridabad City is a hub of manufacturing industries, fire is the major man-made disaster to which the city’s industrial base is prone. The fire department of MCF is responsible for responding to this kind of a disaster.

Presently, a staff of 55 people is working in the fire department in three shifts with six fire tenders. Four fire stations, located at various places in the city, cater to the needs of the MCF area. In addition to these, certain large industries have their own fire services. The department during interactions has clearly made a point with respect to the inadequacy of the system in the city in terms of available staff or equipment to tackle with any potential for occurrence of large scale fire accident due to large numbers of high rise buildings coming up in the city.

Table 23. Staff and vehicles with Fire Department, MCF S. No Name of Fire Station No of staff No of Fire tenders1 Sector 15 A 15 1 2 NIT 15 2 3 Ballabgarh 13 2 4 Sarai Khwaja 12 1 Total 55 6

Source: Fire department, MCF

The city houses a number of slums, markets, high-rise buildings and large industrial estates and small industrial units which dot the entire landscape of the residential sector. Given this, the existing fire stations and staff are inadequate to meet the current demand and to cater to the growing population of the city. The system lacks even the wireless system of communication tools. The number of fire calls/ rescue calls received by the four fire stations of MCF during the past five years is presented in the table below. It is observed that the numbers have been on the rise and constantly increasing. The numbers have increased from 366 during 2001-02 to 470 during 2003-04 and 488 during 2004-05. During 2005-06 a total of 624 calls were registered and responded to.

60


As per the norms laid down by the Standing Fire Advisory Council, the current MCF area will require at least 12 fire stations with minimum technical staff, including a well-equipped central fire station with facilities like a parade ground, a full-fledged workshop, training halls and residential facilities. An area of two acres would be required for the setting up of the central station. The department also needs more specialised equipment like hydraulic platforms, fire trailers, rescue vans, ambulances and mortuary vans.

Issues with respect to fire services Inadequate infrastructure to cater to current and future demand

Shortfall of equipment and a spacious central fire station

Lack of adequate technical manpower

Narrow roads in slums and densely populated areas like markets for the movements of fire tenders

Increasing number of high-rise buildings and the lack of capacity of the fire brigade to reach upper floors

4.10.2 Recreation, Gardens and Parks

Faridabad has just started to see the mushrooming of a large number of recreational facilities like shopping malls, entertainment centres, and cinema halls, which are being developed by private agencies. There are presently 15 cinema halls, four clubs, two amusement parks, one international stadium, one athletics stadium, and one golf course in the city.

Further, MCF has been active in trying to improve the environmental status of the city. Over the past few years, MCF has contributed to the same through the development of traffic islands, a number of parks and other measures. Lands have been reserved for 484 parks/ gardens in the city, of which MCF has already developed 322, either completely or partially. The works included beautification, landscaping, protection of boundaries through compounds etc.

Park in Ballabgarh Park in sector 16

61


The area to be developed under the remaining 162 lands is 432,542 sq.km. and these are located across the city. 63 such lands are located in Ballabgarh zone and another 25 along the NH 1 and 2. Also, 29 lands are located in sectors 21A, 21B, 21C, 22, 23 and 23A.

Rose Garden, NIT

Infrastructure requirements and Investment needs are presented in the Chapter 5, City Investment Plan, Strategies and Implementation plan.

4.10.3 Health facilities

The city has three major hospitals, of which one a government hospital is (BK Hospitaal) located in front of the Municipal Corporation office. The total bed strength of these three hospitals is 250. Also, there are 10 primary health centres, three dispensaries and one blood bank. Apart from these, there are a good number of private health facilities in most of the neighbourhoods, catering to the day-to-day needs of patients in the city.

4.10.4 Educational facilities

With respect to the government-run facilities, Faridabad city has 52 primary schools, 44 middle schools and 32 higher secondary schools, five degree colleges, three vocational training institutes, one management institute, and one polytechnic. Besides, there are private schools which number more than the government facilities; however, information about them is not available. The city is clearly lacking in professional, graduation and post- graduation level educational facilities; students have to depend on NCT-Delhi for these facilities.

62


4.11 MUNICIPAL FINANCES

The first step in analysing the financial position of MCF is to differentiate and categorise the account heads into revenue account and capital account through a budget recasting exercise. For the purpose of financial assessment, financial data pertaining to the last five years (2001-02 to 2005-06) have been recast into a standard format, as presented in Annexure 5.

ULB Finance Assessment – Analysis Framework

Municipal FinancesData as obtained fromMCF

• Budget books • DCB statements • Taxation

information • Debt/ non-debt

liabilities’ data

Recast Data: • Extra-ordinary account

heads

Recast Data: • Revenue Account • Capital Account

Liabilities: • Debt Liabilities • Non-debt Liabilities

MCF Financial Assessment/ Credit Standing

Stage I - Sourcing Stage II - Assessment Stage III - Analysis

*Extra-ordinary account heads comprising cesses, advances, deposits etc is not considered for financial assessment and further projections, as these items would not affect the financial health of the ULB.

MCF’s current accounting system is cash-based; income and expenditure heads are maintained on a cash basis. All the expenses towards regular maintenance are treated as revenue expenses, while expenses on new projects are treated as capital expenses. The standing committee exercises strict control over the projects that requires capitalization. Direct expenses are appropriated to the user department.

The Corporation accounts can be classified under two major heads, revenue account and capital account. The revenue sources of the Corporation may be broadly classified as internal or operating income and external receipts. Internal income includes receipts from the operations of the Corporation, in the form of taxes, water and sewer charges and fees and charges on other services such as advertisement fee, food and license fee. General heads of internal sources are:

General tax and other taxes levied by the Municipal Corporation such as house tax, education, and street and tree tax

Income under special acts such as receipts in the form of food and license fee

Income from properties rent receipts from lands, buildings, and other properties

Income from municipal services such as receipts from water supply charges and fees from other services (health and hospital, public health, etc.)

Miscellaneous income heads such as income from investments and sale proceeds

External fund sources include revenue grants from State and Central Government, loans and contributions for projects.

63


Expenditure incurred towards establishment, operation and maintenance of services, as well as repayment of loans are treated as revenue expenditure. Expenditure on asset creation and investments in new projects or purchase of equipment are treated as capital expenditure.

Advances, deposits and any item of income or expenditure, which is temporary in nature is treated and accounted for under the extraordinary account. This account head is not analysed as the items in it are temporary in nature and have no impact on the overall financial position of MCF.

4.11.1 Financial Status at a Glance

The municipal finances of the Corporation (MCF) have been reviewed for the last five years, commencing from the financial year 2001-02 to 2005-06. The items of both receipts and expenditure are classified under revenue and capital accounts as per their sources and uses.

The revenue income of MCF has grown to a level of Rs. 9043 lakhs in

FY 2005-06 from Rs.6019 lakhs during FY 2001-02, registering a CAGR of 11 percent, while revenue expenditure increased at a similar CAGR of 11 percent. Though this does not project a sound financial condition for the future, MCF has consistently maintained a revenue surplus of an average 37 percent of its revenue income. However, the pressure of capital expenses on the revenue account is increasing year after year. This situation demands expenditure control measures and planned capital investments on the part of MCF.

MCF - Revenue Account

0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000

2001-02

2002-03

2003-04

2004-05

2005-06

R s. lakhs.Revenue Income Revenue Expenditure

Table 24. Financial Status at a Glance 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 CAGR Items

Actuals in Rs. Lakhs % Revenue Account

Income 6019 5974 5172 8159 9043 11 Expenditure 3524 3868 3745 4955 5338 11 Surplus/ Deficit 2495 2106 1427 3204 3705

Capital Account Receipts 2192 3427 2075 2099 2287 1 Payments 3927 4692 2914 4781 6821 15 Surplus/ Deficit (1735) (1265) (839) (2682) (4534)

Overall Status incl. O.B. 1105 1391 2039 2605 1804

Source: MCF Annual Accounts

The capital income of MCF comprises own sources in the form of sale of lands, loans and internal transfers from revenue to capital account for utilization towards asset creation. During the review period, MCF has not availed of the minimal quantum of loans for its capital expenditure.

64


It is observed that internal sources contributed about 60 percent of the capital income during the review period; the rest is contributed to by external sources, mainly in the form of project- specific grants. It is also observed that capital expenditure has been inconsistent during the review period; this trend can be attributed to the availability of revenue surplus.

MCF - Capital Account

0 2000 4 000 6000 800 0

2001-02

2002-03

2003-04

2004-05

2005-06

R s. lakhs .Capital Expenditure Capital Income

The following sections provide an

4.11.2 Revenue Account

The revenue account comprises two components - revenue income and revenue expenditure.

Revenue Income

in-depth review of the revenue account, in order to assess the municipal fiscal status and to provide a base for determining the potential of each of the sources and the ability of MCF to sustain the extent of planned investments identified under the City Development Plan.

Revenue income comprises internal resources in the form of tax and non-tax items. External resources constitute of shared taxes/transfers and revenue grants from the State and Central Government. Revenue expenditure comprises expenditure incurred on salaries; operation & maintenance cost; contributions and donations; and debt servicing.

M

The revenue sources of MCF can be

Table 25. Source-wise revenue income

broadly categorized into own sources, assignewise income generated during the review period is presented in Table 25. The detailed income and expenditure statement, the sectoral contributions and the growth rates of each item are presented in Annexure 5.

d revenues, grants and contributions. The source-

67%1% 0%

32%

Octroi Compensation

Tax Revenue

Non Tax Revenue

Assigned Rev, Grants/Contrib

CF - Sources of Revenue

2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 Share CAGR Items

Actual aks in Rs. L hs % % Own sources 5957 5898 5092 8116 9043 9 9 11

Octroi compensation 0 0 0 0 0 0 - Tax revenue 2053 2728 1692 3278 3414 29 7 Non tax revenue 13904 3170 3399 4838 5629 61 0 ssigned rev, grant 62 76 80 43 0 1 11)

Total 6019 5974 5172 8159 9043 100 11

Source

A s/ contrib (

: MCF Annual Accounts

65


Own Sources

Own source income includes income from house tax, other taxes and non-tax income in the form of development charges, income from municipal properties, fees & fines and other miscellaneous income. Income from own sources accounts for over 99% of the revenue income, indicating low dependability of MCF on external sources for its operations. The own sources registered an average annual growth rate of about 11 percent.

Octroi compensation: In lieu of the abolition of octroi in 1999, the Government of Haryana had compensated during the initial years of the abolition of octroi. However, during the review period, there has been no income in the form of octroi compensation.

General Taxes: General taxes consist of various taxes levied as part of house tax; they consist of general tax on properties, fire tax, tree tax and street tax. General tax is charged based as a percentage (2.5 percent for residential and five percent for non-residential) of net Annual Rental Value (ARV). Net ARV is arrived at, based on the capital value of the land and/ or building. The calculation method is presented below.

Capital value = Cost of land (as per collector/ revenue guidelines) + cost of bldg (as per PWD (B&R) rates) – 1% depreciation per annum on Bldg (subject to a maximum of 50%)

Annual rateable Value (ARV) = 5% of capital value

Net ARV = ARV – 10% of ARV (allowable for maintenance)

House tax = 2.5% of net ARV (residential purposes

5% of net ARV (non-residential purposes) Exemptions:

- Any property with ARV of less than Rs. 1200 is exempted from paying house tax. - Any new house/ property are exempted from paying house tax for the initial three

years.

Table 26. Nos. of properties in Faridabad 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 No. of PT Assessments Numbers

1 Residential 135,824 135,824 173,663 173,663 173,663 2 Commercial 7,835 7,835 8,783 8,783 8,783 3 Industrial 3,180 3,180 3,459 3,459 3,459 4 Central/ State Govt. Buildings 278 278 315 315 315 5 Exempted Buildings 130 130 100 100 90 Total 147,247 147,247 186,320 186,320 186,310 Growth in PT Assessments - - 26.54 - -

Source: MCF

As can be observed from the table above, the total number of properties in MCF’s jurisdiction is 1,86,310. In the state of Haryana, property tax records are updated through a general survey conducted every five years. The last such general survey was conducted during 2003-04 and is again due in 2008-09. During the last revision of records, it was noted that the numbers of properties increased at an annual growth rate of 5.3 percent.

66


In MCF, the house tax accounts for about 29 percent of the revenue income and has registered an average annual growth rate of 7 percent. The overall collection performance for the past five years is an average of 46 percent of the total demand including arrears, indicating a large scope for improving collection efficiency. During 2005-06, arrears accounted for 57 percent of the total demand.

Table 27. House tax – DCB statement Item 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06

1 Demand - Rs. Lakh Arrears 1989 2372 2541 3140 2325 Current 1986 1986 1785 1785 1785 Total Demand 3975 4358 4326 4925 4110

2 Collection - Rs. Lakh Arrears 486 604 264 738 622 Current 1482 1399 696 1862 1847 Total Collection 1968 2003 960 2600 2469

3 Balance - Rs. Lakh 2007 2355 3366 2325 16414 Collection Performance - % Arrears 24 25 10 23 27 Current 75 70 39 104 103 Total 50 46 22 53 60

5 Tax per Assessment – Rs. 1349 1349 958 958 9586 Persons per assessment – Nos. 7.4 7.7 6.3 6.6 6.8

Source: MCF DCB statement

On a comparative note, between various cities in the country,1 the average tax per assessment is relatively low in MCF at Rs. 958. Also, the number of persons per assessment is high at an average of seven indicating scope for identifying un-assessed properties. This however is against the State Government’s policy of conducting property roll revision once every five years and not every year as is reflected in the decreasing tax per assessment and increasing persons per assessment after the revision year. It also need mention that in Haryana any new property is exempted from paying tax for the first three years, which need to be re-looked in the context of losing tax revenue. The average household size in MCF being about 4.9 (against the current number of persons per assessment of 6.8) indicates a scope for about 50,000 un-assessed residential properties. The number of current property tax assessments figure includes commercial establishments. Thus, on a conservative estimate, the number of properties to be assessed in Faridabad is likely to be over 2.4 lakhs.

Non Tax Revenue: Non-tax sources include all non-tax revenues such as fees and charges levied as per the Haryana Municipal Corporation Act, 1994 and services provided by MCF. These sources include income from building license fee, development charges, trade licence fee,

1 Comparative Statement of ARV and person per asesment – around FY 2002-03 City Tax per Assessment –Rs. Persons per Asesmsent-Nos. Pune 5,062 9.14 Hyderabad 1,495 8.14 Chennai 3,405 10.14 Coimbatore 1,819 5.68 Ahmedabad 1,605 3.75

67


births and death certificate, income from municipal properties and other fees and fines. The non-tax income of MCF accounts for about 61 percent of its revenue income and has registered a average growth rate of 10 percent CAGR less than growth rate of the total revenues. The majority of non-tax income is generated by duty on sale/ transfer of properties at 19 percent of total revenues, followed by fees from HUDA at 12 percent (which is received in lieu expenditure incurred for the facilities maintained by MCF in HUDA administered sectors) Income from sale of water in the form of user charges also contributed 12 percent of the revenues during the review period. The demand collection balance (DCB) statement for water charges and cost recovery on the service is discussed in section 4.6.

External Sources

External sources mainly include grants from local funds and grants from the State and the Central Government. All external sources together account for about only one percent of MCF’s revenue income. The growth of these income sources is inconsistent owing to the unrealistic nature of these sources. During the review period, these sources showed a decline of 11 percent.

Revenue Expenditure

The revenue expenditure of MCF has been analyzed, based on expenditure heads. These have been broadly classified into the following department/sections of MCF - general administration & tax collection, water supply, roads & drains, municipal works, conservancy, street lighting, town planning and the miscellaneous like gardens and libraries.

Revenue expenditure is further classified under establishment (mainly comprising salaries and wages); contingencies (O&M) and debt servicing. The application of funds by account head is presented in Table 28, which indicates that the overall revenue expenditure registered an average annual growth of 11 percent against the growth in revenue income by 11 per cent. This trend indicates that MCF needs to take measures to reduce its expenditure or enhance its resources to avoid a deficit situation in future.

Table 28. Application of funds by head of Account 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 Share CAGR

Items Actuals in Rs. Lakhs % %

Salaries, Allowances & Pension 3247 3326 3564 3930 4639 88 9 Operation & Maintenance 257 525 149 182 287 7 3 Debt Servicing 20 18 32 843 412 5 112 Total 3524 3868 3745 4955 5338 100 11


The establishment expenditure alone accounts for over 88 percent of revenue expenditure. In terms of revenue income spent on salaries, it is 56 percent, which is well above the reasonable range of 40 percent. O&M expenditure accounts for just about seven percent of the total revenue expenses, clearly showing that municipal services do not have any preventive or periodic maintenance plans in place.

MCF - Items of Expenditure

7% 88%5%

Salaries, Allow ances& Pension

Operation &Maintenance

Debt Servicing

68


A salient feature of the accounts of MCF is that the Corporation has been regularly servicing its debt commitments. Its expenditure towards debt servicing at present is low at barely five percent of its revenue expenditure, indicating the scope for further leveraging of its resources to implement large-scale projects.

Establishment expenditure Establishment expenditure accounts for an average 88 percent of revenue expenditure and registered an annual growth rate of over nine percent during the review period. Conservancy and water supply departments account for the maximum share of establishment cost at 31 and 28 percent respectively, followed by the general administration and tax collection department at 12 percent and engineering department comprising roads, drains and municipal works also at 12 percent (refer to Table 29).

Table 29. Section-wise establishment expenditure 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 Share CAGRItems Actuals in Rs. Lakhs % %

General Administration & Tax Collection

408 378 424 453 511 12% 6

Water supply 861 973 980 1129 1356 28% 12 Roads, Drains & Municipal works

394 376 412 439 536 12% 8

Conservancy/ SWM 1009 1054 1097 1222 1415 31% 9 Street Lighting 28 26 30 34 47 1% 14 Town planning 54 54 65 63 78 2% 10 All others 494 466 556 589 695 15% 10 Total 3247 3326 3564 3930 4639 100% 9 Share in Rev. expenditure - % 92 86 95 79 87 Share in Rev. income - % 54 56 69 48 51


Operation and maintenance expenditure

As earlier mentioned the O&M expenses of the corporation doesn’t follow any preventive or periodic maintenance plans and are day-to-day in nature and hence reflected by the very low O&M expenses of an average Rs. 3 Crores per annum. This is against handling of all core municipal services like water supply, sewerage, drainage, roads, solid waste management etc by MCF itself.

Within the total O&M expenses, more than 66 percent is spent on general administration, followed by 24 percent on conservancy/ solid waste management. Water supply operations accounted for about four percent and roads for about three percent of the expenses. During FY2005-06, the total O&M expenses of the Corporation were Rs. 287 lakhs. During the review period, O&M expenses have increased by just about three percent CAGR.

MCF - O&M Expenditure

2%1%0%

3%

24%

4%

66%

General Administration & Tax CollectionWater supplyRoads, Drains & M unicipal worksConservancy/ SWMStreet LightingTown planningAll others

69


Debt servicing and outstanding loans

The review of annual accounts reveal that debt servicing expenses account for about five percent of the revenue expenditure. In terms of revenue income, only three percent is spent on debt servicing against an accepted comfortble limit of about 25-30 percent. The review of the outstanding loan statement of MCF, as on 31st March 2006, reveals that the net outstanding debt liabilities of MCF stand at Rs. 10.26 crores, which is 57 percent of its property tax demand. The ratio of outstanding debt liabilities to the ARV is about 0.02 against a threshold of two considered by financial institutions. This indicates MCF’s potential to leverage its resources to mobilise debt funds for the implementation of large-scale projects.

Table 30. Outstanding Debt Liability

Agency Loan Purpose Loan

Amount (Rs. Lakhs)

Year of Drawl

Repayment Period

(Years)

Interest Rate (%)

O/s as on 31-03-2006

(Rs. Lakhs)1 GoH Sewerage 2.30 1981 30 9.0% 0.382 GoH Water supply 2.20 1983 30 10.0% 0.493 GoH Water supply 0.90 1983 30 10.0% 0.214 LIC Water supply 33.75 1983 22 8.5% 3.075 GoH Water supply 3.50 1984 30 12.0% 0.946 LIC Water supply 9.00 1984 22 8.5% 0.827 LIC Water supply 7.00 1985 30 9.8% 0.648 GoH Water supply 4.80 1987 30 12.0% 1.769 GoH Water supply 1.20 1987 30 12.0% 0.4410 GoH Water supply 1.30 1987 30 12.0% 0.4611 GoH Water supply 1.20 1987 30 12.0% 0.4412 GoH Water supply 7.20 1988 30 12.0% 2.8813 GoH Water supply 2.20 1988 30 12.0% 0.8714 GoH Water supply 3.20 1988 30 12.0% 1.2815 GoH Water supply 2.60 1988 30 12.0% 1.0416 GoH Water supply 12.00 1992 30 12.0% 6.4017 GoH Water supply 6.00 1992 30 12.0% 3.2018 GoH Water supply 5.50 1992 30 12.0% 2.9219 GoH Water supply 8.00 1993 30 12.0% 4.5320 GoH Water supply 8.00 1993 30 12.0% 4.5321 GoH Water supply 2.00 1993 30 12.0% 1.1322 GoH Water supply 4.00 1993 30 12.0% 2.2623 GoH Water supply 10.00 1993 30 12.0% 5.6624 GoH Water supply 6.00 1993 30 12.0% 3.4025 GoH Water supply 4.00 1993 30 12.0% 2.2626 GoH Water supply 1.50 1993 30 12.0% 0.8527 GoH Water supply 1.50 1993 30 12.0% 0.8528 GoH Water supply 2.00 1993 30 12.0% 1.1329 GoH Water supply 10.00 1994 30 12.0% 5.9930 GoH Water supply 6.00 1994 30 12.0% 3.6031 GoH Water supply 1.00 1995 30 12.0% 0.6332 GoH Water supply 1.00 1995 30 12.0% 0.63

33 NCRPB Water supply/ Rainy well scheme 1,600.00 2002 5 7.0% 960.00

Total 1,770.85 1025.66

Source: MCF

70


Further, of the total outstanding loan of Rs. 10.26 crores, Rs. 9.6 crores is outstanding against the loan of Rs. 16 crores, received from National Capital Region Planning Board (NCRPB) during 2002-03 towards capital works in water supply. The tenure of repayment of this loan is five years; the repayment is scheduled to be completed by 2007-08.

All other outstanding loans of MCF is less than Rs. 0.5 crore against loans received from the Government of Haryana and LIC for various water supply works during 1981 to 1995. It needs mention that these old loans are of high interest rate loans of 12 percent as compared to the current market rates. Hence, MCF needs to swap these loans with low-cost funds. Though the savings might appear comparatively small, this option needs to be explored.

4.11.3 Capital Account

In general, the capital income of MCF comprises own sources in the form of sale of property, loans, grants and contributions and transfers from revenue surplus. During the review period, an average of Rs. 22 crores per annum has been the revenue surplus transfer to capital account. While own sources contributed 60 percent of the capital receipts during the review period, grants and contributions accounted for 39 percent and loans for the rest.

Table 31. Details of Capital Account 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 ShareItems Actuals in Rs. Lakhs %

Capital Income Own Sources 517 3106 1682 1872 359 60 Loans 30 0 0 0 87 1 Grants 1644 321 394 227 1841 39 Total 2192 3427 2075 2099 2287 100

Capital Expenditure

General Administration 24 82 32 49 112 1 Roads and drains 819 1709 732 2010 2073 31 Water supply 2730 1920 1284 1704 2351 45 Sewerage 0 57 0 0 0 0 Conservancy/ SWM 26 73 17 48 2 1 Street lighting 175 416 608 427 651 11 Gardens & Parks 28 83 37 187 225 2 Slum development 30 58 47 59 0 1 Fire services 0 1 1 3 5 0 Library, schools, PHC, etc 28 43 11 15 16 1 Town planning 19 160 70 81 5 2 Other Grant related works 49 89 74 98 1381 6 Others 0 0 0 100 0 0 Total 3927 4692 2914 4781 6821 100

Funding pattern Capital receipts 2192 3427 2075 2099 2287 68%Revenue/ municipal surpluses 1735 1265 839 2682 4534 32%


71


The figure presented in Table 31 indicates that about 68 percent of MCF’s capital expenditure during the review period is met from its capital receipts. The rest is contributed to by the revenue/ municipal surpluses.

On an average, over the past five years, the majority of capital expenditure has been directed towards water supply and roads.

Water supply system augmentation through the utilisation of the NCRPB loan has been the major capital expenditure item at 45 percent of the total capital investment for the past five years. Construction of new roads and improvement of surface condition of important city roads accounted for a significant 31 percent of the investments.

Apart from these, other major investments have been in the street lighting sector which accounted for 11 percent of the total investment. While the results of the improvements in roads and lighting in the city are visible, other sectors like drains and conservancy did not receive any major investments during the review period.

Capital works towards providing amenities to the residents of unauthorised slum dwellers has been

stopped since 1997, in the light of Memo No. 439 (30)/8081/G.II dated 21-07-1997 of the Government of Haryana, restricting any such provision. Accordingly, it is observed that capital expenditure towards improvement of facilities in slums accounted for just about one percent of the total investments during the review period.

Capital Expenditure

2%

1%

44%

0%

31%

1%

11%

1%2% 7%

General AdministrationRoads and drainsWater supplySew erageConservancy/ SWMStreet lightingGardens & ParksSlum developmentTow n planningOthers

4.11.4 Key issues regarding financial condition of MCF

The following key issues emerged from the above analysis of the municipal finances of MCF; MCF’s financial soundness is revealed by the financial indicators presented in Table 32.

Both revenue income and expenditure are growing at a similar rate, indicating no change in the financial condition of MCF from 2001 to 2006.

Over 55 percent of the revenues of the Corporation are accounted for by establishment/ salary expenses. This results in extremely low or minimal expenses towards the maintenance of capital assets of MCF, indicating the urgency for improving MCF’s revenues.

While non-tax revenues are significant at 61 percent of the revenues, the tax base needs to be improved and widened to enhance revenues from this stream.

The overall collection efficiency of property taxes is about 46 percent against current collections of near 80 percent. This is because the arrears form 57 percent of the total demand and collections of arrears is extremely low.

72


The cost recovery on water supply service is just about 76 percent, indicating the large quantum of non-revenue water in the form of unauthorised connections, subsidised water, etc. With respect to the sewerage system, the cost recovery is just 13 percent against a very low coverage of the service at just 50 percent of population.

Old outstanding loans which have been taken at high interest rates could be swapped or restructured with currently available low-interest and low-cost funds.

Capital expenditure per year is of the order of Rs. 46 crores only, as most investments are financed through internal generation and not any external funding, thus causing pressure on available surpluses.

