Rams Horn Sculpture by John McEwen, Calgary, AB www.waltersinc.com Build on Our Experience fabricators and erectors of structural steel GM Trestle, Oshawa, ON Ottawa MacDonald-Cartier International Airport, Ottawa, ON A new sound for the Roy Thomson Hall 2002 Design Awards A field of beams PUBLICATION OF THE CANADIAN INSTITUTE OF STEEL CONSTRUCTION NUMBER 17 SPRING 2003
16
Embed
fabricators and erectors of structural steel Experiencequebec.cisc-icca.ca/getmedia/25e85f0f-dc99-443b-aa59-37a62bff49af/... · What about welding to existing structures? The older
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Rams Horn Sculpture byJohn McEwen, Calgary, AB
www.waltersinc.com
Build on OurExperience
fabricators and erectors of structural steel
GM Trestle, Oshawa, ON
Ottawa MacDonald-CartierInternational Airport,Ottawa, ON
A new sound for the
Roy Thomson Hall
2002 Design Awards
A f ield of beamsP U B L I C A T I O N O F T H E C A N A D I A N I N S T I T U T E O F S T E E L C O N S T R U C T I O N N U M B E R 1 7 S P R I N G 2 0 0 3
03-088.advansteel.ENG.03 5/27/03 2:58 PM Page 1
from the editor
I have always admired those who have thepatience to build the wonderfully complex and beautifulmodels of the windjammer sailing ships with 3 or 4 masts,replete with ropes and sails, inside those thin-necked glassbottles. What tools did these craftsmen use? How did theyassemble the parts? What were the erection techniques?The team that designed and built the AcousticalEnhancement Project for Roy Thomson Hall faced similarchallenges.
Just as the ship model makers must usesmall parts, so too did the Roy Thomson Hall AcousticalEnhancement Project team. Getting the parts through theone existing door was only part of the story; they also hadto assemble and erect the new steel support structure witha crane too large to slip through the “eye of a needle” door.The cover of this issue showcases the finished product;however, behind the scenes lies a remarkable tale involvingthe close cooperation of all parties to this contract.
The new Canadian Light Source project inSaskatoon presented a different set of challenges for theUMA Group and Supreme Steel. Housing the world’s fourthlargest synchrotron, the Canadian Light Source buildingfeatures a structure with an unobstructed span of 83 m inboth directions. With a history of strength, structural steelprovided the opportunity to house this base of researchwhich will enhance all our lives and that of our children wellinto the future.
Across the country, steel structurescontinue to be recognized for their innovations, gracefullines, and economic solutions to demanding needs. Again,Advantage Steel is proud to feature the CISC RegionalDesign Awards for 2002.
Have a steel question that you alwayswanted to ask? Then check out the new feature column inthis issue of Advantage Steel – Ask Dr. Sylvie.
in this issue
04 Ask Dr. Sylvie
06 What’s Cool, What’s Hot, What’s New!
09 A new sound for the Roy Thomson Hall
12 A field of beams
15 2002 Design Awards
24 CISC Fabricator Members
27 Members
Cover : Roy Thomson Hall's new acoustic canopy
Above :Résidence Olivier, Bowker Lake, QC
Photo: François Bastien
Your NumberOne Ticket To ISO & CISCRegistrationAt QUASAR there’s a real difference due to our value-added, practical approach to ISO 9000, ISO 14000 andCISC Quality Standards Registration.
With the CWB Groupbehind the QUASARname, we bring over50 years of valuableindustry knowledgeand experience tohelp you improveyour business.
Contact us today or visit our website and check outthe QUASAR Ticket to ISO and CISC registration. It represents an advantage in industry specializationthat is second to none.
QUASAR
ISO & CISC
Registration
Advantages
• CWB Association
• Value-Added
Service
• Industry
Specialization
• Focussing On
Your Needs
• Knowledgeable
Professionals
• 9 Locations
In Canada
• Gateway To
New Business
• Superior Audits
• Cost
Effectiveness
CALL TODAY
905-542-0547
OR
1-800-461-9001
OUR EXPERIENCE IS YOUR ADVANTAGE
Tel: 905-542-0547 or 1-800-461-9001Fax: 905-542-1318
has to be careful not to use the same truck load. TheAmerican truck is about half the weight of the Canadiantruck. The moral of the story is: “When comparingcodes between Canada and The United-States, don’tassume the same truck load". Why the difference? Thatcould be the subject of another question. In any case,when the correct American truck load was substitutedin the AASTHO equation, the spacing about doubled to200 mm. In effect, both S6-00 and AASHTO provide thesame answer, in this case, a spacing of 200 mm.
The Fy of 1967 Canadian steelI am presently checking the roof joists of a
building that was constructed in 1967. If I backtrackusing the snow loads of that period, it would appearthat the joists were built with steel having an Fy of 380MPa (55 ksi), which is rather surprising. Would you, byany chance, have a list of historical steels that wereused during that time, either plates or rolled angles?
- B.C.Backtracking can give you a rough ballpark figure,
but I would apply caution when using the ‘detective’method for ascertaining Fy, especially when you canfind a lot of useful information about historical steels onour site, page 6-5 of the CISC Handbook, and in a bookpublished by AISC (see next column).
You can locate the table, “Historical Steels”, on ourweb site. There you will find that the standard in effectin 1967 was the CSA Standard G40.12, 1964, with Fy = 300 MPa (44 ksi) and Fu= 450 MPa (66 ksi). Theaddress for that table is:
http://www.cisc-icca.ca/historical_steels.html.
That was the conservative answer. We have
information that Truscon joists went to an Fy of 380 MPa(55 ksi) for chords in 1968. With joists, you must be verycareful as individual producers used higher strengthchords before these steels were in general use for otherstructural elements. DOSCO made the chords in its ownmill for Truscon, which was then a division of DOSCO(now ISPAT). Joist manufacturers have used steels ofdifferent strength over time, although the exact years arenot known precisely as their catalogues were not alwaysdated. In fact, few people used to put dates on theircatalogues. For your information, open web steel joistsdate back to 1930’s in Canada. In the United States, theSteel Joist Institute’s specification of 1962 introducedsteel of 350 MPa (50 ksi) for chords.
If in doubt, Clause 5.2.2 of CSA Standard S16.1-94provides “default” values for unidentified steels.
For older steel shapes, what could you do? I wasshocked when I couldn’t find a book I have relied on foryears, which included Iron and Steel Beams from 1873 to1952. In fact, AISC replaced it by a new guide. As well,this publication describes how existing structuralsystems can be enhanced for increased strength andstiffness. It’s called:
Design Guide 15: AISC Rehabilitation and Retrofit Guide:A Reference for Historic Shapes and Specificationshttp://www.normas.com/AISC/PAGES/815-02.html
What about welding to existing structures? Theolder steels usually have a higher carbon content, whichdecreases the weldability of a member. What might beuseful is an article in Engineering Journal authored byDavid Ricker, entitled “Field Welding to Existing SteelStructures”, 1st Quarter 1988, 16 pages:http://www.steelstructures.com/IIW%20files/25_1_001.pdf
5A D V A N T A G E S T E E L S P R I N G 2 0 0 34
procedure for these beams. The paper is referenced inthe CISC Handbook (see page 2-95 of the 7th edition). Itis also available online for $25 US at the following address:
http://www.pubs.asce.org/WWWdisplay.cgi?9505901.
