Evidence-Based Practice and the Future of Nursing Suzanne Prevost, RN, PhD Associate Dean for Practice University of Kentucky College of Nursing President-Elect – Sigma Theta Tau International Brought to you by
Jan 20, 2015
Evidence-Based Practice and the Future of NursingEvidence-Based Practice and the Future of Nursing
Suzanne Prevost, RN, PhDAssociate Dean for Practice University of Kentucky College of NursingPresident-Elect – Sigma Theta Tau International
Suzanne Prevost, RN, PhDAssociate Dean for Practice University of Kentucky College of NursingPresident-Elect – Sigma Theta Tau International
Brought to you by
The Evolution of
Evidence-Based Practice
Brought to you by
What is - Evidence?What is - Evidence?
Anything that provides material or
information on which a conclusion or proof
may be based; used to arrive at the truth, used to prove or disprove the point at issue.
(Webster)
Brought to you by
Evidence-Based PracticeEvidence-Based Practice
• Evidence-Based Practice – Conscientious, explicit and judicious use of current best evidence with clinical expertise, and patient values to make decisions about the care of patients. (Sackett, 2000)
• Evidence-based nursing practice is the process of shared decision-making between practitioner, patient and significant others, based on research evidence, the patient’s experiences and preferences, clinical expertise, and other robust sources of information.
(STTI , 2007)
Brought to you by
• EBP is both a process and a product… requiring that the evidence which is produced – is also applied to practice.
(D. Rutledge, 2002)
Brought to you by
Evolution of EBP Evolution of EBP
• 1991 – Evidence-based medicine -first described in the American College of Physicians Journal Club.
• 1992 – the Evidence-based Medicine Working Group described it as a “paradigm shift” in JAMA
– Clinical observations and experience, principles of pathophysiology, knowledge gained from authoritative figures, and common sense -- are no longer a sufficient guide for clinical practice, decision-making, or the development of practice guidelines
Brought to you by
Evolution of EBP Evolution of EBP
• Early 1990’s – US Prev. Services TF – began developing EB Guidelines for Screening and Prevention
• 1992 – AHCPR (now AHRQ) – started publishing systematic reviews and consensus statements in the form of Clinical Practice Guidelines, starting with the guideline for Acute Pain, 19 guidelines were produced from ’92-’96
• 1993 - the first annual Cochrane Colloquia was held at the New York Academy of Sciences
• 1993 – Online Journal of Knowledge Synthesis for Nursing
Brought to you by
Evolution of EBP Evolution of EBP
1997 – Jan 2011 – 198 Evidence Reports published by the EBP centers
– May, 2005 – Episiotomy Use – “…no health benefits from episiotomy…
routine use is harmful …”
Brought to you by
Recent Evidence ReportsRecent Evidence Reports
193. Alzheimer's Disease and Cognitive Decline 192. Lactose Intolerance and Health 190. Enhancing Use and Quality of Colorectal Cancer Screening189. Exercise-induced Bronchoconstriction and Asthma188. Impact of Consumer Health Informatics Applications187. Treatment of Overactive Bladder in Women185. Management of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ (DCIS)184. Treatment of Common Hip Fractures
151. Nurse Staffing and Quality of Patient Care140. Tobacco Use: Prevention, Cessation, and Control
This is just one example of literature syntheses that are available
to support EBP.
Brought to you by
Nurse Staffing and Quality of Patient Care
• Objectives: To assess how nurse to patient ratios and nurse work hours were associated with patient outcomes in acute care hospitals
• Results: Higher RN staffing was associated with less mortality, failure to rescue, cardiac arrest, hospital acquired pneumonia, and other adverse events. Limited evidence suggests that the higher proportion of RNs with BSN degrees was associated with lower mortality and failure to rescue. More overtime hours were associated with an increase in hospital related mortality, nosocomial infections, shock, and bloodstream infections.
