This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
1
Exercise Set 7 (Propositional Logic) Keith Burgess-Jackson 13 September 2017
Exercises I. If A, B, and C are true propositions and X, Y, and Z are false propositions, which of the following are true?
II. If A and B are known to be true and X and Y are known to be false, but the truth values of P and Q are not known, of which of the following propositions can you determine the truth values?
IV. If A and B are known to be true and X and Y are known to be false, but the truth values of P and Q are not known, of which of the following propositions can you determine the truth values?
1. P כ A
2. X כ Q
3. (Q כ A) כ X
4. (P • A) כ B
5. (P כ P) כ X
5
6.(X כ Q) כ X
7. X כ (Q כ X)
8. (P • X) כ Y
9. [P כ (Q כ P)] כ Y
10. (Q כ Q) כ (A כ X)
11. (P כ X) כ (X כ P)
12. (P כ A) כ (B כ X)
13. (X כ P) כ (B כ Y)
14. [(P כ B) כ B] כ B
15. [(X כ Q) כ Q] כ Q
16. (P כ X) כ (~X כ ~P)
17. (X כ P) כ (~X כ Y)
18. (P כ A) כ (A כ ~B)
19. (P כ Q) כ (P כ Q)
20. (P כ ~~P) כ (A כ ~B)
21. ~(A • P) כ (~A Ú ~P)
22. ~(P • X) כ ~(P Ú ~X)
23. ~(X Ú Q) כ (~X • ~Q)
24. [P כ (A Ú X)] כ [(P כ A) כ X]
25. [Q Ú (B • Y)] כ [(Q Ú B) • (Q Ú Y)] V. Use truth tables to characterize the following propositional forms as (1) tautologous, (2) self-contradictory, (3) contingent, or (4) self-consistent. More than one of these terms may apply to a given propositional form, so you will need to check for each of them.
6
1. [p כ (p כ q)] כ q
2. p כ [(p כ q) כ q]
3. (p • q) • (p כ ~q)
4. p כ [~p כ (q Ú ~q)]
5. p כ [p כ (q • ~q)]
6. (p כ p) כ (q • ~q)
7. [p כ (q כ r)] כ [(p כ q) כ (p כ r)]
8. [p כ (q כ p)] כ [(q כ q) כ ~(r כ r)]
9. {[(p כ q) • (r כ s)] • (p Ú r)} כ (q Ú s)
10. {[(p כ q) • (r כ s)] • (q Ú s)} כ (p Ú r) VI. Use truth tables to determine whether the following pairs of propositional forms exhibit (1) logical implication (if so, in which direction), (2) logical equivalence, (3) contradictoriness, (4) contrariety, (5) subcontrariety, (6) subalternation (if so, in which direction), (7) independence, (8) consistency, or (9) inconsistency. More than one of these terms may apply to a given pair, so you will need to check for each of them.
1. ~(p • q) | ~p Ú ~q
2. ~(p Ú q) | ~p • ~q
3. p Ú q | ~p Ú q
4. ~p • q | ~q Ú p
5. p Ú q | q Ú p
6. p • ~p | p
7. p כ q | p • ~q
8. p º q | p • q
9. p Ú (q Ú r) | (p Ú q) Ú r
7
10. p • (q Ú r) | (p • q) Ú (p • r)
11. (q כ ~r) • s | s º (q • r)
12. q Ú p | ~q כ ~p
13. p • q | ~p Ú ~q
14. p כ q | ~q כ ~p
15. p º q | (p כ q) • (q כ p)
16. q כ p | q • p
17. ~p • q | ~q • p
18. (p • q) כ r | p כ (q כ r)
19. p | p Ú p
20. p Ú ~p | p
21. t º u | t Ú u
22. ~(p Ú q) | ~p Ú ~q
23. (p • q) כ r | p Ú (q כ r)