Another useful tool for designing the cantilever-suspended span system is CISC’s Gravity Frame Design(GFD) computer software. This program incorporatesthe finite element method and automatically generates anumerical model with no additional input from the user.The actual loading and lateral support conditions aremodelled by the program. A free GFD demo can bedownloaded from the CISC website: http://www.cisc-icca.ca/computer.html
Big stud spacing differencesWhen I calculate the spacing of studs needed for a
relatively standard composite bridge I-girder, I getmarkedly different results whether I used S6-00 orAASHTO. In both cases, the fatigue criterion governed.However, for S6, a spacing of about 400 mm wasrequired, whereas for AASHTO, only 100 mm wasneeded. Which one is correct?
- J.L.
It turns out the answer is ‘neither one’. Let’s seewhy. Although some experts feel that this clause is tooconservative as no known fatigue failures of studs havebeen reported, nonetheless, the Chairman of S6 wasparticularly concerned about this question. In fact, itturned out that a factor of 2 had been omitted in clause10.17.2.3. The Fsrt should be divided by two to read(38d2)/2 which makes the equation the same asAASHTO. The 1/2 should be there as the constantamplitude fatigue threshold stress range. Please markyour CSA Standard S6-00. Although this errata has beenreported extensively already, one can never say it toooften especially when the errata is on the non-conservative side. However, that brings the spacing downto 200 mm. So what about AASHTO? Well, in fact, one
Points of inflection as lateral supportCan I use the theoretical points of inflection in a
Gerber cantilever system as a lateral support to reduce myunsupported length? It seems that I took a CISC course inthe eighties, which said we could.
- O.G.Although there has been debate on this subject in
the past, the answer today is ‘no’. Kirby and Nethercot,among others, have pointed out that a point of inflection,or zero moment, cannot be taken as a lateral support(Design for Structural Stability, 1979). In the case of amulti-span, continuous beam, using the “effective lengthof compression flange” for computing the momentresistance would be incorrect because the entire beam isinvolved in the lateral buckling. Furthermore, you cannotcompare a cantilever section with a simply supportedbeam. Hence, to try and find an equivalent L tosubstitute in the equation for Mu of clause 13.6 of S16.1,is incorrect, since that clause is based on the assumptionthat the beam is simply supported. Also, the details ofconstruction have a major influence on the stability ofthe beam, for instance, whether the bottom chordextends to the column, how much bridging is used, howthe joists are connected to the beam.
In 1995, Essa and Kennedy wrote a paper entitled“Design of Steel Beams in Cantilever-Suspended-SpanConstruction” which appeared in the ASCE Journal ofStructural Engineering, Vol. 121, No. 11, November 1995,pp. 1667-1673. Researchers considered severalgeometries and construction details, and through use oftesting and finite element analysis, arrived at a set ofguidelines. For instance, one of their findings is thatproperly made beam-to-joist connections can contributeto lateral and torsional restraint of the top flange.Although the finite element method was conclusive, onecannot expect practicing engineers to perform such ananalysis every time they have a Gerber cantilever systemto design. The paper provides a simplified design
training in the research and developmentarea and later in the Project AnalysisDivision. In 1987, he became Manager ofEngineering and Costing Services. He wasappointed Manager of the Project AnalysisDivision in 1997 and Chief Engineer ofCISC in 2000. In his new position as
Director of Engineering, Mr. Wong will continue hisleading role in the development and presentation ofCISC short courses for design and construction ofbuilding and bridge structures as well as in the ProjectAnalysis Division.
Mr. Wong has served on many national code andstandard committees. He is currently a member of theTechnical Committee of the Canadian Highway BridgeDesign Code, Standing Committee on Structural Design ofthe Canadian Commission on Building and Fire Code, ULCFire Tests Committee, CSA Technical Committee of ParkingStructures, and the task groups on Seismic Design andComposite Construction of CSA Technical Committee S16.
CISC’s new Director of Codes and StandardsCISC is pleased to welcome back to the steel industry,David MacKinnon, P.Eng., as Director of Codes andStandards. Dave MacKinnon graduated from the
Alberta• Scott Steel Ltd., Edmonton, Alberta• Spencer Steel Limited, Ilderton, Ontario• Supreme Steel Ltd., Edmonton, Alberta• Weldfab Limited, Saskatoon, SaskatchewanCurrently, more than a dozen CISC Fabricators are
investigating the implementation of, or are in the processof implementing or registering their quality systems tothese Guidelines.
In coming issues, Advantage Steel will list all CISCFabricator Members who have been audited and registeredto these Guidelines and encourage Owners, SpecificationWriters, Architects and Engineers – when the assurance ofquality is essential – to specify CISC Members registered tothe CISC quality system Guidelines.
CISC names Alfred F. Wong, P. Eng., MCSCE , Directorof Engineering.Mr. Wong received his B.Sc.E. from the University ofNew Brunswick and his M.Eng. from the University ofAlberta. In 1979, he joined the CISC where he received
A D V A N T A G E S T E E L S P R I N G 2 0 0 36
CSA Standard S16-01CSA Standard S16-01, LimitStates Design of SteelStructures, is now available fromthe Canadian StandardsAssociation in both officiallanguages. It may be purchaseddirectly from CSA through theirOnline store (www.csa.ca) ashardcopy or as a PDF file.
Among the changes to S16 is the addition of a newClause 15 dealing with trusses, a Clause 20 for steel plateshear walls (now termed just plate walls), simplificationsfor the design of trusses, bracing, and members withslender elements (Class 4). Clause 27 dealing withseismic design requirements has been extensively revisedbased on past performance of steel buildings and therecent flood of research findings on moment frames,plate walls and braced frames. A Commentary iscurrently being written to assist designers and users of
the Standard understand the requirements contained inS16-01. The required changes to NBCC 1995 arecurrently in process and will be followed by adoption bythe provincial building codes.
CISC’s Steel Fabrication Quality Systems GuidelineThe last issue (No.16) introduced CISC’s SteelFabrication Quality Systems Guideline, the backgroundand focus of this programme. At that time a number of
CISC Fabricator Members wereimplementing these Guidelines intheir operations. At press time thefollowing CISC Fabricators havenot only implemented theGuidelines but have alsosuccessfully been audited andregistered by Quasar. They are:
• Benson Steel Limited, Bolton, Ontario• Empire Iron Works Ltd., Delta, BC
WHAT’SCOOL,
WHAT’SHOT,
WHAT’SNEW!
One of North America’s largest fully integrated structural steel firms
S P R I N G 2 0 0 3 A D V A N T A G E S T E E LA D V A N T A G E S T E E L S P R I N G 2 0 0 38 9
Since it opened in1982, the ArthurErickson designed
Roy Thomson Hall inToronto has met with a mix of what can onlybe called bouquets andbrickbats. The elegantdesign is almostuniversally lauded, butmany musicians andpatrons alike felt thatthe building's acousticsleft more than a little tobe desired. With an interior volume of close to 1 millioncubic feet, the Hall was 25% larger than many moresuccessful acoustic designs, and some studies alsopointed to the circular shape as an acoustical detriment.So when a renovation project was undertaken in 2001,the emphasis was clearly on how the finished projectwould sound, rather than look.
“The project was completely acoustically driven,”says David Jesson, associate in charge of the project forKPMB Architects. “We had to reduce the volume andreshape the hall. And how do we reshape an interior thatwas already an architectural jewel?”
