Collberg TCE COMPARISON REPORT 30823-01 1/31/2012 Comparative Programming LEC 001 372 CSC Christian S Fall-11 - 5,550 45 3,261 C_SCALUH Enrollment: Sections: huge class, 60 or more enrolled Comp Group 2: CSC Upper Division Undergraduate Comp Group 1: 5 or more enrolled Sections: 127 C_SCALU0 Enrollment: (62%) Response: 53 Enrollment : 85 Instructor Question / Instructor Frequency Mean 95% CI 95% CI Mean 95% CI Dev. St. Mean Comparison Group Descriptions Lecture, Seminars, Colloquia Fall and Spring 1 . - 4.24 4.66 4.1 4.05 - 3.86 4.13 - 4.22 4.0 4.5 0.77 Overall rating of teaching effectiveness 0 0 9 11 33 62% 0% 0% 21% 17% almost never effective rarely effective sometimes effective usually effective almost always effective 2 . - 3.84 4.39 3.8 3.76 - 3.56 3.84 - 3.92 3.7 4.1 1.01 Overall rating of the course 7 0 3 20 23 43% 0% 13% 38% 6% one of the worst worse than average about average better than average one of the best 3 . - 3.80 4.28 4.0 3.90 - 3.78 4.04 - 4.05 3.9 4.0 0.88 Amount learned 2 0 13 19 19 36% 0% 4% 36% 25% almost nothing less than usual about as much as usual more than usual an exceptional amount 4 . - 3.88 4.46 3.8 3.71 - 3.49 3.82 - 3.90 3.7 4.2 1.05 Overall instructor comparison 7 0 4 15 27 51% 0% 13% 28% 8% one of the least effective less effective than most about as effective as most more effective than most one of the most effective 8 . - 4.33 4.76 4.7 4.62 - 4.50 4.61 - 4.70 4.6 4.5 0.80 Students treated with respect 2 0 4 10 37 70% 0% 4% 19% 8% strongly disagree disagree uncertain agree strongly agree 10 . - 4.14 4.70 4.1 4.06 - 3.95 4.15 - 4.20 4.0 4.4 0.86 Value of time spent on course 2 0 3 10 23 61% 0% 5% 26% 8% almost none valuable less than half valuable about half valuable more than half valuable almost all valuable 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 1 2 3 4 8 10 1 2 3 4 8 10 For each QUESTION: Instructor L, M, U; Group 1 L,M,U; Group 2 L,M,U L - Low CI, M - MEAN, U - Upper CI Graphic Comparison of the Means and Confidence Intervals Questions University of Arizona. OIRPS. (520) 621-9585. [email protected]. http://oirps.arizona.edu (Que Eva:120) 432
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Collberg TCE COMPARISON REPORT
30823-01
1/31/2012
Comparative ProgrammingLEC001372CSCChristian S
Fall-11
-
5,550 45 3,261
C_SCALUH
Enrollment: Sections:
huge class, 60 or more enrolled
Comp Group 2:
CSC
Upper Division Undergraduate
Comp Group 1:
5 or more enrolled
Sections: 127
C_SCALU0
Enrollment:
(62%)Response: 53
Enrollment : 85
Instructor
Question / Instructor Frequency
Mean 95% CI 95% CIMean95% CIDev. St. Mean
Comparison Group Descriptions
Lecture, Seminars, Colloquia
Fall and Spring
1. - 4.24 4.66 4.1 4.05 - 3.86 4.13- 4.22 4.0 4.5 0.77Overall rating of teaching effectiveness
0 0
9 11 33 62%
0% 0%
21% 17%
almost never effectiverarely effectivesometimes effectiveusually effectivealmost always effective
2. - 3.84 4.39 3.8 3.76 - 3.56 3.84- 3.92 3.7 4.1 1.01Overall rating of the course
7 0
3 20 23 43%
0% 13%
38% 6%
one of the worstworse than averageabout averagebetter than averageone of the best
3. - 3.80 4.28 4.0 3.90 - 3.78 4.04- 4.05 3.9 4.0 0.88Amount learned
2 0
13 19 19 36%
0% 4%
36% 25%
almost nothingless than usualabout as much as usualmore than usualan exceptional amount
4. - 3.88 4.46 3.8 3.71 - 3.49 3.82- 3.90 3.7 4.2 1.05Overall instructor comparison
7 0
4 15 27 51%
0% 13%
28% 8%
one of the least effectiveless effective than mostabout as effective as mostmore effective than mostone of the most effective
8. - 4.33 4.76 4.7 4.62 - 4.50 4.61- 4.70 4.6 4.5 0.80Students treated with respect
2 0
4 10 37 70%
0% 4%
19% 8%
strongly disagreedisagreeuncertainagreestrongly agree
10. - 4.14 4.70 4.1 4.06 - 3.95 4.15- 4.20 4.0 4.4 0.86Value of time spent on course
2 0
3 10 23 61%
0% 5%
26% 8%
almost none valuableless than half valuableabout half valuablemore than half valuablealmost all valuable
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
1
2
3
4
8
10
1
2
3
4
8
10
For each QUESTION: Instructor L, M, U; Group 1 L,M,U; Group 2 L,M,U
L -
Lo
w C
I, M
- M
EA
N,
U -
Up
per
CI
Graphic Comparison of the Means and Confidence Intervals
Questions
University of Arizona. OIRPS. (520) 621-9585. [email protected]. http://oirps.arizona.edu (Que Eva:120)432
Collberg TCE COMPARISON REPORT
30824-01
1/31/2012
Comparative ProgrammingLEC002372CSCChristian S
Fall-11
-
5,550 36 319
C_SCALUS
Enrollment: Sections:
small class, fewer than 20 enrolled
Comp Group 2:
CSC
Upper Division Undergraduate
Comp Group 1:
5 or more enrolled
Sections: 127
C_SCALU0
Enrollment:
(83%)Response: 5
Enrollment : 6
Instructor
Question / Instructor Frequency
Mean 95% CI 95% CIMean95% CIDev. St. Mean
Comparison Group Descriptions
Lecture, Seminars, Colloquia
Fall and Spring
1. - 4.06 5.00 4.1 4.05 - 4.19 4.46- 4.22 4.3 4.6 0.55Overall rating of teaching effectiveness
0 0
0 2 3 60%
0% 0%
40% 0%
almost never effectiverarely effectivesometimes effectiveusually effectivealmost always effective
2. - 3.02 4.98 3.8 3.76 - 3.85 4.11- 3.92 4.0 4.0 1.00Overall rating of the course
0 0
2 1 2 40%
0% 0%
20% 40%
one of the worstworse than averageabout averagebetter than averageone of the best
3. - 3.76 4.64 4.0 3.90 - 3.92 4.16- 4.05 4.0 4.2 0.45Amount learned
0 0
0 4 1 20%
0% 0%
80% 0%
almost nothingless than usualabout as much as usualmore than usualan exceptional amount
4. - 3.06 4.14 3.8 3.71 - 3.86 4.16- 3.90 4.0 3.6 0.55Overall instructor comparison
0 0
2 3 0 0%
0% 0%
60% 40%
one of the least effectiveless effective than mostabout as effective as mostmore effective than mostone of the most effective
8. - 4.36 5.00 4.7 4.62 - 4.73 4.87- 4.70 4.8 4.8 0.45Students treated with respect
0 0
0 1 4 80%
0% 0%
20% 0%
strongly disagreedisagreeuncertainagreestrongly agree
10. - 3.17 5.00 4.1 4.06 - 4.23 4.46- 4.20 4.3 4.3 0.96Value of time spent on course
0 0
1 1 2 50%
0% 0%
25% 25%
almost none valuableless than half valuableabout half valuablemore than half valuablealmost all valuable
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
1
2
3
4
8
10
1
2
3
4
8
10
For each QUESTION: Instructor L, M, U; Group 1 L,M,U; Group 2 L,M,U
L -
Lo
w C
I, M
- M
EA
N,
U -
Up
per
CI
Graphic Comparison of the Means and Confidence Intervals
Questions
University of Arizona. OIRPS. (520) 621-9585. [email protected]. http://oirps.arizona.edu (Que Eva:120)432
Collberg TCE COMPARISON REPORT
36236-01
1/31/2012
Principles of CompilatiLEC001553CSCChristian S
Spring-11
-
1,307 Enrollment: Sections:
Comp Group 2:
CSC
Graduate
Comp Group 1:
5 or more enrolled
Sections: 79
C_SCALG0
Enrollment:
(90%)Response: 9
Enrollment : 10
Instructor
Question / Instructor Frequency
Mean 95% CI 95% CIMean95% CIDev. St. Mean
Comparison Group Descriptions
Lecture, Seminars, Colloquia
Fall and Spring
1. - 3.92 4.53 4.3 4.27 -- 4.43 4.2 0.44Overall rating of teaching effectiveness
0 0
0 7 2 22%
0% 0%
78% 0%
almost never effectiverarely effectivesometimes effectiveusually effectivealmost always effective
2. - 3.69 4.53 4.1 4.00 -- 4.17 4.1 0.60Overall rating of the course
0 0
1 6 2 22%
0% 0%
67% 11%
one of the worstworse than averageabout averagebetter than averageone of the best
3. - 3.18 4.16 4.0 3.95 -- 4.12 3.7 0.71Amount learned
0 0
4 4 1 11%
0% 0%
44% 44%
almost nothingless than usualabout as much as usualmore than usualan exceptional amount
4. - 3.32 4.24 4.0 3.85 -- 4.09 3.8 0.67Overall instructor comparison
0 0
3 5 1 11%
0% 0%
56% 33%
one of the least effectiveless effective than mostabout as effective as mostmore effective than mostone of the most effective
5. - 3.99 4.68 4.3 4.17 -- 4.34 4.3 0.50Usefulness of the in-class activities
0 0
0 6 3 33%
0% 0%
67% 0%
