Evaluation of Yellow Perch Grow- Evaluation of Yellow Perch Grow- out in a 19 out in a 19 o o C RAS C RAS Gregory Fischer, Chris Hartleb, James Held, Kendall Gregory Fischer, Chris Hartleb, James Held, Kendall Holmes, Sarah Kaatz, & Jeff Malison Holmes, Sarah Kaatz, & Jeff Malison
16
Embed
Evaluation of Yellow Perch Grow-out in a 19 o C RAS Gregory Fischer, Chris Hartleb, James Held, Kendall Holmes, Sarah Kaatz, & Jeff Malison.
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Evaluation of Yellow Perch Grow-out in a Evaluation of Yellow Perch Grow-out in a 1919ooC RASC RAS
Gregory Fischer, Chris Hartleb, James Held, Kendall Holmes, Sarah Kaatz, & Gregory Fischer, Chris Hartleb, James Held, Kendall Holmes, Sarah Kaatz, & Jeff MalisonJeff Malison
Yellow Perch are an important commercially raised coolwater fish in the Midwest
Raised for food markets and stocking uses in outdoor ponds and recirculating water systems
Fillet prices range from $18.70 to $37.40/kg depending on market
Market size within 12 months is desirable
Issues with initial larvae feeding for commercial rearing in RAS
Issues with cold water temperatures during winter for outdoor rearing in ponds
HISTORYHISTORY
Conduct pilot study to evaluate the effectiveness of combining Conduct pilot study to evaluate the effectiveness of combining early outdoor pond rearing with indoor RAS for yellow perch grow-early outdoor pond rearing with indoor RAS for yellow perch grow-out to meet the needs of the food fish market. out to meet the needs of the food fish market.
NADF acquired Lake Mendota strain, pond raised, feed trained, NADF acquired Lake Mendota strain, pond raised, feed trained, fingerling (avg127 mm) yellow perch (monosex female and mixed fingerling (avg127 mm) yellow perch (monosex female and mixed sex). sex).
Project conducted inside main AquaticProject conducted inside main Aquatic Barn in Bayfield, WisconsinBarn in Bayfield, Wisconsin
Drum filter, fluidized sand biofilter, carbon dioxide stripping column w/fan, oxygen cone and UV treatment unit.
Average water flow was 1,480L/min.
Replacement water 4.7L/min (<1% Total Flow)
Materials and MethodsMaterials and Methods
Materials and MethodsMaterials and Methods
Tanks were partially covered with foam board
Fish were fed Nelson Silver cup extruded feed (46% protein, 16% lipid) daily with automatic vibratory feeders
Photoperiod was controlled by timers and lights to provide12-16 hours daily
Tanks were cleaned and monitored daily
Dissolved oxygen (mg/L), temperature (ºC), and total dissolved gases (%) were measured daily in each tank (Common Sensing Model TBO-DL6F Gas Meter, Common Sensing Inc., ID).
pH was monitored daily in each tank (Pinpoint pH meter, American Marine Inc, CT).
Ammonia-nitrogen (NH3-N), nitrite-nitrogen (NO2-N), and reactive phosphorous (PO4) were measured (CEL 850 Hach Test Kit, Hach Inc., CO) weekly from water samples collected in the RAS sump according to standard water quality methods (APHA, 1989).
Yellow perch length and weights were measured monthly by obtaining 50 randomly sampled trout from each tank.
