EUROPEAN UNION INTERNAL MARKET LAWassets.cambridge.org/.../9781107035355_frontmatter.pdf · EUROPEAN UNION INTERNAL MARKET LAW This is the market’s most student-friendly textbook
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
EUROPEAN UNION INTERNAL MARKET LAW
This is the market’s most student-friendly textbook on EU internal market law,covering everything students need to know about the legal and regulatoryframework of the internal market and eliminating the need for a full EU law text.Concise and focused, chapters explore the underlying socio-economic andhistorical contexts of EU law, and offer a thorough examination of the law’stechnical aspects, ensuring that students gain a rich understanding of the way thatlegal rules and structures have developed from key political and social debates. Keyconcepts are illustrated by excerpts, summaries and discussions of classic andmodern cases. Numerous features include text boxes, illustrative cases, legalinterpretations, tables, and suggestions for further reading, which support studentswith little background knowledge of the subject, leading them to total mastery ofthe material.
Friedl Weiss is Professor at the Department of European, International Law andComparative Law, University of Vienna.
Clemens Kaupa is Assistant Professor at the Department of Transnational LegalStudies, VU University Amsterdam.
Cambridge University Press978-1-107-03535-5 - European Union Internal Market LawFriedl Weiss and Clemens KaupaFrontmatterMore information
University Printing House, Cambridge CB2 8BS, United Kingdom
Cambridge University Press is part of the University of Cambridge.
It furthers the University’s mission by disseminating knowledge in the pursuit ofeducation, learning and research at the highest international levels of excellence.
www.cambridge.orgInformation on this title: www.cambridge.org/9781107636002
This publication is in copyright. Subject to statutory exceptionand to the provisions of relevant collective licensing agreements,no reproduction of any part may take place without the writtenpermission of Cambridge University Press.
First published 2014
Printed in the United Kingdom by Clays, St Ives plc.
A catalogue record for this publication is available from the British Library
ISBN 978-1-107-03535-5 HardbackISBN 978-1-107-63600-2 Paperback
Cambridge University Press has no responsibility for the persistence or accuracy ofURLs for external or third-party internet websites referred to in this publication,and does not guarantee that any content on such websites is, or will remain,accurate or appropriate.
Cambridge University Press978-1-107-03535-5 - European Union Internal Market LawFriedl Weiss and Clemens KaupaFrontmatterMore information
1.1 Overview of the Treaty freedom provisions page 31.2 Overview of the major Treaty reforms 41.3 Various preferences regarding European integration, according to
Leon Lindberg 61.4 Overview of TFEU provisions 111.5 Exclusive and shared competences, according to Articles 3 and 4 TFEU 141.6 Central provisions authorizing secondary law in regard to the Treaty
freedoms 152.1 Common structure 182.2 Internal market provisions having direct effect (according to the
Court’s case law) 202.3 Overview of the principal measures governing the movement rights
of Turkish citizens in the EU 283.1 Schematic overview of the steps of economic integration according
to Bela Balassa 373.2 Overview of the main Treaty provisions with regard to the free
movement of goods 403.3 Delineating the free movement of goods from the other Treaty
freedoms 423.4 Excerpt from Annex I to Council Regulation 2658/87 on the tariff and
statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff 523.5 Selling arrangements 633.6 Schemes of geographical indications 773.7 Examples of harmonized measures 803.8 Examples of harmonized standards in the field of machinery 803.9 Important secondary law on consumer protection 823.10 Differentiating between Article 30 TFEU and Article 110 TFEU 873.11 Comparison between Article 110(1) and Article 110(2) TFEU 914.1 Overview of Union citizenship provisions 974.2 Schematic overview of three cases that were not considered to be
“purely internal” to a Member State by the Court 1054.3 Restrictions of mobility and residence rights 119
xiii
Cambridge University Press978-1-107-03535-5 - European Union Internal Market LawFriedl Weiss and Clemens KaupaFrontmatterMore information
4.4 Issues the Court proposed that the national court should consider inTsakouridis 130
4.5 Overview of the main regulatory fields covered by the anti-discrimination Directives 141
5.1 First work permits granted to foreign workers by six EEC MemberStates 147
5.2 Overview of Treaty provisions in the field of the free movement ofworkers 147
5.3 Overview of the provisions of Regulation 492/2011 1705.4 Example: the rules related to sickness benefits 1925.5 Some relevant secondary law measures 1946.1 Overview of the main Treaty provisions with regard to the freedom
of establishment 1986.2 Overview: establishment and services (Gebhard, 1995) 2036.3 Schematic comparison of the Court’s case law on the status of natural
and legal persons 2246.4 Overview: how companies can “move” to another Member State 2316.5 Examples of secondary law in the field of establishment and their
legal bases 2346.6 Overview: important company law harmonization measures 2397.1 Overview of the main Treaty provisions with regard to the freedom
to provide and receive services 2427.2 Types of public service and their applicable law 2818.1 Overview of the main Treaty provisions with regard to the free
