Top Banner
Ethics of Working with Individuals with Disabilities and their Families in Maintaining Health Dick Sobsey University of Alberta 1
33

Ethics of Working with Individuals with Disabilities and their Families in Maintaining Health

Feb 24, 2016

Download

Documents

Xenia

Ethics of Working with Individuals with Disabilities and their Families in Maintaining Health. Dick Sobsey University of Alberta. A Father’s Perspective. MECP2 Duplication Syndrome Diagnosis at Age 18 In general, our family’s experience has been positive and supportive. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Ethics of Working with Individuals with Disabilities  and their Families in Maintaining Health

1

Ethics of Working with Individuals with Disabilities

and their Families in Maintaining Health

Dick SobseyUniversity of Alberta

Page 2: Ethics of Working with Individuals with Disabilities  and their Families in Maintaining Health

2

A Father’s Perspective

• MECP2 Duplication Syndrome• Diagnosis at Age 18• In general, our family’s experience has been

positive and supportive.

Page 3: Ethics of Working with Individuals with Disabilities  and their Families in Maintaining Health

3

A Father’s Perspective

• ER, University Hospital, Edmonton

• ER, Rockyview Hospital, Calgary• ER, Taber Hospital• ER, Vancouver General• ER, Vancouver Children’s• ER, Anaheim Memorial• Urgent Care, Dunedin, NZ• Urgent Care, Queenstown, NZ• Urgent Care, Brisbane,

Australia• Suva Hospital, Fiji• Navua Health Clinic, Fiji

Page 4: Ethics of Working with Individuals with Disabilities  and their Families in Maintaining Health

4

Disparities

Health Outcome Disparities• May be due to impairment

or disease process.• May be due to unequal

treatment

Health Care Disparities• Differences in health care

access and quality of health services.

≠ ≠ ≠ ≠

Page 5: Ethics of Working with Individuals with Disabilities  and their Families in Maintaining Health

5

United StatesHavercamp, Scandlin, & Roth. (2004). Health Disparities Among Adults with

Developmental Disabilities, Adults with Other Disabilities, and Adults Not Reporting Disability in North Carolina. Public Health Reports, 119, 418-426

No Disability

Other Disability

Developmental Disability

Never had Pap TestAdult Females

2.2 4.7 11.5

Never had mammogramFemales over 40

13.0 14.5 26.8

No Teeth Cleaning for more than 5 years

8.0 17.2 14.4

Page 6: Ethics of Working with Individuals with Disabilities  and their Families in Maintaining Health

6

United States• Racial and ethnic disparities in the use of health care have

attracted the greatest public and Congressional notice. Nevertheless, another large subgroup of Americans—the 40 to 50 million individuals with disabilities—experience similar disadvantages while generating little public outcry.

• Disparities monitoring is only a first step to eliminat- ing harmful inequalities in health service use across populations. The next more important step is under- standing reasons for these disparities and eliminating barriers to equitable use of health care.

• Tracking disability disparities: the data dilemma• Journal of Health Services & Research Policy. 13(3):129-30,

2008 Jul Iezzoni, Lisa I.

Page 7: Ethics of Working with Individuals with Disabilities  and their Families in Maintaining Health

7

United States• Although 82.2% of nondisabled persons had surgery, 68.5% of

disabled persons received operations. Adjusted relative risks (RRs) of receiving surgery were especially low for persons with respiratory disabilities (adjusted RR=.76), nervous system conditions (adjusted RR=.86; 95% CI, .76–.98), and mental health and/or mental retardation disorders (adjusted RR=.92; 95% CI, .86–.99). Persons with disabilities had significantly higher cancer-specific mortality rates (hazard ratio [HR]=1.37) than persons without disabilities. Observed differences in cancer mortality persisted after adjusting for demographic and tumor characteristics (adjusted relative HR=1.23).

• Iezzoni, L.I. et al. (2008). Treatment Disparities for Disabled Medicare Beneficiaries With Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 89, 595-601.

Page 8: Ethics of Working with Individuals with Disabilities  and their Families in Maintaining Health

8

Taiwan

• After adjusting for age, gender, ethnicity, socioeconomic status and hospital characteristics, the presence of schizophrenia was associated with a 2.83 times higher risk of having a ruptured appendix.