Table 32. Key Financial Indicators Value

S. No INDICATOR Unit

Minimum Maximum Average

OR as on 31/03/2006

A Resource Mobilisation 1 Per Capita Income Rupees 710 2 Source of Funds i Share of Octroi % 0.00 0.00 0.00 ii Share of Taxes % 32.72 45.66 38.08 iii Share of Non Taxes % 53.06 65.73 61.04

iv Share of Assigned Revenues, Grants & Contributions % 0.00 1.55 0.88

3 Growth in Income Sources i Growth in Octroi Income % p.a. 0.00 0.00 - ii Growth in Taxes % p.a. -37.97 93.72 23.20 iii Growth in Non Taxes % p.a. -18.81 42.31 11.78

iv Growth in Assigned Revenues, Grants & Contributions % p.a. -100.00 22.81 -29.48

v Growth in Own Sources' Receipts % p.a. -13.67 59.40 14.04 vi Growth in Total Receipts % p.a. -13.44 57.77 13.61 B Expenditure Management 1 Per Capita Expenditure Rupees 419 2 Functional Allocation i Share of Salaries & Wages % 79.31 95.18 87.90 ii Share of O&M Expenditure % 3.67 13.56 6.77 iii Share of Debt Servicing Expenditure % 0.47 17.01 5.33 iv Share of Salaries' Exp. to Revenue Income % 48.17 68.92 55.60 3 Growth in Items of Expenses i Growth in Salaries' Expenditure % p.a. 2.41 18.05 9.47 ii Growth in O&M Expenditure % p.a. -71.69 104.46 28.18 iii Growth in Total Expenditure % p.a. -3.19 32.32 11.65 C Performance 1 Operating Ratio Ratio 0.59 0.72 0.59 2 Capital Utilisation Ratio Ratio 1.37 2.98 2.98 3 Per-capita performance Assessment i Per Capita Own Income Rs. p.a. 430.81 709.80 572.70

ii Per Capita Assigned Revenues, Grants & Contributions Rs. p.a. 0.00 6.77 4.53

73


Value S. No INDICATOR Unit

Minimum Maximum Average

OR as on 31/03/2006

iii Growth in Per Capita Revenue Income % p.a. 6.63 iv Per Capita Salaries Expenditure Rs. p.a. 292.16 364.15 314.88 v Per Capita O&M Expenditure Rs. p.a. 12.57 46.08 23.87 vi Growth in Per Capita Revenue Expenditure % p.a. 6.85 D Taxation 1 No. of PT Assessments 186310 2 ARV per Assessment Rs. 28386 39959 34172 3 Tax Per Assessment Rs. p.a. 958 1349 958 4 Population per PT Assessment (Bldgs) Persons 7 E Efficiency 1 Property Tax i Growth in Assessments % p.a. 5.31 ii Collection Performance-Property Tax % 22 60 46 iii PT Arrears as % of Total Demand % 50 64 57 iv PT Demand per Assessment Rs. p.a. 958 1349 1114 v Cost of Collecting Rs. 1000 of Taxes Rs. 90.72 160.73 116.21 2 Water Supply i Growth in Water Connections % p.a. 5.67 7.32 6.53 ii Expenditure per Connection/ month Rupees 91.73 111.38 98.33 iii Revenue per Connection/ month Rupees 51.07 90.10 74.43 iv Cost Recovery on Water Supply (%) % 76 vi Collection Performance-Water Charges % 50.98 82.95 67.56

vii Water Charge Arrears as % of Total Demand % 17.04 36.48 28.62

3 Sewerage/ UGD i Growth in UGD Connections % p.a. 6.05 10.98 8.26 ii Expenditure per Connection/ month Rupees 12.42 17.87 13.76

iii Revenue per Connection/ month (Excl. Taxes) Rupees 1.53 2.09 1.80

iv Cost Recovery on Sewerage system % 13.06

vi Collection Performance-Sewerage Charges % 67.77 78.74 72.97

vii Sewerage Charge Arrears as % of Total Demand % 14.44 37.28 29.15

F Debt and Liability Management 1 Outstanding Debt per Capita Rupees 80.50 2 Liability against Revenues i Outstanding Debt against Own revenues % 0.11 ii Outstanding Debt against revenue income % 0.11 3 Debt Servicing Ratio Ratio 0.00 0.10 0.03 4 Ratio of Outstanding Debt to Tax Demand Ratio 0.57 5 Ratio of Outstanding Debt to ARV Ratio 0.02 6 Non-Debt Liability as % of Total Liability % -

74


5 CITY INVESTMENT PLAN, STRATEGIES AND IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

City Investment Plan in line with the identified vision for Faridabad has been prepared through a comprehensive process of assessment of gaps in the physical and social infrastructure sectors. This assessment has also led to the identification of sector-specific strategies, implementation actions and associated reforms with specific inputs from stakeholders. The strategies adopted primarily have three dimensions - improving service delivery by efficiency measures; improving service delivery by creating infrastructure assets; and improving the governance aspects of the Municipal Corporation of Faridabad. This section summarises the capital investments required for creating infrastructure assets and various strategic interventions required in the implementation of such projects; these strategies are both investment-oriented and administration-oriented.

5.1 CITY INVESTMENT PLAN (CIP)

The City Investment Plan is the multi-year scheduling of identified and prioritized investments. The scheduling or phasing of the Plan is based on studies of fiscal resources availability (for new investments and O&M), technical capacity for construction and O&M, and the choice of specific improvements to be carried out for a period of six years.

The CIP is needed for:

Realisation of city growth and a meeting of infrastructure needs (to be carried out once every five years)

Scheduling of investments of ongoing projects due to cost and/ or time overruns Assigning of priorities within the constraints of available financial resources

5.1.1 Institutionalising the CIP Process

The City Investment Plan is an important element of the CDP and is significant in terms of the city’s management process and sustainability with regard to the delivery of basic services. The CIP also provides a framework for the annual budget cycle of MCF for the future 6-10 year period. As a part of the Faridabad CDP, the CIP prepared includes the following:

Desired norms and standards for infrastructure services; Roles and responsibilities of various stakeholders in the implementation of identified

projects; and Project phasing and strategies for implementation.

In Faridabad MCF is the primary agency responsible for delivering municipal services and hence the CDP proposals ought to be implemented by MCF. However HUDA in its role as a developer will assume equal footing with MCF towards acquiring lands for implementation of the DP proposals. The projects, prioritization, investment phasing, strategies and action plan are framed accordingly. Table 33 below indicates the sector wise responsibility of the agencies.

Table 33. Municipal service delivery – Responsible agencies S. No Sector Responsible Agency 1 All sectors MCF 2 Land development, Implementation of DP Proposals MCF, HUDA

75


The CIP involved the identification of public capital facilities to cater to the demands of the city populace by the year 2011 and 2031 according to their short, medium and long-term infrastructure needs. The project identification has been done through a demand-gap analysis of the services and DPRs available with the MCF. Further, project prioritisation and strategising of the investments/ phasing of investment are based on strategies, listed under each service sector as identified through stakeholder consultations. The projects derived are aimed at ensuring the optimal and efficient utilisation of existing infrastructure systems and enhancing the capacity of the systems/ services to cater to the demands of future population additions. Certain other projects listed as part of the CIP include developmental projects other than those addressing the core service sectors viz. system modernisation, etc.

The CIP and the forecasted future needs for provision of capital facilities under each identified sector are presented below. These assets will help Faridabad to universalise services for the current population as well as accommodate the expected increase in population. In sectors where long-term planning is required (for example, source development for water supply and development of landfill site), the planning horizon till the year 2031 is considered. Assets created in such sectors consider the projected population in this horizon. MCF expects that these infrastructure assets would not only guarantee services to its citizens, but also signal a proactive commitment to potential investors considering the Faridabad region.

5.1.2 Summary of Investments

The total estimated capital investment required for providing efficient services to the present population and future population of Faridabad by the year 2031 is Rs. 3053 crores at constant prices. Of this, a total of Rs. 2934 crores is proposed for investment by MCF and the rest of Rs. 119 crores by HUDA. Of the total identified investment need of Rs. 2934 crores by MCF, a total of Rs. 2049 crores is proposed for investment by MCF by 2011-12.

Table 34. Agency/ Period wise summary of Capital Investments S. No Investment Head (Agency/ Period) Rs. crores

Total investment Need of Faridabad Rs. 3053 crores Investment by MCF Rs. 2934 crores

1

Investment by HUDA Rs. 119 croresTotal investment need of Faridabad by 2011-12 Rs. 2168 crores

Investment by MCF by 2011-12 Rs. 2049 crores2

Investment by HUDA by 2011-12 Rs. 119 crores

The planning horizon for the projects identified in the urban poor/ slums sector is 2011-12. Accordingly, the entire identified investment is proposed for funding by 2011-12 itself. The planning horizon for the core service sectors of water supply, sewerage, drainage, and solid waste management, land use/ development planning and other projects is 2031; hence, only a part of the identified investment is proposed for funding by 2011-12. Faridabad will need to plan for the remaining identified investment to be funded beyond 2011-12, but before 2021.

distribution capacities have been increased

The phasing of the identified projects and investments is based on the following principles. Priority needs, with developed areas receiving

priority over future development area

Inter and intra-service linkages, viz. water supply investments shall be complemented by corresponding sewerage/ sanitation improvements

Size and duration of the requirements, including preparation and implementation period

Project-linked revenue implications, such as installing house connections where supply and

76


The table below presents the summary of sector-wise total investment needs and investments up to 2011-12.

Table 35. Summary of Capital Investments Investment by MCF till 2011-12

(Rs. lakhs) Sector

Total Investment

Need (Rs. Lakhs)

Base Cost

Escalated Cost*

% Sector wise of Total

% Investment till 2011-12

against Total

1 Water Supply 62,869 43,449 56,049 21% 69%2 Sewerage 70,200 48,290 62,455 23% 69%3 Roads & Urban Transport 61,358 41,193 54,215 20% 67%4 Drains 41,357 25,560 33,754 13% 62%5 Street Lights 3,618 2,465 3,143 1% 68%6 Conservancy & Sanitation 8,264 3,910 4,874 2% 47%7 Urban Poor/ Slums 24,701 24,701 32,971 12% 100%8 Land use/ Dev. Planning 23,760 7,035 9,608 4% 59%9 Others 9,136 8,294 10,841 4% 91% Total 305,263 204,896 267,911 100% 70%

* Escalated cost includes physical contingencies and technical assistance at 10% of total cost and 6% cost escalation due to inflation.

Investment Need in Constant Prices (Rs. Crores)

629

702

414

247

238

91

614

83

3625

83

70

247

39

256

434

483

412

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800

Water supply

Sew erage

Roads & Urban Transport

Drains

Street Lights

Conservancy (SWM) & Sanitation

Urban Poor/ Slums

Land use/ Dev. Planning

Others

Rs. Crores

Investment till 2011-12Investment Need of City

As can be observed from the table above, a total 70 percent of the identified investment need is proposed for funding by 2011-12. Urban poor/ slums sector envisages entire investment phasing by 2011-12 itself. From the perspective of sector priorities, urban poor sector is followed by the water supply and sewerage sectors at 69 percent each, street lighting and roads & transport sectors at 68 percent and 67 percent respectively. Drains sector envisage 62 percent of the identified investment by 2011-12 while conservancy sector envisage 47 percent of the identified investment by 2011-12.

Within the total investment proposed by 2011-12 for MCF, maximum share is taken by sewerage sector at 23 percent followed by water supply at 21 percent and roads & transport sector at 20 percent. Drains and urban poor sectors account for 13 and 12 percent respectively. Land use/ dev. planning accounts for 4 percent share against part funding by HUDA.

77


Sector wise details of the CIP, capital facilities identified to be created, supportive actions and implementation aspects/ strategies are discussed in the following sections in detail. Demand-gap assessment leading to various projects’ identification and costing of the same is presented in Annexure 5 and the summary of capital investment phasing under each sector is presented in Annexure 6.

5.2 SECTOR WISE CIP DETAILS – CAPITAL NEEDS/ INVESTMENTS

5.2.1 Water Supply (MCF)

Table 36. Water supply : Demand-Gap Assessment Service Levels, Demand and Gaps Existing/ desired level By Year 2031 By Year 2011/ 2021 Service head

Indicator Current level

Desired level

Unit Existing (2006) Demand Demand Gap

1 Daily Supply

Per-capita supply (lpcd) 188 315 MLD 240 896 672 432

2 Treatment Treatment capacity against supply (%) 0 100 ML 0 896 672 672

3 Distribution Network

Distribution Network length against road length (%)

75 85 Km. 910 1957 1468 558

4 Elevated Storage capacity

Elevated Storage capacity w.r.t Supply (%)

5 33 ML 11.37 299 224 213

5 Refurbishment of old distribution network Km. 1826 Metering System/ Installation of water meters No.s 32,883

Source: CRISIL Estimates

Sector Strategies & Investment Need

Strategy identified Augmentation of system for increased extract from rainy wells; in line with long-term planning to reduce dependency on ground water source and strive for equitable distribution of potable water to all through piped supply.

Expected Outcome Assured ability to meet year 2031 demand Total Investment Need Rs. 62,869 lakhs

Long-term needs (2031)

Though NCRPB specifies 200 lpcd as the norm, the desired level of per capita supply is proposed at 315 lpcd considering the large industrial demand in Faridabad and estimated industrial demand by 2031. The total quantity of supply required is estimated to be in the range of 896 MLD against the current supply of 240 MLD. Accordingly, treatment capacity and an additional elevated storage of 287 ML capacity is required at 33% of total supply by 2031.

The total investment need for water sector by 2031 is estimated at Rs. 62,869 lakhs. However the above mentioned gaps in the system are proposed to be filled in phases in line with the quantum of population addition. Accordingly part of the identified investment is proposed to be funded by 2011-12 to cater to the current gaps and meet the immediate requirements.

78


Priority needs (2011-12)

A sum of Rs. 43,448 lakhs (69% of total investment need in the water supply sector) is the capital cost estimation for the proposed interventions for the augmentation of water supplies through additional rainy wells, improvement of distribution network and provision of additional storage reservoirs by 2011-12. Additional rainy wells, each of 20 MLD capacities, are proposed near Basant Pur, Nasir Pur, Bhaskola and Mohana.

While the present ground water extract requires disinfection only, MCF proposes to have a treatment facility for future extracts from rainy wells as well as ground water. This is in view of the increasing reports of ground water contamination. Hence based on authentic analysis to be conducted by ground water resources/ irrigation department on the quality of ground water and reliability, MCF may act upon providing treatment facilities at an appropriate time. In this CDP the treatment facilities are proposed during the current plan period and MCF needs to identify locations for proposed treatment plants.

Action Plan for Implementation (2006-07 to 2011-12)

Water Supply 2006-07

2007-08

2008-09

2009-10

2010-11

2011-12

Investment upto 2011-12 (Rs. lakhs)

Rs. 43448 lakhs 514 10773 11357 6784 7691 6329

Additional Rainy wells each of 20 MLD capacity

Treatment Plant for entire capacity addition

Storage capacity addition by 213 ML

Distribution network augmentation by about 558 km length

Capital Facilities

System refurbishment & replacements

Metering System Regularise unauthorised connections, Check distribution leaks and reduce UFW

Improve collections to reach 85% collection efficiency by 2011-12

Support & System Sustenance Measures

Revision of tariff every five years starting 2007-08 by 100%

Other actions/ Measures

Identify potential location for additional rainy wells for further augmentation of water supply and reduce dependency on ground water as drinking water source

Conduct water sample and reliability analysis for ground water and assess the appropriate time for providing conventional treatment facilities

Prepare an asset inventory and map the water supply systems for effective monitoring

Plan tiny industrial units in residential location distribution system in a comprehensive manner to ensure equitable distribution; the comprehensive distribution system should be planned including those sectors being developed by

79


Water Supply 2006-07

2007-08

2008-09

2009-10

2010-11

2011-12

HUDA too. The planning should take into account 38 villages falling within the MCF

Controlled Area limits, but lacking in basic infrastructure. Conduct a water audit and leak detection study to identify leaks, unaccounted for

water (UFW) and worn-out networks for refurbishment Facilitate regular checking of internal plumbing and storage systems at the

consumers’ end by licensing service providers As Faridabad has a large number of industrial connections, ensure that high-

volume non-domestic users compulsorily fit ISP metres Promote individual house service connections (HSCs) even in slum locations and

discourage public stand posts (PSPs) as a policy measure and to increase accountability

Sector Notes

MCF shall be primarily responsible for the implementation of all the suggested actions

Capital investments on system refurbishment and replacements shall happen only after conducting a water audit and identification of UFW sources.

Assessed gaps and investment needs also includes the urban poor/ slum locations/ jhuggie clusters

Performance Monitoring Indicators

Elevated storage capacity w.r.t supply (33%) Distribution network reach as % of road length (100% of road length) System coverage – water HSCs as % of PT Assessments (min 75%)

5.2.2 Sewerage (MCF)

Table 37. Sewerage : Demand-Gap Assessment

Existing/ desired level By Year 2031 By Year 2011/ 2021


Existing (2006) Demand

Transfer the billing and collection responsibility to the revenue department (house tax) to reduce cost of collections

Improvement of collection efficiency is applicable to both arrears and current demand.

Daily per-capita water supply (min of 315 lpcd, including industrial supply, the domestic supply norm being 180 lpcd)

Cost recovery through user charges (100% O&M Expenses)

Service Levels, Demand and Gaps

Service head Desired

level Unit Demand Gap

1

System coverage/ Collection network

Collection network length against road length (%)

52 80 Km. 638 1842 1382 744

Treatment capacity against supply (%) 2 Treatment 60 100 ML 115 717 538 423



Strategy identified

Expected Outcome

Total Investment Need

Capacity expansion and upgradation of the existing collection and conveyance system to match additional water supply and provide for environmentally safe disposal Synchronisation with water supply capacity, ability to meet service level targets and disposal norms Rs. 70,200 lakhs

80



The demand-gap assessment above presented is against an assumed sewerage generation of 80 percent of water supply that is 717 MLD by 2031. Identified investments in the sector are meant to augment the UGD networks in line with the proposed increase in water supply and road network, as well as refurbishments to the existing network and treatment plants. The system plans to cover 70 percent of the population and 85 percent of the road network for efficient service delivery. Construction of public convenience systems in the immediate future to cater to the needs of the urban poor is also envisaged as a part of the sanitation sector.

The total investment need for sewerage sector by 2031 is estimated at Rs. 70,200 lakhs. However the above mentioned gaps in the system are proposed to be filled in phases in line with the quantum of population addition and augmentation of water supplies to the town. Accordingly part of the identified investment is proposed to be funded by 2011-12 to cater to the current gaps and meet the immediate requirements.


A sum of Rs. 48,290 lakhs (69% of total investment need in the sewerage sector) is proposed for sewerage infrastructure by 2011-12 excluding the proposals prepared under YAP-II. Priority capital investments are expected to cater to the current service gap as well the medium-term needs of the estimated population by 2021. Accordingly, additional 744 km. of sewerage network is proposed to be put in place by 2011-12.

Capacity addition of sewerage treatment by 423 ML through new sewerage treatment plants (STPs) is proposed by 2011-12. These would also serve the cause of the river conservation/ YAP-II. Maximum investment is expected to come under YAP-II during the initial years and accordingly investment phasing has been planned for the proposed investment by MCF. Further, MCF will need to plan beyond 2011-12 for further augmentation of capacity by another 179 ML of STPs and about 461 km. of UGD network to cater to the long-term needs of 2031.

Action Plan for Implementation

Sewerage System/ UGD 2006-07

2007-08

2008-09

2009-10

2010-11

2011-12


Rs. 48290 lakhs - 7197 13793 14247 10375 2679

Conveyance and rising mains for capacity augmentation

Collection network augmentation by about 744 km

Sewerage Treatment Plants addition by about 423 ML capacity

Capital Facilities

Pumping Machinery

Ensure every house tax assessment & water connection is also connected to the UGD

Support & System Sustenance Measures Improve collections to reach 85%

collection efficiency by 2011-12

81


Sewerage System/ UGD 2006-07

2007-08

2008-09

2009-10

2010-11

2011-12


Isolate sewerage system storm water lines. Prepare a comprehensive UGD master plan to explore the possibility of the

decentralisation of the system of operations for effective service delivery. The planning should take into account 38 villages falling within MCF’s limits, and

lacking in basic infrastructure. Promote the use of Decentralized Waste Water Treatment Systems (DEWATS) in

areas that cannot be served by the centralized system and in appropriate spot locations where the use of DEWATS is beneficial.

Plan the UGD system and ensure the location of STPs as anticipated under Yamuna Action Plan – II, so that benefits are maximised.

Improve and ensure access to sanitary facilities for the urban poor and slum dwellers.

Encourage pay & use category of public conveniences with community involvement in the maintenance of the same.

Sector Notes

The current system of sewerage tariff, based on the number of water closets needs to be reviewed as it is not the correct indicator of the cost of service. Rather, it should be linked with water supply.



Collection network reach as % of road length (min 85%) System coverage – UGD HSCs as % of water supply connections (min 90%) Cost recovery through user charges (100% O&M expenses)

5.2.3 Roads, Street lighting, Urban transport and Traffic management (MCF)

Table 38. Roads, street lighting, traffic management : Demand-Gap Assessment Service Levels, Demand and Gaps Existing/ desired level By Year 2031 By Year 2011/ 2021 Service head


Desired level


1 Degree of Connectivity

Per-capita road length (mt) 0.96 0.96

2 Road width Average road width (mt) 6.66 7.00

Concrete (%) 4 15 Km 48 345 259 211BT (%) 74 85 Km 920 1957 1468 548WBM (%) 0 0 Km 0 0 0 03 Roads –

Surface type Earthen (%) 22 0 Km 250 0 0 -250

Total municipal road length Km 1218 2303 1727 509BT to CC Km 70WBM to BT Km 0Up-gradation Earthen to BT Km 250CC Km 141

4

New formation BT Km 298

Widening & Strengthening, utility shifting, beautification Km 1225

Improvements to identified major roads ROBs/ Flyovers No.s 4

Spacing between lamp poles (mt) 55 30 Km 6 Street lighting

Tube lights (%) 76 30 No.s 16681 23029 17272 591

82


Service Levels, Demand and Gaps Existing/ desired level By Year 2031 By Year 2011/ 2021 Service head Indicator Current

level Desired

level Unit Existing

(2006) Demand Demand Gap

High power lamps (%) 24 70 No.s 5354 53657 40243 34889

High mast lamps (%) 0 0.1 No.s 1 15 12 11

Replacements Tube lights with high power lamps No.s 0Tube lights No.s 591High power lamps No.s 34889New

installations High mast lamps No.s 11

7 Traffic Mgmt Junction improvements No.s 8



Strategy identified Increase carrying capacity through widening and improve riding quality through strengthening of existing roads. New roads will cater to missing links and developing areas.

Expected Outcome Hassle-free travel on the roads, safe driving during nights Total Investment Need Rs. 64976 lakhs


Identified investments based on the demand-gap assessment above presented are meant for the up-gradation of existing un-surfaced roads; new road development; widening and strengthening of major roads; implementation of the public transport system (an appropriate system like bus rapid transits system (BRTS) etc need to be identified), traffic management systems and junction improvements; provision of street lighting, etc. In line with the DP proposal of 9.91 percent of the total city area for transportation and circulation and an average road width of 7 m, a total length of 2303 km. of road network would provide a fair degree of connectivity at an average of 0.96 meters per capita by 2031. Accordingly, an additional 1085 km. of surfaced road networks are proposed to be put in place. Installation of lighting systems on the roads will be in line with new roads development and shall maintain a spacing of not more than 30 metres per light pole.

Currently, the intra-city public transport system within Faridabad is of the nature of an intermediate public transport system, supported by privately operated stage carriers and DTC bus service from other locations up to the MCF boundary. In order to improve the public transport system, it is proposed that MCF in conjunction with NCRPB will plan for an appropriate road based public transport system with dedicated bus lanes for intra-city connectivity; regional connectivity will be ensured through the RRTS/ MRTS as proposed for the NCR region. The CDP has allocated about Rs. 2000 lakhs for the public transport system and another Rs. 25,455 lakhs for the improvement of identified major roads and the construction of ROBs at various critical intersections to achieve an efficient traffic management system.

The total investment need for roads, street lighting, transportation and traffic management sectors by 2031 is estimated at Rs. 64,976 lakhs. However the above mentioned gaps in the system are proposed to be filled in phases in line with the area being developed and quantum of population addition. Accordingly part of the identified investment is proposed to be funded by 2011-12 to cater to the current gaps and meet the immediate requirements.

83



A sum of Rs. 46,735 lakhs (76% of total investment need in the roads and transport sector) and Rs. 2465 lakhs (68% of total investment in the street lighting sector) is proposed by 2011-12. Priority capital investments are meant to cater to the current service gaps and medium-term needs of 2021. In addition to CDP investment, it is anticipated that the proposal under the NCR plan will also benefit Faridabad. Also, the proposed KMP western peripheral expressway is expected to improve the circulation pattern of the city and avoid traffic congestion in it.

The details of various road improvement proposals are presented in Annexure 6 under service gap assessment. As a long-term strategy, MCF proposes widening/ strengthening and improvement of about 122 km. of important roads of the city along with the construction of four ROBs, of which two would be planned across the railway line. A sum of Rs. 17,587 lakhs is proposed to be invested by 2011-12 on these proposals; this sum includes investment for organizing all utility corridors for better service management. Also, every new road shall be designed to have utility corridors as part of better asset management practice; the cost of this facility is in-built into road improvement cost.

Action Plan for Implementation Roads, Street lighting, Transportation and Traffic Management

2006-07

2007-08

2008-09

2009-10

2010-11

2011-12


Rs. 49200 lakhs 3161 6021 10428 8918 13709 6962

Roads Up-gradation of 250 km. of earthen & WBM roads to BT and 70 km of BT roads to CC surface

New formations- 439 km. Road Widening & Strengthening-85 km

Public Transport/ (BRTS) Improvement of identified major corridors

Land Acquisition, ROB, improvement traffic system and Junction improvements

Capital Facilities

Street lighting (about 35500 poles with fixtures to be installed)


KMP bye-pass to be implemented at the earliest to improve regional connectivity The Badarpur elevated road and widening to be constructed at the earliest to

improve connectivity with Delhi Improve connectivity in the peripheral areas and villages within MCF’s limits and

peripheral sectors that are poorly connected Regional traffic passing through NH 1 2, 3 and 4 needs to be bypassed Effective coordination between MCF and various agencies/bodies within NCR Hawker zones to be created as part of land use policy and continuous efforts to be

made to avoid encroachments Provide parking lots and introduce parking fee in prime areas Provide for bicycle networks and pedestrian facilities including footpaths It must be ensured that at least 60 percent of the roads have footpaths (i.e. roads

measuring 20 feet and more)

84


Roads, Street lighting, Transportation and Traffic Management

2006-07

2007-08

2008-09

2009-10

2010-11

2011-12

Sector Notes

Design of new roads shall necessarily have provision for shoulders, foot paths, utility ducts and storm water drains under the foot paths, landscaped median and concealed cabling for lighting system

Construction of new roads shall be integrated with drain construction (i.e., for any new road drainage facility to be planned and constructed first)

Coordinated efforts between MCF, PWD-BR, HUDA and traffic police departments need to be put in place for effective traffic management and for ensuring disciplined travel and behaviour.

Street lighting systems shall comprise automation of switching, dimming mechanism, etc.



Road network – degree of connectivity in terms of per-capita road length (min 0.96 meters)

Road condition – percentage of municipal roads surfaced (100% - CC/ BT surfacing)

Street lighting- spacing between two poles not to exceed 30 m.

5.2.4 Storm Water Drainage (MCF)

Table 39. Storm water drainage : Demand-Gap Assessment Service Levels, Demand and Gaps Existing/ desired level By Year 2031 By Year 2011/ 2021 Service head


Desired level


1 Network reach Road length covered with drains (%)

66 150

Kutcha open (%) 0 0 Km 0 0 0 0Pucca open (%) 100 30 Km 800 1036 777 -23Pucca closed (%) 0 70 Km 0.00 2418 1814 1814

2 Network – type

Total network length Km 800 3454 2591 1791Up-gradation of Pucca open to Pucca closed Km 23

New Pucca open drains Km 0New Pucca closed drains Km 17913 Augmentation/

Improvements Desilting & strengthening of Primary Drains Km 74 74 74 74



Strategy identified Network expansion, conversion of kutcha and pucca open drains to closed Pucca drains

Expected Outcome Universal coverage and disposal capability, restrict sewerage flow into storm water drains

Total Investment Need Rs. 41357 lakhs

85



Identified investments based on the demand-gap assessment above presented are meant for the up-gradation of the existing open network to a closed network and the construction of 1791 km. of new drains to cater to current and future service gaps. The system plans to cover 150% of the road network for service efficiency. The total investment need for drains sectors by 2031 is estimated at Rs. 41,357 lakhs. However the above mentioned gaps in the system are proposed to be filled in phases in line with the road network being developed and quantum of population addition. Accordingly part of the identified investment is proposed to be funded by 2011-12 to cater to the current gaps and meet the immediate requirements.


A sum of Rs. 25,560 lakhs (62% of total investment need in the drains sector) is proposed to be invested in storm water drainage by 2011-12. Priority capital investments are meant to cater to the current service gap as well as to the medium-term needs of the proposed storm water drainage network by 2021. The majority of the investment is dedicated to the formation of new networks in un-serviced and newly developed areas of Faridabad. Further, MCF will need to plan beyond 2011-12 for further augmentation of network by another 864 km. in line with new roads to be developed beyond 2011-12, to cater to the long-term needs of 2031.


