Top Banner
NUMI Far Detector Performance and Calibration J. Musser Indiana University Minneapolis, July 2002
29

Far Detector Performance and Calibration

Jan 18, 2016

Download

Documents

dacia

Far Detector Performance and Calibration. J. Musser Indiana University Minneapolis, July 2002. Summary. roughly 200 ‘plane trigger’ runs available for analysis in March-July time period. A small number of cabling errors have been ‘fixed’ in the plex, reprocessing complete (at IU) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Far Detector Performance and Calibration

NUMI

Far Detector Performance and Calibration

J. Musser

Indiana University

Minneapolis, July 2002

Page 2: Far Detector Performance and Calibration

NUMI

Summary

• roughly 200 ‘plane trigger’ runs available for analysis in March-July time period.

• A small number of cabling errors have been ‘fixed’ in the plex, reprocessing complete (at IU)

– Improvement in time resolution: ~ 5% velocity resolution now observed.

• Primary Data Analysis/Reconstruction Activities

– Calibration Constant Refinement/Stability Studies

– Demultiplexing Optimization

– Detector Aligmment Studies

– Up-going Muon Searches

– Contained Event Analyses

• The Future

Page 3: Far Detector Performance and Calibration

NUMI

Calibrations (1) Timing

• T0s: Independent determination by Lee, Musser, Rebel,Tardiff.

• Timewalk: Independent determination by Lee, Musser.

• Studies indicate that calibrations hold at better than 1 ns over the March-July time period.

• Calibration quality is sufficiently good at this time to consider batch data processing and production of DSTs.

Page 4: Far Detector Performance and Calibration

NUMI

T0 Calibration

T0s vs Channel-15 ns < T0 < 15 ns

Strip MeantimeTiming Residualns

L/R strip timing vs track positionpredicts 2.2 ns.

Page 5: Far Detector Performance and Calibration

NUMI

TimeWalk Calibration

Pulse-height dependent tail on time residuals - correctableby time walk correction.

Page 6: Far Detector Performance and Calibration

NUMI

Time Walk CorrectionM

ean

Tim

e R

esid

ual (

ns)

ADC

T' = T - C1/(C2+ADC^1.2)

Page 7: Far Detector Performance and Calibration

NUMI

T0 Stability

T0 differences between two data setsseparated by 2 months.

Page 8: Far Detector Performance and Calibration

NUMI

T0 Stability (2)

Stability is better than 1 ns over this period. However, some statistically significant differences are seen.

Page 9: Far Detector Performance and Calibration

NUMI

Velocity Resolution/Stability

Average muon 1/vs run, from March to the present. Average is stable to much better than 1%.

Average 1/ RMS vs run, from March to the present. RMS is stableat 8%

Page 10: Far Detector Performance and Calibration

NUMI

Calibrations (2) Pulse Height

• Strip Attenuation (mapper data)

• Inter-strip Normalization Using Muons

• Stopping Muons Inter-Detector Normalization

Page 11: Far Detector Performance and Calibration

NUMI

Muon Pulse Height Distribution

Blue: RawGreen: Clear Fiber Atten.Yellow: Strip Atten.Red: Path Length.Black: Inter-Strip Norm.

Far Detector Data - Single End

Page 12: Far Detector Performance and Calibration

NUMI

Inter-Strip Normalization

# Events Usedin Calibration vs Plane

Inter-StripNormalizationFactorDistribution

(23% strip-stripgain variations)

Page 13: Far Detector Performance and Calibration

NUMI

Inter-Strip Normalization

Mean Resp.vs Plane

Raw

Mean Resp.vs Plane

Corrected

Page 14: Far Detector Performance and Calibration

NUMI

Time Stability of Strip Response*PMT Gain

Restricted to first 120 planes (those planes instrumentedfor entire period under consideration (March 15-July 1)

Response is stable to better than 1%

Page 15: Far Detector Performance and Calibration

NUMI

Stopping Muon Calibration

Page 16: Far Detector Performance and Calibration

NUMI

Demuxing Optimization

• Optimization of ‘IU’ demuxer is ongoing, all pathological events sent to B. Rebel.

• UMN group is working on an alternative demuxer, based on ‘global’ event analysis (rather than event swimming, as in IU code) Status will be reported in this meeting.

Page 17: Far Detector Performance and Calibration

NUMI

Detector Alignment

• SM1 will be energized in the near future. This makes detector alignment studies very timely. There is now a group of people actively working on this. Results will be presented by Nelson, Lee, Boehnlein, Becker, and Viren at this meeting.

Page 18: Far Detector Performance and Calibration

NUMI

Alignment Using Muons (Post Nicolai)

Work Presented in 6/02 by R. Lee

Single Strip Tracking Uncertainty is ~ 2.3 mm.

Page 19: Far Detector Performance and Calibration

NUMI

Alignment (2)

Residual vs Plane - Outlier Planes Identified (some associated with cabling errors)

Page 20: Far Detector Performance and Calibration

NUMI

Upgoing Muons

• Searches for upgoing muons being conducted by Rebel, Musser, Lee, and Tardiff.

• ~ 6 candidate events (in my analysis)

• Data from March to July 1 now processed.

Page 21: Far Detector Performance and Calibration

NUMI

Muon Velocity Distribution

Page 22: Far Detector Performance and Calibration

NUMI

Candidate Events

Run Snarl # PlanesUsed

x (m) L (m)

3281(Roy)

2621 15 0.45 0.34 3.0

4408 1804 35 0.56 0.39 3.4

4428 4007 36 0.97 0.35 2.7

4434 1809 14 0.36 0.25 3.4

4436(Brian 1)

424 42 0.39 0.29 5.5

5378(Brian 2)

14383 108 0.70 0.41 9.5

Page 23: Far Detector Performance and Calibration

NUMI

Horizontal Muon

Page 24: Far Detector Performance and Calibration

NUMI

Fully ContainedUp-going Event

Page 25: Far Detector Performance and Calibration

NUMI

Contained Events

• Most of this work is being conducted by Roy in conjunction with veto shield study.

• Expect ~ 0.7 fully contained, reconstructed events in this data set.

Page 26: Far Detector Performance and Calibration

NUMI

Contained Event Candidate

Page 27: Far Detector Performance and Calibration

NUMI

Contained Event Candidate 2

Page 28: Far Detector Performance and Calibration

NUMI

Angular Distributions - Signal & Background

Page 29: Far Detector Performance and Calibration

NUMI

The Future

• The state of calibrations and reconstruction is consistent with moving towards batch processing of data, and generation of DSTs.

• Broader participation in reconstruction and analysis is highly desirable. The following steps will be taken to assist in this - thoughts on how we can do better are appreciated:

– Maintainance of a ‘needed task list’ on MINOS web site.

– Improve documentation for reconstruction software.

– Begin batch data processing, making DSTs available to general users.