This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Introduction................................................................................................................ 6Background of the Study:...................................................................................................6
Problem Formulation........................................................................................................ 7
Problem statement:........................................................................................................... 7
Significance of the Study:.................................................................................................. 8
Analysis and research.....................................................................................................27Pearson .orrelation........................................................................................................28
Tests and e'aminations at all levels of education< esecially at higher education
level have been considered a major and owerful tool for decision making in our aggressive and fierce society8ollar and Ben=chain >;??1@ have the oinion that the
eriod in which we live is a test intended time in which the
lives of many eole are not only greatly affected< but are
also determined by their e'am erformance %t has beenfound that students regularly and consistently distinguished
e'amination as a source of increase in an'iety and a
situation affected with uncertainty+unfairness in lettingthem demonstrate their true results >8ollar C Ben=chain<
;??1D Sielberger< ;?59@ these feelings among studentsE limit their robable erformance
during the test situation< emerging in higher te't an'iety >"ill C )igfield< ;?57@ directly causingdro in the student achievement A study accomlished by icholson >211?@ to e'lore the
effects of test an'iety on student accomlishments of grade ;; students< disclosed that an'iety
and achievement are related to each other Test an'iety can be concetuali0ed as a situation=secific characteristic< namely as atemerament to react with heightened an'iety in the face of situations that are categorically
towards achievements >"oda< Glan0mann< C $au'< ;??9@ An'iety< then< interferes with
erformance in situations in which evaluative ressure heads some individuals to become overlyengrossed with the ossibility of failure and concerned about ossible negative reactions of adult
evaluators Such circumstances are really common in most elementary and secondary
classroomsD e'amles are classroom tests< e,uali0ed achievement tests< delivering to the teacher
or before the class< and new or difficult learning situations)a#kground of the Study:
Research on test an'ety has a long and useful and roductive history >for a brief ancient and old
overview< see 8eidner< ;??5@ )hile first studies relating to test
an'iety were coordinated as rior as ;?;7 >Folin< *emis< C
Smillie< ;?;7@< test an'iety assed into the stage of scientific
investigation under its own actual and real name in ;?92 when
#andler and Sarason >;?92D Sarason C #andler< ;?92@ ublished
chaters of studies on test an'iety and how it relates to
erformance and< besides< rovided researchers with an instrument
to assess individual differences in test an'iety in mature students<the Test An'iety !uestionnaire< which was followed a few years
later by an instrument to assess test an'iety in children< the Test An'iety Scale for .hildren
>Sarason< *avidson< $ighthall< )aite< C Ruebush< ;?H1@ These two ,uestionnaires became the
gold standard of test an'iety research and granted a sound basis for many advances in test
%n the H1s and early 41s< a number of concetual advances followed of which two turned out to
be seminal contributions for test an'iety research: the first was the distinction between an'iety
as a transitory state and an'iety as a stable ersonality trait >.attell C Scheier< ;?H;D
Sielberger< ;?H2< ;?42@ and the other distinction between two basic dimensions in the
e'erience of an'iety< namely fear < anic and emotionality >$iebert C #orris< ;?H4D #orris C$iebert< ;?41@ Following these theoretical advances< the 41s and 51s saw major advances in
model construction >articularly cognitive models of test an'iety and its effects on attention and
cognitive erformance@< research< and alications These advances resulted in a si0able body of
cumulative research findings as demonstrated by an increasing number of scientific ublications
on test an'iety that< from ;?92 to now< have concluded to a whole of over a ;<111 ublications
>8eidner< ;??5<@
*roblem +ormulation
)estern research on test an'iety has Iourished since the ioneering work of Sarason and
#andlerin ;?92%t has made imortant advances in all asects of investigation including theory
and concetuali0ation< assessment< and treatment #any latest reorts show that an'iety has the
great %F$(&.& /n the academic erformances of the students #ost students reort some
amount of test an'iety %t is different for each individual< but symtoms can include headaches<