Perhaps the answer is 'very carefully' or at least'very respectfully'. The design of award winning KPMBpartner Tom Payne sought to reduce the interior volumewith the introduction of 23 wooden bulkheads that nowline the upper chamber of the hall. In addition, twoacoustic canopies, which can be adjusted independentlyabove the stage to fine tune the sound specifically for themany different performances and events that aremounted at the Hall, were installed. And while the upperchamber now features maple rather than concrete, aneffort was made to reflect the original design whereverpossible.
“The bulkheads follow the same curvature as theoriginal concrete walls,” explains Jesson. “And the light
coloured wood waschosen to complementthe light grey of theconcrete and stainlesssteel of the originaldesign.”
Roy ThomsonHall is a steel building,which facilitated thedesign concept - thecanopies andbulkheads are allcompletely or partiallyattached to and
supported by the roof structure, and the bulkheads areframed with structural steel. A total of 238 tonnes ofsteel was utilized in the project, much of it in a less thantypical fashion.
“The steel costs ran between $12,000 and $15,000per tonne,” says Steven Seifert, project executive withcontractor EllisDon Construction. “That's a phenomenalnumber, but it's all bits and pieces of steel.”
The reason behind the bits and pieces is twofold.First, much of the initial work was done in the attic ofthe building, where the trusses and roof structure werereinforced to accommodate almost all of the weight ofthe steel utilized, as well as the some 480,000 sq ft of 5"thick engineered wood timber (manufactured to adensity of 16.5 lb/sq ft). The second factor, one thatinfluenced every facet of design and construction, wasthe limited access available to the hall - a single 10' x 12'bay door was the only way in - or out - for the men,machinery and materials over the ten month scope of theproject.
“We had to utilize very small component parts inorder to get through that door,” acknowledges Jesson.“And that influenced the design, but just because youraccess is small doesn't mean you design small.”
And in its finished state there is nothing small. Thecanopies which hang from the ceiling, framed in steel
A NEW SOUND FOR THE ROY THOMSON HALL
by J.K. Malmgren
Solid FootingPut Your Next Project On Solid FootingSafetyGratingCustomShearand
Form
GRIP STRUT®
GRATELOCK®
TRACTION TREAD®
PERF-O GRIP®
Use anywhere safe,easy-to-maintain,
cost-effective flooring is needed.
PLATFORMSROOFTOP WALKWAYSMEZZANINE FLOORING
SUB-FLOORSCATWALKS
STAIR TREADS
EDVANIndustries Inc.
Canada wide: 800-661-7897Fax: 780-955-9423
www.edvancan.com1407-8th Street, Nisku, AB. T9E 7M5
University of Waterloo with a B.A.Sc. inCivil Engineering in 1976, worked in theStructural Department at Proctor andRedfern Consulting Engineers for 2 yearsand returned to the University of Waterloofrom which he received his M.A.Sc. in 1981.
In 1979, he joined the CanadianInstitute of Steel Construction where he was involved inthe conceptual design of steel structures and in thedevelopment of computer-based analysis and design toolsfor steel buildings.
In 1995, Dave joined the Canadian SteelConstruction Council as the Codes and StandardsEngineer. In this position he focused on the fireengineering aspects of building codes and fire protectionstandards in both Canada and the US, and directed fireresearch activities in Canada.
In 2002, he joined Underwriters’ Laboratories ofCanada as head of the Fire Protection Division. In thisposition he directed engineering and laboratoryoperations responsible for the certification of BuildingProducts, Fire-Resistant Construction, Fire-SuppressionEquipment, Flammable Liquid Storage Systems, FuelBurning Appliances and Marine Safety Products toCanadian and US standards.
As Director of Codes and Standards, he manages andparticipates in the overall effort to garner favourabletreatment of structural steel in the development andinterpretation of construction codes and standards inCanada. In addition, he is responsible for thedevelopment, publication and delivery of core publications
and education programs for the design community. He iscurrently a member of the CCBFC Standing Committee onFire Safety and Occupancy, the NFPA TechnicalCommittee on Fundamentals, the AISC Fire SafetyEngineering Committee and the ULC Committee on FireTests. Dave has co-authored 2 papers on the fireendurance of concrete-filled HSS columns with Dr.Venkatesh Kodur, National Research Council of Canada.
CSCC recruits new Codes and Standards EngineerGeorge Frater, P.Eng., has recently joinedthe Canadian Steel Construction Council(CSCC) as a Codes and StandardsEngineer. The CSCC presently is con-cerned primarily with improved buildingcodes and with research related to firesafety of steel structures.
Prior to this position George worked at engineeringconsultancy firms and a major steel fabricator for a totalof eight years. Most of his engineering design experiencehas been with Hatch Associates, with shorter periods atStone and Webster Canada Ltd., SNC Lavalin and CanronEast, Division of Canron Construction Inc. He has beenlicensed as a Professional Engineer with the ProfessionalEngineers of Ontario since 1995. He received his Ph.D.from the University of Toronto in 1991 (investigated welddesign for HSS trusses) and subsequently worked instructural engineering research laboratories; twoin The Netherlands and one in Sweden.
Look for this mark!
03-088.advansteel.ENG.03 5/27/03 2:59 PM Page 9
A D V A N T A G E S T E E L S P R I N G 2 0 0 310
and clad in wood, are in two shapes. The larger circularone, made from 12 pie shaped pieces, is 55’ in diameterand weighs 38 tonnes. The crescent shaped canopy isslightly wider at 64’, and weighs 28.5 tonnes. They'resupported by separate cable and pulley systems.
“It's like an elevator, with counterbalances of equalweight,” explains project engineer Paul Sandford ofCarruthers & Wallace Ltd.
The head block itself sits directly above the stage,the ‘elevator shaft’ drops down behind the stage, and thecanopies were built in place on scaffolding 18' above thestage floor.
“As it was being built, it was kept in balance byadding weight in the form of steel plates,” says Sandford.
The bulkheads range in size; each is approximately40’ deep and 15’ wide, and they are staggered in heightfrom 40’ down to 17’. Attached to both the roof and theconcrete wall, their installation was carefully planned.
“We put up the bulkheads starting at the organ [atthe stage] and working back simultaneously on both sidesto the ‘follow spot room’,” says Steve Benson, presidentof Benson Steel, which provided all of the steel in theproject. “The ‘follow spot room’, at the very back of thehall, was also renovated and expanded, and installing thetwo sides at once allowed for any necessary minoradjustments to be made when it finally went into place.”
The project was completed in two stages; a ‘pre-dark’ stage and a ‘dark’ stage. The pre-dark stageran from October 2001 to March 2002, and the work thattook place between 11:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. each nightwhile the theatre was still in operation was focusedalmost entirely on the attic area, both reinforcing theexisting steel and creating a framework for the wire
system that would supportthe canopies and theircounter weights. Thematerials were moved upinto the attic space on aroller-type conveyor, thenbuggied across the space inpieces – the multiplecomponents made for hugeamounts of joints and welds,and up to 18 men workingat a given time in the space.The head block for thecanopy wiring system,which brings together the30 cables that support over60 tonnes of weight, is itself
supported by two fifteen tonne girders, each of whichwas brought up into the space in three pieces.
“Each piece was brought in by hand,” says Steve Benson,“Then it entailed hours and hours if not days of welding.”
