Top Banner
Euthanasia Euthanasia Part IV Part IV Ethics Dr. Jason M. Chang
7

Euthanasia Part IV Ethics Dr. Jason M. Chang. David Velleman, “Against the Right to Die” “The most important way in which the option of euthanasia may.

Jan 20, 2016

Download

Documents

Ashlie Young
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Euthanasia Part IV Ethics Dr. Jason M. Chang. David Velleman, “Against the Right to Die” “The most important way in which the option of euthanasia may.

EuthanasiaEuthanasia

Part IVPart IVEthics

Dr. Jason M. Chang

Page 2: Euthanasia Part IV Ethics Dr. Jason M. Chang. David Velleman, “Against the Right to Die” “The most important way in which the option of euthanasia may.

David Velleman, “Against the Right to Die”

“The most important way in which the option of euthanasia may harm patients [..] is that it will deny them the possibility of staying alive by default.”

Page 3: Euthanasia Part IV Ethics Dr. Jason M. Chang. David Velleman, “Against the Right to Die” “The most important way in which the option of euthanasia may.

Ben Mattlin

“I’ve lived so close to death for so long that I know how thin and porous the border between coercion and free choice is, how easy it is for someone to inadvertently influence you to feel devalued and hopeless — to pressure you ever so slightly but decidedly into being ‘reasonable,’ to unburdening others, to ‘letting go’.”

Page 4: Euthanasia Part IV Ethics Dr. Jason M. Chang. David Velleman, “Against the Right to Die” “The most important way in which the option of euthanasia may.

Ben Mattlin

“[Forces of coercion] include that certain look of exhaustion in a loved one’s eyes, or the way nurses

and friends sigh in your presence while you’re zoned out in a hospital bed. All these can cast a dangerous

cloud of depression upon even the most cheery of optimists, a situation clinicians might misread since, to them, it seems perfectly rational. And in a sense,

it is rational, given the dearth of alternatives. If nobody wants you at the party, why should you

stay?”

Page 5: Euthanasia Part IV Ethics Dr. Jason M. Chang. David Velleman, “Against the Right to Die” “The most important way in which the option of euthanasia may.

Imposition on Doctors

“Different people, of different religious and ethical beliefs, embrace very different convictions about

which way of dying confirms and which contradicts the value of their lives […] None of these

dramatically different attitudes about the meaning of death can be dismissed as irrational. None should be

imposed, either by the pressure of doctors or relatives or by the fiat of government, on people who

reject it.”

(The Philosophers’ Brief, 1997)

Page 6: Euthanasia Part IV Ethics Dr. Jason M. Chang. David Velleman, “Against the Right to Die” “The most important way in which the option of euthanasia may.

American Medical Association

“The intentional termination of the life of one human being by another – mercy killing – is contrary to that

for which the medical profession stands and is contrary to the policy of the American Medical

Association.”

(AMA, Opinions of Judicial Council, 1973)

Page 7: Euthanasia Part IV Ethics Dr. Jason M. Chang. David Velleman, “Against the Right to Die” “The most important way in which the option of euthanasia may.

Willard Gaylin

“[I]f physicians become killers or are even licensed to kill, the profession – and, therewith, each physician – will never again be worthy of trust and

respect as healer and comforter and protector of life in all its frailty.”