Page 1
EUROPEAN UNION THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT THE COUNCIL
Brussels, 3 April 2014 (OR. en)
2012/0184 (COD) 2012/0185 (COD) 2012/0186 (COD) LEX 1488
PE-CONS 12/2/14 REV 2
TRANS 19 CODEC 114
DIRECTIVE
OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL
ON THE TECHNICAL ROADSIDE INSPECTION
OF THE ROADWORTHINESS OF COMMERCIAL VEHICLES
CIRCULATING IN THE UNION
AND REPEALING DIRECTIVE 2000/30/EC
PE-CONS 12/2/14 REV 2 EN
020203/EU XXV. GPEingelangt am 03/04/14
Page 2
DIRECTIVE 2014/47/EU
OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL
of 3 April 2014
on the technical roadside inspection of the roadworthiness of commercial vehicles circulating
in the Union and repealing Directive 2000/30/EC
(Text with EEA relevance)
THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular
Article 91 thereof,
Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission,
After transmission of the draft legislative act to the national parliaments,
Having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee1,
After consulting the Committee of the Regions,
Acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure2,
1 OJ C 44, 15.2.2013, p 128. 2 Position of the European Parliament of 11 March 2014 (not yet published in the Official
Journal) and decision of the Council of 24 March 2014.
PE-CONS 12/2/14 REV 2 1 EN
Page 3
Whereas:
(1) In its White Paper of 28 March 2011 entitled 'Roadmap to a Single European Transport
Area – Towards a competitive and resource efficient transport system', the Commission set
out a 'zero-vision' objective whereby the Union should move close to zero fatalities in road
transport by 2050. With a view to attaining that objective, vehicle technology is expected
to contribute greatly to the improvement of the safety record of road transport.
(2) In its Communication entitled 'Towards a European road safety area: policy orientations on
road safety 2011-2020', the Commission proposed a further halving of the overall number
of road fatalities in the Union by 2020, starting from 2010. With a view to attaining that
goal, the Commission set out seven strategic objectives, and identified actions for safer
vehicles, a strategy to reduce the number of injuries and measures to improve the safety of
vulnerable road users, in particular motorcyclists.
(3) Roadworthiness testing is a part of a wider regime designed to ensure that vehicles are kept
in a safe and environmentally acceptable condition during their use. That regime should
cover periodic roadworthiness testing of vehicles and technical roadside inspection of
vehicles used for commercial road transport activities, as well as providing for a vehicle
registration procedure allowing for the suspension of a vehicle's authorisation to be used in
road traffic where the vehicle constitutes an immediate risk to road safety. Periodic testing
should be the main tool to ensure roadworthiness. Roadside inspections of commercial
vehicles should merely be complementary to periodic testing.
PE-CONS 12/2/14 REV 2 2 EN
Page 4
(4) A number of technical standards and requirements in respect of vehicle safety and
environmental characteristics have been adopted within the Union. It is necessary to
ensure, through a regime of unexpected technical roadside inspections, that vehicles
remain roadworthy.
(5) Technical roadside inspections are a crucial element for the achievement of a continuous
high level of roadworthiness of commercial vehicles throughout their use. Such inspections
contribute not only to road safety and a reduction of vehicle emissions but also to avoiding
unfair competition in road transport due to acceptance of different inspection levels as
between the Member States.
(6) Regulation (EC) No 1071/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council1 established
the European Register of Road Transport Undertakings (ERRU). ERRU allows national
electronic registers of transport undertakings to be interconnected throughout the Union, in
compliance with the Union rules on the protection of personal data. The use of that system,
operated by the competent authority of each Member State, facilitates cooperation among
Member States.
1 Regulation (EC) No 1071/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 establishing common rules concerning the conditions to be complied with to pursue the occupation of road transport operator and repealing Council Directive 96/26/EC (OJ L 300, 14.11.2009, p. 51).
PE-CONS 12/2/14 REV 2 3 EN
Page 5
(7) This Directive should apply to certain commercial vehicles with a design speed exceeding
25 km/h of the categories defined in Directive 2007/46/EC of the European Parliament and
the Council1. It should not, however, prevent the Member States from carrying out
technical roadside inspections on vehicles not covered by this Directive or checking other
aspects of road transport, in particular those relating to driving and resting time or the
transport of dangerous goods.
(8) Wheeled tractors with a maximum design speed exceeding 40 km/h are increasingly used
to replace trucks in local transport activities and for commercial road haulage purposes.
Their risk potential is comparable to that of trucks, and vehicles in that category, which are
used mainly on public roads, should therefore be treated in the same way as trucks when it
comes to technical roadside inspections.
1 Directive 2007/46/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 5 September 2007 establishing a framework for the approval of motor vehicles and their trailers, and of systems, components and separate technical units intended for such vehicles (OJ L 263, 9.10.2007, p. 1).
PE-CONS 12/2/14 REV 2 4 EN
Page 6
(9) Reports on the implementation of Directive 2000/30/EC of the European Parliament and of
the Council1 clearly show the importance of technical roadside inspections. During the
period from 2009 to 2010, more than 350 000 vehicles subject to technical roadside
inspections throughout the Union were reported to be in a condition requiring their
immobilisation. Those reports also show very significant differences between the results of
inspections carried out in different Member States. During the period from 2009 to 2010,
the rate of detection for certain deficiencies ranged from 2,1 % of all vehicles inspected in
one Member State to 48,3 % in another. Finally, those reports show the significant
differences in the number of technical roadside inspections performed as between Member
States. In order to arrive at a more balanced approach, Member States should commit to
carrying out an appropriate number of inspections, proportionate to the number of
commercial vehicles registered and/or operating on their territory.
(10) Vans, such as N1 vehicles, and their trailers are not subject to the same road safety
requirements at Union level as heavy duty vehicles such as those relating to driving time,
training for professional drivers or the installation of speed limitation devices. Although N1
vehicles do not fall within the scope of this Directive, Member States should take such
vehicles into account in their overall road safety and roadside inspection strategies.
1 Directive 2000/30/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 June 2000 on the technical roadside inspection of the roadworthiness of commercial vehicles circulating in the Community (OJ L 203, 10.8.2000, p. 1).
PE-CONS 12/2/14 REV 2 5 EN
Page 7
(11) In order to avoid unnecessary administrative burdens and costs, and to improve the
efficiency of inspections, it should be possible for competent national authorities to select,
as a priority, vehicles operated by undertakings not complying with road safety and
environmental standards, while vehicles which are operated by responsible and safety-
minded operators and properly maintained should be rewarded with less frequent
inspections. The selection of vehicles for roadside inspection based on the risk profile of
their operators could prove to be a useful tool for the purposes of checking high-risk
undertakings more closely and more often.
(12) Roadside inspections should be supported by the use of a risk rating system. Regulation
(EC) No 1071/2009 requires Member States to extend the risk classification system
established under Directive 2006/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council1, as
regards implementation of the rules on driving time and resting-periods, to cover other
specified areas relating to road transport, including the roadworthiness of commercial
vehicles. Consequently, the information concerning the number and severity of
deficiencies found in vehicles should be introduced into the risk rating system established
under Article 9 of Directive 2006/22/EC. It should be possible for Member States to decide
on the appropriate technical and administrative arrangements for the operation of risk
rating systems. The effectiveness and harmonisation of risk rating systems throughout the
Union should be further analysed.
(13) The holder of the registration certificate and, where applicable, the operator of the vehicle
should be responsible for keeping the vehicle in a roadworthy condition.
1 Directive 2006/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 on minimum conditions for the implementation of Council Regulations (EEC) No 3820/85 and (EEC) No 3821/85 concerning social legislation relating to road transport activities and repealing Council Directive 88/599/EEC (OJ L 102, 11.4.2006, p. 35).
PE-CONS 12/2/14 REV 2 6 EN
Page 8
(14) Inspectors, when performing technical roadside inspections, should act independently, and
their judgement should not be affected by conflicts of interest, including those of an
economic or personal nature, in particular as regards the driver, the operator or the holder
of the registration certificate, that could have any influence on the impartiality and
objectivity of their decisions. There should therefore be no direct correlation between the
reward of inspectors and the results of technical roadside inspections. This should not
prevent a Member State from authorising private bodies to perform both more detailed
technical roadside inspections and vehicle repairs, even on the same vehicle.
(15) Technical roadside inspections should consist of initial and, where necessary, more
detailed inspections. In both cases they should cover relevant parts and systems of
vehicles. In order to achieve harmonisation of more detailed inspections at Union level,
recommended test methods and examples of deficiencies and their categorisation according
to their severity should be introduced for each test item.
(16) Securing of cargo is crucial for road safety. Cargo should therefore be secured in such a
way as to cope with accelerations occurring during the use of the vehicle on road. For the
sake of practicality, the mass-forces resulting from such accelerations should be used as
limit values based on European standards. Personnel involved in checking whether cargo is
adequately secured should be appropriately trained.
(17) All parties involved in the logistics process, including packers, loaders, transport
companies, operators and drivers, have a role to play in ensuring that cargo is properly
packed and loaded on a suitable vehicle.
PE-CONS 12/2/14 REV 2 7 EN
Page 9
(18) In several Member States, reports of technical roadside inspections are drawn up by
electronic means. In such cases, a copy of the inspection report should be provided to the
driver. All the data and information gathered during technical roadside inspections should
be transferred to a common database of the Member State concerned, so that the data can
be easily processed and the relevant information can be transferred without any additional
administrative burden.
(19) In order to reduce the administrative burden on inspection authorities, reports of initial
technical roadside inspections, including on vehicles registered in third countries, should
contain only essential information recording that a check took place on a particular vehicle
and the outcome of that check. A detailed report should be required only where a more
detailed inspection takes place following an initial inspection.
(20) The Commission should examine the possibility of combining the report form contained in
Annex IV with other reports.
(21) The use of mobile inspection units reduces the delay and costs for operators as more
detailed inspections can be performed directly at the roadside. The closest practicable
testing centres and designated roadside inspection facilities may also be used to carry out
more detailed inspections.
PE-CONS 12/2/14 REV 2 8 EN
Page 10
(22) Personnel conducting technical roadside inspections should be appropriately trained or
qualified, including for the purpose of carrying out visual inspections in an efficient
manner. Inspectors performing more detailed technical roadside inspections should have at
least the same skills and fulfil the same requirements as those performing roadworthiness
tests in accordance with Directive 2014/.../EU of the European Parliament and of the
Council1 . Member States should require inspectors carrying out inspections in designated
roadside inspection facilities or using mobile inspection units to fulfil these or equivalent
requirements approved by the competent authority.
(23) In order to mitigate the costs arising from the use of technical equipment for a more
detailed roadside inspection, Member States should be able to require a payment where
deficiencies have been found. The amount of that payment should be reasonable and
proportionate.
(24) Cooperation and exchange of best practices between Member States is crucial in order to
achieve a more harmonised system of technical roadside inspections throughout the Union.
Consequently, Member States should work more closely together, also during operational
activities, where possible. Such cooperation should include the periodical organisation of
concerted technical roadside inspections.
1 Directive 2014/.../EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of ... on periodic roadworthiness tests for motor vehicles and their trailers and repealing Directive 2009/40/EC (OJ L ...).
OJ: Please insert the number, the date and the OJ references of Directive in document 2012/0184(COD).
PE-CONS 12/2/14 REV 2 9 EN
Page 11
(25) In order to ensure the efficient exchange of information between Member States, there
should be, within each Member State, a contact point for liaising with other relevant
competent authorities. That contact point should also compile relevant statistics.
Furthermore, Member States should apply a coherent national enforcement strategy on
their territory and should be able to designate a body to coordinate its implementation. The
competent authorities in each Member State should designate procedures setting out time
limits and the contents of the information to be forwarded.
(26) When designating contact points, constitutional provisions and the resulting level of
competencies should be respected.
(27) In order to allow the roadside inspection regime implemented in the Union to be
monitored, Member States should communicate to the Commission, before 31 March 2021
and before 31 March every two years thereafter, the results of the technical roadside
inspections performed. The Commission should report the data collected to the European
Parliament and to the Council.
(28) In order to minimise the time loss for undertakings and drivers and to increase the overall
efficiency of roadside checks, the performance of technical roadside inspections, along
with inspections to check compliance with social legislation in the field of road transport,
in particular Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 of the European Parliament and of the
Council1, Directive 2006/22/EC and Council Regulation (EEC) No 3821/852, should
be encouraged.
1 Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 on the harmonisation of certain social legislation relating to road transport and amending Council Regulations (EEC) No 3821/85 and (EC) No 2135/98 and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 3820/85 (OJ L 102, 11.4.2006, p. 1).
2 Council Regulation (EEC) No 3821/85 of 20 December 1985 on recording equipment in road transport (OJ L 370, 31.12.1985, p. 8).
PE-CONS 12/2/14 REV 2 10 EN
Page 12
(29) Member States should lay down rules on penalties applicable to infringements of the
provisions of this Directive and should ensure that they are implemented. Those penalties
should be effective, proportionate, dissuasive and non-discriminatory. Member States
should, in particular, include appropriate measures to address a failure by a driver or
operator to cooperate with the inspector and for the unauthorised use of a vehicle with
dangerous deficiencies.
(30) In order to ensure uniform conditions for the implementation of this Directive,
implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission. Those powers should be
exercised in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament
and of the Council1.
(31) The Commission should not adopt implementing acts concerning the procedures for the
notification of vehicles with major or dangerous deficiencies to the contact points of the
Member States of registration, as well as those laying down the data format for the
communication to the Commission of the information collected by the Member States
concerning vehicles inspected, where the Committee established pursuant to this Directive
delivers no opinion on the draft implementing act presented by the Commission.
1 Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 2011 laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by the Member States of the Commission's exercise of implementing powers (OJ L 55, 28.2.2011, p. 13).
PE-CONS 12/2/14 REV 2 11 EN
Page 13
(32) In order to update Article 2(1) and Annex IV point 6 as appropriate, without affecting the
scope of this Directive, to update point 2 of Annex II in respect of methods, and to adapt
point 2 of Annex II in respect of the list of test items, methods, reasons for failure and
assessment of deficiencies, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the
Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union should be delegated to the Commission.
It is of particular importance that the Commission carry out appropriate consultations
during its preparatory work, including at expert level. The Commission, when preparing
and drawing up delegated acts, should ensure simultaneous, timely and appropriate
transmission of relevant documents to the European Parliament and to the Council.
(33) Since the objective of this Directive, namely to improve road safety by laying down
minimum common requirements and harmonised rules concerning technical roadside
inspections of vehicles circulating within the Union, cannot be sufficiently achieved by the
Member States but can rather, by reason of the scale of the action, be better achieved at
Union level, the Union may adopt measures, in accordance with the principle of
subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty on European Union. In accordance with the
principle of proportionality, as set out in that Article, this Directive does not go beyond
what is necessary in order to achieve that objective.
(34) This Directive respects fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised by the
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union as referred to in Article 6 of the
Treaty on European Union.
PE-CONS 12/2/14 REV 2 12 EN
Page 14
(35) This Directive develops the existing regime of technical roadside inspections, updates the
technical requirements of Directive 2000/30/EC and integrates the rules contained in
Commission Recommendation 2010/379/EU1. As a result, Directive 2000/30/EC should
be repealed,
HAVE ADOPTED THIS DIRECTIVE:
1 Commission Recommendation 2010/379/EU of 5 July 2010 on the risk assessment of deficiencies detected during technical roadside inspections (of commercial vehicles) in accordance with Directive 2000/30/EC (OJ L 173, 8.7.2010, p. 97).
PE-CONS 12/2/14 REV 2 13 EN
Page 15
CHAPTER I
SUBJECT MATTER, DEFINITIONS AND SCOPE
Article 1
Subject matter
In order to improve road safety and the environment, this Directive establishes minimum
requirements for a regime of technical roadside inspections of the roadworthiness of commercial
vehicles circulating within the territory of the Member States.
Article 2
Scope
1. This Directive shall apply to commercial vehicles with a design speed exceeding 25 km/h
of the following categories, as defined in Directive 2003/37/EC of the European
Parliament and of the Council1 and Directive 2007/46/EC:
(a) motor vehicles designed and constructed primarily for the carriage of persons and
their luggage comprising more than eight seating positions in addition to the driver's
seating position – vehicle categories M2 and M3;
(b) motor vehicles designed and constructed primarily for the carriage of goods and
having a maximum mass exceeding 3,5 tonnes – vehicle categories N2 and N3;
1 Directive 2003/37/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 26 May 2003 on type-approval of agricultural or forestry tractors, their trailers and interchangeable towed machinery, together with their systems, components and separate technical units and repealing Directive 74/150/EEC (OJ L 171, 9.7.2003, p. 1).
PE-CONS 12/2/14 REV 2 14 EN
Page 16
(c) trailers designed and constructed for the carriage of goods or persons, as well as for
the accommodation of persons, having a maximum mass exceeding 3,5 tonnes –
vehicle categories O3 and O4;
(d) wheeled tractors of category T5, the use of which mainly takes place on public roads
for commercial road haulage purposes, with a maximum design speed
exceeding 40 km/h.
2. This Directive does not affect the right of Member States to carry out technical roadside
inspections on vehicles not covered by this Directive, such as light commercial vehicles of
category N1 having a maximum mass not exceeding 3,5 tonnes, and to check other aspects
of road transport and safety, or to carry out inspections in places other than public roads.
Nothing in this Directive prevents a Member State from limiting the use of a particular
type of vehicle to certain parts of its road network for reasons of road safety.
Article 3
Definitions
The following definitions shall only apply for the purposes of this Directive:
(1) 'vehicle' means any not rail-borne motor vehicle or its trailer;
(2) 'motor vehicle' means any power-driven vehicle on wheels which is moved by its own
means with a maximum design speed exceeding 25 km/h;
PE-CONS 12/2/14 REV 2 15 EN
Page 17
(3) 'trailer' means any non-self propelled vehicle on wheels which is designed and constructed
to be towed by a motor vehicle;
(4) 'semi-trailer' means any trailer designed to be coupled to a motor vehicle in such a way that
part of it rests on the motor vehicle and a substantial part of its mass and the mass of its
load is borne by the motor vehicle;
(5) 'cargo' means all goods that would normally be placed in or on the part of the vehicle
designed to carry a load and that are not permanently fixed to the vehicle, including objects
within load carriers such as crates, swap bodies or containers on vehicles;
(6) 'commercial vehicle' means a motor vehicle and its trailer or semi-trailer used primarily for
the transport of goods or passengers for commercial purposes, such as transport for hire
and reward or own-account transport, or for other professional purposes;
(7) 'vehicle registered in a Member State' means a vehicle which is registered or put into
service in a Member State;
(8) 'holder of a registration certificate' means the legal or natural person in whose name the
vehicle is registered;
(9) 'undertaking' means an undertaking as defined in point 4 of Article 2 of Regulation
(EC) 1071/2009;
PE-CONS 12/2/14 REV 2 16 EN
Page 18
(10) 'technical roadside inspection' means an unexpected technical inspection of the
roadworthiness of a commercial vehicle carried out by the competent authorities of a
Member State or under their direct supervision;
(11) 'public road' means a road that is of general public utility, such as a local, regional or
national road, highway, expressway or motorway;
(12) 'roadworthiness test' means an inspection in accordance with point (9) of Article 3 of
Directive 2014/…/EU*;
(13) 'roadworthiness certificate' means a roadworthiness test report issued by the competent
authority or a testing centre containing the result of the roadworthiness test;
(14) 'competent authority' means an authority or public body entrusted by a Member State with
responsibility for managing the system of technical roadside inspections, including, where
appropriate, the carrying-out of such inspections;
(15) 'inspector' means a person authorised by a Member State or by its competent authority to
carry out initial and/or more detailed technical roadside inspections;
(16) 'deficiencies' mean technical defects and other instances of non-compliance found during a
technical roadside inspection;
(17) 'concerted roadside inspection' means a technical roadside inspection undertaken jointly by
the competent authorities of two or more Member States;
* OJ: please insert the number of the Directive in document 2012/0184 (COD).
PE-CONS 12/2/14 REV 2 17 EN
Page 19
(18) 'operator' means a natural or legal person operating the vehicle as its owner or authorised to
operate the vehicle by its owner;
(19) 'mobile inspection unit' means a transportable system of test equipment needed to carry out
more detailed technical roadside inspections, staffed by inspectors who are competent to
carry out more detailed roadside inspection;
(20) 'designated roadside inspection facility' means a fixed area for the performance of initial
and/or more detailed technical roadside inspections which may also be equipped with
permanently installed test equipment.
CHAPTER II
TECHNICAL ROADSIDE INSPECTION SYSTEM
AND GENERAL OBLIGATIONS
Article 4
Roadside inspection system
The technical roadside inspection system shall include initial technical roadside inspections as
referred to in Article 10(1) and more detailed technical roadside inspections as referred to in
Article 10(2).
PE-CONS 12/2/14 REV 2 18 EN
Page 20
Article 5
Percentage of vehicles to be inspected
1. For vehicles referred to in points (a), (b) and (c) of Article 2(1), the total number of initial
technical roadside inspections in the Union shall, in every calendar year, correspond to at
least 5 % of the total number of these vehicles that are registered in the Member States.
2. Each Member State shall make efforts to carry out an appropriate number of initial
technical roadside inspections, proportionate to the total number of such vehicles that are
registered in its territory.
3. Information on vehicles inspected shall be communicated to the Commission in
accordance with Article 20(1).
Article 6
Risk rating system
For vehicles referred to in points (a), (b) and (c) of Article 2(1), Member States shall ensure that the
information concerning the number and severity of deficiencies set out in Annex II and, where
applicable, Annex III found on vehicles operated by individual undertakings is introduced into the
risk rating system established under Article 9 of Directive 2006/22/EC. For the attribution of a risk
profile to an undertaking, Member States may use the criteria set out in Annex I. That information
shall be used to check undertakings with a high risk rating more closely and more often. The risk
rating system shall be operated by the competent authorities of the Member States.
PE-CONS 12/2/14 REV 2 19 EN
Page 21
For the purpose of implementing the first subparagraph, the Member State of registration shall use
the information received from other Member States pursuant to Article 18(1).
Member States may allow additional voluntary roadworthiness tests. Information on compliance
with roadworthiness requirements obtained from voluntary tests may be taken into account in order
to improve the risk profile of an undertaking.
Article 7
Responsibilities
1. Member States shall require that the roadworthiness certificate corresponding to the most
recent periodic roadworthiness test or a copy thereof or, in the case of an electronically
produced roadworthiness certificate, a certified or original printout of that certificate, and
the report of the most recent technical roadside inspection, be kept on board the vehicle
when they are available. Member States may allow their authorities to accept electronic
evidence of such inspections when information in that regard is accessible.
2. Member States shall require undertakings and drivers of a vehicle subject to a technical
roadside inspection to cooperate with the inspectors and to provide access to the vehicle,
its parts and all relevant documentation for the purposes of the inspection.
3. Member States shall ensure that the responsibilities of undertakings for keeping their
vehicles in a safe and roadworthy condition are defined, without prejudice to the
responsibilities of the drivers of those vehicles.
PE-CONS 12/2/14 REV 2 20 EN
Page 22
Article 8
Inspectors
1. When selecting a vehicle for a technical roadside inspection and when carrying out that
inspection, inspectors shall refrain from any discrimination on grounds of the nationality of
the driver or of the country of registration or entry into service of the vehicle.
2. When carrying out a technical roadside inspection, the inspector shall be free from any
conflict of interest that could have any influence on the impartiality and objectivity of
his decision.
3. The reward of inspectors shall not be directly related to the results of initial or more
detailed technical roadside inspections.
4. More detailed technical roadside inspections shall be carried out by inspectors who fulfil
the minimum competence and training requirements laid down in Article 13 and in
Annex IV to Directive 2014/.../EU*. Member States may provide that inspectors carrying
out inspections in designated roadside inspection facilities or using mobile inspection units
are to fulfil those requirements or equivalent requirements approved by the
competent authority.
* OJ: please insert the number of the Directive in document 2012/0184(COD).
PE-CONS 12/2/14 REV 2 21 EN
Page 23
CHAPTER III
INSPECTION PROCEDURES
Article 9
Selection of vehicles for initial technical roadside inspection
When identifying vehicles to be subject to an initial technical roadside inspection, inspectors may
select, as a priority, vehicles operated by undertakings with a high-risk profile as referred to in
Directive 2006/22/EC. Vehicles may also be selected randomly for inspection, or where there is a
suspicion that the vehicle presents a risk to road safety or to the environment.
Article 10
Contents and methods of technical roadside inspections
1. Member States shall ensure that vehicles selected in accordance with Article 9 are subject
to an initial technical roadside inspection.
In each initial technical roadside inspection of a vehicle, the inspector:
(a) shall check the latest roadworthiness certificate and technical roadside inspection
report, where available, kept on board, or electronic evidence thereof in accordance
with Article 7(1);
(b) shall carry out a visual assessment of the technical condition of the vehicle;
PE-CONS 12/2/14 REV 2 22 EN
Page 24
(c) may carry out a visual assessment of the securing of the vehicle's cargo in
accordance with Article 13;
(d) may carry out technical checks by any method deemed appropriate. Such technical
checks may be carried out in order to substantiate a decision to submit the vehicle to
a more detailed technical roadside inspection, or to request that the deficiencies be
rectified without delay in accordance with Article 14(1).
The inspector shall verify whether any deficiencies indicated in the previous technical
roadside inspection report have been rectified.
2. On the basis of the outcome of the initial inspection, the inspector shall decide whether the
vehicle or its trailer should be subject to a more detailed roadside inspection.
3. A more detailed technical roadside inspection shall cover those items listed in Annex II
that are considered necessary and relevant, taking into account in particular the safety of
the brakes, tyres, wheels, chassis and nuisance, and the recommended methods applicable
to the testing of those items.
4. Where the roadworthiness certificate or a roadside inspection report demonstrates that an
inspection of one of the items listed in Annex II has been carried out in the course of the
preceding three months, the inspector shall not check that item, except where such a check
is justified on the grounds of an obvious deficiency.
PE-CONS 12/2/14 REV 2 23 EN
Page 25
Article 11
Inspection facilities
1. A more detailed technical roadside inspection shall be carried out using a mobile
inspection unit or a designated roadside inspection facility, or in a testing centre as referred
to in Directive 2014/.../EU*.
2. Where a more detailed inspection is to be carried out in a testing centre or designated
roadside inspection facility, it shall be carried out as soon as possible in one of the closest
practicable centres or facilities.
3. Mobile inspection units and designated roadside inspection facilities shall include
appropriate equipment for carrying out a more detailed technical roadside inspection,
including the equipment necessary to assess the condition of the brakes and brake
efficiency, steering, suspension and nuisance of the vehicle as required. Where mobile
inspection units or designated roadside inspection facilities do not include the equipment
required to check an item indicated in an initial inspection, the vehicle shall be directed to
a testing centre or facility where a detailed check of that item can be performed.
Article 12
Assessment of deficiencies
1. For each item to be inspected, Annex II provides a list of possible deficiencies and their
level of severity to be used during technical roadside inspections.
* OJ: please insert the number of the Directive in document 2012/0184 (COD).
PE-CONS 12/2/14 REV 2 24 EN
Page 26
2. Deficiencies found during technical roadside inspections of vehicles shall be categorised in
one of the following groups:
(a) minor deficiencies having no significant effect on the safety of the vehicle or impact
on the environment, and other minor non-compliances,
(b) major deficiencies that may prejudice the safety of the vehicle or have an impact on
the environment or put other road users at risk, or other more significant
non-compliances;
(c) dangerous deficiencies constituting a direct and immediate risk to road safety or
having an impact on the environment.
