EUnetHTA Plenary · 2019. 10. 14. · Check ’Display drawing guides on screen’ 3. Select ’OK’ Presentation title maximum three lines Press ‘Caps locked’ for title in Caps

European network for Health Technology Assessment | JA2 2012-2015 | www.eunethta.eu

To view drawing guides

1. Right-click on slide and

select ’Grid and Guides...’

2. Check ’Display drawing

guides on screen’

3. Select ’OK’

Presentation title

maximum three lines

Press ‘Caps locked’

for title in Caps

Presentation subtitle

maximum three lines

of text

EUnetHTA Plenary Assembly May 28-29, 2015

Copenhagen, Denmark

European network for Health Technology Assessment | JA2 2012-2015 | www.eunethta.eu 1


Agenda - I

2


May 28

09:00 – 09:10 Opening remarks

09:10 – 10:30

Finalising JA2 – I • Report on Year 2 from the Coordinator

• EUnetHTA CoI process and update

• EUnetHTA-SEED cooperation

10:30 – 11:00 Coffee break

11:00 – 12:30

EUnetHTA, HTA Network and national HTA activities and

processes • HTA Network Strategy and Reflection paper ‘Re-use of Joint work in national

activities’

• National experiences with applying EUnetHTA tools, outcomes and processes

12:30 – 13:30 Lunch

13:30 – 14:30 Finalising JA2 – II • Remaining tasks and expected results of JA2; reporting of JA2

• Stakeholder perspectives on the experiences and learnings from JA2


Agenda - II

3


May 28

14:30 – 17:30 Possible JA3 – advice on priorities, objectives and activities (I) • Introduction by EUnetHTA and HTA Network

• Group work


15:30 – 17:30 Possible JA3 – advice on priorities, objectives and activities (I) • Group work continues

18:00 – 19:45

19:45 – ca. 23:00

Social event: Guided boat trip through Copenhagen Habour

Dinner at Restaurant Ravelinen


Agenda - I

4


May 29

09:30 – 10:15 Possible JA3 – Reports from Group discussions


10:45 – 12:00 Possible JA3 – advice on priorities, objectives and activities • Plenary discussion

12:00 – 13:00 Lunch

13:00 – 13:30 Other issues and Conclusion


Maximum two

lines in header


for title in Caps

Change fact box colour

Click on box, choose between

the five highlighted colours

under Shape fill

Text starts with no-bullet

To add pre-formatted

bullet text please use the

Increase/Decrease Indent

buttons found in the

Top-PowerPoint menu

Opening remarks

5

• Luciana Ballini, EUnetHTA Plenary Assembly Chair

• Finn Børlum Kristensen, EUnetHTA Executive Committee Chair



Maximum two

lines in header


for title in Caps






Top-PowerPoint menu

1.To review and discuss the main achievements

and expected results of JA2.

2.To discuss and advise on objectives and

activities in the possible JA3.

3.To provide a networking opportunity and

strengthen working relationships between the

EUnetHTA participants.

Meeting objectives


6


Finalising JA2 – I Report from the Coordinator

EUnetHTA Secretariat, DHMA (Denmark)


Maximum two

lines in header


for title in Caps






Top-PowerPoint menu

Impressive volume of collective EUnetHTA JA2 output and activities after Year 2

A recurring important experience:

• the cross-WP coordination (content and process) is vital to the success of the

individual WPs’ and EUnetHTA JA2 as a whole.

A few examples (NOT AN EXHAUSTIVE LIST! – see WP Tech Reports for details):

Overall EUnetHTA accomplishments and new developments

• Development and endorsement of the EUnetHTA JA2 Recommendations on a sustainable EU

cooperation on HTA.

• Strengthened scientific coordination of JA2 activities (Scientific Coordination Officer at the Secretariat)

• Successful ‘HTA 2.0 Europe – Teaming Up for Value’ conference in Rome, Italy on 30-31 October

2014 (450 participants). The programme was developed in cooperation with the EUnetHTA

Stakeholder Forum, and the European Commission and with other external collaboration partners,

e.g., FP7 HTA projects.

• EUnetHTA regularly involved in commenting of the documents and at the events of the HTA Network.