almost never usefulrarely usefulsometimes usefulusually usefulalmost always useful
6. - 4.05 5.00 4.3 4.27 -- 4.42 4.6 0.73Usefulness of the outside assignments
0 0
1 2 6 67%
0% 0%
22% 11%
almost never usefulrarely usefulsometimes usefulusually usefulalmost always useful
7. - 4.08 4.81 4.3 4.19 -- 4.34 4.4 0.53Usefulness of course materials (new question)
0 0
0 5 4 44%
0% 0%
56% 0%
almost never usefulrarely usefulsometimes usefulusually usefulalmost always useful
8. - 4.66 5.00 4.7 4.65 -- 4.75 4.9 0.33Students treated with respect
0 0
0 1 8 89%
0% 0%
11% 0%
strongly disagreedisagreeuncertainagreestrongly agree
9. - 3.57 4.65 3.7 3.64 -- 3.82 4.1 0.78Difficulty level of the course (new order)
0 0
2 4 3 33%
0% 0%
44% 22%
extremely easyeasier than averageabout averagemore difficult than averageextremely difficult
10. - 3.76 4.68 4.3 4.26 -- 4.39 4.2 0.67Value of time spent on course
0 0
1 5 3 33%
0% 0%
56% 11%
almost none valuableless than half valuableabout half valuablemore than half valuablealmost all valuable
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
For each QUESTION: Instructor L, M, U; Group 1 L,M,U; Group 2 L,M,U
L -
Lo
w C
I, M
- M
EA
N,
U -
Up
per
CI
Graphic Comparison of the Means and Confidence Intervals
Questions
University of Arizona. OIRPS. (520) 621-9585. [email protected]. http://oirps.arizona.edu (Que Eva:120)232
Collberg TCE COMPARISON REPORT
14876-01
1/31/2012
Comparative ProgrammingLEC001372CSCChristian S
Fall-10
-
5,550 45 3,261
C_SCALUH
Enrollment: Sections:
huge class, 60 or more enrolled
Comp Group 2:
CSC
Upper Division Undergraduate
Comp Group 1:
5 or more enrolled
Sections: 127
C_SCALU0
Enrollment:
(59%)Response: 42
Enrollment : 70
Instructor
Question / Instructor Frequency
Mean 95% CI 95% CIMean95% CIDev. St. Mean
Comparison Group Descriptions
Lecture, Seminars, Colloquia
Fall and Spring
1. - 4.01 4.41 4.1 4.05 - 3.86 4.13- 4.22 4.0 4.2 0.67Overall rating of teaching effectiveness
0 0
6 21 15 36%
0% 0%
50% 14%
almost never effectiverarely effectivesometimes effectiveusually effectivealmost always effective
2. - 3.69 4.26 3.8 3.76 - 3.56 3.84- 3.92 3.7 4.0 0.94Overall rating of the course
2 0
12 12 16 38%
0% 5%
29% 29%
one of the worstworse than averageabout averagebetter than averageone of the best
3. - 4.03 4.49 4.0 3.90 - 3.78 4.04- 4.05 3.9 4.3 0.76Amount learned
1 0
5 18 18 43%
0% 2%
43% 12%
almost nothingless than usualabout as much as usualmore than usualan exceptional amount
4. - 3.54 3.99 3.8 3.71 - 3.49 3.82- 3.90 3.7 3.8 0.75Overall instructor comparison
1 0
15 19
7 17%
0% 2%
45% 36%
one of the least effectiveless effective than mostabout as effective as mostmore effective than mostone of the most effective
5. - 3.66 4.20 4.0 3.87 - 3.68 3.96- 4.04 3.8 3.9 0.88Usefulness of the in-class activities
3 0
8 19 12 29%
0% 7%
45% 19%
almost never usefulrarely usefulsometimes usefulusually usefulalmost always useful
6. - 4.38 4.76 4.3 4.19 - 4.13 4.31- 4.32 4.2 4.6 0.63Usefulness of the outside assignments
0 0
2 12 27 64%
0% 0%
29% 5%
almost never usefulrarely usefulsometimes usefulusually usefulalmost always useful
7. - 3.47 4.17 3.8 3.76 - 3.54 3.76- 3.91 3.7 3.8 1.10Usefulness of course materials (new question)
2 2
9 14 12 29%
5% 5%
33% 21%
almost never usefulrarely usefulsometimes usefulusually usefulalmost always useful
8. - 4.25 4.73 4.7 4.62 - 4.50 4.61- 4.70 4.6 4.5 0.80Students treated with respect
2 0
2 12 26 62%
0% 5%
29% 5%
strongly disagreedisagreeuncertainagreestrongly agree
9. - 3.38 3.78 3.9 3.80 - 3.75 3.98- 3.95 3.9 3.6 0.66Difficulty level of the course (new order)
0 0
22 16
4 10%
0% 0%
38% 52%
extremely easyeasier than averageabout averagemore difficult than averageextremely difficult
10. - 3.98 4.49 4.1 4.06 - 3.95 4.15- 4.20 4.0 4.2 0.84Value of time spent on course
1 0
7 14 20 48%
0% 2%
33% 17%
almost none valuableless than half valuableabout half valuablemore than half valuablealmost all valuable
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
For each QUESTION: Instructor L, M, U; Group 1 L,M,U; Group 2 L,M,U
L -
Lo
w C
I, M
- M
EA
N,
U -
Up
per
CI
Graphic Comparison of the Means and Confidence Intervals
Questions
University of Arizona. OIRPS. (520) 621-9585. [email protected]. http://oirps.arizona.edu (Que Eva:120)232
Collberg TCE COMPARISON REPORT
15549-01
1/31/2012
COMPAR PROGRAMMING LANGLEC001372C SCChristian S
Fall-09
-
5,550 45 3,261
C_SCALUH
Enrollment: Sections:
huge class, 60 or more enrolled
Comp Group 2:
C SC
Upper Division Undergraduate
Comp Group 1:
5 or more enrolled
Sections: 127
C_SCALU0
Enrollment:
(38%)Response: 26
Enrollment : 67
Instructor
Question / Instructor Frequency
Mean 95% CI 95% CIMean95% CIDev. St. Mean
Comparison Group Descriptions
Lecture, Seminars, Colloquia
Fall and Spring
1. - 4.18 4.74 4.1 4.05 - 3.86 4.13- 4.22 4.0 4.5 0.71Overall rating of teaching effectiveness
0 0
3 8
15 58%
0% 0%
31% 12%
almost never effectiverarely effectivesometimes effectiveusually effectivealmost always effective
2. - 3.81 4.50 3.8 3.76 - 3.56 3.84- 3.92 3.7 4.2 0.88Overall rating of the course
1 0
5 9
11 42%
0% 4%
35% 19%
one of the worstworse than averageabout averagebetter than averageone of the best
3. - 4.37 4.87 4.0 3.90 - 3.78 4.04- 4.05 3.9 4.6 0.64Amount learned
0 0
2 6
18 69%
0% 0%
23% 8%
almost nothingless than usualabout as much as usualmore than usualan exceptional amount
4. - 3.70 4.38 3.8 3.71 - 3.49 3.82- 3.90 3.7 4.0 0.84Overall instructor comparison
1 0
5 11
8 32%
0% 4%
44% 20%
one of the least effectiveless effective than mostabout as effective as mostmore effective than mostone of the most effective
5. - 3.74 4.49 4.0 3.87 - 3.68 3.96- 4.04 3.8 4.1 0.95Usefulness of the in-class activities
2 0
4 9
11 42%
0% 8%
35% 15%
almost never usefulrarely usefulsometimes usefulusually usefulalmost always useful
6. - 4.42 4.81 4.3 4.19 - 4.13 4.31- 4.32 4.2 4.6 0.50Usefulness of the outside assignments
0 0
0 10 16 62%
0% 0%
38% 0%
almost never usefulrarely usefulsometimes usefulusually usefulalmost always useful
7. - 3.45 4.47 3.8 3.76 - 3.54 3.76- 3.91 3.7 4.0 1.22Usefulness of course materials (new question)
0 2
5 6
10 38%
8% 0%
23% 19%
almost never usefulrarely usefulsometimes usefulusually usefulalmost always useful
8. - 4.65 4.97 4.7 4.62 - 4.50 4.61- 4.70 4.6 4.8 0.40Students treated with respect
0 0
0 5
21 81%
0% 0%
19% 0%
strongly disagreedisagreeuncertainagreestrongly agree
9. - 3.40 3.98 3.9 3.80 - 3.75 3.98- 3.95 3.9 3.7 0.74Difficulty level of the course (new order)
1 0
9 13
3 12%
0% 4%
50% 35%
extremely easyeasier than averageabout averagemore difficult than averageextremely difficult
10. - 3.95 4.53 4.1 4.06 - 3.95 4.15- 4.20 4.0 4.2 0.72Value of time spent on course
0 0
4 11 10 40%
0% 0%
44% 16%
almost none valuableless than half valuableabout half valuablemore than half valuablealmost all valuable
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
For each QUESTION: Instructor L, M, U; Group 1 L,M,U; Group 2 L,M,U
L -
Lo
w C
I, M
- M
EA
N,
U -
Up
per
CI
Graphic Comparison of the Means and Confidence Intervals
Questions
University of Arizona. OIRPS. (520) 621-9585. [email protected]. http://oirps.arizona.edu (Que Eva:120)232
Collberg TCE COMPARISON REPORT
15665-01
1/31/2012
COMPILERS+SYSTEMS SFTWRLEC001453C SCChristian S
Fall-09
-
5,550 16 471
C_SCALUM
Enrollment: Sections:
medium class, 20-39 enrolled
Comp Group 2:
C SC
Upper Division Undergraduate
Comp Group 1:
5 or more enrolled
Sections: 127
C_SCALU0
Enrollment:
(36%)Response: 13
Enrollment : 36
Instructor
Question / Instructor Frequency
Mean 95% CI 95% CIMean95% CIDev. St. Mean
Comparison Group Descriptions
Lecture, Seminars, Colloquia
Fall and Spring
1. - 4.02 4.75 4.1 4.05 - 3.97 4.44- 4.22 4.2 4.4 0.65Overall rating of teaching effectiveness