3. A vehicle having deficiencies falling into more than one of the deficiency groups referred
to in paragraph 2 shall be classified in the group corresponding to the more serious
deficiency. A vehicle showing several deficiencies within the same inspection areas as
defined in the scope of the technical roadside inspection referred to in point 1 of Annex II
may be classified in the next most serious deficiency group if it is considered that the
combined effect of those deficiencies results in a higher risk to road safety.
PE-CONS 12/2/14 REV 2 25 EN
Page 27
Article 13
Inspection of cargo securing
1. During a roadside inspection a vehicle may be subject to an inspection of its cargo securing
in accordance with Annex III, in order to ensure that the cargo is secured in such a way
that it does not interfere with safe driving, or pose a threat to life, health, property or the
environment. Checks may be carried out to verify that during all kinds of operation of the
vehicle, including emergency situations or uphill starting manoeuvres:
– loads can only minimally change their position relative to each other, against walls or
surfaces of the vehicle, and
– loads cannot leave the cargo space or move outside the loading surface.
2. Without prejudice to the requirements applicable to transport of certain categories of
goods, such as those covered by the European Agreement concerning the International
Carriage of Dangerous Goods by Road (ADR)1, cargo securing and inspection of the
securing of cargo may be carried out in accordance with the principles and, where
appropriate, the standards laid down in section I of Annex III. The latest version of the
standards laid down in point 5 of section I of Annex III may be used.
3. The follow-up procedures referred to in Article 14 may also apply in the case of major or
dangerous deficiencies related to cargo securing.
1 Transposed by Directive 2008/68/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 September 2008 on the inland transport of dangerous goods (OJ L 260, 30.9.2008, p. 13), as amended by, inter alia, Commission Directive 2012/45/EU (OJ L 332, 4.12.2012, p. 18).
PE-CONS 12/2/14 REV 2 26 EN
Page 28
4. Member States shall provide that personnel involved in cargo securing checks are to be
appropriately trained for that purpose.
Article 14
Follow-up in the case of major or dangerous deficiencies
1. Without prejudice to Article 14(3), Member States shall provide that any major or
dangerous deficiency revealed by an initial or more detailed inspection is to be rectified
before the vehicle is further used on public roads.
2. The inspector may decide that the vehicle is to be subject to a full roadworthiness test
within a specified time limit if it is registered in the Member State where the technical
roadside inspection has been carried out. If the vehicle is registered in another Member
State, the competent authority may request the competent authority of that other Member
State, via the contact points referred to in Article 17, to carry out a new roadworthiness test
of the vehicle following the procedure laid down in Article 18(2). Where major or
dangerous deficiencies are found in a vehicle registered outside the Union, Member States
may decide to inform the competent authority of the country of registration of the vehicle.
PE-CONS 12/2/14 REV 2 27 EN
Page 29
3. In the case of any deficiencies which require prompt or immediate rectification due to any
direct and immediate risk to road safety, the Member State or the competent authority
concerned shall provide that the use of the vehicle in question is to be restricted or
prohibited until those deficiencies have been rectified. The use of such a vehicle may be
permitted in order to enable it to reach one of the closest workshops where those
deficiencies can be rectified, on condition that the dangerous deficiencies in question have
been fixed in such a way as to allow it to reach that workshop and that there is no
immediate risk to the safety of its occupants or other road users. In the case of deficiencies
that do not require immediate rectification, the Member State or the competent authority
concerned may decide on the conditions and a reasonable timespan under which the
vehicle may be used before the deficiencies are rectified.
Where the vehicle cannot be fixed in such a way to allow it to reach the workshop, the
vehicle may be brought to an available location where it can be repaired.
Article 15
Inspection fees
Where deficiencies have been found following a more detailed inspection, Member States may
require the payment of a reasonable and proportionate fee that should be linked to the cost of
carrying out that inspection.
PE-CONS 12/2/14 REV 2 28 EN
Page 30
Article 16
Inspection report and databases on technical roadside inspections
1. For each initial technical roadside inspection carried out, the following information shall
be communicated to the competent authority:
(a) country of registration of the vehicle;
(b) category of the vehicle;
(c) outcome of the initial technical roadside inspection.
2. On completion of a more detailed inspection, the inspector shall draw up a report in
accordance with Annex IV. Member States shall ensure that the driver of the vehicle is
provided with a copy of the inspection report.
3. The inspector shall communicate to the competent authority the results of the more
detailed technical roadside inspection within a reasonable time following that inspection.
The competent authority shall keep that information in accordance with the applicable
legislation on data protection for not less than 36 months from the date of its receipt.
PE-CONS 12/2/14 REV 2 29 EN
Page 31
CHAPTER IV
COOPERATION AND EXCHANGE OF INFORMATION
Article 17
Designation of a contact point
1 Member States shall designate a contact point which shall:
– ensure coordination with contact points designated by other Member States as
regards actions taken under Article 18;
– forward the data referred to in Article 20 to the Commission;
– ensure, where appropriate, any other exchange of information with, and the provision
of assistance to, the contact points of other Member States.
2. Member States shall forward to the Commission the names and contact details of their
national contact point by ... *, and shall inform it without delay of any changes thereto. The
Commission shall draw up a list of all contact points and forward it to the Member States.
* OJ: please insert the date: one year after the entry into force of this Directive.
PE-CONS 12/2/14 REV 2 30 EN
Page 32
Article 18
Cooperation between Member States
1. In cases where major or dangerous deficiencies, or deficiencies resulting in a restriction or
prohibition on the use the vehicle, are found in a vehicle not registered in the
Member State of inspection, the contact point shall notify the results of the inspection to
the contact point of the Member State of registration of the vehicle. That notification shall
contain the elements of the roadside inspection report as set out in Annex IV and shall be
communicated preferably through the national electronic register referred to in Article 16
of Regulation (EC) 1071/2009. The Commission shall adopt detailed rules concerning the
procedures for the notification of vehicles with major or dangerous deficiencies to the
contact point of the Member State of registration in accordance with the examination
procedure referred to in Article 23(2).
2. In cases where major or dangerous deficiencies are found in a vehicle, the contact point of
the Member State in which the vehicle has been inspected may request the competent
authority of the Member State in which the vehicle is registered, via the contact point of
the latter Member State, to take appropriate follow-up action, such as submitting the
vehicle to a further roadworthiness test as provided for in Article 14.
PE-CONS 12/2/14 REV 2 31 EN
Page 33
Article 19
Concerted technical roadside inspections
On a yearly basis, Member States shall regularly undertake concerted roadside inspection activities.
Member States may combine those activities with those provided for by Article 5 of
Directive 2006/22/EC.
Article 20
Communication of information to the Commission
1. Before 31 March 2021 and before 31 March every two years thereafter, Member States
shall communicate to the Commission, by electronic means, the data collected relating to
the previous two calendar years and concerning the vehicles inspected in their territory.
Those data shall indicate:
(a) the number of vehicles inspected;
(b) the category of vehicles inspected;
(c) the country of registration of each vehicle inspected;
(d) in the case of more detailed inspections, the areas checked and the items failed, in
accordance with point 10 of Annex IV.
The first report shall cover the period of two years beginning on 1 January 2019.
PE-CONS 12/2/14 REV 2 32 EN
Page 34
2. The Commission shall adopt detailed rules, in accordance with the examination procedure
referred to in Article 23(2), concerning the format in which the data referred to in
paragraph 1 are to be communicated by electronic means. Pending the establishment of
such rules, the standard reporting form set out in Annex V shall be used.
The Commission shall report the data collected to the European Parliament and to
the Council.
CHAPTER V
DELEGATED AND IMPLEMENTING ACTS
Article 21
Delegated acts
The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 22 in
order to:
– update Article 2(1) and point 6 of Annex IV as appropriate in order to take account of
changes to the vehicle categories stemming from amendments to the legislation referred to
in that Article, without affecting the scope of this Directive;
PE-CONS 12/2/14 REV 2 33 EN
Page 35
– update point 2 of Annex II in respect of methods in the event that more efficient and
effective test methods become available, without extending the list of items to be tested;
– adapt point 2 of Annex II, following a positive assessment of the costs and benefits
involved, in respect of the list of test items, methods, reasons for failure and assessment of
deficiencies in the event of a modification of mandatory requirements relevant for
type-approval in Union safety or environmental legislation.
Article 22
Exercise of delegation
1. The power to adopt delegated acts is conferred on the Commission subject to the
conditions laid down in this Article.
2. The delegation of power referred to in Article 21 shall be conferred on the Commission for
a period of five years from ...*. The Commission shall draw up a report in respect of the
delegation of power not later than nine months before the end of the five-year period. The
delegation of power shall be tacitly extended for periods of an identical duration, unless the
European Parliament or the Council opposes such extension not later than three months
before the end of each period.
* OJ: please insert the date of entry into force of this Directive.
PE-CONS 12/2/14 REV 2 34 EN
Page 36
3. The delegation of powers referred to in Article 21 may be revoked at any time by the
European Parliament or by the Council. A decision to revoke shall put an end to the
delegation of the power specified in that decision. It shall take effect the day following the
publication of the decision in the Official Journal of the European Union or at a later date
specified therein. It shall not affect the validity of any delegated acts already in force.
4. As soon as it adopts a delegated act, the Commission shall notify it simultaneously to the
European Parliament and to the Council.
5. A delegated act adopted pursuant to Article 21 shall enter into force only if no objection
has been expressed by either the European Parliament or the Council within a period of
two months of notification of that act to the European Parliament and the Council or if,
before the expiry of that period, the European Parliament and the Council have both
informed the Commission that they will not object. That period shall be extended by two
months at the initiative of the European Parliament or of the Council.
Article 23
Committee procedure
1. The Commission shall be assisted by the Roadworthiness Committee referred to in
Directive 2014/…/EU . That committee shall be a committee within the meaning of
Regulation (EU) No 182/2011.
OJ: Please insert number of Directive in document 2012/0184 (COD).
PE-CONS 12/2/14 REV 2 35 EN
Page 37
2. Where reference is made to this paragraph, Article 5 of Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 shall
apply. Where the committee delivers no opinion, the Commission shall not adopt the draft
implementing act and the third paragraph of Article 5(4) of Regulation (EU) 182/2011
shall apply.
CHAPTER VI
FINAL PROVISIONS
Article 24
Reporting
1. By... , the Commission shall submit a report to the European Parliament and the Council
on the implementation and effects of this Directive. The report shall analyse, in particular,
its effect in terms of improvement of road safety as well as the costs and benefits of the
possible inclusion of N1 and O2 category vehicles within the scope of this Directive.
OJ: please insert the date: six years from the date of entry into force of this Directive.
PE-CONS 12/2/14 REV 2 36 EN
Page 38
2. No later than ... , the Commission shall submit to the European Parliament and to the
Council a report on the application and effects of this Directive, in particular as regards the
effectiveness and harmonisation of risk rating systems, notably in the definition of a
mutually comparable risk profile of the different undertakings concerned. That report shall
be accompanied by a detailed impact assessment analysing the costs and benefits
throughout the Union. The impact assessment shall be made available to the
European Parliament and to the Council at least six months prior to the submission of any
legislative proposal, if appropriate, to include new categories of vehicles within the scope
of this Directive.
Article 25
Penalties
The Member States shall lay down the rules on penalties applicable to infringements of the
provisions of this Directive and shall take all measures necessary to ensure that they are
implemented. Those penalties shall be effective, proportionate, dissuasive and non-discriminatory.
Article 26
Transposition
1. Member States shall adopt and publish, by ...**, the laws, regulations and administrative
provisions necessary to comply with this Directive. They shall immediately inform the
Commission thereof.
OJ: please insert the date: eight years after the entry into force of this Directive ** OJ: please insert the date: 36 months after the entry into force of this Directive.
PE-CONS 12/2/14 REV 2 37 EN
Page 39
They shall apply those measures from ... .
With regard to the risk rating system referred to in Article 6 of this Directive, they shall
apply those measures from ... .
When Member States adopt those measures, they shall contain a reference to this Directive
or shall be accompanied by such reference on the occasion of their official publication. The
methods of making such reference shall be laid down by Member States.
2. Member States shall communicate to the Commission the text of the main measures of
national law which they adopt in the field covered by this Directive.
Article 27
Repeal
Directive 2000/30/EC is repealed with effect from ...**.
Article 28
Entry into force
This Directive shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the
Official Journal of the European Union.
OJ: please insert the date: 48 months after the entry into force of this Directive. OJ: please insert the date: 60 months after the entry into force of this Directive.
PE-CONS 12/2/14 REV 2 38 EN
Page 40
Article 29
Addressees
This Directive is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels,
For the European Parliament For the Council
The President The President
PE-CONS 12/2/14 REV 2 39 EN
Page 41
ANNEX I
ELEMENTS OF THE RISK RATING SYSTEM
The risk rating system shall provide the basis for a targeted selection of vehicles operated by
undertakings with a poor record concerning compliance with vehicle maintenance and
roadworthiness requirements. It shall take into account results from both periodic roadworthiness
tests and technical roadside inspections.
The risk rating System shall consider the following parameters for determining a risk rating for the
undertaking concerned:
– number of deficiencies
– severity of deficiencies
– number of technical roadside inspections or periodic and voluntary
roadworthiness tests
– time factor
1. The deficiencies shall be weighted according to their severity, using the following
severity factors:
– Dangerous deficiency = 40
– Major deficiency = 10
– Minor deficiency = 1
PE-CONS 12/2/14 REV 2 1 ANNEX I EN
Page 42
2. The evolution of an undertaking's (vehicle's) situation shall be reflected by applying a
lower weighting to 'older' inspection results (deficiencies) than to more 'recent' ones, using
the following factors:
– Year 1 = last 12 months = factor 3
– Year 2 = months 13–24 = factor 2
– Year 3 = months 24-36 = factor 1
This shall only apply for the calculation of the overall risk rating.
3. The risk rating shall be calculated using the following formulas:
(a) The formula for the overall risk rating:
321
321
###123
YYY
YYY
CCCDDD
RR
Where
RR = overall risk rating score
I = total for the defects in year 1, 2, 3
DY1 = (#DDx 40) + (#MaD x 10) + (#MiD x 1) in year 1
#... = number of…
PE-CONS 12/2/14 REV 2 2 ANNEX I EN
Page 43
DD = dangerous deficiencies
MaD = major deficiencies
MiD = minor deficiencies
C = checks (technical roadside inspections or periodic and voluntary
roadworthiness tests) in year 1, 2, 3
(b) The formula for the annual risk rating:
C
MiDMaDDDAR#
1#10#40#
Where
AR = annual risk score
#... = number of…
DD = dangerous deficiencies
MaD = major deficiencies
MiD = minor deficiencies
C = checks (technical roadside inspections or periodic and voluntary
roadworthiness tests)
PE-CONS 12/2/14 REV 2 3 ANNEX I EN
Page 44
The annual risk shall be used to assess the evolution of an undertaking over the years.
The classification of undertakings (vehicles) based on the overall risk rating shall be performed in
such a way that the following distribution within the listed undertakings (vehicles) is reached:
– <30 % low risk
– 30 % - 80 % medium risk
– >80 % high risk.
PE-CONS 12/2/14 REV 2 4 ANNEX I EN
Page 45
ANNEX II
SCOPE OF TECHNICAL ROADSIDE INSPECTION
1. INSPECTION AREAS
(0) Identification of the vehicle;
(1) Braking equipment;
(2) Steering;
(3) Visibility;
(4) Lighting equipment and parts of electrical system;
(5) Axles, wheels, tyres, suspension;
(6) Chassis and chassis attachments;
(7) Other equipment;
(8) Nuisance;
(9) Supplementary tests for passenger-carrying vehicles of categories M2 and M3.
2. INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS
Items that may only be checked by the use of equipment are marked with an (E).
PE-CONS 12/2/14 REV 2 1 ANNEX II EN
Page 46
Items that can only be checked to some extent without the use of equipment are marked with + (E).
Where a method of inspection is indicated as visual, this means that, in addition to looking at the
items concerned, the inspector shall also, if appropriate, handle them, evaluate their noise or use any
other appropriate means of inspection not involving the use of equipment.
Technical roadside inspections may cover items listed in Table 1, which includes the recommended
testing methods that should be used. Nothing in this Annex shall prevent an inspector from using
additional equipment where relevant, such as a hoist or a pit.
The tests shall be carried out using techniques and equipment currently available, without the use of
tools to dismantle or remove any part of the vehicle. The test may also include a verification as to
whether the respective parts and components of the vehicle correspond to the safety and
environmental requirements that were in force at the time of approval or, if applicable, at the time
of retrofitting.
Where the design of the vehicle does not allow the application of the test methods laid down in this
Annex, the test shall be conducted in accordance with the recommended test methods accepted by
the competent authorities.
The 'Reasons for failure' do not apply in cases where they refer to requirements which were not
prescribed in the relevant vehicle approval legislation at the time of first registration or first entry
into service, or in the retrofitting requirements.
PE-CONS 12/2/14 REV 2 2 ANNEX II EN
Page 47
3.
CO
NTE
NTS
AN
D M
ETH
OD
S O
F TE
STIN
G, A
sses
smen
t of d
efic
ienc
ies O
F V
EHIC
LES
The
test
shal
l cov
er th
ose
item
s tha
t are
con
side
red
nece
ssar
y an
d re
leva
nt, t
akin
g in
to a
ccou
nt in
par
ticul
ar th
e sa
fety
of t
he b
rake
s, ty
res,
whe
els,
chas
sis a
nd n
uisa
nce,
and
the
reco
mm
ende
d m
etho
ds li
sted
in th
e fo
llow
ing
tabl
e.
For e
ach
vehi
cle
syst
em a
nd c
ompo
nent
subj
ect t
o te
stin
g, th
e as
sess
men
t of d
efic
ienc
ies s
hall
be c
arrie
d ou
t in
acco
rdan
ce w
ith th
e cr
iteria
set o
ut in
that
tabl
e, o
n a
case
-by-
case
bas
is.
Def
icie
ncie
s not
list
ed in
this
Ann
ex sh
all b
e as
sess
ed in
term
s of t
he ri
sks t
hat t
hey
pose
to ro
ad sa
fety
.
Item
M
etho
d R
easo
ns fo
r fai
lure
A
sses
smen
t of d
efic
ienc
ies
M
inor
M
ajor
D
ange
rous
0. ID
ENTI
FIC
ATI
ON
OF
THE
VEH
ICLE
0.1.
Reg
istra
tion
num
ber p
late
s (if
nee
ded
by re
quire
men
ts(1
) ) V
isua
l ins
pect
ion
(a)
Num
ber p
late
(s) m
issi
ng o
r so
inse
cure
ly fi
xed
that
it is
(th
ey a
re) l
ikel
y to
fall
off.
X
(b)
Insc
riptio
n m
issi
ng o
r ille
gibl
e.
X
(c)
Not
in a
ccor
danc
e w
ith v
ehic
le d
ocum
ents
or r
ecor
ds.
X
PE-C
ON
S 12
/2/1
4 R
EV 2
3
AN
NEX
II
EN
Page 48
Item
M
etho
d R
easo
ns fo
r fai
lure
A
sses
smen
t of d
efic
ienc
ies
M
inor
M
ajor
D
ange
rous
0.2.
Veh
icle
iden
tific
atio
n/
chas
sis/
seria
l num
ber
Vis
ual i
nspe
ctio
n
(a)
Mis
sing
or c
an n
ot b
e fo
und.
X
(b)
Inco
mpl
ete,
ille
gibl
e, o
bvio
usly
fals
ified
, or d
oes n
ot
mat
ch th
e ve
hicl
e do
cum
ents
.
X
(c)
Illeg
ible
veh
icle
doc
umen
ts o
r cle
rical
inac
cura
cies
. X
1. B
RA
KIN
G E
QU
IPM
ENT
1.1.
Mec
hani
cal c
ondi
tion
and
oper
atio
n
1.1.
1. S
ervi
ce b
rake
ped
al/h
and
leve
r piv
ot
Vis
ual i
nspe
ctio
n of
the
com
pone
nts
whi
le th
e br
akin
g sy
stem
is o
pera
ted
Not
e: V
ehic
les w
ith p
ower
-ass
iste
d br
akin
g sy
stem
s sho
uld
be in
spec
ted
with
the
engi
ne sw
itche
d of
f.
(a)
Pivo
t too
tigh
t.
X
(b)
Exce
ssiv
e w
ear o
r pla
y.
X
1.1.
2. P
edal
/han
d le
ver c
ondi
tion
and
trave
l of t
he b
rake
ope
ratin
g de
vice
Vis
ual i
nspe
ctio
n of
the
com
pone
nts
whi
le th
e br
akin
g sy
stem
is o
pera
ted
Not
e: V
ehic
les w
ith p
ower
-ass
iste
d br
akin
g sy
stem
s sho
uld
be in
spec
ted
with
the
engi
ne sw
itche
d of
f.
(a)
Exce
ssiv
e or
insu
ffic
ient
rese
rve
trave
l.
Bra
ke c
anno
t be
fully
app
lied
or is
blo
cked
X
X
(b)
Bra
ke c
ontro
l not
rele
asin
g co
rrec
tly.
Its fu
nctio
nalit
y is
aff
ecte
d
X
X
(c)
Ant
i-slip
pro
visi
on o
n br
ake
peda
l mis
sing
, loo
se o
r wor
n sm
ooth
.
X
PE-C
ON
S 12
/2/1
4 R
EV 2
4
AN
NEX
II
EN
Page 49
Item
M
etho
d R
easo
ns fo
r fai
lure
A
sses
smen
t of d
efic
ienc
ies
M
inor
M
ajor
D
ange
rous
1.1.
3. V
acuu
m p
ump
or
com
pres
sor a
nd re
serv
oirs
V
isua
l ins
pect
ion
of th
e co
mpo
nent
s at
norm
al w
orki
ng p
ress
ure.
Che
ck ti
me
requ
ired
for v
acuu
m o
r air
pres
sure
to
reac
h sa
fe w
orki
ng v
alue
and
func
tion
of w
arni
ng d
evic
e, m
ulti-
circ
uit
prot
ectio
n va
lve
and
pres
sure
relie
f va
lve.
(a)
Insu
ffic
ient
pre
ssur
e/va
cuum
to g
ive
assi
stan
ce fo
r at l
east
fo
ur b
rake
app
licat
ions
afte
r the
war
ning
dev
ice
has
oper
ated
(or g
auge
show
s an
unsa
fe re
adin
g).
X
at le
ast t
wo
brak
e ap
plic
atio
ns a
fter t
he w
arni
ng d
evic
e ha
s ope
rate
d (o
r gau
ge sh
ows a
n un
safe
read
ing)
.
X
(b)
Tim
e ta
ken
to b
uild
up
air p
ress
ure/
vacu
um to
safe
w
orki
ng v
alue
is to
o lo
ng a
ccor
ding
to th
e re
quire
men
ts(1
) .
X
(c)
Mul
ti-ci
rcui
t pro
tect
ion
valv
e or
pre
ssur
e re
lief v
alve
not
w
orki
ng.
X
(d)
Air
leak
cau
sing
a n
otic
eabl
e dr
op in
pre
ssur
e or
aud
ible
ai
r lea
ks.
X
(e)
Exte
rnal
dam
age
likel
y to
aff
ect t
he fu
nctio
n of
the
brak
ing
syst
em.
X
Seco
ndar
y br
akin
g pe
rfor
man
ce n
ot m
et.
X
1.1.
4. L
ow p
ress
ure
war
ning
ga
uge
or in
dica
tor
Func
tiona
l che
ck
Mal
func
tioni
ng o
r def
ectiv
e ga
uge
or in
dica
tor.
Low
pre
ssur
e no
t ide
ntifi
able
.
X
X
PE-C
ON
S 12
/2/1
4 R
EV 2
5
AN
NEX
II
EN
Page 50
Item
M
etho
d R
easo
ns fo
r fai
lure
A
sses
smen
t of d
efic
ienc
ies
M
inor
M
ajor
D
ange
rous
1.1.
5. H
and
oper
ated
bra
ke
cont
rol v
alve
V
isua
l ins
pect
ion
of th
e co
mpo
nent
s w
hile
the
brak
ing
syst
em is
ope
rate
d (a
) C
ontro
l cra
cked
, dam
aged
or e
xces
sive
ly w
orn.
X
(b)
Con
trol i
nsec
ure
on v
alve
or v
alve
inse
cure
.
X
(c)
Loos
e co
nnec
tions
or l
eaks
in sy
stem
.
X
(d)
Uns
atis
fact
ory
oper
atio
n.
X
1.1.
6. P
arki
ng b
rake
act
ivat
or,
leve
r con
trol,
park
ing
brak
e ra
tche
t, el
ectro
nic
park
ing
brak
e
Vis
ual i
nspe
ctio
n of
the
com
pone
nts
whi
le th
e br
akin
g sy
stem
is o
pera
ted
(a)
Rat
chet
not
hol
ding
cor
rect
ly.
X
(b)
Wea
r at l
ever
piv
ot o
r in
ratc
het m
echa
nism
.
Exce
ssiv
e w
ear
X
X
(c)
Exce
ssiv
e m
ovem
ent o
f lev
er in
dica
ting
inco
rrec
t ad
just
men
t.
X
(d)
Act
ivat
or m
issi
ng, d
amag
ed o
r ino
pera
tive.
X
(e)
Inco
rrec
t fun
ctio
ning
, war
ning
indi
cato
r sho
ws
mal
func
tion.
X
PE-C
ON
S 12
/2/1
4 R
EV 2
6
AN
NEX
II
EN
Page 51
Item
M
etho
d R
easo
ns fo
r fai
lure
A
sses
smen
t of d
efic
ienc
ies
M
inor
M
ajor
D
ange
rous
1.1.
7. B
raki
ng v
alve
s (fo
ot
valv
es, u
nloa
ders
, gov
erno
rs)
Vis
ual i
nspe
ctio
n of
the
com
pone
nts
whi
le th
e br
akin
g sy
stem
is o
pera
ted
(a)
Val
ve d
amag
ed o
r exc
essi
ve a
ir le
ak.
Its fu
nctio
nalit
y is
aff
ecte
d.
X
X
(b)
Exce
ssiv
e oi
l dis
char
ge fr
om c
ompr
esso
r.
X
(c)
Val
ve in
secu
re o
r ina
dequ
atel
y m
ount
ed.
X
(d)
Hyd
raul
ic fl
uid
disc
harg
e or
leak
.
Its fu
nctio
nalit
y is
aff
ecte
d.
X
X
1.1.
8. C
oupl
ings
for t
raile
r bra
kes
(ele
ctric
al &
pne
umat
ic)
Dis
conn
ect a
nd re
conn
ect b
raki
ng
syst
em c
oupl
ing
betw
een
tow
ing
vehi
cle
and
traile
r
(a)
Tap
or se
lf se
alin
g va
lve
defe
ctiv
e.
Its fu
nctio
nalit
y is
aff
ecte
d.
X
X
(b)
Tap
or v
alve
inse
cure
or i
nade
quat
ely
mou
nted
.
Its fu
nctio
nalit
y is
aff
ecte
d.
X
X
(c)
Exce
ssiv
e le
aks.
Its fu
nctio
nalit
y is
aff
ecte
d.
X
X
(d)
Not
func
tioni
ng c
orre
ctly
.
Ope
ratio
n of
bra
ke a
ffec
ted.
X
X
PE-C
ON
S 12
/2/1
4 R
EV 2
7
AN
NEX
II
EN
Page 52
Item
M
etho
d R
easo
ns fo
r fai
lure
A
sses
smen
t of d
efic
ienc
ies
M
inor
M
ajor
D
ange
rous
1.1.
9. E
nerg
y st
orag
e re
serv
oir/
pres
sure
tank
V
isua
l ins
pect
ion
(a)
Tank
slig
htly
dam
aged
or s
light
ly c
orro
ded.
Tank
hea
vily
dam
aged
, cor
rode
d or
leak
ing.