• Tsay, J-H.. Lee, C-H,. Hsu, Y-J., Wang, P-J., Bai, Ya-Mei., Chou, Y-J., & Huang, N. (2007)Disparities in appendicitis rupture rate among mentally ill patients. BMC (BioMed Central) Public Health. 7, 331-340.

Page 9: Ethics of Working with Individuals with Disabilities  and their Families in Maintaining Health

9

United KingdomMencap Reports

• Treat me right, 2004• Poor access to GPs• Poor Treatment in

hospitals.• Blatant discrimination

cases

• Death by Indifference, 2008

• “Senior management within the Department for Health, strategic health authorities, hospital trusts and primary care trusts see people with a learning disability as a low priority”

• “Many healthcare professionals do not understand much about learning disability”

Page 10: Ethics of Working with Individuals with Disabilities  and their Families in Maintaining Health

10

United KingdomHealthcare for All, 2008 (Michael Report)

• “People with learning disabilities find it much harder than other people to access assessment and treatment for general health problems.”

• “insufficient attention given to making reasonable adjustments to support the delivery of equal treatment…”

• “Health service staff, particularly those working in general healthcare, have very limited knowledge about learning disability.”

• “…witnesses described some appalling examples of discrimination, abuse and neglect across the range of health services “

Page 11: Ethics of Working with Individuals with Disabilities  and their Families in Maintaining Health

11

Canadian Perspectives

• “As a group people with DD have poorer health and greater difficulty accessing health care than those in the general population.”

• Sullivan et al. Consensus guidelines for primary health care of adults with developmental disabilities. Canadian Family Physician 2006

Page 12: Ethics of Working with Individuals with Disabilities  and their Families in Maintaining Health

12

Canadian Perspectives• “Across Canada, there have

been insufficient advances in clinical training and service developments to meet the needs of individuals with disabilities and comorbid mental health disturbances”

• Lunsky & Bradley. (2001) Developmental Disability training in Canadian residency psychiatry programs. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry

• “There are no attractive career paths for health professionals prepared to consider a vocation that emphasizes service to persons with developmental disabilities”

• Hennan, B. (2005). Gaps and silos: Persons with developmental disabilities move to the community: University of Manitoba Department of Family Medicine.

Page 13: Ethics of Working with Individuals with Disabilities  and their Families in Maintaining Health

13

Canadian Perspectives• “The value society has

placed on persons with ID has contributed to disinterest in understanding the various etiologies of ID and their health consequences, which has led to inadequate access to needed care.”

• Ouellette-Kuntz, Addressing health disparities through promoting equity for individuals with intellectual disability. Canadian Journal of Public Health 2005

Page 14: Ethics of Working with Individuals with Disabilities  and their Families in Maintaining Health

14

Some problems

• Pandemic Triage Protocol• Poor access to consistent primary care• Quality of life issues – About 15% of infants

who die in hospital are viable infants but treatment is withheld or withdrawn because they are considered not to have adequate potential quality.

• Issues in prenatal diagnosis and counseling

Page 15: Ethics of Working with Individuals with Disabilities  and their Families in Maintaining Health

15

Symptom MaskingDiagnostic Overshadowing

• The individual’s’ disability becomes the reason for every issue and routing diagnostic and treatment procedures are overlooked.

• It is essential to begin with the same diagnostic and treatment assumptions that are typical for other patients.

Page 16: Ethics of Working with Individuals with Disabilities  and their Families in Maintaining Health

16

Limited Communication

• Symptoms are typically described by the patient.

• Signs are measured directly by observer.• Patients with limited communication require

increased reliance on objectively reliable signs.

Page 17: Ethics of Working with Individuals with Disabilities  and their Families in Maintaining Health

17

Increased Time Requirements

• Many people with disabilities require more time for the same health care procedures.

• This creates financial disincentives in a “pay-by-procedure” system.

• “Difficult cases” may result in poor utilization and outcome evaluation data.

