T o mee t a te st indic at or for gr ade s 3- 8 and1 0 , atlea st 7 5% of stud ent s te ste d mustscore proficientor highe r on that test . Other indicat or re quire ments are : 1 1 th gra de Ohio Gra duati on T ests, 85%; At te ndance Rate, 93%; Graduation Rate, 90%. State Indicators 2008-2009 School Year Report Card The state requirement is 75 percent The state requirement is 75 percent The state requirement is 75 percent The state requirement is 75 percent The state requirement is 75 percent The state requirement is 85 percent The state requirement is 93 percent The state requirement is 90 percent 3rd Grade Achievement 1. Rea ding 2. Mathematics 4th Grade Achievement 3. Reading 4. Mathematics 5. Writing 5th Grade Achievement 6. Read ing 7. Mathematics 8. Science 9. Social Studies 6th Grade Achievement 10. Reading 11. Mathematics 7th Grade Achievement 12. Reading 13. Mathematics 14. Writing 8th Grade Achievement 15. Reading 16. Mathematics 17. Science 18. Social Studies Ohio Graduation Tests ( 10th Grade) 19. Reading 20. Mathematics 21. Writing 22. Science 23. Social Studies Ohio Graduation Tests ( 11th Grade) 24. Reading 25. Mathematics 26. Writing 27. Science 28. Social Studies Attendance Rate 29. All Gra des 2007-08 Graduation Rate 30. District The state requirement is 75 percent The state requirement is 75 percent The six designations a re • Excellent wit h Distinction • Excellent • Effective • Continuous Improv ement • Academic W atch • Academic Emergency Value-Added Adequate Y early Progress Performance Index Indicators The D istr ict Re port Car d for the 2 008-2 009 school ye ar shows the progress district s h ave made based on four measure s ofperformance. The combinat ion of the four measures is the basis for assigning state designations to districts, buildings and community schools. Your District’s Designation: Number of State Indicators Met out of 30 Performance Index State Indicators Performance Index Value-Added Measure Your District 2008-2009 Similar Districts 2008-2009 State 2008-2009 Percentage of Students at and above the Proficient Level On the Web: reportcard.ohio.gov Value-Added Measure State Indicators District Improve ment (0-120 points) A YP Any result at or abo ve the state standard is ind icated b y a . SimilarDistrictsare basedon com paringdemog raphi c,socioec onomicand geog raphi cfactors. Cumulati ve resultsfor studentswho tookthe testsas 10th or 11thgrader s. -- =Not Calculated/Not Displ ayed when there are fewer than 10 in the group. 97.7 % 93.2 % 97.7 % 88.6 % 86.4 % 93.4 % 90.2 % IRN # 045369 Effective 20 90.3 Not Met At Risk Fairport Harbor Exempted Village School District 329 Vine St, Fairport Harbor, OH 44077-5741 - Lake County Current S uperinten dent: Domenic A. Paolo (440) 354-5400 83.9 % 79.3 % 81.3 % 78.1 % 81.3 % 83.3 % 66.7 % 83.3 % 56.7 % 80.8 % 74.5 % 81.6 % 63.2 % 73.7 % 37.5 % 40.6 % 46.9 % 31.3 % 78.8 % 78.8 % 94.2 % 73.1 % 75.0 % 86.3 % 88.7 % 77.4 % 81.3 % 87.9 % 86.7 % 88.7 % 82 % 78.4 % 84.4 % 80.7 % 73.6 % 80.5 % 70.9 % 72 % 62.3 % 70.6 % 61.6 % 81.3 % 75.2 % 88.6 % 85.9 % 76.6 % 74.3 % 80.5 % 85.9 % 85.3 % 88.5 % 72.4 % 70.6 % 62.8 % 51.1 % 77.6 % 78.8 % 71.5 % 57.4 % 84.5 % 81.4 % 89.7 % 76 % 81.6 % 90.6 % 90.3 % 94.9 % 86.4 % 88.6 % 92.8 % 88.4 % 93.2 % 84.2 % 88.6 % 94.3 % 84.6 % 95.9 % 94.5 % 96.2 % 91.4 % 92.7 % 95.9 % 96.9 % - = below
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
8/14/2019 Fairport Harbor Schools State Report Card 2009
Overall CompositeScores reflect grade level and overall composite
ratings for the 2008-2009 school year.
Value-Added Measure
Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8
Reading
Mathematics
On the Web: reportcard.ohio.gov
Your district’s Value-Added rating represents the progress yourdistrict has made with its students since last school year.In contrast, achievement scores represent students’ performance at apoint in time. A score of “Above” indicates greater than one year of
progress has been achieved; “Met” indicates one year of progress has beenachieved; “Below” indicates less than one year of progress has been achieved.
