Top Banner
Evolution II. Evolution II.
39

Evolution II.

Jan 21, 2016

Download

Documents

Elvis

Evolution II. Dating of fossils. Relative Absolute. Relative dating. Absolute dating. Radiometric dating. 1,0. decay product. Share of isotope. 0,5. isotope. 0. t. Half-life. time. P rinciple of radiometric dating. Mesozoic. K-T Border (66-65 mil.y.): mass extinction. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Evolution II.

Evolution II.Evolution II.

Page 2: Evolution II.

Dating of fossils

• Relative

• Absolute

Page 3: Evolution II.

Relative dating

Page 4: Evolution II.

Absolute dating• Radiometric dating

IsotopeHalf-live (years)

K40 1,3 .1012

Th232 14 .1012

U235 704 .106

C14 5 730

Page 5: Evolution II.

Principle of radiometric dating

0,5

1,0

0t

Sh

are

of

iso

top

e

time

isotope

decay product

Half-life

Page 6: Evolution II.

Mesozoic

PERIODTIME

(milions of years)

Triassic

190

Jurassic136

Cretaceous

66

K-T Border (66-65 mil.y.): mass extinction

Page 7: Evolution II.

Chixculub Crater (Mexiko)

Site of colision with an asteroide measuring 10-20 km across

Page 8: Evolution II.

KenozoicPERIOD

Time(mil.y.)

CHARAKTERISTIC

Tertiary

53 Occurence of Prosimii

35 Occurence of Anthropoidea

25 Occurence of Hominoidea

5 Occurence of Dryopithecus

1,8 Hominids (Australopithecus)

Quarternary

Pleistocene

0,01

Homo habilisHomo erectus

Homo sapiens neanderthalensis

Holocene

recent

Homo sapiens sapiens

Page 9: Evolution II.

Cladistics• A method of analyzing

the evolutionary

relationships between

groups to construct their

family tree. Phylogenetic

relationship between

organisms is derived from

the similarity of certain

characters.

• Result of cladistic

analysis – cladogram.

Cladogram

Page 10: Evolution II.

hair? milk? lay eggs? livebearing? placenta?

platypus

                     

x x x    

echidna

                      

x x x  

opossum

                     

x x   x  

cat

                     

x x   x x

elephant

                     

x x   x x

Page 11: Evolution II.

Simple cladogram of mammals

Page 12: Evolution II.

A cladogram derived from the molecular data (DNA sequence)

Page 13: Evolution II.

Possible fylogenetic relationships of hominides I.

0

0,25

0,5

1

2

3

4

5

6

Time (milions of years)

Homo sapiens sapiens Homo „sapiens“

neanderthalensis

Homo erectus

Homo habilis

Australopithecusafarensis

Ardipithecus ramidus

Australopithecus. africanusHomo

heidelbergensis

Tertiary

Quarternary

Page 14: Evolution II.

Possible fylogenetic relationships of hominides II.

Page 15: Evolution II.

Kenyantropus

Page 16: Evolution II.

Australopithecus africanus

Page 17: Evolution II.

Australopithecus africanus

Skull of „Taung child“ – found in south Africa

Page 18: Evolution II.

Australopithecus afarensis

Page 19: Evolution II.

Autralopithecus afarensisskeleton„Lucy“

Page 20: Evolution II.

Footsteps of A.afarensis (Laetoli, Tanzania)

Australopithecus walked upright

(bipedal)

Page 21: Evolution II.

Australopithecus afarensis

Page 22: Evolution II.

Homo habilis

Page 23: Evolution II.

Homo erectus

the first hominide living outside Africa

Page 24: Evolution II.

Homo erectus

Page 25: Evolution II.

Homo erectus

Page 26: Evolution II.

Homo heidelbergensis

Page 27: Evolution II.

0

0,25

0,5

1

2

3

4

5

6

Time (milions of years)

Homo sapiens sapiens Homo „sapiens“

neanderthalensis

Homo erectus

Homo habilis

Australopithecusafarensis

Ardipithecus ramidus

Australopithecus. africanusHomo

heidelbergensis

Possible fylogenetic relationships of hominides

Page 28: Evolution II.

Homo neanderthalensis

Page 29: Evolution II.

Homo neanderthalensis

Page 30: Evolution II.

Homo neanderthalensis

Page 31: Evolution II.

Homo neanderthalensis

X

Homo sapiens

Page 32: Evolution II.

Modern Homo sapiens

Lascaux cave (France)

– paintings of wild horses and aurochs (17 000 years ago).

Page 33: Evolution II.

http://www.modernhumanorigins.com/

Page 34: Evolution II.

About the origin of Homo sapiens

• Monocentric models

– Homo sapiens evolved in one site (probably in

the Africa) – out-of-Africa theory

• Polycentric models (multiregional

evolution)

– Homo sapiens evolved independently in a few

different sites. Modern humans originated of

crossbreedind of these different strains.

Page 35: Evolution II.

Out-of-Africa Theory

Page 36: Evolution II.

Mitochondrial Eve• The rate of mutations in the mitochondrial

genome (mtDNA) is constant – roughly 1/1500-3000 years.

• Comparison of these mutations could explain differences on possible relationship between different human populations. Its also possible to estimate the time of evolutionary division of their ancestors.

• mtDNA studies showed that the modern humans (Homo sapiens sapiens) differed from other species of the genus Homo before some 150 – 200 thousands of years. Homo sapiens originated from a small group of females (or only one female) – such called „mitochondrial Eve“, which delivered to us her mitochondrial genes.

• „Eve“ lived probably in Africa. It supports the hypothesis, that the whole mankind originated from only one ancestor (i.e. „out-of-Africa theory).

Page 37: Evolution II.

What hapenned with Homo neanderthalensis?

Theories• Homo sapiens evolved from H. neanderthalensis• H. sapiens and H. neanderthalensis were

different species, but H.neanderthalensis failed in competition with H. sapiens – (H.n. was a trophy of H.sapiens)

• There was numerous crossbreeding between H. sapiens and H. neanderthalensis. Current human population consist of descendants of the both of species.

Page 38: Evolution II.

Results of the mtDNA studies?

• Hypervariable sequences HVR I a HVR II of the mtDNA (aDNA) isolated from the fossil materials were analyzed.

• Intraspecific variability within the population of the modern humans reaches maximum only 11pb.

• Differences in HVR squences between the modern human and H. neanderthalensis are 35 pb. It could be explained as a interspecific difference.

Page 39: Evolution II.