0 0
1 6 6 46%
0% 0%
46% 8%
almost never effectiverarely effectivesometimes effectiveusually effectivealmost always effective
2. - 3.35 4.65 3.8 3.76 - 3.79 4.23- 3.92 4.0 4.0 1.15Overall rating of the course
2 0
2 3 6 46%
0% 15%
23% 15%
one of the worstworse than averageabout averagebetter than averageone of the best
3. - 3.76 4.70 4.0 3.90 - 3.84 4.28- 4.05 4.1 4.2 0.83Amount learned
0 0
3 4 6 46%
0% 0%
31% 23%
almost nothingless than usualabout as much as usualmore than usualan exceptional amount
4. - 3.43 4.57 3.8 3.71 - 3.62 4.12- 3.90 3.9 4.0 1.00Overall instructor comparison
1 0
3 4 5 38%
0% 8%
31% 23%
one of the least effectiveless effective than mostabout as effective as mostmore effective than mostone of the most effective
5. - 3.76 4.70 4.0 3.87 - 3.82 4.30- 4.04 4.1 4.2 0.83Usefulness of the in-class activities
0 0
3 4 6 46%
0% 0%
31% 23%
almost never usefulrarely usefulsometimes usefulusually usefulalmost always useful
6. - 3.95 4.82 4.3 4.19 - 4.07 4.53- 4.32 4.3 4.4 0.77Usefulness of the outside assignments
0 0
2 4 7 54%
0% 0%
31% 15%
almost never usefulrarely usefulsometimes usefulusually usefulalmost always useful
7. - 3.44 4.72 3.8 3.76 - 3.85 4.23- 3.91 4.0 4.1 1.08Usefulness of course materials (new question)
1 0
3 2 6 46%
0% 8%
15% 23%
almost never usefulrarely usefulsometimes usefulusually usefulalmost always useful
8. - 4.63 5.00 4.7 4.62 - 4.66 4.81- 4.70 4.7 4.8 0.38Students treated with respect
0 0
0 2
11 85%
0% 0%
15% 0%
strongly disagreedisagreeuncertainagreestrongly agree
9. - 3.54 4.62 3.9 3.80 - 3.51 4.06- 3.95 3.8 4.1 0.95Difficulty level of the course (new order)
1 0
2 5 5 38%
0% 8%
38% 15%
extremely easyeasier than averageabout averagemore difficult than averageextremely difficult
10. - 3.66 4.80 4.1 4.06 - 3.81 4.31- 4.20 4.1 4.2 1.01Value of time spent on course
1 0
2 3 7 54%
0% 8%
23% 15%
almost none valuableless than half valuableabout half valuablemore than half valuablealmost all valuable
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
For each QUESTION: Instructor L, M, U; Group 1 L,M,U; Group 2 L,M,U
L -
Lo
w C
I, M
- M
EA
N,
U -
Up
per
CI
Graphic Comparison of the Means and Confidence Intervals
Questions
University of Arizona. OIRPS. (520) 621-9585. [email protected]. http://oirps.arizona.edu (Que Eva:120)232
Collberg TCE COMPARISON REPORT
14641-01
1/31/2012
COMPAR PROGRAMMING LANGLEC001372C SCChristian S
Fall-08
-
5,550 45 3,261
C_SCALUH
Enrollment: Sections:
huge class, 60 or more enrolled
Comp Group 2:
C SC
Upper Division Undergraduate
Comp Group 1:
5 or more enrolled
Sections: 127
C_SCALU0
Enrollment:
(58%)Response: 40
Enrollment : 68
Instructor
Question / Instructor Frequency
Mean 95% CI 95% CIMean95% CIDev. St. Mean
Comparison Group Descriptions
Lecture, Seminars, Colloquia
Fall and Spring
1. - 3.71 4.29 4.1 4.05 - 3.86 4.13- 4.22 4.0 4.0 0.93Overall rating of teaching effectiveness
4 0
5 18 13 33%
0% 10%
45% 13%
almost never effectiverarely effectivesometimes effectiveusually effectivealmost always effective
2. - 3.41 4.04 3.8 3.76 - 3.56 3.84- 3.92 3.7 3.7 1.01Overall rating of the course
4 1
9 17
9 23%
3% 10%
43% 23%
one of the worstworse than averageabout averagebetter than averageone of the best
3. - 3.75 4.35 4.0 3.90 - 3.78 4.04- 4.05 3.9 4.1 0.96Amount learned
3 0
8 13 16 40%
0% 8%
33% 20%
almost nothingless than usualabout as much as usualmore than usualan exceptional amount
4. - 3.43 4.07 3.8 3.71 - 3.49 3.82- 3.90 3.7 3.8 1.03Overall instructor comparison
4 1
9 16 10 25%
3% 10%
40% 23%
one of the least effectiveless effective than mostabout as effective as mostmore effective than mostone of the most effective
5. - 3.70 4.30 4.0 3.87 - 3.68 3.96- 4.04 3.8 4.0 0.96Usefulness of the in-class activities
2 0
12 10 16 40%
0% 5%
25% 30%
almost never usefulrarely usefulsometimes usefulusually usefulalmost always useful
6. - 4.02 4.63 4.3 4.19 - 4.13 4.31- 4.32 4.2 4.3 0.97Usefulness of the outside assignments
1 1
5 10 23 57%
3% 3%
25% 13%
almost never usefulrarely usefulsometimes usefulusually usefulalmost always useful
7. - 3.58 4.31 3.8 3.76 - 3.54 3.76- 3.91 3.7 3.9 1.14Usefulness of course materials (new question)
2 2
7 12 14 35%
5% 5%
30% 18%
almost never usefulrarely usefulsometimes usefulusually usefulalmost always useful
8. - 4.25 4.70 4.7 4.62 - 4.50 4.61- 4.70 4.6 4.5 0.72Students treated with respect
1 0
2 14 23 57%
0% 3%
35% 5%
strongly disagreedisagreeuncertainagreestrongly agree
9. - 3.42 3.88 3.9 3.80 - 3.75 3.98- 3.95 3.9 3.7 0.74Difficulty level of the course (new order)
2 0
14 20
4 10%
0% 5%
50% 35%
extremely easyeasier than averageabout averagemore difficult than averageextremely difficult
10. - 3.65 4.30 4.1 4.06 - 3.95 4.15- 4.20 4.0 4.0 1.03Value of time spent on course
4 0
9 11 16 40%
0% 10%
28% 23%
almost none valuableless than half valuableabout half valuablemore than half valuablealmost all valuable
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
For each QUESTION: Instructor L, M, U; Group 1 L,M,U; Group 2 L,M,U
L -
Lo
w C
I, M
- M
EA
N,
U -
Up
per
CI
Graphic Comparison of the Means and Confidence Intervals
Questions
University of Arizona. OIRPS. (520) 621-9585. [email protected]. http://oirps.arizona.edu (Que Eva:120)232
Collberg TCE COMPARISON REPORT
15111-01
1/31/2012
ADV TPC PROGRAMMING LANLEC001620C SCChristian S
Fall-08
-
1,307 Enrollment: Sections:
Comp Group 2:
C SC
Graduate
Comp Group 1:
5 or more enrolled
Sections: 79
C_SCALG0
Enrollment:
(91%)Response: 11
Enrollment : 12
Instructor
Question / Instructor Frequency
Mean 95% CI 95% CIMean95% CIDev. St. Mean
Comparison Group Descriptions
Lecture, Seminars, Colloquia
Fall and Spring
1. - 3.81 4.56 4.3 4.27 -- 4.43 4.2 0.60Overall rating of teaching effectiveness
0 0
1 7 3 27%
0% 0%
64% 9%
almost never effectiverarely effectivesometimes effectiveusually effectivealmost always effective
2. - 3.47 4.34 4.1 4.00 -- 4.17 3.9 0.70Overall rating of the course
0 0
3 6 2 18%
0% 0%
55% 27%
one of the worstworse than averageabout averagebetter than averageone of the best
3. - 3.28 4.36 4.0 3.95 -- 4.12 3.8 0.87Amount learned
1 0
2 6 2 18%
0% 9%
55% 18%
almost nothingless than usualabout as much as usualmore than usualan exceptional amount
4. - 3.44 4.19 4.0 3.85 -- 4.09 3.8 0.60Overall instructor comparison
0 0
3 7 1 9%
0% 0%
64% 27%
one of the least effectiveless effective than mostabout as effective as mostmore effective than mostone of the most effective
5. - 3.72 4.65 4.3 4.17 -- 4.34 4.2 0.75Usefulness of the in-class activities
0 0
2 5 4 36%
0% 0%
45% 18%
almost never usefulrarely usefulsometimes usefulusually usefulalmost always useful
6. - 3.57 4.79 4.3 4.27 -- 4.42 4.2 0.98Usefulness of the outside assignments
1 0
1 4 5 45%
0% 9%
36% 9%
almost never usefulrarely usefulsometimes usefulusually usefulalmost always useful
7. - 3.76 4.43 4.3 4.19 -- 4.34 4.1 0.54Usefulness of course materials (new question)
0 0
1 8 2 18%
0% 0%
73% 9%
almost never usefulrarely usefulsometimes usefulusually usefulalmost always useful
8. - 4.44 5.00 4.7 4.65 -- 4.75 4.7 0.47Students treated with respect
0 0
0 3 8 73%
0% 0%
27% 0%
strongly disagreedisagreeuncertainagreestrongly agree
9. - 3.22 3.87 3.7 3.64 -- 3.82 3.5 0.52Difficulty level of the course (new order)
0 0
5 6 0 0%
0% 0%
55% 45%
extremely easyeasier than averageabout averagemore difficult than averageextremely difficult
10. - 3.66 4.53 4.3 4.26 -- 4.39 4.1 0.70Value of time spent on course
0 0
2 6 3 27%
0% 0%
55% 18%
almost none valuableless than half valuableabout half valuablemore than half valuablealmost all valuable
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
For each QUESTION: Instructor L, M, U; Group 1 L,M,U; Group 2 L,M,U
L -
Lo
w C
I, M