Value-AddedMeasure
-
+ AboveExpected Growth
MetExpected Growth
BelowExpected Growth
=
=
=
Legend
Performance Index
Performance Level Across Grades3-8 and 10 for all Tested Subjects
(Includes every student enrolled in
the district for a full academic year)
X =WeightPercentage Points
Your District’s Performance Index
0.0
0.3
0.6
1.0
1.1
1.2
Untested
Limited
Basic
Proficient
Accelerated
Advanced
X
X
X
X
X
X
=
=
=
=
=
=
The PerformanceIndex reflects theachievementof everystudentenrolled for the full academic
year. The Performance Indexis a weighted average that includesall tested subjects and grades anduntested students. The greatestweight is given to advanced scores(1.2); the weights decrease for eachperformance level and a weight of zero is given to untested students.This results in a scale from 0 to120points. The Performance Index can becompared across years to showdistrict achievement trends.
PerformanceIndex
2008-2009 2007-2008 2006-2007
Performance Index Over Time
0.1
7.7
20.3
40.2
23.8
7.8
2.3
12.2
40.2
26.2
9.4
90.3 88.8 91.5
90.3
Fairport Harbor Exempted Village School District, Lake Coun
-
+ - + - -
+ - - - -
0.0
8/14/2019 Fairport Harbor Schools State Report Card 2009
Not Required – This indicator was not evaluated for this subgroup because the subgroup size was smaller than the minimum number needed to achieve a statistically
reliable result. 30 students is the minimum size for the proficiency and non-test indicators, while 40 is the minimum size for the participation rate indicators.
This subgroup met AYP for this indicator with its current year, two-year combined, Safe Harbor, or growth measure results.
This subgroup did not meet AYP for this indicator.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)
ReadingProficiency:
MathematicsProficiency:
ReadingParticipation:
Mathematics
Participation:
AttendanceRate:
AYP Determinatio
by Indicator
GraduationRate:
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) is a federally required measure. Everyschooland district must meet AYP goals thatare set for Reading and Mathematics
Rate. These goals are applied to ten student groups: All Students,Economically Disadvantaged Students, Asian/Pacific IslanderStudents, Black, non-Hispanic Students, American Indian/AlaskaNative Students, Hispanic Students, Multi-Racial Students, White,
non-Hispanic Students, Students with Disabilities (IEP), and Students withLimited English Proficiency (LEP). If any one of these groups does not meet
Rate, or Graduation Rate, then the school or district does not meet AYP.Not meeting AYP for consecutive years will have both federal and stateconsequences. Federal consequences could include a school or district beingidentified for improvement. State consequences could include a reductionin the state’s rating designation.
AYP
AYP Determination
by Subgroup
AYPDetermination
for Your District:
This legend explains terms used in the above chart that describe whether each student group met this year’s AYP goals.
For test indicators, AYP can be met in one of four ways:
1) meeting the AYP targets with current year results;
2) meeting the AYP targets with two-year combined results;
3) meeting the improvement requirements of Safe Harbor;
4) meeting the AYP targets with projected results.
For non-test indicators, AYP can be met in one of three ways:
1) meeting the AYP targets with current year results;
2) meeting the AYP targets with two-year combined results;
3) making improvement over the previous year.
* The non-test indicators used for overall AYP (Attendance Rate and Graduation Rate)are evaluated only for the All Students subgroup.
Black,non-Hispanic
HispanicWhite,
non-Hispanic
Asian or Pacific Islander
American Indian/ Alaska Native
Econ.Disadvtgd
Limited EnglishProficient Multi-Racial
Federally RequiredGraduation Rate Information
The disaggregated graduation rates ofyour district are provided forinformational purposes onlyand are not used foryour AYPdetermination.
Students withDisabilities
Met
Met
Met
Met
Met
Met
Met
Fairport Harbor Exempted Village School District, Lake County
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
Met
Met
Met
Met
Met
Not Met
Not Met
NR
NR
Not Met
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
Not M
Not M
Met
Met
Met
Met
Not M
0% 0% >95% 0%
>95% 0% >95% >95% 89.5%
8/14/2019 Fairport Harbor Schools State Report Card 2009
Under the federalNo Child Left BehindAct, states are
required to reportcertain data aboutschools and teachers.Data presented hereare for reportingpurposes only andare not used in thecomputation of thestate designationfor districts andschools.
-- =Not Calculated/Not Displayed when there are fewer than 10 in the group.