24. q Ú p | ~q • ~p
25. p • q | ~p כ ~q
26. p | p º q
27. p | q
VII. Use truth tables to determine whether the following argument forms are valid.
VIII. Use truth tables to determine whether the following argument forms are valid.
1. (A Ú B) כ (A • B) A Ú B \ A • B
10
2. (C Ú D) כ (C • D) C • D \ C Ú D
3. E כ F F כ E \ E Ú F
4. (G Ú H) כ (G • H) ~(G • H) \ ~(G Ú H)
5. (I Ú J) כ (I • J) ~(I Ú J) \ ~(I • J)
6. K Ú L K \ ~L
7. M Ú (N • ~N) M \ ~(N • ~N)
8. (O Ú P) כ Q Q כ (O • P) \ (O Ú P) כ (O • P)
9. (R Ú S) כ T T כ (R • S) \ (R • S) כ (R Ú S)
10. U כ (V Ú W) (V • W) כ ~U \ ~U
IX. For each of the following elementary valid argument forms, state the implication rule (MP, MT, HS, DS, CD, Simp, Conj, or Add) by which its conclusion follows from its premise or premises.
1. (D Ú E) • (F Ú G) \ D Ú E
2. H כ I
11
\ (H כ I) Ú (H כ ~I)
3. ~(J • K) • (L כ ~M) \ ~(J • K)
4. [N כ (O • P)] • [Q כ (O • R)] N Ú Q \ (O • P) Ú (O • R)
5. (X Ú Y) כ ~(Z • ~A) ~~(Z • ~A) \ ~(X Ú Y)
6. (S º T) Ú [(U • V) Ú (U • W)] ~(S º T) \ (U • V) Ú (U • W)
X. Each of the following is a formal proof of validity for the indicated argument. State the justification for each line that is not a premise. Use only the eight implication rules (MP, MT, HS, DS, CD, Simp, Conj, and Add).
1. 1. A • B 2. (A Ú C) כ D / \ A • D 3. A 4. A Ú C 5. D 6. A • D
2. 1. (E Ú F) • (G Ú H) 2. (E כ G) • (F כ H) 3. ~G / \ H 4. E Ú F 5. G Ú H 6. H
3. 1. I כ J 2. J כ K 3. L כ M 4. I Ú L / \ K Ú M
13
5. I כ K 6. (I כ K) • (L כ M) 7. K Ú M
4. 1. Q כ R 2. ~S כ (T כ U) 3. S Ú (Q Ú T) 4. ~S / \ R Ú U 5. T כ U 6. (Q כ R) • (T כ U) 7. Q Ú T 8. R Ú U
5. 1. (A Ú B) כ C 2. (C Ú B) כ [A כ (D º E)] 3. A • D / \ D º E 4. A 5. A Ú B 6. C 7. C Ú B 8. A כ (D º E) 9. D º E
XII. Construct a formal proof of validity for each of the following arguments. Use only the eight implication rules (MP, MT, HS, DS, CD, Simp, Conj, and Add).
1. 1. A כ B 2. A Ú (C • D) 3. ~B • ~E / \ C
2. 1. (F כ G) • (H כ I) 2. J כ K 3. (F Ú J) • (H Ú L) / \ G Ú K
3. 1. (~M • ~N) כ (O כ N)
15
2. N כ M 3. ~M / \ ~O
4. 1. (K Ú L) כ (M Ú N) 2. (M Ú N) כ (O • P) 3. K / \ O
5. 1. (Q כ R) • (S כ T) 2. (U כ V) • (W כ X) 3. Q Ú U / \ R Ú V
XIII. For each of the following elementary valid argument forms, state the replacement rule (DM, Com, Assoc, Dist, DN, Trans, MI, ME, Exp, or Taut) by which its conclusion follows from its premise.
\ [(C • D) • ~E] • [(C • D) • ~E] XIV. Each of the following is a formal proof of validity for the indicated argument. State the justification for each line that is not a premise. Use all 18 rules of inference: the eight implication rules and the 10 replacement rules.