X
X
(b)
Dra
in d
evic
e in
oper
ativ
e.
X
(c)
Tank
inse
cure
or i
nade
quat
ely
mou
nted
.
X
1.1.
10. B
rake
serv
o un
its, m
aste
r cy
linde
r (hy
drau
lic sy
stem
s)
Vis
ual i
nspe
ctio
n of
the
com
pone
nts
whi
le th
e br
akin
g sy
stem
is o
pera
ted,
if
poss
ible
(a)
Def
ectiv
e or
inef
fect
ive
serv
o un
it.
If it
is n
ot o
pera
ting.
X
X
(b)
Mas
ter c
ylin
der d
efec
tive
but b
rake
still
ope
ratin
g.
Mas
ter c
ylin
der d
efec
tive
or le
akin
g.
X
X
(c)
Mas
ter c
ylin
der i
nsec
ure
but b
rake
still
ope
ratin
g.
Mas
ter c
ylin
der i
nsec
ure.
X
X
(d)
Insu
ffic
ient
bra
ke fl
uid
belo
w M
IN m
ark.
Bra
ke fl
uid
sign
ifica
ntly
bel
ow M
IN m
ark.
No
brak
e flu
id v
isib
le.
X
X
X
(e)
Mas
ter c
ylin
der r
eser
voir
cap
mis
sing
. X
(f)
Bra
ke fl
uid
war
ning
ligh
t illu
min
ated
or d
efec
tive.
X
(g)
Inco
rrec
t fun
ctio
ning
of b
rake
flui
d le
vel w
arni
ng d
evic
e.
X
PE-C
ON
S 12
/2/1
4 R
EV 2
8
AN
NEX
II
EN
Page 53
Item
M
etho
d R
easo
ns fo
r fai
lure
A
sses
smen
t of d
efic
ienc
ies
M
inor
M
ajor
D
ange
rous
1.1.
11. R
igid
bra
ke p
ipes
V
isua
l ins
pect
ion
of th
e co
mpo
nent
s w
hile
the
brak
ing
syst
em is
ope
rate
d, if
po
ssib
le
(a)
Imm
inen
t ris
k of
failu
re o
r fra
ctur
e.
X
(b)
Pipe
s or c
onne
ctio
ns le
akin
g (a
ir br
ake
syst
ems)
.
Pipe
s or c
onne
ctio
n le
akin
g (h
ydra
ulic
bra
ke sy
stem
s).
X
X
(c)
Pipe
s dam
aged
or e
xces
sive
ly c
orro
ded.
Aff
ectin
g th
e fu
nctio
ning
of t
he b
rake
s on
acco
unt o
f bl
ocki
ng o
r im
min
ent r
isk
of le
akin
g.
X
X
(d)
Pipe
s mis
plac
ed.
Ris
k of
dam
age.
X
X
1.1.
12. F
lexi
ble
brak
e ho
ses
Vis
ual i
nspe
ctio
n of
the
com
pone
nts
whi
le th
e br
akin
g sy
stem
is o
pera
ted,
if
poss
ible
.
(a)
Imm
inen
t ris
k of
failu
re o
r fra
ctur
e.
X
(b)
Hos
es d
amag
ed, c
hafin
g, tw
iste
d or
too
shor
t.
Hos
es d
amag
ed o
r cha
fing.
X
X
(c)
Hos
es o
r con
nect
ions
leak
ing
(air
brak
e sy
stem
s).
Hos
es o
r con
nect
ions
leak
ing
(hyd
raul
ic b
rake
syst
ems)
.
X
X
(d)
Hos
es b
ulgi
ng u
nder
pre
ssur
e.
Cor
d im
paire
d.
X
X
(e)
Hos
es p
orou
s.
X
PE-C
ON
S 12
/2/1
4 R
EV 2
9
AN
NEX
II
EN
Page 54
Item
M
etho
d R
easo
ns fo
r fai
lure
A
sses
smen
t of d
efic
ienc
ies
M
inor
M
ajor
D
ange
rous
1.1.
13. B
rake
lini
ngs a
nd p
ads
Vis
ual i
nspe
ctio
n (a
) Li
ning
or p
ad e
xces
sive
ly w
orn.
(min
imum
mar
k re
ache
d).
Lini
ng o
r pad
exc
essi
vely
wor
n. (m
inim
um m
ark
not
visi
ble)
.
X
X
(b)
Lini
ng o
r pad
con
tam
inat
ed (o
il, g
reas
e et
c.).
Bra
ke p
erfo
rman
ce a
ffec
ted.
X
X
(c)
Lini
ng o
r pad
mis
sing
or w
rong
ly m
ount
ed.
X
1.1.
14. B
rake
dru
ms,
brak
e di
scs
Vis
ual i
nspe
ctio
n (a
) D
rum
or d
isc
wor
n.
Dru
m o
r dis
c ex
cess
ivel
y sc
ored
, cra
cked
, ins
ecur
e or
fr
actu
red
X
X
(b)
Dru
m o
r dis
c co
ntam
inat
ed (o
il, g
reas
e, e
tc.).
Bra
king
per
form
ance
seve
rely
aff
ecte
d.
X
X
(c)
Dru
m o
r dis
c m
issi
ng.
X
(d)
Bac
k pl
ate
inse
cure
.
X
PE-C
ON
S 12
/2/1
4 R
EV 2
10
A
NN
EX II
E
N
Page 55
Item
M
etho
d R
easo
ns fo
r fai
lure
A
sses
smen
t of d
efic
ienc
ies
M
inor
M
ajor
D
ange
rous
1.1.
15. B
rake
cab
les,
rods
, lev
ers,
linka
ges
Vis
ual i
nspe
ctio
n of
the
com
pone
nts
whi
le th
e br
akin
g sy
stem
is o
pera
ted,
if
poss
ible
(a)
Cab
le d
amag
ed o
r kno
tted.
Bra
king
per
form
ance
aff
ecte
d.
X
X
(b)
Com
pone
nt e
xces
sive
ly w
orn
or c
orro
ded.
Bra
king
per
form
ance
aff
ecte
d.
X
X
(c)
Cab
le, r
od o
r joi
nt in
secu
re.
X
(d)
Cab
le g
uide
def
ectiv
e.
X
(e)
Res
trict
ion
to fr
ee m
ovem
ent o
f the
bra
king
syst
em.
X
(f)
Abn
orm
al m
ovem
ent o
f the
leve
rs/li
nkag
e in
dica
ting
mal
adju
stm
ent o
r exc
essi
ve w
ear.
X
1.1.
16. B
rake
act
uato
rs
(incl
udin
g sp
ring
brak
es o
r hy
drau
lic c
ylin
ders
)
Vis
ual i
nspe
ctio
n of
the
com
pone
nts
whi
le th
e br
akin
g sy
stem
is o
pera
ted,
if
poss
ible
.
(a)
Act
uato
r cra
cked
or d
amag
ed.
Bra
king
per
form
ance
aff
ecte
d.
X
X
(b)
Act
uato
r lea
king
.
Bra
king
per
form
ance
aff
ecte
d.
X
X
(c)
Act
uato
r ins
ecur
e or
inad
equa
tely
mou
nted
.
Bra
king
per
form
ance
aff
ecte
d.
X
X
PE-C
ON
S 12
/2/1
4 R
EV 2
11
A
NN
EX II
E
N
Page 56
Item
M
etho
d R
easo
ns fo
r fai
lure
A
sses
smen
t of d
efic
ienc
ies
M
inor
M
ajor
D
ange
rous
(d)
Act
uato
r exc
essi
vely
cor
rode
d.
Like
ly to
cra
ck.
X
X
(e)
Insu
ffic
ient
or e
xces
sive
trav
el o
f ope
ratin
g pi
ston
or
diap
hrag
m m
echa
nism
.
Bra
king
per
form
ance
aff
ecte
d (la
ck o
f res
erve
m
ovem
ent).
X
X
(f)
Dus
t cov
er d
amag
ed.
Dus
t cov
er m
issi
ng o
r exc
essi
vely
dam
aged
.
X
X
1.1.
17. L
oad
sens
ing
valv
e V
isua
l ins
pect
ion
of th
e co
mpo
nent
s w
hile
the
brak
ing
syst
em is
ope
rate
d, if
po
ssib
le.
(a)
Def
ectiv
e lin
kage
.
X
(b)
Link
age
inco
rrec
tly a
djus
ted.
X
(c)
Val
ve se
ized
or i
nope
rativ
e (A
BS
func
tioni
ng).
Val
ve se
ized
or i
nope
rativ
e
X
X
(d)
Val
ve m
issi
ng. (
if re
quire
d).
X
(e)
Mis
sing
dat
a pl
ate.
X
(f)
Dat
a ill
egib
le o
r not
in a
ccor
danc
e w
ith re
quire
men
ts(1) .
X
PE-C
ON
S 12
/2/1
4 R
EV 2
12
A
NN
EX II
E
N
Page 57
Item
M
etho
d R
easo
ns fo
r fai
lure
A
sses
smen
t of d
efic
ienc
ies
M
inor
M
ajor
D
ange
rous
1.1.
18. S
lack
adj
uste
rs a
nd
indi
cato
rs
Vis
ual i
nspe
ctio
n (a
) A
djus
ter d
amag
ed, s
eize
d or
hav
ing
abno
rmal
mov
emen
t, ex
cess
ive
wea
r or i
ncor
rect
adj
ustm
ent.
X
(b)
Adj
uste
r def
ectiv
e.
X
(c)
Inco
rrec
tly in
stal
led
or re
plac
ed.
X
1.1.
19. E
ndur
ance
bra
king
sy
stem
(whe
re fi
tted
or re
quire
d)
Vis
ual i
nspe
ctio
n (a
) In
secu
re c
onne
ctor
s or m
ount
ings
.
Its fu
nctio
nalit
y is
aff
ecte
d.
X
X
(b)
Syst
em o
bvio
usly
def
ectiv
e or
mis
sing
.
X
1.1.
20. A
utom
atic
ope
ratio
n of
tra
iler b
rake
s D
isco
nnec
t bra
ke c
oupl
ing
betw
een
tow
ing
vehi
cle
and
traile
r Tr
aile
r bra
ke d
oes n
ot a
pply
aut
omat
ical
ly w
hen
coup
ling
disc
onne
cted
.
X
1.1.
21. C
ompl
ete
brak
ing
syst
em
Vis
ual i
nspe
ctio
n (a
) O
ther
syst
em d
evic
es (e
.g. a
nti-f
reez
e pu
mp,
ai
r dry
er, e
tc.)
dam
aged
ext
erna
lly o
r exc
essi
vely
cor
rode
d in
a w
ay th
at a
dver
sely
aff
ects
the
brak
ing
syst
em.
X
Bra
king
per
form
ance
aff
ecte
d.
X
(b)
Leak
age
of a
ir or
ant
i-fre
eze.
Syst
em fu
nctio
nalit
y af
fect
ed.
X
X
PE-C
ON
S 12
/2/1
4 R
EV 2
13
A
NN
EX II
E
N
Page 58
Item
M
etho
d R
easo
ns fo
r fai
lure
A
sses
smen
t of d
efic
ienc
ies
M
inor
M
ajor
D
ange
rous
(c)
Any
com
pone
nt in
secu
re o
r ina
dequ
atel
y m
ount
ed.
X
(d)
Uns
afe
mod
ifica
tion
to a
ny c
ompo
nent
(3) .
Bra
king
per
form
ance
aff
ecte
d.
X
X
1.1.
22. T
est c
onne
ctio
ns (w
here
fit
ted
or re
quire
d)
Vis
ual i
nspe
ctio
n M
issi
ng.
X
1.1.
23. O
verr
un b
rake
V
isua
l ins
pect
ion
and
by o
pera
tion
Insu
ffic
ient
eff
icie
ncy.
X
1.2.
Ser
vice
bra
king
per
form
ance
and
eff
icie
ncy
1.2.
1. P
erfo
rman
ce
(E)
Dur
ing
a te
st o
n a
brak
e te
ster
, app
ly
the
brak
es p
rogr
essiv
ely
up to
m
axim
um e
ffor
t.
(a)
Inad
equa
te b
raki
ng e
ffor
t on
one
or m
ore
whe
els.
No
brak
ing
effo
rt on
one
or m
ore
whe
els.
X
X
(b)
Bra
king
eff
ort f
rom
any
whe
el is
less
than
70
% o
f the
m
axim
um e
ffor
t rec
orde
d fr
om th
e ot
her w
heel
on
the
sam
e ax
le. O
r, in
the
case
of t
estin
g on
the
road
, the
ve
hicl
e de
viat
es e
xces
sive
ly fr
om a
stra
ight
line
.
Bra
king
eff
ort f
rom
any
whe
el is
less
than
50
% o
f the
m
axim
um e
ffor
t rec
orde
d fr
om th
e ot
her w
heel
on
the
sam
e ax
le in
the
case
of s
teer
ed a
xles
.
X
X
PE-C
ON
S 12
/2/1
4 R
EV 2
14
A
NN
EX II
E
N
Page 59
Item
M
etho
d R
easo
ns fo
r fai
lure
A
sses
smen
t of d
efic
ienc
ies
M
inor
M
ajor
D
ange
rous
(c)
No
grad
ual v
aria
tion
in b
rake
eff
ort (
grab
bing
).
X
(d)
Abn
orm
al la
g in
bra
ke o
pera
tion
of a
ny w
heel
.
X
(e)
Exce
ssiv
e flu
ctua
tion
of b
rake
forc
e du
ring
each
com
plet
e w
heel
revo
lutio
n.
X
1.2.
2. E
ffic
ienc
y
(E)
Test
with
a b
rake
test
er a
t the
pr
esen
ted
wei
ght o
r, if
one
cann
ot b
e us
ed fo
r tec
hnic
al re
ason
s, by
a ro
ad
test
usi
ng a
dec
eler
atio
n re
cord
ing
inst
rum
ent1 .
Doe
s not
giv
e at
leas
t the
min
imum
figu
re a
s fol
low
s2 :
Cat
egor
ies M
1, M
2 and
M3:
50 %
3
Cat
egor
y N
1: 45
%
Cat
egor
ies N
2 and
N3:
43 %
4
Cat
egor
ies O
3 and
O4:
40 %
5
Less
than
50
% o
f the
abo
ve v
alue
s rea
ched
X
X
1 Th
e br
ake
perc
enta
ge e
ffic
ienc
y is
cal
cula
ted
by d
ivid
ing
the
tota
l bra
ke e
ffor
t ach
ieve
d w
hen
the
brak
e is
app
lied
by th
e ve
hicl
e w
eigh
t or,
in
the
case
of a
sem
i-tra
iler,
the
sum
of t
he a
xle
load
s and
then
mul
tiply
ing
the
resu
lt by
100
. 2
The
vehi
cle
cate
gorie
s whi
ch a
re o
utsi
de th
e sc
ope
of th
is D
irect
ive
are
incl
uded
for g
uida
nce.
3
48 %
for v
ehic
les n
ot fi
tted
with
AB
S or
type
app
rove
d be
fore
1 O
ctob
er 1
991.
4
45 %
for v
ehic
les r
egis
tere
d af
ter 1
988
or fr
om th
e da
te sp
ecifi
ed in
requ
irem
ents
, whi
chev
er is
the
late
r. 5
43 %
for s
emi-t
raile
rs a
nd d
raw
-bar
trai
lers
regi
ster
ed a
fter 1
988
or fr
om th
e da
te in
requ
irem
ents
, whi
chev
er is
the
late
r. PE
-CO
NS
12/2
/14
REV
2
15
AN
NEX
II
EN
Page 60
Item
M
etho
d R
easo
ns fo
r fai
lure
A
sses
smen
t of d
efic
ienc
ies
M
inor
M
ajor
D
ange
rous
1.3.
Sec
onda
ry (e
mer
genc
y) b
raki
ng p
erfo
rman
ce a
nd e
ffic
ienc
y (if
met
by
sepa
rate
syst
em)
1.3.
1. P
erfo
rman
ce
(E)
If th
e se
cond
ary
brak
ing
syst
em is
se
para
te fr
om th
e se
rvic
e br
akin
g sy
stem
, use
the
met
hod
spec
ified
in
1.2
.1.
(a)
Inad
equa
te b
raki
ng e
ffor
t on
one
or m
ore
whe
els.
No
brak
ing
effo
rt on
one
or m
ore
whe
els.
X
X
(b)
Bra
king
eff
ort f
rom
any
whe
el is
less
than
70
% o
f m
axim
um e
ffor
t rec
orde
d fr
om a
noth
er w
heel
on
the
sam
e ax
le sp
ecifi
ed. O
r, in
the
case
of t
estin
g on
the
road
, the
ve
hicl
e de
viat
es e
xces
sive
ly fr
om a
stra
ight
line
.
Bra
king
eff
ort f
rom
any
whe
el is
less
than
50
% o
f the
m
axim
um e
ffor
t rec
orde
d fr
om th
e ot
her w
heel
on
the
sam
e ax
le in
the
case
of s
teer
ed a
xles
.
X
X
(c)
No
grad
ual v
aria
tion
in b
rake
eff
ort (
grab
bing
).
X
1.3.
2. E
ffic
ienc
y
(E)
If th
e se
cond
ary
brak
ing
syst
em is
se
para
te fr
om th
e se
rvic
e br
akin
g sy
stem
, use
the
met
hod
spec
ified
in
1.2.
2.
Bra
king
eff
ort l
ess t
han
50 %
1 of t
he re
quire
d se
rvic
e br
ake
perf
orm
ance
def
ined
in se
ctio
n 1.
2.2
in re
latio
n to
the
max
imum
au
thor
ized
mas
s.
X
Less
than
50
% o
f the
abo
ve b
raki
ng e
ffor
t val
ues r
each
ed in
re
latio
n to
the
vehi
cle
mas
s dur
ing
test
ing.
X
1 2.
2m/s
2 for N
1, N
2 an
d N
3 veh
icle
s. PE
-CO
NS
12/2
/14
REV
2
16
AN
NEX
II
EN
Page 61
Item
M
etho
d R
easo
ns fo
r fai
lure
A
sses
smen
t of d
efic
ienc
ies
M
inor
M
ajor
D
ange
rous
1.4.
Par
king
bra
king
per
form
ance
and
eff
icie
ncy
1.4.
1. P
erfo
rman
ce
(E)
App
ly th
e br
ake
durin
g a
test
on
a br
ake
test
er
Bra
ke in
oper
ativ
e on
one
side
or,
in th
e ca
se o
f tes
ting
on th
e ro
ad,
the
vehi
cle
devi
ates
exc
essi
vely
from
a st
raig
ht li
ne.
X
Less
than
50
% o
f the
bra
king
eff
ort v
alue
s as r
efer
red
to in
po
int 1
.4.2
. rea
ched
in re
latio
n to
the
vehi
cle
mas
s dur
ing
test
ing
X
1.4.
2. E
ffic
ienc
y
(E)
Test
with
a b
rake
test
er. I
f not
po
ssib
le, t
hen
by a
road
test
usi
ng a
n in
dica
ting
or d
ecel
erat
ion
reco
rdin
g in
stru
men
t
Doe
s not
giv
e, fo
r all
vehi
cles
, a b
raki
ng ra
tio o
f at l
east
16
% in
re
latio
n to
the
max
imum
aut
horis
ed m
ass,
or, f
or m
otor
veh
icle
s, of
at
leas
t 12
% in
rela
tion
to th
e m
axim
um a
utho
rised
com
bina
tion
mas
s of t
he v
ehic
le, w
hich
ever
is th
e gr
eate
r.
X
Less
than
50
% o
f the
abo
ve b
raki
ng ra
tio v
alue
s rea
ched
in
rela
tion
to th
e ve
hicl
e m
ass d
urin
g te
stin
g.
X
1.5.
End
uran
ce b
raki
ng sy
stem
pe
rfor
man
ce
Vis
ual i
nspe
ctio
n an
d, w
here
pos
sibl
e te
st w
heth
er th
e sy
stem
func
tions
(a
) N
o gr
adua
l var
iatio
n of
eff
icie
ncy
(not
app
licab
le to
ex
haus
t bra
ke sy
stem
s).
X
(b)
Syst
em n
ot fu
nctio
ning
.
X
1.6.
Ant
i-loc
k br
akin
g sy
stem
(A
BS)
V
isua
l ins
pect
ion
and
insp
ectio
n of
w
arni
ng d
evic
e an
d/or
usi
ng e
lect
roni
c ve
hicl
e in
terf
ace
(a)
War
ning
dev
ice
mal
func
tioni
ng.
X
(b)
War
ning
dev
ice
show
s sys
tem
mal
func
tion.
X
(c)
Whe
el sp
eed
sens
ors m
issi
ng o
r dam
aged
.
X
PE-C
ON
S 12
/2/1
4 R
EV 2
17
A
NN
EX II
E
N
Page 62
Item
M
etho
d R
easo
ns fo
r fai
lure
A
sses
smen
t of d
efic
ienc
ies
M
inor
M
ajor
D
ange
rous
(d)
Wiri
ngs d
amag
ed.
X
(e)
Oth
er c
ompo
nent
s mis
sing
or d
amag
ed.
X
(f)
Syst
em in
dica
tes f
ailu
re v
ia th
e el
ectro
nic
vehi
cle
inte
rfac
e.
X
1.7.
Ele
ctro
nic
brak
e sy
stem
(E
BS)
V
isua
l ins
pect
ion
and
insp
ectio
n of
w
arni
ng d
evic
e an
d/or
usi
ng e
lect
roni
c ve
hicl
e in
terf
ace
(a)
War
ning
dev
ice
mal
func
tioni
ng.
X
(b)
War
ning
dev
ice
show
s sys
tem
mal
func
tion.
X
(c)
Syst
em in
dica
tes f
ailu
re v
ia th
e el
ectro
nic
vehi
cle
inte
rfac
e.
X
(d)
Con
nect
or b
etw
een
tow
ing
vehi
cle
and
traile
r in
com
patib
le o
r mis
sing
.
X
1.8.
Bra
ke fl
uid
Vis
ual i
nspe
ctio
n
Bra
ke fl
uid
cont
amin
ated
or s
edim
ente
d.
Imm
inen
t ris
k of
failu
re.
X
X
PE-C
ON
S 12
/2/1
4 R
EV 2
18
A
NN
EX II
E
N
Page 63
Item
M
etho
d R
easo
ns fo
r fai
lure
A
sses
smen
t of d
efic
ienc
ies
M
inor
M
ajor
D
ange
rous
2. S
TEER
ING
2.1.
Mec
hani
cal c
ondi
tion
2.1.
1. S
teer
ing
gear
con
ditio
n V
isua
l ins
pect
ion
of th
e op
erat
ion
of
the
stee
ring
gear
whi
le th
e st
eerin
g w
heel
is ro
tate
d
(a)
Sect
or sh
aft t
wis
ted
or sp
lines
wor
n.
Aff
ectin
g fu
nctio
nalit
y.
X
X
(b)
Exce
ssiv
e w
ear i
n se
ctor
shaf
t.
Aff
ectin
g fu
nctio
nalit
y.
X
X
(c)
Exce
ssiv
e m
ovem
ent o
f sec
tor s
haft.
Aff
ectin
g fu
nctio
nalit
y.
X
X
(d)
Leak
ing.
Form
atio
n of
dro
ps.
X
X
2.1.
2. S
teer
ing
gear
cas
ing
atta
chm
ent
Vis
ual i
nspe
ctio
n of
the
atta
chm
ent o
f ge
ar c
asin
g to
cha
ssis
whi
le th
e st
eerin
g w
heel
is ro
tate
d cl
ockw
ise
and
anti-
cloc
kwis
e.
(a)
Stee
ring
gear
cas
ing
not p
rope
rly a
ttach
ed.
Atta
chm
ents
dan
gero
usly
loos
e or
rela
tive
mov
emen
t to
chas
sis/
body
wor
k vi
sibl
e.
X
X
(b)
Elon
gate
d fix
ing
hole
s in
chas
sis.
Atta
chm
ents
serio
usly
aff
ecte
d.
X
X
PE-C
ON
S 12
/2/1
4 R
EV 2
19
A
NN
EX II
E
N
Page 64
Item
M
etho
d R
easo
ns fo
r fai
lure
A
sses
smen
t of d
efic
ienc
ies
M
inor
M
ajor
D
ange
rous
(c)
Mis
sing
or f
ract
ured
fixi
ng b
olts
.
Atta
chm
ents
serio
usly
aff
ecte
d.
X
X
(d)
Stee
ring
gear
cas
ing
frac
ture
d.
Stab
ility
or a
ttach
men
t of c
asin
g af
fect
ed.
X
X
2.1.
3. S
teer
ing
linka
ge c
ondi
tion
Vis
ual i
nspe
ctio
n of
stee
ring
com
pone
nts f
or w
ear,
frac
ture
s and
se
curit
y w
hile
the
stee
ring
whe
el is
ro
tate
d cl
ock-
wis
e an
d an
ti-cl
ock-
wis
e
(a)
Rel
ativ
e m
ovem
ent b
etw
een
com
pone
nts w
hich
shou
ld b
e fix
ed.
X
Exce
ssiv
e m
ovem
ent o
r lik
ely
to u
nlin
k.
X
(b)
Exce
ssiv
e w
ear a
t joi
nts.
A v
ery
serio
us ri
sk o
f unl
inki
ng.
X
X
(c)
Frac
ture
s or d
efor
mat
ion
of a
ny c
ompo
nent
.
Aff
ectin
g fu
nctio
n.
X
X
(d)
Abs
ence
of l
ocki
ng d
evic
es.
X
(e)
Mis
alig
nmen
t of c
ompo
nent
s (e.
g. tr
ack
rod
or d
rag
link)
.
X
(f)
Uns
afe
mod
ifica
tion(3
) .
Aff
ectin
g fu
nctio
n.
X
X
PE-C
ON
S 12
/2/1
4 R
EV 2
20
A
NN
EX II
E
N
Page 65
Item
M
etho
d R
easo
ns fo
r fai
lure
A
sses
smen
t of d
efic
ienc
ies
M
inor
M
ajor
D
ange
rous
(g)
Dus
t cov
er d
amag
ed o
r det
erio
rate
d.
Dus
t cov
er m
issi
ng o
r sev
erel
y de
terio
rate
d.
X
X
2.1.
4. S
teer
ing
linka
ge o
pera
tion
Vis
ual i
nspe
ctio
n of
stee
ring
com
pone
nts f
or w
ear,
frac
ture
s and
se
curit
y w
hile
the
stee
ring
whe
el is
ro
tate
d cl
ockw
ise
and
anti-
cloc
kwis
e w
ith th
e ro
ad w
heel
s on
the
grou
nd
and
the
engi
ne ru
nnin
g (p
ower
st
eerin
g).
(a)
Mov
ing
stee
ring
linka
ge fo
ulin
g a
fixed
par
t of t
he c
hass
is.
X
(b)
Stee
ring
stop
s not
ope
ratin
g or
mis
sing
.
X
2.1.
5. P
ower
stee
ring
Che
ck st
eerin
g sy
stem
for l
eaks
and
hy
drau
lic fl
uid
rese
rvoi
r lev
el (i
f vi
sibl
e). W
ith th
e ro
ad w
heel
s on
grou
nd a
nd w
ith th
e en
gine
runn
ing,
ch
eck
that
the
pow
er st
eerin
g sy
stem
is
oper
atin
g
(a)
Flui
d le
ak.
X
(b)
Insu
ffic
ient
flui
d (b
elow
MIN
mar
k).
Insu
ffic
ient
rese
rvoi
r.
X
X
(c)
Mec
hani
sm n
ot w
orki
ng.
Stee
ring
affe
cted
.
X
X
(d)
Mec
hani
sm fr
actu
red
or in
secu
re.
Stee
ring
affe
cted
.
