Exploring the legacy of misnaming on Prophetstown tourism Linda Joyce Forristal, PhD Drexel University November 4-6, 2011 Wiping Away the Tears at Purdue University
Jun 25, 2015
Exploring the legacy of misnaming on Prophetstown tourism
Linda Joyce Forristal, PhDDrexel University
November 4-6, 2011 Wiping Away the Tears at Purdue University
November 4-6, 2011 2
Current Configuration
Historic Prophetstown is comprised three
main areas: a 1920s living history farm a partially restored prairie a modest Woodland Indian village with a
council house, medicine lodge, chief’s cabin, and granary
Not original site? Indian village settled by the Prophet and his
followers was probably not the Woodland village currently located within the boundaries of the 247-acre Historic Prophetstown property.
Kethtippecanunk located both spatially and temporally very close to the encampments of the Prophet and Tecumseh, although not overlapping in time, may have overlapped in space
Site Sacralization Theory Proposed by sociologist Dean MacCannell
in the 1970s (MacCannell, 1976:43–45) When introducing his concept, MacCannell
was interested in the linkages between society and attractions that lead to making them famous, resulting from becoming a desired place to visit
November 4-6, 2011 5
MacCannell’s five stages
Argued that a tourism site is transformed into a tourism attraction by passing through five stages: 1) naming 2) framing and elevating 3) enshrinement 4) mechanical reproduction 5) social reproduction.
November 4-6, 2011 6
Past 2 decades, used in tourism
MacCannell’s Original Stages
Relabeled Phase
1. Naming 1. Resource identification
2. Framing and elevating 2. Marketing emphasis
3. Enshrinement 3. Interpretation
4. Mechanical reproduction 4. Sales and merchandizing
5. Social reproduction 5. Broader community use
November 4-6, 2011 7
Destination attractiveness Some researchers have focused on the
‘sacred’ angle, especially that the tourist is a modern-day religious pilgrim
Taking the logic one step further, tourists are drawn to specific attractions like a religious pilgrim who plans a once-in-a-lifetime visit, because the site meets their specific needs and wants (i.e., is intrinsically attractive to them)
Site possesses destination attractiveness
November 4-6, 2011 8
Naming The first stage, called naming, occurs when
the site is “marked off from similar objects as worthy of preservation (MacCannell, 1976:44).”
Drew from Charles Sanders Peirce’s Theory of Signs
A marker represents something about a site to the tourist, which help delineate and create an attraction Tourist, site and marker = attraction
November 4-6, 2011 9
The power and role of naming The importance of proper
naming is suggested or can be derived from anthropological and sociological studies in the universal and seminal power and role of naming and naming systems for people and places (Basso, 1986; Tooker, 1984) in cultures around the world.
November 4-6, 2011 10
Framing & elevating Framing is the
“placement of an official boundary around the object” and elevation is “putting an object on display” or opening it up for visitation (Jacobsen, 1997; MacCannell, 1976:44).
Locate, perceive, identify and label
November 4-6, 2011 11
Enshrinement Occurs when the framing
material or boundary (as a container) itself enters the first stage of sacralization, i.e., naming
In the tourism literature, researchers have translated this stage to mean that the buildings on a site become venerated themselves (Jacobsen, 1997; Leiper, 1990).
November 4-6, 2011 12
Geysers at Yellowstone surrounded by the park
Mechanical reproduction
The fourth stage in MacCannell’s site sacralization theory is mechanical reproduction of artifacts and souvenirs associated with a site.
Prints, photographs, models, or effigies of the “sacred object” which themselves become valued
November 4-6, 2011 13
Social reproduction Social reproduction
occurs when towns, schools or even people start to name themselves after someone or something famous (MacCannell, 1976:45)
Leads to place names on maps
November 4-6, 2011 14
Naming
At its root, a name for a place is an important sign or signpost and societal marker.
In relation to MacCannell’s first stage of naming, a core necessity is accurately identifying the site north of Lafayette referred to as “Prophet’s town” in the early 1800s with the right name.