1. 1. A כ B 2. C כ ~B / \ A כ ~C 3. ~~B כ ~C 4. B כ ~C 5. A כ ~C
2. 1. (D • E) כ F 2. (D כ F) כ G / \ E כ G 3. (E • D) כ F 4. E כ (D כ F) 5. E כ G
3. 1. (H Ú I) כ [J • (K • L)] 2. I / \ J • K 3. I Ú H 4. H Ú I 5. J • (K • L) 6. (J • K) • L 7. J • K
XVI. Construct a formal proof of validity for each of the following arguments. Use all 18 rules of inference: the eight implication rules and the 10 replacement rules.
1. 1. ~A / \ A כ B
2. 1. C / \ D כ C
3. 1. E כ (F כ G) / \ F כ (E כ G)
4. 1. H כ (I • J) / \ H כ I
5. 1. K כ L / \ K כ (L Ú M) Solutions I. If A, B, and C are true propositions and X, Y, and Z are false propositions, which of the following are true?
1. ~A Ú B FT T T
2. ~B Ú X FT F F
3. ~Y Ú C TF T T
4. ~Z Ú X TF T F
5. (A • X) Ú (B • Y) T F F F T F F
6. (B • C) Ú (Y • Z) T T T T F F F
7. ~(C • Y) Ú (A • Z) T T F F T T F F
8. ~(A • B) Ú (X • Y) F T T T F F F F
9. ~(X • Z) Ú (B • C) T F F F T T T T
20
10. ~(X • ~Y) Ú (B • ~C) T F F TF T T F FT
11. (A Ú X) • (Y Ú B) T T F T F T T
12. (B Ú C) • (Y Ú Z) T T T F F F F
13. (X Ú Y) • (X Ú Z) F F F F F F F
14. ~(A Ú Y) • (B Ú X) F T T F F T T F
15. ~(X Ú Z) • (~X Ú Z) T F F F T TF T F
16. ~(A Ú C) Ú ~(X • ~Y) F T T T T T F F TF
17. ~(B Ú Z) • ~(X Ú ~Y) F T T F F F F T TF
18. ~[(A Ú ~C) Ú (C Ú ~A)] F T T FT T T T FT
19. ~[(B • C) • ~(C • B)] T T T T F F T T T
20. ~[(A • B) Ú ~(B • A)] F T T T T F T T T
21. [A Ú (B Ú C)] • ~[(A Ú B) Ú C] T T T T T F F T T T T T
22. [X Ú (Y • Z)] Ú ~[(X Ú Y) • (X Ú Z)] F F F F F T T F F F F F F F
23. [A • (B Ú C)] • ~[(A • B) Ú (A • C)] T T T T T F F T T T T T T T
24. ~{[(~A • B) • (~X • Z)] • ~[(A • ~B) Ú ~(~Y • ~Z)]} T FT F T F TF F F F T T F FT F F TF T TF
21
25. ~{~[(B • ~C) Ú (Y • ~Z)] • [(~B Ú X) Ú (B Ú ~Y)]} F T T F FT F F F TF T FT F F T T T TF
II. If A and B are known to be true and X and Y are known to be false, but the truth values of P and Q are not known, of which of the following propositions can you determine the truth values?
25. ~[(P • Q) Ú (Q • ~P)] • ~[(P • ~Q) Ú (~Q • ~P)] = False III. If A, B, and C are true propositions and X, Y, and Z are false propositions, which of the following are true?
IV. If A and B are known to be true and X and Y are known to be false, but the truth values of P and Q are not known, of which of the following propositions can you determine the truth values?