The limited access and working space wascomplicated by tight timelines and the difficulties ofworking within an operating facility. Each morning
room has been doubled in size to allow increased stagelighting within the hall. The canopies incorporatecatwalks and lighting that improve the hall from atechnical viewpoint. The design itself has beennecessarily altered, but remains true to the original lines,and the sound, by all accounts, is beautiful.
Owner:r: Corporation of Massey Hall & Roy Thomson Hall
Erector: Canron East, A Division of Canron Construction Inc.
Steel Detailer Dowco Consultants Ltd.
before leaving the site, the steel crew performed acareful fire watch and checked over the literallyhundreds of spots where an errant piece of constructionmaterial might fall through to the audience below.
When the hall was completely closed down, thedark stage was necessarily short, only 22 weeks, and thelimited time available and large amount of work led to anextensive period of detailed preparation.
“We did a full-scale mock-up of the steel for thebulkheads in a Mississauga warehouse, then took aportion of that and did a full architectural dress,”explains Benson. “We knew we didn't have time for anyfield changes.”
This trial run not only ensured that things would gosmoothly on site, it also allowed both the architects andengineers to make changes that probably wouldn’t havebeen considered or even possible once the materialswere within the hall itself.
And once the design was finalized, the steelfabricated and the hall dark, the work couldn’t begin untilthe necessary machinery was in place. In order to installthe 22 tonne crane that would carry out the work withinthe hall, crews first had to remove its tires and engine,then cut off its outrigger assembly (which was reweldedonce inside) to fit through that single small door.
“It was kind of like
building a ship in a bottle,” says EllisDon’s Seifert.
Because of the small opening that was actuallyscheduled for use by each of the contractors on an hourby hour basis. The time on-site was planned to thesmallest detail because of the limited time available. Thefact that it was completed without complication andattained the mythical ‘on time, on budget’ status is atribute to all of the consultants and contractors involved,and each of them places the credit squarely at the feet ofthe project contractor.
“We were under constant pressure to meet theschedule,” says Steve Benson. “It was a logisticalnightmare, and it was coordinated tremendously well byEllisDon.”
The refurbished Hall, which opened in August 2002,will no doubt stir up more discussion. Although the workreduced the internal volume of the hall by 17%, it tookup no useable space. In fact, the large open areas withinthe bulkheads have been utilized to house some of theHVAC services moved from the roof, and the follow spot
03-088.advansteel.ENG.03 5/27/03 2:59 PM Page 11
S P R I N G 2 0 0 3 A D V A N T A G E S T E E L 13A D V A N T A G E S T E E L S P R I N G 2 0 0 312
The largest science project undertaken in Canadain over 30 years is moving toward completion atthe University of Saskatchewan in Saskatoon.
The $174 million Canadian Light Source (CLS), asynchrotron that will be the fourth largest device of itskind in the world, will bring Canada up-to-pace with theother G-8 industrialized nations and form the basetechnology that will espouse research in virtually everyscientific field for 25 years to come. CLS has taken onthe slogan, ‘Field of beams. If you build it, they willcome.’, and based on the bated breaths of researchersfrom across the country waiting for the 56 monthconstruction schedule to be completed in December of2003, it rings more than true.
The synchrotron will produce beams of light up to1 million times brighter than the sun, and allowscientists to explore molecules and atoms withastounding accuracy. Precise enough to analyzematerials less than 1/1000 of a millimetre, it will openthe door to a new understanding of everything fromcancerous cells to engine oil viscosity, and findapplication in studies as diverse as diamond mining anddentistry. It is expected to draw not only literally 100s
of scientists, but a range of private companies to an areathat has already begun to become known as ‘ScienceCity’. And, while the synchrotron itself has taken upmuch of the project’s time and budget, the design,planning and construction of the building that will houseit has been necessarily just as precise.
The first consideration in the design process wasspace. Driven by the needs of the scientists and firstdeveloped by the UMA Group Ltd, which took on twosignificant roles in the project, the concept came with aprerequisite of 83 square metres of clear unimpededspace. Because of this, structural steel became the bestand likely only building solution. “We had to have acolumn-free space,” says Nizar Dhanani, structuralengineer and design manager, UMA Group Ltd, for thebuilding that is basically an open 83 metre square box.“And we needed 12m of clear ceiling height to acc-ommodate a 10 tonne crane that would be permanentlysupported by the roof trusses. We used steel.”
Over 1,400 tonnes of steel in fact, for which the $3million fabrication and erection contract was awarded toSupreme Steel. Because the envelop needed to be in placebefore construction could begin on the synchrotron, the
“We had to isolate the building from the sciencefloor,” explains Martin Heikoop of the UMA Group, whoalso acted as project manager for CLS. “It’s completelyseparate - it sits about 1.5” from the foundation.”
And in order to overcome vibration caused bytraffic, trains and some seismic activity, that 350mmthick concrete floor slab is attached to 800 concrete pileswhich are three to four metres deep and are set at 11.5mcentres throughout the interior space. The piles werealready in place by the time Supreme arrived to beginsteel erection in January 2000, creating a difficultworking environment simply by their presence, and alsoexacerbating what would become a much larger problem.
“We had assumed we would be working on frozenground, but the schedule was pushed back,” saysSupreme’s Petrinchuk. “The spring thaw created a lot ofdifficulty.”
The ground was softened further by the drilling thathad taken place when the floor piles were installed, andthe remaining materials were left on the site.
“There was a time when our people couldn’t evenwork, they were up to their knees in mud,” saysPetrinchuk. “We couldn’t get even get vehicles in or out.”
And they also couldn’t find a solid foundation onwhich to locate the erection towers. The loose materialand mud were dug out and removed, and dirt and rockfill were brought in to create a more stable base, but thatstill couldn’t create the stability necessary, so a secondplan was hatched.
“The trusses were completely assembled on theground, then installed in a single piece,” explainsPetrinchuk. “We actually had to do an engineered lift.”
Three cranes, the largest 450 tonnes, the smallest75 tonnes, were employed, and the 60 tonne trusseswere bolted in across the 83m span one by one. Althoughmore costly, the solution was more efficient and helpedovercome the time lost because of earlier delays and themud. The building was clad in galvanized steel.
“We started from the east, then moved to the westand finished in the middle,” says Petrinchuk. “Thecladding followed right behind us as we were goingalong.”
The CLS undertaking, as a whole, can be betterdescribed as a science project rather than a building,which perhaps explains why the architectural firm wassubcontracted by UMA.
“It’s not our usual role, engineers usually work for us,”acknowledges Lawrence Dressel, project architect andpartner with AODBT Architects Ltd. “But this is primarily anengineering and scientifically driven project.”
steel construction phase came at the outset of the project,and 12,000 hours of fabrication time began in Novemberof 1999. Sixteen supporting columns, each 11.5m long,60cm in diameter and weighing nearly ten tonnes, werefabricated at Supreme’s Saskatoon facility. The roofstructure consisted of eight trusses, each 85m long andclose to 60 tonnes in weight when in place. Their massmade complete prefabrication out of the question, andthe necessary strength also dictated a need for boltedconnections.
“We had to design for extremely large forces - inexcess of 5,000kN on some of the cord sections,” saysSupreme’s Don Petrinchuk. “A lot of the cord sections[some of which were 28 metres long] had to be fullstrength shop slices - it wasn’t possible to weld.”
The specifications dictated the use of largeconnecting steel trusses and each truss was completelyfabricated offsite and erected on site. Once there, theplan was relatively straightforward.
