7/29/2019 Evaluating Information Architecture
1/12
Evaluating Information Architecture
Izabella Warner
Information Architecture for the Web
Site location: www.defencejobs.gov.au
Site purpose: To provide information regarding defence force career and study options and
associated benefits.
Target audience: Prospective and current recruits and their families and friends.
OrganisationalSystems
OrganisationalSchemes
Sharedcharacteristicsofcontentitemsandtheirgroupings
The information on the sites is organised according to a topical hierarchy allowing for fast
and streamlined navigation of the content. Content is organised according to the three main
divisions of the Australian defence forces that being: Army, Navy and Air force, as well as ageneral education and recruitment section.
The organisational scheme defines the shared characteristics of each of the three main
sections of content and logically groups information under major topical sections:
lifestyle
training
pay and benefits
jobs
7/29/2019 Evaluating Information Architecture
2/12
reserve and
technology
These sections are consistent for all three categories and provide a clear navigation across
the site (see Figure 1 below). Each category has its own associated phrase (Air Force
Accomplished, Army Challenge yourself, Navy The team works) I think the recognition of
the different sections could be further aided by applying a more aggressive colour scheme to
differentiate the various sections of the site and give each section a more defined branding.
This would increase the chances that visitors would be able to make a lasting, unconscious
connection between a given colour/branding scheme and content of the site, aiding future
information retrieval.
Figure 1: Shared content categories for each of the three main defence force branches.
Breadthvsdepthofthesite
The site is in essence broad in structure. There are many categories for the user to choose
from and not as many levels of information that the user needs to penetrate to get to the
content in mind.
Hybridorganisationalstructuresandschemes
The site successfully combines topics and tasks on their main page and within the
navigational menu making use of a shallow hybrid scheme. The information is also, by
default of being organised by topic (army, navy, air force), geared towards specific audience
types. This caterers for repeat visitors who will only be interested in one of the three topical
areas. In essence the site is a series of three mini sites which, are organised in the same
fashion ensuring that once a visitor becomes familiar with one section browsing through the
others can be based on recalling the major navigational menus.
Figure 2: Shared content categories for each of the three main defence force branches.
7/29/2019 Evaluating Information Architecture
3/12
The site control requirements cater to both the experience user who knows what section of
the site there are heading to, and the less experienced user by providing a consistent, clear
navigation strip at the top of each page (see figure 2 above). This navigation allows users to
quickly re-position themselves within the site and exit to the home area by making actions
and options highly visible.
Basic instructions for use of the system, like Apply Now and Contact Us are easily
retrievable from most places on the site.
The design of the site is minimalistic and streamlined. There is a lot of information on the
site with additional information being accessible via a link so that the details are available,
but dont interfere with the more relevant content.
The site has also an extensive help and documentation section including FAQs
Taxonomy
The taxonomy of the site is based on the three main branches of the defence forces: army,
navy and air force as well as a general education and recruitment section. These categories
are coherent and logical. Content is specific to each section and the degree of overlap is
limited to general information which is the same for each category.
LabellingandVocabularyControl
The labelling of content on the site is clear, consistent and effective. The language used is
professional and free of jargon or specialised terminology. The site maintains a good match
with the real world through the use of words, phrases and concepts which, are familiar to the
everyday user.
Navigation
The global and secondary navigational structures are effective and consistent across the
site.
Conclusion
This is a well organised website with clear, concise and effective content labelling and
navigation. The structures and systems used in the major sections are intuitive and aid
information recall for subsequent visits. I think a stronger branding would aid visual
7/29/2019 Evaluating Information Architecture
4/12
navigation of the site with the three main areas of army, navy and air force benefiting from a
more defined visual identity.
7/29/2019 Evaluating Information Architecture
5/12
Site location: www.arc.gov.au
Site purpose: To provide information on research and innovation policy and programs
supported by the Australian government.
Target audience: Government grant seekers (researchers) and the general public
OrganisationalSystems
OrganisationalSchemes
Sharedcharacteristicsofcontentitemsandtheirgroupings
The information on the sites is organised according to topic as reflected by the main
navigation in Figure 3 below.
Figure 3: Main topical navigation menu of the ARC website.
The main navigation menu is a little ambiguous with sections such as About ARC and
General Information causing confusion at first glance. One needs to click on the General
Information link to discover that this section contains informationpublishedonthispage
relatestovariousaspectsoftheARC'sbusinessandactivitiesthatmaybeofinteresttomembersof
7/29/2019 Evaluating Information Architecture
6/12
theresearchandgeneralcommunities,andothers. This only creates further confusion as to
how, this section differs from the ARC-Supported Activities section. Essentially the site is
very content-heavy and requires careful reading to discover what a given section is about.
This leads to the first time user having to wander through the site and visit various sections
before being able to find the desired content.
A possible way to aid quicker identification of what each section is about would be to include
bolded text at the beginning of each section which, would describe, in a short sentence, what
information that section contains. For example, purpose of the section National Competitive
Grants Program isnt clear until the reader gets down to the bullet point about funding for
research activities. A suggestion would be to present the content with a heading and a
descriptor sentence underneath as seen below.
National Competitive Grants Program (NCGP)
Funding Australias highest-quality research
The use of additional headings on each page would also aid the scanning of information and
quicker identification of relevant content.
Breadthvsdepthofthesite
At first glance, it is difficult to make an assessment if the site is deep or broad in structure.
There are a lot of categories on some pages such as the National Competitive Grants
Program making the site broad. In most instances there is also considerable depth to the
structure and users are asked to drill down through many levels before they reach the
desired information. This makes the site rather complex.
