3. EVALUATION OF RECRUITMENT AND SELECTION
3. EVALUATION OF RECRUITMENT AND
SELECTION
3. EVALUATION OF RECRUITMENT AND
SELECTION
3.1 LITERATURE REVIEW
The importance of recruiting the right type of person cannot be over emphasized. This is
obviously linked with the needs of the organization and business. In a country like ours
with a surplus of educated manpower and dearth of employment opportunities, there is
a heavy pressure on getting jobs. Organizations have to be extremely cautious in
resisting pressures to recruit candidates except through a rigorous selection procedure.
The dangers of over staffing are also very real and the spate of VRS to remove surplus
staff from banks a few years after liberalisation is a case in point.
The basic recruitment strategy of any organization is ideally based on Business
projections and manpower requirements as envisaged by the top management. This
presupposes a very good rapport and interaction between the various departments and
a planned need projection for the short, medium and long term manpower requirements.
How ever it is a generally observed fact that such planning is rarely done much less
implemented. Thus in most cases it comes down to adhoc recruitment to replace
employee turnover in departments as and when it occurs. There is always a compulsion
to keep the employee numbers under some control.
Lower headcounts mean that each new hire is that much more crucial to the firm's
success, and the departure of a star performer can impact financial results that
investors are watching more closely than ever. In this environment, HR leaders need to
develop business processes that allow their teams to be more efficient and productive.
[Microsoft Corporation. 2003].
Retaining the key employees has been a concern and various strategies are adopted to
hold on to the valuable human assets. Several Indian companies offer examples of
comprehensive retention programs that include employee stock option plans (ESOPs).
44
Business leaders in India are increasingly concerned with the challenges of recruiting
and retaining talented employees, despite a population of over one billion. The
Workforce Stability Institute, a U.S.-based not-for-profit research and educational
organization, reports that the Indian mutual-fund industry has been a leader in creating
ESOPs designed to help address the problem. Templeton Asset Management (India)
launched one such program. Templeton India CEO Rajiv Vij stated that the program is
"designed to retain our best talent by enhancing the feeling of owner-ship... at a time
when the industry as a whole is facing an attrition problem." Vij sums up the logic of
human capital management by adding, "People are the key asset for us."
The recruitment and selection process works best when we've carefully identified our
department's personnel requirements. Determining staffing needs isn't hard, but like any
other aspect of human resources management, it requires some careful consideration
on our part.
Basing staffing decisions on business volume is the most effective way to make sure
that we've got the right number of people to perform all the tasks associated with
providing a customer-focussed purchase and service experience. [Deiss, 1997].
Manpower Planning provides information to help ensure that we have the right number
of people to handle the volume of business in our department in a way that supports a
high quality experience for our customers. But human resources requirements are never
satisfied once and for all. It's important to periodically review staffing needs, especially
when:
■ The volume of business increases or decreases significantly
■ A change in business volume is forecast, shortly.
■ Customers complain about treatment or quality of work because there are too
few employees to respond to their needs
• Employees complain about excessive workloads or contradictory job
assignments.
45
It's important to know our current human resources requirements and make sure that
departments are appropriately staffed. In our ongoing effort to attract and retain
qualified employees, it's equally important to look down the road and project future
employment needs in order not to get caught short in the recruitment process and
settle for a mediocre candidate, we must plan for changes in staffing requirements
before they happen. Projecting future employment needs is far from an exact science,
but it's much better to make an educated guess than be stuck with an eleventh-hour
attempt to recruit qualified employees.
Using technique called a trend projection will get us even beyond that educated guess
With trend projection we can develop a forecast based on a past relationship between a
factor related to staffing requirements—like sales volume—and the number of people
actually employed (2). .[Diess 1997 ]
The rate of employee turnover is another predictor of personnel requirements. If we
determine the annual percentage of employee turnover, we'll have a good idea about
the number of employees we should be prepared to replace.
Smart managers keep a plan for filling key positions in mind all the time. They identify
employees who could be promoted to these jobs and determine what additional training
they would need to succeed. We thus prepare current employees to meet our
department's future requirements.
Mistakes like over hiring or hiring the wrong person for the job are costly. That's why
organizations pay careful attention to the recruitment and selection process. Top
managers are often asked to develop plans for recruitment and employee selection that
complement the strategic and business plans for their organizations.[Diess 1997]
(2) Deiss & Associates Inc. for GM Corpn.1997,Recruitment and Selection & Retention, chapter 1.2.2 pge33/34
46
Promoting from within or providing current employees an opportunity to work in different
positions helps eliminate costly turnover. [Diess 1997].:
While drawing up job descriptions for a position, we have to make sure the information
is up to date and that it accurately outlines responsibilities, task assignments,
qualifications, and performance standards. Job descriptions are required to ensure that
candidates meet the necessary eligibility requirements and help clearly explain the
position during selection interviews.
Prior to reviewing a resume, the evaluator should have a list of standards and criteria in
mind against which to compare resumes. Ideally the screening committee as a group
will have developed a list of essential and desirable skills, knowledge, and previous
work experiences sought in a new staff member. If the search committee has not
developed such a list, then each reviewer should write his or her estimations of the
necessary skills, knowledge, and experience against which to evaluate resumes. (If
there is no prior conscientious about needed qualifications, one may expect
disagreement and the need for consensus building before the committee can get to its
task of sorting through applications.) In addition, the job description and any other
relevant information should also be compared with the resumes (Bailey, 1999;
Wendover, 1998). It is important that one always keep these standards in mind and not
bend as they were created to meet the job expectations (Caldwell, 1998). "By
evaluating all candidates against the same screening standards, the process will be
more objective, fair and accurate" (Klinvex et al., 1999,- p. 70). In addition, the resume
screening process can be accomplished quicker by knowing what one is looking for in
the position (Klinvex et al., 1999).
There are two different perspectives on how to screen resumes. One approach holds
that it is better to review all resumes in the sarne day. This way, the evaluators keep
the standards consistent, as they maintain the same "frame of mind." It is then
recommended that the resumes be re-checked the next day for accuracy (Bailey, 1999).
However, screening resumes in a single setting is perhaps not a realistic or practical
approach for organizations receiving scores of resumes. Consequently, the other
47
approach advocates reviewing resumes piece meal. Deems (1999) encourages
reviewers to work in shorter blocks of time so the reviewer "stays fresh." The challenge
with this approach is to make sure that the assessment criteria remain consistent from
day to day and applicant to applicant.
The Qualification category may be one of the most straightforward to evaluate. The
evaluator should make sure to check the applicant's course of study. This should help
the reviewer discover whether the individual took courses that provided the expertise
needed to perform the job tasks (Cook, 1979). Because most organizations do not
require a specific major for the degree earned, they consider candidates with related
fields of expertise or experience (Wendover, 1998). Some organizations require
applicants to meet a certain educational level. It is important for those organizations to
ensure that level was actually obtained (Klinvex et al., 1999; Resume screening
guidelines,.). Although completion of a degree does not necessarily guarantee the
applicant has the appropriate skills or knowledge for the position, it may indicate a
certain familiarity with the field and demonstrate the candidate's ability to complete a
task (Klinvex et al., 1999). If a particular degree is important, make sure the resume
indicates that the degree was actually earned. Some candidates list classes attended
at a university, but no graduation date. All educational credentials should be verified
with the institution (Wendover, 1998). It is also important to note that since the
academic world is changing, many candidates may have received appropriate
educational training during their previous job experiences or through on-line education.
These experiences should not be discounted by the reviewer.
In order to be consistent and fair in the reviewing process, it is important to determine
the educational requirements of the position in advance of screening—actually before
announcing the position vacancy. For some positions, a masters or doctoral degree
may be preferred, but not mandatory. If the vacant position does not require a particular
degree, an evaluator should be cautious of the motivations of applicants who possess
more than the required level of education. During periods of economic downturns, it is
conceivable that no other work could be found. However, it is also possible the
48
applicant is looking for a temporary position in hopes that something better will become
available, and will consequently grow bored and unproductive in a short period of time if
they are overqualified for that position (Wendover, 1998).
An applicant's work history and experience is the most critical information for most
organizations. Generally, the best predictor of future job performance is looking at the
most recent position held by the applicant (Handbook for staffing practices in student
affairs, 2002). Resume reviewers, however, should examine carefully work
responsibilities from all previous jobs to see if they match the requirements for the
position to be filled. It is rare to find an applicant who has experience identical to the
vacant position, so evaluators often need to compare the experience identified and the
candidate's potential from those experiences with the organization's requirements. The
resume should draw the reviewer's attention to a list of accomplishments that may give
an indication of the work ethic of the individual as well as his or her working knowledge
of a topic or skill. (Potential may be most accurately gauged during interviews than from
information included in the resume.) .