- M
EA
N,
U -
Up
per
CI
Graphic Comparison of the Means and Confidence Intervals
Questions
University of Arizona. OIRPS. (520) 621-9585. [email protected]. http://oirps.arizona.edu (Que Eva:120)232
Collberg TCE COMPARISON REPORT
71799-01
1/31/2012
PRIN PROGRAMMING LANGLEC001520C SCChristian S
Spring-08
-
1,307 Enrollment: Sections:
Comp Group 2:
C SC
Graduate
Comp Group 1:
5 or more enrolled
Sections: 79
C_SCALG0
Enrollment:
(89%)Response: 35
Enrollment : 39
Instructor
Question / Instructor Frequency
Mean 95% CI 95% CIMean95% CIDev. St. Mean
Comparison Group Descriptions
Lecture, Seminars, Colloquia
Fall and Spring
1. - 3.82 4.47 4.3 4.27 -- 4.43 4.1 0.97Overall rating of teaching effectiveness
2 1
2 16 14 40%
3% 6%
46% 6%
almost never effectiverarely effectivesometimes effectiveusually effectivealmost always effective
2. - 3.87 4.47 4.1 4.00 -- 4.17 4.2 0.89Overall rating of the course
0 1
5 15 14 40%
3% 0%
43% 14%
one of the worstworse than averageabout averagebetter than averageone of the best
3. - 3.77 4.41 4.0 3.95 -- 4.12 4.1 0.95Amount learned
2 1
2 18 12 34%
3% 6%
51% 6%
almost nothingless than usualabout as much as usualmore than usualan exceptional amount
4. - 3.56 4.27 4.0 3.85 -- 4.09 3.9 1.07Overall instructor comparison
1 2
6 15 11 31%
6% 3%
43% 17%
one of the least effectiveless effective than mostabout as effective as mostmore effective than mostone of the most effective
5. - 3.93 4.59 4.3 4.17 -- 4.34 4.3 0.98Usefulness of the in-class activities
1 1
4 11 18 51%
3% 3%
31% 11%
almost never usefulrarely usefulsometimes usefulusually usefulalmost always useful
6. - 4.27 4.82 4.3 4.27 -- 4.42 4.5 0.82Usefulness of the outside assignments
0 1
1 10 23 66%
3% 0%
29% 3%
almost never usefulrarely usefulsometimes usefulusually usefulalmost always useful
7. - 3.90 4.50 4.3 4.19 -- 4.34 4.2 0.90Usefulness of course materials (new question)
2 0
5 12 16 46%
0% 6%
34% 14%
almost never usefulrarely usefulsometimes usefulusually usefulalmost always useful
8. - 4.70 4.96 4.7 4.65 -- 4.75 4.8 0.38Students treated with respect
0 0
0 6
29 83%
0% 0%
17% 0%
strongly disagreedisagreeuncertainagreestrongly agree
9. - 3.29 3.79 3.7 3.64 -- 3.82 3.5 0.74Difficulty level of the course (new order)
2 0
15 15
3 9%
0% 6%
43% 43%
extremely easyeasier than averageabout averagemore difficult than averageextremely difficult
10. - 4.20 4.74 4.3 4.26 -- 4.39 4.5 0.79Value of time spent on course
1 0
3 9
21 62%
0% 3%
26% 9%
almost none valuableless than half valuableabout half valuablemore than half valuablealmost all valuable
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
For each QUESTION: Instructor L, M, U; Group 1 L,M,U; Group 2 L,M,U
L -
Lo
w C
I, M
- M
EA
N,
U -
Up
per
CI
Graphic Comparison of the Means and Confidence Intervals
Questions
University of Arizona. OIRPS. (520) 621-9585. [email protected]. http://oirps.arizona.edu (Que Eva:120)232
Collberg TCE COMPARISON REPORT
12111-01
1/31/2012
COMPAR PROGRAMMING LANGLEC001372C SCChristian S
Fall-07
-
5,550 45 3,261
C_SCALUH
Enrollment: Sections:
huge class, 60 or more enrolled
Comp Group 2:
C SC
Upper Division Undergraduate
Comp Group 1:
5 or more enrolled
Sections: 127
C_SCALU0
Enrollment:
(67%)Response: 43
Enrollment : 64
Instructor
Question / Instructor Frequency
Mean 95% CI 95% CIMean95% CIDev. St. Mean
Comparison Group Descriptions
Lecture, Seminars, Colloquia
Fall and Spring
1. - 3.68 4.18 4.1 4.05 - 3.86 4.13- 4.22 4.0 3.9 0.83Overall rating of teaching effectiveness
0 1
10 22 10 23%
2% 0%
51% 23%
almost never effectiverarely effectivesometimes effectiveusually effectivealmost always effective
2. - 3.43 3.97 3.8 3.76 - 3.56 3.84- 3.92 3.7 3.7 0.89Overall rating of the course
3 0
16 15
9 21%
0% 7%
35% 37%
one of the worstworse than averageabout averagebetter than averageone of the best
3. - 3.51 4.02 4.0 3.90 - 3.78 4.04- 4.05 3.9 3.8 0.84Amount learned
1 0
18 14 10 23%
0% 2%
33% 42%
almost nothingless than usualabout as much as usualmore than usualan exceptional amount
4. - 3.14 3.69 3.8 3.71 - 3.49 3.82- 3.90 3.7 3.4 0.91Overall instructor comparison
5 1
16 17
4 9%
2% 12%
40% 37%
one of the least effectiveless effective than mostabout as effective as mostmore effective than mostone of the most effective
5. - 3.59 4.18 4.0 3.87 - 3.68 3.96- 4.04 3.8 3.9 0.98Usefulness of the in-class activities
3 1
8 19 12 28%
2% 7%
44% 19%
almost never usefulrarely usefulsometimes usefulusually usefulalmost always useful
6. - 3.98 4.43 4.3 4.19 - 4.13 4.31- 4.32 4.2 4.2 0.74Usefulness of the outside assignments
1 0
5 21 16 37%
0% 2%
49% 12%
almost never usefulrarely usefulsometimes usefulusually usefulalmost always useful
7. - 3.28 3.81 3.8 3.76 - 3.54 3.76- 3.91 3.7 3.5 0.86Usefulness of course materials (new question)
5 0
14 18
5 12%
0% 12%
42% 33%
almost never usefulrarely usefulsometimes usefulusually usefulalmost always useful
8. - 4.26 4.67 4.7 4.62 - 4.50 4.61- 4.70 4.6 4.5 0.67Students treated with respect
1 0
1 18 23 53%
0% 2%
42% 2%
strongly disagreedisagreeuncertainagreestrongly agree
9. - 3.22 3.62 3.9 3.80 - 3.75 3.98- 3.95 3.9 3.4 0.66Difficulty level of the course (new order)
2 0
23 16
2 5%
0% 5%
37% 53%
extremely easyeasier than averageabout averagemore difficult than averageextremely difficult
10. - 3.70 4.30 4.1 4.06 - 3.95 4.15- 4.20 4.0 4.0 0.98Value of time spent on course
2 1
8 17 15 35%
2% 5%
40% 19%
almost none valuableless than half valuableabout half valuablemore than half valuablealmost all valuable
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
For each QUESTION: Instructor L, M, U; Group 1 L,M,U; Group 2 L,M,U
L -
Lo
w C
I, M
- M
EA
N,
U -
Up
per
CI
Graphic Comparison of the Means and Confidence Intervals
Questions
University of Arizona. OIRPS. (520) 621-9585. [email protected]. http://oirps.arizona.edu (Que Eva:120)232
Collberg TCE COMPARISON REPORT
11503-01
1/31/2012
COMPAR PROGRAMMING LANGLEC001372C SCChristian S
Fall-05
-
Enrollment: Sections:
Comp Group 2:
C SC
Comp Group 1:
Sections: Enrollment:
(70%)Response: 28
Enrollment : 40
Instructor
Question / Instructor Frequency
Mean 95% CI 95% CIMean95% CIDev. St. Mean
Comparison Group Descriptions
1. - 3.74 4.41 -- 4.1 0.87Overall rating of teaching effectiveness
2 0
3 13
9 33%
0% 7%
48% 11%
almost never effectiverarely effectivesometimes effectiveusually effectivealmost always effective
2. - 3.60 4.32 -- 4.0 0.94Overall rating of the course
2 0
6 10
9 33%
0% 7%
37% 22%
one of the worstworse than averageabout averagebetter than averageone of the best
3. - 3.53 4.25 -- 3.9 0.93Amount learned
1 0
10 7 9 33%
0% 4%
26% 37%
almost nothingless than usualabout as much as usualmore than usualan exceptional amount
4. - 3.35 4.21 -- 3.8 1.12Overall instructor comparison
2 1
8 7 9 33%
4% 7%
26% 30%
one of the least effectiveless effective than mostabout as effective as mostmore effective than mostone of the most effective
5. - 3.66 4.34 -- 4.0 0.88Usefulness of the in-class activities
2 0
4 13
8 30%
0% 7%
48% 15%
almost never usefulrarely usefulsometimes usefulusually usefulalmost always useful
6. - 3.80 4.42 -- 4.1 0.80Usefulness of the outside assignments
1 0
4 13
9 33%
0% 4%
48% 15%
almost never usefulrarely usefulsometimes usefulusually usefulalmost always useful
7. - 3.47 4.13 -- 3.8 0.82Usefulness of course materials (new question)
1 0
8 11
5 19%
0% 4%
41% 30%
almost never usefulrarely usefulsometimes usefulusually usefulalmost always useful
8. - 4.05 4.62 -- 4.3 0.73Students treated with respect
0 0
4 10 13 48%
0% 0%
37% 15%
strongly disagreedisagreeuncertainagreestrongly agree
9. - 3.11 3.63 -- 3.4 0.69Difficulty level of the course (new order)
2 0
14 10
1 4%
0% 7%
37% 52%
extremely easyeasier than averageabout averagemore difficult than averageextremely difficult