Brought to you by
Evolution of EBP Evolution of EBP
• 1998 – Evidence-Based Nursing journal debuted
• 1999 – The UK Department of Health stipulated that, to enhance the quality of care, nursing, midwifery, and health visiting practice must be evidence-based
• 2002 - JCAHO begins requiring monitoring of evidence-based core measures
• 2004 – WorldViews on Evidence-Based Nursing
• 2004 – AACN began publishing “Practice Alerts”Brought to you by
Evolving Interest in Evidence-Based PracticeEvolving Interest in Evidence-Based Practice
0 0 1 0 0 5 25 35 47 51 67 83
139
530
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
'91 '92 '93 '94 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04
2011 – Medline search > 38,000
Brought to you by
Within one decade, the concept of evidence-based practice has evolved and been embraced by nurses in nearly every clinical specialty, across a variety of roles and positions, and in locations around the globe.
EBP – means many things to many people Brought to you by
Factors Contributing to Emphasis on Evidence-Based Nursing Practice
Factors Contributing to Emphasis on Evidence-Based Nursing Practice
• Scientific knowledge expansion– Knowledge expands exponentially q 2 yrs – 12 yrs. from now – 128 x as much knowledge
• Knowledge availability -- The Internet
• Highly educated nurses in clinical settings– APNs – focusing on evidence-based clinical problem-solving– Clinical Nurse Researchers– DNP Movement
Brought to you by
Factors Contributing to Emphasis on Evidence-Based Nursing Practice
Factors Contributing to Emphasis on Evidence-Based Nursing Practice
• Aggressive pursuit of cost-effectiveness• Focus on quality of care, Risk & error
reduction• Highly educated consumers • JCAHO/Accreditation expectations• Increased attention to institutional image
– Magnet hospital movement
Brought to you by
• Most nurses agree that EBP is important… but how do we make it happen?
Brought to you by
What is the 1st step toward EBP for the practicing nurse?What is the 1st step toward EBP for the practicing nurse?
• Asking good clinical questions
• Nurses must be empowered to ask critical questions in the spirit of looking for opportunities to improve nursing care and patient outcomes
• Risk-taking environmentBrought to you by
Nursing vs. Medical QuestionsNursing vs. Medical Questions
• Often more exploratory
• Less frequently focused on intervention selection
• Less evidence to support many nursing interventions
• Most nursing interventions have less capacity for harm
• Many nursing challenges often go beyond individual clinical interventions (e.g. nurse staffing, education, recruitment)
Brought to you by
Clinical Nursing QuestionsClinical Nursing Questions
• In postoperative patients, does prn or ATC analgesic administration yield better pain relief?
• Among critically ill patients, is controlled or open visitation more effective in reducing patient anxiety?
Brought to you by
Questions for APNsQuestions for APNs
• In acute care hospitals, is the CNS more effective by focusing on a specific patient population or a specific unit?
• What else?
Brought to you by
What kind of questions might the Nurse Manager ask?
What kind of questions might the Nurse Manager ask?
• On medical-surgical units, do 12 hour or 8 hour shifts result in more medication errors?
Brought to you by
Key Questions to Ask When Considering EBP
Key Questions to Ask When Considering EBP
• Why have we always done “it” this way?• Do we have evidence-based rationale? • Or, is this practice merely based on tradition?• Is there a better (more effective, faster, safer,
less expensive, more comfortable) method? • What approach does the patient (or the target
group) prefer? • What do experts in this specialty recommend?
Brought to you by
Key Questions to Ask When Considering EBP
Key Questions to Ask When Considering EBP
• What methods are used by leading/benchmark, organizations?
• Do the findings of recent research suggest an alternative method?
• Are organizational barriers inhibiting the application of best practices in this situation?
• Is there a review of the research on this topic?• Are there nationally recognized standards of care,
practice guidelines, or protocols that apply?
Brought to you by
Steps in the EBP ProcessSteps in the EBP Process
• Developing a well-built question
• Finding evidence-based resources to answer the question
• Evaluating the strength and applicability of the evidence
• Applying the evidence to practice
• Evaluating the effects
Brought to you by
• Once we agree upon the question that poses an opportunity for improvement, then we must find the evidence
• Where should we look?