• National adaptation of EUnetHTA outputs gaining momentum.

• Further development of conflict of interest and confidentiality (CoI) handling processes.

As of May 2015: report from the Coordinator (I)


8


Maximum two

lines in header


for title in Caps






Top-PowerPoint menu

Scientific Output

WP4, Core HTA

1st Core HTA completed.

2nd Core HTA being finalised and 3rd Core HTA development process initiated.

Second draft for the Methodological Standards and Procedures for collaborative

Core HTA production finalised.

WP5, Rapid HTA

4 pilots in Strand A (pharmaceuticals) and 3 pilot in Strand B (on other

technologies) finalised.

2 new pilots in Strand A and 3 in Strand B underway.

Updating the HTA Core Model for Rapid REA progressing towards completion.

As of May 2015: report from the Coordinator(II)


9


Maximum two

lines in header


for title in Caps






Top-PowerPoint menu

WP7, Methodology development and evidence generation

Survey of participating HTA bodies, EMA, manufacturers and other

stakeholders on Early Dialogue processes finalised (for drugs only).

9 pilot Early Dialogues finalised, 2 additional to commence.

Common core protocol for AED - drafting proceeding towards

completion on time.

Two methodological guidelines published; 4 more at different stages of

development.

Draft submission template for pharmaceuticals – piloting by WP5

initiated.

Draft submission template for medical devices – piloting by WP5

initiated.

As of May 2015: report from the Coordinator (III)


10


Maximum two

lines in header


for title in Caps






Top-PowerPoint menu

EUnetHTA Tools and Support

Three training courses on EUnetHTA tools (e.g. Evident Database, POP

Database and HTA Core Model®) for EUnetHTA Partners and

Associates as well as EUnetHTA Stakeholder Forum conducted.

E-learning platform proposed and being piloted.

Expansion of the HTA Core Model® with an application to support core

HTAs on pharmaceuticals completed.

Enhancement of HTA Core Model® Online to support production of a)

rapid HTAs and b) local HTA reports commenced.

Survey done by a global technology manufacturer on HTA Core Model®

to support the company’s internal processes completed

As of May 2015: report from the Coordinator (IV)

11


12

POP Statistics:

Quarterly Updates

In spring 2015, POP Database contained: 1,314 planned, ongoing and recently

published projects from 47 EUnetHTA JA partners and 26 countries.

Q4 2014 POP Request

Out of 69 EUnetHTA JA partners:

• Response rate: 71%

• Total number of projects: 1,249

• Alert (SAME) topics: 103 (8%)

• Similar projects (within alert

topics): 233

• Access-rights: 50 partners

Q1 2015 POP Request

Out of 69 EUnetHTA JA partners:

• Response rate: 65%

• Total number of projects: 1,314

• Alert (SAME) topics: 103 (8 %)

• Similar projects (within alert

topics): 251

• Access-rights: 47 partners


Maximum two

lines in header


for title in Caps






Top-PowerPoint menu

Output: SERVICE – OPERATIONS AND Project MANAGEMENT (tools and support):

- EUnetHTA JA2 3-year Work Plan, SOP update (WP1, Secretariat).

- Stakeholder involvement PROCESS SUPPORT: SF and SAGs, public consultations,

expert meetings (with EFPIA, medical devices industry) (WP1, Secretariat).

- Electronic timesheets management/processing (financial reporting AND for WP3’s

calculation of efficiency gains) (Secretariat).

- Surveys and interviews to audit the progress and to capture specifics of the cross-

border collaboration activities (WP3).

- Internal and external communications support (eg, newsletters, coordination and

facilitation of presentations at various events, news service, social media presence

(Secretariat, WP1).

- CoI and Confidentiality handling process support and improvement (DOICU Form,

Task Force on CoI assessment criteria) (Secretariat, WP1).

- Daily support with project and financial management issues at the partner level

(Secretariat).

- LP and Co-LP Project Managers training and support (Secretariat).

As of May 2015: report from the Coordinator (V)

13


Maximum two

lines in header


for title in Caps






Top-PowerPoint menu

External collaborations - sample:

- EMA: progress in the 3 year Work Plan implementation; 6 joint

meetings; input in a number of workshops; coordinated EUnetHTA

partners’ input to EMA’s public consultations; cooperation with EMA

in WP5 and WP7 specific activities.