In addition, reviewers should be able to see the scope of previous experiences and
positions responsibilities. For example, the number of staff members supervised or the
size of a budget should be listed on the resume (Wendover, 1998). Finally, evaluators
should note if duties and tasks are listed clearly. Many times the candidate will mention
the job title but not elaborate on what he or she actually did or was responsible for. The
problem is that a term like "manager" or "director" or "assistant dean" could mean
different things to different reviewers. Concrete terms can help the evaluator assess
what the applicant has actually done (Klinvex et al., 1999). If desired information is not
provided on the resume, note should be made of specific questions that should be
answered in a telephone interview with the candidate and/or previous supervisor.
Reviewers should never "fill in the blanks" observed in a resume by reference to the
employing institution's practices or the reviewer's personal experience.
When critiquing job experience for mid- or senior-level applicants, the reviewer should
also see if there is evidence of career progression as the candidate moves from position
49
to position (Outlaw, 1998). Many candidates list more than one position held on their
resume, but the reviewer should note whether the career progression is logical or if the
candidate skipped around or made several lateral moves (Klinvex et al., 1999).
It is also important to see if there are gaps or breaks in employment (Cook, 1992;
Outlaw, 1998). If the resume is chronological, gaps between jobs are easily detectable
by looking at precise dates of employment. While as a reviewer it is good to note gaps,
one should refrain from assuming that there were negative reasons for those gaps
(Caldwell, 1998; Resume screening guidelines, n. d.). The purpose of noting breaks of
employment is to remember to explore those gaps in an interview setting (Bailey, 1999;
Caldwell, 1998; Cook, 1992) or make a telephone inquiry to the candidate. Candidates
should not be eliminated from the process if they have a gap in employment. There
could be a reasonable explanation for the employment gap, such as an illness or
temporary disability such as maternity leave. Removing those applicants from the
selection process may result in unlawful discrimination.
Another factor to review is whether the tenure of the positions held has been
appropriate (Klinvex et al.. 1999). As an evaluator, one should observe if the
candidates have stability in their positions or move from job to job in a relatively short
period of time (Outlaw, 1998). A candidate who is only in a position for months at a time
may list all of their responsibilities, however, if he or she was only in those jobs for a
couple of months, the reviewer may wonder whether the candidate really obtained the
depth of experience needed for the position to be filled (Wendover, 1998).
The amount of time a candidate spends at a particular organization can have its
advantages and disadvantages. A long tenure of employment with one organization
may imply institutional loyalty, an ability to get along with others as well as an ability to
contribute to a team. However, the evaluator could wonder whether the candidate has
become stagnant in his or her position and lost the desire to challenge himself or
herself. Similarly, many short-term employments could indicate that the applicant was
50
promoted due to hard work and assertiveness. On the other hand, a short tenure could
also indicate the candidate's impatience or lack of concentration (Wendover, 1998).
For the IT sector a major part of the human capital comes from the group of young IT
graduates. so the Internet is considered best for the recruitment .of recent graduates.
As a company put it most characteristically: The young IT graduate most probably will
first search on the Internet and, secondly, on the University Careers Service only after
that he will look at other traditional sources.
Interview is the most popular and commonly used tool for selection. But research has
shown up that it is not necessarily as efficient as one expects it to be. Personnel
selection experts have found no greater correlation between interview-based
employment decisions and ultimate success on the job than would occur strictly by
chance. In other words, most interviews are about as effective at predicting success on
the job as flipping a coin. The problem is that people are unconsciously inclined to
select other people who most closely fit their image of themselves. It's a very human
failing that stands in the way of matching applicant qualifications to job requirements.
And if you think about the costs of selecting the wrong people, you'll recognize how vital
it is to use every reasonable means to make the best employee selection decisions
[Diess 1997]
Employee retention is as important as selecting the right people for the job. Managers
should understand the considerable costs of employee turnover and regularly monitor
employee satisfaction through formal and informal channels. They should recognize the
importance of developing plans to encourage employee loyalty and work toward
creating an environment that ensures a high level of employee retention.
2003 General Top Five business related Issues:
• Finding and retaining qualified staff
• Succession planning/developing future owners
• Marketing/practice growth
51
■ Seasonality/workload compression
• Fee pressure/pricing of services. [Reported in The American Institute of Certified
Public Accountants,2005]
Some points to regarding recruitment and selection are:
• The recruitment and selection process works best when we've carefully identified
our department's personnel requirements
■ Monitoring employee satisfaction on a regular basis provides managers with
concrete information about the company from an employee perspective.
■ Mistakes like over hiring or hiring the wrong person for the job are costly. That's
why organizations pay careful attention to the recruitment and selection process.
■ Every recruitment effort should begin in our own backyard. That means
considering our employees first.
■ Screening job applicants improves the odds of selecting the right person. A pre-
employment assessment is a valuable tool for screening job applicants. It is a
better predictor of job success than the traditional job interview.
■ The screening process narrows the field of job applicants. The people we invite
back for the hiring interview should be qualified and suitable for the position.
From this group, we want to select the best person for the job.
While discussing some future directions of human resource practices in Singapore Irene
Chew and Mark Goh found from their studies that a company used at least four
channels: First, newspaper advertisements were most frequently used to identity and
recruit employees across the occupational groups, second, employee recommendations
were the second most popular source of recruiting all three occupational categories.
This suggests that employers relied heavily on internal sources of labour market
information, and perhaps they used these sources before searching for employees in
the external labour market.
Third, the use of executive search firms and professional societies were more
popular to recruit employees higher up the organization. For example, over half of
companies use executive search firms to recruit managers as compared to only 20
52
per cent and 14 per cent to recruit supervisors and the rank and file respectively.
Fourth, walk-ins were the third most popular source to identify and recruit supervisors
and the rank and file.
Companies with HR departments tended to use them to recruit the rank and file more
than companies with none.[ Irene Chew, 1991].
Selection of people for managerial jobs cannot be based largely on personality test
results. The article concludes with some ways in which personality testing can
complement other selection procedures.
Thus we may see that recruitment and selection is one of the single most important
decision taken by managements during the life of the business. Efficient controls during
entry into the organisation sets the pace for the future effectiveness of the individual and
the company.
53
3.2 CORRELATION ANALYSIS OF STRATEGIC ISSUES OF RECRUITMENT AND SELECTION AND THEIR PRACTICES
The strategic issues of Human Resources Development are as follows: 1) business
projection and manpower requirement 2), Ad hoc basis recruitment 3), Replacing
employee turnover in department 4) continuous learning, 5) business requirement
behind organizational development 6) career growth and development 7) sparing of
employees from main line business 8), strategic plan and the target set by the
management and, 9) strategic plan and target set by supervisors. These are being
examined in Table 3.2.1 below to study the relationship between them.. This analysis
will bring out to what extent the employees perceive a significantly positive or negative
relationship between the nine strategic issues of Recruitment and Selection The result
in turn will show to what extent some of the Recruitment and Selection strategies are
seen to be effective, while some may need improvement as perceived by the
employees of the financial services institutions.
54
3.2.1 TABLE
Correlation between strategic issues of HRD perceived by the employees of
financial services institution I M
AN
PO
WE
R R
EQ
UIR
EM
EN
T
I TU
RN
OV
ER
IN T
HE
OR
GA
NIZ
ATI
ON
DEV
EL
OP
ME
NT
DE
VE
LO
PM
ENT
MA
IN L
INE
BU
SIN
ES
S
SE
T B
Y TH
E M
AN
AG
EM
EN
T
TAR
GET
SE
T BY
THE
Business
projections and
Manpower
requirements
1
Ad hoc basis
recruitment -.294("*) 1
Replacing
employee
turnover in
department
-.169(**) .046 1
Continuous
learning .133(') -.096(*) -.057 1
Business
requirement
behind
organization
development
.235(**) .055 -.189(**) -.151(**) 1
Career growth
and
development
.020 .094(*) .037 -.015 -.021
Sparing
employees
from main line
business
-.111(**) .008 .013 .279(**) -.326(**) -.062
55
MA
NP
OW
ER
RE
QU
IRE
ME
NT
TUR
NO
VE
R IN
TH
E
OR
GA
NIZ
ATI
ON
DE
VE
LOP
ME
NT
I D
EV
ELO
PM
EN
T
I M
AIN
LINE
BU
SIN
ES
S
SE
T B
Y TH
E M
AN
AG
EM
EN
T
TAR
GET
SE
T B
Y TH
E
Strategic plan
and target set
by the
management
.231(**) -.018 -.170(**) .071 .369(**) .009 -.094(*) 1
Strategic plan
and target set
by the
supervisor
.128(**) .012 -.150(**) .064 .295(**) -.031 .004 .263(**) 1
CORRELATION BETWEEN STRATEGIC ISSUES OF HRD PERCEIVED BY THE
EMPLOYEES OF FINANCIAL SERVICES INSTITUTION
Table 3.2.1 showed the relationship between the strategic issues of HRD perceived by
the employees of financial services institution. The result showed that the business
projection and manpower requirement perceived by the employees had a significantly
positive relationship with the continuous learning, business requirement behind
organizational development, strategic plan and the target set by the management and,
target set by supervisors (0.13, 0.24, 0.23 and 0.13 respectively).