1. P כ A = True
2. X כ Q = True
3. (Q כ A) כ X = False
4. (P • A) כ B = True
5. (P כ P) כ X = False
6.(X כ Q) כ X = False
7. X כ (Q כ X) = True
8. (P • X) כ Y = True
9. [P כ (Q כ P)] כ Y = False
10. (Q כ Q) כ (A כ X) = False
11. (P כ X) כ (X כ P) = True
24
12. (P כ A) כ (B כ X) = False
13. (X כ P) כ (B כ Y) = False
14. [(P כ B) כ B] כ B = True
15. [(X כ Q) כ Q] כ Q = True
16. (P כ X) כ (~X כ ~P) = True
17. (X כ P) כ (~X כ Y) = False
18. (P כ A) כ (A כ ~B) = False
19. (P כ Q) כ (P כ Q) = True
20. (P כ ~~P) כ (A כ ~B) = False
21. ~(A • P) כ (~A Ú ~P) = True
22. ~(P • X) כ ~(P Ú ~X) = False
23. ~(X Ú Q) כ (~X • ~Q) = True
24. [P כ (A Ú X)] כ [(P כ A) כ X] = False
25. [Q Ú (B • Y)] כ [(Q Ú B) • (Q Ú Y)] = True
V. Use truth tables to characterize the following propositional forms as (1) tautologous, (2) self-contradictory, (3) contingent, or (4) self-consistent. More than one of these terms may apply to a given propositional form, so you will need to check for each of them.
VI. Use truth tables to determine whether the following pairs of propositional forms exhibit (1) logical implication (if so, in which direction), (2) logical equivalence, (3) contradictoriness, (4) contrariety, (5) subcontrariety, (6) subalternation (if so, in which direction), (7) independence, (8) consistency, or (9) inconsistency. More than one of these terms may apply to a given pair, so you will need to check for each of them.
10. U כ (V Ú W) (V • W) כ ~U \ ~U Invalid (8 rows) (Shown by second and third rows)
IX. For each of the following elementary valid argument forms, state the implication rule (MP, MT, HS, DS, CD, Simp, Conj, or Add) by which its conclusion follows from its premise or premises.
1. (D Ú E) • (F Ú G) \ D Ú E Simp
2. H כ I \ (H כ I) Ú (H כ ~I) Add
3. ~(J • K) • (L כ ~M) \ ~(J • K) Simp
4. [N כ (O • P)] • [Q כ (O • R)] N Ú Q \ (O • P) Ú (O • R) CD
5. (X Ú Y) כ ~(Z • ~A) ~~(Z • ~A) \ ~(X Ú Y) MT
32
6. (S º T) Ú [(U • V) Ú (U • W)] ~(S º T) \ (U • V) Ú (U • W) DS
X. Each of the following is a formal proof of validity for the indicated argument. State the justification for each line that is not a premise. Use only the eight implication rules (MP, MT, HS, DS, CD, Simp, Conj, and Add).
1. 1. A • B 2. (A Ú C) כ D / \ A • D 3. A 1, Simp 4. A Ú C 3, Add 5. D 2, 4, MP 6. A • D 3, 5, Conj
2. 1. (E Ú F) • (G Ú H) 2. (E כ G) • (F כ H) 3. ~G / \ H 4. E Ú F 2, Simp 5. G Ú H 2, 4, CD 6. H 5, 3, DS
3. 1. I כ J 2. J כ K 3. L כ M 4. I Ú L / \ K Ú M 5. I כ K 1, 2, HS
34
6. (I כ K) • (L כ M) 5, 3, Conj 7. K Ú M 6, 4, CD
4. 1. Q כ R 2. ~S כ (T כ U) 3. S Ú (Q Ú T) 4. ~S / \ R Ú U 5. T כ U 2, 4, MP 6. (Q כ R) • (T כ U) 1, 5, Conj 7. Q Ú T 3, 4, DS 8. R Ú U 6, 7, CD
5. 1. (A Ú B) כ C 2. (C Ú B) כ [A כ (D º E)] 3. A • D / \ D º E 4. A 3, Simp 5. A Ú B 4, Add 6. C 1, 5, MP 7. C Ú B 6, Add 8. A כ (D º E) 2, 7, MP 9. D º E 8, 4, MP
XI. For each of the following, adding just two propositions to the premises will produce a formal proof of validity. Use only the eight implication rules (MP, MT, HS, DS, CD, Simp, Conj, and Add).