Hybridorganisationalstructuresandschemes
The site is organised according to topic or subject matter. I think however that the site would
benefit greatly from being more audience/task focused. From a preliminary assessment
some of the content on the site is clearly aimed at researchers and administering institutions
wanting to:
find out more about different funding opportunities National Competitive Grants
Program
find out how, when and who can apply for funding Information for Applicants
actually apply for funding by submitting a proposal RMS log in
manage their user records
7/29/2019 Evaluating Information Architecture
7/12
One suggestion would be to clearly divide the site into sections which support the tasks
associated with initial information discovery about funding, application process and
management.
Figure 4: Action box, informing the user that they are about to be taken to an external site without giving the
option to return to the ARC pages.
The areas for performing actions on the site are limited to the ERA Login section and the
RMS/GAMS Login. The ERA Login section lacks any basic instructions for use of the
system. On the other hand, the RMS/GAMS Login link leads the user to a page over
loaded with information and the actual log in link is not clearly visible.
There is also a link on the site, which takes the user away to an external page for the
Minister responsible for the portfolio (Figure 4). The user is informed that they will exit the
ARC site and be taken to a different page. However, there is only one option to accept this
and proceed to the new site. The user is not presented with the option in the action dialogue
box to stay on the ARC site. While the back button can be used to cancel the action I find
that a lot of users are will not make the switch from page navigation to the browser function
to perform this action.
Taxonomy,LabellingandVocabularyControl
The taxonomy of the site is polyhierarchical and ambiguous. The categories used to group
content are not exclusive, in fact under such menus as About ARC, General Information
and Information for Applicants I can see content that could easily belong in either grouping.
The labelling of content on the site is a little obscure. For example on the Information for
Applicants page there are links labelled.
Information for researchers
7/29/2019 Evaluating Information Architecture
8/12
Information to applicants
Since the ARC provides funding for research, the applicants are researchers and thus it is
not clear how the content of those two links differ. What is also not clear is how the linklabelled Information for Applicants differs from the link Instructions to applicants. Also the
use of similar phrases like Progress reports and Reporting requirements can be
confusing because the phrases suggest that both of these are referring to the same
information (Figure 8 below).
The language used throughout the site is consistent and very much what one would expect
from a government publication characterised by broad policy statements and jargon. There
is a range of acronyms used in links for example FOR, RFCD, SEO, ANZSIC Codes which
assumes the user is familiar with those terms and able to identify the content hidden behind
such links.
Navigation
The global navigational structure is consistent throughout the site. When a user clicks on
one of the top links the text becomes blue and there is a bread-crumb trail activated above
the given page heading. This is a very useful navigational structure given how complex and
content heavy the site is. There is, however, an inconsistency in the mechanisms. When a
user selects the ARC-supported Activities, section the General Information section
becomes blue (See figure 5 below).
Figure 5: Inconsistency in the way the main navigation displays.
The secondary navigational structure is not consistent across the site and does create some
confusion. On the home page the left hand side supporting navigation bar displays a series
of Quick Links (see Figure 6 below). These seem to have been chosen based on the
information seeking needs of a wide range of audiences from potential applicants for grants
Instructions to applicants to job seekers Job Vacancies to obscure links such as File
Lists which do not reveal the type of user they are intended for or the type of content they
might be hiding.
7/29/2019 Evaluating Information Architecture
9/12
Figure 6: ARC home page with a Quick Links left hand side menu.
The left hand side navigation menu changes depending which page the user selects. If one
is on the About ARC page the Quick links change to a selection of links with general
information about the Council and its operations (Figure 7 below.)
Figure 7: Left hand side link on the About ARC page.
When a user selects the Information for Applicants link the left hand side navigation
changes again and displays a series of links with information about the ARC grantapplication process. On this page however the links on the side are also replicated in the
7/29/2019 Evaluating Information Architecture
10/12
main body of the text albeit not in the same order with some information only appearing on
the left hand side navigation and some on the page (Figure 8 below). A better way of
organising the information in the body of the page would be to outline a typical application
process and provide contextual links to further information. This would allow users to
identify the particular stage of application they are at and permit them to locate the desired
content quicker.
Figure 8: Left hand side links on the Information for Applicants page and links in the body of the content.
Conclusion
This is a very content heavy site with some ambiguity in the navigation structure and content
labelling. The inconsistencies in structures and systems used across the site hinder intuitive
information recall for subsequent visits.
7/29/2019 Evaluating Information Architecture
11/12
Figure 9: Example of screen space being wasted on repeating links from the side navigation in the body of the
text.
Figure 10: Example of screen space being wasted on repeating links from the side navigation in the body of the
text.
The site often replicates information like in the example above (Figure 9 and 10) where linksfrom the side menu are repeated in the body of the page. This produces information
7/29/2019 Evaluating Information Architecture
12/12
redundancy, can be confusing for the reader and increases the amount of clicks required
before information is located.
The site would benefit greatly from an architectural overhaul. My suggestion would be to
conduct a thorough content inventory and analysis. Approaching the design of information
architecture from a more audience centric angle and grouping the content based on the
purpose of the visit of a given user is recommended. One such approach would be to
assume that a typical user visits the ARC site to:
1. obtain information about the ARC
2. seek information about research funding
3. seek information about ARC activities such as the ERA initiative
This way of organising content would also align with the overall organisational goals of the
ARC.
The use of a A-Z index for organising information for applicants would also be beneficial and
allow users to locate content much more quickly.
While pull down menus can pose accessibility challenges their use could also benefit the site
by providing users a quick glance at some of the content behind a given link.