sweating< nausea< fatigue< trouble sleeing and eating< fast and shallow breathing< muscle
tension< difficulty concentrating< and being overly aware of others finishing the test faster
"ancock >211;@ investigated the effects of studentsE test an'iety and teacherEs evaluation
ractices on studentsE achievement and motivation at ost the secondary level
"e found statistically significant results which revealed that all students< esecially students with
high an'iety level< erformed oorly and were less motivated to learn Thus he concluded thatthat when students who are articularly test=an'ious are e'osed to a highly evaluative
assessment environment in their educational institution< they erform oorly and are less
motivated to erform >"ancock< 211;@ A research study conducted by .assady C 3ohnson
>2112@ to investigate the effect of cognitive test an'iety on studentsE academic erformance and
found that cognitive test an'iety e'erts a significant stable and negative imact on academic
erformance measures Albero< Brown< &liason C )ind >;??4@< on the basis of their research
study< concluded that students having high test an'iety had significantly lower scores /ludie
>211?@ conducted a study to e'lore how test an'iety affects studentsE erformance levels in the
sciences< esecially in Physics< and estimated that low test an'ious students did better than high
test=an'ious students on both numerical and non=numerical e'ercises in Physics
*roblem statement:
To e'amine the imact of an'iety of the students of (niversity of the Punjab by e'amining four
&'am an'iety is a sychological condition in which eole e'erience e'treme agony< ain and
an'iety in testing situations )hile many eole e'erience
some degree of stress and an'iety before and during e'ams<
test an'iety can really affect learning and hurt test
erformance A little bit of nervousness can actually be
helful< making you feel mentally alert and ready to tackle
the challenges resented in an e'am #ore fear< on the other
hand< can make it difficult to concentrate and you might
struggle hard to recall things that you have studied
Exam Anxiety&'am an'iety is a combination of series of hysiological roblem tension and somatic
symtoms< along with worry< dread< fear of failure< and catastrohe< that occur before or during
test situations %t is a hysiological condition in which eole e'erience e'treme ressure<
an'iety< and discomfort during and+or before taking a test+e'am This an'iety creates significant
roblems to learning and erformance Researchers suggest that high levels of emotional fear
have a direct correlation to reduced academic erformance marks< and higher overall student
dro=out rates &'am an'iety can have broader results< negatively affecting a studentJs social<
emotional and behavioral develoment< as well as their feelings about themselves and school
"ighly test=an'ious students did score about ;2 ercentile oints below their low an'iety eers
&'am an'iety is revalent amongst the student oulations of the world %t has been studiedformally since the early ;?91s beginning with researchers George #andler and Seymour
Sarason SarasonJs brother< %rwin G Sarason< then contributed to early investigation of test
an'iety< clarifying the relationshi between the focused effects of test an'iety< other focused
forms of an'iety< and generali0ed an'iety
Researchers believe that feelings of an'iety arise to reare a erson for threats %n humans<
an'iety symtoms are distributed along a continuum and different symtom levels of an'iety
• Analyse the changes in (S olicy towards .hina during the ;?41s
• Assess the contribution of Asoka to the sread of Buddhism in %ndia
• &'lain the concet of JroleJ /f what use is the concet to a ractising managerM
• .omare and contrast cellulose and lignin decomosition in soil
• $ist the criteria you would aly to the resentation of government e'enditure olicy• .ritically discuss economies and diseconomies of scale
• )hat deductions can be made after studying the cell e'hibited at .M
• &valuate the contribution of olitical arties to the develoment of ublic olicy in the
(nited States and .anada
,orry%f you are sending too much time worrying about your studies or your e'ams< if you are feeling
low in confidence and self esteem< if you are anicky or feeling deressed or an'ious< then youknow you will not be in a good learning state
And you also know that your learning and erformance
will be hamered if you find it difficult to focus< if youJre losing slee because of the ressure< if youEre
stressing out over your studies< or if youEre over an'ious
about the e'am itself either will you make much rogress if you have
trouble with your motivation Nou could be someone
who will do anything to avoid getting down to some
good solid revision The most mundane of tasks
somehow becomes fascinating if it can delay the moment when you just have to get started andaly yourself to revision
&'ams donJt have to be stressful &ven if you are very conscientious< revise well and know your material< all that effort could be wasted if you are so an'ious in the e'am that you canEt ut your