• Are all forms of evidence equivalent in quality?
Brought to you by
Strength of EvidenceStrength of Evidence
• Level I - meta-analysis of multiple studies
• Level II - experimental studies, RCTs
• Level III - quasiexperimental studies
• Level IV - nonexperiemental studies
• Level V - case reports, clinical examples
AHCPR/AHRQ
• At what level is most nursing evidence?
Brought to you by
AACN Levels of Evidence (Armola, et al. , C C Nurse, 2009)
AACN Levels of Evidence (Armola, et al. , C C Nurse, 2009)
• Level A
• Level B
• Level C
• Level D
• Level E
• Level M
• Meta-analysis or metasynthesis of multiple controlled studies, supporting a specific action
• Controlled, randomized, or nonrandomized studies, supporting a specific action
• Qualitative, descriptive or correlational studies or systematic reviews with consistent results
• Peer-reviewed prof. organ. standards with studies to support them
• Theory-based evidence from expert opinion or case studies
• Manufacturer’s recommendations only
Brought to you by
What constitutes the “Evidence” in
Evidence-Based Practice? What constitutes the “Evidence” in
Evidence-Based Practice?
“Evidence-based practice has been defined as the use of the best clinical evidence from systematic research (referring to meta-analysis, integrated reviews, & RCTs – as the gold standard). …Others (often nurses) believe that experimental studies, observational studies, and correlational studies are also suitable evidence.” C. Goode, Applied Nursing Research, 2000
Brought to you by
University of Colorado Multidisciplinary Evidence-Based Practice Model
University of Colorado Multidisciplinary Evidence-Based Practice Model
• Emphasizes that all types of research can be evaluated for their contribution
• Recognizes the use of 9 non-research sources of evidence: – Pathophysiology, Retrospective or Concurrent Chart
Review, Quality Improvement or Risk Data, International and Local Standards, Infection Control Data, Clinical Expertise, Benchmarking Data, Cost-Effectiveness Analysis, and Patient Preferences
Brought to you by
A major dilemma for the practicing nurse:
Finding the time, access, and research expertise that are needed to search and analyze the evidence to find answers to their clinical questions.
For those of you who are already pursuing EBP, which of these issues pose the greatest challenges for you?
Brought to you by
Finding the Evidence Finding the Evidence
• Don’t reinvent the wheel
• If other experts have reviewed the evidence on your topic … start there
Brought to you by
Preprocessed EvidencePreprocessed Evidence
(A. DiCenso, 2009)
Brought to you by
Resources to Support Evidence-Based PracticeResources to Support Evidence-Based Practice
• Government agencies
• Cochrane Collaboration
• Professional Organizations
• Benchmark Institutions
Brought to you by
AHRQ – Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
Brought to you by
Brought to you by
Brought to you by
Cochrane Collaboration Cochrane Collaboration
• “an international, independent, not-for-profit organization of over 27,000 contributors from more than 100 countries, dedicated to making up-to-date, accurate information about the effects of health care readily available worldwide.
• Contributors produce systematic assessments of healthcare interventions, known as Cochrane Reviews, which are published online in The Cochrane Library.
• Rely heavily on RCTs• Primarily focused on effectiveness of interventions, more
medical and pharmaceutical than nursing
Brought to you by
Cochrane Collaboration http://www.cochrane.org
Cochrane Collaboration http://www.cochrane.org
Brought to you by
Brought to you by
Substitution of Drs by Nurses in Primary Care
Objectives: to evaluate the impact on patient outcomes, processes of care, and costs. Outcomes included: morbidity; mortality; satisfaction; compliance; and preference.
Studies were included if nurses were compared to doctors providing a similar primary health care service. Doctors included: general practitioners, family physicians, pediatricians, internists or geriatricians. Nurses included: nurse practitioners, clinical nurse specialists, or advanced practice nurses.