movement of capital and payments 2928.2 The definition of “capital” according to the nomenclature of
Directive 88/361/EEC 2948.3 Some important golden share cases 3068.4 Overview: legal bases for secondary law measures concerning the
free movement of capital 316
xiv List of tables
Cambridge University Press978-1-107-03535-5 - European Union Internal Market LawFriedl Weiss and Clemens KaupaFrontmatterMore information
A and B see Skatteverket v. A and BA-Punkt Schmuckhandel, Case C-441/04, [2006]
ECR I-2093 63–64Abatay (Eran) and Others (C-317/01) and Nadi Sahin
(C-369/01) v. Bundesanstalt für Arbeit, Joined Cases,[2003] ECR I-12301 27, 28–29, 199
Acoset SpA v. Conferenza Sindaci e Presidenza Prov RegATO Idrico Ragusa and Others, Case C-196/08,[2009] ECR I-9913 285–286
Air Liquide Industries, Joined Cases C-393/04 andC-41/05, [2006] ECR I-5293 86–87
Åklagaren v. Percy Mickelsson and Joakim Roos,Case C-142/05, [2009] ECR I-4273 66, 74
Aladzhov (Petar) v. Zamestnik director na Stolichnadirektsia na vatreshnite raboti kam Ministerstvo navatreshnite raboti, Case C-434/10, [2011]ECR I-11659 118, 123
Alarape (Olaitan Ajoke) and Olukayode Azeez Tijaniv. Secretary of State for the Home Department,Case C-529/11, [2013] ECR I-00000 171
Albore (Alfredo), Case C-423/98, [2000] ECR I-5965296–297, 298
Alfa Vita, Joined Cases C-158/04 and C-159/04, [2006]ECR I-8135 66, 74–75
Alliance for Natural Health, Joined Cases C-154/04 andC-155/04, [2005] ECR I-6451 44
Allué, Joined Cases C-259/91, C-331/91 and C-332/91,[1993] ECR I-4309 175–176
Almelo, Case C-393/92, [1994] ECR I-1477 41–42Alpine Investments BV v. Minister Van Financiën, Case
C-384/93, [1995] ECR I-1141 21, 251Altmark Trans GmbH and Regierungspräsidium
Magdeburg v. Nahverkehrsgesellschaft AltmarkGmbH, Case C-280/00, [2003] ECR I-7747 281,283–284
Amministrazione delle Finanze dello Stato v.Simmenthal SpA, Case 106/77, [1978] ECR 629 19–20
ANAV see Associazione Nazionale AutotrasportoViaggiatori (ANAV) v. Comune di Bari and AMTABServizio SpA
André Marchandise, Case C-332/89, [1991] ECR I-102760–61
Angonese (Roman) v. Cassa di Risparmio di BolzanoSpA, Case C-281/98, [2000] ECR I-4139 31, 158–159,160–161
Anker, Case C-47/02, [2003] ECR I-10447 166–167Anton Las see Las (Anton) v. PSA Antwerp NVAntonissen, Case C-292/89, [1991] ECR I-745 153–154,
171Apothekerkammer des Saarlandes (DocMorris II),
Case C-171/07, [2009] ECR I-4171 74–75Apple and Pear Development Council, Case 222/82,
[1983] ECR 4083 46–47Aragonesa de Publicidad Exterior, Joined Cases C-1/90
and C-176/90, [1991] ECR I-4151 43–44Arblade see Criminal proceedings against Jean-Claude
ArbladeASM Brescia SpA v. Comune di Rodengo Saiano,
Case C-347/06, [2008] ECR I-5641 201Association of Pharmaceutical Importers see R v. Royal
Pharmaceutical Society of Great BritainAssociazione Nazionale Autotrasporto Viaggiatori
(ANAV) v. Comune di Bari and AMTAB Servizio SpA,Case C-410/04, [2006] ECR I-3303 285–286
Attanasio Group Srl v. Comune di Carbognano,Case C-384/08, [2010] ECR I-2055 208, 211
Ayuntamiento de Ceuta, Case C-45/94, [1995]ECR I-4385 86–87, 170–171
Bachmann, Case C-204/90, [1992] ECR I-00249 188,270–271, 312
Bâtiments et Ponts Construction SA and WISAGProduktionsservice GmbH v. Berlaymont 2000 SA,Case C-74/09, [2010] ECR I-7271 285
Baumbast, Case C-413/99, [2002] ECR I-709195, 100
Belgian State v. René Humbel and Marie-Thérèse Edel,Case 263/86, [1988] ECR 5365 249, 282–283
Belgian State–SPF Finances v. Truck Center SA,Case C-282/07, [2008] ECR I-10767 205
Bergström see Försäkringskassan v. ElisabethBergström
Bernini, Case C-3/90, [1992] ECR I-1071 151–152, 189Bettray, Case 344/87, [1989] ECR 1621 151–152Bidar, Case C-209/03, [2005] ECR I-2119 110, 111, 115,
120–121, 134–136, 183
xv
Cambridge University Press978-1-107-03535-5 - European Union Internal Market LawFriedl Weiss and Clemens KaupaFrontmatterMore information
Blanckaert (JEJ) v. Inspecteur van de Belastingdienst/Particulieren/Ondernemingen buitenland te Heerlen,Case C-512/03, [2005] ECR I-7685 300
Blanco Pérez (José Manuel) and María del Pilar ChaoGómez v. Consejería de Salud y Servicios Sanitarios(C-570/07) and Principado de Asturias (C-571/07),Joined Cases, [2010] ECR I-4629 34, 209, 214
Bobadilla, Case C-234/97, [1999] ECR I-4773 164–165Boehringer Ingelheim, Case C-143/00, [2002]
ECR I-3759 79Bonsignore, Case 67/74, [1975] ECR 297 117,
128–129, 165Bordessa see Criminal proceedings against Aldo
Bordessa, Vicente Marí Mellado and ConcepciónBarbero Maestre
Bosman see Union Royale Belge des Sociétés deFootball Association ASBL v. Jean-Marc Bosman
Bozkurt see Land Baden-Württemberg v. Metin BozkurtBresciani, Case 87/75, [1976] ECR 129 50Bressol (Nicolas) and Others and Céline Chaverot and
Others v. Gouvernement de la Communautéfrançaise, Case C-73/08, [2010] ECR I-2735 31, 103,110, 115, 119–120, 132–133
Commission v. Spain – Shopping Centres, Case C-400/08, [2011] ECR I-1915 217–218
Commission v. Spain – Spanish Chocolate, Case C-12/00,[2003] ECR I-459 62–63
Commission v. Spain – Tourist Guides, Case C-375/92,[1994] ECR I-923 260
Commission v. Sweden, Case C-167/05, [2008]ECR I-2127 91
Commission v. United Kingdom, Case 207/83, [1985]ECR 1201 76
Commission v. United Kingdom, Case 261/85, [1988]ECR 547 55
Commission v. United Kingdom –Wine and Beer Cases,Case 170/78, [1983] ECR 2265 90–91
Consiglio Nazionale degli Ingegneri, Case C-311/06,[2009] ECR I-415 235–236
Corporación Dermoestética SA v. To Me GroupAdvertising Media, Case C-500/06, [2008] ECR I-5785266
Corsica Ferries France SA v. Gruppo AntichiOrmeggiatori del porto di Genova Coop. arl, GruppoOrmeggiatori del Golfo di La Spezia Coop. arl andMinistero dei Trasporti e della Navigazione,Case C-266/96, [1998] ECR I-3949 257, 282