X
X
PE-C
ON
S 12
/2/1
4 R
EV 2
21
A
NN
EX II
E
N
Page 66
Item
M
etho
d R
easo
ns fo
r fai
lure
A
sses
smen
t of d
efic
ienc
ies
M
inor
M
ajor
D
ange
rous
(e)
Mis
alig
nmen
t or f
oulin
g of
com
pone
nts.
Stee
ring
affe
cted
.
X
X
(f)
Uns
afe
mod
ifica
tion(3
) .
Stee
ring
affe
cted
.
X
X
(g)
Cab
les/
hose
s dam
aged
, exc
essi
vely
cor
rode
d.
Stee
ring
affe
cted
.
X
X
2.2.
Ste
erin
g w
heel
, col
umn
and
hand
le b
ar
2.2.
1. S
teer
ing
whe
el c
ondi
tion
With
the
road
whe
els o
n th
e gr
ound
, pu
sh a
nd p
ull t
he st
eerin
g w
heel
in li
ne
with
col
umn,
pus
h st
eerin
g w
heel
in
vario
us d
irect
ions
at r
ight
ang
les t
o th
e co
lum
n. V
isua
l ins
pect
ion
of p
lay,
and
co
nditi
on o
f fle
xibl
e co
uplin
gs o
r un
iver
sal j
oint
s
(a)
Rel
ativ
e m
ovem
ent b
etw
een
stee
ring
whe
el a
nd c
olum
n in
dica
ting
loos
enes
s.
X
Ver
y se
rious
risk
of u
nlin
king
.
X
(b)
Abs
ence
of r
etai
ning
dev
ice
on st
eerin
g w
heel
hub
.
Ver
y se
rious
risk
of u
nlin
king
.
X
X
(c)
Frac
ture
or l
oose
ness
of s
teer
ing
whe
el h
ub, r
im o
r spo
kes.
Ver
y se
rious
risk
of u
nlin
king
.
X
X
(d)
Uns
afe
mod
ifica
tion(3
) .
X
PE-C
ON
S 12
/2/1
4 R
EV 2
22
A
NN
EX II
E
N
Page 67
Item
M
etho
d R
easo
ns fo
r fai
lure
A
sses
smen
t of d
efic
ienc
ies
M
inor
M
ajor
D
ange
rous
2.2.
2. S
teer
ing
colu
mn
and
stee
ring
dam
pers
Pu
sh a
nd p
ull t
he st
eerin
g w
heel
in li
ne
with
col
umn,
pus
h st
eerin
g w
heel
in
vario
us d
irect
ions
at r
ight
ang
les t
o th
e co
lum
n. V
isua
l ins
pect
ion
of p
lay,
and
co
nditi
on o
f fle
xibl
e co
uplin
gs o
r un
iver
sal j
oint
s.
(a)
Exce
ssiv
e m
ovem
ent o
f cen
tre o
f ste
erin
g w
heel
up
or
dow
n.
X
(b)
Exce
ssiv
e m
ovem
ent o
f top
of c
olum
n ra
dial
ly fr
om a
xis
of c
olum
n.
X
(c)
Det
erio
rate
d fle
xibl
e co
uplin
g.
X
(d)
Atta
chm
ent d
efec
tive.
Ver
y se
rious
risk
of u
nlin
king
.
X
X
(e)
Uns
afe
mod
ifica
tion
(3)
X
2.3.
Ste
erin
g pl
ay
With
the
engi
ne ru
nnin
g, fo
r veh
icle
s w
ith p
ower
stee
ring
and
with
the
road
w
heel
s in
the
stra
ight
-ahe
ad p
ositi
on,
light
ly tu
rn th
e st
eerin
g w
heel
cl
ockw
ise
and
anti-
cloc
kwis
e as
far a
s po
ssib
le w
ithou
t mov
ing
the
road
w
heel
s. V
isua
l ins
pect
ion
of fr
ee
mov
emen
t.
Free
pla
y in
stee
ring
exce
ssiv
e (f
or e
xam
ple,
mov
emen
t of a
poi
nt
on th
e rim
exc
eedi
ng o
ne fi
fth o
f the
dia
met
er o
f the
stee
ring
whe
el) o
r not
in a
ccor
danc
e w
ith th
e re
quire
men
ts(1
) .
X
Safe
stee
ring
affe
cted
.
X
2.4.
Whe
el a
lignm
ent (
X)(2
) V
isua
l ins
pect
ion
Obv
ious
mis
alig
nmen
t
Stra
ight
-on
driv
ing
affe
cted
; dire
ctio
nal s
tabi
lity
impa
ired.
X
X
PE-C
ON
S 12
/2/1
4 R
EV 2
23
A
NN
EX II
E
N
Page 68
Item
M
etho
d R
easo
ns fo
r fai
lure
A
sses
smen
t of d
efic
ienc
ies
M
inor
M
ajor
D
ange
rous
2.5.
Tra
iler s
teer
ed a
xle
turn
tabl
e V
isua
l ins
pect
ion
or u
sing
a sp
ecia
lly
adap
ted
whe
el p
lay
dete
ctor
(a
) C
ompo
nent
slig
htly
dam
aged
.
Com
pone
nt h
eavi
ly d
amag
ed o
r cra
cked
.
X
X
(b)
Exce
ssiv
e pl
ay.
Stra
ight
-on
driv
ing
affe
cted
; dire
ctio
nal s
tabi
lity
impa
ired.
X
X
(c)
Atta
chm
ent d
efec
tive.
Atta
chm
ent s
erio
usly
aff
ecte
d.
X
X
2.6.
Ele
ctro
nic
Pow
er S
teer
ing
(EPS
) V
isua
l ins
pect
ion
and
cons
iste
ncy
chec
k be
twee
n th
e an
gle
of th
e st
eerin
g w
heel
and
the
angl
e of
the
whe
els
whe
n sw
itchi
ng o
n/of
f the
eng
ine,
an
d/or
usi
ng th
e el
ectro
nic
vehi
cle
inte
rfac
e.
(a)
EPS
mal
func
tion
indi
cato
r lam
p (M
IL) i
ndic
ates
any
kin
d of
failu
re o
f the
syst
em.
X
(b)
Pow
er a
ssis
tanc
e no
t wor
king
.
X
(c)
Syst
em in
dica
tes f
ailu
re v
ia th
e el
ectro
nic
vehi
cle
inte
rfac
e.
X
3.
VIS
IBIL
ITY
3.1.
Fie
ld o
f vis
ion
Vis
ual i
nspe
ctio
n fr
om d
rivin
g se
at
Obs
truct
ion
with
in d
river
's fie
ld o
f vie
w th
at m
ater
ially
aff
ects
his
vi
ew in
fron
t or t
o th
e si
des (
outs
ide
clea
ning
are
a of
win
dscr
een
wip
ers)
.
X
Insi
de c
lean
ing
area
of w
inds
cree
n w
iper
s aff
ecte
d or
out
er m
irror
s no
t vis
ible
.
X
PE-C
ON
S 12
/2/1
4 R
EV 2
24
A
NN
EX II
E
N
Page 69
Item
M
etho
d R
easo
ns fo
r fai
lure
A
sses
smen
t of d
efic
ienc
ies
M
inor
M
ajor
D
ange
rous
3.2.
Con
ditio
n of
gla
ss
Vis
ual i
nspe
ctio
n (a
) C
rack
ed o
r dis
colo
ured
gla
ss o
r tra
nspa
rent
pan
el (i
f pe
rmitt
ed).
(out
side
cle
anin
g ar
ea o
f win
dscr
een
wip
ers)
X
Insi
de c
lean
ing
area
of w
inds
cree
n w
iper
s aff
ecte
d or
ou
ter m
irror
s not
vis
ible
X
(b
) G
lass
or t
rans
pare
nt p
anel
(inc
ludi
ng re
flect
ing
or ti
nted
fil
m) t
hat d
oes n
ot c
ompl
y w
ith sp
ecifi
catio
ns in
the
requ
irem
ents
(1) (o
utsi
de c
lean
ing
area
of w
inds
cree
n w
iper
s).
Insi
de c
lean
ing
area
of w
inds
cree
n w
iper
s aff
ecte
d or
ou
ter m
irror
s not
vis
ible
.
X
X
(c
) G
lass
or t
rans
pare
nt p
anel
in u
nacc
epta
ble
cond
ition
.
Vis
ibili
ty th
roug
h in
side
clea
ning
are
a of
win
dscr
een
wip
ers h
eavi
ly a
ffec
ted.
X
X
3.3.
Rea
r-vi
ew m
irror
s or d
evic
es
Vis
ual i
nspe
ctio
n (a
) M
irror
or d
evic
e m
issi
ng o
r not
fitte
d ac
cord
ing
to th
e re
quire
men
ts(1
) (at l
east
two
rear
-vie
w d
evic
es a
vaila
ble)
. X
Few
er th
an tw
o re
ar-v
iew
dev
ices
ava
ilabl
e.
X
PE-C
ON
S 12
/2/1
4 R
EV 2
25
A
NN
EX II
E
N
Page 70
Item
M
etho
d R
easo
ns fo
r fai
lure
A
sses
smen
t of d
efic
ienc
ies
M
inor
M
ajor
D
ange
rous
(b)
Mirr
or o
r dev
ice
slig
htly
dam
aged
or l
oose
. X
Mirr
or o
r dev
ice
inop
erat
ive,
hea
vily
dam
aged
, loo
se o
r in
secu
re.
X
(c)
Nec
essa
ry fi
eld
of v
isio
n no
t cov
ered
.
X
3.4.
Win
dscr
een
wip
ers
Vis
ual i
nspe
ctio
n an
d by
ope
ratio
n (a
) W
iper
s not
ope
ratin
g or
mis
sing
.
X
(b)
Wip
er b
lade
def
ectiv
e.
Wip
er b
lade
mis
sing
or o
bvio
usly
def
ectiv
e.
X
X
3.5.
Win
dscr
een
was
hers
V
isua
l ins
pect
ion
and
by o
pera
tion
Was
hers
not
ope
ratin
g ad
equa
tely
(lack
of w
ashi
ng fl
uid
but p
ump
oper
atin
g or
wat
er-je
t mis
alig
ned)
. X
Was
hers
not
ope
ratin
g.
X
3.6.
Dem
istin
g sy
stem
(X)(2
) V
isua
l ins
pect
ion
and
by o
pera
tion
Syst
em in
oper
ativ
e or
obv
ious
ly d
efec
tive.
X
PE-C
ON
S 12
/2/1
4 R
EV 2
26
A
NN
EX II
E
N
Page 71
Item
M
etho
d R
easo
ns fo
r fai
lure
A
sses
smen
t of d
efic
ienc
ies
M
inor
M
ajor
D
ange
rous
4. L
AM
PS, R
EFLE
CTO
RS
AN
D E
LEC
TRIC
AL
EQU
IPM
ENT
4.1.
Hea
dlam
ps
4.1.
1. C
ondi
tion
and
oper
atio
n V
isua
l ins
pect
ion
and
by o
pera
tion
(a)
Def
ectiv
e or
mis
sing
ligh
t / li
ght s
ourc
e (m
ultip
le
light
/lig
ht so
urce
s; in
the
case
of L
ED, l
ess t
han
1/3
not
func
tioni
ng).
X
Sing
le li
ght /
ligh
t sou
rces
; in
the
case
of L
ED, s
erio
usly
af
fect
ed v
isib
ility
.
X
(b)
Slig
htly
def
ectiv
e pr
ojec
tion
syst
em (r
efle
ctor
and
lens
).
Hea
vily
def
ectiv
e or
mis
sing
pro
ject
ion
syst
em (r
efle
ctor
an
d le
ns).
X
X
(c)
Lam
p no
t sec
urel
y at
tach
ed.
X
4.1.
2. A
lignm
ent
Vis
ual i
nspe
ctio
n an
d by
ope
ratio
n (a
) H
eadl
amp
gros
sly
mis
alig
ned.
X
(b)
Ligh
t sou
rce
inco
rrec
tly fi
tted.
PE-C
ON
S 12
/2/1
4 R
EV 2
27
A
NN
EX II
E
N
Page 72
Item
M
etho
d R
easo
ns fo
r fai
lure
A
sses
smen
t of d
efic
ienc
ies
M
inor
M
ajor
D
ange
rous
4.1.
3. S
witc
hing
V
isua
l ins
pect
ion
and
by o
pera
tion
(a)
Switc
h do
es n
ot o
pera
te in
acc
orda
nce
with
the
requ
irem
ents
(1) (n
umbe
r of h
eadl
amps
illu
min
ated
at t
he
sam
e tim
e).
X
Max
imum
per
mitt
ed li
ght b
right
ness
to th
e fr
ont
exce
eded
.
X
(b)
Func
tion
of c
ontro
l dev
ice
impa
ired.
X
4.1.
4. C
ompl
ianc
e w
ith
requ
irem
ents
(1) .
Vis
ual i
nspe
ctio
n an
d by
ope
ratio
n (a
) La
mp,
em
itted
col
our,
posi
tion,
brig
htne
ss o
r mar
king
not
in
acc
orda
nce
with
the
requ
irem
ents
(1) .
X
(b)
Prod
ucts
on
lens
or l
ight
sour
ce w
hich
obv
ious
ly re
duce
lig
ht b
right
ness
or c
hang
e em
itted
col
our.
X
(c)
Ligh
t sou
rce
and
lam
p no
t com
patib
le.
X
4.1.
5. L
evel
ling
devi
ces (
whe
re
man
dato
ry)
Vis
ual i
nspe
ctio
n an
d by
ope
ratio
n if
poss
ible
(a
) D
evic
e no
t ope
ratin
g.
X
(b)
Man
ual d
evic
e ca
nnot
be
oper
ated
from
driv
er's
seat
.
X
4.1.
6. H
eadl
amp
clea
ning
dev
ice
(whe
re m
anda
tory
) V
isua
l ins
pect
ion
and
by o
pera
tion
if po
ssib
le
Dev
ice
not o
pera
ting.
In th
e ca
se o
f gas
-dis
char
ging
lam
ps.
X
X
PE-C
ON
S 12
/2/1
4 R
EV 2
28
A
NN
EX II
E
N
Page 73
Item
M
etho
d R
easo
ns fo
r fai
lure
A
sses
smen
t of d
efic
ienc
ies
M
inor
M
ajor
D
ange
rous
4.2.
Fro
nt a
nd re
ar p
ositi
on la
mps
, sid
e m
arke
r lam
ps, e
nd o
utlin
e m
arke
r lam
ps a
nd d
aytim
e ru
nnin
g la
mps
4.2.
1. C
ondi
tion
and
oper
atio
n V
isua
l ins
pect
ion
and
by o
pera
tion
(a)
Def
ectiv
e lig
ht so
urce
.
X
(b)
Def
ectiv
e le
ns.
X
(c)
Lam
p no
t sec
urel
y at
tach
ed.
Ver
y se
rious
risk
of f
allin
g of
f.
X
X
4.2.
2. S
witc
hing
V
isua
l ins
pect
ion
and
by o
pera
tion
(a)
Switc
h do
es n
ot o
pera
te in
acc
orda
nce
with
the
requ
irem
ents
(1) .
Rea
r pos
ition
lam
ps a
nd si
de m
arke
r lam
ps c
an b
e sw
itche
d of
f whe
n he
adla
mps
are
on.
X
X
(b)
Func
tion
of c
ontro
l dev
ice
impa
ired.
X
4.2.
3. C
ompl
ianc
e w
ith
requ
irem
ents
(1)
Vis
ual i
nspe
ctio
n an
d by
ope
ratio
n (a
) La
mp,
em
itted
col
our,
posi
tion
brig
htne
ss o
r mar
king
not
in
acc
orda
nce
with
the
requ
irem
ents
(1) .
Red
ligh
t to
the
fron
t or w
hite
ligh
t to
the
rear
; hea
vily
re
duce
d lig
ht b
right
ness
.
X
X
(b)
Prod
ucts
on
lens
or l
ight
sour
ce w
hich
redu
ce li
ght
brig
htne
ss o
r cha
nge
emitt
ed c
olou
r.
Red
ligh
t to
the
fron
t or w
hite
ligh
t to
the
rear
; hea
vily
re
duce
d lig
ht b
right
ness
.
X
X
PE-C
ON
S 12
/2/1
4 R
EV 2
29
A
NN
EX II
E
N
Page 74
Item
M
etho
d R
easo
ns fo
r fai
lure
A
sses
smen
t of d
efic
ienc
ies
M
inor
M
ajor
D
ange
rous
4.3.
Sto
p La
mps
4.3.
1. C
ondi
tion
and
oper
atio
n V
isua
l ins
pect
ion
and
by o
pera
tion
(a)
Def
ectiv
e lig
ht so
urce
(mul
tiple
ligh
t sou
rce,
in th
e ca
se o
f LE
D le
ss th
an 1
/3 n
ot fu
nctio
ning
). X
Sing
le li
ght s
ourc
es; i
n th
e ca
se o
f LED
less
than
2/3
fu
nctio
ning
.
X
All
light
sour
ces n
ot fu
nctio
ning
.
X
(b)
Slig
htly
def
ectiv
e le
ns (n
o in
fluen
ce o
n em
itted
ligh
t).
Hea
vily
def
ectiv
e le
ns (e
mitt
ed li
ght a
ffec
ted)
.
X
X
(c)
Lam
p no
t sec
urel
y at
tach
ed.
Ver
y se
rious
risk
of f
allin
g of
f,
X
X
4.3.
2. S
witc
hing
V
isua
l ins
pect
ion
and
by o
pera
tion
(a)
Switc
h do
es n
ot o
pera
te in
acc
orda
nce
with
the
requ
irem
ents
(1) .
X
Del
ayed
ope
ratio
n.
X
No
oper
atio
n at
all.
X
(b)
Func
tion
of c
ontro
l dev
ice
impa
ired.
X
PE-C
ON
S 12
/2/1
4 R
EV 2
30
A
NN
EX II
E
N
Page 75
Item
M
etho
d R
easo
ns fo
r fai
lure
A
sses
smen
t of d
efic
ienc
ies
M
inor
M
ajor
D
ange
rous
4.3.
3. C
ompl
ianc
e w
ith
requ
irem
ents
(1) .
Vis
ual i
nspe
ctio
n an
d by
ope
ratio
n La
mp,
em
itted
col
our,
posi
tion,
brig
htne
ss o
r mar
king
not
in
acco
rdan
ce w
ith th
e re
quire
men
ts(1
) . X
Whi
te li
ght t
o th
e re
ar; h
eavi
ly re
duce
d lig
ht b
right
ness
.
X
4.4.
Dire
ctio
n in
dica
tor a
nd h
azar
d w
arni
ng la
mps
4.4.
1. C
ondi
tion
and
oper
atio
n V
isua
l ins
pect
ion
and
by o
pera
tion
(a)
Def
ectiv
e lig
ht so
urce
(mul
tiple
ligh
t sou
rce;
in th
e ca
se o
f LE
D le
ss th
an 1
/3 n
ot fu
nctio
ning
). X
Sing
le li
ght s
ourc
es; i
n th
e ca
se o
f LED
less
than
2/3
fu
nctio
ning
.
X
(b)
Slig
htly
def
ectiv
e le
ns (n
o in
fluen
ce o
n em
itted
ligh
t).
Hea
vily
def
ectiv
e le
ns (e
mitt
ed li
ght a
ffec
ted)
.
X
X
(c)
Lam
p no
t sec
urel
y at
tach
ed.
Ver
y se
rious
risk
of f
allin
g of
f.
X
X
4.4.
2. S
witc
hing
V
isua
l ins
pect
ion
and
by o
pera
tion
Switc
h do
es n
ot o
pera
te in
acc
orda
nce
with
the
requ
irem
ents(1
) .
No
oper
atio
n at
all.
X
X
4.4.
3. C
ompl
ianc
e w
ith
requ
irem
ents
(1) .
Vis
ual i
nspe
ctio
n an
d by
ope
ratio
n La
mp,
em
itted
col
our,
posi
tion,
brig
htne
ss o
r mar
king
not
in
acco
rdan
ce w
ith th
e re
quire
men
ts(1
) .
X
PE-C
ON
S 12
/2/1
4 R
EV 2
31
A
NN
EX II
E
N
Page 76
Item
M
etho
d R
easo
ns fo
r fai
lure
A
sses
smen
t of d
efic
ienc
ies
M
inor
M
ajor
D
ange
rous
4.4.
4. F
lash
ing
freq
uenc
y V
isua
l ins
pect
ion
and
by o
pera
tion
Rat
e of
flas
hing
not
in a
ccor
danc
e w
ith th
e re
quire
men
ts(1
) .(fre
quen
cy m
ore
than
25
% d
evia
ting)
. X
4.5.
Fro
nt a
nd re
ar fo
g la
mps
4.5.
1. C
ondi
tion
and
oper
atio
n V
isua
l ins
pect
ion
and
by o
pera
tion
(a)
Def
ectiv
e lig
ht so
urce
(mul
tiple
ligh
t sou
rce;
in th
e ca
se o
f LE
D le
ss th
an 1
/3 n
ot fu
nctio
ning
). X
Sing
le li
ght s
ourc
es; i
n th
e ca
se o
f LED
less
than
2/3
fu
nctio
ning
.
X
(b)
Slig
htly
def
ectiv
e le
ns (n
o in
fluen
ce o
n em
itted
ligh
t).
Hea
vily
def
ectiv
e le
ns (e
mitt
ed li
ght a
ffec
ted)
.
X
X
(c)
Lam
p no
t sec
urel
y at
tach
ed.
Ver
y se
rious
risk
of f
allin
g of
f or d
azzl
ing
onco
min
g tra
ffic
.
X
X
4.5.
2 A
lignm
ent (
X)(2
) V
isua
l ins
pect
ion
and
by o
pera
tion
Fr
ont f
og la
mp
out o
f hor
izon
tal a
lignm
ent w
hen
the
light
pat
tern
ha
s cut
-off
line
(cut
-off
line
too
low
). X
Cut
-off
line
abo
ve th
at fo
r dip
ped
beam
hea
dlam
ps.
X
PE-C
ON
S 12
/2/1
4 R
EV 2
32
A
NN
EX II
E
N
Page 77
Item
M
etho
d R
easo
ns fo
r fai
lure
A
sses
smen
t of d
efic
ienc
ies
M
inor
M
ajor
D
ange
rous
4.5.
3. S
witc
hing
V
isua
l ins
pect
ion
and
by o
pera
tion
Switc
h do
es n
ot o
pera
te in
acc
orda
nce
with
the
requ
irem
ents(1
) .
Not
ope
rativ
e.
X
X
4.5.
4. C
ompl
ianc
e w
ith
requ
irem
ents
(1) .
Vis
ual i
nspe
ctio
n an
d by
ope
ratio
n (a
) La
mp,
em
itted
col
our,
posi
tion,
brig
htne
ss o
r mar
king
not
in
acc
orda
nce
with
the
requ
irem
ents
(1) .
X
(b)
Syst
em d
oes n
ot o
pera
te in
acc
orda
nce
with
the
requ
irem
ents
(1) .
X
4.6.
Rev
ersi
ng la
mps
4.6.
1. C
ondi
tion
and
oper
atio
n V
isua
l ins
pect
ion
and
by o
pera
tion
(a)
Def
ectiv
e lig
ht so
urce
. X
(b)
Def
ectiv
e le
ns.
X
(c)
Lam
p no
t sec
urel
y at
tach
ed.
Ver
y se
rious
risk
of f
allin
g of
f.
X
X
4.6.
2. C
ompl
ianc
e w
ith
requ
irem
ents
(1)
Vis
ual i
nspe
ctio
n an
d by
ope
ratio
n (a
) La
mp,
em
itted
col
our,
posi
tion,
brig
htne
ss o
r mar
king
not
in
acc
orda
nce
with
the
requ
irem
ents
(1) .
X
(b)
Syst
em d
oes n
ot o
pera
te in
acc
orda
nce
with
the
requ
irem
ents
(1) .
X
PE-C
ON
S 12
/2/1
4 R
EV 2
33
A
NN
EX II
E
N
Page 78
Item
M
etho
d R
easo
ns fo
r fai
lure
A
sses
smen
t of d
efic
ienc
ies
M
inor
M
ajor
D
ange
rous
4.6.
3. S
witc
hing
V
isua
l ins
pect
ion
and
by o
pera
tion
Switc
h do
es n
ot o
pera
te in
acc
orda
nce
with
the
requ
irem
ents(1
) .
Rev
ersi
ng la
mp
can
be sw
itche
d on
with
gea
r not
in re
vers
e po
sitio
n.
X
X
4.7.
Rea
r reg
istra
tion
plat
e la
mp
4.7.
1. C
ondi
tion
and
oper
atio
n V
isua
l ins
pect
ion
and
by o
pera
tion
(a)
Lam
p th
row
ing
dire
ct o
r whi
te li
ght t
o th
e re
ar.
X
(b)
Def
ectiv
e lig
ht so
urce
(mul
tiple
ligh
t sou
rce)
.
Def
ectiv
e lig
ht so
urce
(sin
gle
light
sour
ce).
X
X
(c)
Lam
p no
t sec
urel
y at
tach
ed.
Ver
y se
rious
risk
of f
allin
g of
f.
X
X
4.7.
2. C
ompl
ianc
e w
ith
requ
irem
ents
(1)
Vis
ual i
nspe
ctio
n an
d by
ope
ratio
n Sy
stem
doe
s not
ope
rate
in a
ccor
danc
e w
ith th
e re
quire
men
ts(1
) . X
PE-C
ON
S 12
/2/1
4 R
EV 2
34
A
NN
EX II
E
N
Page 79
Item
M
etho
d R
easo
ns fo
r fai
lure
A
sses
smen
t of d
efic
ienc
ies
M
inor
M
ajor
D
ange
rous
4.8.
Ret
ro-r
efle
ctor
s, co
nspi
cuity
(ret
ro re
flect
ing)
mar
king
s and
rear
mar
king
pla
tes
4.8.
1. C
ondi
tion
Vis
ual i
nspe
ctio
n (a
) R
efle
ctin
g eq
uipm
ent d
efec
tive
or d
amag
ed.
Ref
lect
ing
affe
cted
.
X
X
(b)
Ref
lect
or n
ot se
cure
ly a
ttach
ed.
Like
ly to
fall
off.
X
X
4.8.
2. C
ompl
ianc
e w
ith
requ
irem
ents
(1)
Vis
ual i
nspe
ctio
n D
evic
e, re
flect
ed c
olou
r or p
ositi
on n
ot in
acc
orda
nce
with
the
requ
irem
ents
(1) .
X
Mis
sing
or r
efle
ctin
g re
d co
lour
to th
e fr
ont o
r whi
te c
olou
r to
the
rear
.
X
4.9.
Tel
l-tal
es m
anda
tory
for l
ight
ing
equi
pmen
t
4.9.
1. C
ondi
tion
and
oper
atio
n V
isua
l ins
pect
ion
and
by o
pera
tion
Not
ope
ratin
g.
Not
ope
ratin
g fo
r mai
n be
am h
eadl
amp
or re
ar fo
g la
mp.
X
X
4.9.
2. C
ompl
ianc
e w
ith
requ
irem
ents
(1)
Vis
ual i
nspe
ctio
n an
d by
ope
ratio
n N
ot in
acc
orda
nce
with
the
requ
irem
ents
(1) .
X
PE-C
ON
S 12
/2/1
4 R
EV 2
35
A
NN
EX II
E
N
Page 80
Item
M
etho
d R
easo
ns fo
r fai
lure
A
sses
smen
t of d
efic
ienc
ies
M
inor
M
ajor
D
ange
rous
4.10
. Ele
ctric
al c
onne
ctio
ns
betw
een
tow
ing
vehi
cle
and
traile
r or s
emi-t
raile
r
Vis
ual i
nspe
ctio
n: if
pos
sibl
e ex
amin
e th
e el
ectri
cal c
ontin
uity
of t
he
conn
ectio
n
(a)
Fixe
d co
mpo
nent
s not
secu
rely
atta
ched
.
