Top Banner
EXTERNALITIES Chapter 5
23

EXTERNALITIES

Jan 03, 2016

Download

Documents

EXTERNALITIES. Chapter 5. Externalities. Externality – An activity of one entity that affects the welfare of another entity in a way that is outside the market mechanism - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: EXTERNALITIES

EXTERNALITIESChapter 5

Page 2: EXTERNALITIES

Externalities

• Externality – An activity of one entity that affects the welfare of another entity in a way that is outside the market mechanism– A paper mill’s production of the carcinogen dioxin

increases society’s health care costs; these costs to society are not included in the paper mill’s paper price

– However, when large numbers of suburbanites relocate to a city, society is affected, although the effect is captured through higher prices of city housing

5-2

Page 3: EXTERNALITIES

The Nature of Externalities

• Privately-owned vs. commonly-owned resources– A privately owned resource: its price reflects its value so used

efficiently (MSC=MSB)– A commonly-owned resource (air, oceans): price ($0) does not

reflect its value so used inefficiently (MSC>MSB)

• Externalities can be produced by consumers & firms• Externalities are reciprocal in nature• Externalities can be positive or negative• Public goods can be viewed as a special kind of

externality

5-3

Page 4: EXTERNALITIES

The Nature of Externalities-Graphical Analysis

Q per year

$

MB

0

MD

MPC

MSC = MPC + MD

Q1Q*Actual outputSocially efficient output

ab

c

d

fe

g

h

Reduction from Q1 to Q* means dcg profit loss for Supplier and dchg welfare gain for Demander.

5-4

Page 5: EXTERNALITIES

What Pollutants Do Harm?

• Empirical Research on Pollution Effects on Health– Difficult to measure because of inability to perform randomized

studies on pollution effects– Must rely on cross-sectional or time-series analysis– Studies unable to measure lifetime exposure to air pollution

• Once pollutant identified:– Must identify the activities that produce the pollutant– Must identify the value of the damage done– Must identify the costs of remedying the damage

• Empirical Evidence: The Effect of Air Pollution on Housing Values

5-5

Page 6: EXTERNALITIES

Private ResponsesBargaining and the Coase Theorem

Q per year

$

MB

0

MD

MPC

MSC = MPC + MD

Q1Q*

c

dg

h

Supplier will ↓ Q1 to Q* if paid by Demander, who is willing to do so. Bargain possible over $ transferred.

5-6

Page 7: EXTERNALITIES

The Coase Theorem

• Coase Theorem – Given:– Low transaction costs– Clear assignment of property rights

An efficient solution to an externality problem can be achieved

• Assumptions necessary for Coase Theorem to work– The costs to the parties of bargaining are low– The owners of resources can identify the source of

damages to their property and legally prevent damages

5-7

Page 8: EXTERNALITIES

Other Private Solutions

• Mergers – way to internalize the externality– The externality transmitter and recipient become

one company.

• Social conventions/Morals– For example: “Littering” is wrong.

5-8

Page 9: EXTERNALITIES

Public Responses to Externalities - Taxes

Q per year

$

MB

0

MD

MPC

MSC = MPC + MD

Q1Q*

c

d

(MPC + cd)

Pigouviantax revenues

i

j

5-9

Page 10: EXTERNALITIES

Public Responses to Externalities – Subsidies that pay polluter not to pollute

Q per year

$

MB

0

MD

MPC

MSC = MPC + MD

Q1Q*

c

d

(MPC + cd)

i

jgk

h

f

e

Pigouviansubsidy

5-10

Page 11: EXTERNALITIES

Public Responses to Externalities- Emissions Fee: tax on each pollution unit

0Pollution reduction

MSB

MC

e*

f*

$

Emissions fee

Emissions feef1

f1 results in only e1 reductionf* results in e* reduction: the efficient level

e1

5-11

Page 12: EXTERNALITIES

Public Responses to Externalities- Uniform Pollution Reduction

Bart’spollutionreduction

Homer’spollutionreduction

50 75 90 50 75 90

MCB

MCH

25

10

bRequiring each company to reduce pollution by 50 units is not cost effective. Better to have Bart reduce pollution by 100 units because he can do so at a lower cost. But is it fair???

