Top Banner
Evolution II. Evolution II.
39
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Evolution Ii

Evolution II.Evolution II.

Page 2: Evolution Ii

Dating of fossils

• Relative

• Absolute

Page 3: Evolution Ii

Relative dating

Page 4: Evolution Ii

Absolute dating• Radiometric dating

IsotopeHalf-live (years)

K40 1,3 .1012

Th232 14 .1012

U235 704 .106

C14 5 730

Page 5: Evolution Ii

Principle of radiometric dating

0,5

1,0

0t

Sh

are

of

iso

top

e

time

isotope

decay product

Half-life

Page 6: Evolution Ii

Mesozoic

PERIODTIME

(milions of years)

Triassic

190

Jurassic136

Cretaceous

66

K-T Border (66-65 mil.y.): mass extinction

Page 7: Evolution Ii

Chixculub Crater (Mexiko)

Site of colision with an asteroide measuring 10-20 km across

Page 8: Evolution Ii

KenozoicPERIOD

Time(mil.y.)

CHARAKTERISTIC

Tertiary

53 Occurence of Prosimii

35 Occurence of Anthropoidea

25 Occurence of Hominoidea

5 Occurence of Dryopithecus

1,8 Hominids (Australopithecus)

Quarternary

Pleistocene

0,01

Homo habilisHomo erectus

Homo sapiens neanderthalensis

Holocene

recent

Homo sapiens sapiens

Page 9: Evolution Ii

Cladistics• A method of analyzing

the evolutionary

relationships between

groups to construct their

family tree. Phylogenetic

relationship between

organisms is derived from

the similarity of certain

characters.

• Result of cladistic

analysis – cladogram.

Cladogram

Page 10: Evolution Ii

hair? milk? lay eggs? livebearing? placenta?

platypus

                     

x x x    

echidna

                      

x x x  

opossum

                     

x x   x  

cat

                     

x x   x x

elephant

                     

x x   x x

Page 11: Evolution Ii

Simple cladogram of mammals

Page 12: Evolution Ii

A cladogram derived from the molecular data (DNA sequence)

Page 13: Evolution Ii

Possible fylogenetic relationships of hominides I.

0

0,25

0,5

1

2

3

4

5

6

Time (milions of years)

Homo sapiens sapiens Homo „sapiens“

neanderthalensis

Homo erectus

Homo habilis

Australopithecusafarensis

Ardipithecus ramidus

Australopithecus. africanusHomo

heidelbergensis

Tertiary

Quarternary

Page 14: Evolution Ii

Possible fylogenetic relationships of hominides II.

Page 15: Evolution Ii

Kenyantropus

Page 16: Evolution Ii

Australopithecus africanus

Page 17: Evolution Ii

Australopithecus africanus

Skull of „Taung child“ – found in south Africa

Page 18: Evolution Ii

Australopithecus afarensis

Page 19: Evolution Ii

Autralopithecus afarensisskeleton„Lucy“

Page 20: Evolution Ii

Footsteps of A.afarensis (Laetoli, Tanzania)

Australopithecus walked upright

(bipedal)

Page 21: Evolution Ii

Australopithecus afarensis

Page 22: Evolution Ii

Homo habilis

Page 23: Evolution Ii

Homo erectus

the first hominide living outside Africa

Page 24: Evolution Ii

Homo erectus

Page 25: Evolution Ii

Homo erectus

Page 26: Evolution Ii

Homo heidelbergensis

Page 27: Evolution Ii

0

0,25

0,5

1

2

3

4

5

6

Time (milions of years)

Homo sapiens sapiens Homo „sapiens“

neanderthalensis

Homo erectus

Homo habilis

Australopithecusafarensis

Ardipithecus ramidus

Australopithecus. africanusHomo

heidelbergensis

Possible fylogenetic relationships of hominides

Page 28: Evolution Ii

Homo neanderthalensis

Page 29: Evolution Ii

Homo neanderthalensis

Page 30: Evolution Ii

Homo neanderthalensis

Page 31: Evolution Ii

Homo neanderthalensis

X

Homo sapiens

Page 32: Evolution Ii

Modern Homo sapiens

Lascaux cave (France)

– paintings of wild horses and aurochs (17 000 years ago).

Page 33: Evolution Ii

http://www.modernhumanorigins.com/

Page 34: Evolution Ii

About the origin of Homo sapiens

• Monocentric models

– Homo sapiens evolved in one site (probably in

the Africa) – out-of-Africa theory

• Polycentric models (multiregional

evolution)

– Homo sapiens evolved independently in a few

different sites. Modern humans originated of

crossbreedind of these different strains.

Page 35: Evolution Ii

Out-of-Africa Theory

Page 36: Evolution Ii

Mitochondrial Eve• The rate of mutations in the mitochondrial

genome (mtDNA) is constant – roughly 1/1500-3000 years.

• Comparison of these mutations could explain differences on possible relationship between different human populations. Its also possible to estimate the time of evolutionary division of their ancestors.

• mtDNA studies showed that the modern humans (Homo sapiens sapiens) differed from other species of the genus Homo before some 150 – 200 thousands of years. Homo sapiens originated from a small group of females (or only one female) – such called „mitochondrial Eve“, which delivered to us her mitochondrial genes.

• „Eve“ lived probably in Africa. It supports the hypothesis, that the whole mankind originated from only one ancestor (i.e. „out-of-Africa theory).

Page 37: Evolution Ii

What hapenned with Homo neanderthalensis?

Theories• Homo sapiens evolved from H. neanderthalensis• H. sapiens and H. neanderthalensis were

different species, but H.neanderthalensis failed in competition with H. sapiens – (H.n. was a trophy of H.sapiens)

• There was numerous crossbreeding between H. sapiens and H. neanderthalensis. Current human population consist of descendants of the both of species.

Page 38: Evolution Ii

Results of the mtDNA studies?

• Hypervariable sequences HVR I a HVR II of the mtDNA (aDNA) isolated from the fossil materials were analyzed.

• Intraspecific variability within the population of the modern humans reaches maximum only 11pb.

• Differences in HVR squences between the modern human and H. neanderthalensis are 35 pb. It could be explained as a interspecific difference.

Page 39: Evolution Ii