- 4 FP7 projects: Collaboration with AdHopHTA regarding options for

an online database; cooperation in the HTA 2.0 Europe conference;

cooperation with MedTechHTA in WP7 SG3 on guidelines

development.

- CRD HTA Database: ongoing cooperation with regards to POP

Database.

- SEED: update on activities and coordination of work plans with WP7

SG1 (HAS is a Lead in both activities).

As of May 2015: report from the Coordinator(VI)


14


Maximum two

lines in header


for title in Caps






Top-PowerPoint menu

Finances – Year 2 (Oct 2013- Sept 2014):

Total expenditure Y2: 2.661.921 € (i.e. 28% of the total budget (Y1 – 22%))

Total expenditure Y1+Y2: 4.769.136 (50% of the total JA2 budget)

• 79% spent on staff (budgeted: 75,7%). 4 beneficiaries did not declare any staff costs

in Year 2.

• 25 partners spent 100% of the distributed grant.

• 7 partners spent between 50% and 100% of the distributed grant.

• 4 spent less than 50% of the distributed grant.

• 2 partners did not declare any expenditure at all.

• A budget revision has been finalised – the final adjusted budget (as part of the overall

request for the Grant Agreement amendment) is to be submitted to CHAFEA for

approval.

As of May 2015: report from the Coordinator(VII)


15


Maximum two

lines in header


for title in Caps






Top-PowerPoint menu

Finances - General comment:

Sufficient financial resources to operate with, BUT

- the JA construction of the budget (traditional budgeting (Total Direct cost/OH).

- JA reporting requirements from the Commission.

- varying budget/financial management practices by individual partners

- substantial variation in the possibility to employ the right staff at the right time for the

European activities by individual partner organisations.

make it difficult to spend these financial resources effectively

Budget adjustment insight:

- Attempt to satisfy all eligible (i.e. justifiable in connection with the workload and level of

involvement in the activities) requests for budget increase.

- More incentive to national uptake introduced.

- Coordination with the LPs on connecting the budget availability with the workload in Year 3

(e.g. Authors/Co-Authors/Reviewers – budget availability accordingly).

- Extension to M38 for deliverables scheduled for M36 (conditions described in a letter from

the Financial Officer).

As of May 2015: report from the Coordinator(VII)

16


Maximum two

lines in header


for title in Caps






Top-PowerPoint menu

- Standardisation of CoI and confidentiality handling across WPs is an

important issue that is challenging when moving to practical implementation.

- Good planning and management (project/process management)

competence is indispensable to successful implementation (HTA Core Model

discussions, in- and cross-WP coordination, etc.).

- Project managers meetings and support by the Secretariat is useful.

- High number of activities and complexity continues to be a challenge (reduce

complexity and number of activities markedly in the next JA).

- Training of new staff members is important in order to bring them-up-to-

speed in fast, ongoing JA2 activities (training-on-the-job remains the most

important).

- EUnetHTA liaison person in each agency should be a requirement.

- More than 40% of the content work remains to be delivered in the last

year of JA2!

As of May 2015: report from the Coordinator (VIII)

17


Maximum two

lines in header


for title in Caps

Name of author / presenter

Title


EUnetHTA CoI Process

update

18




Maximum two

lines in header


for title in Caps






Top-PowerPoint menu

Task Force (TF) to develop standard criteria for evaluation of the CoI in order

to increase the transparency of the process.

Participants: 2 individual(s) per WP4 LP, WP5 LP and Co-LP and WP7 LP; 3

Executive Committee members; 3 non-Exec Committee EUnetHTA members.