November 4-6, 2011 15
Roots of name lost
No one can be sure what the Native Americans called the site themselves. Perhaps “Prophet’s town” was anglicized from the Shawnee language
An early account of Harrison’s life may be the first appearance of the name “Prophet’s town,” which was later reduced to Prophetstown.
November 4-6, 2011 16
Museums at Prophetstown
First organized for visitation under the name Museums at Prophetstown in 1995.
In 2002, the site’s name was changed to the singular Museum of Prophetstown to reinforce the “unity of the three components” (Bodenmiller, 2005:1)
Changed again in 2005 to Historic Prophetstown.
November 4-6, 2011 17
Power of iconic figures The power of naming
can be multiplied by capitalizing on the name of an iconic figure (Pearce et al, 2003).
In relation to this historic site, the most-recognized iconic figure was Tecumseh, not Tenskwatawa.
November 4-6, 2011 18
Whose story…which site? Confusion over which brother is the key attractor
for bringing tourists to Prophetstown Which Prophet? There are others in the Midwest. “Historic” site of Prophet’s village maybe
elsewhere Thus, MacCannell’s first stage, “naming,” has not
occurred at Historic Prophetstown
November 4-6, 2011 19
Framing and elevating
MacCannell’s framing is the “placement of an official boundary around the object” and elevation is “putting an object on display (MacCannell, 1976).”
Appropriate “labeling” or signage Maps clearly demarcate the boundaries of
Historic Prophetstown within the larger Prophetstown State Park.
But this is from an aerial perspective
November 4-6, 2011 20
Boundary is not obvious to the visitor on the ground.
No signage announcing the site along Interstate 65 less than one mile away
Various stakeholders have “framed” the site with different representations.
November 4-6, 2011 21
Inadequate signage
Signage on the property, either near the entrance of the property or at the edge of the parking lot adjacent to the farm, does not adequately showcase its rich Native American history.
Nor does the signage provide adequate visitor orientation about the Indian village’s location.
November 4-6, 2011 22
Signage is minimal Framing and
elevation of the 3 parts of the site— the farm, the prairie and the Indian village—are not done consistently or adequately.
November 4-6, 2011 23
No electronic elevation In lieu of physical
elevation (i.e., putting object on display), the Native American aspect of Historic Prophetstown could be electronically elevated
However, Web presence tied to an agrarian calendar
November 4-6, 2011 24
Current FACEBOOK statement of the site’s mission (electronic elevation):
“We are dedicated to enhancing public awareness of agriculture and horse powered farming.”
November 4-6, 2011 25
The design of the current Website and membership card (which sports a picture of a draft horse and a little girl) all demonstrate that site’s promotion and image is tied to an agrarian calendar—not a Native American one.
November 4-6, 2011 26
Framing and elevation not achieved All in all, there is no consistent or agreed-
upon framing and elevation of the site, either physically, sociology or electronically.
Thus, MacCannell’s second stage of framing and elevation has not taken place at Historic Prophetstown.
November 4-6, 2011 27
Enshrinement This stage has been interpreted to occur
when the buildings on a site become venerated themselves
It seems unlikely the houses or barn on the living-history farm at Historic Prophetstown could become venerated objects, but the potential for such a development might have existed for the two structures proposed in the original plan for the Museums of Prophetstown.
November 4-6, 2011 28
Early 1990s plans
Then, in the 1990s, the founding board of the Museums at Prophetstown hoped to garner the funds to build two structures they proposed for the property.
However, none of the plans to promote the site based on this broader historical potential materialized.
November 4-6, 2011 29
November 4-6, 2011 30
The sister Eagle Wing Visitor and Education Center was to welcome local visitors and
tourists from Chicago and beyond.
November 4-6, 2011 31
A 65,000-square-foot Woodland Native American Center was to serve as a museum with both
permanent and rotating exhibits
November 4-6, 2011 32
Enshrinement not yet achieved Because Prophetstown State Park completely surrounds
HP, one could view the 3,000-acre Prophetstown State Park as the “framing material” for Historic Prophetstown.