xviii Table of cases
Cambridge University Press978-1-107-03535-5 - European Union Internal Market LawFriedl Weiss and Clemens KaupaFrontmatterMore information
Costa/ENEL see Flaminio Costa v. ENELCouncil of the City of Stoke-on-Trent, Case C-169/91,
[1992] ECR I-6635 60–61Cowan (Ian William) v. Trésor public, Case 186/87,
[1989] ECR 195 244, 271Criel, Case 41/76, [1976] ECR 1921 42Criminal proceedings against A, Case E-1/07, [2007]
EFTA CR 246 24Criminal proceedings against Aldo Bordessa, Vicente Marí
Mellado and Concepción Barbero Maestre, JoinedCases C-358/93 and C-416/93, [1995] ECR I-361 292
Criminal proceedings against Alfred John Webb, Case279/80, [1981] ECR 3305 246, 247
Criminal proceedings against Donatella Calfa,Case C-348/96, [1999] ECR I-11 244–245
Criminal proceedings against Ernst Engelmann,Case C-64/08, [2010] ECR I-8219 232–233
Criminal proceedings against Guerrino Casati,Case 203/80, [1981] ECR 2595 288–289
Criminal proceedings against Jacques Pistre (C-321/94),Michèle Barthes (C-322/94), Yves Milhau (C-323/94)et Didier Oberti (C-324/94), Joined Cases, [1997] ECRI-2343 43
Criminal proceedings against Jan van de Haar andKaveka de Meern BV, Joined Cases 177/82 and 178/82, [1984] ECR 1797 46–47, 56–57
Criminal proceedings against Jean-Claude Arblade andArblade & Fils SARL (C-369/96) and Bernard Leloup,Serge Leloup and Sofrage SARL (C-376/96), JoinedCases, [1999] ECR I-8453 33, 258, 259–260
Criminal proceedings against Lucas Emilio Sanz de Lera,Raimundo Díaz Jiménez and Figen Kapanoglu, CaseC-163/94, [1995] ECR I-4821 292
Criminal proceedings against Massimiliano Placanica(C-338/04), Christian Palazzese (C-359/04) andAngelo Sorricchio (C-360/04), Joined Cases C-338/04,C-359/04 and C-360/04, [2007] ECR I-1891 211,265–266
Criminal proceedings against Piergiorgio Gambelli andOthers, Case C-243/01, [2003] ECR I-13031 248
Criminal proceedings against Uwe Kay Festersen, CaseC-370/05, [2007] ECR I-1129 309–310
Criminal proceedings against Vítor Manuel dos SantosPalhota and Others, Case C-515/08, [2010] ECRI-9133 268
Cristini, Case 32/75, [1975] ECR 1085 180
Daily Mail see R v. HM Treasury and Commissioners ofInland Revenue, ex parte Daily Mail and GeneralTrust plc
Danner (Rolf Dieter), Case C-136/00, [2002] ECR I-8147248
Dansk Supermarked, Case 58/80, [1981] ECR 18143–44, 46–47
Dassonville see Procureur du Roi v. Benoît and GustaveDassonville
De Agostini, Joined Cases C-34/95, C-35/95 and C-36/95, [1997] ECR I-3843 64–65, 66
De Coster (François) v. Collège des Bourgmestre etEchevins de Watermael-Boitsfort, Case C-17/00,[2001] ECR I-9445 250–251, 254–255
De Cuyper, Case C-406/04, [2006] ECR I-06947 114, 115,120, 138, 169
De Peijper, Case 104/75, [1976] ECR 613 69–70, 78–79De Vos, Case C-315/94, [1996] ECR I-1417 178Deak, Case 94/84, [1985] ECR 1873 190DEB Deutsche Energiehandels- und
Beratungsgesellschaft mbH v. BundesrepublikDeutschland, Case C-279/09, [2010] ECR I-13849 102
Decker (Nicolas) v. Caisse de Maladie des EmployésPrivés, Case C-120/95, [1998] ECR I-1831 273–274
Defrenne II, Case 43/75, [1976] ECR 455 141Delay (Nancy) v. Università degli Studi di Firenze,
Istituto Nazionale della Previdenza Sociale (INPS)and Italian Republic, Case C-276/07, [2008] ECRI-3635 30–31, 175–176
Deli Ostrich NV v. Belgische Staat, Case C-559/10, [2011]ECR I-10873 52–53
Deliège (Christelle) v. Ligue Francophone de Judo etDisciplines Associées ASBL, Ligue Belge de Judo ASBL,Union Européenne de Judo (C-51/96) and FrançoisPacquée (C-191/97), Joined Cases, [2000] ECR I-2549249–250, 251–252
Demirel (Meryem) v. Stadt Schwäbisch Gmünd,Case 12/86, [1987] ECR 3719 27
Denkavit Futtermittel, Case 251/78, [1979] ECR 3369 58Dereci and Others v. Bundesministerium für Inneres,
Case C-256/11, [2011] ECR I-11315 28–29, 107, 122Deserbais, Case 286/86, [1988] ECR 4907 60Deutsche Grammophon, Case 78/70, [1971] ECR 487 47Deutsches Milch-Kontor, Case C-272/95, [1997]
ECR I-1905 84D’Hoop, Case C-224/98, [2002] ECR I-6191 111, 112,
120, 137–137, 153–154, 183–184Di Leo, Case C-309/89, [1990] ECR I-4185 190Diamantarbeiders, Case 2/69, [1969] ECR 211 41, 49Dijkman (Gerhard) and Maria Dijkman-Lavaleije v.
Belgische Staat, Case C-233/09, [2010] ECR I-6649 271DKV Belgium v. Association Belge des Consommateurs
Test-Achats ASBL, Case C-577/11, [2013] ECR I-00000263–264
DocMorris I, Case C-322/01, [2003] ECR I-14887 74–75DocMorris II see Apothekerkammer des SaarlandesDonà, Case 13/76, [1976] ECR 1333 151, 160Dülger (Natthaya) v. Wetteraukreis, Case C-451/11,
(C-358/10) and Irtel Srl (C-359/10) v. Comune diBaranzate (C-357/10 and C-358/10) and Comune diVenegono Inferiore (C-359/10), Joined Cases, [2013]ECR I-00000 200–203, 232–233
Dusseldorp, Case C-203/96, [1998] ECR I-4075 84, 85
xix Table of cases
Cambridge University Press978-1-107-03535-5 - European Union Internal Market LawFriedl Weiss and Clemens KaupaFrontmatterMore information
Ebert (Donat Cornelius) v. Budapesti Ügyvédi Kamara,Case C-359/09, [2011] ECR I-269 217, 218–219
Econord SpA v. Comune di Cagno and Comune diVarese (C-182/11) and Comune di Solbiate andComune di Varese (C-183/11), Joined Cases, [2013]ECR I-00000 285
EFTA Surveillance Authority v. Republic of Iceland,Case E-1/03, [2003] EFTA CR 143 23
Eind, Case C-291/05, [2007] ECR I-10719 172–173Elsen, Case C-135/99, [2000] ECR I-10409 137Eman and Sevinger, Case C-300/04, [2006]
ECR I-8055 98Engelmann see Criminal proceedings against Ernst
EngelmannErny (Georges) v. Daimler AG – Werk Wörth,
Case C-172/11, [2013] ECR I-00000 159Essent Netwerk, Case C-206/06, [2008] ECR I-5497 40,
43–44, 49, 89Etablissements Delhaize Frères et Compagnie Le Lion