Storm Water Drainage 2006-07

2007-08

2008-09

2009-10

2010-11

2011-12


Rs.25560 lakhs - 5230 5220 3828 5014 6268

Up-gradation of open drains to closed drains

Formation of pucca closed drains Capital Facilities Desilting and strengthening of

about 74 km length of primary drains in city


Ensure that every divided road has closed drains on either side and undivided roads have drains on at least one side


Sector Notes

Isolate storm water drainage from the sewerage system Identify, delineate, sanitize and protect the natural drainage system of the city Develop common washing areas in identified hawking areas with connections to

treated water and drainage

Improve drainage network on a priority basis in flood-prone areas Ensure that all new roads designed make adequate provision for storm water

drains Construction of new roads should be integrated with construction of drains Assessed gaps and investment needs also includes the urban poor/ slum locations/

jhuggie clusters

86


Storm Water Drainage 2006-07

2007-08

2008-09

2009-10

2010-11

2011-12


Drainage network reach as percentage of road length (min 150%) All divided roads to have drains on either side and undivided roads on at least one

side Drains to be cleaned before and after monsoon for better functioning

5.2.5 Conservancy (SWM) & Sanitation (MCF)

Table 40. Conservancy & Sanitation : Demand-Gap Assessment Service Levels, Demand and Gaps Existing/ desired level By Year 2031 By Year 2011/ 2021 Service head


Desired level


1 Waste generation

Per-capita waste generation (tpcd) 377 377 MT 480 775 654 -

2 Waste Collection

Collection performance (%) 86 100

3 Density Factor Moisture content NA 0.35

4 Vehicle utilisation

Trips per Vehicle per day 3.03 2.50

5 Primary collection

No.s of Hand carts against proposed 80% privatisation No.s 890 1564 1173 283

Container bins No.s 180 777 661 4816 Secondary collection Dual loaded dumper placers No.s 2 32 27 25

7 Waste transportation Vehicle capacity MT 209 477 402 193

Landfill site Acres NA 147 59 59

Landfill infrastructure MT/ day - 276 138 1388 Disposal

Composting infrastructure MT/ day - 136 68 68

9

Slums/ Sanitation/ Public conveniences

Slum popl. per seat of Public convenience

359 90 Seats 410 0 1971

1561 (98 Pay &

Use units each

with 16 seats)



Strategy identified Source segregation and door-to-door collection, effective transportation and environmentally safe disposal

Expected Outcome Reduced waste generation, hygienic conditions and a clean city Total Investment Need Rs. 8264 lakhs


The demand-gap assessment above presented indicates generation of 775 MT of waste in the city by 2031 against the current generation of 480 MT at 377 grams per capita per day; the future generation of solid waste is assumed at 2.2% per annum for the first ten years and at a reduced rate of 1.9% per annum and 1.6% per annum for the next two decades. Accordingly, the requirements are planned for the horizon year 2031.

87


In addition to the proposed land of about 59 acres for disposal, MCF needs to acquire an additional land of about 88 acres after 2011-12 for future landfill and composting purposes. About 193 tons capacity addition by 2011-12 through increasing fleet size would be required for efficient primary and secondary collection of solid waste.

Further, public conveniences mainly to cater to the urban poor and slums in the city are planned for 2011-12 only. It is considered that as a long term measure public conveniences should be discouraged; this is also in line with the considered strategy of making Faridabad a no-slum city.

The total investment need for conservancy and sanitation sectors by 2031 is estimated at Rs. 8264 lakhs. However the above mentioned gaps in the system are proposed to be filled in phases in line with the road network being developed and quantum of population addition. Accordingly part of the identified investment is proposed to be funded by 2011-12 to cater to the current gaps and meet the immediate requirements.


A sum of Rs. 3910 lakhs (47% of total investment need in the sector) is proposed by 2011-12. Priority capital investments are meant to cater to the current service gap and the medium-term needs of 2021.

The requirements at the disposal site are planned for the horizon year 2031. Accordingly, infrastructure for land fill and composting is proposed on a total land of 58 acres. Infrastructure development for land fill would be a year-to-year capital expense. In line with these developments, augmentation of vehicle capacity by 193 tons would be required by 2011-12 to meet the current gap and immediate needs. About 300 handcarts are proposed to be acquired; 481 dumper placer bins and 25 dual-loaded dumper placers are proposed to meet the gap by 2011-12. Rs. 829 lakhs is proposed for construction of public convenience systems mainly to cater to the urban poor and slum locations. These would be in the form of 16 seat complex (total 98 units) to be operated on pay & use format. This however is to cater to the present slum population only and not a long term measure as earlier suggested.

Further, MCF will need to plan beyond 2011-12 for further augmentation of vehicle capacity by 75 tons as well as the construction of more intermediate transfer stations in line with the changing land use pattern and waste generation trends, to cater to the long-term needs of 2031.


Solid Waste Management 2006-07

2007-08

2008-09

2009-10

2010-11

2011-12


83 1970 607 365 547 339

Acquisition of new vehicles -three bin handcarts for door to door collection

Acquisition of new vehicles for secondary collection

Capital Facilities

Acquiring a new disposal site of approx. 59 acres

Rs. 3910 lakhs

88


Solid Waste Management 2006-07

2007-08

2008-09

2009-10

2010-11

2011-12

Land fill infrastructure and composting facility development at disposal site

DLDP & Container Bins Construction of pay & use public convenience systems in slums

Implementation of complete door -to-door collection

Part-privatisation of house-to-house collection at 80% households (MCF to cover only 20% households)

Support & System Sustenance Measures Awareness campaign on source

segregation


Sector Notes


Create a separate multi-disciplinary SWM cell with expertise in engineering, human resources/personnel management, awareness generation/ social behaviour, health

Increase the ambit of Solid Waste Management to include “recycling” and to facilitate and regulate the sector accordingly.

Ensure optimum utilization of existing fleet Initiate information-Education-Communication (I-E-C) campaigns to raise

awareness among the urban poor and slum dwellers of better SWM practices Initiate steps towards sharing the responsibility of primary collection of segregated

garbage with citizens Develop transfer stations in a scientific, eco-friendly manner – processing waste at

these sites, for different types of material Develop decentralized waste processing sites at each zone and appropriate

technologies Improve and ensure access to sanitary facilities for the urban poor and slum

dwellers. Encourage pay & use category of public conveniences with community

involvement in the maintenance of the same.

MCF shall be the prime implementing agency for the sector For establishment of Intermediate Transfer Stations to reduce cost of

transportation, identify sites which are cost- effective Identify localised/ decentralised locations for processing/ disposal/ reuse of bio-

degradable and plastic waste Assessed gaps and investment needs also includes the urban poor/ slum locations/

jhuggie clusters

Source segregation – reduction of waste to be collected (min 70 % of waste generated)

Door-to-door collection as percentage of households covered (min 80%) Optimum fleet utilisation (No. of trips/ vehicle/ day - average minimum of 2.5) Vehicle capacity as percentage of rated capacity to waste generated (minimum

100%)

89


5.2.6 Slums and Basic Services for Urban Poor (MCF)


Strategy identified Rehabilitation of slum dwellers currently staying in vulnerable areas and in proposed project locations, in-site improvements and access to basic services and amenities

Expected Outcome Improvement in quality of services for the urban poor, preservation of sensitive geographies, reduced vulnerability of urban poor, removal of slums by year 2011-12

Total Investment Need Rs. 24,701 lakhs

The requirements in this sector are of immediate priority. Hence, the planning horizon for the sector is 2011 and accordingly projects and investments have been identified to be funded by 2011-12. A sum of Rs. 24701 lakhs is the investment identified for various slum rehabilitation and improvement projects and for providing basic services to urban poor. This however is partly against resolution of the prime issue of the encroachments of the proposed rehabilitation lands. Of the identified investment, a sum of Rs. 21,646 has been allocated for improving and rehabilitating housing stock (about 15,000 units). As part of 10% own funding, it is proposed that 10% will be mobilised as beneficiary contribution.


Slums and Urban Poor 2006-07

2007-08

2008-09

2009-10

2010-11

2011-12


Rs. 24701 lakhs - 6328 6328 4329 3858 3858-

In situ rehabilitation of slums- housing Capital

Facilities Infrastructure development for slum rehabilitation

Inventory and geographical mapping of all slums and infrastructure in slums for MCF

Socio-Economic Survey of all slums in MCF Support &

System Sustenance Measures

Training for women in slums and urban poor towards self-employment and other income generating activities. NGOs and CBOs to play the lead role and MCF shall assume the secondary/ supportive role


Providing for reservation of lands for the economically weaker sections (EWS) in each type of commercial/ industrial/ residential land use in the development plan

Facilitating access to credit for urban poor. MCF can explore the option of acting as a guarantor.

Organising frequent meetings with slum dwellers towards encouraging participation in slum development programmes, creating awareness on beneficiary contribution to project development and also assuming the responsibility of implementing the projects

90


Slums and Urban Poor 2006-07

2007-08

2008-09

2009-10

2010-11

2011-12

Sector Notes


Facilitating and encouraging the neighbourhood concept in slums to carry out recreational activities such as reading, sports and drama

Infrastructure and basic services’ provision in slums shall not be in isolation but in conjunction in line with overall infrastructure development in the city

Awareness on health and hygiene shall be created among slum dwellers in line with the long-term goal of moving towards individual toilets and doing away with public convenience systems

Water Supply –Individual house service connections to all Sewerage - Individual house service connections to all Sanitation – Community toilets in the short run and individual toilets in the long run Solid Waste Management -- Coverage of all slum households under door-to-door

collection and awareness campaigns on source segregation

5.2.7 Land use/ Development planning (MCF, HUDA)

The total funding required is estimated at Rs. 23760 lakhs in view of the impending revision of the current Development Plan, which has its planning horizon only till 2011. A sum of Rs. 14,010 lakhs is the identified investment by 2011-12 for the acquisition of lands for future development of sectors in Faridabad and also those reserved lands to be proposed in the Development Plan proposals, including the relocation of wholesale markets.

Considering the role of HUDA as the prime agency with respect to development of new sectors, part of the investment amounting to Rs. 6975 lakhs by 2011-12 is proposed to be funded by HUDA. In view of the various NCR proposals in urban transport sector for which major land would be required, MCF in consultation with NCRPB will work towards incorporating all such proposals into the revised DP and accordingly acquire the necessary land. Rs. 7035 lakhs including a GIS-based land use survey for the preparation of the revised DP (to be taken up during 2007-08) is proposed to be funded by MCF.

Further, MCF and HUDA will need to plan beyond 2011-12 for further acquisition of lands for future urban development proposals. Funding to the tune of Rs. 4875 lakhs each by MCF and HUDA would be required for the purpose.

Sector Strategies & Investment Need Strategy identified Facilitate planned development of city as per Development Plan proposals

Expected Outcome Planned, orderly development of the peripheral areas contributing to overall city development

Total Investment Need Rs. 23,760 lakhs


Land Use / Development Planning 2006-07

2007-08

2008-09

2009-10

2010-11

2011-12

Rs. 7,035 lakhs by MCF - 60 1395 1395 2093 2093 Investment upto 2011-12 (Rs. lakhs) Rs. 6,975 lakhs by HUDA - - 1395 1395 2093 2093

Capital Facilities

GIS-based existing land use survey by MCF

91


Land Use / Development Planning 2006-07

2007-08

2008-09

2009-10

2010-11

2011-12

Acquisition of lands for sector development by HUDA

Inventory and geographical mapping of all slums and infrastructure in slums

Support & System Sustenance Measures Revitalisation of inner/core areas

in old Faridabad


Acquisition of lands for NCR proposals and other reserved lands by MCF

Consideration of change in policy regarding planning horizon/ revision period of DP from 20 years to 10 years

Immediate revision of DP and incorporation of all NCRPB proposals relating to FCA area.

Decongesting core areas through selective relocation of commercial, wholesale and trading activities (priority markets are steel, rice and fruits and vegetables)

Identifying land in the peripheral areas and providing connectivity and other infrastructure

Framing common building regulations for FCA (MCF and HUDA areas) Byelaws to encourage decongestion of the core areas through Revision of FSI

norms and incentives; Parking norms; and Specific regulations like accommodation and reservation

Discouraging development in critical, ecologically sensitive areas Idenitfying environmentally critical locations Making special DCR applicable to these areas to restrict encroachments and

unauthorised developments Developing available open spaces, parks and playgrounds as lungs of the city Using market-friendly mechanisms like densification, accommodation, and

reservation to generate more urban land and to further generate open space Reserving more lands for health and institutional purposes and facilitating

development of all basic services

5.2.8 River Conservation


Strategy identified Desilting, clearing encroachments, beautification, treatment facilities for preserving rivers and the riverine system around or within the city

Expected Outcome Conservation of natural river resource; enriched and enhanced lung spaces for the city


Under the YAP-II conservation of the river Yamuna is proposed; in this CDP in addition to improvement of sewerage system a sum of Rs. 750 lakhs has been allocated as contribution by MCF towards the components planned under YAP-II for cleaning, strengthening of river banks and providing for permanent treatment facilities and also including awareness programs. These are proposed to follow the YAP-II implementation plan. The investments under the sewerage sector also benefit river conservation since it would clean the sewerage before discharging it into the river.

92



River Conservation 2006-07

2007-08

2008-09

2009-10

2010-11

2011-12

188 263 300 -

Clearing of encroachments and desilting operations

Strengthening and lining of river banks Capital

Facilities Development and beautification of surroundings

Augmentation/ extension of UGD system in the city for complete coverage and compliance


Implementation of SWM practices and complete coverage of city through door-to-door collection

Coordination measures


Rs. 750 lakhs

Coordinated efforts between MCF, YAP- II, NCR Board, and the Irrigation

Department are required for plugging all inlet points into the rivers, before desilting operations are taken up.

A Faridabad River Conservation Committee needs to be formed from among the officials of MCF, PWD- PH, and environmental groups of the cities for effective management of the riverine areas.


Eradicate conditions for malaria, dengue and other water-borne diseases Ensure location of STPs under the River Conservation Plan in such a way that the

benefits are maximised Identify, delineate, sanitize and protect the natural drainage system of the city Ensure functioning of UGD network and compliance by citizens Identify and facilitate conservation of structures of heritage and public importance

along riverbanks

Sector Notes Rehabilitation/ relocation of slums along the riverbanks needs to be given

maximum priority and coordinated efforts are required from the respective departments of MCF.

5.2.9 Fire services


Strategy identified Strengthening disaster management aspects in the city particularly fire hazard management systems.

Expected Outcome Effective and timely tackling of industrial, commercial and domestic fire calls Total Investment Need Rs. 850 lakhs

The present fire brigade of MCF though is effectively handling fire calls from various quarters is seriously strained with lack of infrastructure and personnel. It is proposed to construct one central fire station with all facilities like parade ground, workshop, training areas and residential facilities etc on 2 acres of identified MCF land.

93


Also another 7 new fire stations are proposed to be located at different locations of the city to effectively address the fire rescue calls against the increasing numbers of such calls over the years. The equipment required along with hydraulic platforms, trailers, rescue vans, ambulances, mortuary van etc. A total of Rs. 850 lakhs is proposed for these initiatives to strengthen the fire department of MCF.


River Conservation 2006-07

2007-08

2008-09

2009-10

2010-11

2011-12


Rs. 850 lakhs 340 298 213 - -

Setting up of Central Fire station on identified 2 Acres of land with all facilities

Development of 7 new fire stations Capital Facilities Acquisition of equipment, hydraulic

platforms, trailers, rescue vans, ambulances, mortuary van etc

Coordination measures


Coordinated efforts between MCF, HUDA and Industries’ associations for effectively managing the fire hazard are necessary through awareness creation.

Resident Welfare Associations to be taken into confidence by MCF towards educating them on tackling minor fire accidents before Fire brigade can answer the situation.

MCF need to initiate a study on Fire Hazard Management system to identify the types of fire calls in the past, divide the city area into hazard prone zones and accordingly locate the new fire stations to effectively manage fire calls

Town planning department of MCF and HUDA to ensure fire safety for all existing and new constructions in the form of adequate setbacks, fire detector systems, sprinkler systems etc as necessary

5.2.10 Projects supporting Economic Development and City Beautification


Strategy identified Appropriate siting of economic infrastructure, revitalisation of old cities of Old Faridabad and Ballabgarh and city beautification

Expected Outcome Boost in the economy of the region, preservation of its culture & heritage and sustenance of growth


While MCF does not have a direct role to play in the economic development of the city or the region, they propose to play a proactive role in facilitating and supporting the same through identified projects from time to time. Initiatives like revitalisation of the old cities of Old Faridabad and Ballabgarh through decongestion of the core area, relocation of specific economic infrastructure like markets and wholesale centres (rice, steel and fruits and vegetable wholesale markets) are proposed.

94


A sum of Rs. 2000 lakhs is the proposed investment for truck terminals and wholesale markets; Rs. 400 lakhs has been proposed for improvement of gardens, Rs. 64 lakhs for creating night shelters and Rs. 200 lakhs for improvements to the stadium and its surroundings. MCF also proposes to lend a helping hand to heritage/ tourist development by providing linkages to Surajkund and other prominent tourist places around Faridabad. Of the total identified investment of Rs. 3446 lakhs, Rs. 2664 lakhs is proposed for utilisation by 2011-12.


Economy, Culture and Heritage 2006-07

2007-08

2008-09

2009-10

2010-11

2011-12


Rs. 2664 lakhs 119 600 622 700 622

Tree plantation, creation of gardens, conservation of heritage structures

Relocation of markets/ Construction of truck terminals/ slaughter house etc

Provision of night shelters

Capital Facilities

Improvement to of stadium and surroundings

Other actions/ Coordination measures

Facilitating economic development Parks/ gardens development; Beautification of water bodies by creating parks and

carrying out other recreational activities Encouraging citizens contribution towards the maintenance of neighbourhood

parks, Decongesting of the core areas by removing high trading activity through selective

relocation of commercial, wholesale and trading activities Identifying land in the peripheral areas and providing connectivity and other

infrastructure Revision of FSI norms and incentives for factory type layouts Facilitate setting up of exhibition, convention and science centres for

dissemination of best practices and development of tourism Listing and documentation of tourist spots around Faridabad

5.2.11 Urban Governance/ System Modernisation

A sum of Rs. 550 lakhs has been proposed to be spent over the next five years towards system modernisation, e-Governance and GIS projects. These projects would involve administrative reforms implementation, computerisation efforts, GIS-based systems development etc. These capital investments are expected to bring in more accountability and transparency in the administration of MCF and thereby enhance MCF reach to the citizens.


Other Projects 2006-07

2007-08

2008-09

2009-10

2010-11

2011-12


Rs. 550 lakhs - 110 110 110 110 110

95



2007-08

2008-09

2009-10

2010-11

2011-12

Capital Facilities

Urban governance, GIS systems, Systems modernisation

Implementation of double entry accrual system of accounting

Implementing GIS based property tax system and support engineering services

Rationalisation of tax admin. process

Restructuring of admin. systems



Urban governance & finance Identifying alternate resources to reduce dependency on octroi compensation Identifying the training needs of the staff (HR, Administration, Financial

Management, Urban Governance, Service Delivery, Citizens Communication, IT) Involving city- based institutions in imparting training Publishing property tax records at the ward level and bringing in transparency in

the system Carrying out a cost audit of all the expenditure, incurred service-wise and identify

and assess sector-wise expenditure to categorise specific expenditure control measures

Communicating with the public and within the organisation to build popular support for the reform initiatives

Outsourcing Property Tax database management, demand notices generation, arrears collection, non-core functions in the vehicle/ workshop department, etc.

5.2.12 New MCF office, system studies and minor capital works

A sum of Rs. 800 lakhs has been proposed for construction of new office premises for all departments of MCF on the existing site. MCF proposes to take up this activity during 2009-10 and complete the same in two years time. This is proposed towards presenting an ideal and corporate environment for the staff of MCF and thereby improves HR productivity. A sum of Rs. 180 lakhs has been proposed for funding various systems’ improvement studies, to be taken up by MCF by 2011-12 in line with the various reforms proposed in the CDP (leak detection, preparation of a comprehensive master plan for all infrastructure service, socio-economic survey of slums, preparation of asset inventory, fire hazard management study etc). Another Rs. 60 lakhs has been proposed for studies to be initiated after 2011-12.

These apart, MCF proposes to invest a total of Rs. 2500 lakhs through budget allocations for regular minor development works to be identified on a year-to-year basis. These regular capital works have been planned in addition to the proposed investment, but these are not covered under JNNURM funding; they shall be fully funded by MCF’s budget.



2007-08

2008-09

2009-10

2010-11

2011-12


Rs. 3480 lakhs 417 417 417 817 817 417

96



2007-08

2008-09

2009-10

2010-11

2011-12

Construction of new MCF office Systems’ Studies Capital

Facilities Regular capital works (minor)


Identify on a year-to-year basis, the detailed list of minor capital works to be taken up at the ward level

Identify various studies to be conducted for effective implementation of the various proposed reforms

Administrative restructuring Conducting Water audit Mapping and socio-economic survey of Slums Initiate Fire Hazard Management study Preparation of master plan documents for water supply, sewerage, drainage, etc.

97


5.3 SECTOR WISE LISTING OF PRIORITY PROJECTS

5.3.1 Priority Projects – Water Supply S. No Location Quantity UnitA Water suply

1 Construction of Ranney wells of 20 MLD capacity each on Yamuna bank2 Construction of 4 Nos. of under ground storage tanks (Common collection tank). 14.97 ML3 Consturction of water treatment plant including civil and E & M works all complete. 780.00 ML4 Construction of Elevated Storage Reservoirs Capacity (ML)

i Old Faridabad - 29 Nos 4.5 130.50 MLii Ballabhgarh - 18 Nos 4.5 81.00 MLiii NIT - 40 Nos 4.5 180.00 ML

5 Installing pumps and accessories etc at each ESR Capacity (HP)i Old Faridabad - 29 x 2 Nos 100 58.00 Nosii Ballabhgarh - 18 x 2 Nos 100 36.00 Nosiii NIT - 40 x 2 Nos 100 80.00 Nos

6 Augmentation of distribution network - Old Faridabad zone Diameter (mm)i Bye pass road -18 C1 - 60-55-121-37 A 200 2477.00 mtii 6 - 91 150 671.00 mtiii 1 - 26 - 115 150 810.00 mtiv 37 A - 131 150 540.00 mtv 162 - 158 - 132 150 482.00 mtvi 92 - 130 150 473.00 mtvii 25 - 119 E 150 293.00 mtviii 1 - 6 150 244.00 mtix 50 - 55 150 250.00 mtx 2 - 18, 18 C 150 2 x 268 mtxi 60 - 90 150 405.00 mtxii 76 - 81 150 230.00 mtxiii 91 - 132 150 630.00 mtxiv 27 A 300 800.00 mtxv 27 A 150 2400.00 mtxvi 27 B 300 1000.00 mtxvii 27 B 150 450.00 mtxviii 27 C 300 8700.00 mtxix 27 C 150 2850.00 mtxx Green Tubewell 6.00 Nos

7 Augmentation of distribution network - Ballabgarh zone Diameter (mm)i Tigaon road boosting to Ambedker chowk 600 1300.00 mtii D.M road to Bohra public school road at 100' 250 760.00 mtiii 100' road to pond chawla colony 250 550.00 mtiv 100' road to mastana chowk, Chawla colony 250 380.00 mtv 60' road and Gurdawara road chawla colony 200 1800.00 mtvi D.M road to T.W. No. 1 at milkplan road 250 2100.00 mtvii D.M. road to Ambedkar chowk hospital road to Unchagaon Octroi at Mohna road 250 3075.00 mtviii Gupta hotel to Unchagaon Neem tree 250 1200.00 mtix Sihi gate Tigaon road to Gupta hotel 250 1550.00 mt

8 Augmentation of distribution network - NIT zone and Sector 24 Diameter (mm)i Bata to Hitkari chowk 200 1445.00 mtii Shona road to Hard ware chowk 600 3430.00 mtiii NH - 2-3 chowk to press colony 150 2000.00 mtiv Internal road NH - 2 150 1800.00 mtv Internal road NH - 1 150 2000.00 mtvi S.R. road 150 400.00 mtvii Internal road at NH - 3 150 3000.00 mt

9 Augmentation of distribution network in approved colonies

98


5.3.2 Priority Projects – Sewerage S. No Location Quantity UnitB Sewerage

1 Construction of Sewage Treatment plantsi Mirzapur 88.00 MLii Badsahpur 44.00 MLiii Pratapgarh 128.00 ML

2 Construction of Main Pumping station at STP site including E & M works.i Mirzapur 204.00 MLii Badshapur 40.00 MLiii Pratapgarh 277.60 ML

3 Construction of Intermediate pumping stations in each zone Nos.i Faridabad Zone 4 156.00 MLii Ballabhgarh Zone 3 124.00 MLiii NIT Zone 5 287.00 ML

4 Prividing and laying rising mainsi Construction of steel Truss structure bridges for crossing of rising mains. Span (mt)

across Gurgaon Canal 25 3.00 Nosacross Agra Canal 40 3.00 Nos

ii Providing and laying Rising mains from IPS DI pipe class k - 9 of following sizes Diameter (mm)800 2000.00 mt900 1000.00 mt1100 2000.00 mt

iii Supply and laying of MS pipe of following sizes Diameter (mm)1200 1500.00 mt1500 3000.00 mt1600 1000.00 mt1800 4000.00 mt1900 1000.00 mt2200 500.00 mt2400 6000.00 mt

5 Prividing and laying sewer lines/ collection network - Old Faridabad zone Diameter (mm)i Sector 19

600 749.00 mt450 1781.00 mt

ii Ward 22P-6 to 91 450 671.00 mt60 - 90 450 406.00 mt1-9 250 244.00 mt50 - 55 250 268.00 mt1 - 25 250 268.00 mt40 - 18 C 300 777.00 mt2 - 18, 18B 250 536.00 mt158 - 162 250 137.00 mt76 - 81 300 229.00 mt1/28 - 1/13 300 180.00 mt92 - 130 300 473.00 mt156 - 132 300 335.00 mt37 A - 116 450 540.00 mt37 - 115 450 495.00 mt25 - 119 E 450 293.00 mt75 - ISC 250 137.00 mt

iii Ashoka Enclave -I and Main193 to 357 300 280.00 mt62 - 121 300 225.00 mt133-144 300 125.00 mt162 - 198 300 250.00 mt

Contd..

99


S. No Location Quantity UnitB Sewerage

iv Ashoka Enclave - IIA-59 to A-93 450 460.00 mtA-37 to A-38 300 80.00 mtA-18 to A-34 300 180.00 mtA-7 to A-49 300 200.00 mtB-2 to B-30 300 280.00 mtA-7 to A-49 300 200.00 mtB-2 to B-30 300 280.00 mtB-45 to B-52 300 100.00 mtB-13 to B-61 300 125.00 mtB-63 to B-70 300 125.00 mt

6 Prividing and laying sewer lines/ collection network - Ballabgarh zone Diameter (mm)i Ward No. 31 & 32

Ambedker Chowk to Sihi Gate Road at Tigaon Road 900 1300.00 mtSibi Gate to Tigaon Road disposal 1200 900.00 mtD.M Road to Bhohara Public school Road 450 760.00 mt100' Road to Tigaon Road at Pathawari Road 450 450.00 mt100' Road to Public High school Chowk 450 450.00 mtMastana chowk to Echwala colony at 33' Road 450 275.00 mt100' Road to Tigaon Road at Bhohara Public school Road 450 215.00 mt

ii Ward No. 33 & 34Uncha Gaon Octroi to Gupta Hotal 450 1400.00 mtGupta Hotel to Ambedker Chowk 450 600.00 mtGupta Hotel to Sihi Gate road at jTigaon road 450 1600.00 mtAalya Vidiya mandir school to Bhagat Singh colony road 450 600.00 mtBhagat Singh road to Aggresen chowk 450 700.00 mtD.M road to Ambedker chowk Hospital road 450 475.00 mtSihi Gate road to NagarPark school at Tigaon road 450 450.00 mt

7 Prividing and laying sewer lines/ collection network - NIT zone Diameter (mm)i Bhagat singh school to Mujesor disposal 1200 5000.00 mtii Neelam chowk to 4 - 5 chowk 600 1750.00 mtiii 4 - 5 chowk to Banke Bihari 600 850.00 mtiv NH 1 - 2 chowk to Phawra singh Kalyan singh chowk, Delite Hotel 600 2000.00 mtv Prince Hotel 450 500.00 mtvi NH - 2 police chowki road 600 600.00 mtvii NH - 2 E Block 600 1600.00 mtviii 2 - D Block to NH 1 - 2 chowk 600 700.00 mtix Chimni Bai to 2 - 3 chowk 1200 2200.00 mtx Masjid chowk to ESI chowk 600 500.00 mtxi NH - 3 outer road to DAV college 600 500.00 mtxii NH - 3 outer road to sports complex 600 500.00 mtxiii Parag Medical store to NH 2 - 3 chowk to 2-3 circle 600 2100.00 mtxiv Internal road of NH - 3 450 3100.00 mtxv Sec. 22, 575 to 740 600 320.04 mtxvi Sec. 22, 575 to 541 300 381.00 mtxvii Sec. 22, 397 to 363, 483 to 562, 574 to 499, 764 to 883 250 914.40 mtxviii Sec. 22, Balance all road 200 3505.20 mt

8 Prividing and laying sewer lines/ collection network in approved colonies

100


5.3.3 Priority Projects – Roads S. No Location

D Roads & Street lightingNature of work

Length (mt)

Width (mt)

Footpaths (sides)

Street lights (SV fixtures)

Utility shifting

ROB/ Flyover

1 Road works in Old faridabad zonei Plot No: 6 - 19, 40 - 18C, DLF Industrial Area

W - 22 Widening 1448 6.70 48

ii Plot No: 1 - 9, Mkt. Plot (50 - 55), 2 - 18, 2 - 18 B, 75, 76, - 81, I/29 - I/13, 92 -130, 162 - 158

Widening 2225 4.60 74

iii Plot No. 1 to Tele.Exch , 60-68,37A-116,156-132,26-115,85-90 DLF Indstrial Area. Widening 2044 5.50 68

iv Old Sher shah suri road Dividing sector 30 -31 upto Burhia nalla ward - 22 Widening 2500 13.70 84 2 Nos LT/

HT linesv Sector 28 & 29 dividing road (petrol pump

road) ward - 22 Widening 925 7.85 2 sides 31 2 Nos LT/ HT lines

vi H.B. colony & HUDA Sector 29 VIA Market to dry 28 & 29 Widening 1050 10.00 35

vii Sector 21C (old D.c office road) Marble Market road sector 21c, 60' road (Plot No. 450 to 698), 60' road (Plot No. 439 to 250)

Widening 3970 16.00 132

viii Dual carriage road of sector 21A & D, 21 B & D, dividing road sector A, D & C dividing road.