10. - 3.51 4.34 -- 3.9 1.07Value of time spent on course
1 1
7 8
10 37%
4% 4%
30% 26%
almost none valuableless than half valuableabout half valuablemore than half valuablealmost all valuable
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
For each QUESTION: Instructor L, M, U; Group 1 L,M,U; Group 2 L,M,U
L -
Lo
w C
I, M
- M
EA
N,
U -
Up
per
CI
Graphic Comparison of the Means and Confidence Intervals
Questions
University of Arizona. OIRPS. (520) 621-9585. [email protected]. http://oirps.arizona.edu (Que Eva:120)232
Collberg TCE COMPARISON REPORT
11907-01
1/31/2012
ADV TPC PROGRAMMING LANGLEC001620C SCChristian S
Fall-05
-
Enrollment: Sections:
Comp Group 2:
C SC
Comp Group 1:
Sections: Enrollment:
(69%)Response: 9
Enrollment : 13
Instructor
Question / Instructor Frequency
Mean 95% CI 95% CIMean95% CIDev. St. Mean
Comparison Group Descriptions
1. - 3.51 4.49 -- 4.0 0.71Overall rating of teaching effectiveness
0 0
2 5 2 22%
0% 0%
56% 22%
almost never effectiverarely effectivesometimes effectiveusually effectivealmost always effective
2. - 3.01 4.77 -- 3.9 1.27Overall rating of the course
0 1
1 4 3 33%
11% 0%
44% 11%
one of the worstworse than averageabout averagebetter than averageone of the best
3. - 3.47 4.31 -- 3.9 0.60Amount learned
0 0
2 6 1 11%
0% 0%
67% 22%
almost nothingless than usualabout as much as usualmore than usualan exceptional amount
4. - 2.64 4.03 -- 3.3 1.00Overall instructor comparison
0 1
3 5 0 0%
11% 0%
56% 33%
one of the least effectiveless effective than mostabout as effective as mostmore effective than mostone of the most effective
5. - 3.66 4.12 -- 3.9 0.33Usefulness of the in-class activities
0 0
1 8 0 0%
0% 0%
89% 11%
almost never usefulrarely usefulsometimes usefulusually usefulalmost always useful
6. - 3.35 4.43 -- 3.9 0.78Usefulness of the outside assignments
1 0
0 7 1 11%
0% 11%
78% 0%
almost never usefulrarely usefulsometimes usefulusually usefulalmost always useful
7. - 3.69 4.53 -- 4.1 0.60Usefulness of course materials (new question)
0 0
1 6 2 22%
0% 0%
67% 11%
almost never usefulrarely usefulsometimes usefulusually usefulalmost always useful
8. - 4.19 4.92 -- 4.6 0.53Students treated with respect
0 0
0 4 5 56%
0% 0%
44% 0%
strongly disagreedisagreeuncertainagreestrongly agree
9. - 2.84 3.82 -- 3.3 0.71Difficulty level of the course (new order)
1 0
4 4 0 0%
0% 11%
44% 44%
extremely easyeasier than averageabout averagemore difficult than averageextremely difficult
10. - 3.20 4.36 -- 3.8 0.83Value of time spent on course
1 0
1 6 1 11%
0% 11%
67% 11%
almost none valuableless than half valuableabout half valuablemore than half valuablealmost all valuable
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
For each QUESTION: Instructor L, M, U; Group 1 L,M,U; Group 2 L,M,U
L -
Lo
w C
I, M
- M
EA
N,
U -
Up
per
CI
Graphic Comparison of the Means and Confidence Intervals
Questions
University of Arizona. OIRPS. (520) 621-9585. [email protected]. http://oirps.arizona.edu (Que Eva:120)232
Collberg TCE COMPARISON REPORT
11079-01
1/31/2012
PRIN PROGRAMMING LANGLEC001520C SCChristian S
Spring-05
-
Enrollment: Sections:
Comp Group 2:
C SC
Comp Group 1:
Sections: Enrollment:
(73%)Response: 22
Enrollment : 30
Instructor
Question / Instructor Frequency
Mean 95% CI 95% CIMean95% CIDev. St. Mean
Comparison Group Descriptions
1. - 2.94 3.88 -- 3.4 1.10Overall rating of teaching effectiveness
3 1
8 6 4 18%
5% 14%
27% 36%
almost never effectiverarely effectivesometimes effectiveusually effectivealmost always effective
2. - 2.81 3.64 -- 3.2 0.97Overall rating of the course
1 2
10 8 1 5%
9% 5%
36% 45%
one of the worstworse than averageabout averagebetter than averageone of the best
3. - 2.47 3.35 -- 2.9 1.02Amount learned
8 1
6 6 1 5%
5% 36%
27% 27%
almost nothingless than usualabout as much as usualmore than usualan exceptional amount
4. - 2.51 3.40 -- 3.0 1.05Overall instructor comparison
2 3
11 5 1 5%
14% 9%
23% 50%
one of the least effectiveless effective than mostabout as effective as mostmore effective than mostone of the most effective
5. - 2.77 3.68 -- 3.2 1.07Usefulness of the in-class activities
5 1
6 8 2 9%
5% 23%
36% 27%
almost never usefulrarely usefulsometimes usefulusually usefulalmost always useful
6. - 3.15 4.12 -- 3.6 1.14Usefulness of the outside assignments
3 1
4 9 5 23%
5% 14%
41% 18%
almost never usefulrarely usefulsometimes usefulusually usefulalmost always useful
7. - 3.04 3.87 -- 3.5 0.96Usefulness of course materials (new question)
4 0
7 8 3 14%
0% 18%
36% 32%
almost never usefulrarely usefulsometimes usefulusually usefulalmost always useful
8. - 3.85 4.69 -- 4.3 0.98Students treated with respect
0 1
2 8
11 50%
5% 0%
36% 9%
strongly disagreedisagreeuncertainagreestrongly agree
9. - 2.80 3.29 -- 3.0 0.58Difficulty level of the course (new order)
3 0
15 4 0 0%
0% 14%
18% 68%
extremely easyeasier than averageabout averagemore difficult than averageextremely difficult
10. - 2.73 3.63 -- 3.2 1.05Value of time spent on course
5 1
7 7 2 9%
5% 23%
32% 32%
almost none valuableless than half valuableabout half valuablemore than half valuablealmost all valuable
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
For each QUESTION: Instructor L, M, U; Group 1 L,M,U; Group 2 L,M,U
L -
Lo
w C
I, M
- M
EA
N,
U -
Up
per
CI
Graphic Comparison of the Means and Confidence Intervals
Questions
University of Arizona. OIRPS. (520) 621-9585. [email protected]. http://oirps.arizona.edu (Que Eva:120)232
Collberg TCE COMPARISON REPORT
11449-01
1/31/2012
COMPAR PROGRAMMING LANGLEC001372C SCChristian S
Fall-04
-
Enrollment: Sections:
Comp Group 2:
C SC
Comp Group 1:
Sections: Enrollment:
(54%)Response: 35
Enrollment : 64
Instructor
Question / Instructor Frequency
Mean 95% CI 95% CIMean95% CIDev. St. Mean
Comparison Group Descriptions
1. - 3.02 3.75 -- 3.4 1.07Overall rating of teaching effectiveness
5 2
9 14
4 12%
6% 15%
41% 26%
almost never effectiverarely effectivesometimes effectiveusually effectivealmost always effective
2. - 2.79 3.57 -- 3.2 1.14Overall rating of the course
6 3
11 10
4 12%
9% 18%
29% 32%
one of the worstworse than averageabout averagebetter than averageone of the best
3. - 3.24 3.88 -- 3.6 0.93Amount learned
4 0
13 11
6 18%
0% 12%
32% 38%
almost nothingless than usualabout as much as usualmore than usualan exceptional amount
4. - 2.42 3.28 -- 2.9 1.26Overall instructor comparison
10 5
8 7 4 12%
15% 29%
21% 24%
one of the least effectiveless effective than mostabout as effective as mostmore effective than mostone of the most effective
5. - 3.00 3.73 -- 3.4 1.06Usefulness of the in-class activities
9 0
8 11
5 15%
0% 27%
33% 24%
almost never usefulrarely usefulsometimes usefulusually usefulalmost always useful
6. - 3.80 4.26 -- 4.0 0.67Usefulness of the outside assignments
0 0
7 19
8 24%
0% 0%
56% 21%
almost never usefulrarely usefulsometimes usefulusually usefulalmost always useful
7. - 2.87 3.65 -- 3.3 1.09Usefulness of course materials (new question)
3 3
11 11
3 9%
9% 9%
33% 33%
almost never usefulrarely usefulsometimes usefulusually usefulalmost always useful
8. - 3.68 4.38 -- 4.0 1.04Students treated with respect
2 1
6 12 14 40%
3% 6%
34% 17%
strongly disagreedisagreeuncertainagreestrongly agree
9. - 3.61 4.09 -- 3.9 0.70Difficulty level of the course (new order)
0 0
11 17
6 18%
0% 0%
50% 32%
extremely easyeasier than averageabout averagemore difficult than averageextremely difficult
10. - 3.36 4.01 -- 3.7 0.96Value of time spent on course
2 1
11 14
7 20%
3% 6%
40% 31%
almost none valuableless than half valuableabout half valuablemore than half valuablealmost all valuable
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
For each QUESTION: Instructor L, M, U; Group 1 L,M,U; Group 2 L,M,U