Results: 4253 articles were screened, 25 articles met our inclusion criteria. No appreciable differences were found between doctors and nurses in health outcomes, processes of care, or cost; but patient satisfaction was higher with nurse-led care. Brought to you by
Professional Nursing Organizations Supporting Evidence-Based PracticeProfessional Nursing Organizations Supporting Evidence-Based Practice
• AACN
• AWHONN
• AORN
• ONS
• Sigma Theta Tau
Brought to you by
Am. Assoc. of Critical Care NursesAm. Assoc. of Critical Care Nurses
Succinct dynamic directives…supported by evidence to ensure excellence in practice and a safe and humane work environment.
• Venous Thromboembolism Prevention• Oral Care in the Critically Ill• Noninvasive BP Monitoring• Verification of Feeding Tube Placement• Ventilator Associated Pneumonia• Dysrthymia Monitoring
• Published since 2005 • Available free on AACN website• Include ppt presentations and audit tools
Brought to you by
Oncology Nursing SocietyOncology Nursing Society
• EBP Resource Center • http://onsopcontent.ons.org/toolkits/evidence/
• Also provides topical toolkits, on specific topics, plus:
• How To Find The Evidence • How To Critique Evidence• How To Develop An Evidence Based Presentation• Evidence Based Practice Education Guidelines• Evidence on Clinical Topics• How to Change Practice• Levels of Evidence Table
Brought to you by
Sigma Theta Tau EBP Initiatives Sigma Theta Tau EBP Initiatives
• Strategic Plan• Online Resources
– NKI http://www.nursingknowledge.org > 200 resources for EBP – some free, some for purchase
• New Award for EBP (formerly Clin Scholarship)
• Conferences – International EBP and Research Congress– July, 2010 – Orlando– July, 2011 – Cancun– July, 2012 – Australia
Brought to you by
Journals Supporting EBPJournals Supporting EBP
– Evidence-Based Nursing– Online Journal of Clinical Innovations– WorldViews on Evidence-Based Nursing– The Online Journal of Knowledge Synthesis for
Nursing – (archived, no longer being published)– Reflections on Nursing Leadership (Vol 28, 2)
Brought to you by
Local vs. Global Evidence Local vs. Global Evidence
• Institutional/Local > National/International– CPI Data/Research Results– Standards & Protocols/Practice
Guidelines– Expert Advice
– Patient/Family Preferences
Brought to you by
Values and PreferencesValues and Preferences
EBN - integration of the best evidence available, nursing expertise, and the values and preferences of the individuals, families and communities …
Yasmin Amarsi, RNL, 2002:
“The crux is to ensure that EBN attends to what is important to nursing and that caring is not sacrificed on the altar of scientific evidence.”
Brought to you by
Amy’s Blog Amy’s Blog
• I consulted a well-regarded oncologist in New York. After the tests she regretfully informed me that my disease was not curable. She recommended an evidence-based course of medications aimed at slowing the progression. Before I committed, I wanted a second opinion. I secured an appointment with the pre-eminent researcher/ clinician in inflammatory breast cancer. …
• The building was beautiful, the staff attentive. …I had no doubt that the care would be top-notch.
• Everything changed when I sat down with the physician. He never asked about my goals for care. He recommended an aggressive approach of chemotherapy, radiation, mastectomy, and more aggressive chemotherapy. My doctor in New York had said this was the standard, evidence-based protocol for patients in Stage III B…But since I am in Stage IV (with mets) she said I wouldn’t get the benefit of this aggressive, curative approach.
Brought to you by
• “All of my patients use this protocol,” he said. • I was shocked. “Does this mean I could get better?” I asked.• “No, this is not a cure.” he answered. “But if you respond to the
treatment, you might live longer, although there are no guarantees.”• My goals are to maximize my quality of life so I can live, work, and
enjoy my family … Would I undergo a year or more of grueling, debilitating treatment only to live with spinal fractures if the cancer progressed? … Would I get the possibility of quantity and no quality?