SA v. Promalvin SA and AGE Bodegas Unidas SA,Case C-47/90, [1992] ECR I-3669 82–83
Etablissements Rimbaud SA v. Directeur général desimpôts and Directeur des services fiscaux d’Aix-en-Provence, Case C-72/09, [2010] ECR I-10659 303
Even, Case 207/78, [1979] ECR 2019 176–177, 178Exportur, Case C-3/91, [1992] ECR I-5529 56, 76–77
Factortame see R v. Secretary of State for Transport, exparte Factortame Ltd and Others
Federal Republic of Germany v. European Parliamentand Council of the European Union (TobaccoAdvertising I), Case C-376/98, [2000] ECR I-841915–16
Fédération des Maisons de Repos Privées de Belgique(Femarbel) ASBL v. Commission CommunautaireCommune de Bruxelles-Capitale, Case C-57/12,[2013] ECR I-00000 278
Fedesa, Case 331/88, [1990] ECR I-4023 69Femarbel see Fédération des Maisons de Repos Privées
de Belgique (Femarbel) ASBL v. CommissionCommunautaire Commune de Bruxelles-Capitale
Festersen see Criminal proceedings against Uwe KayFestersen
Fidium Finanz AG v. Bundesanstalt fürFinanzdienstleistungsaufsicht, Case C-452/04, [2006]ECR I-9521 245, 261–262
Filipiak, Case C-314/08, [2009] ECR I-11049 187Finalarte Sociedade de Construção Civil Ltd (C-49/98),
Portugaia Construções Ltd (C-70/98) and EngilSociedade de Construção Civil SA (C-71/98) v.Urlaubs-und Lohnausgleichskasse der Bauwirtschaftand Urlaubs- und Lohnausgleichskasse derBauwirtschaft v. Amilcar Oliveira Rocha (C-50/98),Tudor Stone Ltd (C-52/98), Tecnamb-Tecnologia doAmbiante Lda (C-53/98), Turiprata Construções CivilLda (C-54/98), Duarte dos Santos Sousa (C-68/98)
Finanzamt Köln-Altstadt v. Schumacker, Case C-279/93,[1995] ECR I-225 114–115, 138–139, 164–165,185–187
Fink-Frucht, Case 27/67, [1968] ECR 327 40–41, 88FKP Scorpio Konzertproduktionen GmbH v. Finanzamt
Hamburg-Eimsbüttel, Case C-290/04, [2006] ECRI-9461 243–244
Flaminio Costa v. ENEL, Case 6/64, [1964] ECR 1141 2Flemish Insurance Case, Case C-212/06, [2008]
ECR I-1683 156, 157–158Fokus Invest AG v. Finanzierungsberatung-
Immobilientreuhand und Anlageberatung GmbH(FIAG), Case C-541/08, [2010] ECR I-1025 25–26,300
Forcheri, Case 28/83, [1984] ECR 1425 131–132Försäkringsaktiebolaget Skandia (publ) and Ola
Ramstedt v. Riksskatteverket, Case C-422/01, [2003]ECR I-6817 248
Försäkringskassan v. Elisabeth Bergström, Case C-257/10, [2013] ECR I-00000 182–182
Förster, Case C-158/07, [2008] ECR I-8507 135–136Fra.bo SpA v. Deutsche Vereinigung des Gas- und
Wasserfaches eV (DVGW) – Technisch-Wissenschaftlicher Verein, Case C-171/11, [2013] ECRI-00000 46
Frascogna, Joined Cases 157/84 and 256/86, [1987] ECR1739 180
Freskot, Case C-355/00, [2003] ECR I-5263 86–87Futura Participations, Case C-250/95, [1997] ECR I-2471
188, 303
GALP Energia see Commission v. Portugal (GALPEnergia)
Gambelli see Criminal proceedings against PiergiorgioGambelli and Others
Garcia Avello, Case C-148/02, [2003] ECR I-11613 103,104–105, 114–115, 140
Gaston Schul, Case 15/81, [1982] ECR 1409 44Gaydarov (Hristo) v. Director na Glavna direktsia
“Ohranitelna politsia” pri Ministerstvo navatreshnite raboti, Case C-430/10, [2011] ECR I-11637118–119
Gebhard (Reinhard) v. Consiglio dell’Ordine degliAvvocati e Procuratori di Milano, Case C-55/94,[1995] ECR I-4165 32, 34, 196, 201–203, 211–212,217, 250–251
Geraets-Smits (BSM) v. Stichting Ziekenfonds VGZ andHTM Peerbooms v. Stichting CZ GroepZorgverzekeringen, Case C-157/99, [2001] ECRI-05473 249, 272, 274–275
Geschwind, Case C-391/97, [1999] ECR I-5451 186–187Geurts (Maria) and Dennis Vogten v. Administratie van
de BTW, Registratie en Domeinen and BelgischeStaat, Case C-464/05, [2007] ECR I-9325 200–201
xx Table of cases
Cambridge University Press978-1-107-03535-5 - European Union Internal Market LawFriedl Weiss and Clemens KaupaFrontmatterMore information
Geven (Wendy) v. Land Nordrhein-Westfalen,Case C-213/05, [2007] ECR I-6347 178
Giersch (Elodie) and Others v. Etat du Grand-Duché deLuxembourg, Case C-20/12, [2013] ECR I-00000 32,135, 176–177
Glaxo Wellcome GmbH & Co. KG v. FinanzamtMünchen II, Case C-182/08, [2009] ECR I-8591 303
Gomes Valente, Case C-393/98, [2001] ECR I-1327 88Gottwald, Case C-103/08, [2009] ECR I-9117 120, 121,
135–136Gourmet International, Case C-405/98, [2001]
ECR I-1795 65Government of Communauté Française and
Gouvernement Wallon v. Gouvernement Flamand,Case C-212/06, [2008] ECR I-1683 31
Graf, Case C-190/98, [2000] ECR I-493 158, 171–172Gravier, Case 293/83, [1985] ECR 593 97–98, 100,
111, 131Grilli, Case C-12/02, [2003] ECR I-11585 84, 85–86Grimme (Christian) v. Deutsche Angestellten-
Krankenkasse, Case C-351/08, [2009] ECR I-1077725–26
Groener v. Ministry of Education, Case 379/87, [1989]ECR 3967 174–174
Groenveld (PB) BV v. Produktschap voor Vee en Vlees,Case 15/79, [1979] ECR 3409 83, 84, 85–86
Grogan see Society for the Protection of UnbornChildren Ireland Ltd v. Stephen Grogan and Others
Grundstücksgemeinschaft Busley and CibrianFernandez v. Finanzamt Stuttgart-Körperschaften,Case C-35/08, [2009] ECR I-9807 313–314
Grunkin and Paul, Case C-353/06, [2008] ECR I-7639 140Grzelczyk, Case C-184/99, [2001] ECR I-06193 93, 95,
111, 116, 120, 124–125, 134–136, 183Gül, Case 131/85, [1986] ECR 1573 190Gysbrechts (Lodewijk) v. Santurel Inter BVBA,
Case C-205/07, [2008] ECR I-9947 21, 84, 85–86
Hansen & Balle, Case 148/77, [1978] ECR 1787 89Hartlauer Handelsgesellschaft mbH v. Wiener
Landesregierung and OberösterreichischeLandesregierung, Case C-169/07, [2009] ECR I-172134, 69, 77–78, 214
Hartmann (Gertraud) v. Freistaat Bayern, Case C-212/05, [2007] ECR I-6303 31, 157, 178
Hedley Lomas, Case C-5/94, [1996] ECR I-2553 83Hendrix, Case C-287/05, [2007] ECR I-6909 157, 184Hengartner (Alexander) and Rudolf Gasser v.
