Experts Respond to Your Questions 2006 Annual Conference Alexandria, Virginia Council on Licensure, Enforcement and Regulation Expect the Unexpected: Are We Clearly Prepared? Are You Ready?
Mar 30, 2015
Experts Respond to Your Questions
2006 Annual Conference
Alexandria, Virginia
Council on Licensure, Enforcement and Regulation
Expect the Unexpected: Are We Clearly Prepared?
Are You Ready?
Presented at the 2006 CLEAR Annual ConferenceSeptember 14-16 Alexandria, Virginia
Moderator/Coordinator
Chuck FriedmanAssistant Vice President
ACT
Presented at the 2006 CLEAR Annual ConferenceSeptember 14-16 Alexandria, Virginia
Panelist
David FosterChief Executive OfficerKryterion, Inc.
Presented at the 2006 CLEAR Annual ConferenceSeptember 14-16 Alexandria, Virginia
Panelist
Ron RodgersPresident
Employment Research InstituteDirector of Measurement Services
Continental Testing Services
Presented at the 2006 CLEAR Annual ConferenceSeptember 14-16 Alexandria, Virginia
Panelist
Barbara ShowersDirector, Education and
ExaminationsWisconsin Department of Regulation and Licensing
Presented at the 2006 CLEAR Annual ConferenceSeptember 14-16 Alexandria, Virginia
Speakers
You . . . the audience!!!
Presented at the 2006 CLEAR Annual ConferenceSeptember 14-16 Alexandria, Virginia
• Developing and Implementing ADA Accommodations and Preparing for ADA Litigation
Credentialing & Exam Issues Sessions
Early Bird SessionsThursday, September 14
• Psychometrics of Testing with Small Numbers
Friday, September 15
Presented at the 2006 CLEAR Annual ConferenceSeptember 14-16 Alexandria, Virginia
• Demystifying Testing: Guide to Managing Exam Programs
• Leveraging the Internet in Exam Development and Delivery
• When the Unexpected Happens: Logistical and Technical Challenges
Credentialing & Exam Issues Sessions
Presented at the 2006 CLEAR Annual ConferenceSeptember 14-16 Alexandria, Virginia
• Physical Ability Testing and Practical Examinations: They Fought the Law and the Law Won
• Reporting Examination Results to Stakeholders: Issues and Best Practices
• Test Compromise and Security: Be Prepared
Credentialing & Exam Issues Sessions
Presented at the 2006 CLEAR Annual ConferenceSeptember 14-16 Alexandria, Virginia
Responding to YOUR Testing Questions
Presented at the 2006 CLEAR Annual ConferenceSeptember 14-16 Alexandria, Virginia
Test Blueprint
Job
An
alysis
Relia
bility
Scoring
Validity
Passing Score
Item Writing
Standard
Adm
inistra
tion
Item A
nalysis
Item Review
Presented at the 2006 CLEAR Annual ConferenceSeptember 14-16 Alexandria, Virginia
Test Blueprint
Job
An
alysis
Relia
bility
Scoring
Validity
Passing Score
Item Writing
Standard
Adm
inistra
tion
Item A
nalysis
Item Review
Presented at the 2006 CLEAR Annual ConferenceSeptember 14-16 Alexandria, Virginia
How often should my program conduct a job analysis?
Job analysis
Presented at the 2006 CLEAR Annual ConferenceSeptember 14-16 Alexandria, Virginia
Job analysis required to support testLink content outline to test
referencesSurvey representative sample of
professionSupport test specifications with
job analysis resultsDocument each question with test
references identified and available to all candidates
Presented at the 2006 CLEAR Annual ConferenceSeptember 14-16 Alexandria, Virginia
Job analysis should be updated when:
References supporting test have changed (new editions, out of print, etc.)
Emerging technology changes practice
Changes in practice redefine critical knowledge & skills needed to protect public & practitioners
Presented at the 2006 CLEAR Annual ConferenceSeptember 14-16 Alexandria, Virginia
Should my Board or program sponsor allow candidates to review test results including test questions?
Presented at the 2006 CLEAR Annual ConferenceSeptember 14-16 Alexandria, Virginia
Considerations:
Credibility/defensibility of test process
Content reviews/expert inputVerification measures for
scoringHistory of scoring errors
Presented at the 2006 CLEAR Annual ConferenceSeptember 14-16 Alexandria, Virginia
Considerations:
Test exposure/security issuesExtended study time with
test contentLimit to questions wrong?Provide correct answers?
Presented at the 2006 CLEAR Annual ConferenceSeptember 14-16 Alexandria, Virginia
Considerations:
Current law or legislative climateLaw on books?Transparency of governmentFairnessRemedies – is retake enough?