• I pressed him. “Why do the mastectomy? If the cancer has already spread to my spine. You can’t remove it.”
• His brow furrowed. “Well, you don’t want to look at the cancer, do you?” He made it sound like cosmetic surgery.
• Right now, I feel fine. I can work. I am pain free. Did I want to trade that for a slim chance of a little extra time (no guarantees, of course)?
Brought to you by
• “But what about the side effects of radiation?” I asked. “I’ve heard they are terrible.”
• He frowned and seemed annoyed by my questions. “My patients don’t complain to me about it,” he replied.
• Inwardly, I shook my head. Of course his patients never complained to him. Most of them were probably unaware that less aggressive treatments were viable options. To me, there were real drawbacks. Undergo aggressive therapy that might buy me a longer life…at what cost? I might never recover my health for the limited period of time I have.
• This doctor, top in his field, was reflecting the bias of our medical system towards focusing (evidence-based) survival. He was focused only on quantity and forgot about quality.
Brought to you by
• The patient’s goals and desires, hopes and fears, were not part of the equation. He was practicing one-size-fits-all (cookbook?) medicine that was not going to be right for me, even though scientific studies showed it was statistically more likely to lengthen life.
• Based on a perverse set of metrics, this oncologist was offering technically the “best” care America had to offer.
• Yet this good care was not best for me. It wouldn’t give me health. Instead, it might take away what health I had. It doesn’t matter if care is cutting-edge, technologically advanced, (and evidence-based); if it doesn’t take the patient’s goals into account, it may not be worth doing.
Brought to you by
• I returned to my original New York oncologist.
• I was determined not only to choose treatment that would maximize the healthy time I had remaining, but also to use that time to call on our health care institutions and professionals to make a real commitment to listening to their patients.
Brought to you by
Moving Toward our Destiny
Evidence-based practice is every nurses’ responsibility
What can you do to make this goal a reality?
Moving Toward our Destiny
Evidence-based practice is every nurses’ responsibility
What can you do to make this goal a reality?
Brought to you by
Educator’s Role Educator’s Role
– EB Education for EB Practice
– Base educational content on evidence
– Seek the most current forms of evidence, e.g. journals & online sources vs. texts
– Encourage students to question and challenge
– Teach research content in a manner that is interesting and useful
Brought to you by
Manager/Administrator’s RoleManager/Administrator’s Role
– Encourage inquisitive minds – Promote risk-taking and flexibility in the clinical
environment – Incorporate EBP activities into performance
evals – Provide time & resources – unit internet
access– Provide support personnel– Empower staff to make EB practice changes– Acknowledge and reward EB improvements
Brought to you by
Researcher’s RoleResearcher’s Role
– Remain clinically in touch– Conduct clinically useful studies– Support clinicians in accessing and
synthesizing the evidence– Collaborate with clinicians and patients – Disseminate findings that are
understandable and accessible– Emphasize clinical implications
Brought to you by
Nurse Clinician’s RoleNurse Clinician’s Role
– “Worry and Wonder”
– Be the Inquiring Mind
– Question clinical traditions
– Stay abreast of the literature - guidelines
– Find your niche – and become the expert
– Collaborate with APNs & researchers
– Be an advocate for evidence-based changes
– LISTEN to your PATIENTS – to guard patient & family preferences Brought to you by
Join us: STTI Research & EBP Congress
July 11-14, 2011
Join us: STTI Research & EBP Congress
July 11-14, 2011
Brought to you by
59
THE 2010 IOM REPORT ON THE FUTURE OF NURSINGTHE 2010 IOM REPORT ON THE FUTURE OF NURSING
Brought to you by
Center to Champion Nursing in America http://championnursing.org
Center to Champion Nursing in America http://championnursing.org
• Center to Champion Nursing in America is an initiative of AARP, the AARP Foundation and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The Center, a consumer-driven, national force for change, works to increase the nation’s capacity to educate and retain nurses who are prepared and empowered to positively impact health care access, quality, and costs.
