EVALUATION CRITERIA - acce.in · EVALUATION CRITERIA CONSTRUCTION ... Alternatives considered and the reasoning for the selection of the adapted system ... ACCE\(I\)-L&T FORMWORK

No.2, UVCE Alumni Association Building, K R Circle, Bangalore 560 001, INDIA.

Telephone: +91-080-22247466 Website: www.acce.in 1 of 3 Pages

EVALUATION CRITERIA

CONSTRUCTION AND CONTRACTS), CHENNAI C. INCEPTED SINCE: 2001

D. PERIODICITY OF THE AWARD: ANNUAL

E. NUMBER OF INIDIVIDUALS WHO HAVE BEEN CONFERRED THIS AWARD THUS FAR:

F. General Criteria for selection for the Award:

For this award, work executed using any material for formwork for any kind of structure will be considered, primarily focusing on innovativeness, economy, adaptability, ease of usage, repeatability, localization, indigenization, etc.

The magnitude and volume of work executed shall not be a criterion for evaluation.

The work designed should have been incorporated in the project and project shall not be more than 3 years old as on closing date of filing nomination.

The criteria for selection for this award shall be based on the following by giving appropriate weightage for all/some of the following, the discretion for which shall rest with the jury duly constituted for the purpose:

1. Alternatives considered and the reasoning for the selection of the adapted system/design. 2. Innovativeness in the design of formwork. 3. Usage of unconventional support systems. 4. Effective usage of locally available material to achieve the desired results. 5. Effective usage of material and/or technology for cost saving/economy, including recycling/reuse of an existing

material, without compromising on the quality of the finish. 6. Development of a new system resulting in patenting the same. 7. Effective development of forms and features without additional external intervention either for aesthetics or

architectural requirements. 8. Development of additional skill set for the personnel deployed in the usage of the system. 9. Intrinsic knowledge enhancement because of the usage of the system for the personnel. 10. Ease of usage of the system in comparison with other considered alternatives. 11. Scalability of the locally available talent for the execution of the same. 12. Additional training required for the execution of the developed system. 13. Probable shortcomings identified in the design stage, for which the design was modified before execution. 14. Unlisted shortcomings experienced during execution, and the remedial measures initiated to overcome the

same. 15. Development of an alternative to an existing patented system.

A. SHORT TITLE OF THE AWARD: ACCE(I) – L & T FORMWORK AWARD 2018B. INSTITUTED BY: LARSEN & TOUBRO LIMITED, ECC DIVISION (ENGINEERING

No.2, UVCE Alumni Association Building, K R Circle, Bangalore 560 001, INDIA.

Telephone: +91-080-22247466 Website: www.acce.in 2 of 3 Pages

16. Enhancement of the number of repetitive cycles of usage in comparison with the existing systems. 17. Need for usage of any specialized equipment for the assembly and dismantling of the adapted system. 18. Has this system been tried/used earlier, upon which improvements have been incorporated for this project –

if yes, please provide details of the earlier attempts. 19. Recipient of any special recognition/awards earlier from other Organization/s. 20. Expression of willingness to share knowledge about this system, with the engineering fraternity for the

betterment of the community in particular and our Country in general. 21. System adopted, a development of an Individual or a team. Please provide details. 22. If the system was a collaborative effort by various stake holders, please provide details of all the entities

involved in the development of the system. 23. Desired finish been a result exclusively due the deployment of the system adapted, or was there a contribution

from the used material also. 24. Special materials/admixtures used in the development of Concrete for this work. 25. Submission of any other relevant information pertaining to the award.

No.2, UVCE Alumni Association Building, K R Circle, Bangalore 560 001, INDIA.

Telephone: +91-080-22247466 Website: www.acce.in 3 of 3 Pages

EVALUATION METHODOLOGY 1. Upon receipt of nomination for an Award, the same would be scrutinized for its completeness in terms of necessary

submissions and compliance of the terms and conditions pertaining to the Award.

2. Such of those nominations, which are deficient in terms of submissions and compliance of the terms and conditions pertaining to the Award will be summarily rejected, with due intimation citing reason for rejection to the nominee.

4. Nominees of such of those carried over nominations, would be informed in advance about the status, and would be requested to submit additional information, if any, about the previously submitted project if they wish to share with the Jury.

5. A jury comprising of select members of ACCE(I) and Industry experts would be constituted for the evaluation of the nominations.

6. The nominations would be evaluated independently by each member of Jury and evaluated on certain pre-formulated criteria arrived at by mutual discussion, by the Honorable members of the Jury.

7. The cumulative marking of the nominations by the Jury will determine the ranking of the nominations for a particular Award.

8. In case of requirement of additional information/data from a particular nomination, the Jury, will seek such information/data and the nominee will have to provide such information or validate information provided, to further continue to be evaluated. Failure to do so will invalidate the nomination.

9. On a need based requirement, nominees should take care of travel, local transport, and hospitality, for the Jury Member/s who might visit the Project site for collation of additional information/data or for validating the submission of the nominee.

10. Upon conclusion of the evaluation, nominees of the top two/three nominations based on the number of nominations received would be informed by email and/or post about the status of their submissions.

11. The number of nominations being given presentation time will be at the sole discretion of ACCE(I).

13. A separate time slot will be provided for the Q & A session at the conclusion of the Presentations for each Award, for the queries raised either by the Honorable members of the Jury and/or Audience/Gathering.

14. The Audience/Gathering will also help in evaluating the Project, based on the Presentation made, by answering a pre-qualified questionnaire that will be distributed on the day of the Presentation.

15. The Award winning nomination will be determined by the cumulative total of the responses received from the Jury and the Audience/Gathering.

16. A weightage of 70 percent will be given to the evaluation of the Jury and the Audience/Gathering responses will have 30 percent weightage in determining the winner for an Award.

17. If there is only one nomination for a particular Award, there is no binding on ACCE(I) to award the nomination.

18. Further in the opinion of the Jury, if they find that a few/all nominations for a particular Award, are meeting the requirements for the Award, ACCE(I) has the right to remove the Award from the list for the year under consideration.

19. The clear winning nomination of the Award, will be announced and presented, during the Gala Awards Night, hosted ACCE(I), on the day of the Awards and Foundation Day celebrations in the Evening.

20. ACCE(I) will take care of basic hospitality during the event at the venue of the Awards ceremony. ACCE(I) does not commit itself to provide any form of Travel, Transport, Lodging or any other such facilities either local or otherwise, for attending/participating in the event.

3. As per tradition being followed over the years, the first and the second runner up of the previous year (2017) evaluation nominations will also be carried over/added to the respective category of Awards for the year 2017.

12. The top three nominees for each award, will have to make a presentation about their Project, for a duration not exceeding 10 Minutes, before the Jury and the Audience/Gathering, during the First Session (Morning) on the day of the Awards Function