If state park became a viable, successful destination in its own right (as are the plans), this would facilitate Historic Prophetstown’s movement into MacCannell’s third stage of enshrinement
At this point, the state park is still in the middle of a three-stage development process.
Thus, the enshrinement phase has not taken place at Historic Prophetstown.
November 4-6, 2011 33
Mechanical reproduction not achieved There is historical
material on which to base mechanical reproduction, and thus, the creation of venerable souvenirs for Tenskwatawa
Not happened at Prophetstown.
November 4-6, 2011 34
Social reproduction In the past 200 years, there has NOT been
extensive social reproduction (i.e., towns, schools, or people named after someone or something famous) in relation to Tenskwatawa
Fair amount in relation to Tecumseh, such as the name of towns in Michigan, Nebraska, and Oklahoma.
November 4-6, 2011 35
Towns and schools
November 4-6, 2011 36
WorldCat searches Place names and
book titles 1 for Historic
Prophetstown 12 records for
Prophet’s Town 126 returned for
Tenskwatawa 4,408 for Tecumseh
November 4-6, 2011 37
Social reproduction out of order However, these events of social reproduction
have taking place out of order (i.e., without successful completion of Stages 1, 2, 3)
Not in relation to Prophet, but his brother Thus, MacCannell’s fifth stage of social
reproduction has not occurred in relation to the person Historic Prophetstown, was named for (i.e., the Prophet Tenskwatawa).
November 4-6, 2011 38
Improper naming hinders progress Site has remained in naming stage A lack of focus that proper naming would
provide has hindered framing and elevation (Stage 2), enshrinement (Stage 3) and mechanical reproduction (Stage 4).
Although there has been ample social reproduction (Stage 5) related to Tecumseh, it is absent in relation to Historic Prophetstown itself and to the Prophet who gave it its name.
November 4-6, 2011 39
Site lacks destination attractiveness If MacCannell’s model is used as a measure,
because Historic Prophetstown has not successfully moved through all five stages, it lacks attractiveness as a tourist destination.
The lack of attractiveness stemming from the improper naming of the site may substantially contribute to its low visitation and financial stagnation.
November 4-6, 2011 40
Cascading effects
The lack of a proper or right name has cascading effects that influence or impede the progression through the rest of the stages
Thwarts the development of destination attractiveness
Name of a site is intrinsically a branding issue
Concept of a brand is very close to MacCannell’s “marker” and Peirce’s “sign”
November 4-6, 2011 41
Recommendations
Beneficial for the site to clearly identify its resources—especially which name and historical framing of the site would best maximize the potential for successful future development and promotion
May be prudent to realign the visitors’ perceptions and expectations to match the name and significance of the site.
November 4-6, 2011 42
Increase awareness of Tenskwatawa Undertake concerted efforts to increase the
awareness of significance of Tenskwatawa, the Prophet, on the ground and on the web.
Incorporate George Catlin’s (1830) and Henry Inman’s (1830) paintings of Tenskwatawa literature design for schools and the site website(s).
Add places names to area and virtual tour
November 4-6, 2011 43
Name change?
To capitalize on the name of Tecumseh, an iconic figure whose name has been extensively socially reproduced during the past 200 years and who is historically tied to the destination.
November 4-6, 2011 44
Naming is a sacred process It should also be remembered that within
the indigenous community, the naming of something is an important and sometimes sacred process
Consideration should be given to whether the promotion of agricultural events under the umbrella of Historic Prophetstown leads to misidentification of the site among potential visitors.
November 4-6, 2011 45
State park as framing material
Since Prophetstown State Park is the “framing material” for Historic Prophetstown, any improvements and successes in the park could contribute to the Historic Prophetstown’s enshrinement as a tourism destination
Cultivate and maintain a good symbiotic and working relationship with the park and state of Indiana DNR
November 4-6, 2011 46
November 4-6, 2011 47
Elevated to National Park? Higher framing,
elevation and enshrinement of events if Prophetstown State Park became a national park
Not impossible, based on the historical significance of the elements within its boundaries.
November 4-6, 2011 48