Brought to you by
Nursing has an unprecedented opportunity to have one voice on behalf
of patient care…
Nursing has an unprecedented opportunity to have one voice on behalf
of patient care…
• 18 member committee– Donna E. Shalala (Chair), President, University of Miami
– Linda Burns Bolton (Vice Chair), Vice President and Chief Nursing Officer, Cedars-Sinai Health
• Evidence based
• IOM part of National Academy of Sciences– Private, nonprofit, society of distinguished scholars engaged in
scientific research, dedicated to the furtherance of science and technology and to their use for the general welfare
61
Brought to you by
Interprofessional Team-Based Competencies
Interprofessional Team-Based Competencies
• IPEC Expert Panel Presentation• HRSA, Macy Foundation, Robert Wood Johnson
Foundation, and ABIM Foundation
• Amy Blue, PhD
• Jane Kirschling, DNS, RN, FAAN
• Madeline Schmitt, PhD, RN, FAAN-Chair
• Thomas Viggiano, MD, MEd
62Brought to you by
“Work in Interprofessional
Teams”Core
Competencies
UtilizeInformatics
Employ Evidence-Based
Practice
Provide Patient-Centered
Care
Apply Quality Improvement
IOM 5 core competencies, adapted to IPEC Expert Panel Work 63
Brought to you by
Institute of Medicine October 2010 Report: The Future of Nursing Leading Change,
Advancing Health
1. Remove scope-of-practice barriers2. Expand opportunities for nurses to lead and diffuse
collaborative improvement efforts3. Implement nurse residency programs4. Increase the proportion of nurses with a baccalaureate
degree to 80% in 20205. Double the number of nurses with a doctorate by 20206. Ensure that nurses engage in lifelong learning7. Prepare and enable nurses to lead change to advance
health8. Build an infrastructure for the collection and analysis of
interprofessional health care workforce data
Brought to you by
65
IOM Key Message
RECOMMENDATION NO. 1
Brought to you by
The many faces of advanced practice registered nurses in 2011
High quality,
safe, affordable health care
provided by teams of
health care professionals Brought to you by
Health care reformHealth care reform
• Survey published in JAMA 2008, only 2% fourth-year medical students plan to work in general internal medicine (primary care) after graduation, despite need for 40% increase in number of primary care physicians in the U.S. by 2020
• Association of American Medical Colleges predicts
shortage of 35,000-44,000 primary care physicians by 2025
• Expanded opportunities for APRNs
67
Brought to you by
Hospital care… Hospital care…
• Evolution of opportunities for advanced practice registered nurses– Change in residency hours– 24 x 7 coverage– Evolving recognition of specialty needs
68
Brought to you by
69Brought to you by
National barriersNational barriersNational barriersNational barriers
• National nursing organizations are working to Improve APRN reimbursement, Medicare
reimburses NPs and CNSs at 85% of physician rate
Amend rules that prohibit APRNs from ordering such things as home health and hospice services or diabetic shoes
Brought to you by
Recent national advancesRecent national advancesRecent national advancesRecent national advances
Medicare now– Allows NPs to serve as the attending for a
hospice patient– Allows Governors of states to opt out of
supervision rule for CRNAs – 16 states have opted out
– Reimburses CNMs at 100%
Brought to you by
““Messaging”Messaging” ““Messaging”Messaging”
Barriers to practice reduce access to care
Main issue is access to care and this should define our focus
Brought to you by
73
IOM Key Message
RECOMMENDATION NO. 3
New graduates and
nurses in transition
Brought to you by
The Problem – Transition to Practice: Promoting Public Safety
The Problem – Transition to Practice: Promoting Public Safety
• 35 to 60% new nurses leave position in first year of practice, estimated replacement cost $46,000 to $64,000 per nurse
• 10% typical hospital’s nursing staff comprised of new graduates
• New nurses experience increased stress 3-6 months after hire, increased stress levels are risk factors for patient safety and practice errors
Brought to you by
• NCSBN – transition programs reduce 1st year turnover from 35-60% to 6-13%, results in positive return on investment from 67 to 885%
Brought to you by
University Healthsystem Consortium (UHC) and American Assoc. of Colleges of NursingUniversity Healthsystem Consortium (UHC) and American Assoc. of Colleges of Nursing
A one year education and support program to assist new BSN graduates employed as staff nurses on clinical units to transition to professional nursing practice
Now 54 sites nationwide in 25 states› Over 12,000 BSNs have been enrolled
nationwide
National research component to determine the best practice for integrating new BSN nurses into the workforce Brought to you by
What is the Residency Research Showing?What is the Residency Research Showing?