L -
Lo
w C
I, M
- M
EA
N,
U -
Up
per
CI
Graphic Comparison of the Means and Confidence Intervals
Questions
University of Arizona. OIRPS. (520) 621-9585. [email protected]. http://oirps.arizona.edu (Que Eva:120)232
Collberg TCE COMPARISON REPORT
11083-01
1/31/2012
PRIN PROGRAMMING LANGLEC001520C SCChristian S
Spring-04
-
Enrollment: Sections:
Comp Group 2:
C SC
Comp Group 1:
Sections: Enrollment:
(81%)Response: 21
Enrollment : 26
Instructor
Question / Instructor Frequency
Mean 95% CI 95% CIMean95% CIDev. St. Mean
Comparison Group Descriptions
1. - 3.24 4.09 -- 3.7 0.97Overall rating of teaching effectiveness
3 0
5 9 4 19%
0% 14%
43% 24%
almost never effectiverarely effectivesometimes effectiveusually effectivealmost always effective
2. - 2.95 3.81 -- 3.4 0.97Overall rating of the course
2 1
8 8 2 10%
5% 10%
38% 38%
one of the worstworse than averageabout averagebetter than averageone of the best
3. - 2.91 3.85 -- 3.4 1.07Amount learned
4 1
4 10
2 10%
5% 19%
48% 19%
almost nothingless than usualabout as much as usualmore than usualan exceptional amount
4. - 2.58 3.42 -- 3.0 0.95Overall instructor comparison
5 1
9 5 1 5%
5% 24%
24% 43%
one of the least effectiveless effective than mostabout as effective as mostmore effective than mostone of the most effective
5. - 3.19 4.24 -- 3.7 1.19Usefulness of the in-class activities
3 1
3 8 6 29%
5% 14%
38% 14%
almost never usefulrarely usefulsometimes usefulusually usefulalmost always useful
6. - 3.14 4.29 -- 3.7 1.31Usefulness of the outside assignments
0 3
3 9 6 29%
14% 0%
43% 14%
almost never usefulrarely usefulsometimes usefulusually usefulalmost always useful
7. - 3.16 4.17 -- 3.7 1.15Usefulness of course materials (new question)
3 1
3 9 5 24%
5% 14%
43% 14%
almost never usefulrarely usefulsometimes usefulusually usefulalmost always useful
8. - 4.00 4.57 -- 4.3 0.64Students treated with respect
0 0
2 11
8 38%
0% 0%
52% 10%
strongly disagreedisagreeuncertainagreestrongly agree
9. - 2.80 3.49 -- 3.1 0.79Difficulty level of the course (new order)
4 0
11 5 1 5%
0% 19%
24% 52%
extremely easyeasier than averageabout averagemore difficult than averageextremely difficult
10. - 3.09 4.15 -- 3.6 1.20Value of time spent on course
3 1
5 6 6 29%
5% 14%
29% 24%
almost none valuableless than half valuableabout half valuablemore than half valuablealmost all valuable
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
For each QUESTION: Instructor L, M, U; Group 1 L,M,U; Group 2 L,M,U
L -
Lo
w C
I, M
- M
EA
N,
U -
Up
per
CI
Graphic Comparison of the Means and Confidence Intervals
Questions
University of Arizona. OIRPS. (520) 621-9585. [email protected]. http://oirps.arizona.edu (Que Eva:120)232
Collberg TCE COMPARISON REPORT
11897-01
1/31/2012
ADV TPC PROGRAMMING LANGLEC001620C SCChristian S
Fall-03
-
Enrollment: Sections:
Comp Group 2:
C SC
Comp Group 1:
Sections: Enrollment:
(93%)Response: 14
Enrollment : 15
Instructor
Question / Instructor Frequency
Mean 95% CI 95% CIMean95% CIDev. St. Mean
Comparison Group Descriptions
1. - 4.09 4.63 -- 4.4 0.50Overall rating of teaching effectiveness
0 0
0 9 5 36%
0% 0%
64% 0%
almost never effectiverarely effectivesometimes effectiveusually effectivealmost always effective
2. - 3.32 4.11 -- 3.7 0.73Overall rating of the course
0 0
6 6 2 14%
0% 0%
43% 43%
one of the worstworse than averageabout averagebetter than averageone of the best
3. - 3.27 4.16 -- 3.7 0.83Amount learned
0 0
7 4 3 21%
0% 0%
29% 50%
almost nothingless than usualabout as much as usualmore than usualan exceptional amount
4. - 3.36 4.18 -- 3.8 0.73Overall instructor comparison
0 0
5 6 2 15%
0% 0%
46% 38%
one of the least effectiveless effective than mostabout as effective as mostmore effective than mostone of the most effective
5. - 4.29 4.85 -- 4.6 0.51Usefulness of the in-class activities
0 0
0 6 8 57%
0% 0%
43% 0%
almost never usefulrarely usefulsometimes usefulusually usefulalmost always useful
6. - 3.83 4.59 -- 4.2 0.70Usefulness of the outside assignments
0 0
2 7 5 36%
0% 0%
50% 14%
almost never usefulrarely usefulsometimes usefulusually usefulalmost always useful
7. - 3.95 4.76 -- 4.4 0.74Usefulness of course materials (new question)
0 0
2 5 7 50%
0% 0%
36% 14%
almost never usefulrarely usefulsometimes usefulusually usefulalmost always useful
8. - 4.46 4.97 -- 4.7 0.47Students treated with respect
0 0
0 4
10 71%
0% 0%
29% 0%
strongly disagreedisagreeuncertainagreestrongly agree
9. - 2.41 3.17 -- 2.8 0.70Difficulty level of the course (new order)
2 1
10 1 0 0%
7% 14%
7% 71%
extremely easyeasier than averageabout averagemore difficult than averageextremely difficult
10. - 3.67 4.47 -- 4.1 0.73Value of time spent on course
0 0
3 7 4 29%
0% 0%
50% 21%
almost none valuableless than half valuableabout half valuablemore than half valuablealmost all valuable
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
For each QUESTION: Instructor L, M, U; Group 1 L,M,U; Group 2 L,M,U
L -
Lo
w C
I, M
- M
EA
N,
U -
Up
per
CI
Graphic Comparison of the Means and Confidence Intervals
Questions
University of Arizona. OIRPS. (520) 621-9585. [email protected]. http://oirps.arizona.edu (Que Eva:120)232
Collberg TCE COMPARISON REPORT
11321-01
1/31/2012
PRIN PROGRAMMING LANGLEC001520C SCChristian S
Spring-03
-
Enrollment: Sections:
Comp Group 2:
C SC
Comp Group 1:
Sections: Enrollment:
(82%)Response: 23
Enrollment : 28
Instructor
Question / Instructor Frequency
Mean 95% CI 95% CIMean95% CIDev. St. Mean
Comparison Group Descriptions
1. - 3.38 4.10 -- 3.7 0.86Overall rating of teaching effectiveness
2 0
6 11
4 17%
0% 9%
48% 26%
almost never effectiverarely effectivesometimes effectiveusually effectivealmost always effective
2. - 2.96 3.74 -- 3.3 0.93Overall rating of the course
5 0
7 9 2 9%
0% 22%
39% 30%
one of the worstworse than averageabout averagebetter than averageone of the best
3. - 2.65 3.61 -- 3.1 1.14Amount learned
6 1
9 3 4 17%
4% 26%
13% 39%
almost nothingless than usualabout as much as usualmore than usualan exceptional amount
4. - 2.90 3.80 -- 3.3 1.07Overall instructor comparison
4 1
7 8 3 13%
4% 17%
35% 30%
one of the least effectiveless effective than mostabout as effective as mostmore effective than mostone of the most effective
5. - 3.13 4.00 -- 3.6 1.04Usefulness of the in-class activities
2 1
7 9 4 17%
4% 9%
39% 30%
almost never usefulrarely usefulsometimes usefulusually usefulalmost always useful
6. - 3.30 4.00 -- 3.7 0.83Usefulness of the outside assignments
1 0
10 8 4 17%
0% 4%
35% 43%
almost never usefulrarely usefulsometimes usefulusually usefulalmost always useful
7. - 3.02 3.80 -- 3.4 0.91Usefulness of course materials (new question)
3 0
10 6 3 13%
0% 13%
26% 43%
almost never usefulrarely usefulsometimes usefulusually usefulalmost always useful
8. - 4.09 4.69 -- 4.4 0.72Students treated with respect
0 0
3 8
12 52%
0% 0%
35% 13%
strongly disagreedisagreeuncertainagreestrongly agree
9. - 3.00 3.70 -- 3.3 0.83Difficulty level of the course (new order)
2 0
14 4 3 13%
0% 9%
17% 61%
extremely easyeasier than averageabout averagemore difficult than averageextremely difficult
10. - 2.76 3.67 -- 3.2 1.09Value of time spent on course
5 1
8 6 3 13%
4% 22%
26% 35%
almost none valuableless than half valuableabout half valuablemore than half valuablealmost all valuable
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
For each QUESTION: Instructor L, M, U; Group 1 L,M,U; Group 2 L,M,U
L -
Lo
w C
I, M
- M
EA
N,
U -
Up
per
CI
Graphic Comparison of the Means and Confidence Intervals
Questions
University of Arizona. OIRPS. (520) 621-9585. [email protected]. http://oirps.arizona.edu (Que Eva:120)232
Collberg TCE COMPARISON REPORT
11973-01
1/31/2012
COMPILERS SYSTEMS SFTWRLEC001453C SCChristian S
Fall-02
-
