Top Banner
Failure Analysis of a Hollow Bar TEAM FAIL! Samantha Atmur Timmy Strait Dave Bernick Joe Yoder Alan Korovin
16

Failure Analysis of a Hollow Bar TEAM FAIL! Samantha Atmur Timmy Strait Dave Bernick Joe Yoder Alan Korovin.

Jan 03, 2016

Download

Documents

Leonard Blair
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Failure Analysis of a Hollow Bar TEAM FAIL! Samantha Atmur Timmy Strait Dave Bernick Joe Yoder Alan Korovin.

Failure Analysis of a Hollow BarTEAM FAIL! Samantha AtmurTimmy StraitDave BernickJoe YoderAlan Korovin

Page 2: Failure Analysis of a Hollow Bar TEAM FAIL! Samantha Atmur Timmy Strait Dave Bernick Joe Yoder Alan Korovin.

Background

• Bar is made of 316L Stainless Steel.• Bar was heat-cleaned at 1200˚C on Silicon

Carbide blocks. (Supposed to be 1200˚F)• Bar is used to rotate (Torque=40 lbf*ft) a material

(Total Force=21.62 lbf) in a vacuum furnace at around 400˚C.

• Bar failed after operating for less than 400 hr. (57,750-60,000 Cycles)

Insert Pic of bar here

Page 3: Failure Analysis of a Hollow Bar TEAM FAIL! Samantha Atmur Timmy Strait Dave Bernick Joe Yoder Alan Korovin.

Hypothesis

• Heat cleaning at near-melting point (1371 ˚C) Solid state reaction

between SiC block and the bar.

Void creation Changed material

properties

• Failure Cyclic Torsion causing

crack propagation around the void

Decohesive Fracture

Page 4: Failure Analysis of a Hollow Bar TEAM FAIL! Samantha Atmur Timmy Strait Dave Bernick Joe Yoder Alan Korovin.

Analysis

• Supporting evidence of a solid state reaction

Change in Chemical Composition

Possible change in material properties

Page 5: Failure Analysis of a Hollow Bar TEAM FAIL! Samantha Atmur Timmy Strait Dave Bernick Joe Yoder Alan Korovin.

Analysis Continued

• Fracture analysis showed stress intensity factor to be much less than the fracture toughness KI << KIC (4 MPa m << 260 MPa m)

• Was not a pure fracture• Evidence of Torsion

Page 6: Failure Analysis of a Hollow Bar TEAM FAIL! Samantha Atmur Timmy Strait Dave Bernick Joe Yoder Alan Korovin.

• Evidence of a pure shear element (from torsion) The bar fractures at 35 degree angle Crack below fracture at 45 degree

angle  

• Decohesive Fracture Dimple rupture evidence along with

transgranular evidence

    

Analysis Continued

Page 7: Failure Analysis of a Hollow Bar TEAM FAIL! Samantha Atmur Timmy Strait Dave Bernick Joe Yoder Alan Korovin.

Analysis Continued• We modeled our void as a notch in

a cylindrical bar

 

• Estimated number of cycles for crack propagation failure: 9,571 - 16,945 cycles using the max torsional load as an axial load

• Bar lasted between 57,750 -60,000 cycles

• Pure torsion decreases crack growth rate

• "Crystal" void may have been growing due to heating/cooling cycles

Page 8: Failure Analysis of a Hollow Bar TEAM FAIL! Samantha Atmur Timmy Strait Dave Bernick Joe Yoder Alan Korovin.

Conclusions

• Solid state reaction caused a large void to form and altered material properties

• The cyclic torque applied to the bar lead to crack propagation with the aid of the void acting as a stress concentration

• Once crack reached its critical size the bar experienced a decohesive fracture

Page 9: Failure Analysis of a Hollow Bar TEAM FAIL! Samantha Atmur Timmy Strait Dave Bernick Joe Yoder Alan Korovin.

Caveats • Stress Concentration Factor approximated with a notched bar• Most of failure surface is covered in tool marks destroying

evidence• Constants for crack propagation from a study using higher

temperatures • Crack propagation analysis was modeled as if void was not

there but using the stress concentration of void• Stress intensity correction factor was taken from aging aircraft

data representing a semicircular crack in a cylindrical tube• Fracture toughness was estimated from 316L annealed steel•  Do not know the effect of heating/cooling cycles and gases

on the "crystal" void

Page 10: Failure Analysis of a Hollow Bar TEAM FAIL! Samantha Atmur Timmy Strait Dave Bernick Joe Yoder Alan Korovin.

Appendix

Page 11: Failure Analysis of a Hollow Bar TEAM FAIL! Samantha Atmur Timmy Strait Dave Bernick Joe Yoder Alan Korovin.

Appendix Continued

Page 12: Failure Analysis of a Hollow Bar TEAM FAIL! Samantha Atmur Timmy Strait Dave Bernick Joe Yoder Alan Korovin.

Appendix Continued

Page 13: Failure Analysis of a Hollow Bar TEAM FAIL! Samantha Atmur Timmy Strait Dave Bernick Joe Yoder Alan Korovin.

Appendix Continued

Walsh, R.P., Summers, L.T., Miller, J.R. “The 4 K Tensile and Fracture Toughness Properties of a Modified 316LN Conduit Alloy” <http://www.magnet.fsu.edu/library/publications/NHMFL_Publication-4952.pdf>.

Page 14: Failure Analysis of a Hollow Bar TEAM FAIL! Samantha Atmur Timmy Strait Dave Bernick Joe Yoder Alan Korovin.

Appendix Continued

Chen, C. T., Han, “Stress-Intensity Factor and Fatigue Crack Growth Analyses For Rotorcraft Using AGILE.” The 7th Joint DoD/FAA/NASA Conference on Aging Aircraft. 8-11 September, 2003. <http://airportaircraftsafetyrd.tc.faa.gov/Programs/AgingAircraft/rotorcraft/Publications/SIF%20and%20FCGA%20for%20RC%20Using%20AGILE_CChen.pdf>.

Page 15: Failure Analysis of a Hollow Bar TEAM FAIL! Samantha Atmur Timmy Strait Dave Bernick Joe Yoder Alan Korovin.

Appendix Continued

“Comparative study on the fatigue crack growth behavior of316L and 316LN stainless steels: e€ect of microstructure ofcyclic plastic strain zone at crack tip.” Journal of Nuclear Materials. Volume 282, Issue 1, November 2000, Pages 32-39. <http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6TXN-41F60C4-2&_user=209810&_coverDate=11%2F30%2F2000&_rdoc=1&_fmt=high&_orig=gateway&_origin=gateway&_sort=d&_docanchor=&view=c&_searchStrId=1728562245&_rerunOrigin=google&_acct=C000014439&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=209810&md5=0a38baa557ff0725f1f08719ec9b2cde&searchtype=a>.

Page 16: Failure Analysis of a Hollow Bar TEAM FAIL! Samantha Atmur Timmy Strait Dave Bernick Joe Yoder Alan Korovin.

Appendix Continued

ReferencesVander, Voort George F. Metallography and Microstructures. Materials

Park, OH: ASM International, 2004. Print.

Powell, Gordon W. Failure Analysis and Prevention. [Metals Park,OH]: ASM International, 2007. Print.