thoughts together in a coherent enough form to answer the ,uestions
ast Ex*erienesPast e'erience of any aer or test have great influence on the e'am an'iety %t seems that in
our research that students who have done bad in their ast aer will have the dilemma that thiswill also affect their erformance of the ucoming aer"owever some students were disagreed
with that because they thought this not true And many students believe that a iece of aer
cannot judge their future life Still we can say that ast e'eriences of the students has neutral
effects+ear of Results%n any field or in any deartment everyone has to face the result of the any thing that they havedone Some students have not any fear about the results this can be seen in every ast decade< in
which many great ersonalities were failed in their college or school< become the most
successful businessmen This is because they have not any fear of results )hile still eole whostudy only because of the fear of results Research show that students who do well in their aer
#ethodology means the selection of correct model out of various choices for lanning and
imlementing for our research As research had to undergo various activities like rearingaroriate models< case to study< data gathering techni,ues< format of data analysis selection of
correct methodology is most essential ste >Silverman< 211H@ This chater e'lains which
research methodology is adoted< the develoing research design as well as the methods adotedthat are enclosed with the research roblem ie how varied indeendent variables sway the e'am
an'iety The selection had to be made from ,ualitative and ,uantitative research in general Theresearch was conducted on ,ualitative method with articular discussion on the survey research
method %t also e'lains rocedure of data collection and analysis at different hases Further itdelineates the stratagem for ascertaining firmness< trust and fidelity of the research )e can
describe knowledge hilosohically into followingD in ontology knowledge is what eole say
about knowledgeD in eistemology how eole know about knowledgeD a'iology is what valuesgo into knowledgeD rhetoric is how eole write about knowledgeD and methodology is the
rocedure to study knowledge >.reswell< 2116: H@ %n literature different terms are used such as<
aroach< strategy< mode of en,uiry< method< techni,ue< and aradigm %n order to establishrelationshi between these terms hilosohers have incororated research methodologies
>,ualitative< ,uantitative@< aradigms >ositivist< interretivist<@ research methods >survey< case
study< e'erimental research< ethnograhy< action research< historical research@ researchtechni,ues >interview< ,uestionnaire< e'eriment<@ with the hel of using research instrument
>human< encil and aer etc@ >Pickard <2114@< >)alliman<2119@ >Oumar< ;???@ states that the
study can be classified into ,uantitative< ,ualitative and mi'ed aroaches *ifferent theoretical
ersectives on this strategy of in,uiry eg ethnomethodology< ethnograhy< discourse analysis<grounded theory< narrative analysis< hermeneutics< frame analysis and conversation analysis<
henomenology The work of >#aioneC.henail< ;???@< >Trochim< 2119@ and >*enscombe<
2116@ avows that ,ualitative research is a term used for descrition and interretation of social henomenon They all jointly divide ,ualitative research aroaches into following main
aroaches henomenology< ethnograhy< grounded theory surveys< field research case studies<
e'eriment< internet research< action research !uantitative research aroach involves
deduction ie formulation of hyotheses< identification of variables which could measure theobjectives and such measurement then used for en,uiry *ata collected then used for testing of
hyotheses and really describe reality Finally the results of en,uiry are matched with original
hyotheses to modify or confirm the theory from which original hyotheses was taken The mainobjective of or research conducted through ,ualitative aroach was that our research could be
generali0ed< to be objective and theories could be tested There are many strategies associated
with the ,uantitative aroach %t can be e'erimental in which researcher act as an active agentinvolved in maniulation of indeendent variable and observing effect on deendent variable %n
survey strategy cross=sectional and longitudinal studies are conducted by emloying
,uestionnaire or structured interviews for data collection from a selected samle of oulation
This research is carried with the hel of survey on cross=sectional andlongitudinal method by using ,uestionnaire as data instrument to
collect data from students selected as samle oulation of students of
Punjab (niversity
Resear#h &esign/ur research design was based on the following dimensionsD that
research could e'ress causal connection between variables both between indeendent variables and deendent variables and also
e'ressed causal connection between indeendent variables as
well Research designEs other dimension was also ket mind inthis research that there must be large number of articiants should
