Event/ date: WG D meeting, 28 March 12, Brussels Author: Anita Künitzer 1 State of play of reporting on Urban Waste Water treatment Directive,UWWTD Bathing.

Event/ date: WG D meeting, 28 March 12, BrusselsAuthor: Anita Künitzer1

State of play of reporting onUrban Waste Water treatment Directive,UWWTD

Bathing Water Directive, BWDState of Environment, SoE

and OECD/Eurostat Joint Questionnaire pre-filling

Anita Künitzer

European Topic Centre on inland, coastal and marine waters (ETC/ICM)

2

State of play of 2011/2012 reporting on

Urban Waste Water treatment Directive, UWWTD

Event/ date: WG D meeting, 28 March 12, BrusselsAuthor: Anita Künitzer

3

State of play of 2011/2012 reporting onUrban Waste Water treatment Directive,UWWTD• Reporting by MS of the 2011

UWWTD data request took place from July 2011 – February 2012 using the new webtool

• ETC/ICM partner Cenia (Petra Ronen, Michal Sik) – support the reporting (helpdesk),

– do the QA of the data with MS,

• Finalized datasets for 19 MS (AT, BE, BG, CY, DK, EE, FI, GR, HU, RO, SK, MT, NL, LU, LT, PT, SI, SE, UK )

• Datasets of other 8 MS (CZ, LV, PL, ES,IE, FR, DE, IT) close to completion


4

Data upload in CDR

Event/ date:Author

5

QAQC process statistics

• 1529 errors corrected• 7022 missing records filled

Event/ date:Author:

Dataset submission Status

dataset provided in time [Y/N]

date of upload in

CDR

complete dataset

[Y/N]

Data reference

year

No. of incorrect records

Missing data


Missing data


Missing data


Missing data


Missing data


Missing data


Missing dataNo. of

incorrect records

Missing data

AT Y 3.12.2011 Y 2010 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 final

BE N 6.2.2012 Y 2010 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 53 0 2 final

BG Y 22.12.2011 Y 2010 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 88 617 0 4 final

CY Y 29.12.2011 Y 2009 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 5 0 5 final

CZ Y 2.2.2012 Y 2010 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 208 0 236 0 208 update in progress

DK Y 25.1.2012 Y 2010 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 10 0 0 final

EE Y 29.12.2011 Y 2009 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 46 0 0 final

FI Y 2.2.2012 Y 2009 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 final

FR Y 3.2.2012 Y 2010 37 1 1034 23 0 0 90 23 0 0 0 390 1161 3844 1161 437 update in progress

DE Y 21.12.2011 Y 2010 0 0 1236 0 0 2 825 12 0 1 0 1 2060 735 2061 16 update in progress

GR Y 2.2.2012 Y 2010 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 1 final

HU Y 3.2.2012 Y 2009 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 11 0 11 final

IE Y 17.1.2012 Y 2010 0 115 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 54 424 671 0 169 update in progress

IT Y 18.1.2012 Y 2009 0 20 420 57 0 54 167 103 0 3863 0 263 587 7943 587 4360 update in progress

LV Y 19.1.2012 Y 2009 0 1 0 1 0 0 12 0 0 5 0 3 12 10 12 10 update in progress

LT Y 26.1.2012 Y 2009 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 53 0 0 final

LU Y 19.12.2011 Y 2010 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 2 1 1 final

MT Y 3.12.2011 Y 2010 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 22 0 0 final

NL Y 16.1.2012 Y 2009 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 395 1 0 0 final

PL N 9.2.2012 Y 2010 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 448 0 448 update in progress

PT N 17.2.2012 Y 2009 0 0 0 2 0 45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 47 final

RO Y 21.12.2011 Y 2009 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 final

SK Y 21.12.2011 Y 2009 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 21 38 0 1 final

SI Y 16.12.2011 Y 2009 0 0 0 6 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 4 48 4 6 final

ES Y 30.1.2012 Y 2010 0 0 0 0 0 37 18 0 0 0 0 2 498 212 18 39 update in progress

SE Y 17.1.2012 Y 2010 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 367 0 0 final

UK Y 22.12.2011 Y 2010 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 113 252 0 1 final

Total finalTotal 02/2012Receiving areas Agglomerations UWWTPsConnecting table

UWWTP_Agglo Discharge points Historiography

6

Further work

• Complete production database to be submitted to DG ENV by 2 April for consultant to make the compliance report for publication in 2012.