Widening 3600 18.00 120

ix sector 21 - A, 21 - B, 21 - C Premixing 7800 6.70x Plot No. A - 133 to A - 142, A - 94 to B - 56, A

- 104 to A - 113, A - 50 to A - 37 near A - 37 to A - 34, A - 1 to A - 7, B - 61 to B - 71, B - 45 to B - 52, B - 63 to B - 70, B - 13 to B - 61 of Ashoka Enclave (II).

Resurfacing 1370 3.65

xi B - 2 to B - 30 in Ashoka Enclave (II)Widening 280 7.00 9 1 Nos LT/

HT linesxii B - 80 to C - 4, B - 96 to B - 106, A - 59 to A -

93 in Ashoka Enclave (II) Widening 960 10.00 32 1 Nos LT/ HT lines

xiii Palla Chowk to village Basantpur Widening & strengthening 5000 8.00 162

xiv Old Shershah Suri road from K.G. Khosla to Burhia Nalla

Widening & strengthening 3250 8.00 108 2 Nos LT/

HT linesxv Main Road of Sector, 37 from D.M road to bye

pass road, and Tilput road from old shershah suri road to Palla chowk.


HT lines

xvi House No. 1324 - 826, 643 - 1045, 232 - 375, 11 to D.A.V School in Sector, 37


HT linesxvii D.M road to old Shershah Suri road in village

Sarai Resurfacing 700 6.70

xviii Surya nagar phase I of 12 near plot No. 1 - 20, 29 - 40, 41 - 51, 57 - 67, 78 - 79, 35 - 57, 115 - 129, 145 - 149, 200 - 203, 107 - 145, 308 - 309, 276 - 279, 216 - 225, 226 - 235, 246 - 255, 266 -275


xix Near plot No. 28 to 85, 80 - 137, 130 - 144, 275 to park, near park in surya nagar phase - I Resurfacing 690 6.70

xx Near plot No. 662 - 682, 657 - 610, 714 - 708, 600 - 607, 603 - 600, 622 - 632, 642 - 650, 651 -662, 689 - 707 in surya nagar phase - II Resurfacing 920 3.65

xxi Near plot No. 513 - 401, 497 - 407, 402 - 404, 408 - 409, 411 - 412, 557 - 412, 486 - 417, 339 -318, 430 - 340, 569 - 574, 581 - 586, 593 - 598, 291 - 292, 350 - 385, 430 - 441, 400 - 414, 386 -391, 392 - 399, 550 - 563, 568 - 65, 30 - 81 in surya nagar


xxii Near plot No. 216 - 234, 128 - 201, 166 - 187, 92 - 101, 201 - 269, 188 - 193, 155 - 91, 233 - 258 of surya nagar phaes - (II)


Quantity

101


S. No Location


Length (mt)

Width (mt)

Footpaths (sides)


Utility shifting

ROB/ Flyover

1 Road works in Old faridabad zonexxiii Near plot No. 568 - 497, 82 - 269, 480 - 497 in

surya nagar phase - (II) Resurfacing 720 6.70

xxiv Village Sehatpur towards Tillpat upto Surya Nagar phase - I Resurfacing 610 6.70

xxv Road sector - 18 HBC colony sector - 16 x 17 Widening & strengthening 3225 15.00 2 sides 108

xxvi Agra canal bridge to Mata chowk Widening & strengthening 650 9.00 22

xxvii Various road of sector - 17 Widening & strengthening 2640 10.00

xxviii Sector - 19 main road, sector - 16 main road, sector - 16A main road

Widening & strengthening 13904 10.00

xxix MCF office to Fire station Widening & strengthening 3774 11.00 2 sides 126

xxx MCF office to sector - 19 & Puran colony chowk on dividing road of Shastri colony


xxxi Old MCF office to Lajpat chowk Widening & strengthening 350 14.00

xxxii Sectro - 27A, 27B, 27C & 27D Resurfacing 3025 6.70xxxiii Sector - 27A, 27B, 27C, 27D Resurfacing 1900 3.65xxxiv Rajiv chowk to bye pass road Resurfacing 2255 12.00 2 sidesxxxv D.M road to bye pass of sector - 15A & 16A

dividing and 15A and sector - 12 dividing Resurfacing 4821 12.00 2 sides

2 Road works in Ballabgarh zonei Good year road & dividing road of sector 6 &

7Widening & strengthening 3000 14.00 2 sides 100 1 Nos LT/

HT linesii Internal road & sector - 10 & 11 Widening &

strengthening 825 7.00 28

iii Sector 7 & 8, 9 & 10 Widening & strengthening 2980 12.00 2 sides 100 1 Nos LT/

HT linesiv Dividing road of sector - 10 & 11 Widening &

strengthening 1390 7.00 2 sides 46 1 Nos LT/ HT lines

v YMCA road from D.M road to bey pass road and disposal sector - 9

Widening & strengthening 2470 12.00 2 sides 90 1 Nos LT/

HT linesvi Improvement of roads in sector - 6 plot No. 8

to 40 Resurfacing 671 10.00

vii Improvement of roads in sector - 6 Ind. Area near plot No. 47, 61, 111, 120, 84, 90, 24 & plot No. 31 to 56


viii Improvement of roads inscetor - 6 road from plot No. 1 to YMCA Resurfacing 1585 3.67

ix Improvement of roads in sectro - 4 Ind. Area near C.R.I. (NCB) Resurfacing 412 3.67

x Improvement of roads in sectro - 4 Ind. Area near plot No. 6, 28, 38, 41, 46, 16, 20 Resurfacing 2190 7.00

xi Rest house to tigaon road in front of panchayat bhawan


xii Primix corpate from anaj mandi to S.D. publice school in subhash colony Resurfacing 1000 3.65

xiii Primix corpate from D.M.road to ambedkar hospital road Resurfacing 475 5.50

xiv Primix corpate road from samahan ghat to tigaon road disposal

Widening & strengthening 1375 6.00 45

xv Primix corpate road from ambedkar chowk to samshan ghat Resurfacing 800 6.00

xvi Primix corpate road from D.M.road to ambedkar chowk Widening 550 6.00

xvii Primix corpate road from ambedkar chowk to T.W.No. 1 Milk plant road Widening 1590 6.00

xviii Punjabi dharamshala to MCF. Limit at mohna road


Quantity

Contd..

102


S. No Location


Length (mt)

Width (mt)

Footpaths (sides)


Utility shifting

ROB/ Flyover

2 Road works in Ballabgarh zonexix Gupta hotel to bhudut colony gali No.1 Widening &

strengthening 650 10.00

xx Bhudut colony gali No.1 to tigaon road to sihi gate road Resurfacing 950 5.50

xxi Petrol pump sector - 3 to tigaon road Resurfacing 1100 7.00xxii Ambedkar chowk to punjbi dharamshala at

mohna road Resurfacing 800 7.00

3 Road works in NIT zonei Chimni bai dharamshala to tikona park,

auditorium to maszid chowk, sanik colony, 1 & 2 to dabua FCI godam road


HT lines

ii St. joseph road, bankebihari to 4 & 5 chowk, NH - 1 & 2 chowk to nehru ground, NH - 1, gurudawara to dayanand school, bus stand to delite hotel, NH - 5 gurudawar road


HT lines

iii Outer road NH - 2 & 3 from bodhbihar chowk to hitkari chowk


HT linesiv Neelam to bhagatsingh, neelam to bata chowk,

bhagatsing to B.K.chowk to hardware, neelam to B.K.chowk


HT lines

v Nehru ground Widening & strengthening 3000 10.00 2 sides 100 1 Nos LT/

HT linesvi Main road of sector - 22, sector - 22 to mini

restorant & sector - 22 to disposal & sector - 22

Strengthening 1700 7.00

vii Bata flyover to hitkari chowk Widening & strengthening 1445 16.00 2 sides 58 1 Nos LT/

HT linesviii Widening of road hitkari chowk to eicher

chowk & jawahar colonyWidening & strengthening 800 16.00 2 sides 28 2 Nos LT/

HT linesix Road of Industries area & NIT plot No. - 1 -

16, 18 & 19, 16 - 34, eicher to jawahar colony Widening & strengthening 4920 10.00 1 side 164 1 Nos LT/

HT lines

x Eleson cotton mill / DM road to plot 176 sector - 25


HT linesxi Plot No. 176 & sector - 25 to shona road /

water sector - 25Strengthening 2400 8.00 2 sides 80

1 Nos LT/ HT line; 1 water supply line

1 ROB over canal

xii Existing internal road & sector - 25 main road, plot No. 176 to 39, 71 to 75, 76 to hydrabad ltd, 24 to 70, sector - 25


HT lines1 ROB over canal

xiii Plot no. 176 / 25 to 8 / 25 service road of sectro - 25

Widening & strengthening 1900 4.50 1 side 64

xiv Hardware chowk to shona roadWidening & strengthening 3430 10.00 2 sides 115

1 Nos LT/ HT line; 1 water supply line

1 ROB over canal

xv Sector - 24, plot No. 131 to 260, 99 to 271 136 to 259 & service road 8 to 158 at sector - 24 Widening &

strengthening 4830 10.00 2 sides 161 1 Nos LT/ HT lines

xvi Chowk sector - 22 / 23, plot No. 5 / 24 Mujesher


HT linesxvii Pali Gurgaon road to Sooraj Kund, Dual

carriage way of crushing zone Strengthening 2500 6.70 2 sides 400

4 Road works in Approved Coloniesi 12 Approved colonies in Old Faridabad Widening, strengthening, new construction and provision of street lightsii 33 Approved colonies in ballabgarh Widening, strengthening, new construction and provision of street lightsiii 14 Approved colonies in NIT Widening, strengthening, new construction and provision of street lights

Quantity

103


5.3.4 Priority Projects – Storm Water Drains S. No Location Quantity UnitC Storm water drainage

1 Prividing and laying storm water drains - Old Faridabad zonei DLF area, Ward 22 Diameter (mm)

6 - 19 900 1342.00 mt 1 - 6 600 248.00 mt2 - 18,18 A 600 540.00 mt18 C - 11 600 290.00 mt60 - 59 etc 600 290.00 mt50 - 55 600 270.00 mt 1 - 47 600 270.00 mt1/33 - 37 A 600 450.00 mt40 - 47 600 180.00 mt60 - 90 900 814.00 mt76 - 81 600 450.00 mt158 - 162 600 136.00 mt156 - 132 600 315.00 mt168 - 131 600 1036.00 mt37 - 115 900 956.00 mt25 - 119 E 600 580.00 mt1/28 - 1/13 600 360.00 mt92 - 114 900 630.00 mt132 - Nalla 1050 815.00 mt

ii Sector 37 Diameter (mm)578 - 630 and 630 to Bye pass 1050 800.00 mt643 - 1035 600 370.00 mt17- D.A.V school 600 450.00 mt

iii Ashoka Enclave II Diameter (mm)C - 105 to C- 48 600 200.00 mtC - 138 to C - 166 600 300.00 mtC - 12 to Green Belt 600 100.00 mtA - 59 to A-93 600 460.00 mtB-2 to B-30 600 280.00 mtOld Sher Shah Suri Road 600 700.00 mtOld S.S.S road to Green belt 1050 600.00 mtTilpat Road 1050 700.00 mt

iv Sector 27A 900 3550.00 mtv Sector 27B 900 4750.00 mtvi Sector 27C 900 2550.00 mtvii Sector 27D 900 1150.00 mtviii Ashoka Enclave I & Main road Diameter (mm)

173 - 357 900 600.00 mt 1 - 62 900 300.00 mt193 - 357 900 250.00 mt29 - 246 900 650.00 mt

2 Prividing and laying storm water drains - Ballabgarh zonei Sec. 6, P.No. 21 to 30, 31-36,106-69,85 to 95, 51 to 106, 1 to 56 Diameter (mm)

Sec. - 6 600 4053.00 mtSec. - 6 900 1585.00 mtDividing road of sector 4 & 7 up to disposal 900 10800.00 mt

Construction of culverts Nos.5 0.63 0.95 1.0

Diameter (mm)ii Div. Road 940 600 1390.00 mtiii X-ing of sec.7 sec. 60 disposal 900 470.00 mtiv Div. Road sec. 829 to disposal sec. 8 600 1300.00 mtv Div. Road of sec 8 & 7 600 1590.00 mtvi T.W. No.8 to Mohna road at Bhagat singh road 600 1960.00 mtvii S.D. public school to Malerna road 600 1560.00 mtviii T.W. No. 12 to T. road disposal 1050 1100.00 mtix Subhash colony main road from S.D. public school to Anaj Mandi 600 2060.00 mtx B.P. school road to T.W. No. 12.LHS 900 1100.00 mt

0 mt1 mt6 mt

Contd..

104


S. No Location Quantity UnitC Storm water drainage

xi B.P. school road to Sihi gate road RHS 900 990.00 mtxii Sihi gate at Tigaon roadb to Bhudutt colony gali No.1 600 1980.00 mtxiii Punjab National Bank at D.M. road to B.P. school road 600 1100.00 mtxiv At 60' road to post office at 100' road 600 780.00 mtxv Tigaon road Gurgaon canal at B.P. school road 600 3300.00 mtxvi Petrol pump road Gurgaon canal to T. road in sec.-3 900 1600.00 mtxvii P.W.D. store to Chandawali disposal 600 950.00 mtxviii D.M. road to Punjabi Dharamshala 600 1575.00 mtxix Punjabi Dharamshala to Uncha gaon octroi 1050 900.00 mtxx Chhajju Ram school road to Gupta hotel 900 3000.00 mtxxi Sec. - 4 Industrial Area 600 2601.00 mtxxii Construction of culverts 10.00 Nos

3 Prividing and laying storm water drains - NIT zonei NIT Industrial area Diameter (mm)

Plot No. 1-16 1050 950.00 mt17-26 1050 900.00 mt16-34 1050 1050.00 mt36-49 1050 760.00 mt50-58 1050 760.00 mt32-34 1050 900.00 mt63-66 1050 700.00 mt

ii NIT Sector 25 Diameter (mm)Plot No. 176-83 900 840.00 mt82-8/25 900 1130.00 mt176-112 900 840.00 mt121-83 900 730.00 mt64-8/25 900 850.00 mt97/25-103/25 900 550.00 mt9-19 900 580.00 mt76-Hyderabad 900 900.00 mt

iii from Mujesher disposal area to Shona Road 900 2000.00 mtiv Sec.23-123A Devinding 600 1220.00 mtv Sec.22 H.No. 73-740,605,575 600 2180.00 mtvi at Main road sec.22-23 Chowk/plot No. 105/24 to Autopiri Nalla Mujesher 900 3800.00 mtvii AC Nagar Nalla from Neelam to Bata 1550.00 mtviii Neelam to Bata to hardware 2350.00 mtix Chimni Bai Dharamshala 2850.00 mtx B.K. Chowk to Hardware 1650.00 mtxi Bhagat singh chowk to B.K. chowk 2150.00 mtxii Bhagat singh chowk to Neelam chowk 3400.00 mtxiii Neelam chowk to B.K. 700.00 mtxiv Lion club to Neelam Bata road 1300.00 mtxv Bus stand to Hotel Arya samaj 1700.00 mtxvi Chimni to 1,2 chowk 6500.00 mtxvii Sector 24 Diameter (mm)

Plot No. 131-260 Sec-24 900 1050.00 mtPlot No. 131-158 900 1100.00 mtAutopiri Sec-24 to Gaunchi drain 2100 1800.00 mt

4 Prividing and laying storm water drains in Approved Colonies5 Prividing and constructing Storm water drainge Pumping Stations

105


5.3.5 Priority Projects – Parks and Play Grounds S. No Location

E Parks and gardens No. of parks developed

No. of parks to be developed

Area to be developed (Sq.mt) Nature of work

1 NH 1 & 2 18 25 515702 NH 3 & 5 23 10 228993 Sector 21A,B & C 8 15 393914 Sectors 22, 23 & 23A 15 14 149105 Sector 14 18 2 69806 Sector 15 23 1 112057 Sector 15A 9 08 Sector 16 23 3 38789 Sector 16A 7 2 154410 Sector 17 16 011 Sector 19 11 212 Sector 18A 3 013 Sector 18 HBC 5 514 Old Faridabad 7 215 Sector 28 27 316 Sector 29 13 117 Spring Field City 0 318 Sector 37 12 119 Ashoka enclave I, II & Main 8 320 Surya Nagar 0 621 Dayal Bagh 0 122 Ballabgarh 76 63 212203

Levelling, landscaping, play areas, equipment, water fountains, electrification, compund wall construction etc

18930

18130

30902

106


5.3.6 Priority Projects – Slums S. No Location

F Slum location Ward Houses PoplRelocation/ Rehabilitation/ Improvement

Hsg. Units to be relocated

Roads (Km)

Water supply (Km)

UGD (Km)

Drains (Km)

Street lights (Nos.)

Public conveniences (Nos of Seats)

Old Faridabad1 Sector 15A jhuggies near Azad colony 20 71 247 Improvement - 0.21 0.18 0.13 0.31 7 6 2 Sector 20 jhuggies along Badhkal road 13 84 231 Relocation 84 - - - - - - 3 Sector 27 Ekta nagar jhuggies near Budia Nallah 14 265 871 Relocation 265 - - - - - - 4 Sector 37 Anangpur Dairy jhuggies 15 86 368 Improvement - 0.31 0.27 0.19 0.47 10 9 5 Sector 28 jhuggies 17 193 710 Rehabilitation - 0.60 0.51 0.36 0.91 20 17 6 Jhuggies behind Frick India 14 388 1302 Rehabilitation - 1.11 0.94 0.66 1.66 37 31 7 Jhuggies near Jarukal crossing 14 384 1377 Relocation 384 - - - - - - 8 Kishan Majdoor colony jhuggies 18 471 2080 Rehabilitation - 1.77 1.50 1.06 2.65 59 50 9 Sector 18 HB colony jhuggies 18 253 1188 Rehabilitation - 1.01 0.86 0.61 1.51 34 29 10 Shastri colony jhuggies (sector 19) 17 118 545 Improvement - 0.46 0.39 0.28 0.69 15 13 11 Baselwa colony jhuggies 17 20 115 Improvement - 0.10 0.08 0.06 0.15 3 3 12 Jhuggies near M/s Gopalsons 14 50 184 Rehabilitation - 0.16 0.13 0.09 0.23 5 4 13 Rajiv Gandhi colony jhuggies behind DLF Industrial area 14 1273 3991 Improvement - 3.39 2.88 2.04 5.09 113 96 14 Jhuggies in Sector 28 14 171 284 Rehabilitation - 0.24 0.21 0.14 0.36 8 7 15 Jhuggies in 14/6, HS behind Sureka Ind. 15 30 96 Relocation 30 - - - - - - 16 Subash nagar jhuggies 13/3, Budia nala 15 535 1689 Relocation 535 - - - - - - 17 Jhuggies along Anangpur 15 150 700 Rehabilitation - 0.60 0.51 0.36 0.89 20 17 18 Dayal nagar jhuggies 14 1200 8000 Improvement - 6.80 5.78 4.08 10.20 227 193 19 Nahar nagar jhuggies 14 397 1777 Improvement - 1.51 1.28 0.91 2.27 50 43 20 Jhuggies near Ankheer 14 215 990 Improvement - 0.84 0.72 0.50 1.26 28 24 21 Lakarpur khan majdoor camp jhuggies 14 158 800 Improvement - 0.68 0.58 0.41 1.02 23 19 22 Khan majdoor camp jhuggies 14 362 1793 Improvement - 1.52 1.30 0.91 2.29 51 43 Ballabgarh - - - - - 23 Jhuggies along Gurgaon canal (sector 4) 23 1259 10000 Relocation 1,259 - - - - - - 24 Azad colony jhuggies near Good Year Factory 23 320 2000 Improvement - 1.70 1.45 1.02 2.55 57 48 25 Jhuggies between Railway line, Sector 24 and Mujeshar cr 3 2398 8354 Relocation 2,398 - - - - - - 26 Jhuggies along Sohna road 3 98 321 Improvement - 0.27 0.23 0.16 0.41 9 8 27 Sector 25 jhuggies 3 187 615 Rehabilitation - 0.52 0.44 0.31 0.78 17 15 28 Sector 25 jhuggies behind Hyderabad Asbestos company 3 818 2903 Rehabilitation - 2.47 2.10 1.48 3.70 82 70 29 Shiv sharada colony jhuggies 3 895 2115 Improvement - 1.80 1.53 1.08 2.70 60 51 30 Jhuggies between Railway line besides BBMB 3 67 322 Relocation 67 - - - - - - 31 Sanjay colony jhuggies opp. Cotton mill 2 63 331 Rehabilitation - 0.28 0.24 0.17 0.42 9 8 32 Jhuggies opp. Oswal steels 3 87 260 Rehabilitation - 0.22 0.19 0.13 0.33 7 6 33 Sector 24 jhuggies facing sectors 22 & 23 3 68 339 Improvement - 0.29 0.24 0.17 0.43 10 8 34 Jhuggies along Gurgaon canal (sector 24) 3 182 650 Relocation 182 - - - - - - 35 Jhuggies near water park (sector 25) 3 157 1075 Relocation 157 - - - - - - 36 Tigaon road jhuggies (Sector 3) 22 19 84 Relocation 19 - - - - - - 37 Jhuggies near Tube well No. 7 22 15 71 Rehabilitation - 0.06 0.05 0.04 0.09 2 2 38 Jhuggies near Old DM Road bridge 22 79 360 Relocation 79 - - - - - - 39 Bapu nagar jhuggies 1 39 165 Relocation 39 - - - - - - 40 Jhuggies in south of Anaj mandi 1 231 901 Rehabilitation - 0.77 0.65 0.46 1.15 26 22 41 Jhuggies in south village rehar kalahan 3 50 428 Improvement - 0.36 0.31 0.22 0.55 12 10 NIT - - - - - 42 Neelam bata jhuggies 1 2076 10829 Rehabilitation - 9.20 7.82 5.52 13.81 307 261 43 Jhuggies along railway line and nalah 9 790 5392 Relocation 790 - - - - - - 44 Krishna nagar 9 937 5161 Improvement - 4.39 3.73 2.63 6.58 146 125 45 IK Park jhuggies 8 23 230 Relocation 23 - - - - - - 46 Jhuggies behind Railway compound 9 1092 6000 Relocation 1,092 - - - - - - 47 Market 1 jhuggies 8 116 1000 Relocation 116 - - - - - - 48 Sector 2B park jhuggies 8 55 359 Relocation 55 - - - - - - 49 Sector 2C park jhuggies 8 398 2207 Relocation 398 - - - - - - 50 Sector 2D park jhuggies 8 120 497 Relocation 120 - - - - - - 51 Millhard colony jhuggies 9 800 4000 Improvement - 3.40 2.89 2.04 5.10 113 97 52 Jhuggies near Bata railway line and power house 9 355 1386 Relocation 355 - - - - - - 53 Rajeev nagar jhuggies behind Hitkari 4 498 1216 Improvement - 1.03 0.88 0.62 1.55 34 29 54 Press colony jhuggies near Saran 5 234 764 Improvement - 0.65 0.55 0.39 0.97 22 18 55 Indira colony jhuggies along railway line near Escorts hos 3 2599 10802 Relocation 2,599 - - - - - - 56 Auto pin jhuggies 4 801 2998 Rehabilitation - 2.55 2.17 1.53 3.82 85 72 57 Shastri nagar jhuggies (1st and 2nd Block on NH 2) 8 92 302 Improvement - 0.26 0.22 0.15 0.39 9 7 58 Bhagat singh colony jhuggies along railway line (NH 4) 10 241 1290 Relocation 241 - - - - - - 59 Adarsh nagar jhuggies near NH 4 12 943 4109 Relocation 943 - - - - - - 60 Kalyan puri jhuggies near Samshan ghat (NH 3) 11 439 1308 Relocation 439 - - - - - - 61 Nehru colony jhuggies (NH 3) 11 1611 5069 Relocation 1,611 - - - - - - 62 Sant nagar jhuggies 9 800 3458 Rehabilitation - 2.94 2.50 1.76 4.41 98 83 63 3A park Gujarati colony jhuggies along widow home 11 63 310 Rehabilitation - 0.26 0.22 0.16 0.40 9 7 64 Jhuggies in central green near BK and Rahul colony 11 478 1899 Relocation 478 - - - - - - 65 Pakistani colony near Metro cinema 8 68 410 Improvement - 0.35 0.30 0.21 0.52 12 10 66 New Janta colony jhuggies near Samshan ghat 4 120 562 Relocation 120 - - - - - - 67 3A Ramlila ground jhuggies 11 53 234 Relocation 53 - - - - - -

Total 29,708 132,424 14,931 55.09 46.82 33.05 82.63 1,836 1,561

Infrastructure Needs (Quantity)

107


6 INVESTMENT CAPACITY AND SUSTENANCE OF MCF

The investment capacity of the Municipal Corporation of Faridabad has been assessed through a Financial Operating Plan (FOP) which gives a multi-year forecast of finances for a medium term. In line with the phasing of identified investment from 2006/07 to 2011/12, the FOP has been generated for the same period for MCF. A salient feature of the FOP is that all outstanding dues, including debt and non-debt liabilities, have been taken into account.

The accounts data collected between the years 2000-01 and 2005-06 are used as the basis for determining past trends in revenue and expenditure and arriving at appropriate growth assumptions for each income and expense item. After forecasting the revenue account, the capital investments proposed under the CIP are added to the forecast. The FOP is generated to assess the investment-sustaining capacity of these three agencies.

The project funding structure comprises grants under the JNNURM framework (accounting for 70 percent of the funding), internal resources and loans. The level of investment that Faridabad can sustain is determined by studying the overall surpluses/ year-to-year opening balance and debt service coverage ratio (DSCR). If the debt service coverage ratio (amount of surplus available to pay interest and to repay principal that is due) falls below 1.25 (i.e. less than 25 % cushion), then the investments are reduced gradually till the DSCR exceeds 1.25 in all the years in the forecast period.

The main items of income and expenditure, classified into the revenue account and the capital account, are projected in the FOP under the following categories:

Categories of FOP Projections o Revenue Account Receipts:

Octroi, Taxes, Non Tax Sources, and Grants, Contribution and Subsidies

o Revenue Account Expenditure: Establishment Operation and Maintenance Debt Servicing- Existing and New Loans Phasing of non debt liabilities, and Additional O&M

o Capital Income and o Capital Expenditure

6.1 FINANCING STRATEGIES FOR THE CIP

MCF plans to raise resources and fund the CIP through:

Grants available under the JNNURM Framework (as percentage of investment proposed for funding by 2011-12 in urban governance and the infrastructure sectors -- 50% Central Govt. grants and 20% State Govt. grants)

Available internal resources and improving upon the same by:

o Revision of the Annual Rateable Value at certain levels

o Revision of water and sewerage charges at specific intervals

108


o Maintenance of the collection performance of taxes and charges at certain minimum levels for current and for arrears

o Borrowings

6.2 FINANCE PROJECTIONS

Current revenue sources are projected under built-in growth assumptions for income and expenditure items, to assess the impact of each such revenue enhancement measure being suggested. The projections also aim at estimating the surplus that will be available for servicing new debt. Part of the surplus, after meeting the additional O&M expenses on newly created assets and infrastructure, is translated into debt size and project size (grant component plus debt component) based on certain assumptions regarding interest rate, repayment method and loan-grant mix.

A spreadsheet FOP model has been customised to depict the financial position of MCF and the investment-sustaining capacity of MCF has been assessed based on the FOP assumptions. The model was used to calculate future surpluses under various scenarios involving combinations of internal revenue improvement, state support, financing terms, etc.

6.2.1 Municipal Account – Growth Projections and Assumptions

The standard assumptions under which the projections are carried out and certain expenditure control and revenue augmentation measures proposed in line with the mandatory and optional reforms under the JNNURM framework are presented below. The detailed assumptions and workings are presented in Annexure 8.