become the art of investigation Therefore our research has
covered si' major deartments in Punjab (niversity andinvestigating ;91 articiants< so that our research can be
generali0ed Five different research designs are discussed in
literature ie ,uasi=e'eriments< cross=sectional or social survey
design< case study design and comarative design >.reswell< 2116@ For our research cross=sectional or social survey design is selected Following stes were taken
for research design First of all a samling lan was develoed %n this methodology samle was
selected from oulation Purose of samling lan was to deict rocedure by selecting samle<fi'ing the si0e of samle and medley of media by which survey will be organi0ed %n our
research survey was conducted with the method of distributing ,uestionnaire to the resondents
Secondly< rocedures were adoted for estimation of reliabilityof oulation from which the samle data and estimates were
obtained Reliability was a rime issue while conductingresearch< as our concern whether a measure is stable or not
Thirdly< inuts ac,uired from the eole and articiants
through survey by measuring identified variables -alidity was
concerned with the veracity of conclusions that were roducedfrom research #easurement validity is also known with the
name of construct validity This concet means that the ,uestions asked from the articiant are
bringing the same concet which is re,uired to ask by the researcher %f measurement validity isnot stable then the results become unreliable The concet of internal validity is also ket in
focus in this research %nternal validity relates the issue of casualty ie the conclusion derivedfrom the research incororates causal relationshi among the variables is authentic and notformed by anything else The issue of e'ternal validity is although more imortant for
,ualitative research but it is e,ually significant for ,uantitative research as well while
ma'imi0ing oortunity for generating a reresentative samle The e'ternal validity means that
the results can be generali0ed %t is only ossible if careful selection of articiants is selected to articiate in the research Regarding ecological validity arises whether or not the findings can
be alied to eole or not is imortant for both ,ualitative and ,uantitative research Further< as
mentioned in literature three key elements were ket in mind while develoing our research
methodology to ensure correctness of our study ie samle selection< samle si0e and survey
media Samle selection was based on oulation si0e and similarity inde' with resect to itscharacteristic The articiants were selected at random but belong to the re,uired re,uirements
for survey The oulation as narrowed down as much as ossible to kee the study at level
where aro'imate effect is achieved %f null hyothesis is mistakenly acceted Tye %% error e'ists To avoid this situation reasonable si0e of samle is selected Samle of this research was
selected which ossessed its mean and variance $iterature states that a good samle must have
caability of narrowing the means there by decreasing variance< resultantly reducing the overlaof distributions and roviding better statistical results As far units of analysis were concerned in
the research individual students were articiants in the survey The researcherEs resources
allowed using the choice of ,uestionnaire for survey as it re,uired minimum resources in terms
of cost< time and manower re,uired Further written survey was adoted to get more ace and romt resonse of articiants /ther methods like verbal and mi'ed mode survey methods
were not used Some disadvantages or roblems or errors were seen in the rocess of written
surveys )ritten survey was subject to coverage error where oulation was ,uite vast and
distinctly situated )ritten survey also had error of non resonse Also it was observed that inwritten survey the articiants referred to others resondents during the filling the ,uestionnaire
Further< item non resonse error is also observed in the survey method when some or many,uestions were skied intentionally of by mistake
*opulation6Sample
%n this study robability samling secifically Stratified Random Samling techni,ue was used
%t is used when the oulation comrises into homogeneous sub=sets Also when these sub=sets
donEt overla each other and called strata Generally in strata based samling subjects can be
classified on natural basis with resect to age< education and gender etc %n
such setting all grous got e,ual chance of articiation and vigilant selection
hels to concluded rationale research findings alicable generally Further
cautious selection was made for comilation of data from medley of
students belonging to varied colleges and universities engaged in different
rograms
For this urose students were selected on gender basis with resect to their years of study ie
Bachelors< #asters and P"* Si' major *eartments of Punjab (niversity were selected They
are:
; %nstitute of Administrative sciences
2 #ass .ommunication6 %nstitute of Biochemistry and Biotechnology