Enrollment: Sections:
Comp Group 2:
C SC
Comp Group 1:
Sections: Enrollment:
(87%)Response: 47
Enrollment : 54
Instructor
Question / Instructor Frequency
Mean 95% CI 95% CIMean95% CIDev. St. Mean
Comparison Group Descriptions
1. - 4.06 4.49 -- 4.3 0.74Overall rating of teaching effectiveness
1 0
5 21 20 43%
0% 2%
45% 11%
almost never effectiverarely effectivesometimes effectiveusually effectivealmost always effective
2. - 4.00 4.42 -- 4.2 0.72Overall rating of the course
1 0
5 24 17 36%
0% 2%
51% 11%
one of the worstworse than averageabout averagebetter than averageone of the best
3. - 4.02 4.45 -- 4.2 0.73Amount learned
1 0
5 23 18 38%
0% 2%
49% 11%
almost nothingless than usualabout as much as usualmore than usualan exceptional amount
4. - 3.88 4.33 -- 4.1 0.76Overall instructor comparison
1 0
8 23 15 32%
0% 2%
49% 17%
one of the least effectiveless effective than mostabout as effective as mostmore effective than mostone of the most effective
5. - 3.72 4.19 -- 4.0 0.79Usefulness of the in-class activities
2 0
9 24 11 24%
0% 4%
52% 20%
almost never usefulrarely usefulsometimes usefulusually usefulalmost always useful
6. - 4.37 4.72 -- 4.5 0.59Usefulness of the outside assignments
0 0
2 17 27 59%
0% 0%
37% 4%
almost never usefulrarely usefulsometimes usefulusually usefulalmost always useful
7. - 3.28 3.89 -- 3.6 1.02Usefulness of course materials (new question)
3 2
16 16
9 20%
4% 7%
35% 35%
almost never usefulrarely usefulsometimes usefulusually usefulalmost always useful
8. - 4.38 4.72 -- 4.6 0.58Students treated with respect
0 0
2 17 28 60%
0% 0%
36% 4%
strongly disagreedisagreeuncertainagreestrongly agree
9. - 3.99 4.31 -- 4.1 0.55Difficulty level of the course (new order)
0 0
4 32 11 23%
0% 0%
68% 9%
extremely easyeasier than averageabout averagemore difficult than averageextremely difficult
10. - 3.94 4.40 -- 4.2 0.79Value of time spent on course
1 0
8 20 18 38%
0% 2%
43% 17%
almost none valuableless than half valuableabout half valuablemore than half valuablealmost all valuable
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
For each QUESTION: Instructor L, M, U; Group 1 L,M,U; Group 2 L,M,U
L -
Lo
w C
I, M
- M
EA
N,
U -
Up
per
CI
Graphic Comparison of the Means and Confidence Intervals
Questions
University of Arizona. OIRPS. (520) 621-9585. [email protected]. http://oirps.arizona.edu (Que Eva:120)221
Collberg TCE COMPARISON REPORT
10881-01
1/31/2012
ADV TPC PROGRAMMING LANGLEC001620C SCChristian S
Spring-02
-
Enrollment: Sections:
Comp Group 2:
C SC
Comp Group 1:
Sections: Enrollment:
(100%)Response: 12
Enrollment : 12
Instructor
Question / Instructor Frequency
Mean 95% CI 95% CIMean95% CIDev. St. Mean
Comparison Group Descriptions
1. - 4.19 4.90 -- 4.5 0.52Overall rating of teaching effectiveness
0 0
0 5 6 55%
0% 0%
45% 0%
almost never effectiverarely effectivesometimes effectiveusually effectivealmost always effective
2. - 4.19 4.90 -- 4.5 0.52Overall rating of the course
0 0
0 5 6 55%
0% 0%
45% 0%
one of the worstworse than averageabout averagebetter than averageone of the best
3. - 3.99 4.92 -- 4.5 0.69Amount learned
0 0
1 4 6 55%
0% 0%
36% 9%
almost nothingless than usualabout as much as usualmore than usualan exceptional amount
4. - 3.99 4.92 -- 4.5 0.69Overall instructor comparison
0 0
1 4 6 55%
0% 0%
36% 9%
one of the least effectiveless effective than mostabout as effective as mostmore effective than mostone of the most effective
5. - 3.96 4.59 -- 4.3 0.47Usefulness of the in-class activities
0 0
0 8 3 27%
0% 0%
73% 0%
almost never usefulrarely usefulsometimes usefulusually usefulalmost always useful
6. - 4.30 4.98 -- 4.6 0.50Usefulness of the outside assignments
0 0
0 4 7 64%
0% 0%
36% 0%
almost never usefulrarely usefulsometimes usefulusually usefulalmost always useful
7. - 4.10 4.81 -- 4.5 0.52Usefulness of course materials (new question)
0 0
0 6 5 45%
0% 0%
55% 0%
almost never usefulrarely usefulsometimes usefulusually usefulalmost always useful
8. - 4.08 5.00 -- 4.5 0.69Students treated with respect
0 0
1 3 7 64%
0% 0%
27% 9%
strongly disagreedisagreeuncertainagreestrongly agree
9. - 2.99 4.10 -- 3.5 0.82Difficulty level of the course (new order)
1 0
4 5 1 9%
0% 9%
45% 36%
extremely easyeasier than averageabout averagemore difficult than averageextremely difficult
10. - 3.90 5.00 -- 4.5 0.82Value of time spent on course
0 0
2 2 7 64%
0% 0%
18% 18%
almost none valuableless than half valuableabout half valuablemore than half valuablealmost all valuable
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
For each QUESTION: Instructor L, M, U; Group 1 L,M,U; Group 2 L,M,U
L -
Lo
w C
I, M
- M
EA
N,
U -
Up
per
CI
Graphic Comparison of the Means and Confidence Intervals
Questions
University of Arizona. OIRPS. (520) 621-9585. [email protected]. http://oirps.arizona.edu (Que Eva:120)221
Collberg TCE COMPARISON REPORT
11579-01
1/31/2012
COMPILERS+SYSTEMS SFTWRLEC001453C SCChristian S
Fall-01
-
Enrollment: Sections:
Comp Group 2:
C SC
Comp Group 1:
Sections: Enrollment:
(66%)Response: 33
Enrollment : 50
Instructor
Question / Instructor Frequency
Mean 95% CI 95% CIMean95% CIDev. St. Mean
Comparison Group Descriptions
1. - 4.35 4.75 -- 4.5 0.56Overall rating of teaching effectiveness
0 0
1 13 19 58%
0% 0%
39% 3%
almost never effectiverarely effectivesometimes effectiveusually effectivealmost always effective
2. - 4.04 4.56 -- 4.3 0.73Overall rating of the course
1 0
2 16 14 42%
0% 3%
48% 6%
one of the worstworse than averageabout averagebetter than averageone of the best
3. - 4.28 4.69 -- 4.5 0.57Amount learned
0 0
1 15 17 52%
0% 0%
45% 3%
almost nothingless than usualabout as much as usualmore than usualan exceptional amount
4. - 4.24 4.67 -- 4.5 0.62Overall instructor comparison
0 0
2 14 17 52%
0% 0%
42% 6%
one of the least effectiveless effective than mostabout as effective as mostmore effective than mostone of the most effective
5. - 4.03 4.58 -- 4.3 0.77Usefulness of the in-class activities
1 0
3 14 15 45%
0% 3%
42% 9%
almost never usefulrarely usefulsometimes usefulusually usefulalmost always useful
6. - 4.41 4.80 -- 4.6 0.56Usefulness of the outside assignments
0 0
1 11 21 64%
0% 0%
33% 3%
almost never usefulrarely usefulsometimes usefulusually usefulalmost always useful
7. - 3.54 4.34 -- 3.9 1.11Usefulness of course materials (new question)
4 1
2 14 11 34%
3% 12%
44% 6%
almost never usefulrarely usefulsometimes usefulusually usefulalmost always useful
8. - 4.46 4.81 -- 4.6 0.49Students treated with respect
0 0
0 12 21 64%
0% 0%
36% 0%
strongly disagreedisagreeuncertainagreestrongly agree
9. - 4.00 4.42 -- 4.2 0.60Difficulty level of the course (new order)
0 0
3 20 10 30%
0% 0%
61% 9%
extremely easyeasier than averageabout averagemore difficult than averageextremely difficult
10. - 4.44 4.83 -- 4.6 0.55Value of time spent on course
0 0
1 10 22 67%
0% 0%
30% 3%
almost none valuableless than half valuableabout half valuablemore than half valuablealmost all valuable
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
For each QUESTION: Instructor L, M, U; Group 1 L,M,U; Group 2 L,M,U
L -
Lo
w C
I, M
- M
EA
N,
U -
Up
per
CI
Graphic Comparison of the Means and Confidence Intervals
Questions
University of Arizona. OIRPS. (520) 621-9585. [email protected]. http://oirps.arizona.edu (Que Eva:120)221
Collberg TCE COMPARISON REPORT
09831-01
1/31/2012
FOUND COMPUTER SYSLEC001340C SCChristian S
Spring-01
-
Enrollment: Sections:
Comp Group 2:
C SC
Comp Group 1:
Sections: Enrollment:
(61%)Response: 57
Enrollment : 94
Instructor
Question / Instructor Frequency
Mean 95% CI 95% CIMean95% CIDev. St. Mean
Comparison Group Descriptions
1. - 3.87 4.31 -- 4.1 0.83Overall rating of teaching effectiveness
4 0
5 30 18 32%
0% 7%
53% 9%