• Use of data for OECD/Eurostat JQ pre-filling, for updating of WISE maps, for updating of EEA core set indicator 24 on UWWT, for updating the GIS reference layer on sensitive areas


7Event/ date: Working group D, 28 March 2012, BrusselsAuthor: Hana Prchalova, CENIA

Comparison of E-PRTR data with UWWTD data reporting

8


• Comparison of discharges from urban wastewater treatment plants (UWWTPs) reported under UWWTD and E-PRTR

• Pollutants compared: – Total Nitrogen, – Total Phosphorus and – TOC (TOC in UWWTD was calculated from the COD)

• Only UWWTPs with more than 100.000 p.e. and emission discharges above threshold values are reported in E-PRTR and were compared

• The first comparison was produced by UBA Vienna in 2011 with the UWWTD database of 2007/2008

Event/ date: Working group D, 28 March 2012, BrusselsAuthor: Hana Prchalova, CENIA

9


• The 2nd comparison is now done by ETC/ICM (Hana Prchalova) with the UWWTD database of 2009/2010 and E-PRTR data (reference year 2009, version 3.1)

• Request from EEA: to compare discharges from CZ, PL, IT and ES based on the same IDs

• No same IDs were found for these countries, the comparison was based on reported names and p.e. – only for ES and CZ

• Methodology – the same as in the 2011 comparison: interlinking of E-PRTR facilities reporting under activity 5.(f) with UWWTPs


10

Results - Spain

The match is similar to the previous UWWTD reporting.


Discharge data comparison E-PRTRand UWWTD database

E-PRTR release (reference year 2009) [kg/a]

1000 10000 100000 1000000 10000000

UW

WT

D d

atab

ase

dis

char

ge

(ref

eren

ce y

ear

2007

/200

8) [

kg/a

]

1000

10000

100000

1000000

10000000

TOCtot Ntot Pconsistency± 25%

11

Results - CZ

The consistency of reporting by the Czech Republic has improved considerably due to corrected discharges under UWWTD reporting.

Total nitrogen and phosphorus discharges match very well, but TOC discharges in UWWTD are significantly smaller than E-PRTR values for three facilities.


Discharge data comparison E-PRTRand UWWTD database

E-PRTR release (reference year 2009) [kg/a]

1000 10000 100000 1000000 10000000

UW

WT

D d

atab

ase

dis

cha

rge

(ref

eren

ce y

ear

20

07/2

008)

[k

g/a

]

1000

10000

100000

1000000

10000000

TOCtot Ntot Pconsistency± 25%

12

State of play of 2011 reporting onBathing Water Directive, BWD


13

State of play of 2011 reporting onBathing Water Directive, BWD

• Reporting by MS of the 2011 bathing season took place in Nov/Dec 2011

• ETC/ICM partner IWRS (Lidija Globevnik, Tina Kirn, Marko Kovacic, Katarina Zore, Dunja Zupan Vrenko) – supports the reporting, – is doing the QA of the data with MS, – is analysing the data, – is consulting compliance issues with DG

ENV, – is preparing the EEA Report on European

bathing water quality 2011 for launch in June 2012.


14

First draft results of assessment for the 2011 bathing season

• A total of 16 MS are already assessed under the new Directive compared to 3 MS in 2010 (LU, MT, HU) and 2 MS in 2009 (LU, MT).

• A total of 8 MS are assessed under transitional rules (AT, BG, FR, IE, IT, NL, PL, SI) plus three non-EU countries (CH, HR, ME).

• Only three MS are assessed under the old Directive

(CZ, RO and UK).


15Event/ date: WG D meeting, 28 March 12, BrusselsAuthor: Anita Künitzer

Comparison with results for the 2009 and 2010 bathing seasons


Assessment under new Directive


Transition period assessment


Assessment under old Directive

19

State of play of 2011 reporting onState of Environment, SoE



21

WISE SoE data request 2011 (1)


22



If emission data have already been provided under E-PRTR, UWWTD, WFD or SoE Quantity reporting obligations and are flagged as such in the SoE emission reporting, then 1 or 2 points will be scored

23


Overview for data flow TCM:

Evaluation of countries was not published yet. •3 smileys: CY, DE, DK, EE, ES, FR, GB, HR, LT, NL, NO, PL, RO, SE (14 countries) •2 smileys: AL, BA, BE, FI, IE, IS, LV, ME, SI, TR (10 countries) •1 smiley: BG •0 smileys : GR, IT, MT, PT, UA


24

OECD/Eurostat Joint Questionnaire pre-filling 2012


25

OECD/Eurostat Joint Questionnaire pre-filling2012

• 2011: SoE/UWWTD parameter comparison with JQ, scripts for data extraction and aggregation by ETC/ICM

• 31 January 2012: Meeting OECD, Eurostat, EEA, ETC/ICM on update of Joint Questionnaire (JQ) and pre-filling by ETC/ICM

• End March/early April: Revised JQ finalised by OECD and Eurostat (Info from Eurostat: probably delayed).