7 "ailey .ollege of Banking and Finance9 %nstitute of Business Administration
)hile develoing the instrument for survey< the study focused on clear objectives of translating
the variables in to measureable factors The researcher ensured that at any oint the sirit of the
toic is not neglected .onsistency in administrating the survey was also focused The instrument
develoed has all ,ualities of a good instrument like< hel full in ,uality data collection< helfulin data rocessing and afterwards conducive for data analysis %t was made sure that such
,uestions must be designed that it could roduce answers something reliable and valid The
wording used was easily understood by articiants according to the educational level Also the
re
sonse given by the resondents must be clear (nclear and ambiguous statements were not
included in the instrument which could create any roblem of understanding for the articiants
The instrument develoed fulfilled all civil and ethical re,uirements and included such ,uestions
which the resondents should be willing to answer with no hesitation Biased wording<
acronyms< abbreviations etc were not used Precaution were
taken while drafting the instrument that similar ,uestions were
not used in the beginning and same at the end this could lead to
difficult situation because resondent might answer differently
o ersonal< objectionable and difficult analogies were
included in the instrument
)hile drafting the ,uestionnaire length was also considered that
it should not look a time consuming activity for the resondents For data collection a variety of
instruments can be emloyed like ,uestionnaires< interviews and focus grous For this articular
research ,uestionnaire was used to collect data containing ,uestions easily understandable for the
articiants Few minutes were re,uired by the resondents and any ambiguity or confusionarisen at the time of filling the ,uestionnaire was discussed and clarified on sot .lose=ended
,uestions were used so that resondents could answer the ,uestions ,uickly after e'amining
individual resonses with available choices To facilitate this rocess Five oint $ikert scale was
used This tool is useful when researcher wants rank items in order of reference %n third tye
of closed=ended ,uestion in which the resondent is asked to comare ossible resonses and
select one< or write in other
easurement of /uestions
$iterature suggests &valuative continua and Agreement continua used in closed ended ,uestions
regarding describing and evaluating eole< lace and events The roblem might arise if
resondent misinterreted numerical scales Then the whole research could fail For this research
Agreement continua was used %n this< resondents were simly re,uired to resond to ,uestions
with agree or disagree to given statements These scales were easy for resondents to understand
and answer To measure knowledge< ,uestion is often used to evaluate resondentsE
ac,uaintance with a toic< to measure resondentsE caability to rovide informed resonses
about a said knowledge already available with the resondent This method is to identify these
resonses with the hel of true and false or yes and no format Some times researcher
as used by running the findings of ,uestionnaires through *escritive Statistics< "istogram<
Scatter lots< Pearson .orrelation< Regression with regression e,uations and /ne Samle Test
This heled researcher to scrutini0e the imact of indeendent variables like Prearation<
(nderstanding< worry< Past &'eriences and Fear of Results on &'am An'iety as deendent
variable Pearson .orrelation is used on the research data to see that variables are related in alinear straight line< to find out and indicate the associations among all the airs of three or more
variables Pearson .orrelation and Searman rho were two otions )e selected Pearson
.orrelation as our variables are scale< where as Searman is used when variables are ordinal
Further Bivariate regression is used to redict scores on deendent variable from other
indeendent+redictor variables To measure comle' associational statistic< multile regression
is run to redict a scale+deendent variable from two or more
indeendent variables
2alidity and Reliability
For the rationale of data collection< a ,uestionnaire was so remeditated
by the researcher in which close=ended ,uestions were reared Five=
oint $ikert Scale was emloyed in ,uestionnaire The ,uestionnaire
consisted of 27 items reresenting with the following detail:
An'iety as deendent variable >?< ;1< ;;< ;2@
% have visible signs of nervousness such as sweaty alms< shaky hands< etc right before the
e'am
)hen % start to solve the aer< many things try to distract me
% enjoy taking a difficult e'am more than an easy one
)hile taking the e'am % had an uneasy< uset feeling in my stomach
Prearation >;< 2< 6< 7@%&en I stud! 'or $! exa$s( I )orr! t&at I )ill not re$e$er t&e $aterial
during t&e exa$s.
% study hard for my e'ams
%&en I tr! to stud! e'ore t&e exa$( $an! ot&er t&ings distracts $e to
'ocus on $! su*ect at t&at ti$e.
E+en )&en I a$ )ell prepared 'or an exa$( I 'eel +er! ner+ous aout it.