But a significantly negative relationship with, Ad hoc basis recruitment (0.29), Replacing
employee turnover in department (0.17),and sparing of employees from business
(-0.11). The employees who perceived the business projection and manpower
requirement as important, also perceived the requirement for continuous learning,
business requirement behind organizational development, strategic plan and the target
set by the management and, target set by supervisors, as important. However the
aspects of, Ad hoc basis recruitment, Replacing employee turnover in department and
56
employees being spared from operations for further development, have not been
perceived as favorable by employees.
Table 3.2.1 also showed that, the replacement of employees in various departments,
had a significantly negative relationship with strategic targets set by the management
and supervisor (rs= -0.17 and -0. 15 respectively). The employees perceived that the
pace with which the strategic plan and targets are set by the management and
supervisor is not maintained by the pace of recruitment to replace the employee
tu mover
Further the Table 3.2.1 showed that, The business requirement behind organizational
development, perceived by the employees of financial service institution shown positive
relationship with strategic plan and target set by the management as well as supervisor
(rs= 0.37 and 0.29 respectively) and negative relationship with employees being spared
from business operation for further development (rsz0.33).
This result can be interpreted as the employees who felt the business requirement
behind organizational development as important are also felt that the strategic target
and plan set by the management as well as supervisor as equally important, on a
contrary, sparing the employees from operations for further development was not
perceived as important.
Table 3.2..1 also showed that, the strategic target and plan perceived by the
management as well as supervisors shown significantly positive correlation ( 0.26),
which means that the strategic target and plan set by the management as well as the
targets set by supervisors are perceived as equally important by the employees of
financial services institution.
57
CORRELATION BETWEEN STRATEGIC ISSUES OF RECRUITMENT AND
SELECTION SUB SYSTEMS AND THE VARIED RECRUITMENT AND SELECTION
PRACTICES PERCEIVED BY THE EMPLOYEES OF FINANCIAL SERVICES
INSTITUTION
Table 3.2..2 attempts to show the relationship between the strategic issues of
Recruitment and Selection sub systems such as 1) business projection and manpower
requirement2) , Ad hoc basis recruitment and 3) Replacing employee turnover in
department and the varied Recruitment and Selection practices of (a) Searching
through newspapers,(b)Searching through Internet,(c) ,Searching through Campus
selection, (d)Searching through Consultants ,(e)Searching through Employee
referrals,(f) Searching through other sources,(g) Scanning bio-data, (h)Conducting
subject based tests, (i)Conducting psychological test), (j)Group Discussion
,(k)Conducting interviews, (I)Selecting consensus candidate, (m)Assigning Interview
criteria marks ,(n)Department visits during training,(o) Class room lectures ,(p)Talk by
CEO on mission and objectives of the company,(q) Providing hospitality.(r) Making new
employee productive,(s) Providing feedback by the superiors ,(t) Accepting better salary
,(u) Accepting better position and responsibilities ,(v) Joining on time ,(w)Receiving
good rating for performance and(x) Satisfying department needs, as perceived by the
employees of Financial Services Institutions.
This analysis will bring out to what extent the employees perceive a significantly positive
or negative relatiOnship between the three strategic issues and the varied Recruitment
and Selection practices The result in turn will show to what extent some of the
Recruitment and Selection strategies are seen to be effective, while some may need
improvement as perceived by the employees of the financial services institutions.
58
3.2.2 TABLE CORRELATION BETVVEEN STRATEGIC ISSUES OF RECRUITMENT AND
SELECTION SUB SYSTEMS AND THE VARIED RECRUITMENT AND SELECTION
PRACTICES PERCEIVED BY THE EMPLOYEES OF FINANCIAL SERVICES
INSTITUTION
PARAMETERS
BUSINESS
PROJECTIONS
AND MANPOWER
REQUIREMENT
ADHOC BASIS
RECRUITMENT
REPLACING
EMPLOYEE
TURNOVER
Search through news papers -.020 .101* .031
Search through Internet .141** -.107* .001
Search through Campus selection .282- -.018 -.177**
Search through Consultants .367** -.090* .008
Search through Employee referrals .114- -.025 .012
Search through any other -.329** .099* .182**
Scanning biodata .130** -.019 -.090*
Conducting Subject based tests .034 -.039 -.227**
Conducting psychological test .181** -.002 -.206**
Group Discussion .210** .028 -.155**
Conducting interviews .269** .023 .012
Selecting consensus candidate .158** -.066 -.015
Assigning Interview criteria marks .204** .011 -.016
Department visits during training .415** -.038 -.104*
Class room lectures .165- .051 -.036
Talk by CEO on mission and objectives of the company 1 .147** -.063 -.047
Providing platform for employee closeness -.074 .257** .067
Providing hospitality -.112- .322** .041
Making new employee productive -.041 .246** .016
Providing feedback by the superiors .496- -.032 -.242
Accepting better salary t
.026 .009 .098-
Accepting better position and responsibilities .034 .160- .078
Joining on time .079 .029 .198**
Receiving good rating for performance .167** -.058 -.064
Satisfying department needs .124* .152** -.115**
**Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed) *Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).
59
Table 3.2.2 shows the relationship between the strategic issues of Recruitment and
Selection sub systems and the varied Recruitment and Selection practices as perceived
by the employees of Financial Services Institutions (FSI).
RELATIONSHIP WITH BUSINESS PROJECTION AND MANPOWER REQUIREMENT
The results show that, the business projection and manpower requirement ,as
perceived by the employees had a significantly positive relationship with Searching
through Internet(0.141),Searching through Campus selection(0.282) Searching through
Consultants(0.367),Searching through Employee referrals(0.114), Scanning bio-data
(0.130), Conducting psychological test (0.181), Group Discussion (0.210), Conducting
interviews (0.269) Selecting consensus candidate(0.158),Assigning Interview criteria
marks (0.204),
Department visits during training (0.415) Class room lectures (0.165),
Talk by CEO on mission and objectives of the company (0.147), Providing feedback by
the superiors(0.496),Reciving good rating for performance(0.167) and Satisfying
department needs (0.124).
The business projection and manpower requirement as perceived by the employees
had a significantly negative relationship with Searching through any other source
(-0.329), and providing hospitality (-0.112).
Therefore the employees who perceived the business projection and man power
requirement as important also perceived the Searching through Internet, Searching
through Campus selection, Searching through Consultants ,Searching through
Employee referrals, Scanning bio-data, Conducting psychological test), Group
Discussion ,Conducting interviews, Selecting consensus candidate, Assigning Interview
criteria marks ,Department visits during training, Class room lectures ,Talk by CEO on
mission and objectives of the company, Providing feedback by the superiors ,Receiving
good rating for performance and Satisfying department needs, as important.
However the aspects of Searching through any other, and Providing hospitality have not
been perceived as favourable by the employees.
60
INTERPRETATION
We may interpret that business projections and man power requirements are done in an
effective manner keeping in mind the various significant Recruitment and Selection
practices as perceived by the employees of the Financial Services Institutions (FSI).
RELATIONSHIP WITH AD HOC RECRUITMENT:
Table 3.2.2 shows the relationship between the strategic issues of Recruitment and
Selection sub systems and the varied Recruitment and Selection activities perceived by
the employees of Financial Services Institutions (FSI).
The results show that the Ad hoc basis recruitment, as perceived by the employees had
a significantly positive relationship with Providing platform for employee closeness
(0.257),Providing hospitality (0.322),Making new employee productive (0.246),
Accepting better position and responsibilities(0.160) and satisfying department
needs(0.152)
Therefore the employees who perceived the Ad hoc basis recruitment as important also
perceived the Providing platform for employee closeness ,Providing hospitality, Making
new employee productive , Accepting better position and responsibilities and satisfying
department needs as important.