Retention nationally 94.4% for new grad first year vs. about 73% without residency
Surveys completed initially, 6 months, and 12 months; scores improve in new graduate’s ability to› organize and prioritize› communicate and be leaders at bedside› decreased stress over the year (less so at Kentucky)
Brought to you by
78
IOM Key Message
RECOMMENDATION NO. 4
Brought to you by
Rationale (Institute of Medicine, 2011, p. 169-170)Rationale (Institute of Medicine, 2011, p. 169-170)
“Several studies support significant association between educational level of RN and outcomes for patients in acute care settings, including mortality”
79
Brought to you by
Enrollments increasing in both DNP and PhD programs (1997-2009)
Enrollments increasing in both DNP and PhD programs (1997-2009)
80
AACN 2009: over 9,500 applicants turned away master’s and doctoral programs
Brought to you by
81
IOM Key Message
RECOMMENDATION NO. 6
Brought to you by
Faculty partner with health care organizations
Faculty partner with health care organizations
• Develop and prioritize competencies so curricula updated regularly across all programs– go beyond task-based proficiencies to higher-
level competencies• demonstrate mastery over care management
knowledge domains • provide foundation decision-making skills under
variety clinical situations across care settings
82
Brought to you by
Academic administratorsAcademic administrators
• Require all faculty – participate continuing professional
development– Perform cutting-edge competence in practice,
teaching, and research
83
Brought to you by
Health care organizations and schools of nursing
Health care organizations and schools of nursing
• Foster culture of lifelong learning
• Provide resources for interprofessional continuing competency programs
• If offer continuing competency programs, regularly evaluate for flexibility, accessibility, and impact on clinical outcomes
84
Brought to you by
85
Institute of Medicine October 2010 Report: The Future of Nursing Leading Change, Advancing Health
2. Expand opportunities for nurses to lead and diffuse collaborative improvement efforts
7. Prepare and enable nurses to lead change to advance health
8. Build an infrastructure for the collection and analysis of interprofessional health care workforce data
Brought to you by
86
…IN CONCLUSION…IN CONCLUSION
We must commit to take action on recommendations from IOM report
Affirm that this is about access to access to patient-centered care and health care reform
Essential that nurses mobilize Not just to support nursing, but
more importantly – to support the public
Brought to you by
This platform has been started by Parveen Kumar Chadha with the vision that nobody should suffer the way he has suffered because of lack and improper healthcare facilities in India. We need lots of funds manpower etc. to make this vision a reality please contact us. Join us as a member for a noble cause.
This platform has been started by Parveen Kumar Chadha with the vision that nobody should suffer the way he has suffered because of lack and improper healthcare facilities in India. We need lots of funds manpower etc. to make this vision a reality please contact us. Join us as a member for a noble cause.
Brought to you by
Our views have increased the mark of the 10,000
Our views have increased the mark of the 10,000
Thank you viewers
Looking forward for franchise,
collaboration, partners. Brought to you by
011-25464531 ,011-41425180 ,011-66217387
+91-9818308353+,91-9818569476
www.other-mother.in
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Other-Mother-Nursing-Crusade/224235031114989?ref=hl
http://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=326103341&trk=nav_responsive_tab_profile
https://twitter.com/othermotherindi
https://cparveen.wix.com/other-mother
A WORLDWIDE MISSITION
Contact Us-:
JOIN US