“We were going to use erection towers - they wereactually sent to the site,” says Petrinchuk. “The plan wasto build the trusses in three sections on site, then installone section at a time - first either side, then the middle.”
But the strategy ran afoul of Mother Nature andanother significant project design feature. Thesynchrotron requires an extreme degree of stability tofunction efficiently, so much so that the floor slab wasseparated from the building envelop and built as astandalone structure.
A FIELD OF BEAMS
Project/Construction Manager:UMA Projects
Synchrotron Designers and Engineers: Canadian Light Source (CLS)
Steel Fabricator, Detailer and Erector:Supreme Steel Ltd.
by J.K. Malmgren
03-088.advansteel.ENG.03 5/27/03 2:59 PM Page 13
A D V A N T A G E S T E E L S P R I N G 2 0 0 314
What the engineers and scientists wanted was asquare box to house the ring of the synchroton, but theUniversity held a better understanding of the local andinternational significance of the project. They anticipatedthe awareness and acclaim it would create, and looked tothe architects for recognition of that in the final design.Beyond its simple overwhelming girth, the envelope’simmediate appeal is created by the full glass window wallthat covers the north facing front facade, and the metalscreen above that acts as a visor.
“The sheer size and scale createsgreat impact, and we actually tried tolighten it somewhat through the use ofsteel cladding,” says Dressel. “Theglass is a reaction to that. Theperforated screen provides some solarcontrol, and it also breaks up the massof the building.”
And reaction to the facility hasbeen immediate and ebullient. CLS hashosted open house events that havedrawn more than 3,000 residents andvisitors alike. When CLS opens inJanuary of 2004, it is anticipated that
the enthusiasm of researchers will be matched orbettered by visitors from across the country.
At the outset, CLS will incorporate six beamlines,and fundraising is already underway to raise the $200million necessary to bring its complement up to a fullcapacity of 30. It is expected to become the birthplaceof innovation and invention that will change the way welive, and its own construction has created some solid andnecessary innovation on the ground.
W I N N E R
AWARDSEXCELLENCE
2002 CISC STEEL DESIGN
for
B R I T I S HC O L U M B I A
O N T A R I O
A L B E R T A
Q U E B E C
IKEA Store Complex, Coquitlam, BC
S P R I N G 2 0 0 3 A D V A N T A G E S T E E L 15
Engineering Category
BR
ITIS
H
CO
LU
MB
IA When deciding where to build its thirdlargest outlet in North America and sixthlargest in the world, IKEA choseCoquitlam, British Columbia. The31,590m2 store consists of a three-storeyretail section, a two-storey warehousesection, and a ground-level parking garageunder the entire structure. The building is conveniently locatedalongside the Lougheed highway, just offthe Trans-Canada highway. Thisparticular parcel of land createdconsiderable developmental challengesdue to the poor condition of the soil (anold swampland). Read JonesChristoffersen quickly realized the
importance of developing the lighteststructure possible.
“We chose structural steel because itprovided us with a lightweight structurethat reduced seismic demand, this wasimportant given the challenges we facedwith the geotechnical conditions on thissite” says Bob Neville, Project Engineerfrom Read Jones Christoffersen Ltd.
To resist the seismic lateral loads, asteel buckling inhibited brace system wasselected for this project. This bracingsystem has only been used on a few NorthAmerican projects to-date but played asignificant role in addressing the locationchallenges of this project. The buckling
inhibited brace system basically consistsof a steel core element or brace insertedinside a steel tube and filled with aconcrete mixture. This encasementenables the brace to maintain strength incompression and tension, and as a resultbuckling, kinking and other deformationsare minimized.
Through the use of publishedinformation and advice provided byProfessor Robert Tremblay of ÉcolePolytechnique in Montreal, Read JonesChristoffersen was able to implement thissystem for the first time in WesternCanada.
“We believe that the bucklinginhibited brace system represents a betterperforming alternative to conventionalbracing systems. It can provideeconomical solutions for future projectsthat may face challenges similar to thoseof the IKEA project,” says Neville.
Owner:
IKEA Properties Ltd.
Architect:
ABBARCH Partnership
Structural Engineer:
Read Jones Christoffersen Ltd.
General Contractor:
Wales McLelland
Steel Fabricator, Detailer and Erector:
XL Ironworks Co.
MBS Steel LtdMBS Steel Ltd
MBS Steel LtdMBS Steel Ltd
MBS Steel LtdSteel Joists are not “JUST PART” of our Product Line
Steel Joists “ARE” our Product Line
All Your Joist Needs with ONE CallFrom 8” to 8’- 0” Deep
From 8’ to 140’- 0” Span
MBS Steel Ltd.Serving the Structural Fabricating Community since 1988
S P R I N G 2 0 0 3 A D V A N T A G E S T E E L 17
Picture, if you will, a two thousandtonne steel box. Now imagine having totransport this structure every four to sixyears. This will be the case for SuncorEnergy in Alberta, when its currentmining site is no longer resourceful andthe plant’s new reclaim chamber will needto be relocated.
In 2002, a reclaim chamber or steelbox was completed for Suncor’s plant inFort McMurray, Alberta. The vision wasto create a chamber that would be lightenough to transport every few years butyet, strong enough to support 30-40,000tonnes of oil sand.
“Steel was used because of itsstrength and lightweight mass,” recallsJohn Moyse, Senior Structural Engineer,SNC Lavalin Inc. “Even though thechamber weighs two thousand tonnes,the finished product is much lighter thanit would have been if any material otherthan steel had been used.”
Every hour, 5 – 6,000 tonnes of oilsand pass through the 100ft by 60ftchamber onto a conveyor belt below. It isextremely important that the operationmaintain this level of surge capacity and
that sandcontinuously moveto avoid an ‘hour-glassing’ effect orinterruptions in theoperational flowfurther down theline. Standing 100fthigh with a diameterof 300ft, trucks arecontinuouslyrestocking ordumping on thisconical pile of oilsand.
Once mining iscomplete at itscurrent site and thedistance to transport sand increases, thereclaim chamber will need to move to anew location. Even at two thousandtonnes, steel was the most practicalstructural solution for this project,providing both a lightweight and durablestructure.
Owner:
Suncor Energy Inc.
Structural Engineer:
SNC Lavalin Inc.
Steel Fabricator, Detailer and Erector:
Waiward Steel Fabricators
Moving into the 21st century is sureto bring many interesting scientificdiscoveries and developments, some ofwhich will be showcased at the newOdyssium in Edmonton, Alberta. Arecent $14-million expansion andrenovation project transformed what wasonce known as the Edmonton Space andScience Centre, into a world-class scienceexhibition facility, now called theOdyssium.
George Smith, President and CEOat the Odyssium wanted to initiate aspark that would create a newfoundinterest in science for current and futuregenerations. As part of a 3,100m2
addition and renovation, the facilityreceived new exhibit galleries, a science
demonstration stage, a new entranceway,expanded food service area and threenew classrooms.
Exposed structural steel is usedthroughout the building including theroof, supporting columns, cross-bracingas well as for the featured pedestrianbridge, visible from the front lobby. Theindoor pedestrian bridge features spans17-metres long and is stabilized by sixsteel cables secured by custom designedand fabricated steel anchor plates. Theexposed nature of the structural steelrequired careful attention to detail forfunction and aesthetics by Whitemud IronWorks as well as the use of intumescentpaint to achieve the required fireprotection rating.