Page 18: Ethics of Working with Individuals with Disabilities  and their Families in Maintaining Health

18

Specialized Equipment Needs

• For example, examination tables are rarely accessible making routine examinations difficult or impossible -

Page 19: Ethics of Working with Individuals with Disabilities  and their Families in Maintaining Health

19

Ghettoization

• When some health services actually make people with disabilities welcome and strive to provide services, they are often oversubscribed by patients who are unwelcome or provided with substandard treatment elsewhere.

Page 20: Ethics of Working with Individuals with Disabilities  and their Families in Maintaining Health

20

The Deaf Woman & The Red Cockaded Woodpecker

• Dubner & Levitt 20 Jan 2008 NY Times• When do the requirements of providing good

services result in maneuvers intended to avoid any services at all?

Page 21: Ethics of Working with Individuals with Disabilities  and their Families in Maintaining Health

21

Perfectionism & REhabilitation

• Rehabilitation Medicine was deeply rooted in restoring people particularly survivors of war to their pre-injury state. The goals for people who had no pre-injury status or who could not be “restored” were less clear.

• Eradication of conditions is often conflated with eradication of people who had the condition.

Page 22: Ethics of Working with Individuals with Disabilities  and their Families in Maintaining Health

22

Self-Fulfilling Outcome Prophecy

Page 23: Ethics of Working with Individuals with Disabilities  and their Families in Maintaining Health

23

Difficult Consent Issues

• The major focus of current ethical discourse is on Autonomy rather than upon beneficence or preventing harm.

• The application of the principle of autonomy to people who may not be apple to fully understand the implications of their choices is difficult.

Page 24: Ethics of Working with Individuals with Disabilities  and their Families in Maintaining Health

24

Pediatrics to Adult Services

• Although pediatric services are far from adequate, children with disabilities are much better served than adults with disabilities.

Page 25: Ethics of Working with Individuals with Disabilities  and their Families in Maintaining Health

25

The Magic Bullet

• The idea that we will discover a miraculous prevention or cure diverts too much effort away from supportive treatments that make better lives.

Page 26: Ethics of Working with Individuals with Disabilities  and their Families in Maintaining Health

26

Already Use More than Their Share

• Many people with disabilities have serious health issues.

• What would the impact be if we tried to treat everyone.

• Baby Doe -• Candace Taschuk• Annie Farlow

Page 27: Ethics of Working with Individuals with Disabilities  and their Families in Maintaining Health

27

Everyone is in the same boat..Well… sort of…

• When we are all experiencing the same problems such as difficulty in accessing primary or emergency care… it is difficult to focus on the specific needs of small sub-populations..

• We are all feeling the pinch but these problems disproportionately impact some people.

Page 28: Ethics of Working with Individuals with Disabilities  and their Families in Maintaining Health

28

The Will to Change

• Change will occur only when key stakeholders believe that this is important.

• Many stakeholders agree that there is a problem, but it doesn’t seem to be very high on anyone’s priority list.

• Some issues may be difficult but others could be easily resolved.

Page 29: Ethics of Working with Individuals with Disabilities  and their Families in Maintaining Health

29

Primary Care Networks & Group Practice Can Help

• It is important to ensure that the development of primary care networks include provisions for individuals with complex needs.

Page 30: Ethics of Working with Individuals with Disabilities  and their Families in Maintaining Health

30

Nurse Clinicians Can Play an Essential Role

• They should not replace physicians in serving patients with complex needs but should preprocess files to increase efficiency.

Page 31: Ethics of Working with Individuals with Disabilities  and their Families in Maintaining Health

31

Professional Training Curricula

• Training programs are already overloaded with content and there are many more things that should be included.

• How do we decide what is important enough to include.

Page 32: Ethics of Working with Individuals with Disabilities  and their Families in Maintaining Health

32

Meeting Convention Obligations

Rights of the Child• Universal and Special

Protections• Right to Survival and

Development

Rights of Persons with Disabilities

Article 25 Health• Require health professional

to provide care of the same quality

• Prevent discriminatory denial of health care… on the basis of disability

Page 33: Ethics of Working with Individuals with Disabilities  and their Families in Maintaining Health

33

Child Protection Intervention

• Denial of medical care is child endangerment and medical neglect.