Landesregierung Vorarlberg, Case C-70/09, [2010]ECR I-7233 25–26, 198
Henn and Darby, Case 34/79, [1979] ECR 3795 55Hoeckx, Case 249/83, [1985] ECR 973 180Hoekstra, Case 75/63, [1964] ECR 177 152–153Hoffmann-La Roche, Case 102/77, [1978] ECR 1139 79Höfner (Klaus) and Fritz Elser v. Macrotron GmbH, Case
Klopp see Ordre des avocats au Barreau de Paris v.Onno Klopp
Knoors (J) v. Staatssecretaris van Economische Zaken,Case 115/78, [1979] ECR 399 29–30
Kohll (Raymond) v. Union des Caisses de Maladie,Case C-158/96, [1998] ECR I-1931 244, 246, 247, 248,273, 274
Konle (Klaus) v. Republik Österreich, Case C-302/97,[1999] ECR I-3099 309
Konstantinidis, Case C-168/91, [1992] ECR I-1191 93–94Kranemann, Case C-109/04, [2005] ECR I-2421
151–152, 166–167Kraus (Dieter) v. Land Baden-Württemberg, Case C-19/
92, [1993] ECR I-01663 206–207Kurz (Bülent), né Yüce v. Land Baden-Württemberg,
Case C-188/00, [2002] ECR I-10691 149–150
L. N. v. Styrelsen for Videregående Uddannelser ogUddannelsesstøtte, Case C-46/12, [2013] ECR I-00000179–180
Läärä (Markku Juhani), Cotswold Microsystems Ltd andOy Transatlantic Software Ltd v. Kihlakunnansyyttäjä(Jyväskylä) and Suomen valtio (Finnish State),Case C-124/97, [1999] ECR I-6067 265–266
Lair (Sylvie) v. Universität Hannover, Case 39/86, [1988]ECR 3161 189
Lakebrink, Case C-182/06, [2007] ECR I-6705 187Land Baden-Württemberg v. Metin Bozkurt,
Case C-303/08, [2010] ECR I-13445 149–150Land Baden-Württemberg v. Panagiotis Tsakouridis,
Case C-145/09, [2010] ECR I-11979 115, 116–117,129, 130–131
Las (Anton) v. PSA Antwerp NV, Case C-202/11, [2013]ECR I-00000 168–169
Laurence Prinz v. Region Hannover (Case C-523/11) andPhilipp Seeberger v. Studentenwerk Heidelberg(Case C-585/11) Joined Cases, [2013] ECR I-00000 135
Laval un Partneri Ltd v. SvenskaByggnadsarbetareförbundet,SvenskaByggnadsarbetareförbundets avdelning 1,Byggettan and Svenska Elektrikerförbundet,Case C-341/05, [2007] ECR I-11767 248, 251–252,253, 255–256, 268, 269
Lawrie-Blum, Case 66/85, [1986] ECR 2121 151–152,165, 166–167
Lebon, Case 316/85, [1987] ECR 2811 155, 176–177Levin v. Staatssecretaris van Justitie, Case 53/81, [1982]
ECR 1035 151Libert (Eric) and Others v. Gouvernement Flamand
(C-197/11) and All Projects & Developments NV andOthers v. Vlaamse Regering (C-203/11), Joined Cases,[2013] ECR I-00000 283–284, 309–310
Lindfors, Case C-365/02, [2004] ECR I-7183 139Luisi (Graziana) and Giuseppe Carbone v. Ministero del
Tesoro, Joined Cases C-286/82 and C-26/83, [1984]ECR 377 271, 292, 293
Lütticke, Case 57/65, [1966] ECR 3159 89
Mann Singh Shingara, Joined Cases C-65/95 and C-111/95, [1997] ECR I-3343 117
Manninen (Petri), Case C-319/02, [2004] ECR I-7477299–300, 311–312
Mars, Case C-470/93, [1995] ECR I-1923 62–63Marsman, Case 44/72, [1972] ECR 1243 180Martínez Sala (María) v. Freistaat Bayern, Case C-85/96,
[1998] ECR I-2691 94–95, 135–136Matteucci, Case 235/87, [1988] ECR 5589 189McCarthy (Shirley) v. Secretary of State for the Home
Department, Case C-434/09, [2011] ECR I-3375 104,121, 122, 157
Meca-Medina (David) and Igor Majcen v. Commissionof the European Communities, Case C-519/04P,[2006] ECR I-6991 246, 247
Meeusen, Case C-337/97, [1999] ECR I-3289 180–181Metock, Case C-127/08, [2008] ECR I-06241 119, 121Meyhui, Case C-51/93, [1994] ECR I-3879 44Michel, Case 76/72, [1973] ECR 457 180, 190Micheletti, Case C-369/90, [1992] ECR I-04239 101Mickelsson and Roos see Åklagaren v. Percy Mickelsson
and Joakim RoosMinister voor Wonen, Wijken en Integratie v.
Woningstichting Sint Servatius, Case C-567/07,[2009] ECR I-9021 310–311
Mobistar SA v. Commune de Fléron (C-544/03) andBelgacom Mobile SA v. Commune de Schaerbeek(C-545/03), Joined Cases, [2005] ECR I-7723 250–251,254–255
Monsees, Case C-350/97, [1999] ECR I-2921 60Morgan, Joined Cases C-11/06 and C-12/06, [2007] ECR
I-9161 98–99, 103, 109–110, 114, 137, 138Morson and Jhanjan, Joined Cases 35/82 and 36/82,
[1982] ECR 3723 157Moser (Hans) v. Land Baden-Württemberg, Case 180/
83, [1984] ECR 2539 156–157MRAX, Case C-459/99, [2002] ECR I-6591 122Mutsch, Case 137/84, [1985] ECR 2681 180
N, Case C-470/04, [2006] ECR I-7409 200, 232Nadin, Case C-151/04, [2005] ECR I-11203 152Nancy Delay see Delay (Nancy) v. Università degli Studi
di Firenze, Istituto Nazionale della Previdenza Sociale(INPS) and Italian Republic
National Grid Indus BV v. Inspecteur van deBelastingdienst Rijnmond/kantoorRotterdam, Case C-371/10, [2011] ECR I-12273203–204, 232
Netherlands v. Ann Florence Reed, Case 59/85, [1986]ECR 1283 180
Nimco Hassan Ibrahim, Case C-310/08, [2010]ECR I-1065 170–171
Ninni-Orasche, Case C-413/01, [2003] ECR I-13187151–152, 155–156
Nolte, Case C-317/93, [1995] ECR I-4625 151Nottebohm Case, Judgment of April 6, 1955, ICJ
Reports 1955, p. 4 101
xxii Table of cases
Cambridge University Press978-1-107-03535-5 - European Union Internal Market LawFriedl Weiss and Clemens KaupaFrontmatterMore information
Punto Casa, Joined Cases C-69/93 and C-258/93, [1994]ECR I-2355 60–61, 63–64
Pusa, Case C-224/02, [2004] ECR I-5763 113–114
Queen v. see R v.