35
1. 1. A 2. B / \ (A Ú C) • B 3. A Ú C 1, Add 4. (A Ú C) • B 3, 2, Conj
2. 1. D כ E 2. D • F / \ E 3. D 2, Simp 4. E 1, 3, MP
3. 1. G 2. H / \ (G • H) Ú I 3. G • H 1, 2, Conj 4. (G • H) Ú I 3, Add
4. 1. J כ K 2. J / \ K Ú L 3. K 1, 2, MP 4. K Ú L 3, Add
5. 1. M Ú N 2. ~M • ~O / \ N 3. ~M 2, Simp 4. N 1, 3, DS
6. 1. P • Q 2. R / \ P • R 3. P 1, Simp 4. P • R 3, 2, Conj
8. 1. V Ú W 2. ~V / \ W Ú X 3. W 1, 2, DS 4. W Ú X 3, Add
9. 1. Y כ Z 2. Y / \ Y • Z 3. Z 1, 2, MP
36
4. Y • Z 2, 3, Conj
10. 1. D כ E 2. (E כ F) • (F כ D) / \ D כ F 3. E כ F 2, Simp 4. D כ F 1, 3, HS
XII. Construct a formal proof of validity for each of the following arguments. Use only the eight implication rules (MP, MT, HS, DS, CD, Simp, Conj, and Add).
1. 1. A כ B 2. A Ú (C • D) 3. ~B • ~E / \ C 4. ~B 3, Simp 5. ~A 1, 4, MT 6. C • D 2, 5, DS 7. C 6, Simp
2. 1. (F כ G) • (H כ I) 2. J כ K 3. (F Ú J) • (H Ú L) / \ G Ú K 4. F כ G 1, Simp 5. (F כ G) • (J כ K) 4, 2, Conj 6. F Ú J 3, Simp 7. G Ú K 5, 6, CD
3. 1. (~M • ~N) כ (O כ N) 2. N כ M 3. ~M / \ ~O 4. ~N 2, 3, MT 5. ~M • ~N 3, 4, Conj 6. O כ N 1, 5, MP 7. ~O 6, 4, MT
4. 1. (K Ú L) כ (M Ú N) 2. (M Ú N) כ (O • P) 3. K / \ O 4. K Ú L 3, Add 5. M Ú N 1, 4, MP 6. O • P 2, 5, MP 7. O 6, Simp
5. 1. (Q כ R) • (S כ T)
37
2. (U כ V) • (W כ X) 3. Q Ú U / \ R Ú V 4. Q כ R 1, Simp 5. U כ V 2, Simp 6. (Q כ R) • (U כ V) 4, 5, Conj 7. R Ú V 6, 3, CD
XIII. For each of the following elementary valid argument forms, state the replacement rule (DM, Com, Assoc, Dist, DN, Trans, MI, ME, Exp, or Taut) by which its conclusion follows from its premise.
XIV. Each of the following is a formal proof of validity for the indicated argument. State the justification for each line that is not a premise. Use all 18 rules of inference: the eight implication rules and the 10 replacement rules.