Loos
e so
cket
.
X
X
(b)
Dam
aged
or d
eter
iora
ted
insu
latio
n.
Like
ly to
cau
se a
shor
t-circ
uit f
ault.
X
X
(c)
Trai
ler o
r tow
ing
vehi
cle
elec
trica
l con
nect
ions
not
fu
nctio
ning
cor
rect
ly.
X
Trai
ler b
rake
ligh
ts n
ot w
orki
ng a
t all.
X
4.11
. Ele
ctric
al w
iring
V
isua
l ins
pect
ion
incl
udin
g in
side
the
engi
ne c
ompa
rtmen
t (if
appl
icab
le)
(a)
Wiri
ng in
secu
re o
r not
ade
quat
ely
secu
red.
X
Fixi
ngs l
oose
, tou
chin
g sh
arp
edge
s, co
nnec
tors
like
ly to
be
dis
conn
ecte
d.
X
Wiri
ng li
kely
to to
uch
hot p
arts
, rot
atin
g pa
rts o
r gro
und,
co
nnec
tors
dis
conn
ecte
d (r
elev
ant p
arts
for b
raki
ng,
stee
ring)
.
X
PE-C
ON
S 12
/2/1
4 R
EV 2
36
A
NN
EX II
E
N
Page 81
Item
M
etho
d R
easo
ns fo
r fai
lure
A
sses
smen
t of d
efic
ienc
ies
M
inor
M
ajor
D
ange
rous
(b)
Wiri
ng sl
ight
ly d
eter
iora
ted.
Wiri
ng h
eavi
ly d
eter
iora
ted.
Wiri
ng e
xtre
me
dete
riora
ted
(rel
evan
t par
ts fo
r bra
king
, st
eerin
g).
X
X
X
(c)
Dam
aged
or d
eter
iora
ted
insu
latio
n.
Like
ly to
cau
se a
shor
t-circ
uit f
ault.
Imm
inen
t ris
k of
fire
, for
mat
ion
of sp
arks
.
X
X
X
4.12
. Non
-obl
igat
ory
lam
ps a
nd
retro
-ref
lect
ors (
X)(2
) V
isua
l ins
pect
ion
and
by o
pera
tion
(a)
A la
mp/
retro
-ref
lect
or fi
tted
not i
n ac
cord
ance
with
the
requ
irem
ents
(1) .
X
Emitt
ing/
refle
ctin
g re
d lig
ht to
the
fron
t or w
hite
ligh
t to
the
rear
.
X
(b)
Lam
p op
erat
ion
not i
n ac
cord
ance
with
the
requ
irem
ents
(1) .
X
Num
ber o
f hea
dlig
hts s
imul
tane
ous o
pera
ting
exce
edin
g pe
rmitt
ed li
ght b
right
ness
; em
ittin
g re
d lig
ht to
the
fron
t or
whi
te li
ght t
o th
e re
ar.
X
(c)
Lam
p/re
tro-r
efle
ctor
not
secu
rely
atta
ched
.
Ver
y se
rious
risk
of f
allin
g of
f.
X
X
PE-C
ON
S 12
/2/1
4 R
EV 2
37
A
NN
EX II
E
N
Page 82
Item
M
etho
d R
easo
ns fo
r fai
lure
A
sses
smen
t of d
efic
ienc
ies
M
inor
M
ajor
D
ange
rous
4.13
. Bat
tery
(ies)
V
isua
l ins
pect
ion
(a)
Inse
cure
.
Not
pro
perly
atta
ched
; lik
ely
to c
ause
a sh
ort-c
ircui
t fau
lt.
X
X
(b)
Leak
ing.
Loss
of h
azar
dous
subs
tanc
es.
X
X
(c)
Def
ectiv
e sw
itch
(if re
quire
d).
X
(d)
Def
ectiv
e fu
ses (
if re
quire
d).
X
(e)
Inap
prop
riate
ven
tilat
ion
(if re
quire
d).
X
5. A
XLE
S, W
HEE
LS, T
YR
ES A
ND
SU
SPEN
SIO
N
5.1.
Axl
es
5.1.
1. A
xles
(+ E
)
Vis
ual i
nspe
ctio
n us
ing
whe
el p
lay
dete
ctor
s if a
vaila
ble
(a
) A
xle
frac
ture
d or
def
orm
ed.
X
(b)
Inse
cure
fixi
ng to
veh
icle
.
Stab
ility
impa
ired,
func
tiona
lity
affe
cted
: ext
ensi
ve
mov
emen
t rel
ativ
e to
its f
ixtu
res.
X
X
(c)
Uns
afe
mod
ifica
tion(3
) .
Stab
ility
impa
ired,
func
tiona
lity
affe
cted
, ins
uffic
ient
cl
eara
nce
to o
ther
vehi
cle
parts
or t
o th
e gr
ound
.
X
X
PE-C
ON
S 12
/2/1
4 R
EV 2
38
A
NN
EX II
E
N
Page 83
Item
M
etho
d R
easo
ns fo
r fai
lure
A
sses
smen
t of d
efic
ienc
ies
M
inor
M
ajor
D
ange
rous
5.1.
2. S
tub
axle
s
(+E)
Vis
ual i
nspe
ctio
n us
ing
whe
el p
lay
dete
ctor
s if a
vaila
ble.
App
ly a
ver
tical
or
late
ral f
orce
to e
ach
whe
el a
nd n
ote
the
amou
nt o
f mov
emen
t bet
wee
n th
e ax
le b
eam
and
stub
axl
e
(a)
Stub
axl
e fr
actu
red.
X
(b)
Exce
ssiv
e w
ear i
n th
e sw
ivel
pin
and
/or b
ushe
s.
Like
lihoo
d of
loos
enin
g; d
irect
iona
l sta
bilit
y im
paire
d.
X
X
(c)
Exce
ssiv
e m
ovem
ent b
etw
een
stub
axl
e an
d ax
le b
eam
.
Like
lihoo
d of
loos
enin
g; d
irect
iona
l sta
bilit
y im
paire
d.
X
X
(d)
Stub
axl
e pi
n lo
ose
in a
xle.
Like
lihoo
d of
loos
enin
g; d
irect
iona
l sta
bilit
y im
paire
d.
X
X
5.1.
3. W
heel
bea
rings
(+E)
Vis
ual i
nspe
ctio
n us
ing.
whe
el p
lay
dete
ctor
s if a
vaila
ble.
Roc
k th
e w
heel
or
app
ly a
late
ral f
orce
to e
ach
whe
el
and
note
the
amou
nt o
f upw
ard
mov
emen
t of t
he w
heel
rela
tive
to th
e st
ub a
xle.
(a)
Exce
ssiv
e pl
ay in
a w
heel
bea
ring.
Dire
ctio
nal s
tabi
lity
impa
ired;
dan
ger o
f dem
olis
hmen
t.
X
X
(b)
Whe
el b
earin
g to
o tig
ht, j
amm
ed.
Dan
ger o
f ove
rhea
ting;
dan
ger o
f dem
olis
hmen
t.
X
X
PE-C
ON
S 12
/2/1
4 R
EV 2
39
A
NN
EX II
E
N
Page 84
Item
M
etho
d R
easo
ns fo
r fai
lure
A
sses
smen
t of d
efic
ienc
ies
M
inor
M
ajor
D
ange
rous
5.2.
Whe
els a
nd ty
res
5.2.
1. R
oad
whe
el h
ub
Vis
ual i
nspe
ctio
n (a
) A
ny w
heel
nut
s or s
tuds
mis
sing
or l
oose
.
Mis
sing
fixi
ng o
r loo
se to
an
exte
nt w
hich
ver
y se
rious
ly
affe
cts r
oad
safe
ty.
X
X
(b)
Hub
wor
n or
dam
aged
.
Hub
wor
n or
dam
aged
in su
ch a
way
that
secu
re fi
xing
of
whe
els i
s aff
ecte
d.
X
X
5.2.
2. W
heel
s V
isua
l ins
pect
ion
of b
oth
sides
of e
ach
whe
el w
ith v
ehic
le o
ver a
pit
or o
n a
hois
t
(a)
Any
frac
ture
or w
eldi
ng d
efec
t.
X
(b)
Tyre
reta
inin
g rin
gs n
ot p
rope
rly fi
tted.
Like
ly to
com
e of
f.
X
X
(c)
Whe
el b
adly
dis
torte
d or
wor
n.
Secu
re fi
xing
to h
ub a
ffec
ted;
secu
re fi
xing
of t
yre
affe
cted
.
X
X
(d)
Whe
el si
ze, t
echn
ical
des
ign,
com
patib
ility
or t
ype
not i
n ac
cord
ance
with
the
requ
irem
ents
(1) a
nd a
ffec
ting
road
sa
fety
.
X
PE-C
ON
S 12
/2/1
4 R
EV 2
40
A
NN
EX II
E
N
Page 85
Item
M
etho
d R
easo
ns fo
r fai
lure
A
sses
smen
t of d
efic
ienc
ies
M
inor
M
ajor
D
ange
rous
5.2.
3. T
yres
V
isua
l ins
pect
ion
of th
e en
tire
tyre
by
rolli
ng th
e ve
hicl
e ba
ckw
ards
and
fo
rwar
ds
(a)
Tyre
size
, loa
d ca
paci
ty, a
ppro
val m
ark
or sp
eed
ratin
g ca
tego
ry n
ot in
acc
orda
nce
with
the
requ
irem
ents
(1) a
nd
affe
ctin
g ro
ad sa
fety
.
X
Insu
ffic
ient
load
cap
acity
or s
peed
ratin
g ca
tego
ry fo
r ac
tual
use
; tyr
e to
uche
s oth
er fi
xed
vehi
cle
parts
impa
iring
sa
fe d
rivin
g.
X
(b)
Tyre
s on
sam
e ax
le o
r on
twin
whe
els o
f diff
eren
t siz
es.
X
(c
) Ty
res o
n sa
me
axle
of d
iffer
ent c
onst
ruct
ion
(rad
ial/c
ross
-ply
).
X
(d)
Any
serio
us d
amag
e or
cut
to ty
re.
Cor
d vi
sibl
e or
dam
aged
.
X
X
(e)
Tyre
trea
d w
ear i
ndic
ator
bec
omes
exp
osed
.
Tyre
trea
d de
pth
not i
n ac
cord
ance
with
the
requ
irem
ents
(1) .
X
X
PE-C
ON
S 12
/2/1
4 R
EV 2
41
A
NN
EX II
E
N
Page 86
Item
M
etho
d R
easo
ns fo
r fai
lure
A
sses
smen
t of d
efic
ienc
ies
M
inor
M
ajor
D
ange
rous
(f)
Tyre
rubb
ing
agai
nst o
ther
com
pone
nts (
flexi
ble
anti
spra
y de
vice
s).
X
Tyre
rubb
ing
agai
nst o
ther
com
pone
nts (
safe
driv
ing
not
impa
ired)
.
X
(g)
Re-
groo
ved
tyre
s not
in a
ccor
danc
e w
ith re
quire
men
ts(1) .
Cor
d pr
otec
tion
laye
r aff
ecte
d.
X
X
5.3.
Sus
pens
ion
syst
em
5.3.
1. S
prin
gs a
nd st
abili
zer
(+E)
Vis
ual i
nspe
ctio
n us
ing
whe
el p
lay
dete
ctor
s if a
vaila
ble
(a)
Inse
cure
atta
chm
ent o
f spr
ings
to c
hass
is o
r axl
e.
Rel
ativ
e m
ovem
ent v
isib
le, f
ixin
gs v
ery
serio
usly
loos
e.
X
X
(b)
A d
amag
ed o
r fra
ctur
ed sp
ring
com
pone
nt.
Mai
n sp
ring
(-le
af),
or a
dditi
onal
leaf
s ver
y se
rious
ly
affe
cted
.
X
X
(c)
Sprin
g m
issi
ng.
Mai
n sp
ring
(-le
af),
or a
dditi
onal
leaf
s ver
y se
rious
ly
affe
cted
.
X
X
(d)
Uns
afe
mod
ifica
tion(3
) .
Insu
ffic
ient
cle
aran
ce to
oth
er v
ehic
le p
arts
; spr
ing
syst
em
inop
erat
ive.
X
X
PE-C
ON
S 12
/2/1
4 R
EV 2
42
A
NN
EX II
E
N
Page 87
Item
M
etho
d R
easo
ns fo
r fai
lure
A
sses
smen
t of d
efic
ienc
ies
M
inor
M
ajor
D
ange
rous
5.3.
2. S
hock
abs
orbe
rs
Vis
ual i
nspe
ctio
n (a
) In
secu
re a
ttach
men
t of s
hock
abs
orbe
rs to
cha
ssis
or a
xle.
Shoc
k ab
sorb
er lo
ose.
X
X
(b)
Dam
aged
shoc
k ab
sorb
er sh
owin
g si
gns o
f sev
ere
leak
age
or m
alfu
nctio
n.
X
(c)
Shoc
k ab
sorb
er m
issi
ng.
X
5.3.
3. T
orqu
e tu
bes,
radi
us a
rms,
wis
hbon
es a
nd su
spen
sion
arm
s
(+E)
Vis
ual i
nspe
ctio
n us
ing
whe
el p
lay
dete
ctor
s if a
vaila
ble
(a)
Inse
cure
atta
chm
ent o
f com
pone
nt to
cha
ssis
or a
xle.
Like
lihoo
d of
loos
enin
g; d
irect
iona
l sta
bilit
y im
paire
d.
X
X
(b)
A d
amag
ed o
r exc
essi
vely
cor
rode
d co
mpo
nent
.
Stab
ility
of c
ompo
nent
aff
ecte
d or
com
pone
nt fr
actu
red.
X
X
(c)
Uns
afe
mod
ifica
tion(3
) .
Insu
ffic
ient
cle
aran
ce to
oth
er v
ehic
le p
arts
; sys
tem
in
oper
ativ
e.
X
X
PE-C
ON
S 12
/2/1
4 R
EV 2
43
A
NN
EX II
E
N
Page 88
Item
M
etho
d R
easo
ns fo
r fai
lure
A
sses
smen
t of d
efic
ienc
ies
M
inor
M
ajor
D
ange
rous
5.3.
4. S
uspe
nsio
n jo
ints
(+E)
Vis
ual i
nspe
ctio
n us
ing
whe
el p
lay
dete
ctor
s if a
vaila
ble
(a)
Exce
ssiv
e w
ear i
n sw
ivel
pin
and
/or b
ushe
s or a
t su
spen
sion
join
ts.
X
Like
lihoo
d of
loos
enin
g; d
irect
iona
l sta
bilit
y im
paire
d.
X
(b)
Dus
t cov
er se
vere
ly d
eter
iora
ted.
Dus
t cov
er m
issi
ng o
r fra
ctur
ed.
X
X
5.3.
5. A
ir Su
spen
sion
V
isua
l ins
pect
ion
(a)
Syst
em in
oper
able
.
X
(b)
Any
com
pone
nt d
amag
ed, m
odifi
ed o
r det
erio
rate
d in
a
way
that
wou
ld a
dver
sely
aff
ect t
he fu
nctio
ning
of t
he
syst
em.
X
Func
tioni
ng o
f sys
tem
serio
usly
aff
ecte
d.
X
(c)
Aud
ible
syst
em le
akag
e.
X
(d)
Uns
afe
mod
ifica
tion.
X
PE-C
ON
S 12
/2/1
4 R
EV 2
44
A
NN
EX II
E
N
Page 89
Item
M
etho
d R
easo
ns fo
r fai
lure
A
sses
smen
t of d
efic
ienc
ies
M
inor
M
ajor
D
ange
rous
6. C
HA
SSIS
AN
D C
HA
SSIS
ATT
AC
HM
ENTS
6.1.
Cha
ssis
or f
ram
e an
d at
tach
men
ts
6.1.
1. G
ener
al c
ondi
tion
Vis
ual i
nspe
ctio
n
(a)
Slig
ht fr
actu
re o
r def
orm
atio
n of
any
side
or c
ross
-m
embe
r.
X
Serio
us fr
actu
re o
r def
orm
atio
n of
any
side
or c
ross
-m
embe
r.
X
(b)
Inse
curit
y of
stre
ngth
enin
g pl
ates
or f
aste
ning
s.
Maj
ority
of f
aste
ning
s loo
se; i
nsuf
ficie
nt st
reng
th o
f par
ts.
X
X
(c)
Exce
ssiv
e co
rros
ion
whi
ch a
ffec
ts th
e rig
idity
of t
he
asse
mbl
y.
X
Insu
ffic
ient
stre
ngth
of p
arts
.
X
6.1.
2. E
xhau
st p
ipes
and
sile
ncer
s V
isua
l ins
pect
ion
(a
) In
secu
re o
r lea
king
exh
aust
syst
em.
X
(b)
Fum
es e
nter
ing
cab
or p
asse
nger
s com
partm
ent.
Dan
ger t
o he
alth
of p
erso
ns o
n bo
ard.
X
X
PE-C
ON
S 12
/2/1
4 R
EV 2
45
A
NN
EX II
E
N
Page 90
Item
M
etho
d R
easo
ns fo
r fai
lure
A
sses
smen
t of d
efic
ienc
ies
M
inor
M
ajor
D
ange
rous
6.1.
3. F
uel t
ank
and
pipe
s (in
clud
ing
heat
ing
fuel
tank
and
pi
pes)
Vis
ual i
nspe
ctio
n, u
se o
f lea
k de
tect
ing
devi
ces i
n th
e ca
se o
f LPG
/CN
G/L
NG
sy
stem
s
(a)
Inse
cure
tank
or p
ipes
, cre
atin
g pa
rticu
lar r
isk
of fi
re.
X
(b)
Leak
ing
fuel
or m
issi
ng o
r ine
ffec
tive
fille
r cap
.
Ris
k of
fire
; exc
essi
ve lo
ss o
f haz
ardo
us m
ater
ial
X
X
(c)
Cha
fed
pipe
s.
Dam
aged
pip
es.
X
X
(d)
Fuel
stop
cock
(if r
equi
red)
not
ope
ratin
g co
rrec
tly.
X
(e)
Fire
risk
due
to:
le
akin
g fu
el;
fu
el ta
nk o
r exh
aust
not
pro
perly
shie
lded
;
en
gine
com
partm
ent c
ondi
tion.
X
(f)
LPG
/CN
G/L
NG
or h
ydro
gen
syst
em n
ot in
acc
orda
nce
with
requ
irem
ents
; any
par
t of t
he sy
stem
def
ectiv
e (1
) .
X
PE-C
ON
S 12
/2/1
4 R
EV 2
46
A
NN
EX II
E
N
Page 91
Item
M
etho
d R
easo
ns fo
r fai
lure
A
sses
smen
t of d
efic
ienc
ies
M
inor
M
ajor
D
ange
rous
6.1.
4. B
umpe
rs, l
ater
al p
rote
ctio
n an
d re
ar u
nder
run
devi
ces
Vis
ual i
nspe
ctio
n (a
) Lo
osen
ess o
r dam
age
likel
y to
cau
se in
jury
whe
n gr
azed
or
cont
acte
d.
X
Parts
like
ly to
fall
off;
func
tiona
lity
heav
ily a
ffec
ted.
X
(b)
Dev
ice
obvi
ousl
y no
t in
com
plia
nce
with
the
requ
irem
ents
(1) .
X
6.1.
5. S
pare
whe
el c
arrie
r (if
fitte
d)
Vis
ual i
nspe
ctio
n (a
) C
arrie
r not
in p
rope
r con
ditio
n.
X
(b)
Car
rier f
ract
ured
or i
nsec
ure.
X
(c)
A sp
are
whe
el n
ot se
cure
ly fi
xed
in c
arrie
r.
Ver
y se
rious
risk
of f
allin
g of
f.
X
X
6.1.
6. M
echa
nica
l cou
plin
g an
d to
win
g de
vice
(+E)
Vis
ual i
nspe
ctio
n fo
r wea
r and
cor
rect
op
erat
ion
with
spec
ial a
ttent
ion
to a
ny
safe
ty d
evic
e fit
ted
and/
or u
se o
f m
easu
ring
gaug
e.
(a)
Com
pone
nt d
amag
ed, d
efec
tive
or c
rack
ed (i
f not
in u
se).
Com
pone
nt d
amag
ed, d
efec
tive
or c
rack
ed (i
f in
use)
X
X
(b)
Exce
ssiv
e w
ear i
n a
com
pone
nt.
Bel
ow w
ear l
imit.
X
X
(c)
Atta
chm
ent d
efec
tive.
X
Any
atta
chm
ent l
oose
with
a v
ery
serio
us ri
sk o
f fal
ling
off.
X
PE-C
ON
S 12
/2/1
4 R
EV 2
47
A
NN
EX II
E
N
Page 92
Item
M
etho
d R
easo
ns fo
r fai
lure
A
sses
smen
t of d
efic
ienc
ies
M
inor
M
ajor
D
ange
rous
(d)
Any
safe
ty d
evic
e m
issi
ng o
r not
ope
ratin
g co
rrec
tly.
X
(e)
Any
cou
plin
g in
dica
tor n
ot w
orki
ng.
X
(f)
Obs
truct
regi
stra
tion
plat
e or
any
lam
p (w
hen
not i
n us
e).
Reg
istra
tion
plat
e no
t rea
dabl
e (w
hen
not i
n us
e).
X
X
(g)
Uns
afe
mod
ifica
tion(3
) (sec
onda
ry p
arts
).
Uns
afe
mod
ifica
tion(3
) (prim
ary
parts
).
X
X
(h)
Cou
plin
g to
o w
eak
or in
com
patib
le, o
r cou
plin
g de
vice
not
in
acc
orda
nce
with
requ
irem
ents
.
X
6.1.
7. T
rans
mis
sion
V
isua
l ins
pect
ion
(a)
Loos
e or
mis
sing
secu
ring
bolts
.
Loos
e or
mis
sing
secu
ring
bolts
to su
ch a
n ex
tent
that
road
sa
fety
is se
rious
ly e
ndan
gere
d.
X
X
(b)
Exce
ssiv
e w
ear i
n tra
nsm
issi
on sh
aft b
earin
gs.
Ver
y se
rious
risk
of l
oose
ning
or c
rack
ing.
X
X
(c)
Exce
ssiv
e w
ear i
n un
iver
sal j
oint
s or t
rans
mis
sion
ch
ains
/bel
ts.
X
Ver
y se
rious
risk
of l
oose
ning
or c
rack
ing.
X
PE-C
ON
S 12
/2/1
4 R
EV 2
48
A
NN
EX II
E
N
Page 93
Item
M
etho
d R
easo
ns fo
r fai
lure
A
sses
smen
t of d
efic
ienc
ies
M
inor
M
ajor
D
ange
rous
(d)
Det
erio
rate
d fle
xibl
e co
uplin
gs.
Ver
y se
rious
risk
of l
oose
ning
or c
rack
ing.
X
X
(e)
A d
amag
ed o
r ben
t sha
ft.
X
(f)
Bea
ring
hous
ing
frac
ture
d or
inse
cure
.
Ver
y se
rious
risk
of l
oose
ning
or c
rack
ing.
X
X
(g)
Dus
t cov
er se
vere
ly d
eter
iora
ted.
Dus
t cov
er m
issi
ng o
r fra
ctur
ed.
X
X
(h)
Illeg
al p
ower
-trai
n m
odifi
catio
n.
X
6.1.
8. E
ngin
e m
ount
ings
V
isua
l ins
pect
ion
D
eter
iora
ted,
obv
ious
ly a
nd se
vere
ly d
amag
ed m
ount
ings
Loos
e or
frac
ture
d m
ount
ings
.
X
X
6.1.
9 En
gine
per
form
ance
(X) (2
) V
isua
l ins
pect
ion
and/
or u
sing
el
ectro
nic
inte
rfac
e (a
) C
ontro
l uni
t mod
ified
aff
ectin
g sa
fety
and
/or t
he
envi
ronm
ent.
X
(b)
Engi
ne m
odifi
catio
n af
fect
ing
safe
ty a
nd/o
r the
en
viro
nmen
t.
X
PE-C
ON
S 12
/2/1
4 R
EV 2
49
A
NN
EX II
E
N
Page 94
Item
M
etho
d R
easo
ns fo
r fai
lure
A
sses
smen
t of d
efic
ienc
ies
M
inor
M
ajor
D
ange
rous
6.2.
Cab
and
bod
ywor
k
6.2.
1. C
ondi
tion
Vis
ual i
nspe
ctio
n (a
) A
loos
e or
dam
aged
pan
el o
r par
t lik
ely
to c
ause
inju
ry.
Like
ly to
fall
off.
X
X
(b)
Inse
cure
bod
y pi
llar.
Stab
ility
impa
ired.
X
X
(c)
Perm
ittin
g en
try o
f eng
ine
or e
xhau
st fu
mes
.
Dan
ger t
o he
alth
of p
erso
ns o
n bo
ard.
X
X
(d)
Uns
afe
mod
ifica
tion(3
) .
Insu
ffic
ient
cle
aran
ce to
rota
ting
or m
ovin
g pa
rts a
nd
road
.
X
X
6.2.
2. M
ount
ing
Vis
ual i
nspe
ctio
n (a
) B
ody
or c
ab in
secu
re.
Stab
ility
aff
ecte
d.
X
X
(b)
Bod
y/ca
b ob
viou
sly
not l
ocat
ed sq
uare
ly o
n ch
assi
s.
X
PE-C
ON
S 12
/2/1
4 R
EV 2
50
A
NN
EX II
E
N
Page 95
Item
M
etho
d R
easo
ns fo
r fai
lure
A
sses
smen
t of d
efic
ienc
ies
M
inor
M
ajor
D
ange
rous
(c)
Inse
cure
or m
issi
ng fi
xing
of b
ody/
cab
to c
hass
is o
r cro
ss-
mem
bers
and
if sy
mm
etric
al.
X
Inse
cure
or m
issi
ng fi
xing
of b
ody/
cab
to c
hass
is o
r cro
ss-
mem
bers
to su
ch a
n ex
tent
that
road
safe
ty is
ver
y se
rious
ly e
ndan
gere
d.
X
(d)
Exce
ssiv
e co
rros
ion
at fi
xing
poi
nts o
n in
tegr
al b
odie
s.
Stab
ility
impa
ired.
X
X
6.2.
3. D
oors
and
doo
r cat
ches
V
isua
l ins
pect
ion
(a)
A d
oor w
ill n
ot o
pen
or c
lose
pro
perly
.
X
(b)
A d
oor l
ikel
y to
ope
n in
adve
rtent
ly o
r one
that
will
not
re
mai
n cl
osed
(slid
ing
door
s).
X
A d
oor l
ikel
y to
ope
n in
adve
rtent
ly o
r one
that
will
not
re
mai
n cl
osed
(tur
ning
doo
rs).
X
(c)
Doo
r, hi
nges
, cat
ches
or p
illar
det
erio
rate
d.
Doo
r, hi
nges
, cat
ches
or p
illar
mis
sing
or l
oose
.
X
X
6.2.
4. F
loor
V
isua
l ins
pect
ion
Fl
oor i
nsec
ure
or b
adly
det
erio
rate
d.
Insu
ffic
ient
stab
ility
.
X
X
PE-C
ON
S 12
/2/1
4 R
EV 2
51
A
NN
EX II
E
N
Page 96
Item
M
etho
d R
easo
ns fo
r fai
lure
A
sses
smen
t of d
efic
ienc
ies
M
inor
M
ajor
D
ange
rous
6.2.
5. D
river
's se
at
Vis
ual i
nspe
ctio
n (a
) Se
at w
ith d
efec
tive
stru
ctur
e.
