Fuzzy Analytic Hier Input cells Auto-filled Weighing Score This calculation tool is designed to automate the Fuzzy AHP process to weighting evaluation criteria b the weight stage, performance attributes for a transportation project are defined as well as the stakeh This tool uses the FAHP technique was utilized to establish the consensus w objective and subjective factors. ♦ Fuzzy number is utilized to analyze di fuzzy number (TFN) is used in this model In Fuzzy AHP, complex structur ♦ comparisons and to estimate their relative weights The importance level ♦ the group of stakeholders. If local survey is not feasible, the importance version only allows to define three (3) stakeholders and four (4) criteria. analysis are estimates. Actual performance may vary and practical results m PERMISSION. Departm T
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process Weight Scoring Tool
Input cellsAuto-filledWeighing Score
This calculation tool is designed to automate the Fuzzy AHP process to weighting evaluation criteria by considering conflicting interests from multiple stakeholders. This is one of the four modules in the entire decision making model. In the weight stage, performance attributes for a transportation project are defined as well as the stakeholders' preference. This tool will provide a weight vector applied to each project evaluation criteria.
This tool uses the FAHP technique was utilized to establish the consensus weights among stakeholders of the concerning performance attributes in a project by considering both objective and subjective factors. ♦ Fuzzy number is utilized to analyze discrepancies arising due to stakeholders’ preferences on performance attributes. The triangular fuzzy number (TFN) is used in this model In Fuzzy AHP, complex structure ♦representing performance attributes are organized in hierarchical cluster to facilitate pair wise comparisons and to estimate their relative weights The importance levels of these attributes among different ♦interests groups can be determined by conducting a survey in the group of stakeholders. If local survey is not feasible, the importance levels can also be estimated based on the specific interests in each interest group.
♦ This demo version only allows to define three (3) stakeholders and four (4) criteria.
Disclaimer: This analysis tool implements the Fuzzy AHP procedures for analyzing the normalized weight vectors of the performance attributes. All values reported in this analysis are estimates. Actual performance may vary and practical results may differ from planning estimates. NOT AUTHORIZED FOR FURTHER REPRODUCTION OR DISTRIBUTION WITHOUT PERMISSION.
Start Analysis
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Traffic and Transportation Laboratory
Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process Weight Scoring ToolThis calculation tool is designed to automate the Fuzzy AHP process to weighting evaluation criteria by considering conflicting interests from multiple stakeholders. This is one of the four modules in the entire decision making model. In the weight stage, performance attributes for a transportation project are defined as well as the stakeholders' preference. This tool will provide a weight vector applied to each project evaluation
This tool uses the FAHP technique was utilized to establish the consensus weights among stakeholders of the concerning performance attributes in a project by considering both objective and subjective factors. ♦ Fuzzy number is utilized to analyze discrepancies arising due to stakeholders’ preferences on performance attributes. The triangular fuzzy number (TFN) is used in this model In Fuzzy AHP, complex structure ♦representing performance attributes are organized in hierarchical cluster to facilitate pair wise comparisons and to estimate their relative weights The importance levels of these attributes among different ♦interests groups can be determined by conducting a survey in the group of stakeholders. If local survey is not feasible, the importance levels can also be estimated based on the specific interests in each interest group.
Disclaimer: This analysis tool implements the Fuzzy AHP procedures for analyzing the normalized weight vectors of the performance attributes. All values reported in this analysis are estimates. Actual performance may vary and practical results may differ from planning estimates. NOT AUTHORIZED FOR FURTHER REPRODUCTION OR DISTRIBUTION WITHOUT PERMISSION.
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Traffic and Transportation Laboratory
Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process Weight Scoring ToolThis calculation tool is designed to automate the Fuzzy AHP process to weighting evaluation criteria by considering conflicting interests from multiple stakeholders. This is one of the four modules in the entire decision making model. In the weight stage, performance attributes for a transportation project are defined as well as the stakeholders' preference. This tool will provide a weight vector applied to each project evaluation
This tool uses the FAHP technique was utilized to establish the consensus weights among stakeholders of the concerning performance attributes in a project by considering both objective and subjective factors. ♦ Fuzzy number is utilized to analyze discrepancies arising due to stakeholders’ preferences on performance attributes. The triangular fuzzy number (TFN) is used in this model In Fuzzy AHP, complex structure ♦representing performance attributes are organized in hierarchical cluster to facilitate pair wise comparisons and to estimate their relative weights The importance levels of these attributes among different ♦interests groups can be determined by conducting a survey in the group of stakeholders. If local survey is not feasible, the importance levels can also be estimated based on the specific interests in each interest group.
Disclaimer: This analysis tool implements the Fuzzy AHP procedures for analyzing the normalized weight vectors of the performance attributes. All values reported in this analysis are estimates. Actual performance