INTERPRETATION
We may interpret that Ad hoc basis recruitment does serve a useful purpose as
perceived by the employees of the Financial Services Institutions..
RELATIONSHIP WITH REPLACING EMPLOYEE TURNOVER:
Table 3.2.2 shows the relationship between the strategic issues of Recruitment and
Selection sub system of replacing employee turnover' and the varied Recruitment and
Selection activities perceived by the employees of Financial Services Institutions.
The results show that the Replacing employee turnover as perceived by the employees
had a significantly positive relationship with Searching through any other (0.182),
Accepting better salary (0.098) and Joining on time (0.198).
But a significantly negative relationship with Searching through Campus selection
(-0.177), Conducting Subject based tests (-0.227,) Conducting psychological test
(-0.206), Group Discussion (-0.155) and Satisfying department needs (-0.115).
Therefore the employees, who perceived Replacing employee turnover as important,
also perceived the Searching through any other source, accepting better salary and
Joining on time, as important.
However the aspects of Searching through Campus selection. Conducting Subject
based tests, Conducting psychological test, Group Discussion and Satisfying
department needs have not been perceived as favourable by the employees.
INTERPRETATION
We may interpret that "replacing employee turnover" as a practice is not seen as
effective and needs improvement, keeping in mind the various significant Recruitment
and Selection practices as perceived by the employees of the Financial Services
Institutions
62
MODEL
ADJUSTED
R R SQUARE R SQUARE
STD. ERROR OF
THE ESTIMATE
679(a) .461 .436 .37552
3.3 DATA ANALYSIS BY REGRESSION OF RECRUITMENT AND SELECTION PRACTICES
Regression as a statistical tool helps us to examine the effect, one Dependent variable
": Overall business strategy and manpower projection" has on several other
Independent variables which in this case pertain to Recruitment and Selection practices.
3.3.1 TABLE Predictors of recruitment and selection ractices on overall business strate man ower
rdection erceived b the em lo ees of financial services institution
MODEL SUMMARY
a Predictors: (Constant), Satisfying department needs, Selecting consensus candidate,
Conducting interviews, Accepting for better position and responsibilities, Talk by CEO
on mission and objectives of the company, Searching through any other, Searching
through news papers, Scanning bio-data, Searching through Employee referrals,
Accepting better salary, Making new employee productive, Searching through Campus
selection, Department visits during training, Conducting Subject based tests, Receiving
good rating for performance, Assigning Interview criteria marks, Searching through
Consultants, Searching through Internet, Class room lectures, Joining on time,
Providing feedback by the superiors, Group Discussions, Providing hospitality,
Providing platform for employee closeness, and Conducting psychological test.
6:
COEFFICIENTS (a)
PARAMETERS
UNSTANDARDIZED
COEFFICIENTS
STANDARDIZED
COEFFICIENTS T SIG.
B Std. Error Beta
(Constant) -.152 .061 -2.465 .014
Searching through news papers -.019 .038 -.018 -.498 .618
Searching through Internet -.041 .049 -.032 -.847 .397
Searching through Campus selection .076 .043 .065 1.749 .081
Searching through Consultants .163 .037 .163 4.437 .000
Searching through Employee referrals .059 .046 .045 1.286 .199
Searching through any other -.227 .053 -.160 -4.258 .000
Scanning biodata .057 .036 .056 1.568 .117
Conducting Subject based tests -.111 .047 -.098 -2.374 .018
Conducting psychological test -.001 .046 -.001 -.029 .977
Group Discussion .090 .046 .084 1.945 .052
Conducting interviews .256 .053 .161 4.845 .000
Selecting consensus candidate -.003 .039 -.003 -.076 .940
Assigning Interview criteria marks .035 .041 .032 .857 .392
Department visits during training .252 .038 .245 6.668 .000
Class room lectures .014 .039 .014 .370 .711
Talk by CEO on mission and objectives
of the company .011 .042 .009 .252 .801
Providing platform for employee close
ness -.036 .044 -.035 -.813 .417
Providing hospitality -.077 .042 -.077 -1.817 .070
Making new employee productive -.008 .041 -.008 -.203 .839
Providing feedback by the superiors .244 .040 .242 6.021 .000
Accepting better salary -.002 .036 -.002 -.044 .965
Accepting better position and
responsibilities .028 .035 .028 .778 .437
Joining on time .067 .046 .056 1.447 .149
Receiving good rating for performance .050 .057 .032 .876 .382
Satisfying department needs .090 .037 .090 2.414 .016
a Dependent Variable: overall business strategy and manpower projection
64
PREDICTORS OF RECRUITMENT AND SELECTION PRACTICES ON OVERALL
BUSINESS STRATEGY MANPOWER PROJECTION PERCEIVED BY THE
EMPLOYEES OF FINANCIAL SERVICES INSTITUTION
Here we study the effect that one dependent variable ie; overall business strategy and
manpower projection has on other independent variables like :
Search through news papers,
Search through Internet
Search through Campus selection
Search through Consultants
Search through Employee referrals
Search through any other
Scanning biodata
Conducting Subject based tests
Conducting psychological test
Group Discussion
Conducting interviews
Selecting consensus candidate
Assigning Interview criteria marks
Department visits during training
Talk by CEO on mission and objectives of the company
Providing hospitality
Making new employee productive
Providing feedback by the superiors
Accepting better salary
Accepting better position and responsibilities
Joining on time
1 Receiving good rating for performance and
Table3.3.1 shows that the dependent variable, overall business strategy and man power
projection, is significantly affecting changes in the independent variables including
Searching through consultants, Conducting subject based tests, Conducting interviews
Department visits during training Providing feedback by the superiors and Satisfying
department needs .
65
.However it is also seen that the dependent variable, overall business strategy and man
power projection, is not significantly affecting changes in the other independent
variables including :Searching through news papers, Searching through Internet,
Searching through Campus selection, Searching through Employee referrals, Scanning
bio-data, Conducting psychological test, Group Discussion, Selecting consensus
candidate, Assigning Interview criteria marks, Class room lectures, Talk by CEO on
mission and objectives of the company, Providing platform for employee closeness,
Providing hospitality, Making new employee productive ,Accepting better salary,
Accepting better position and responsibilities, Joining on time and Receiving good rating
for performance .
FINDING
From the above we find that a large number of predictors are not significantly influenced
by the policy of overall business strategy and man power projection.
Thus the overall business strategy and man power projection is not seen to be
important in the recruitment and selection practices of: Searching through news
papers, Searching through Internet, Searching through Campus selection, Searching
through Employee referrals, Scanning bio-data, Conducting psychological test, Group
Discussion, Selecting consensus candidate, Assigning Interview criteria marks, Class
room lectures, Talk by CEO on mission and objectives of the company, Providing
platform for employee closeness, Providing hospitality ,Making new employee
productive ,Accepting better salary, Accepting better position and responsibilities,
Joining on time and Receiving good rating for performance, as perceived by the
employees of the institutions studied
But, the overall business strategy and man power projection is seen to be important in
the recruitment and selection practices of ,conducting subject based tests, Conducting
interview, Department visits during training, Providing feedback by the superiors and
Satisfying department needs , as perceived by the employees of the institutions studied.
66
INTERPRETATION:
Thus we may conclude that the overall business strategy and man power projection is
effective to some extent in the recruitment and selection process as perceived by the
employees of the institutions studied.
Regression as a statistical tool is used in the table 3.3.2 below to examine the effect
that, one Dependent variable" Ad hoc basis recruitment" has ,on several other
Independent variable of Recruitment and Selection practices stated below .
3.3.2 TABLE
PREDICTORS OF RECRUITMENT AND SELECTION PRACTICES ON "ADHOC
RECRUITMENT" POLICIES PERCEIVED BY THE EMPLOYEES OF FINANCIAL
SERVICES INSTITUTION
STD ERROR
R ADJUSTED OF THE
MODEL R SQUARE R SQUARE ESTIMATE
1 .424(a) .180 .141 .45776
a Predictors: (Constant), Satisfying department needs, Selecting consensus candidate,
Conducting interviews, Accepting for better position and responsibilities, Talk by CEO
on mission and objectives of the company, Searching through any other, Searching
through news papers, Scanning bio-data, Searching through Employee referrals,
Accepting better salary, Making new employee productive, Searching through Campus
selection, Department visits during training, Conducting Subject based tests, Receiving
good rating for performance, Assigning Interview criteria marks, Searching through
Consultants, Searching through Internet, Class room lectures, Joining on time,
Providing feedback by the superiors, Group Discussions, Providing hospitality,
Providing platform for employee closeness and Conducting psychological test.
