evolution were not true ... If biological Then why do over 99.85% of all scientists in the relevant fields of earth and life sciences agree that biological evolution is a fact? Then why can we construct an evolutionary family tree independently based on Embryological Development? The evolutionary history of an organism unfolds during its development. For example, birds are descendants of dinosaurs thus carry their DNA. So in its early stages, a chicken embryo will develop dinosaur traits like a long tail, teeth, and 3-fingered hands. Then why can we construct an evolutionary family tree independently based on Comparative Anatomy? By comparing the anatomy of species, past & present, we can create a logical family tree. For instance, at one point in our evolutionary history, all species were simple invertebrates until the first vertebra evolved. A further split in this family tree occurred as some vertebrates developed a jaw bone. A FACT AND A THEORY In science a "theory" is an explanation, not a guess. The "theory of evolution" is the explanation of how the fact of evolution occurred. Similarly, the "theory of gravity" explains how gravity occurs. Then why do humans have the genes to develop a tail and a gene to destroy the tail during embryological development? TAIL GENE IN HUMANS The genes that control the development of tails in mice and other vertebrates have been identified (the Wnt-3a and Cdx1 genes). As predicted by common descent these tail genes have also been discovered in the human genome. (Greco et al. 1996; Prinos et al. 2001; Schubert et al. 2001; Shum et al. 1999; Takada et al. 1994; Katoh 2002; Roelink et al. 1993) Then why can we construct an evolutionary family tree independently based on Geographical Succession? We only find distant ancestors in older rocks and closer ancestors in younger rocks. We NEVER find anything like fossils of a rabbit in the older Precambrian era rock layers. Vertebral Column Bony Jaw Lungs Legs Vertebrate with a Jaw, Lungs, & Legs. Then why can we construct an evolutionary family tree independently based on Biogeography? Fossils are not randomly scattered across the world but rather show distinct migration paths. The fossils of a species are always found closer to their most recent evolutionary ancestor than more distantly related ones. by Truth-Saves.com Then why can we construct an evolutionary family tree independently based on Genetic Similarities? All animals carry the genes of their evolutionary ancestors and only the genes of their evolutionary ancestors. Since our DNA has been passed on and handed down from every evolutionary ancestor our genome carries a lot of evolutionary baggage. Comparing that baggage between species allows scientists to determine how closely related one organism is to another. Then why can we construct an evolutionary family tree independently based on The Fossil Record? Despite claims by vocal creationists, and even though it is extremely rare for bones to become fossilized, the fossil record is still very abundant and extensively displays the evolutionary history of various species. If biological evolution were not true, then why do all of these evolutionary family trees which are each constructed independently from each other NASAL DRIFT IN EARLY WHALES The fossil record even shows the nostril migrating from the snout to the top of skull in the transitional forms leading to whales. There are so many transitional forms in the fossil record linking reptiles to mammals that scientists have classified them as a new group called "Therapsids" (above), which are now all extinct. Fossils even show the complete transition from 3 mandibular jaw bones & 1 middle ear bone in reptiles to the 1 mandibular jaw bone & 3 middle ear bones in mammals. Reptiles use the jaw bones, which developed into mammalian ear bones, to hear low frequencies as lower jaw vibrations transmit to their single ear bone. More details online at www.Truth-Saves.com ALL MATCH UP PERFECTLY?
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
evolutionwere not true...
If biological
Then why do over99.85% of all scientistsin the relevant fields of earth and life sciences agree that biological evolution is a fact?
Then why can we construct an evolutionary family tree independently based onEmbryological Development?The evolutionary history of an organism unfolds during its development. For example, birds are descendants of dinosaurs thus carry their DNA. So in its early stages, a chicken embryo will develop dinosaur traits like a long tail, teeth, and 3-fingered hands.
Then why can we construct an evolutionary family tree independently based on Comparative Anatomy?By comparing the anatomy of species, past & present, we can create a logical family tree. For instance, at one point in our evolutionary history, all species were simple invertebrates until the first vertebra evolved. A further split in this family tree occurred as some vertebrates developed a jaw bone.
A FACT AND A THEORYIn science a "theory" is an explanation, not a guess. The "theory of evolution" is the explanation of how the fact of evolution occurred. Similarly, the "theory of gravity" explains how gravity occurs.
Then why do humans have the genes to develop a tail and a gene to destroy the tail during embryological development?
TAIL GENE IN HUMANSThe genes that control the development of tails in mice and other vertebrates have been identified (the Wnt-3a and Cdx1 genes). As predicted by common descent these tail genes have also been discovered in the human genome.
(Greco et al. 1996; Prinos et al. 2001; Schubert et al. 2001; Shum et al. 1999; Takada et al. 1994; Katoh 2002; Roelink et al. 1993)
Then why can we construct an evolutionary family tree independently based onGeographical Succession?We only find distant ancestors in older rocks and closer ancestors in younger rocks. We NEVER find anything like fossils of a rabbit in the older Precambrian era rock layers.
Vertebral Column
Bony Jaw
Lungs
Legs
Vertebrate with a Jaw, Lungs, & Legs.
Then why can we construct an evolutionary family tree independently based onBiogeography?Fossils are not randomly scattered across the world but rather show distinct migration paths. The fossils of a species are always found closer to their most recent evolutionary ancestor than more distantly related ones.
by Truth-Saves.com
Then why can we construct an evolutionary family tree independently based on Genetic Similarities?All animals carry the genes of their evolutionary ancestors and only the genes of their evolutionary ancestors. Since our DNA has been passed on and handed down from every evolutionary ancestor our genome carries a lot of evolutionary baggage. Comparing that baggage between species allows scientists to determine how closely related one organism is to another.