R v. Ernest George Thompson, Brian Albert Johnsonand Colin Alex Norman Woodiwiss, Case 7/78,[1978] ECR 2247 41–42, 293
R v. HM Treasury and Commissioners of InlandRevenue, ex parte Daily Mail and General Trust plc,Case 81/87, [1988] ECR 5483 220–222, 226
R v. Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain, exparte Association of Pharmaceutical Importers andOthers, Joined Cases 266/87 and 267/87, [1989] ECR1295 21–22, 45, 56–57
R v. Secretary of State for the Home Department, exparte Abdulnasir Savas, Case C-37/98, [2000]ECR I-2927 27, 28–29, 199
R v. Secretary of State for the Home Department, exparte Mann Singh Shingara (C-65/95) and ex parteAbbas Radiom (C-111/95), Joined Cases, [1997]ECR I-3343 209
R v. Secretary of State for the Home Department, exparte on the application of Ezgi Payir, Burhan Akyuzand Birol Ozturk, Case C-294/06, [2008] ECR I-203149–150
R v. Secretary of State for Transport, ex parteFactortame Ltd and Others, Case C-221/89, [1991]ECR I-3905 215–216
Raccanelli, Case C-94/07, [2008] ECR I-5939 151–152Radlberger, Case C-309/02, [2004] ECR I-11763 79Radziejewski (Ulf Kazimierz) v.
Kronofogdemyndigheten i Stockholm, Case C-461/11, [2013] ECR I-00000 181
Rahman see Secretary of State for the HomeDepartment v. Muhammad Sazzadur Rahman andOthers
Ramel, Joined Cases 80/77 and 81/77, [1978] ECR 92744
Rau, Case 261/81, [1981] ECR 3961 68–69Reading Borough Council, Case C-304/90, [1992]
ECR I-6493 60–61Recep Tetik v. Land Berlin, Case C-171/95, [1997]
ECR I-329 28
xxiii Table of cases
Cambridge University Press978-1-107-03535-5 - European Union Internal Market LawFriedl Weiss and Clemens KaupaFrontmatterMore information
Redmond, Case 83/78, [1978] ECR 2347 40–41Reed see Netherlands v. Ann Florence ReedReina, Case 65/81, [1982] ECR 33 176–177, 180Reisch Montage AG v. Kiesel Baumaschinen Handels
GmbH, Case C-103/05, [2006] ECR I-6827 309–310Renneberg (RHH) v. Staatssecretaris van Financiën,
Case C-527/06, [2008] ECR I-7735 187Rewe-Zentral AG v. Bundesmonopolverwaltung für
Branntwein (Cassis de Dijon), Case 120/78, [1979]ECR 649 33, 58–59, 62, 69, 70–71, 299, 303
Reyners (Jean) v. Belgian State, Case 2/74, [1974]ECR 631 196, 210, 211
Ritter-Coulais (Hans-Jürgen) and Monique Ritter-Coulaisv. Finanzamt Germersheim, Case C-152/03, [2006]ECR I-1711 187
Rochdale Borough Council, Case 306/88, [1992]ECR I-6457 60–61
Rottmann, Case C-135/08, [2010] ECR I-1449 98–99,101, 102, 105
Rubino, Case C-586/08, [2009] ECR I-12013 234–235Rüffert (Dirk) v. Land Niedersachsen, Case C-346/06,
[2008] ECR I-1989 268, 269Rüffler (Uwe) v. Dyrektor Izby Skarbowej weWroclawiu
Osrodek Zamiejscowy w Walbrzychu, Case C-544/07,[2009] ECR I-03389 111, 113–114, 138
Säger (Manfred) v. Dennemeyer & Co Ltd, Case C-76/90, [1991] ECR I-4221 32, 253–254, 261
Sagulo, Case 8/77, [1977] ECR 1495 145–146Sandoz GmbH v. Finanzlandesdirektion für Wien,
Niederösterreich und Burgenland, Case C-439/97,[1999] ECR I-7041 296–297
Santander Asset Management SGIIC SA (C-338/11) v.Directeur des Résidents à l’Etranger et des ServicesGénéraux and Santander Asset Management SGIICSA and Others (C-339/11 to C-347/11) v. Ministre duBudget, des Comptes Publics, de la FonctionPublique et de la Réforme de l’Etat, Joined Cases,[2013] ECR I-00000 299–300
Sanz de Lera see Criminal proceedings against LucasEmilio Sanz de Lera, Raimundo Díaz Jiménez andFigen Kapanoglu
Sapod Audic v. Eco-Emballages SA, Case C-159/00,[2002] ECR I-5031 46–47
SAT Fluggesellschaft mbH v. Eurocontrol, Case C-364/92, [1994] ECR I-43 282–283
Saunders, Case 175/78, [1979] ECR 1129 156Savas see R v. Secretary of State for the Home
Department, ex parte Abdulnasir SavasSchempp, Case C-403/03, [2005] ECR I-6421 105, 106,
139, 270Scheunemann (Marianne) v. Finanzamt Bremerhaven,
Case C-31/11, [2013] ECR I-00000 294–296Schindler, Case C-275/92, [1994] ECR I-01039 42,
264–265Schmidberger v. Republic of Austria, Case C-112/00,
250–251, 262Scholz, Case C-419/92, [1994] ECR I-505 157, 174Schöning-Kougebetopoulou v. Freie und Hansestadt
Hamburg, Case C-15/96, [1998] ECR I-47 174–175Schröder (Ulrich) v. Finanzamt Hameln, Case C-450/09,
[2011] ECR I-2497 293, 314Schulz-Delzers (Cathy) and Pascal Schulz v. Finanzamt
Stuttgart III, Case C-240/10, [2011] ECR I-8531187–188
Schumacker see Finanzamt Köln-Altstadt v.Schumacker
Schwarz (Herbert) and Marga Gootjes-Schwarz v.Finanzamt Bergisch Gladbach, Case C-76/05, [2007]ECR I-6849 112, 138, 187, 249
Scorpio Konzertproduktionen see FKP ScorpioKonzertproduktionen GmbH v. Finanzamt Hamburg-Eimsbüttel
Seco see Société anonyme de droit français Seco andSociété anonyme de droit français Desquenne & Giralv. Etablissement d’assurance contre la vieillesse etl’invalidité
Secretary of State for the Home Department v.Muhammad Sazzadur Rahman and Others, CaseC-83/11, [2013] ECR I-00000 126
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v. Lucja Czop(C-147/11) and Margita Punakova (C-148/11), JoinedCases, [2013] ECR I-00000 171
Semeraro Casa Uno Srl v. Sindaco del Comune diErbusco (C-418/93), Semeraro Mobili SpA v. Sindacodel Comune di Erbusco (C-419/93), RB ArredamentoSrl v. Sindaco del Comune di Stezzano (C-420/93),Città Convenienza Milano Srl v. Sindaco del Comunedi Trezzano sul Naviglio (C-421/93), CittàConvenienza Bergamo Srl v. Sindaco del Comune diStezzano (C-460/93), Centro Italiano Mobili Srl v.Sindaco del Comune di Pineto (C-461/93), Il 3CCentro Convenienza Casa Srl v. Sindaco del Comunedi Roveredo in Piano (C-462/93), Benelli ConfezioniSNC v. Sindaco del Comune di Capena (C-464/93),M. Quattordici Srl v. Commissario straordinario delComune di Terlizzi (C-9/94), Società ItalianaElettronica Srl (SIEL) v. Sindaco del Comune di Dozza