67
COEFFICIENTS (g)
PARAMETERS
UNSTANDARDIZED
COEFFICIENTS
STANDARDIZED
COEFFICIENTS T SIG.
B Std. Error Beta
(Constant) .163 .075 2.181 .030
Searching through news papers .096 .046 .093 2.093 .037
Searching through Internet -.062 .060 -.049 -1.043 .297
Searching through Campus selection .057 .053 .049 1.076 .282
Searching through Consultants -.064 .045 -.065 -1.435 .152
Searching through Employee referrals .026 .056 .020 .459 .646
Searching through any other .069 .065 .049 1.058 .290
Scanning biodata .007 .044 .007 .153 .878
Conducting Subject based tests -.047 .057 -.042 -.831 .406
Conducting psychological test .008 .056 .008 .150 .881
Group Discussion .024 .056 .022 .422 .673
Conducting interviews .012 .008 .185 .853
Selecting consensus candidate -.043 .048 -.041 -.892 .373
Assigning Interview criteria marks .081 .050 .074 1.621 .106
Department visits during training -.055 .046 -.054 -1.189 .235
Class room lectures -.025 .047 -.025 -.524 .600
Talk by CEO on mission and objectives
of the company -.136 .051 -.118 -2.672 .008
Providing platform for employee closure ness
.119 .054 .118 2.197 .028
Providing hospitality .217 .051 .220 4.214 .000
Making new employee productive .058 .050 .058 1.166 .244
Providing feedback by the superiors .037 .049 .038 .758 .449
Accepting better salary -.030 .044 -.031 -.697 .486
Accepting better position and responsibilities
.075 .043 .076 1.723 .085
Joining on time .067 .056 .057 1.189 .235
Receiving good rating for performance .019 .070 .012 .271 .786
Satisfying department needs .097 .046 .098 2.120 .034
a Dependent Variable: Ad hoc basis recruitment
68
Predictors of recruitment and selection practices on adhoc recruitment policies
perceived by the employees of financial services institution
Table3.3.2 shows that the dependent variable, recruitment on ad hoc basis, is
significantly affecting changes in the independent variables including Searching
through news papers, Talk by CEO on mission and objectives of the company,
Providing platform for employee closeness, Providing hospitality and Satisfying
department needs.
However it is also seen that the dependent variable recruitment on ad hoc basis is not
significantly affecting changes in the other independent variables including:, Searching
through Internet, Searching through Campus selection, Searching through Consultants,
Searching through Employee referrals, Searching through any other, Scanning bio-data,
Conducting Subject based tests, Conducting psychological test, Group Discussion,
Conducting interviews, Selecting consensus candidate, Assigning Interview criteria
marks, Department visits during training, Class room lectures, Making new employee
productive ,Providing feedback by the superiors, Accepting better salary,Accepting
better position and responsibilities, Joining on time and Receiving good rating for
performance..
FINDING
From the above we find that a large number of predictors are not significantly influenced
by the dependent variable, recruitment on ad hoc basis. Thus the ad hoc recruitment
policies of the management is not seen to be important in the recruitment and
selection process as perceived by the employees of the institutions studied in the
practices of :,Searching through Internet, Searching through Campus selection,
Searching through Consultants, Searching through Employee referrals, Searching
through any other, Scanning bio-data, Conducting Subject based tests, Conducting
psychological test, Group Discussion, Conducting interviews, Selecting consensus
candidate, Assigning Interview criteria marks, Department visits during training, Class
room lectures, Making new employee productive and Providing feedback by the
69
superiors, Accepting better salary„ Accepting for better position and responsibilities,
Joining on time and Receiving good rating for Performance.
But the recruitment on ad hoc basis by the management is seen to be important in the
recruitment and selection process as perceived by the employees of the institutions
studied in the practices of Searching through news papers, Talk by CEO on mission and
objectives of the company, Providing platform for employee closeness, Providing
hospitality and satisfying department needs, parameters.
INTERPRETATION:
Thus the "ad hoc recruitment" policies of the management are seen to be effective only
to a limited extent in the recruitment and selection process as perceived by the
employees of the institutions studied.
70
Regression as a statistical tool is used in the table 3.3.3 below to examine the effect,
one Dependent variable "replacement for employee turnover" has, on several othel-
Independent variables of Recruitment and Selection practices.
3.3.3 TABLE PREDICTORS OF RECRUITMENT AND SELECTION PRACTICES ON
"REPLACEMENT FOR EMPLOYEE TURNOVER" POLICIES PERCEIVED BY THE
EMPLOYEES OF FINANCIAL SERVICES INSTITUTION
MODEL R ' R SQUARE
ADJUSTED
I R SQUARE
STD. ERROR
OF THE
ESTIMATE
1 .430(a) .185 147 .40371
a Predictors: (Constant), Satisfying department needs, Selecting consensus candidate,
Conducting interviews, Accepting for better position and responsibilities, Talk by CEO
on mission and objectives of the company, Searching through any other, Searching
through news papers, Scanning bio-data, Searching through Employee referrals,
Accepting better salary, Making new employee productive, Searching through Campus
selection, Department visits during training, Conducting Subject based tests, Receiving
good rating for performance, Assigning Interview criteria marks, Searching through
Consultants, Searching through Internet, Class room lectures, Joining on time,
Providing feedback by the superiors, Group Discussions, Providing hospitality,
Providing platform for employee closeness and Conducting psychological test.
71
COEFFICIENTS (et)
Unstandardized
Parameters Coefficients
Standardized
Coefficients T Test
Significanc
e
B Sig Error Beta
(Constant) .251 066 3.804 .000
Searching through news papers -.006 .041 -.007 -.157 .875
Searching through Internet .032 .053 .028 .600 .549
Searching through Campus selection -.077 047 -.075 -1.646 .100
Searchig through Consultants .091 .039 .104 2.313 .021
Searching through Employee referrals .036 .050 .031 .718 .473
Searching through any other .099 .057 .080 1.726 .085
Scanning biodata -.046 .039 -.051 -1.177 .240
Conducting Subject based tests -.136 .050 -.136 -2.691 .007
Conducting psychological test -.054 .050 -.059 -1.081 .280
Group Discussion -.034 .050 -.037 -.692 .489
Conducting interviews .090 .057 .065 1.589 .113
Selecting consensus candidate -.040 042 -.043 -.935 .350
Assigning Interview criteria marks .019 .044 .019 .425 .671
Department visits during training -.076 041 -.084 -1.856 .064
Class room lectures .060 1 .042 .068 1.435 .152
Talk by CEO on mission and -.028
objectives of the company .045 -.027 -.625 .532
Providing platform for employee .113 i .048
closure ness 126 2.365 .018
Providing hospitality -.015 I, .045 - 017 -.329 .742
Making new employee productive -.075 i .044 -.085 -1.718 .086
Providing feedback by the superiors -.141 I , .043 -.160 -3.234 .001
Accepting better salary .108 ; .038 123 2.803 .005
Accepting for better position and .013 1 .038
responsibilities .014 .331 .741
Joining on time 153 : .050 147 3.067 .002
Receiving good rating for -.053 .061
performance -.038 -.869 .385
Satisfying department needs -.033 ; .040 - 038 -.830 .407
a Dependent Variable: Replacing employee turnover in department
72
Predictors of recruitrnent and selection practices on" replacement for employee
turnover" policy as perceived by the employees of financial services institution
Table3.3.3 shows that the dependent variable, 'Replacing employee turnover in
department', is significantly affecting changes in the independent variables including:
Searching through Consultants, Conducting Subject based tests, Providing platform for
employee closeness, Providing feedback by the superiors, Accepting better salary and
Joining on time.
However it is also seen that the dependent variable' Replacing employee turnover in
department', is not significantly affecting changes in the other independent variables
including Searching through news papers, Searching through Internet, Searching
through Campus selection, Searching through Employee referrals, Searching through
any other source, Scanning bio-data, Conducting psychological test, Group Discussion,
Conducting interviews. Selecting consensus candidate, Assigning Interview criteria
marks, Department visits during training, Class room lectures, Talk by CEO on mission
and objectives of the company, Providing hospitality ,Making new employee productive ,
Accepting better position and responsibilities, Receiving good rating for performance
and Satisfying department needs.
FINDING
From the above we find that a large number of predictors are not significantly influenced
by the dependent variable 'replacing employee turnover in department'.