Tables 7 rovides the mean and standard deviation scores of indeendent variables and
deendent variables adoted in this study To answer the ,uestions< the resondents were asked
to rate each of the four dimensions on a five=oint scale ranging from strongly disagree >;@ tostrongly agree >9@ /verall< the mean scores for the si' scales which consist of total twenty four
items shows the ositive high mean values which ranged from ;11 to 911
%n Table 9 the Pearson .orrelation coefficient is 22HD the significance level >sig@ or is 119 and
the number of articiants of both variables >An'iety and Prearation@ is ;51 The correlation
between >An'iety and Prearation@ %s statistically significant because the sig is less than 19
Thus< we can reject the null hyothesis of no relationshi and state that there is an association
between >An'iety and Prearation@The Pearson .orrelation coefficient is 662D the significance level >sig@ or is 111 and the
number of articiants of both variables >An'iety and (nderstanding@ is ;51 The correlation
between >An'iety and (nderstanding@ is statistically significant because the sig is less than
19 Thus< we can reject the null hyothesis of no association and state that there is an association
between >An'iety and (nderstanding@ As the correlation is ositive this means that higher the
social influence higher will be the an'iety of the e'am and vice versa
The Pearson .orrelation coefficient is 2;;D the significance level >sig@ or is 11? and the
number of articiants of both variables >An'iety and )orry@ is ;51 The correlation between
>An'iety and )orry@ is statistically significant because the sig is less than 19 Thus< we can
reject the null hyothesis of no association and state that there is an association between
>An'iety and )orry@ As the correlation is ositive this means that higher the worry higher will
be an'iety of e'am and vice versa
The Pearson .orrelation coefficient is 21;D the significance level >sig@ or is 1;2 and the
number of articiants of both variables >An'iety and Past &'eriences@ is ;51 The correlation
between >An'iety and Past &'eriences@ is statistically significant because the sig is less than
19 Thus< we can reject the null hyothesis of no association and state that there is an association
between >An'iety and Past &'eriences@ As the correlation is ositive this means that higher the
Past &'eriences higher will be an'iety of e'am and vice versa
The Pearson .orrelation coefficient is 224D the significance level >sig@ or is 119 and thenumber of articiants of both variables >An'iety and Fear of Results@ is ;51 The correlation
between >An'iety and Fear of Results@ is statistically significant because the sig is less than
19 Thus< we can reject the null hyothesis of no association and state that there is an association
between >An'iety and Fear of Results@ As the correlation is ositive this means that higher the
Fear of Results higher will be an'iety of e'am and vice versa
ultiple Regressions
)e have used multile linear regressions which is a generali0ation of simle linear regression
where several redictor variables are allowed on a right hand side An'iety is taken as resonse<
outcome or deendent variable< fear of results< worry< understanding< ast e'erience<
rearation are used as e'lanatory< redictor or indeendent variables The systematic art of
our model consists of >green urchase intention@ as constant term and rest are other redictor
variables mentioned above are regarded as fi'ed >non=random or e'ogenous@
%n Table H The #odel Summary table shows that the multile correlation coefficient >R@< using
fear of results< worry< understanding< ast e'erience< rearation redictors simultaneously< is
64 and Adjusted R2 is ;;< meaning that ;; of the &'am An'iety can be redicted from the
combination of fear of results< worry< understanding< ast e'erience< rearation ote thatadjusted R2 is lower than unadjusted R2 >;7;@ This is in art related to the number of variables
in the e,uation
Table <
ANOVAa
0oel /um of
/quares
2f 0ean
/quare
F /i+.
1
8e+ression 1%.7"" " *.1"1 1#.7*$ .%%1b
8esiual 6"."(* 1## .#""
otal 76.$$7 1#&
a. 2epenent Variable; aniety
b. Preictors; 5Constant< fear of results< orry< unerstanin+< past eperience<
preparation
%n Table 4 of A/-A table shows that F;7426 and is statistically significant This indicates
that the redictors combine together to redict &'am an'iety Also model is considered to be
good fit if significance value falls between1 to 9 %n Table 4 shows the sig value of 11;
which means that relationshi between %ndeendent and deendent variable is highly significant
Table 5 signifies Regression coefficients ie Beta >@ of rearation with e'am an'iety is 17?
with significant value 994 which shows no relationshi between rearation and e'am an'iety
Regression coefficients ie Beta >@ of understanding with e'am an'iety is 2;5 with significant
value 11? which shows a ositive and significant relationshi between understanding with e'am
an'iety Regression coefficients ie Beta >@ of worry with e'am an'iety is ;4H with significant
value 177 which shows a ositive and significant relationshi between worry with e'am an'iety
Regression coefficients ie Beta >@ of ast e'eriences with e'am an'iety is ;77 with
significant value 1;9 which shows strong relationshi between ast e'eriences with e'am
an'iety Regression coefficients ie Beta >@ of fear of results with e'am an'iety is 12?H withsignificant value 11? which shows strong relationshi between fear of results with e'am an'iety
Table ? show the level at which different indeendent factors affecting the e'am an'iety of
