Evaluation of the Malaysian Mortgage Corporation - Cagamas N. Kokularupan Views expressed in this paper are that of the authors and do not represent the views of IFC/World Bank Workshop on Housing Finance June 26-29, 2011 Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia
Mar 27, 2015
Evaluation of the MalaysianMortgage Corporation - Cagamas
N. Kokularupan
Views expressed in this paper are that of the authors and do not represent the views of IFC/World Bank
Workshop on Housing Finance
June 26-29, 2011
Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia
2
Cagamas Liquidity Model
Provide liquidity to mortgageoriginators at competitive
prices to promote home ownership
Develop the local capital market by being
a credible issuer ofhigh quality securities
Purchase with RecoursePurchase without Recourse
Conventional CagamasBonds, Cagamas RMBS,Cagamas Islamic bonds
Liquidity Hedging Mechanism
3
Cagamas Liquidity Model
• Started operations in October 1987 by purchasing housing loans with recourse
• Purchase with recourse designed to suit local conditions and to overcome barriers that could prevent Scheme from taking off successfully
• Interim step towards Purchase without Recourse and Securitization
4
P Purchase with Recourse with Recourse
House Owners
Financial Institutions
and Selected Corporations
Cagamas
Lead Managers
Investors
Grant loans and debts
Sell loans and debts
Issues debt securities
Subscribe to or purchase debt securities
5
Types of Purchase with Recourse
Purchase With Recourse
• Housing Loans
- fixed rate (1987)
- floating rate (1992)
- convertible rate (1993)
• Islamic house financing debts (1994)
• Industrial property loans (1996)
• Hire purchase and leasing debts (1998)
• Islamic hire purchase debts (2002)
• Credit card receivables (2003)
• Islamic personal loans (2008)
6
Benefits of Purchase with Recourse
• Able to source long-term funds
• Hedge interest rate risk and liquidity risk
• Able to price mortgage loans competitively
• Proceeds from sale not subject to statutory reserve and liquidity requirements
7
Features of Purchase without Recourse
• Outright sale of housing loans to Cagamas with no recourse to default risk
• Cagamas rate based on cost plus basis – bond yield plus Cagamas required margin
• Standardized structure and documentation
• Cash purchase or settlement by Cagamas
• Banks appointed as servicer for the loans
8
Purchase without Recourse/Securitization• Cagamas first introduced Purchase without Recourse to the financial
institutions in 1999
• However, financial institutions did not find it an attractive product then due to following reasons:
- housing loans are good assets
- excess liquidity in banking system
- high risk-weighted capital adequacy ratio of banking system (12.5% in 1999)
- default rates very low
- foreclosure losses negligible
• Breakthrough for Securitization/Purchase without Recourse came in April 2004
• Government of Malaysia mandated Cagamas as the vehicle to undertake securitization of the Government’s staff housing loans on a scheduled basis and over a period of time
• 2004 – Securitization of Government’s staff housing loans
• 2007 – Purchase without Recourse conventional mortgage loans from banks
• 2008 – Purchase without Recourse Islamic mortgage loans from banks
• 2009 – Purchase without Recourse conventional and Islamic hire purchase
debts from banks
9
Cagamas Share of Market Loans
Year Market Share %
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
2.0
6.1
10.0
10.8
9.3
14.2
14.2
21.2
22.8
27.2
30.8
29.6
Year Market Share %
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
21.0
18.7
14.2
11.7
10.6
9.5
9.7
7.3
11.4
11.2
10.3
8.8
10
Key Success Factors of Cagamas
• Shareholding structure and composition of Board
• Support by Ministry of Finance, Securities Commission and Bank Negara Malaysia
• Proceeds of sale of housing loans to Cagamas are exempt from statutory reserves and liquidity requirements (cheaper than fixed deposits)
• Concessions granted to Cagamas bonds to kick start the operations
• High quality assets
• Strong risk management practices, particularly ALM
• Proactive approach
11
Concessions given to Cagamas
Issuance before4 September 2004