Materials and MethodsMaterials and Methods
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
1 11 21 31 41 51 61 71 81 91 101
111
121
131
141
151
161
171
181
191
Days in RAS
Cel
siu
s/p
pm
/mo
rtal
ity
temp
oxygen
pH
morts(x100)
ResultsResultsMixed Sex Yellow Perch Water Quality and MortalityMixed Sex Yellow Perch Water Quality and Mortality
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.01 11 21 31 41 51 61 71 81 91 101
111
121
131
141
151
161
171
181
Days in RAS
Cel
siu
s/p
pm
/mo
rtal
ity
temp
oxygen
pH
morts
ResultsResultsMonosex Female Yellow Perch Water Quality and MortalityMonosex Female Yellow Perch Water Quality and Mortality
0.000
0.100
0.200
0.300
0.400
0.5001
2/7
/06
12
/14
/06
12
/21
/06
12
/28
/06
1/4
/07
1/1
1/0
7
1/1
8/0
7
1/2
5/0
7
2/1
/07
2/8
/07
2/1
5/0
7
2/2
2/0
7
3/1
/07
3/8
/07
3/1
5/0
7
3/2
2/0
7
3/2
9/0
7
4/5
/07
4/1
2/0
7
4/1
9/0
7
4/2
6/0
7
5/3
/07
5/1
0/0
7
5/1
7/0
7
5/2
4/0
7
5/3
1/0
7
6/7
/07
Monitoring Dates
mg
/L NITRITE AS NITROGEN
AMMONIA AS NITROGEN
ResultsResultsMeasured Ammonia-nitrogen (NHMeasured Ammonia-nitrogen (NH33-N) and Nitrite-nitrogen (NO-N) and Nitrite-nitrogen (NO22-N) in -N) in
the Yellow Perch RAS systemthe Yellow Perch RAS system
Results-Fish PerformanceResults-Fish Performance
Lake Mendota Yellow Perch Mixed Sex and Mono-Sex Lake Mendota Yellow Perch Mixed Sex and Mono-Sex Monthly Length IncreaseMonthly Length Increase
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
Novem ber Decem ber January February March April
Month
Le
ng
th (
mm
)
Lake Mendota m ixed sex
Lake Mendota m ono sex fem ale
Results-Fish PerformanceResults-Fish Performance
Lake Mendota Yellow Perch Mixed Sex and Mono-sexLake Mendota Yellow Perch Mixed Sex and Mono-sexMonthly Weight IncreaseMonthly Weight Increase
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Novem ber Decem ber January February March April
Month
We
igh
t (g
)
Lake Mendota m ixed sex
Lake Mendota m ono sex fem ale
Results-Fish PerformanceResults-Fish Performance
Condition factors were considered excellent for both groups (monosex fish were 1.412 and 1.393 for mixed sex fish)
Filet yield averaged 47.8% for all groups
Tank densities at harvest were 26kg/m³ for mixed sex fish and 44kg/m³ for monosex fish
Total mortality was 28% for mixed sex fish and 0.6% for monosex fish
Results-Estimated Production CostsResults-Estimated Production Costs
Calculated system operating cost without capitol cost was $2,179/month based on Calculated system operating cost without capitol cost was $2,179/month based on commercial utility rates ($0.08/kw/hr) and estimated labor.commercial utility rates ($0.08/kw/hr) and estimated labor.
The actual operating cost at NADF was $1,432/month based on an electrical rate of The actual operating cost at NADF was $1,432/month based on an electrical rate of $0.04/kw/hr.$0.04/kw/hr.
This translates into $0.183/L and approximately $3,940 for 6.3 months of operation for This translates into $0.183/L and approximately $3,940 for 6.3 months of operation for two 10,757 L (10.8 mtwo 10,757 L (10.8 m33 )tanks. )tanks.
Total of 919 kg of feed at an average cost of $970 ($1.06/kg) was used during the Total of 919 kg of feed at an average cost of $970 ($1.06/kg) was used during the study.study.
Total estimated production costs, not including capital & fingerling cost, was $4,910.Total estimated production costs, not including capital & fingerling cost, was $4,910.
Based on a market value of $5.50/kg(2.50/lb), the total approximate value of yellow Based on a market value of $5.50/kg(2.50/lb), the total approximate value of yellow perch raised in the system was $5,550perch raised in the system was $5,550..
Conclusion
Lake Mendota mono-sex female yellow perch can potentially outperform Lake Mendota mixed sex yellow perch in a 19ºC water RAS.
127 mm(5inch) fall pond fingerlings can be finished successfully for market in approximately 190 days in a indoor RAS system.
Additional research and replicated studies are needed to further investigate grow-out of various strains of yellow perch in RAS and the cost effectiveness of such systems.
We thank Peter Fritch of Rushing Waters Trout Farm for his involvement and interest in this project. Jeff Taylor and Nate Wendt of Star Prairie Trout Farms were also helpful
throughout this project and provided important information regarding fish production and processing. We would also like to acknowledge the efforts of technicians Kendall
Holmes, Dan Duffy, and summer interns Abby Purdy and Ryan Huber at the UWSP-NADF for fish rearing and data collection. Steve Summerfelt of Freshwater Institute
provided valuable review comments and technical assistance.
This project was supported by NADF base funding. Mention of trade name, proprietary product, or specific equipment does not constitute a guarantee or warranty and does not
imply approval to the exclusion of other products that may be suitable.