Timelines: start mid August 2014

• Project Plan: 11 Sep 2014

• 1st Draft (by Drafting Group): 20 Oct 2014

• 2nd Draft (by TF shared with Ex. Comm.): 18 Nov 2014

• Consultation rounds between the Ex. Comm. Members and TF: Dec 2014

– Mar, 2015

• 3rd Draft – ready to be used in the pilots in WP5 and WP7: 26 Mar 2015

EUnetHTA Conflict of Interest (CoI) process update

19


Maximum two

lines in header


for title in Caps






Top-PowerPoint menu

By the end of JA2:

major issues to be tested in the real life projects in WP5 and WP7:

- Clarity of the definitions used (e.g. potential, actual, specific, non-specific CoI)

- Involvement of the experts

• As a part of the team, or

• With request to answer specific questions

• Commenting on the drafts

• Medical writer/editorial reviewer

and the level of CoI acceptable to be involved in the task

- Transparency issues (Information on the CoI of external experts

involved in the task made publicly available)

EUnetHTA Conflict of Interest (CoI) process update - II

20


Maximum two

lines in header


for title in Caps


Title


EUnetHTA – SEED cooperation

21

Francois Meyer, HAS, WP7 LP (France)







guides on screen’

3. Select ’OK’

Presentation title

maximum three lines


for title in Caps


maximum three lines

of text

Please remember to complete the Yearly WP3 Survey!

- and remind your colleagues

Enjoy coffee break!



Maximum two

lines in header


for title in Caps


Title


EUnetHTA, HTA Network and

national activities and processes

23

Presentations and discussion



Maximum two

lines in header


for title in Caps


Title


HTA Network Strategy and Reflection

paper ‘Re-use of Joint work in

national HTA activities’

24

Jérome Boehm, DGSante, HTA Network Secretariat



Maximum two

lines in header


for title in Caps


Title


Current overview of the national

uptake and adaptation practices in

EUnetHTA

25


Anna Nachtnebel, LBI-HTA, Co-LP WP5 (Austria)



Maximum two

lines in header


for title in Caps

Change or edit chart

1. Right click on chart

2a. Select Change Type and

choose a new chart type from

the viewed selection

2b. Select Edit Data and fill in

the new data

Pre-designed chart

1. Click Chart icon or chart

2. Insert pre-designed chart

from Templates

National Uptake of EUnetHTA Outputs


26

National uptake

Guidelines

POP-

database

HTA Core

Model®

National

adaptation

Pilots

Submission

template

National Uptake is

the general

implementation of

any EUnetHTA

outputs on

national/regional

level

National adaptation

is a specific type of

national uptake: a

use of the

EUnetHTA HTA

pilot/joint

assessment

results on

national/regional

level


Maximum two

lines in header


for title in Caps






Top-PowerPoint menu

• A dedicated tab on the home page

o Introduction to national uptake

o Definition of national uptake and national adaptation

o List and description of EUnetHTA Outputs that facilitate national uptake

o Table on the national adaptation of EUnetHTA pilots presenting the

following information (to be continuously updated):

EUnetHTA public website content on national uptake


27

NATIONAL ADAPTATION OF EUnetHTA OUTPUTS

Country Authoring Agency

Title of

EUnetHTA

output used for adaptation

Status as of per [DATE]

Link to published

report [Please

indicate language]

Details on

adaptation

process for published reports

Contact information

XX XX XX XX XX XX XX

Change picture

Right click on picture

Choose a new picture

When the picture is active, use

‘Crop’ tool from Picture Tools

to pan and zoom the picture

If the logo and bottom line are

hidden, right click on picture

and ‘Send to Back’



Maximum two

lines in header


for title in Caps






Top-PowerPoint menu

The survey was conducted by LBI Co-LP in WP5 in April

and the final analysis is expected to be done around

July/August.

Next round of surveying – September 2015.

Objectives of survey:

- Gain insights into the level of the national uptake of EUnetHTA’s

outputs and the national adaptation of the Joint Assessments within

EUnetHTA members.

- Obtain a broad overview of the barriers and challenges in using

the Joint Assessments.