“Structural steel was clearly thematerial of choice for this project. Itprovided us with the most economicaland efficient solution for this facility’scomplex geometric requirements andlong roof spans”, says Jim Montgomery,Partner/Engineer with The Cohos EvamyPartners, Edmonton.
The intention for this facility was toincorporate functional components intothe design, enabling the building to be anexhibit in itself. By leaving thestructural, mechanical and electricalcomponents uncovered, visitors are ableto gain an inside look and appreciationfor how buildings work.
W I N N E R
AWARDSEXCELLENCE
2002 CISC STEEL DESIGNB
RIT
ISH
C
OL
UM
BIA
Structural Category
Suncor Energy’s Reclaim Chamber, Fort McMurray, Alberta
AL
BE
RT
A
Great care and consideration wentinto developing Commercial Station onVancouver’s Rapid Transit line. Rising20m up from the Grandview Cut, thestation was carefully constructed to avoid
any disruption to a nearbyresidential community and tothe existing BurlingtonNorthern/Santa Fe Railwayline below.
Structural steel was usedfor this superstructure becauseof its ability to be prefabricatedoffsite and erected withoutinterrupting other onsiteoperations. Six structural steelstruts radiating from the top ofthe concrete columns supportthe two-level winged roof.These tapered strut supportsresemble the stretched outfingers of an upturned hand. Inaddition, a pedestrian bridge ofuniquely shaped structural steeltrusses crosses over theGrandview Cut and connectsthe station to the Ticket Hallbuilding and existing Broadway
station. “The composite construction that
gives Commercial Station its richness hasonly been achieved due to the strength,flexibility and accuracy of structural
steel,” says Andrew Norrie, and architectwith VIA Architecture. “Because ofconstraints we faced due to building overthis operating railway system, we wouldhave never been able to sell the conceptof this project without the use of steel.”
With elegant skeletal steelstructures in place, other prefabricatedcomponents such as the beams, roofpanels and skylights followed in naturalsequence. This station creates layers oflight that rise out of the Grandview Cutand become a beacon for the community.The resulting design fits into thecommunity as if it had always been there.
Owner:
Rapid Transit Project 2000
Architect:
VIA Architecture
Structural Engineer:
Glotman Simpson Consulting Engineers
General Contractor:
Smith Bros. & Wilson (BC) Ltd.
Steel Fabricator, Detailer and Erector:
George Third & Son
Architectural Category
Odyssium, Edmonton, AB
AL
BE
RT
A Owner:
Odyssium
Architect:
The Cohos Evamy Partners
Structural Engineer:
The Cohos Evamy Partners
General Contractor:
Jen-Col Construction Ltd.
Steel Fabricator, Detailer and Erector:
Whitemud Ironworks Ltd.
B R I T I S HC O L U M B I A
O N T A R I O
A L B E R T A
Q U E B E C for
03-088.advansteel.ENG.03 5/27/03 2:59 PM Page 17
A D V A N T A G E S T E E L S P R I N G 2 0 0 318
Architectural Category
University Health Network at Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Ontario
S P R I N G 2 0 0 3 A D V A N T A G E S T E E L 19
As part of the Greater TorontoAirport Authority’s vision to improve andexpand the existing airport facilities atPearson International Airport andsurrounding roadways, 720 metric tonnesof steel were used to develop a newoutbound bridge that connects air travelpassengers to the collector lanes ofHighway 409.
Bridge 606 brought forth manycomplex and restrictive geometricalchallenges for designers including therequirement to keep existing roadwaysopen while abiding by measurement
standards set by the Ontario HighwayBridge Code. In addition, the bridgedeck width varied by approximately 6mfrom the southern portion to the northend.
A steel box girder system, whichused two different separation dimensionsfor the southern and northern ends ofthe bridge, was a challenge in itself. Withgirder erection taking place during short-term overnight closures, the use of steelin this project avoided significant impactand major interruptions to the high-speed highway traffic passing below the
bridge on two interchanges. Concrete structures were originally
chosen for the construction of all bridgesin this entrance road system. A re-evaluation led to the application of steelgirders in a total of ten bridge structures.
Bridge 606 was successfullycompleted in 2001. The use of curvedsteel box girders proved to be a cost-effective and practical solution for thisbridge construction. The end result sawa significant reduction in cost, as muchas 15% less than what designers hadoriginally budgeted.
How do you take one of downtownMontreal's landmarks, the Eaton building,and give it a new beginning as Complexeles Ailes? By creating a vertical volumecontaining a spectacular glass roof and abreathtaking atrium for accommodatingLes Ailes de la Mode shopping centre aswell as four storeys of prestigious officespace. The designers explained that theuse of structural steel lightened thestructure, so that nearly all the existingfoundations could be reused. Also, thecantilever deflections were easier to
control for a minimal depth. Finally, giventhe ovoid shape of the atrium, concreteforms would have been too onerous anddifficult to put in place.
The jury recognised the technicalfeat and the construction challenge thatwere addressed by the design team increating a light and transparentappearance for the 75 year-old heritagebuilding. Adopting the 'fast-track'approach also contributed to thechallenge. At the peak of construction,there were over 80 ironworkers on site. A
crane was ingeniously installed by NicoMétal on top of the building to acceleratethe process and reduce congestion onSte-Catherine and University streets.Approximately 10 000 anchor rods and 56 000 high-strength bolts were installed!
The major architecturaltransformations also required a seismicoverhaul, resulting in the use of 161seismic friction dampers. "Only a steelbuilding could resolve the problemsrelated to the seismic rehabilitation of theexisting building economically and
Hospital was to create a coherentnew identity that reconnected thehospital to the surroundingcommunity using modern technologyfor its approximately 45,000 squarefeet of new development.
This project saw a courtyardtransformed into a glass rooftopenclosed atrium that opened up fourlevels of exterior corridors andintegrated them into the new atriumspace. Structural steel was selectedfor the atrium to achieve the desiredelegant and light design appearance.
Standing 29.5m off the ground,the curved roof framing and mainentrance canopy were engineeredusing varied styles of steel trusses. Three unique standalone columns branchupwards into six cruciform sections ortree-like structures that support the glassatrium roof. A similar structure holds acantilevered canopy over the northentrance of the building. The use of glassin this project opened up the space
offering a clear and visible area, nowknown as the heart of the facility.
Accessible from the sidewalk andthrough the retail outlets, this new openspace reinforces the surroundingstreetscape and establishes an invitingcommunity connection at the TorontoWestern Hospital.
Owner:
University Health Network
Architects:
Dunlop Architects Inc.
Murphy Hilgers Architects Inc.
Structural Engineer:
Halsall Associates Ltd.
General Contractor:
EllisDon Construction
Steel Fabricator, Detailer and Erector:
Walters Inc.
Commercial/Institutional Category
Refurbishment of the Eaton Building into Complexe les Ailes — Montreal, QC
QU
EB
EC
AWARDSEXCELLENCE
2002 CISC STEEL DESIGN
B R I T I S HC O L U M B I A
O N T A R I O
A L B E R T A
Q U E B E C
for
03-088.advansteel.ENG.03 5/27/03 2:59 PM Page 19
International Category
James Hillhouse Athletic Center — New Haven Connecticut, USA
QU
EB
EC
20 21
The athletic center of the JamesHillhouse College, situated in New Haven,Connecticut, was composed of 40 three-dimensional tubular trusses providing anexceptionally clear span for athletes andspectators. The sheer dimensions of thetruss members and the requiredarchitectural quality contributed to thecomplexity of the project at all stages:connection design, detailing, fabrication,transportation and erection of thestructure. Today, with modern methodsand tools, such complexity can beaddressed.