Table 41. Important assumptions made in the projections Head Assumptions Guiding Factor for Assessing the Sustaining Capacity Surplus Positive surplus – year-on-year basis DSCR Greater than 1.25 Project Financing – for admissible Components under JNNURM Project Costing Unit Cost, with 6 % price contingency and 10% Physical

contingency New/Additional O&M and from second year of investment 6% growth is considered for the additional O&M

Grant from GoI 50% of Proposed Projects Grant from GoH 20% of Proposed Projects If Loan for Balance funding Repayment in 20 years, with 5 year principal moratorium @ 8

% interest rate Contribution to revolving fund 25% of Grants starting from third year (in built in the model

from 2009-10 onwards) Old Outstanding loans As per existing terms and conditions

Water supply : 2% of Capital cost Sewerage : 5% of Capital cost Roads : 3% of Capital cost Drains : 2% of Capital cost Street lighting : 8% of Capital cost Urban poor/ Slums : 2% of Capital cost River Conservation : 3% of Capital cost Solid waste management : 12% of Capital cost Others : 2% of Capital cost

109


Head Assumptions Revenue Expenditure Growth in Expenditure Actual average growth with a minimum 8% and maximum of

10% (based on last five years trend) Pay Commission Revision 6th Pay Commission revision- additional 10% from 2007-08

every five years Assumption for assessment of MCFs sustainability Income Items Growth in revenue income Actual average growth with a minimum 8% and maximum of

15% (based on last five years trend) Property Tax: Propose to introduce from FY 2007-08 Annual growth in Assessment 5.0% per annum Revision of Tax 25% every 5 years Collection Performance 85% or current average whichever is higher by 2011-12 Assumption for assessment of PHED sustainability Income Items- Water Supply Individual Water Connections 6.53% per annum (current average) Initial Water Tariff revision by 100% in FY 2008-09 Next Revisions by 25% every three years Collection Performance 85% by 2011-12 Income Items- Sewerage

100% of Water supply connections by 2011-12 Sewerage Charge Same as water charge to start with (for full cost recovery) Next Revisions by 15% every five years Collection Performance 90% by 2011-12

Sewerage Connections

6.3 INVESTMENT CAPACITY/ SUSTENANCE

Given the existing financial position of MCF, the revenue and capital accounts of MCF are projected against the growth scenario and assumptions presented above. The FOP is generated from the sustainable investment point of view in line with current growth trends against the identified investment of Rs. 2204 crores at constant prices till 2011-12. The results of the FOP are presented in Annexure 8 and the same is summarised below.

MCF receipts are expected to be 2.1 times their current levels by 2011-12 under the projection scenario. The revenue improvement and expenditure control measures, coupled with the availability of grants under the JNNURM framework, takes the investment capacity of MCF to Rs. 758 crores (constant prices) over the next six years against an investment need of Rs. 2049 crores by 2011-12. Thus the investment sustenance capacity of MCF is 37 percent of identified need; this is under the assumption that as stipulated under JNNURM, MCF will contribute 25% of grant received to the State Revolving Fund from 3rd year onwards. In case revolving fund contribution is waived off, the sustainability against the investment need will significantly increase to 65 percent (Rs.1332 crores)

6.3.1 Impact of JNNURM Reforms on Investment Capacity

The total investment identified for MCF by 2011-12 is Rs. 2049 crores. It is observed that following the current growth trends (in the absence of any grant funding from JNNURM and associated reforms), MCF can sustain an investment of Rs. 246 crores (constant prices), which is 12 percent of the identified investment till 2011-12. The impact of various revenue improvement and expenditure control measures are assessed in terms of contribution/ addition to this base investment capacity.

110


Only expenditure control measures in the form of energy efficiency measures in all departments of MCF is observed to enhance the investment capacity by Rs. 20 crores which is 8 percent of the base investment capacity. And reforms in property tax like rationalisation of tax structure, identification of unassessed properties, regular revision of property records, improving collection efficiency etc would improve the investment capacity by Rs. 82 crores which is 33 percent of the base investment capacity

Investment Capacity (Rs. Crores) in Constant Prices

Base Investment Capacity249

Expenditure Controls20

PT Improvements82

Water/ Sewerage reforms246

JNNURM & Reforms512 Base Investment Capacity

Expenditure Controls

PT ImprovementsWater/ Sewerage reforms

JNNURM & Reforms

Also reforms in service provision like part privatisation of maintenance functions in water supply, sewerage, roads, street lighting, and conservancy sectors will increase the investment capacity by Rs. 246 crores, i.e. a significant 100 percent of the base investment capacity. Thus it may also be understood that reforms in service delivery and introduction of privatisation are the prime requirements for MCF to position itself as a better governed and financially sound Corporation. And availability of JNNURM grants and associated reforms in various sectors (property tax revenue enhancement, cost recovery on services, energy efficiency measures, improving governance aspects etc) are observed to contribute significantly to the base investment capacity by Rs. 512 crores that is about 208 percent of base investment capacity. The total investment capacity thus is Rs. 758 crores.

6.3.2 Fund Requirement

For the investment identified by 2011-12 of MCF of Rs. 2049 crores at constant prices and Rs. 2679 crores at current prices, the funding pattern as worked out in the FOP model is:

Table 42. CIP Funding Pattern S. No Mode of Funding Source Amount (Rs. Crores) –

Current Prices % of Total Investment

Identified Investment till 2011-12 2679.11 100%Sustainable Investment till 2011-12 991.27 37%1 Grants JNNURM 663.34* 67%* GoI Grants JNNURM 473.82 48% GoH Grants JNNURM 189.53 19%2 Loan Open Market/FIs 47.28 5%3 Own sources MCF 280.65 28%

* Of the sustainable investment of Rs. 991.27 crores (current prices), only Rs. 966.28 crores is being proposed under JNNURM and hence the grant figure reflects 67% against the eligible 70%.

In order to improve the sustainability/ investment capacity of MCF to the extent of requirement, it has to execute major revisions in property tax and implement reforms with respect to service delivery aspects as earlier suggested.

111


7 REFORM ACTION PLAN

7.1 BACKGROUND

The aim of JNNURM is to create “economically productive, efficient, equitable and responsive cities” by focusing on: a) improving and augmenting the civic, social and economic infrastructure, b) ensuring basic services for the poor including security of tenure at affordable prices, c) initiating wide- ranging urban sector reforms, primarily aimed at eliminating legal, institutional and financial constraints that are impeding investments in urban infrastructure and services, and d) strengthening municipal governments and their functioning in accordance with the provisions of the 74th CAA.

Though one of the main aims of JNNURM is to finance infrastructure investments identified as part of the CDP, the larger objective of the mission is to initiate the much-needed reforms in ULBs. The mission has identified certain mandatory and optional reforms to be undertaken during the mission period by the ULB to be eligible for funding; the reforms are at the level of the State Government and the ULB. This section deals with the ULB-level reforms. Specific items have been identified under each reform. The timelines for implementation need to be submitted along with the MoA; the checklist of reforms is enclosed in Annexure 9.

7.2 MANDATORY REFORMS BY FARIDABAD MUNICIPAL CORPORATION

Under JNNURM, there are six mandatory reforms that a ULB or the parastatal agencies delivering municipal services need to implement before 2011-12 to be eligible for funding under JNNURM. The specific reforms that need to be implemented are:

Adoption of a modern accrual-based double-entry system of accounting

Introduction of a system of e-governance using IT applications such as GIS and MIS for various services provided by the ULB

Reform of property tax with GIS and achievement of collection efficiency of 85 percent of the demand by the end of the mission

Levy of reasonable user charges with the objective that the full cost of O&M or the recurring cost is collected within the next seven years

Internal earmarking in budgets for basic services to the urban poor, and

Provision of basic services to the urban poor including security of tenure at affordable prices

7.2.1 Adoption of a modern accrual-based double-entry system of accounting

As part of the adoption of a modern accrual based double entry system of accounting, the MCF needs to implement the following actions and generate balance sheets:

Complete audit formalities for all previous years

Prepare accounting manual based on the National Municipal Accounting Manual (NMAM)

Implement function and accounting codes

Develop computer program for the double entry accounting system

112


Record and value a

Carry out bank reconciliation work of all the bank accounts

Train corporation staff for accurate account coding as per NMAM for the preparation of the balance sheet and the budget

y to transform the Corporation’s commitment to be citizen-centric, provide cost-effective services and enhance governance through improved access to

nefits of the system of accurate billing. Corruption should be avoided.

onal to transformative governance – The process is computerized to increase productivity. Each

Reduce delays and ensure promptness in delivery of services -- Computerization would

ctions within the local bodies and creating

itizens to the local government by talking to

The citizens through citi

ation of births and deaths

Pu

Property tax payments through CFC

Management System

engineering, water supply and other services

ll fixed and flexible assets and liabilities

The MCF needs to fix the timelines for the above actions in the format presented in Annexure 9 and adhere to the timelines for the implementation of each action.

7.2.2 Introduction of a system of e-Governance using IT applications such as GIS and MIS for various services provided

E-Governance is an opportunit

accurate information and transparent and responsive democratic institutions. Thus e-Governance is no longer an experiment in administrative reform, but a permanent part of the governing process. For both government organizations and citizens, its advantages are far-reaching in comparison to investment in establishing e-Governance. The objectives of e-Governance reforms are:

Promote people-centric administration – Common citizens should get the be

Move from process accountability to productivity accountability and from transacti

department of the Corporation has reports giving the exact statistics of how accountability is achieved through the system.

ensure timely delivery of accurate service.

E-Administration – Improve administrative processes by cutting cost, managing performance, making strategic conneempowerment

E-Citizen and E–Services – Connect ccitizens and supporting accountability; by listening to citizens and supporting democracy; and by improving public services.

Corporation needs to plan for e-Governance and extend this facility to allzen facilitations centres (CFC) which could provide the following services:

Registr

blic grievance redressal as part of an interactive web site and also at CFCs

Works Management System and E-Procurement

Fully computerized pay roll and pension system

Fully automated building plan permissions

Document

GIS-based property tax and overall GIS for

113


7.2. hievement of collection

JNNsimple, transparent, non-discretionary and equitable property tax to encourage voluntary compliance; the same is to be brought under the GIS platform. With regard to reforms in the

D

C tax

y of reasonable user charges by MCF for all services to recover full cost

JNNUR services, with the objective of secto the s

Water ch was last revised in the year 2003-04; the MCF nperform

Sewerahence, cost recovery of just 13 percent in the service is of no significance. Upon completion of thecharge

Solid W d for solid waste management. As part of

7.2 local bodies, budgets for basic services to the including

security of tenure at affordable prices

JNN the urban poor with the objective of providing security of tenure at affordable prices, improved housing, water supply and sanitation. In a of the government for education, health and CF needs to earmark a fixed percentage of funds (25% of ULB budget or in proportion of urban poor); MCF also needs to provide access to bas r citizens.

3 Property tax on GIS platform and proposed acefficiency of at least 85%

URM requires certain reforms in property taxes with the broad objective of establishing a

property tax system, the first step is to introduce property tax. In this regard, MCF needs to carry out the following actions:

raft byelaws and rules for the implementation of property tax

ouncil resolution for the implementation of property

Identify the system of property tax (capital, ARV or area-based unit rate, etc.)

Institute house tax assessment system (self- assessment or by ULB)

Prepare the inventory of house tax assessments

Map all the properties on the GIS platform

7.2.4 Levof O&M

M requires the levy of user charges on different municipal uring effective linkages between asset creation and asset maintenance and ultimately leading

elf-sustaining delivery of urban services.

Supply: MCF currently levies water tariff, whicurrent cost recovery is only about 76% and collection performance is below 70%. Hence,

eeds to revise the tariff to achieve full cost recovery by 2011-12 and a collection ance of above 85%.

ge: The current system is able to service only 50 percent of the area and population;

CDP proposed projects as well as the YAP-II projects, MCF needs to plan to rationalize user s towards achieving full cost recovery.

aste Management: No charge or tax is leviethe introduction of property tax, MCF needs to implant a SWM cess or sewerage charge. It also needs to implement door-to-door to collection and scientific disposal as part of this reform.

.5 Internal earmarking withinurban poor and provision of basic services to the urban poor

URM endorses the provision of basic services to

ddition, delivery of other existing universal services social security will be ensured. In this regard, M

ic minimum services to all urban poo

114


7.3 OPTIONAL REFORMS AT ULB LEVEL

The mission has identified seven optional reforms that a ULB needs to implement to be eligible

e to initiate any two reforms every year:

nstruction of buildings,

public and ubsidization

esting mandatory in all buildings and

Fr

5. Administrative reforms, i.e., reduction in establishment costs by adopting the Voluntary

6. Structural reforms like decentralisation of functions at ward level

plant operations, disposal and land fill site operations, citizen facilitation centres

forms to be carried out by ULBs, JNNURM has prescribed some reforms for implementation by the State Governments. There are seven

1. Im s envisaged in the 74 CAA - The State sh gement of ULBs in planning the function

4. Rationalization of stamp duty to bring it down to no more than five per cent within the next seven years

under JNNURM. Ideally, the ULB should implement at least two reforms each year. The specific items under each reform, which MCF needs to implement, are listed below. The difference between the mandatory and optional reforms exists only in terms of the initiation of the reform. All mandatory reforms need to be started immediately, whereas of the optional reforms, a local body is fre

1. Revision of byelaws to streamline the approval process for codevelopment of site, etc.

2. Earmarking of at least 20-25% of developed land in all housing projects (both private agencies) for EWS and LIG category with a system of cross s

3. Revision of byelaws to make rain-water harvadoption of water conservation measures

4. aming of byelaws for reuse of recycled water

Retirement Scheme (VRS), not filling posts falling vacant due to retirement, etc., and achieving specified milestones in this regard

7. Encouraging PPP -- With regard to private sector participation, the following activities can be considered: door-to- door collection, maintenance of water supply operations, sewerage treatment

7.4 REFORMS TO BE UNDERTAKEN BY GOVT. OF HARYANA

In addition to the mandatory and optional re

mandatory and three optional reforms. However, the repeal of the Urban Land Ceiling Act and the reform of the Rent Control Act can be treated as optional in the case of water supply and sanitation projects.

7.4.1 Mandatory Reforms

plementation of decentralization measures a th

ould ensure meaningful association and engaof parastatal agencies as well as the delivery of services to the citizens.

2. Repeal of ULCRA, if applicable in the State

3. Reform of rent control laws, balancing the interests of landlords and tenants, if applicable in the State

115


5. Enactment of the public disclosure law to ensure the preparation of a medium-term fiscal plan of ULBs and parastatal agencies and the release of quarterly performance

function”; over a period of seven years, transferring all special agencies that deliver civic services in urban areas to

7.4.

1. Simplification of legal and procedural frameworks for the conversion of land from

2. Introduction of the Property Title Certification System

3. Introduction of a computerised process of registration of land and property

information to all stakeholders

6. Enactment of the Community Participation Law to institutionalize citizens’ participation and introduction of the concept of the Area Sabha in urban areas

7. Assigning or associating elected ULBs with “city planning

ULBs and creating accountability platforms for all urban civic service providers in transition

2 Optional Reforms

agricultural to non-agricultural purposes

116


ANNEXURES

117


118

45 Mr. Mahavir Prasad Joint Commissioner, MCF 46 Dr. Neeraja Architect

Annexure 1: JNNURM Interactive Workshop

Date: 8th July 2006

1.0 List of Participants S.No. Name Designation 1 Dr. Avthar Singh, IAS Ld. Commissioner, Gurgaon Division 2 Mr. Mehtab Singh, IAS Commissioner, MCF 3 Dr. Anupama Sharma, IAS Dy. Commissioner, Gurgaon Division 4 Mr. SC Sharma Director, UE & PE, GoI 5 Mr. Anirood Kumar Director, UD, GoI 6 Mr. DPS Negi OSD, Mission Directorate, UE & PA, GoI 7 Mr. Jayachandran Dy. Director, Ministry of Housing and PA 8 Prof. Usha Raghupathy Professor, NIUA, New Delhi 9 Mr. Ajay Pal Additional GM, NBCC 10 Mr. Anil Gosawmi EE, Irrigation Department, Faridabad 11 Mr. Anil Mehta EE, MCF 12 Mr. BS Kaliram City Magistrate, Faridabad 13 Mr. Dharam Singh AE, MCF 14 Mr. DK Soni SE, HUDA 15 Mr. DR Bhaskar EE, MCF 16 Mr. DR Mittal EE, MCF 17 Mr. Harichand NBO 18 Mr. IJ Sikka SDE, PWD (NH), Faridabad 19 Mr. IJS Sidhu Chief (PM & T), BMTPC 20 Mr. LR Virmani Finance Controller, MCF 21 Mr. ND Vashista AE, MCF 22 Mr. NK Katara SE, MCF 23 Mr. NS Chauhan DTP, Faridabad 24 Mr. Radhya Shyam Sharma AE, MCF 25 Mr. Rajendra Mohan SE, Planning, NBCC 27 Mr. Rajesh Nanda Draughtsman, MCF 28 Mr. Ravi Singla ATP, MCF 29 Mr. Rishi Pal Singh Accounts Officer, MCF 30 Mr. RK Bansal EE, MCF 31 Mr. RK Pachuja SE, Irrigation Department, Faridabad 32 Mr. S. Poonia EE, MCF 33 Mr. SC Pundir EE, MCF 34 Mr. SD Saini Chief Town Planner, MCF 35 Mr. SK Bansal SE, Public Health, Faridabad 36 Mr. Sudeep Das HUDCO 37 Mr. Umraw Singh Research Officer, NBO 38 Mr. Vinit Kumar AE, MCF 39 Mr. VK Bathla EE, Public Health, Faridabad 40 Ms. Anita Verma Secretary, MCF 41 Ms. Sunita Verma Joint Commissioner, MCF 42 Mr. Yogesh Chand Dy General Manager, NBCC 43 Mr. SS Arora Administrative Officer, MCF 44 Mr. Anil Batra Superintendent, MCF


2.0 Newspaper Coverage

Faridabad development plan to be finalised by August-end Bijendra Ahlawat

Tribune News Service Faridabad, July 9 The wor paring the City Development Pla r the ambitious Jawaharlal Lal National k of pre n (CDP) undeUrban R ridabad city begenewal Mission for Fa an here today with an interactive meeting between officials nt, the state gov ipal Corporation of Faridabad of the Union Governme ernment and the Munic(MCF), w g the plan. hich would be implementin Infrastru sultancy agency, CR ed to prepare and submit the CDP cture advisor and con ISIL, has been askwithin a . The final plan is likely rnment by month’s period to be submitted and approved by the goveAugust-e d by the MCF. More ned under nd. It was organise than Rs 2000 crore was likely to be sanctiothe scheme. The Com ld the officials that y on the urban missioner, MCF, to the project would be focusing mainlinfrastru nce besides the basic services to the urban poor, especially those living in slum cture and governaareas. H for the project wa oon a state-level steering e said while the MoU s likely to be signed very scommitte constituted under the ip of the Chief Minister. He said the CDP e had already been chairmanshwould be /s CRISIL Ltd, which had bmit the report by August 15. Mr.. Ravi prepared by M agreed to suPoddar, evelopment, CRISIL, c the work would be completed within the Head, Business D laimed thatgiven tim d that the relevant details and data were supplied immediately. eframe, provide He said t oject was meant for about 6 ad a population of more he JNURM pr 3 cities of the country, which hthan 10 l was the only city of Haryaakh. Faridabad na to be included in it. He claim concerned would have well the optional reforms ed the authorities to implement mandatory asfor effec ndling the problems re ut 50 per cent of the total tive results and ha lating to the scheme. Abobudgetar ade available by the Union Government. y funds would be m The state ensure at lea he financial contribution of the total government would have to st 20 per cent of tcosts. Th ld be genera ts own resources. According to e remaining 30 per cent wou ted by the MCF from iexperts, cy had to ensure t stem of revenue collection for the implementing agen hat the process and syservices, and other user charg hurdle-free. If the project was to including house tax es, was efficient and be a suc ty had to be of primar . The JNURM was to be implemented cess, sustainabili y importancebetween 011 and it was expec ed civic infrastructure for the the period of 2006- 2 ted to create a broad-basrequirem 035, stated the officials. ent of the year 2 It was an stakeholders, inclu entatives of residents and resident welfare nounced that various ding represassociati ken into confidence for ge s for preparing the CDP. It may be recalled ons, would be ta tting detailthat the lan of Faridabad has 91 ur ages, with the population development p ban sectors, 41 revenue villprojected . 5 lakh in the year 2011. to be around 17 With mo of the population resi nies and slum areas, the city re than 45 per cent ding in unauthorised colohas an a cleaning and scavenging, 450 km of sewer lines, 550 km of water supply rea of 208 sq km for lines, 42 18 km of metalled roads l unapproved colonies, 0 tube wells, 11 , 73 approved colonies, severamore than 22,000 streetlight points and as many as d sectors. 24 fully develope

119


Annexure 2: MCF Officials Workshop

Date: 11th July 2006

rticipants 1S.No. Name Designation 1 Mr. Mehtab Singh, IAS Commissioner, MCF 2 Mr. NK Katara SE, MCF 3 Dr. RC Agrawal

.0 List of Pa

Civil Surgeon, Faridabad 4 Mr. Amar Singh AE, MCF 5 Mr. Anil Batra Superintendent, MCF 6 Mr. Anil Mehta EE, MCF 7 Mr. Bhim Singh Inspector, District Industries Centre 8 Mr. BS Dhillon Assistant Architect, MCF 9 Mr. BS Mareloda WRI, MCF 10 Mr. BS Panwar ZTO, MCF 11 Mr. DC Sharma SSI, MCF 12 Mr. Dharam Singh AE, MCF 13 Mr. DK Soni SE, HUDA 14 Mr. DR Bhaskar EE, MCF 15 Mr. DR Mittal EE, MCF 16 Mr. Gopi Chand Sharma WRI, MCF 17 Mr. Inderjeet Makkar Sr. Stenographer, MCF 18 Mr. JP Sharma ZTO, MCF 19 Mr. JS Malik ADSO 20 Mr. Kali Charan Garg WRI, MCF 21 Mr. Kulbir S Dhake Tehsildar, MCF

2 Mr. Kuldeep Atri SDO, DHBVNL 223 Mr. LC Chauhan SSI, MCF 24 Mr. LR Virmani Finance Controller, MCF 25 Mr. MP Mudgal HTI, NIT Zone, MCF 26 Mr. ND Vashista AE, MCF 27 Mr. Nirmal Dhama ZTO, MCF 28 Mr. NS Chauhan DTP, Faridabad 29 Mr. OP Verma AE, MCF 30 Mr. OP Yadav District Attorney, MCF 31 Mr. Prem Pal Sharma AE (H), MCF 32 Mr. Radhya Shyam Sharma AE, MCF 33 Mr. Raj Pal Verma AE, MCF 34 Mr. Rajesh Nanda Draughtsman 35 Mr. Ram Singh WRI, MCF 36 Mr. Ramparakash AE, MCF 37 Mr. Ravi Singla ATP, MCF 38 Mr. RK Bansal EE, MCF 39 Mr. RK Goel AE, MCF 40 Mr. RS. Bodhan 41 Mr. S. Poonia EE, MCF 42 Mr. Satish K Agrawal SE, DHBVN 43 Mr. SC Pundir EE, MCF 44 Mr. SD Saini Chief Town Planner, MCF 45 Mr. Shyam Singh AE, MCF

120


S.No. Name Designation 46 Mr. SK Bansal SE, Public Health, Faridabad

48 Mr. Sohanlal ZTO, MCF 49 Mr. SR Tanwar CHD 50 Mr. SS Arora

M k Singh r. Te JE 52 AE, MCF 53 ar Sardhana Mr. Vinod Kum F 54 ad Mr. VK Bathla EE, Public Health, Faridab

Mr. Satish Parash

47 Mr. SK Sharma ADFO

Administrative Officer, MCF 51

Mr. Umar Farooq ADA, MC

55 er DTP, MCF56 Ms. Anita Yadav Secretary, Information

121


Annexure 3: City Stakehol ly 2006 der Workshop– 16th Ju

Date: 16 July 2006th

1.0 List of Participants o. ation S.N Name Design

1 Mr. Mehtab Singh, IAS Commissioner, MCF 2 Mr. NK Katara SE, MCF

Mr. Sunderlal Sh Senior Deputy Mayor 4 Col S Kapoor Faridabad Industries Association 5 Mr. HR Gupta Association Faridabad Industries

3 arma

6 Mr. BS Dhillon Association of Architects, Faridabad 7 Mr. VR Narayanaan Faridabad Chamb. of Comm & Industry 8 Mr. Ravi Vaslidev Gen. Secretary, Faridabad Small Ind. Asso. 9 Mr. Rajiv Chawla President, Faridabad Small Industries Asso. 10 Mr. Amrendra Kumar Singh Centre for Social Action 11 Dr Sagar President, Janhit, Society for Social Welfare 12 Mr. Arun Bajaj President, Manav 13 Mr. Shuchi Parash Councillor 14 Mr. JN Batra Association 15 Mr. Lajpat Rai Chairman RWA, Sector 15 16 Mr. Anand Kumar Dayal Bhag 17 Mr. Nalin Ranjan Jena Dayal Bhag Colony Association 18 Mr. Rajeev Mahajan Dayal Bhag Colony Association 19 Mr. Sudharshan Kumar Dayal Bhag Colony Association 20 Mr. Surendran Dayal Bhag Colony Association 21 Mr. Dhanesh Gupta Dist. President, Haryana Vyapar Mandal 22 Dr SP Verma Executive Member, Dayal Bhag Colony 23 Mr. Lalit Khurana Executive Member, Dayal Bhag Colony 24 Mr. Nitin Srivastav Executive Member, Dayal Bhag Colony 25 Mr. Santosh Kumar Faridabad Nagar Social Foundation 26 Mr. Chandan Kaul Feedback Ventures 27 Mr. Kislay Feedback Ventures 28 Mr. Srikamal Feedback Ventures 29 Mr. Vivek Feedback Ventures 30 Mr. OP Goyal Finance Secretary, RWA Sector 16 31 Mr. Ramnik Prabhakar General Secretary, MAF 32 Mr. Kailash Sharma General Secretary, Manav 33 Mr. RC Bhatia General Secretary, RWA, 3C 34 Mr. Satyendra Bhadana General Secretary, RWA, Sector 14 35 Mr. Jai Prakash Verma General Secretary, RWA, Sector 15A 36 Mr. JK Luthra General Secretary, RWA, Sector 29 37 Mr. MM Ahuja General Secretary, Sector 16A 38 Mr. V. Raj Babul HAT 39 Mr. IJ Kalia MAF 40 Mr. Kanta Arora MEC 41 Mr. Ashok Bhatia Nehru Ground Welfare Association 42 Mr. Ram Bhatia Nehru Ground Welfare Association 43 Mr. RK Gupta Nehru Ground Welfare Association 44 Mr. BK Thakral President, RWA Sector 16A 45 Mr. TD Jatwani President, RWA, Sector 15

122


S.No. Name Designation 46 Mr. TD Jatwani President, RWA, Sector 15 47 Col. Rishi Pal Goel President, RWA, Sector 15A 48 Mr. Dinesh Sackar President, RWA, Sector 18A 49 Mr. Balraj Gupta President, RWA, Sector 29 50 Mr. Balrajgupta

RP Nagpal President, RWA, Sector 29

51 Mr. President, Sector 16 52 Maj Gen tor 21A eral (Retd), SK Datt President, WCRA, Sec53 Mr. Anil Mehta Resident 54 Mr. Surendra Dinga Resident 55 cate Mr. DP Bhadana, Advo Resident 1040/14 56 Mr. NK Arora Resident 673/15 57 Mr. KG Modi Resident 941/14 58 Mr. Jitendra Bhatia Resident Sector, 1D 59 Mr. Pankaj Bhatia Resident Sector, 1D 60 Mr. Gurmeet Singh Resident, 1498/55 61 Mr. Sitaram Sharma Resident, 698/55 62 Dr VL Jatwani Resident, 82/15A 63 Mr. MP Nayar Resident, Sector 3 64 Mr. BM Batish, Retd. EE Resident, Sector 7 65 Mr. SR Rawat Resident, Sector 7 66 Mr. PC Masta Retd. District Attorney 67 Mr. HS Malik RWA Sector 19 68 Mr. DL Kathuria RWA Sector 3D 69 Mr. HS Dingra RWA Sector 3D 70 Mr. Sanjay Wadwa RWA Sector 3D 71 Mr. Yash Pal RWA Sector 3D 72 Mr. Chandilal RWA Sector 55 73 Mr. Anand Kumar Bhatia RWA, 2E 74 Mr. Manoj Bhatia RWA, 2E 75 Mr. Pritam Singh Bhali RWA, 3C 76 Mr. KC Sharma RWA, 3D/35 77 Mr. JS Narula RWA, Nehru ground 78 Mr. ND Dua RWA, Nehru ground 79 Mr. SK Arora, Advocate RWA, Sector 11 80 Mr. AK Shegal RWA, Sector 14 81 Mr. Rakesh Ahuja RWA, Sector 14 82 Mr. VK Chkrawarthi RWA, Sector 14 83 Mr. Ajit RWA, Sector 16 84 Mr. SR Tewatis RWA, Sector 19 85 Mr. JK Luthra RWA, Sector 29 86 Mr. ML Gupta RWA, Sector 3D 87 Mr. PL Sehgal RWA, Sector 3D 88 Mr. PP Gupta RWA, Sector 3D 89 Mr. Dharam Singh RWA, Sector 4 90 Mr. Harish Chandra Taneja Sector 4 RWA,91 Mr. Chand Singh RWA, Sector 4A 92 Mr. Harjit Singh RWA, Sector 4A 93 Mr. Balkar Singh RWA, Sector 55 94 Mr. Jagat Singh RWA, Sector 55 95 Mr. Rajkumar Kaushik RWA, Sector 55 96 Mr. CL Jain RWA, Sector 7A 97 Mr. Barten Singh RWA, Sector 7B

123


S.No. Name Designation 98 Mr. Ranbir Singh RWA, Sector 7B 99 Mr. HN Sharma RWA, Sector 7D 100 Mr. KC Agrawal RWA, Sector 7D 101 . Capt RK Sharma RWA, Sector 8 102 Mr. DK Jain Secretary, RWA, Sector 14 103 tor 18A Mr. OP Wadhwa Secretary, RWA, Sec104 Mr. GPS Chopra Tresurer, RWA, Sector 16A 105 dent, Sector 16 Mr. VN Sudha Vice Presi106 ntent Mr. Anil Batra Superinde107 Mr. AS Bansal SDO, MCF 108 da Mr. BC Majelan WRI, MCF 109 Mr. BK Kardan AE, MCF 110 Mr. BS Panwar ZTO, MCF 111 Mr. DC Sharma SSI, MCF 112 Mr. Dharam Singh AE, MCF 113 Mr. DK Solonki JE, MCF 114 Mr. DR Bhaskar EE, MCF 115 Mr. DR Mittal MCF 116 Mr. Dr. SS Yadav MoH, MCF 117 akkar Mr. Indra Jeet M Stenographer 118 n Mr. LC Chauha SSI, MCF 119 i r, MCF Mr. LR Virman Finance Controlle120 d er, MCF Mr. Mahavir Prasa Joint Commission121 h Mr. Nawal Sing JE, MCF 122 Mr. ND Vashishta AE, MCF 123 ama Mr. Nirmal Dh ZTO, MCF 124 Mr. OP Kardan JE, MCF 125 an Mr. Rajesh Wadva Draughtsm126 Mr. Rakesh Mudgil GBWSS 127 Mr. SK Agrawal AE, MCF 128 a ioner, MCF Ms. Sunita Verm Joint Commiss129 ar Mr. Vinod Kum MCF

124


2.0 orkPress Notification for Stakeholder w shop

125


3.0 Invitation Letter to Stakeholders

126


4.0 Newspaper Coverage in Dainik Jagaran, Dainik Baskar & Amar Ujjala- 17 July

127


Annexure 4: Summary of Discussions with Stakeholders

The discussions with Faridabad stakeholders were held at three levels. The agenda for the discussion and its outcome is presented below.