Loos
e se
at.
X
X
(b)
Adj
ustm
ent m
echa
nism
not
func
tioni
ng c
orre
ctly
.
Seat
mov
ing
or b
ackr
est n
ot fi
xabl
e.
X
X
6.2.
6. O
ther
seat
s V
isua
l ins
pect
ion
(a)
Seat
s in
defe
ctiv
e co
nditi
on o
r ins
ecur
e (s
econ
dary
par
ts).
Seat
s in
defe
ctiv
e co
nditi
on o
r ins
ecur
e (m
ain
parts
).
X
X
(b)
Seat
s not
fitte
d in
acc
orda
nce
with
requ
irem
ents
(1) .
Perm
itted
num
ber o
f sea
ts e
xcee
ded;
pos
ition
ing
not i
n co
mpl
ianc
e w
ith a
ppro
val.
X
X
6.2.
7. D
rivin
g co
ntro
ls
Vis
ual i
nspe
ctio
n an
d by
ope
ratio
n A
ny c
ontro
l nec
essa
ry fo
r the
safe
ope
ratio
n of
the
vehi
cle
not
func
tioni
ng c
orre
ctly
.
X
Safe
ope
ratio
n af
fect
ed.
X
6.2.
8. C
ab st
eps
Vis
ual i
nspe
ctio
n (a
) St
ep o
r ste
p ru
ng in
secu
re.
Insu
ffic
ient
stab
ility
.
X
X
(b)
Step
or r
ung
in a
con
ditio
n lik
ely
to c
ause
inju
ry to
use
rs.
X
PE-C
ON
S 12
/2/1
4 R
EV 2
52
A
NN
EX II
E
N
Page 97
Item
M
etho
d R
easo
ns fo
r fai
lure
A
sses
smen
t of d
efic
ienc
ies
M
inor
M
ajor
D
ange
rous
6.2.
9. O
ther
inte
rior a
nd e
xter
ior
fittin
gs a
nd e
quip
men
t V
isua
l ins
pect
ion
(a)
Atta
chm
ent o
f oth
er fi
tting
or e
quip
men
t def
ectiv
e.
X
(b
) O
ther
fitti
ng o
r equ
ipm
ent n
ot in
acc
orda
nce
with
the
requ
irem
ents
(1) .
X
Parts
fitte
d lik
ely
to c
ause
inju
ries;
safe
ope
ratio
n af
fect
ed.
X
(c
) Le
akin
g hy
drau
lic e
quip
men
t.
Exte
nsiv
e lo
ss o
f haz
ardo
us m
ater
ial.
X
X
6.2.
10. M
udgu
ards
(win
gs),
spra
y su
ppre
ssio
n de
vice
s V
isua
l ins
pect
ion
(a)
Mis
sing
, loo
se o
r bad
ly c
orro
ded.
Like
ly to
cau
se in
jurie
s; li
kely
to fa
ll of
f.
X
X
(b)
Insu
ffic
ient
cle
aran
ce to
tyre
/ whe
el (s
pray
supp
ress
ion)
.
Insu
ffic
ient
cle
aran
ce to
tyre
/ whe
el (m
udgu
ards
).
X
X
(c)
Not
in a
ccor
danc
e w
ith th
e re
quire
men
ts(1
) .
Insu
ffic
ient
cov
erag
e of
trea
d.
X
X
PE-C
ON
S 12
/2/1
4 R
EV 2
53
A
NN
EX II
E
N
Page 98
Item
M
etho
d R
easo
ns fo
r fai
lure
A
sses
smen
t of d
efic
ienc
ies
M
inor
M
ajor
D
ange
rous
7. O
THER
EQ
UIP
MEN
T
7.1.
Saf
ety-
belts
/buc
kles
and
rest
rain
t sys
tem
s
7.1.
1. S
ecur
ity o
f saf
ety-
belts
/buc
kles
mou
ntin
g V
isua
l ins
pect
ion
(a)
Anc
hora
ge p
oint
bad
ly d
eter
iora
ted.
Stab
ility
aff
ecte
d.
X
X
(b)
Anc
hora
ge lo
ose.
X
7.1.
2. C
ondi
tion
of sa
fety
-be
lts/b
uckl
es.
Vis
ual i
nspe
ctio
n an
d by
ope
ratio
n (a
) M
anda
tory
safe
ty-b
elt m
issi
ng o
r not
fitte
d.
X
(b)
Safe
ty-b
elt d
amag
ed.
Any
cut
or s
ign
of o
vers
tretc
hing
.
X
X
(c)
Safe
ty-b
elt n
ot in
acc
orda
nce
with
the
requ
irem
ents
(1) .
X
(d)
Safe
ty-b
elt b
uckl
e da
mag
ed o
r not
func
tioni
ng c
orre
ctly
.
X
(e)
Safe
ty-b
elt r
etra
ctor
dam
aged
or n
ot fu
nctio
ning
cor
rect
ly.
X
7.1.
3. S
afet
y be
lt Lo
ad li
mite
r V
isua
l ins
pect
ion,
and
/or u
sing
el
ectro
nic
inte
rfac
e (a
) Lo
ad li
mite
r obv
ious
ly m
issi
ng o
r not
suita
ble
with
the
vehi
cle.
X
(b)
Syst
em in
dica
tes f
ailu
re v
ia th
e el
ectro
nic
vehi
cle
inte
rfac
e.
X
PE-C
ON
S 12
/2/1
4 R
EV 2
54
A
NN
EX II
E
N
Page 99
Item
M
etho
d R
easo
ns fo
r fai
lure
A
sses
smen
t of d
efic
ienc
ies
M
inor
M
ajor
D
ange
rous
7.1.
4. S
afet
y be
lt Pr
e-te
nsio
ners
V
isua
l ins
pect
ion,
and
/or u
sing
el
ectro
nic
inte
rfac
e (a
) Pr
e-te
nsio
ner o
bvio
usly
mis
sing
or n
ot su
itabl
e w
ith th
e ve
hicl
e.
X
(b)
Syst
em in
dica
tes f
ailu
re v
ia th
e el
ectro
nic
vehi
cle
inte
rfac
e.
X
7.1.
5. A
irbag
V
isua
l ins
pect
ion,
and
/or u
sing
el
ectro
nic
inte
rfac
e (a
) A
irbag
s obv
ious
ly m
issi
ng o
r not
suita
ble
with
the
vehi
cle.
(b)
Syst
em in
dica
tes f
ailu
re v
ia th
e el
ectro
nic
vehi
cle
inte
rfac
e..
X
X
(c)
Airb
ag o
bvio
usly
non
-ope
rativ
e
X
7.1.
6. S
RS
Syst
ems
Vis
ual i
nspe
ctio
n of
MIL
, and
/or u
sing
el
ectro
nic
inte
rfac
e (a
) SR
S M
IL in
dica
tes a
ny k
ind
of fa
ilure
of t
he sy
stem
(b)
Syst
em in
dica
tes f
ailu
re v
ia th
e el
ectro
nic
vehi
cle
inte
rfac
e.
X
X
7.2.
Fire
ext
ingu
ishe
r (X
)(2)
Vis
ual i
nspe
ctio
n (a
) M
issi
ng.
X
(b)
Not
in a
ccor
danc
e w
ith th
e re
quire
men
ts(1
) .
If re
quire
d (e
.g. t
axi,
buss
es, c
oach
es, e
tc.).
X
X
7.3.
Loc
ks a
nd a
nti-t
heft
devi
ce
Vis
ual i
nspe
ctio
n an
d by
ope
ratio
n (a
) D
evic
e no
t fun
ctio
ning
to p
reve
nt v
ehic
le b
eing
driv
en.
X
(b)
Def
ectiv
e.
Inad
verte
ntly
lock
ing
or b
lock
ing.
X
X
PE-C
ON
S 12
/2/1
4 R
EV 2
55
A
NN
EX II
E
N
Page 100
Item
M
etho
d R
easo
ns fo
r fai
lure
A
sses
smen
t of d
efic
ienc
ies
M
inor
M
ajor
D
ange
rous
7.4.
War
ning
tria
ngle
(if
requ
ired)
(X)(2
) V
isua
l ins
pect
ion
(a)
Mis
sing
or i
ncom
plet
e.
X
(b)
Not
in a
ccor
danc
e w
ith th
e re
quire
men
ts(1
) . X
7.5.
Firs
t aid
kit.
(if r
equi
red)
(X
)(2)
Vis
ual i
nspe
ctio
n M
issi
ng, i
ncom
plet
e or
not
in a
ccor
danc
e w
ith th
e re
quire
men
ts(1) .
X
7.6.
Whe
el c
hock
s (w
edge
s) (i
f re
quire
d) (X
)(2)
Vis
ual i
nspe
ctio
n M
issi
ng o
r not
in g
ood
cond
ition
; ins
uffic
ient
stab
ility
or
dim
ensi
on.
X
7.7.
Aud
ible
war
ning
dev
ice
Vis
ual i
nspe
ctio
n an
d by
ope
ratio
n (a
) N
ot w
orki
ng p
rope
rly.
Not
wor
king
at a
ll.
X
X
(b)
Con
trol i
nsec
ure.
X
(c)
Not
in a
ccor
danc
e w
ith th
e re
quire
men
ts(1
) .
Emitt
ed so
und
likel
y to
be
conf
used
with
off
icia
l sire
ns.
X
X
7.8.
Spe
edom
eter
V
isua
l ins
pect
ion
or b
y op
erat
ion
durin
g ro
ad te
st o
r by
elec
troni
c m
eans
(a
) N
ot fi
tted
in a
ccor
danc
e w
ith th
e re
quire
men
ts(1
) .
Mis
sing
(if r
equi
red)
.
X
X
(b)
Ope
ratio
n im
paire
d.
Not
ope
ratio
nal a
t all.
X
X
(c)
Not
cap
able
of b
eing
suff
icie
nt il
lum
inat
ed.
Not
cap
able
of b
eing
illu
min
ated
at a
ll.
X
X
PE-C
ON
S 12
/2/1
4 R
EV 2
56
A
NN
EX II
E
N
Page 101
Item
M
etho
d R
easo
ns fo
r fai
lure
A
sses
smen
t of d
efic
ienc
ies
M
inor
M
ajor
D
ange
rous
7.9.
Tac
hogr
aph
(if
fitte
d/re
quire
d)
Vis
ual i
nspe
ctio
n (a
) N
ot fi
tted
in a
ccor
danc
e w
ith th
e re
quire
men
ts(1
) .
X
(b)
Not
ope
ratio
nal.
X
(c)
Def
ectiv
e or
mis
sing
seal
s.
X
(d)
Inst
alla
tion
plaq
ue m
issi
ng, i
llegi
ble
or o
ut o
f dat
e.
X
(e)
Obv
ious
tam
perin
g or
man
ipul
atio
n.
X
(f)
Size
of t
yres
not
com
patib
le w
ith c
alib
ratio
n pa
ram
eter
s.
X
7.10
. Spe
ed li
mita
tion
devi
ce (i
f fit
ted/
requ
ired)
(+E)
Vis
ual i
nspe
ctio
n an
d by
ope
ratio
n if
equi
pmen
t ava
ilabl
e (a
) N
ot fi
tted
in a
ccor
danc
e w
ith th
e re
quire
men
ts(1
) .
X
(b)
Obv
ious
ly n
ot o
pera
tiona
l.
X
(c)
Inco
rrec
t set
spee
d (if
che
cked
).
X
(d)
Def
ectiv
e or
mis
sing
seal
s.
X
(e)
Plaq
ue m
issi
ng o
r ille
gibl
e.
X
(f)
Size
of t
yres
not
com
patib
le w
ith c
alib
ratio
n pa
ram
eter
s.
X
7.11
. Odo
met
er if
ava
ilabl
e (X
)(2)
Vis
ual i
nspe
ctio
n, a
nd/o
r usi
ng
elec
troni
c in
terf
ace
(a)
Obv
ious
ly m
anip
ulat
ed (f
raud
) to
redu
ce o
r mis
repr
esen
t th
e ve
hicl
e's d
ista
nce
reco
rd.
X
(b)
Obv
ious
ly in
oper
ativ
e.
X
PE-C
ON
S 12
/2/1
4 R
EV 2
57
A
NN
EX II
E
N
Page 102
Item
M
etho
d R
easo
ns fo
r fai
lure
A
sses
smen
t of d
efic
ienc
ies
M
inor
M
ajor
D
ange
rous
7.12
. Ele
ctro
nic
Stab
ility
Con
trol
(ESC
) if f
itted
/requ
ired
(X)(2
) V
isua
l ins
pect
ion,
and
/or u
sing
el
ectro
nic
inte
rfac
e (a
) W
heel
spee
d se
nsor
s mis
sing
or d
amag
ed.
X
(b)
Wiri
ngs d
amag
ed.
X
(c)
Oth
er c
ompo
nent
s mis
sing
or d
amag
ed.
X
(d)
Switc
h da
mag
ed o
r not
func
tioni
ng c
orre
ctly
.
X
(e)
ESC
MIL
indi
cate
s any
kin
d of
failu
re o
f the
syst
em.
X
(f)
Syst
em in
dica
tes f
ailu
re v
ia th
e el
ectro
nic
vehi
cle
inte
rfac
e.
X
8. N
UIS
AN
CE
8.1.
Noi
se
8.1.
1 N
oise
supp
ress
ion
syst
em
(+E)
Subj
ectiv
e ev
alua
tion
(unl
ess t
he
insp
ecto
r con
side
rs th
at th
e no
ise
leve
l m
ay b
e bo
rder
line,
in w
hich
cas
e a
mea
sure
men
t of n
oise
em
itted
by
stat
iona
ry v
ehic
le u
sing
a so
und
leve
l m
eter
may
be
cond
ucte
d)
(a)
Noi
se le
vels
in e
xces
s of t
hose
per
mitt
ed in
the
requ
irem
ents
(1) .
X
(b)
Any
par
t of t
he n
oise
supp
ress
ion
syst
em lo
ose,
dam
aged
, in
corr
ectly
fitte
d, m
issi
ng o
r obv
ious
ly m
odifi
ed in
a w
ay
that
wou
ld a
dver
sely
aff
ect t
he n
oise
leve
ls.
Ver
y se
rious
risk
of f
allin
g of
f.
X
X
PE-C
ON
S 12
/2/1
4 R
EV 2
58
A
NN
EX II
E
N
Page 103
Item
M
etho
d R
easo
ns fo
r fai
lure
A
sses
smen
t of d
efic
ienc
ies
M
inor
M
ajor
D
ange
rous
8.2.
Exh
aust
em
issi
ons
8.2.
1 Po
sitiv
e ig
nitio
n en
gine
em
issi
ons
8.2.
1.1.
Exh
aust
em
issi
ons
cont
rol e
quip
men
t V
isua
l ins
pect
ion
(a)
Emis
sion
con
trol e
quip
men
t fitt
ed b
y th
e m
anuf
actu
rer
abse
nt, m
odifi
ed o
r obv
ious
ly d
efec
tive.
X
(b)
Leak
s whi
ch w
ould
aff
ect e
mis
sion
mea
sure
men
ts.
(c)
MIL
doe
s not
follo
w c
orre
ct se
quen
ce.
X
X
PE-C
ON
S 12
/2/1
4 R
EV 2
59
A
NN
EX II
E
N
Page 104
Item
M
etho
d R
easo
ns fo
r fai
lure
A
sses
smen
t of d
efic
ienc
ies
M
inor
M
ajor
D
ange
rous
8.2.
1.2.
Gas
eous
em
issi
ons
(E)
– Fo
r veh
icle
s up
to e
mis
sion
cla
sses
Eu
ro 5
and
Eur
o V
1 :
mea
sure
men
t usi
ng a
n ex
haus
t gas
an
alys
er in
acc
orda
nce
with
the
requ
irem
ents
(1) o
r rea
ding
of O
BD
. Ta
ilpip
e te
stin
g sh
all b
e th
e de
faul
t m
etho
d of
exh
aust
em
issi
on
asse
ssm
ent.
On
the
basi
s of a
n as
sess
men
t of e
quiv
alen
ce, a
nd b
y ta
king
into
acc
ount
the
rele
vant
type
-ap
prov
al le
gisl
atio
n, M
embe
r Sta
tes
may
aut
horis
e th
e us
e of
OB
D in
ac
cord
ance
with
the
man
ufac
ture
r's
reco
mm
enda
tions
and
oth
er
requ
irem
ents
.
(a)
Eith
er g
aseo
us e
mis
sion
s exc
eed
the
spec
ific
leve
ls g
iven
by
the
man
ufac
ture
r.
X
(b)
Or,
if th
is in
form
atio
n is
not
ava
ilabl
e, th
e C
O e
mis
sion
s ex
ceed
,
(i)
for v
ehic
les n
ot c
ontro
lled
by a
n ad
vanc
ed
emis
sion
con
trol s
yste
m,
– 4,
5 %
, or
– 3,
5 %
acco
rdin
g to
the
date
of f
irst r
egis
tratio
n or
use
sp
ecifi
ed in
requ
irem
ents
(1) ;
(ii)
for v
ehic
les c
ontro
lled
by a
n ad
vanc
ed e
mis
sion
co
ntro
l sys
tem
,
– at
eng
ine
idle
: 0,5
%,
– at
hig
h id
le: 0
,3 %
,
X
1 Ty
pe-a
ppro
ved
in a
ccor
danc
e w
ith D
irect
ive
70/2
20/E
EC, R
egul
atio
n (E
C) N
o 71
5/20
07, A
nnex
I, T
able
1 (E
uro
5), D
irect
ive
88/7
7/EE
C a
nd
Dire
ctiv
e 20
05/5
5/EC
. PE
-CO
NS
12/2
/14
REV
2
60
AN
NEX
II
EN
Page 105
Item
M
etho
d R
easo
ns fo
r fai
lure
A
sses
smen
t of d
efic
ienc
ies
M
inor
M
ajor
D
ange
rous
–
For v
ehic
les a
s of e
mis
sion
cla
sses
Eu
ro 6
and
Eur
o V
I1 :
mea
sure
men
t usi
ng a
n ex
haus
t gas
an
alys
er in
acc
orda
nce
with
the
requ
irem
ents
(1) o
r rea
ding
of O
BD
in
acco
rdan
ce w
ith th
e m
anuf
actu
rer's
re
com
men
datio
ns a
nd o
ther
re
quire
men
ts (1
) .
Mea
sure
men
ts n
ot a
pplic
able
for
two-
stro
ke e
ngin
es.
Alte
rnat
ivel
y, m
easu
rem
ent u
sing
re
mot
e se
nsin
g eq
uipm
ent a
nd
conf
irmed
by
stan
dard
test
met
hods
.
or
– at
eng
ine
idle
: 0,3
%2 ,
– at
hig
h id
le: 0
,2 %
,
acco
rdin
g to
the
date
of f
irst r
egis
tratio
n or
use
sp
ecifi
ed in
requ
irem
ents
(1) .
(c)
Lam
bda
coef
ficie
nt o
utsi
de th
e ra
nge
1± 0
,03
or n
ot in
ac
cord
ance
with
the
man
ufac
ture
r's sp
ecifi
catio
n.
X
(d)
OB
D re
adou
t ind
icat
ing
sign
ifica
nt m
alfu
nctio
n.
X
(e)
Rem
ote
sens
ing
mea
sure
men
t sho
win
g si
gnifi
cant
non
-co
mpl
ianc
e.
X
1 Ty
pe-a
ppro
ved
in a
ccor
danc
e w
ith R
egul
atio
n (E
C) N
o 71
5/20
07, A
nnex
I, T
able
2 (E
uro
6) a
nd R
egul
atio
n (E
C) N
o 59
5/20
09 (E
uro
VI)
. 2
Type
-app
rove
d in
acc
orda
nce
with
Dire
ctiv
e 70
/220
/EEC
, R
egul
atio
n (E
C) N
o 71
5/20
07, A
nnex
I, T
able
1 (E
uro
5), D
irect
ive
88/7
7/EE
C a
nd
Dire
ctiv
e 20
05/5
5/EC
. .
PE-C
ON
S 12
/2/1
4 R
EV 2
61
A
NN
EX II
E
N
Page 106
Item
M
etho
d R
easo
ns fo
r fai
lure
A
sses
smen
t of d
efic
ienc
ies
M
inor
M
ajor
D
ange
rous
8.2.
2. C
ompr
essi
on ig
nitio
n en
gine
em
issi
ons
8.2.
2.1.
Exh
aust
em
issi
on c
ontro
l eq
uipm
ent
Vis
ual i
nspe
ctio
n (a
) Em
issi
on c
ontro
l equ
ipm
ent f
itted
by
the
man
ufac
ture
r ab
sent
or o
bvio
usly
def
ectiv
e.
X
(b)
Leak
s whi
ch w
ould
aff
ect e
mis
sion
mea
sure
men
ts.
(c)
MIL
doe
s not
follo
w c
orre
ct se
quen
ce.
(d)
Insu
ffic
ient
reag
ent,
if ap
plic
able
.
X
X
X
PE-C
ON
S 12
/2/1
4 R
EV 2
62
A
NN
EX II
E
N
Page 107
Item
M
etho
d R
easo
ns fo
r fai
lure
A
sses
smen
t of d
efic
ienc
ies
M
inor
M
ajor
D
ange
rous
8.2.
2.2.
Opa
city
Veh
icle
s reg
iste
red
or p
ut in
to
serv
ice
befo
re 1
Janu
ary
1980
are
ex
empt
ed fr
om th
is re
quire
men
t
- For
veh
icle
s up
to e
mis
sion
cla
sses
Eu
ro 5
and
Eur
o V
1 :
exha
ust g
as o
paci
ty to
be
mea
sure
d du
ring
free
acc
eler
atio
n (n
o lo
ad fr
om
idle
up
to c
ut-o
ff sp
eed)
with
gea
r le
ver i
n ne
utra
l and
clu
tch
enga
ged
or
read
ing
of O
BD
. The
tailp
ipe
test
ing
shal
l be
the
defa
ult m
etho
d of
exh
aust
em
issi
on a
sses
smen
t. O
n th
e ba
sis o
f an
ass
essm
ent o
f equ
ival
ence
, M
embe
r Sta
tes m
ay a
utho
rise
the
use
of O
BD
in a
ccor
danc
e w
ith th
e m
anuf
actu
rer's
reco
mm
enda
tions
and
ot
her r
equi
rem
ents
.
(a)
For v
ehic
les r
egis
tere
d or
put
into
serv
ice
for t
he fi
rst t
ime
afte
r the
dat
e sp
ecifi
ed in
requ
irem
ents
(1) ,
opac
ity e
xcee
ds th
e le
vel r
ecor
ded
on th
e m
anuf
actu
rer's
pl
ate
on th
e ve
hicl
e;
X
1 Ty
pe-a
ppro
ved
in a
ccor
danc
e w
ith D
irect
ive
70/2
20/E
EC, R
egul
atio
n (E
C) N
o 71
5/20
07, A
nnex
I, T
able
1 (E
uro
5), D
irect
ive
88/7
7/EE
C a
nd
Dire
ctiv
e 20
05/5
5/EC
PE
-CO
NS
12/2
/14
REV
2
63
AN
NEX
II
EN
Page 108
Item
M
etho
d R
easo
ns fo
r fai
lure
A
sses
smen
t of d
efic
ienc
ies
M
inor
M
ajor
D
ange
rous
- F
or v
ehic
les a
s of e
mis
sion
cla
sses
Eu
ro 6
and
Eur
o V
I1 :
exha
ust g
as o
paci
ty to
be
mea
sure
d du
ring
free
acc
eler
atio
n (n
o lo
ad fr
om
idle
up
to c
ut-o
ff sp
eed)
with
gea
r le
ver i
n ne
utra
l and
clu
tch
enga
ged
or
read
ing
of O
BD
in a
ccor
danc
e w
ith th
e m
anuf
actu
rer's
reco
mm
enda
tions
and
ot
her r
equi
rem
ents
(1) .
1 Ty
pe a
ppro
ved
acco
rdin
g to
Reg
ulat
ion
(EC
) No
715/
2007
Ann
ex I
Tabl
e 2
(Eur
o 6)
and
Reg
ulat
ion
(EC
) No
595/
2009
(Eur
o V
I).
PE-C
ON
S 12
/2/1
4 R
EV 2
64
A
NN
EX II
E
N
Page 109
Item
M
etho
d R
easo
ns fo
r fai
lure
A
sses
smen
t of d
efic
ienc
ies
M
inor
M
ajor
D
ange
rous
V
ehic
le p
reco
nditi
onin
g:
1. V
ehic
les m
ay b
e te
sted
with
out
prec
ondi
tioni
ng a
lthou
gh fo
r saf
ety
reas
ons c
heck
s sho
uld
be m
ade
that
the
engi
ne is
war
m a
nd in
a sa
tisfa
ctor
y m
echa
nica
l con
ditio
n.
(b)
Whe
re th
is in
form
atio
n is
not
ava
ilabl
e or
requ
irem
ents
(1)
do n
ot a
llow
the
use
of re
fere
nce
valu
es,
X
for n
atur
ally
asp
irate
d en
gine
s: 2
,5 m
-1,
fo
r tur
bo-c
harg
ed e
ngin
es: 3
,0 m
-1,
or, f
or v
ehic
les i
dent
ified
in re
quire
men
ts(1
) or f
irst
regi
ster
ed o
r put
into
serv
ice
for t
he fi
rst t
ime
afte
r the
da
te sp
ecifi
ed in
requ
irem
ents
(1) :
1,5
m-1
1
or
0,7
m-1
2
1 Ty
pe-a
ppro
ved
in a
ccor
danc
e w
ith li
mits
in ro
w B
, sec
tion
5.3.
1.4.
of A
nnex
I to
Dire
ctiv
e 70
/220
/EEC
; row
B1,
B2
or C
, sec
tion
6.2.
1 of
A
nnex
I to
Dire
ctiv
e 88
/77/
EEC
or f
irst r
egis
tere
d or
put
into
serv
ice
afte
r 1 Ju
ly 2
008.
2
Type
-app
rove
d in
acc
orda
nce
with
Reg
ulat
ion
(EC
) No
715/
2007
, Ann
ex I,
Tab
le 2
(Eur
o 6)
. Typ
e-ap
prov
ed in
acc
orda
nce
with
Reg
ulat
ion
(EC
) No
595/
2009
(Eur
o V
I).
PE-C
ON
S 12
/2/1
4 R
EV 2
65
A
NN
EX II
E
N
Page 110
Item
M
etho
d R
easo
ns fo
r fai
lure
A
sses
smen
t of d
efic
ienc
ies
M
inor
M
ajor
D
ange
rous
2.
Pre
cond
ition
requ
irem
ents
:
(i) E
ngin
e sh
all b
e fu
lly w
arm
, for
in
stan
ce th
e en
gine
oil
tem
pera
ture
m
easu
red
by a
pro
be in
the
oil l
evel
di
pstic
k tu
be to
be
at le
ast 8
0 ºC
, or
norm
al o
pera
ting
tem
pera
ture
if lo
wer
, or
the
engi
ne b
lock
tem
pera
ture
m
easu
red
by th
e le
vel o
f inf
rare
d ra
diat
ion
to b
e at
leas
t an
equi
vale
nt
tem
pera
ture
. If,
owin
g to
the
vehi
cle
conf
igur
atio
n, th
is m
easu
rem
ent i
s im
prac
tical
, the
eng
ine's
nor
mal
op
erat
ing
tem
pera
ture
may
be
esta
blis
hed
by o
ther
mea
ns, f
or
exam
ple
by th
e op
erat
ion
of th
e en
gine
co
olin
g fa
n.
(ii) E
xhau
st sy
stem
shal
l be
purg
ed b
y at
leas
t thr
ee fr
ee a
ccel
erat
ion
cycl
es o
r by
an
equi
vale
nt m
etho
d.
