1 Example 7 Example 7 Meteorological Analysis along a Meteorological Analysis along a Trajectory Trajectory • Configure a trajectory run to plot the model terrain height along the trajectory path. • Change the vertical motion method from “Model Vertical Velocity” to Isentropic to view differences.
17
Embed
Example 7 Meteorological Analysis along a Trajectory
Configure a trajectory run to plot the model terrain height along the trajectory path. Change the vertical motion method from “Model Vertical Velocity” to Isentropic to view differences. Example 7 Meteorological Analysis along a Trajectory. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
11
Example 7Example 7Meteorological Analysis along a TrajectoryMeteorological Analysis along a Trajectory
• Configure a trajectory run to plot the model terrain height along the trajectory path.• Change the vertical motion method from “Model Vertical Velocity” to Isentropic to view differences.
22
Run a forward trajectory with NAMF12 Run a forward trajectory with NAMF12 forecast data from the Workshop archive.forecast data from the Workshop archive.
33
Choose Source LocationChoose Source Location
Enter a starting location at: 39.92N and 105.12W
44
Total run time: 84 hours
Starting height: 1500 m AGL
Model Runtime Options
55
Vertical plot height units: Pressure
Check Terrain Height to plot along trajectory. Note: this will not plot the terrain heights, but will calculate them.
Display Options
66
Submit the job and view the resultsSubmit the job and view the results
77
The resulting trajectory proceeds to the southeast into central Texas, descending from 700 hPa to nearly 950 hPa. Now click on “Modify the trajectory plot without rerunning the model” from the results page.
88
Vertical plot height units: Above model ground level
Click “Request plot.”
99
Submit the graphics job and view the resultsSubmit the graphics job and view the results
1010
The same trajectory is plotted, and since the terrain height along the trajectory was already saved, it is plotted below the trajectory (this can also be done by rerunning the model and clicking Yes to plot the meteorological data along the trajectory).
The trajectory actually follows the terrain for the most part, so care must be exercised when interpreting the up or down movement of trajectories wrt terrain.
The terrian heights (MAGL) along the trajectory can be viewed as the right-most column of the trajectory endpoints file.
1111
Use the option to rerun the jobUse the option to rerun the job
A recently added option, allows a user to rerun a model case from the results page without having to re-enter all the inputs previously entered.
Click on “Rerun the model with user entered defaults” from the results page.
Uncheck Terrain Height and check Mixed Layer Depth.
Check “Plot meteorological field along trajectory.”
1212
Submit the job and view the resultsSubmit the job and view the results
1313
This plot shows the mixed layer depth along the trajectory varied from 250 m to 687 m. (The HYSPLIT trajectory model sets the minimum mixing height to 250 m.)
1414
Review Vertical Motion Options discussion before proceeding….
1515
Use the option to rerun the jobUse the option to rerun the job
Now we will rerun the model using the Isentropic vertical motion option to demonstrate the differences observed between model vertical motion and Isentropic motion.
Vertical plot height units: Theta
Also, Uncheck “Plot meteorological field along trajectory” and uncheck “Mixed Layer Depth.”
Click on “Rerun the model with user entered defaults” from the results page.
Vertical Motion: Isentropic
1616
Submit the job and view the resultsSubmit the job and view the results
1717
Shown below left is the trajectory from Example 7 using the NAM 12 km vertical velocity fields. To the right is the same trajectory computed using the isentropic flow assumption and choosing the Theta vertical coordinate option. This graphic shows that the potential temperature varied by only about 1 degree, however by assuming adiabatic flow conditions the second trajectory ended in northeastern Louisiana after 84 hours instead of north central Texas. The validity of the adiabatic flow assumption would need to be assessed for this case (no precipitation, cloud, etc).