Levels of Stakeholder Consultations: Municipal officials

Elected representatives (MP and MLAs)

City stakeholders (industry representatives, resident welfare associations, NGOs, councilors and citizens)

Discussion Agenda: Inform stakeholders about the JNNURM concept

Discuss the CDP process adopted for Faridabad

Discuss the issues and potential of Faridabad

Explore strategies and actions required to achieve the vision Municipal Officials Workshop – 11 July, 2006 The MCF officials’ workshop was organised on July 11, 2006 to get feedback from officials on issues related to services offered by MCF, and their perspective on the preparation of the CDP. The workshop was chaired by the Municipal Commissioner, MCF, where the CDP consultants, CRISIL Infrastructure Advisory, explained the approach to the CDP and invited feedback and suggestions from the officials. In addition to MCF officials, officials from HUDA, PHED, the Electricity Board and District Centre also attended the workshop.

Focus Areas: The following areas were identified by the Commissioner and the municipal officials. Planned road network with good riding quality, exiting roads to be widened as per the

plan, encroachments to be removed, all junctions to be improved and beautification to be undertaken

Bypass for NH traffic to be explored and developed to reduce traffic congestion Multi-level parking system to be provided at critical junctions Metro rail to be extended to Faridabad as per the NCR Plan The existing defunct sewerage system to be rehabilitated and extended to cover the entire city A Comprehensive Storm Water Drainage Master Plan to be prepared Ongoing efforts on developing parks to be expedited to develop 400 parks E-Governance and computerisation to be undertaken in all departments and all m

Industries

master

unicipal functions

Scientific solid waste disposal facility to be developed

Shri Avatar Singhji Bhadana, MP, Faridabad – 15th July 2006

Focus Areas : Identified issues and suggested actions Faridabad, which is a part of the Mewat region of Haryana is a backward region. Hence, the

planning for Faridabad should be in the regional perspective to support and promote regional economy.

An alternative source of water to be identified and developed as reliability on ground water in the long run is not feasible; the availability of Agra Canal, which supplies water to Gurgaon, needs to be explored

Improved educational and infrastructure facilities to attract investments in the IT sector

128


A SEZ to be developed in the vicinity of Faridabad; a bypass for NH traffic to be explored and dev of SEZ to imp

eloped to reduce traffic congestion; this project may be considered as a part rove its viability

Connectivity with New Delhi to be improved (Badarpur flyover and parallel roads to be identified)

Smt. Sharda Rathod, MLA Vallabgarh -15th July 2006

Foc

roblems mainly in three sectors i.e., water supply, sewerage & drainage, and internal/ regional connectivity, if planned interventions are not given importance. The number of slums in Faridabad has been continuously increasing. Slum-dwellers in

o not have access to most of the basic services; the concentration of these industrial and other environmentally sensitive areas is also a main problem that

Increasing crime rate in Faridabad is a major fallout of the failure of various urban poor/ nefits having not reached/ not reaching the

Faridabad is not in a position to compete with other cities in attracting new investments in

d distribute the benefits equitably to all the residents of Faridabad; build confidence in people to actually contribute to the development process.

us Areas: Issues In the near future, Faridabad will face p

Faridabad dlocations inshould be immediately tackled.

slum development initiatives and the intended beactual beneficiaries.

the commerce and industry sectors

Suggested Actions Comprehensive master plans need to be prepared immediately for all municipal services and

implementation of the same should be monitored in an integrated manner to avoid unnecessary and recurring expenditure. Slum-dwellers need to be provided with basic infrastructure and based on consensus they

should be to be rehabilitated or relocated for better living conditions. Provide infrastructure an

Attract population working in Faridabad but residing ou

Provide infrastructure facilities in all JJ colo

Shri AC Choudary, MLA NIT, Faridabad-13th July 2006

reas: Focus A

is now at the ninth position. It is

ment problem.

industrial growth, improve infrastructure facilities, provide better higher educational l and residential areas to recapture lost

ground as the preferred satellite destination of Delhi tside Faridabad

Develop affordable housing plots for EWS and LIG nies

ve connectivity with Delhi, by developing the Badarpur Flyover.

Issues Faridabad, once the sixth largest industrial estate in Asia,

losing its importance due to the lack of infrastructure. Faridabad lacks good educational and medical facilities. Slowdown and the closure of certain units has created an unemploy

Suggested Actions Revive

facilities and plan the development of commercia

Widen all main roads and improve all junctions Undertake city beautification on a priority basis Impro Develop more power projects and encourage captive power plants Develop tourism by marketing Badkal and Surajkund

129


Shri Mahendra Pratap Singhji, MLA Faridabad -16th July 2006

Foc as not developed in accordance with the growing population and infrastructure

requirements. Over 50% of the colonies are unauthorised. s for EWS and LIG need to be developed as

per requirement and affordability, to address the problem of unauthorised colonies and slums. unct sewerage system needs to be upgraded and a comprehensive master plan for both

sewerage and storm water drainage needs to be prepared and projects implemented.

loca The future proposal should include plots for EWS and LIG families too.

coll A m Pla hills surrounding Faridabad.

Tra ridors need to be have four lanes (Gurgaon-Faridabad, Badkal-Pali and

alli-Lakepur-Ferozpur must be developed on a priority basis.

ge needs to be widened.

ne flyovers on GT Road, and flyover at the Badkal

Eco Any new large-scale or water-intensive or polluting industries need to be located outside

All small industries located in residential zones are to be relocated by developing plots of ropriate size. thermal power plant located in the heart of city needs to be relocated and its capacity

d and incentives for the use of solar

us Areas: The following issues were identified and actions suggested by him. Faridabad h

Faridabad, being an industrial hub, residential plot

The def

Faridabad (Palwal or Hodal).

app

All Juggi-Jopdis (slums) need to be rehabilitated at the same site or resettled at an appropriate tion.

Faridabad lacks modern health facilities, the BK Hospital needs to be modernised and a medical ege set up in the city. ini-stadium needs to be developed to promote sports.

n for storage of rainwater from the

ffic & Transportation All the city main corBadarpur Border Bypass, NIT-Pali, Balbgarh-Sona, Balbagarh-Tigaon, etc). KPT Bypass and the bypass via P

The Badkal Brid An Under bridge at the Old Faridabad-Ferozpur chandli railway crossing needs to be

provided. There are proposals to build an eight-laturn in old Faridabad, Bata Junction, Nelam Junction, Balabgarh and Faridabad Junction Eight-lane roads and an eight-lane flyover on GT Road are needed.

nomy

Theshould be enhanced to address the growing demand. Installation of captive power plants must be promoteenergy provided.

City Stakeholder during Workshop: July 16, 2006

Focus A

Gen

sector. an area of concern.

is ignored and needs to be addressed.

A. ticularly all developed

sectors lack primary medical facilities. Development of community centres to be undertaken in all sectors.

reas: The following issues were identified and actions suggested.

eral Issues Identified: Lacks storm water drainage system Power supply is inadequate power. Electrical sub-stations need to be installed in each Operation of industrial units in residential areas is Infrastructure of villages within the MCF limits Arrest further growth of unauthorised colonies and slums. There is a lack of proper infrastructure in sectors developed by HUD Faridabad, in general, lacks medical facilities at city level and par

130


Sectors are of the opinion that there should be frequent meetings with RWAs to address local

Faridabad, being a manufacturing hub, should aim to develop and attract the service industry

annelised to

port nagars (truck terminals) to be planned at various locations provided on all major

o be developed in Faridabad, and all auto and transport vehicles to be Delhi

dia Nalla need to be built to improve connectivity with surrounding areas.

hi to be improved and the Badarpur flyover proposal to be

in all all sectors

fic junctions to be improved and beautified y locations

ity bus stands to be improved and equipped with proper signboards and bus

ld

lanning

tries in the villages within MCF

ad, only 3000 plots have been planned.

plots of all sizes as per the requirements of industry Adopt the industrial cluster development approach while planning for new industrial estates,

ad hoc way Shift forging industrial units located in residential areas

re the possibility of vertical growth to service better

unct. New bore wells need to be installed after proper

channels and the sides of the roads need to be

problems.

to achieve overall development.

instead of allocating land to industries in an

Modify byelaws to accommodate existing small plots and explo

Involve the industry and institutions in the development process.

Traffic & Transportation All internal roads to be made of cement concrete and all roads to have proper footpaths Connectivity with Delhi, Noida and Gurgaon to be improved The road design should be at higher level than the sidewalks, which can be ch

recharge ground water Trans Existing service lanes to be improved and new service lanes to be

roads to reduce accidents on highways CNG filling stations t

converted to CNG in order to allow these vehicles into A railway under bridge at Munjesar Phatak and a bridge on Gu

Connectivity with Delimplemented at the earliest Sanitation facilities need to be improved and a proper green cover provided along the railway track and NH. All traf Parking facilities to be improved on all bus Slow-moving vehicular traffic to be restricted on roads carrying high speed/volume of traffic

All intra-ctimings need to be maintained To enhance the life of roads and also to improve the outlook of the city, all roads shouhave underground service corridors.

Land use P Decongest the core city by relocating various wholesale markets (rice mandi, steel market,

vegetable market) Develop sectors in a planned manner and in conformity with land use in the adjacent areas

Locate new indus Develop areas earmarked as parks with the participation of RWAs.

Though there are about 15,000 industries in FaridabThere is need for proper planning to overcome non-confirming land use all over the city. Develop industrial

Water Supply Currently, many bore wells are def

investigation about the availability and quality of water. Regularise unauthorised water connections to improve cost recovery. Rain water harvesting needs to be promoted.

Sewerage and Storm Water Drainage There is a need to prepare a comprehensive drainage master plan for the city.

All encroachments along the drainageremoved.

131


The low level areas should be connected to near by canal or water channels. There is a need for greater coordination between MCF, HUDA, the irrigation and other

ough the city, must be covered to avoid mosquito menace. ewerage with storm water

drainage checked. have their own or common effluent treatment plants.

energy.

poor. Hence, solid waste is being dumped in open

-door collection and source

ncouraged.

t of city is causing pollution. It needs to n the heart of city

l reduce pollution resulting from the thermal power plant.

concerned departments. The Agra Canal, which passes thr The defunct sewer system has to be revived and mixing of s

All industrial units must

Street Lighting Improve street lighting coverage in sectors and maintain streetlights.

Promote the use of solar

Solid Waste Management Currently, the collection system is verydrains and sewer lines. Improve solid waste management by promoting door-tosegregation. Implement scientific disposal methods. Segregate industrial waste from domestic waste.

Social Infrastructure and other Suggestions Rain water harvesting should be e The location of the thermal power plant in the hear

be relocated, this will help in realising high value land i If the thermal power plant is to be retained, then the non-working electrostatic plates need to

be repaired; this will reduce the pollution. Use of the right technology wil All earmarked open spaces should be developed with proper green cover.

132


Annexure 5: Municipal Finance – Assessment of Past 5 Years Income & Expenditure Statement

S. No. Head o 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06

Mun d General AccountO 258 1,105 1,391 2,039 2,605

Part I - RI Reven

A OTax Revenue1 - - - - - 2 P3 O

Sub-To 2,053 2,728 1,692 3,278 3,414

Non T1 Duty on 1,159 1,066 1,002 1,510 1,710 2 B 327 354 377 432 360 3 O 117 83 200 146 4 W 519 908 1,006 1,102 5 Sewerage charges 10 9 11 15 16 6 1 1 1 2 2 7 312 864 532 799 423 8 O 122 320 787 1,730 9 In10 O

Sub-To 838 5,629 Total O

B Assign1 G2 S3 O 43 - Total Grants & Contributions 62 76 80 43 -

Total Revenue Income 6,019 5,974 5,172 8,159 9,043

II Revenue ExpenditureA Salaries/ Wages & Allowances1 General Administration & Tax Collection 408 378 424 453 511 2 Pension - - - - - 3 Water supply 861 973 980 1,129 1,356 4 Roads, Drains & Municipal works 394 376 412 439 536 5 Conservancy/ SWM 1,009 1,054 1,097 1,222 1,415 6 Street Lighting 28 26 30 34 47 7 Town planning 54 54 65 63 78 8 Fire Fighting 58 53 72 75 79 9 Gardens 326 307 356 377 431 10 Public Health & Sanitation 74 74 89 91 134 11 Others (Libraries, Dispensaries, Community halls, Cattle p 36 31 39 47 50 Total Salary Expenses 3,247 3,326 3,564 3,930 4,639

B Operation & Maintenance1 General Administration & Tax Collection 181 437 74 102 145 2 Water supply 9 14 4 9 7 3 Roads, Drains & Municipal works 3 4 5 5 33 4 Conservancy/ SWM 60 65 61 60 90 5 Street Lighting - - - - - 6 Town planning 2 2 0 2 2 7 Fire Fighting 1 1 2 2 2 8 Gardens 0 2 1 1 2 9 Public Health & Sanitation 0 0 1 1 3 10 Others (Libraries, Dispensaries, Community halls, Cattle p 0 1 1 1 2 Total O&M Expenses 257 525 149 182 287

C Debt Servicing1 Principal & Interest repayment 20 18 32 843 412 2 Others - - - - - Total Debt Servicing Expenses 20 18 32 843 412

Total Revenue Expenditure 3,524 3,868 3,745 4,955 5,338 Operating Status - Revenue Account 2,495 2,106 1,427 3,204 3,705

Rupees Lakh

f Account

Income and Expenditure Statement

icipal Corporation, Faridabapening Balance

EVENUEue Incomewn Sources

Octroi Compensationroperty Tax 1,891 2,125 1,065 2,601 2,469 ther Taxes 161 603 627 677 945

tal (Tax Revenue)

ax Revenue sale of property

uilding permission and Development charges ther realisations under Byelaws & Special acts 271 ater charges 551

Income from Municipal Assets/ Institutions Fee from HUDA 1,

ther License and Fees 34 terest on Investments 87 1 69 7 44 ther Miscellaneous Income 151 116 98 79 96

tal (Non Tax Revenue) 3,904 3,170 3,399 4, wn Sources 5,957 5,898 5,092 8,116 9,043

ed Rev, Grants & Contributionseneral GrantsFC Revenue grantsther Revenue grants 62 76 80

133


S. No. Head of Ac 2005-06

Part II - CAPITALI Capital Income

A Own Sources1 Sale of Lands 517 3,106 1,682 1,872 359 2 Sale of Municipal Property3 Lease IncomeTotal Own Sources 517 3,106 1,682 1,872 359

B Loans 30 - - - 87

C Grants & Contributions1 TFC/ EFC/ TFC Grants - 172 115 61 244 2 SFC Development Grants3 MP/ MLA Development Grants 5 - - - - 4 Project Specific Grants (Roads) - 50 50 160 - 5 Project Specific Grants (Urban Infra) 1,600 - - - 147 6 Project Specific Grants (Slum Development, NSDP) 37 98 153 - 58 7 Other project/ scheme specific grants 3 - 75 6 1,393 Total Grants & Contributions 1,644 321 394 227 1,841

Total Capital Income 2,192 3,427 2,075 2,099 2,287

II Capital Expenditure1 General Administration 24 82 32 49 112 2 Roads and drains 819 1,709 732 2,010 2,073 3 Water supply 2,730 1,920 1,284 1,704 2,351 4 Sewerage - 57 - - - 5 Conservancy/ SWM 26 73 17 48 2 6 Street lighting 175 416 608 427 651 7 Gardens & Parks 28 83 37 187 225 8 Slum development 30 58 47 59 - 9 Fire services 0 1 1 3 5 10 Library, schools, PHC, community centres etc 28 43 11 15 16 11 Town planning 19 160 70 81 5 12 Other Grant related works 49 89 74 98 1,381 13 Others - - - 100 -

Total Capital Expenditure 3,927 4,692 2,914 4,781 6,821 Utilisation Status - Capital Account (1,735) (1,265) (839) (2,682) (4,534)

Summary - General AccountOpening Balance 258 1,105 1,391 2,039 2,605 Revenue Account Status 2,495 2,106 1,427 3,204 3,705 Capital Account Status (1,735) (1,265) (839) (2,682) (4,534) Suspense Account Status 88 (555) 60 44 28 Closing Balance 1,105 1,391 2,039 2,605 1,804

Income and Expenditure Statement

count 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05

134


Income & Expenditure Statement-Sectotral Contribution

S. No. Head of Account 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 Avg (2001-02 to 2005-

06)

Municipal Corporation, Faridabad General AccountOpening Balance

Part I - REVENUEI Revenue Income

A Own SourcesTax Revenue1 Octroi Compensation - - - - - - 2 Property Tax 31 36 21 32 27 29 3 Other Taxes 3 10 12 8 10 9

Sub-Total (Tax Revenue) 34 46 33 40 38 38

Non Tax Revenue1 Duty on sale of property 19 18 19 19 19 19 2 Building permission and Development charges 5 6 7 5 4 6 3 Other realisations under Byelaws & Special acts 5 2 2 2 2 2 4 Water charges 9 9 18 12 12 12 5 Sewerage charges 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 Income from Municipal Assets/ Institutions 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 Fee from HUDA 22 14 10 10 5 12 8 Other License and Fees 1 2 6 10 19 8 9 Interest on Investments 1 0 1 0 0 1 10 Other Miscellaneous Income 3 2 2 1 1 2

Sub-Total (Non Tax Revenue) 65 53 66 59 62 61 Total Own Sources 99 99 98 99 100 99

B Assigned Rev, Grants & Contributions1 General Grants - - - - - - 2 SFC Revenue grants - - - - - - 3 Other Revenue grants 1 1 2 1 - 1 Total Grants & Contributions 1 1 2 1 - 1

Total Revenue Income 100 100 100 100 100 100

II Revenue ExpenditureA Salaries/ Wages & Allowances1 General Administration & Tax Collection 12 10 11 9 10 10 2 Pension - - - - - - 3 Water supply 24 25 26 23 25 25 4 Roads, Drains & Municipal works 11 10 11 9 10 10 5 Conservancy/ SWM 29 27 29 25 27 27 6 Street Lighting 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 Town planning 2 1 2 1 1 1 8 Fire Fighting 2 1 2 2 1 2 9 Gardens 9 8 10 8 8 8 10 Public Health & Sanitation 2 2 2 2 3 2 11 Others (Libraries, Dispensaries, Community halls, Cattle p 1 1 1 1 1 1 Total Salary Expenses 92 86 95 79 87 88

B Operation & Maintenance1 General Administration & Tax Collection 5 11 2 2 3 5 2 Water supply 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 Roads, Drains & Municipal works 0 0 0 0 1 0 4 Conservancy/ SWM 2 2 2 1 2 2 5 Street Lighting - - - - - - 6 Town planning 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 Fire Fighting 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 Gardens 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 Public Health & Sanitation 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 Others (Libraries, Dispensaries, Community halls, Cattle p 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total O&M Expenses 7 14 4 4 5 7

C Debt Servicing1 Principal & Interest repayment 1 0 1 17 8 5 2 Others - - - - - - Total Debt Servicing Expenses 1 0 1 17 8 5

Total Revenue Expenditure 100 100 100 100 100 100

Sectoral Contribution/ Share

Percentage

135



06)


A Own Sources1 Sale of Lands 24 91 81 89 16 60 2 Sale of Municipal Property - - - - - - 3 Lease Income - - - - - - Total Own Sources 24 91 81 89 16 60

B Loans 1 - - - 4 1

C Grants & Contributions1 TFC/ EFC/ TFC Grants - 5 6 3 11 5 2 SFC Development Grants - - - - - - 3 MP/ MLA Development Grants 0 - - - - 0 4 Project Specific Grants (Roads) - 1 2 8 - 2 5 Project Specific Grants (Urban Infra) 73 - - - 6 16 6 Project Specific Grants (Slum Development, NSDP) 2 3 7 - 3 3 7 Other project/ scheme specific grants 0 - 4 0 61 13 Total Grants & Contributions 75 9 19 11 81 39

Total Capital Income 100 100 100 100 100 100

II Capital Expenditure1 General Administration 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 Roads and drains 21 36 25 42 30 31 3 Water supply 70 41 44 36 34 45 4 Sewerage - 1 - - - 0 5 Conservancy/ SWM 1 2 1 1 0 1 6 Street lighting 4 9 21 9 10 11 7 Gardens & Parks 1 2 1 4 3 2 8 Slum development 1 1 2 1 - 1 9 Fire services 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 Library, schools, PHC, community centres etc 1 1 0 0 0 1 11 Town planning 0 3 2 2 0 2 12 Other Grant related works 1 2 3 2 20 6 13 Others - - - 2 - 0

Total Capital Expenditure 100 100 100 100 100 100

Sectoral Contribution/ Share

Percentage

136


Income & Expenditure Statement-Growth Trends

S. No. Head of Account 2001-02 to 2002-03

2002-03 to 2003-04

2003-04 to 2004-05

2004-05 to 2005-06

SAGR (2001-02 to 2005-06)

CAGR (2001-02 to 2005-06)

Municipal Corporation, Faridabad General AccountOpening Balance


A Own SourcesTax Revenue1 Octroi Compensation - - - - - -2 Property Tax 12 (50) 144 (5) 25 7 3 Other Taxes 274 4 8 40 81 56

Sub-Total (Tax Revenue) 33 (38) 94 4 23 14

Non Tax Revenue1 Duty on sale of property (8) (6) 51 13 12 10 2 Building permission and Development charges 8 6 15 (17) 3 2 3 Other realisations under Byelaws & Special acts (57) (29) 140 (27) 7 (14) 4 Water charges (6) 75 11 10 22 19 5 Sewerage charges (5) 15 42 6 14 13 6 Income from Municipal Assets/ Institutions 2 44 40 18 26 25 7 Fee from HUDA (34) (38) 50 (47) (17) (25) 8 Other License and Fees 253 163 146 120 170 166 9 Interest on Investments (98) 4,891 (90) 550 1,313 (16) 10 Other Miscellaneous Income (23) (16) (19) 22 (9) (11)

Sub-Total (Non Tax Revenue) (19) 7 42 16 12 10 Total Own Sources (1) (14) 59 11 14 11

B Assigned Rev, Grants & Contributions1 General Grants - - - - - -2 SFC Revenue grants - - - - - -3 Other Revenue grants 23 5 (46) (100) (29) (11) Total Grants & Contributions 23 5 (46) (100) (29) (11)

Total Revenue Income (1) (13) 58 11 14 11

II Revenue ExpenditureA Salaries/ Wages & Allowances1 General Administration & Tax Collection (8) 12 7 13 6 6 2 Pension - - - - - -3 Water supply 13 1 15 20 12 12 4 Roads, Drains & Municipal works (5) 10 7 22 8 8 5 Conservancy/ SWM 4 4 11 16 9 9 6 Street Lighting (9) 16 13 40 15 14 7 Town planning 1 20 (3) 24 10 10 8 Fire Fighting (9) 37 4 5 9 8 9 Gardens (6) 16 6 14 8 7 10 Public Health & Sanitation 0 20 2 48 18 16 11 Others (Libraries, Dispensaries, Community halls, Cattle p (12) 23 21 8 10 9 Total Salary Expenses 2 7 10 18 9 9

B Operation & Maintenance1 General Administration & Tax Collection 142 (83) 37 42 35 (5) 2 Water supply 57 (74) 157 (30) 28 (7) 3 Roads, Drains & Municipal works 7 24 6 581 155 76 4 Conservancy/ SWM 8 (6) (3) 52 13 11 5 Street Lighting - - - - - -6 Town planning 27 (80) 368 15 82 8 7 Fire Fighting (47) 320 (39) 32 67 16 8 Gardens 364 (70) 18 227 135 52 9 Public Health & Sanitation (42) 89 102 196 86 60 10 Others (Libraries, Dispensaries, Community halls, Cattle p 243 4 35 123 101 81 Total O&M Expenses 104 (72) 23 57 28 3

C Debt Servicing1 Principal & Interest repayment (11) 77 2,530 (51) 636 112 2 Others - - - - -Total Debt Servicing Expenses (11) 77 2,530 (51) 636 112

Total Revenue Expenditure 10

-

(3) 32 8 12 11

Trends in Income & Expenditure

Percentage per Annum

137


S. No. Head of Account 2001-02 to 2002-03

2002-03 to 2003-04

2003-04 to 2004-05

2004-05 to 2005-06

SAGR (2001-02 to 2005-06)

CAGR (2001-02 to 2005-06)


A Own Sources1 Sale of Lands 500 (46) 11 (81) 96 (9) 2 Sale of Municipal Property - - - - - -3 Lease Income - - - - - -Total Own Sources 500 (46) 11 (81) 96 (9)

-B Loans (100) - - - (100) 30

C Grants & Contributions1 TFC/ EFC/ TFC Grants - (33) (47) 300 73 12 2 SFC Development Grants - - - - - -3 MP/ MLA Development Grants (100) - - - (100) (100) 4 Project Specific Grants (Roads) - - 220 (100) 40 (100) 5 Project Specific Grants (Urban Infra) (100) - - - (100) (45) 6 Project Specific Grants (Slum Development, NSDP) 168 56 (100) - 41 12 7 Other project/ scheme specific grants (100) - (92) 24,382 8,063 356 Total Grants & Contributions (81) 23 (42) 713 153 3