• April - July: ETC/ICM to pre-fill the OECD/Eurostat JQ and the Eurostat Regional Questionnaire in with SoE data (emission and water quantity) from 2011 reporting and UWWTD data from 2011/2012 reporting.

• Early September: JQ + RQ sent to Member Countries


26

SoE Water Quantity/JQ parameter comparison

69 parameters with same definitions (direct match)

11 parameters of the JQ can be calculated from two or more SoE#3 parameters

17 parameters with different definitions

10 parameters of the JQ (Tables 1-3) not in SoE#3Analysis is based on the 2010 JQ-IW


27

Pre-filling Tables 1-3 with SoE WQ

• First estimates of pre-filled data regarding water quantity (Tables 1-3)

Reference year 2010

All available years

Number of countries for which data can be prefilled

10 20

Average number of parameters with direct match (SoE#3-JQ) per country

22.5 24.75

Estimates are based on the 2010 JQ-IW


28

JQ Inland Waters pre-filled

Example of pre-filled JQ



Joint Questionnaire - Table 7Pre-filling with SoE emission data

Green cells 1-4: SoE emission data available for pre-filling

SoE data103 kg O2/d N103 kg O2/d N103 kg O2/d N103 kg O2/d N103 kg O2/d N103 kg O2/d N103 kg O2/d N103 kg O2/d N103 kg O2/d N103 kg O2/d N103 kg O2/d N103 kg O2/d N

103 kg O2/d 2

103 kg O2/d 3

103 kg O2/d 4103 kg O2/d N

CODTREATMENT AND DISCHARGE OF WASTEWATERWastewater generated by domestic sector (c) (37)

Total wastewater generated by industry (e) (38)

of which: treated, total (33)

of which: treated, total (33(**

of which: in wastewater treatment plants (urban) (35) and other (43)

in independent treatment facilities (45)

of which: discharged, total (51)

Direct discharges from non-point sources

Total discharges to Inland waters (g) (51)

Total discharges to the sea (51)

of which: discharged, total (51)**

of which: after treatment

of which: without treatment

Discharges of wastewater treatment plants (urban (35) and other (43)) (f)

of which: after treatment

of which: without treatment

30

Examples of data availability for pre-filling


COD AT BE CZ EE FI FR CH IS LT LV NL RO SE SI SK1 non-point sources2 Discharges of wastewater treatment plants (urban and other) y* y* n y y* y* n n y n n y y* y* y*3 Direct discharges from non-point sources 4 Total discharges to Inland waters y* y* y y* y y* n n y* y n y y* y y*

N tot AT BE CZ EE FI FR CH IS LT LV NL RO SE SI SK1 non-point sources y y* y* y* y y y2 Discharges of wastewater treatment plants (urban and other) y y* n y y* y* y* n y n y* y y* n y*3 Direct discharges from non-point sources y y y 4 Total discharges to Inland waters y* y* y y y* y* y* y* y* y y* y y y y*

y* incomplete data availabley (almost) complete data available

31

Streamlining of UWWTD reporting with Eurostat Joint Questionnaire-ETC ICM work

• Identification of additional parameters to be reported within the UWWTD data flow (2010)

• Consultation with the MS (2010)• Incorporating the additional parameters into the UWWTD

reporting IT tool-the web tool• Developing additional QAQC scripts to ensure data

quality for the pre-filling• Internal testing• Pre-filling for JQ in spring 2012

32

Additional UWWT parameters

Parameter Description

uwwE-PRTRCode ID of E-PRTR facility

uwwpInhabitantsConnected Number of inhabitants connected to particular UWWTP/collecting system

uwwMoreStringentStandards Indication of application of more stringent effluent standards as compared to UWWTD

uwwMoreStringentStandardsNtot Indication of application of more stringent effluent standards for N total as compared to UWWTD

uwwMoreStringentStandardsPtot Indication of application of more stringent effluent standards for Ptotal as compared to UWWTD

uwwMoreStringentStandardsBOD Indication of application of more stringent effluent standards for BOD as compared to UWWTD

uwwMoreStringentStandardsOther Indication of application of more stringent effluent standards for other parameters as compared to UWWTD

uwwEffluentFlowType

uwwEffluentFlowTypeRemark Remarks on the CSO

aggInhabitantsConnectedIAS No of inhabitants served by IAS per agglomeration

aggInhabitantsWithoutTreatment No of inhabitants without treatment per agglomeration

mslInhabitantsIAS Number of inhabitants conntected to IAS

mslInhabitantsWithoutTreatment Number of inhabitants not connected to collecting system nor served by IAS

mslInhabitantsUwwtpCollsys Number of inhabitants connected to collecting system or treatment plant

mslInhabitantsUwwtpAgglo2 Number of inhabitants connected to collecting system or treatment plant serving agglomeration smaller than 2 000 p.e.