What happens when six tubularmembers meet at the same point? Theyoverlap. Since there were no flat surfaces,all the welded joints had to be designedusing elliptical, three-dimensionalintersections. Each truss was welded andpre-assembled at Supermétal, andweighed between 16 000 and 22 000 kg.Each truss was then transported on its
back on a customized bogie system,through 900 kilometres of secondaryroads. On site, it had to be turned overlike a turtle, and lifted in place. The resultwas well worth bending over backwardson this project!
This project also received an AISCaward at the NASCC in Baltimore in April2003.
Architect and Structural Engineer:
The S.L.A.M. COLLABORATIVE
General Contractor:
Giordano Construction Co. Inc.
Steel Fabricator:
Supermétal Structures inc.
Industrial/Bridges Category
Monk Boulevard Bridge — Lachine, QC
QU
EB
EC Spanning across the Lachine canal, the
new Monk boulevard bridge is the linkbetween Saint-Patrick and Notre-Damestreets. The bridge offers a splendid viewof the gigantic Turcot interchange withthe St-Joseph Oratory dome in thebackground. In the opposite direction, theviewer can glimpse the heart of a localresidential neighbourhood.
A bowstring bridge consisting of twoarches was selected in order to connectthe old with the new, cross the 75 metrecanal in a single span, and satisfy thenavigation height under the bridge. Thejury commented that the Monk boulevardbridge reflects the successful compromisebetween architectural and engineeringdemands, resulting in an aesthetic andefficient steel structure that respects thehistory of the canal while addressingcontemporary issues. The 700-tonne bridge supports threelanes. The 225 mm concrete slab rests ona 76 mm steel deck, which avoided theuse of formwork thereby accelerating theconstruction process and reducingconstruction costs. The composite actionof the steel-concrete deck helped reduce
the size of the transverse girders. Bymaking the arches more rigid, thedeflection of the cantilevered walkwaydue to pedestrian traffic was limited to 50mm. Some of the 500 bolt splices werepre-assembled in the fabricator's shop.The bridge was erected from two barges.The design and construction of the bridgetook 20 months.Owner:
Ville de Montréal
Architect:
Cardinal Hardy et Associés
Structural Engineer:
AXOR Experts-Conseils inc.
General Contractor:
Construction Louisbourg Ltée
Steel Fabricator:
Locweld inc.
W I N N E R
AWARDSEXCELLENCE
2002 CISC STEEL DESIGN
H o n o u r a b l e M e n t i o n
AWARDSEXCELLENCE
2002 CISC STEEL DESIGN
Owner:
Rapid Transit Project 2000
Architect:
Busby and Associates
Structural Engineer:
Fast & Epp Partnership
General Contractor:
Dominion Construction
Steel Fabricator and Erector:
George Third & Son
Architectural Category
Brentwood Skytrain Station, Burnaby, BC
BR
ITIS
H
CO
LU
MB
IA
Owner:
Blue Tree Management Canada Ltd.
Architect:
Downs/Archambault & Partners
Structural Engineer:
Glotman Simpson Consulting Engineers
General Contractor:
Intertech Construction Ltd.
Steel Fabricator, Detailer and Erector:
XL Ironworks Ltd.
Westin Bayshore Hotel and Resort Porte Cochere, Vancouver, BC
BR
ITIS
H
CO
LU
MB
IA
Owner:
Town & Country BMW
Architect:
Carson Woods Architects Limited
Structural Engineer:
Otter Brown Engineering Limited
General Contractor:
Dalar Contracting Limited
Steel Fabricator, Detailer and Erector:
Pittsburgh Steel
(Division of 1226616 Ontario Inc.)
Town and Country BMW, Markham, ON
ON
TA
RIO
S P R I N G 2 0 0 3 A D V A N T A G E S T E E LA D V A N T A G E S T E E L S P R I N G 2 0 0 3
B R I T I S HC O L U M B I A
O N T A R I O
A L B E R T A
Q U E B E C for
B R I T I S HC O L U M B I A
O N T A R I O
A L B E R T A
Q U E B E C for
03-088.advansteel.ENG.03 5/27/03 2:59 PM Page 21
H o n o u r a b l e M e n t i o n
AWARDSEXCELLENCE
2002 CISC STEEL DESIGN
Owner:
Gestion Immeuble Culturel de Matane
Architect:
Anne Carrier architectes
Structural Engineer:
Delfar Experts – Conseils et Axys Consultants inc.
Project Manager:
Roche Ltée, Groupe-Conseil
Steel Fabricator:
Industries Canatal inc.
Commercial/Institutional Category
Joseph-Rouleau Cultural Centre — Matane, QC
QU
EB
EC
Owner:
Mr. Armand Rainville
Architect:
ABCP Architecture et Urbanisme
Structural Engineer:
Progémes Consultants inc.
Steel Fabricator:
Structures Yamaska inc.
Photo:
François Bastien
La Résidence Olivier — Bowker Lake, QC
QU
EB
EC
Owner:
Hydro – Québec
Architect:
Lapointe Magne/Massicotte
& Dignard
Structural Engineer:
SNC – Lavalin/Rousseau
Sauvé Warren inc.
General Contractor:
Le Groupe C.R.T. inc.
Steel Fabricator:
Au Dragon Forgé inc.
Industrial/Bridge Category
Beauharnois Powerplant, East Building — Beauharnois, QC
QU
EB
EC
S P R I N G 2 0 0 3 A D V A N T A G E S T E E L 23A D V A N T A G E S T E E L S P R I N G 2 0 0 322
and Wellness - Bolton• Victoria Village - Barrie• GTAA Infield Holdroom Terminal• CP Rail - Keele• Granite Club - Toronto• Sony Music - Toronto• Daimler Chrysler• Queen’s University
- Biosciences Complex - Kingston• Roberts Pharmaceutical
- Oakville• Queen’s University - Chemistry Bldg.
- Kingston• IBM - Facility for Software Development
- Mississauga• Brewers Retail - Distribution Centre• Baycrest Centre - Toronto• Roy Thomson Hall - Acoustic Enhancement
- Toronto
B R I T I S HC O L U M B I A
O N T A R I O
A L B E R T A
Q U E B E C for
03-088.advansteel.ENG.03 5/27/03 3:00 PM Page 23
S P R I N G 2 0 0 3 A D V A N T A G E S T E E L25
CISC Fabricator Members Plants and sales offices as of May. 23, 2003
Legend: *sales office only S – structural P – platework J – open web steel joist
Quirion Métal Inc. SBeauceville, Québec (418) 774-9881
www.customplate.net(Cut to size steel plate in various grades to12” thick. Stock size sheets of plate to 12” thickin various grades, shearing & forming).