Presented at the 2006 CLEAR Annual ConferenceSeptember 14-16 Alexandria, Virginia
How do we increase security for both paper-and-pencil test delivery and computerized test delivery in the face of new technologies for cheating and test theft?
Presented at the 2006 CLEAR Annual ConferenceSeptember 14-16 Alexandria, Virginia
Be informed; know the threats and risks
Presented at the 2006 CLEAR Annual ConferenceSeptember 14-16 Alexandria, Virginia
Question
• Do you • know
what • this is?
Presented at the 2006 CLEAR Annual ConferenceSeptember 14-16 Alexandria, Virginia
Question
• Do you • know
what • this is?
• Two-Way Radio
Presented at the 2006 CLEAR Annual ConferenceSeptember 14-16 Alexandria, Virginia
Question
•What is the threat here?
Presented at the 2006 CLEAR Annual ConferenceSeptember 14-16 Alexandria, Virginia
Question
•What is the threat here?
•Web Camera •to capture items
Presented at the 2006 CLEAR Annual ConferenceSeptember 14-16 Alexandria, Virginia
Question
•What is the threat here?
•Display •to show answers
Presented at the 2006 CLEAR Annual ConferenceSeptember 14-16 Alexandria, Virginia
Be informed; know the threats and risks
Detecting and monitoring the threats will reduce the risks: Examples include
Better training of site and program staffData forensicsWatch the Web
Protect your items, tests and test results with better access controls, authentication and identification, encryption, etc.
Take decisive action when a breach occurs
Presented at the 2006 CLEAR Annual ConferenceSeptember 14-16 Alexandria, Virginia
What is the relationship between the examination process and reciprocity between states? Between countries?
Presented at the 2006 CLEAR Annual ConferenceSeptember 14-16 Alexandria, Virginia
Between states:Uniform national exams aid
reciprocityState-unique exams can create
barriersAuthority to regulate
professions is given to state government, but reciprocity is gaining importance
Presented at the 2006 CLEAR Annual ConferenceSeptember 14-16 Alexandria, Virginia
Between countries:Global delivery of exams is
increasingly possibleEvaluations of foreign
credentials have been aided by supplemental exams – ECFMG, ECFVG
CGFNS – will they remain necessary?
Presented at the 2006 CLEAR Annual ConferenceSeptember 14-16 Alexandria, Virginia
When it is appropriate to translate or adopt and exam?
See you soon
Presented at the 2006 CLEAR Annual ConferenceSeptember 14-16 Alexandria, Virginia
Public Health & Safety IssuesAre safety sources (MSDS, etc.) and
product labels available to practitioners in the target language?
Are comparable training materials and textbooks available in English & in target language?
How are target language candidates trained? In what language? With comparable health/safety resources?
Presented at the 2006 CLEAR Annual ConferenceSeptember 14-16 Alexandria, Virginia
If translation/adaptation is appropriate:
Are practice standards compromised in any way by training as delivered in target language?
Follow standards & guidelines for adapting test into new language
Review CLEAR Resource Brief on translating or adapting tests
Presented at the 2006 CLEAR Annual ConferenceSeptember 14-16 Alexandria, Virginia
What new technologies can we expect in the next five years that will affect the testing process?
Presented at the 2006 CLEAR Annual ConferenceSeptember 14-16 Alexandria, Virginia
New security technologies will enable us to prevent fraud and catch test thieves, cheaters and proxy test takers in the act
The Internet combined with test administration technologies will make possible truly ubiquitous high-stakes testing where people work, learn and live
Better measurement with innovations at the item and test levels (performance testing using simulations, for example)
Faster, virtually immediate, test revision and worldwide distribution
Presented at the 2006 CLEAR Annual ConferenceSeptember 14-16 Alexandria, Virginia
How should my program deal with an error: for example an incorrect score report, setting of an incorrect passing score, incorrect scoring on an item?
Presented at the 2006 CLEAR Annual ConferenceSeptember 14-16 Alexandria, Virginia
Guiding PrinciplesAccept responsibility for the
problem and the resolutionApologize promptly and sincerelyRemediate with candidate and
with internal or external systems
Presented at the 2006 CLEAR Annual ConferenceSeptember 14-16 Alexandria, Virginia
Steps to TakeFirst, investigate who is impacted
and how it happenedMost important in licensing is
pass/fail status and licensing errorsIdentify remedies – Rescore? Free
retest? Other? Request back the license?
Presented at the 2006 CLEAR Annual ConferenceSeptember 14-16 Alexandria, Virginia
Thank you and Enjoy Lunch!!!!!!!!!