Issuance after4 September 2004
Risk weight under the Risk-Weighted Capital Ratio Framework
10% 20%
Liquefiable assets status under the Liquidity Framework
Class-1 liquefiable Class-2 liquefiable
Yield slippage under the Liquidity Framework
4% 6%
Mode of Primary Issuance
Through Principal Dealers’ Network
Book Building
Holdings by insurance companies
Accorded low risk asset status
Accorded credit facilities status
12
Cagamas Evolving Role
1987-1991 Start-up Phase
1992-1997 Take-off and Growth Phase
1998-2003 Diversification Phase
2007 onwards
Securitization Phase 2004 to 2007
Provision of Risk Management Tools
13
1987-1991: Start-up Phase1987-1991: Start-up Phase
• The newness of its operations and its limited product line contributed to its slow progress in the early stage
• Client base:
- Financial institutions (1987)
- Government (1988)
• Initially, only one product - buying on fixed rate for 5 years with recourse
Cagamas Evolving Role (Contd)
14
• 1 Nov 1989, introduced 7-year Cagamas Rate
- to increase the Company’s range of products offered to the
market
- to satisfy the market’s demand for such longer term facilities
• On 24 August 1990, introduced 3-year Cagamas Rate
- to cater to the demand for sale of housing loans for a period shorter than the standard 5 years
• With the new facility, primary lenders can sell their housing loans to Cagamas for a period that may range from 3 to 7 years
Cagamas Evolving Role (Contd)
15
• First five years - low volumes of housing loans purchased
- unfamiliarity with Cagamas’ operations and the
advantages of selling housing loans to Cagamas
- interest rates were declining rapidly
• Outstanding loans held by Cagamas (1987-91)
As at end Housing Loans(RM million)
1987 407
1988 1,396
1989 2,490
1990 3,082
1991 3,060
Cagamas Evolving Role (Contd)
16
• From 1992 - active marketing and introduction of new products
• Widening of client base to include selected corporations
• Extended its range of products on with recourse basis
- Floating rate housing loans (1992)
- Convertible rate housing loans (1993)
- Islamic house financing debts (1994)
- Industrial property loans (1996)
1992-1997: Take-off and Growth Phase1992-1997: Take-off and Growth Phase
Cagamas Evolving Role (Contd)
17
• Outstanding loans and debts held by Cagamas (1992-97)
As atend
RM million % RM million % RM million % RM million %
1992 5,345 100.0 5,345 100.0
1993 6,076 100.0 6,076 100.0
1994 9,915 99.7 29 0.3 9,944 100.0
1995 11,854 99.8 28 0.2 11,882 100.0
1996 16,086 99.7 56 0.3 16,142 100.0
1997 21,317 96.7 85 0.4 643 2.9 22,045 100.0
HousingLoans
Islamic House FinancingDebts Loans
TotalIndustrial Property
Cagamas Evolving Role (Contd)
18
Purchase With Recourse
• Hire purchase and leasing debts (1998)
- serves as a hedging mechanism for such debts which are granted on a fixed rate basis
• Islamic hire purchase debts (2002)
- provides Islamic institutions with an avenue to raise fixed rate funds at low cost to hedge their fixed rate assets
• Credit card receivables (2003)
- allows the sellers to diversify their funding resources
1998-2003: Diversification Phase1998-2003: Diversification Phase
Cagamas Evolving Role (Contd)
19
• Diversification into non-mortgage products has prevented the Company’s balance sheet from decreasing
• Outstanding loans and debts held by Cagamas (1998-2003)As atend
RM million % RM million % RM million % RM million % RM million % RM million %
1998 21,363 95.1 150 0.7 762 3.4 200 0.9 22,475 100.0
1999 17,493 86.9 120 0.6 868 4.3 1,659 8.2 20,140 100.0
2000 17,803 79.4 213 1.0 550 2.5 3,844 17.2 22,410 100.0
2001 15,309 68.8 143 0.6 377 1.7 6,437 28.9 22,266 100.0
2002 14,579 56.0 244 0.9 238 0.9 10,513 40.4 459.0 1.8 26,033 100.0
2003 15,140 55.4 345 1.3 55 0.2 11,236 41.1 563.0 2.1 27,339 100.0
Loans Financing Debts Loans Leasing Debts Purchase DebtsHousing Islamic House Industrial Property TotalHire Purchase and Islamic Hire
Cagamas Evolving Role (Contd)
20
• Purchase of housing loans on without recourse basis
- introduced in March 1999 in tandem with the thrust towards asset-backed securitization
• However, there was no urgency for the financial institutions to securitize their housing loans