xxiv Table of cases
Cambridge University Press978-1-107-03535-5 - European Union Internal Market LawFriedl Weiss and Clemens KaupaFrontmatterMore information
(C-10/94), Modaffari Srl v. Sindaco del Comune diTrezzano sul Naviglio (C-11/94), Modaffari Srl v.Comune di Cinisello Balsamo (C-14/94), Cologno Srlv. Sindaco del Comune di Cologno Monzese (C-15/94), Modaffari Srl v. Sindaco del Comune di OsioSopra (C-23/94), M. Dieci Srl v. Sindaco del Comunedi Madignano (C-24/94) and Consorzio CentroCommerciale “Il Porto” v. Sindaco del Comune diAdria (C-332/94), [1996] ECR I-2975 207
SEVIC Systems AG, Case C-411/03, [2005] ECR I-10805229–230, 231
Sevince (S Z) v. Staatssecretaris van Justitie, Case C-192/89, [1990] ECR I-3461 28
SIA Garkalns v. Rigas dome, Case C-470/11, [2013]ECR I-00000 265–266
SIAT see Société d’ investissement pour l’agriculturetropicale SA (SIAT) v. Belgian State
SIDEF, Case C-312/89, [1991] ECR I-997 60–61Simitzi, Joined Cases C-485/93 and C-486/93, [1995]
ECR I-2655 43Simmenthal I, Case 35/76, [1976] ECR 1871 73–74Simmenthal II see Amministrazione delle Finanze dello
Stato v. Simmenthal SpASkandia see Försäkringsaktiebolaget Skandia (publ)
and Ola Ramstedt v. RiksskatteverketSkatteverket v. A and B, Case C-102/05, [2007]
ECR I-3871 294–296Sky Italia Srl v. Autorità per le Garanzie nelle
Comunicazioni, Case C-234/12, [2013] ECR I-00000258
Smith & Nephew, Case C-201/94, [1996] ECR I-581978–79
Smits v. Peerbooms see BSM Geraets-Smits v. StichtingZiekenfonds VGZ and HTM Peerbooms v. StichtingCZ Groep Zorgverzekeringen
Société Anonyme de Droit Français Seco and SociétéAnonyme de Droit Français Desquenne & Giral v.Etablissement d’Assurance Contre la Vieillesse etl’Invalidité, Case 62/81, [1982] ECR I-223 255–256
Société d’Importation Edouard Leclerc-Siplec v. TF1Publicité SA and M6 Publicité SA, Case C-412/93,[1995] ECR I-179 66
Société d’Investissement pour l’Agriculture Tropicale SA(SIAT) v. Belgian State, Case C-318/10, [2013] ECRI-00000 270–271
Société Fiduciaire Nationale d’Expertise Comptable v.Ministre du Budget, des Comptes Publics et de laFonction Publique, Case C-119/09, [2011] ECR I-2551267
Society for the Protection of Unborn Children IrelandLtd v. Stephen Grogan and Others, Case C-159/90,[1991] ECR I-4685 249
Solgar Vitamins France and Others v. Ministre del’Economie, des Finances et de l’Emploi and Others,Case C-446/08, [2010] ECR I-3973 34
Sotgiu, Case 152/73, [1974] ECR 153 162, 167, 180
Soysal (Mehmet) and Ibrahim Savatli v. Germany,Case C-228/06, [2009] ECR I-1031 28–29, 199
Spanish Strawberries see Commission v. France –Spanish Strawberries
Spotti, Case C-272/92, [1993] ECR I-5185175–176
Staatssecretaris van Financiën v. LAC van Putten (C-578/10), P Mook (C-579/10) and G Frank (C-580/10),Joined Cases, [2013] ECR I-00000 293, 297, 298,303–304
Staatssecretaris van Justitie v. F Toprak and I Oguz,Joined Cases C-300/09 and C-301/09, [2013]ECR I-00000 149–150
Staatssecretaris van Justitie v. Tayfun Kahveci (C-7/10)and Osman Inan (C-9/10), Joined Cases, [2013]ECR I- 00000 149–150
Stadt Halle and RPL Recyclingpark Lochau GmbH v.Arbeitsgemeinschaft Thermische Restabfall- undEnergieverwertungsanlage TREA Leuna, Case C-26/03, [2005] ECR I-1 285
Stadtgemeinde Frohnleiten, Case C-221/06, [2007]ECR I-9643 41–42, 89
Stanleybet International Ltd and Others (C-186/11)and Sportingbet plc (C-209/11) v. YpourgosOikonomias kai Oikonomikon and YpourgosPolitismou, Joined Cases, [2013] ECR I-00000265–266
Star Fruit Company, Case 247/87, [1989] ECR 291 44Steinhauser (P) v. City of Biarritz, Case 197/84, [1985]
ECR 1819 217Stewart (Lucy) v. Secretary of State for Work and
Pensions, Case C-503/09, [2011] ECR I-6497112–114
Stichting Collectieve Antennevoorziening Gouda andOthers v. Commissariaat voor de Media, Case C-288/89, [1991] ECR I-4007 246, 247, 256
Stopover Tax see Presidente del Consiglio dei Ministri v.Regione Sardegna
Stylianakis (Georgios) v. Elliniko Dimosio, Case C-92/01,[2003] ECR I-1291 250–251
Susisalo (Marja-Liisa), Olli Tuomaala and Merja Ritala,Case C-84/11, [2013] ECR I-00000 213
Svensson (Peter) and Lena Gustavsson v. Ministre duLogement et de l’Urbanisme, Case C-484/93, [1995]ECR I-3955 298
Sydhavnens Sten & Grus, Case C-209/98, [2000]ECR I-3743 84, 85
Tankstation Heukske, Joined Cases C-401/92 and C-402/92, [1994] ECR I-2199 60–61
Tas-Hagen (K) and RA Tas v. Raadskamer WUBO van dePensioen- en Uitkeringsraad, Case C-192/05, [2006]ECR I-10451 95, 109, 112, 135–136
Tatu (Ioan) v. Statul Român Prin Ministerul Finantelor siEconomiei and Others, Case C-402/09, [2011] ECRI-2711 86, 89–90
xxv Table of cases
Cambridge University Press978-1-107-03535-5 - European Union Internal Market LawFriedl Weiss and Clemens KaupaFrontmatterMore information
Teckal Srl v. Comune di Viano and Azienda Gas-AcquaConsorziale (AGAC) di Reggio Emilia, Case C-107/98,[1999] ECR I-8121 285
Teixeira (Maria) v. London Borough of Lambeth andSecretary of State for the Home Department,Case C-480/08, [2010] ECR I-1107 170–171
Terhoeve, Case C-18/95, [1999] ECR I-345 157,171–172
Test Claimants in the FII Group Litigation v.Commissioners of Inland Revenue and theCommissioners for Her Majesty’sRevenue & Customs, Case C-35/11, [2013]ECR I-00000 296
Thieffry (Jean) v. Conseil de l’ordre des avocats à la courde Paris, Case 71/76, [1977] ECR 765 216–217,234–235
Thompson see R v. Ernest George Thompson, BrianAlbert Johnson and Colin Alex Norman Woodiwiss
Tobacco Advertising I see Federal Republic of Germanyv. European Parliament and Council of the EuropeanUnion
Tobacco Advertising II see Commission v. GermanyToprak see Staatssecretaris van Justitie v. F Toprak and I
OguzTorfaen Borough Council, Case 145/88, [1989] ECR
