Top Banner
European crop wild relative diversity and conservation Brian Ford-Lloyd, Shelagh Kell and Nigel Maxted University of Birmingham, UK
14

European crop wild relative diversity and conservation

Jan 30, 2016

Download

Documents

Rafael Chupan

European crop wild relative diversity and conservation. Brian Ford-Lloyd, Shelagh Kell and Nigel Maxted University of Birmingham, UK. PGR Forum participants:. National and regional institutes from 21 European countries + IPGRI + IUCN. Five work packages. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: European crop wild relative diversity and conservation

European crop wild relative diversity and

conservationBrian Ford-Lloyd, Shelagh

Kell and Nigel MaxtedUniversity of Birmingham,

UK

Page 2: European crop wild relative diversity and conservation

PGR Forum participants:

• National and regional institutes from 21 European countries

• + IPGRI• + IUCN

Page 3: European crop wild relative diversity and conservation

Five work packages

• European crop wild relative assessment

• Threat and conservation assessment• In situ data management

methodologies• Population management

methodologies• Genetic erosion and genetic pollution

methodologies

Page 4: European crop wild relative diversity and conservation

What is a crop wild relative (CWR)?

• A crop wild relative is a wild plant taxon that has an indirect use derived from its relatively close genetic relationship to a crop;

• this relationship is defined in terms of the CWR belonging to gene pools 1 or 2, or taxon groups 1 to 4 of the crop

Page 5: European crop wild relative diversity and conservation

Gene pools? Taxon groups?

• GP-1 cultivated forms and the wild or weedy forms of the crop;

• GP-2 includes the coenospecies (gene transfer possible)

• GP-3 includes species from which gene transfer is impossible

• Taxon Group 1a: the crop• Taxon Group 1b: same

species as crop• Taxon Group 2: same

series or section• Taxon Group 3: same

subgenus• Taxon Group 4: same

genus• Taxon Group 5: different

genus to the crop

Page 6: European crop wild relative diversity and conservation

The European CWR Database

CWR catalogueCrops and their wild relative species

+ uses

CWR case studiesCollection of in-depth data

for selected taxa to illustrate thedata model

MetadataLinks to external data

sources ie. developmentof the “real” CWRinformation system

User requirements+

Data standards

Page 7: European crop wild relative diversity and conservation

How to generate the CWR list?

Genera fromMansfeld’s World

Database

Forestry and ornamentalgenera

CWR genera

Euro+Med PlantBasespecies

List of CWR species

Page 8: European crop wild relative diversity and conservation

Data sources

• Two major databases:– Euro+Med PlantBase (www.euromed.org.uk)

– Mansfeld’s World Database of Agricultural and

Horticultural Crops (http://mansfeld.ipk-gatersleben.de/)

• Forestry genera:

– Schultze-Motel (1966) (Enumeration of cultivated

forest plant species

• Ornamental genera:– Community Plant Variety Office (www.cpvo.eu.int)

Page 9: European crop wild relative diversity and conservation

CWR list Ver.3.1: summary statistics

Families Genera Species

E+M filtered 215 2,422 30,729

Crops (Mansfeld) 157 843 19,091

Forestry 54 135 2,798

Ornamental 87 227 7,388

All groups 164 920* 20,127

*106 genera are common to Mansfeld and forestry lists; 166 genera are common to Mansfeld and ornamental lists

Page 10: European crop wild relative diversity and conservation

Further work on the CWR list

• Establishment of Population Management Methodologies

• Genetic Erosion and Pollution Assessment Methodologies

• Threat and Conservation Assessment

• But……………

Page 11: European crop wild relative diversity and conservation

These tasks are substantial

• There are over 20,000 CWR species in Europe

• These must be prioritised• How to do?

Page 12: European crop wild relative diversity and conservation

Prioritisation is needed:

• Which species are under greatest threat

– Red data assessment?

• Need for indicators of loss/erosion

– In reality proxy indicators of genetic erosion

• Prioritise in terms of economic importance?

Page 13: European crop wild relative diversity and conservation

CBD 2010 targets and WS5

A: Focal area

Status and trendsof the componentsof biological diversity

Threats to biodiversity

A: Focal area

Status and trendsof the componentsof biological diversity

Threats to biodiversity

B: Indicator forimmediate testing

Trends in abundanceand distribution ofselected species

B: Indicator forimmediate testing

Trends in abundanceand distribution ofselected species

C: Possibleindicators (require further development)

Trends in genetic diversity of ....cultivated plants...

Number and costof alien invasions

C: Possibleindicators (require further development)

Trends in genetic diversity of ....cultivated plants...

Number and costof alien invasions

CWR list &Euro+Med

CWR list &Euro+Med

Page 14: European crop wild relative diversity and conservation

Crop Wild Relative CoreDatabase

Names of crops and theirwild relatives; uses; degree

of relatedness (geneticand/or taxonomic)

Euro+ MedPlantBase

Nomenclature

Mansfeld’s World Databaseof Agricultural andHorticultural Crops

Crop names; uses; cultivationhistory; domestication;

references; images

Ancillary datasource 1

Ancillary datasource 2

Ancillary datasource 3

Ancillary datasource 4

EURISCO

Ex SituCollections in

Europe

Ancillary datasource n……..

Crop Wild RelativeData Users

Crop Wild RelativeData Users