Reading
WritingMathematicsScienceSocial Studies
ReadingWritingMathematicsScienceSocial Studies
ReadingWritingMathematicsScience
Social Studies
ReadingWritingMathematicsScienceSocial Studies
ReadingWritingMathematicsScienceSocial Studies
Black,non-Hispanic
AmericanIndian/
Alaska Native
Asian or Pacific
Islander Hispanic
Multi-Racial
White,non-Hispanic
Non-DisabledStudents
Studentswith
DisabilitiesMigrant
Non-Econ.
Disadvtgd
Econ.Disadvtgd
LimitedEnglish
ProficientFemale Male
Your District's Percentage of Students at Each Performance Level
Percentage of Students Scoring Limited
Percentage of Students Scoring Basic
Percentage of Students Scoring Proficient
Percentage of Students Scoring Accelerated
Percentage of Students Scoring Advanced
State and Federally Required District Information
Number of Limited English Proficient StudentsExcluded from Accountability Calculations
Your District State
All Schools inYour District
High-PovertySchools Locatedin Your District*
Low-PovertySchools Locatedin Your District*
Percentage of teachers with at least a Bachelor’s Degree
Percentage of teachers with at least a Master’s Degree
Percentage of core academic subject elementary and secondaryclasses not taught by highly qualified teachers
Percentage of core academic subject elementary and secondaryclasses taught by properly certified teachers
Percentage of core academic subject elementary and secondary classes taught byteachers with temporary, conditional or long-term substitute certification/licensure
*High-povertyschoolsare thoserankedin the topquartile based onthe percentage ofeconomicallydisadvantagedstudents. Low-poverty schoolsare thoserankedin thebottomquartile based onthe percent
ofeconomicallydisadvantagedstudents. Adistrict mayhavebuildingsin both quartiles, in just onequartile orin neither quartile.
Federally Required School Teacher Information
-- =Not Calculated/Not Displayed when there are fewer than 10 in the group.
Average DailyStudent
Enrollment
Black,non-
Hispanic
AmericanIndian or
Alaska Native
Asian orPacific
IslanderHispanic Multi-Racial
White,non-
Hispanic
Studentswith
DisabilitiesMigrant
EconomicallyDisadvantaged
LimitedEnglish
Proficient
Your District’s Students 2008-2009
--
549 4.2% -- -- 2.0% 4.9% 88.9% -- -- 11.0% --
Fairport Harbor Exempted Village School District, Lake Coun
100.0
63.8
2.6
98.0
99.3
59.3
1.8
98.7
----------
--
--------
--
--------
--
--------
25.0
--16.7
----
6.6
3.710.84.76.6
5.1
1.97.74.05.1
26.7
21.436.713.320.0
--
--------
7.2
3.310.45.37.1
--
--------
4.4
1.911.33.55.3
--
--------
10.6
5.710.77.08.8
----------
----------
----------
0.0--
33.3----
16.811.217.826.435.8
13.59.3
16.225.333.3
40.028.643.333.346.7
----------
16.011.719.226.534.5
----------
----------
14.17.7
20.326.338.6
18.914.318.326.331.6
--------
--
--------
--
--------
--
--------
--
58.3--
33.3--
--
42.640.239.836.8
33.0
45.641.742.735.4
33.3
33.350.016.746.7
33.3
--------
--
44.542.540.036.3
33.6
--------
--
--------
--
45.940.436.838.6
35.1
42.444.342.735.1
31.6
----------
----------
----------
----------
16.7--
8.3----
24.243.022.025.514.2
25.745.422.628.317.2
0.00.03.36.70.0
----------
23.240.820.825.715.0
----------
----------
25.246.220.328.112.3
20.535.720.622.817.5
----------
--
--------
----------
----------
----------
0.0--
8.3----
9.81.99.56.6
10.4
10.11.9
10.77.1
11.1
0.00.00.00.00.0
----------
9.11.79.66.29.7
----------
----------
10.43.8
11.33.58.8
7.60.07.68.8
10.5
0.0 -- 0.0
8/14/2019 Fairport Harbor Schools State Report Card 2009
Every school in SI has to create animprovement plan. If a school in SIreceives federal funds, it may have tooffer Public School Choice and/orSupplemental Educational Services.
Being in SI for three or more yearsrequires more extensive correctiveactions and, eventually, restructuring.
Generally, a school will enter SchoolImprovement (SI) after missing AYPfor two consecutive years, and it canexit SI only after meeting AYP for two
consecutive years.