3851 60–61Trojani, Case C-456/02, [2004] ECR I-7573 135–137, 152,
183Trummer (Manfred) and Peter Mayer, Case C-222/97,
[1999] ECR I-1661 298, 302Tsakouridis see Land Baden-Württemberg v. Panagiotis
TsakouridisTulliasiamies, Case C-101/00, [2002] ECR I-7487 88Turpeinen, Case C-520/04, [2006] ECR I-10685 111,
138–139, 186
Überseering BV v. Nordic Construction CompanyBaumanagement GmbH (NCC), Case C-208/00,[2002] ECR I-9919 211, 225–225, 226, 231
Uecker and Jacquet, Joined Cases C-64/96 and C-65/96,[1997] ECR I-3171 157, 190
Unión de Televisiones Comerciales Asociadas (UTECA)v. Administración General del Estado, Case C-222/07,[2009] ECR I-1407 33
Union Royale Belge des Sociétés de Football AssociationASBL v. Jean-Marc Bosman, Royal Club Liégeois SAv. Jean-Marc Bosman and Others and Union desAssociations Européennes de Football (UEFA) v.Jean-Marc Bosman, Case C-415/93, [1995]ECR I-4921 32, 160, 161–162, 163–164, 171–172,174–175
United Foods, Case 132/80, [1981] ECR 995 58United Pan-Europe Communications Belgium SA and
Others v. Belgian State, Case C-250/06, [2007]ECR I-11135 33, 258
Upjohn, Case C-379/97, [1999] ECR I-6927 78
VALE Epítési kft, Case C-378/10, [2013] ECR I-00000230–231
Valentina Neri v. European School of Economics (ESEInsight World Education System Ltd), Case C-153/02,[2003] ECR I-13555 211
Van Binsbergen (Johannes Henricus Maria) v. Bestuurvan de Bedrijfsvereniging voor de Metaalnijverheid,Case 33/74, [1974] ECR 1299 243, 248, 253
Van de Haar see Criminal proceedings against Jan vande Haar and Kaveka de Meern BV
Van Duyn, Case 41/74, [1974] ECR 1337 148Van Eycke, Case 267/86, [1988] ECR 4769 87–88Van Gend see NV Algemene Transport- en Expeditie
Onderneming van Gend & Loos v. NetherlandsInland Revenue Administration
Van Putten see Staatssecretaris van Financiën v. LACvan Putten
Variola, Case 34/73, [1973] ECR 981 50–51Vatsouras, Joined Cases C-22/08 and C-23/08, [2009]
ECR I-4585 153–154, 155–156, 181, 183VBV – Vorsorgekasse AG v.
Finanzmarktaufsichtsbehörde (FMA), Case C-39/11,[2013] ECR I-00000 310
Vereniging Veronica Omroep Organisatie v.Commissariaat voor de Media, Case C-148/91, [1993]ECR I-487 302
Veronsaajien oikeudenvalvontayksikkö v. A Oy,Case C-48/11, [2013] ECR I-00000 303
Viking see International Transport Workers’ Federationand the Finnish Seamen’s Union
Vlassopoulou v. Ministerium für Justiz, Bundes- u.Europaangelegenheiten Baden-Württemberg, CaseC-340/89, [1991] ECR I-2357 234–235
Volkswagen see Commission v. Germany (Volkswagen)Vriend, Case 94/79, [1980] ECR 327 84
Wählergruppe “Gemeinsam Zajedno/BirlikteAlternative und Grüne GewerkschafterInnen/UG”,and Bundesminister für Wirtschaft und Arbeit andOthers, Case C-171/01, [2003] ECR I-4301 28
Walrave and Koch, Case 36/74, [1974] ECR 1405 22,159–160, 244
Waypoint Aviation SA v. Belgian State-SPF Finances,Case C-9/11, [2011] ECR I-9697 270
Webb see Criminal proceedings against Alfred JohnWebb
Weigel, Case C-387/01, [2004] ECR I-4981 42Wirth (Stephan Max) v. Landeshauptstadt Hannover,
Case C-109/92, [1993] ECR I-6447 249Wolzenburg, Case C-123/08, [2009] ECR I-9621 126Woningstichting Sint Servatius see Minister voor
Wonen, Wijken en Integratie v. Woningstichting SintServatius
Wouters and Others v. Algemene Raad van deNederlandse Orde van Advocaten, Case C-309/99,[2002] ECR 1-1577 22, 204, 294–296, 307
xxvi Table of cases
Cambridge University Press978-1-107-03535-5 - European Union Internal Market LawFriedl Weiss and Clemens KaupaFrontmatterMore information
Additional Protocol to the Agreement establishing anAssociation between the European EconomicCommunity and Turkey, of 23 November 1970,[1972] OJ L293/3 27
Agreement between the European EconomicCommunity and the Swiss Confederation [1972]OJ L300/189 25
Agreement on the European Economic Area (EEAAgreement) 1992 [1994] OJ L1/3 23–24
Art. 28 149
Art. 31 198Art. 34 199–200Art. 40 303
Agreement between the European Community and itsMember States, of the one part, and the SwissConfederation, of the other, on the free movementof persons [2002] OJ L114/6 25–26, 182
Agreement between the European Community and itsMember States, of the one part, and the SwissConfederation, of the other, on the freemovement of persons – Final Act – JointDeclarations – Information relating to the entryinto force of the seven Agreements with the SwissConfederation in the sectors free movement ofpersons, air and land transport, publicprocurement, scientific and technologicalcooperation, mutual recognition in relation toconformity assessment, and trade in agriculturalproducts [2002] OJ L114/6 149
Agreement on scientific and technological cooperationbetween the European Community and theEuropean Atomic Energy Community, of the onepart, and the Swiss Confederation, of the otherpart [2007] OJ L189/26 25
Agreement between the European Community and theSwiss Confederation concerning the criteria andmechanisms for establishing the State responsiblefor examining a request for asylum lodged in aMember State or in Switzerland [2008] OJ L53/5 25
Agreement between the European Union, theEuropean Community and the SwissConfederation on the Swiss Confederation’sassociation with the implementation, applicationand development of the Schengen acquis [2008]OJ L53/52 24
EU treatiesTreaty of Paris (ECSC Treaty) 1951 4
Art. 69 145–146
xxviii
Cambridge University Press978-1-107-03535-5 - European Union Internal Market LawFriedl Weiss and Clemens KaupaFrontmatterMore information
Treaty of Brussels (Merger Treaty) 1965 4Treaty Amending Certain Budgetary Provisions
1970 4Treaty Amending Certain Financial Provisions 1975 4Single European Act (SEA) 1986 3, 4, 8–10, 14–15Treaty on European Union (TEU) (Treaty of Maastricht)