Survey on national uptake and adaptation

May 29, 2015


29


Maximum two

lines in header


for title in Caps






Top-PowerPoint menu

- Web-based survey via SurveyMonkey

- Response time: 2,5 weeks

- Sent to main representatives of CPs & APs

- Response rate:

- 37 of the 69 organisations responded

- 53.6 % response rate

General Information on the Survey

May 29, 2015


30


Maximum two

lines in header


for title in Caps

- 58.3 % of 36 organisations used, or are using one or

more of the Joint Assessments, for any purpose

˗ 30.3% of 33 organisations intend to use one or more of

the Joint Assessments in the nearest future (2015-2017),

for any purpose

Main reasons for not using the Joint Assessments:

Organisational barriers (34%), such as limited resources, timing joint

assessment and irrelevant topic

Usage of Joint Assessments

May 29, 2015


31


Maximum two

lines in header


for title in Caps






Top-PowerPoint menu

Insert picture by clicking

the picture icon

Pan and Zoom picture while

picture is active,

using ‘Crop’ in

Picture Tools

from the Top menu

May 29, 2015 32


0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14Z

osta

va

x

Ca

na

glifl

ozin

So

rafe

nib

Ra

mu

cir

um

ab

Du

od

en

al-

jeju

na

lb

yp

as

s s

leev

e

Re

na

l d

en

erv

ati

on

sy

ste

ms

Ba

llo

on

Eu

sta

ch

ian

Tu

bo

pla

sty

Fe

ca

lIm

mu

no

ch

em

ica

lT

es

t

Purpose of Using Joint Assessment

Direct decision-making

For producing a localHTA report

Cross-checkingevidence/methods withown reportsOther, please specify


Maximum two

lines in header


for title in Caps

National Adaptation Joint Assessments WP5 Strand A

May 29, 2015


33

Joint

Assessment

Published+ (already

adapted on national

level)

Ongoing Other purposes (e.g., direct

decision-making, cross

checking own methods,

learning purposes etc.)

Zostavax Austria, Netherlands Austria, Sweden, Netherlands

Canagliflozin Slovakia, Netherlands

Croatia, Spain,

Malta

Croatia, Slovakia, Spain,

Sweden, Netherlands

Sorafenib Slovakia United Kingdom, Slovakia,

Spain

Ramucirumab Slovakia Croatia, Austria Slovakia, Netherlands

+ includes confidential reports


Maximum two

lines in header


for title in Caps

National Adaptation Joint Assessments WP5 Strand B

May 29, 2015


34

Joint

Assessment

Published+ (already

adapted on national

level)

Ongoing Other purposes (e.g., direct

decision-making, cross

checking own methods,

learning purposes etc.)

Duodenal-

jejunal bypass

sleeve

Spain, Austria, Slovakia,

Netherlands

Croatia Italy, Austria, Slovakia,

Netherlands, Lithuania

Renal

Denervation

Systems

Slovakia Denmark Denmark, Finland,

Netherlands, Italy, Slovakia,

Austria, Spain (2), UK,

Lithuania

Balloon

Eustachian

Tuboplasty

Slovakia Spain, Austria,

Finland

Austria, Italy, Slovakia,

Netherlands, Lithuania

+ includes confidential reports


Maximum two

lines in header


for title in Caps

National Adaptation Joint Assessments WP4

May 29, 2015


35

Joint Assessment Published (already

adapted on national

level)

Ongoing Other purposes (e.g.,

direct decision-making,

cross checking own

methods, learning

purposes etc.)

Fecal

Immunochemical

Test

Austria (2) Croatia, Romania,

Finland

Italy, Spain, Switzerland,

Lithuania


Maximum two

lines in header


for title in Caps

POP Database: used by 58% (18 organisations)

EVIDENT Database: used by 26% (8 organisations)

HTA Core Model

- Comprehensive HTA: used by 61% (19 organisations)

- Rapid REA: used by 55% (17 organisations)

Guidelines: used by 58% (18 organisations)

31 organisations answered the questions on other outputs

National Uptake Other Outputs Current Use

May 29, 2015


36


Maximum two

lines in header


for title in Caps






Top-PowerPoint menu

May 29, 2015


37

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

PO

P-D

ata

ba

se

EV

IDE

NT

Data

base

HT

A C

ore

Mo

del

ap

plica

tio

ns

for

co

mp

reh

en

siv

e H

TA

HT

A C

ore

Mo

del

ap

plica

tio

n f

or

Rap

id R

EA

Purpose Using Other Outputs

Not aware

Not used

For theproduction ofJointAssessments

In theproductionprocess of localHTA reports

Other purposes


Maximum two

lines in header


for title in Caps


Title


National experiences with applying

EUnetHTA tools, outcomes and

processes

38

Teresa Molina López, AETSA & Marisa López Garcia, AVALIA-t –

Spanish Network (Spain)

Raf Mertens, KCE (Belgium)



Maximum two

lines in header


for title in Caps






Top-PowerPoint menu

• What worked best?