mslInhabitantsIASAgglo2 Number of inhabitants connected to collecting system or treatment plant serving agglomeration smaller than 2 000 p.e.

mslInhabitantsWithoutTreatmentAgglo2 Number of inhabitants in agglomeration smaller than 2 000 p.e.

aggInfoFateWithoutTreatment brief text information on the fate of generated wastewater

33

Additional QAQC rules

• Checks of population served by the treatment vs.total national population

• Design capacity vs. load entering the WWTP• plausibility check for water reuse• Discharged vs.incoming load (BOD, COD, N and P)

• Sludge production

quotient must in all cases be <0 - otherwise the WTTP would generate pollution. The actual values allow checking of the treatment efficiency + outlier detection.

34

Web tool –IT tool for Eurostat JQ pre-filling

Event/ date:Author:

35

Web tool –IT tool for Eurostat JQ pre-filling

36

UWWTD data availability JQ tables 4 and 6y*

incomplete data ava i lable

y(a lmost) complete data ava i lable

data process ing

TABLE 4: Population connected to wastewater (32) treatment (33) plants -JQ 2010

Units AT BE BG CY CZ DK EE FI FR DE GR HU IE IT LV LT LU MT NL NO PL PT RO SK SI ES SE UK Remark

% of res ident population connected to: Urban wastewater treatment (35) % of tot. pop.

Ita ly and Romania provided additional parametrs requested for the pre-fi l l ing

of which: (a ) - Primary treatment (39) % of tot. pop.

'- Secondary treatment (40) % of tot. pop.

- Tertiary treatment (41) % of tot. pop.

Urban wastewater col lecting system without treatment % of tot. pop.

Independent wastewater treatment (45) % of tot. pop.

TABLE 6: Sewage sludge (49) production and disposal (a) (in dry substance (d.s.))-JQ 2010

Units AT BE BG CY CZ DK EE FI FR DE GR HU IE IT LV LT LU MT NL NO PL PT RO SK SI ES SE UK

URBAN WASTEWATER TREATMENT (35) Tota l s ludge production 106 kg y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y yTota l s ludge disposa l 106 kg

of which: Agricul tura l use (b) 106 kg

Landfi l l (d) 106 kg

Incineration (f) 106 kg

Others , please speci fy 106 kg

37

UWWTD data availability JQ table 5TABLE 5: Treatment capacity of WWTPs, in terms of BOD5-2009 and 2011

Units AT BE BG CY CZ DK EE FI FR DE GR HU IE IT LV LT LU MT NL NO PL PT RO SK SI ES SE UK Remark

URBAN WASTEWATER TREATMENT (35), Primary treatment plants (39) number y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y*

available only for WWTP serving agglomerations bigger than 2000 p.e.

design capacity BOD5 (46) 1000 kg O 2 /d y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y*

available only for WWTP serving agglomerations bigger than 2000 p.e. Available (PE)Population equivalent

incoming load BOD5 1000 kg O 2 /d y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y*

under provision that MS fill in the additional parameters requested under the UWWTD reporting exercise, but only for WWTP serving agglomerations bigger than 2000 p.e.

effluent BOD5 1000 kg O 2 /d y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y*


Secondary treatment plants (40)number y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y*








Tertiary treatment (41), total number y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y*








of which Nitrogen removal (47) number y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y*


Available (PE)Population equivalent





of which phosporus removal (48) number y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y*design capacity BOD5 (46) 1000 kg O 2 /d y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* Available (PE)Population equivalent



effluent BOD5 1000 kg O 2 /d y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y*under provision that MS fill in the additional parameters requested under the UWWTD reporting exercise, but only for WWTP serving agglomerations bigger than 2000 p.e.

incoming load BOD5 (independent treatment) 1000 kg O 2 /d y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y* y*available for IAS in agglomerations bigger than 2000 p.e. (available in p.e.)

38

Feed back from MS

• Your feed back on the use of pre-filled data is welcome when the JQ reporting has been finalised


Event/ date: WG D meeting, 28 March 12, Brussels Author: Anita Künitzer 1 State of play of reporting on Urban Waste Water treatment Directive,UWWTD Bathing.

Documents

wg d meeting

uwwtd data reportingevent

anita knitzerevent date

uwwtdevent date

authorevent date

ceniaevent date

completionevent date

group d