ESD. S40 Peer Assessment Prof. Dov Dori Dr. Niva Wengrowicz.

ESD. S40Peer Assessment

Prof. Dov DoriDr. Niva Wengrowicz

General

• The Peer Assessment task includes three sub tasks:– Quality assessment (fill out findings form) of the first project– Quality assessment (fill out findings form) of the second project– Comparing (fill out comparison form) between these two projects

• The quality of the models and the comparison between them is done based on four categories:– Model clarity and understandability– Model completeness– Model correctness– Documentation

You will find a link to this comparison form in the course site. Here are the

links for the findings forms

You will find a link to this comparison form in the course site. Here are the

links for the findings forms

You have to• Fill out first findings page• Fill out the second findings page• Fill out the comparison page

Findings form -Fill out for each project

Category

criteria

Attention - You are writing feedback to your friends!• You have to fill out all the criteria of each category• You have to explain in the “Where & other comments” column what is the problem and where

(in what figure & diagram) you find it in each criterion that is not graded as excellent.• If you have an idea how to correct this - please advice.

Do not forget to save the findings forms

• You can save it during work

Findings form -Fill out for each project

Do not forget to save the findings forms

You can continue saving it until the deadline of the task

Findings form -Fill out for each project

Do not forget to fill out all the necessary comments.

Please grade on the basis of the finding pagesYou can not use the same grade twice

Comparison form

Explain your grading.You do not have to repeat the finding page – you have to generalize, conclude and focus in the main issues only.You must prove your claims and conclusions with examples.

Comparison form

• 2-3 sentences that generalize the main and important findings for each answer.

• Add examples (diagram names + figure number)

• No need to repeat the findings – just conclude and give prominent examples.

Comparison form

• 2-3 sentences that generalize the main and important findings for each answer.

• Add examples (diagram names + figure number)

• No need to repeat the findings – just conclude and give prominent examples.

Comparison formExample of what we expect:

Do not forget to save the comparison form

• Save and continue

• Answer these three questions

• Give examples from your project and the two projects you assessed.

Comparison form – last section

Project submission May 18 2014Peer assessment timeline

May 27 2014 at 02 PM start

May 29 2014 at 06 PM end

Grading of Your Peer Assessment Task

• Your assessment will be graded by the course staff based on:– Your conclusions, claims, arguments and examples– Your ability to critique other projects

• This is an individual task.

• Accounts for 25% from total grade.