• Which problems/challenges were experienced when

applying EUnetHTA results?

• What learnings can be shared with your colleagues in the

EUnetHTA network in order to practically improve the

uptake process?

Plenary discussion – Experiences of implementing EUnetHTA outputs nationally


39






guides on screen’

3. Select ’OK’

Presentation title

maximum three lines


for title in Caps


maximum three lines

of text

Please remember to fill out the Yearly WP3 Survey!


Enjoy Lunch!



Maximum two

lines in header


for title in Caps


Title


Finalising JA2 – II Remaining tasks and expected

results of JA2, reporting of JA2

41




Maximum two

lines in header


for title in Caps






Top-PowerPoint menu

Grant Agreement (GA) with CHAFEA:

- 10 main deliverables.

- Achievement of objectives as per specific indicators (e.g.

at least 40 national HTA reports with use of tools and

information from JA2; Core HTA Database has

information on at least 17 produced Core HTAs (including

rapid HTAs), etc.).

- 6 months left to deliver (M38 (Nov’15).

- Final report to CHAFEA: M42 (Mar’16).

Remaining tasks and reporting (I)


42


Maximum two

lines in header


for title in Caps






Top-PowerPoint menu

WP2

GA Deliverable: Report on yearly training courses on EUnetHTA tools

and methodology.

Remaining tasks: national uptake promotion, finalising development of

e-learning/webinar training, Community of Practice activities.

final report to CHAFEA (task for all WPs!)

WP3

GA Deliverable: Report on evaluation of project completion including

assessment of impact on secondary users of HTA information.

Remaining tasks: analysis of the 2015 annual survey, finalisation of the

efficiency gains report.

Remaining tasks and reporting (II)


43


Maximum two

lines in header


for title in Caps






Top-PowerPoint menu

WP4

GA Deliverable: 3 full Core HTAs.

Remaining tasks: finalising 2nd and 3rd Core HTAs and methodological

standard and procedure guide.

WP5

GA Deliverable: 12 pilot rapid assessments.

Remaining tasks: finalise 2 pilots (Strand A) and 3 pilots (Strand B),

piloting of the submission template, finalise the update of the HTA Core

Model for Rapid REA including feedback on the online tool; workshop

with EFPIA on rapid REA pilots on pharmaceuticals; WP5 f-t-f meeting

(Dublin).

Remaining tasks and reporting (III)


44


Maximum two

lines in header


for title in Caps






Top-PowerPoint menu

WP6

GA Deliverable: Report on Information Management Infrastructure and

Services.

Remaining tasks: support and maintenance of the EUnetHTA public

website and Intranet, POP Database Release 2; new aggregator

update; e-learning platform support.

WP8

GA Deliverable: upgraded and updated application package of the HTA

Core Model®.

Remaining tasks: training in the HTA Core Model, finalising update of

the HTA Core Model and upgrade of the Online Service to support

production of rapid HTAs and local reports.

Remaining tasks and reporting (V)


45


Maximum two

lines in header


for title in Caps






Top-PowerPoint menu

WP7

GA Deliverables: guidelines and pilots to improve quality and adequacy

of initial and additional evidence generation; Methodological guidelines

and Templates to support production of core HTA information and rapid

assessments.

Remaining tasks: SG1: 2 EDs and report on lessons learned on the

disease-specific guideline development.

SG2: finalising common core protocol pilot, position paper on study

design and position paper on research recommendations.

SG3: 3 guidelines and 1 reflection paper to finalise; finalise update of

JA1 methodological guidelines.

SG4: finalisation of submission templates, dissemination of results.

Remaining tasks and reporting (VI)


46


Maximum two

lines in header


for title in Caps






Top-PowerPoint menu

WP1/Secretariat

GA Deliverables: Recommendations on the implementation of a

sustainable European network for HTA; Final report from the JA.