Thus the policy of replacing employee turnover in departments' is not seen to be
important in the recruitment and selection process as perceived by the employees of
the institutions studied. in regard to the practices of Searching through news papers,
Searching through Internet, Searching through Campus selection, Searching through
Employee referrals, Searching through any other source, Scanning bio-data, conducting
psychological test, Group Discussion, Conducting interviews, Selecting consensus
candidate, Assigning Interview criteria marks, Department visits during training, Class
room lectures, Talk by CEO on mission and objectives of the company, Providing
73
hospitality, Making new employee productive ,Accepting better position and
responsibilities, Receiving good rating for performance and Satisfying department
needs.
But the policy of " replacing employee turnover in departments", is seen to be important
in the recruitment and selection process as perceived by the employees of the
institutions studied in the practices of Searching through Consultants ,Conducting
Subject based tests, Providing platform for employee closeness, Providing feedback by
the superiors, Accepting better salary and Joining on time.
INTERPRETATION
Thus the policy of replacing employee turnover in departments is not generally seen to
be effective in the recruitment and selection process as perceived by the employees of
the institutions studied.
3.4 DATA ANALYSIS BY ANOVA OF RECERUITMENT AND SELECTION PRACTICES
The analysis of variance between the groups in the (a) pre- globalization era,(b)
transition period and (c) post globalization era, have been studied with respect to the
strategic issues of recruitment and selection as well as the recruitment and selection
practices. This brings out the aspect of whether the practices are significantly differing
in variance as perceived by the employees of these institutions. In case they are found
to be significantly differing, then those recruitment and selection practices are seen as
important, while in case they are seen to be not differing significantly then such
practices are not so important, as perceived by the employees.
74
3.4.1 TABLE
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE BETWEEN THE PRE GLOBALIZATION, TRANSITION
AND POST GLOBALIZATION ERA FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS ON STRATEGIC
ISSUES OF RECRUITMENT AND SELECTION SUB SYSTEMS AS WELL AS
VARIED OTHER RECRUITMENT AND SELECTION PRACTICES PERCEIVED BY
THE EMPLOYEES OF FINANCIAL SERVICES INSTITUTIONS
PARAMETERS SUM OF
SQUARES DF
MEAN
SQUARE F SIG.
Between Business Be
projections Groups 22.460 2 11.230 53.486 .000
and Within Groups 115.687 551 .210
requirements ' Total 138.146 553
Between
Ad hoc basis Groups
3.010 2 1.505 6.290 .002
recruitment Within Groups 131.835 551 .239
Total 134.845 553
Between Replacing employee
Groups
11.081 2 5.540 32.297 .000
turnover in Within Groups 94.522 551 .172 departments Total 105.603 553
Between
Searching Groups 7.406 2 3.703 17.240 .000
through news Within Groups papers
118. 357 i 551 .215
Total 125.764 553
Between Searching Groups
.420 2 .210 1.407 .246
through Within Groups 82.167 551 .149
Internet Total 82.587 .553
Between Searching Be Groups
17.451 2 8.725 57.141 .000 through Campus
Within Groups 84.138 551 .153
selection Total 101.588 553
Between
Searching Groups 16.029 2 8.014 36.091 .000
through Within Groups 122.356 551 .222
consultants Tstal 138.384 553
75
PARAMETERS SUM OF
SQUARES DF
MEAN
SQUARE F SIG.
Searching
through
Between
Groups 1.687 2 .843 5.933 .003
Employee Within Groups 78.329 551 .142
referrals Total 80.016 553
Any other
Between
Groups
5.497 2 2.748 24.055 .000
source Within Groups 62.951 551 .114
Total 68.448 553
Scanning Between
Groups 19.521 2 9.760 47.905 .000
biodata Within Groups 112.263 551 .204
Total 131.783 553
Conducting
Subject based
tests
Between
Groups 16.469 2 8.234 50.091 .000
Within Groups 90.580 551 .164
Total 107.049 553
Conducting
psychological
test
Between
Groups 25.282 2 12.641 69.112 .000
Within Groups 100.783 551 .183
Total 126.065 553
Group
Discussions
Between
Groups 1.923 2 .961 4.526 .011
Within Groups 117.054 551 .212
Total 118.977 553
Conducting interviews
Between
Groups .117 2 .058 .584 .558
Within Groups 54.945 551 .100
Total 55.061 553
Selecting
consensus
candidate
Between
Groups 1.968 2 .984 4.412 .013
Within Groups 122.870 551 .223
Total 124.838 553
Assigning
Interview
criteria marks
Between
Groups 2.582 2 1.291 6.421 .002
I Within Groups 110.785 551 .201
Total 113.366 553
76
PARAMETERS SUM OF
SQUARES DF
MEAN
SQUARE F SIG.
Department
visits during
Between
Groups 16.823 2 a 411 40.807 .000
training Within Groups 113.574 551 206
Total 130.397 553
Class room
Between
Groups 16.595 2 6,2.98 38.324 .000
lectures Within Groups 119.298 551 _217
Total 135.894 553
Talk by CEO
on mission
Between
Groups 5.754 2 2 377 16.724 .000
and objectives Within Groups 94.794 551 ,I72
of the
company Total 100.549 553
Providing
platform for
employee
closeness
Between
Groups 6.642 2 3,321 14.546 .000
Within Groups 125.786 551 .223
Total 132.428 553
Providing hospitality
Between
Groups 6.399 2 3..200 13.346 .000
Within Groups 132.101 551 -240
Total 138.500 553
Making new
employee
productive
Between
Groups 4.263 2 2..131 9.119 .000
Within Groups 128.777 551 .234
Total 133.040 553
Providing
feedback by
the superiors
Between
Groups 31.425 2 15,713 82.561 .000
Within Groups 104.864 551 .190
Total 136.289 553
Accepting better salary
Between
Groups 13.958 2 6-979 30.978 .000
\ Vithin Groups 124.136 551 -22o
Total 138.094 553
77
PARAMETERS SUM OF
SQUARES DF
MEAN
SQUARE F SIG. 1
Accepting for
better position
and
responsibilitie
s
Between
Groups 10.550 2 5.275 22.747 .000
Within Groups 127.770 551 .232
Total 138.319 553
Joining on
time
Between
Groups 20.448 2 10.224 72.243 .000
Within Groups 77.978 551 .142 1
Total 98.426 553
Receiving
good rating for
performance
Between
Groups .273 2 .136 1.372 .255
Within Groups 54.789 551 .099
Total 55.061 553
Satisfying
department
needs
Between
Groups 10.847 2 5.424 23.495 .000
Within Groups 127.191 551 .231
Total 138.038 553
78
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE BETWEEN THE PRE GLOBALIZATION, TRANSITION
AND POST GLOBALIZATION ERA FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS ON STRATEGIC
ISSUES OF RECRUITMENT AND SELECTION SUB SYSTEMS AS WELL AS
VARIED OTHER RECRUITMENT AND SELECTION PRACTICES PERCEIVED BY
THE EMPLOYEES OF FINANCIAL SERVICES INSTITUTIONS
From the analysis of variance between the groups in the pre globalization era, transition
and post globalization era, it may be seen that the strategic issues of recruitment and
selection as well as the recruitment and selection practices are significantly differing as
perceived by the employees of these institutions.
The areas of significant difference are:
Searching through news papers
Searching through Campus selection
Searching through Consultants
Searching through Employee referrals
Searching through any other
Scanning bio-data
Conducting Subject based tests
Conducting psychological test
Group Discussions
Selecting consensus candidate
Assigning Interview criteria marks
Department visits during training
Class room lectures
Talk by CEO on mission and objectives of the company
Providing platform for employee closeness
Providing hospitality
Making new employee productive
Providing feedback by the superiors
Accepting better salary
Accepting better position and responsibilities
79
Joining on time
Satisfying department needs
The areas where the groups did not differ significantly were:
Searching through Internet, Conducting interviews and Receiving good rating for
performance.
It may be seen from the above that, the employees who perceived the strategic issues
of Recruitment and Selection as important during the pre-globalization era, transition
and post globalization era, also see the Recruitment and Selection practices of,:
Searching through news papers, Searching through Campus selection, Searching
through Consultants, Searching through Employee referrals, Searching through any
other ,Scanning bio-data Conducting Subject based tests, Conducting psychological
test, Group Discussions, Selecting consensus candidate, Assigning Interview criteria
marks, Department visits during training, Class room lectures, Talk by CEO on mission
and objectives of the company, Providing platform for employee closeness, Providing
hospitality, Making new employee productive, Providing feedback by the superiors,
Accepting better salary, Accepting better position and responsibilities, Joining on time
and Satisfying department needs, as important.