Total Capital Income 56 (39) 1 9 7 1

II Capital Expenditure1 General Administration 246 (61) 55 129 92 48 2 Roads and drains 109 (57) 175 3 57 26 3 Water supply (30) (33) 33 38 2 (4) 4 Sewerage - (100) - - (100) (100) 5 Conservancy/ SWM 181 (76) 182 (96) 48 (47) 6 Street lighting 138 46 (30) 53 52 39 7 Gardens & Parks 199 (55) 401 20 141 68 8 Slum development 91 (19) 25 (100) (0) 25 9 Fire services 12,100 (31) 280 65 3,103 379 10 Library, schools, PHC, community centres etc 50 (73) 30 6 3 (14) 11 Town planning 748 (56) 15 (93) 153 (27) 12 Other Grant related works 84 (17) 32 1,306 351 131 13 Others - - - (100) (100) (100)

Total Capital Expenditure 19 (38) 64 43 22 15

ure

Percentage per Annum

Trends in Income & Expendit

138


Per Capita -Income & Expenditure Statement


06)

CAGR in Per Capita

Amounts (% p.a)

Municipal Corporation, Faridabad General AccountOpening Balance 10.96 11.38 11.82 12.27 12.74 <------- Popl in Lakhs


A Own SourcesTax Revenue1 Octroi Compensation - - - - - - -2 Property Tax 173 187 90 212 194 171 3 3 Other Taxes 15 53 53 55 74 50 50

Sub-Total (Tax Revenue) 187 240 143 267 268 221 9

Non Tax Revenue1 Duty on sale of property 106 94 85 123 134 108 6 2 Building permission and Development charges 30 31 32 35 28 31 (1) 3 Other realisations under Byelaws & Special acts 25 10 7 16 11 14 (17) 4 Water charges 50 46 77 82 87 68 15 5 Sewerage charges 1 1 1 1 1 1 9 6 Income from Municipal Assets/ Institutions 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 7 Fee from HUDA 120 76 45 65 33 68 (27) 8 Other License and Fees 3 11 27 64 136 48 156 9 Interest on Investments 8 0 6 1 3 4 (19) 10 Other Miscellaneous Income 14 10 8 6 8 9 (14)

Sub-Total (Non Tax Revenue) 356 278 288 394 442 352 6 Total Own Sources 543 518 431 661 710 573 7

B Assigned Rev, Grants & Contributions1 General Grants - - - - - - -2 SFC Revenue grants - - - - - - -3 Other Revenue grants 6 7 7 4 - 5 (14) Total Grants & Contributions 6 7 7 4 - 5 (14)

Total Revenue Income 549 525 438 665 710 577 7

II Revenue ExpenditureA Salaries/ Wages & Allowances1 General Administration & Tax Collection 37 33 36 37 40 37 2 2 Pension - - - - - - -3 Water supply 78 85 83 92 106 89 8 4 Roads, Drains & Municipal works 36 33 35 36 42 36 4 5 Conservancy/ SWM 92 93 93 100 111 98 5 6 Street Lighting 3 2 3 3 4 3 9 7 Town planning 5 5 6 5 6 5 6 8 Fire Fighting 5 5 6 6 6 6 4 9 Gardens 30 27 30 31 34 30 3 10 Public Health & Sanitation 7 7 8 7 11 8 12 11 Others (Libraries, Dispensaries, Community halls, Cattle p 3 3 3 4 4 3 5 Total Salary Expenses 296 292 302 320 364 315 5

B Operation & Maintenance1 General Administration & Tax Collection 16 38 6 8 11 16 (9) 2 Water supply 1 1 0 1 1 1 (10) 3 Roads, Drains & Municipal works 0 0 0 0 3 1 70 4 Conservancy/ SWM 5 6 5 5 7 6 7 5 Street Lighting - - - - - - -6 Town planning 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 7 Fire Fighting 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 8 Gardens 0 0 0 0 0 0 47 9 Public Health & Sanitation 0 0 0 0 0 0 54 10 Others (Libraries, Dispensaries, Community halls, Cattle p 0 0 0 0 0 0 74 Total O&M Expenses 23 46 13 15 22 24 (1)

C Debt Servicing1 Principal & Interest repayment 2 2 3 69 32 21 104 2 Others - - - - - - -Total Debt Servicing Expenses 2 2 3 69 32 21 104

- - - - - - -Total Revenue Expenditure 321 340 317 404 419 360 7

Per-Capita Income & Expenditure

Rs. per Annum

139



06)

CAGR in Per Capita

Amounts (% p.a)


A Own Sources1 Sale of Lands 47 273 142 153 28 129 (12) 2 Sale of Municipal Property - - - - - - -3 Lease Income - - - - - - -Total Own Sources 47 273 142 153 28 129 (12)

B Loans 3 - - - 7 2 25

C Grants & Contributions1 TFC/ EFC/ TFC Grants - 15 10 5 19 10 8 2 SFC Development Grants - - - - - - -3 MP/ MLA Development Grants 0 - - - - 0 (100) 4 Project Specific Grants (Roads) - 4 4 13 - 4 (100) 5 Project Specific Grants (Urban Infra) 146 - - - 12 31 (47) 6 Project Specific Grants (Slum Development, NSDP) 3 9 13 - 5 6 8 7 Other project/ scheme specific grants 0 - 6 0 109 23 340 Total Grants & Contributions 150 28 33 18 145 75 (1)

Total Capital Income 200 301 176 171 179 205 (3)

II Capital Expenditure1 General Administration 2 7 3 4 9 5 42 2 Roads and drains 75 150 62 164 163 123 21 3 Water supply 249 169 109 139 185 170 (7) 4 Sewerage - 5 - - - 1 (100) 5 Conservancy/ SWM 2 6 1 4 0 3 (49) 6 Street lighting 16 37 51 35 51 38 34 7 Gardens & Parks 3 7 3 15 18 9 62 8 Slum development 3 5 4 5 - 3 20 9 Fire services 0 0 0 0 0 0 361 10 Library, schools, PHC, community centres etc 3 4 1 1 1 2 (17) 11 Town planning 2 14 6 7 0 6 (30) 12 Other Grant related works 4 8 6 8 108 27 122 13 Others - - - 8 - 2 (100)

Total Capital Expenditure 358 412 247 390 535 388 11

penditure

Rs. per Annum

Per-Capita Income & Ex

140

elopment Plan Municipal Corporation of Faridabad

141

Annexure 6: CIP- Demand –Gap Analysis, Costing and Investments

Sector/ Head Existing Level Unit Desired

LevelExisting

(2006) Demand Gap Estimate (2016) Demand Gap Unit Cost Investment by 2011-

12Investment beyond

2011-12Total Investment

NeedRs. Lakhs Rs. Lakhs Rs. Lakhs Rs. Lakhs

A Water Supply 43,448.68 19,420.34 62,869.02 1 Daily Supply/ (gross) 188 Litres 315 240.00 672.32 432.32 672.32 896.33 224.01 MLD 45.00 19,454.43 10,080.60 29,535.03 2 Treatment capacity 0 % 100 0.00 672.32 672.32 672.32 896.33 224.01 ML 25.00 16,808.02 5,600.33 22,408.35 3 Roads Covered with Distribution Network 75 % 85 910.00 1468.07 558.07 1468.07 1957.43 489.36 Km. 4.00 2,232.30 1,957.43 4,189.73 4 Elevated Storage capacity w.r.t Supply 5 % 33 11.37 224.11 212.74 224.11 298.78 74.67 ML 16.00 3,403.87 1,194.74 4,598.60 5 Refurbishment of Old Distribution Network 182.00 146.81 Km. 4.00 728.00 587.23 1,315.23 6 Metering System 32,883 - No.s 0.03 822.08 - 822.08

B Sewerage 48,289.76 21,910.32 70,200.08 1 Under Ground Drainage

1 Population Coverage 50 % 70 637024 1494046 857022 1494046 1991853 497808 Persons2 UGD Network/ Road Length Covered 52 % 80 637.68 1381.72 744.04 1381.72 1842.29 460.57 km. 18.00 13,392.67 8,290.30 21,682.97 3 Sewerage Treatment (Against generation) 60 % 100 115.00 537.86 422.86 537.86 717.07 179.21 ML 52.00 21,988.54 9,318.96 31,307.50 4 Intermediate pumping stations, Pumping machinery & Transmission mains 807 269 ML 16.00 12,908.56 4,301.06 17,209.61

C Urban Roads, Transport & Traffic 41,192.61 20,165.71 61,358.32 1 Road Length per Capita 0.96 meters 0.962 % Town Area under Roads/ Circulation 9.91 % 9.913 Average Road Width 6.66 meters 7.004 Distribution of Road by Type

i Concrete 4 % 15 48.00 259.07 11.07 259.07 345.43 86.36 km.ii Black Top 74 % 85 920.00 1468.07 548.07 1468.07 1957.43 489.36 km.iii WBM 0 % 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 km.iv Cut Stone/ Earthen/Others 22 % 0 250.00 0.00 -250.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 km.Total Municiapl Road Length 1218.00 1727.15 509.15 1727.15 2302.86 575.72 km.

5 Upgradation (Roads)i BT to Concrete 70.36 28.79 km. 70.00 4,925.01 2,015.00 6,940.02 ii WBM to Black Top 0.00 0.00 km. 10.00 - - - iii Earthen to Black Top 250.00 0.00 km. 14.00 3,500.00 - 3,500.00

6 New Formation (Roads)i Concrete 140.71 57.57 km. 55.00 7,739.31 3,166.44 10,905.74 ii Black Top 298.07 489.36 km. 13.50 4,024.00 6,606.33 10,630.34 iii WBM 0.00 0.00 km. 7.50 - - -

7 Public Transport System (bus shelters and other facilities) L.S 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 8 Improvements to identified Major Roads 121.80 km.

Widening/ Strengthening (Roads) 85.26 51.81 km. 65.00 5,541.90 3,367.94 8,909.84 ROB/ Fly-overs 4 2 Nos. 1,000.00 4,000.00 2,000.00 6,000.00 Minor bridges/ Skywalks 10 5 Nos. 500.00 5,000.00 2,500.00 7,500.00 Utility Shifting for Road Improvements 121.80 0 km. 25.00 3,045.00 - 3,045.00

9 Land Acquisition for Road Improvements 21.07 Acre 35.00 737.38 - 737.38 10 Traffic Management/ Junction Improvements 8 6 Nos. 85.00 680.00 510.00 1,190.00

Existing and Desired Level Service Gap by Year 2011/ 2021 Service Gap by Year 2031 CostingUnit

Contd..

2

City Dev


Sector/ Head Existing Desired Existing Estimate Investment by 2011-12

Investment beyond 2011-12

Total Investment Need

Rs. Lakhs Rs. Lakhs Rs. LakhsD Storm Water Drains 25,559.74 15,797.14 41,356.88

1 Road Length Covered with Drains 66 % 150 800.00 2590.72 1790.72 2590.72 3454.29 863.57 km.2 Distribution by Type

i Kutcha Open 0 % 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 km.ii Pucca Open 100 % 30 800.00 777.22 -22.78 777.22 1036.29 259.07 km.iii Pucca Closed 0 % 70 0.00 1813.50 1813.50 1813.50 2418.00 604.50 km.

3 Desilting & Strengthening of Primary Drains 100 74.00 74.00 74.00 74.00 74.00 74.00 km. 4.00 296.00 296.00 592.00 4 Upgradation km.

i Kutcha to Pucca Open 0.00 0.00 km. 9.00 - - - ii Kutcha to Pucca Closed 0.00 0.00 km. 10.00 - - - iii Pucca Open to Pucca Closed 22.78 604.50 km. 8.50 193.67 5,138.26 5,331.93

5 New Pucca Open Drains 0.00 863.57 km. 12.00 - 10,362.88 10,362.88 6 New Pucca Closed Drains 1790.72 0.00 km. 14.00 25,070.07 - 25,070.07

E Street Lighting 2,465.25 1,152.30 3,617.56 1 Spacing Between Lamp Posts 55 meters 30 22036 57572 35536 57527 76762 19235 Nos.2 Distribution by Type

i Tube Light 76 % 30 16681 17272 591 17272 23029 5757 Nos.ii High Power 24 % 70 5354 40243 34889 40243 53657 13414 Nos.iii High Mast Lamps 0 % 0.1 1 12 11 12 15 3 Nos.

3 Replacements Rupees per Fixturei Tube Light with High power lamps 0 0 Nos. 4,000.00 - - -

4 New Installationi Tube Light 591 5757 Nos. 3,700.00 21.87 213.01 234.88 ii High Power 34889 13414 Nos. 7,000.00 2,442.23 938.98 3,381.21 iii High Mast Lamps 11 3 Nos. 10,500.00 1.16 0.32 1.47

F Conservancy (SWM) & Sanitation 3,909.93 4,353.94 8,263.87 1 Waste Generated per capita 377 Grams 377 480 654 594.94 775 Tonne2 Collection Performance 85.8 % 1003 Density Factor Ratio 0.354 No. of Trips per Vehicle/ day 3.03 Nos. 2.505 Vehivle Carrying Capacity 209.00 402.25 193.25 402.25 477.03 74.79 Tonne 2.50 483.11 186.97 670.09

Hand Carts (@ Privatisation of 80% HHs) 5 % HHs 20 890 1173 283 1173 1564 391 Nos. 0.03 8.49 11.73 20.22 6 Disposal Site 0.00 Acres 0.00 58.66 58.66 58.66 146.66 88.00 Acres 20.00 1,173.28 1,759.92 2,933.20

Land Fill Infrastructure (as per CPHEEO Standards) % 67 137.97 275.93 Tonne/ Day 7.50 1,034.75 2,069.51 3,104.26 Composting Plant % 33 67.95 135.91 Tonne/ Day 2.00 135.91 271.82 407.72

7 Secondary Collection (Area Coverage) 0.40 Sq. Km 0.201 Container Bins - 2.5 MT (Addl 5 bins for servicing) 180 661 481 661 777 116 Nos. 0.25 120.25 29.00 149.25 2 Dual Loaded Dumper Placers No. of Trips 3 2 27 25 27 32 5 Nos. 5.00 125.00 25.00 150.00

8 Slum Population per Seat of Public Convenience 359 Persons 90 410 1971 1561 1971 0 0 Seat98 0 Units (P&U) 8.50 829.13 - 829.13


Contd..

Level Unit Level (2006) Demand Gap (2016) Demand Gap Unit Cost

Rs. Lakhs

142


Sector/ Head Existing Level Unit Desired

LevelExisting

(2006) Demand Gap Estimate (2016) Demand Gap Unit Cost Investment by 2011-

12Investment beyond

2011-12Total Investment

NeedRs. Lakhs Rs. Lakhs Rs. Lakhs Rs. Lakhs

G Urban Poor/ Slums' Improvement 24,701.18 - 24,701.18 1 Slum Improvement - Rehabilitation/ Housing 14928 0 Units 1.45 21,646.18 - 21,646.18 2 Slum Improvement - Infrastructure 47 Units 65.00 3,055.00 3,055.00 3 Slum Improvement - Land Acquition L.S - - -

H Land use/ Development Plan 14,010.00 9,750.00 23,760.00 1 Acquisition of Reserved lands 465 325 Acres 30.00 13,950.00 9,750.00 23,700.00 2 Existing Land use Survey (GIS based) L.S 60.00 60.00 60.00 3 Others L.S - - - -

I Other Projects 8,294.00 842.00 9,136.00 1 As Identified by the ULB

a River Conservation/ Protection L.S 750.00 750.00 750.00 b Tree Plantation & Gardens L.S 400.00 400.00 400.00 c Fire Services L.S 850.00 850.00 850.00 d Stadium Improvements L.S 200.00 200.00 200.00 e Night Shelters/ Travellers Bungalows 4 2 Nos. 16.00 64.00 32.00 96.00 f Eco. Infra Relocations/ Truck Terminals/ Slaughter house etc 8 3 Nos. 250.00 2,000.00 750.00 2,750.00 g Urban Governance/ E-Governance/ GIS L.S 550.00 550.00 550.00 h Others (System Stduies etc) 6 2 Nos. 30.00 180.00 60.00 240.00 i MCF new office and Regular Capital Works L.S 3,300.00 3,300.00 3,300.00

Total Investment Identified 211,871.15 93,391.75 305,262.90


143


Annexure 7: Investment Phasing

Investment till 2011-12 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12Sector/ Component (Rs. Lakhs)Water supply 43,449 514 10,773 11,357 6,784 7,691 6,329 1 Source/ system capacity augmentation 19,454 - 9,727 9,727 - - - 2 Treatment capacity augmentation 16,808 - - - 5,042 5,883 5,883 3 Distribution network augmentation 2,232 223 335 335 446 446 446 4 Elevated Storage capacity augmentation 3,404 - - 1,021 1,021 1,362 - 5 Refurbishment of old Distribution Network 728 291 437 - - - - 6 Metering System 822 - 274 274 274 - -

Sewerage 48,290 - 7,197 13,793 14,247 10,375 2,679 1 UGD - Network 13,393 - 2,679 2,679 2,679 2,679 2,679 2 UGD - STPs 21,989 - - 6,597 7,696 7,696 - 3 UGD - Pumping Machinery 12,909 - 4,518 4,518 3,873 - -

Roads & Urban Transport 41,193 1,808 4,296 9,940 6,883 11,680 6,585 1 Roads Upgrdation 8,425 700 2,456 2,806 - 1,231 1,231 2 Roads New Formation 11,763 - - 3,127 805 3,916 3,916 3 Public Transport/ Improvements/ BRTS 2,000 - 400 400 600 600 - 4 Road Infra Dev (Imp. Roads) incl. Widening 17,587 1,108 1,108 2,964 5,478 5,728 1,200 5 Land Acquisition for Road Improvements 737 - 332 406 - - - 6 Traffic Management/ Jn. Improvements 680 - - 238 - 204 238

Drains 25,560 - 5,230 5,220 3,828 5,014 6,268 1 Drains Upgradation 194 - 68 58 68 - - 2 Drains New Formation 25,070 - 5,014 5,014 3,761 5,014 6,268 3 Desilting & Strengthening of Primary Drains 296 - 148 148 - - -

Street Lights 2,465 244 616 488 372 367 377 1 Replacement - Tube Lights - - - - - - - 2 New Installation - Tube Lights 22 - 5 - 5 - 11 3 New Installation - High power Lamps 2,442 244 611 488 366 366 366 4 New Installation - High Mast Lamps 1 - 0 - 0 0 -

(Rs. Lakhs)

144


Investment till 2011-12 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12Sector/ Component (RsConservancy (SWM) & Sanitation 607 365 547 339 1 New Vehicles (Primary Collection) 8 - 2 - 2 2 2 2 New Vehicles (Secondary and Disposal) 483 - 121 121 - 121 121 3 Acquiring New Disposal Site 1,173 - 1,173 - - - - 4 Infrastructure at Disposal Site 1,171 - 446 259 155 155 155 5 DLDPs & Container Bins 245 - 61 61 - 61 61 6 Public Convenience Systems 829 82.91 165.83 165.83 207.28 207.28 -

Urban Poor/ Slums 24,701 - 4,011 4,011 4,329 6,175 6,175 1 Slum Improvement - Rehabilitation/ Housing 21,646 - 3,247 3,247 4,329 5,412 5,412 2 Slum Improvement - Infrastructure 3,055 - 764 764 - 764 764 3 Slum Improvement - Land acquisition - - - - - - -

Land use/ Dev. Planning 7,035 - 60 1,395 1,395 2,093 2,093 1 Acquisition of Reserved lands 6,975 - - 1,395 1,395 2,093 2,093 2 Existing Land use Survey (GIS based) 60 - 60 - - - - 2 Others - - - - - - -

Others 8,294 417 1,049 1,675 2,078 1,927 1,149 1 River Conservation/ Protection 750 - - 188 263 300 - 2 Tree Plantation & Gardens 400 - 100 100 100 100 - 3 Fire Services 850 - 340 298 213 - - 4 Stadium Improvements 200 - - 100 100 - - 5 Night Shelters/ Travellers Bungalows 64 - 19 - 22 - 22 6 Eco. Infra Relocations/ Truck Terminals/ Slaughter 2,000 - - 400 400 600 600 7 Urban Governance/ E-Governance/ GIS 550 - 110 110 110 110 110 8 Others (System Stduies etc) 180 - 63 63 54 - - 9 MCF new office and Regular Capital Works 3,300 417 417 417 817 817 417

Total 204,896 3,067 35,201 48,486 40,282 45,867 31,994

(Rs. Lakhs)

. Lakhs)3,910 83 1,970

145


Annexure 8: Financial Projections- Financial Operating Plan Financial Year ------> 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12

Figures in Rs. Lakhs EstimateMCFA SUMMARY

i Opening balance 258 1105 1391 2039 2605 1804 6331 6247 4283 3219 727ii Revenue Receipts 6019 5974 5172 8159 9043 8182 9044 13203 14484 14909 17174iii Revenue Expenditure 3524 3868 3745 4955 5338 5865 6908 11675 13105 14658 16576iv Municipal receipts 8317 9711 7596 10530 11652 11640 22011 31884 31567 35734 34179v Municipal expenditure 7469 9425 6949 9965 12453 7113 22095 33848 32631 38226 34002

New Debt Servicing Exp. 0 0 58 108 234 552New O&M Exp. 0 42 497 1234 1960 2792ULB contribution/ Rev. Surplus Transfer for Asset creation 374 5010 6505 5698 6258 4218

vi Operating Surplus/ Deficit for the year 2495 2106 1427 3204 3705 2317 2136 1528 1379 251 599vii Municipal Surplus/ Deficit for the year 847 286 648 566 -801 4527 -84 -1964 -1064 -2492 177viii Closing balance 1105 1391 2039 2605 1804 6331 6247 4283 3219 727 904ix Performance Indicators

DSCR 5.77 5.40 25.52 13.21 2.05 2.08DSR 6% 5% 0% 1% 2% 3%PT Collection Performance 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%Water Charges Collection Performance 77% 79% 80% 82% 83% 85%Cost Recovery (Water Supply) - only Charges 49% 58% 136% 149% 135% 160%Cost Recovery (Sewerage) - only Charges 169% 206% 296% 264% 245% 359%

B REVENUE ACCOUNTRECEIPTSI Own Sources

1 Octroi Compensation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02 Property Tax 1891 2125 1065 2601 2469 2383 2266 3703 3552 3454 34073 Other Taxes 161 603 627 677 945 685 777 883 1003 1139 12934 Duty on sale of property 1159 1066 1002 1510 1710 1413 1549 1697 1859 2037 22335 Building permission and Development charges 327 354 377 432 360 405 444 487 533 584 6406 Other realisations under Byelaws & Special acts 271 117 83 200 146 179 196 215 236 258 2837 Water charges 551 519 908 1006 1102 949 1283 2697 3228 3124 40698 Sewerage charges 10 9 11 15 16 429 623 1435 1788 1809 25079 Fee from HUDA 1312 864 532 799 423 861 944 1034 1133 1242 136110 Other non-Tax revenues & Misc. Income 274 240 488 875 1872 822 900 987 1081 1185 1298

Total 5957 5898 5092 8116 9043 8126 8983 13137 14412 14832 17091II Transfers & Revenue Grants

1 General Grants 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02 SFC Revenue grants 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03 Other Revenue grants 62 76 80 43 0 57 61 66 71 77 83

Total 62 76 80 43 0 57 61 66 71 77 83Total Revenue Receipts 6019 5974 5172 8159 9043 8182 9044 13203 14484 14909 17174

Actuals Projection

146


Financial Year ------> 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12

Figures in Rs. LaMCF

EXPENDITUREIII Establishment 3247 3326 3564 3930 4639 5072 6052 6617 7234 7909 8647IV O&M Expenses

O&M on Current Assets 257 525 149 182 287 307 329 353 378 406 4351 General Administration & Tax Collection 181 437 74 102 145 154 163 173 183 194 2062 Water supply 9 14 4 9 7 7 7 8 8 9 93 Roads, Drains & Municipal works 3 4 5 5 33 36 39 43 48 53 584 Conservancy/ SWM 60 65 61 60 90 98 105 114 123 133 1435 Street Lighting 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06 Town planning 2 2 0 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 37 Others 2 3 4 4 10 10 11 12 13 14 15O&M on New Assets 0 42 497 1234 1960 2792Phasing of Non-Debt Liabilities 0 0 0 0 0 0

V Debt ServicingOutstanding Debt Liabilities - Old 20 18 32 843 412 486 485 4 4 4 4Outstanding Debt Liabilities - New 0 0 58 108 234 552

VI Contribution to Revolving Fund/ SUIF 4146 4146 4146 4146Total Revenue Expenses 3524 3868 3745 4955 5338 5865 6908 11675 13105 14658 16576

C CAPITAL ACCOUNTRECEIPTS

I Own Sources/ Sale of lands 517 3106 1682 1872 359 1628 1758 1899 2051 2215 2392II Capital grants & Contributions

1 TFC/ SFC/ MP/ MLA Grants 5 172 115 61 244 129 139 150 162 175 1892 Project Specific & Other grants 1640 148 278 166 1598 827 893 965 1042 1125 12153 JNNURM Grants from GoI 624 7269 10675 9425 11246 81434 JNNURM Grants from GoH 250 2907 4270 3770 4498 3257

Total 1644 321 394 227 1841 1830 11209 16060 14399 17045 12805III Loans 30 0 0 0 87 0 0 723 633 1565 1808

Total Capital Receipts 2192 3427 2075 2099 2287 3458 12967 18681 17083 20825 17005EXPENDITUREIV CAPEX 3927 4692 2914 4781 6821 1248 15187 22173 19526 23568 17426

khs EstimateActuals Projection

147


148

Annexure 9: Reform Check List

1- MUNICIPAL ACCOUNTING

DESIRED OBJECTIVES:

Note: JNNURM requires certain reforms to be undertaken by states/ cities in Municipal Accounting, with the objective of having a modern accounting system based on double-entry accrual principles, leading to better financial management, transparency and self-reliance.

I CURRENT STATUS

a. Please provide a short note on the present method of accounting being followed in your city

b. Please provide the status of completion and adoption of accounts, and if they have been audited and published in the last 3 years Year Adopted by Council Audited Published

2002-2003 No Pre audit -System of Government No



c. Please state whether State/city has drawn up its own accounting manual Yes No


148

Annexure 9: Reform Check List

1- MUNICIPAL ACCOUNTING

DESIRED OBJECTIVES:

Note: JNNURM requires certain reforms to be undertaken by states/ cities in Municipal Accounting, with the objective of having a modern accounting system based on double-entry accrual principles, leading to better financial management, transparency and self-reliance.

I CURRENT STATUS

a. Please provide a short note on the present method of accounting being followed in your city

b. Please provide the status of completion and adoption of accounts, and if they have been audited and published in the last 3 years Year Adopted by Council Audited Published




c. Please state whether State/city has drawn up its own accounting manual Yes No

d. Please state whether State/city has adopted NMAM -

i. without modifications

ii. with modifications.

If NMAM has been adopted with modifications, please state these: Not Applicable

e. Please state whether State has modified its current appropriate laws and regulations to be in compliance with the double-entry accrual principles. If yes, please provide date of such modification. (in form GO if any) Yes No Date

f. If applicable, please provide current status of implementation of double-entry accrual system: State government has floated tenders to shortlist

consultants

No

No


II TIMELINE FOR ACTION ON REFORMS

a Resolution by Government expressing commitmenmunicipal accounting system. (Note: This resolutiwithin 6 months of signing of MOA under JNNURM

.)

t to establish modern on should be passed

and a copy :

submitted to MOUD

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 b GO/Legislation/Modification

accounting system of rules for migrating to double-entry

c Appointment of consultants for development of State manual (either based on NMAM or independently d Completion and adoption of m nual a e Commence training of person nel

)

f Appointment of field-level consultant for implementation at the citylevel -

g Notification of cut-off date for migrating to the double-entry accounting system

Business Process Re-engineering (if required) h

i Valuation of assets and liabilities j Drawing up of opening balance sheet (OBS):

i Provisional OBS ii Adoption of provisional OBS

iii Finalization of OBS k Full migration to double-entry accounting system

149


Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12

Production of financial statements (income-expenditure accounts and balance sheet)

l

m Audit of financial statements n Adoption of accounts

Preparation of outc

p Complete re-vamp of the Public Financial Management (PFM) cyclewhich includes internal accounts

,

q Credit rating of ULB (if required)

r Any other reform steps being undertaken (please use additional space to pecify)

i s

Capacity building of all ULB staff Discl

o ome budget

ii osures and public information

150


2 – E-GOVERNANCE

DESIRED OBJECTIVES:

ote: JN E-Governance, with the obj ctive of h ving a transp nt admiservice d ve MIS, and general improvement in the service delivery link

C

E-Governance applications ypes of ULBs/ Parastatals involved Remarks

N NURM requires certain reforms to be undertaken by states/ cities in elivery, effecti

e a are nistration, quick

I URRENT STATUS

a. T

Please provide a list of services covered byService

Registrat MCF Currently 50% of the work is computerised, it is planned to fully comion of Births and Deaths puterised all the activities by year 2007

Public G All complaints are accepted by office of Deputy Commi sioner, MCF rievance Redressal MCF s

Tax Management, including records Mgm

Municipa MCF Manually, Single entry cash based accountin system, Ch ve recentl introduced computers for accounts departmel Accounting System g M F

nt a yWorks M Manual anagement System MCF E-Procur Manually, through notice board, newspapers and PRO ement MCF

na Management, i.e., Personal Informat

Property t. MCF Manual

Perso l ion System. MCF Data is entered in computers, but not on PIS package- not available

Payment of Property Tax, Utility Bills and Management of Utilities that come under the ULBs

MCF Manually, at collection points

Building Plan Approval MCF Manually G.I.S. MCF Not available

II TIMELINE FOR ACTION ON REFORMS Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 a Appointment of State-level Technology Consultant as State Technology

Advisor. This is State Level Activity

b Preparation of Municipal E-Governance Design Document (MEDD) on

the basis of National Design Document as per NMMP. Will be prepared as per NMMP guidelines over the period of next five years starting from 2007-08

151


Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2005-06 c Assessment of MEDD against National E- Governance Standards.

