1/26/2017 1 Evidence - based Care Plans for Chiropractic ( that can’t be denied) 1 Presented by Evan M. Gwilliam, DC MBA BS CPC CCPC NCICS CCCPC CPC-I MCS-P CPMA Vice President • Use evidence to bridge the gap from general recommendations to additional care • Document care plans that make it easy for auditors to agree with you • Maximize insurance reimbursement Takeaway
11
Embed
Evidence-based Care Plans for Chiropractic · 2018. 4. 4. · 1/26/2017 1 Evidence-based Care Plans for Chiropractic (that can’t be denied)1 Presented by Evan M. Gwilliam, DC MBA
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
1/26/2017
1
Evidence-based Care Plansfor Chiropractic
(that can’t be denied)
1
Presented by Evan M. Gwilliam, DC MBA BS
CPC CCPC NCICS CCCPC CPC-I MCS-P CPMA
Vice President
• Use evidence to bridge the gap from general recommendations to additional care
• Document care plans that make it easy for auditors to agree with you
• Maximize insurance reimbursement
Takeaway
1/26/2017
2
What is a Treatment Plan?
“A care plan is an ordered assembly of expected or planned activities, including observation goals, services, appointments and procedures, usually organized in phases or sessions, which have an objective of organizing and managing health care activity for the patient.”
3
What is a Treatment Plan?
1. A list of each complaint, with its relevant diagnoses
2. Treatments and modalities selected
3. Duration and frequency of care
4. Treatment goals
5. Objective measures to show progress
1/26/2017
3
Clinical Practice Guideline: Chiropractic Care for Low Back Pain
(J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2016; 39, by Globe G,
1. Care foundation includes: Research, clinical decision-making, patient values.
2. They are “guidelines”, not cookbooks for care.
3. They are NOT caps in care.
4. They are NOT rigid recommendations.
5. One must consider the “uniqueness” of each pt.
6. If denied, challenge the claim reviewer to produce the page, paragraph, and sentence demonstrating where you exceeded the guideline. If he/she cannot……………
7
Proper use of guidelines
8
General Recommendations
Additional Care
Complicating factors and Co-morbidities
Bridging the Gap
1/26/2017
5
Patient Characteristics• Older age
• Pregnancy
• Psychosocial factors
• Delay treatment >7 days
• Non-compliance
• Lifestyle habits
• Obesity
• Type of work activities
Complicating Factors
Injury Characteristics• Severe initial injury
• > 3 previous episodes
• Severe signs and symptoms
• Number/severity of previous exacerbations
• Treatment withdrawal fails to sustain MTI
Complicating Factors
1/26/2017
6
History• Pre-existing pathology/surgery
• History of lost time
• History of prior treatment
• Congenital anomalies
• Symptoms persist despite previous
treatment
Complicating Factors
Algorithm for the Chiropractic Management of Low Back Pain
• Dictate or recommend the modality of treatment• Guide the management of non-painful functional
or structural spinal care (subluxation correction, posture correction, scoliosis management, etc)
• Apply to wellness care/health promotion
The scope of this algorithm is for the
chiropractic management of spine related
pain.
It does not:
1/26/2017
7
This is a new
patient
Patient presents with low
back pain
This is an established patient with
a new condition or a moderate-
severe exacerbation of a pre-
existing condition
This is an established patient with
a mild episode of a previously
treated (usually chronic)
condition.
Perform New Patient
Evaluation
Perform Established
Patient EvaluationPerform Evaluation1 (Often
Condition Focused)
Go to Acute Care
Algorithm
Go to Chronic
Care Algorithm
1
2 3
4
5 6
Pain ≥ 3 mo.
duration
Pain < 3 mo.
duration 7 8
Patient presents with acute spine related pain.
Is ConditionOutside of Scope of
Practice or Skill Set
Refer to appropriate provider/ facility
Is co-management required?
Refer to appropriate provider/facility
Yes No Yes
Yes or No
Begin therapeutic trial of up to 12 visits within 4 weeks.
Assess for improvement at mid-point of trial using any
of the accepted measurement tools
Improvement Evident at Midpoint?
Consider• Modifying treatment methods• Additional diagnostic procedures• Referral or co-management
Refer to appropriate provider/facility
Continue TrialSymptoms Resolved?
Perform Reassessment
Evaluation
Yes
Yes
No
No
Acute Care Algorithm
1
23
4
5
6
7
8
910
11
12
1/26/2017
8
MTB Achieved?
Continue up to 12 visits within
4 weeks
Yes
No
Acute Care Algorithm
Do Significant
Symptoms and/orFunctional deficits
Remain?
Is conditionStable or resolved?
Release with home care instructions or
transition to wellness care
Trial withdrawal desired?
Functional/symptom improvements?
Has condition deteriorated
Consider co-management
Provide home care instructions and initiate trial
withdrawal.
Reassess condition status
Refer
Yes Go to Chronic
Care Algorithm
OtherTreatment
Options availableIn this
facility?
Additional improvement
likely?
Refer
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
Yes
1314
17
1516
19
18
2021
22
23
24
25
26
27
Yes No Yes
No/Not Sure YesNo/Not Sure
Complicating factors that may document the necessity of