However they do not perceive the practices of Searching through Internet, Conducting
interviews and Receiving good rating for performance, as important.
INTERPRETATION:
This 'shows that but for a few exceptions the Recruitment and Selection practices has
been continuing to be effective over the different periods as perceived by the employees
of these institutions.
The analysis of variance between the (a) public limited companies,(b) private Indian and
(c) private foreign financial institutions on strategic issues of recruitment and selection
80
sub systems as well as varied other Recruitment and Selection practices are studied in
the table below. This brings out the aspect of whether the practices are significantly
differing in variance as perceived by the employees of these institutions. In case they
are found to be significantly differing, then those Recruitment and Selection practices
are seen as important, while in case they are seen to be not differing significantly then
the perception is that such practices are not so important, and therefore not effective as
perceived by the employees.
81
3.4.2 TABLE
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE BETWEEN THE PUBLIC LIMITED, PRIVATE INDIAN AND PRIVATE FOREIGN FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS ON STRATEGIC ISSUES OF RECRUITMENT AND SELECTION SUB SYSTEMS AS WELL AS VARIED OTHER
RECRUITMENT AND SELECTION PRACTICES PERCEIVED BY THE EMPLOYEES
PARAMETERS SUM OF SQUARES DF 1
MEAN SQUARE F SIG.
Business projections and Manpower requirements
Between Groups
.986 2 .493 1.980 .139
4
Within Groups 137.160 551 .249
Total 138.146 553
Ad hoc basis recruitment
Between 1.018 Groups
.509 2 096 - 1 .124
133.827 VVithin Groups
551 .243
134.845 Total
553
Replacing employee turnover in departments
Between Grouss
1.295 .647 3.419 . .033
Within Groues 104.308 551 .189
105.603 Total
553
Searching through news papers
Between 1.636 Groups
.818 3.630 .027
_,
124.128 VVithin Groups
551 .225 '
125.764 Total
553
Searching
through Internet
Between 10.595 Groups
2 5.298 40.547 .000
71.991 VVithin Groups
551 .131
82.587 Total
553
Between 9.859 Searching
Groups 4.930 29.611 , .000
through 91.729 VVithin Groups
551 .166 Campus
selection Total 101.588 553 , 7
Between 3.462 Searching
Groups 1.731 7.068 , .001
I _1
through 134.923
Within Grou_ps Consultants
551 .245 .
138.384 553 Total
82
PARAMETERS SUM OF SQUARES DF
MEAN SQUARE F SIG.
Searching
through
Employee
referrals
Between Grou es
8.157 2 4.079 31.274 ! .000
Within Grou ss 71.859 551 .130
Total 80.016 553
Anyother Between Grou • s
.083 2 .042 .336 .715
Within Groups 68.364 551 .124
Total 68.448 553
Scanning
biodata
Between Groups
11.732 2 5.866 26.923 .000
Within Groups 120.052 551 .218
Total 131.783 553
Conducting Between Groups
17.358 , 2 8.679 53.319 .000
Subject based Within Groups
89.690 551 .163 tests
Total 107.049 553
Conducting Between Groups
15.425 2 7.712 38.409 .000
psychological Within Groups
110.640 551 .201 test
Total 126.065 I 553
Group , Between
Groups 3.833 2 1.916 9.171 .000
Discussions , Within Grouss
115.144 551 .209
!i Total 118.977 553
i Conducting ! Between interviews Groups
.418 2 .209 2.109 .122
Within Groups 54.643 551 .099
Total 55.061 553
Between 4.853 Selecting ' Groups
2 2.427 11.143 .000
consensus 119.985 Within Groups
551 .218 candidate
124.838 Total
553
83
PARAMETERS SUM OF SQUARES
MEAN DF SQUARE F SIG.
Assigning
Interview
criteria marks
Between Groups
4.092 i 2.046 10.318 .000
Within Groups
109.274 551 .198
Total 113.366 553
Department
visits during
training
Between 4.439 Groups
2 2.220 9.709
i
.000
125.958 Within Groups
551 .229 1---
Total 130.397 553
Class room lectures
Between Groups
21.914 2 10.957 52.967 , .000
Within Groups 113.980 551 .207
Total 135.894 553
--t
10.017 .000 Talk by CEO on
mission and
objectives of
the company
Between Grouis
3.528 2 1.764
97.021 Within Groups
W
551 .176
Total 100.549 553 ---T
71.083 ' .000 Between 27.161 Providing
' Groups 13.580
platform for
employee
closeness
105.267 Within Groups
551 .191
Total 132.428 553
Providing hospitality
Between 12.017 Groups
2 6.009 26.176 .000
126.483 Within Groups
551 .230
138.500 Total
553
Making new Between 2.500 Groups
2 1.250 5.275 .005
employee 130.540
Within Groups 551 .237
productive 133.040
Total 553
Between 13.721 2 6.861 Providing
' Groups 30.841 .000
'I- feedback by the ^
122. 568 Within Groups L
551 .222 1 i superiors -II
136.289 Total
553
84
PARAMETERS SUM OF SQUARES
MEAN DF SQUARE F SIG.
Accepting better salary
i
Between Groups
6.752 2 j 3.376 14.162 .000
Within Groups 131.342 551 .238
Total 138.094 553
Accepting for
better position
and
responsibilities
Between Groups
12.670 6.335 27.780 .000
125.649 Within Groups
551 i .228
Total 138.319 553
Joining on time Between 15.811 Groups
7.905 52.725 1 .000
82.615 Within Groups
551 .150
Total 98.426 553
Receiving good
rating for
performance
Between i Groups
5.086 2 2.543 28.041 .000
Within Groups 49.975
. 551 , .091
Total 1 55.061 553
Satisfying Between 21.811 Groups
2 10.906 51.701 .000
department 116.226
Within Groups 1 551 .211
needs
Total 138.038 553
85
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE BETWEEN THE PUBLIC LIMITED, PRIVATE INDIAN AND PRIVATE FOREIGN FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS ON STRATEGIC ISSUES OF RECRUITMENT AND SELECTION SUB SYSTEMS AS WELL AS VARIED OTHER
RECRUITMENT AND SELECTION PRACTICES PERCEIVED BY THE EMPLOYEES
From the analysis of variance between the public limited, private Indian and private
foreign financial institutions on strategic issues of Recruitment and Selection sub
systems as well as varied other Recruitment and Selection practices perceived by the
employees, it may be seen that the strategic issues of Recruitment and Selection as
well as the Recruitment and Selection practices are significantly differing as perceived
by the employees of these institutions.
The areas of significant difference are:
Replacing employee turnover in department
Searching through news papers
Searching through Internet
Searching through Campus selection
Searching through Consultants
Searching through Employee referrals
Searching through any other
Scanning biodata
Conducting Subject based tests
Conducting psychological test
Group Discussions
Selecting consensus candidate
Assigning Interview criteria marks
Department visits during training
Class room lectures
Talk by CEO on mission and objectives of the company
Providing platform for employee closeness
Providing hospitality
Making new employee productive
86
Providing feedback by the superiors
Accepting better salary
Accepting better position and responsibilities
Joining on time
Receiving good rating for performance and
Satisfying department needs
The areas where the groups did not differ significantly were:
Business projections and Manpower requirements
Ad hoc basis recruitment and Conducting interviews.
FINDING
It may be seen from the above that, the employees in the public limited, private Indian
and private foreign financial institutions who perceived the strategic issues of
Recruitment and selection as important ,also see the recruitment and selection
practices of:, Replacing employee turnover in department, Searching through news
papers, Searching through Campus selection, Searching through Consultants,
Searching through Employee referrals, Searching through Internet„ Searching through
any other source ,Scanning biodata Conducting Subject based tests, Conducting
psychological test, Group Discussions, Selecting consensus candidate, Assigning
Interview criteria marks, Department visits during training, Class room lectures, Talk by
CEO on mission and objectives of the company, Providing platform for employee
closeness, Providing hospitality, Making new employee productive, Providing feedback
by the superiors, Accepting better salary, Accepting better position and responsibilities,
Joining on time, Receiving good rating for performance and Satisfying department
needs ,as important.
INTERPRETATION:
This shows that apart from a few exceptions the Recruitment and Selection practices
have been continuing to be effective in the different types of institutions [by ownership]
in the financial services sectors, as perceived by the employees of these institutions.