(Scalability, intra-operability & security standards etc.)

vernance Action Agenda. d Agreement on Municipal E-Go

e BPR for migration to E-governance f Appointment of software consultant(s)

h Defining monitor able time table for implementation of each E-

at is being taken up. Governance initiative th

i Ongoing

able tim implementation of E- Governance initiatives, against mo

e-table nitor

j Any other reform steps being undertaken (please use additional space to

stem (GIS) specify)

i Geographic Information Sy

ii

iii

g Exploring PPP option for different E-Governance service (Public Private Participation.)

IVRS (Interactive Voice Response System) Municipal Area Networking (MAN)

iv Kiosk v nning & Storage) Document Management System (Document Sca

vi Web Portal of the Local body (if any)

152


3 – PROPERTY TAX

DESIRED OBJECTIVES:

Note : JNNURM requires certain reforms taken by states/ cities in Property Taxes, with the broad objective of establishing a simple, tscreti es/cities n ed to ensure th t the desirable include

these re

tax levied on the following types of properties:

ransparent, non-di onary and equitable property tax is encourages voluntary compliance. St

forms, but need not restrict to these items. at e a ir objectives for reforms

I CURRENT STATUS

a. Please indicate if Property

i Residential

ii Commercial

b. ear-ending 2005-2006

1,73,663 Nos.

Please indicate the Property tax being collected for y

i Domestic Residential

8 ), and average

P ase Provide the Method of Property Tax Ass

i Self-Assessment

ii Demand-based

me e vy d m

p

iii Industrial

153

ii Commercial ,783 Nos.

iii

Non-Domestic/ Non-residential Industrial 3,459 Nos.

Total current demand collection was 18.47 crores during 2005-06 (almost 100%collection performance during the last five years was 78%

c. le essment being followed.

In the current system property tax assess nt ar updated once in fi e ears an demand is raised as per the co pletion year. However any

new property is exempted from aying tax for the first three years on application by the assessing, hence the actual demand raised during a FY is higher than the collectable demand.


d. Please provide the below information on Current coverage. (Year 2005-06)

Name of Estimated no. of properties

(Total)

No. of properties ithe records of the

municipality paying property

tax Coverage ratio

Demand Raised

Rs. Crores

Demand Collected

Rs. Crores

Collection Ratio

Rs. Crores

n No. of properties

Property No

1 2 3 4 5 =(4)/(2) 6 7 8

1 Residential 1,73,663

2 Commercial 8,783

3 Industrial 3,459

4 Governm 315 ent

Total 2,36,000 1,86,310 1,86,310 78.83 17.85 18.46 100% (refer

item c above)

e. Please state the Exemption given to property owners individual Revenue implication of exemption No. Type of Exemption Qualifying institution/

1 Any assessm RV below Rs. 12exempted and new property is exempted for the first three ye rty tax

C under e

ent with A 00 are

ars from paying prope

urrently 90 assessments arexemption list

operty taxf. Please provide the Basis of determination of pr . i Capital Value ii Rateable Value iii Unit Area iv Other (Please specify)

Currently it is charged based as a percentage (2.5 percent for residential and 5 percent for non-residential) of net Annual Rental Value (ARV). Net ARV is arrived at based on the capital value of the land and/ or building. The

calculation method is as described below2

2 Capital value = Cost of land (as per guidelines) + cost of bld num on Bldg (subject to a max. of 50%) Annual rateable Value (ARV) = 5% of capital value Net ARV = ARV – 10% of ARV (allowable for maintenance) House tax = 2.5% of net ARV (residential purposes and 5% of net ARV (non-residential purposes) Exemptions: =any property with ARV less than Rs. 1200 is exempted from paying house tax and any new house/ property is exempted from paying house tax

for the initial three years

g (as per PWD (B&R) rates) – 1% depreciation per an

154


g. Please provide the Use of technology in property tax management: Currentli GIS of ord

y all the process is manually done Property Tax Rec s

ii Electroni f Prope c Database o rty Records iii Any pliance software for com

h. Please describe the Level of discretionary : NIL, Commissioner is the final authority

Please provide the last updation of property records and guidance values. Last updation of Property Records 2003-04

power available with assessing authority

i. i ii Last revision of guidance values 003-04 2

iv Please indicate whether information from authorities on new building construction, ldings is being captured; how (e.g. development authority etc.)

appropriate or additions to existing bui

Yes No

iii Frequency of revision of guidance values Once in five years

(Completion certificate is the basis, but in c ecorded once in five

appropriate authorities on change of ownership and lan Yes No

urrent system new assessment is r years only)

v Please indicate whether information from(e.g. Dept of Stamps and Registration)

d valuation is being captured; if so, how

II TIMELINE FOR ACTION ON REFORMS

Please provide timelines for the following action items Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7

005-06 2006-07

2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2 2011-12

a Extension of property tax regime to all properties b Elimination of exemption Current Exemption will continue c Migration to Self-Assessment System of Property Taxation

i Setting up a Committee/Team to draft/amend legislation

155


Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7

2005-06 2006-07

2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12

ii Stakeh der ol consultations of Draft Legislation

iii Preparation iv Approval of Cabinet/ Government v Final Enactment of Legislation by legislature

vi Notification vi i Preparation and notification of appropriate subordinate legislation

viii Imple enta m tion by municipality (ies)

g u non-discretionary method for determinati o

d Settin p a on f Property Tax (

i Settine.g. unit area, etc) g up a Committee/Team to draft/amend legislation

consultations ii Stakeholder iii Preparation of Draft Legislation iv Approval of Cabinet/ Government v Final Enactment of Legislation by legislature

vi Notification vii Preparation and notification of appropriate subordinate legislation

ntation by municipality (ies) viii Impleme e Use of GIS-based property tax system

i Selection of appropriate consultant ii Preparation of digital property maps for municipality

iii Verification of digital maps and preparation of complete database of roperties p

f Next revision of guidance value (Unit Area Rateable Value)

g Fix periodicity for revision of guidance values Current periodicity of five years shall continue i eriodicity to be adopted P

Deadline for adoption

iv Full migration to GIS system

NA ii NA

156


Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 7 Year 6

Establish Taxpayer educat Local camps for clarification of forms

ii Setting up a website for property tax issues/ FAQs etc

Establish Dispute Resolution Mechanism

j est and prompt taxpayers Rewarding and acknowledging hon(Rewards will be decided on lottery basis)

Achievement of 85% Coverage Ratio (CR) (see item I d

Achievement of 90% Collection

Any other reform steps being undertaken (pleto specify

2005-06 2006-07

2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12

h ion programme

i doubts and assistance in filling out

i

k above)

l Ratio (CR) ( see item I d above)

m ase use additional space

157


4 – USER CHARGES

DESIRED OBJECTIVES:

ote: ndertaken by states / cities in the levy of User Charges on different municipal services, with an objective of securin nd ultimately leading to self-sustaining delivery of urban services.

I

. municipalities/ parastatals and the status of user charges being leviedTariff Structure Last Revision of Tariff

N JNNURM requires certain reforms to be ug effective linkages between asset creation and asset maintenance a

CURRENT STATUS

a Please provide a list of services being delivered byType of Service Service Provider

for each

Domestic - Metered

Stepped tariff ranging from Rs. 1.2 /KL to R . 4.00/KL, inabsence of meters it is charged at Rs. 300 /month

5 s

Water Supply MCF FY 2002-03

ge MCF Based on No. of closets, F 3

Solid Waste Management MCF No Charge is levied Public Transport Agencies

Domestic - Unmetered

Rs. 4.00/KL, in absence of meters it is charged at Rs. 300 /month

Sewera the charge per closets is Rs. 15/month. Y 2002-0

Private Others (please specify) NA Fire Service, street lighting are provided but no charge is levied

b. Please provide the costs for providing the following services (total cost as well as per unit cost) and the total and per unit charges collected in 2005-06

Total O&M Cost (with debt service charges) Total user charge, if collected (Please specify the unit) Type of Service

Per Unit Cost (1 unit = 1000 ltrs.) Total Cost Per Unit Recovery (1 unit = 1000 ltrs.) Total Recovery

Water Supply Rs. 1.56/KL Rs. 1363 lakhs Rs. 1.26/KL Rs. 1102 lakhs

Sewerage It is not accounted separately, part of water supply department cost Rs. 2/connection/month Rs. 16 Lakhs Solid Waste Management Rs. 67/assessment/month Rs. 1505 lakhs Not charged Public Transport Agencies

Others (please specify) • Street Lighting • Fire Fighting

• Rs.47 lakhs/annaum • Rs. 81 lakhs/annuam

Fire Service, street lighting are provided but no charge is levied

158


c. Please provide metrics and current services levels

For Water Supply

LPCD 188

Coverage 57% of property tax assessments are connected and 75% of roads by network

Hrs. of Supply 2 hours

Quality Potable

of road network by UGD

ent: -to-door col on is only in few wards

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Y 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09

The State/ ULB m formulatproper

a policy on user which should incl subsidies, if any, for all

of O&M cost by the end of the services, ensuring full

For Sewerage: 55% of population and 52%

For Solid Waste Managem 100%, but door lecti

II TIMELINE FOR ACTION ON REFORMS ear 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7

2009-10 2010-11 2011-12

a

ust e and adopt charges ude targeting of the realization

MOUD)

Mission period. (Note : This resolution should be passed within 6 months of signing of MOA under JNNURM and a copy submitted to

Establishm r accounting system for each servi

y. Please specify the as to

for each se

i Water

rage ii Solid Waste Management

iii Public Transport Services iv. Others (Please specify

b ent of prope ce so

determine the O&M cost separatel timeline rvice separately

Start Complete

Supply and Sewe

)

159



achieving these

Public Transport Services

c The State/ULB should define user charge structure and timelines for

i Water Supply and Sewerage ii Solid Waste Management

iii iv. Others (Please specify)

d The State should setup a body for recommending a user charge structure

State should quantify/study the impact of subsidies for each service on

e a periodic basis The MCF shall do it on its own

Time table to achieve full recovery of O&M costs fromf (

Water Supply Sewerage

Solid Waste Management Other Services

Any other reform steps being undertaken (please use additional space to specify)

o s

readdressal

PPP is already

user charges Please indicate proposed recovery level for each year)

i

ii

iii iv

g

• Door to collection of solid waste has been initiated with the help of NGOs, households will be charged Rs. 35/m nth for u ing this service

• A help line is proposed where residents can lodge their complaints personally/phone/internet. They will be informed after the

of complaints, the complaints shall be addressed in a time bound period as per the citizens charter

• in place for O&M of tube wells and Public convenience /sanitation

160


5 – INTERNAL EARMARKING FOR BASIC SERVICES FOR POOR

DESIR D OBJECTIVES

Note: JNNURM requires certain reforms to be undertaken by states / cities in the provision of basic services to the Urban Poor with an objective of providing curity s nitation. I addition, delivery of other existing universal services of the

overn n, health and social security is to be ensured.

I

a. e ate has identified all Urban Below Poverty Line (BPL) fam lies/ benef ciaries es No

E

seg

of tenure at affordable prices, improved housing, water supply and ment for educatio

a n

CURRENT STATUS

Pl ase indicate whether the St i i Y

b. If the answer to 1 (a) is yes, then please indicate what criteria have been adopted in this identification. (for example Kerala model)

List of BPL families is forwarded by Divisional Commissioners office to MCF

c. Ple se indicate the number of individuals/ families that have been identified as BPL - 1,32,424 (Population living in slums, please indicate the BP

d. aintained by ULB/ different departme the State? What is the overlap of BPL m ese lists?

he ed by Divisional Commissioners office

a L Population)

Please indicate how many BPL lists of the Urban Poor are being m nts of fa ilies among th

T re is only one list prepar

e. Please indicate the percentage of households living in squatter settlements/ te porary structures -

f. Please indicate the percentage of households living in squatter settlements/ tem

i. Municipal water supply - about 20%

ii. Sanitation -

m

a Sewer About 50 %

porary structures without access to :

b Drainage About 50 % c Community Toilets About 50 % d Solid Waste Management NIL

iii. Primary education NIL

iv. Primary Health NIL

161


g. Please indicate if there is any internal earmarking within the municipal budget. Please provide the total amount earmarked and the percentage of the total budget in the last 3 years.

unt Budgeted- Rs. Crores Actual Amount Spent- Rs. Crores % of the total budget Year Amo2002-2003 No 2003-2004 No 2004-2005 No.

By 2008-09, MCF propose to allocate at least 15-20% of budget for urban poor

II TIMELINE FOR ACTION ON REFORMS a The State/ULB must formulate and adopt an overarching, comprehensive policy on providing basis services for the Urban Poor which should include

security of tenure at affordable prices, improved housing, water supply and sanitation. Delivery of other existing universal se ent marking in municipal within 6-9 months of

signing of MOA under JNNURM and a copy submitted to MOUD/EPEA

Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7

rvices of the governmfor education, health and social security should be ensured. This policy document must include the minimum budgetary earbudgets for the provision of these budgets (Note: This policy document should involve stakeholder participation and be released

Year 1

08 09 10 11 12 2005-06 2006-07 2007- 2008- 2009- 2010- 2011-

b Defining criteria for identification of urban poor As per State government directive Fresh enum

c eration based on the above

Define threshold service levels for the Urban Poor across various d services

Strategic document which outlines the requirements both physical and

e finan al ntation strat e output

any

ci , timeframes, sources of funding and impleme

egies Including community participation, monitor ablindicators for each of the services, including outlining convergences, if

(Already under

progress

f Periodic im ct ev dent agencies apState Government No pa aluation by indepen pointed by the

g Any g undertaken specify other reform steps bein ( )

162


6 – CITY PLANNING FUNCTIONS

SIRED OBJECTIVES: DE

Note: JNNwith “city p

URM requires certain reforms to be undertaken by states/ cities in the area of city associate elected ULBs lanning functions”. Over a period of seven years, th Mission aims to ensure that all special agencies that deliver civil services in urban areas to ansferred a d accountability platforms are created for all urban service providers in transition.

I CURRENT STATUS

a. Please indicate whether the ULB has ) Yes No

planning, with an objective to assign ore

ULBs are tr n

been associated with city planning functions. (Town Planning Department is also involved to an extent

parastatal has been involved with city planning, please indicate whether it has been involved with the formulation of the City Development Plan. P), - The views of HUDA /PHED and other agencies have been taken Yes No

b. If a (CD

c. Please indicate whether the master plan / CDP have been approved by the m / ULB. Yes unicipality No

d. ance ittee (MPC)/ District Pl mittee. (Not ap e No Please indicate whether the city planning has been in accord with the Metropolitan Planning Comm anning Com

plicable for MCF) Y s

e. Please state which agency is responsible for the provision of water supply

ase state which agency is responsible for the provision of public transpo

ase state which agency is responsible for the provision of Solid nt (SWM) services II a olution by Government expressing commitment to transferring responsibility of municipal services to the ULBs. (Note: This can

be done by way of unbundling of services. e.g. parastatals or others may operate, maintain, even own and collect user charges for the production and acc table to U Bs. Service levels sh uld be fix d by ULBs. The ULBs shall

y of services at the defined level by the service provider/s through the mechanism of contractual arrangement. This is consistent with the reform being required in the 74th Amendment)

TIMELINE FOR REFORMS

Res of the delivery

distribution facilities for these municipal services, so long as they areensure the deliver

oun L s o e

and sewerage services MCF

f. Ple rt services Haryana Roadways & Private contractors

g. Ple Waste Manageme MCF

163



Note : Master Plan / CDP can be prepared by professional body but in

b consultation and requires finalis no, please indicate a tim

approval of ULB. If the answer to (1-d) eline of when the city planning will be in

accordance with MPC/ DPC.

Please fill in the timeline for the following functions in months / years :

Not Applicable to MCF

c

Function Gov. Resolution Cabinet Amendment of State / Implementation Approval Municipalities Act

planning It is already an MCF function City

Water Supply & Sewerage It is already an MCF function

Public Transport Not under MCF

Solid Waste Management It is already an MCF function

It is already an MCF function Others (Fire, Street lighting

Year 1 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7Year 2 Year 3 2005-06 6 0 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-1200 -07 2 07-08 2

d to specify). Any other reform steps being undertaken (please use additional space

164


7-CHECK LIST OF REFORMS FOR THE URBAN POOR

Provision of basic services to the poor, including security of tenure at affordable prices, improved housing, water supply, sanitation and ensuring delivery of ther existing universal services of the Government for education, health and social security.

HOUSING

o

I an At the beginning of the Mission period, has the City Development Pl

for urban poor? made a total inventory of housing stock available No

Is there any formal housing available for urban poor such as EWS/LIG/ assified as a ‘slum’? If yes, what percentage of the total housing stock does it comprise? What percentage of the total housing stock is

II resettlement housing NOT cl Yes III 5% IV classified as ‘slum’ by the urban local body? 40% V What percentage of the total housing stock is classified as squatter, i.e., not recognizable as slums or legal

ements/settlements? 5%

tenVI What has been the growth rate of housing stock classified as slum and squatter (in percentage) in the overall

g stock (a) annually ecen ially (4 decades average) (a) 10% (b) NA

growth of total housin over the last decade, and (b) d n

VII Of this, has the City Developm acceptable housing stock, i.e., that which requires replacement? f slum e rel cated are about 15,,000 as they are on critical locations

Yes ent Plan identified all unThe total number o tenements which needs to b o

a Does the unacceptable stock include all structures in squatter settlements? indicate percent ceptable stock?

Yes 5% If yes, age in total unac

If yes, indicate age in total unacceptable stock

es, indicate percentage in total unacceptable stock?VIII At the beginning of the Mission period, has the City Devel ent Plan m de a total estimate of required housing stock for

the urban poor within the CDP perspective period, including new stock as well as replacement stock? No opm a

b Does the unacceptable stock include dilapidated/unsafe structures inside slums? percent ?

Yes 95%

c Does the unacceptable stock include temporary (kutccha) structures inside slums? If y

Yes 60%

IX What is the housing stock production capacity required to meet the housin or or? e in nnu,000 units per annum are the housing stock under JNNURM(over a p 5

15 B

g need feriod of

urban poyears).

Indicat units/a m 3

3000/annum000), H

(Total is also H

involved Assuming that a multitude of agencies are capable of provieach:

X ding housing stock for urban poor, list the required capacities of

a Own capacity (if ULB is engaged in creation/replacement of housing stock) 15,000 under JNNURM b Development Authority - c Housing Board - d Slum Clearance Board - e Other public agency (including institutional/industrial housing) -

165


f Cooperative model (plotted/flatted) - g Private sector (plotted/flatted) - h Other -

How has the provision of housing stock for the urban poor been phased over Mission period keeping the need rate constant

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 YearUnder JNNURM by MCF

3800 2600 4000

ha section indicates period when such data shall be complied into the GIS-enabled MIS infrastructure.

AN AND BUILDING TENURE he ULB employ any method of assembling land for housing the urban poor, which can be used to subsidize capital costs of tD s t enements for the urban

p (soeoor uch as land bank, pooling, TDR or plot reconstitution)? If so, please state below:

125 acres is available with MCF, no additional land acquisition is required

Does LB have any taxable/tax saving bonds or capital market instrume amoassets? o, please state below:

NO

How is

1

the ing stock requirement for urban poor proposed to be met?

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-

requirement of land for meeting new/replacement hous

Year 10 2010-1 2011-12 and requirement 125 acres is available with MCF, no additional land acquisition is requi

ve e subsidy in pricing of housing (%

NA NA NA NA NA NA

ot ubsidy is provided.

3800

S ded

L D

the U nt which it can use/has used to provide housing for urban poor, ngst other If s

L(hectares)

red

A rag)

NA

N e: No s

166


I Is th ure of an occupant over a tenement? The r MCF decides the same.

e ULB responsible for defining tenunde Competent Authority (Slums)

Yes

What kinds of tenure is ratified by No

II the ULB as regards housing in slums/resettlement areas/housing for urban poor? Ownership through sale Ownership through hereditary title transfer No Leasehold agreem housing vent from endor Yes Tenancy under Rent Control/Rent Act No Transfer under Power of Attorney NA III Is registration of title necessary on: (a) hereditary transfer/natural succession Yes

NA (b) Power of Attorney IV Does the ULB employ an apartment ownership act for buildings with more than one tenement? No V Does the State offer any concession on Stamp Duty for property acquired by an urban poor household? Yes VI Does the ULB provide preference to women to be the primary title holder of a land/tenement awarded under a State/Central

housing scheme? Yes

VII Is prior clearance of the ULB required for selling/transferring a tenement acquired under a slum improvement scheme, if the tenure has been awarded di

Yes rectly by the ULB (first allottee)?

WATER I What percentage of the households living within slums receives less than the stipulated supply? 60% II What percentage of the households living within slums is dependent on piped water supply… 30% For over 80% of their needs? 100% For between 60% to 80% of their needs? NA For between 40% to 60% of their needs? NA For less than 40% of their needs? NA Are not connected at all? NA III What percentage of holds livi slums is dependent on private tankers? the house ng within 10% IV What percentage of the households living wi NIL thin slums is dependent on private bore wells? V Of the total estimated water demand from the entire slum area of the city, what percentage is provisioned through municipal 30%

supply? VI What is the estimated T&D loss (in percentage)? 35% VII What is the expected per capita capital cost for providing water supply to the entire projected urban poor population? Rs.800 VIII What is the O&M cost per kiloliter that is proposed to be recovered from the urban poor? Rs. 2.50 per kiloliter at

the consumers end

167


Keepin rked for the Mission period:

Year 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 Total

g in mind the design and supply thresholds, please indicate the targets earma

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08Populati on * Design Supply (LP

135 Threshold CD)

Shaded se be complied into the GIS-enabled MIS infrastructure.

NIT

ction indicates period when such data shall

SA ATION I W living within slums is chat percentage of the households onnected to sewerage? 0% 3I What percentage of the households living within slums has individual/septic tanks? 3II What percentage of the households living within slums discharge sewage into open drains? 40V What percentage of the households living within slums has individual toilets? 40

V What percentage of the households living within slums has shared toilets? 5% VI What percentage of the households living within slums does not a have toilet at all? 25% VII What is the expected per capita capital cost for providing a sewer link to the entire projected urban poor population? Rs.6

Is any O&M cost proposed to be recovered from the urban poor?

I 0% I % I %

00 VIII Rs. 250 per slum

per annum IX Is any EDC (External Development Charge) proposed to be levied for uplink to trunk sewage sy

If so, how much? Indicate in Rupees/WC/month or flat rate/household/month stems? o

N

X For households without access to an owned toilet, does the ULB propose to sensitize the people about good hygiene practices? s Ye

of provisioning is proposed in the next s erage network with standard d

2005-06 TotaOnPo

ly pula

oftion

Uncovered 0% 26% 26% 18% 16% 16% 100%

What k s to individ ilets?

Year

ind of provisioning would be required in the next seven years in terms of seats to accommodate the population without acces ual to

Population No. of Seats (men) 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 100% No. of Seats (women) 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 100%

100%

What kind even years in terms of coverage of the entire urban poor population by a sewisposal?

Year 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 l

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 Total 15% 25% 25% 25% 10% 100%

Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Shaded section indicates period when such data shall be complied into the GIS-enabled MIS infrastructure.

168


SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT I What is the expected output in MT from of the c ng urban

olid waste genera ums is 200g to 250g per capitaMT to 44 Mthe areas ity housi poor?

The s ted by sl per day. Total generation of city is about 480 tons 30 T per

day II What percentage of the to al solid waste g nerated by the city originates from slum areas? 30% t eIII What is the waste profile n terms of (at city level, as no separate study was conducted particular to slums) i Organic kitchen waste 60-70% Sharps 8-10% Inert matter 2.5-4.0% Inorganic/ 4-7%

plastics Hazardous waste including medical/chemical 0.5-1.0% IV l through landfill? Same level

100%) What percentage of waste generated from the areas housing the urban poor requires disposa as city

(V Is this more or less than 50% of the total waste generated from urban poor households? Less VI ? Yes Are there adequate landfill sites to accommodate this waste over a period of 20 years Are the landfill sites planned and designed accordingly (with liner, leachate removal and LFG extraction)? Yes What is the average projected life of one hectare of landfill site as

per: (a) present estimates (b)estimated after implementing waste

management techniques

20 years 30 years

VII Is the ULB considering any alternative to disposal through landfill sites? Yes, Verm post, i comSeggregation at

collection points itself VIII Does the ULB employ any method of segregation at source? Initiated, 100% by

2009-10 IX Does the ULB h ec o m segreg e (inclu

rs) o unization and or the wor s?

e ave anyag picke

proposed/existing mes this

hanism finclude occupational security

r involving the com unity to ate wastm

ding rehabilitation of rhealth check ups) f

? Dker

(use of gloves, masks, routine imInitiated, propose to

involv NGOs

X What is the per capita cost of managing (collection, transport and disposal) solid waste in the city? Rs.118 per capita/annum

Of this, how muc buted in h is distri, if per capita cost is Rs. 10/- per m

to: onth, (Say how is this divided into the following sectors):

Collection (including manpower) 60% Segregation at source (including manpower) 10% Transport (including manpower) 15% Disposal (including manpower, proportional cost of landfill site or disposal mechanism) 15%

169


XI Does the ULB have any predefined/proposed sites for vermi composting? At ward level No At colony level Yes

At city level No XII Does the ULB have any resources for: Waste incinerators (also include any privately owned units that may be used by the ULB) No Rendering units for visceral waste (also include any privately owned units that may be used by the ULB) Yes Medical waste sterilization units (also include any privately owned units that may be used by the ULB) No

Does the pose to have any legislative measures (existing or proposed) in order to minimize waste generation over the perspective period of the CDP such as r te generating units or imposing volume penalty on waste generation)? Please state as below

ULB pro( estricting use of plastics, clustering use of was :

Yes

Does th generated will be disposed through landfill sites? Yes

f YES

e ULB commit to adhering to the CPHEEO norm that not more than 50% of solid waste

I , state the measures that the ULB proposes to take to adhere to this norm:

CONVERGENCE Does the ULB commit to converge all the schemes pertaining to provision of housing, water supply, sanitation and solid waste ma

r t of the Mission period? nagement, undertaken

unde he sub-Mission ‘Basic Services to the Urban Poor’ by the end

Yes

he ULB commit to converge (m along with the above mentioned projects pertaining to housing, water supply, sanitation and solid waste m he Mission

100% coverage of urban poor population in fined

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 Total

170

Does t ake concurrent or co-terminus) all the schemes pertaining to provision of primary education, healthcare and social security anagement by the end of tperiod?

Yes

Assuming the city by the end of the Mission period, please state relative coverage plan for the sectors debelow:

Year


HousinNNURM

g (MCF under J )

ply 00%

Sanitation 100%

te Management 0%

ducation

100% 100%

Water Sup 100% 1

100%

Solid Was 100% 10

Primary E GoH

Healthcare GoH

Social Security (Insurance) GoH

Shaded section indicates period when such data shall be complied into the GIS-enabled MIS infrastructure.

PHASING AND IMPLEMENTATION OF REFORMS UNDER BASIC SERVICES TO THE URBAN POOR

1. Data requested above shall be compiled and presented as part of the GIS-enabled MIS infrastructure by March 31, 2008 and the yearly targets to be 001-12.

2. The above targets are desired to be adhered to, but ULBs shall have the flexibility to fix annual delivery targets in a phased manner. However, 100% coverage is desirable by end of the Mission period, i.e., March 31, 2012.

set for achieving 100% coverage by the end of the Mission period, i.e., 2

171

faridabadCDP

Documents

eminent sufi

anil mehta

anil batra

ns chauhan

sc pundir

lr virmani

dk soni mr

rajesh nanda