Remaining tasks: monitoring national uptake, recommendations for

coherent joint assessment production processes and procedures (SOP)

across WPs (review of current guides, procedure manuals, etc.);

reporting on implementing EMA-EUnetHTA cooperation (1 f-t-f meeting

Dec’15); expert workshop with Med Tech industry; preparation of the

EUnetHTA JA2 Final Technical and Financial Report; regular support in

project management, administration and financial management of

EUnetHTA JA activities (partner, WP and network levels).

Remaining tasks and reporting (VI)


47


Maximum two

lines in header


for title in Caps






Top-PowerPoint menu

Content: specific deliverables, description of undertaken

activities and analysis and discussion of the results.

Responsible: WP Lead and Co-Lead Partners and the JA2

Coordinator.

Timing and logistical details on submission of required

data will be made available as early as June (instructions

to the WP LPs and Co-LPs) and no later than August 2015

(all Associated Partners in JA2).

Final EUnetHTA JA2 Technical Report


48


Maximum two

lines in header


for title in Caps


Title


Finalising JA2 – II Stakeholder perspectives on the

experiences and learnings from

EUnetHTA JA2

49

Stakeholder Forum representatives



Maximum two

lines in header


for title in Caps


Title


Possible JA3 Advice on priorities, objectives and

activities

50

Introduction by HTA Network Secretariat and EUnetHTA Secretariat



Maximum two

lines in header


for title in Caps






Top-PowerPoint menu

Spring 2005

10 years ago…


51


Maximum two

lines in header


for title in Caps


Change Country colour

Click twice on country,

choose between the five

highlighted colours

under Shape fill

˗ Denmark

˗ Austria

˗ Finland

˗ France

˗ Germany

˗ Italy

˗ Spain

˗ United Kingdom

Task Force from 8 countries

52

Change picture









53 European network for Health Technology Assessment | JA2 2012-2015 | www.eunethta.eu

Spring

2015


Maximum two

lines in header


for title in Caps






Top-PowerPoint menu

What’s the final aim?

- Standardisation

- Transparency

as the basis for improved efficiency and quality of the HTA

production process in national settings.

- Shared understanding of the role of HTA in decision-making of the EU

countries.

Outcome:

Ultimately, a European HTA network system for the Member States

contributing to seamless introduction and faster patient access to

effective health technologies in Europe.

What do we want to have in 2019 in the European cooperation on HTA?


54


Maximum two

lines in header


for title in Caps






Top-PowerPoint menu

A permanent European HTA network system for the Member States.

Features of the system:

- Joint assessments that fit national processes (both process- and output-

wise)

- A support structure (including maintained tools and process support) for

HTA agencies to produce local HTA reports individually in a format or/and

in a process that allows cross-border utilisation of the final product and/or

of intermediate results of the local production process

- Understanding and practical utilisation of the knowledge of the national

HTA production processes/outcomes in connection with the decision-

making on access/reimbursement of healthcare technologies in the EU

MS.

- Effective system of cooperation between regulators and HTAs

- Other ??

What do we want to have in 2019 in the European cooperation on HTA?


55


Kristensen FB_1 Lupus_ 20110923

2014-15

2016-20

2020+

Change picture










2020+


Maximum two

lines in header


for title in Caps






Top-PowerPoint menu

General objective (as per the HTA Network Strategy): To increase use, quality

and efficiency in HTA production in Europe.

Specific operational objectives:

• Improve and develop further joint production with intent to take up the

results of the joint work in national activities.

• Facilitate routine implementation/application of the results of joint work within

national settings.

• Improve and increase, as appropriate, capacity to engage in joint work and

implement results in national settings.

• Support integration of the HTA activities in the whole life cycle of

technologies in interaction with stakeholders and decision makers.

• Test and deliver a final workable business model for the scientific and

technical mechanism of a permanent European cooperation on HTA.

Objectives suggested by EUnetHTA Exec Comm for JA3:


58


Maximum two

lines in header


for title in Caps






Top-PowerPoint menu

To receive input and suggestions from the JA2 partners to

be included in the on-going preparatory activities on JA3.

• Your views on OBJECTIVES and KEY ACTIVITIES (main

questions).

• Your views, suggestions, etc. by replying to supporting

questions.