- housing loans are good quality assets
- excess liquidity in the banking system
- high risk-weighted capital adequacy ratio of the banking system [12.5% (1999), 13.1% (2005)]
- housing loans are deemed to be high quality assets since their default rates are very low and foreclosure losses are negligible
2004 : Securitization Phase2004 : Securitization Phase
Cagamas Evolving Role (Contd)
21
• The breakthrough for the Scheme came in April 2004 when
the Government of Malaysia mandated Cagamas as the
vehicle to undertake the securitization of the Government’s
staff housing loans (GSHL) on a scheduled basis and over
a period of time
Cagamas Evolving Role (Contd)
22
Cagamas Evolving Role (Contd)
First Securitization Deal with the GovernmentFirst Securitization Deal with the Government
• 20 October 2004
- RM1,936 million of pensioners’ housing loans and the issuance of RM1,555 million in nominal value RMBS
- Represents Malaysia’s first transaction, backed by residential mortgages
• Attracted RM11.1 billion in book size (RM2.2 billion from offshore investors, RM8.9 billion domestic investors)
• At the cut-off rates, book size remained substantial at RM10.6 billion giving an over-subscription rate of 5.6 times
Tenure
(Years)
Issue Amount
(RM million)
Maturity
Date
Coupon Rate
(%)
Spread over MGS
(basis points)
3
5
7
10
580
340
290
345
19-Oct-2007
20-Oct-2009
20-Oct-2011
20-Oct-2014
3.70
4.30
4.95
5.50
18
26
38
45
23
Cagamas Evolving Role (Contd)
2007 Onwards: Provision of Risk Management Tools2007 Onwards: Provision of Risk Management Tools
• Due to excess liquidity, the banks do not require a liquidity tool. Instead, with Basel II, banks were looking for risk management tools
• Thus, Cagamas enhanced the Purchase with Recourse to create the Purchase without Recourse – risk management tool for banks
• 2007 – Purchase without Recourse Conventional mortgage loans from banks
• 2008 – Purchase without Recourse Islamic mortgage debts from banks
• 2009 – Purchase without Recourse Conventional and Islamic Hire Purchase Debts from banks
24
Assets of Cagamas
2005
RM bil
2006
RM bil
2007
RM bil
2008
RM bil
2009
RM bil
2010
RM bil
PWR Conventional MLs
PWR Islamic MLs
PWOR Conventional MLs
PWOR Islamic MLs
Government’s Securitization
(Conventional MLs)
Government’s Securitization (Islamic MLs)
Sub total MLs
11.4
0.7
-
-
3.3
2.1
17.5
8.7
0.6
-
-
3.1
2.0
14.4
9.9
2.7
2.5
-
5.3
4.1
24.5
8.0
2.4
4.8
2.2
4.9
4.0
26.3
3.9
1.8
12.2
8.0
-
-
25.9
3.9
0.5
11.4
7.7
-
-
23.5
PWR Conventional HPLs
PWR Islamic HPLs
PWR Islamic Personal Financing
PWOR Conventional HPLs
PWOR Islamic HPLs
Sub total MLs
9.7
2.0
-
-
-
11.7
7.2
4.6
-
-
-
11.8
3.4
4.3
-
-
-
7.7
1.7
2.8
0.4
-
-
4.9
0.8
1.7
1.0
0.003
0.03
3.5
0.4
2.6
3.7
0.0008
0.03
6.7
Grand Total 29.2 26.2 32.2 31.2 29.4 30.2
25
Types of Bonds
End 2010
RM Million
Fixed Rate Bonds
Medium Term Notes
Commercial Papers
Residential Mortgage Backed Securities
Secured Credit Linked Notes
Islamic Securities
Islamic Residential Mortgage Backed Securities
Total
480
9,420
35
4,115
150
10,535
3,365
______
28,100
26
Holders of Cagamas Group Debt Securities
2006
RM million %
2007
RM million %
2008
RM million %
2009
RM million %
2010
RM million %
Banking Institutions
Insurance Companies
and Investment Funds
Government Funds and
Trusts
Non-resident Investors
Individuals
Other Corporations
10,772 39.8
4,976 18.4
9,124 33.7
872 3.2
- -
1,307 4.8
14,844 45.4
6,246 19.1
9,573 29.3
556 1.7
- -
1,476 4.5
14,797 47.7
7,298 23.5
7,344 23.7
171 0.6
- -
1,435 4.6
10,752 36.67
8,336 28.43
8,393 28.62
186 0.63
3 0.01
1,655 5.64
10,837 38.57
8,281 29.47
7,523 26.77
146 0.52
3 0.01
1,310 4.66
Total 27,050 100 32,695 100 31,045 100 29,325 100 28,100 100
27
Total Outstanding Debt Market Securities
Instruments 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Malaysian Government Securities
Khazanah Bonds
Other Quasi-Government
e.g. Multilaterial Development Financial Institutions
Cagamas Group Debt Securities
Private Debt Securities
48.8
2.3
3.9
5.9
39.1
52.5
1.9
3.6
5.9
36.1
47.7
1.9
3.9
5.7
40.8
49.7
2.1
4.7
4.7
38.8
51.0
2.0
4.7
4.2
38.1
Total 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
% of total issuance outstanding