Stan Ainslie, P.Eng., Calgary 403-537-2956William J. Alcock, P.Eng, N. Vancouver 604-986-0663Martin M. Archer-Shee, P.Eng., Dartmouth 902-435-1114Hensel O. Assam, P.Eng., Brampton 416-727-1941Gordon D. Barrett, P.Eng. Fredericton 506 455-9937F. Michael Bartlett, P.Eng., London 519-661-3659Leonard G. Basaraba, P.Eng., Vancouver 604-664-5409Dominique Bauer, ing., Montréal 514-396-8944Rejean Blais, ing., St-Jean-Chrysostôme 418-839-1733Richard Bonneau, P.Eng., Mississauga 905-542-1312Roy G. Brown, P.Eng., Stratford 519-271-4322François Charest, ing., Repentigny 450-581-8070Ronald.C. Clough, P.Eng., West Vancouver 604-922-7472Michel P. Comeau, P.Eng., Halifax 902-429-5454Jean-Pierre Dandois, ing., Châteauguay 514-592-1164E.B. Davison, P.Eng., Edmonton 780-465-8995/1-800-463-6033Arno Dyck, P.Eng., Calgary 403-255-6040Daniel A. Estabrooks, P.Eng., Saint John 506-674-1810Roberto Filippi, ing., Montréal 514-881-9197Jeff A. Fox, P.Eng., Calgary 403-279-4168Richard Frehlich, P.Eng., Calgary 403-281-1005Jean-Paul Giffard, ing., St-Jean-Chrysostôme 418-839-7937James M. Giffin, P.Eng., Amherst 902-667-3300F.L. Goodard, P.Eng., Fredericton 506-452-8480Graham Hill, P.Eng., Baden 519-634-8768Gary L. Hodgson, P.Eng., Niagara Falls 905-357-6406J. David Howard, P.Eng., Burlington 905-632-9040Don Ireland, P.Eng., Brampton 905-846-9514John S. Ivanyi,, P.Eng., Toronto 416-232-1085David S. Jenkins, P.Eng., Dartmouth 902-452-6072Ely E. Kazakoff, P.Eng., Kelowna 250-763-2306D. Scott Kennedy, P.Eng., West Vancouver 604-921-6605Bhupender S. Khoral, P.Eng., Ottawa 613-739-7482Marc-André Langevin, ing., Laval 450-686-0240Pierre Laplante, ing., Sainte Foy 418-651-8984Nazmi Lawen, P.Eng., Charlottetown 902-368-2300Raine A. Lawrence, P.Eng., Saint John 506-634-8259R. Mark Lasby, P.Eng., Calgary 403-283-5073Barry F. Laviolette, P.Eng., Edmonton 780-454-0884Jeffery Leibgott, ing., Montréal 514-933-6621Martin Lemyre, ing., Québec 418-871-8151William C.K. Leung, P.Eng., Woodbridge 905-851-9535Marcel P. Levesque, P.Eng., Moncton 506-869-6265Harold A. Lissel, P. Eng., Calgary 403-253-4111Tam A. London, P.Eng., Vancouver 604 739-8544Jason R. Long, P.Eng., Calgary 403-292-7401Constantino (Dino) Loutas, P.Eng., Edmonton 780-423-5855Clint S. Low, P.Eng., Vancouver 604-688-9861Douglas R. Luciani, P.Eng., Mississauga 905-542-0547Ciro Martoni, ing., Montréal 514-596-1000Alfredo Mastrodicasa, P.Eng., Woodbridge 905-856-2530Brian McClure, P.Eng., Nanaimo 250-741-8551George C. McCluskey, P.Eng., London 519-438-6192Allan J. McGill, P.Eng., Port Alberni 250-724-3400Grant Milligan, P.Eng., Toronto 416-961-8294Philip Meades, P.Eng., Barrie 705-733-3200Avrid Meland, P.Eng., Calgary 403-716-8158John Mowat, P.Eng., Moncton 506-856-4375
03-088.advansteel.ENG.03 5/27/03 3:00 PM Page 29
Kazmar Associates Limited, Markham 905-475-8486K D Ketchen & Associates Ltd., Kelowna 250-769-9335Keyes Engineering Ltd., Vancouver 604-737-8000Krahn Engineering Ltd., Abbotsford 604-853-8831Kruger inc., Trois-Rivières 819-375-1691 Le Groupe LMB Experts-Conseils inc., Québec 418-648-9512Leekor Engineering Inc., Ottawa 613-234-0886Les Consultants GEMEC inc., Montréal 514-331-5480Mardon Engineering Ltd., London 519-659-2264McCavour Engineering Limited, Mississauga 905-629-9934Morrison Hershfield Limited, North York 416-499-3110Morrison Hershfield Limited, Burnaby 604-454-0402MPa Groupe Conseil inc., St-Mathias 450-447-4537N.A. Engineering Associates Inc., Stratford 519-273-3205N.L. Sobey & Associates Limited, Truro 902-895-2790Pioneer Consultants Ltd., Vancouver 604-737-0333Pomeroy Engineering Limited, Burnaby 604-294-5800Pow Technologies,
Div. of Pow Peterman & Associates Inc., Ingersoll 519-425-5000Read Jones Christoffersen Ltd., Toronto 416-977-5335Read Jones Christoffersen Ltd., Vancouver 604-738-0048Rowswell & Associates Engineers Ltd., Sault Ste. Marie 705-759-6612Sandwell Engineering Services Limited, Vancouver 604-684-9311Schorn Consultants Ltd., Waterloo 519-884-4840Sopax Ltée., Rimouski 418-722-8513
Stantec Consulting Ltd., Hamilton 905-385-3234Stantec Consulting Ltd., London 519-645-2007Stantec Consulting Ltd., Mississauga 905-858-4424T.H. O'Rourke Structural Consultants Inc., Toronto 416-292-5502Tabcon Engineering, Toronto 416-491-7006The Walter Fedy Partnership, Kitchener 519-576-2150Totten Sims Hubicki Associates, Whitby 905-668-9363UMA Engineering Ltd., Mississauga 905-238-0007Valron Engineers Inc., Moncton 506-856-9601VanBoxmeer & Stranges Engineering Ltd., London 519-433-4661W.G. Baird & Associates Ltd., Coquitlam 604-931-2270Weiler Smith Bowers, Burnaby 604-294-3753Westmar Consultants Inc., N. Vancouver 604-985-6488Ying + Associates, Toronto 416-250-6162Yolles Partnership Inc., Toronto 416-363-8123
Technical-Individual
Rick Ellis, Surrey 604-582-3933George Graham, C.E.T., Winnipeg 204-943-7501Allan Kathrens, Edmonton 780-465-7788Kevin Neustaedter, Burnaby 604-451-6833Anjelo M. Ricciuto, Concord 905-669-6303Yvon Sénéchal, Pointe-Claire 514-694-8421John J. Sulaiman, LaSalle 519-734-0728
A D V A N T A G E S T E E L S P R I N G 2 0 0 330
Associate – Professional
Top Consultancies, Steelwork Fabricators as well as sole practitioners throughout Canada have made the RAM Structural System an integral part of their company.
Nanaimo Aquatic and Leisure Centre in British Columbia.
It’s a Fact…Competing at the top
has never been easier!
On their very first project with the RAM Structural System, Herold Engineering Limited in Vancouver cut their engineering hours by 25%. Since then, they have used it on several projects, including a newfour-story office building,the City of Comox Library and Town Hall,the Malaspina UniversityCollege AdministrationBuilding seismic upgrade,and several others.
To see a full Case Study on the Nanaimo project please visit our website at www.ramint.com, or call us at 760-431-3610 to find out how the RAM Structural System can help you become more profitable while providing better service to your clients.
Software for structural steel building analysis, design and drafting,fully compliant with the NBC ofCanada and the CAN/CSA-s16.I-94