PE-C
ON
S 12
/2/1
4 R
EV 2
66
A
NN
EX II
E
N
Page 111
Item
M
etho
d R
easo
ns fo
r fai
lure
A
sses
smen
t of d
efic
ienc
ies
M
inor
M
ajor
D
ange
rous
Te
st p
roce
dure
:
1. E
ngin
e an
d an
y tu
rboc
harg
er fi
tted
to b
e at
idle
bef
ore
the
star
t of e
ach
free
acc
eler
atio
n cy
cle.
For
hea
vy-d
uty
dies
els,
this
mea
ns w
aitin
g fo
r at l
east
10
seco
nds a
fter t
he re
leas
e of
the
thro
ttle.
2. T
o in
itiat
e ea
ch fr
ee a
ccel
erat
ion
cycl
e, th
e th
rottl
e pe
dal m
ust b
e fu
lly
depr
esse
d qu
ickl
y an
d co
ntin
uous
ly (i
n le
ss th
an o
ne se
cond
) but
not
vio
lent
ly,
so a
s to
obta
in m
axim
um d
eliv
ery
from
th
e in
ject
ion
pum
p.
PE-C
ON
S 12
/2/1
4 R
EV 2
67
A
NN
EX II
E
N
Page 112
Item
M
etho
d R
easo
ns fo
r fai
lure
A
sses
smen
t of d
efic
ienc
ies
M
inor
M
ajor
D
ange
rous
3.
Dur
ing
each
free
acc
eler
atio
n cy
cle,
th
e en
gine
shal
l rea
ch c
ut-o
ff sp
eed
or,
for v
ehic
les w
ith a
utom
atic
tra
nsm
issi
ons,
the
spee
d sp
ecifi
ed b
y th
e m
anuf
actu
rer o
r, if
this
dat
a is
not
av
aila
ble,
then
two
third
s of t
he c
ut-o
ff
spee
d, b
efor
e th
e th
rottl
e is
rele
ased
. Th
is c
ould
be
chec
ked,
for i
nsta
nce,
by
mon
itorin
g en
gine
spee
d or
by
allo
win
g a
suff
icie
nt ti
me
to e
laps
e be
twee
n in
itial
thro
ttle
depr
essi
on a
nd
rele
ase,
whi
ch in
the
case
of v
ehic
les
of c
ateg
orie
s M2,
M3,
N2 a
nd N
3, sh
ould
be
at le
ast t
wo
seco
nds.
PE-C
ON
S 12
/2/1
4 R
EV 2
68
A
NN
EX II
E
N
Page 113
Item
M
etho
d R
easo
ns fo
r fai
lure
A
sses
smen
t of d
efic
ienc
ies
M
inor
M
ajor
D
ange
rous
4.
Veh
icle
s sha
ll on
ly b
e fa
iled
if th
e ar
ithm
etic
mea
ns o
f at l
east
the
last
th
ree
free
acc
eler
atio
n cy
cles
are
in
exce
ss o
f the
lim
it va
lue.
Thi
s may
be
calc
ulat
ed b
y ig
norin
g an
y m
easu
rem
ent t
hat d
epar
ts si
gnifi
cant
ly
from
the
mea
sure
d m
ean,
or t
he re
sult
of a
ny o
ther
stat
istic
al c
alcu
latio
n th
at
take
s acc
ount
of t
he sc
atte
ring
of th
e m
easu
rem
ents
. Mem
ber S
tate
s may
lim
it th
e nu
mbe
r of t
est c
ycle
s.
PE-C
ON
S 12
/2/1
4 R
EV 2
69
A
NN
EX II
E
N
Page 114
Item
M
etho
d R
easo
ns fo
r fai
lure
A
sses
smen
t of d
efic
ienc
ies
M
inor
M
ajor
D
ange
rous
5. T
o av
oid
unne
cess
ary
test
ing,
Mem
ber S
tate
s may
fail
vehi
cles
whi
ch h
ave
mea
sure
d va
lues
si
gnifi
cant
ly in
exc
ess o
f the
lim
it va
lues
afte
r few
er th
an th
ree
free
ac
cele
ratio
n cy
cles
or a
fter t
he p
urgi
ng
cycl
es. E
qual
ly to
avo
id u
nnec
essa
ry
test
ing,
Mem
ber S
tate
s may
pas
s ve
hicl
es w
hich
hav
e m
easu
red
valu
es
sign
ifica
ntly
bel
ow th
e lim
its a
fter
few
er th
an th
ree
free
acc
eler
atio
n cy
cles
or a
fter t
he p
urgi
ng c
ycle
s.
Alte
rnat
ivel
y, m
easu
rem
ent u
sing
re
mot
e se
nsin
g eq
uipm
ent a
nd
conf
irmed
by
stan
dard
test
met
hods
(c)
Rem
ote
sens
ing
mea
sure
men
t sho
win
g si
gnifi
cant
no
n-co
mpl
ianc
e.
X
8.4.
Oth
er it
ems r
elat
ed to
the
envi
ronm
ent
8.4.
1. F
luid
leak
s
Any
exc
essi
ve fl
uid
leak
, oth
er th
an w
ater
, lik
ely
to h
arm
the
envi
ronm
ent o
r to
pose
a ri
sk to
the
safe
ty o
f oth
er ro
ad u
sers
.
Stea
dy fo
rmat
ion
of d
rops
that
con
stitu
tes a
ver
y se
rious
risk
.
X
X
PE-C
ON
S 12
/2/1
4 R
EV 2
70
A
NN
EX II
E
N
Page 115
Item
M
etho
d R
easo
ns fo
r fai
lure
A
sses
smen
t of d
efic
ienc
ies
M
inor
M
ajor
D
ange
rous
9. S
UPP
LEM
ENTA
RY
TES
TS F
OR
PA
SSEN
GER
CA
RR
YIN
G V
EHIC
LES
OF
CA
TEG
OR
IES
M2,
M3
9.1.
Doo
rs
9.1.
1. E
ntra
nce
and
exit
door
s V
isua
l ins
pect
ion
and
by o
pera
tion
(a)
Def
ectiv
e op
erat
ion.
X
(b)
Det
erio
rate
d co
nditi
on.
Like
ly to
cau
se in
jurie
s.
X
X
(c)
Def
ectiv
e em
erge
ncy
cont
rol.
X
(d)
Rem
ote
cont
rol o
f doo
rs o
r war
ning
dev
ices
def
ectiv
e.
X
9.1.
2. E
mer
genc
y ex
its
Vis
ual i
nspe
ctio
n an
d by
ope
ratio
n (w
here
app
ropr
iate
) (a
) D
efec
tive
oper
atio
n.
X
(b)
Emer
genc
y ex
its si
gns i
llegi
ble.
Emer
genc
y ex
its si
gns m
issi
ng.
X
X
(c)
Mis
sing
ham
mer
to b
reak
gla
ss.
X
(d)
Acc
ess b
lock
ed.
X
PE-C
ON
S 12
/2/1
4 R
EV 2
71
A
NN
EX II
E
N
Page 116
Item
M
etho
d R
easo
ns fo
r fai
lure
A
sses
smen
t of d
efic
ienc
ies
M
inor
M
ajor
D
ange
rous
9.2.
Dem
istin
g an
d de
fros
ting
syst
em (X
)(2)
Vis
ual i
nspe
ctio
n an
d by
ope
ratio
n (a
) N
ot o
pera
ting
corr
ectly
.
Aff
ectin
g sa
fe o
pera
tion
of th
e ve
hicl
e.
X
X
(b)
Emis
sion
of t
oxic
or e
xhau
st g
ases
into
driv
er's
or
pass
enge
r com
partm
ent.
Dan
ger t
o he
alth
of p
erso
ns o
n bo
ard.
X
X
(c)
Def
ectiv
e de
fros
ting
(if c
ompu
lsor
y).
X
9.3.
Ven
tilat
ion
& h
eatin
g sy
stem
(X
)(2)
Vis
ual i
nspe
ctio
n an
d by
ope
ratio
n (a
) D
efec
tive
oper
atio
n.
Ris
k to
hea
lth o
f per
sons
on
boar
d.
X
X
(b)
Emis
sion
of t
oxic
or e
xhau
st g
ases
into
driv
er's
or
pass
enge
r com
partm
ent.
X
Dan
ger t
o he
alth
of p
erso
ns o
n bo
ard.
X
PE-C
ON
S 12
/2/1
4 R
EV 2
72
A
NN
EX II
E
N
Page 117
Item
M
etho
d R
easo
ns fo
r fai
lure
A
sses
smen
t of d
efic
ienc
ies
M
inor
M
ajor
D
ange
rous
9.4.
Sea
ts
9.4.
1. P
asse
nger
seat
s (in
clud
ing
seat
s for
acc
ompa
nyin
g pe
rson
nel a
nd c
hild
rest
rain
t sy
stem
s whe
n ap
plic
able
)
Vis
ual i
nspe
ctio
n Fo
ldin
g se
ats (
if al
low
ed) n
ot w
orki
ng a
utom
atic
ally
.
Blo
ckin
g an
em
erge
ncy
exit.
X
X
9.4.
2. D
river
's se
at (a
dditi
onal
re
quire
men
ts)
Vis
ual i
nspe
ctio
n (a
) D
efec
tive
spec
ial d
evic
es su
ch a
s ant
i-gla
re sh
ield
.
Fiel
d of
vis
ion
impa
ired.
X
X
(b)
Prot
ectio
n fo
r driv
er in
secu
re.
Like
ly to
cau
se in
jurie
s.
X
X
9.5.
Inte
rior l
ight
ing
and
dest
inat
ion
devi
ces (
X)(2
) V
isua
l ins
pect
ion
and
by
oper
atio
n
Dev
ice
defe
ctiv
e.
Not
ope
ratio
nal a
t all.
X
X
9.6.
Gan
gway
s, st
andi
ng a
reas
V
isua
l ins
pect
ion
(a)
Inse
cure
floo
r.
Stab
ility
aff
ecte
d.
X
X
(b)
Def
ectiv
e ra
ils o
r gra
b ha
ndle
s.
Inse
cure
or u
n-us
eabl
e.
X
X
PE-C
ON
S 12
/2/1
4 R
EV 2
73
A
NN
EX II
E
N
Page 118
Item
M
etho
d R
easo
ns fo
r fai
lure
A
sses
smen
t of d
efic
ienc
ies
M
inor
M
ajor
D
ange
rous
9.7.
Sta
irs a
nd st
eps
Vis
ual i
nspe
ctio
n an
d by
ope
ratio
n (w
here
app
ropr
iate
)
(a)
Det
erio
rate
d co
nditi
on.
Dam
aged
con
ditio
n.
Stab
ility
aff
ecte
d.
X
X
X
(b)
Ret
ract
able
step
s not
ope
ratin
g co
rrec
tly.
X
9.8.
Pas
seng
er c
omm
unic
atio
n sy
stem
(X)(2
) V
isua
l ins
pect
ion
and
by o
pera
tion.
D
efec
tive
syst
em.
Not
ope
ratio
nal a
t all.
X
X
9.9.
Not
ices
(X)(2
) V
isua
l ins
pect
ion
(a)
Mis
sing
, err
oneo
us o
r ille
gibl
e no
tice.
X
Fals
e in
form
atio
n.
X
9.10
. Req
uire
men
ts re
gard
ing
the
trans
porta
tion
of c
hild
ren
(X)(2
)
9.10
.1. D
oors
V
isua
l ins
pect
ion
Prot
ectio
n of
doo
rs n
ot in
acc
orda
nce
with
the
requ
irem
ents
(1) .re
gard
ing
this
form
of t
rans
port.
X
9.10
.2. S
igna
lling
and
spec
ial
equi
pmen
t V
isua
l ins
pect
ion
Sign
allin
g or
spec
ial e
quip
men
t abs
ent.
X
PE-C
ON
S 12
/2/1
4 R
EV 2
74
A
NN
EX II
E
N
Page 119
Item
M
etho
d R
easo
ns fo
r fai
lure
A
sses
smen
t of d
efic
ienc
ies
M
inor
M
ajor
D
ange
rous
9.11
. Req
uire
men
ts re
gard
ing
the
trans
porta
tion
of p
erso
ns w
ith re
duce
d m
obili
ty(X
)(2)
9.11
.1. D
oors
, ram
ps a
nd li
fts
Vis
ual i
nspe
ctio
n an
d op
erat
ion
(a)
Def
ectiv
e op
erat
ion.
Safe
ope
ratio
n af
fect
ed.
X
X
(b)
Det
erio
rate
d co
nditi
on.
Stab
ility
aff
ecte
d; li
kely
to c
ause
inju
ries.
X
X
(c
) D
efec
tive
cont
rol(s
).
Safe
ope
ratio
n af
fect
ed.
X
X
(d)
Def
ectiv
e w
arni
ng d
evic
e(s)
.
Not
ope
ratin
g at
all.
X
X
9.11
.2. W
heel
chai
r res
train
t sy
stem
V
isua
l ins
pect
ion
and
by o
pera
tion
if ap
prop
riate
(a
) D
efec
tive
oper
atio
n.
Safe
ope
ratio
n af
fect
ed.
X
X
PE-C
ON
S 12
/2/1
4 R
EV 2
75
A
NN
EX II
E
N
Page 120
Item
M
etho
d R
easo
ns fo
r fai
lure
A
sses
smen
t of d
efic
ienc
ies
M
inor
M
ajor
D
ange
rous
(b
) D
eter
iora
ted
cond
ition
.
Stab
ility
aff
ecte
d; li
kely
to c
ause
inju
ries.
X
X
(c
) D
efec
tive
cont
rol(s
).
Safe
ope
ratio
n af
fect
ed.
X
X
9.11
.3. S
igna
lling
and
spec
ial
equi
pmen
t V
isua
l ins
pect
ion
Sign
allin
g or
spec
ial e
quip
men
t abs
ent.
X
NO
TES:
(1)
'Req
uire
men
ts' a
re la
id d
own
by ty
pe-a
ppro
val a
t the
dat
e of
app
rova
l, fir
st re
gist
ratio
n or
firs
t ent
ry in
to se
rvic
e, a
s wel
l as b
y re
trofit
ting
oblig
atio
ns o
r by
natio
nal
legi
slat
ion
in th
e co
untry
of r
egis
tratio
n. T
hese
reas
ons f
or fa
ilure
app
ly o
nly
whe
n co
mpl
ianc
e w
ith re
quire
men
ts h
as b
een
chec
ked.
(2
) (X
) ide
ntifi
es it
ems w
hich
rela
te to
the
cond
ition
of t
he v
ehic
le a
nd it
s sui
tabi
lity
for u
se o
n th
e ro
ad b
ut w
hich
are
not
con
side
red
esse
ntia
l in
a ro
adw
orth
ines
s tes
t. (3
) U
nsaf
e m
odifi
catio
n m
eans
a m
odifi
catio
n th
at a
dver
sely
aff
ects
the
road
safe
ty o
f the
veh
icle
or h
as a
dis
prop
ortio
nate
ly a
dver
se e
ffec
t on
the
envi
ronm
ent.
(E)
For t
estin
g of
this
item
, equ
ipm
ent i
s req
uire
d.
PE-C
ON
S 12
/2/1
4 R
EV 2
76
A
NN
EX II
E
N
Page 121
ANNEX III
I. Principles of cargo securing
1. Cargo securing shall withstand the following forces resulting from accelerations /
decelerations of the vehicle:
– in driving direction: 0,8 times the weight of the cargo and
– in lateral direction: 0,5 times the weight of the cargo and
– against driving direction: 0,5 times the weight of the cargo,
– and in general must prevent tilting or tipping of cargo.
2. The distribution of cargo shall take into account the maximum authorised axle loads as
well as the necessary minimum axle loads within the limits of the maximum authorised
mass of the vehicle, in line with the legal provisions on weights and dimensions of
vehicles.
3. During the securing of cargo, the applicable requirements regarding the strength of certain
vehicle components, such as the headboard, sideboard, endbords, stanchions or lashing
points, shall be taken into account when those components are used for the cargo securing.
PE-CONS 12/2/14 REV 2 1 ANNEX III EN
Page 122
4. For the securing of cargo, one or more or a combination of the following restraining
methods may be used:
– locking;
– blocking (local/overall);
– direct lashing;
– top-over lashing.
5. Applicable standards:
Standard Subject
– EN 12195-1 Calculation of lashing forces
– EN 12640 Lashing points
– EN 12642 Strength of vehicle body structure
– EN 12195 -2 Web lashings made from man-made fibres
– EN 12195-3 Lashing chains
– EN 12195-4 Lashing steel wire ropes
– ISO 1161, ISO 1496 ISO container
– EN 283 Swap bodies
– EN 12641 Tarpaulins
– EUMOS 40511 Poles - Stanchions
– EUMOS 40509 Transport Packaging
PE-CONS 12/2/14 REV 2 2 ANNEX III EN
Page 123
II. Inspection of the Securing of Cargo
1. Classification of deficiencies
Deficiencies shall be classified in one of the following deficiency groups:
– Minor deficiency: a minor deficiency exists when the load has been properly secured
but a safety advice might be appropriate.
– Major deficiency: a major deficiency exists when the load has not been sufficiently
secured and a significant shifting or overturning of the load or parts thereof is
possible.
– Dangerous deficiency: a dangerous deficiency exists when traffic safety is directly
endangered due to a risk of loss of cargo or parts thereof or a hazard deriving directly
from the cargo or an immediate endangering of persons
Where several deficiencies are present, the transport is classified in the highest deficiency
group. If, in the event that there are several deficiencies, as the effects based on the
combination of those deficiencies are expected to reinforce one another, the transport shall
be classified in the next higher deficiency level.
PE-CONS 12/2/14 REV 2 3 ANNEX III EN
Page 124
2. Methods of inspection
The method of inspection is a visual assessment of the proper use of appropriate measures
in the amount necessary to secure cargo and/or measurement of tension forces, calculation
of securing efficiency and checking of certificates where appropriate.
3. Assessment of deficiencies
Table 1 sets out rules that may be applied during a cargo securing inspection to determine
whether the condition of the transport is acceptable.
The categorisation of the deficiencies shall be determined on the basis of the classifications
set out in section 1 of this chapter, on a case-by-case basis.
The values stated in Table 1 are of an indicative nature and should be seen as a guideline
for determining the category of a given deficiency in light of the specific circumstances –
depending in particular on the nature of the cargo and the discretion of the inspector.
In the case of a transport falling within the scope of Council Directive 95/50/EC1, more
specific requirements may apply.
1 Council Directive 95/50/EC of 6 October 1995 on uniform procedures for checks on the transport of dangerous goods by road (OJ L 249, 17.10.1995, p. 35).
PE-CONS 12/2/14 REV 2 4 ANNEX III EN
Page 125
TABLE 1
Item Deficiencies Deficiencies assessment
Minor Major Dangerous
A Transport packaging does not allow proper load securing. At discretion of inspector
B One or more load units are not properly positioned. At discretion of inspector
C The vehicle is not suitable for the loaded cargo (deficiency other than those listed under item 10). At discretion of inspector
D Obvious defects of the vehicle superstructure (deficiency other than those listed under item 10). At discretion of inspector
10 Suitability of the vehicle
10.1 Front wall (if used for the securing of cargo)
10.1.1 Part-weakening rust damage or deformations
Part cracked risking the integrity of the cargo compartment
x
x
10.1.2 Insufficient strength (certificate or label if applicable)
Insufficient height relevant to cargo carried
x
x
10.2. Board walls (if used for the securing of cargo)
10.2.1. Part-weakening rust damage, deformations, insufficient condition of hinges or catches
Part cracked; hinges or catches missing or inoperative
x
x
10.2.2. Stayer insufficient strength (certificate or label if applicable)
Insufficient height relevant to cargo carried
x
x
10.2.3. Board wall planks, insufficient condition
Part cracked
x
x
10.3. Rear wall (if used for the securing of cargo)
10.3.1. Part-weakening rust damage, deformations, insufficient condition of hinges or catches
Part cracked; hinges or catches missing or inoperative
x
x
10.3.2. Insufficient strength (certificate or label if applicable)
Insufficient height relevant to cargo carried
x
x
PE-CONS 12/2/14 REV 2 5 ANNEX III EN
Page 126
Item Deficiencies Deficiencies assessment
Minor Major Dangerous
10.4. Stanchions (if used for the securing of cargo)
10.4.1. Part-weakening rust damage, deformations or insufficient attachment to vehicle
Part cracked; attachment to vehicle instable
x
x
10.4.2. Insufficient strength or design
Insufficient height relevant to cargo carried
x
x
10.5. Lashing points (if used for the securing of cargo)
10.5.1. Insufficient condition or design
Not capable of bearing required lashing forces
x
x
10.5.2. Insufficient number
Insufficient number for bearing required lashing forces
x
x
10.6. Required special structures (if used for the securing of cargo)
10.6.1. Insufficient condition, damaged
Part cracked; not able to bear restraint forces
x
x
10.6.2. Not suitable for transported cargo
Missing
x
x
10.7. Floor (if used for the securing of cargo)
10.7.1. Insufficient condition, damaged
Part cracked; not able to bear cargo
x
x
10.7.2. Insufficient load rating
Not able to bear cargo
x
x
20 Restraining methods
20.1. Locking, blocking and direct lashing
20.1.1 Direct attachment of the load (blocking)
20.1.1.1 Distance forward to the front wall, if used for direct securing of cargo, too great
More than 15 cm and danger of penetrating the wall
x
x
PE-CONS 12/2/14 REV 2 6 ANNEX III EN
Page 127
Item Deficiencies Deficiencies assessment
Minor Major Dangerous
20.1.1.2. Lateral distance to the board wall, if used for direct securing of cargo, too great
More than 15 cm and danger of penetrating the wall
x
x
20.1.1.3. Distance backwards to the rear board wall, if used for direct securing of cargo, too great
More than 15 cm and danger of penetrating the wall
x
x
20.1.2. Securing devices such as lashing rails, blocking beams, battens and wedges to the front, to the sides and to the rear
20.1.2.1. Improper attachment to vehicle
Insufficient attachment
Not able to bear restraint forces, loose
x
x
x
20.1.2.2. Securing improper
Insufficient securing
Completely ineffective
x
x
x
20.1.2.3. Insufficient suitability of the securing equipment
Securing equipment complete unsuitable
x
x
20.1.2.4. Suitability of the chosen method for securing the packaging suboptimal
Chosen method completely inadequate
x
x
20.1.3 Direct securing with nets and blankets
20.1.3.1. Condition of the nets and blankets (label missing/damaged but device still in good order)
Load-restraint devices damaged
Load-restraint devices seriously deteriorated and no longer suitable for use
x
x
x
20.1.3.2. Insufficient strength of the nets and blankets
Capability less than 2/3 of the required restraint forces
x
x
PE-CONS 12/2/14 REV 2 7 ANNEX III EN
Page 128
Item Deficiencies Deficiencies assessment
Minor Major Dangerous
20.1.3.3. Insufficient fastening of the nets and blankets
Fastening less capable to bear 2/3 of the required restraint forces
x
x
20.1.3.4. Insufficient suitability of the nets and blankets for securing the cargo
Completely unsuitable
x
x
20.1.4. Separation and padding of the loading units or clearance spaces
20.1.4.1. Unsuitability of the separation and padding unit
Extensive separation or clearance spaces
x
x
20.1.5. Direct lashing (horizontal, transverse, diagonal, loop and spring lashings)
20.1.5.1. The required securing strengths inadequate
Less than 2/3 of required strength
x
x
20.2. Friction-lock securing
20.2.1. Attainment of the required securing strengths
20.2.1.1. The required securing strengths inadequate
Less than 2/3 of required strength
x
x
20.3. Load-restraint devices used
20.3.1 Unsuitability of the load-restraint devices
Completely unsuitable device
x
x
20.3.2. Label (e.g. patch/test trailer) is missing/damaged but device still in good order
Label (e.g. patch/test trailer) is missing/damaged but device shows considerable deterioration
x
x
20.3.3. Load-restraint devices damaged
Load-restraint devices seriously deteriorated and no longer suitable for use
x
x
20.3.4. Lashing winches incorrect used
Defective lashing winches
x
x
PE-CONS 12/2/14 REV 2 8 ANNEX III EN
Page 129
Item Deficiencies Deficiencies assessment
Minor Major Dangerous
20.3.5. Use of the load-restraint wrong (e.g. absence of edge protection)
Use of the load-restraint devices defective (e.g. knots)
x
x
20.3.6. Fastening of the load-restraint devices inappropriate
Less than 2/3 of required strength
x
x
20.4. Additional equipment (e.g. anti-slip mats, edge protectors, edge slides)
20.4.1. Unsuitable equipment used
Wrong or defective equipment used
Equipment used completely unsuitable
x
x
x
20.5. Transport of bulk material, light and loose material
20.5.1. Bulk material blown away during operation of the vehicle on the road likely to distract traffic
Posing a danger to traffic
x
x
20.5.2. Bulk materials are not adequately secured
Loss of cargo posing a danger to traffic
x
x
20.5.3. Absence of covering for light goods
Loss of cargo posing a danger to traffic
x
x
20.6. Round timber transports
20.6.1. Transport material (logs) partially loose x
20.6.2. Securing strengths of the loading unit inadequate
Less than 2/3 of required strength
x
x
30 Load entirely unsecured x
PE-CONS 12/2/14 REV 2 9 ANNEX III EN
Page 130
ANNEX IV
(front side)
SPECIMEN MORE DETAILED TECHNICAL ROADSIDE
INSPECTION REPORT INCORPORATING A CHECK-LIST
1. Place of technical roadside inspection ................................................................................
2. Date .....................................................................................................................................
3. Time ....................................................................................................................................
4. Vehicle nationality mark and registration number .............................................................
5. Vehicle identification / VIN number ..................................................................................
6. Category of vehicle
(a) N2(a) (3,5 to 12 t)
(b) N3(a) (more than 12 t)
(c) O3(a) (3,5 to 10 t)
(d) O4(a) (more than 10 t)
(e) M2(a) (>9 seats(b) to 5 t)
(f) M3(a) (>9 seats(b) more than 5 t)
(g) T5
(h) Other vehicle category:
(please specify)
PE-CONS 12/2/14 REV 2 1 ANNEX IV EN
Page 131
7. Odometer reading at the time of inspection
8. Undertaking carrying out transport
(a) Name and address ......................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................................................
(b) Number of the Community licence(c) (Regulations (EC) No 1072/2009 and
No 1073/2009) ...........................................................................................................
9. Driver name ........................................................................................................................
10. Checklist
Checked(d) Failed(e)
(0) Identification(f)
(1) Braking equipment(f)
(2) Steering(f)
(3) Visibility(f)
(4) Lighting equipment and electrical system(f)
(5) Axles, wheels, tyres, suspension(f)
(6) Chassis and chassis attachments(f)
(7) Other equipment incl. tachograph and speed limitation device(f)
(8) Nuisance incl. emissions and spillage of fuel and/or oil(f)
(9) Supplementary tests for category M2 and M3 vehicles(f)
(10) Cargo securing(f)
PE-CONS 12/2/14 REV 2 2 ANNEX IV EN
Page 132
11. Result of inspection:
Passed
Failed
Prohibition or restriction on using the vehicle, which has dangerous deficiencies
12. Miscellaneous/remarks: ......................................................................................................
13. Authority/officer or inspector having carried out the inspection
Signature of:
Competent authority/officer or inspector Driver
…………………………………… …………………………………… Notes: (a) Vehicle category in accordance with Article 2 to Directive 2014/…/EU . (b) Number of seats including the drivers seat (item S.1 of registration certificate). (c) If available. (d) "checked" means that at least one or more of the inspection items of this group, as listed in Annex II or III to
Directive 2014/…/EU , have been checked and minor or no deficiencies have been found. (e) Failed items with major or dangerous deficiencies indicated on the rear side. (f) Methods for testing and assessment of defects in accordance with Annex II or III to Directive 2014/…/EU .