• The voice of various (geographically, size, mandate, etc.)

individual EUnetHTA partners and stakeholders should be

heard – please be active!

Group work - Aim


59


Maximum two

lines in header


for title in Caps




under Shape fill






Top-PowerPoint menu

Group rooms

60

Group 1: In meeting room ‘Iron’ – on the left hand side

when walking out the meeting room, behind the service-desk.

EUnetHTA sign on the door.

Group 2: In meeting room ‘Copper’ – on the right hand

side when walking out the meeting room. EUnetHTA sign on

the door.

Group 3: Stay in meeting room

Group 4: Stay in meeting room


Change picture











Maximum two

lines in header


for title in Caps






Top-PowerPoint menu

• What do you think should be key activities in JA3? How to ensure that attention to pharmaceuticals

and to other technologies is appropriately balanced in the number and type of activities in JA3?

• Based on the experience and lessons learned from JA2, what would be the scope of and organisation of

production of joint assessments in JA3?

• How to practically ensure (JA3 organisation, governance, content) that the joint production is in fact meeting

the national and regional HTA process needs and quality requirements? How would you see JA3 practically

supporting national implementation of the European HTA cooperation’s output (i.e. tools, developed

processes, databases, joint assessment information, etc.)?

• How to engage stakeholders in JA3 to ensure that interaction is effective and brings added value to the

scientific and technical processes and outcomes? Please suggest practical solutions based on lessons

learned from JA2.

• How would you see the most effective and appropriate ways of interacting with regulators and policy and

payer decision-makers? How does your organisation see a practical interaction and cooperation with the

EMA?

• Joint Actions on HTA is not an exercise in academic inquiry, however, contacts and useful interaction with

leading research environments are important. How can we effectively involve academic and research

institutions in JA3?

• EUnetHTA’s recognition and influence is growing – with this growth comes an increasing number of requests

to engage in and provide input to other projects, initiatives, cooperations, etc. Funds are limited and

assigned to delivering specific output as is described in the technical annex of the JA. What would be your

recommendation of how to deal with this growing demand on EUnetHTA in JA3?

• Other issues?

Group work - Questions


62






guides on screen’

3. Select ’OK’

Presentation title

maximum three lines


for title in Caps


maximum three lines

of text

EUnetHTA Plenary Assembly May 28-29, 2015

Copenhagen, Denmark



Agenda - I

64


May 29

09:30 – 10:15 Possible JA3 – Reports from Group discussions


10:45 – 12:00 Possible JA3 – advice on priorities, objectives and activities • Plenary discussion

12:00 – 13:00 Lunch

13:00 – 13:30 Other issues and Conclusion


Maximum two

lines in header


for title in Caps


Title


Possible JA3 Reports from Group discussion

65

Introduction and discussion



Maximum two

lines in header


for title in Caps






Top-PowerPoint menu

Introduction to group presentation and discussion


66






guides on screen’

3. Select ’OK’

Presentation title

maximum three lines


for title in Caps


maximum three lines

of text

Please remember to fill out the Yearly WP3 Survey!


Enjoy the Coffee break!



Maximum two

lines in header


for title in Caps


Title


Possible JA3 – advice on

priorities, objectives and

activities Plenary discussion

68







guides on screen’

3. Select ’OK’

Presentation title

maximum three lines


for title in Caps


maximum three lines

of text

Please remember to fill out the Yearly WP3 Survey! Deadline – May 29 (today)

Enjoy Lunch!



Maximum two

lines in header


for title in Caps


Title


Other issues and Conclusion

70



Maximum two

lines in header


for title in Caps




under Shape fill






Top-PowerPoint menu

Other issues

71

• PA evaluation – in the folder, please fill out and give to

a staff from the Secretariat.

• WP3 yearly Survey – please remember to fill out the

survey and also remind your colleagues at home to do

the same!



for title and subtitle

in Caps


Thank you! Have a safe trip home!! And remember to fill in the evaluation of the Plenary Assembly!


EUnetHTA Plenary · 2019. 10. 14. · Check ’Display drawing guides on screen’ 3. Select ’OK’ Presentation title maximum three lines Press ‘Caps locked’ for title in Caps

Documents