1. 1. A כ B 2. C כ ~B / \ A כ ~C 3. ~~B כ ~C 2, Trans 4. B כ ~C 3, DN 5. A כ ~C 1, 4, HS
2. 1. (D • E) כ F 2. (D כ F) כ G / \ E כ G 3. (E • D) כ F 1, Com 4. E כ (D כ F) 3, Exp 5. E כ G 4, 2, HS
3. 1. (H Ú I) כ [J • (K • L)] 2. I / \ J • K 3. I Ú H 2, Add 4. H Ú I 3, Com 5. J • (K • L) 1, 4, MP 6. (J • K) • L 5, Assoc 7. J • K 6, Simp
8. 1. A כ B 2. B כ C 3. C כ A 4. A כ ~C / \ ~A • ~C 5. A כ C 1, 2, HS 6. (A כ C) • (C כ A) 5, 3, Conj 7. A º C 6, ME 8. (A • C) Ú (~A • ~C) 7, ME 9. ~A Ú ~C 4, MI 10. ~(A • C) 9, DM 11. ~A • ~C 8, 10, DS
9. 1. (I Ú ~~J) • K 2. [~L כ ~(K • J)] • [K כ (I כ ~M)] / \ ~(M • ~L) 3. [(K • J) כ L] • [K כ (I כ ~M) 2, Trans 4. [(K • J) כ L] • [(K • I) כ ~M] 3, Exp 5. (I Ú J) • K 1, DN 6. K • (I Ú J) 5, Com 7. (K • I) Ú (K • J) 6, Dist 8. (K • J) Ú (K • I) 7, Com
40
9. L Ú ~M 4, 8, CD 10. ~M Ú L 9, Com 11. ~M Ú ~~L 10, DN 12. ~(M • ~L) 11, DM
XV. For each of the following, adding just two propositions to the premises will produce a formal proof of validity. Use all 18 rules of inference: the eight implication rules and the 10 replacement rules.
1. 1. A כ ~A / \ ~A 2. ~A Ú ~A 1, MI 3. ~A 2, Taut
2. 1. B • (C • D) / \ C • (D • B) 2. (C • D) • B 1, Com 3. C • (D • B) 2, Assoc
3. 1. E / \ (E Ú F) • (E Ú G) 2. E Ú (F • G) 1, Add 3. (E Ú F) • (E Ú G) 2, Dist
4. 1. H Ú (I • J) / \ H Ú I 2. (H Ú I) • (H Ú J) 1, Dist 3. H Ú I 2, Simp
5. 1. ~K Ú (L כ M) / \ (K • L) כ M 2. K כ (L כ M) 1, MI 3. (K • L) כ M 2, Exp
12. 1. H כ (I • J) 2. I כ (J כ K) / \ H כ K 3. (I • J) כ K 2, Exp 4. H כ K 1, 3, HS
13. 1. (L כ M) • (N כ M) 2. L Ú N / \ M 3. M Ú M 1, 2, CD 4. M 3, Taut
14. 1. (O Ú P) כ (Q Ú R) 2. P Ú O / \ Q Ú R 3. O Ú P 2, Com 4. Q Ú R 1, 3, MP
15. 1. (S • T) Ú (U • V) 2. ~S Ú ~T / \ U • V 3. ~(S • T) 2, DM 4. U • V 1, 3, DS
XVI. Construct a formal proof of validity for each of the following arguments. Use all 18 rules of inference: the eight implication rules and the 10 replacement rules.
1. 1. ~A / \ A כ B 2. ~A Ú B 1, Add 3. A כ B 2, MI
2. 1. C / \ D כ C 2. C Ú ~D 1, Add
42
3. ~D Ú C 2, Com 4. D כ C 3, MI
3. 1. E כ (F כ G) / \ F כ (E כ G) 2. (E • F) כ G 1, Exp 3. (F • E) כ G 2, Com 4. F כ (E כ G) 3, Exp
4. 1. H כ (I • J) / \ H כ I 2. ~H Ú (I • J) 1, MI 3. (~H Ú I) • (~H Ú J) 2, Dist 4. ~H Ú I 3, Simp 5. H כ I 4, MI
5. 1. K כ L / \ K כ (L Ú M) 2. (K כ L) Ú M 1, Add 3. (~K Ú L) Ú M 2, MI 4. ~K Ú (L Ú M) 3, Assoc 5. K כ (L Ú M) 4, MI