5-12

Page 13: EXTERNALITIES

Emissions Fees achieve fairness and efficiency

Bart’spollutionreduction

Homer’spollutionreduction

50 75 90 50 75 90

MCB

MCH

25

f = $50

f = $50

Bart’s TaxPayment Homer’s Tax

Payment

An Emissions Fee=$50 means Bart will reduce by 75 and Homer only by 25, but Homer pays larger tax.

5-13

Page 14: EXTERNALITIES

Public Responses to Externalities- Cap-and-Trade: Polluters must have a permit

Bart’spollutionreduction

Homer’spollutionreduction

50 75 90 50 75 90

MCB

MCH

25

f = $50

f = $50

10

a

b

Bart: The cost of reducing pollution is less than market price of a permit, so sell permit. Homer: The cost of reducing pollution is greater than market price of a permit so buy permit.BOTH GAIN FROM TRADE

5-14

Page 15: EXTERNALITIES

Emissions Fee v Cap-and-Trade

• Responsiveness to Inflation• Responsiveness to Cost Changes• Distributional Effects• Responsiveness to Uncertainty of Costs of

reducing pollution (cont on next slides)

5-15

Page 16: EXTERNALITIES

Cap-and-Trade vs. Emissions FeeInelastic MSB of pollution reduction

0Pollution reduction

MSB

MC*

e*

f*

$

MC’

ef e’Too much pollution reductionToo little pollution reduction

• Cap/trade allows too much pollution

• Emissions Fee allows too little pollution

• C&T more efficient than Emissions Fee

5-16

Page 17: EXTERNALITIES

Cap-and-Trade v Emissions FeeElastic MSB of pollution reduction

0Pollution reduction

MC*

e*

f*

$

MC’

ef e’

MSB

Too much pollution reductionToo little pollution reduction

• Cap/trade allows too much pollution

• Emissions Fee allows too little pollution

• Emissions Fee more efficient than C&T

5-17

Page 18: EXTERNALITIES

Command-and-Control Regulation

• Command-and-control regulations require a given amount of pollution reduction with limited or no flexibility on how to achieve reduction– Technology requirements– Performance requirements

• Is command-and-control ever better?– Hot spots: Areas with relatively high

concentrations of emissions

5-18

Page 19: EXTERNALITIES

The U.S. Response

• Clean Air Act– 1970 amendments– Command-and-control in the 70s– How well did it work?

• Policy Perspective: Cap-and-Trade for Sulfur Dioxide

5-19

Page 20: EXTERNALITIES

Implications for Income Distribution

• Who Benefits?– Low- or High-Income Individuals?

• Who Bears the Cost?– Workers of firms who must reduce output– Buyers of firms’ output

5-20

Page 21: EXTERNALITIES

Positive Externalities

Research per year

$

MPB

MC

MEB

MSB = MPB + MEB

R*R1

5-21

Page 22: EXTERNALITIES

Positive Externalities:A Cautionary Note on Requests for Subsidies

• Subsidies must come from taxpayers• Market does not always fail: the fact that an

activity is beneficial does not always mean that a subsidy is required for efficiency

• Policy Perspective: Owner-Occupied Housing

5-22

Page 23: EXTERNALITIES

Chapter 5 Summary• Externalities occurs when the activity of one person or firm

positively or negatively affects another person/group/firm outside the market mechanism

• An inefficient allocation of resources results because the market price does not reflect the external costs or benefits

• The Coase Theorem indicates that private solutions through bargaining can achieve the efficient outcome under certain circumstances

• Public solutions to externalities designed to achieve efficiency include taxes/subsidies; emissions fees; and command-and-control regulations

• A market-based, cost-effective, public solution is cap-and-trade where pollution permits – the right to pollute – are traded

5-23