Name of the School & Years in Improvement
Name of Schools Identified for Improvement and Years in Improvement Status
Schools in School Improvement
Measures of a Rigorous Curriculum for the Class of 2008
Measure 2007-08 Graduates Data Source
EMIS - EducationManagement Information Systemof the Ohio Department of Education
ACT College Entrance Exam - Nonprofit organization that administerstheACT college entrance test
College Board (SAT)- Nonprofit association that administers the SAT exam
AP - Advanced Placement, a program offering courses/exams that provide
students the opportunity to earn credit or advanced standing at colleges anduniversities
Legend
The Measures of a Rigorous Curriculum are intended toreport on the completion of a rigorous curriculum and otherindicators of studentsuccess thatensure students leaveschool with the knowledgeand skills needed to succeed in
college, careers and citizenship. These indicators pertain toschools that have any combination of grades10, 11 and 12.
The National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP),often referred to as “The Nation’s Report Card,” is the only nationallyrepresentative and continuingassesssubject areas. Schools and students within each stateare selected randomly to be a part of theassessment. Not all students in the state or in a particularschool take the assessment.
, and there are no individual student or even schoolsummary results. The assessments are conducted in mathematics, reading, science, writing,the arts, civics, economics, geography and U.S. history.
To view Ohio’s most recentNAEP results,
go to:
and search for key word “N AEP”
gov
90.2
Fairport Harbor Exempted Village School District, Lake County
No Schools Identified for Improvement in District
898
0
48.6
--
2.7
0
19
%
%
%
8/14/2019 Fairport Harbor Schools State Report Card 2009
1. If a district meets AYP in the current year, it can berated no lower than Continuous Improvement.
2. If a district does not meet AYP for three consecutive years and in the current year it does not meet AYP inmore than one student group, it can be rated no
higher than Continuous Improvement.3. In all other cases, AYP has no effect on the
preliminary designation. Thus, the preliminary designationbecomes the final designation.
Once the preliminary designation is determined, Value-Added, the fourth measure in the accountability system, is evaluated to determine the impact (if any) on the district’s finaldesignation.
1. If your district’s rating is restricted to ContinuousImprovement due to AYP, then Value-Added will have noimpact on the designation and the preliminary designationbecomes the final designation.
2. If your district experiences above expected growth for atleast two consecutive years, your district’s finaldesignation will increase by one designation.
3. If your district experiences below expected growth for atleast three consecutive years, your district’s finaldesignation will decrease by one designation.
The preliminary designation results from identifying thehigher value between the percentage of indicators met by your district and your district’s performance index. AYP then is evaluated to determine its effect on the preliminarydesignation. There are three ways in which AYP can affect the preliminary designation.
Determining Your District's Rating
Indicators Met Performance Index Score AYP Status Preliminary Designation94%-100% 100 to 120or
or
or
or
or
and
and
and
and
and
andand
Met or Not Met Excellent
75%-93.9%
0%-74.9%
50%-74.9%
31%-49.9%
0%-30.9%
90 to 99.9
80 to 89.9
0 to 89.9
70 to 79.9
0 to 69.9
Met or Not Met
Not Met
Not Met
Not Met
Met
Effective
Academic Watch
Academic Emergency
Continuous
Improvement
=
=
=
=
=
=
Preliminary Designation Value-Added Measure* Final Designation
Excellent
Effective
Continuous Improvement
Academic Watch
Academic Emergency
Above expected growth for at least 2 consecutive yearsand
and
and
and
and
Excellent with Distinction
Effective
Above expected growth for at least 2 consecutive years
Above expected growth for at least 2 consecutive years
Below expected growth for at least 3 consecutive years
Above expected growth for at least 2 consecutive years
Below expected growth for at least 3 consecutive years
Below expected growth for at least 3 consecutive years
Below expected growth for at least 3 consecutive years
Above expected growth for at least 2 consecutive years
Below expected growth for at least 3 consecutive years
Excellent
Continuous Improvement
Academic Emergency
Academic Watch
Academic Emergency
Continuous Improvement
Academic Watch
Effective
*In all other cases, including if your district’s designation has been restricted to Continuous Improvement, then Value-Added will haveno impact on the designation and the preliminary designation becomes the final designation.
or
or
or
or
or
Determiningyour district’s reportcard designationis a multi-stepprocess. Thefirst stepis to determinea preliminary designation,whichis basedon thefollowingcomponents:1)the percentageof indicators met, 2)theperformanceindex and 3)AYP determination.
Fairport Harbor Exempted Village School District, Lake Coun
8/14/2019 Fairport Harbor Schools State Report Card 2009