OJ: please insert number of this Directive.
PE-CONS 12/2/14 REV 2 3 ANNEX IV EN
Page 133
(rev
erse
side
)
0.
IDEN
TIFI
CA
TIO
N O
F TH
E V
EHIC
LE
0.1.
R
egis
tratio
n nu
mbe
r pla
tes
0.2.
V
ehic
le id
entif
icat
ion
/ cha
ssis
/ser
ial n
umbe
r
1.
BR
AK
ING
EQ
UIP
MEN
T
1.1.
M
echa
nica
l con
ditio
n an
d op
erat
ion
1.1.
1.
Serv
ice
brak
e pe
dal p
ivot
1.1.
2.
Peda
l con
ditio
n an
d tra
vel o
f bra
ke o
pera
ting
devi
ce
1.1.
3.
Vac
uum
pum
p or
com
pres
sor a
nd re
serv
oirs
1.1.
4.
Low
pre
ssur
e w
arni
ng g
auge
or i
ndic
ator
1.1.
5.
Han
d-op
erat
ed b
rake
con
trol v
alve
1.1.
6.
Park
ing
brak
e ac
tivat
or, l
ever
con
trol,
park
ing
brak
e ra
tche
t
1.1.
7.
Bra
king
val
ves (
foot
val
ves,
un-lo
ader
s, go
vern
ors)
1.1.
8.
Cou
plin
gs fo
r tra
iler b
rake
s (el
ectri
cal &
pn
eum
atic
)
1.1.
9.
Ener
gy st
orag
e re
serv
oir p
ress
ure
tank
4.
LAM
PS, R
EFLE
CTO
RS,
ELE
CTR
ICA
L EQ
UIP
MEN
T
4.1.
H
eadl
amps
4.1.
1.
Con
ditio
n an
d op
erat
ion
4.1.
2.
Alig
nmen
t
4.1.
3.
Switc
hing
4.1.
4.
Com
plia
nce
with
requ
irem
ents
4.1.
5.
Leve
lling
dev
ices
4.1.
6.
Hea
dlam
p cl
eani
ng d
evic
e
4.2.
Fr
ont a
nd re
ar p
ositi
on la
mps
, sid
e m
arke
r lam
ps
and
end
outli
ne m
arke
r lam
ps
4.2.
1.
Con
ditio
n an
d op
erat
ion
4.2.
2.
Switc
hing
4.2.
3.
Com
plia
nce
with
requ
irem
ents
4.3.
St
op la
mps
6.1.
3.
Fuel
tank
and
pip
es (i
ncl.
heat
ing
fuel
tank
and
pi
pes)
6.1.
4.
Bum
pers
, lat
eral
pro
tect
ion
and
rear
und
er-r
un
devi
ces
6.1.
5.
Spar
e w
heel
car
rier
6.1.
6.
Mec
hani
cal c
oupl
ing
and
tow
ing
devi
ce
6.1.
7.
Tran
smis
sion
6.1.
8.
Engi
ne m
ount
ings
6.1.
9.
Engi
ne p
erfo
rman
ce
PE-C
ON
S 12
/2/1
4 R
EV 2
4
AN
NEX
IV
EN
Page 134
1.1.
10.
Bra
ke se
rvo
units
, mas
ter c
ylin
der (
hydr
aulic
. sy
stem
s)
1.1.
11.
Rig
id b
rake
pip
es
1.1.
12.
Flex
ible
bra
ke h
oses
1.1.
13.
Bra
ke li
ning
s and
pad
s
1.1.
14.
Bra
ke d
rum
s, br
ake
disc
s
1.1.
15.
Bra
ke c
able
s, ro
ds, l
ever
s, lin
kage
s
1.1.
16.
Bra
ke a
ctua
tors
(inc
l. sp
ring
brak
es o
r hy
drau
lic c
ylin
ders
)
1.1.
17.
Load
sens
ing
valv
e
1.1.
18.
Slac
k ad
just
ers a
nd in
dica
tors
1.1.
19.
Endu
ranc
e br
akin
g sy
stem
(whe
re fi
tted
or
requ
ired)
1.1.
20.
Aut
omat
ic o
pera
tion
of tr
aile
r bra
kes
1.1.
21.
Com
plet
e br
akin
g sy
stem
1.1.
22.
Test
con
nect
ions
1.1.
23.
Ove
rrun
bra
ke
1.2.
Se
rvic
e br
akin
g pe
rfor
man
ce a
nd e
ffic
ienc
y
1.2.
1.
Perf
orm
ance
1.2.
2.
Effic
ienc
y
4.3.
1.
Con
ditio
n an
d op
erat
ion
4.3.
2.
Switc
hing
4.3.
2.
Com
plia
nce
with
requ
irem
ents
4.4.
D
irect
ion
indi
cato
r and
haz
ard
war
ning
lam
ps
4.4.
1.
Con
ditio
n an
d op
erat
ion
4.4.
2.
Switc
hing
4.4.
3.
Com
plia
nce
with
requ
irem
ents
4.4.
4.
Flas
hing
freq
uenc
y
4.5.
Fr
ont a
nd re
ar fo
g la
mps
4.5.
1.
Con
ditio
n an
d op
erat
ion
4.5.
2.
Alig
nmen
t
4.5.
4.
Switc
hing
4.5.
2.
Com
plia
nce
with
requ
irem
ents
4.6.
R
ever
sing
lam
ps
4.6.
1.
Con
ditio
n an
d op
erat
ion
4.6.
2.
Switc
hing
6.2.
C
ab a
nd b
odyw
ork
6.2.
1.
Con
ditio
n
6.2.
2.
Mou
ntin
g
6.2.
3.
Doo
rs a
nd d
oor c
atch
es
6.2.
4.
Floo
r
6.2.
5.
Driv
er's
seat
6.2.
6.
Oth
er se
ats
6.2.
7.
Driv
ing
cont
rols
6.2.
8.
Cab
step
s
6.2.
9.
Oth
er in
terio
r and
ext
erio
r fitt
ings
and
eq
uipm
ent
6.2.
10.
Mud
guar
ds (w
ings
), sp
ray
supp
ress
ion
devi
ces
7.
OTH
ER E
QU
IPM
ENT
7.1.
Sa
fety
-bel
ts/b
uckl
es
7.1.
1.
Secu
rity
of m
ount
ing
7.1.
2.
Con
ditio
n
7.1.
3.
Safe
ty b
elt l
oad-
limite
r
PE-C
ON
S 12
/2/1
4 R
EV 2
5
AN
NEX
IV
EN
Page 135
1.3.
Se
cond
ary
(em
erge
ncy)
bra
king
per
form
ance
&
effic
ienc
y
1.3.
1.
Perf
orm
ance
1.3.
2.
Effic
ienc
y
1.4.
Pa
rkin
g br
akin
g pe
rfor
man
ce a
nd e
ffic
ienc
y
1.4.
1.
Perf
orm
ance
1.4.
2.
Effic
ienc
y
1.5.
En
dura
nce
brak
ing
syst
em p
erfo
rman
ce
1.6.
A
nti-l
ock
brak
ing
syst
em
1.7
Elec
troni
c br
ake
syst
em
1.8
Bra
ke fl
uid
2.
STEE
RIN
G
2.1.
M
echa
nica
l con
ditio
n
2.1.
1.
Stee
ring
gear
con
ditio
n
2.1.
2.
Stee
ring
gear
cas
ing
atta
chm
ent
2.1.
3.
Stee
ring
linka
ge c
ondi
tion
2.1.
4.
Stee
ring
linka
ge o
pera
tion
2.1.
5.
Pow
er st
eerin
g
4.6.
3.
Com
plia
nce
with
requ
irem
ents
4.7.
R
ear r
egis
tratio
n pl
ate
lam
p
4.7.
1.
Con
ditio
n an
d op
erat
ion
4.7.
2.
Com
plia
nce
with
requ
irem
ents
4.8.
R
etro
-ref
lect
ors,
cons
picu
ity m
arki
ngs a
nd re
ar
mar
king
pla
tes
4.8.
1.
Con
ditio
n
4.8.
2.
Com
plia
nce
with
requ
irem
ents
4.9.
Te
ll-ta
les m
anda
tory
for l
ight
ing
equi
pmen
t
4.9.
1.
Con
ditio
n an
d op
erat
ion
4.9.
2.
Com
plia
nce
with
requ
irem
ents
4.10
. El
ectri
cal c
onne
ctio
ns b
etw
een
tow
ing
vehi
cle
and
traile
r or s
emi-t
raile
r
4.11
. El
ectri
cal w
iring
4.12
. N
on-o
blig
ator
y la
mps
and
refle
ctor
s
4.13
. B
atte
ry
7.1.
4.
Safe
ty b
elt p
re-te
nsio
ners
7.1.
5.
Airb
ag
7.1.
6.
SRS
Syst
ems
7.2.
Fi
re e
xtin
guis
her
7.3.
Lo
cks a
nd a
nti-t
heft
devi
ce
7.4.
W
arni
ng tr
iang
le
7.5.
Fi
rst a
id k
it.
7.6.
W
heel
cho
cks (
wed
ges)
7.7.
A
udib
le w
arni
ng d
evic
e
7.8.
Sp
eedo
met
er
7.9.
Ta
chog
raph
7.10
. Sp
eed
limita
tion
devi
ce
7.11
. O
dom
eter
7.12
. El
ectro
nic
Stab
ility
Con
trol (
ESC
)
8.
NU
ISA
NC
E
PE-C
ON
S 12
/2/1
4 R
EV 2
6
AN
NEX
IV
EN
Page 136
2.2.
St
eerin
g w
heel
and
col
umn
5.
AX
LES,
WH
EELS
, TY
RES
AN
D
SUSP
ENSI
ON
8.
1.
Noi
se su
ppre
ssio
n sy
stem
2.2.
1.
Stee
ring
whe
el c
ondi
tion
2.2.
2.
Stee
ring
colu
mn
2.3.
St
eerin
g pl
ay
2.4.
W
heel
alig
nmen
t
2.5.
Tr
aile
r ste
ered
axl
e tu
rnta
ble
2.6.
El
ectro
nic
Pow
er S
teer
ing
5.1.
A
xles
5.1.
1.
Axl
es
5.1.
2.
Stub
axl
es
5.1.
3.
Whe
el b
earin
gs
5.2.
W
heel
s and
tyre
s
5.2.
1.
Roa
d w
heel
hub
8.2.
Ex
haus
t em
issi
ons
8.2.
1.
Posi
tive
igni
tion
engi
ne e
mis
sion
s
8.2.
1.1.
Ex
haus
t em
issi
on c
ontro
l equ
ipm
ent
8.2.
1.2.
G
aseo
us e
mis
sion
s
8.2.
2.
Com
pres
sion
igni
tion
engi
ne e
mis
sion
s
8.2.
2.1.
Ex
haus
t em
issi
on c
ontro
l equ
ipm
ent
3.
VIS
IBIL
ITY
3.1.
Fi
eld
of v
isio
n
3.2.
C
ondi
tion
of g
lass
3.3.
R
ear-
view
mirr
ors
3.4.
W
inds
cree
n w
iper
s
3.5.
W
inds
cree
n w
ashe
rs
3.6.
D
emis
ting
syst
em
5.2.
2.
Whe
els
5.2.
3.
Tyre
s
5.3.
Su
spen
sion
syst
em
5.3.
1.
Sprin
gs a
nd st
abili
ser
5.3.
2.
Shoc
k ab
sorb
ers
5.3.
3.
Torq
ue tu
bes,
radi
us a
rms,
wis
hbon
es &
susp
. ar
ms
5.3.
4.
Susp
ensi
on jo
ints
8.2.
2.2.
O
paci
ty
8.4.
O
ther
item
s rel
ated
to th
e en
viro
nmen
t
8.4.
1.
Flui
d le
aks
9.
SUPP
LEM
ENTA
RY
TES
TS F
OR
PA
SSEN
GER
-CA
RR
YIN
G V
EHIC
LES
OF
CA
TEG
OR
IES
M2;
M3
9.1
Doo
rs
PE-C
ON
S 12
/2/1
4 R
EV 2
7
AN
NEX
IV
EN
Page 137
5.
3.5.
A
ir su
spen
sion
6.
CH
ASS
IS A
ND
CH
ASS
IS A
TTA
CH
MEN
TS
6.1.
C
hass
is o
r fra
me
and
atta
chm
ents
6.1.
1.
Gen
eral
con
ditio
n
6.1.
2.
Exha
ust p
ipes
and
sile
ncer
s
9.1.
1.
Entra
nce
and
exit
door
s
9.1.
2 Em
erge
ncy
exits
9.2.
D
emis
ting
and
defr
ostin
g sy
stem
s
9.3.
V
entil
atio
n &
hea
ting
syst
ems
9.4
Seat
s
9.4.
1 Pa
ssen
ger s
eats
9.4.
2.
Driv
er's
seat
9.5.
In
terio
r lig
htin
g an
d de
stin
atio
n de
vice
9.6.
G
angw
ays,
stan
ding
are
as
9.7.
St
airs
and
step
s
9.8.
Pa
ssen
ger c
omm
unic
atio
n sy
stem
9.9.
N
otic
es
9.10
. R
equi
rem
ents
rega
rdin
g th
e tra
nspo
rtatio
n of
ch
ildre
n
9.10
.1.
Doo
rs
9.10
.2.
Sign
allin
g an
d sp
ecia
l equ
ipm
ent
9.11
. R
equi
rem
ents
rega
rdin
g th
e tra
nspo
rtatio
n of
pe
rson
s with
redu
ced
mob
ility
9.11
.1.
Doo
rs, r
amps
and
lifts
9.11
.2.
Whe
elch
air r
estra
int s
yste
m
9.11
.3.
Sign
allin
g an
d sp
ecia
l equ
ipm
ent
PE-C
ON
S 12
/2/1
4 R
EV 2
8
AN
NEX
IV
EN
Page 138
ANNEX V
STANDARD FORM FOR REPORTING TO THE COMMISSION
The standard form shall be drawn up in a computer-processable format and transmitted by
electronic means using standard office software.
Each Member State shall produce:
– one single summary table; and
– for each country of registration of vehicles checked in a more detailed inspection, a
separate detailed table containing information on checked and detected deficiencies for
each vehicle category.
PE-CONS 12/2/14 REV 2 1 ANNEX V EN
Page 139
SUM
MA
RY
TA
BLE
of a
ll (in
itial
and
mor
e de
taile
d) in
spec
tions
R
epor
ting
Mem
ber S
tate
: e.
g. B
elgi
um
Rep
ortin
g pe
riod
year
[X]
to
year
[X+1
]
Veh
icle
Cat
egor
y:
N2
N3
M2
M3
O3
O4
T5
Oth
er c
ateg
orie
s (o
ptio
nal)
Tota
l
Num
ber
of
vehi
cles
ch
ecke
d
Num
ber
of
vehi
cles
fa
iled1 N
umbe
r of
ve
hicl
es
chec
ked
Num
ber
of
vehi
cles
fa
iled
Num
ber
of
vehi
cles
ch
ecke
d
Num
ber
of
vehi
cles
fa
iled
Num
ber
of
vehi
cles
ch
ecke
d
Num
ber
of
vehi
cles
fa
iled
Num
ber
of
vehi
cles
ch
ecke
d
Num
ber
of
vehi
cles
fa
iled
Num
ber
of
vehi
cles
ch
ecke
d
Num
ber
of
vehi
cles
fa
iled
Num
ber
of
vehi
cles
chec
ked
Num
ber
of
vehi
cles
fa
iled
Num
ber
of
vehi
cles
ch
ecke
d
Num
ber
of
vehi
cles
fa
iled
Num
ber
of
vehi
cles
ch
ecke
d
Num
ber
of
vehi
cles
fa
iled
Cou
ntry
of
regi
stra
tion
Bel
gium
Bul
garia
Cze
ch R
epub
lic
Den
mar
k
Ger
man
y
Esto
nia
Irel
and
1 Fa
iled
vehi
cles
with
maj
or o
r dan
gero
us d
efic
ienc
ies a
s per
Ann
ex IV
. PE
-CO
NS
12/2
/14
REV
2
2 A
NN
EX V
E
N
Page 140
Veh
icle
Cat
egor
y:
N2
N3
M2
M3
O3
O4
T5
Oth
er c
ateg
orie
s (o
ptio
nal)
Tota
l
Num
ber
of
vehi
cles
ch
ecke
d
Num
ber
of
vehi
cles
fa
iled1 N
umbe
r of
ve
hicl
es
chec
ked
Num
ber
of
vehi
cles
fa
iled
Num
ber
of
vehi
cles
ch
ecke
d
Num
ber
of
vehi
cles
fa
iled
Num
ber
of
vehi
cles
ch
ecke
d
Num
ber
of
vehi
cles
fa
iled
Num
ber
of
vehi
cles
ch
ecke
d
Num
ber
of
vehi
cles
fa
iled
Num
ber
of
vehi
cles
ch
ecke
d
Num
ber
of
vehi
cles
fa
iled
Num
ber
of
vehi
cles
chec
ked
Num
ber
of
vehi
cles
fa
iled
Num
ber
of
vehi
cles
ch
ecke
d
Num
ber
of
vehi
cles
fa
iled
Num
ber
of
vehi
cles
ch
ecke
d
Num
ber
of
vehi
cles
fa
iled
Cou
ntry
of
regi
stra
tion
Gre
ece
Spai
n
Fran
ce
Cro
atia
Italy
Cyp
rus
Latv
ia
Lith
uani
a
Luxe
mbo
urg
Hun
gary
Mal
ta
Net
herla
nds
Aus
tria
Pola
nd
PE-C
ON
S 12
/2/1
4 R
EV 2
3
AN
NEX
V
EN
Page 141
Veh
icle
Cat
egor
y:
N2
N3
M2
M3
O3
O4
T5
Oth
er c
ateg
orie
s (o
ptio
nal)
Tota
l
Num
ber
of
vehi
cles
ch
ecke
d
Num
ber
of
vehi
cles
fa
iled1 N
umbe
r of
ve
hicl
es
chec
ked
Num
ber
of
vehi
cles
fa
iled
Num
ber
of
vehi
cles
ch
ecke
d
Num
ber
of
vehi
cles
fa
iled
Num
ber
of
vehi
cles
ch
ecke
d
Num
ber
of
vehi
cles
fa
iled
Num
ber
of
vehi
cles
ch
ecke
d
Num
ber
of
vehi
cles
fa
iled
Num
ber
of
vehi
cles
ch
ecke
d
Num
ber
of
vehi
cles
fa
iled
Num
ber
of
vehi
cles
chec
ked
Num
ber
of
vehi
cles
fa
iled
Num
ber
of
vehi
cles
ch
ecke
d
Num
ber
of
vehi
cles
fa
iled
Num
ber
of
vehi
cles
ch
ecke
d
Num
ber
of
vehi
cles
fa
iled
Cou
ntry
of
regi
stra
tion
Portu
gal
Rom
ania
Slov
enia
Slov
akia
Finl
and
Swed
en
Uni
ted
Kin
gdom
PE-C
ON
S 12
/2/1
4 R
EV 2
4
AN
NEX
V
EN
Page 142
Veh
icle
Cat
egor
y:
N2
N3
M2
M3
O3
O4
T5
Oth
er c
ateg
orie
s (o
ptio
nal)
Tota
l
Num
ber
of
vehi
cles
ch
ecke
d
Num
ber
of
vehi
cles
fa
iled1 N
umbe
r of
ve
hicl
es
chec
ked
Num
ber
of
vehi
cles
fa
iled
Num
ber
of
vehi
cles
ch
ecke
d
Num
ber
of
vehi
cles
fa
iled
Num
ber
of
vehi
cles
ch
ecke
d
Num
ber
of
vehi
cles
fa
iled
Num
ber
of
vehi
cles
ch
ecke
d
Num
ber
of
vehi
cles
fa
iled
Num
ber
of
vehi
cles
ch
ecke
d
Num
ber
of
vehi
cles
fa
iled
Num
ber
of
vehi
cles
chec
ked
Num
ber
of
vehi
cles
fa
iled
Num
ber
of
vehi
cles
ch
ecke
d
Num
ber
of
vehi
cles
fa
iled
Num
ber
of
vehi
cles
ch
ecke
d
Num
ber
of
vehi
cles
fa
iled
Cou
ntry
of
regi
stra
tion
Alb
ania
And
orra
Arm
enia
Aze
rbai
jan
Bel
arus
Bos
nia
and
Her
zego
vina
Geo
rgia
Kaz
akhs
tan
Liec
hten
stei
n
Mon
aco
1 Fa
iled
vehi
cles
with
maj
or o
r dan
gero
us d
efic
ienc
ies a
s per
Ann
ex IV
. PE
-CO
NS
12/2
/14
REV
2
5 A
NN
EX V
E
N
Page 143
Veh
icle
Cat
egor
y:
N2
N3
M2
M3
O3
O4
T5
Oth
er c
ateg
orie
s (o
ptio
nal)
Tota
l
Num
ber
of
vehi
cles
ch
ecke
d
Num
ber
of
vehi
cles
fa
iled1 N
umbe
r of
ve
hicl
es
chec
ked
Num
ber
of
vehi
cles
fa
iled
Num
ber
of
vehi
cles
ch
ecke
d
Num
ber
of
vehi
cles
fa
iled
Num
ber
of
vehi
cles
ch
ecke
d
Num
ber
of
vehi
cles
fa
iled
Num
ber
of
vehi
cles
ch
ecke
d
Num
ber
of
vehi
cles
fa
iled
Num
ber
of
vehi
cles
ch
ecke
d
Num
ber
of
vehi
cles
fa
iled
Num
ber
of
vehi
cles
chec
ked
Num
ber
of
vehi
cles
fa
iled
Num
ber
of
vehi
cles
ch
ecke
d
Num
ber
of
vehi
cles
fa
iled
Num
ber
of
vehi
cles
ch
ecke
d
Num
ber
of
vehi
cles
fa
iled
Cou
ntry
of
regi
stra
tion
Mon
tene
gro
Nor
way
Rep
ublic
of
Mol
dova
Rus
sian
Fe
dera
tion
San
Mar
ino
Serb
ia
Switz
erla
nd
Tajik
ista
n
Turk
ey
Turk
men
ista
n
Ukr
aine
PE-C
ON
S 12
/2/1
4 R
EV 2
6
AN
NEX
V
EN
Page 144
Veh
icle
Cat
egor
y:
N2
N3
M2
M3
O3
O4
T5
Oth
er c
ateg
orie
s (o
ptio
nal)
Tota
l
Num
ber
of
vehi
cles
ch
ecke
d
Num
ber
of
vehi
cles
fa
iled1 N
umbe
r of
ve
hicl
es
chec
ked
Num
ber
of
vehi
cles
fa
iled
Num
ber
of
vehi
cles
ch
ecke
d
Num
ber
of
vehi
cles
fa
iled
Num
ber
of
vehi
cles
ch
ecke
d
Num
ber
of
vehi
cles
fa
iled
Num
ber
of
vehi
cles
ch
ecke
d
Num
ber
of
vehi
cles
fa
iled
Num
ber
of
vehi
cles
ch
ecke
d
Num
ber
of
vehi
cles
fa
iled
Num
ber
of
vehi
cles
chec
ked
Num
ber
of
vehi
cles
fa
iled
Num
ber
of
vehi
cles
ch
ecke
d
Num
ber
of
vehi
cles
fa
iled
Num
ber
of
vehi
cles
ch
ecke
d
Num
ber
of
vehi
cles
fa
iled
Cou
ntry
of
regi
stra
tion
Uzb
ekis
tan
The
form
er
Yug
osla
v R
epub
lic o
f M
aced
onia
Oth
er th
ird
coun
tries
(ple
ase
spec
ify)
PE-C
ON
S 12
/2/1
4 R
EV 2
7
AN
NEX
V
EN
Page 145
RES
ULT
S of
mor
e de
taile
d in
spec
tions
Rep
ortin
g M
embe
r Sta
te:
e.g.
Bel
gium
Nam
e of
the
repo
rting
Mem
ber S
tate
Cou
ntry
of R
egis
tratio
n:
e.g.
Bul
garia
PE
RIO
D: f
rom
01
/yea
r [x]
to
12
/ yea
r [x+
1]
Nam
e of
the
coun
try o
f veh
icle
s reg
istra
tion
Veh
icle
C
ateg
ory:
N
2 N
3 M
2 M
3 O
3 O
4 T5
O
ther
cat
egor
ies
(opt
iona
l) To
tal
N
umbe
r of
ve
hicl
es
chec
ked
Num
ber
of
vehi
cles
fa
iled1
Num
ber o
f ve
hicl
es
chec
ked
Num
ber
of
vehi
cles
fa
iled
Num
ber
of
vehi
cles
ch
ecke
d
Num
ber
of
vehi
cles
fa
iled
Num
ber
of
vehi
cles
ch
ecke
d
Num
ber
of
vehi
cles
fa
iled
Num
ber
of
vehi
cles
ch
ecke
d
Num
ber o
f ve
hicl
es f
aile
d
Num
ber
of
vehi
cles
ch
ecke
d
Num
ber
of
vehi
cles
fa
iled
Num
ber
of
vehi
cles
ch
ecke
d
Num
ber o
f ve
hicl
es f
aile
d
Num
ber
of
vehi
cles
ch
ecke
d
Num
ber o
f ve
hicl
es
faile
d
Num
ber
of
vehi
cles
ch
ecke
d
Num
ber
of
vehi
cles
fa
iled
1 Fa
iled
vehi
cles
with
maj
or o
r dan
gero
us d
efic
ienc
ies a
s per
Ann
ex IV
. PE
-CO
NS
12/2
/14
REV
2
8 A
NN
EX V
E
N
Page 146
Def
ect d
etai
l
C
heck
ed
Faile
d C
heck
ed
Faile
d C
heck
ed
Faile
d C
heck
ed
Faile
d C
heck
ed
Faile
d C
heck
ed
Faile
d C
heck
ed
Faile
d C
heck
ed
Faile
d C
heck
ed
Faile
d
(0)
Iden
tific
atio
n
(1) B
raki
ng
equi
pmen
t
(2) S
teer
ing
(3) V
isib
ility
(4) L
ight
ing
equi
pmen
t and
el
ectri
cal
syst
em
(5) A
xles
, w
heel
s, ty
res,
susp
ensi
on
(6) C
hass
is
and
chas
sis
atta
chm
ents
(7) O
ther
eq
uipm
ent
incl
udin
g ta
chog
raph
an
d sp
eed
limita
tion
devi
ces
PE-C
ON
S 12
/2/1
4 R
EV 2
9
AN
NEX
V
EN
Page 147
C
heck
ed
Faile
d C
heck
ed
Faile
d C
heck
ed
Faile
d C
heck
ed
Faile
d C
heck
ed
Faile
d C
heck
ed
Faile
d C
heck
ed
Faile
d C
heck
ed
Faile
d C
heck
ed
Faile
d
(8) N
uisa
nce
incl
udin
g em
issi
ons a
nd
spill
age
of
fuel
and
/or o
il
(9)
Supp
lem
enta
ry
test
s for
M2
/ M3
(10)
Car
go
secu
ring
PE-C
ON
S 12
/2/1
4 R
EV 2
10
A
NN
EX V
E
N
Page 148
Def
ect d
etai
ls (a
dditi
onal
)
1.1.
1
1.1.
2
...
2.1.
1
2.1.
2
...
3.1
3.2
...
20.6
.2
30
Tota
l num
ber o
f fa
ilure
s
PE-C
ON
S 12
/2/1
4 R
EV 2
11
A
NN
EX V
E
N