Top Banner
Evaluating the impact of integrated local delivery on enhancing ecosystem services resilience Chris Short, Janet Dwyer (CCRI) & Jenny Phelps (FWAG)
13

Evaluating the impact of integrated local delivery on enhancing ecosystem services resilience

Jan 19, 2017

Download

Environment

Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Evaluating the impact of integrated local delivery on enhancing ecosystem services resilience

Evaluating the impact of integrated local delivery on

enhancing ecosystem services resilience

Chris Short, Janet Dwyer (CCRI) & Jenny Phelps (FWAG)

Page 2: Evaluating the impact of integrated local delivery on enhancing ecosystem services resilience

Outline

• Introduce WILD project & link to nexus• Outline approach: reporting & governance• Issues of evaluation and ‘proof of concept’• Implications for institutions & policy• Some concluding thoughts

Page 3: Evaluating the impact of integrated local delivery on enhancing ecosystem services resilience

WILD project

• Water and Integrated Local Delivery– in area of 25,000 ha (Cotswolds & Swindon)

• Improvements to rivers through partnership• Key driver WFD and initial EA funding• Farmers, local communities & agencies• Range of activity, linked to lead partner• Led by FWAG, CCRI role to evaluate

Page 4: Evaluating the impact of integrated local delivery on enhancing ecosystem services resilience
Page 5: Evaluating the impact of integrated local delivery on enhancing ecosystem services resilience

Reporting & Governance

• ILD links the local to strategic objectives– makes ‘the local’ relevant to the govt agency– brings ‘a face’ from the agency at local level

• Joining up within project– Reporting and recording

• Getting message out across project area

Page 6: Evaluating the impact of integrated local delivery on enhancing ecosystem services resilience
Page 7: Evaluating the impact of integrated local delivery on enhancing ecosystem services resilience
Page 8: Evaluating the impact of integrated local delivery on enhancing ecosystem services resilience
Page 9: Evaluating the impact of integrated local delivery on enhancing ecosystem services resilience

Evaluation & proof of concept

• Social-ecological system resilience (Biggs et al 2012)

• Critical friend • Proof of concept

– Via CBA• Need SES too

Page 10: Evaluating the impact of integrated local delivery on enhancing ecosystem services resilience

Key findings:

• Evidence of Engagement, Communication, Knowledge, Consistency & Trust

• Multi-layer challenges tackled at local level• Need facilitator & agency to ‘stand-back’• Clear evidence of increased understanding

– Up & down stream impacts, role of soil etc.

Page 11: Evaluating the impact of integrated local delivery on enhancing ecosystem services resilience

Implications for institutions & policy

• The nexus of water issues in the EA– WFD, flooding, biodiversity, planning …

• Farmers cautiously emerging from isolation• Local authorities challenged by process• Communities embrace opportunity• Private funding sources cautiously engaged

Page 12: Evaluating the impact of integrated local delivery on enhancing ecosystem services resilience

Concluding thoughts

• UK ‘important arena’ for nexus as ‘tool for action’ (Cairns & Krzywoszynska 2016)

• Need a ‘gathering’ of nexus projects?• Transferability tricky as cases bespoke

– Framework not a blueprint or model• A common framework for comparisons• Compare evaluation approaches on 1 project

Page 13: Evaluating the impact of integrated local delivery on enhancing ecosystem services resilience

THANK YOU, ANY QUESTIONS

@chrisshortccri,, [email protected] @[email protected] @deliverymodel