87
The analysis of variance between the major financial services sectors such as (a)
Indian and (b)foreign financial institutions,(c)mutual funds,(d) custodians, (e) credit
rating agencies,(f) stock exchanges,(g)insurance companies,(h) regulator and
(i)depository, on strategic issues of recruitment and selection sub systems as well as
varied recruitment and selection practices are studied in the table below.This brings out
the aspect of whether the practices are significantly differing in variance as perceived
by the employees of these institutions. In case they are found to be significantly
differing, then those recruitment and selection practices are seen as important, while in
case they are seen to be not differing significantly then the perception is that such
practices are not so important and therefore not effective, as perceived by the
employees.
88
3.4.3 TABLE ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE BETWEEN THE MAJOR FINANCIAL SERVICES
SECTORS SUCH AS INDIAN AND FOREIGN FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS, MUTUAL FUNDS, CUSTODIANS, CREDIT RATING AGENCIES, STOCK EXCHANGES,
INSURANCE COMPANIES, REGULATOR AND DEPOSITORY ON STRATEGIC ISSUES OF RECRUITMENT AND SELECTION SUB SYSTEMS AS WELL AS
VARIED OTHER RECRUITMENT AND SELECTION PRACTICES PERCEIVED BY THE EMPLOYEES
PARAMETERS SUM OF SQUARES DF MEAN
SQUARE F SIG.
Business projections
and Manpower
requirements
Between Groups
34.069 8 4.259 22.300 .000
Within Groups 104.078 545 .191
Total 138.146 553
Ad hoc basis recruitment
Between Groups
17.298 8 2.162 10.025 .000
Within Groups 117.547 545 .216
Total 134.845 553
Replacing employee turnover in
departments
Between Groups
21.497 8 2.687 17.413 .000
Within Groups 84.106 545 .154
Total 105.603 553
Searching through news
papers
Between Groups
23.221 8 2.903 15.427 .000
Within Groups 102.543 545 .188
Total 125.764 553
Searching
through
Internet
Between Groups
17.742 8 2.218 18.640 .000
Within Groups 64.845 545 .119
Total 82.587 553
Searching
through
Campus
selection
Between Groups
24.889 8 3.111 22.106 .000
Within Grouss 76.700 545 .141
Total 101.588 553
89
PARAMETERS SUM OF SQUARE
S DF MEAN
SQUARE F SIG.
Searching
through
Consultants
Between Groups
36.047 8 4.506 23.996 .000
Within Groups 102.337 545 .188
Total 138.384 553
Searching
through
Employee
referrals
Between Groups
12.445 8 1.556 12.547 I .000
Within Groups 67.571 545 .124
Total 80.016 553
Any other
Between Groups
27.464 8 3A33 45.653 .000
.... . vvithin Groups
40.983 545 .075
Total 68.448 553
Scanning
biodata
Between Groups
37.436 8 4.680 27.031 .000
Within Groups 94.347 545 .173
Total 131.783 553
Conducting , Between I Groups
46.373 8 5.797 52.067 .000
Subject based
tests Within Groups 60.676 545 .111
Total 107.049 553
Conducting
psychological
test
Between Groups
70.227 8 8.778 85.681 .000
Within Groups 55.838 545 .102
Total 126.065 553
Between Group Groups
44.604 8 5.576 40.857 .000
74.372 Discussions Within Groups 545 .136
Total _, 118.977 553
90
PARAMETERS SUM OF SQUARE S
DF MEAN SQUARE
F SIG.
Conducting Between Groups
2.129 8 .266 2.741 .006
interviews Within Groups 52.932 545 .097
Total 55.061 553
Between Groups
24.088 8 3.011 16.288 .000
Selecting
consensus
candidate
Within Groups 100.749 545 .185
Total 124.838 553
I
Assigning
Interview
criteria marks
Between 15.399 Grou•s
8 1 1.925 10.708 .000
Within Groups 97.967 545 .180
Total 113.366
1
553
Department
visits during
training
Between Groups
25.740 8 i 3.217 16.755 .000
Within Groups 104.658 545 I .192
Total 130.397 553
Class room lectures _.,
Between Groups
28.997 8 3.625 18.480 .000
Within Groups 106.897 545 .196
Total 135.894 553
Talk by CEO
on mission
and objectives
of the
company
Between 13.101 Groups
8 i 1.638 10.206 .000
Within Groups 87.448 545 j .160
Total 100.549
III
553
Providing
platform for
employee
closeness
Between 55.728 1 Groups
8 1 6.966 49.498 .000
i Within Groups 76.700 545 I .141
! Total 132.428 553
Providing hospitality
Between , Groups
34.462 8 4.308 22.566 .000
' Within Groups 104.038 545 I .191
Total 138.500 553
91
PARAMETERS SUM OF SQUARE
S DF
MEAN SQUARE
F SIG.
Making new
employee Between Groups
33.086 8 4.136 22.550 .000
productive Within Groups
99.953 545 .183
Total 133.040 553
Providing Between Groups
49.062 8 6.133 38.318 .000
feedback by
the superiors Within Grouis
87.227 545 .160
Total 136.289 553
Accepting better salary
Between Groups
40.280 8 , 5.035 28.054 .000
Within Groups
97.814 545 179
Total 138.094 553
Accepting better position and responsibilities
Between Groups
24.928 8 3.116 14.976 .000
Within Groups
113.392 545 208
Total 138.319 553
Joining on time Between Groups
41.735 8 5.217 50.152 .000
Within Groups
56.691 545 .104
Total 98.426 553
Receiving good rating for performance
Between Groups
9.609 8 1.201 14.401 I .000
Within 145.453 Groups
545 .083
Total 55.061 553
Satisfying
department
needs
Between 45.352 Groups
8 5.669 33.334 .000
Within 92.686 Groups
545 .170
Total 138.038 553
92
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE BETWEEN THE MAJOR FINANCIAL SERVICES SECTORS SUCH AS INDIAN AND FOREIGN FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS, MUTUAL
FUNDS, CUSTODIANS, CREDIT RATING AGENCIES, STOCK EXCHANGES, INSURANCE COMPANIES, REGULATOR AND DEPOSITORY ON STRATEGIC ISSUES OF RECRUITMENT AND SELECTION SUB SYSTEMS AS WELL AS
VARIED OTHER RECRUITMENT AND SELECTION PRACTICES PERCEIVED BY THE EMPLOYEES
From the analysis of variance between the major financial services sectors such as
Indian and foreign financial institutions, mutual funds, custodians, credit rating agencies,
stock exchanges, insurance companies, regulator and depository on strategic issues of
recruitment and selection sub systems as well as varied Recruitment and Selection
practices perceived by the employees, it may be seen that the strategic issues of
Recruitment and Selection as well as the Recruitment and Selection practices are
significantly differing as perceived by the employees of these institutions.
The areas of significant difference are:
Business projections and Manpower requirements
Ad hoc basis recruitment
Replacing employee turnover in department
Searching through news papers
Searching through Internet
Searching through Campus selection
Searching through Consultants
Searching through Employee referrals
Searching through any other
Scanning bio-data
Conducting Subject based tests
Conducting psychological test
Group Discussions
Conducting interviews
Selecting consensus candidate
Assigning Interview criteria marks
Department visits during training
93
Class room lectures
Talk by CEO on mission and objectives of the company
Providing platform for employee closure ness
Providing hospitality
Making new employee productive
Providing feedback by the superiors
Accepting better salary
Accepting for better position and responsibilities
Joining on time
Receiving good rating for performance and
Satisfying department needs.
FINDING:
It may be seen from the above that, the employees in the major financial services
sectors such as Indian and foreign financial institutions, mutual funds, custodians, credit
rating agencies, stook exchanges insurance companies, regulator and depository who
perceived the strategic issues of Recruitment and selection as important, also see the
recruitment and selection practices of Business projections and Manpower
requirements, Adhoc basis recruitment, Replacing employee turnover in department,
Searching through news papers, Searching through Campus selection, Searching
through Consultants. Searching through Employee referrals, Searching through
Internet„ Searching through any other ,Scanning biodata Conducting Subject based
tests, Conducting psychological test, group Discussions, Selecting consensus
candidate, Assigning Interview criteria marks, Department visits during training, Class
room lectures, Talk by CEO on mission and objectives of the company, Providing
platform for employee closeness, Providing hospitality, Making new employee
productive, Providing feedback by the superiors, Accepting better salary, Accepting
better position and responsibilities, Joining on time, Receiving good rating for
performance and Satisfying department needs ,as important.
94
INTERPRETATION:
This shows that without exception the Recruitment and Selection practices have been
continuing to be effective over the different financial services sectors, as perceived by
the employees of these institutions.
95