©Fiorelli, 2009 Ethical Quiz Bowl: September 15, 2009 2009 SCCE Annual Compliance and Ethics Institute Las Vegas, Nevada Paul Fiorelli, J.D., M.B.A. C.C.E.P. Co-Director Cintas Institute for Business Ethics Xavier University (513)745-2050, fi[email protected] How to Keep Your Company Out of Jeopardy ©Fiorelli, 2009 Game Considerations • Objectives • Learning Objectives • Training Effectiveness • Corporate Culture • Game Design • Software/Hardware • Prizes?
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
©Fiorelli, 2009
Ethical Quiz Bowl:
September 15, 20092009 SCCE Annual Compliance and Ethics Institute
Las Vegas, Nevada
Paul Fiorelli, J.D., M.B.A. C.C.E.P.Co-Director Cintas Institute for Business Ethics
Xavier University(513)745-2050, [email protected]
How to Keep Your Company Out of Jeopardy
©Fiorelli, 2009
Game Considerations• Objectives
• Learning Objectives
• Training Effectiveness
• Corporate Culture
• Game Design
• Software/Hardware
• Prizes?
©Fiorelli, 2009
Learning Objectives
• Simulation games may be better fordeveloping specific skills
• Jungle Escape, Lost in the Desert, Bafa-Bafa, Promises-Promises
• Quiz Bowl style games may be better forreinforcing retention of material
©Fiorelli, 2009
Training Effectiveness
• Do employees look forward to training?
• Games can engage employees in ways thatlectures can not
• Can be a team building experience
• Spirit of camaraderie and competition
• How much information can an employeeabsorb in a half-day or full-day trainingsession?
©Fiorelli, 2009
Company Culture
• Will “games” be taken seriously?• Love the concept of “games” - hate the word
“games”• 71% of e-learning design, development and
management professionals would prefer theterm “immersive learning” to “games”, becauseits “easier to sell”.
©Fiorelli, 2009
Game Design• Content
• All serious? Any “fun” categories
• Limit “trivia”
• High-tech, low-tech, no-tech
• Software
• powerpoint template v. gaming software
• Hardware
• Prizes/rewards for “winning the game”
©Fiorelli, 2009
Jeopardy-Style Games
©Fiorelli, 2009
Jeopardy-Style Games
©Fiorelli, 2009
Jeopardy-Style Games
©Fiorelli, 2009
Jeopardy-Style Games
©Fiorelli, 2009
Hardware
• No tech - raise hands, shout team name
• “Buzzers” - wireless
• Number of teams/players per team
©Fiorelli, 2009
Slammers
©Fiorelli, 2009
Buzzers
©Fiorelli, 2009
Prizes/Rewards
• May cause too much emphasis on the gameand competition
• May cause arguments instead of fun
• Consider prize of nominal value or no-prize
©Fiorelli, 2009
References• How Employees Can “Play” to Win at Learning, HR
Focus, July 2007.
• Susan R. Wiebenga, Guidelines for Selecting, Using andEvaluating Games in Corporate Training, 18Performance Improvement Quarterly 18 (2005).
• Dina Berta, Quarterly “Jeopardy” competitions put funand games back into training for Hospitality Holdings,Dec. 17, 2007 Nations Restaurant News.
Related Documents