students studying in Punjab (niversity All of these indeendent variables of the current study
were tested at test value of 6 in /ne=Samle Test The results showed that: T= -alue of
environmental concern is 6466 which is ositively related to An'iety with significant value of
111 which shows that considered rearation as a significant indeendent variable imortant for
the e'am an'iety T= -alue of understanding is =12H with significant value of ?4? which shows
that students have declared that understanding is not an essential ingredient necessary for e'am
an'iety The students have clear ersective that e'am an'iety could be comleted without the
understating T= -alue of worry is 219; with significant value of 172 which shows that students
s strongly believe that worriednessE is one of key elements in e'am an'iety )ithout such anattribute there is rare ossibility of e'am an'iety Therefore worry becomes an essential factor
resonsible for e'am an'iety T= -alue of ast e'eriences is 2462 with P value of 119 which
shows that the resondents have agreed with the literature that e'am an'iety is one of the most
successful rocesses T= -alue of fear of results is 276; with significant value of 1;H which
shows that students s strongly believe that fear of results is one of key elements in e'am an'iety
)ithout such an attribute there is rare ossibility of e'am an'iety
Oeeing in view the focus of the study to find the relative relationshi of student achievement
with affective and cognitive factors of test an'iety< the results revealed that cognitive factors
>worry scale@ are ivotal in generating an'iety in students more that affective >emotionality@
factors This finding was of interest as it is in line with the findings of the studies reorted inliterature >.haell et al< 2119D .assady C 3ohnson< 2112D Birenbaum C asser< ;??7@ and it
diminishes the assumtion that test an'iety is a function of the stakes involved in a test score %t
was assumed that tests in Pakistani higher education institutions were more structured and rigid
in structure< thus causing greater test an'iety as comared to students in countries where
e'ams+test formats are relatively fle'ible The students feel e,ually an'ious with every test they
are asked to take #oreover< it is reiterated through these results that ressure of scoring high on
tests< fear of assing a course< conse,uences of failing in test and incomatibility of rearation
for test and demand of test were the reason for cognitive te't an'iety This showed the
comle'ity of thinking rocess student go through while rearing for tests This increases as
they think more into the conse,uences or imlication related to the achievement in tests
)orrying about a test cannot be regarded as negative henomenon as a certain level of an'iety
contributes ositively in successful erformance of a test but it accumulates into a negative force
when student enters into a cyclic< non=roductive rocess of seculating outcomes based on
conse,uences of the test scores %t is ossible to guide students to avoid getting indulged into
thinking cycle letting an'iety take over their actions Teachers< arents and eers can be
considerable hel for students to kee them motivated to erform better without unnecessarily
letting the anticiated conse,uences of failure taking over the ositive force bringing
erformance of student comatible with their abilities and skills
Suggestions and Re#ommendations
Teachers and universities can educate students about how to remove or reduce the e'am an'iety
This is an e'tensive rocedure and will take elongated time to nurture the an'iety %t was also
found that friends and associates had a strong influence on the Students They have confidence in
the oinion of their friends Social networks can be very effective in doing that Government
should also lay its art in encouraging in develoment and new structure if education in
Pakistan %t can also encourage the better test erformances of the students as well as
imrovement in their academic scores
Referen#esAlbero< PD Brown< AD &liason< SD C )ind< 3 >;??4@: %mroving Reading through the use of
#ultile %ntelligences &aster's Action Researc($ Proect < Saint avier (niversity C %R%
#wamwenda< T S >;??7@ Gender differences in scores on test an'iety and
academic achievement
among South African (niversity graduate students South African 3ournal of Psychology< 27>7@<
icholson< A # >211?@ &ffects of test an'iety on student achievement
>A.T@ for college bound students 0issertation Abstract "nternational *A%=A=41+14< AAT 66HH;2H
Serok< S >;??;@ The alication of Gestalt methods for the reduction of test
an'iety in students
Assess!ent and E%aluation in +ig(er Education, *8 >2@< ;94=H7
Smith< O " >2111@ The self=concet and verbal academic achievement of rimary and secondary
teachers (nublished *octoral *issertation< (niversity of #elbourne< Australia
Stober< 3 >2117@ *imensions of test an'iety: Relations to ways of coing with re=e'am an'ietyand uncertainty Anxiety, Stress and oping, *2 >6@< 2;6=22H
)illiams< 3 F >;??;@ #odeling test an'iety< self=concet and high school studentsE academic
achievement )ournal of Researc( 9 0e%elop!ent and Education< 29< 9;=94
)illiams< 3& >;??7@ An'iety measurement: .onstruct validity and test
erformance
&easure!ent 9 E%aluation in ounseling 9 0e%elop!ent, 12 >;@<
8eidner< # >;??1@ *oes test an'iety bias scholastic atitude test
erformance by gender and
socio=cultural grouM )ournal of Personality Assess!ent, 44< ;79=;H1
8oller< (< C Ben=.hain< * >;??1@ Gender differences in e'amination tye< test an'iety< and academicachievement in college science: a case study Science education, 2.>H@< 9?4=H15