almost never effectiverarely effectivesometimes effectiveusually effectivealmost always effective
2. - 3.49 3.91 -- 3.7 0.80Overall rating of the course
4 0
17 28
8 14%
0% 7%
49% 30%
one of the worstworse than averageabout averagebetter than averageone of the best
3. - 3.78 4.22 -- 4.0 0.82Amount learned
4 0
7 31 15 26%
0% 7%
54% 12%
almost nothingless than usualabout as much as usualmore than usualan exceptional amount
4. - 3.44 3.93 -- 3.7 0.91Overall instructor comparison
3 2
14 30
8 14%
4% 5%
53% 25%
one of the least effectiveless effective than mostabout as effective as mostmore effective than mostone of the most effective
5. - 3.73 4.23 -- 4.0 0.94Usefulness of the in-class activities
4 0
13 20 20 35%
0% 7%
35% 23%
almost never usefulrarely usefulsometimes usefulusually usefulalmost always useful
6. - 4.26 4.61 -- 4.4 0.66Usefulness of the outside assignments
0 0
5 22 30 53%
0% 0%
39% 9%
almost never usefulrarely usefulsometimes usefulusually usefulalmost always useful
7. - 2.51 3.24 -- 2.9 1.38Usefulness of course materials (new question)
9 13
14 12
8 14%
23% 16%
21% 25%
almost never usefulrarely usefulsometimes usefulusually usefulalmost always useful
8. - 4.20 4.54 -- 4.4 0.64Students treated with respect
0 0
5 26 26 46%
0% 0%
46% 9%
strongly disagreedisagreeuncertainagreestrongly agree
10. - 4.20 4.60 -- 4.4 0.75Value of time spent on course
2 0
3 22 30 53%
0% 4%
39% 5%
almost none valuableless than half valuableabout half valuablemore than half valuablealmost all valuable
13. - 3.94 4.27 -- 4.1 0.62Difficulty level of the course
35 14
8 0 0 0%
25% 61%
0% 14%
extremely difficult (5)more difficult than average (4)about average (3)easier than average (2)extremely easy (1)
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
10
13
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
10
13
For each QUESTION: Instructor L, M, U; Group 1 L,M,U; Group 2 L,M,U
L -
Lo
w C
I, M
- M
EA
N,
U -
Up
per
CI
Graphic Comparison of the Means and Confidence Intervals
Questions
University of Arizona. OIRPS. (520) 621-9585. [email protected]. http://oirps.arizona.edu (Que Eva:120)121
Collberg TCE COMPARISON REPORT
11451-01
1/31/2012
FOUND COMPUTER SYSLEC001340C SCChristian S
Fall-00
-
Enrollment: Sections:
Comp Group 2:
C SC
Comp Group 1:
Sections: Enrollment:
(73%)Response: 58
Enrollment : 79
Instructor
Question / Instructor Frequency
Mean 95% CI 95% CIMean95% CIDev. St. Mean
Comparison Group Descriptions
1. - 3.80 4.30 -- 4.1 0.93Overall rating of teaching effectiveness
3 1
8 25 20 35%
2% 5%
44% 14%
almost never effectiverarely effectivesometimes effectiveusually effectivealmost always effective
2. - 3.37 3.96 -- 3.7 1.11Overall rating of the course
5 3
14 21 14 25%
5% 9%
37% 25%
one of the worstworse than averageabout averagebetter than averageone of the best
3. - 3.83 4.32 -- 4.1 0.92Amount learned
3 0
13 18 23 40%
0% 5%
32% 23%
almost nothingless than usualabout as much as usualmore than usualan exceptional amount
4. - 3.58 4.18 -- 3.9 1.13Overall instructor comparison
5 2
13 15 22 39%
4% 9%
26% 23%
one of the least effectiveless effective than mostabout as effective as mostmore effective than mostone of the most effective
5. - 3.60 4.08 -- 3.8 0.90Usefulness of the in-class activities
4 1
10 30 12 21%
2% 7%
53% 18%
almost never usefulrarely usefulsometimes usefulusually usefulalmost always useful
6. - 4.17 4.60 -- 4.4 0.80Usefulness of the outside assignments
1 0
8 16 32 56%
0% 2%
28% 14%
almost never usefulrarely usefulsometimes usefulusually usefulalmost always useful
8. - 4.22 4.62 -- 4.4 0.75Students treated with respect
1 0
6 18 32 56%
0% 2%
32% 11%
strongly disagreedisagreeuncertainagreestrongly agree
13. - 3.79 4.17 -- 4.0 0.72Difficulty level of the course
36 11
9 0 1 2%
19% 63%
0% 16%
extremely difficult (5)more difficult than average (4)about average (3)easier than average (2)extremely easy (1)
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
1
2
3
4
5
6
8
13
1
2
3
4
5
6
8
13
For each QUESTION: Instructor L, M, U; Group 1 L,M,U; Group 2 L,M,U
L -
Lo
w C
I, M
- M
EA
N,
U -
Up
per
CI
Graphic Comparison of the Means and Confidence Intervals
Questions
University of Arizona. OIRPS. (520) 621-9585. [email protected]. http://oirps.arizona.edu (Que Eva:120)32
Collberg TCE COMPARISON REPORT
11451-02
1/31/2012
FOUND COMPUTER SYSDIS001340C SCChristian S
Fall-00
-
Enrollment: Sections:
Comp Group 2:
C SC
Comp Group 1:
Sections: Enrollment:
(56%)Response: 44
Enrollment : 79
Instructor
Question / Instructor Frequency
Mean 95% CI 95% CIMean95% CIDev. St. Mean
Comparison Group Descriptions
1. - 3.32 4.07 -- 3.7 1.15Overall rating of teaching effectiveness
6 1
9 11 12 31%
3% 15%
28% 23%
almost never effectiverarely effectivesometimes effectiveusually effectivealmost always effective
2. - 2.74 3.68 -- 3.2 1.42Overall rating of the course
4 7
10 8 9 24%
18% 11%
21% 26%
one of the worstworse than averageabout averagebetter than averageone of the best
3. - 3.09 3.86 -- 3.5 1.18Amount learned
6 2
11 10
9 24%
5% 16%
26% 29%
almost nothingless than usualabout as much as usualmore than usualan exceptional amount
8. - 3.85 4.62 -- 4.2 1.17Students treated with respect
0 3
4 9
22 58%
8% 0%
24% 11%
strongly disagreedisagreeuncertainagreestrongly agree
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
1
2
3
8
1
2
3
8
For each QUESTION: Instructor L, M, U; Group 1 L,M,U; Group 2 L,M,U
L -
Lo
w C
I, M
- M
EA
N,
U -
Up
per
CI
Graphic Comparison of the Means and Confidence Intervals
Questions
University of Arizona. OIRPS. (520) 621-9585. [email protected]. http://oirps.arizona.edu (Que Eva:120)36
Collberg TCE COMPARISON REPORT
08133-01
1/31/2012
PRINCIPLE OF COMPILATIONLEC001553C SCChristian S
Spring-00
-
Enrollment: Sections:
Comp Group 2:
C SC
Comp Group 1:
Sections: Enrollment:
(83%)Response: 10
Enrollment : 12
Instructor
Question / Instructor Frequency
Mean 95% CI 95% CIMean95% CIDev. St. Mean
Comparison Group Descriptions
1. - 3.47 4.73 -- 4.1 0.88Overall rating of teaching effectiveness
1 0
0 6 3 30%
0% 10%
60% 0%
almost never effectiverarely effectivesometimes effectiveusually effectivealmost always effective
2. - 3.00 4.20 -- 3.6 0.84Overall rating of the course
1 0
3 5 1 10%
0% 10%
50% 30%
one of the worstworse than averageabout averagebetter than averageone of the best
3. - 2.91 4.29 -- 3.6 0.97Amount learned
1 0
4 3 2 20%
0% 10%
30% 40%
almost nothingless than usualabout as much as usualmore than usualan exceptional amount
4. - 2.80 4.20 -- 3.5 0.97Overall instructor comparison
2 0
2 5 1 10%
0% 20%
50% 20%
one of the least effectiveless effective than mostabout as effective as mostmore effective than mostone of the most effective
5. - 3.06 4.54 -- 3.8 1.03Usefulness of the in-class activities
1 0
3 3 3 30%
0% 10%
30% 30%
almost never usefulrarely usefulsometimes usefulusually usefulalmost always useful
6. - 3.71 4.89 -- 4.3 0.82Usefulness of the outside assignments
0 0
2 3 5 50%
0% 0%
30% 20%
almost never usefulrarely usefulsometimes usefulusually usefulalmost always useful
8. - 3.90 4.90 -- 4.4 0.70Students treated with respect
0 0
1 4 5 50%
0% 0%
40% 10%
strongly disagreedisagreeuncertainagreestrongly agree
13. - 3.90 4.90 -- 4.4 0.70Difficulty level of the course
4 5
1 0 0 0%
50% 40%
0% 10%
extremely difficult (5)more difficult than average (4)about average (3)easier than average (2)extremely easy (1)
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
1
2
3
4
5
6
8
13
1
2
3
4
5
6
8
13
For each QUESTION: Instructor L, M, U; Group 1 L,M,U; Group 2 L,M,U
L -
Lo
w C
I, M
- M
EA
N,
U -
Up
per
CI
Graphic Comparison of the Means and Confidence Intervals
Questions
University of Arizona. OIRPS. (520) 621-9585. [email protected]. http://oirps.arizona.edu (Que Eva:120)32
Related Documents