Then why can we construct an evolutionary family tree independently based on The Fossil Record?Despite claims by vocal creationists, and even though it is extremely rare for bones to become fossilized, the fossil record is still very abundant and extensively displays the evolutionary history of various species.
If biological evolution were not true, then why do all of these evolutionary family trees which are each constructed independently from each other
NASAL DRIFT IN EARLY WHALESThe fossil record even shows the nostril migrating from the snout to the top of skull in the transitional forms leading to whales.
There are so many transitional forms in the fossil record linking reptiles to mammals that scientists have classified them as a new group called "Therapsids" (above), which are now all extinct. Fossils even show the complete transition from 3 mandibular jaw bones & 1 middle ear bone in reptiles to the 1 mandibular jaw bone & 3 middle ear bones in mammals. Reptiles use the jaw bones, which developed into mammalian ear bones, to hear low frequencies as lower jaw vibrations transmit to their single ear bone.
More details online at www.Truth-Saves.com
ALL MATCH UP PERFECTLY?
Claim 1: Evolution violates the second law of thermodynamics.
Reality: The law says that systems must become more disordered over time so how could complex living cells and organisms come from basic inanimate chemicals? What creationists fail to mention is that this law only applies to a closed system where no matter or energy enters. The earth is NOT a closed system and receives energy from the sun which fuels simple organisms so they can become more complex.
Claim 2: Carbon Dating isn't accurate.
Reality: That is why scientists use dozens of different Radiometric Dating methods to determine the age of older rock layers, not just Carbon Dating.
"Scientists use rocks to date bones and bones to date the rocks, it is
circular logic."
Claim 4: Evolution claims something came from nothing.
Reality: Nothing in science actually claims this. It is the Bible that claims God created everything out of nothing.
Claim 5: Evolution can't explain where life came from so it must be wrong.
Reality: Gravity also can't explain where an object came from. Evolution, just like gravity, is just the explanation of how something got from point A to point B.
What are the odds?Earth may be the only "Goldilocks" planet in our solar system that is just right for harboring life but there are an estimated 100 billion Earth-like planets in just the Milky Way. Life is also made from Hydrogen, Carbon, Oxygen, & Nitrogen - the most common elements in the universe. Keep in mind that all life is built out of non-life, atoms.
creationismwere true?What if
Claim 9: Evolution says complex life just randomly happened.
Reality: Life looks designed because it IS designed BUT not by a conscious designer. The only random portion of evolution is the slight alterations, "mutations," in genes when DNA is passed on to an offspring. Nature then designs life by weeding out harmful mutations and maintaing beneficial ones and after enough filtering natural selection produces results that appear utterly impossible at first glance.
Claim 10: Scientists don't accept evolution.
Reality: Over 99.85% of scientists, in the relevant fields of earth and life sciences, do.
Claim 11: There are no transitional fossils.
Reality: Creationists claim that the fossil record does not show any transitional forms. This may have been true 100 years ago but if you just take a couple minutes to do some research you will find that there is a massive abundance of transitional forms currently discovered in the fossil record.
Transitional species do not look like the Crocoduck propaganda as creationists Ray Comfort & Kirk Cameron claim they should. Evolution does not claim we should find a half-duck/half-crocodile, not just because they are not ancestors but because evolution works through slight gradual changes with no targeted outcome and not on a direct path. The existence of a "crocoduck" would actually be evidence against evolution.
Claim 12: Biological systems are too "Irreducibly Complex" to have evolved in steps.
Reality: All systems that creationist Michael J Behe claims are Irreducibly Complex have been easily explained through gradual evolution. Even every stage of the human eye's evolution can be seen in various living organisms from euglenids to octopuses. Each stage involves modifications of the last, not just pieces of the final outcome as Behe falsely assumes.
"...they created an entire skeleton with arms, legs, feet, hands, even facial features when all they really had was one tooth which, later, was found to be the tooth of an extinct pig."
Reality: Kirk Cameron is referring to the drawing in a 1922 paper in an attempt to make it look like scientists just make up species to support evolution. What Kirk fails to share is the following text which accompanied the photo...
"Mr. Forestier has made a remarkable sketch to convey some idea of the possibilities suggested by this discovery. As we know nothing of the creature 's form, his reconstruction is merely the expression of an artist's brilliant imaginative genius." - (Smith 1922)
Once examined by the scientific community the tooth was quickly identified as a pig tooth (very similar to human tooth) and was never accepted as a hominid tooth. The scientific community constantly has claims peer reviewed to weed out any potentially false claims such as Archaeoraptor or Piltdown man.
Claim 7:"Big Science" attackspeople for simply notsupporting evolution.
Reality: No one in the film Expelled were actually fired, blacklisted, or attacked as Ben Stein in this propaganda film claims. Learn the full and true story at expelledexposed.com
Claim 8: Knowledge of Darwinian evolution caused the holocaust.
This is just a weak attempt to demonize science. However, Hitler's actions were based on eugenics/Lamarckism, the discredited idea (replaced by Darwin's ideas) that an organism can pass on characteristics that it acquired during its lifetime to its offsprings. Unlike what Darwinian evolution which also favors diversity, Lamarckism is progressive and goal-oriented.
Then why must Creationists repeatedly make dishonest claims to make evolution sound less likely, dangerous, or like a conspiracy?
Reality: Scientists do use the rocks to find the age of the bones within them; but they do NOT uses bones to determine the age of rocks.
More details online at www.Truth-Saves.com
Why can't they just be honest?
Related Documents
